1501
|
Sahni S, Valecha G, Sahni A. Role of Anti-PD-1 Antibodies in Advanced Melanoma: The Era of Immunotherapy. Cureus 2018; 10:e3700. [PMID: 30788189 PMCID: PMC6372252 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Advanced melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer characterized by poor survival rates and response to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are novel agents capable of utilizing one's own immune system to bring about the tumor destruction. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are fully humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies that have shown significant anti-tumor activity in a variety of cancers including melanoma and have significantly improved the survival outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma. In this updated review article, we will discuss the outcomes of various clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of these agents. We will also briefly discuss their mechanism of action and adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakshi Sahni
- Internal Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Gautam Valecha
- Hematology-Oncology, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, USA
| | - Ankit Sahni
- Miscellaneous, Ross University School of Medicine, Knoxville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1502
|
Stadler R, Leiter U, Garbe C. Lack of survival benefit in sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma with immediate complete lymphadenectomy - a review. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2018; 17:7-13. [DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rudolf Stadler
- University Hospital for Dermatology; Johannes Wesling Clinical Centre in Minden; Ruhr University Hospital; Bochum Germany
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Centre for Dermato-oncology; University Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University; Tübingen Germany
| | - Claus Garbe
- Centre for Dermato-oncology; University Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University; Tübingen Germany
| |
Collapse
|
1503
|
Gu F, Chen TH, Pfeiffer RM, Fargnoli MC, Calista D, Ghiorzo P, Peris K, Puig S, Menin C, De Nicolo A, Rodolfo M, Pellegrini C, Pastorino L, Evangelou E, Zhang T, Hua X, DellaValle CT, Timothy Bishop D, MacGregor S, Iles MI, Law MH, Cust A, Brown KM, Stratigos AJ, Nagore E, Chanock S, Shi J, Consortium MMA, Consortium M, Landi MT. Combining common genetic variants and non-genetic risk factors to predict risk of cutaneous melanoma. Hum Mol Genet 2018; 27:4145-4156. [PMID: 30060076 PMCID: PMC6240742 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddy282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Melanoma heritability is among the highest for cancer and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) contribute to it. To date, only SNPs that reached statistical significance in genome-wide association studies or few candidate SNPs have been included in melanoma risk prediction models. We compared four approaches for building polygenic risk scores (PRS) using 12 874 melanoma cases and 23 203 controls from Melanoma Meta-Analysis Consortium as a training set, and newly genotyped 3102 cases and 2301 controls from the MelaNostrum consortium for validation. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for melanoma risk using traditional melanoma risk factors and the PRS with the largest area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC). We estimated absolute risks combining the PRS and other risk factors, with age- and sex-specific melanoma incidence and competing mortality rates from Italy as an example. The best PRS, including 204 SNPs (AUC = 64.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 63-65.8%), developed using winner's curse estimate corrections, had a per-quintile OR = 1.35 (95% CI = 1.30-1.41), corresponding to a 3.33-fold increase comparing the 5th to the 1st PRS quintile. The AUC improvement by adding the PRS was up to 7%, depending on adjusted factors and country. The 20-year absolute risk estimates based on the PRS, nevus count and pigmentation characteristics for a 60-year-old Italian man ranged from 0.5 to 11.8% (relative risk = 26.34), indicating good separation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangyi Gu
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ting-Huei Chen
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ruth M Pfeiffer
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Donato Calista
- Department of Dermatology, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Paola Ghiorzo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa and Genetics of Rare Cancers, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ketty Peris
- Institute of Dermatology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Susana Puig
- Dermatology Department, Melanoma Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Valencia, Spain
| | - Chiara Menin
- Department of Immunology and Molecular Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV–IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Arcangela De Nicolo
- Cancer Genomics Program, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV–IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Monica Rodolfo
- Department of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Lorenza Pastorino
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa and Genetics of Rare Cancers, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Evangelos Evangelou
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Tongwu Zhang
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Xing Hua
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Curt T DellaValle
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - D Timothy Bishop
- Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Stuart MacGregor
- Statistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mark I Iles
- Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew H Law
- Statistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anne Cust
- Sydney School of Public Health, and Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kevin M Brown
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alexander J Stratigos
- 1 Department of Dermatology–Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Eduardo Nagore
- Department of Dermatology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, València, Spain
| | - Stephen Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jianxin Shi
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Maria Teresa Landi
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1504
|
Gajiwala S, Torgeson A, Garrido-Laguna I, Kinsey C, Lloyd S. Combination immunotherapy and radiation therapy strategies for pancreatic cancer-targeting multiple steps in the cancer immunity cycle. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:1014-1026. [PMID: 30603120 PMCID: PMC6286952 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.05.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly disease, with its mortality rate approaching its incidence rate every year. Accordingly, much interest has been generated in harnessing the immune system in order to improve survival outcomes for these patients. Pancreatic cancer is not thought to be as immunogenic as other cancers that have seen promising results with immune checkpoint inhibitors alone, therefore likely several targets within the cancer-immunity cycle will need to be employed for successful treatment. We sought to investigate both the current state of the field in immunotherapy in PDAC with a special emphasis on combined approaches with radiation therapy (RT). We also summarized ongoing clinical trials that are examining the use of radiotherapy with other immune-stimulating agents in the treatment of PDAC. A PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov search was conducted using the following search terms, either alone or in combination: "pancreatic cancer", "immunotherapy", and "abscopal effect". Open clinical trials were reviewed and included if they involved both RT and other immune-stimulating agents. Pancreatic cancers tend to reside within immune-suppressive tumor microenvironments (TME), express PD-L1, and secrete several immuno-suppressive agents, such as TGF-B, IL-10, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, galectin-1. Whole-cell vaccine therapies, peptide and protein vaccines, dendritic cell vaccines, and vaccines with micro-organisms have been investigated by themselves with promising results. Open clinical trials are currently investigating the use of these vaccines, which increase antigen presentation, with treatments that stimulate release of tumor antigens including RT. There are currently at least 21 open clinical trials investigating the combination of RT with other immune-stimulating agents. The combination of RT and immunotherapy may be a promising avenue for PDAC treatment and deserves further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Snehal Gajiwala
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Anna Torgeson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ignacio Garrido-Laguna
- Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Conan Kinsey
- Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1505
|
Ullenhag G. Cancer treatment of today in view of the Nobel Prize. Ups J Med Sci 2018; 123:205-206. [PMID: 30526172 PMCID: PMC6327621 DOI: 10.1080/03009734.2018.1548528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gustav Ullenhag
- a Scientific Secretary, Swedish Society of Oncology, Associate Professor and Consultant in Oncology , Uppsala University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
1506
|
Di Nunno V, Gatto L, Fragomeno B, Cubelli M, Nobili E, Romano I, Santoni M, Pisconti S, Montironi R, Massari F. Combination immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Are we leaving something back? Future Oncol 2018; 14:2997-2999. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lidia Gatto
- Oncology Unit, SG Moscati Hospital of Taranto, Taranto, Italy
| | | | - Marta Cubelli
- Division of Oncology, S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Ida Romano
- Division of Oncology, S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Santoni
- Oncology Unit, Macerata Hospital, via Santa Lucia 2, Macerata, Italy
| | | | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, School of Medicine, United Hospital, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
1507
|
Wang DY, Salem JE, Cohen JV, Chandra S, Menzer C, Ye F, Zhao S, Das S, Beckermann KE, Ha L, Rathmell WK, Ancell KK, Balko JM, Bowman C, Davis EJ, Chism DD, Horn L, Long GV, Carlino MS, Lebrun-Vignes B, Eroglu Z, Hassel JC, Menzies AM, Sosman JA, Sullivan RJ, Moslehi JJ, Johnson DB. Fatal Toxic Effects Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4:1721-1728. [PMID: 30242316 PMCID: PMC6440712 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1799] [Impact Index Per Article: 257.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Importance Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now a mainstay of cancer treatment. Although rare, fulminant and fatal toxic effects may complicate these otherwise transformative therapies; characterizing these events requires integration of global data. Objective To determine the spectrum, timing, and clinical features of fatal ICI-associated toxic effects. Design, Setting, and Participants We retrospectively queried a World Health Organization (WHO) pharmacovigilance database (Vigilyze) comprising more than 16 000 000 adverse drug reactions, and records from 7 academic centers. We performed a meta-analysis of published trials of anti-programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) to evaluate their incidence using data from large academic medical centers, global WHO pharmacovigilance data, and all published ICI clinical trials of patients with cancer treated with ICIs internationally. Exposures Anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab or tremelimumab), anti-PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), or anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab). Main Outcomes and Measures Timing, spectrum, outcomes, and incidence of ICI-associated toxic effects. Results Internationally, 613 fatal ICI toxic events were reported from 2009 through January 2018 in Vigilyze. The spectrum differed widely between regimens: in a total of 193 anti-CTLA-4 deaths, most were usually from colitis (135 [70%]), whereas anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related fatalities were often from pneumonitis (333 [35%]), hepatitis (115 [22%]), and neurotoxic effects (50 [15%]). Combination PD-1/CTLA-4 deaths were frequently from colitis (32 [37%]) and myocarditis (22 [25%]). Fatal toxic effects typically occurred early after therapy initiation for combination therapy, anti-PD-1, and ipilimumab monotherapy (median 14.5, 40, and 40 days, respectively). Myocarditis had the highest fatality rate (52 [39.7%] of 131 reported cases), whereas endocrine events and colitis had only 2% to 5% reported fatalities; 10% to 17% of other organ-system toxic effects reported had fatal outcomes. Retrospective review of 3545 patients treated with ICIs from 7 academic centers revealed 0.6% fatality rates; cardiac and neurologic events were especially prominent (43%). Median time from symptom onset to death was 32 days. A meta-analysis of 112 trials involving 19 217 patients showed toxicity-related fatality rates of 0.36% (anti-PD-1), 0.38% (anti-PD-L1), 1.08% (anti-CTLA-4), and 1.23% (PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4). Conclusions and Relevance In the largest evaluation of fatal ICI-associated toxic effects published to date to our knowledge, we observed early onset of death with varied causes and frequencies depending on therapeutic regimen. Clinicians across disciplines should be aware of these uncommon lethal complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Y. Wang
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Joe-Elie Salem
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee,Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacovigilance Unit,
AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France,INSERM, UMR ICAN 1166, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC
Univ Paris 06, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), Paris, France
| | - Justine V. Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sunandana Chandra
- Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Department of Medicine,
Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Christian Menzer
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of
Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fei Ye
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Shilin Zhao
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Satya Das
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kathryn E. Beckermann
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Lisa Ha
- Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Department of Medicine,
Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - W. Kimryn Rathmell
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kristin K. Ancell
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Justin M. Balko
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Caitlin Bowman
- Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Department of Medicine,
Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Elizabeth J. Davis
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - David D. Chism
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Leora Horn
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, Sydney, New South
Wales, Australia,University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales,
Australia,Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales,
Australia,Mater Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales,
Australia
| | - Matteo S. Carlino
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, Sydney, New South
Wales, Australia,University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales,
Australia,Department of Medical Oncology, Westmeade Hospital,
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,Department of Medical Oncology, Blacktown Hospital,
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Benedicte Lebrun-Vignes
- Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacovigilance Unit,
AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France,INSERM, UMR ICAN 1166, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC
Univ Paris 06, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), Paris, France
| | - Zeynep Eroglu
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, The Moffitt Cancer
Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jessica C. Hassel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of
Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander M. Menzies
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, Sydney, New South
Wales, Australia,University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales,
Australia,Department of Medical Oncology, Westmeade Hospital,
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,Department of Medical Oncology, Blacktown Hospital,
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeffrey A. Sosman
- Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Department of Medicine,
Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ryan J. Sullivan
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Javid J. Moslehi
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Douglas B. Johnson
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of
Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
1508
|
Wang DY, Salem JE, Cohen JV, Chandra S, Menzer C, Ye F, Zhao S, Das S, Beckermann KE, Ha L, Rathmell WK, Ancell KK, Balko JM, Bowman C, Davis EJ, Chism DD, Horn L, Long GV, Carlino MS, Lebrun-Vignes B, Eroglu Z, Hassel JC, Menzies AM, Sosman JA, Sullivan RJ, Moslehi JJ, Johnson DB. Fatal Toxic Effects Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2018. [PMID: 30242316 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3923erratum.in:jamaoncol4(12):1792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now a mainstay of cancer treatment. Although rare, fulminant and fatal toxic effects may complicate these otherwise transformative therapies; characterizing these events requires integration of global data. OBJECTIVE To determine the spectrum, timing, and clinical features of fatal ICI-associated toxic effects. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We retrospectively queried a World Health Organization (WHO) pharmacovigilance database (Vigilyze) comprising more than 16 000 000 adverse drug reactions, and records from 7 academic centers. We performed a meta-analysis of published trials of anti-programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) to evaluate their incidence using data from large academic medical centers, global WHO pharmacovigilance data, and all published ICI clinical trials of patients with cancer treated with ICIs internationally. EXPOSURES Anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab or tremelimumab), anti-PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), or anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Timing, spectrum, outcomes, and incidence of ICI-associated toxic effects. RESULTS Internationally, 613 fatal ICI toxic events were reported from 2009 through January 2018 in Vigilyze. The spectrum differed widely between regimens: in a total of 193 anti-CTLA-4 deaths, most were usually from colitis (135 [70%]), whereas anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related fatalities were often from pneumonitis (333 [35%]), hepatitis (115 [22%]), and neurotoxic effects (50 [15%]). Combination PD-1/CTLA-4 deaths were frequently from colitis (32 [37%]) and myocarditis (22 [25%]). Fatal toxic effects typically occurred early after therapy initiation for combination therapy, anti-PD-1, and ipilimumab monotherapy (median 14.5, 40, and 40 days, respectively). Myocarditis had the highest fatality rate (52 [39.7%] of 131 reported cases), whereas endocrine events and colitis had only 2% to 5% reported fatalities; 10% to 17% of other organ-system toxic effects reported had fatal outcomes. Retrospective review of 3545 patients treated with ICIs from 7 academic centers revealed 0.6% fatality rates; cardiac and neurologic events were especially prominent (43%). Median time from symptom onset to death was 32 days. A meta-analysis of 112 trials involving 19 217 patients showed toxicity-related fatality rates of 0.36% (anti-PD-1), 0.38% (anti-PD-L1), 1.08% (anti-CTLA-4), and 1.23% (PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In the largest evaluation of fatal ICI-associated toxic effects published to date to our knowledge, we observed early onset of death with varied causes and frequencies depending on therapeutic regimen. Clinicians across disciplines should be aware of these uncommon lethal complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Y Wang
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Joe-Elie Salem
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacovigilance Unit, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
- INSERM, UMR ICAN 1166, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), Paris, France
| | - Justine V Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sunandana Chandra
- Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Christian Menzer
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fei Ye
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Shilin Zhao
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Satya Das
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kathryn E Beckermann
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Lisa Ha
- Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - W Kimryn Rathmell
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kristin K Ancell
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Justin M Balko
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Caitlin Bowman
- Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Elizabeth J Davis
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - David D Chism
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Leora Horn
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Mater Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmeade Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Benedicte Lebrun-Vignes
- Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacovigilance Unit, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
- INSERM, UMR ICAN 1166, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), Paris, France
| | - Zeynep Eroglu
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, The Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmeade Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeffrey A Sosman
- Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ryan J Sullivan
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Javid J Moslehi
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
1509
|
Rothermel LD, Zager JS. Engineered oncolytic viruses to treat melanoma: where are we now and what comes next? Expert Opin Biol Ther 2018; 18:1199-1207. [PMID: 30392405 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1544614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Melanoma treatments have evolved rapidly in the past decade and have included the use of intratumoral injections of engineered oncolytic viruses. One such oncolytic virus is talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), which is the first approved therapy of its kind for use in recurrent, unresectable stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma. Additional oncolytic viruses and their uses in combination with other interventions are currently under investigation. AREAS COVERED Oncolytic viruses are being evaluated as immunotherapies for a variety of advanced malignancies. In this article, we review T-VEC, the only FDA-approved engineered oncolytic virus, in addition to ongoing research regarding other oncolytic viruses for the treatment of advanced melanomas. Finally, we discuss opportunities to improve these therapies through viral, host, and tumor-related modifications. EXPERT OPINION Engineered and naturally oncolytic viruses have demonstrable local and systemic efficacy as immunotherapies in cancer. T-VEC leads the way with improved survival outcomes for unresectable, stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma as a monotherapy, and is demonstrating superior results in combination with systemic checkpoint inhibitors. Additional viral vectors show acceptable safety profiles and varying degrees of efficacy in targeting melanoma. The indications for use of oncolytic viruses will expand as their efficacy and appropriate usage is better understood in coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- b Department of Cutaneous Oncology and Sarcoma , Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa , FL , USA
| |
Collapse
|
1510
|
Perez-Gracia JL, Sanmamed MF, Melero I. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: the sooner the better? Transl Lung Cancer Res 2018; 7:S356-S357. [PMID: 30705854 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.10.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Luis Perez-Gracia
- Oncology Department, Clinica Universidad of Navarra (CUN), Pamplona, Spain.,Health Research Institute of Navarra (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), CUN and CIMA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Miguel F Sanmamed
- Oncology Department, Clinica Universidad of Navarra (CUN), Pamplona, Spain.,Health Research Institute of Navarra (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Melero
- Health Research Institute of Navarra (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), CUN and CIMA, Pamplona, Spain.,Department of Immunology and Cancer Immunotherapy, CUN and CIMA, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
1511
|
Grob JJ, Garbe C, Ascierto P, Larkin J, Dummer R, Schadendorf D. Adjuvant melanoma therapy with new drugs: should physicians continue to focus on metastatic disease or use it earlier in primary melanoma? Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:e720-e725. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30596-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 08/01/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
1512
|
Hruby G, Guminski A, Thompson JF. Management of Regional Lymph Nodes in Patients with Merkel Cell Carcinoma Following a Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy: Less May be More, But is Either Enough? Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:315-317. [PMID: 30483975 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-7076-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- George Hruby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Genesis Cancer Care, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander Guminski
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
1513
|
El Rassy E, Farhat F, Kattan J. The forgotten role of adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in preventing melanoma brain metastasis. Immunotherapy 2018; 10:1289-1291. [PMID: 30474477 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2018-0108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elie El Rassy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hotel Dieu de France University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Lebanon
| | - Fadi Farhat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hotel Dieu de France University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Lebanon
| | - Joseph Kattan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hotel Dieu de France University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
1514
|
Liu J, Rozeman EA, O'Donnell JS, Allen S, Fanchi L, Smyth MJ, Blank CU, Teng MWL. Batf3 + DCs and type I IFN are critical for the efficacy of neoadjuvant cancer immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology 2018; 8:e1546068. [PMID: 30713806 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2018.1546068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Revised: 10/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
New clinical trials are now evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the context of primary tumor surgery. Using the orthotopic 4T1.2 mouse model of spontaneously metastatic mammary cancer, we have shown that neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery was superior in the generation of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells and eradication of lethal metastases compared to surgery followed by adjuvant immunotherapy. However, the importance of host Batf3 and type I interferon (IFN) for long-term survival of mice following neoadjuvant immunotherapy is unknown. Here we demonstrated that loss of Batf3+ DCs or type I IFN receptor blockade in 4T1.2 tumor-bearing mice treated with neoadjuvant anti-PD-1+anti-CD137 immunotherapy reduced long-term survival with a corresponding reduction in tumor-specific CD8+ T cells producing effector cytokines in the primary tumor and in the periphery. Interestingly, we found all high-risk stage III melanoma patients relapsing after adjuvant or neoadjuvant ipilimumab+nivolumab within the OpACIN trial (NCT02437279) displayed low expression of Batf3+ DC-associated genes in pre-treatment tumor biopsies. Further focus should now be placed on validating the requirement of an intratumoral Batf3+ DC gene signature for response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Liu
- Cancer Immunoregulation and Immunotherapy Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Elisa A Rozeman
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jake S O'Donnell
- Cancer Immunoregulation and Immunotherapy Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,Immunology in Cancer and Infection Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stacey Allen
- Cancer Immunoregulation and Immunotherapy Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Lorenzo Fanchi
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark J Smyth
- Immunology in Cancer and Infection Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Christian U Blank
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michele W L Teng
- Cancer Immunoregulation and Immunotherapy Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
1515
|
Health-related quality of life analysis in stage III melanoma patients treated with adjuvant dendritic cell therapy. Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 21:774-780. [PMID: 30465182 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1987-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important issue in the rapidly evolving field of adjuvant treatment for stage III melanoma. Dendritic cell vaccination is one of the adjuvant forms of therapy currently investigated. METHODS We enrolled adults with stage III melanoma to receive adjuvant dendritic cell vaccination after a complete radical lymph node dissection. HRQoL assessment was one of the secondary endpoints of this trial and investigated with the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline and week 26. RESULTS Fifteen patients with a median age of 50 years were included in the study, with twelve evaluable patients on study at time of the second questionnaire. Global health status and role functioning improved clinically relevant with a mean difference of 15 (p = 0.010) and 26 points (p = 0.005), respectively. DISCUSSION Despite the small number of patients, we found a clinically relevant improved global health status. Besides, compared to the other investigated therapies, toxicity of dendritic cell vaccination is low, which supports our finding. CONCLUSION This is the first description of HRQoL in melanoma patients receiving dendritic cell vaccination. We show the expected improvement in global health status after surgical treatment of stage III melanoma. Thus, adjuvant dendritic cell vaccination does not seem to hamper this improvement, as shown in our small explorative study.
Collapse
|
1516
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Rectal cancer is predominantly a disease of older adults but current guidelines do not incorporate the associated specific challenges leading to wide variation in the delivery of cancer care to this subset of population. Here, we will review the current data available regarding the management of rectal cancer in older adults. RECENT FINDINGS The greatest challenge arises in the management of stage II/III disease as it involves tri-modality treatment that can be harder to tolerate by frail older patients. Response to neoadjuvant treatment is being used as a new marker to tailor further therapy and possibly avoid surgery. Oxaliplatin can be omitted from the adjuvant treatment without compromising outcomes. Physicians should perform geriatric assessment utilizing many validated tools available to help predict treatment tolerability and outcomes in older adults that can help personalize subsequent management. Most older adults can undergo standard therapy for stages I, II, or III rectal cancer with curative intent. Increasing evidence suggests that patients with a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant treatment may be observed closely with the possibility of avoiding surgery. Studies are evaluating alternate systemic treatments for advanced metastatic disease with the hope of maintaining quality of life without compromising cancer outcomes.
Collapse
|
1517
|
Miller DM, Trowbridge RM, Desai A, Drews RE. Kaposi's varicelliform eruption in a patient with metastatic melanoma and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma treated with talimogene laherparepvec and nivolumab. J Immunother Cancer 2018; 6:122. [PMID: 30454071 PMCID: PMC6245809 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-018-0437-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 10/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Immune-directed therapies have become front-line therapy for melanoma and are transforming the management of advanced disease. In refractory cases, multi-modal immunoncology (IO) approaches are being utilized, including combining immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with oncolytic herpes viruses. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is the first genetically modified oncolytic viral therapy (OVT) approved for the treatment of recurrent and unresectable melanoma. The use of IO in patients with concomitant malignancies and/or compromised immune systems is limited due to systematic exclusion from clinical trials. For example, a single case report of a solid organ transplant patient successfully treated with T-VEC for metastatic melanoma has been reported. Furthermore, the use of ICB in T-cell malignancies is limited and paradoxical worsening has been described. To our knowledge, this is the first report of dual ICB/T-VEC being administered to a patient with concurrent primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (pcALCL) and melanoma. Case presentation Here we present the case of a patient with concomitant primary cutaneous ALCL and metastatic melanoma, progressing on anti-programmed death (PD)-1 therapy, who developed Kaposi’s varicelliform eruption after receiving the first dose of Talimogene laherparepvec. Conclusion This case highlights the complexities of care of patients with coexistent cancers, demonstrates rapid progression of primary cutaneous ALCL on nivolumab and introduces a novel adverse effect of Talimogene laherparepvec.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Miller
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. .,Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Ryan M Trowbridge
- Department of Dermatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Anupam Desai
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Reed E Drews
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1518
|
Bertolli E, Franke V, Calsavara VF, de Macedo MP, Pinto CAL, van Houdt WJ, Wouters MWJM, Duprat Neto JP, van Akkooi ACJ. Validation of a Nomogram for Non-sentinel Node Positivity in Melanoma Patients, and Its Clinical Implications: A Brazilian–Dutch Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:395-405. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-7038-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
1519
|
Barroso-Sousa R, Ott PA. Transformation of Old Concepts for a New Era of Cancer Immunotherapy: Cytokine Therapy and Cancer Vaccines as Combination Partners of PD1/PD-L1 Inhibitors. Curr Oncol Rep 2018; 21:1. [PMID: 30498900 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-018-0738-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are only effective in a subset of patients. Here, we will review the rationale and data supporting the combination of PD-1 pathway inhibition with recombinant cytokines and neoantigen-based cancer vaccines that can potentially increase the number of patients who will benefit from immunotherapy. RECENT FINDINGS The safety and tolerability of new interleukin(IL)-2 formulations, IL-15 super agonist, and PEGylated IL-10 have been evaluated in early phase clinical trials with promising efficacy data, both as monotherapy and in combination with ICI. Larger studies focusing on the efficacy of these combinations are ongoing. Personalized neoantigen-based cancer vaccines, enabled by improvements in sequencing computational capabilities, have been proven to be feasible, safe, and able to trigger a consistent vaccine-specific immune response in cancer patients. New pharmacologically modified recombinant cytokines and personalized neoantigen-based vaccines may turn these approaches into powerful tools for effective combination immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romualdo Barroso-Sousa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 2127, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Patrick A Ott
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 2127, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
1520
|
Nan Tie E, Henderson MA, Gyorki DE. Management of in-transit melanoma metastases: a review. ANZ J Surg 2018; 89:647-652. [PMID: 30414233 DOI: 10.1111/ans.14921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2018] [Revised: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
In-transit metastases (ITM) of cutaneous melanoma are locoregional recurrences confined to the superficial lymphatics that occur in 3.4-6.2% of patients diagnosed with melanoma. ITM are a heterogeneous disease that poses a therapeutic dilemma. Patients may have a prolonged disease trajectory involving multiple or repeat treatment modalities for frequent recurrences. The management of ITM has evolved without the development of a standardized protocol. Owing to the variability of the disease course there are few dedicated clinical trials, with a number of key trials in stage III melanoma excluding ITM patients. Thus, there is a paucity of quality data on the efficacy of the treatment modalities available for ITM and even fewer studies directly comparing modalities. At present the mainstay of ITM treatment is surgical resection, with intralesional therapies, isolated limb infusion and radiotherapy utilized as second-line measures. The developing role of targeted therapies and immunotherapy has yet to be explored completely in these patients. This review addresses the evidence base of the efficacy of the various treatment modalities available and those factors that have impacted their clinical uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Nan Tie
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael A Henderson
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David E Gyorki
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
1521
|
Xu C, Chen YP, Du XJ, Liu JQ, Huang CL, Chen L, Zhou GQ, Li WF, Mao YP, Hsu C, Liu Q, Lin AH, Tang LL, Sun Y, Ma J. Comparative safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2018; 363:k4226. [PMID: 30409774 PMCID: PMC6222274 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k4226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 378] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a complete toxicity profile, toxicity spectrum, and a safety ranking of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) drugs for treatment of cancer. DESIGN Systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were systematically searched to include relevant studies published in English between January 2007 and February 2018. REVIEW METHODS Only head-to-head phase II and III randomised controlled trials comparing any two or three of the following treatments or different doses of the same ICI drug were included: nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, tremelimumab, atezolizumab, conventional therapy (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and their combinations), two ICI drugs, or one ICI drug with conventional therapy. Eligible studies must have reported site, organ, or system level data on treatment related adverse events. High quality, single arm trials and placebo controlled trials on ICI drugs were selected to establish a validation group. RESULTS 36 head-to-head phase II and III randomised trials (n=15 370) were included. The general safety of ICI drugs ranked from high to low for all adverse events was as follows: atezolizumab (probability 76%, pooled incidence 66.4%), nivolumab (56%, 71.8%), pembrolizumab (55%, 75.1%), ipilimumab (55%, 86.8%), and tremelimumab (54%, not applicable). The general safety of ICI drugs ranked from high to low for severe or life threatening adverse events was as follows: atezolizumab (49%, 15.1%), nivolumab (46%, 14.1%), pembrolizumab (72%, 19.8%), ipilimumab (51%, 28.6%), and tremelimumab (28%, not applicable). Compared with conventional therapy, treatment-related adverse events for ICI drugs occurred mainly in the skin, endocrine, hepatic, and pulmonary systems. Taking one ICI drug was generally safer than taking two ICI drugs or one ICI drug with conventional therapy. Among the five ICI drugs, atezolizumab had the highest risk of hypothyroidism, nausea, and vomiting. The predominant treatment-related adverse events for pembrolizumab were arthralgia, pneumonitis, and hepatic toxicities. The main treatment-related adverse events for ipilimumab were skin, gastrointestinal, and renal toxicities. Nivolumab had a narrow and mild toxicity spectrum, mainly causing endocrine toxicities. Integrated evidence from the pooled incidences, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses implied that nivolumab is the best option in terms of safety, especially for the treatment of lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS Compared with other ICI drugs used to treat cancer, atezolizumab had the best safety profile in general, and nivolumab had the best safety profile in lung cancer when taking an integrated approach. The safety ranking of treatments based on ICI drugs is modulated by specific treatment-related adverse events. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42017082553.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
- Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
- Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/etiology
- Humans
- Ipilimumab/adverse effects
- Ipilimumab/therapeutic use
- Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Neoplasms/immunology
- Nivolumab/adverse effects
- Nivolumab/therapeutic use
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Yu-Pei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Xiao-Jing Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Jin-Qi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Cheng-Long Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Guan-Qun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Wen-Fei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Yan-Ping Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Chiun Hsu
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Qing Liu
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ai-Hua Lin
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ling-Long Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
1522
|
Is earlier better for melanoma checkpoint blockade? Nat Med 2018; 24:1645-1648. [PMID: 30401867 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0250-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
A neoadjuvant approach relying on the administration of combined anti-CTLA-4-anti-PD-1 treatment before lymph node surgery is evaluated in two phase 1 trials. Encouraging clinical, pathological and immunological responses to neoadjuvant therapy were observed, suggesting that this concept warrants further exploration; however, any future approach must address the unacceptably high toxicity of the regimens evaluated in these trials.
Collapse
|
1523
|
Kang A, Zhao D, Yeh JJ, Lee DJ. Updates on Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Skin Cancer. CURRENT DERMATOLOGY REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s13671-018-0246-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
1524
|
Bertolli E, de Macedo MP, Calsavara VF, Pinto CAL, Duprat Neto JP. A nomogram to identify high-risk melanoma patients with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 80:722-726. [PMID: 30395920 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.10.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2018] [Revised: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanoma patients with negative nodes after sentinel lymph node biopsy are a heterogeneous group. Current guidelines fail to adequately stratify surveillance and treatment for this group. Also, there is scarce data on adjuvant treatments for these patients. OBJECTIVE To create a nomogram including clinical and pathologic characteristics capable of evaluating the risk for recurrence of primary melanoma patients with negative sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs). METHODS We used a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent SLNB during 2000-2015 at a single institution. RESULTS Our cohort comprised 1213 patients. Among these patients, 967 (79.7%) had a negative SLNB, and mean follow-up was 59.67 months. There were 133 recurrences (13.8%); 45 (33.8%) presented with nodal recurrence, and 35 (26.3%) recurred where a SLNB was performed. Breslow thickness, ulceration, and microsatellitosis were found to be predictive of risk for recurrence at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years. LIMITATION Single center analysis. CONCLUSION We created a predictive nomogram for melanoma patients with negative SLNBs. This nomogram is easy to use and identifies high-risk patients who should have more strict surveillance and be considered for adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Bertolli
- Skin Cancer Department, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
1525
|
Pampena MB, Cartar HC, Cueto GR, Levy EM, Blanco PA, Barrio MM, Mordoh J. Dissecting the Immune Stimulation Promoted by CSF-470 Vaccine Plus Adjuvants in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients: Long Term Antitumor Immunity and Short Term Release of Acute Inflammatory Reactants. Front Immunol 2018; 9:2531. [PMID: 30450100 PMCID: PMC6224428 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
As cutaneous melanoma (CM) currently remains with a bleak prognosis, thorough investigation of new treatment options are of utmost relevance. In the phase II/III randomized clinical trial (CASVAC-0401), the repeated immunization of stages IIB-III CM patients with the irradiated, allogeneic cellular CSF-470 vaccine plus the adjuvants bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and recombinant human granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) demonstrated a significant benefit over IFN-alpha2B treatment in distant metastasis-free survival. Here we present on the short and long term immune monitoring results after completing the 2-year protocol; a continuation of the previous report by Mordoh et al. (1). We demonstrate that the repeated CSF-470 vaccinations stimulated a long term cellular and humoral immunity response directed against the vaccine antigens. In the case of 2 patients, we are able to show that a similar immune response was generated against autologous antigens. Evaluation of inhibitory receptor co-expression on patient's T cells indicates that the vaccination protocol did not stimulate T cell exhaustion. In order to better understand the basis for the efficacious vaccine responses observed, we investigated the short term immune events following vaccine injection. A significant increase in C-reactive protein (CRP) and IL-6 was observed 24 h after vaccination, with in vitro studies suggesting IL-6 production occurs in the vaccine site. We demonstrate that CRP enhances the cytotoxicity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) against melanoma cells in an in vitro model. Additionally, CRP stimulates the release of pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines from PBMC. As our results demonstrate that successive vaccinations with CSF-470 plus adjuvants promoted an increase in both anti-tumor innate and adaptive immunity, we propose a subsequent model of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María B Pampena
- Centro de Investigaciones Oncológicas-Fundación Cáncer, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Holliday C Cartar
- Centro de Investigaciones Oncológicas-Fundación Cáncer, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gerardo Rubén Cueto
- Grupo de Bioestadística Aplicada, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA-UBA/CONICET), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Estrella M Levy
- Centro de Investigaciones Oncológicas-Fundación Cáncer, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Paula A Blanco
- Centro de Investigaciones Oncológicas-Fundación Cáncer, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - María M Barrio
- Centro de Investigaciones Oncológicas-Fundación Cáncer, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - José Mordoh
- Centro de Investigaciones Oncológicas-Fundación Cáncer, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Department of Biotherapy, Instituto Alexander Fleming, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Fundación Instituto Leloir, IIBBA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
1526
|
Kudchadkar RR, Michielin O, van Akkooi ACJ. Practice-Changing Developments in Stage III Melanoma: Surgery, Adjuvant Targeted Therapy, and Immunotherapy. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2018; 38:759-762. [PMID: 30231370 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_200241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
In this article, we will focus on the practice-changing developments for stage III melanoma, from the use of the sentinel node (SN) biopsy to complete lymph node dissection (CLND) and upcoming adjuvant therapies. MSLT-1 (Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial-1) was the first and only prospective randomized controlled trial to examine whether the SN biopsy has any notable melanoma-specific survival benefit (primary endpoint). MSLT-1 randomly assigned 2,001 patients to undergo either wide local excision (WLE) and an SN biopsy or WLE and nodal observation. Two prospective randomized controlled trials have examined the potential benefit for immediate CLND versus delayed CLND after sequential observation. Both the DECOG-SLT and MSLT-2 trials failed to demonstrate a notable benefit for immediate CLND; therefore, sequential follow-up with ultrasonography and a delayed CLND in the case of relapse should be considered the new standard of care. The CheckMate 238 study demonstrated a notable benefit for adjuvant nivolumab in terms of 18-month relapse-free survival (RFS) rates compared with high-dose adjuvant ipilimumab. Single-agent adjuvant BRAF inhibition has been examined and failed to improve RFS. However, the COMBI-AD study did demonstrate a substantial benefit for combination BRAF and MEK inhibition for patients with BRAF-mutated resected stage IIIA to IIIC melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ragini R Kudchadkar
- From the Department of Hematology/Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Olivier Michielin
- From the Department of Hematology/Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- From the Department of Hematology/Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
1527
|
Amaria RN, Reddy SM, Tawbi HA, Davies MA, Ross MI, Glitza IC, Cormier JN, Lewis C, Hwu WJ, Hanna E, Diab A, Wong MK, Royal R, Gross N, Weber R, Lai SY, Ehlers R, Blando J, Milton DR, Woodman S, Kageyama R, Wells DK, Hwu P, Patel SP, Lucci A, Hessel A, Lee JE, Gershenwald J, Simpson L, Burton EM, Posada L, Haydu L, Wang L, Zhang S, Lazar AJ, Hudgens CW, Gopalakrishnan V, Reuben A, Andrews MC, Spencer CN, Prieto V, Sharma P, Allison J, Tetzlaff MT, Wargo JA. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma. Nat Med 2018; 24:1649-1654. [PMID: 30297909 PMCID: PMC6481682 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0197-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 609] [Impact Index Per Article: 87.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Preclinical studies suggest that treatment with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade is associated with enhanced survival and antigen-specific T cell responses compared with adjuvant treatment1; however, optimal regimens have not been defined. Here we report results from a randomized phase 2 study of neoadjuvant nivolumab versus combined ipilimumab with nivolumab in 23 patients with high-risk resectable melanoma ( NCT02519322 ). RECIST overall response rates (ORR), pathologic complete response rates (pCR), treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) and immune correlates of response were assessed. Treatment with combined ipilimumab and nivolumab yielded high response rates (RECIST ORR 73%, pCR 45%) but substantial toxicity (73% grade 3 trAEs), whereas treatment with nivolumab monotherapy yielded modest responses (ORR 25%, pCR 25%) and low toxicity (8% grade 3 trAEs). Immune correlates of response were identified, demonstrating higher lymphoid infiltrates in responders to both therapies and a more clonal and diverse T cell infiltrate in responders to nivolumab monotherapy. These results describe the feasibility of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma and emphasize the need for additional studies to optimize treatment regimens and to validate putative biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodabe N. Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sangeetha M. Reddy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hussein A. Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael A. Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Merrick I. Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Isabella C. Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Janice N. Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carol Lewis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wen-Jen Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ehab Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael K. Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neil Gross
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Randal Weber
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stephen Y. Lai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard Ehlers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jorge Blando
- Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Denái R. Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Scott Woodman
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robin Kageyama
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Danny K. Wells
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sapna P. Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amy Hessel
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey E. Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren Simpson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elizabeth M. Burton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Liberty Posada
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Linghua Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shaojun Zhang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | - Alexandre Reuben
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Miles C. Andrews
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Victor Prieto
- Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Genitourinary Cancers, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - James Allison
- Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael T. Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational and Molecular Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer A. Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1528
|
Ziogas DE, Kyrochristos ID, Roukos DH. Discovering novel valid biomarkers and drugs in patient-centric genomic trials: the new epoch of precision surgical oncology. Drug Discov Today 2018; 23:1848-1872. [PMID: 30077778 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2018] [Revised: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Despite standardization of multimodal treatment and approval of several targeted drugs for resectable, non-metastatic cancer (M0 patients), intrinsic and acquired resistance and relapse rates remain high, even in early-stage aggressive tumors. Genome analysis could overcome these unmet needs. Our comprehensive review underlines the controversy on stable or spatiotemporally evolving clones as well as promising yet inconclusive data on genome-based biomarkers and drug development. We propose clinicogenomic trials in M0 patients for the validation of intratumor heterogeneity (ITH), circulating genomic subclones (cGSs) and intra-patient genomic heterogeneity (IPGH) as biomarkers and simultaneous discovery of novel oncotargets. This evidence-based strategy highlights the coming of precision surgical oncology with a future perspective of understanding and disrupting deregulated transcriptional networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Demosthenes E Ziogas
- Centre for Biosystems and Genome Network Medicine, Ioannina University, Ioannina, Greece; Department of Surgery, 'G. Hatzikosta' General Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Ioannis D Kyrochristos
- Centre for Biosystems and Genome Network Medicine, Ioannina University, Ioannina, Greece; Department of Surgery, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Dimitrios H Roukos
- Centre for Biosystems and Genome Network Medicine, Ioannina University, Ioannina, Greece; Department of Surgery, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece; Department of Systems Biology, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens (BRFAA), Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
1529
|
Swetter SM, Tsao H, Bichakjian CK, Curiel-Lewandrowski C, Elder DE, Gershenwald JE, Guild V, Grant-Kels JM, Halpern AC, Johnson TM, Sober AJ, Thompson JA, Wisco OJ, Wyatt S, Hu S, Lamina T. Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 80:208-250. [PMID: 30392755 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.08.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 394] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Revised: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of primary cutaneous melanoma continues to increase each year. Melanoma accounts for the majority of skin cancer-related deaths, but treatment is usually curative following early detection of disease. In this American Academy of Dermatology clinical practice guideline, updated treatment recommendations are provided for patients with primary cutaneous melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer stages 0-IIC and pathologic stage III by virtue of a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy). Biopsy techniques for a lesion that is clinically suggestive of melanoma are reviewed, as are recommendations for the histopathologic interpretation of cutaneous melanoma. The use of laboratory, molecular, and imaging tests is examined in the initial work-up of patients with newly diagnosed melanoma and for follow-up of asymptomatic patients. With regard to treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma, recommendations for surgical margins and the concepts of staged excision (including Mohs micrographic surgery) and nonsurgical treatments for melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type (including topical imiquimod and radiation therapy), are updated. The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy as a staging technique for cutaneous melanoma is described, with recommendations for its use in clinical practice. Finally, current data regarding pregnancy and melanoma, genetic testing for familial melanoma, and management of dermatologic toxicities related to novel targeted agents and immunotherapies for patients with advanced disease are summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Swetter
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center and Cancer Institute, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
| | - Hensin Tsao
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher K Bichakjian
- Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski
- Division of Dermatology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
| | - David E Elder
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Jane M Grant-Kels
- Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut; Department of Pathology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut; Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut
| | - Allan C Halpern
- Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Timothy M Johnson
- Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Arthur J Sober
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John A Thompson
- Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Oliver J Wisco
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Shasa Hu
- Department of Dermatology, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida
| | - Toyin Lamina
- American Academy of Dermatology, Rosemont, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
1530
|
Wieland A, Kamphorst AO, Adsay NV, Masor JJ, Sarmiento J, Nasti TH, Darko S, Douek DC, Xue Y, Curran WJ, Lawson DH, Ahmed R. T cell receptor sequencing of activated CD8 T cells in the blood identifies tumor-infiltrating clones that expand after PD-1 therapy and radiation in a melanoma patient. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2018; 67:1767-1776. [PMID: 30167863 PMCID: PMC6196100 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-018-2228-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PD-1-targeted therapy has dramatically changed advanced cancer treatment. However, many questions remain, including specificity of T cells activated by PD-1 therapy and how peripheral blood analysis correlates to effects at tumor sites. In this study, we utilized TCR sequencing to dissect the composition of peripheral blood CD8 T cells activated upon therapy, comparing it with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. We report on a nonagenarian melanoma patient who showed a prominent increase in peripheral blood Ki-67 + CD8 T cells following brain stereotactic radiation and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Proliferating CD8 T cells exhibited an effector-like phenotype with expression of CD38, HLA-DR and Granzyme B, as well as expression of the positive costimulatory molecules CD28 and CD27. TCR sequencing of peripheral blood CD8 T cells revealed a highly oligoclonal repertoire at baseline with one clonotype accounting for 30%. However, the majority of dominant clones-including a previously identified cytomegalovirus-reactive clone-did not expand following treatment. In contrast, expanding clones were present at low frequencies in the peripheral blood but were enriched in a previously resected liver metastasis. The patient has so far remained recurrence-free for 36 months, and several CD8 T cell clones that expanded after treatment were maintained at elevated levels for at least 8 months. Our data show that even in a nonagenarian individual with oligoclonal expansion of CD8 T cells, we can identify activation of tumor-infiltrating CD8 T cell clones in peripheral blood following anti-PD-1-based immunotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Wieland
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory Vaccine Center, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, 1510 Clifton Road, Rm G209, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Alice O Kamphorst
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory Vaccine Center, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, 1510 Clifton Road, Rm G209, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences and Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - N Volkan Adsay
- Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
- Koç University Hospital, 34010, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jonathan J Masor
- Division of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Juan Sarmiento
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Tahseen H Nasti
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory Vaccine Center, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, 1510 Clifton Road, Rm G209, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Sam Darko
- Human Immunology Section, Vaccine Research Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Daniel C Douek
- Human Immunology Section, Vaccine Research Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Yue Xue
- Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - David H Lawson
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, 30322, GA, USA
| | - Rafi Ahmed
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory Vaccine Center, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, 1510 Clifton Road, Rm G209, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
1531
|
Indini A, Brecht I, Del Vecchio M, Sultan I, Signoroni S, Ferrari A. Cutaneous melanoma in adolescents and young adults. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27292. [PMID: 29968969 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is rare in children, but has greater incidence in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Diagnosis may be challenging due to its rarity in these age groups. Few studies have specifically addressed the topic of AYA melanoma. Though young-age melanoma may have particular biological characteristics, available data suggest that its clinical history is similar to that of adults. However, advances in treatment of adult melanoma have not been reflected in the treatment of AYAs. There is no standard treatment, and access to clinical trials is difficult for AYAs. Further efforts are needed to overcome these issues by improving cooperation with experts on adult melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Indini
- Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ines Brecht
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Michele Del Vecchio
- Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Iyad Sultan
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Stefano Signoroni
- Unit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumours, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
1532
|
McKean MA, Amaria RN. Multidisciplinary treatment strategies in high-risk resectable melanoma: Role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 70:144-153. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2018] [Revised: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
1533
|
Delman KA, Wong SL. Completion Node Dissection After Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma. JAMA Surg 2018; 153:1045-1046. [DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sandra L. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Department of Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
1534
|
Gonzalez A. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Past and Present Implications for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma with Nodal Metastasis. Am J Clin Dermatol 2018; 19:24-30. [PMID: 30374897 PMCID: PMC6244615 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-018-0379-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Although significant progress has been made in the understanding of melanoma pathophysiology and therapy, patients with metastatic melanoma still have a poor prognosis. The management of regional nodes remains a matter of debate. By replacing elective lymph node dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy has revolutionized the treatment of malignant melanoma. In this paper, the history of the procedure is traced, and the indication for completion lymphadenectomy after positive sentinel node biopsy is discussed in light of the recent studies that addressed this issue. The role of adjuvant therapies in the management of patients with stage III melanoma is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abel Gonzalez
- Mohs Surgery Unit, Institute of Oncology Angel H. Roffo, University of Buenos Aires, Av San Martin 5481, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- Unit of Cutaneous Oncology and Mohs Surgery, Institute Alexander Fleming, Conesa 1003, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
1535
|
Tio M, Rai R, Ezeoke OM, McQuade JL, Zimmer L, Khoo C, Park JJ, Spain L, Turajlic S, Ardolino L, Yip D, Goldinger SM, Cohen JV, Millward M, Atkinson V, Kane AY, Ascierto PA, Garbe C, Gutzmer R, Johnson DB, Rizvi HA, Joshua AM, Hellmann MD, Long GV, Menzies AM. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in patients with solid organ transplant, HIV or hepatitis B/C infection. Eur J Cancer 2018; 104:137-144. [PMID: 30347289 PMCID: PMC10176037 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy is now routinely used to treat several cancers. Clinical trials have excluded several populations, including patients with solid organ transplant, HIV infection and hepatitis B/C infection. We examined the safety outcomes of these populations treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment in a multicentre retrospective study. METHODS Patients from 16 centres with advanced cancer and solid organ transplant, HIV infection or hepatitis B/C infection were included. Demographic, tumour, treatment, toxicity and outcome data were recorded. RESULTS Forty-six patients were included for analysis, with a median age of 60 years, and the majority of patients diagnosed with melanoma (72%). Among six patients with solid organ transplants, two graft rejections occurred, with one resulting in death, whereas two patients achieved partial responses. There were four responses in 12 patients with HIV infection. In 14 patients with hepatitis B, there were three responses, and similarly, there were three responses in 14 patients with hepatitis C. There was no unexpected toxicity in any viral infection group or an increase in viral load. CONCLUSION Patients with HIV or hepatitis B/C infections treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy may respond to treatment without increased toxicity. Given the risk of graft rejection in solid organ transplant patients and also the potential for response, the role of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy needs to be carefully considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Tio
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Rajat Rai
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Lisa Zimmer
- University of Duisburg-Essen Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Chloe Khoo
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John J Park
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia; Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lavinia Spain
- Skin and Renal Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Samra Turajlic
- Skin and Renal Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | | | - Desmond Yip
- The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia; ANU Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Alisa Y Kane
- Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Garvan Institute, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Hira A Rizvi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Anthony M Joshua
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia; St Vincents Hospital, Sydney, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
1536
|
Wang DY, Mooradian MJ, Kim D, Shah NJ, Fenton SE, Conry RM, Mehta R, Silk AW, Zhou A, Compton ML, Al-Rohil RN, Lee S, Voorhees AL, Ha L, McKee S, Norrell JT, Mehnert J, Puzanov I, Sosman JA, Chandra S, Gibney GT, Rapisuwon S, Eroglu Z, Sullivan R, Johnson DB. Clinical characterization of colitis arising from anti-PD-1 based therapy. Oncoimmunology 2018; 8:e1524695. [PMID: 30546965 PMCID: PMC6287774 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2018.1524695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Revised: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Colitis is a frequent, clinically-significant immune-related adverse event caused by anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1). The clinical features, timing, and management of colitis with anti-PD-1-based regimens are not well-characterized. Patients with advanced melanoma that received either anti-PD-1 monotherapy ("monotherapy") or combined with ipilimumab ("combination therapy") were screened from 8 academic medical centers, to identify those with clinically-relevant colitis (colitis requiring systemic steroids). Of 1261 patients who received anti-PD-1-based therapy, 109 experienced colitis. The incidence was 3.2% (30/937) and 24.4% (79/324) in the monotherapy and combination therapy cohorts, respectively. Patients with colitis from combination therapy had significantly earlier symptom onset (7.2 weeks vs 25.4 weeks, p < 0.0001), received higher steroid doses (median prednisone equivalent 1.5 mg/kg vs 1.0 mg/kg, p = 0.0015) and experienced longer steroid tapers (median 6.0 vs 4.0 weeks, p = 0.0065) compared to monotherapy. Infliximab use and steroid-dose escalation occurred more frequently in the combination therapy cohort compared to monotherapy. Nearly all patients had resolution of their symptoms although one patient died from complications. Anti-PD-1 associated colitis has a variable clinical presentation, and is more frequent and severe when associated with combination therapy. This variability in checkpoint-inhibitor associated colitis suggests that further optimization of treatment algorithms is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Y Wang
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA,CONTACT Douglas B. Johnson Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2220 Pierce Ave, 777 Preston Research Bldg. Nashville TN 37232
| | | | - DaeWon Kim
- Department of Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Neil J Shah
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University-Lombardi Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sarah E Fenton
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Robert M Conry
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rutika Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, IL, USA
| | - Ann W. Silk
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Alice Zhou
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Margaret L Compton
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Rami N Al-Rohil
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sunyoung Lee
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, IL, USA
| | | | - Lisa Ha
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Svetlana McKee
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jacqueline T Norrell
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Janice Mehnert
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, IL, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Sosman
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Geoffrey T Gibney
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University-Lombardi Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Suthee Rapisuwon
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University-Lombardi Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Zeynep Eroglu
- Department of Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ryan Sullivan
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
1537
|
Middleton MR. Long-term survival with anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy, but what is the best approach? Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:1424-1426. [PMID: 30361171 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30753-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark R Middleton
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
1538
|
Abstract
Early-stage non-small cell lung cancer is a potentially curable disease, but with relapse rates exceeding 50% with standard treatments, this is a patient population in critical need of therapy innovation. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade has revolutionized the treatment strategy for advanced lung cancer. However, the role of this therapy in earlier-stage disease is largely unknown. The study of immunotherapy in earlier-stage disease has many advantages, including assessment of pathologic response and incorporation of translational scientific analyses to evaluate antitumor immune responses. Multiple clinical trials are currently under way, with promising early results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Rosner
- Upper Aerodigestive Division, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA; , ,
| | - Joshua E Reuss
- Upper Aerodigestive Division, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA; , ,
| | - Patrick M Forde
- Upper Aerodigestive Division, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA; , ,
| |
Collapse
|
1539
|
Tarhini A, Lin Y, Lin H, Rahman Z, Vallabhaneni P, Mendiratta P, Pingpank JF, Holtzman MP, Yusko EC, Rytlewski JA, Rao UNM, Ferris RL, Kirkwood JM. Neoadjuvant ipilimumab (3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg) and high dose IFN-α2b in locally/regionally advanced melanoma: safety, efficacy and impact on T-cell repertoire. J Immunother Cancer 2018; 6:112. [PMID: 30352626 PMCID: PMC6199801 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-018-0428-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant immunotherapy utilizing novel combinations has the potential to transform the standard of care for locally/regionally advanced melanoma. We hypothesized that neoadjuvant ipilimumab in combination with high dose IFNα2b (HDI) is safe and associated with durable pathologic complete responses (pCR). METHODS Patients with locally/regionally advanced melanoma were randomized to ipilimumab 3 or 10 mg/kg × 4 doses bracketing definitive surgery, then every 12 weeks × 4. HDI was given concurrently. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination with ipilimumab 3 or 10 mg/kg. The impact on T-cell fraction and clonality were investigated in tumor and blood. RESULTS Thirty patients (age 37-76), 15 each at 3 and 10 mg/kg, 18 male and 12 female were treated. Considering immune related adverse events (irAEs) of interest, more grade 3/4 irAEs were seen with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus 3 mg/kg (p = 0.042). Among 28 evaluable patients, 11 relapsed, of whom 5 died. Median follow-up for 17 patients who have not relapsed was 32 months. The radiologic preoperative response rate was 36% (95% CI, 21-54); 4 patients at ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and 6 at 10 mg/kg and 2 (at 10 mg/kg) later relapsed. The pCR was 32% (95% CI, 18-51); 5 patients at ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and 4 at 10 mg/kg and one (at 3 mg/kg) had a late relapse. In patients with pCR, T-cell fraction was significantly higher when measured in primary melanoma tumors (p = 0.033). Higher tumor T-cell clonality in primary tumor and more so following neoadjuvant therapy was significantly associated with improved relapse free survival. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant ipilimumab-HDI was relatively safe and exhibited promising tumor response rates with an associated measurable impact on T-cell fraction and clonality. Most pCRs were durable supporting the value of pCR as a primary endpoint in neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01608594 . Registered 31 May 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Tarhini
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA. .,Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, 9500 Euclid Ave CA6-157, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| | - Yan Lin
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Huang Lin
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA
| | | | | | - Prateek Mendiratta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, 9500 Euclid Ave CA6-157, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
1540
|
Solinas C, Porcu M, De Silva P, Musi M, Aspeslagh S, Scartozzi M, Willard-Gallo K, Mariotti S, Saba L. Cancer immunotherapy-associated hypophysitis. Semin Oncol 2018; 45:181-186. [PMID: 30352754 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2018.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2018] [Revised: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Side effects of immune checkpoint blockade are often said to be infrequent and usually mild. The uniqueness of endocrine immune-related adverse events is their non-reversibility, with incidence and prevalence destined to increase in the coming years, particularly if immunotherapy is used at earlier stages of neoplastic disease. Immune-related hypophysitis is one of these observed endocrine adverse events. It is often difficult to diagnose, sometimes occurring without specific symptoms. It can lead to irreversibly altered functioning of diverse endocrine glands. Radiographically, the differential diagnosis of hypophysitis includes pituitary apoplexy and primary and secondary neoplastic lesions. Immune-related hypophysitis is most common with single-agent anti-CTLA-4, followed by the combination of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1, while occurs infrequently when anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 agents are administered alone. Hypophysitis with immune checkpoint blockade requires early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. Patients can present with headache, visual disturbances or other endocrine-related syndromes or they can be asymptomatic. The manifestation of symptoms should prompt blood analysis and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Imaging is important to exclude secondary meningeal or parenchymal lesions. Management should include discontinuation of the immune checkpoint blockade, initiation of corticosteroid therapy and eventually hormone replacement therapy. Hypophysitis impacts treatment of the disease and usually requires long-term management of this irreversible side effect. A multidisciplinary team approach is merited to insure the correct diagnosis and management of immune-related hypophysitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Solinas
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium; Deparment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Hospital of Aosta, Italy.
| | - Michele Porcu
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| | - Pushpamali De Silva
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Marco Musi
- Deparment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Hospital of Aosta, Italy.
| | - Sandrine Aspeslagh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Mario Scartozzi
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Cagliari, Cagliari Italy.
| | - Karen Willard-Gallo
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Stefano Mariotti
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital of Cagliari,Cagliari Italy.
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
1541
|
Verver D, van Klaveren D, Franke V, van Akkooi ACJ, Rutkowski P, Keilholz U, Eggermont AMM, Nijsten T, Grünhagen DJ, Verhoef C. Development and validation of a nomogram to predict recurrence and melanoma-specific mortality in patients with negative sentinel lymph nodes. Br J Surg 2018; 106:217-225. [PMID: 30307046 PMCID: PMC6585628 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Revised: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients with melanoma and negative sentinel nodes (SNs) have varying outcomes, dependent on several prognostic factors. Considering all these factors in a prediction model might aid in identifying patients who could benefit from a personalized treatment strategy. The objective was to construct and validate a nomogram for recurrence and melanoma‐specific mortality (MSM) in patients with melanoma and negative SNs. Methods A total of 3220 patients with negative SNs were identified from a cohort of 4124 patients from four EORTC Melanoma Group centres who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy. Prognostic factors for recurrence and MSM were studied with Cox regression analysis. Significant factors were incorporated in the models. Performance was assessed by discrimination (c‐index) and calibration in cross‐validation across the four centres. A nomogram was developed for graphical presentation. Results There were 3180 eligible patients. The final prediction model for recurrence and the calibrated model for MSM included three independent prognostic factors: ulceration, anatomical location and Breslow thickness. The c‐index was 0·74 for recurrence and 0·76 for the calibrated MSM model. Cross‐validation across the four centres showed reasonable model performance. A nomogram was developed based on these models. One‐third of the patients had a 5‐year recurrence probability of 8·2 per cent or less, and one‐third had a recurrence probability of 23·0 per cent or more. Conclusion A nomogram for predicting recurrence and MSM in patients with melanoma and negative SNs was constructed and validated. It could provide personalized estimates useful for tailoring surveillance strategies (reduce or increase intensity), and selection of patients for adjuvant therapy or clinical trials. Could personalize care
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Verver
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D van Klaveren
- Medical Statistics, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - V Franke
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A C J van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| | - U Keilholz
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - A M M Eggermont
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - T Nijsten
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
1542
|
Gong J, Hendifar A, Tuli R, Chuang J, Cho M, Chung V, Li D, Salgia R. Combination systemic therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors in pancreatic cancer: overcoming resistance to single-agent checkpoint blockade. Clin Transl Med 2018; 7:32. [PMID: 30294755 PMCID: PMC6174117 DOI: 10.1186/s40169-018-0210-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated broad single-agent antitumor activity and a favorable safety profile that render them attractive agents to combine with other systemic anticancer therapies. Pancreatic cancer has been fairly resistant to monotherapy blockade of programmed cell death protein 1 receptor, programmed death ligand 1, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4. However, there is a growing body of preclinical evidence to support the rational combination of checkpoint inhibitors and various systemic therapies in pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, early clinical evidence has begun to support the feasibility and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. Despite accumulating preclinical and clinical data, there remains several questions as to the optimal dosing and timing of administration of respective agents, toxicity of combination strategies, and mechanisms by which immune resistance to single-agent checkpoint blockade are overcome. Further development of biomarkers is also important in the advancement of combination systemic therapies incorporating checkpoint blockade in pancreatic cancer. Results from an impressive number of ongoing prospective clinical trials are eagerly anticipated and will seek to validate the viability of combination immuno-oncology strategies in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Gong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Malignancies, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, AC 1042C, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Andrew Hendifar
- Department of Gastrointestinal Malignancies, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, AC 1042C, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Richard Tuli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, AC 1023, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Jeremy Chuang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 W Carson St, Box 400, Torrance, CA, 90509, USA
| | - May Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4501 X Street, Ste 3016, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA
| | - Vincent Chung
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Bldg 51, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Daneng Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Bldg 51, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Ravi Salgia
- Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Building 51, Room 101, 1500 E Duarte St, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
1543
|
Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma. Nat Med 2018; 24:1655-1661. [PMID: 30297911 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0198-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 625] [Impact Index Per Article: 89.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Adjuvant ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) both improve relapse-free survival of stage III melanoma patients1,2. In stage IV disease, the combination of ipilimumab + nivolumab is superior to ipilimumab alone and also appears to be more effective than nivolumab monotherapy3. Preclinical work suggests that neoadjuvant application of checkpoint inhibitors may be superior to adjuvant therapy4. To address this question and to test feasibility, 20 patients with palpable stage III melanoma were 1:1 randomized to receive ipilimumab 3 mg kg-1 and nivolumab 1 mg kg-1, as either four courses after surgery (adjuvant arm) or two courses before surgery and two courses postsurgery (neoadjuvant arm). Neoadjuvant therapy was feasible, with all patients undergoing surgery at the preplanned time point. However in both arms, 9/10 patients experienced one or more grade 3/4 adverse events. Pathological responses were achieved in 7/9 (78%) patients treated in the neoadjuvant arm. None of these patients have relapsed so far (median follow-up, 25.6 months). We found that neoadjuvant ipilimumab + nivolumab expand more tumor-resident T cell clones than adjuvant application. While neoadjuvant therapy appears promising, with the current regimen it induced high toxicity rates; therefore, it needs further investigation to preserve efficacy but reduce toxicity.
Collapse
|
1544
|
Brancaccio G, Napolitano S, Troiani T, Franco R, Iovino F, Reginelli A, Ciardiello F, Argenziano G. Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma classification: what about stage IIC? Br J Dermatol 2018; 179:1422-1423. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- G. Brancaccio
- Dermatology Unit; Department of Internal & Experimental Medicine ‘F Magrassi’; University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’; Via Pansini 5 80131 Naples Italy
| | - S. Napolitano
- Oncology Unit; Department of Internal & Experimental Medicine ‘F Magrassi’; University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’; Via Pansini 5 80131 Naples Italy
| | - T. Troiani
- Oncology Unit; Department of Internal & Experimental Medicine ‘F Magrassi’; University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’; Via Pansini 5 80131 Naples Italy
| | - R. Franco
- Pathology Unit; Department of Cardiothoracic and Respiratory Science; University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’; Via Pansini 5 80131 Naples Italy
| | - F. Iovino
- Division of General Surgery; Department of Cardiothoracic and Respiratory Science; University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’; Via Pansini 5 80131 Naples Italy
| | - A. Reginelli
- Department of Radiology & Radiotherapy, Department of Internal & Experimental Medicine ‘F Magrassi’; University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’; Via Pansini 5 80131 Naples Italy
| | - F. Ciardiello
- Oncology Unit; Department of Internal & Experimental Medicine ‘F Magrassi’; University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’; Via Pansini 5 80131 Naples Italy
| | - G. Argenziano
- Dermatology Unit; Department of Internal & Experimental Medicine ‘F Magrassi’; University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’; Via Pansini 5 80131 Naples Italy
| |
Collapse
|
1545
|
Komiya T, Huang CH. Updates in the Clinical Development of Epacadostat and Other Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1 Inhibitors (IDO1) for Human Cancers. Front Oncol 2018; 8:423. [PMID: 30338242 PMCID: PMC6180183 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent application of immunotherapy in clinical oncology revolutionized our management of advanced human cancers. Check point inhibitors targeting CTLA4 and PD-1/PD-L1 axis are immunotherapeutic agents currently available to treat a variety of cancers. However, a novel therapeutic approach is needed to further improve patient outcome with these agents. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is a rate-limiting enzyme in the metabolism of essential amino acid tryptophan in the peripheral tissue. IDO1 is overexpressed in human cancer cells and suppresses effector T cell function and promotes regulatory T cells (Tregs). Overexpression of IDO1 is associated with poor patient survival in several types of human cancer. These findings indicate that IDO1 is a promising target that can improve the treatment outcome in the field of Immuno-oncology. Several orally available IDO1 inhibitors including Epacadostat have entered human clinical trials over the last few years without a major safety concern. Although there is no objective response in single-agent trials, combination regimens with PD-1 inhibitors appear to exceed the activity of PD-1 inhibitors alone. Recent phase III ECHO 301 trial testing the combination of Epacadostat with Pembrolizumab in melanoma did not show superior outcome compared to Pembrolizumab alone. This lead to halting of other phase III trials using IDO1 inhibitors. In this minireview, we will discuss the recent clinical development of Epacadostat and other IDO1 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chao H Huang
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Fairway, KS, United States.,Subspecialty Medicine, Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
1546
|
Zhao B, Zhao H, Zhao J. Serious adverse events and fatal adverse events associated with nivolumab treatment in cancer patients : Nivolumab-related serious/fatal adverse events. J Immunother Cancer 2018; 6:101. [PMID: 30285872 PMCID: PMC6171173 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-018-0421-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, has revolutionized the treatment of many cancers. Due to its novel mechanisms of action, nivolumab induces a distinct profile of adverse events. Currently, the incidence and risk of developing serious adverse events (SAEs) or fatal adverse events (FAEs) following nivolumab administration are unclear. Methods We conducted a systematic search for phase 2 and phase 3 nivolumab trials in PubMed and Embase from inception to June 2018. Data on SAEs/FAEs were extracted from each study and pooled to calculate the overall incidence and odds ratios (ORs). Results A total of 21 trials with 6173 cancer patients were included in this study. The overall incidence of SAEs and FAEs with nivolumab were 11.2% (95% CI, 8.7–13.8%) and 0.3% (95% CI, 0.1–0.5%), respectively. The incidence of SAEs varied significantly with cancer type and clinical phase, but no evidence of heterogeneity was found for FAEs. Compared with conventional treatment, the administration of nivolumab did not increase the risk of SAEs (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.34–1.40; p = 0.29) or FAEs (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.27–1.39; p = 0.24). SAEs occurred in the major organ systems in a dispersed manner, with the most common toxicities appearing in the respiratory (21.4%), gastrointestinal (7.7%), and hepatic systems (6.6%). The most common cause of SAEs/FAEs was pneumonitis. Conclusions Although nivolumab is a relatively safe antitumor agent, nononcologists should be advised of the potential adverse events. Additionally, future studies are needed to identify patients at high risk of SAEs/FAEs to aid in the development of optimal monitoring strategies and the exploration of treatments to decrease the risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Zhao
- The Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
| | - Hong Zhao
- The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
| | - Jiaxin Zhao
- The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
1547
|
Hieken TJ, Kane JM, Wong SL. The Role of Completion Lymph Node Dissection for Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:1028-1034. [PMID: 30284132 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6812-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE AND METHODS Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive melanoma patients has been guideline-concordant standard of care since adoption of lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy for the management of clinically node-negative melanoma patients more than 20 years ago. However, a trend for omission of CLND has been observed over the past decade, and we now have randomized, controlled clinical trial data to help guide treatment recommendations. Publication of these data prompted an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Society of Surgical Oncology 2018 clinical practice guideline update for these patients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Systematic review of current evidence supports a selective, individualized approach to CLND for SLN-positive melanoma. For low-risk, low-volume micrometastatic disease, SLN biopsy may be both diagnostic and therapeutic, and close clinical follow-up with imaging or CLND are reasonable options for appropriately selected patients. For higher-risk patients, omission of CLND requires careful consideration of risks versus benefits, relevant histopathology, and individualized patient discussion. This should address patient comorbidities and life expectancy, the predicted likelihood of additional positive nodes, availability of imaging surveillance, likelihood of adherence to imaging and clinical follow-up, consequences of regional recurrence, and the prognostic value of complete nodal staging and its impact on adjuvant therapy recommendations or clinical trial participation. Data on long-term outcomes, cost, and patient-reported quality of life measures are not yet available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - John M Kane
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Sandra L Wong
- Department of Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1548
|
Richtig G, Hoeller C, Wolf M, Wolf I, Rainer BM, Schulter G, Richtig M, Grübler MR, Gappmayer A, Haidn T, Kofler J, Huegel R, Lange-Asschenfeldt B, Pichler M, Pilz S, Heinemann A, Richtig E. Body mass index may predict the response to ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: An observational multi-centre study. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0204729. [PMID: 30273398 PMCID: PMC6166940 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Immunotherapy is a well-established treatment option in patients with metastatic melanoma. However, biomarkers that can be used to predict a response in these patients have not yet been found, putting patients at risk of severe side effects. Methods In this retrospective analysis, we investigated the association between the body mass index and ipilimumab treatment response in patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients with metastatic melanoma who received a monotherapy of up to 4 doses of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) every 3 weeks from 2011 to 2014 in three major hospitals in Austria were included. Patients were classified into two groups: normal group (BMI<25) and overweight group (BMI≥25). Results 40 patients had a normal BMI, and 36 had a BMI above normal. Patients with a BMI that was above normal showed significantly higher response rates (p = 0.024, χ2), and lower likelihood of brain metastases (p = 0.012, χ2). No differences were found between both groups with respect to gender (p = 0.324, χ2), T-stage (p = 0.197, χ2), or the occurrence of side effects (p = 0.646, χ2). Patients with a BMI above normal showed a trend towards longer overall survival (p = 0.056, Log-Rank), but no difference was found regarding progression-free survival (p = 0.924, Log-Rank). Conclusions The BMI correlated with the response to ipilimumab treatment in a cohort of metastatic melanoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Richtig
- Otto Loewi Research Center, Pharmacology Section, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- * E-mail:
| | - Christoph Hoeller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Wolf
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Department of Dermatology, State Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Ingrid Wolf
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Barbara M. Rainer
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Günter Schulter
- Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology Unit, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Markus Richtig
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Martin R. Grübler
- Swiss Cardiovascular Center Bern, Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Anna Gappmayer
- Department of Dermatology, State Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Thomas Haidn
- Department of Dermatology, State Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Julian Kofler
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, State Hospital Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria
| | - Rainer Huegel
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, State Hospital Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria
| | - Bernhard Lange-Asschenfeldt
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, State Hospital Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria
- Skin Cancer Center Charité, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Pichler
- Division of Oncology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Stefan Pilz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Akos Heinemann
- Otto Loewi Research Center, Pharmacology Section, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Erika Richtig
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
1549
|
van Willigen WW, Bloemendal M, Gerritsen WR, Schreibelt G, de Vries IJM, Bol KF. Dendritic Cell Cancer Therapy: Vaccinating the Right Patient at the Right Time. Front Immunol 2018; 9:2265. [PMID: 30327656 PMCID: PMC6174277 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors propelled the field of oncology with clinical responses in many different tumor types. Superior overall survival over chemotherapy has been reported in various metastatic cancers. Furthermore, prolonged disease-free and overall survival have been reported in the adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma. Unfortunately, a substantial portion of patients do not obtain a durable response. Therefore, additional strategies for the treatment of cancer are still warranted. One of the numerous options is dendritic cell vaccination, which employs the central role of dendritic cells in activating the innate and adaptive immune system. Over the years, dendritic cell vaccination was shown to be able to induce an immunologic response, to increase the number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and to provide overall survival benefit for at least a selection of patients in phase II studies. However, with the success of immune checkpoint inhibition in several malignancies and considering the plethora of other treatment modalities being developed, it is of utmost importance to delineate the position of dendritic cell therapy in the treatment landscape of cancer. In this review, we address some key questions regarding the integration of dendritic cell vaccination in future cancer treatment paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter W van Willigen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Martine Bloemendal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Winald R Gerritsen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Gerty Schreibelt
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - I Jolanda M de Vries
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Kalijn F Bol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
1550
|
Challenges and Opportunities of Neoadjuvant Treatment in Locally Advanced Melanoma. Am J Clin Dermatol 2018; 19:639-646. [PMID: 30039289 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-018-0371-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Locally advanced and metastatic melanoma have historically had poor survival outcomes. Long-term follow-up of both targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors has confirmed the survival benefit of these agents in stage IV melanoma, and recent studies have now demonstrated relapse-free survival benefits from these targeted and immunotherapeutic agents in the adjuvant setting. Neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced melanoma, including in-transit disease, is now under investigation. Clinical trials have shown early promising results using either combination targeted therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Neoadjuvant treatment may improve surgical morbidity, but balancing treatment efficacy and toxicity has already been challenging in the use of combination immune checkpoint inhibitors preoperatively. While improvement in relapse-free survival has been noted, additional follow-up of patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment will be necessary to report on long-term outcomes. Neoadjuvant treatment also provides additional translational research opportunities to determine predictive biomarkers for targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Evidence of early resistance to treatment may also lead to novel combination therapies to explore in future clinical trials. While neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced melanoma has exciting potential, more investigation is necessary to determine efficacious regimens with manageable toxicities.
Collapse
|