Efficacy and safety of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol-increasing compounds: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Low incidence of paradoxical reductions in HDL-C levels in dyslipidemic patients treated with fenofibrate alone or in combination with ezetimibe or ezetimibe/simvastatin

BACKGROUND

Fibrates have been reported to cause paradoxical decreases in HDL-C in certain patients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This post-hoc analysis explored the frequency/magnitude of HDL-C reductions in a pooled database of mixed dyslipidemic patients (LDL-C:3.4-5.7 mmol/L;TG:1.7-5.7 mmol/L) receiving placebo (PBO), fenofibrate (FENO), ezetimibe plus FENO (EZE+FENO), or EZE/simvastatin plus FENO (EZE/SIMVA+FENO) for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

PBO-treated patients had the highest incidence of HDL-C reductions from baseline (45%) compared with patients taking FENO (14%), EZE+FENO (9%), or EZE/SIMVA+FENO (9%). Reductions <30% reflected natural variability since the largest reduction in HDL-C approached 30% in the PBO group. Only 3 patients exhibited HDL-C reductions ≥30% (i.e., 2 patients in the FENO group and 1 in the EZE+FENO group). There were no differences in demographic/biochemical characteristics between patients with and without HDL-C reductions.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of paradoxical HDL-C reductions was low in mixed dyslipidemic patients receiving FENO alone or combined with EZE or EZE/SIMVA.

The epidemiological concept of residual risk

Residual cardiovascular risk can be defined as the residual risk of incident vascular events or progression of established vascular damage persisting in patients treated with current evidence-based recommended care including the risk that established from risk factors, such as dyslipidemia, high blood pressure, and the risk related to emerging or newer risk factors. The concept clearly derives from intervention trials, mainly the statin trials, and there is a lot of debate about the residual risk conferred by other lipid components, in particular low levels of HDL cholesterol and high levels of triglycerides. A meta-analysis of 53 fibrates (16,802 subjects) and 30 niacin trials (4,749 subjects) revealed an average HDL-C increase of 10% with fibrates and 16% with niacin, a triglyceride decrease of 36% with fibrates and 20% with niacin, and a LDL-C decrease of 8% with fibrates and 14% with niacin. These lipid changes resulted in similar overall reductions in major coronary events evidenced by a 25% decrease with fibrates and 27% with niacin. However, recent analyses of the primary and secondary prevention trials like JUPITER, Treating to New Targets (TNT) and PROVE-IT TIMI 22 force to reconsider the issue. In these three trials, HDL-C was useful in the initial risk assessment but when LDL-C was aggressively lowered the residual risk predictive value of HDL-C was markedly attenuated. Also epidemiological studies evaluate the residual risk in treated hypertensives and dyslipidemic subjects within a general population. The PRIME study in Northern Ireland and France and the Progetto CUORE study in Italy, both with a 10-year follow-up were able to test the hypothesis of the residual cardiovascular risk in treated hypertensives, because the proportion of treated dyslipidemic subjects was too low at baseline. In both studies treatment with antihypertensive agents was associated with a sizeable residual cardiovascular risk with the hazard ratio of 1.5-1.7, suggesting that more efficient risk reduction strategies in hypertension should be developed as a priority. In conclusion residual cardiovascular risk should be better studied in cardiovascular epidemiology, refining the methods to evaluate it, to consider measures of exposure to the modifiable risk factors and indicators of treatment (both at pharmacological and lifestyle level) over the time. Repeated measures and cohortal follow-up are needed and also new statistical methods are necessary to evaluate the residual risk to understand how to reduce it.

High-density lipoprotein therapy: is there hope?

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment of lipid abnormalities generally has focused on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction based on extensive clinical trials and the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Unfortunately, it has become increasingly clear that a significant percentage of patients continue to have cardiovascular events despite being on LDL-C-lowering medications and having LDL-C levels below 100 mg/dL. Numerous epidemiologic studies have associated low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Furthermore, recent data show that up to 55% of patients hospitalized for CVD have low HDL-C levels (<40 mg/dL) on admission, suggesting a possible target for further reducing CVD. Low HDL-C also is part of the atherogenic phenotype associated with obesity, glucose intolerance, and hypertension, termed the metabolic syndrome, and often is seen in patients with insulin resistance states. In general, the first line of therapy for increasing HDL-C in patients with levels below 40 mg/dL is lifestyle modification with smoking cessation, exercise, weight loss, and diet modifications. The pharmacologic treatment of isolated low HDL-C in patients without coronary disease is controversial but should be considered in those with a strong family history of CVD. In patients with coronary artery disease and isolated low HDL-C, statins remain the first-line therapy and should be instituted after lifestyle modifications, with the goal of increasing HDL-C above 40 mg/dL. If concomitant hypertriglyceridemia is present, a fibrate or niacin should be considered. Although statins do offer some HDL-C-raising properties, they tend to have modest effects. If treatment goals have not been achieved with either lifestyle changes or statin therapy, then the next agent of choice is niacin. Among the various HDL-C-raising therapies, niacin continues to be the most potent therapeutic option available. There are several novel HDL-C therapies in the research pipeline; however, only one class of medications is relatively close to clinical use, the cholesteryl ester transferase protein (CETP) inhibitors. Although one of the CETP inhibitors, torcetrapib, has received much negative attention from a large randomized trial showing increased mortality associated with its use, the overall class of therapeutic agents may still hold some benefit. Currently, two new CETP inhibitors without the off-target effects of torcetrapib are undergoing clinical research. Overall, the use of HDL-C-modifying agents likely will increase over the next decade.

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors and lipoprotein metabolism

Plasma lipoproteins are responsible for carrying triglycerides and cholesterol in the blood and ensuring their delivery to target organs. Regulation of lipoprotein metabolism takes place at numerous levels including via changes in gene transcription. An important group of transcription factors that mediates the effect of dietary fatty acids and certain drugs on plasma lipoproteins are the peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs). Three PPAR isotypes can be distinguished, all of which have a major role in regulating lipoprotein metabolism. PPARalpha is the molecular target for the fibrate class of drugs. Activation of PPARalpha in mice and humans markedly reduces hepatic triglyceride production and promotes plasma triglyceride clearance, leading to a clinically significant reduction in plasma triglyceride levels. In addition, plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels are increased upon PPARalpha activation in humans. PPARgamma is the molecular target for the thiazolidinedione class of drugs. Activation of PPARgamma in mice and human is generally associated with a modest increase in plasma HDL-cholesterol and a decrease in plasma triglycerides. The latter effect is caused by an increase in lipoprotein lipase-dependent plasma triglyceride clearance. Analogous to PPARalpha, activation of PPARbeta/delta leads to increased plasma HDL-cholesterol and decreased plasma triglyceride levels. In this paper, a fresh perspective on the relation between PPARs and lipoprotein metabolism is presented. The emphasis is on the physiological role of PPARs and the mechanisms underlying the effect of synthetic PPAR agonists on plasma lipoprotein levels.

Association between extended-release niacin treatment and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: analysis of an administrative-claims database

The aim of the study was to evaluate trends in antihyperglycemic agents (AHAs) use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) newly initiating extended-release niacin (ERN) compared with other lipid-modifying therapy (LMT). United States administrative-claims data identified adults with T2DM on AHAs who received a new prescription for ERN or another LMT between January 2001 and June 2003 (index date), and these adults were followed for 12 months. Inclusion criteria were (1) stable T2DM as defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes and also receiving at least 2 AHA prescriptions 12 to 24 months before initiating ERN or LMT treatment and (2) at least 2 prescriptions within 12 months before the onset of ERN or LMT. Trends in AHA prescriptions 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) index date were defined as (1) no change (ie, stable T2DM), (2) increased (ie, worsening T2DM), or (3) reduced (ie, improved T2DM). Among 3799 patients with T2DM, 392 (10.3%) were treated with ERN and 3407 (89.7%) were treated with other LMT. In the ERN cohort, 82.1% of patients experienced no change in AHA prescriptions between baseline and follow-up compared with 79.4% of patients in the LMT cohort (P = .20); 13% of the ERN cohort and 16% of the LMT cohort (P = .17) experienced a dose increase or the addition of another AHA; and 5% of both cohorts were prescribed fewer AHAs or switched to a lower dose (P = .92). Treatment with ERN (vs other types of LMT) did not significantly increase AHA use, implying that T2DM status did not worsen in this cohort.

Efficacy of aerobic exercise and a prudent diet for improving selected lipids and lipoproteins in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Studies addressing the effects of aerobic exercise and a prudent diet on lipid and lipoprotein concentrations in adults have reached conflicting conclusions. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of aerobic exercise combined with a prudent diet on lipid and lipoprotein concentrations in adults.

METHODS

Studies were located by searching nine electronic databases, cross-referencing, and expert review. Two independent reviewers selected studies that met the following criteria: (1) randomized controlled trials, (2) aerobic exercise combined with diet recommendations (saturated/trans fat intake less than 10% of total calories and cholesterol less than 300 mg/day and/or fiber intake ≥ 25 g/day in women and ≥ 35 grams per day in men), (3) intervention ≥ 4 weeks, (4) humans ≥ 18 years of age, (5) published studies, including dissertations and Master's theses, (6) studies published in any language, (7) studies published between January 1, 1955 and May 1, 2009, (8) assessment of one or more of the following lipid and lipoprotein concentrations: total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), ratio of TC to HDL-C, non-HDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides (TG). Two reviewers independently extracted all data. Random-effects models that account for heterogeneity and 95% confidence intervals were used to pool findings.

RESULTS

Of the 1,401 citations reviewed, six studies representing 16 groups (8 intervention, 8 control) and up to 559 men and women (282 intervention, 277 control) met the criteria for analysis. Statistically significant intervention minus control reductions were found for TC (-15.5 mg/dl, 95% CI, -20.3 to -10.7), TC:HDL-C (-0.4 mg/dl, 95% CI, -0.7 to -0.2), LDL-C (-9.2 mg/dl, 95% CI, -12.7 to -5.8) and TG (-10.6 mg/dl, 95% CI, -17.2 to -4.0) but not HDL-C (-0.5 mg/dl, 95% CI, -4.0 to 3.1). Changes were equivalent to reductions of 7.5%, 6.6%, 7.2% and 18.2% respectively, for TC, TC:HDL-C, LDL-C and TG. Because of missing variance statistics, non-HDL-C was excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

Aerobic exercise combined with a prudent diet is highly efficacious for improving TC, TC:HDL-C, LDL-C and TG, but not HDL-C concentrations, in adults. However, additional studies are needed, including effectiveness studies using intention-to-treat analysis.

Discovery of substituted biphenyl oxazolidinone inhibitors of cholesteryl ester transfer protein

Recently, there has been a strong interest in the ability to increase levels of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C). This interest stems from the hypothesis that such an elevation in HDL-C will decrease the likelihood of cardiovascular disease. Inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) has been shown to elevate HDL-C levels in human subjects. This letter describes the discovery of a novel and potent (<100 nM IC50 for the inhibition of CE transfer) CETP inhibitor scaffold containing an oxazolidinone core.

Important considerations for treatment with dietary supplement versus prescription niacin products

Niacin is a water-soluble B vitamin (B3) known to have favorable effects on multiple lipid parameters, including raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and lowering triglycerides (TGs), lipoprotein(a), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Although LDL-C remains the primary target of lipid-altering therapy, current guidelines emphasize HDL-C and other modifiable lipid factors as key secondary targets. Thus, niacin is considered an important therapeutic option to help reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with mixed dyslipidemia who, in addition to high LDL-C, have elevated TGs and low HDL-C. Although available prescription niacin products, including immediate-release niacin (IR; Niacor) and an extended-release niacin formulation (Niaspan), have demonstrated safety and efficacy in randomized clinical trials, confusion remains among health care providers and their patients regarding the various commercially available nonprescription dietary supplement niacin products. These dietary supplements, which include IR, sustained-release (SR), and "no-flush" or "flush-free" niacin products, are not subject to the same stringent US Food and Drug Administration regulations as prescription drugs. In fact, both the American Heart Association and the American Pharmacists Association recommend against the use of dietary supplement niacin as a substitute for prescription niacin. Although some dietary supplement IR and SR niacin products have demonstrated a lipid response in clinical trials, products labeled as "no-flush" or "flush-free" that are intended to avoid the common niacin-associated adverse effect of flushing generally contain minimal or no free, pharmacologically active niacin and therefore lack beneficial lipid-modifying effects. To clarify important differences between available prescription and dietary supplement niacin products, this article contrasts current regulatory standards for dietary supplements and prescription drugs and provides an overview of available clinical data from key trials of niacin.

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of dalcetrapib following single and multiple ascending doses in healthy subjects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I study

BACKGROUND

Dalcetrapib is a modulator of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity developed to raise levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) with the goal of further reduction of cardiovascular events additive to standard of care alone. In clinical studies, dalcetrapib has been shown to effectively increase levels of HDL-C with no significant safety concerns.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to investigate the safety of single ascending and multiple ascending doses of dalcetrapib at doses markedly greater than that intended therapeutically (600 mg/day). Secondary objectives were to investigate the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and dose proportionality of dalcetrapib.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, combined single and multiple ascending dose phase I study. Healthy males (age 18-65 years, body mass index 18-32 kg/m2) were randomized to four of five dalcetrapib doses (2100, 2700, 3300, 3900 or 4500 mg) or placebo, with ≥10 days washout between doses (n = 15, single ascending doses) or to dalcetrapib (1800, 2100, 3000 or 3900 mg once daily) or placebo for 7 days (four cohorts, each n = 10, randomization 8 : 2, multiple ascending doses).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Tolerability and safety were assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), laboratory parameters, vital signs and 12-lead ECG recordings. Primary pharmacokinetic assessments were area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) and maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) [single doses] and AUC from time zero to 24 hours (AUC(24)) and C(max) (multiple doses). Pharmacodynamic assessments included CETP activity and lipids (multiple dosing only).

RESULTS

Exposure increased with dose but was less than proportional to increasing dose after single dosing, although deviation from dose proportionality could not be demonstrated for C(max). Dose proportionality was consistent following multiple doses. Steady state was modelled to have been reached by approximately 4 days, with little to no accumulation. CETP activity reduction was dose dependent (maximum -55% after 3900 mg; placebo -2.6%) at 6 hours post-dose on day 1, while HDL-C increased by 12-19% (placebo -13%) on day 8 following treatment with 1800-3900 mg/day for 7 days. All AEs were mild or moderate in intensity and there were no serious AEs, deaths or withdrawals due to AEs. No clinically relevant effects on laboratory parameters, cardiac parameters or vital signs were noted.

CONCLUSION

Single-dose dalcetrapib up to 4500 mg and multiple doses up to 3900 mg were generally safe and well tolerated.

Evolving concepts on benefits and risks associated with therapeutic strategies to raise HDL

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) biology and emerging new HDL-based therapies for athero-thrombosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains a major public health threat despite a significant decline over the past three decades. Although current medical therapies, specifically low-density lipoprotein lowering with statins, reduce cardiovascular events by about 25-35%, a substantial residual risk remains, leading to a search for additional therapeutic interventions. In this regard, HDL has emerged as one important target because of epidemiologic evidence linking HDL levels inversely to cardiovascular events, known vascular protective actions of HDL and experimental and clinical research supporting athero-protective actions of HDL. However, complexities of HDL composition, particle size, and metabolism have suggested that HDL functionality, and how HDL is increased, may be important determinants of its protective effects.

SUMMARY

Thus the possibility that HDL modification could address the residual risk has brought renewed focus on an old HDL-raising drug, niacin, and a number of newer strategies to exploit the vascular benefits of HDL.

Nicotinic acid inhibits glucose-stimulated insulin secretion via the G protein-coupled receptor PUMA-G in murine islet β cells

OBJECTIVES

Chronic administration of nicotinic acid (NA), a potent antilipidemic compound, aggravates glycemic control in diabetic patients. It is not known if NA has direct effects on islet β cells.

METHODS

Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, in situ hybridization, and immunofluorescence techniques were used to examine the expression of NA receptor PUMA-G, a member of the G protein-coupled receptor (G-PCR) family, in murine islet β cells. Calcium transient was measured using confocal microscopy, whereas the intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) from isolated islets were determined by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

High levels of PUMA-G transcripts and protein were detected in all β cells, and about 40% of α cells. PUMA-G transcripts increased more than 3-fold in islets incubated with interferon γ. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate accumulation, induced by IBMX/forskolin, was inhibited by NA; however, the inhibition was completely abolished by pretreatment of the culture with pertussis toxin. No calcium transient was detected in islet cells in the presence of NA. Static incubation of islets with NA led to an approximately 30% reduction of GSIS.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that PUMA-G stimulation by NA in islet β cells inhibited GSIS likely via activation of the Gi signaling pathway.

Synthesis, characterization and in vitro hydrolysis of a gemfibrozil-nicotinic acid codrug for improvement of lipid profile

Combination therapy of fibrates and nicotinic acid has been reported to be synergistic. Herein, we describe a covalent codrug of gemfibrozil (GEM) and nicotinic acid (NA) that was synthesized and characterized by (1)H NMR, (13)C NMR, FT-IR, MS analysis and elemental analysis. A validated HPLC method was developed that allows for the accurate quantitative determination of the codrug and its hydrolytic products that are formed during the in vitro chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis. The physico-chemical properties of codrug were improved compared to its parent drugs in term of water solubility and partition coefficient. The kinetics of hydrolysis of the codrug was studied using accelerated hydrolysis experiments at high temperatures in aqueous phosphate buffer solution in pH 1.2, 6.8 and 7.4. Using the Arrhenius equation, the extrapolated half-life at 37°C were 289 days at pH 1.2 for the codrug and 130 and 20,315 days at pH 6.8 for the codrug and gemfibrozil 2-hydroxyethyl ester (GHEE), respectively. The shortest half-lives were at pH 7.4; 42 days for the codrug and 5837 days for GHEE, respectively. The hydrolysis of the latter was studied, alone, at 80°C and pH 1.2 and compared to its hydrolysis when it is produced from the codrug using similar conditions. The k(obs) was found in both cases to be 1.60×10(-3)h(-1). The half-lives in plasma were 35.24 min and 26.75 h for the codrug and GHEE, respectively. With regard to liver homogenate, the hydrolysis half-lives were 1.96 min and 48.13 min for the codrug and GHEE, respectively. It can be expected that in vivo, the codrug will liberate NA immediately in plasma then GEM will be liberated from its 2-hydroxyethyl ester in the liver.

Prevention of cardiovascular disease utilizing fibrates--a pooled meta-analysis

Dyslipidemia increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk which is a leading cause of mortality. This creates the need for therapies to effectively manage dyslipidemia to decrease the CVD risk associated with it. This meta-analysis evaluates fibrate therapy in respect to dealing with dyslipidemia and CVD risk. Fibrates significantly reduced plasma total cholesterol by 8% and significantly reduced triglyceride levels by 30%. High density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were raised by 9% with fibrates. All-cause mortality and noncardiovascular mortality were both significantly increased with fibrates but these significant changes no longer appeared after trials using clofibrate were removed from the analysis. There was no significant reduction in fatal myocardial infarction but there was a significant 22% reduction of nonfatal myocardial infarction. Fibrates can effectively reduce low density lipoprotein C (LDL-C) while also optimizing high-density lipoprotein and triglyceride levels as well, which statins do not. Negative effects of fibrates were not significant after clofibrate trials were removed from consideration in the study. It should be noted that gemfibrozil should not be used as well due to its adverse effects.

Anacetrapib and dalcetrapib: two novel cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) in the cholesterol transport system and review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, and adverse effects of the CETP inhibitors, anacetrapib and dalcetrapib, for the treatment of dyslipidemia.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted in Ovid/MEDLINE (1950 to week 4 December 2010), PubMed/MEDLINE (up to December 2010), EMBASE (2000 to December 2010), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 to December 2010) using the MeSH terms and key words anacetrapib, MK 0859, dalcetrapib, and JTT 705. The search was limited to publications in English.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies evaluating the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of anacetrapib and dalcetrapib for the treatment of dyslipidemia were included. Clinical reviews evaluating the characterization of CETP and its inhibition as a mechanism for reducing cardiovascular risk were also included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Anacetrapib and dalcetrapib represent a novel treatment option for patients who have dyslipidemia and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Anacetrapib and dalcetrapib increase HDL-C by inhibiting CETP-mediated transfer of cholesteryl ester and triglyceride. Studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of anacetrapib and dalcetrapib concluded that both agents safely and effectively augment HDL-C. Their mechanism of action, potential for significant raising of HDL-C, once-daily dosing regimen, and favorable lipid-altering effects when added to hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors are key elements. Anacetrapib and dalcetrapib are well tolerated, with mild gastrointestinal complaints reported more than with placebo. Although another CETP inhibitor, torcetrapib, was withdrawn from clinical development secondary to increased morbidity and mortality, neither anacetrapib nor dalcetrapib has demonstrated the adverse off-target effects portrayed with torcetrapib.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhibition of CETP by anacetrapib and dalcetrapib represents an encouraging development in the management of dyslipidemia, particularly in patients with low HDL-C levels. Results of future trials are much anticipated, as these will clarify the role of anacetrapib and dalcetrapib in reduction of cardiovascular disease.

Prevalence of lipid abnormalities before and after introduction of lipid modifying therapy among Swedish patients with dyslipidemia (PRIMULA)

BACKGROUND

Data on the prevalence of dyslipidemia and attainment of goal/normal lipid levels in a Swedish population are scarce. The objective of this study is to estimate the prevalence of dyslipidemia and attainment of goal/normal lipid levels in patients treated with lipid modifying therapy (LMT).

METHODS

This longitudinal retrospective observational study covers time periods before and after treatment. Data were collected from 1994-2007 electronic patient records in public primary healthcare centers in Uppsala County, Sweden. Patients were included if they had been treated with LMT and had at least one lipid abnormality indicating dyslipidemia and if complete lipid profile data were available. Thresholds levels for lipids were defined as per Swedish guidelines.

RESULTS

Among 5,424 patients included, at baseline, the prevalence of dyslipidemia (≥1 lipid abnormality) was by definition 100%, while this figure was 82% at follow-up. At baseline, 60% had elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) combined with low high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) and/or elevated triglycerides (TG s), corresponding figure at follow-up was 36%. Low HDL-C and/or elevated TGs at follow-up remained at 69% for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), 50% among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and 66% among patients with 10 year CHD risk >20%. Of the total sample, 40% attained goal levels of LDL-C and 18% attained goal/normal levels on all three lipid parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Focusing therapy on LDL-C reduction allows 40% of patients to achieve LDL-C goal and helps reducing triglyceride levels. Almost 60% of patients experience persistent HDL-C and/or triglyceride abnormality independently of LDL-C levels and could be candidates for additional treatments.

Effects of fenofibrate on plasma oxidized LDL and 8-isoprostane in a sub-cohort of GOLDN participants

BACKGROUND

Fenofibrate significantly reduces circulating triglyceride (TG) concentrations, particularly in individuals with elevated levels. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether fenofibrate treatment reduces markers of oxidative stress, oxidized low density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) and 8-isoprostane (8-isoP), in a manner similar to TG where those with the highest levels show the greatest reductions.

MATERIALS/METHODS

The concentrations of TG, 8-isoP, and ox-LDL were measured in plasma before and after 3 weeks of fenofibrate treatment (160 mg/d) in a sub-cohort (n=187) of the Genetics of Lipid Lowering Drugs and Diet Network (GOLDN) study.

RESULTS

Data were divided into tertiles as determined by pre-treatment values of the respective target. Fenofibrate treatment resulted in significant reductions in TG concentrations by 24.2% (p<0.0001), 41.9% (p < 0.0001), and 46.6% (p < 0.0001) in tertiles 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Significant reductions were also observed in ox-LDL of 7.2% (p=0.0096), 8.5% (p = 0.0019) and 12.1% (p < 0.0001) in tertiles 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Finally, fenofibrate treatment resulted in a 32.7% increase (p=0.0201) in 8-isoP levels in tertile 1, but a significant decrease of 34.4% (p < 0.0001) in tertile 3.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the largest to date to demonstrate that fenofibrate reduces oxidative stress and the first to show a suppressive effect on 8-isoP levels in individuals with a high oxidative burden following short term (3 wk) drug therapy. Those with the highest baseline levels of ox-LDL and 8-isoP showed the greatest reductions following fenofibrate treatment. Given the role of oxidative stress in atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease, our observations may partially explain the efficacy of fenofibrate in reducing cardiovascular events in select patients.

Utilization patterns of extended-release niacin in Canada: analysis of an administrative claims database

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate utilization patterns with extended-release niacin (ERN) compared with those observed with other lipid-modifying drugs (LMDs).

METHODS

A random sample of 17% of patients who had at least one LMD dispensation between January 2004 and February 2007 was obtained from the administrative databases of the Régie de l'assurance maladie du Quebec. Primary outcomes included drug adherence, persistence and discontinuation with ERN and other LMDs, and daily maintenance dose attainment (1500 mg and 2000 mg) with ERN at one-year follow-up. Adherence was defined as the sum of days of all dispensations divided by the total number of days of follow-up. Persistence was defined as renewal of prescription before the end of dispensation plus a grace period (50% prescription duration).

RESULTS

Among 26,862 patients, the majority received statins (73.4%), whereas 867 (3.2%) received ERN. The mean age of ERN patients was 62 years and 75% were male. After one year, adherence with ERN was below that of statins (62.0% versus 74.9%), as was persistence (36.1% versus 46.7%), while discontinuation rates were higher (64.0% versus 53.3%). The median time until discontinuation for ERN was shorter than for statins (66 days versus 99 days). After one year, 5.8% of patients were taking 1500 mg or more and 3.2% were on 2000 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present cohort of patients from regular clinical practice in Quebec, ERN use was associated with low prescription rates, inferior adherence and persistence compared with other LMDs, high discontinuation rates, and very low 2000 mg dose attainment.

Fibrates in the treatment of cardiovascular risk and atherogenic dyslipidaemia

PURPOSE

New data have emerged over the last few years about the role of fibrates in treatment of microvascular and macrovascular disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endpoint studies have been conducted with fibrates in coronary heart disease (CHD) since 1971 and initial results were contradictory. Fibrates later showed benefits in patients with low HDL-C and low LDL-C. The prominence ascribed to the lipid triad of the metabolic syndrome and the increasing prevalence of diabetes has increased the topicality of fibrates given their main action of converting small dense to light buoyant LDL. The Fenofibrate Intervention in Endpoint Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study has carried on the tradition. Fenofibrate therapy in 9795 patients comprising a mixed low-risk primary and a medium-risk secondary prevention cohort resulted in an 11% reduction in coronary events (P = 0.16), a similar but significant reduction in cardiovascular events (P = 0.04; number-needed-to-treat = 70). The benefits were concentrated in primary prevention and on nonfatal myocardial events, and post-hoc greater effects were seen in patients with moderate hypertriglyceridaemia (>2.3 mmol/l) and low HDL-C, as had previously been noted in a trial with bezafibrate. Safety was generally good, including in combination with statins, but old concerns about sudden death, pancreatitis and venous thrombosis returned. Unexpected benefits were seen with fenofibrate for microvascular endpoints including microalbuminuria and retinopathy.

SUMMARY

Fenofibrate and bezafibrate are reasonable second-line therapies for dyslipidaemia and in diabetes, and well tolerated in combination therapy. The benefits of fenofibrate for microvascular disease and its potential role in combination therapy require further confirmation.

Optimal pharmacologic approach to patients with hypertriglyceridemia and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol: randomized comparison of fenofibrate 160 mg and niacin 1500 mg

OBJECTIVES

Atherogenic dyslipidemia is emerging as a target of lipid-modifying therapy. However, an optimal pharmacologic approach has not yet been established. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the typical doses of fenofibrate and niacin.

METHODS

After an eight-week dietary run-in, 201 patients who had triglyceride (TG) levels of 150-499 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels of <45 mg/dL and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of <130 mg/dL were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups for 16 weeks: fenofibrate 160 mg or niacin extended release 1500 mg (starting at 500 mg and up-titrated at the fifth and ninth weeks).

RESULTS

One hundred forty patients completed the study. The percent reductions in apoB/A1 were not different between the two groups (-20% and -22% in the fenofibrate and niacin groups, respectively, p=0.47). The effects of the two regimens on HDL-C were similar (24% and 20%, respectively, p=0.22), while fenofibrate reduced TG more than did niacin (-53% and -48%, respectively, p=0.045). Niacin was more effective at lowering LDL-C, Lp (a), and hs-CRP. However, niacin worsened the parameters of glycemic control, whereas fenofibrate improved them. Niacin showed more frequent adverse events including pruritus and skin flushing.

CONCLUSIONS

These two regimens have largely comparable lipid-modifying effects. However, their effects on glucose metabolism and inflammation, and their adverse events need to be considered additionally. Our results underscore more individualized pharmacologic approaches to patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia.

The Role of PPARα Activation in Liver and Muscle

PPARα is one of three members of the soluble nuclear receptor family called peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR). It is a sensor for changes in levels of fatty acids and their derivatives that responds to ligand binding with PPAR target gene transcription, inasmuch as it can influence physiological homeostasis, including lipid and carbohydrate metabolism in various tissues. In this paper we summarize the involvement of PPARα in the metabolically active tissues liver and skeletal muscle and provide an overview of the risks and benefits of ligand activation of PPARα, with particular consideration to interspecies differences.

Management of dyslipidemias with fibrates, alone and in combination with statins: role of delayed-release fenofibric acid

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Lifestyle modifications, along with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction, remain the highest priorities in CVD risk management. Among lipid-lowering agents, statins are most effective in LDL-C reduction and have demonstrated incremental benefits in CVD risk reduction. However, in light of the residual CVD risk, even after LDL-C targets are achieved, there is an unmet clinical need for additional measures. Fibrates are well known for their beneficial effects in triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and LDL-C subspecies modulation. Fenofibrate is the most commonly used fibric acid derivative, exerts beneficial effects in several lipid and nonlipid parameters, and is considered the most suitable fibrate to combine with a statin. However, in clinical practice this combination raises concerns about safety. ABT-335 (fenofibric acid, Trilipix^®) is the newest formulation designed to overcome the drawbacks of older fibrates, particularly in terms of pharmacokinetic properties. It has been extensively evaluated both as monotherapy and in combination with atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin in a large number of patients with mixed dyslipidemia for up to 2 years and appears to be a safe and effective option in the management of dyslipidemia.

Raising HDL cholesterol in women

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration is essential in the determination of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in women. This is especially true in the postmenopausal state, where lipid profiles and CHD risk mimic that of age-matched men. Thus, interventions designed to reduce CHD risk by raising HDL-C levels may have particular significance during the transition to menopause. This review discusses HDL-C-raising therapies and the role of HDL in the primary prevention of CHD in women. Lifestyle-based interventions such as dietary change, aerobic exercise regimens, and smoking cessation are initial steps that are effective in raising HDL-C, and available data suggest women respond similarly to men with these interventions. When combined with pharmacotherapy, the effects of these lifestyle alterations are further amplified. Though studies demonstrating gender-specific differences in therapy are limited, niacin continues to be the most effective agent in raising HDL-C levels, especially when used in combination with fibrate or statin therapy. Emerging treatments such as HDL mimetic therapy show much promise in further raising HDL-C levels and improving cardiovascular outcomes.

Fibrates: no ACCORD on their use in the treatment of dyslipidaemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

New data have emerged over the last few years about the role of fibrates in treatment of microvascular and macrovascular disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endpoint studies have been conducted with fibrates in coronary heart disease since 1971 and results have been contradictory. Fibrates have shown benefits in patients with low HDL-cholesterol and low LDL-cholesterol. Fibrates remain topical, given their actions on the lipid triad present in the metabolic syndrome and in diabetes. In the Fenofibrate Intervention in Endpoint Lowering in Diabetes study of mixed primary and secondary prevention cohorts, fenofibrate therapy resulted in an 11% reduction in coronary or cardiovascular events in monotherapy. Despite frequent use, there was little endpoint data on fibrate-statin combination therapy until recently. The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial of fenofibrate added to baseline simvastatin therapy in diabetes showed a nonsignificant 8% reduction in cardiovascular events. The benefits were concentrated in men, and women did slightly worse with fibrate therapy. In post-hoc analysis, slight beneficial effects of fenofibrate were seen in patients with moderate hypertriglyceridaemia (>2.3 mmol/l) and low HDL-cholesterol (<0.88 mmol/l). The safety profile of fibrate-simvastatin combination was good.

SUMMARY

Fenofibrate and bezafibrate are reasonable second-line therapies for dyslipidaemia and in diabetes. They are safe in combination therapy with statins but add little endpoint benefit except possibly in patients with a significant degree of atherogenic dyslipidaemia (high triglycerides and low HDL-cholesterol). The benefits of fibrates on microvascular disease remain to be fully explored.

Seeing red: flushing out instigators of niacin-associated skin toxicity

The use of niacin to improve plasma lipid levels and reduce risk of myocardial infarction is limited by noxious skin effects that result from stimulation of G protein-coupled receptor 109A (GPR109A) in skin immune cells. Niacin causes vasodilation, manifest as rubor (redness) of the head and neck, providing a visible sign associated with other, more bothersome skin complaints. The working theory is that niacin provokes Langerhans cells to produce prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), stimulating vascular DP1 receptors to cause vasodilation. In this issue of the JCI, Hanson and colleagues raise a serious challenge to this paradigm in showing that the major player in vasodilation is the keratinocyte, which produces PGE2, stimulating EP2/4 receptors, shifting the role of the Langerhans/PGD2/DP1 pathway to that of an accomplice. They also show that the antipsoriasis drug monomethyl fumarate, itself a GPR109A agonist, provokes vasodilation through the same cells. These efforts bring us one step closer to solving a key limitation of an important cardioprotective drug and reveal that the skin response to niacin is much more complicated than previously thought.

Dyslipidaemia in the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: pathogenesis, priorities, pharmacotherapies

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Dyslipoproteinaemia is a cardinal feature of the metabolic syndrome that accelerates atherosclerosis. It is usually characterized by high plasma concentrations of triglyceride-rich and apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins, with depressed concentrations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Drug interventions are essential for normalizing metabolic dyslipidaemia.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review discusses the mechanisms and treatment for dyslipidaemia in the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

A comprehensive understanding of the pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy of dyslipidaemia in the metabolic syndrome and diabetes.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Dysregulation of lipoprotein metabolism may be due to a combination of overproduction of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, decreased catabolism of apoB-containing particles, and increased catabolism of HDL particles. These abnormalities may be consequent on a global metabolic effect of insulin resistance and an excess of both visceral and hepatic fat. Lifestyle modifications may favourably alter lipoprotein transport in the metabolic syndrome. Patients with dyslipidaemia and established cardiovascular disease should receive a statin as first-line therapy. Combination with other lipid-regulating agents, such as ezetimibe, fibrates, niacins and fish oils may optimize the benefit of statin on atherogenic dyslipidaemia.

Fibrate therapy in the management of dyslipidemias, alone and in combination with statins: role of delayed-release fenofibric acid

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Optimization of lipid management is a crucial aspect in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Currently, HMG-CO reductase inhibitors (statins) are a mainstay of therapy. While this class of drugs has proven efficacy at lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), their effects on other important lipid parameters, such as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides, are less robust.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The current paper will address the significance of these secondary targets and review currently available therapies, including a new formulation of delayed-release fenofibric acid. A comprehensive MEDLINE search (1966 to September 2009) was performed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will gain a comprehensive review of the importance of secondary cholesterol targets, as well as the effectiveness of currently available therapies to address non-LDL-C. The role of the newly released fenofibric acid will also be addressed, as well as its potential use in combination therapy with a statin.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Adequate treatment of lipid parameters beyond LDL-C is an essential component in the treatment of dyslipidemia. The fibrate class of drugs has proven efficacy in improving secondary targets; however, concerns regarding severe myopathy and rhabdomyolysis have limited their combination with statins. Recently, a new fibrate derivative, fenofibric acid, has become available. Studies to date reflect a positive safety and tolerability profile when combined with statins. This may offer a new tool to address the important secondary cholesterol targets that are becoming increasingly recognized as important contributors to cardiovascular outcomes.

Effects of fibrates on cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several clinical trials have reported inconsistent findings for the effect of fibrates on cardiovascular risk. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effects of fibrates on major clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for trials published between 1950 and March, 2010. We included prospective randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of fibrates on cardiovascular outcomes compared with placebo. Summary estimates of relative risk (RR) reductions were calculated with a random effects model. Outcomes analysed were major cardiovascular events, coronary events, stroke, heart failure, coronary revascularisation, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, non-vascular death, sudden death, new onset albuminuria, and drug-related adverse events.

FINDINGS

We identified 18 trials providing data for 45 058 participants, including 2870 major cardiovascular events, 4552 coronary events, and 3880 deaths. Fibrate therapy produced a 10% RR reduction (95% CI 0-18) for major cardiovascular events (p=0.048) and a 13% RR reduction (7-19) for coronary events (p<0.0001), but had no benefit on stroke (-3%, -16 to 9; p=0.69). We noted no effect of fibrate therapy on the risk of all-cause mortality (0%, -8 to 7; p=0.92), cardiovascular mortality (3%, -7 to 12; p=0.59), sudden death (11%, -6 to 26; p=0.19), or non-vascular mortality (-10%, -21 to 0.5; p=0.063). Fibrates reduced the risk of albuminuria progression by 14% (2-25; p=0.028). Serious drug-related adverse events were not significantly increased by fibrates (17 413 participants, 225 events; RR 1.21, 0.91-1.61; p=0.19), although increases in serum creatinine concentrations were common (1.99, 1.46-2.70; p<0.0001).

INTERPRETATION

Fibrates can reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events predominantly by prevention of coronary events, and might have a role in individuals at high risk of cardiovascular events and in those with combined dyslipidaemia.

FUNDING

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

Biochemical characterization of cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) has been identified as a novel target for increasing HDL cholesterol levels. In this report, we describe the biochemical characterization of anacetrapib, a potent inhibitor of CETP. To better understand the mechanism by which anacetrapib inhibits CETP activity, its biochemical properties were compared with CETP inhibitors from distinct structural classes, including torcetrapib and dalcetrapib. Anacetrapib and torcetrapib inhibited CETP-mediated cholesteryl ester and triglyceride transfer with similar potencies, whereas dalcetrapib was a significantly less potent inhibitor. Inhibition of CETP by both anacetrapib and torcetrapib was not time dependent, whereas the potency of dalcetrapib significantly increased with extended preincubation. Anacetrapib, torcetrapib, and dalcetrapib compete with one another for binding CETP; however anacetrapib binds reversibly and dalcetrapib covalently to CETP. In addition, dalcetrapib was found to covalently label both human and mouse plasma proteins. Each CETP inhibitor induced tight binding of CETP to HDL, indicating that these inhibitors promote the formation of a complex between CETP and HDL, resulting in inhibition of CETP activity.

A new paradigm for managing dyslipidemia with combination therapy: laropiprant + niacin + simvastatin

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Despite effective lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with statin for prevention of cardiovascular adverse events, residual risk remains high due to low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels in patients with mixed dyslipidemia. As a result, alternative treatment options to raise HDL-C are being investigated intensively. Currently, niacin is the most potent lipid lowering agent for raising HDL-C levels together with lowering of triglyceride and LDL-C. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated that niacin therapy significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in high risk subjects. However, the clinical use of niacin is limited by its major adverse effect, cutaneous flushing. Although the use of extended-release (ER) formulation can reduce flushing, the tolerability and compliance of niacin remains suboptimal. A selective antagonist of prostaglandin D Type 1 receptor, laropiprant, has been investigated in a number of clinical studies and shown to be effective in reducing niacin-induced flushing. Despite the potential of laropiprant in reducing niacin-induced flushing, the long-term clinical efficacy and potential off-target side effects are not well studied. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEWS: In this article, the pharmacological properties, clinical efficacy and future perspective of this combination therapy of simvastatin/ER niacin/laropiprant are reviewed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Readers will understand both the mechanism and clinical effects of the combination therapy of simvastatin/ER niacin/laropiprant.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The triple combination therapy of simvastatin/ER niacin/laropiprant may reduce flushing side effects and facilitate a more comprehensive treatment for patients with mixed dyslipidemia.

Effects of toremifene and tamoxifen on lipid profiles in post-menopausal patients with early breast cancer: interim results from a Japanese phase III trial

OBJECTIVE

Toremifene and tamoxifen have been used for adjuvant therapy in post-menopausal patients with breast cancer in Japan. Dyslipidemias are common in post-menopausal women. However, limited data are available on the effects of these agents on lipid profiles in Japanese patients. The Japan Toremifene Cooperative Study Group has been conducting a Phase III randomized trial of post-menopausal patients with breast cancer. One of its secondary endpoints is to confirm the effects of these agents on serum lipid profiles.

METHODS

The subjects were post-menopausal Japanese patients who had undergone surgery for early breast cancer. Toremifene or tamoxifen was administered for 2 years. Lipid levels were measured before and up to 24 months after initiation.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, at 24 months, the toremifene group (n = 123) showed significantly decreased total cholesterol (P < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (P < 0.001), and significantly increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (P < 0.001). Their triglyceride levels were not affected (P = 0.677). The tamoxifen group (n = 120) also showed significantly decreased total cholesterol (P < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (P < 0.001); no significant changes occurred in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.297) or triglyceride levels (P = 0.120).

CONCLUSIONS

Distinct differences between two selective estrogen receptor modulators on lipids were observed. Toremifene improved lipid profiles, particularly as an enhancer of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. To a large extent, tamoxifen improved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The impact of these improved lipid profiles on the risk of cardiovascular diseases needs further confirmation.

The HDL hypothesis: does high-density lipoprotein protect from atherosclerosis?

There is unequivocal evidence of an inverse association between plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations and the risk of cardiovascular disease, a finding that has led to the hypothesis that HDL protects from atherosclerosis. This review details the experimental evidence for this "HDL hypothesis". In vitro studies suggest that HDL has a wide range of anti-atherogenic properties but validation of these functions in humans is absent to date. A significant number of animal studies and clinical trials support an atheroprotective role for HDL; however, most of these findings were obtained in the context of marked changes in other plasma lipids. Finally, genetic studies in humans have not provided convincing evidence that HDL genes modulate cardiovascular risk. Thus, despite a wealth of information on this intriguing lipoprotein, future research remains essential to prove the HDL hypothesis correct.

A "hot" topic in dyslipidemia management--"how to beat a flush": optimizing niacin tolerability to promote long-term treatment adherence and coronary disease prevention

Niacin is the most effective lipid-modifying agent for raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, but it also causes cutaneous vasodilation with flushing. To determine the frequency of flushing in clinical trials, as well as to delineate counseling and treatment approaches to prevent or manage flushing, a MEDLINE search was conducted of English-language literature from January 1, 1985, through April 7, 2009. This search used the title keywords niacin or nicotinic acid crossed with the Medical Subject Headings adverse effects and human. Niacin flushing is a receptor-mediated, mainly prostaglandin D(2)-driven phenomenon, the frequency, onset, and duration of which are largely determined by the distinct pharmacological and metabolic profiles of different niacin formulations. Subjective assessments include ratings of redness, warmth, itching, and tingling. In clinical trials, most (>60%) niacin users experienced mild or moderate flushing, which tended to decrease in frequency and severity with continued niacin treatment, even with advancing doses. Approximately 5% to 20% of patients discontinued treatment because of flushing. Flushing may be minimized by taking niacin with meals (or at bedtime with a low-fat snack), avoiding exacerbating factors (alcohol or hot beverages), and taking 325 mg of aspirin 30 minutes before niacin dosing. The current review advocates an initially slow niacin dose escalation from 0.5 to 1.0 g/d during 8 weeks and then from 1.0 to 2.0 g in a single titration step (if tolerated). Through effective counseling, treatment prophylaxis with aspirin, and careful dose escalation, adherence to niacin treatment can be improved significantly. Wider implementation of these measures should enable higher proportions of patients to reach sufficient niacin doses over time to prevent cardiovascular events.

Niacin and fibrates in atherogenic dyslipidemia: pharmacotherapy to reduce cardiovascular risk

Although statin therapy represents a cornerstone of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, a major residual CVD risk (60-70% of total relative risk) remains, attributable to both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. Among the former, low levels of HDL-C together with elevated triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins and their remnants represent major therapeutic targets. The current pandemic of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes is intimately associated with an atherogenic dyslipidemic phenotype featuring low HDL-C combined with elevated TG-rich lipoproteins and small dense LDL. In this context, there is renewed interest in pharmacotherapeutic strategies involving niacin and fibrates in monotherapy and in association with statins. This comprehensive, critical review of available data in dyslipidemic subjects indicates that niacin is more efficacious in raising HDL-C than fibrates, whereas niacin and fibrates reduce TG-rich lipoproteins and LDL comparably. Niacin is distinguished by its unique capacity to effectively lower Lp(a) levels. Several studies have demonstrated anti-atherosclerotic action for both niacin and fibrates. In contrast with statin therapy, the clinical benefit of fibrates appears limited to reduction of nonfatal myocardial infarction, whereas niacin (frequently associated with statins and/or other agents) exerts benefit across a wider range of cardiovascular endpoints in studies involving limited patient numbers. Clearly the future treatment of atherogenic dyslipidemias involving the lipid triad, as exemplified by the occurrence of the mixed dyslipidemic phenotype in metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, renal, and auto-immune diseases, requires integrated pharmacotherapy targeted not only to proatherogenic particles, notably VLDL, IDL, LDL, and Lp(a), but also to atheroprotective HDL.