Real-world Evaluation of Asthma Control and Treatment (REACT): Findings from a national Web-based survey

Asthma control in patients receiving inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2-agonist fixed combinations. A real-life study comparing dry powder inhalers and a pressurized metered dose inhaler extrafine formulation

Background

Although patients have more problems using metered dose inhalers, clinical comparisons suggest they provide similar control to dry powder inhalers. Using real-life situations this study was designed to evaluate asthma control in outpatients with moderate to severe persistent asthma and to compare efficacy of fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long acting beta-agonists (LABA).

Methods

This real-life study had a cross-sectional design. Patients using fixed combinations of ICS and LABA had their asthma control and spirometry assessed during regular visits.

Results

111 patients were analyzed: 53 (47.7%) received maintenance therapy of extrafine beclomethasone-formoterol (BDP/F) pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI), 25 (22.5%) fluticasone-salmeterol (FP/S) dry powder inhaler (DPI), and 33 (29.7%) budesonide-formoterol (BUD/F) DPI. Severity of asthma at time of diagnosis, assessed by the treating physician, was comparable among groups. Asthma control was achieved by 45.9% of patients; 38.7% were partially controlled and 15.3% were uncontrolled. In the extrafine BDF/F group, asthma control total score, daytime symptom score and rescue medication use score were significantly better than those using fixed DPI combinations (5.8 ± 6.2 vs. 8.5 ± 6.8; 1.4 ± 1.8 vs. 2.3 ± 2.1; 1.8 ± 2.2 vs. 2.6 ± 2.2; p = 0.0160; p = 0.012 and p = 0.025, respectively) and the mean daily ICS dose were significantly lower.

Conclusions

pMDI extrafine BDP/F combination demonstrated better asthma control compared to DPIs formulated with larger particles. This could be due to the improved lung deposition of the dose or less reliance on the optimal inhalation technique or both.

Tiotropium improves lung function in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Some patients with severe asthma remain symptomatic and obstructed despite maximal recommended treatment. Tiotropium, a long-acting inhaled anticholinergic agent, might be an effective bronchodilator in such patients.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of tiotropium (5 and 10 μg daily) administered through the Respimat inhaler with placebo as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma (Asthma Control Questionnaire score, ≥ 1.5; postbronchodilator FEV₁, ≤ 80% of predicted value) despite maintenance treatment with at least a high-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus a long-acting β₂-agonist.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover study with three 8-week treatment periods. The primary end point was peak FEV₁ at the end of each treatment period.

RESULTS

Of 107 randomized patients (54% female patients; mean, 55 years of age; postbronchodilator FEV₁, 65% of predicted value), 100 completed all periods. Peak FEV₁ was significantly higher with 5 μg (difference, 139 mL; 95% CI, 96-181 mL) and 10 μg (difference, 170 mL; 95% CI, 128-213 mL) of tiotropium than with placebo (both P < .0001). There was no significant difference between the active doses. Trough FEV₁ at the end of the dosing interval was higher with tiotropium (5 μg: 86 mL [95% CI, 41-132 mL]; 10 μg: 113 mL [95% CI, 67-159 mL]; both P < .0004). Daily home peak expiratory flow measurements were higher with both tiotropium doses. There were no significant differences in asthma-related health status or symptoms. Adverse events were balanced across groups except for dry mouth, which was more common on 10 μg of tiotropium.

CONCLUSION

The addition of once-daily tiotropium to asthma treatment, including a high-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus a long-acting β₂-agonist, significantly improves lung function over 24 hours in patients with inadequately controlled, severe, persistent asthma.

Efficacy and safety of fluticasone and formoterol in a single pressurized metered dose inhaler

BACKGROUND

Fluticasone and formoterol are well established medications for the treatment of asthma. This study (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00734318) compares the efficacy and safety of a combination of these drugs in a single inhaler (fluticasone/formoterol) versus the individual components (fluticasone + formoterol).

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years (n=620) with a history of severe, persistent reversible asthma for ≥ 6 months prior to screening were included in this randomized, double-blind study, which consisted of a screening phase of up to 5 days, a 2-week run-in phase and an 8-week treatment period.

RESULTS

Fluticasone/formoterol (500/20 μg, b.i.d.) was at least as effective as fluticasone + formoterol (500 μg + 24 μg, b.i.d.) with respect to the primary outcome measure: there were similar increases in mean pre-morning dose forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1)) in these two groups. Fluticasone/formoterol (500/20 μg, b.i.d.) also demonstrated similar efficacy to fluticasone + formoterol in terms of change in mean FEV(1) from baseline pre-morning dose to 2 h post-morning dose at week 8, as well as for several secondary parameters. Fluticasone/formoterol (500/20 μg, b.i.d.) demonstrated superiority to fluticasone monotherapy (500 μg, b.i.d.) and fluticasone/formoterol (100/10 μg, b.i.d.) for several secondary efficacy parameters. Fluticasone/formoterol had a similar safety and tolerability profile to fluticasone + formoterol.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the fluticasone/formoterol combination is at least as effective as its components administered concurrently from separate inhalers. Fluticasone/formoterol (500/20 μg, b.i.d.) showed superior efficacy to its inhaled corticosteroid component alone and the efficacy of fluticasone/formoterol was dose-dependent for several clinically important parameters.

Difference in Asthma Control Test™ (ACT) Scores in Three Different Clinical Practice Settings

Introduction: Asthma control varies in different clinical settings because of its multidimensional and heterogeneous nature, and variability over time. The revised asthma management guidelines indicate that the goal of treatment should be maintaining asthma control for long periods. The aims of this study were to explore: (i) difference in asthma control test scores in patients at different clinical practice settings; (ii) assess if patients were overestimating the level of their asthma control and (iii) assess the relationship of the derived Asthma Control Test (ACT) score to cost of inpatient stay and length of stay (LOS). Materials and Methods: The Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a 5-item questionnaire that assesses the multidimensional perspective of asthma control from activity limitation, shortness of breath, night symptoms, use of rescue medication and self perception of asthma control. The score ranges on a scale from 1 (poorly controlled) to 5 (well controlled). ACT was administered to 447 patients diagnosed with asthma from the in-patient and out-patient settings (new and follow-up cases). Results: Three hundred and ninety-nine (92%) patients completed the ACT questionnaire. The analysis only included patients who had completed the ACT questionnaire. The analysis showed that all the 5 items in the ACT questionnaire were significantly associated with different clinical settings (P <0.001). When we correlated the ACT question 5 (patients self rating of asthma control) in the ACT with Question 3 and Question 4 individually, it showed that most patients did not overestimate their asthma control (P <0.001). However, there was no correlation between the derived ACT score and cost (P = 0.419), LOS (P = 0.373), and the number of comorbid medical history (P = 0.055). Conclusion: Our results reinforce the usefulness of ACT for clinicians to identify patients with poorly controlled asthma and to optimise their level of control in different clinical settings. Key words: Clinical guidelines, Overestimate, Useful

Home environmental factors associated with poor asthma control in Montreal children: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Home environmental exposures may aggravate asthma. Few population-based studies have investigated the relationship between asthma control in children and home environmental exposures.

OBJECTIVE

Identify home environmental exposures associated with poor control of asthma among asthmatic children less than 12 years of age in Montreal (Quebec, Canada).

METHODS

This cross-sectional population-based study used data from a respiratory health survey of Montreal children aged 6 months to 12 years conducted in 2006 (n = 7980). Asthma control was assessed (n = 980) using an adaptation of the Canadian asthma consensus report clinical parameters. Using log-binomial regression models, prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated to explore the relationship between inadequate control of asthma and environmental home exposures, including allergens, irritants, mold, and dampness indicators. Subjects with acceptable asthma control were compared with those with inadequate disease control.

RESULTS

Of 980 children with active asthma in the year prior to the survey, 36% met at least one of the five criteria as to poor control of their disease. The population's characteristics found to be related with a lack of asthma control were younger age, history of parental atopy, low maternal education level, foreign-born mothers, and tenant occupancy. After adjustments, children living along high-traffic density streets (PR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.00-1.81) and those with their bedroom or residence at the basement level (PR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01-1.66) were found to be at increased risk of poor asthma control.

CONCLUSIONS

Suboptimal asthma control appears to be mostly associated with traffic, along with mold and moisture conditions, the latter being a more frequent exposure and therefore having a greater public health impact.

Asthma control and activity limitations: insights from the Real-world Evaluation of Asthma Control and Treatment (REACT) study

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled asthma remains prevalent in the United States and confers a substantial burden on the health care system.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between uncontrolled asthma and activity limitations in a nationally representative sample of patients with moderate-to-severe-treated asthma and to assess the degree to which demographics and comorbidities were associated with activity limitations.

METHODS

Patients who participated in the Real-world Evaluation of Asthma Control and Treatment study were surveyed regarding type and degree of activity limitations in 4 categories: outdoor activity, physical activity, daily activity, and environmental triggers. Information about asthma control, demographics, and comorbidities was collected. Multivariable regression was used to assess the association between uncontrolled asthma and activity limitations while adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions.

RESULTS

Uncontrolled asthma was associated with a greater than 2-fold risk of outdoor (odds ratio [OR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.90-3.51) or physical (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.90-3.61) activity limitations and a 66% increased risk of daily activity limitations (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.09-2.51). Comorbidities associated with activity limitation included hives, chronic sinusitis, arthritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypercholesterolemia, and depression. The observed associations between uncontrolled asthma and activity limitation remained significant after controlling for demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients with controlled asthma, those with uncontrolled asthma are at higher risk for limitations in outdoor activity, physical activity, and daily activity. To help patients achieve optimal health, asthma management should include routine assessment of activity limitations and assessment and coordinated care for comorbid conditions.

One year treatment with omalizumab is effective and well tolerated in Japanese Patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

We have previously demonstrated that addition of omalizumab to standard therapy improved asthma control by significantly improving lung function and reducing asthma exacerbations in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of omalizumab on long-term disease control in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.

METHODS

An open-label, 48-week study was conducted in 133 Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma. Omalizumab was administered subcutaneously every 2 or 4 weeks based on serum IgE level and body weight in each patient.

RESULTS

Treatment with omalizumab significantly improved lung function. A subgroup of patients with inadequately controlled severe persistent asthma, despite high dose inhaled corticosteroids and other multiple controller therapies, which corresponds to the Japanese label (label population), showed greater improvements in morning PEF and FEV(1) than the whole study population (full Analysis Set). Serum free IgE levels decreased to below the target and were maintained during the treatment period in almost all patients. The majority of adverse events were mild-to-moderate in severity and there was no trend toward an increase in incidence of adverse events with increase in duration of omalizumab. In addition, the profile of adverse events in this study was similar to that in a 16-week, placebo-controlled study which the present authors had conducted previously in Japan. There were no anaphylactic reactions and no anti-omalizumab antibodies were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term treatment with omalizumab is effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.

Barriers to patient-clinician collaboration in asthma management: the patient experience

OBJECTIVE

To describe what adult patients with asthma report about their experiences with their own self-management behavior and working with their clinicians to control asthma.

METHODS

The study sample consisted of 104 patients with persistent asthma participating in a clinical trial on asthma monitoring. All subjects were seen by primary care clinicians of a large, academic medical center. This qualitative post hoc analysis examined the views of adults with asthma about their asthma-related health care. Patients attended monthly visits as part of their study participation, during which data were derived from semistructured interviews. All patients included in this analysis participated in the study for 1 year. At the end of study participation, patients were asked to complete an evaluation of their clinician's communication behavior. All study clinicians were also asked to complete a self-evaluation of their own communication behavior.

RESULTS

Five major themes of barriers to successful self-management were identified, including personal constraints, social constraints, communication failures, medication issues, and health care system barriers to collaboration with their clinicians. Patients most frequently reported lack of communication surrounding issues relating to day-to-day management of asthma (31%) and home management of asthma (24%). Clinicians generally rated themselves well for consistency in showing nonverbal attentiveness (89%) and maintaining interactive conversations (93%). However, only 30% of clinicians reported consistency in helping patients make decisions about asthma management and only 33% of clinicians reported consistency in tailoring medication schedules to the patient's routines.

CONCLUSION

These findings emphasize the difficulties of establishing and maintaining a therapeutic partnership between patients and clinicians. The results underscore the need for system-wide interventions that promote the success of a therapeutic patient-clinician relationship in order to achieve long-term success in chronic disease management.

Predictors of uncontrolled asthma in adult and pediatric patients: analysis of the Asthma Control Characteristics and Prevalence Survey Studies (ACCESS)

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of effective asthma treatments and evidence-based management guidelines focusing on asthma control, many patients have asthma that is inadequately controlled. The objective of this analysis was to identify risk factors for uncontrolled asthma among adult and pediatric patients.

METHODS

Two cross-sectional surveys assessing asthma control status were conducted between January 25 and May 2, 2008, among adult and pediatric patients with asthma. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire including demographics, medical history, and current asthma medication use. In addition, participants completed either the Asthma Control Test (ACT) or Childhood ACT (C-ACT). Uncontrolled asthma was defined as a score of < or = 19 on the ACT or C-ACT. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors related to uncontrolled asthma.

RESULTS

A sample of 64 primary care provider sites (35 for adults and 29 for pediatric patients) across the United States enrolled. One study enrolled 2238 adults (aged > or = 18 years) and the other 2429 children (aged 4-17 years) with asthma. The patients were visiting their health care provider for a scheduled appointment for any reason. The overall prevalence of uncontrolled asthma was 58% and 46% in adult and pediatric patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified predictors of uncontrolled asthma in both adults and children including self-reported asthma severity, lack of adherence, and recent history of cold, flu, or sinus infection. The predictors of uncontrolled asthma seen only in adults were less education, insurance status, current smoker, body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m(2), and history of gastroesophageal symptoms. The predictors of uncontrolled asthma seen only in children were female aged 12-17 years, caregiver unemployment, and history of asthma exacerbation.

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of patients with asthma seen in primary care settings are not well controlled. Recognition of specific predictors can signal who may be at higher risk of uncontrolled asthma and provide the opportunity for early interventions.

Patterns of inhaled corticosteroid use and asthma control in the Childhood Asthma Management Program Continuation Study

BACKGROUND

Daily controller medication use is recommended for children with persistent asthma to achieve asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

To examine patterns of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use and asthma control in an observational study of children and adolescents with mild-to-moderate asthma (the Childhood Asthma Management Program Continuation Study).

METHODS

We assessed patterns of ICS use during a 12-month period (consistent, intermittent, and none) and asthma control (well controlled vs poorly controlled). Multivariate logistic regression examined the association between pattern of ICS use and asthma control.

RESULTS

Of 914 patients enrolled, 425 were recommended to continue receiving ICS therapy in the Childhood Asthma Management Program Continuation Study. Of these patients, 46% reported consistent ICS use and 20% reported no ICS use during year 1. By year 4, consistent ICS use decreased to 20%, whereas no ICS use increased to 57%; poorly controlled asthma was reported in 18% of encounters. In multivariate models controlling for age, sex, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and asthma severity assessment, patients reporting consistent ICS use during a 12-month period were more likely to report poor asthma control (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.1) compared with those reporting no ICS use.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study of children and adolescents with mild-to-moderate asthma, most did not report continued use of ICS. Patients recommended to continue receiving ICS therapy and reporting consistent ICS use were less likely to report well-controlled asthma even after controlling for markers of asthma severity. Although residual confounding by severity cannot be ruled out, many children and adolescents may not achieve well-controlled asthma despite consistent use of ICS.

From the page to the clinic: Implementing new National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines

The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program's (NAEPP) revised guidelines, the Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3), published in 2007, represents a shift in the approach to asthma: the EPR-3 recommends that clinicians think of asthma as a chronic disease with an inflammatory basis. EPR-3 guidelines also represent a shift in the treatment paradigm for asthma in line with the shift in approach: although symptomatic relief is still necessary, the primary goal of asthma treatment is now long-term control, with the aim of minimizing exacerbation frequency and severity and limiting possible permanent airway damage that can result from frequent asthma exacerbations. To help clinicians implement the new EPR-3 guidelines into daily practice, the NAEPP's Guidelines Implementation Panel has identified 6 key action-focused recommendations. This article describes those recommendations and the evidence supporting them.

Was it Easy to Use an Asthma Control Test (ACT) in Different Clinical Practice Settings in a Tertiary Hospital in Singapore?

Introduction: TheAsthmaControlTestTM (ACT) is a 5-item self-administered tool designed to assess asthma control. It is said to be simple, easy and can be administered quickly by patients in the clinical practice setting. This stated benefit has yet to be demonstrated in our local clinical practice setting. The aim was to identify factors associated with difficulty in the administration of the ACT in different clinical practice settings in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study performed from April to June 2008. All patients diagnosed with asthma and referred to an asthma nurse from the in-patient and out-patient clinical practice setting in Tan Tock Seng Hospital were enrolled. Results: Four hundred and thirty-four patients were asked to complete the ACT tool. In the univariate model, we found that age, clinical setting and medical history to be significantly associated with the completion of the ACT. The odds of completion decreased by a factor of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.94) for every year’s increase in age, and this was statistically significant (P <0.001). Similarly, the odds ratio of completion for those with more than 3 medical conditions by history were 0.59 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.71) as compared to those with less than 3 medical conditions by history, and this was also significant (P <0.001). In the multivariate model, we only found age to be an independent and significant factor. After adjusting for age, none of the other variables initially significant in the univariate model remained significant. Conclusion: The results show that the ACT was simple and easy to be administered in younger-aged patients. Key words: Administer, Guidelines, Interpretation, Questionnaire

Pharmacological strategies for improving the efficacy and therapeutic ratio of glucocorticoids in inflammatory lung diseases

Glucocorticoids are widely used to treat various inflammatory lung diseases. Acting via the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), they exert clinical effects predominantly by modulating gene transcription. This may be to either induce (transactivate) or repress (transrepress) gene transcription. However, certain individuals, including those who smoke, have certain asthma phenotypes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or some interstitial diseases may respond poorly to the beneficial effects of glucocorticoids. In these cases, high dose, often oral or parental, glucocorticoids are typically prescribed. This generally leads to adverse effects that compromise clinical utility. There is, therefore, a need to enhance the clinical efficacy of glucocorticoids while minimizing adverse effects. In this context, a long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA) can enhance the clinical efficacy of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in asthma and COPD. Furthermore, LABAs can augment glucocorticoid-dependent gene expression and this action may account for some of the benefits of LABA/ICS combination therapies when compared to ICS given as a monotherapy. In addition to metabolic genes and other adverse effects that are induced by glucocorticoids, there are many other glucocorticoid-inducible genes that have significant anti-inflammatory potential. We therefore advocate a move away from the search for ligands of GR that dissociate transactivation from transrepression. Instead, we submit that ligands should be functionally screened by virtue of their ability to induce or repress biologically-relevant genes in target tissues. In this review, we discuss pharmacological methods by which selective GR modulators and "add-on" therapies may be exploited to improve the clinical efficacy of glucocorticoids while reducing potential adverse effects.

Factors associated with uncontrolled asthma in Porto Alegre, Brazil

The prevalence of uncontrolled and controlled asthma, and the factors associated with uncontrolled asthma were investigated in a cross-sectional study. Patients aged 11 years with confirmed asthma diagnosis were recruited from the outpatient asthma clinic of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. Patients were excluded if they had other chronic pulmonary disease. They underwent an evaluation by a general questionnaire, an asthma control questionnaire (based on the 2006 Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines), assessment of inhaled device technique and pulmonary function tests. Asthma was controlled in 48 of 275 patients (17.5%), partly controlled in 74 (26.9%) and uncontrolled in 153 (55.6%). In the univariate analysis, asthma severity was associated with asthma control (P < 0.001). Availability of asthma medications was associated with asthma control (P = 0.01), so that most patients who could purchase medications had controlled asthma, while patients who depend on the public health system for access to medications had lower rates of controlled asthma. The use of inhaled corticosteroid was lower in the uncontrolled group (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified three factors associated with uncontrolled asthma: severity of asthma (OR = 5.33, P < 0.0001), access to medications (OR = 1.97, P = 0.025) and use of inhaled corticosteroids (OR = 0.17, P = 0.030). This study showed a high rate of uncontrolled asthma in patients who attended an outpatient asthma clinic. Severity of asthma, access to medications and adequate use of inhaled corticosteroids were associated with the degree of asthma control.

Assessment of asthma control in primary care

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of uncontrolled asthma in patients who are visiting their primary care provider for any reason.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This multisite, cross-sectional survey was conducted between January 25 and May 2, 2008. Participants aged > or =18 years were recruited from 35 primary care provider sites. Eligible participants presented to the office for any acute medical, routine, follow-up, or nonmedical reason; had a self-reported physician diagnosis of asthma; used medication to treat asthma in the past year; and had no history of COPD. They completed the Asthma Control Test dagger (ACT) and provided information including demographics, health behaviors, medical history, and asthma medication use. Uncontrolled asthma was defined as ACT score < or =19.

RESULTS

The overall weighted prevalence of uncontrolled asthma in 2238 patients in primary care was 58% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.60). Among asthma patients seeking care for a respiratory complaint, 72% (95% CI, 0.68-0.75) had uncontrolled asthma compared to 48% (95% CI, 0.45-0.51) of asthma patients presenting for a non-respiratory reason.

CONCLUSIONS

At the population level, over half of patients with asthma under primary care management had uncontrolled asthma at the time of an office visit. Surprisingly, nearly 50% of patients with asthma who presented for office visits not associated with respiratory-related complaints had uncontrolled asthma. The study results may be influenced by a seasonal effect of upper respiratory infections and by the insurance status of the study respondents. However identifying patients with uncontrolled asthma is important and remains a challenge. Therefore, health care providers should consider evaluating asthma control on a regular basis, regardless of reason for visit.

Phenotypic determinants of uncontrolled asthma

BACKGROUND

Although uncontrolled asthma remains frequent, determinants of asthma control are poorly studied.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to estimate the distribution and the phenotypic characteristics of asthma control in 2 groups of subjects defined by the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the past 12 months, in the Epidemiological study on the Genetics and Environment of Asthma, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and atopy (EGEA).

METHODS

Five hundred one adult current patients with asthma who participated in the follow-up of the EGEA study were included. Asthma control was assessed from survey questions reflecting asthma control, as defined in the 2006 Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines. The factors analyzed were age, sex, educational level, body mass index, active and passive smoking, sensitization to aeroallergens, total IgE, rhinitis, chronic cough/phlegm, and age at asthma onset. Analyses were stratified according to ICS use.

RESULTS

Uncontrolled asthma was more frequent in ICS users (27.6%, 35.0%, and 37.4% with controlled, partly-controlled, and uncontrolled asthma respectively) compared with non-ICS users (60.0%, 23.9%, and 16.1%, respectively). In ICS users, chronic cough or phlegm and female sex were independently and significantly related to uncontrolled asthma. In non-ICS users, high total IgE and sensitization to molds were associated with uncontrolled asthma. Smoking and rhinitis were not associated with asthma control.

CONCLUSION

Optimal asthma control remained unachieved in the majority of patients with asthma in this study. Factors associated with uncontrolled asthma were different in ICS users (chronic cough/phlegm, female sex) and non-ICS users (high total IgE and sensitization to molds).

Treatment of moderate to severe asthma: patient perspectives on combination inhaler therapy and implications for adherence

Symptom control in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma is essential to reduce the significant morbidity associated with the disease. Poor adherence to controller medications has been identified as a major contributing factor to the high level of uncontrolled asthma. This review examines patient perspectives on, and preferences for, controller medications (inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting β(2)-agonist combinations [ICS/LABA]), and how this may affect adherence to therapy. Fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol, the currently available ICS/LABA combination products, have similar efficacy and tolerability based on a recent meta-analysis of asthma trials. Adherence is higher with the combination ICS/LABAs than when the components are administered separately. Investigations into patient preferences for desirable attributes of asthma medications indicate that an effective reliever with a fast onset and long duration of action is preferred and may lead to improved adherence. This rapid onset of effect was perceived and highly valued in patient surveys, and was associated with greater patient satisfaction. Thus, future research should be directed at therapy that offers both anti-inflammatory activity and a rapid onset of bronchodilator effect. To further improve patient adherence and treatment outcome, the effect of these characteristics as well as other factors on adherence should also be investigated.

Two first-in-human, open-label, phase I dose-escalation safety trials of MEDI-528, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-9, in healthy adult volunteers

BACKGROUND

Interleukin-9 (IL-9) is involved in pathogenic aspects of the asthmatic response, including induction of the proliferation of T-helper type 2 lymphocytes, mucus production, and mast-cell differentiation, proliferation, and recruitment to the lung. In preclinical studies in mice, inhibition of IL-9 through neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment partially reduced airway hyperresponsiveness and mast-cell progenitor migration to the lung.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of the present studies was to determine the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles and immunogenicity of MEDI-528, a humanized immunoglobulin G1k anti-IL-9 mAb, in healthy adult volunteers.

METHODS

In separate open-label, Phase I dose-escalation studies, single doses of MEDI-528 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, or 9.0 mg/kg were administered as an intravenous infusion (20 mg/min administered over 1-40 minutes, depending on dose) and by subcutaneous injection. All subjects were followed for 84 days. Any laboratory test value outside the normal reference range was considered an adverse event (AE).

RESULTS

Twenty-four subjects were enrolled in the intravenous study, and 29 subjects were enrolled in the subcutaneous study. No deaths or serious or severe AEs occurred in either study. The most frequently reported AEs in the intravenous study were laboratory test abnormalities; the most frequently reported AEs in the subcutaneous study were pharyngolaryngeal pain, palpable lymph nodes, and laboratory test abnormalities. The single-dose pharmacokinetics of MEDI-528 were linear and dose proportional over the dose range studied with both routes of administration. The mean t((1/2)) after intravenous administration was approximately 26 days (range, 25-28 days); the mean t((1/2)) after subcutaneous administration ranged from 33 to 87 days across doses. A low titer (1:80) of antibodies to MEDI-528 was detected on day 84 in a single volunteer receiving intravenous MEDI-528 3.0 mg/kg. No antibody titers were detected in any of the volunteers receiving subcutaneous MEDI-528.

CONCLUSIONS

Administered intravenously or subcutaneously, MEDI-528 had an acceptable safety profile and exhibited linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range studied in healthy adults in these Phase I studies. The findings support further investigation of MEDI-528 in multiple-dose trials in patients with asthma. ClinicalTrials.gov Identification numbers: NCT00192296 (intravenous study); NCT00116168 (subcutaneous study).

Predicting asthma control using patient attitudes toward medical care: the REACT score

BACKGROUND

The association between patients' degree of asthma control and their attitudes toward medical professionals and asthma therapy is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a tool, the REACT Score, that can be used by physicians to compute the risk of having uncontrolled asthma based on patient attitudes toward medical professionals and asthma treatment.

METHODS

A nationally representative sample of adult patients (> or = 18 years old) with moderate to severe asthma completed the Asthma Control Test and were surveyed regarding their attitudes about relationships with medical professionals and asthma treatments. Competing predictive models were developed to determine the association between attitude questions and asthma control. Using the model with the highest c-index, a REACT Score was computed.

RESULTS

The proportion of uncontrolled patients (Asthma Control Test score < 20) in the high-, medium-, and low-risk REACT Score categories was 75%, 50%, and 24%, respectively. Patients who believed that their physician recognized lifestyle compromises due to asthma, who were not satisfied with their treatment regimen, and who took asthma medication more frequently than prescribed had a higher risk of poor asthma control.

CONCLUSION

The REACT Score is a novel way to predict asthma control and to identify key attitudes and behaviors that need to be addressed to engage a patient in ongoing, effective care. This tool may also improve communication between asthmatic patients and their physicians by identifying patient concerns regarding their treatment and quality of life.

Absorption of montelukast is transporter mediated: a common variant of OATP2B1 is associated with reduced plasma concentrations and poor response

OBJECTIVES

To (i) determine whether montelukast undergoes carrier-mediated uptake; (ii) classify the carrier protein(s) responsible for uptake; (iii) identify specific transporters that mediate transport of montelukast; and (iv) evaluate whether variation in the gene encoding the transport protein(s) influences the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of montelukast.

METHODS

In-vitro permeability studies of montelukast are carried out using Caco-2 cell culture, a standard model of human intestinal drug transport. In-vivo plasma concentrations of montelukast in an asthmatic population are determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, and genotyping of transport proteins is by LightTyper analysis.

RESULTS

Permeability of montelukast has an activation energy of 13.7+/-0.7 kcal/mol, consistent with carrier-mediated transport. Permeability is saturable at high concentrations of montelukast and follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Permeability is subject to competition by sulfobromophthalein, estrone-3-sulfate, pravastatin, taurocholic acid, and cholic acid (P<0.05, percentage of control: 72+/-7-86+/-7) and is inhibited by 5-10% citrus juice (P<0.05, maximal inhibition percentage of control: 31+/-2). An MDCKII cell line expressing OATP2B1 (coded for by the SLCO2B1 gene) displays significantly increased permeability of montelukast (P<0.05, percentage of control: 140+/-20). A nonsynonymous polymorphism in SLCO2B1, rs12422149; SLCO2B1 {NM_007256.2}:c.935G>A, associates with significantly reduced plasma concentration in patients measured on the morning after an evening dose (P<0.025, square root mean transformed plasma concentration+/-SE; c.[935G>A]+[935G]=3+/-1, c.[935G]+[935G]=7.0+/-0.9) and differential response as assessed by change in baseline Asthma Symptom Utility Index scores after 1 month of therapy (delta mean Asthma Symptom Utility Index; c.[935G>A]+[935G]=0.02+/-0.01, P=1.0; c.[935G]+[935G]=1.0+/-0.3, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Altogether, these observations suggest that the genetics of SLCO2B1 may be an important variable in determining the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of montelukast.

Asthma Control Test correlates well with the treatment decisions made by asthma specialists

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Poor assessment of asthma control results in suboptimal treatment. Identifying parameters that accurately assess control will benefit treatment decisions. The Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a five-item questionnaire for the assessment of asthma control. This study evaluated its correlation with the treatment decisions made by asthma specialists in an outpatient clinic setting, and compared its performance with other conventional parameters including spirometry, PEF rate (PEFR), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and BHR.

METHODS

The 383 (122 men) study subjects completed a 1-month diary on symptoms and PEFR before the assessment. All subjects then completed the ACT together with same-day spirometry and FeNO measurement. BHR to methacholine was performed in 73 subjects in the week before assessment. Asthma specialists, blinded to the results of the ACT, FeNO and BHR (but not spirometry and PEFR), assessed the patients' level of control according to the 2006 version of the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines and made appropriate treatment decision.

RESULTS

The group mean (SD) age was 46.1 (13.4) years with pre-bronchodilator FEV(1) 84.72 (20.81) % predicted. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis found that an ACT score of < or = 20 best correlated with uncontrolled asthma (area under curve (AUC) = 0.76) with a sensitivity of 70.5%, specificity 76.0%, positive predictive value 76.2% and negative predictive value 70.2% for predicting step-up of asthma therapy. On ROC analysis, the ACT score had the highest AUC (0.81 (P < 0.001)) for changing asthma therapy when compared with FeNO, spirometry, PEFR and BHR parameters

CONCLUSIONS

The ACT correlated better with treatment decisions made by asthma specialists than spirometry, PEFR and FeNO.

The effect of sex on asthma control from the National Asthma Survey

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated conflicting results with regard to differences in asthma control between the sexes.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify sex differences in short-term and long-term measures of asthma control in adults from the National Asthma Survey.

METHODS

This study analyzed data from the National Asthma Survey (Four-State sample) sponsored by the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Asthma control was compared between the sexes based on short-term (recent symptoms, asthma attacks, and albuterol use) and long-term (asthma attacks, work days lost, and urgent-care visits and hospitalizations in the prior year) measures. Composite scores for short-term and long-term control were calculated based on any single measure of poor asthma control and based on a sum of poor asthma control measures.

RESULTS

Women were more likely to have poor short-term asthma control based on any measure (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.20; CI, 1.01-1.44) or sum of measures (adjusted OR, 1.24; CI, 1.08-1.53) compared with men. Women also demonstrated worse asthma control based on any uncontrolled long-term measure (adjusted OR, 1.52; CI, 1.29-1.79) or sum of measures (adjusted OR, 1.68; CI, 1.45-1.93). These findings were present despite higher reported inhaled corticosteroid use and scheduled health care visits for asthma among women.

CONCLUSIONS

Women demonstrated worse asthma control compared with men with regard to several short-term and long-term measures, despite reporting higher rates of inhaled corticosteroid use and routine asthma care visits. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether these findings are due to differences in health reporting or to pathophysiologic differences in asthma between the sexes.

A retrospective randomized study of asthma control in the US: results of the CHARIOT study

BACKGROUND

The third version of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) Expert Panel Report (EPR-3): Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma emphasizes the need to use asthma control rather than patient severity to base adjustments to treatment and ultimately improve patient outcomes. The objectives of the current study were to assess control of patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, examine the natural history of the disease, practice patterns and resource utilization in specialty community practices according to recently reviewed NAEPP guidelines.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This analysis represents a retrospective, multicenter, randomized study of 1009 patient charts in sixty United States allergy and pulmonary medicine community practices. The proportion of patients with controlled and uncontrolled asthma over 12 months, prevalence and characteristics of atopy, past asthma history, pulmonary function, medications and treatment patterns, patient and clinical practice characteristics were analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome of interest was asthma control.

RESULTS

A total of 365 male and 644 female patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma (mean 43.2 +/- 17.1 years) were enrolled. 81.9% of patients were uncontrolled according to recent NAEPP guidelines. Importantly, a greater percentage of patients with moderate asthma vs. severe persistent asthma were uncontrolled (p < 0.0114). Atopy was detected in 92% of patients. Patients with early onset of asthma were associated with control (p < 0.0433). Atopic symptoms, such as allergic rhinitis (p < 0.0130) and rhinosinusitis (p < 0.0476), were associated with uncontrolled asthma. Uncontrolled patients were also associated with more medications (a mean of 4.05 +/- 1.87 medications) than were controlled patients (a mean of 3.40 +/- 1.37 medications (p < 0.0001), although the temporal relationship of this association was not recorded. Limitations may have included patient and/or study site selection bias and difficulty in the process of operationalizing the definitions of control and disease severity. Since the current study only examined patients from specialty practices, the results may not be generalizable to the overall asthma population.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater than 80% of asthma patients from specialty practices were uncontrolled with regard to asthma symptoms. Atopic symptoms, such as allergic rhinitis and rhinosinusitis, in addition to a greater number of medications, were associated with uncontrolled asthma. Moreover, patients designated as having asthma of moderate severity were associated with being uncontrolled more than were those with severe asthma (p < 0.0114), which suggests that the former population may not have received adequate assessment of impairment or risk, with subsequent changes in treatment for control of symptoms.

Formulating an effective and efficient written asthma action plan

Written asthma action plans (WAAPs) are recommended by national and international guidelines to help patients recognize and manage asthma exacerbations. Despite this recommendation, many patients with asthma do not have a WAAP. In addition, WAAPs vary widely in their readability and usability. To promote issuance and patient use, the WAAP should clearly define the decision (action) points, expected response, and expected time of response. The WAAP should also be easily integrated into a physician's busy practice. Herein, we describe the key elements of an effective WAAP, including concise, detailed recommendations regarding asthma exacerbation recognition (patient self-monitoring) and treatment.

Asthma control and future asthma-related morbidity in inner-city asthmatic children

BACKGROUND

Asthma guidelines recommend routine evaluation of asthma control, which includes measurements of impairment and risk. It is unclear whether rigorous asthma control changes risk of asthma morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether the degree of asthma control in inner-city asthmatic children results in differential risk reduction of future asthma-related morbidity.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study examines 960 inner-city children with asthma who were highly engaged in an asthma-specific disease management program for a minimum of 2 years. Degree of asthma control was determined during the first year of enrollment and was categorized as well controlled (> or = 80% of visits in control), moderately controlled (50%-79% of visits in control), or difficult to control (< 50% of visits in control). Risk and probability of asthma-related morbidity at each visit were determined during the second year of enrollment and included self-reported asthma exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroid rescue and emergency department visits or hospitalizations.

RESULTS

Increasing the degree of asthma control measured during the first year of enrollment led to statistically significant incremental reductions in risk of acute asthma exacerbations and emergency department visits or hospitalizations during the second year of enrollment.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving and maintaining asthma control in inner-city children with asthma results in significant reductions in asthma-related morbidity. Systematic assessments of asthma control may be useful for predicting future risk in children with asthma.

A breath for health: an exploratory study in severe asthma patients in Turkey

BACKGROUND

Severe asthma puts enormous burden on patients. To evaluate asthma-related restrictions on patients' daily lives along with their expectations about future asthma care.

METHODS

A structured questionnaire was administered to severe asthma patients at 25 centers across Turkey. The patients were divided into; uncontrolled (n: 274) and controlled asthma (n: 177) according to the existence of symptoms despite the GINA step 4 or 5 treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 451 patients (F/M: 337/114, mean age: 47.6 +/- 13.2 years) were included; 93% were nonsmokers and 51.2% were atopic. Chronic rhino-sinusitis, ASA/NSAID sensitivity, and osteoporosis were significantly higher in uncontrolled patients. Nearly 70% of the uncontrolled asthmatics defined asthma as disturbing with significant restrictions in daily life. The most important role for medication was symptom relief. One inhaler or one tablet a month was the most preferred form of drug usage. In addition, 30.6% of the patients had tried alternative treatment with herbal remedies. Although patients were willing to become members of an asthma association, they expected the Turkish government to provide special asthma clinics and fund research into new treatments. Controlled patients achieved or were close to achieving asthma control goals. Uncontrolled patients seemed to be more pessimistic in this respect, but they reserved significant levels of hope for the future. Two-thirds of all the patients thought that they would receive better treatment in the next 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study group, severe asthma patients face significant limitations in their daily lives, but they are optimistic about better asthma control and treatment options in the future.

A Holy Grail of asthma management: toward understanding how long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists enhance the clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids

There is unequivocal evidence that the combination of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) -- i.e. glucocorticoid -- and an inhaled long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA) is superior to each component administered as a monotherapy alone in the clinical management of asthma. Moreover, Calverley and colleagues (Lancet 2003, 361: 449-456; N Engl J Med 2007, 356: 775-789) reporting for the 'TRial of Inhaled STeroids ANd long-acting beta(2)-agonists (TRISTAN)' and 'TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health (TORCH)' international study groups also demonstrated the superior efficacy of LABA/ICS combination therapies over ICS alone in the clinical management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This finding has been independently confirmed indicating that the therapeutic benefit of LABA/ICS combination therapies is not restricted to asthma and may be extended to other chronic inflammatory diseases of the airways. Despite the unquestionable benefit of LABA/ICS combination therapies, there is a vast gap in our understanding of how these two drugs given together deliver superior clinical efficacy. In this article, we review the history of LABA/ICS combination therapies and critically evaluate how these two classes of drugs might interact at the biochemical level to suppress pro-inflammatory responses. Understanding the molecular basis of this fundamental clinical observation is a Holy Grail of current respiratory diseases research as it could permit the rational exploitation of this effect with the development of new 'optimized' LABA/ICS combination therapies.

Asthma control in Europe: a real-world evaluation based on an international population-based study

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic evidence related to asthma control in patients from the general population is scanty.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess asthma control in several European centers according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines and to investigate its determinants.

METHODS

In the European Community Respiratory Health Survey II (1999-2002), 1241 adults with asthma were identified and classified into inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) users and non-ICS users in the last year. Control was assessed in both groups by using the GINA proposal (controlled, partly controlled, and uncontrolled asthma), and it was related to potential determinants.

RESULTS

Only 15% (95% CI, 12% to 19%) of subjects who had used ICSs in the last year and 45% (95% CI, 41% to 50%) of non-ICS users had their asthma under control; individuals with uncontrolled asthma accounted for 49% (95% CI, 44% to 53%) and 18% (95% CI, 15% to 21%), respectively. Among ICS users, the prevalence of uncontrolled asthma showed great variability across Europe, ranging from 20% (95% CI, 7% to 41%; Iceland) to 67% (95% CI, 35% to 90%; Italy). Overweight status, chronic cough and phlegm, and sensitization to Cladosporium species were associated with poor control in ICS users. About 65% and 87% of ICS users with uncontrolled and partly controlled asthma, respectively, were on a medication regimen that was less than recommended by the GINA guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Six of 7 European asthmatic adults using ICSs in the last year did not achieve good disease control. The large majority of subjects with poorly controlled asthma were using antiasthma drugs in a suboptimal way. A wide variability in asthma control emerged across Europe.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Greater attention should be paid to asthma management and to the implementation of the GINA guidelines.