Pharmacogenetics of antidepressant response

Clinical Need and Rationale for Multi-Target Drugs in Psychiatry

High attrition in attempts to discover new pharmacological agents for the treatment of psychiatric disorders has triggered a decline in R&D investment in important disease categories such as schizophrenia and mood disorders. Poor knowledge about disease molecular pathology and molecular target validation coupled with notable costly failures involving clinical trials with highly novel and selective single target agents (STAs) have contributed to the development of this trend. One positive development arising from the current situation is the renewed interest in investigating approaches involving multi-target agents (MTAs), which have historically shown a strong track record of success and utility in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. However, it is clear that the traditional serendipity-dependent drug discovery approach for multi-target agents is suboptimal and has to evolve towards a new model of rationally designed and tailored MTAs. It is of course highly challenging to optimise compounds across several therapeutic targets whilst minimising potential broad receptor promiscuity as well as other properties to generate high quality drug candidates. Nevertheless, recent developments in medicinal chemistry approaches and pharmacological evaluation suggest that feasibility for tailored MTAs is not unrealistic. Appropriately designed MTAs, such as hybrids of validated and unprecedented novel molecular targets, offer a multi-functional pharmacology with the potential for multi-symptomatic efficacy and multi-indicational use. If successful this will help to address the compelling unmet medical need and the treatment requirements of schizophrenia and mood disorder patients as well as easing the burden of carers and the societal costs arising from these devastating illnesses.

Effect of obstructive sleep apnea on response to cognitive behavior therapy for depression after an acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) interferes with cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for depression in patients with coronary heart disease.

METHODS

Patients who were depressed within 28 days after an acute myocardial infarction (MI) were enrolled in the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) trial; 289 (12%) of the 2481 participants in ENRICHD met the criteria for inclusion in this ancillary study.

RESULTS

A validated ambulatory ECG algorithm was used to detect OSA. Of the 289 participants, 64 (22%) met the criteria for OSA. CBT was efficacious relative to usual care (UC) for depression (p=.004). OSA had no effect on 6-month Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores (p=.11), and there was no interaction between OSA and treatment (p=.42). However, the adjusted mean (s.e.) 6-month BDI scores among patients without OSA were 12.2 (0.8) vs. 9.0 (0.8) in the UC and CBT groups (Cohen's d=.40); among those with OSA, they were 9.5 (1.4) and 8.1 (1.5) in the UC and CBT groups (d=.17). There were no significant OSA×Treatment interactions in the major depression (n=131) or minor depression (n=158) subgroups, but in those with major depression, there was a larger treatment effect in those without (d=.44) than with (d=.09) OSA. In those with minor depression, the treatment effects were d=.37 and d=.25 for the non-OSA and OSA subgroups.

CONCLUSION

CBT is efficacious for depression after an acute myocardial infarction in patients without obstructive sleep apnea, but it may be less efficacious for post-MI patients with OSA.

Paroxetine for the treatment of depression: a critical update

INTRODUCTION

A growth in the market for antidepressants, paired with an ever-increasing population affected from depressive disorder, requires a critical re-evaluation of most prescribed antidepressants, in order to provide up-to-date practical prescribing information for clinicians. Paroxetine represents a widely prescribed and reliable antidepressant for the expert clinician, but the latest data do not rank it amongst the most effective and tolerable newer antidepressants.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews latest data on paroxetine and investigates its clinical efficacy and safety in different groups of patients.

EXPERT OPINION

In previous subanalysis and metaregression analysis, paroxetine failed to show clear differences in terms of efficacy across clinical subgroups. Thus, nowadays the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the molecule are fundamental to guiding its prescription, both for efficacy and tolerability issues, for example, it can have a high impact on sexual function and weight should also be considered at the beginning of treatment. Since prescription is still based mainly on its side-effect profile, newer and more accurate directions for an individualized prescription are needed.

Behavioural genetics of the serotonin transporter

The serotonin transporter is a key regulator of the bioavailability of serotonin and therefore any modulation in the expression or action of the transporter would be expected to have consequences on behaviour. The transporter has therefore become a target for pharmaceutical intervention in behavioural and mood disorders. The search for polymorphic variants in the transporter that would associate with neurological disorders has been extensive but has become focused on two domains which are both termed variable number tandem repeat (VNTR)polymorphisms. Both of these VNTRs are in non-coding DNA and therefore proposed to be mechanistically involved in a disorder through their ability to modulate transcriptional or post-transcriptional regulation of the transporter. The most extensively studied is in the promoter and is a bi-allelic insertion/deletion found in the 50 promoter region of the gene 1.2 kb upstream of the transcriptional start site. This VNTR, termed, 5-HTTLPR was initially identified as two variants containing either, 14 (short/deletion) or 16 (long/insertion) copies of a 22 bp repeat. A second widely studied VNTR found in the non-coding region of the transporter is located within intron 2 and comprises 9, 10 or 12 copies of a16–17 bp repeat termed, STin2.9, STin2.10 and STin2.12, respectively. These VNTR polymorphisms have been associated with a range of behavioural and psychiatric disorders including depression, OCD, anxiety and schizophrenia, however often the lack of reproducibility in different cohorts has led to debate on the actual association of the polymorphisms with this extensive range of neurological conditions. Here we review these two polymorphic VNTRs in depth and relate that to pharmaceutical response, their ability to regulate differential transporter expression, their core involvement in gene-environment interaction and their genetic association with specific disorders.

Antidepressants and adolescent brain development

Despite being a first-line treatment for adolescent depression and anxiety, antidepressant drugs appear to have questionable efficacy and carry an increased risk of adverse effects in this population. The neural mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are currently unknown. Recent research into the neural effects of alcohol and recreational drugs suggests that the developmental trajectory of the adolescent brain may be particularly vulnerable to pharmacological disturbance. It is therefore important to consider whether prescription psychotropic drugs may have analogous effects. This article reviews the contribution of recent preclinical, clinical and pharmacogenetic literature to current knowledge on the short-term and enduring neural effects of antidepressants on the adolescent brain, with a particular focus on the major neurotransmitter systems and neuroplasticity.

Pharmacogenomics of antidepressant treatment effects

There has been considerable promise and hope that pharmacogenomics will optimize existing treatments for major depression, as well as identify novel targets for drug discovery. Immediately after the sequencing of the human genome, there was much hope that tremendous progress in pharmacogenomics would rapidly be achieved. In the past 10 years this initial enthusiasm has been replaced by a more sober optimism, as we have gone a long way towards the goal of guiding therapeutics based on genomics. While the effort to translate discovery to clinical applications is ongoing, we now have a vast body of knowledge as well as a clear direction forward. This article will provide a critical appraisal of the state of the art in the pharmacogenomics of depression, both in terms of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics.