Weight Regain Following Sleeve Gastrectomy-a Systematic Review

Is there an indication left for gastric band? A single center experience on 178 patients with a follow-up of 10 years

Background

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) has been widely performed in the past at our university bariatric center. Aim of this study was to retrospectively assess long term outcomes of LAGB at our university hospital, with special regard to non-response (EWL < 25%) and rate of band removal.

Methods

Retrospective search of prospectively maintained database of our university bariatric center was carried out to find all consecutive patients that had undergone LAGB at our department with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Collected data were sex, age, body mass index (BMI), obesity related diseases remission, complications and weight loss.

Results

After 10 years, patients with the band (n = 144) in place had a BMI of 35.2 ± 7.5 kg/m2, while %EWL and % TWL were 40.8 ± 52.4 and 18.9 ± 20.7. Seventy-four (41.6%) achieved a success (%EWL > 50), while 38 (21.3%) were non-responders (%EWL < 25), 32 (18%) had an insufficient weight loss (25 < %EWL < 50) and 34 (19.1%) underwent band removal. Among these, 6 (3.4%) were removed for complications and 28 (15.7%) for insufficient weight loss. Weight regain occurred in 38 out of 144 (26.4%) subjects with the band in place at 10 years. Only one case of early vomiting with readmission for medical treatment was recorded. Slippage, erosion/migration and port/tube complications occurred in 4 (2.2%), 2(1.1%) and 9(5%) cases respectively.

Conclusion

LAGB is a safe and moderately effective bariatric procedure but it showed disappointing rates of removal, non-response and remission from comorbidities. However, LAGB could still be proposed for selected/motivated patients.

Re-suturing after primary endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) for obesity

INTRODUCTION

Although primary endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (P-ESG) is effective, some patients may require revision procedures to augment weight loss. We hypothesized that a non-surgical approach using redo ESG (R-ESG) might be a viable option in such patients. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of R-ESG following P-ESG to treat obesity.

METHODS

We reviewed the outcome of patients who underwent R-ESG at our unit. We classified them as weight loss failure (WF)-< 10% total body weight (TBWL) at 6-months; weight regain (WR)-lost ≥ 10% TBWL and regained 50% of the maximum weight loss at or after 1-year; weight plateau (WP)-lost ≥ 10% TBWL but could not lose further over 3-months. We analyzed the feasibility, safety, and evaluated the efficacy of R-ESG in each group.

RESULTS

Of the 482 patients who underwent P-ESG, 35 (7%) required R- ESG (WF-12, WR-12, WP-11). The mean age, weight, BMI (38.2 kg/m²), and the number of sutures used during P-ESG were similar between the groups. The nadir %TBWL was lowest in WF group compared to WR and WP (6.5% vs. 20% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.001). The mean BMI at R-ESG was 33.6 kg/m². The time to R-ESG was longer in the WR group compared to WF and WP (22.3 vs. 13.4 vs. 13.7 months, p = 0.03). We placed a median of 3 (range 2-6) sutures. R-ESG was technically successful, and no serious complications occurred. All except two patients were discharged on the same day. The overall %TBWL achieved by R-ESG was significantly higher in WP (26%) as compared to WF (11.2%) and WR (12%), respectively (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The need for R-ESG after P-ESG is low. R-ESG is safe and induced weight loss in all patients. The maximum benefit was observed in WP.

Analysis of Medium-Term Weight Regain 5 Years After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

OBJECTIVE

Some patients fail to maintain weight loss after bariatric surgery. Weight regain (WR) disturbs the patients due to possible reappearance of obesity-related comorbidities. This study aimed to assess WR 5 years after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 100 adults who underwent LGS. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was recorded. WR was defined as an increase of at least 10% of the lowest postoperative weight. Patients with WR were subjected to CT gastric volumety. Eating behavior was assessed by the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-Revised 18-Items (TFEQ-R18).

RESULTS

Preoperative comorbidities improved in 89.5% of the patients. Twenty-five females (32.5%) got pregnant within 3 years after surgery. Age, maximum weight loss, and uncontrolled and emotional eating scales of the TFEQ-R18 were independently affecting %EWL. Also, pregnancy negatively affected %EWL. Fourteen patients regain weight: 11 females and three males. CT volumetry of the 14 patients showed a median stomach volume of 515 mL (range 172-1066 mL). CT estimated gastric volume was negatively correlated with % EWL (r = - 0.674, p = 0.008). Patients who developed WR were significantly older (p = 0.006), with lower maximum weight loss, and having higher scores of uncontrolled and emotional eating scales of TFEQ-R18.

CONCLUSION

Medium-term postsurgical weight regain and unsuccessful weight loss in patients who had undergone LSG is associated with older age, maladaptive eating behavior, larger residual stomach, and pregnancy.

The rise of one anastomosis gastric bypass: insights from surgeons and dietitians

One anastomosis gastric bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) is an emerging bariatric surgery (BS) technique. We evaluated and compared attitudes of bariatric surgeons and dietitians towards the considerations for choosing BS-type ("Decision-making"), the contributing factors to the rise of OAGB/MGB in Israel ("OAGB/MGB-rise") and notions regarding the occurrence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and nutritional deficiencies following OAGB/MGB. Anonymous online surveys were distributed. The participants were asked to rate by a 10-point Likert scale (0 = not at all; 100 = very much/often) their attitudes towards "Decision-making", "OAGB/MGB-rise" and occurrence of GI symptoms and nutritional deficiencies following OAGB/MGB. For "Decision-making" and "OAGB/MGB-rise", items were considered prioritized where ≥ 50% of the group considered them as 'very-important' (rating ≥ 80). Data on age, sex, years-in-practice and main workplace were also collected. A total of 106 professionals participated in the survey (42 surgeons; 64 dietitians). The respective mean age, years-in-practice and sex were 52.3 ± 8.7 vs. 42.3 ± 9.0 years, 21.0 ± 10.8 vs. 15.5 ± 9.2 years and 85.7% vs. 3.1% males. The inter-observer agreement for prioritized items related to "Decision-making" was fair (Kappa = 0.250; P = 0.257) and both groups prioritized patient's BMI, comorbidities and compliance. The inter-observer agreement for prioritized items related to "OAGB/MGB-rise" was moderate (Kappa = 0.550; P = 0.099) and both groups prioritized ease of performance, shorter operation duration and failure of former restrictive BS. Surgeons reported lower occurrence of nutritional deficiencies and GI symptoms as adverse effects of OAGB/MGB (P ≤ 0.033). The study highlights the views of bariatric surgeons and dietitians concerning factors that underpin the rise of OABG/MGB in Israel and possible rates of GI symptoms and nutritional deficiencies associated with this modality.

Outcomes After Laparoscopic Conversion of Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) or Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADS)

BACKGROUND

Inadequate weight loss following LAGB (laparoscopic adjusted gastric banding) requiring band removal and conversion to another bariatric procedure is common. There is a paucity of objective data to guide procedure selection. Single anastomosis modifications (SIPS, SADI, SADS) of the duodenal switch biliopancreatic division (DS-BPD) are being investigated. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most prevalent primary bariatric procedure and has been used for revision following LAGB.

PURPOSE

The purpose is to investigate single-stage LAGB removal to LSG SADS (single anastomosis duodenal switch). A matched cohort analysis compared each revision to a similar patient having a primary procedure. This was performed to understand the impact of prior banding on outcomes with each procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study to investigate the outcomes of revision of LAGB for inadequate weight loss to LSG or SADS. To determine whether prior banding impairs results, a matched cohort was done comparing each revision to a patient that had a primary procedure.

RESULTS

As expected, patients who had SADS had greater weight loss than LSG. There was no difference in peri-operative and early complications. Both procedures resulted in weight loss. Importantly, with matched cohort, prior LAGB decreased weight loss outcomes in LSG, but not SADS.

CONCLUSION

Conversion of LAGB to LSG or SADS results in weight loss. The presence of LAGB decreases weight loss in LSG, but not in SADS. This can have important implications for long-term outcomes.

Standardization of Bariatric Metabolic Procedures: World Consensus Meeting Statement

BACKGROUND

Standardization of the key measurements of a procedure's finished anatomic configuration strengthens surgical practice, research, and patient outcomes. A consensus meeting was organized to define standard versions of 25 bariatric metabolic procedures.

METHODS

A panel of experts in bariatric metabolic surgery from multiple continents was invited to present technique descriptions and outcomes for 4 classic, or conventional, and 21 variant and emerging procedures. Expert panel and audience discussion was followed by electronic voting on proposed standard dimensions and volumes for each procedure's key anatomic alterations. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement.

RESULTS

The Bariatric Metabolic Surgery Standardization World Consensus Meeting (BMSS-WOCOM) was convened March 22-24, 2018, in New Delhi, India. Discussion confirmed heterogeneity in procedure measurements in the literature. A set of anatomic measurements to serve as the standard version of each procedure was proposed. After two voting rounds, 22/25 (88.0%) configurations posed for consideration as procedure standards achieved voting consensus by the expert panel, 1 did not attain consensus, and 2 were not voted on. All configurations were voted on by ≥ 50% of 50 expert panelists. The Consensus Statement was developed from scientific evidence collated from presenters' slides and a separate literature review, meeting video, and transcripts. Review and input was provided by consensus panel members.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard versions of the finished anatomic configurations of 22 surgical procedures were established by expert consensus. The BMSS process was undertaken as a first step in developing evidence-based standard bariatric metabolic surgical procedures with the aim of improving consistency in surgery, data collection, comparison of procedures, and outcome reporting.

Short- to medium-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass compared with one-anastomosis gastric bypass for weight recidivism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) and the one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are 2 revisional procedures to address the problem of weight recidivism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of SADI and OAGB as revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) in initially super-obese patients (body mass index [BMI] >50 kg/m²).

SETTING

Academic hospital, bariatric center of excellence, Germany.

METHODS

Observational study of outcomes in 84 initially super-obese patients who had undergone RBS after LSG (SADI n = 42, OAGB n = 42) between July 2013 and April 2018. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after RBS. The variables analyzed included time between LSG and RBS, BMI, excess weight loss, total weight loss, operation time, and complications.

RESULTS

The time interval between LSG and RBS was 45.5 ± 22.8 and 43.5 ± 24.2 months for SADI and OAGB, respectively. At the time of RBS, the mean BMI was 42.8 ± 7.9 kg/m² for SADI and 43.4 ± 9.2 kg/m² for OAGB. The follow-up examinations rates (%) after SADI were 97.6, 92.8, 90.5, 78.6, 57.1, and 100, 97.6, 95.2, 85.7, and 59.5 after OAGB. The BMI at the follow-up examinations were 39.1 ± 7.2, 34.2 ± 6.9, 31.2 ± 5.8, 30.2 ± 5.3, 29.3 ± 5.1 for SADI, and 39.5 ± 8.1, 36.6 ± 7.4, 34.7 ± 7.9, 32.9 ± 6.3, and 31.6 ± 5.9 for OAGB. The mean operating times for SADI and OAGB were 138 ± 40 and 123 ± 39 minutes, respectively. Three patients in the SADI group and 1 patient in the OAGB group developed a major complication within the first 30 postoperative days.

CONCLUSION

SADI and OAGB were effective second-step procedures for further weight reduction after LSG in initially super-obese patients after short to medium follow-up. There was a trend toward higher weight loss for SADI though this did not reach statistical significance. Substantial differences concerning surgery time and complications between the 2 procedures were not observed.

Presurgical Predictive Factors of Excess Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

PURPOSE

Conditions associated with surgical technique and postoperative lifestyle changes, as well as the characteristics of patients, may affect weight loss following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. In this study, the effects of age, gender, BMI, and excess weight at the time of surgery on weight loss during follow-up were examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Demographic data (age, gender), preoperative BMI, and weight values of the patients were recorded. TWL% and EWL% values of patients were recorded during follow-up at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, and 18th months. Patients were grouped according to age (AGE1 < 30, AGE2 30-50, AGE3 ≥ 50 years), BMI at the time of surgery (BMI1 ≤ 50, BMI2 > 50 kg/m²), and EW at the time of surgery (EW1 ≤ 60, EW2 > 60 kg). EWL% values obtained in the follow-up visits were compared among the gender, age, BMI, and EW groups.

RESULTS

A total of 456 patients (371 females, 85 males) were operated. Mean EWL% was lower in AGE3 group (p < 0.001). Patients in AGE1 group had the highest mean EWL%, while those in BMI2 and EW2 groups had lower mean EWL% values throughout the follow-up period (p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that age and BMI were associated with EWL% at all follow-up visits (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with less than 60 kg of excess weight, those with BMI ≤ 50 kg/m² and younger patients may lose weight more effectively following LSG.

Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery-A Multicentre Study of 9617 Patients from Indian Bariatric Surgery Outcome Reporting Group

BACKGROUND

There is little robust data on weight regain (WR) after bariatric surgery making it difficult to counsel patients regarding long-term outcomes of different bariatric procedures. The purpose of this study was to see WR in medium and long term after SG, RYGB, and OAGB in Indian population.

METHODS

In a multicentre study, data on preoperative and postoperative weights over 5 years were collected. Multiple definitions were applied to find the proportion of patients with significant WR increase of 25% of lost weight from nadir (definition 1), weight gain of > 10 kg from nadir (definition 2), and BMI gain of > 5 kg/m² from nadir (definition 3). The proportion of those with significant WR was compared across sub-groups.

RESULTS

A total of 9617 patients were included. Median WR at 5 years was 14.1% of lost weight, 1.92 kg/m², and 5 kg. Significant WR using definition 1 was 35.1%, 14.6%, and 3% after sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and mini-one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) respectively. Severe albumin deficiency was highest in OAGB (5.9%) patients followed by SG (2.9%) and RYGB (2.2%) at 5 years(p = 0.023). Haemoglobin levels < 10 g/dL were seen in 8.2%, 9.0%, and 13.9% of SG, RYGB, and OAGB patients respectively (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first comparative study of WR, OAGB had lesser WR in comparison to SG and RYGB but had the most impact on Hb and albumin levels in the long term. Definition selection for reporting WR has a significant impact on the results. There is a need for standardising the reporting of WR in bariatric literature.

Weight regain after bariatric surgery: a systematic literature review and comparison across studies using a large reference sample

Published estimates of weight regain (WR) after bariatric surgery vary greatly. Understanding the sources of variability in the literature and clarifying the magnitude of WR after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are critical for informing expectations and planning interventions. A literature search through January 2019 yielded 15 English-language studies that reported WR in at least 30 participants, not selected based on weight loss or WR, at least 3 years after primary RYGB (n = 11) or SG (n = 5). Median follow-up was 5.0 (range, 3.2-10.0) years. Median sample size was 62 (range, 33-464). Samples represented a median of 54.3% (range, 10.7%-100%) of eligible participants. Nadir weight was determined by serial research assessments (n = 1), medical records (n = 7), participant recall (n = 4), or an undisclosed method (n = 4). Three continuous and 8 binary WR measures (the latter, based on various thresholds for clinically meaningful WR) were reported. To enable comparison across studies, the percentage difference in WR in each study versus a reference sample (n = 1433 RYGB), matched on time since surgery and WR measure, was calculated. Median WR in the reference sample increased from 8.2 (25th-75th percentile: 0-19.5) to 23.8 (25th-75th percentile: 9.0-33.9) percent of maximum weight lost, 3 to 6 years post RYGB surgery. Studies of RYGB versus SG, with larger versus smaller samples, with higher versus lower participation rates, that determined nadir weight via participant recall versus medical records, and reported continuous versus binary WR measures tended to have WR values closer to the reference sample and each other. Variation in WR estimates was explained by heterogeneity in WR measures, timing of assessment, surgical procedure, and study design characteristics. The best estimate of WR after RYGB likely comes from the large reference sample. WR after SG versus RYGB appears higher. However, additional high-quality studies with uniform reporting of WR by surgical procedure are needed.

Mini/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as a Second Step Procedure After Sleeve Gastrectomy-a Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Whether one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a better revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is still under debate. The aim is to compare short-term outcomes of RYGB and OAGB as a RBS after SG, pertaining to their effects on weight loss, resolution of comorbidities, and complications.

METHODS

We performed a single-center analysis of 55 patients (n = 34 OAGB, n = 21 RYGB). Indications for revisional surgery included weight regain/loss failure (67%) and intractable gastroesophageal reflux disease (33%). Data were collected up to 1-year follow-up (FU) and included time of revisional surgery, operation time, weight, body mass index, excess weight loss, and total weight loss (TWL), both in percent, complications and resolution of comorbidities.

RESULTS

Operation time was 79 ± 36 (OAGB-MGB) and 98 ± 24 min (RYGB) (p = 0.03). In the first 30 postoperative days, three patients in the RYGB group, and no patient in the OAGB group, had postoperative complications. FU was 100%. Minor complication rates at 12 months were 33.3% (RYGB) and 35.3% (OAGB). At 12 months, mean % TWL was 10.3 ± 7.6% (RYGB) and 15.8 ± 7.8% (OAGB) (p = 0.0132).

CONCLUSIONS

OAGB after failed SG was found to be a quicker procedure with less perioperative complications. At 1-year FU, no significant differences were seen between RYGB and OAGB regarding readmission and minor complications. Still long-term FU including the risk of malnutrition is needed to have a complete evaluation of OAGB as a RBS for the future.

Impact of sleeve gastrectomy and dietary change on metabolic and hepatic function in an obesity rat model - Experimental research

PURPOSE

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is an effective procedure to treat morbid obesity. SG induces remission of type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome and improves non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, it is imperative to clarify the extent to which these beneficial effects may be attributed to SG among other concomitant changes including postoperative diet. The current study addresses this question in a rodent model of obesity by subjecting it to SG, normal diet, or a combination of the two.

METHODS

Male Wistar-rats were fed with either high fat diet (HF, n = 32) or received chow diet (CD, n = 8). After 15 weeks, the HF-fed rats underwent either SG or sham operation, following which they were randomised to either continue HF or switched to CD for another 6 weeks. Body weight, fasting blood glucose level, blood pressure, and adipokine expression (leptin, adiponectin, MCP-1) in the adipose tissue along with triglycerides level in the blood serum were assessed to evaluate metabolic function. Hepatic function was assessed by histological evaluation of liver fibrosis (Hydroxyproline, Sirius Red) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of the inflammation marker monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1).

RESULTS

Postoperative dietary change improved adipose tissue inflammation and arterial blood pressure regardless of the surgical intervention, while SG improved hyperglycaemia, blood triglyceride levels and, regardless of the postoperative diet, hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. However, combined administration of SG with post-operative normal diet was the most effective with regard to reducing the body weight.

CONCLUSION

HF for 15 weeks induced obesity with metabolic syndrome and NAFLD in rats. SG and dietary intervention improved metabolic state and NAFLD; however, their combination was significantly more effective.

The Cards and Lottery Task: Validation of a New Paradigm Assessing Decision Making Under Risk in Individuals With Severe Obesity

BACKGROUND

A growing body of research demonstrated impaired executive functions in individuals with severe obesity, including increased sensitivity to reward and impulsive decision making under risk conditions. For the assessment of decision making in patients with severe obesity, studies widely used the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) or the Delay Discounting Task (DDT), which cover short-term or long-term consequences of decisions only. A further development originating from the field of addiction research is the Cards and Lottery Task (CLT), in which each decision made has conflicting immediate and long-term consequences at the same time. The present study aimed to validate the CLT in individuals with severe obesity.

METHODS

Patients with severe obesity (N = 78, 67% women, 42.9 ± 10.4 years old, body mass index of 48.1 ± 8.3 kg/m²) were included. Convergent validity was evaluated using the computerized Delay Discounting Task and well-established self-report questionnaires assessing different aspects of impulsivity. For discriminant validity, CLT performance was compared between symptom groups characterized by high versus low impulsivity. The task's clinical validity was evaluated based on associations with general and eating disorder psychopathology, and body mass index. Test-retest reliability was determined by administering the CLT in n = 31 participants without weight-loss treatment one year later. The task's sensitivity to change due to weight loss was evaluated by retesting n = 32 patients one year after receiving obesity surgery.

RESULTS

The number of advantageous decisions in the CLT was significantly positively associated with delay discounting and effortful control, and significantly negatively correlated with behavioral impulsivity. CLT performance differed significantly between individuals with and without symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and between samples with severe obesity and healthy controls. Clinically, CLT performance was significantly associated with general, but not eating disorder psychopathology. The CLT showed moderate test-retest reliability after one year in weight-stable individuals and was sensitive to change in those undergoing obesity surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified the CLT to be a highly promising, new complex measure of short- and long-term decision making with good reliability and validity in individuals with severe obesity. Future studies should assess its association with the IGT and predictive value for real-life health behavior.

Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Nonbanded Sleeve: Midterm Results from a Prospective Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

Weight regain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is nowadays a growing concern. Sleeve dilatation and loss of food restriction is considered the main mechanism. The placement of a silicon ring around the gastric tube seems to give benefits in the short term. We report the results of a randomized study comparing LSG and laparoscopic banded sleeve gastrectomy (LBSG) over a 4-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of banded sleeve gastrectomy compared to standard sleeve in the midterm.

METHODS

Between 01/2014 and 01/2015, we randomly assigned 50 patients to receive one of the two procedures. Patients' management was exactly the same, apart from the band placement. We analyzed differences in weight loss, operative time, complication rate, and mortality, with a median follow-up of 4 years.

RESULTS

Twenty five patients were assigned to receive LSG (Group A) and 25 LBSG (Group B). The mean preoperative BMI (body mass index) was 47.3 ± 6.58 kg/m² and 45.95 ± 5.85 kg/m², respectively. There was no significant difference in the operative time. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. At 12-month follow-up, the mean BMI was 29.72 ± 4.40 kg/m² in Group A and 27.42 ± 4.47 kg/m² in Group B (p=0.186). After a median follow-up of 4 years, the mean BMI in Group B was significantly lower than Group A (24.10 ± 4.52 kg/m² vs 28.80 ± 4.62 kg/m²; p=0.00199).

CONCLUSIONS

LBSG is a safe procedure, with no impact on postoperative complications. The banded sleeve showed a significant greater weight loss in the midterm follow-up. Considering the issue of weight regain observed after LSG, the placement of a perigastric ring during the first procedure may be a strategy to improve the results. This trial is registered with NCT04228185.

Lack of Standard Definitions of Primary and Secondary (Non)responders After Primary Gastric Bypass and Gastric Sleeve: a Systematic Review

Lack of standard definitions of primary and secondary (non)responders after RYGB and SG makes it impossible to compare the literature. The aim was to analyze the different definitions used. MEDLINE® was searched for literature published between 01-07-2014 and 01-07-2017 concerning (1) patients who received a primary RYGB or SG and (2) the outcomes of primary and secondary (non)responders. One hundred twelve out of 650 papers were eligible. Forty out of 47 papers described a definition of weight loss success. Sixty-seven out of 112 papers mentioned weight loss failure of which 42 described a definition, in total 23 different definitions. Weight regain was mentioned in 77 papers; only 21 papers provided a definition. The recent literature regarding definitions of these outcomes is highly inconsistent. To compare the literature international consensus is required.

Definitions of Long-Term Weight Regain and Their Associations with Clinical Outcomes

Introduction

The prevalence and clinical significance of weight regain after bariatric surgery remains largely unclear due to the lack of a standardized definition of significant weight regain. The development of a clinically relevant definition of weight regain requires a better understanding of its clinical significance.

Objectives

To assess rates of weight regain 5 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG), applying six definitions and investigating their association with clinical outcomes.

Methods

Patients were followed up until 5 years after surgery and weight regain was calculated. Regression techniques were used to assess the association of weight regain with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the presence of comorbidities.

Results

A total of 868 patients participated in the study, with a mean age of 46.6 (± 10.4) years, of which 79% were female. The average preoperative BMI was 44.8 (± 5.9) kg/m2 and the total maximum weight loss was 32% (± 8%). Eighty-seven percent experienced any regain. Significant weight regain rates ranged from 16 to 37% depending on the definition. Three weight regain definitions were associated with deterioration in physical HRQoL (p < 0.05), while associations between definitions of weight regain and the presence of comorbidities 5 years after surgery were not significant.

Conclusion

These results indicate that identifying one single categorical definition of clinically significant weight regain is difficult. Additional research into the clinical significance of weight regain is needed to inform the development of a standardized definition that includes all dimensions of surgery success: weight, HRQoL, and comorbidity remission.

Preoperative liking and wanting for sweet beverages as predictors of body weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy

Background/objectives:

Patients who receive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) lose more weight than those who receive vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG). RYGB and VSG alter hedonic responses to sweet flavor, but whether baseline differences in hedonic responses modulate weight loss after RYGB or VSG remains untested.

Participants/methods:

Male and female candidates (n=66) for RYGB or VSG were recruited and tested for their subjective liking and wanting ratings of sucrose solutions and flavored beverages sweetened with aspartame. Participants were classified by unsupervised hierarchical clustering for their liking and wanting ratings of sucrose and aspartame. Participant liking ratings were also used in a supervised classification using pre-established categories of liking ratings (liker, disliker, and inverted u-shape). Effects of categories obtained from unsupervised or supervised classification on body weight loss and their interaction with surgery type were analyzed separately at 3 and 12 months after surgery using linear models corrected for sex and age.

Results:

RYGB participants lost more body weight compared to VSG participants at 3 and 12 months after surgery (P < 0.001 for both time points). Unsupervised clustering analysis identified clusters corresponding to high and low wanting or liking ratings for sucrose or aspartame. RYGB participants in high-wanting clusters based on sucrose, but not aspartame, lost more weight than VSG at both 3 (P = 0.01) and 12 months (P = 0.03), yielding a significant cluster by surgery interaction. Categories based on supervised classification using liking ratings for sucrose or aspartame showed no significant effects on body weight loss between RYGB and VSG participants.

Conclusions:

Classification of patients into high/low wanting ratings for sucrose before surgery can predict differential body weight loss after RYGB or VSG in adults and could be used to advise on surgery type.

Loss and Regain of Weight After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy According to Preoperative BMI : Late Results of a Prospective Study (78-138 months) with 93% of Follow-Up

INTRODUCTION

The long-term results in sleeve gastrectomy (SG) have been reported in few publications. None of them has evaluated the importance of preoperative BMI (kg/m²) in the final results.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the loss and regain of weight after SG, determining the influence of preoperative BMI in final results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study included all patients operated between 2006 and 2010. Exclusion criteria corresponded to patients with Barrett's esophagus, type 2 diabetes, and hiatal hernia greater than 3 cm. Patients were followed and controlled "face to face" by the main author.

RESULTS

From 109 original patients included in this study, 102 (93.5%) completed the late follow-up. Patients were divided into four groups: (a) I-29 patients with BMI 32.1-34.9; (b) II-56 patients with BMI 35-39.9; (c) III-20 patients with BMI 40-49.9; and (d) IV-4 patients with BMI > 50. There was a significant decrease in the BMI 12 to 24 months after surgery. At the late control, patients in groups III and IV regained weight in 85 and 100%, respectively. Patients in groups I and II had 3.6 and 38% of weight regain.

CONCLUSION

The changes in weight after SG are directly related to preoperative BMI: the higher this value, the higher the percentage of failure and weight regain late after surgery. Besides, laparoscopic SG seems to be an adequate operation at late control in terms of loose of weight after surgery in patients with a BMI less than 40 kg/m² before surgery.

Is weight regain after bariatric surgery associated with psychiatric comorbidity? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Bariatric surgery has been recognized as the gold standard treatment for severe obesity. Although postbariatric surgery patients usually achieve and maintain substantial weight loss, a group of individuals may exhibit weight regain. Several factors are proposed to weight regain, including psychiatric comorbidity. The objective of the study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the relationship between psychiatric comorbidity and weight regain. A systematic review through PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PsycINFO was performed, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). After a stepwise selection, 13 articles were included in the qualitative analysis and 5 were included for a meta-analysis. Women was majority in most of the studies (87.6%), and a bypass procedure was the bariatric intervention most evaluated (66.8%), followed by gastric banding (32.1%) and sleeve (1.1%). Higher rates of postbariatric surgery eating psychopathology were reported in patients with weight regain. However, the association between general psychopathology and weight regain was not consistent across the studies. In the meta-analysis, the odds of eating psychopathology in the weight regain group was higher compared with the nonweight regain group (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.54-3.15). Postbariatric surgery eating psychopathology seems to play an important role in weight regain.

A Randomised Trial of Text Message Support for Reducing Weight Regain Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a common bariatric procedure with high rates of weight regain (WR). Clinicians and patients have identified a lack of follow-up support and maladaptive lifestyle behaviours as potential causes for WR. While text message support has been shown to be effective for weight loss in non-surgical patients, it has not been investigated for reducing WR in bariatric patients.

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness of text message support in reducing weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy.

METHODS

A text message intervention was designed. The effectiveness of the intervention was investigated by a randomised trial powered to detect a 15% difference in the primary outcome of percent excess weight loss (84 participants required). Secondary outcomes were the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting System (BAROS) score and patient satisfaction. Outcomes were assessed at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Ninety-five participants were randomised to either standard care or text message support (daily text message for 1 year). While there was no significant difference in the primary outcome at 6 or 12 months, patients who received the intervention tended to have less WR and a significantly better BAROS score at 12 months. Participants who received text message support found it beneficial, would have liked the messages to continue, and felt WR was reduced by having the text message support.

CONCLUSION

Text message support following SG is feasible, may reduce weight regain, improves the BAROS score and is valued by patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02341001.

Changes in quality of life 5 years after sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed bariatric surgery procedure worldwide, but reports on long-term quality of life (QOL) outcomes are scarce. We investigated 5-year trajectories in QOL and their associations with weight loss after SG.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a single Norwegian bariatric surgery centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Out of 150 operated patients, 127 were included. Mean age was 41 years, 68% were women and the follow-up rate at 1 year was 85% and 64% at 1 and 5 years, respectively.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Data were collected preoperatively, and 1 and 5 years after surgery assessing three different levels of QOL. The main exposure was weight loss after SG, assessed as per cent excess body mass index (kg/m²) loss (%EBMIL). The Obesity-Related Problem (OP) scale was used to measure obesity-specific health-related QOL (HRQOL). Physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) composite summary scores of the Short Form 36 Health Survey were used to capture generic HRQOL and Cantril Ladder was used to assess overall QOL.

RESULTS

All HRQOL/overall QOL measures significantly improved at 1 year, followed by modest decline from 1 to 5 years after surgery. Greater %EBMIL 5 years after surgery was significantly associated with improvements in OP and PCS scores, but not with MCS and Cantril Ladder scores. Although significant (p<0.001) and clinically relevant improvements in HRQOL/overall QOL outcomes were observed at 5 years, scores were still below the general population norms.

CONCLUSION

Most patients undergoing SG experience substantial weight loss accompanied by statistically significant and clinically relevant long-term improvements in HRQOL/overall QOL. However, an important minority of patients still report low HRQOL/overall QOL 5 years after SG. Further research should aim to identify other factors that contribute to impaired QOL after bariatric surgery, even in the presence of successful weight control.

Is sleeve gastrectomy overcriticized? A single-center Indian experience with 5-year follow-up results

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery has seen a sharp rise in numbers worldwide in the last decade. Being a popular procedure, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has been widely studied over the years for its efficacy, potential for weight regain, metabolic impact, and de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate clinical outcomes of laparoscopic SG after 5 years of follow-up in terms of weight loss, co-morbidity resolution, and GERD.

SETTING

The study was performed in a center of excellence in bariatric surgery in India.

METHODS

All patients who underwent laparoscopic SG from January 2012 to April 2013 were included in the study. Their demographic, preoperative, and postoperative data were prospectively maintained in Microsoft Excel and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighteen patients underwent SG in 2012-2013. Patients had a preoperative body mass index of 45.8 ± 9.5 kg/m² (mean ± standard deviation) and excess weight of 54.1 ± 25.6 kg. Percent excess weight loss was 87.6% ± 28.9% at 1 year, 77.2% ± 29.3% at 3 years, and 69.1% ± 27.8% at 5 years. Percent total weight loss at 1 year was 35.5% ± 7.6%, 31.4% ± 9.1% at 3 years, and 29.2% ± 9.8% at 5 years. At 5 years, 11 of 25 (44%) showed complete diabetic remission and 5 of 25 (20%) showed partial remission. De novo GERD was seen in 24 of 153 (15.7%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study reflects good outcomes after SG in terms of weight loss and diabetes resolution at 5-year follow-up, though GERD remains a matter of concern.

Lorcaserin vs. Phentermine among non-surgical and surgical obese patients: Anthropometric, glycemic, lipid, safety and cost outcomes

Background

To evaluate effectiveness, safety, and costs of Lorcaserin vs. phentermine among obese non–surgical and surgical patients (post bariatric surgery).

Methods

This retrospective study retrieved charts of all patients (January 2013–June 2016) who received Lorcaserin or phentermine for 3 months. The study assessed anthropometric, glycemic, and lipid changes, as well as side effects and cost of medications among overweight and obese non-surgical (n = 83) and surgical patients (n = 46). These two patient groups were compared using Chi-square (χ2) and unpaired‘t’ test for qualitative and quantitative variables respectively.

Results

At 3 months, among the non-surgical group, Phentermine patients had greater percentage of total weight loss (TWL%) (7.65 ± 8.26 vs. 2.99 ± 3.72%, P = 0.003), and greater BMI reduction (−3.16 ± 3.63 vs. −1.15 ± 1.53 kg/m², P = 0.003) than Lorcaserin. Within the surgical group, Lorcaserin patients had significantly smaller TWL% (1.86 ± 5.06 vs. 7.62 ± 9.80%, P = 0.012), and smaller BMI reduction (−0.74 ± 1.80 vs. −3.06 ± 4.08 kg/m², P = 0.012) than Phentermine. Lorcaserin exhibited significant total cholesterol and LDL improvements only among surgical patients with significant weight reduction (≥5% TW). Both medications were not associated with glycemic improvements among non-surgical and surgical groups. Phentermine had slightly more side effects but was less expensive.

Conclusions

Among both patient groups, phentermine was more effective in achieving weight loss. Lorcaserin showed dyslipidemia improvements only among surgical patients who achieved significant weight reduction. Anti-obesity medications as part of weight management programs can result in weight loss among non-surgical and surgical patients, or halt weight regain among surgical patients. This is the first study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two anti-obesity medications (lorcaserin vs. phentermine) among two distinct obese patient groups, non-surgical and surgical patients.

•

First study to evaluate effectiveness and safety of lorcaserin vs. phentermine in obese non-surgical and surgical patients.

•

Among both patient groups, phentermine was more effective in achieving weight loss than lorcaserin.

•

Dyslipidemia improvements was only achieved in surgical patients who achieved significant weight reduction with lorcaserin.

•

Both medications were not associated with glycemic improvements among non-surgical and surgical groups.

•

Phentermine had slightly more side effects but was less expensive.

Does taste preference predict weight regain after bariatric surgery?

BACKGROUND

While bariatric surgery is well established as a means of inducing sustained weight loss, the rate of weight loss typically declines after a year, and weight regain has been observed. Preoperative taste preferences have been suspected to play a role in weight regain, possibly by influencing post-operative dietary practices. We sought to investigate the association between preoperative taste preferences and weight regain following bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent bariatric surgery with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Demographics and weight were collected in follow-up visits; while patient recall of preoperative taste preference was assessed, using a multiple-choice question in the study survey administered at least 6 months post-surgery. Weight regain was calculated as weight at 2 years minus weight at 1 year post-surgery, with weight regain denoted by positive values and weight loss by negative. Linear regression models were utilized to study associations between weight regain and preoperative taste preferences with and without adjusting for demographic factors and surgery type.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing RYGB had less weight regain (- 4.5 kg, p = 0.033) compared to patients undergoing VSG. Compared to patients with no preferences, patients with sweet food or salty food preferences had 5.5 kg (p = 0.038) and 6.1 kg (p = 0.048) weight regain, respectively, at 2 years post-surgery. After adjustment, patients with salty food preference had 6.8 kg (p = 0.027) weight regain compared to patients with no preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative salty taste preference was associated with weight regain at 2 years post-surgery in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Findings of this project might have implications for predicting long-term weight loss maintenance for patients with known preoperative taste preferences. Our study suggests that patients with preoperative salty taste preference may need further post-operative psychosocial support and resources to prevent weight regain and to ensure healthy and sufficient weight loss.

Prospective Longitudinal Trends in Body Composition and Clinical Outcomes 3 Years Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Longitudinal assessment of body composition following bariatric surgery allows monitoring of health status. Our aim was to elucidate trends of anthropometric and clinical outcomes 3 years following sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of 60 patients who underwent SG. Anthropometrics including body composition analysis measured by multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, blood tests, liver fat content measured by abdominal ultrasound and habitual physical activity were evaluated at baseline and at 6 (M6), 12 (M12), and 36 (M36) months post-surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (55% women, age 44.7 ± 8.7 years) who completed the entire follow-up were included. Fat mass (FM) was reduced significantly 1 year post-surgery (55.8 ± 11.3 to 26.7 ± 8.3 kg; P < 0.001) and then increased between 1 and 3 years post-operatively, but remained below baseline level (26.7 ± 8.3 to 33.1 ± 11.1 kg; P < 0.001). Fat free mass (FFM) decreased significantly during the first 6 months (64.7 ± 14.3 to 56.9 ± 11.8 kg; P < 0.001), slightly decreased between M6 and M12 and then reached a plateau through M36. Weight loss "failure" (< 50% excess weight loss) was noticed in 5.0% and 28.3% of patients at M12 and M36, respectively. Markers of lipid and glucose metabolism changed thereafter in parallel to the changes observed in FM, with the exception of HDL-C, which increased continuingly from M6 throughout the whole period analyzed (45.0 ± 10.2 to 59.5 ± 15.4 mg/dl; P < 0.001) and HbA1c which continued to decrease between M12 and M36 (5.5 ± 0.4 to 5.3 ± 0.4%; P < 0.001). There were marked within-person variations in trends of anthropometric and clinical parameters during the 3-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight regain primarily attributed to FM with no further decrease in FFM occurs between 1 and 3 years post-SG. FM increase at mid-term may underlie the recurrence of metabolic risk factors and can govern clinical interventions.

The first consensus statement on revisional bariatric surgery using a modified Delphi approach

BACKGROUND

Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) constitutes a possible solution for patients who experience an inadequate response following bariatric surgery or significant weight regain following an initial satisfactory response. This paper reports results from the first modified Delphi consensus-building exercise on RBS.

METHODS

We created a committee of 22 recognised opinion-makers with a special interest in RBS. The committee invited 70 RBS experts from 27 countries to vote on 39 statements concerning RBS. An agreement amongst ≥ 70.0% experts was regarded as a consensus.

RESULTS

Seventy experts from twenty-seven countries took part. There was a consensus that the decision for RBS should be individualised (100.0%) and multi-disciplinary (92.8%). Experts recommended a preoperative nutritional (95.7%) and psychological evaluation (85.7%), endoscopy (97.1%), and a contrast series (94.3%). Experts agreed that Roux-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (94.3%), One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) (82.8%), and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) (71.4%) were acceptable RBS options after gastric banding (84.3%). OAGB (84.3%), bilio-pancreatic diversion/duodenal switch (BPD/DS) (81.4%), and SADI-S (88.5%) were agreed as consensus RBS options after sleeve gastrectomy. lengthening of bilio-pancreatic limb was the only consensus RBS option after RYGB (94.3%) and OAGB (72.8%).

CONCLUSION

Experts achieved consensus on a number of aspects of RBS. Though expert opinion can only be regarded as low-quality evidence, the findings of this exercise should help improve the outcomes of RBS while we develop robust evidence to inform future practice.

Physical activity and its association with psychosocial health following bariatric surgery

Physical activity (PA) helps sustain weight loss and may also provide psychological benefits in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Using a set of questionnaires, we demonstrated that bariatric patients with increased level of PA at 1-year follow-up had better psychosocial outcomes including depressive symptoms and mental health-related quality of life compared with those who had reduced or unchanged level of PA. Our findings indicate the benefit of incorporating PA in the postoperative care for bariatric patients. Novelty Postoperative behavioural change in terms of physical activity improves psychosocial health in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Modifiable factors associated with weight regain after bariatric surgery: a scoping review

Background: Although bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity, weight regain may still occur. While non-modifiable factors associated with weight regain have been explored, modifiable factors responsible for weight regain are understudied. This scoping review aimed to identify modifiable behaviors associated with weight regain after bariatric surgery. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Google Scholar, Cochrane, National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) and Practice-based Evidence in Nutrition (PEN) which included articles published between January 1990 and February 2 2017, for studies examining "weight regain" after bariatric surgery. A total of 293 citations were retrieved. Eligible articles must have examined modifiable factors and addressed weight regain, or a long-term post-operative phase in which weight regain may occur. After removing duplicates, 22 studies were included for thematic analysis. Results: Key modifiable factors associated with weight regain were identified and categorized under the following themes: poor dietary adherence (e.g. excessive calorie, carbohydrate, and alcohol intake), maladaptive eating behaviors (e.g. grazing, binging), lack of on-going follow-up with the bariatric team and insufficient physical activity. Conclusions:  Health professionals and self-monitoring tools for patients who have undergone bariatric surgery may benefit from these findings to direct their education and interventions to target behavior change.

Modifiable factors associated with weight regain after bariatric surgery: a scoping review

Background: Although bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity, weight regain may still occur. While non-modifiable factors associated with weight regain have been explored, modifiable factors responsible for weight regain are understudied. This scoping review aimed to identify modifiable behaviors associated with weight regain after bariatric surgery. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Google Scholar, Cochrane, National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) and Practice-based Evidence in Nutrition (PEN) which included articles published between January 1990 and February 2 2017, for studies examining "weight regain" after bariatric surgery. A total of 293 citations were retrieved. Eligible articles must have examined modifiable factors and addressed weight regain, or a long-term post-operative phase in which weight regain may occur. After removing duplicates, 22 studies were included for thematic analysis. Results: Key modifiable factors associated with weight regain were identified and categorized under the following themes: poor dietary adherence (e.g. excessive calorie, carbohydrate, and alcohol intake), maladaptive eating behaviors (e.g. grazing, binging), lack of on-going follow-up with the bariatric team and insufficient physical activity. Conclusions:  Health professionals and self-monitoring tools for patients who have undergone bariatric surgery may benefit from these findings to direct their education and interventions to target behavior change.

Predictors of weight regain after sleeve gastrectomy: an integrative review

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is one of the most effective treatments for severe obesity, but weight regain after surgery is a challenging issue. The mechanism of postoperative weight relapse is barely understood because of the lack of long-term data.

OBJECTIVES

To review and synthesize current evidence related to factors that contribute to weight regain after SG.

METHODS

Whittemore and Knafl's integrative method guided the research. The databases PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL, as well as 2 selected journals, were searched through October 2018 to gather English-language journal articles on the potential predictors of post-SG weight regain among adult populations. Only articles with sample size ≥10 were included. A narrative synthesis was used to analyze the 17 studies included in the review.

RESULTS

In recent years there has been an upward trend in the published reports of SG on longer-term outcomes. After a review of 6863 records, 17 eligible studies were identified, reporting various definitions of weight regain and 3 main categories of predictors: surgical/anatomic factors, hormonal/metabolic imbalance, and behavioral/mood factors. The 17 studies used quantitative (n = 16) and qualitative methods (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

There is a dearth of available literature addressing predictors of weight regain after SG, and the inconsistency in the definition of regain limited the comparability between studies. Besides the surgical/anatomic factors that have been reported as significant predictors, other modifiable factors such as behavioral and psychosocial determinants need to be further investigated.

Endoscopic management of weight regain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

INTRODUCTION

With the cumulative increase in the number of patients undergoing bariatric surgery, postoperative weight regain has become a considerable challenge. Mechanisms for weight regain are not fully understood and the process is likely multifactorial in many cases. Endoluminal revisions that reduce gastric pouch size and diameter of the gastrojejunal anastomosis may offer an effective and less invasive management strategy for this population.

AREAS COVERED

We critically review data from case series, retrospective and prospective studies, and meta-analyses pertaining to weight regain after gastric bypass. A variety of endoscopic revision approaches are reviewed, including technique details, procedural safety and efficacy, and post-procedure care.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Given the proliferation of endoluminal therapies with evidence showing safety and efficacy in the treatment of weight regain, it is likely that endoscopic revision will be the gold standard to treat weight regain in patients with gastric bypass.

Eating self-efficacy as predictor of long-term weight loss and obesity-specific quality of life after sleeve gastrectomy: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

A person's confidence to control eating, eating self-efficacy (ESE), has been identified as a target for long-term weight management in nonsurgical weight loss interventions, but has to a limited extent been studied after bariatric surgery.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the association between ESE, weight loss, and obesity-specific quality of life (QOL) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

SETTING

A single-center longitudinal study.

METHODS

Data from adult patients were collected before SG, and at mean 16 months (±standard deviation 4 mo) and 55 (±4) months postoperatively. ESE was measured by the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire Short-Form. Multiple regression analyses were performed with excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) and obesity-specific QOL as dependent variables. Age, sex, and other preoperative values were covariates in all models.

RESULTS

Of 114 preoperative patients, 91 (80%) and 84 (74%) were available for follow-up 16 and 55 months after SG, respectively. Mean %EBMIL from baseline to 16 and 55 months was 76% (95% confidence interval: 71.9, 79.6) and 67% (95% confidence interval: 61.9, 72.2), respectively. Preoperative ESE scores improved significantly at both 16 and 55 months (P = .002) but did not predict postoperative %EBMIL or QOL at 55 months (β = -.08, P = .485). Greater change in ESE from 0 to 16 months predicted higher %EBMIL (β = .34, P = .013) at 55 months, and improvements in ESE from 0 to 55 months were significantly associated with higher %EBMIL (β = .46, P = .001) and obesity-specific QOL (β = .50, P < .001) 55 months after SG.

CONCLUSION

Significant improvements in ESE were seen at 16 months, and remained high at 55 months after SG in this cohort. Patients who improved their ESE the most also experienced the highest weight loss and obesity-specific QOL 5 years postoperatively. Future research should address whether enhancement of ESE corresponds to sustained improvements in eating behavior after bariatric surgery.

Analysis of the Association between Eating Behaviors and Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

SETTING

In a private medical center, 300 patients who underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) were classified into 4 groups according to their eating behaviors (EB) preoperatively. During a 3-year postoperative follow-up, dietary changes in relation to weight loss were studied.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the influence of abnormal EB on the outcome of sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND

Patients with morbid obesity often suffer from abnormal EB. After LSG, the outcome depends largely on improvement of the feeding behaviors acquired.

METHODS

This prospective study includes 300 patients who underwent LSG from 2013 to 2014, divided into the following 4 groups: binge eaters, snack eaters, sweet eaters, and volume eaters.

RESULTS

The average age was 41.65 years, the ratio of male to females was 1 to 2. The average baseline body mass index (BMI) was 42.02. After 3 years, no significant change was found in the number of binge eaters (p = 0.396), but there was an 8.9% increase in snack eaters (p < 0.001), a 12.9% increase in sweet eaters (p < 0.001), and 17.2% increase in healthy eating habits (p < 0.001). Sixty-five (24.8%) patients did not experience changes in their eating patterns. However, after surgery, 24.6% of the patients continued with the same EB and 125 (49.5%) patients changed from one EB to another unhealthy EB. Weight loss, measure as ΔBMI, was similar in each group after 3 years, with a mean BMI of 29.8. When eating habits were related to different features such as gender, sports practice, type of work, smoking, marital status, comorbidities, no influence on the operative results were found.

CONCLUSION

LSG promotes the reduction of overeaters; however, it promotes a switch between other unhealthy EB. The significant increase in snack eaters and sweet eaters is outstanding, although it did not affect weight loss in the midterm follow-up. Worsening of eating habits after LSG is a common fact.

Importance of the gastrointestinal tract in type 2 diabetes. Metabolic surgery is more than just incretin effect

Bariatric and metabolic surgery is creating new concepts about how the intestine assimilates food. Recent studies highlight the role of the gastrointestinal tract in the genesis and evolution of type 2 diabetes. This article has been written to answer frequent questions about metabolic surgery results and the mechanisms of action. For this purpose, a non-systematic search of different databases was carried out, identifying articles published in the last decade referring to the mechanisms of action of metabolic techniques. Understanding these mechanisms will help grasp why some surgeries are more effective than others and why the results can be so disparate among patients undergoing the same surgical approach.

Comparison of the Performance of Common Measures of Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery for Association With Clinical Outcomes

IMPORTANCE

Estimates of weight regain following bariatric surgery vary widely.

OBJECTIVE

To describe weight regain after reaching nadir weight following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery and compare weight regain measures for association with outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Prospective cohort study of 2458 adults who underwent bariatric surgery at 10 hospitals in 6 US cities between March 2006 and April 2009. Assessments were conducted within 30 days' presurgery, at 6 months' postsurgery, and then annually until January 2015. Of the 1703 participants who underwent RYGB surgery, 1406 (83%) were followed up for 5 years or longer and had 5 or more weight measurements (excluding those who died or underwent surgical reversal).

EXPOSURES

Weight regain assessed by 5 continuous measures (weight in kilograms, body mass index [BMI], percentage of presurgery weight, percentage of nadir weight, and percentage of maximum weight lost) and 8 dichotomous measures (per established thresholds) were compared in relation to clinical outcomes based on statistical significance, magnitude of association, and model fit.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Progression of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension and declines in physical and mental health-related quality of life and satisfaction with surgery.

RESULTS

Among the 1406 participants who underwent RYGB surgery, the median age was 47 years (25th-75th percentile, 38-55 years) and the median BMI was 46.3 (25th-75th percentile, 42.3-51.8) prior to surgery. Most participants were female (80.3%) and white (85.6%). The median follow-up was 6.6 years (25th-75th percentile, 5.9-7.0 years). The median percentage of maximum weight loss was 37.4% (25th-75th percentile, 31.6%-43.3%) of presurgery weight and occurred a median of 2.0 years after RYGB surgery (25th-75th percentile, 1.0-3.2 years). The rate of weight regain was highest during the first year after reaching nadir weight, but weight regain continued to increase throughout follow-up (range, a median of 9.5% of maximum weight lost [25th-75th percentile, 4.7%-17.2%] to 26.8% of maximum weight lost [25th-75th percentile, 16.7%-41.5%] 1 to 5 years after reaching nadir weight). The percentage of participants who regained weight depended on threshold (eg, 5 years after nadir weight, 43.6% regained ≥5 BMI points; 50.2% regained ≥15% of nadir weight; and 67.3% regained ≥20% of maximum weight lost). Compared with other continuous weight regain measures, the percentage of maximum weight lost had the strongest association and best model fit for all outcomes except hyperlipidemia, which had a slightly stronger association with BMI. Of the dichotomous measures, 20% or greater of maximum weight lost performed better or similarly with most of the outcomes, and was the second best measure for hyperlipidemia (after ≥10 kg of weight) and hypertension (after ≥10% of maximum weight lost).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among a large cohort of adults who underwent RYGB surgery, weight regain quantified as percentage of maximum weight lost performed better for association with most clinical outcomes than the alternatives examined. These findings may inform standardizing the measurement of weight regain in studies of bariatric surgery.

Weight Regain After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Look at the Benefits of Re-sleeve

Introduction Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become one of the most commonly performed weight loss procedures due to its simpler technique and lower complication rate as compared to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and duodenal switch. However, weight regain is seen in patients with a large gastric fundus. In these cases, a revision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (reLSG) aiming at resecting the excess pouch is a promising option for correction. Methods From April 2013 to March 2016, six patients underwent a reLSG for a failure of weight loss after the demonstration of a large gastric fundus on the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series. Results One patient out of six (16.7%) suffered from a gastric leak and was lost to subsequent follow-up. The rest (83.3%) had a smooth recovery and were followed up for a mean of 18 months. Mean excess weight loss (EWL) was 68%, with a minimum of 48% and a maximum of 75%. Conclusion reLSG is a promising option for failed weight loss after LSG in patients who demonstrate the presence of a large gastric pouch. It carries a higher complication rate than the initial procedure. Further trials and meta-analyses are needed to prove the efficacy of this procedure.

A Cross-sectional Study of Reported Exercise and Medium-Term Weight Loss Following Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

Exercise is a strong determinant of prolonged weight loss in non-surgical patients. Studies evaluating the impact of exercise beyond the first year after bariatric surgery are lacking. We analyzed the relationship between reported intentional exercise and medium-term weight loss following bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent bariatric surgery from 2007 thru 2013 completed a follow-up telephone survey and were separated into groups based on reported weekly exercise, i.e., < 90 min week^-1, 90-200 min week^-1, and > 200 min week^-1. Standardized weight loss measures including percent of total weight loss, percent of excess body mass index (BMI) loss, percent of excess weight loss, and change in BMI were compared using analysis of covariance, with years from surgery as the covariant.

RESULTS

A total of 872 patients were included in this study (age = 48 ± 10 years; BMI = 48 ± 7 kg/m²), with a mean post-surgery follow-up of 39 ± 14 months. Patients reporting > 200 min week^-1 of planned exercise had greater weight loss than those who did less than 90 min week^-1 (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found between those who reported less than 90 min week^-1and those reporting between 91 and 200 min week^-1.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that regular exercise in excess of 200 min week^-1 is associated with greater medium-term weight loss following laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Multidisciplinary bariatric surgery teams should consider emphasizing exercise at this level to help patients achieve optimal weight loss.

Long-term Metabolic Effects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

OBJECTIVE

Obesity is one of the major health challenges throughout the world. The association between obesity and diabetes is well established because 90% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) show excess body weight. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on morbid obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in the long-term follow-up.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-five obese patients, 78 with T2DM, were evaluated before and after LSG up to 10 years, to identify complete diabetes remission (FPG < 100 mg/dl, A1c < 6.0%), partial remission (FPG 100-125 mg/dl, A1c < 6.5%), or relapse.

RESULTS

Before surgery, body weight and BMI were 123 ± 21 kg and 44.6 ± 6.8 kg/m² respectively; at a mean follow-up of 7 years (range 4-10), body weight was 104.9 ± 18 kg and BMI 37 ± 6 kg/m². Minimum weight was reached after 2 years. T2DM remission was observed in 66, 57, and 52% at short (< 2 years), medium (2-5 years), and long-term (> 5 years) follow-up respectively. Furthermore, 45.2% maintained complete remission for at least 5 years and about 36% showed a persistent but improved diabetes. None of the patients cured from diabetes had a duration disease greater than 8 years and a glycemic control requiring insulin. The prevalence of hypertension and dyslipidemia significantly decreased from 49 to 35% and from 51 to 40% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LSG significantly improves body weight, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia in long-term follow-up.