Molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a 2-year perspective

OBJECTIVE

To determine the molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) at our medical center in order to identify the extent of strain clonality and possible transmission patterns of this pathogen.

DESIGN

An important facet of our infection control program includes molecular typing of all clinical and surveillance isolates of VRE to determine transmission patterns in the hospital. Molecular strain typing is performed by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) of genomic DNA. REA patterns are visually compared to categorize VRE strains into type and subtype designations.

SETTING

A 588-bed, university-affiliated, tertiary-care hospital and a neighboring 155-bed rehabilitation facility.

RESULTS

From January 1995 through December 1996, 379 VRE isolates were collected from 197 patients. Thirty-three genotypes were determined by REA typing; 15 genotypes were implicated in 29 instances of potential nosocomial transmission. Three major clusters of VRE involving patients on multiple nursing units and two adjacent hospitals were identified. The remaining instances of nosocomial transmission occurred in small patient clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the VRE epidemic at this medical center is polyclonal. VRE transmission patterns are complex, and, while large clusters do occur, the usual pattern of nosocomial acquisition of this pathogen occurs in the setting of "mini-clusters".

An Update on the Emergence of Glycopeptide Resistance in Enterococci

Glycopeptide resistance may be either constitutive or transferable (on plasmids or as a transposon), and four phenotypes (van A, B, C, D) have been described to date. Recent data suggest solid media screening protocols appear to be insensitive at detecting low levels of carriage, and up to 40% of colonized patients may be falsely glycopeptide-resistant enterococci (GRE) negative. Managing GRE-colonized or -infected patients using contact precautions appears to be useful in controlling clonal outbreaks, but may be of limited utility once GRE is endemic. Alternate strategies to manage GRE-colonized patients with prolonged carriage and in outpatient or home health settings include using risk-based transmission assessment to limit the logistic and psychosocial difficulties associated with the use of continuous contact precautions. The therapeutic options for treating GRE infection remain limited. Attempts to decolonize GRE-colonized patients with bacitracin appear to be of limited utility.

The role of the hospital environment in the epidemiology of multi-resistant bacteria

The aim of this study was to use published data to assess the importance of the hospital environment as a possible secondary reservoir of multi-resistant bacteria capable of colonizing or infecting patients. This should make it possible to develop appropriate measures for preventing cross contamination in medical environments. Multi-resistant bacteria often contaminate the environment of the colonized or infected patients, and survive for long periods. However, measures proposed to reduce contamination and reduce the potential for cross infection such as disinfection when the patient is discharged, the use of materials with intrinsic antibacterial activity and the wearing of gloves by everyone entering the room whether or not they intend to actually touch the patient, have yet to be evaluated as part of an overall strategy to prevent infection with multi-resistant bacteria.

Antimicrobial efficacy of endoscopic disinfection procedures: a controlled, multifactorial investigation

BACKGROUND

Adequate disinfection of endoscopes is essential to prevent environmental and patient-to-patient transmission of infectious agents, but data from controlled studies are limited. Moreover, there is controversy regarding current guidelines for disinfection. We compared the antimicrobial efficacy of several endoscopic disinfection procedures controlling for multiple factors that affect reprocessing.

METHODS

A colonoscope was contaminated with 10(8) CFU/mL of Enterococcus faecalis as a standardized inoculum. The colonoscope was passed through 1 of 16 study arms (5 reps/arm for a total of 80 runs) that were controlled for all possible combinations of the following variables: manual precleaning; 10-, 20-, or 45-minute glutaraldehyde exposure; air or ethanol drying; or automated reprocessing with peracetic acid (liquid sterilization system). Suction accessory channels and air-water channels were harvested for microbiologic culture.

RESULTS

Control runs (no cleaning or disinfection) recovered more than 5 x 10(7) CFU/mL from each sampling site. When each processing variable was isolated independent of other variables, the benefits of manual precleaning, longer soak times, and ethanol drying were apparent. When factors were combined, manual precleaning followed by 20- and 45-minute glutaraldehyde exposure and ethanol drying removed all test organisms, as did processing with the liquid sterilization system.

CONCLUSION

Although the initial cost is higher, the automated liquid sterilization system provides effective sterilization and minimizes worker exposure. In units where chemical disinfection is used, our results suggest that manual precleaning followed by at least 20-minute glutaraldehyde exposure and ethanol rinse drying are sufficient to achieve complete disinfection.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci in intensive-care hospital settings: transmission dynamics, persistence, and the impact of infection control programs

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) recently have emerged as a nosocomial pathogen especially in intensive-care units (ICUs) worldwide. Transmission via the hands of health-care workers is an important determinant of spread and persistence in a VRE-endemic ICU. We describe the transmission of nosocomial pathogens by using a micro-epidemiological framework based on the transmission dynamics of vector-borne diseases. By using the concept of a basic reproductive number, R0, defined as the average number of secondary cases generated by one primary case, we show quantitatively how infection control measures such as hand washing, cohorting, and antibiotic restriction affect nosocomial cross-transmission. By using detailed molecular epidemiological surveillance and compliance monitoring, we found that the estimated basic reproductive number for VRE during a study at the Cook County Hospital, Chicago, was approximately 3-4 without infection control and 0.7 when infection control measures were included. The impact of infection control was to reduce the prevalence from a predicted 79% to an observed 36%. Hand washing and staff cohorting are the most powerful control measures although their efficacy depends on the magnitude of R0. Under the circumstances tested, endemicity of VRE was stabilized despite infection control measures, by the constant introduction of colonized patients. Multiple stochastic simulations of the model revealed excellent agreement with observed pattern. In conjunction with detailed microbiological surveillance, a mathematical framework provides a precise template to describe the colonization dynamics of VRE in ICUs and impact of infection control measures. Our analyses suggest that compliance for hand washing significantly in excess of reported levels, or the cohorting of nursing staff, are needed to prevent nosocomial transmission of VRE in endemic settings.

Efficacy of hand disinfectants against vancomycin-resistant enterococci in vitro

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) may be spread within a hospital via the contaminated hands of the healthcare worker. Effective hand disinfectants are necessary to break chains of transmission. We determined the bactericidal activity of 1-propanol, chlorhexidine digluconate (0.5 and 4%). Sterillium (45% 2-propanol, 30% 1-propanol and 0.2% mecetronium etilsulphate), Skinsept F (70% 2-propanol, 0.5% chlorhexidine digluconate and 0.45% hydrogen peroxide) and Hibisol (70% 2-propanol and 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate) against 11 clonally distinct enterococcal isolates in a quantitative suspension test. Four isolates were vancomycin susceptible, four were vanA and the remainder vanB positive. Eight isolates were identified as Enterococcus faecium, two as Enterococcus faecalis and one as Enterococcus gallinarum. The investigator was blinded to the species and the genotype. Four parallel experiments were carried out for each isolate, each preparation, each dilution and each reaction time. 1-Propanol (60%), Sterillium, Skinsept F and Hibisol were all highly bactericidal after 15 and 30 s against VRE and vancomycin-susceptible enterococci (VSE) with reduction factors (RF) > 6.4, even in dilution of 50% (v/v). No significant difference was observed between vanA isolates, vanB isolates and VSE. Chlorhexidine digluconate (0.5% and 4%) was found to be less bactericidal after 30, 60 and 300 sec (RF < or = 2.5). The vanB genotype isolates were found to be significantly more susceptible to chlorhexidine (0.5%) than the vanA isolates (60 sec; one-way ANOVA model; P = 0.05). After 300 sec the vanB genotype isolates were found to be significantly more susceptible to chlorhexidine (0.5%) than the other two genotype isolates (P = 0.016). The vanA isolates were found to be significantly more susceptible to chlorhexidine (4%) than the vanB isolates (300 s; P = 0.024). E. faecium was found to be less susceptible to chlorhexidine than E. faecalis at all concentrations and reaction times, but significant differences between RF were only observed at 60 sec for both chlorhexidine concentrations (P < 0.05; t-test for independent samples). Propanol is much more effective against enterococci than chlorhexidine and combination of the two may be useful in providing an immediate and long lasting effect.

The threat of vancomycin resistance

Vancomycin, produced in 1958, an essential antibiotic in the modern age, often is reserved for use in patients who are gravely ill or for infections caused by organisms resistant to penicillin, cephalosporin, or other antibiotics. Bacterial resistance to vancomycin has caused great concern among many healthcare professionals. First reported in 1986 in Europe and in 1988 in the United States, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have become a major cause of nosocomial infections. During this time, scattered reports of clinical infections caused by vancomycin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci also were reported. Recently, enterococci that require vancomycin in media for growth, vancomycin-dependent enterococci (VDE), have been reported to cause clinically significant infections. Vancomycin or other glycopeptide intermediately resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VISA/GISA) also has emerged. The mechanisms of resistance to vancomycin for VRE, and probably for VISA/GISA, relate to the acquired ability of these organisms to circumvent the vancomycin-mediated disruption of bacterial cell wall synthesis. Risk factors that lead to VRE colonization or infection include prior antibiotic therapy, prolonged hospitalization, hospitalization in an intensive care unit, concomitant serious medical and surgical illnesses, exposure to equipment contaminated with VRE, and exposure to patients with VRE. Patients colonized or infected with VRE, healthcare workers with contaminated hands, and environmental surfaces in healthcare facilities are major reservoirs of VRE. Risk factors for VDE and VISA/GISA are less well understood, although both organisms emerge in patients receiving vancomycin or other glycopeptide antibiotics. Infection and antibiotic control procedures for both organisms, including restriction of vancomycin use, optimization of the antibiotic formulary, education of hospital personnel, early detection and reporting of vancomycin resistance, isolation of colonized patients, and appropriate cleansing of the environment are used to prevent the spread of these organisms in healthcare settings.

Survival of vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible enterococci on dry surfaces

We compared the abilities of Enterococcus faecium strains (three vancomycin-resistant enterococci [VRE] and five vancomycin-susceptible enterococci [VSE]) and Enterococcus faecalis strains (one VRE and 10 VSE) to survive under dry conditions. Bacterial suspensions of the strains were inoculated onto polyvinyl chloride and stored under defined conditions for up to 16 weeks. All strains survived for at least 1 week, and two strains survived for 4 months. A statistical model was used to distribute the 19 resulting survival curves between two types of survival curves. The type of survival curve was not associated with the species (E. faecalis versus E. faecium), the source of isolation (patient versus environment), or the susceptibility to vancomycin (VRE versus VSE). Resistance to dry conditions may promote the transmissibility of a strain, but VRE have no advantages over VSE with respect to their ability to survive under dry conditions.

[Antibiotic resistance of enterococci in Germany]

BACKGROUND

The resistance of enterococci against various antimicrobial substances including vancomycin has increased markedly. Since 1989 in the USA in particular high resistance rates against vancomycin have been observed but very few surveillance have been published in Europe. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter study in Germany to obtain information about the incidence and distribution of vancomycin and/or high-level aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci.

METHODS

A total of 2046 enterococcal isolates were identified and susceptibility-testing was performed according to international guidelines.

RESULTS

A total number of 90.5% of the enterococcal isolates were identified as Enterococcus faecalis and 7.8% was Enterococcus faecium. Resistance against ampicillin was detected in 56.6% of the Enterococcus faecium isolates, however, in only one Enterococcus faecalis isolate. High-level resistance against gentamycin or streptomycin was observed in 7.3% and 24.8% of the isolates, respectively. Twelve isolates showed resistance against vancomycin, however, cross resistance with teicoplanin was found in only two isolates.

CONCLUSION

The rate of resistance of enterococci in Germany is still considerably lower than in the United States. Previous vancomycin therapy has been implemented as a risk factor for colonization or infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Continued vigilance, decreased use of vancomycin and strict enforcement of infection control measures are appropriate measures to control the growing problem of resistant enterococci.

Controlling the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci with a rehabilitation cohort unit

Enterococci are common to the human gastrointestinal tract. Recently there has been an emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE); infection requires strict contact isolation. Patients with VRE infections are at higher risk for morbidity and mortality. As a result of the high prevalence of VRE, it was recommended that a cohort unit be established to control its spread within our metropolitan community hospital. We report the development of a rehabilitation VRE cohort unit. We present case studies of five patients who developed nosocomial colonization and one with an infection with VRE; all were treated on the rehabilitation cohort unit. Protocols for VRE isolation and procedures for decontamination in the cohort unit were developed. If a cohort unit is necessary, it is feasible to conduct a rehabilitation program in a cohort unit with strict adherence to contact isolation.

Enterococcus faecium in hospitals

Most of the characteristics that have ensured the success of enterococci as nosocomial pathogens were described early in this century. Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis, the enterococci most frequently isolated from clinical material, differ fundamentally. The intrinsic antimicrobial resistance of Enterococcus faecium, supplemented by acquired resistance mechanisms, can generate a glycopeptide-multiply-resistant nosocomial pathogen that survives on hands and in the environment, and has the potential for intra-hospital and inter-hospital spread. The use of terms such as 'an enterococcus', 'faecal streptococci' and 'group D streptococci' have hindered, and still hinder, our understanding of a species rapidly emerging as the most problematic of nosocomial pathogens.

Epidemiology of colonisation of patients and environment with vancomycin-resistant enterococci

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have emerged as nosocomial pathogens during the past 5 years, but little is known about the epidemiology of VRE. We investigated colonisation of patients and environmental contamination with VRE in an endemic setting to assess the importance of different sources of colonisation.

METHODS

Between April 12, and May 29, 1995, cultures from body sites (rectum, groin, arm, oropharynx, trachea, and stomach) and from environmental surfaces (bedrails, drawsheet, blood-pressure cuff, urine containers, and enteral feed) were obtained daily from all newly admitted ventilated patients in our medical intensive-care unit (MICU). Rectal cultures were obtained from all non-ventilated patients in the MICU. Strain types of VRE were determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

FINDINGS

There were 97 admissions of 92 patients, of whom 38 required mechanical ventilation. Colonisation with VRE on admission was more common in ventilated than in non-ventilated patients (nine [24%] vs three [6%], p < 0.05). Of the nine ventilated patients colonised with VRE on admission, one acquired a new strain of VRE in the MICU. Of the 29 ventilated patients who were not colonised with VRE on admission, 12 (41%) acquired VRE in the MICU. The median time to acquisition of VRE was 5 days (interquartile range 3-8). Of the 13 ventilated patients who acquired VRE, 11 (85%) were colonised with VRE by cross-colonisation. VRE were isolated from 157 (12%) of 1294 environmental cultures. The rooms of 13 patients were contaminated with VRE, but only three (23%) of these patients subsequently acquired colonisation with VRE. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of 262 isolates showed 20 unique strain types of VRE.

INTERPRETATION

Frequent colonisation with VRE on MICU admission and subsequent cross-colonisation are important factors in the endemic spread of VRE. Persistent VRE colonisation in the gastrointestinal tract and on the skin, the presence of multiple-strain types of VRE, and environmental contamination may all contribute to the spread of VRE.

Vancomycin resistance: when failure becomes an opportunity for leadership

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the emergence of the enterococci as significant nosocomial pathogens and reports of glycopeptide resistance as demonstrating the failure of healthcare professionals to limit the clinical impact of these organisms.

BACKGROUND

The enterococci have long occupied a peculiar position in medical and surgical patients. A component of the normal gastrointestinal tract, these organisms exhibit little overt pathogenicity in healthy hosts, but are frequently recovered in patients with severe debilitative or immunosuppresive disorders. While the enterococci have always demonstrated intrinsic resistance to a broad range of antiinfective agents, recent findings of moderate to high-level glycopeptide resistance potentially threaten the limited therapeutic options for methicillin-resistant gram-positive cocci.

FINDINGS

The emergence and dissemination of vancomycin-resistant enterococci are signs of much greater problems, which include incomplete success of formulary controls, unreliable detection and identification of resistant microorganisms within the hospital environment, and poor fundamental infection control practices by all healthcare professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

The Hospital Infection Control Practices. Advisory Committee Recommendations for the Prevention and Spread of Vancomycin Resistance are an important step in resolving these issues through the elements of collegiality and shared leadership.