Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer

Advances and challenges in fluoropyrimidine pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics

In cancer pharmacogenetics (the study of how variability in a single or set of known genes influences drug response) and pharmacogenomics (the study of variability on a genome-wide scale), one of the most important fields of research focuses on the fluoropyrimdines (FPs) and, in particular, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). After over 40 years of use, FPs remain one of the most commonly used cancer chemotherapy agents and their application includes a wide spectrum of cancer types. FPs also continue to be the baseline component for many new regimens with novel molecular-targeted agents that are being rapidly introduced. Hence, it would seem appropriate that pharmacogenetic/genomic models for optimizing cancer patient management would involve indicators of FP response. In this article, the current trends in FP pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics are reviewed based on the advances made to date and the challenges faced in realizing their full potential.

Immunohistochemical test for MLH1 and MSH2 expression predicts clinical outcome in stage II and III colorectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic significance of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status in a large series of stage II and III colorectal cancer patients. The relationship among MMR status, adjuvant chemotherapy, and clinical outcome was also investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 718 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (393 stage II and 325 stage III) who underwent curative surgical resection. MMR status was determined by immunohistochemical analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 expression. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was assessed in 363 patients using mononucleotide and dinucleotide markers.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen (15.9%) carcinomas showed abnormal MMR protein (MMRP) expression (96 MLH1 negative and 18 MSH2 negative) and were classified as MMRP negative, whereas 604 tumors demonstrated normal MLH1/MSH2 immunoreactivity (MMRP positive). MLH1/MSH2 expression was closely related to MSI status (P < .001) and several clinicopathologic features. Patients with MMRP-negative carcinomas demonstrated a marked reduction in the risk of cancer-related death with respect to patients with MMRP-positive tumors (hazard ratio, 0.2579; 95% CI, 0.1289 to 0.5159). A better clinical outcome for patients with MMRP-negative tumors was observed in both stage II (P = .0006) and stage III (P = .0052) disease. In stage III disease, the survival advantage conferred by MMRP-negative tumors was more evident among patients treated with surgery alone than among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. A nonsignificant trend for survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was observed among patients with MMRP-positive carcinomas but not among those with MMRP-negative carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

Immunohistochemical testing for MLH1/MSH2 expression provides useful prognostic information for the management of stage II and III colorectal cancer patients.

Immunohistochemistry detects mismatch repair gene defects in colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

The clinical management of colorectal malignancies that arise via the mismatch repair gene pathway may differ from those that arise from the more common loss of heterozygosity pathway. They respond differently to chemotherapy, have a different prognosis and are associated with a raised incidence of metachronous lesions if a germline mutation is present. Established methods of detecting mismatch repair gene defects require the testing for microsatellite instability. This is expensive and requires specialized molecular biological resources and staff. An immunohistochemical method is attractive because it is far cheaper, and can be performed by most anatomical pathology laboratories. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of mismatch repair gene defects using immunohistochemistry in a group of patients who were aged < or = 45 years at the time of diagnosis of colorectal cancer and to compare the patient survival and pathological features of tumours with and without mismatch repair gene defects.

METHODS

One hundred and four patients with colorectal cancer, diagnosed at 45 years or younger between January 1983 and December 2001, who had been managed at Groote Schuur Hospital, were identified from clinical records. Demographic and clinical data was collected from the clinical notes. The pathological reports were reviewed and the original histopathological slides retrieved. New tissue sections were cut from the original paraffin embedded tissue blocks to obtain both normal colonic mucosa and tumour on the same slide. There was insufficient tissue available or poor staining in 11 patients so 93 were available for the study.

RESULTS

The mismatch repair status was detected by antibodies to hMLH1 and hMSH2 gene product using a standard immunohistochemical technique. Fifty-six (60%) of 93 tumours demonstrated normal expression of both hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein. Twenty-five (27%) tumours did not express hMLH1 and 12 (13%) hMSH2 proteins. Comparison of the histopathological features revealed that a greater proportion of tumours with absence of either the hMLH1 or hMSH2 product were right sided, mucinous and poorly differentiated when compared to those that expressed the gene product. There was no detectable difference in overall survival or in survival of patients with Duke's C carcinoma when the groups were separated by the presence or absence of gene product.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that 40% of patients who were < or = 45 years of age at the time of diagnosis of colorectal cancer seen at Groote Schuur Hospital have tumours which are related to the absence of expression of either hMLH1 or hMSH2 genes.

A prospective analysis of microsatellite instability as a molecular marker in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) may be a molecular marker of colorectal tumor biology. We sought to evaluate the incidence and significance of MSI in an unselected colorectal cancer population.

METHODS

Colorectal cancer cases from a community health system were prospectively evaluated for MSI and patient outcomes monitored.

RESULTS

Of 240 eligible, 140 underwent testing; 43 (31%) had high-frequency MSI (MSI-H). Those with MSI-H tumors presented with earlier disease stage (P = .014) and lymphocytic infiltration (P < .001). Stage III MSI-H patients trended toward improved disease-free survival (P = .065). MSI-H patients were more likely to have other primary malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of MSI-H in the general colorectal cancer population is higher than previously reported. MSI testing of colorectal cancers is useful as part of a molecular profile to stratify patients for prognosis, treatment, and further study. Patients with MSI-H tumors are more likely to have other primary malignancies, suggesting a role for heightened screening.

Adjuvant therapy for stage II colorectal cancer: Who and with what?

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II colon adenocarcinoma remains controversial. The high surgical cure rate for patients with "low-risk" stage II colon cancer, ranging from 75% to 80%, and the available clinical trials and meta-analyses provide conflicting recommendations for or against adjuvant chemotherapy for this group of patients. For fit "high-risk" stage II patients with clinical obstruction or perforation at presentation, in which the 5-year survival rate is 60% to 70%, there is little controversy, as these patients are routinely treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Other potential high-risk factors, including high histologic grade, microsatellite instability, and loss of 18q, have yet to be validated in prospective trials. Patients with fewer than 12 regional lymph nodes identified in the surgical specimen have a statistically unclear risk of lymph node involvement. These patients may have stage III disease and should receive adjuvant therapy. The decision to use adjuvant chemotherapy to treat low-risk stage II colon cancer patients (no obstruction or perforation) should be an informed decision weighing the magnitude of a net 2% to 5% survival benefit, a 0.5% to 1.0% risk of mortality with chemotherapy in addition to 6 months of chemotherapy-related toxicities, other coexisting patient morbidities, and the anticipated life expectancy of each patient. As adjuvant chemotherapy is therapy addressing local or metastatic microscopic disease, and the effectiveness of systemic and biologically targeted therapy for advanced macroscopic colon cancer continues to improve rapidly, it remains to be determined by clinical trials whether therapies including newer agents such as cetuximab and bevacizumab administered in the adjuvant setting may affect survival for stage II cancer patients.

Prospective evaluation of fluorouracil chemotherapy based on the genetic makeup of colorectal cancer

Evaluation of 5‐fluorouracil chemotherapy and survival, based on mismatch repair (MMR) status, indicates that patients with MMR proficient colorectal tumours benefit from 5‐fluorouracil treatment while patients with MMR deficient tumours do not

Mismatch repair status in the prediction of benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

AIM

Some retrospective studies have shown a lack of benefit of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with mismatch repair (MMR) deficient colorectal cancer. Our aim was to assess if this molecular marker can predict benefit from 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy. A second objective was to determine if MMR status influences short term survival.

METHODS

We included 754 patients with a median follow up of 728.5 days (range 1-1097). A total of 260 patients with stage II or III tumours received 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy, according to standard clinical criteria and irrespective of their MMR status. A tumour was considered MMR deficient when either BAT-26 showed instability or there was loss of MLH1 or MSH2 protein expression.

RESULTS

At the end of the follow up period, 206 patients died and 120 presented with tumour recurrence. Sixty six (8.8%) patients had MMR deficient tumours. There were no significant differences in overall survival (MMR competent 72.1%; MMR deficient 78.8%; p = 0.3) or disease free survival (MMR competent 61.3%; MMR deficient 72.3%; p = 0.08). In patients with stage II and III tumours, benefit from 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy was restricted to patients with MMR competent tumours (overall survival: chemotherapy 87.1%; non-chemotherapy 73.5%; log rank, p = 0.00001). Patients with MMR deficient tumours did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (overall survival: chemotherapy 89.5%; non-chemotherapy 82.4%; log rank, p = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Benefit from 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy depends on the MMR status of tumours in patients with colorectal cancer. 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with MMR competent tumours but this benefit from chemotherapy cannot be extended to patients with MMR deficient tumours.

Influence of target gene mutations on survival, stage and histology in sporadic microsatellite unstable colon cancers

High-frequency microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) colon tumors develop as a consequence of mutations at repetitive sequences in target genes. TGFBR2 and ACVR2, encoding TGFbeta superfamily receptors, and the proapoptotic gene BAX are frequent targets for frameshift mutation. We analyzed the effect of these mutations on survival and histology in 2 separate cohorts. Forty-eight MSI-H Dukes B2 colon tumors from a cohort of 172 patients had mutations in TGFBR2, BAX and ACVR2 correlated with patient survival. Further, 54 population-based MSI-H colon cancers of all stages from a cohort of 503 patients had mutations correlated with tumor stage, grade and size. Of 44 amplifiable MSI-H Dukes B2 tumors, 70% harbored TGFBR2, 63% BAX and only 4.5% ACVR2 mutations. While mutation alone did not influence survival, concomitant mutation of TGFBR2 and BAX was associated with an improved prognosis in Dukes B2 patients (p=0.05). ACVR2 mutations were more frequent in the second, population-based cohort (stage II: 32.5%, p<0.05). While no target gene mutation correlated with stage in this cohort, poor histological grade and large tumor volume were associated with mutant ACVR2, but not TGFBR2 or BAX mutations, and likely accounts for the lower prevalence of ACVR2 mutations in the first, well-differentiated Dukes B2 cohort. Because target gene mutations did not correlate with stage, they likely occur early in the pathogenesis of MSI-H cancers. Mutations in TGFBR2 and BAX may improve survival in MSI-H Dukes B2 patients, and mutations of ACVR2 may augment histological changes consistent with poor tumor grade that is characteristic of MSI-H colon cancers, and increase tumor size.

[Identification and management of HNPCC syndrome (hereditary non polyposis colon cancer), hereditary predisposition to colorectal and endometrial adenocarcinomas]

BACKGROUND

The HNPCC syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer) is an inherited condition defined by clinical and genealogical information, known as Amsterdam criteria. In about 70% of cases, HNPCC syndrome is caused by germline mutations in MMR genes, leading to microsatellite instability of tumor DNA (MSI phenotype). Patients affected by the disease are at high risk for colorectal and endometrial carcinomas, but also for small intestine, urothelial, ovary, stomach and biliary tract carcinomas. HNPCC syndrome is responsible for 5% of colorectal cancers. Identification and management of this disease are part of a multidisciplinary procedure.

METHODS

Twelve experts have been mandated by the French Health Ministry to analyze and synthesize their consensus position, and the resulting document has been reviewed by an additional group of 4 independent experts.

MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS

The lack of sensitivity of Amsterdam criteria in recognizing patients carrying a MMR germline mutation led to an enlargement of these criteria for the recruitment of possible HNPCC patients, and to a 2-steps strategy, asking first for a tumor characterization according to MSI phenotype, especially in case of early-onset sporadic cases. The identification of germline MMR mutations has no major consequence on the cancer treatments, but influences markedly the long-term follow-up and the management of at-risk relatives. Gene carriers will enter a follow-up program regarding their colorectal and endometrial cancer risks, but other organs being at low lifetime risk, no specific surveillance will be proposed.

Nucleic acid quantification and disease outcome prediction in colorectal cancer

Histopathological stage at diagnosis remains the most important prognostic determinant for colorectal cancer. However, conventional staging is unable to predict disease outcome accurately for each individual patient. This results in considerable prognostic heterogeneity within a given tumor stage and is of particular relevance for a subgroup of patients with stage II disease that would benefit from adjuvant therapy. The recent advances in functional genomics are beginning to have a significant impact on clinical oncology, and there is widespread interest in using molecular techniques for clinical applications. These have focused on two approaches: the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods for the detection of occult disease in lymph nodes, bone marrow and blood and the use of microarrays for the expression profiling of primary tumors. The aim is to develop molecular classifiers that will allow the prediction of disease outcome, thus matching patients with individualized treatment. Despite the obvious attractions of these approaches, there have been significant technical, biological and analytical problems in their translation into clinically relevant practice. This is particularly true for colorectal cancer, the second most common cancer in the western world. Nevertheless, progress is being made and the improved awareness and appreciation of those difficulties is beginning to generate results that should prove useful for clinical oncology.

Nuclear Maspin expression is associated with response to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer

Maspin, a member of the Serpin protease inhibitor family, is overexpressed in poorly differentiated colorectal tumors and more frequently found in tumors with microsatellite instability. Immunohistochemical nuclear Maspin staining is predominantly seen in tumor cells at the invasion front of such cancers, suggesting that this molecule is associated with local tumor cell infiltration and aggressiveness. In a retrospective study, we studied nuclear Maspin expression as a potential prognostic tool in a total of 172 primary stage III colon cancers by immunohistochemistry. Of those 172 patients, 76 were treated by surgery only, and 96 patients received additional adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based chemotherapy. Nuclear Maspin expression was an independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival in our patient cohort (hazard ratio 2.08; 95% CI, 1.13-3.81; p = 0.018). However, patients with primary tumors expressing Maspin in the nucleus showed a significant treatment benefit from 5-FU chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.384; 95% CI, 0.188-0.784; p = 0.009) compared to adjuvantly treated patients whose tumors did not express this molecule. Nuclear Maspin expression is highly predictive of 5-FU chemotherapy response in patients with advanced stage colon cancer. Patients with negative immunohistochemical Maspin expression do not benefit from 5-FU treatment and may be candidates for an alternative (non-5-FU based) adjuvant therapy regime.

Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) causes hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), and occurs in about 15 per cent of sporadic colorectal cancers. Although the basic mechanisms are not clear, there is increased understanding of the clinicopathological consequences of MSI.

METHODS

Medline was searched for articles with a combination of keywords relating to MSI in colorectal cancer, focusing on molecular mechanisms, clinicopathological implications, and prognostic and predictive value. Emphasis was placed on articles from the past 5 years.

RESULTS

The genetic mechanisms differ in hereditary (germline mutation) and sporadic (epigenetic silencing) colorectal cancer. The MSI pathway frequently has altered transforming growth factor beta receptor II and BAX genes, often beta-catenin, and occasionally p16INK4A and PTEN. Changes in K-ras, adenomatous polyposis coli and p53 are rare. Polymerase chain reaction testing for MSI is superior to immunohistochemistry, but complicated by the number and types of nucleotide markers. The Bethesda panel guides HNPCC testing, but guidelines are lacking for general screening. The presence and role of low-frequency MSI remains controversial. Tumours with MSI tend to occur in the proximal colon and be large, but they have a good prognosis. Their reduced response to adjuvant chemotherapy requires confirmation.

CONCLUSION

Research on colorectal cancer needs to be stratified according to microsatellite status in order further to explore the molecular mechanisms and clinicopathological consequences of MSI.

Microsatellite instability in gastric cancer is associated with better prognosis in only stage II cancers

BACKGROUND

The assessment of microsatellite instability (MSI) is not included yet in the routine evaluation of patients with gastric cancer, as controversial data exist regarding its prognostic value.

METHODS

We determined the clinical significance of MSI in 510 sporadic gastric cancers, using the mononucleotide markers BAT25 and BAT26. The results were compared with the immunohistochemical expression of the mismatch repair proteins Mlh1 and Msh2.

RESULTS

MSI was present in 83 (16%) cancers and correlated with better survival (P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that the MSI phenotype was an independent factor (P = .005) and added prognostic information to TNM stage, location, and age. The relative risk of death for MSI cancer patients was 0.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-0.8). Moreover, when grouped according to stage, only stage II cancers showed a significant effect of MSI status on survival (P = .011; hazard ratio = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8). MSI also correlated with older age (P = .002), female gender (P < .001), intestinal histotype (P = .011), lower T stage (P = .018), and less lymph node involvement (P < .001). Finally, comparison of the results of immunohistochemical expression of the mismatch repair proteins Mlh1 and Msh2 with microsatellite analysis showed concordant results in 95% of neoplasms, with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 98%.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsatellite analysis of gastric cancer has clinical utility in determination of prognosis, but should be determined in only stage II neoplasms in a routine clinical setting. Immunohistochemistry may be considered sufficient, although microsatellite analysis is preferable.

Mucinous colorectal cancers with chromosomal instability: a biologically distinct and aggressive subtype

Colorectal cancers can progress through 2 pathways of genomic instability: microsatellite instability (MSI) and chromosomal instability (CSI). We investigated the influence of CSI and MSI on clinicopathological features and survival of 35 patients affected by mucinous colorectal cancers (MCRC). MSI status was determined by PCR amplification using 5 standard markers. Evidence for CSI was gathered by identifying loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of 4 loci (2p, 5q, 17p, 18q). We defined "MSI-MCRC" as those that showed MSI-H, and "CSI-MCRC" as those that showed LOH at 1 or more of these sites but did not show MSI-H. Among 35 cases, 18 cases (51.4%) were CSI-MCRC, whereas 11 cases (31.4%) were MSI-MCRC. Significant differences were found between CSI-MCRC and MSI-MCRC regarding the following clinicopathological features: tumor location (P=0.00026), lymph node metastasis (P=0.026), and TNM stage (P=0.026). Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank analysis demonstrated that MSI-MCRC was associated with better prognosis than CSI-MCRC, although no significant difference was found (P=0.10). CSI-MCRC correlates more strongly with lymph node metastasis and advanced stage than MSI-MCRC. This indicates that CSI-MCRC is an aggressive subtype.

Current issues in adjuvant treatment of stage II colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil modulated by folinic acid, combined with oxaliplatin, has now become an accepted standard of care for patients with stage III colon cancer. In contrast, the use of adjuvant therapy for stage II patients remains controversial, and the identification of reliable prognostic factors to aid therapeutic decision making is crucial.

METHODS

The authors critically review the results of clinical trials and meta-analyses investigating the value of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II patients, emphasizing the heterogeneous nature of this population and the difficulty of performing clinical trials with sufficient power to reliably assess treatment efficacy. They also discuss the evidence concerning potential prognostic factors, particularly molecular markers.

RESULTS

Available clinical trial data do not support the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for all stage II patients but suggest that it should be considered, particularly for certain high-risk patients. Recent guidelines advocate considering factors such as tumor differentiation, tumor perforation, number of lymph nodes examined, and T stage when assessing the likely benefit:risk ratio. Microsatellite instability and allelic imbalance seem to be strong predictors of good and poor prognosis, respectively, and in the near future, therapeutic decision-making models are likely to be further refined by the inclusion of such molecular markers.

CONCLUSIONS

There is growing evidence that the prognosis of certain stage II patients with unfavorable prognostic factors can be improved by adjuvant chemotherapy, and increasingly refined tools are now available to define those most likely to benefit. Referral of stage II patients for individual assessment is strongly recommended.

Stability of BAT26 in tumours of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients with MSH2 intragenic deletion

Colon cancers arising in most patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) show microsatellite instability (MSI). BAT26, a quasimonomorphic polyA stretch located just 3' of MSH2 exon 5, is considered the most sensitive and specific marker of MSI. A total of 10 HNPCC families with large intragenic MSH2 deletions, encompassing exon 5 and intron 5, identified by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) were included in this study. The deletions under study were del1-16, del1-8, del1-7, del1-6, and del3-6, detected in 3, 1, 2, 3, and 1 families, respectively. Although all patients examined from these 10 families developed unstable tumours, 13/19 MSI-H tumours (68 %) surprisingly showed stability of BAT26. By MLPA and MSH2 sequence analyses of the BAT26-stable tumours, we demonstrated that the wild-type MSH2 allele was somatically inactivated by an identical large deletion, with complete loss of intron 5/BAT26 sequences at the tumour DNA level. We could infer that the apparent stability of BAT26 was due to the complete absence of target BAT26 sequences in the tumour sample, which results in exclusive amplification of contaminant normal DNA, containing a single copy of a wild-type stable BAT26 sequence. Identification of a subset of MSH2-related unstable tumours that are not recognized by analysis of BAT26 instability indicates that this marker should never be used alone for rapid MSI screening of HNPCC tumours. Moreover, our findings indicate that BAT26 stability in the context of MSI is strongly suggestive of the presence of a large intragenic MSH2 deletion.

Real-time reverse transcription PCR and the detection of occult disease in colorectal cancer

Molecular diagnostics offers the promise of accurately matching patient with treatment, and a resultant significant effect on improved disease outcome. More specifically, the real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), with its combination of conceptual simplicity and technical utility, has the potential to become a valuable analytical tool for the detection of mRNA targets from tissue biopsies and body fluids. Its potential is particularly promising in cancer patients, both as a prognostic assay and for monitoring response to therapy. Colorectal cancer provides an instructive paradigm for this potential as well as the problems associated with its use as a clinical assay. Currently, histopathological staging, which provides a static description of the anatomical extent of tumour spread within a surgical specimen, defines patient prognosis. The detection of lymph node (LN) metastasis constitutes the most important prognostic factor in colorectal cancer and as the primary indicator of systemic disease spread, LN status determines the choice of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. However, its limitations are emphasised by the considerable prognostic heterogeneity of patients within a given tumour stage: not all patients with LN-negative cancers are cured and not all patients with LN-positive tumours die from their disease. This has resulted in a search for more accurate staging protocols and has seen the introduction of the concept of "molecular staging", the incorporation of molecular parameters into clinical tumour staging. Quantification of disease-associated mRNA is one such parameter that utilises the qRT-PCR assay's potential for generating quantitative results. These are not only more informative than qualitative data, but contribute to assay standardisation and quality management. This review provides an assessment of the practical value to the clinician of RT-PCR-based molecular diagnostics. It points out reasons for the many contradictory results encountered in the literature and concludes that there is an urgent need for standardisation at every level, starting with pre-assay sample acquisition and template preparation, assay protocols and post-assay analysis.

Microsatellite instability in gastrointestinal tract cancers: a brief update

Microsatellite instability (MSI) was initially reported in colorectal cancer and, particularly, in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Since mutations in the genes functioning in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) were found in HNPCC kindred, this phenotype has been connected to a deficiency in MMR. The MSI(+) phenotype is associated with various human malignancies. As MSI(+) tumors appear to form a unique clinicopathological and molecular entity that is clearly distinct from that of classical colorectal tumors, which are accompanied by chromosomal instability (CIN), an exclusive pathway of tumorigenesis has been proposed in colorectal cancer. However, this scheme, comprising two mutually exclusive pathways, is now being reexamined, in light of a series of evidence accumulating in the literature, which relates to (a) distinction between high-level MSI (MSI-H) and low-level MSI (MSI-L), (b) heterogeneity in MSI-H, particularly in the sporadic and hereditary settings, (c) molecular mechanisms underlying the MSI(+) phenotypes, and (d) relationships between the MSI(+) and CIN phenotypes. Several molecular mechanisms may underlie repeat instability in eukaryotic cells. The relationship between MSI and defective MMR may be more complicated than has been suspected. The role of MMR deficiency in tumorigenesis in the digestive tract appears to be diverse and is not simple, even in the colorectum.

Cytokeratin 20 expression identifies a subtype of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with decreased overall survival

BACKGROUND

Cytokeratins are markers of epithelial cell differentiation useful in determining histogenesis for malignancies with an unknown primary. Application of this principle to a single malignancy may identify cancer subtypes with altered developmental programs. Herein, we investigate the relevance of two widely used cytokeratins (CKs), 7 and 20, to subtype pancreas cancer and identify associations with clinical features.

METHODS

A tissue microarray was constructed using tumor specimens from 103 patients who underwent resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with curative intent. A subset of resection specimens was evaluated for pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) lesions. Tissues were immunostained by using specific anticytokeratin 7 and 20 monoclonal antibodies.

RESULTS

CK 7 and 20 expression was present in 96% and 63% cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, respectively. Ubiquitous CK 7 expression precluded further analysis. Tumoral CK 20 expression was not associated with any histopathologic parameter but correlated with worse prognosis when considered as either a dichotomous (P=0.0098) or continuous (P=0.007) variable. In a multivariate model, tumoral CK 20 expression remained a significant independent prognosticator. CK 20 expression was absent in all PanIN lesions from eight resection specimens in which the tumor component was negative for CK 20. In contrast, presence of tumoral CK 20 was highly concordant with its expression in corresponding PanINs.

CONCLUSIONS

CK 20 expression defines a subtype of pancreas cancer with important biologic properties. When present, CK 20 expression is an early event in pancreatic carcinogenesis identifiable in precursor lesions. Further studies to identify the underlying genetic changes associated with this altered developmental pathway are warranted.

Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer): current concepts and approaches to management

Colorectal cancer is among the most frequent causes of cancer death worldwide. An inherited predisposition to cancer of the colon and other organs, Lynch syndrome-- also called hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer--is probably the most frequent cause of hereditary cancer and is often found in a colon cancer patient and traced through other family members. However, this syndrome is not only characterized by the early onset of colon cancers but also by a predisposition to a constellation of extraintestinal cancers that tend to be misdiagnosed. With new diagnostic technologies, the incidence of familial/inherited versus sporadic cases may appear to increase, due to the recognition of cancers in families that do not fulfill clinical guidelines developed prior to knowledge of the genetic basis of this disease. We now have the ability and the responsibility to detect and prevent this disease, and equally important, to direct patients to specifically targeted treatment. Specialists should be aware of the significance of inherited colon cancer and should become familiar with the molecular diagnostic tests now widely available.

A novel logistic model based on clinicopathological features predicts microsatellite instability in colorectal carcinomas

High-frequency microsatellite instability has been reported to be associated with good prognosis in colorectal adenocarcinoma. However, methods to assess microsatellite instability (MIN) are based on genetic assays and are not ideally suited to most histopathology laboratories. The aim of the present study was to develop a model for prediction of MIN status in colorectal cancer based on phenotypic characteristics. Clinicopathological features of a cohort of 204 patients with primary colon cancer were retrospectively reviewed following predetermined criteria. Genetic assessment of MIN status was performed on DNA extracted from sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens by testing a panel of 11 microsatellite markers. Logistic regression analysis generated a mathematical tool capable of identifying colorectal tumors displaying MIN status with a sensitivity of 77.8% and a specificity of 96.8%. Features associated with instability included the proximal location of the lesions, occurrence of solid and/or mucinous differentiation, absence of cribriform structures, presence of peritumoral Crohn-like reaction, expansive growth pattern, high Ki67 proliferative index, and p53-negative phenotype. This approach predicts microsatellite instability in colorectal carcinoma with an overall assigned accuracy of 95.1% and a negative predictive value of 97.8%. Implementation of this tool to routine histopathological studies could improve the management of patients with colorectal cancer, especially those presenting with stage II and III of the disease. It will also assist in identifying a subset of patients likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis

PURPOSE

Many studies have evaluated the role of high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI) as a prognostic marker and predictor of the response to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the results are not conclusive. The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic significance of high levels of MSI (MSI-H) in CRC patients in relation to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In three different institutions, 1,263 patients with CRC were tested for the presence of MSI, and CRC-specific survival was then analyzed in relation to MSI status, chemotherapy, and other clinical and pathologic variables.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-six tumors were MSI-H (20.3%): these were more frequently at a less advanced stage, right-sided, poorly differentiated, with mucinous phenotype, and expansive growth pattern than microsatellite stable carcinomas. Univariate and multivariate analyses of 5-year-specific survival revealed stage, tumor location, grade of differentiation, MSI, gender, and age as significant prognostic factors. The prognostic advantage of MSI tumors was particularly evident in stages II and III in which chemotherapy did not significantly affect the survival of MSI-H patients. Finally, we analyzed survival in MSI-H patients in relation to the presence of mismatch repair gene mutations. MSI-H patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer showed a better prognosis as compared with sporadic MSI-H; however, in multivariate analysis, this difference disappeared.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of genomic instability could influence the prognosis of CRC, in particular in stages II and III. Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy does not seem to improve survival among MSI-H patients. The survival benefit for patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer is mainly determined by younger age and less advanced stage as compared with sporadic MSI-H counterpart.

Testing for defective DNA mismatch repair in colorectal carcinoma: a practical guide

CONTEXT

Significant bench and clinical data have been generated during the last decade regarding DNA mismatch repair in colorectal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

To review clinically relevant aspects of defective DNA mismatch repair in colorectal carcinoma and to suggest testing algorithms for identification of these tumors in the sporadic and familial settings.

DATA SOURCES

This article is based on literature review and clinical testing experience of more than 2000 patient samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 15% of colorectal carcinomas arise as a result of defective DNA mismatch repair. Ninety percent of these carcinomas are sporadic, arising as a result of methylation of the MLH1 gene promoter, silencing expression. These sporadic carcinomas have improved stage-specific prognosis and can be identified by demonstrating aberrant loss of expression with an MLH1 immunoperoxidase stain. Familial colorectal carcinomas with defective DNA mismatch repair (Lynch syndrome) are due to a germline defect in one of several DNA mismatch repair genes. The familial carcinomas are best identified with a combination of immunohistochemistry and molecular microsatellite analysis. This testing facilitates subsequent directed genetic testing of the proband and family members.

Molecular pathogenesis of colorectal cancer: implications for molecular diagnosis

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in both men and woman in industrialized countries. Major advances have been made in our understanding of molecular events leading to formation of adenomatous polyps and cancer. Most colorectal cancers are sporadic, but a significant proportion (5-6%) has a clear genetic background. It is now widely accepted that colorectal carcinogenesis is a multistep process involving the inactivation of a variety of tumor-suppressor and DNA-repair genes and simultaneous activation of certain oncogenes. In addition, epigenetic alterations through aberrant promoter methylation and histone modification have been found to play a major role in the evolution and progression of a large proportion of sporadic colon cancers. Consequently, it is now apparent that individual colorectal cancers may evolve through diverse molecular pathways. In this article, the authors have summarized the current knowledge of molecular pathogenesis in common hereditary syndromes and sporadic forms of colorectal cancer. Novel molecular diagnostic tools for the early diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer that have emerged from these insights are discussed.

Use of mononucleotide repeat markers for detection of microsatellite instability in mouse tumors

Tumors lacking DNA mismatch repair activity (MMR) from patients with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) or those with sporadic colorectal cancer can be identified by the presence of high levels of instability in repetitive sequences known as microsatellites (MSI). The assessment of MSI phenotype in human tumors helps to establish a clinical diagnosis and is accomplished with a reference panel of five mononucleotide repeats. By contrast, detection of MSI in mouse tumors has proven to be problematic and lack of a uniform set of markers for classification of MSI has impeded comparison of results between studies. We tested for MSI in intestinal tumors from MMR-deficient mice with four mononucleotide repeats with polyA(24-37) tracts and three new markers with extended polyA(59-67) tracts. All seven markers were sensitive to MSI in MMR-deficient tumors, but those with extended mononucleotide tracts displayed larger deletions, which were easily distinguishable from the germline alleles. With a panel of the five most sensitive and specific mononucleotide repeats, a high level of MSI was detected in 100% of MMR-deficient tumors, but not in tumors with MMR activity. This novel panel is an improvement over existing combinations of mono- and dinucleotide repeat markers and should facilitate MSI screening and standardize results from different studies.

Chemotherapeutic implications in microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer

Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer is currently offered to patients based on the stage of their cancer, and there is evidence to show an overall survival benefit with 5-fluorouracil-based (5-FU) therapy for patients with lymph node metastasis who receive it. The pathogenesis of colorectal cancer involves genomic instability, with about 15% of tumors demonstrating a form of genomic instability called high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and due to loss of DNA mismatch repair function, and the remainder of colorectal tumors lacking MSI-H with retained DNA mismatch repair function and called microsatellite stable (MSS), with a large proportion of these tumors demonstrating another form of genomic instability called chromosomal instability. There is now evidence to show that the form of genomic instability that is present in a patient's colorectal cancer may predict a survival benefit from 5-FU. In particular, patients whose colorectal tumors have MSI-H do not gain a survival benefit with 5-FU as compared to patients with MSS tumors. In vitro evidence supports these findings, as MSI-H colon cancer cell lines are more resistant to 5-FU compared to MSS cell lines. More specifically, components of the DNA mismatch repair system have been shown to recognize and bind to 5-FU that becomes incorporated into DNA and which could be a trigger to induce cell death. The binding and subsequent cell death events would be absent in colorectal tumors with MSI-H, which have lost intact DNA mismatch repair function. These findings suggest that: (a) tumor cytotoxicity of 5-FU is mediated by DNA mechanisms in addition to well-known RNA mechanisms, and (b) patients whose tumors demonstrate MSI-H may not benefit from 5-FU therapy. Future studies should include a better understanding of the cellular mechanisms of the DNA recognition of 5-FU, multi-centered prospective trials investigating the survival benefit of 5-FU based on genomic instability, and the investigation of alternative chemotherapeutic regimens for patients with MSI-H tumors to improve survival.

Surgical Implications of Colorectal Cancer Genetics

The applications of genetics in colorectal cancer are not limited to identifying germ-line mutations in genetically predisposed individuals. Reports on the use of molecular genetic markers as prognostic factors and for assessing the response to therapy are common in the literature. As the primary caregiver in the majority of these cases, the surgeon needs a basic knowledge of colorectal genetics and their implications to the patient and the patient's family. This article discusses a practical approach for some of the issues likely to be encountered by the surgeon.

A gene expression signature of genetic instability in colon cancer

Genetic instability plays a central role in the development and progression of human cancer. Two major classes of genetic instability, microsatellite instability (MSI) and chromosome instability (microsatellite stable; MSS), are best understood in the context of colon cancer, where MSI tumors represent approximately 15% of cases, and compared with MSS tumors, more often arise in the proximal colon and display favorable clinical outcome. To further explore molecular differences, we profiled gene expression in a set of 18 colon cancer cell lines using cDNA microarrays representing approximately 21,000 different genes. Supervised analysis identified a robust expression signature distinguishing MSI and MSS samples. As few as eight genes predicted with high accuracy the underlying genetic instability in the original and in three independent sample sets, comprising 13 colon cancer cell lines, 61 colorectal tumors, and 87 gastric tumors. Notably, the MSI signature was retained despite genetically correcting the underlying instability, suggesting the signature reflects a legacy of the tumor having arisen from MSI, rather than sensing the ongoing state of MSI. Our findings support a model in which MSI and MSS preferentially target different genes and pathways in cancer. Further, among the MSI signature genes, our findings implicate a role of elevated metallothionein expression in the clinical behavior of MSI cancers.

Clinical description of the Lynch syndrome [hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)]

The Lynch syndrome [Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC)] is a dominantly inherited syndrome characterized by the development of a variety of cancers including cancer of colorectum, endometrium, and less frequently, cancer of the small bowel, stomach, urinary tract, ovaries, and brain. The syndrome is due to a mutation in one of the DNA-mismatch repair (MMR) genes. The main features of the syndrome are an early age of onset and the occurrence of multiple tumors. Knowledge of the specific features of the syndrome is crucial for the identification of the Lynch syndrome. In previous years, the Amsterdam criteria were used for recognition of the syndrome. Since we know that the Lynch syndrome is caused by an MMR defect and that the hallmark of the syndrome is microsatellite instability (MSI), more attention should be given to the so-called Bethesda guidelines. These guidelines describe practically all clinical conditions in which there is suspicion of the Lynch syndrome and in which a search for MSI is indicated.

Use of microsatellite instability and immunohistochemistry testing for the identification of individuals at risk for Lynch syndrome

It is now generally recognized that a specific subset of those patients clinically defined as having hereditary non polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) have germline mutations in any one of several genes involved in DNA mismatch repair (MMR). This important subset of HNPCC families is now defined as having Lynch syndrome. A considerable amount of data has shown that tumors from patients with Lynch syndrome have characteristic features resulting from the underlying molecular involvement of defective MMR, that is, the presence of microsatellite instability (MSI) and the absence of MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). As a result, identifying patients with Lynch syndrome can now be accomplished by testing tumors for these tumor-related changes. Together, MSI and IHC are powerful tools that help identify individuals at risk for having Lynch syndrome and to distinguish these cases from HNPCC cases with other hereditary gene defects. Furthermore, IHC analysis provides valuable clues as to which MMR gene is mutated, allowing for comprehensive mutational analyses of that gene. Here, we discuss the current and historical perspectives regarding MSI and IHC analyses in tumors from sporadic colon cancer and from patients with Lynch syndrome. Given this background, we also provide a testing strategy for the identification of patients at risk for Lynch syndrome and subsequent gene testing.

Multipopulation analysis of polymorphisms in five mononucleotide repeats used to determine the microsatellite instability status of human tumors

PURPOSE

Human gastrointestinal tumors with inactivated DNA mismatch repair system (microsatellite instability [MSI] tumors) have distinct molecular and clinicopathologic profiles, and are associated with favorable prognosis. There is evidence suggesting that colorectal cancer patients with MSI tumors respond differently to adjuvant chemotherapy as compared with patients with non-MSI tumors. Finally, determination of the MSI status has clinical application for assisting in the diagnosis of suspected hereditary cases. It is thus becoming increasingly recognized that testing for MSI should be conducted systematically in all human cancers potentially of this type. We recently described a pentaplex polymerase chain reaction of five mononucleotide repeats to establish the MSI status of human tumors, and showed that this assay was 100% sensitive and specific. Moreover, these markers are quasimonomorphic in germline DNA of the white population (ie, individuals of Eurasian origin), and could be used for tumor MSI determination without the requirement for matching normal DNA in this group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, we analyzed a comparable panel of five mononucleotide markers in germline DNA from 1,206 individuals encompassing 55 different populations worldwide. Results With the exception of two Biaka Pygmies and one San individual for whom three markers showed variant alleles (three cases [0.2%]), the remaining 1,203 individuals showed no alleles of variant size (1,055 cases [87.5%]), or only one (122 cases [10.1%]) or two (26 cases [2.2%]) markers with variant alleles. All 60 MSI tumors investigated display instability in at least four of the five markers.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that tumor MSI status can be determined using the pentaplex reaction for all human populations without the need for matching normal DNA.

Immunogenic hsp-70 is overexpressed in colorectal cancers with high-degree microsatellite instability

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancers that display high-degree mi-crosatellite instability are associated with an improved prognosis and evidence of an activated host immune response. Molecular analyses have suggested that heat shock proteins, a family of proteins that have key immunologic functions, are upregulated in these cancers. We aimed to explore the expression of heat shock proteins 70 and 110 and their relationship to microsatellite instability, survival, and other clinicopathologic parameters.

METHODS

Twenty-six colorectal cancers that displayed microsatellite instability were matched by age, stage, and site in the colorectum to 26 microsatellite-stable cancers. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect expression of both markers.

RESULTS

The microsatellite-unstable group showed significantly higher expression of heat shock protein 70 than the microsatellite-stable group (P = 0.006), and patients undergoing curative resections for unstable cancers had improved prognosis compared with their stable counterparts (P = 0.026). Significantly, in a multivariate survival analysis, low or absent heat shock protein 70 expression was independently associated with a poor outcome (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Heat shock protein 70 has known functions that promote antitumor immune responses. Its overexpression in colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability may be pivotal to explaining these tumors' enhanced immunogenicity and improved prognosis.

A Multicenter Phase II Study of “Adjuvant” Irinotecan Following Resection of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent irinotecan following hepatectomy for metachronous colorectal metastases, and examines the predictive value of p27 and p53 expression and of microsatellite instability (MSI) status.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients, previously treated with 5-fluorouracil, with operable hepatic colorectal metastases underwent hepatectomy and received adjuvant irinotecan (thrice weekly) for 6 planned cycles. Metastases were examined for p53 and p27 expression by immunohistochemistry and for MSI using mono- and dinucleotide markers.

RESULTS

The starting dose of irinotecan was 350 mg/m2 (in 3 patients), 300 mg/m2 (n = 14), and 250 mg/m2 (n = 12). Four patients failed to complete 6 cycles (2 progressive disease and 2 toxicity). Grade > or =3 toxicity was experienced in 8% of cycles (13 of 165). The estimated median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 45.2 months. RFS at 18 months was estimated to be 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43-80), 2-year overall survival (OS) was 85% (95% CI, 72-99.8), and the median follow-up was 27.9 months. Six patients (21%) have died; median OS has not been reached. In univariate analyses, p27 and MSI status were not predictive for RFS while p53 approached statistical significance (P = 0.051). Duration of chemotherapy was the only significant predictive factor (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The tolerability of this regimen after major liver resection supports further evaluation of irinotecan-based adjuvant chemotherapy in this group of patients.

Routine testing for mismatch repair deficiency in sporadic colorectal cancer is justified

This study prospectively examines the accuracy of immunohistochemical staining in the identification of mismatch repair defective (MMRD) colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice. The potential impact of this information on decisions regarding adjuvant treatment and germline testing were quantified. A consecutive series of fresh tissue (836 cancers) was obtained from 786 individuals undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer at one institution. As part of normal practice, each tumour was screened for the expression of MLH1 and MSH2 by immunohistochemical staining (IHC) and relevant clinicopathological details were documented. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was assessed using standard markers. Overall, 108 (13%) tumours showed loss of staining for either MLH1 (92 tumours) or MSH2 (16 tumours). The positive predictive value of mismatch repair IHC when used alone in the detection of MSI tumours was 88%, and the negative predictive value was 97%. Specificity and positive predictive value were improved by correlation with microsatellite status. Tumour stage (HR 3.5, 95% CI 2.0-6.0), vascular space invasion (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.0) and mismatch repair deficiency (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.05-0.87) were independent prognostic factors in stages II and III disease. Screening by mismatch repair IHC could reasonably have been expected to prevent ineffective treatment in 3.6% of stage II and 7.6% of stage III patients. The frequency of germline mismatch repair mutations was 0.8%, representing six unsuspected hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) cases. Routine screening of colorectal cancers by mismatch repair IHC identifies individuals at low risk of relapse, and can prevent unnecessary adjuvant treatments in a significant number of individuals. Abnormal immunohistochemistry should be confirmed by microsatellite testing to ensure that false-positive results do not adversely impact on treatment decisions.

T25 repeat in the 3' untranslated region of the CASP2 gene: a sensitive and specific marker for microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

DNA mismatch repair deficiency is observed in about 10% to 15% of all colorectal carcinomas and in up to 90% of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) patients. Tumors with mismatch repair defects acquire mutations in short repetitive DNA sequences, a phenomenon termed high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H). The diagnosis of MSI-H in colon cancer is of increasing relevance, because MSI-H is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer, seems to influence the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy, and is the most important molecular screening tool to identify HNPCC patients. To make MSI typing feasible for the routine pathology laboratory, highly reproducible and cost effective laboratory tests are required. Here, we describe a novel T25 mononucleotide marker in the 3'untranslated region of the CASP2 gene (CAT25) that displayed a quasimonomorphic repeat pattern in normal tissue of 200 unrelated individuals of Caucasian origin. In addition, CAT25 was monomorphic also in all tested donors of African and Asian origin (n = 102 and n = 79, respectively) and thus differs from the most commonly used markers BAT25 and BAT26. Without the analysis of corresponding normal tissue, CAT25 correctly detected 56 of 57 colorectal cancer specimens classified as MSI-H by using the standard National Cancer Institute/International Collaborative Group-HNPCC marker panel. Combined with the standard markers BAT25 and BAT26 in a multiplex PCR, all MSI-H colorectal cancer samples were typed correctly. No false-positive results were obtained in 60 non-MSI-H control colorectal cancer specimens. These data suggest that CAT25 should be included into novel marker panels for microsatellite testing thus allowing for a significant reduction of the complexity and costs of MSI typing. Moreover, CAT25 represents a highly promising marker for early detection of colorectal cancer in HNPCC germ line mutation carriers.

5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677 and 1298 polymorphisms, folate intake, and microsatellite instability in colon cancer

The 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene plays a critical role in folate metabolism. Studies on the association between MTHFR polymorphisms and length changes in short tandem repeat DNA sequences [microsatellite instability (MSI)] are inconsistent. Using data from colon cancer cases (n=503) enrolled as part of an existing population-based case-control study, we investigated the association between MTHFR 677 and MTHFR 1298 polymorphisms and MSI. We also examined whether the association was modified by folate intake. Participants were case subjects enrolled as part of the North Carolina Colon Cancer Study. Consenting cases provided information about lifestyle and diet during in-home interviews as well as blood specimens and permission to obtain tumor blocks. DNA from normal and tumor tissue sections was used to determine microsatellite status (MSI). Tumors were classified as MSI if two or more microsatellite markers (BAT25, BAT26, D5S346, D2S123, and D17S250) had changes in the number of DNA sequence repeats compared with matched nontumor tissue. Tumors with one positive marker (MSI-low) or no positive markers (microsatellite stable) were grouped together as non-MSI tumors (microsatellite stable). MTHFR 677 and MTHFR 1298 genotypes were determined by real-time PCR using the 5' exonuclease (Taqman) assay. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). MSI was more common in proximal tumors (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.7-8.4) and in current smokers (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.6-9.7). Compared with MTHFR 677 CC referent, MTHFR 677 CT/TT genotype was inversely associated with MSI among White cases (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16-0.81) but not significant among African Americans. Although not statistically significant, a similar inverse association was observed between MTHFR 677 CT/TT genotype and MSI among the entire case subjects (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.26-1.10). Among those with adequate folate intake (>400 microg total folate), we found strong inverse associations between combined MTHFR genotypes and MSI (677 CC+1298 AC/CC, OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.59; 677 CT/TT+1298 AA, OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.85) compared with the combined wild-type genotypes (677 CC+1298 AA). This protective effect was not evident among those with low folate (<400 microg total folate) intake. Our results suggest that MTHFR variant genotypes are associated with reduced risk of MSI tumors under conditions of adequate folate intake, although the data are imprecise due to small numbers. These results indicate that the relationship between MTHFR genotypes and MSI is influenced by folate status.

[Molecular biology in clinical cancer research: the example of digestive cancers]

Cancer is a DNA disease characterized by uncontrolled cell proliferation due to the accumulation of genetic alterations. Recent progress in molecular biology allowed the identification of markers potentially usefull for patients management through the identification of these genetic alterations and a best understanding of chemotherapy molecular targets. Several examples in digestive oncology underline the relevance of molecular biology in clinical research. If almost all colorectal cancers (CRC) correspond to the same histopathological type (adenocarcinoma), molecular biology allowed the identification of two different molecular mechanisms of colorectal carcinogenesis: chromosomal instability characterized by recurrent allelic losses on chromosomes 17, 5, 18, 8 and 22 that contribute to the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, and genetic instability characterized by the instability of microsatellite loci due to an alteration of DNA mismatch repair leading to the accumulation of mutations in genes involved in the control of cell cycle and apoptosis. These data are potentially interesting for the management of CRC patients. Indeed, microsatellite instability seems not only to be a good prognostic factor but also a molecular factor that can predict response to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy. Therapeutic clinical trials taking into account these molecular parameters are still going on. DNA microarray-based gene expression profiling technology that allows the simultaneous analysis of thousand of tumor genes represents also an interesting approach in oncology with the recent identification of a "genetic signature" as a risk factor of tumor recurrence in stage II CRC, a setting in which the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy remains on debate. At last, a best understanding of chemotherapy molecular targets allowed the identification of genetic markers that can predict the response and/or the toxicity of anti-cancer drugs used in gastrointestinal cancers, which could be helpful in the future to propose for each patient a personalized treatment. Mutations that can predict the response of new target therapies such as the inhibitors of the c-KIT tyrosine kinase activity in gastrointestinal stromal tumors have also been found and will allow the selection of patients who can have benefit from these new therapeutic drugs.

Adjuvant therapy for colon cancer

As there have been advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, exciting developments have also been achieved in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. At the same time, more questions have been raised, and some controversies remain. The results of the MOSAIC trial demonstrated the benefit of adding oxaliplatin to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (FOLFOX) in adjuvant therapy for stage II and III disease, but the optimal duration of therapy and the management of toxicities remain to be resolved. Capecitabine is at least equivalent to the Mayo Clinic bolus 5-FU and leucovorin regimen in the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer with a lower incidence profile of adverse events, allowing additional options for patients and physicians. Routine adjuvant systemic therapy in all patients with stage II colon cancer is still debatable. Although a statistically significant advantage for adjuvant treatment in stage II disease was shown for the first time from a large randomized study (QUASAR), the subsets of patients who truly benefit from therapy need to be identified. The application of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer will help to distinguish those patients with risk factors and to guide individualized therapy.

Targeted therapy for colorectal cancer: mapping the way

In spite of the significant advances in conventional therapeutic approaches to colorectal cancer (CRC), most patients ultimately die of their disease. Dissecting the molecular mechanisms underlying CRC progression will not only accelerate the development of novel cancer-selective drugs but will also enable the therapeutic regimen to be personalized according to the molecular features of individual patients and tumors. Here, we report on the novel insights into CRC biology that are paving the way to the development of molecular therapies and summarize the results from recent clinical trials demonstrating that agents targeting tumor-specific molecular derangements can significantly improve the therapeutic efficacy of conventional chemotherapy. Only a broader clinical implementation of these concepts will provide patients with CRC the best chance of a cure.

Colorectal cancer "methylator phenotype": fact or artifact?

It has been proposed that human colorectal tumors can be classified into two groups: one in which methylation is rare, and another with methylation of several loci associated with a "CpG island methylated phenotype (CIMP)," characterized by preferential proximal location in the colon, but otherwise poorly defined. There is considerable overlap between this putative methylator phenotype and the well-known mutator phenotype associated with microsatellite instability (MSI). We have examined hypermethylation of the promoter region of five genes (DAPK, MGMT, hMLH1, p16INK4a, and p14ARF) in 106 primary colorectal cancers. A graph depicting the frequency of methylated loci in the series of tumors showed a continuous, monotonically decreasing distribution quite different from the previously claimed discontinuity. We observed a significant association between the presence of three or more methylated loci and the proximal location of the tumors. However, if we remove from analysis the tumors with hMLH1 methylation or those with MSI, the significance vanishes, suggesting that the association between multiple methylations and proximal location was indirect due to the correlation with MSI. Thus, our data do not support the independent existence of the so-called methylator phenotype and suggest that it rather may represent a statistical artifact caused by confounding of associations.

Gene expression signatures for colorectal cancer microsatellite status and HNPCC

The majority of microsatellite instable (MSI) colorectal cancers are sporadic, but a subset belongs to the syndrome hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Microsatellite instability is caused by dysfunction of the mismatch repair (MMR) system that leads to a mutator phenotype, and MSI is correlated to prognosis and response to chemotherapy. Gene expression signatures as predictive markers are being developed for many cancers, and the identification of a signature for MMR deficiency would be of interest both clinically and biologically. To address this issue, we profiled the gene expression of 101 stage II and III colorectal cancers (34 MSI, 67 microsatellite stable (MSS)) using high-density oligonucleotide microarrays. From these data, we constructed a nine-gene signature capable of separating the mismatch repair proficient and deficient tumours. Subsequently, we demonstrated the robustness of the signature by transferring it to a real-time RT-PCR platform. Using this platform, the signature was validated on an independent test set consisting of 47 tumours (10 MSI, 37 MSS), of which 45 were correctly classified. In a second step, we constructed a signature capable of separating MMR-deficient tumours into sporadic MSI and HNPCC cases, and validated this by a mathematical cross-validation approach. The demonstration that this two-step classification approach can identify MSI as well as HNPCC cases merits further gene expression studies to identify prognostic signatures.

Have we made progress in pharmacogenomics? The implementation of molecular markers in colon cancer

For the last 40 years, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has remained the treatment of choice in both the adjuvant and advanced treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, 5-FU monotherapy produces response rates of only 10–20% in the advanced setting. 5-FU has been combined with newer agents, such as oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and this has significantly increased response rates to 40–50% in the advanced setting. More recently, novel biological agents, such as the monoclonal antibodies targeting either the epidermal growth factor receptor or vascular endothelial growth factor, have shown to provide additional clinical benefit for patients with metastatic CRC. A number of predictive markers have been identified for CRC to date. However, their usefulness as individual markers of response has led to somewhat inconclusive results. Therefore, there is a need to identify panels of predictive markers of response to therapy for advanced CRC, in order to improve these disappointing response rates. The advent of high-throughput methodologies, such as microarrays, enables tumor samples to be profiled on a global scale. This technology has been utilized to develop predictive markers for a wide range of tumor types to date, and hopefully this technology can be translated into the CRC setting with the hope of predicting the response of each individual tumor to chemotherapy.