Normal 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH values. Influence of study center, pH electrode, age, and gender

Successful oesophageal pH monitoring with a catheter-free system

BACKGROUND

Traditional catheter-based oesophageal pH testing is limited by patient discomfort and the tendency for patients to alter their diet and activities during the study. A catheter-free pH monitoring system (Bravo) designed to avoid these problems has recently become available, but the advantages and limitations of this device have not been fully explored.

AIM

To report our initial experience with this new technology.

METHODS

The records of consecutive patients undergoing Bravo pH monitoring were reviewed. The squamo-columnar junction was localized endoscopically and the pH capsule was placed 6 cm above this junction. All patients were re-endoscoped immediately following placement to document mucosal attachment. Patients were monitored for 24-48 h and then returned the radiotelemetry recording device. Data were subsequently downloaded to a personal computer.

RESULTS

Sixty studies were performed over an 11-month period. In seven of the 60 (12%), the probe did not attach properly, but in six of these a replacement probe was prepared and deployed without difficulty. In one case, the probe could not be attached after two attempts and the procedure was abandoned. During one procedure, the probe was attached to the mucosa at a point 9 cm from the squamo-columnar junction, but a positive test result was obtained. In two cases, the data were not initially retrievable from the recorder, but in one case the manufacturer was able to retrieve the data overnight. Finally, two patients were away from the data recorder for extended periods, resulting in a loss of data, in two cases, but there was sufficient information for interpretation in both studies. Therefore, adequate diagnostic data were obtained in 58 of the 60 (97%) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter-free pH testing is a major advance in patient convenience and comfort. The technical difficulties associated with this new technology are minimal and appear to be no more frequent than those seen with catheter-based systems.

Is ambulatory 24-h dual-probe pH monitoring useful in suspected ENT manifestations of GERD?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The present study is aimed at assessing the relationship between ear, nose and throat manifestations and proximal reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease by using 24-h dual-probe pH monitoring.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients were included: (;) 28 patients with suspected ear, nose and throat manifestations of gastrooesophageal reflux disease: (ii) 18 patients with typical symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without extraoesophageal manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; (iii) 12 healthy volunteers. Ambulatory 24-h dual-probe pH monitoring was performed in all patients. Oesophagogastroscopy was performed in all patients of groups I and II. Ear, nose and throat examination was performed in all patients with ear, nose and throat complaints.

RESULTS

At the upper oesophageal sphincter, results of pH monitoring were significantly different between groups I and III (0.009 < P < 0.02) and between groups I and II (0.008 < P < 0.03). When comparing data at the lower oesophageal sphincter, we found a significant difference between groups II and III (0.002 < P < 0.009) and between groups I and III (0.001 < P < 0.002). Endoscopic examination of the oesophagus did not show any significant difference between groups I and II. Laryngoscopy was abnormal in 86% of the patients with ear, nose and throat symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulatory 24-h dual-probe pH monitoring is useful in the assessment of patients with suspected ear, nose and throat manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, especially in the case of abnormal laryngoscopy.

Artefacts in 24-h pharyngeal and oesophageal pH monitoring: is simplification of pH data analysis feasible?

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory 24-h dual-channel pharyngeal and oesophageal pH monitoring is the standard test for measuring gastro-oesophageal and gastropharyngeal reflux. Artefacts caused by the intake of food may result in falsely positive gastropharyngeal reflux, which necessitates a manual review of 24-h pH data. The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of meals and whether leaving out meals affected the reliability of the test.

METHODS

Patients referred for otolaryngological complaints, suspected to have been caused by gastro-oesophageal reflux, underwent 24-h dual-channel pH monitoring. The raw unprocessed pH data were corrected by visual inspection of the 24-h tracings (corrected data), by leaving out meals or meals plus a 2-h postprandrial period.

RESULTS

The raw pH data were substantially influenced by artefacts of food intake and pseudoreflux. Data obtained by leaving out meals agreed best with manually corrected data. Many of the falsely positive reflux episodes could be removed, thereby inducing a 9%-18% chance of undetected reflux. When examining the fraction of time supine, manually corrected data and data leaving out meals were fully concordant and detected 79% of patients with gastropharyngeal reflux. However, leaving out meals plus a 2-h postprandrial period resulted in 21%-50% falsely negative tests.

CONCLUSION

Leaving out the period of intake of meals and beverages from the raw pH data might be the second best test after the time-consuming visual correction with a small chance of undetected gastropharyngeal reflux. For scientific purposes and when in doubt, it remains necessary to review the computer-generated data manually to discover every gastropharyngeal reflux event.

Detection of oxidative DNA damage in oesophageal biopsies of patients with reflux symptoms and normal pH monitoring

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux has been shown to induce oxidative DNA damage.

AIM

To determine whether oxidative DNA damage, detected in oesophageal biopsies by simple immunohistochemical staining, correlates with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease as determined by pH monitoring.

METHODS

The study included 47 patients with reflux symptoms who had oesophageal biopsy and 24-h pH monitoring studies performed within 3 months of each other with no variation in treatment in the time between the two procedures. Sections of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded oesophageal biopsies were stained for 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine using the standard immunoperoxidase method. Positive nuclear immunoreactivity was considered to indicate oxidative DNA damage.

RESULTS

Seven (33%) of the 21 cases with normal 24-h pH monitoring results were negative for oxidative DNA damage, compared with only two (8%) of the 26 cases with abnormal 24-h pH results (P=0.058, two-sided Fisher's exact test). Five of the patients with normal 24-h pH results had oesophageal biopsies performed within 24 h of the monitoring procedure and, of these, four (80%) were positive for oxidative DNA damage, including a case in which both biopsy and 24-h pH monitoring were performed on the same day whilst the patient was on proton pump inhibitor therapy. All cases with normal 24-h pH results and positive oxidative DNA damage showed features of reflux on routine morphological evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxidative DNA damage can occur in the absence of acid reflux and despite adequate antisecretory therapy. This may indicate that other agents, such as bile, can induce oxidative DNA damage in an acid-suppressed environment. The significant discordance between oxidative DNA damage and 24-h pH results makes the determination of oxidative DNA damage a poor surrogate marker for 24-h pH monitoring.

Belching: dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux disease?

OBJECTIVES

Eructation (belching) is a common symptom seen in clinical practice. Because either belching or heartburn may result from transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations, it has been proposed that belching may be a manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In this retrospective study we evaluated the prevalence of belching in dyspepsia and GERD and the relation of belching to acid reflux events documented by pH monitoring.

METHODS

We examined the prevalence, frequency, and severity of belching and other GERD symptoms by use of standardized questionnaires in 180 GERD patients (group A) and 78 dyspeptic controls (group B) referred for evaluation at our institution. GERD was defined as either endoscopic esophagitis (or Barrett's esophagus) or positive DeMeester score (>14.2) on pH monitoring or both. Dyspeptic patients had normal endoscopy and pH studies. We also analyzed the relationship of belching to acid reflux events during the 24-h period of pH studies.

RESULTS

Of 180 GERD patients, 132 (70%) reported belching during pH monitoring, versus 63 of 78 dyspeptic patients (80%) (p = ns). Similarly, 163 of 180 GERD patients (90%) reported heartburn versus 64 of 78 of dyspeptic patients (82%) (p = ns). Review of symptom questionnaires revealed no significant difference in belching severity between groups. However, heartburn and acid regurgitation were significantly more severe among GERD patients. There was a significantly higher correlation of both heartburn and belching with acid events in patients with GERD compared with patients with dyspepsia. In addition, although both belching and heartburn were significantly improved in patients with GERD, belching scores remained unchanged after proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with dyspepsia.

CONCLUSIONS

Belching is as common and as severe in patients with dyspepsia as it is in patients with GERD. Belching and heartburn in GERD patients are more likely correlated with episodes of pathological acid reflux. Because belching cannot be clinically used as a discriminatory symptom, ambulatory pH monitoring should be considered to elucidate the relationship of belching to acid reflux in patients with dyspepsia or GERD.

Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: why, when, and what to do

The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing and if left untreated can lead to significant patient morbidity and even death. The disease results from the abnormal reflux of gastric contents into the distal esophagus causing symptoms in most and subsequent mucosal damage in some. Several investigations can be used to confirm the diagnosis, but most are dependent on the presence of sequelae and complications of the disease. The physiologic test of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring has proved to be the most sensitive and specific diagnostic investigation. It measures increased esophageal exposure to gastric juice by detecting the concentration of hydrogen ions (pH <4) in the distal esophagus. The technique measures gastric juice exposure at a point 5 cm above the manometrically determined upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter. The exposure is measured in components of frequency of reflux episodes, duration of reflux episodes, and accumulated exposure time. The components are integrated into a composite score, which is reproducible, gender and race independent, and correlates with the degree of esophageal epithelial damage determined histologically. The composite score has been shown to be the most reliable measurement of a therapeutic acid suppression regimen or an effective antireflux operation.

Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system

OBJECTIVE

Limitations of catheter-based esophageal pH monitoring are discomfort, inconvenience, and interference with normal activity. An alternative to conventional pH monitoring is the wireless Medtronic Bravo pH System. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, performance, and tolerability of this system.

METHODS

A total of 44 healthy subjects and 41 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were studied for a 2-day period. The pH telemetry capsule was positioned transorally 6 cm above the squamocolumnar junction using endoscopic measurement. The signal transmitted from the capsule was received and recorded by a small, pager-sized receiver, and pH data were subsequently uploaded to a computer for analysis.

RESULTS

Successful 24-h pH studies were completed in 82 subjects (96%). During the 24-h study period the median percentage of the time that pH was <4 was 2.3% (95th percentile, 5.9%) in controls and 6.5% (range, 0.8-27.6) in GERD patients. In 76 subjects (89%), 36-48 h recordings were obtained. For the extended period the median percentage of the time that pH was <40 was 2.0% (95% percentile, 5.3%) in controls and 6.6% (range, 1.0-26.7) in GERD patients. Capsules required endoscopic removal in three subjects (4%). Optimal sensitivity in distinguishing controls from reflux patients was achieved when analyzed from the perspective of the worst of the 2 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The wireless Bravo pH System successfully recorded esophageal acid exposure in 96% of the patients during a 24-h period and in 89% of subjects for >36 h. The 95th percentile for the 2-day recordings in control subjects was 5.3%, slightly higher than observed with conventional systems.

Nocturnal acid breakthrough: clinical significance and correlation with esophageal acid exposure

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies suggest that the addition of H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) therapy is more effective than proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy alone in reducing nocturnal acid breakthrough (NAB). However, the clinical significance of NAB with respect to esophageal acid control has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the degree of upright and supine esophageal and gastric acid suppression using various PPI regimens in comparison to the addition of an H2RA at bedtime.

METHODS

A total of 22 subjects (13 with gastroesophageal reflux disease and nine who served as control subjects) were prospectively evaluated by serial combined esophageal and gastric 24-h pH monitoring. Studies were performed at baseline off antireflux medical therapy and subsequent to completion of the following four drug regimens: 1) omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. for 2 wk; 2) omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. plus ranitidine 300 mg HS for 4 wk; 3) omeprazole 20 mg QAM and QHS for 2 wk; and 4) omeprazole 20 mg every 8 h for 2 wk. A dual pH probe was placed 5 cm above and 10 cm below the manometrically defined LES for a minimum of 18 h. Median total, upright, and supine pH values were compared among treatment regimens. All subjects underwent Helicobacter pylori serology testing.

RESULTS

A total of 17 men and eight women (mean age 37 yr +/- 2.4 yr, range 22-71 yr) were enrolled in the study. Total, upright, and supine median percentage of the time that gastric pH was <4 were significantly less than baseline values in all treatment regimens. Although patients treated with Q8 h omeprazole had significantly (p < 0.01) more gastric acid suppression, there was a high degree of overlap among regimens. Treatment regimens resulted in NAB elimination of 9-41%. However, no single treatment regimen resulted in more significant NAB suppression than the others. Despite continued NAB with all treatment regimens, esophageal acid reflux (90%) and patient symptoms (100%) were well controlled. In addition, there were no differences in the esophageal median percentage of time that pH was <4 for any treatment regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

NAB is an isolated gastric phenomenon that is poorly controlled even with most aggressive acid suppressive therapy. Esophageal acid suppression and symptom control are not dependent on the degree of NAB elimination.

The effect of famotidine on gastroesophageal and duodeno-gastro-esophageal refluxes in critically ill patients

AIM: To investigate the effect of famotidine on gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux (DGER) and to explore it's possible mechanisms. To identify the relevant factors of the reflux.

METHODS: Ninteen critically ill patients were consecutively enrolled in the study. Dynamic 24 h monitoring of GER and DGER before and after administration of famotidine was performed. The parameters of gastric residual volume,multiple organ disorder syndrome (MODS) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score and PEEP were recorded. Paired t test; Wilcoxon signed ranks test and Univariate analysis with Spearman's rank correlation were applied to analyse the data.

RESULTS: Statistical significance of longest acid reflux, reflux time of pH < 4 and fraction time of acid reflux was observed in ten critically ill patients before and after administration. P value is 0.037, 0.005, 0.005 respectively. Significance change of all bile reflux parameters was observed before and after administration. P value is 0.007, 0.024, 0.005, 0.007, 0.005. GER has positive correlation with APACHE II score and gastric residual volume with correlation coefficient of 0.720, 0.932 respectively.

CONCLUSION: GER and DGER are much improved after the administration of famotidine. GER is correlated with APACHE II score and gastric residual volume.

Monitoring of laryngopharyngeal reflux: influence of meals and beverages

Ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring seems to be the best test to measure reflux. Artifacts caused by intake of acid foods and beverages have to be excluded, necessitating a time-consuming manual review of the 24-hour data. Dietary restrictions used to bypass these artifacts would interfere with the normal daily life situation. Therefore, the influence of food and beverages ingested during the monitoring period was studied. Data from 252 patients who underwent double-probe pH monitoring were analyzed, first by visual inspection of the 24-hour tracing and second by leaving out the intake periods. As to the registration of gastroesophageal reflux, the inclusion or omission of meals and beverages hardly influenced the data. However, the registration of laryngopharyngeal reflux was severely biased by intake of food and beverages and other artifacts. Leaving out meals and beverages did not correct for all artifacts. Therefore, we recommend review of each laryngopharyngeal pH drop.

Symptomatic response to lansoprazole predicts abnormal acid reflux in endoscopy-negative patients with non-cardiac chest pain

AIM

To determine whether symptomatic response to lansoprazole predicts abnormal acid reflux in endoscopy-negative patients with non-cardiac chest pain.

METHODS

Patients who complained of chest pain, but had normal coronary angiography, were asked to undergo upper endoscopy. Those without gastric and oesophageal lesions were recruited for 24-h ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring, and were randomly given lansoprazole 30 mg or placebo, both daily for 4 weeks. Chest pain symptoms were recorded before and 1 month after treatment on a locally validated questionnaire. The symptom score was calculated by multiplying the severity and frequency of the symptom, and symptom improvement was defined as > 50% reduction in symptom score.

RESULTS

Overall, 68 patients, 36 on lansoprazole and 32 on placebo, completed the trial. The symptom score was reduced significantly in both groups (P < 0.001). In the lansoprazole group, more patients with than without abnormal reflux showed symptom improvement (92% vs. 33%; odds ratio = 22; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-201.8; chi2 = 10.9; P = 0.001), giving a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 92%, 67%, 58%, 94% and 75%, respectively. In the placebo group, the rates of symptom improvement were similar between those with and without abnormal reflux (33% vs. 35%, P = N.S.).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with lansoprazole is a useful test in diagnosing endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Chinese patients with non-cardiac chest pain.

Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: lansoprazole vs. pantoprazole

BACKGROUND

: Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression is an important therapeutic goal in complicated and atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

AIM

: To compare the efficacy of lansoprazole and pantoprazole in normalizing oesophageal acid exposure.

METHODS

: Fifty patients with complicated or atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg lansoprazole (n = 26) or 40 mg pantoprazole (n = 24) once daily. Three to four weeks after the start of treatment, patients underwent 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring whilst on therapy. If the results were improved but still abnormal, the dosage was doubled and pH monitoring was repeated. If oesophageal acid exposure was not improved, the patient was shifted to the alternative drug regimen.

RESULTS

: Oesophageal acid exposure was normalized in all 26 patients treated with lansoprazole (in 35% of cases with a double daily dosage), whereas in six of the 24 (25%) patients treated with pantoprazole it was neither normalized nor lowered (P = 0.008). Accordingly, the mean percentage acid reflux time was significantly lower for the lansoprazole group (2.1) than for the pantoprazole group (5.8) (P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

: Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression can be accomplished more reliably with lansoprazole than with pantoprazole in patients with complicated and atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

The role of acid and alkaline reflux in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

HYPOTHESIS

At present, main factors considered responsible for the onset of squamous cell carcinoma are tobacco smoking, alcohol abuse, and exposure to viral and toxic agents. In last years, great interest has been focused on gastroesophageal reflux as independent carcinogenic factor and co-carcinogen in association with smoking and alcohol assumption.

STUDY DESIGN

Initially, the aim of this study was to objectively evaluate the presence of distal and proximal esophageal reflux with multielectrode pH measurement in patients with cancer of the larynx and/or hypopharynx (group A). However, in the course of the study, pharyngolaryngeal cancer was also observed in 4 patients with achlorhydria; therefore, the hypothesis that alkaline reflux might be involved in the onset of laryngeal cancer was tested (group B).

METHODS

Twenty-one consecutive patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (group A) entered the study. Twenty-one patients without laryngo-pharyngeal diseases were used as control subjects. A validated questionnaire of the clinical history was completed by all patients who underwent 24-hour pH monitoring. Group B included 40 consecutive gastrectomized patients (28 males and 12 females) in whom biliary or alkaline reflux was directly consequent to Billroth I or Billroth II operation. The control group was composed of 40 non-gastrectomized dyspeptic patients. The clinical history was controlled and obtained; EDGS and ENT examination with videolaryngoscopy was performed in all patients.

RESULTS

In group A, pH measurement showed pathological reflux in 80.9% (17 of 21) of patients with no typical symptoms in 63.7% of them. The difference was significant with respect to the control group. In group B, 6 of 40 (15%) had preneoplastic lesions or a history of laryngeal tumor. The difference was significant with respect to the control group. A total of 7.5% of group B patients had previously undergone CO2 laser cordectomy for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and 7.5% had leukoplakia. We found a significantly higher incidence (<.05) of neoplastic and preneoplastic disease of the larynx in patients undergoing Billroth II and total gastrectomy than in those undergoing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y resection. We also found a significant increase (<.01) in ENT lesions in the group of patients who had undergone gastrectomy more than 20 years previously.

CONCLUSIONS

In agreement with literature reports, results obtained in group A confirmed that gastroesophageal reflux is often present in patients with neoplastic lesions of the pharynx and larynx. Furthermore, gastric resection is indicated for the first time as an additional risk factor or cofactor of precancerosis and squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx or larynx. Further studies are necessary to establish the cause and effect relationship between biliary reflux and pharyngo-laryngeal tumors.

Prevalence of esophagitis in patients with pH-documented laryngopharyngeal reflux

OBJECTIVE

To report the prevalence of esophagitis in patients with pH-documented laryngopharyngeal reflux.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study of 58 consecutive patients with documented laryngopharyngeal reflux, all of whom underwent transnasal esophagoscopy as part of their reflux evaluations.

METHODS

All patients with a diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux confirmed by abnormal pharyngeal pH monitoring over a 5-month period were included, and all subjects completed a self-administered reflux symptom index and underwent transnasal esophagoscopy with directed biopsy.

RESULTS

Of the 58 study patients with pH-documented laryngopharyngeal reflux, the mean age was 49 years (+/- 13 y), and 53% (31 of 58) were women. Of the study group, 40% (23 of 58) had heartburn and 48% (28 of 58) had abnormal esophageal reflux (by pH monitoring criteria); by transnasal esophagoscopy with biopsy, 12% (7 of 58) had esophagitis and another 7% (4 of 58) had Barrett's metaplasia. Thus, 60% of the study cohort had heartburn, and 81% (47 of 58) had normal esophageal epithelium (i.e., esophagitis or Barrett's metaplasia).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present series of patients with documented laryngopharyngeal reflux the prevalence of esophagitis and Barrett's metaplasia was only 19%. These data confirm the clinical impression that the patterns, mechanisms, and manifestations of laryngopharyngeal reflux differ from those of classic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Unlike gastroesophageal reflux disease, patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux uncommonly have esophagitis. Thus, although esophagoscopy may be an excellent method for screening the esophagus, it is not the method of choice for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Extraesophageal reflux in patients with contact granuloma: a prospective controlled study

The aim of this study was to compare the incidences of extraesophageal reflux in patients with contact granuloma and healthy controls. A 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring technique was used to measure reflux parameters in the pharynx and distal esophagus. Pharyngeal acid reflux events occurred in 17 of 26 granuloma patients (1 to 20 episodes per patient) and 5 of 19 controls (1 to 8 episodes per subject). The reflux episodes were typically short and occurred predominantly in an upright position. A comparison between the groups showed a significant difference in the number of pharyngeal reflux episodes (p = .009) and in the total time of pH below 4 (p = .006). On the other hand, we found no significant differences in any esophageal reflux parameters, except for the percentage of distal esophageal reflux episodes that reached the pharynx (p = .006). In this study, pharyngeal acid exposure was significantly more prevalent in patients with contact granuloma than in healthy controls.

Hiatal hernia is the key factor determining the lansoprazole dosage required for effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression

BACKGROUND

Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression can be achieved with lansoprazole. The daily dosage could be influenced by the presence of hiatal hernia.

AIM

To assess the lansoprazole daily dosage required to normalize oesophageal acid exposure in patients with and without hiatal hernia.

METHODS

Fifty patients with complications or atypical manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were given lansoprazole, 30 mg once daily. Three to four weeks after the start of treatment, patients underwent oesophageal pH monitoring while on therapy. If the results were still abnormal, the lansoprazole dosage was doubled and 24-h pH-metry was repeated 20-30 days thereafter.

RESULTS

A 30-mg daily dosage of lansoprazole normalized oesophageal acid exposure in 70% of cases, whilst a 60-mg daily dosage was necessary in the remainder: the two groups differed only in the presence of hiatal hernia (28% vs. 100%, respectively; P=0.000). Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression was obtained in all 25 patients without hiatal hernia with the 30-mg daily dosage of lansoprazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Hiatal hernia is the key factor determining the lansoprazole dosage required for effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression in complicated and atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. High efficacy of a 30-mg daily dosage of lansoprazole can be predicted in the absence of hiatal hernia.

Role of acid and bile reflux in development of specialised intestinal metaplasia in distal oesophagus

BACKGROUND

Barrett's oesophagus is defined as specialised intestinal metaplasia in the distal oesophagus, regardless of extension.

AIM

To study distal oesophagus function, and acid and bile exposure in patients with Long Segment (>3 cm), Short Segment (1 to 2 cm) and Ultra-short Segment (<1 cm) Barrett's Oesophagus, and in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without intestinal metaplasia.

PATIENTS

Study population comprised 17 patients with Long, 8 with Short, 9 with Ultra-Short Segment Barrett's oesophagus, 32 with reflux disease and 12 healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Patients were evaluated by manometry and by 24-hour pH and bile monitoring.

RESULTS

Patients with intestinal metaplasia had greater acid exposure of the distal oesophagus than healthy volunteers. Patients with Long Segment Barrett's oesophagus had a longer history of symptoms, worse lower oesophageal sphincter pressures and longer bile and acid exposure than the other patients. Long Segment Barrett's oesophagus was predicted by low oesophageal pressure and increased bile exposure, age and male sex.

CONCLUSION

Acid exposure in the distal oesophagus is probably the aetiological factor behind intestinal metaplasia, but a severely damaged antireflux barrier and bile in the refluxate are necessary for Long Segment Barrett's Oesophagus to develop.

Role of GERD in chronic resistant sinusitis: a prospective, open label, pilot trial

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether aggressive medical therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) could improve both subjective and objective features of chronic resistant sinusitis (CRS).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with CRS underwent assessment of GERD and sinus symptoms, esophageal motility testing, dual-channel esophageal pH testing, and laryngoscopy and nasal endoscopy at baseline. The results were compared to those of a group of GERD patients without sinus problems. The CRS patients alone then received omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. for 3 months with symptom follow-up at monthly intervals. Laryngoscopy and nasal endoscopy were repeated at 3 months.

RESULTS

Eleven patients with CRS and 19 GERD patients participated. Eight CRS patients experienced heartburn at least once weekly. Esophageal manometry and pH test results were similar between the two groups. Nine CRS patients had an abnormal pH test. All 11 CRS patients completed the 3-month course of omeprazole. Individual sinus symptoms (nasal congestion, nasal drainage, sinus pressure, facial headache, malaise) and global satisfaction were modestly improved in 25-89% and 91%, respectively, at 12 wk. Resolution of symptoms occurred infrequently. We identified no baseline variable that could predict symptom improvement. Although laryngoscopy and nasal endoscopy were abnormal in most CRS patients at baseline and improved in some after treatment, these changes did not parallel symptom improvement.

CONCLUSION

In this small, prospective, open label study, we demonstrated a high prevalence of GERD in patients with CRS, many of whom experienced modest sinus symptom improvement after using omeprazole b.i.d. for 3 months. These findings warrant further randomized, controlled study in a larger patient population.

Acid exposure activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

To explore mechanisms whereby acid reflux might contribute to carcinogenesis in Barrett's esophagus (BE) we studied: (1) the effects of acid on the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, cell proliferation, and apoptosis in a Barrett's adenocarcinoma cell line (SEG-1); and (2) the ability of acid to activate the MAPK pathways in vivo in patients with BE.

METHODS

SEG-1 cells were exposed to acidic media for 3 minutes, and the activities of 3 MAPKs (ERK, p38, and JNK) were determined. Proliferation was assessed using flow cytometry; cell growth and apoptosis were assessed using cell counts and an apoptosis ELISA assay. MAPK activation was studied in biopsy specimens taken from patients with BE before and after esophageal perfusion for 3 minutes with 0.1N HCl.

RESULTS

Acid-exposed SEG-1 cells exhibited a significant increase in proliferation and total cell numbers, and a significant decrease in apoptosis. These effects were preceded by a rapid increase in the activities of ERK and p38, and a delayed increase in JNK activity. PD 98059 abolished the acid-induced increase in G0/G1 and decrease in subG0 phases of the cell cycle. Both SB 203580 and DN-JNK 1/2 inhibited the acid-induced progression from G0/G1 to G2/M. The acid-induced decrease in apoptosis was abolished by inhibition of either ERK or p38. In the patients, acid exposure significantly increased the activity of p38 in the metaplastic epithelium.

CONCLUSIONS

Acid increases proliferation and survival, and decreases apoptosis in SEG-1 cells by activating the MAPK pathways. Acid also activates the MAPK pathways in BE in vivo. These findings suggest that acid might contribute to carcinogenesis in BE through activation of MAPK pathways.

Laparoscopic fundoplication versus lansoprazole for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. A pH-metric comparison

BACKGROUND

Treatment strategies that abolish abnormal reflux could prevent long-term complications of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

AIMS

To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic fundoplication and lansoprazole in abolishing abnormal reflux in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

PATIENTS

Study population comprised 130 patients referred for possible antireflux surgery and with heartburn as the dominant symptom.

METHODS

After oesophageal manometric and pH-metric evaluation and detailed information 55 patients asked to undergo laparoscopic antireflux surgery while 75 chose a medical treatment regimen based on lansoprazole. Treatment efficacy was assessed by ambulatory oesophageal pH-monitoring.

RESULTS

All 55 patients who underwent fundoplication became free of heartburn: oesophageal pH-monitoring gave normal results in 85%. In patients treated with lansoprazole, at individualized daily dosages titrated to abolish both heartburn and abnormal acid reflux, normal pH-metric results were obtained in 96% of cases (p<0.05 vs surgically treated patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Lansoprazole at individualized dosages was significantly more effective than laparoscopic fundoplication, in the short-term, in abolishing abnormal reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.

Gastroesophagopharyngeal reflux in patients with contact granuloma: a prospective controlled study

The aim of this study was to compare the incidences of gastroesophagopharyngeal reflux in patients with contact granuloma and healthy controls. A 24-hour ambulatory esophagopharyngeal pH monitoring technique was used to measure reflux parameters in the pharynx and distal esophagus. Pharyngeal acid reflux events occurred in 17 of 26 granuloma patients (1 to 20 episodes per patient) and 5 of 19 controls (1 to 8 episodes per patient). The reflux episodes were typically short and occurred predominantly in an upright position. A comparison between the groups showed a significant difference in the number of pharyngeal reflux episodes (p = .009) and in the total time of pH below 4 (p = .006). On the other hand, we found no significant differences in any esophageal reflux parameters, except for the percentage of distal esophageal reflux episodes that reached the pharynx (p = .006). In this study, pharyngeal acid exposure was significantly more prevalent in patients with contact granuloma than in healthy controls.

Oral corticosteroids increase esophageal acid contact times in patients with stable asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is higher in people with asthma than in control populations. Predisposing factors for GERD development may include asthma medications such as prednisone. The objective of this study was to determine whether prednisone alters GERD parameters in people with asthma.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

SETTING

University medical center clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty adults with stable, moderate persistent asthma with minimal esophageal reflux symptoms (less than three times a week) who were not receiving antireflux therapy.

INTERVENTION

Prednisone, 60 mg/d, for 7 days.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Asthma, esophageal reflux symptoms, and spirometry were measured during baseline, placebo, and prednisone phases, each 7 days in duration. Dual-probe esophageal pH monitoring, esophageal and respiratory manometrics (20 subjects), and basal and stimulated gastric acid secretion (4 subjects) were measured after placebo and prednisone phases. There were significant increases in esophageal acid contact times at the distal and proximal pH probes during the prednisone phase. Total percentage of time that pH was < 4.0 at the distal probe was 2.5 +/- 0.4% for placebo compared with 5.9 +/- 0.9% for prednisone (p < 0.002). Total percentage of time that pH was < 4.0 at the proximal probe was 0.3 +/- 0.1% for placebo and 0.8 +/- 0.2% for prednisone (p < 0.0007). There were no significant changes in subject weight, spirometry, asthma or esophageal reflux symptoms, manometrics, or basal or stimulated gastric acid secretion.

CONCLUSION

Prednisone, 60 mg/d for 7 days, increased esophageal acid contact times in this small population of people with stable asthma; however, the mechanism for this finding is unclear.

Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations--a pharmacological target for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease?

The oesophago-gastric junction functions as an anti-reflux barrier preventing increased exposure of the oesophageal mucosa to gastric contents. Failure of this anti-reflux barrier results in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and may lead to complications such as oesophagitis, Barrett's oesophagus and eventually oesophageal carcinoma. Recent studies have suggested that transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation is the main mechanism underlying gastro-oesophageal reflux. It involves a prolonged relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter, mediated by a vago-vagal neural pathway, synapsing in the brainstem. Several drugs, such as atropine, baclofen and loxiglumide, have been shown to reduce the rate of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations and concomitantly the number of reflux episodes. These findings illustrate that transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations may represent a potential new target for the pharmacological treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. It is possible that the reduction in the number of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations may also contribute to the beneficial effect of fundoplication and new endoscopic anti-reflux procedures. It should be emphasized, however, that other factors, such as low lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, the presence of a hiatal hernia and impaired oesophageal peristalsis, are also of great importance. Therefore, whether the targeting of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations is the 'golden bullet' in anti-reflux therapy remains to be proven, as evidence of an effective control of gastro-oesophageal reflux in reflux patients is still lacking.

Lansoprazole vs. omeprazole for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a pH-metric comparison

BACKGROUND

Lansoprazole and omeprazole are widely used proton pump inhibitors for the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Normalization of oesophageal acid exposure is an important goal in the management of complicated and atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

AIM

To compare the efficacy of lansoprazole and omeprazole in the abolition of abnormal reflux as assessed by oesophageal pH monitoring.

METHODS

Seventy patients with complicated or atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg lansoprazole or 20 mg omeprazole once daily. Three to four weeks after the start of treatment, patients underwent oesophageal pH monitoring while on therapy. If the results were still abnormal, the proton pump inhibitor dosage was doubled and 24-h pH-metry was repeated after 20-30 days.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were randomized to receive lansoprazole and 34 patients to receive omeprazole. Ten of the 36 (29%) patients treated with 30 mg lansoprazole once daily and 23 of the 34 (68%) patients treated with 20 mg omeprazole once daily had persistently abnormal reflux at oesophageal pH monitoring (P < 0.001). In all such cases, repeat pH monitoring after doubling the proton pump inhibitor dosage gave normal results.

CONCLUSIONS

At the currently marketed dosages of lansoprazole and omeprazole, normalization of oesophageal acid exposure in patients is accomplished more easily with lansoprazole.

Upright versus supine reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Postural measures are early recommendations in the management of heartburn, and are aimed at preventing acid reflux through an incompetent lower esophageal sphincter (LES). However, LES incompetence is found in only a minority of patients, and transient LES relaxations, primarily in the upright position, are currently recognized as the main pathophysiological abnormality in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We investigated the importance of supine acid reflux in patients with GERD.

METHODS

Upon review of their clinical, manometric, pH monitoring and endoscopic characteristics, 85 patients with reflux symptoms were classified into three groups: Group A (n=22), consisting of symptomatic patients without esophagitis or pathological reflux; group B (n=38), symptomatic patients with reflux but no endoscopic esophagitis; and group C (n=25), symptomatic patients with both ulcerative or complicated esophagitis and pathological reflux.

RESULTS

All groups were similar in age distribution. Groups B and C had a higher prevalence of hiatal hernia and reflux symptoms. Manometry revealed similar LES pressures in groups A and B, but lower LES pressure in group C (P < 0.005). In groups A and B, supine reflux, in terms of percentage of time with pH < 4, was less pronounced than upright reflux (P < 0.0001). In contrast, group C supine reflux was as pronounced as the upright reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients reflux in the upright position. Only patients with complicated esophagitis have significant bipositional acid reflux. These findings suggest that unless the patient has severe reflux disease, postural measures may not be indicated.

Ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring: the importance of manometry

OBJECTIVE

Historically, manometry has been used for sphincter localization before ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring to ensure accurate placement of the probes. Recently, direct-vision placement (DVP), using transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy (TFL), has been offered as an alternative technique. Presumably, DVP might be used to precisely place the proximal (pharyngeal) pH probe; however, using DVP, there appears to be no way to accurately position the distal (esophageal) probe. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of DVP for pH probe placement using manometric measurement as the gold standard.

METHODS

Thirty patients undergoing pH monitoring participated in this prospective study. Each subject underwent manometric examination of the esophagus to determine the precise location of the upper and lower esophageal sphincters (UES and LES). In addition, external anatomic landmarks were used to estimate interprobe distances. A physician blinded to the manometry results then placed a pH catheter using DVP so that the proximal probe was located just above the UES. The results were recorded and compared with those obtained by manometry.

RESULTS

Accurate DVP of the proximal pH probe was achieved in 70% (23 of 30) of the subjects. The use of external anatomic landmarks to estimate interprobe distance resulted in accurate positioning of the distal probe in only 40% (12 of 30) of the subjects. Using fixed interprobe distances of 15 cm and 20 cm, distal probe position accuracy was 3% (1 of 30) and 40% (12 of 30), respectively. Therefore, using DVP, the distal esophageal probe was in an incorrect position in 60% to 97% of subjects.

CONCLUSION

For double-probe pH monitoring, the proximal probe can be accurately positioned by DVP; however, there is no precise way to determine the interprobe distance required to correctly position the distal pH probe. Failure to accurately position the distal probe results in grossly inaccurate esophageal acid-exposure times. Thus, manometry is needed to ensure valid double-probe pH monitoring data.

Symptoms, laryngeal findings, and 24-hour pH monitoring in patients with suspected gastroesophago-pharyngeal reflux

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the laryngeal signs and symptoms associated with gastroesophago-pharyngeal reflux (GEPR).

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective controlled study.

METHODS

Nineteen healthy control subjects and 43 patients, 26 with posterior laryngitis (PL) and 17 with a normal larynx and suspected GEPR, were examined using videolaryngoscopy and 24-hour ambulatory dual-probe pH monitoring.

RESULTS

Pharyngeal acid reflux occurred in 18 (69%) patients with PL, in 9 (53%) patients with a normal larynx, and in 5 (26%) healthy control subjects. Multiple-comparison procedure showed that pharyngeal reflux was significantly more prevalent in patients with PL than in the healthy control subjects (P < .05). The laryngoscopic findings in patients with pharyngeal reflux varied from normal mucosa to thickening or edema of the posterior wall of the glottis, which was the most frequent finding in the PL group. Erythema was uncommon; it was found only in patients with verified pharyngeal reflux. There was no difference in symptom profile between the patients with PL and patients with a normal larynx or patients with or without pharyngeal reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharyngeal reflux is significantly more prevalent in patients with posterior laryngitis than in healthy control subjects. Moreover, a certain degree of pharyngeal reflux appears to be a normal phenomenon. The most common laryngeal finding in patients with posterior laryngitis is thickening or edema of the posterior wall of the glottis. GEPR does not yield specific laryngeal symptoms. Thus, it is unreliable to base the reflux diagnosis on symptoms alone.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical, endoscopic, and intraluminal esophageal pH monitoring evaluation

One hundred and twenty-two patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease were studied (90 with and 32 without esophagitis) with the objective of analyzing possible differences between those with and without esophagitis. Evaluation consisted of clinical interview, endoscopy of the high digestive tract, esophageal manometry, and pH monitoring. There was no significant difference between the groups in age, sex, or symptoms. The incidence of hiatal hernia was greater in the group with esophagitis. Although the frequency of motor changes was similar, the type of anomaly was different. The reflux pattern was very similar in both groups. Therefore, the concept of reflux disease, esophagitis, and pathological reflux still needs a broader definition for greater diagnostic precision and for comparing the results of different studies on the subject. Normal reflux (confirmed using pH esophageal monitoring) in 12.2% of patients with esophagitis suggests that other factors are implicated in the etiology of the disease besides those measured using this examination.

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery in the treatment of the acid-sensitive oesophagus

BACKGROUND

Approximately 10 per cent of patients referred for 24-h oesophageal pH tests with symptoms suggestive of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease will have a normal endoscopic examination and normal distal oesophageal acid exposure times, but a clear temporal correlation between their symptoms and episodes of acid reflux. These patients have an 'acid-sensitive oesophagus', which forms part of the spectrum of reflux-related conditions. Their response to antireflux surgery has not been reported previously. This study represents a prospective cohort analysis of a clearly defined group of patients with acid-sensitive oesophagus who have undergone laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

METHODS

Nineteen patients (nine male and ten female; median age 32 years) underwent laparoscopic antireflux surgery for acid-sensitive oesophagus. All had had an incomplete response to medical therapy.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 19 patients were graded Visick I or II at 6 months after operation; all 16 patients followed for 1 year were graded Visick I or II. There were significant falls in DeMeester symptom score (4.0 versus 0.5; P < 0.001), symptom events (20 versus none; P < 0.001), number of reflux episodes (17 versus two; P < 0.001) and overall acid exposure times (1.2 versus 0.3 per cent; P < 0.001) after operation.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is a valid and effective treatment for patients with an acid-sensitive oesophagus. Presented in poster form to the British Society of Gastroenterology, Birmingham, March 2000 and the American Gastroenterological Association, San Diego, May 2000

Esophageal pH monitoring: are you sure that the electrode is properly placed?

OBJECTIVE

A crucial methodological aspect of ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring is electrode placement. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) location is recommended for standard electrode positioning. The aim of the present study was to evaluate prospectively whether LES manometric location and intragastric pH acid confirmation suffice to guarantee that the pH electrode is properly placed.

METHODS

We evaluated data from 402 consecutive patients undergoing esophageal pH monitoring. LES location was determined by manometry, and the pH electrode was introduced until a pH recording <3 was obtained. Subsequently, it was positioned 5 cm above the proximal LES border. Thereafter, adequate catheter placement and absence of bends or loops were checked by fluoroscopy. Patients with bent or rolled catheters were instructed to have breakfast immediately, and catheter placement was checked again by fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

When checked by fluoroscopy, the catheter was properly placed in 383 patients (95.3%). In the other 19 (4.7%), it was not located in the distal part of the esophagus owing to bending or rolling: 14 in the esophagus and five in the pharynx. After breakfast, 14 of the 19 malpositioned catheters were properly positioned whereas five remained bent or rolled. Those bent in the esophagus were more prone to unbending (12 of 14) than those bent or rolled in the pharynx (two of five).

CONCLUSIONS

After LES location by manometry and demonstration of acid pH during the pH step-up technique, the pH electrode was properly placed in more than 95% of cases. Nevertheless, it cannot be completely guaranteed that the pH catheter will not bend or roll, and the pH electrode will not be malpositioned. Eating immediately after electrode placement resolves this problem in the majority (75%) of cases. Therefore, we recommend that patients undergoing esophageal pH-metric studies be instructed to eat as soon as possible after electrode placement to minimize these possible pitfalls.

Can symptoms predict esophageal motor function or acid exposure in gastroesophageal reflux disease? A comparison of esophageal manometric and twenty-four-hour pH parameters in typical and extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease

It has been suggested that patterns of esophageal motor function and acid exposure may differ between those patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with classic symptoms and those with extraesophageal manifestations. Our objective was to compare various parameters of esophageal motility and acid exposure between groups of patients who had presented with extraesophageal manifestations of GERD alone, a combination of classic and extraesophageal manifestations, or classic GERD symptoms alone. A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing esophageal manometry and 24-hour dual-channel esophageal pH testing was performed. Information on patient demographics, symptoms, and results of various manometric and pH testing parameters was examined. We evaluated 84 patients: 32 with extraesophageal symptoms alone, 24 with both classic and extraesophageal symptoms, and 28 with classic symptoms alone. Apart from a trend toward less supine acid exposure in those with extraesophageal symptoms alone, no significant differences were evident among the three patient groups in any of the other parameters of proximal or distal esophageal acid reflux. With respect to motility parameters, lower esophageal sphincter pressure was lower in those with combined symptoms; otherwise, manometric findings were similar in the three patient groups. Our data do not support the hypothesis that the nature of the clinical presentation of GERD, whether in the form of classic or extraesophageal manifestations, is related to differing patterns of esophageal motor function or esophageal acid exposure.

Diagnosis of reflux disease

There are numerous tests for which a diagnostic value in the context of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease has been claimed. Some of these tests (e.g. the acid perfusion test) have become obsolete after the advent of 24-hour oesophageal pH monitoring. With the latter test not only can excessive reflux be identified, but also, and more importantly, a temporal relationship can be demonstrated between a patient's symptoms and reflux episodes. Radiographical examination of the oesophagus has largely been replaced by endoscopy, although the use of the former test is still indicated in certain circumstances (e.g. in the differentiation of sliding from para-oesophageal hiatus hernia). In clinical practice, the so-called proton pump inhibitor test has gained considerable popularity. Despite several studies on the specificity and sensitivity of this test, its value has not yet been established with sufficient accuracy. Conventional manometric evaluation of lower oesophageal sphincter pressure has been over-emphasized as a diagnostic test in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders

OBJECTIVES

The goal was to estimate the prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with laryngeal and voice disorders.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a prospective study of 113 unselected, new patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Patients completed an extensive medical history form including a reflux symptom profile. A comprehensive otolaryngologic examination was performed with photographic transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy. Patients with both symptoms and findings of LPR (78/133, 69%) underwent ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring.

RESULTS

Seventy-three percent (57/78) of patients undergoing pH testing had abnormal studies. Thus 50% (57/113) of the entire the study population had pH-documented reflux. Of the diagnostic sub-groups studied, the highest incidence of reflux was found in patients with vocal cord neoplastic lesions (88%) and patients with muscle tension dysphonias (70%). LPR was infrequently found in patients with neuromuscular disorders.

CONCLUSION

LPR occurs in at least 50% of all patients at our center with laryngeal and voice disorders at presentation.

Esophageal dysmotility as an important co-factor in extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux

OBJECTIVE

Esophageal motility problems have been demonstrated in patients with noninflammatory typical gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and esophagitis, but the frequency of motility disorders in patients with extraesophageal manifestations of GER has not been studied. The primary aim of this study was to assess the frequency of esophageal motility disorders in patients with atypical GER.

METHODS

A prospective study of 112 consecutive patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms and demonstrated physical findings consistent with LPR were studied. Patients were divided into one of the following diagnostic categories: hoarseness; chronic cough; dysphagia or globus pharyngeus; and paroxysmal laryngospasm. Of the 112 patients, 81 (72%) underwent esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring (pH-metry), 19 (17%) had motility studies only, and 12 (11%) had pH-metry studies only. Only patients who had motility studies were included in the analysis. Therefore the study population was 100 patients. Associations between diagnostic category, motility disorder, and abnormal reflux were evaluated with contingency-table analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients, 29 (29%) presented normal motility function, 48 (48%) had ineffective esophageal motility, 10 (10%) had hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and 9 (9%) and 4 (4%) had nutcracker esophagus and achalasia, respectively. There was a significant association between esophageal dysmotility and extraesophageal manifestations of GER However, there was no statistically significant association between esophageal motility disorders and abnormal acid reflux in our patients with atypical GER.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, the frequency of esophageal motility problems in patients with extraesophageal or atypical manifestations of GER was 73% and suggested that these problems exist as an accompanying condition or pathogenic co-factor in some patients with atypical GER.

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in asthma patients without reflux symptoms

Gastroesophageal reflux is a potential trigger of asthma that may be clinically silent. This study examines the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in asthma patients without reflux symptoms. This prospective cohort study evaluated 26 patients with stable asthma without reflux symptoms using esophageal manometry and 24-h esophageal pH testing. Gastroesophageal reflux was considered present if esophageal acid contact times were abnormal. Demographic variables were analyzed to determine if they predicted the presence of gastroesophageal reflux. Asthma patients with asymptomatic gastroesophageal reflux were compared with 30 age-matched asthma patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. The prevalence of abnormal 24-h esophageal pH tests in asthma patients without reflux symptoms was 62% (16 of 26). Demographic variables did not predict abnormal 24-h esophageal pH tests in asthma patients with asymptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. Asthma patients with asymptomatic gastroesophageal reflux had higher amounts of proximal esophageal acid exposure (p < 0.05) compared with asthma patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. Because demographic variables do not predict abnormal 24-h esophageal pH tests in asthma patients without reflux symptoms, 24-h esophageal pH testing is required. This study suggests that gastroesophageal reflux is present in asthma patients, even in the absence of esophageal symptoms.

The efficacy of a 40-mg extended-release formulation of cisapride in the treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of a novel 40-mg extended-release formulation of cisapride in reducing gastro-oesophageal reflux.

METHODS

According to a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design, 19 patients with pathological gastro-oesophageal reflux were treated with extended (40 mg o.d.) or immediate (10 mg q.d.s.) release formulations for two periods of 4 days each (pH-monitoring on day four). Patients received identical treatments in both periods to allow limits of agreement defining equivalent potency of both formulations to be derived from intra-individual variability of treatment effects.

RESULTS

The extended-release formulation decreased total and upright reflux times by 5.5 +/- 1.3% and 8.1 +/- 2.1% (P < 0.001), respectively. It did not change the percentage supine reflux time but diminished the mean duration of reflux episodes by 1.0 +/- 0.4 min (P=0.005). The total number of reflux episodes remained unaltered with both formulations. Immediately-released cisapride decreased total, upright, and supine acid exposures by 5.8 +/- 1.3%, 6.8 +/- 1.6% (P < 0.002) and 3.6 +/- 1.8%, respectively, and mean duration of episodes by 0.9 +/- 0.2 min (P </= 0.05). Equivalent potency for both formulations was accepted in terms of percentage total and upright acid exposure and mean duration of episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The 40-mg extended-release formulation of cisapride decreases total acid exposure and in this study is equivalent to the conventional immediate-release 10 mg q.d.s. regimen. Cisapride primarily interferes with reflux by improving oesophageal acid clearance.

Area under pH 4: a more sensitive parameter for the quantitative analysis of esophageal acid exposure in adults

OBJECTIVE

Traditional quantitative analysis of 24-h esophageal pH monitoring data does not include the pH of reflux episodes. Area under pH 4 (AU4) is a recently introduced parameter that describes the acid exposure rate through both duration and depth of pH falls.

METHODS

In Study A, we enrolled 20 healthy controls and 42 patients (18 without esophagitis, 24 with Savary I-III esophagitis) in a study evaluating reference values for 24-h reflux time at pH <4 (RT) and 24-h AU4 by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) discriminant analysis. For Study B, we next prospectively applied the resulting cutoffs to 16 healthy controls and to 110 gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) patients (55 with esophagitis) to adjust sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of both RT and AU4.

RESULTS

In Study A, the best cutoff values were 5.1% for RT (Area Index +/- SE, 0.899 +/- 0.038; 95% confidence interval [C.I.], 0.796 +/- 0.961) and 36.1 pH x min for AU4 (Area Index +/- SE, 0.935 +/- 0.03; 95% C.I., 0.842 +/- 0.981); AU4 gave the best performance (p = 0.038 vs RT) in discriminating controls and GERD patients. In Study B, RT was abnormal in three controls and 79 patients; AU4 identified all the controls and patients with abnormal RT and also 10/31 patients (32.3%) with so-called "normal" acid exposure (according to RT). In the whole GERD group of patients, AU4 and RT specificity was 81.2%, whereas sensitivity was 71.8% for RT and 80.9% for AU4 (chi2, 61.831; DF, 1; p < 0.005); PPV/NPV were 96.3%/29.5% for RT, and 96.7%/38.2% for AU4.

CONCLUSIONS

AU4 appears to be a simple and sensitive quantitative parameter to measure the esophageal acid exposure in adults submitted to 24-h pH monitoring, and it could be an useful clinical aid in evaluating normal RT tests where, from a clinical point of view, a reflux disease is highly likely.

A prospective evaluation of esophageal testing and a double-blind, randomized study of omeprazole in a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for chronic cough

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies suggest an association between chronic cough and gastroesophageal reflux. Our study aims were 1) to define the prevalence of acid reflux induced cough in the general community, 2) to examine the ability of esophageal testing to identify gastroesophageal reflux related cough, and 3) to assess the utility of omeprazole in a chronic cough algorithm.

METHODS

Patients with chronic cough of unknown etiology, who were mostly from the community, were evaluated. Subjects underwent a chest x-ray, methacholine challenge test, and empiric trial of postnasal drip therapy, and completed daily cough symptom diaries subjectively evaluating cough frequency and severity on a graded scale of 0-4 (combined maximum 8). After excluding other causes of cough, the remaining patients underwent esophageal and pH testing. Those testing positive were randomized to omeprazole 40 mg b.i.d. or placebo for 12 weeks. Follow-up was 1 yr.

RESULTS

A total of 71 patients were screened; 48 were excluded. Twenty-three patients were evaluated for gastroesophageal reflux disease; six (26%) were eventually determined to have an acid-related cough. Of these patients, 17 had a positive pH test, six (35%) of whom showed a striking improvement or resolution of their cough during omeprazole treatment which was sustained for up to 1 yr. Six had a negative pH test, none of whom responded to omeprazole therapy. No significant differences were seen between responders (n = 6) and nonresponders (n = 11) for demographic factors, baseline symptom frequency and duration, or physiological parameters (motility/pH).

CONCLUSIONS

Acid-related chronic cough was present in 26% (six of 23) of patients evaluated for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophageal testing does not reliably identify patients with acid induced chronic cough responsive to proton pump inhibitor therapy. We suggest that the best diagnostic and therapeutic approach, after excluding asthma and postnasal drip syndrome, is empiric treatment for 2 wk with a high dose proton pump inhibitor.

Gastroesophageal reflux: the features in elderly patients

AIM: To compare the features of gastroesophageal reflux disease between elderly and younger patients.

METHODS: Twenty-four hour pH-monitoring and endoscopy were per formed for the 66 elderly patients with typical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, and the results were compared with 112 symptomatic younger patients.

RESULTS: The results of 24-h pH-monitoring and endoscopy showe d that the elderly patients had pathological reflux and reflux esophagitis more frequently than the younger patients. Percentage time with pH < 4 in elderly patients with reflux esophagitis was 32.5% in 24 h, as compared with 12.9% in the younger patients with reflux esophagitis (P < 0.05). The elderly patients with reflux esophagitis have longer periods of acid reflux in both upright and supine positions than the younger patients. Endoscopy showed that 20.8% of elderly patients had grade III/IV esophagitis, whereas only 3.4% of younger patients had grade III/IV esophagitis (P < 0.002). Percentages of grades I/II esophagitis in the two groups were 12.5% and 26.5%, respectively (P < 0.002).

CONCLUSION: Elderly patients, as compared with younger patients, have more severe gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal lesions. The incompetence of lower esophageal sphincter and the presence of hiatal hernia may be important factors leading to the difference in incidence and severity of reflux esophagitis between elderly and younger patients.

Differentiation and proliferation in Barrett's esophagus and the effects of acid suppression

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Maintenance of normal epithelial differentiation and proliferation is an important goal in cancer chemoprevention. Because acid has a dynamic effect on cell proliferation/differentiation of Barrett's esophagus (BE) ex vivo, we investigated the relationship between differentiation, proliferation, and dysplasia in BE biopsy specimens and explored the role of normalization of intraesophageal pH in altering the BE phenotype.

METHODS

Endoscopic biopsy specimens of BE (with or without dysplasia) were analyzed for (1) villin, a differentiation marker, by immunoblotting; (2) proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a proliferation marker, by immunohistochemistry; and (3) dysplasia by histology before and after 6 months of normalization of intraesophageal pH (confirmed by 24-hour pH monitoring) with lansoprazole.

RESULTS

At baseline, there was a negative correlation (r = -0.79) between villin and PCNA expression. Six months later, PCNA expression decreased and villin expression increased (P < 0.001) in 24 patients whose intraesophageal pH normalized. Fifteen patients had persistently pathological intraesophageal acid reflux and no change in villin or PCNA expression. There were no differences in the occurrence of dysplasia after 6 months in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

In BE, there is an inverse relationship between villin and PCNA. In turn, dysplasia is unrelated to villin expression and well correlated with PCNA expression. Complete symptom eradication with lansoprazole does not guarantee normalization of intraesophageal pH profile in BE patients. Effective intraesophageal acid suppression favors differentiation and decreases proliferation. The intriguing possibility that acid suppression can be used to prevent dysplasia remains to be explored.

Risk factors associated with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND

Although patients with gastroesophageal reflux are often instructed to change their lifestyle, population-based data on the risk factors for reflux in the United States are lacking.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study in an age- and gender-stratified random sample of the population of Olmsted County, Minnesota. Residents aged 25 to 74 years were mailed a valid self-report questionnaire that measured reflux symptoms and potential risk factors. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for reflux symptoms (heartburn or acid regurgitation) associated with potential risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,524 (72%) of 2,118 eligible subjects responded. A body mass index >30 kg/m2 (OR = 2.8; CI, 1.7 to 4.5), reporting an immediate family member with heartburn or disease of the esophagus or stomach (OR = 2.6; CI, 1.8 to 3.7), a past history of smoking (OR = 1.6; CI, 1.1 to 2.3), consuming more than seven drinks per week (OR = 1.9; Cl, 1.1 to 3.3), and a higher psychosomatic symptom checklist score (OR per 5 units = 1.4; CI, 1.3 to 1.6) were independently associated with frequent (at least weekly) reflux symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Obesity is a strong risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux, although the value of weight reduction remains to be proven. That family history was also a risk factor suggests that there may be a genetic component to the disorder.

24-h esophageal pH testing in asthmatics: respiratory symptom correlation with esophageal acid events

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) may be a trigger for asthma and may be clinically silent. Twenty-four-hour esophageal pH testing accurately diagnoses GER in asthmatics. There are no reports correlating respiratory symptoms with esophageal acid events. This study examines the prevalence and severity of GER in asthmatics with and without reflux symptoms and examines respiratory symptom correlation with esophageal acid.

METHODS

All esophageal manometry and 24-h esophageal pH tests performed were reviewed in asthmatics who met entrance criteria from July 1, 1989, through November 1, 1994. GER was present if esophageal pH tests were abnormal. Results of esophageal tests were compared for asthmatics with reflux symptoms and GER and asthmatics without reflux symptoms and GER. Respiratory symptoms correlated with esophageal acid events if the esophageal pH was < 4 simultaneously with the respiratory event or within 5 min before its onset.

RESULTS

Of 199 asthmatics who qualified for analysis, 164 (82%) had reflux symptoms. The results of 24-h esophageal pH tests were abnormal in 118 of 164 asthmatics with reflux symptoms (72%), compared with 10 of 35 asthmatics without reflux symptoms (29%). Among asthmatics with GER, 119 of 151 respiratory symptoms (78.8%) were associated with esophageal acid. Seventy-six of 84 reported coughs (90.5%) were associated with esophageal acid. Theophylline did not alter esophageal parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a strong correlation between esophageal acid events and respiratory symptoms in asthmatics with GER. Respiratory symptom correlation with esophageal acid events further supports that GER may be a trigger for asthma.

Omeprazole improves peak expiratory flow rate and quality of life in asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if omeprazole improves pulmonary function and quality of life in asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux.

METHODS

This was a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over trial. After a 4-wk lead-in period, nine patients with documented asthma and gastroesophageal reflux, were prescribed either omeprazole 20 mg, daily or placebo for 8 wk and then crossed over to the alternate treatment. Outcome measurements included: forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and responses on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, a validated disease specific measure of functional status.

RESULTS

After omeprazole treatment, compared with placebo, patients had higher mean morning and evening PEFR, mean absolute difference (95% CI): morning: 37.8 L/min. (10.9-64.6), evening: 31.2 (3.2-59.2). Omeprazole treatment led to higher mean overall scores on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, and on the subdomains of activity limitation, symptoms, and emotions (p = 0.039, 0.049, 0.024, 0.040). A trend toward higher FEV1 (mean: 15.6% difference) with omeprazole failed to reach statistical significance (p > 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

After taking omeprazole for 8 wk, asthmatics with GER have better PEFR and quality of life than after placebo.

Effect of omeprazole in patients with chest pain and normal coronary anatomy: initial experience

Gastroesophageal reflux is frequently found in patients with chest pain despite normal coronary anatomy, but little data on the effect of specific medication exist. After performing 24 h ambulatory pH monitoring and the Bernstein test on 23 patients with normal coronary anatomy, we gave omeprazole, 40 mg nocte, for six weeks to these and to a control group of ten patients with coronary disease. Pain episodes per fortnight fell from 16.2 to 12.0 (P=0.02) in the patients with normal anatomy and from 19.6 to 17.1 (nonsignificant) in the patients with coronary disease. Improvement occurred in seven (30%) of the patients with normal coronary anatomy compared with one (10%) of those with coronary disease, while complete resolution occurred in four (17%) and none, respectively. Improvement or complete resolution were not predicted by the results of 24 h pH monitoring, although there was a trend towards the prediction of efficacy by the Bernstein test. Omeprazole shows promise as a treatment for patients with chest pain despite normal coronary anatomy and larger placebo-controlled trials should now be undertaken.

Complete elimination of reflux symptoms does not guarantee normalization of intraesophageal acid reflux in patients with Barrett's esophagus

OBJECTIVE

Normalization of intraesophageal acid exposure is increasingly recognized as a desired goal in the management of Barrett's esophagus. In this prospective trial, we studied patients with Barrett's esophagus by 24-h intraesophageal pH monitoring after having completely eliminated their reflux symptoms with lansoprazole, to determine whether they had achieved normalization of intraesophageal pH.

METHODS

Thirty patients with Barrett's esophagus, all of whom had presented with reflux symptoms, were treated with lansoprazole (15-30 mg/day) until they were asymptomatic. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory pH monitoring was performed while they were receiving lansoprazole and were asymptomatic.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (40%) showed persistent bipositional, pathologic acid reflux while on therapy, with a mean DeMeester score of 52.8 (95% CI: 33.8-71.8); the remaining 18 (60%) exhibited normalization of intraesophageal acid exposure with a score of 4.4 (95% CI: 2.3-6.6,p < 0.001). This inadequate control of intraesophageal pH is most likely due to incomplete gastric acid suppression induced by the drug and is associated with a variable acid (distal > proximal) exposure within the esophagus. The two groups were not different in regard to their symptom frequency and severity before therapy, amount of lansoprazole dosage required to eliminate symptoms, length of Barrett's metaplasia, presence of hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter resting tone and length, or esophageal peristaltic function.

CONCLUSION

Complete symptom eradication with lansoprazole (15-30 mg daily) in patients with Barrett's esophagus does not guarantee normalization of intraesophageal pH profile. If the goal of therapy in such patients is to achieve complete intraesophageal acid suppression, 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring should be performed to titrate therapy.

Autonomic regulation in asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To study the role of autonomic regulation in asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux (GER).

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Autonomic function laboratory of a 908-bed university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen nonsmoking asthmatics with GER (six men, nine women; average age, 36 years).

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects were connected to an ECG monitor. BP was measured by sphygmomanometer at set intervals. After a resting period, each subject had heart rate and BP monitored during an 80 degrees passive tilt, Valsalva maneuver, quiet and deep breathing, handgrip, and an echo stress test of cortical arousal. Each autonomic function test was analyzed and defined as normal, hypervagal, hyperadrenergic, or mixed (a combination of hypervagal and hyperadrenergic responses) as compared with 23 age-matched normal control subjects from our laboratory (14 men, 9 women; average age, 35 years) and published normal control values. Each subject had an overall response score that was determined by the results of the tilt, Valsalva maneuver, and deep breathing maneuvers.

RESULTS

All asthmatics with reflux had at least one autonomic function test display a hypervagal response. Overall response scores show that eight of 15 asthmatics with GER had an overall hypervagal response, and seven had a mixed response. Of the seven asthmatics with GER who had a mixed response score, two had a hypervagal predominant response.

CONCLUSIONS

Asthmatics with GER have evidence of autonomic dysfunction. Heightened vagal tone may be partially responsible for the heightened airway responsiveness to esophageal acidification in asthmatics with reflux.

Paroxysmal laryngospasm secondary to gastroesophageal reflux

Over a 2-year period (1992 to 1994), 12 consecutive adult patients with paroxysmal laryngospasm were prospectively studied. All had had other symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER); however, only 4 (33%) experienced symptoms of heartburn. Each patient underwent fiberoptic laryngeal examination, barium swallow/esophagography, and ambulatory, 24-hour, double-probe pH monitoring (pH-metry). Eleven (92%) of the 12 patients had evidence of GER on examination, and 10 (83%) had abnormal pH-metry, including 3 who demonstrated pharyngeal reflux while having normal total acid exposure times in the esophageal probe. All the patients responded to antireflux treatment, using dietary and lifestyle modifications and omeprazole, with complete cessation of the laryngospastic episodes. This study documents the role of GER in the etiology of paroxysmal laryngospasm, it highlights the advantages of double-probe pH-metry in diagnosing this extraesophageal manifestation of GER, and it demonstrates that antireflux therapy with omeprazole is effective in controlling GER-induced laryngospasm.