Circulating 1,5-anhydroglucitol levels in adult patients with diabetes reflect longitudinal changes of glycemia: a U.S. trial of the GlycoMark assay

Evaluation of serum 1,5 anhydroglucitol levels as a clinical test to differentiate subtypes of diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Assignment of the correct molecular diagnosis in diabetes is necessary for informed decisions regarding treatment and prognosis. Better clinical markers would facilitate discrimination and prioritization for genetic testing between diabetes subtypes. Serum 1,5 anhydroglucitol (1,5AG) levels were reported to differentiate maturity-onset diabetes of the young due to HNF1A mutations (HNF1A-MODY) from type 2 diabetes, but this requires further validation. We evaluated serum 1,5AG in a range of diabetes subtypes as an adjunct for defining diabetes etiology.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

1,5AG was measured in U.K. subjects with: HNF1A-MODY (n = 23), MODY due to glucokinase mutations (GCK-MODY, n = 23), type 1 diabetes (n = 29), latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA, n = 42), and type 2 diabetes (n = 206). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess discriminative accuracy of 1,5AG for diabetes etiology.

RESULTS

Mean (SD range) 1,5AG levels were: GCK-MODY 13.06 microg/ml (5.74-29.74), HNF1A-MODY 4.23 microg/ml (2.12-8.44), type 1 diabetes 3.09 microg/ml (1.45-6.57), LADA 3.46 microg/ml (1.42-8.45), and type 2 diabetes 5.43 (2.12-13.23). Levels in GCK-MODY were higher than in other groups (P < 10(-4) vs. each group). HNF1A-MODY subjects showed no difference in unadjusted 1,5AG levels from type 2 diabetes, type 1 diabetes, and LADA. Adjusting for A1C revealed a difference between HNF1A-MODY and type 2 diabetes (P = 0.001). The discriminative accuracy of unadjusted 1,5AG levels was 0.79 for GCK-MODY versus type 2 diabetes and 0.86 for GCK-MODY versus HNF1A-MODY but was only 0.60 for HNF1A-MODY versus type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

In our dataset, serum 1,5AG performed well in discriminating GCK-MODY from other diabetes subtypes, particularly HNF1A-MODY. Measurement of 1,5AG levels could inform decisions regarding MODY diagnostic testing.

Screening for type 2 diabetes in obese youth

OBJECTIVE

To assess available blood tests as potential screening tools for impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

We studied 468 obese (BMI mean: 34.4 kg/m(2)) children, including a subgroup with serum fasting insulin levels of >15 microIU/mL. Fasting laboratory tests included measurements of serum glucose and insulin, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and 1,5-anhydroglucitol (insulin-resistant subgroup only) levels. An oral glucose-tolerance test was performed on each patient, and 2-hour postload serum glucose and insulin levels were obtained. Fasting blood glucose (BG), Homeostasis Model of Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), HbA1c, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol values were used as predictors for exceeding various 2-hour BG cut-offs. Receiver operator characteristic curves were fitted to determine area-under-the-curve values as measures of screening efficacy.

RESULTS

In the insulin-resistant subgroup, 3 (2%) patients had T2DM and 23 (12%) had IGT. Optimal sensitivity and specificity to detect T2DM were, respectively, 99% and 96% at HbA1c >or= 6.0%, and 96% and 88% at 1,5-anhydroglucitol < 17.0 microg/mL, with lower values for fasting BG and the HOMA-IR. In the entire study group, 9 (2%) patients had T2DM and 44 (9%) had IGT. Optimal sensitivity and specificity to detect T2DM were, respectively, 86% and 85% at HbA1c levels of 5.7%, 88%, and 93% at a fasting BG level of 104 mg/dL, and 62% and 70% at an HOMA-IR of 7.9.

CONCLUSIONS

HbA1c, 1,5-anhydroglucitol, and fasting BG levels are good predictors of T2DM in obese children, whereas HOMA-IR values are not. HbA1c and 1,5-anhydroglucitol are excellent predictors of T2DM in insulin-resistant obese children.

The clinical use of hemoglobin A1c

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has been accepted as an index of glycemic control since the mid-1970s and is the best marker for diabetic microvascular complications. Clinically, it is now used to assess glycemic control in people with diabetes. Assays are most reliable when certified by the National Hemoglobin Standardization Program but are subject to confounders and effect modifiers, particularly in the setting of hematologic abnormalities. Other measures of chronic glycemic control-fructosamine and 1,5-anhydroglucitol-are far less widely used. The relationship of HbA1c to average blood glucose was intensively studied recently, and it has been proposed that this conversion can be used to report an "estimated average glucose, eAG" in milligrams/deciliter or millimolar units rather than as per cent glycated hemoglobin. Finally, HbA1c has been proposed as a useful method of screening for and diagnosing diabetes.

1,5-Anhydroglucitol reflects postprandial hyperglycemia and a decreased insulinogenic index, even in subjects with prediabetes and well-controlled type 2 diabetes

To examine the serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol (AG) levels as a surrogate measure of postprandial hyperglycemia (PPH) and insulin secretion in a wide range of hyperglycemia, we compared the relationship between the glycemic index during a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and the insulinogenic index and 1,5-AG according the overall glycemic state. Fasting serum 1,5-AG levels were lower in the type 2 diabetic group (18.0+/-7.0microg/mL) than in the normal glucose tolerance (NGT, 25.4+/-4.0microg/mL), impaired fasting glucose (IFG, 24.6+/-6.2microg/mL), and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT, 22.1+/-6.2microg/mL) groups and were clearly correlated with glycemic values from the OGTT. 120-min post-challenge plasma glucose (PPG(120)) emerged as an independent predictor for 1,5-AG levels after multiple linear regression analysis (beta=-0.554, P<0.001). Additionally, 1,5-AG levels were significantly correlated with PPG(120) in each quartile of A1C, and the coefficients increased with higher A1C quartiles. Subjects with low 1,5-AG levels had both increased insulin resistance and decreased insulin secretion. Decreased 1,5-AG levels are closely correlated with PPH and decreased insulin secretion capacity across a wide range of glycemia, even in relatively well-controlled diabetes.

1,5-anhydroglucitol monitoring in diabetes: a mass balance perspective

1,5-anhydroglucitol (AG) is a nonmetabolizable glucose analogue found in plasma due to ingestion. The normal steady-state concentration can be dramatically decreased by inhibition of tubular reabsorption during periods of hyperglycemia. For this reason, monitoring of AG has been plausibly advocated for detection of periodic glucosuric hyperglycemia. In this review, we examine the influence of variation in factors affecting both steady-state and transient changes in plasma AG. Among normals, the lower and upper limits of the plasma AG reference range vary by a factor of 5. Using a simplified mass balance model (a single compartment model with 3-6x larger-than-plasma volume of distribution), reasonable inter-individual variations of ingestion rate, glomerular filtration rate and fractional post-filtration reabsorption are each able to account for the wide range of normal, steady-state AG concentrations. In monitoring of changes in AG, inter-individual variations in the threshold for glucose excretion, volume of distribution and glomerular filtration rate are all likely to significantly affect correspondence of integral changes in AG to integral glucosuria/hyperglycemia. This combination of variables, affecting both steady-state and transient changes, is significantly confounding with respect to interpretation of serial plasma AG concentrations. Resolution of information content of AG monitoring is thus largely that of crossing simple characterization of deltas [+,0,-] for changes in AG concentration against the information content of hemoglobin A1c monitoring. Despite this limitation, AG monitoring can in principle provide information about glycemic control in the short term that is not apparent through monitoring of hemoglobin A1c alone. However, whether AG monitoring can lead to improved outcomes in diabetes management remains to be established.

A novel method for the determination of 1,5-anhydroglucitol, a glycemic marker, in human urine utilizing hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography/MS(3)

Plasma levels of 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1-deoxyglucose), a short-term marker of glycemic control, have been measured and used clinically in Japan since the early 1990s. Plasma levels of 1,5-anhydroglucitol are typically measured using either a commercially available enzymatic kit or GC/MS. A more sensitive method is needed for the analysis of 1,5-anhydroglucitol in urine, where levels are significantly lower than in plasma. We have developed a sensitive and selective LC/MS(3) assay utilizing hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography and ion trap mass spectrometry for the quantitative determination of 1,5-anhydroglucitol in human urine. Diluted human urine samples were analyzed by LC/MS(3) using an APCI source operated in the negative ionization mode. Use of an ion trap allowed monitoring of MS(3) transitions for both 1,5-anhydroglucitol and the internal standard which provided sufficient selectivity and sensitivity for analysis from 50 microL of human urine. Quantitation of 1,5-anhydroglucitol levels in urine was accomplished using a calibration curve generated in water (calibration range 50 ng/mL to 10 microg/mL). Method ruggedness and reproducibility were evaluated by determining the intra- and inter-day accuracies and precision of the assay, as well as the bench-top and freeze-thaw stability. For both inter- and intra-assay evaluations, the accuracy of the assay was found to be acceptable, with the concentrations of all QCs tested not deviating more than 8% from theoretical. Four-hour bench-top and freeze-thaw stabilities were also evaluated; 1,5-anhydroglucitol was found to be stable at room temperature (<18% deviation from theoretical) and during 3 freeze-thaw cycles (<1% deviation from theoretical, except at the lowest QC level). The LC/MS(3) assay was then used to successfully determine the concentration of 1,5-AG in more than 200 urine samples from diabetic patients enrolled in a clinical study.

Association of 1,5-anhydroglucitol and 2-h postprandial blood glucose in type 2 diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) with 2-h postprandial glucose values in type 2 diabetic patients followed over 12 months in an outpatient setting.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In 55 patients, we examined self-measured postprandial blood glucose values for correlations with 1,5-AG values over prespecified preceding time periods (3 days, 1 week, and weekly up to 12 weeks).

RESULTS

The correlation coefficients for postprandial glucose values were -0.34 (P < 0.05) for 3 days, -0.38 (P < 0.001) for 1 week, and -0.40 (P < 0.001) for 2 weeks preceding the measurement of 1,5-AG. Correlations declined for time periods >2 weeks before measurement of 1,5-AG. The correlation was lower with fasting/preprandial plasma glucose levels. There was no time dependency for the correlation between A1C and fasting or postprandial glucose.

CONCLUSIONS

1,5-AG best reflected the 2-h postprandial glucose values of the 2 previous weeks.

Current strategies for evaluating, monitoring, and treating type 2 diabetes mellitus

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic progressive disease that has profound consequences for individuals, families, and society. Despite clear glycemic control targets articulated by the major medical societies, patients and physicians still struggle to meet and maintain these goals, leading to shortfalls in delivery of care. Recent advances in the treatment of type 2 diabetes seek to address these shortfalls: Modern oral hypoglycemic agents may be used with or in place of traditional therapies. Analogue insulins, whose pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties allow patients improved lifestyle flexibility compared with regular insulins, have done much to improve glycemic control. Using these new classes of therapy, physicians should strive to help patients understand and reach the targets for control that we know to be beneficial for the majority of individuals. Such targets include those for glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), but increasingly we also realize the central importance of maintaining postprandial glucose levels within recommended limits, and it is likely that the recent introduction of a serum marker for this purpose, 1,5-anhydroglucitol, will help improve patient outcomes. By intensifying therapy early during the course of the disease process, using the most effective and acceptable therapies available, and maintaining the lowest and safest HbA1c levels for as long as possible, we will be serving our patients well and living up to our responsibilities as diabetes care physicians.

Guideline for management of postmeal glucose

An estimated 246 million people worldwide have diabetes. Diabetes is a leading cause of death in most developed countries, and is reaching epidemic proportions in many developing and newly industrialized nations. Poorly controlled diabetes is associated with the development of renal failure, vision loss, macrovascular diseases and amputations. Large controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that intensive treatment of diabetes can significantly decrease the development and/or progression of microvascular complications of diabetes. There appears to be no glycaemic threshold for reduction of diabetes complications; the lower the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), the lower the risk. The progressive relationship between plasma glucose levels and cardiovascular risk extends well below the diabetic threshold. Until recently, the predominant focus of therapy has been on lowering HbA1c levels, with a strong emphasis on fasting plasma glucose. Although control of fasting hyperglycaemia is necessary, it is usually insufficient to obtain optimal glycaemic control. A growing body of evidence suggests that reducing postmeal plasma glucose excursions is as important, or perhaps more important for achieving HbA1c goals. This guideline reviews the evidence on the harmful effects of elevated postmeal glucose and makes recommendations on its treatment, assessment and targets.

Does serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol establish a relationship between improvements in HbA1c and postprandial glucose excursions? Supportive evidence utilizing the differential effects between biphasic insulin aspart 30 and insulin glargine

AIM

To investigate the relationship between changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and postprandial glucose excursions on 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) in patients with Type 2 diabetes, utilizing the differential effects between biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) or insulin glargine (IGlar) on postprandial glucose (PPG) levels.

METHODS

1,5-AG was measured using the GlycoMark assay at baseline and after 12 and 28 weeks in the INITiation of Insulin to reach HbA(1c) Target (INITIATE) study of 233 patients randomized to either BIAsp 30 or IGlar.

RESULTS

Baseline 1,5-AG was low and not significantly different (4.9 +/- 3.5 and 4.3 +/- 2.6 microg/ml in the BIAsp 30 and IGlar groups, respectively). After 28 weeks, the levels of 1,5-AG were higher in the BIAsp 30 than in the IGlar group (13.4 vs. 11.1 microg/ml, P = 0.008) and change from baseline was 25% greater with BIAsp 30 than IGlar (8.4 vs. 6.7 microg/ml, P = 0.011). 1,5-AG levels increased as a function of decreasing HbA(1c) or the average change in postprandial plasma glucose (PPG(ave)) with significant relationships for 1,5-AG/ HbA(1c) vs. HbA(1c) or 1,5-AG/PPG(ave )vs. PPG(ave) (both P < 0.0001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

As reported in previous publications, 1,5-AG reflects ambient glycaemic control and increases with reductions in HbA(1c) and postprandial glucose. The greater reductions in postprandial excursion achieved with BiAsp 30 compared with glargine were associated with greater increases in 1,5-AG. Even moderate elevations in HbA(1c) substantially lower 1,5-AG, suggesting that it can be most discriminating in identifying patients with excessive postprandial glucose excursions at HbA(1c) levels that approach the upper end of the normal range.

1,5-anhydroglucitol (GlycoMark) as a marker of short-term glycemic control and glycemic excursions

1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) is a validated marker of short-term glycemic control. It is a metabolically inert polyol that competes with glucose for reabsorption in the kidneys. Otherwise stable levels of 1,5-AG are rapidly depleted as blood glucose levels exceed the renal threshold for glucosuria. 1,5-AG more accurately predicts rapid changes in glycemia than hemoglobin A1C (A1C) or fructosamine. It is also more tightly associated with glucose fluctuations and postprandial glucose. Thus, 1,5-AG may offer complementary information to A1C. This review will summarize the limitations of current methods of assessing glycemic control, assess the data to support 1,5-AG as a glycemic marker and highlight the scenarios by which 1,5-AG may fill the gap in assessing glycemic control.

Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol (Glycomark) levels in children with and without type 1 diabetes mellitus

Postprandial hyperglycemia associated with diabetes is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Currently, glycated hemoglobin A(1c) (HgbA(1c)) and glycated protein fructosamine are not sensitive markers for acute and short-term hyperglycemia. 1,5-Anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) (Glycomark; Tomen America, New York, NY, USA) is reported in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as a marker for postmeal hyperglycemia. However, the reference ranges for 1,5-AG in normal children and children with T1DM are not known. We studied 1,5-AG levels in 10 control children (6 males and 4 females) and 10 children with T1DM (7 males and 3 females). The levels of 1,5-AG in the normal controls were higher than those in children with T1DM (24.60 +/- 3.99 microg/mL vs. 4.75 +/- 2.95 microg/mL; p < 0.0001). There were no gender differences noted. The 1,5-AG levels were negatively correlated with HgbA(1c) (r =-0.9366; p < 0.0001) and the peak postmeal plasma glucose concentrations (Pearson r =-7230; p = 0.0003). Our findings suggest that despite good glycemic control, postprandial glucose concentrations are elevated and that 1,5-AG showed a difference between controls and children with T1DM. The data are comparable with previous studies in normal adults and in those with T1DM and T2DM. They support the use of 1,5-AG concentrations, together with HgbA(1c), to evaluate therapy, especially to target postprandial hyperglycemia.

The artificial pancreas: how sweet engineering will solve bitter problems

An artificial pancreas is a closed-loop system containing only synthetic materials which substitutes for an endocrine pancreas. No artificial pancreas system is currently approved; however, devices that could become components of such a system are now becoming commercially available. An artificial pancreas will consist of functionally integrated components that will continuously sense glucose levels, determine appropriate insulin dosages, and deliver the insulin. Any proposed closed loop system will be closely scrutinized for its safety, efficacy, and economic impact. Closed loop control utilizes models of glucose homeostasis which account for the influences of feeding, stress, insulin, exercise, and other factors on blood glucose levels. Models are necessary for understanding the relationship between blood glucose levels and insulin dosing; developing algorithms to control insulin dosing; and customizing each user's system based on individual responses to factors that influence glycemia. Components of an artificial pancreas are now being developed, including continuous glucose sensors; insulin pumps for parenteral delivery; and control software, all linked through wireless communication systems. Although a closed-loop system providing glucagon has not been reported in 40 years, the use of glucagon to prevent hypoglycemia is physiologically attractive and future devices might utilize this hormone. No demonstration of long-term closed loop control of glucose in a free-living human with diabetes has been reported to date, but many centers around the world are working on closed loop control systems. It is expected that many types of artificial pancreas systems will eventually be available, and they will greatly benefit patients with diabetes.

1,5-anhydroglucitol and postprandial hyperglycemia as measured by continuous glucose monitoring system in moderately controlled patients with diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Postprandial hyperglycemia is often inadequately assessed in diabetes management. Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) drops as serum glucose rises above the renal threshold for glucose and has been proposed as a marker for postprandial hyperglycemia. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the relationship between 1,5-AG and postprandial hyperglycemia, as assessed by the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in suboptimally controlled patients with diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and an HbA(1c) (A1C) between 6.5 and 8% with stable glycemic control were recruited from two sites. A CGMS monitor was worn for two consecutive 72-h periods. Mean glucose, mean postmeal maximum glucose (MPMG), and area under the curve for glucose above 180 mg/dl (AUC-180), were compared with 1,5-AG, fructosamine (FA), and A1C at baseline, day 4, and day 7.

RESULTS

1,5-AG varied considerably between patients (6.5 +/- 3.2 mug/ml [means +/- SD]) despite similar A1C (7.3 +/- 0.5%). Mean 1,5-AG (r = -0.45, P = 0.006) correlated with AUC-180 more robustly than A1C (r = 0.33, P = 0.057) or FA (r = 0.38, P = 0.88). MPMG correlated more strongly with 1,5-AG (r = -0.54, P = 0.004) than with A1C (r = 0.40, P = 0.03) or FA (r = 0.32, P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

1,5-AG reflects glycemic excursions, often in the postprandial state, more robustly than A1C or FA. 1,5-AG may be useful as a complementary marker to A1C to assess glycemic control in moderately controlled patients with diabetes.

Prevalence and correlates of post-prandial hyperglycaemia in a large sample of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Post-prandial glucose may be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and chronic diabetic complications. We tested the hypothesis that post-prandial hyperglycaemia is common in type 2 diabetes, even among patients in apparently good glycaemic control, and that simple clinical characteristics identify subsets of diabetic patients with frequent post-prandial hyperglycaemia.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Three self-assessed daily blood glucose profiles over a 1-week period, including 18 glucose readings before and 2 h after meals, were obtained from 3,284 unselected outpatients (men 51%; age 63+/-10 years) with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus attending 500 different diabetes clinics operating throughout Italy.

RESULTS

A post-prandial blood glucose value >8.89 mmol/l (160 mg/dl) was recorded at least once in 84% of patients, and 81% of patients had at least one Delta glucose > or =2.22 mmol/l (40 mg/dl). Among patients with apparently good metabolic control, 38% had >40% of post-prandial blood glucose readings >8.89 mmol/l (> or =4 of 9 meals in total), and 36% had >40% Delta glucose > or =2.22 mmol/l. In multivariate analysis adjusted for pre-prandial glucose levels, older age, longer duration of diabetes, absence of obesity, hyperlipidaemia and hypertension, as well as treatment with sulfonylureas, were significantly associated with greater glucose excursions after meals.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

These results indicate that post-prandial hyperglycaemia is a very frequent phenomenon in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on active treatment; can occur even when metabolic control is apparently good; and can be predicted by simple clinical features.

Evaluation of an assay for serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol (GlycoMark) and determination of reference intervals on the Hitachi 917 analyzer

BACKGROUND

1,5-Anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) is a glucose analogue, which is decreased in hyperglycemic individuals. We report the technical performance of an assay (GlycoMark) on a chemistry analyzer, evaluation of analyte stability and determination of reference intervals for 1,5-AG in a non-diabetic US population.

METHODS

NCCLS protocols were followed to evaluate the reagent on a Hitachi 917 chemistry analyzer.

RESULTS

Intra- and interassay imprecision ranged from 1.3% to 3.8% and 0.79% to 3.7%, respectively. The assay was linear to 110 microg/ml. Interference from triglyceride, hemoglobin and bilirubin was <10% to concentrations of 12.6 mmol/l, 12.1 and 911.4 micromol/l, respectively. Correlation coefficients between lot numbers on the Hitachi 917 and between analyses on the Hitachi 917 and the Hitachi 7170 analyzers were >0.99. The lowest limit of detection was 0.49 microg/ml (mean+/-2 S.D.). 1,5-AG was stable at 4 degrees C for 7 days, at 22 degrees C for 5 days, at -80 degrees C for 14 days and for three freeze-thaw cycles at -80 degrees C. The US reference intervals (nonparametric 2.5th-97.5th percentiles) were 10.2-33.8 microg/ml (males) and 5.9-31.8 microg/ml (females).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of the GlycoMark assay for the measurement of 1,5-AG was acceptable on the Hitachi 917 analyzer.