Three- vs four-drug antiretroviral regimens for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomized controlled trial

Antiretroviral treatment regimen outcomes among HIV-infected prisoners

BACKGROUND

Despite the high prevalence of HIV in correctional settings, the duration of therapy and response to various highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens in this setting is unknown.

METHOD

Using a retrospective cohort study (1997-2002) of HIV-infected prisoners in Connecticut that linked demographic, pharmacy, and laboratory data, we compared HIV-1 RNA (VL) and CD4 lymphocyte responses to four treatment strategies at baseline and at the end of incarceration.

RESULTS

Using an analysis of 1,044 incarceration periods or 1,099 subjects for whom 6 months of continuous data were available, HAART regimens that included a triple NRTI, two NRTIs + either a PI or NNRTI, or a three-class (NRTI+NNRTI+PI) strategy demonstrated no difference in virological and immunological outcomes. The proportion of subjects who were initiated with NRTI, NNRTI, PI, or three-class regimens were 14%, 32%, 46%, and 8%, respectively. For all study groups, the mean change from baseline in CD4 and VL was +74 cells/muL and -0.93 log(10) copies/mL (p < .0001), respectively. Overall, 59% of subjects had an HIV-1 RNA level below the level of detection (<400 copies/mL) by the end of their incarceration. Using Kaplan-Meier curves to examine the time to change in the initial HAART strategy over the incarceration period, the three-class strategy was significantly more likely to be changed earlier than all others (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Although the three-class strategy was less durable, initiating HAART with any strategy resulted in similar and impressive virological and immunological outcomes by the end of incarceration, further supporting prison as an important site for the initiation and provision of effective antiretroviral therapy.

Drug hypersensitivity in HIV

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Drug hypersensitivity has been reported to occur 100 times more commonly in those living with HIV. In the first decade of HIV treatment, this mainly involved drugs used to treat HIV-related infections but now primarily includes drugs used to treat HIV. This review focuses on the current knowledge of the epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical features of drug hypersensitivity reactions of drugs used in the management of the HIV-infected patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our understanding of the immunogenetics and host predisposition to drug hypersensitivity has been advanced considerably by the antiretroviral drugs abacavir and nevirapine. The association of abacavir hypersensitivity reaction with HLA-B*5701 has been particularly important and provides a basis for genetic screening in the clinic setting.

SUMMARY

The increased predisposition of drug hypersensitivity disease in HIV will continue to provide a fertile ground for study of the diverse and complex processes that drive its pathophysiology. Our knowledge of drug hypersensitivity will also increase as the expanding armentarium of antiretroviral therapy is applied to more diverse populations in the developing world. The potential for widespread implementation of HLA-B*5701 screening for abacavir hypersensitivity will set an important precedent for bringing individualized medicine to the clinic and the use of genetic testing to improve drug safety.

Strategies for the optimal sequencing of antiretroviral drugs toward overcoming and preventing drug resistance

Drug regimens now offer more potent, less toxic and more durable choices in the treatment of HIV disease than ever before. This has led to a need to consider the convenient, sequential use of active antiretroviral combinations. Ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) can now be potentially sequenced in a manner that uses the least cross-resistance-prone PI at the start of therapy while leaving the most cross-resistance-prone drug for later, if the latter retains activity against commonly observed drug-resistant forms. Similarly, such new drugs as tenofovir, abacavir and emtricitabine, which make up current nucleoside backbone options, can be potentially sequenced, since each of them selects for an individual pattern of resistance mutations that are generally distinct from those selected by previously popular thymidine analogs such as zidovudine and stavudine.

Antiretroviral Treatment Strategies and Immune Reconstitution in Treatment-naive HIV-Infected Patients with Advanced Disease

Treatment-naïve advanced HIV-infected patients have a lower life expectancy than those treated early with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Early treatment allows greater immunological recovery, a reduction of AIDS progression, a reduced risk of related illnesses, and lower mortality compared with HAART initiation in advanced disease. Given the numbers with advanced disease worldwide and the high cost of care, strategies encouraging early detection may be life saving and cost effective. Factors associated with increased clinical progression include higher baseline HIV viral load and older age, emphasizing the need for early viral load suppression. HAART initiation faces many challenges; interactions between antiretroviral agents and drugs used to treat life-threatening opportunistic infections may cause subtherapeutic antiretroviral exposure and the development of resistance or supratherapeutic levels resulting in adverse effects. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome can be another cause of suboptimal outcomes. The management of patients with advanced HIV infection should include rapid short-term immune reconstitution to limit the risk of disease progression plus aggressive antiviral treatment to achieve rapid virological suppression. Clear evidence on the optimal regimen and agents to use to target advanced HIV disease is lacking. Therefore, antiretroviral treatment for these patients has to be carefully tailored to the individual according to many variables.

CD4+ T-Cell Count Increase in HIV-1-Infected Patients with Suppressed Viral Load Within 1 year after start of antiretroviral therapy

Background

CD4+ T-cell recovery in patients with continuous suppression of plasma HIV-1 viral load (VL) is highly variable. This study aimed to identify predictive factors for long-term CD4+ T-cell increase in treatment-naive patients starting combination antiretroviral therapy (cART).

Methods

Treatment-naive patients in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study reaching two VL measurements <50 copies/ml >3 months apart during the 1st year of cART were included ( n=1,816 patients). We studied CD4+ T-cell dynamics until the end of suppression or up to 5 years, subdivided into three periods: 1st year, years 2–3 and years 4–5 of suppression. Multiple median regression adjusted for repeated CD4+T-cell measurements was used to study the dependence of CD4+ T-cell slopes on clinical covariates and drug classes.

Results

Median CD4+ T-cell increases following VL suppression were 87, 52 and 19 cells/μl per year in the three periods. In the multiple regression model, median CD4+ T-cell increases over all three periods were significantly higher for female gender, lower age, higher VL at cART start, CD4+ T-cell <650 cells/μ l at start of the period and low CD4+ T-cell increase in the previous period. Patients on tenofovir showed significantly lower CD4+T-cell increases compared with stavudine.

Conclusions

In our observational study, long-term CD4+ T-cell increase in drug-naive patients with suppressed VL was higher in regimens without tenofovir. The clinical relevance of these findings must be confirmed in, ideally, clinical trials or large, collaborative cohort projects but could influence treatment of older patients and those starting cART at low CD4+ T-cell levels.

Efficacy and safety of TMC125 (etravirine) in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients in DUET-2: 24-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

TMC125 (etravirine) is a non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) with activity against NNRTI-resistant HIV-1 in phase IIb trials. The aim of DUET-2 is to examine the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of TMC125 in treatment-experienced patients.

METHODS

In this continuing randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial, HIV-1-infected patients on failing antiretroviral therapy with evidence of resistance to currently available NNRTIs and at least three primary protease inhibitor mutations were eligible for enrolment if on stable (8 weeks unchanged) antiretroviral therapy with plasma HIV-1 RNA greater than 5000 copies per mL. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either TMC125 (200 mg) or placebo, each given twice daily with darunavir-ritonavir, investigator-selected nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and optional enfuvirtide. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with confirmed viral load below 50 copies per mL at week 24 (FDA time-to-loss of virological response algorithm). Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00255099.

FINDINGS

591 patients were randomised and treated (295 patients in the TMC125 group and 296 in the placebo group). By week 24, 51 (17%) patients in the TMC125 group and 73 (25%) in the placebo group had discontinued, mainly because of virological failure. 183 (62%) patients in the TMC125 group and 129 (44%) in the placebo group achieved confirmed viral load below 50 copies per mL at week 24 (difference 18%, 95% CI 11-26; p=0.0003). The type and frequency of adverse events were much the same in the two groups.

INTERPRETATION

In treatment-experienced patients, treatment with TMC125 led to better virological suppression at week 24 than did placebo. The safety and tolerability profile of TMC125 was generally comparable with placebo.

Metabolic effects of protease inhibitor-sparing antiretroviral regimens given as initial treatment of HIV-1 Infection (AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5095)

OBJECTIVE

To assess metabolic changes after initiation of protease inhibitor (PI)-sparing regimens in antiretroviral-naive patients.

METHODS

Metabolic changes were analyzed within the triple-nucleoside (zidovudine [ZDV]/lamivudine [3TC]/abacavir [ABC])-containing, 3-drug efavirenz (EFV) [ZDV/3TC + EFV]-containing, and 4-drug EFV [ZDV/3TC/ABC + EFV]-containing arms of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group multicenter trial A5095. Metabolic values were compared with published US general population norms.

RESULTS

From week 0 to week 24, all arms exhibited similar mild median increases in glucose and decreases in insulin sensitivity, whereas changes in lipids were greater in the ZDV/3TC + EFV and ZDV/3TC/ABC + EFV arms than in the ZDV/3TC/ABC arm: triglyceride (TG; 7, 18, and -1 mg/dL, respectively), total cholesterol (TC; 23, 28, and 5 mg/dL, respectively), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; 9, 14, and 1 mg/dL, respectively), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C; 10, 10, and 5 mg/dL, respectively). Adjusted mean study lipid values of all study participants at week 0 and week 96 compared with those of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999 through 2002 values were: TG (148, 187, and 123 mg/dL, respectively), TC (164, 195, and 203 mg/dL, respectively), HDL-C (35, 47, and 51 mg/dL, respectively), and LDL-C (101, 117, and 123 mg/dL, respectively) (P < or = 0.005 for each value vs. NHANES values).

CONCLUSIONS

Similar mild increases in glucose and decreases in insulin sensitivity were observed in all regimens, whereas lipids were modestly higher in the EFV-containing arms. Compared with general population norms, the metabolic dysfunctions of concern after these PI-sparing therapies were increasingly abnormal TC and lower (but improved relative to baseline) HDL-C levels.

Antiretroviral management of treatment-naive patients

Antiretroviral management of treatment-naive patients begins with the decision of when to start treatment. Current treatment guidelines suggest starting therapy in anyone with AIDS, HIV-related symptoms, or a CD4 cell count less than 200/mm3 regardless of symptoms. Starting treatment in asymptomatic patients with CD4 of more than 200 requires consideration of a number of pros and cons, and individualization is the key. Recommended first-line antiretroviral regimens consist of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors together with either a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or a protease inhibitor (with or without ritonavir boosting). The goal of antiretroviral therapy is maximally to suppress viremia, enhance or improve immune function, and prevent clinical progression.

Reaching undetectable viral loads after initial HIV treatment

An HIV patient’s chance for long-term treatment success is maximized when their first-line regimen produces an undetectable viral load. A persistently detectable viral load leads to the development of resistance and subsequent immunological and virological failure. It is important to select a regimen with excellent efficacy, tolerability and toxicity profile that is also easy to administer. Tenofovir/emtricitabine provides an effective and well-tolerated nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) combination. Regimens with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are superior to ritonavir-unboosted PIs and NRTIs in reducing viral load. Data suggest that regimens with lopinavir/ritonavir or efavirenz have the best long-term chance of producing an undetectable viral load.

[Recommendations from the GESIDA/Spanish AIDS Plan regarding antiretroviral treatment in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection (update January 2007)]

OBJECTIVE

This consensus document is an update of antiretroviral therapy (ART) recommendations for adult patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1).

METHODS

To formulate these recommendations, a panel composed of members of the Grupo de Estudio de Sida (GESIDA; AIDS Study Group) and the Plan Nacional sobre el Sida (PNS; Spanish AIDS Plan) reviewed the advances in the current understanding of the pathophysiology of HIV, the safety and efficacy findings from clinical trials, and the results from cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in biomedical journals or presented at scientific meetings over the last years. Three levels of evidence were defined according to the source of the data: randomized studies (level A), cohort or case-control studies (level B), and expert opinion (level C). The decision to recommend, consider or not recommend ART was established in each situation.

RESULTS

Currently, the treatment of choice for chronic HIV infection is the combination of three drugs of two different classes, including 2 nucleosides or nucleotide analogs (NRTI) plus 1 non-nucleoside (NNRTI) or 1 boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r). Initiation of ART is recommended in patients with symptomatic HIV infection. In asymptomatic patients, initiation of ART is recommended on the basis of CD4+ lymphocyte counts and plasma viral load, as follows: 1) therapy should be started in patients with CD4+ counts of < 200 cells/microl; 2) therapy should be started in most patients with CD4+ counts of 200-350 cells/microl, although it can be delayed when CD41 count persists at around 350 cells/microL and viral load is low, and 3) initiation of therapy can be delayed in patients with CD4+ counts of > 350 cells/microL. The initial objective of ART is to achieve an undetectable viral load. Adherence to therapy plays an essential role in maintaining the antiviral response. Therapeutic options are limited with the development of cross resistance and ART failure. Genotype studies are useful in these cases. More information regarding the studies analyzed and the panel recommendations for adherence, toxicity, treatment during pregnancy, patients with hepatitis B or C virus co-infection, and post-exposure prophylaxis can be accessed at www.gesida.seimc.org.

CONCLUSIONS

CD4+ lymphocyte count is the most important reference factor for initiating ART in asymptomatic patients. The large number of available drugs, the increased sensitivity of tests to monitor viral load, and the ability to determine viral resistance is leading to a more individualized approach to therapy.

Intensification of a triple-nucleoside regimen with tenofovir or efavirenz in HIV-1-infected patients with virological suppression

OBJECTIVE

To compare a quadruple-nucleoside with an efavirenz-containing regimen for treatment of HIV-1 infection.

DESIGN

A randomized, open-label study of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG).

METHODS

Subjects receiving zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir on ACTG 5095 with HIV-1 RNA less than 200 copies/ml were randomly assigned to intensify either with tenofovir or efavirenz. Subjects were followed for time to treatment failure, defined as either virological failure or treatment discontinuation. Analyses were intent-to-treat.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy subjects (21% women; 56% non-white) entered the study. At baseline, 95 and 73% had HIV-1-RNA levels less than 200 and 50 copies/ml, respectively; the median CD4 cell count was 453 cells/microl. Over a median 79 weeks follow-up, 165 (97%) completed the study, three (2%) discontinued, and two (1%) died. Treatment failure occurred in 31 subjects: 18 (21%) (quadruple nucleosides) and 13 (15%) (efavirenz-containing regimen); however the failure-time curves crossed and demonstrated a non-constant treatment effect over time, characterized by more early treatment failures on the efavirenz-containing regimen and more late treatment failures on the four-nucleoside regimen. HIV-1 RNA remained suppressed in more than 88% of subjects to less than 200 copies/ml and in more than 78% to less than 50 copies/ml at weeks 24, 48, and 72, without differences by treatment arm. There were no significant differences between the regimens in CD4 cell increases, time to new grade 3/4 adverse events, or adherence.

CONCLUSION

The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the four-nucleoside regimen were not significantly different from the efavirenz-containing regimen. These pilot data support further investigation of the quadruple-nucleoside regimen.

Efavirenz: a review

Efavirenz is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that in most treatment guidelines is recommended to be taken combined with two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, as a preferred first-line regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. The antiretroviral efficacy of efavirenz-based combination regimens is good, as has been demonstrated in many clinical trials. Efavirenz has a long plasma half-life, which allows for once-daily dosing, but, as a consequence of this and the low genetic barrier, it is also prone to select for viral resistance when adherence to therapy is suboptimal. The most frequently encountered side effects are neuropsychiatric symptoms. These side effects are usually transient, but have been shown to persist for up to 2 years after initiation of therapy in some patients. This review outlines important and recent pharmacological and clinical data, which explain why efavirenz became a component of preferred treatment regimens today.

Rapid selection of drug-resistant HIV-1 during the first months of suppressive ART in treatment-naive patients

OBJECTIVE

Efficient antiretroviral therapy (ART) of HIV-1 infection reduces the viral load to undetectable levels and restores the immune system. However, therapy failure appears in a substantial fraction of patients and is mostly associated with the appearance of drug-resistant viruses. It is still not clear when the drug pressure leads to the earliest selection and appearance of drug-resistant HIV-1 populations. In this study, we wanted to determine whether drug-resistant viruses are already selected during viral decline within the first months of ART.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Fifteen mostly chronically HIV-1 infected patients were included. None had received ART prior to this study. The selection of three key resistance mutations, L90M (protease), K103N and M184V (reverse transcriptase), were measured by allele-specific real-time PCR allowing us to track minority quasispecies with a discriminative power of 0.01-0.2%.

RESULTS

Drug-resistant HIV-1 variants were found in 7/15 patients (46.7%) prior to ART. Rapid selection of drug resistance was detected in six patients (40%) independent of the presence of drug-resistant HIV-1 prior to ART. The risk for the selection of drug resistant viruses was correlated with the time until viral load became undetectable (P = 0.02). Besides the proportional increment of drug-resistant viruses, we observed in two patients a quantitative increase of this virus population while the total viral load decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-resistant viruses can be selected and replicate even in the first weeks of suppressive ART, thus, intensification of ART during the initial treatment period should be considered and further evaluated in clinical studies.

Abacavir sulfate/lamivudine/zidovudine fixed combination in the treatment of HIV infection

Treatment of HIV infection has typically been carried out using two nucleoside analogs and a protease inhibitor. Such regimens can be complex and have high pill burdens. Use of alternative regimens, such as triple nucleoside-based regimens, can improve adherence and decrease toxicities associated with protease inhibitor therapy. A formulation of abacavir sulfate/lamivudine/zidovudine allows a dosing schedule of one pill twice daily. The components have performed favorably compared with protease inhibitor-based regimens, such as indinavir. Compared with efavirenz-based regimens, abacavir sulfate/lamivudine/zidovudine has not performed as well. The combination is being studied as a cornerstone for induction maintenance strategies, in which switching a patient to abacavir sulfate/lamivudine/zidovudine has been associated with similar virologic outcomes as continuing with either protease inhibitor- or efavirenz-based regimens. Administration of abacavir sulfate/lamivudine/zidovudine also avoids side effects of antiretroviral therapy, such as hyperlipidemia, but its use is associated with a hypersensitivity reaction in a small number of patients. The combination of abacavir sulfate/lamivudine/zidovudine is an important part of the HIV armamentarium. Its potency and ease of administration make it worth consideration in the treatment of HIV, either by itself or in combination with other agents.

An updated systematic overview of triple combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of three drug combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) in treatment-naive HIV-infected persons, and identify the predictors of responses.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Overview of trials identified by searching public domain publications and conference presentations. The three-drug combination therapy was defined as two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) or nucleotide and NRTI, and either: (1) a protease inhibitor (PI); (2) a non-nucleoside RTI (NNRTI); (3) a third NRTI; or (4) a ritonavir-boosted PI (BPI). Week 24 and 48 results for the proportions of patients with plasma HIV RNA levels < 400 and < 50 copies/ml, and change in CD4(+) cell counts were recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-three trials met the entry criteria, and enrolled 14 264 patients into 90 treatment arms. Overall 55% of patients had plasma HIV RNA levels < 50 copies/ml at week 48 and this percentage increased with later publication dates. In unadjusted pairwise comparisons at week 48, significantly greater percentages of patients receiving NNRTI (64%) and BPI (64%) had RNA < 50 copies/ml than NRTI (54%) or PI (43%), and CD4(+) cell count increases were significantly greater in the BPI group (+200 cells/microl) than the PI (+179), NNRTI (+173), or NRTI (+161) groups. Pill count and percentage of patients with week 48 plasma HIV RNA levels < 50 copies/ml were correlated in the univariate analysis (P = 0.0053; r = -0.323), but pill count was not a significant predictor in the multivariate analyses. Drug class and baseline CD4(+) cell counts were significant predictors, but explained only a modest amount of the treatment effect, (R(2) = 0.355).

CONCLUSIONS

NNRTI and BPI-containing regimens offer superior virologic suppression over 48 weeks, supporting existing guidelines for the choice of initial ART. Pill count was not a consistent predictor of virologic suppression.