151
|
Jacobs DHM, Horeweg N, Straver M, Roeloffzen EMA, Speijer G, Merkus J, van der Sijp J, Mast ME, Fisscher U, Petoukhova AL, Zwanenburg AG, Marijnen CAM, Koper PCM. Health-related quality of life of breast cancer patients after accelerated partial breast irradiation using intraoperative or external beam radiotherapy technique. Breast 2019; 46:32-39. [PMID: 31075670 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2018] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare health-related quality of life (HRQL) in elderly breast cancer patients between two types of Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and external beam APBI (EB-APBI). METHODS Between 2011 and 2016 women ≥60 years undergoing breast conserving therapy for early stage breast cancer were included in a prospective multi-centre cohort study. Patients were treated with electron IORT (1 × 23.3 Gy) or photon EB-APBI (10 × 3.85 Gy daily). HRQL was measured by the EORTC-QLQ C30 and BR23 questionnaires before surgery and at several time points until 1 year. RESULTS HRQoL data was available of 204 IORT and 158 EB-APBI patients. In longitudinal analyses emotional functioning and future perspective were significantly, but not clinically relevantly, worse in IORT-treated patients, and improved significantly during follow-up in both groups. All other aspects of HRQL slightly worsened after treatment and recovered within 3 months with an improvement until 1 year. Cross-sectional analysis showed that postoperatively fatigue and role functioning were significantly worse in IORT patients compared to EB-APBI patients who were not yet irradiated, but the difference was not clinically relevant. At other timepoints there were no significant differences. Multivariable analysis at 1 year identified comorbidity and systemic therapy as risk factors for a worse global health score (GHS). CONCLUSIONS EB-APBI and IORT were well tolerated. Despite a temporary deterioration after treatment, all HRQL scales recovered within 3 months resulting in no clinically relevant differences until 1 year between groups nor compared to baseline levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D H M Jacobs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - N Horeweg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M Straver
- Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - E M A Roeloffzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - G Speijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - J Merkus
- Department of Surgery, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - J van der Sijp
- Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - M E Mast
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - U Fisscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - A L Petoukhova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - A G Zwanenburg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - C A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P C M Koper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Shah C, Vicini F. Accelerated partial breast irradiation-Redefining the treatment target for women with early stage breast cancer. Breast J 2019; 25:408-417. [PMID: 30950133 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Following breast conserving surgery, the standard of care has been to deliver adjuvant radiation therapy directed to the whole breast (WBI) over a period of 3-7 weeks. Over the past decade, increasing data have supported the concept that treatment to the whole breast may not be required in selected patients, allowing for the emergence of partial breast irradiation (PBI). Multiple randomized trials with 5-10 years of follow-up have been published documenting the safety and efficacy associated with PBI using multiple techniques. Questions that remain to be answered include (a) what is the optimal PBI technique for each clinical scenario, (b) are there additional patients that can be effectively managed with PBI approaches, and (c) are there different techniques/dose schedules that allow for further reduction in treatment duration and/or toxicities? Partial breast irradiation represents a standard approach for appropriately selected patients. PBI provides comparable clinical outcomes to WBI while allowing for a reduction in the duration treatment and the potential for reduced toxicities. Future studies may also help to better define which patients require no radiation, PBI, hypofractionated WBI or conventional WBI, based upon patient, clinical, pathologic features as well as potentially using tumor genetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Frank Vicini
- 21st Century Oncology, Michigan Healthcare Professionals, Farmington Hills, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
153
|
Montagne L, Gal J, Chand ME, Schiappa R, Falk AT, Kinj R, Gauthier M, Hannoun-Levi JM. GEC-ESTRO APBI classification as a decision-making tool for the management of 2nd ipsilateral breast tumor event. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 176:149-157. [PMID: 30949798 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05221-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM Second ipsilateral breast tumor event (2ndIBTE) occurring after primary radio-surgical treatment can be treated by either salvage mastectomy or 2nd conservative treatment (2ndCT) including an accelerated partial breast re-irradiation (APBrI). We analyzed the impact of the GEC-ESTRO APBI classification (GAC) on the oncological outcome after APBrI. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2000 and 2016, 159 patients (pts) underwent a 2ndCT. After lumpectomy, APBrI was performed using either low-dose (30-55 Gy reference isodose) or high-dose rate brachytherapy (28-34 Gy). Oncological outcome including 3rdIBTE, regional (RFS) or metastasis-free survival (MFS), specific (SS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed according to GAC. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were conducted to identify significant prognostic factors for 3rdIBTE. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 71 months (range 62-85 months), 60 pts (42%), 61 pts (42.7%) and 22 pts (15.4%) were classified as low-risk (LR), intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR), respectively. For the whole cohort, 6-year 3rdIBTE-free survival, RFS, MFS, SS and OS rates were 97.4, 96.4, 90.3, 92.9 and 91.2%, respectively. Six-year 3rdIBTE-free survival rates for LR, IR and HR were 100, 95.8 and 92.9%, respectively (p = 0.003), while no significant differences were found between the three GAC groups for RFS, MFS, SS. In UVA, lympho-vascular invasion (p = 0.009), positive margins (p = 0.0001) and GAC high-risk group (p = 0.001) were considered as significant prognostic factors for 3rdIBTE, while, in MVA, high-risk group (p = 0.009) was the only prognostic factor. CONCLUSION In case of 2ndIBTE, GAC could be used as a decision helping tool to discuss conservative or radical treatment options. Patient information remains crucial in order to accurately define the salvage therapy modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucile Montagne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center & University of Cote d'Azur, 33 Avenue Valombrose, 06107, Nice Cedex, France
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Biostatistic Unit, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center & University of Cote d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Marie-Eve Chand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center & University of Cote d'Azur, 33 Avenue Valombrose, 06107, Nice Cedex, France
| | - Renaud Schiappa
- Biostatistic Unit, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center & University of Cote d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Alexander T Falk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center & University of Cote d'Azur, 33 Avenue Valombrose, 06107, Nice Cedex, France
| | - Rémy Kinj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center & University of Cote d'Azur, 33 Avenue Valombrose, 06107, Nice Cedex, France
| | - Mathieu Gauthier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center & University of Cote d'Azur, 33 Avenue Valombrose, 06107, Nice Cedex, France
| | - Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center & University of Cote d'Azur, 33 Avenue Valombrose, 06107, Nice Cedex, France.
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Bathily T, Borget I, Rivin Del Campo E, Rivera S, Bourgier C. Partial versus whole breast irradiation: Side effects, patient satisfaction and costs. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:83-91. [PMID: 30929861 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Since accelerated partial breast irradiation has demonstrated non-inferiority to whole breast irradiation regarding recurrence rate in patients with early stage breast cancer, our objective was to compare its impact on short-term adverse events, patient satisfaction and costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with early stage breast cancer treated by breast-conserving surgery between 2007 and 2012 were included: 48 women who received three-dimensional conformal accelerated partial breast irradiation in a multicentre phase-II trial were paired with 48 patients prospectively treated with whole breast irradiation. Adverse events, and patients' opinions concerning cosmesis, satisfaction and pain, were gathered 1 month after treatment. Direct and indirect costs were collected from the French National Health Insurance System perspective until the end of radiotherapy. RESULTS When comparing its impact, skin reactions occurred in 37% of patients receiving three-dimensional conformal accelerated partial breast radiotherapy and 60% of patients receiving whole breast irradiation (P=0.07); 98% were very satisfied in the group three-dimensional conformal accelerated partial breast radiotherapy versus 46% in the group treated with whole breast irradiation (P<0.001); direct costs were significantly lower in the group treated with partial breast irradiation (mean cost: 2510€ versus 5479€/patient), due to less radiation sessions. CONCLUSION In patients with early-stage breast cancer, partial irradiation offered a good alternative to whole breast irradiation, as it was less expensive and satisfactory. These, and the clinical safety and tolerance results, need to be confirmed by long-term accelerated partial breast irradiation results in on-going phase III trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Bathily
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - I Borget
- Service de biostatistique et d'épidémiologie, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France; Inserm U1018, CESP, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Sud, université Paris-Saclay, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - E Rivin Del Campo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France.
| | - S Rivera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - C Bourgier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut du cancer de Montpellier, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Korzets Y, Fyles A, Shepshelovich D, Amir E, Goldvaser H. Toxicity and clinical outcomes of partial breast irradiation compared to whole breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175:531-545. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05209-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
156
|
A comparative study based on deformable image registration of the target volumes for external-beam partial breast irradiation defined using preoperative prone magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative prone computed tomography imaging. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:38. [PMID: 30836970 PMCID: PMC6402104 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1244-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To explore the differences and correlations between the target volumes defined using preoperative prone diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and postoperative prone computed tomography (CT) simulation imaging based on deformable image registration (DIR) for external-beam partial breast irradiation (EB-PBI) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Methods Eighteen breast cancer patients suitable for EB-PBI were enrolled. Preoperative prone diagnostic MRI and postoperative prone CT scan sets for all the patients were acquired during free breathing. Target volumes and ipsilateral breast were all contoured by the same radiation oncologist. The gross tumor volume (GTV) delineated on the preoperative MRI images was denoted as the GTVpreMR and the tumor bed (TB) delineated on the postoperative prone CT images was denoted as the GTVpostCT. The MIM software system was used to deformably register the MRI and CT images. Results When based on the coincidence of the compared target centers, there were statistically significant increases in the conformity index (CI) and degree of inclusion (DI) values for GTVpostCT-GTVpreMR, GTVpostCT-CTVpreMR + 10, CTVpostCT + 10-GTVpreMR, and CTVpostCT + 10-CTVpreMR + 10 when compared with those based on the DIR of the thorax (Z = − 3.724, − 3.724, − 2.591, − 3.593, all P < 0.05; Z = -3.724, − 3.724, − 3.201, − 3.724, all P < 0.05, respectively). Conclusions Although based on DIR, there was relatively poor spatial overlap between the preoperative prone diagnostic MRI images and the postoperative prone CT simulation images for either the whole breast or the target volumes. Therefore, it is unreasonable to use preoperative prone diagnostic MRI images to guide postoperative target delineation for EB-PBI.
Collapse
|
157
|
Marta GN, Barrett J, Porfirio GJM, Martimbianco ALC, Bevilacqua JLB, Poortmans P, Riera R. Effectiveness of different accelerated partial breast irradiation techniques for the treatment of breast cancer patients: Systematic review using indirect comparisons of randomized clinical trials. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2019; 24:165-174. [PMID: 30814916 PMCID: PMC6378667 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 01/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM This systematic review was conducted to compare the effectiveness of different accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques for the treatment of breast cancer patients. BACKGROUND Numerous (APBI) techniques are available for clinical practice. METHODS AND MATERIALS Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of APBI versus whole breast irradiation (WBI). The data from APBI studies were extracted for the analyses. Indirect comparisons were used to compare different APBI techniques. RESULTS Ten studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 4343 patients were included, most of them with tumor stage T1-T2 and N0. Regarding APBI techniques, six trials used external beam radiation therapy; one intraoperative electrons; one intraoperative low-energy photons; one brachytherapy; and one external beam radiation therapy or brachytherapy. The indirect comparisons related to 5-years local control and 5-years overall survival were not significantly different between APBI techniques. CONCLUSIONS Based on indirect comparisons, no differences in clinical outcomes were observed among diverse APBI techniques in published clinical trials that formally compared WBI to APBI. However wide confidence intervals and high risk of inconsistency precluded a sound conclusion. Further head-to-head clinical trials comparing different APBI techniques are required to confirm our findings. Studies comparing different techniques using individual participant data and/or real-life data from population-based studies/registries could also provide more robust results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Nader Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology – Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet, 91, Sao Paulo, SP 01308-050, Brazil
- Department of Radiology and Oncology – Radiation Oncology Unit. of University of São Paulo, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Rua Dona Adma Jafet, 91, Sao Paulo, 01308-050 SP, Brazil
| | - Jessica Barrett
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0SR, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology – Institut Curie, 6 rue d’Ulm, 75248 Paris cedex 05, France
| | - Rachel Riera
- Cochrane Brazil, Rua Borges Lagoa, 564 – Cj 63, Edifício São Paulo, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP 04038-000, Brazil
- Discipline of Emergency Medicine and Evidence-Based Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP-EPM), Rua Borges Lagoa, 564 – Cj 63, Edifício São Paulo, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, 04038-000 SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
Post-implant analysis in permanent breast seed implant: automated plan reconstruction using simulated annealing. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11:61-68. [PMID: 30911312 PMCID: PMC6431098 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.83338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Post-implant analysis in permanent breast seed implant (PBSI) brachytherapy is an important component of the quality assurance process that indicates dosimetric quality relevant to patient outcome, indicating salvage therapy if inadequate, as well as providing feedback to the brachytherapy team to improve future treatments. To measure geometric indices on implant quality, plan reconstruction must be performed to correlate each planned and post-implant seed location. In this work, a simulated-annealing-based algorithm is developed to perform this plan reconstruction automatically. Material and methods The plan reconstruction algorithm was developed in MATLAB, taking the patient pre-treatment and post-implant (Day 0) plan and associated contours as inputs. For 19 treated patients, a reconstruction was obtained that defined the correspondence between each planned and post-implant seed. The simulated-annealing algorithm was used to reconstruct each patient 10 times to assess the variability in convergence. Manual reconstructions performed by at least two independent observers to obtain consensus were defined as the ground truth; these were compared to the automatic reconstructions obtained by the algorithm. Metrics on seed placement accuracy and needle strand angulation were calculated for the patients. Results The algorithm performed reconstructions on 19 patients (1235 seeds) with ground-truth reconstructions, obtaining 97 ± 8% correct matches. This strong performance indicates the ability to incorporate this algorithm into the clinical quality assurance workflow. Conclusions The plan reconstruction algorithm developed herein performed very well in a 19-patient cohort. This algorithm can be incorporated into the clinical process to assist in the assessment of center-specific seed placement accuracy and can be used to gather implant metrics in an automated, standardized fashion for future PBSI trials.
Collapse
|
159
|
Single-center long-term results from the randomized phase-3 TARGIT-A trial comparing intraoperative and whole-breast radiation therapy for early breast cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 195:640-647. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01438-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
160
|
Tagliaferri L, Kovács G, Aristei C, De Sanctis V, Barbera F, Morganti AG, Casà C, Pieters BR, Russi E, Livi L, Corvò R, Giovagnoni A, Ricardi U, Valentini V, Magrini SM. Current state of interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) education in Italy: results of the INTERACTS survey. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11:48-53. [PMID: 30911310 PMCID: PMC6431105 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.83137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Increased complexity of interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy - BT) treatment planning and quality control procedures has led to the need of a specific training. However, the details of the features of BT learning objectives and their distribution in the training paths of the Italian Radiation Oncology Schools are not known. This paper aims to provide the actual 'state-of-the-art' of BT education in Italy and to stimulate the debate on this issue. MATERIAL AND METHODS All the Italian radiation oncology schools' directors (SD) were involved in a web survey, which included questions on the teaching of BT, considering also the 2011 ESTRO core curriculum criteria. The survey preliminary results were discussed at the 8th Rome INTER-MEETING (INTERventional Radiotherapy Multidisciplinary Meeting), June 24th, 2017. The present paper describes the final results of the survey and possible future teaching strategies resulting from the discussion. RESULTS A total of 23 SDs answered the survey. The results evidenced a wide heterogeneity in the learning activities available to trainees in BT across the country. While theoretical knowledge is adequately and homogeneously transmitted to trainees, the types of practice to which they are exposed varies significantly among different schools. CONCLUSIONS This survey proves the need for an improvement of practical BT education in Italy and the advisability of a national BT education programme networking schools of different Universities. Beside the organization of national/international courses for BT practical teaching, Universities may also establish post-specialization courses ('second level' Masters) to allow professionals (already certified in radiation oncology) to acquire more advanced BT knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Tagliaferri
- Chair of the Brachytherapy, Interventional Radiotherapy and IORT Study Group of the Italian Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology Society (AIRO); Gemelli ART (Advanced Radiation Therapy), UOC Radioterapia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - György Kovács
- INTERACTS (Interventional Radiotherapy Active Teaching School) Educational Program Director; Head, Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University of Lübeck/UKSH CL, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Past Chair of AIRO Brachytherapy study group; Head, Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Vitaliana De Sanctis
- Deputy Chair of the Brachytherapy, Interventional Radiotherapy and IORT AIRO Study Group; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicina e Psicologia, Sant’Andrea Hospital, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy
| | - Fernando Barbera
- Board Member of the Brachytherapy, Interventional Radiotherapy and IORT AIRO Study Group; Head, Brachytherapy Section, Radiation Oncology Department, Spedali Civili Hospital and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Member of the Scientific Committee and Teacher, INTERACTS School; Head, Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Calogero Casà
- National Coordinator of Resident Physician Department (SIMS) of the Italian Young Doctors Association (SIGM); Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Bradley Rumwell Pieters
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elvio Russi
- AIRO Past President; Head, Radiotherapy Unit, Ospedale S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Chair of the Section for Radiation Oncology Schools, National College of Professors of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine; Head, Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Renzo Corvò
- Chair of the Scientific Commission, AIRO; Head, Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS San Martino-IST, National Cancer Research Institute, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Chair of the National College of Professors of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine; Head, Radiology Department, University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Chair of the Department of Oncology; Head, Radiation Oncology Department, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Head, Gemelli ART (Advanced Radiation Therapy) – UOC Radioterapia – Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- INTERACTS School Director; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- AIRO President; Chairman, Radiation Oncology Section, National College of Professors of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine; Head, Radiation Oncology Department, Spedali Civili Hospital and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
161
|
Stelczer G, Major T, Mészáros N, Polgár C, Pesznyák C. External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation: dosimetric assessment of conformal and three different intensity modulated techniques. Radiol Oncol 2019; 53:123-130. [PMID: 30661060 PMCID: PMC6411019 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2019-0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare four different external beam radiotherapy techniques of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) considering target coverage, dose to organs at risk and overall plan quality. The investigated techniques were three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), "step and shoot" (SS) and "sliding window" (SW) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), intensity-modulated arc therapy (RA). Patients and methods CT scans of 40 APBI patients were selected for the study. The planning objectives were set up according to the international recommendations. Homogeneity, conformity and plan quality indices were calculated from volumetric and dosimetric parameters of target volumes and organs at risk. The total monitor units and feasibility were also investigated. Results There were no significant differences in the coverage of the target volume between the techniques. The homogeneity indices of 3D-CRT, SS, SW and RA plans were 0.068, 0.074, 0.058 and 0.081, respectively. The conformation numbers were 0.60, 0.80, 0.82 and 0.89, respectively. The V50% values of the ipsilateral breast for 3D-CRT, SS, SW and RA were 47.5%, 40.2%, 39.9% and 31.6%, respectively. The average V10% and V40% values of ipsilateral lung were 13.1%, 28.1%, 28%, 36% and 2.6%, 1.9%, 1.9%, 3%, respectively. The 3D-CRT technique provided the best heart protection, especially in the low dose region. All contralateral organs received low doses. The SW technique achieved the best plan quality index (PQI). Conclusions Good target volume coverage and tolerable dose to the organs at risk are achievable with all four techniques. Taking into account all aspects, we recommend the SW IMRT technique for APBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gábor Stelczer
- Center of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
- Institute of Nuclear Techniques, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, BudapestHungary
| | - Tibor Major
- Center of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Norbert Mészáros
- Center of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csaba Polgár
- Center of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csilla Pesznyák
- Center of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
- Institute of Nuclear Techniques, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, BudapestHungary
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Leonardi MC, Corrao G, Frassoni S, Vingiani A, Dicuonzo S, Lazzeroni M, Fodor C, Morra A, Gerardi MA, Rojas DP, Dell'Acqua V, Marvaso G, Bassi FD, Galimberti VE, Veronesi P, Miglietta E, Cattani F, Zurrida S, Bagnardi V, Viale G, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Ductal carcinoma in situ and intraoperative partial breast irradiation: Who are the best candidates? Long-term outcome of a single institution series. Radiother Oncol 2019; 133:68-76. [PMID: 30935584 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Revised: 12/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To report the long-term outcome of a single institution series of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with accelerated partial irradiation using intraoperative electrons (IOERT). METHODS From 2000 to 2010, 180 DCIS patients, treated with quadrantectomy and 21 Gy IOERT, were analyzed in terms of ipsilateral breast recurrences (IBRs) and survival outcomes by stratification in two subgroups. The low-risk group included patients who fulfilled the suitable definition according to American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Guidelines (size ≤2.5 cm, grade 1-2 and surgical margins ≥3 mm) (Suitable), while the remaining ones formed the high-risk group (Non-Suitable). RESULTS Eighty-four and 96 patients formed the Suitable and Non-Suitable groups, respectively. In the whole population, the cumulative incidence of IBR at 5, 7 and 10 years was 19%, 21%, and 25%, respectively. In the Suitable group, the cumulative incidence of IBR remained constant at 11% throughout the years, while in the Non-Suitable group increased from 26% at 5 years to 36% at 10 years (p < 0.0001). When hormonal positivity and HER2 absence of expression were added to the selection of the Suitable group, the cumulative incidence of IBR dropped and stabilized at 4% at 10 years. None died of breast cancer. In the whole population, 5-year and 10-year overall survival rate was 98% and 96.5%, respectively, without any difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The overall and by group IBR rates were high and stricter criteria are required for acceptable local control for Suitable DCIS. Because of the concerns raised, IOERT should not be used in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy
| | - Andrea Vingiani
- Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Matteo Lazzeroni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Damaris Patricia Rojas
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Veronica Dell'Acqua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Domenico Bassi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Veronesi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy; Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Miglietta
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Zurrida
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy; Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Outcomes of Breast Cancer (Invasive Lobular and Ductal Carcinoma) Treated with Boost Intraoperative Electron Radiotherapy Versus Conventional External Beam Radiotherapy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT 2019. [DOI: 10.5812/ijcm.84850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
164
|
Miranda FA, Teixeira LAB, Heinzen RN, de Andrade FEM, Hijal T, Buchholz TA, Moraes FY, Poortmans P, Marta GN. Accelerated partial breast irradiation: Current status with a focus on clinical practice. Breast J 2019; 25:124-128. [DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2017] [Revised: 12/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabiana A. Miranda
- Department of Radiation Oncology Hospital Sírio‐Libanês São Paulo Brazil
| | - Lorine A. B. Teixeira
- Department of Radiation Oncology Hospital Sírio‐Libanês São Paulo Brazil
- Department of Radiology and Oncology of University of São Paulo, Division of Radiation Oncology Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP/FMUSP) São Paulo Brazil
| | - Rebeca N. Heinzen
- Department of Breast Surgery Hospital Sírio‐Libanês São Paulo Brazil
| | | | - Tarek Hijal
- Division of Radiation Oncology McGill University Health Centre Montréal Quebec Canada
| | - Thomas A. Buchholz
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Fabio Y. Moraes
- Department of Radiation Oncology Hospital Sírio‐Libanês São Paulo Brazil
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
| | | | - Gustavo N. Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology Hospital Sírio‐Libanês São Paulo Brazil
- Department of Radiology and Oncology of University of São Paulo, Division of Radiation Oncology Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP/FMUSP) São Paulo Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Breast: Hungarian Experience and European Trend. Brachytherapy 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0490-3_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
166
|
Witt JS, Gao RW, Sudmeier LJ, Rosenberg SA, Francis DM, Wallace CR, Das RK, Anderson BM. Low cardiac and left anterior descending coronary artery dose achieved with left-sided multicatheter interstitial-accelerated partial breast irradiation. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:50-56. [PMID: 30262411 PMCID: PMC6338487 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Studies have shown that an additional mean dose of 1 Gy to the heart can increase the relative risk of cardiac events. The purpose of this study was to quantify the dose delivered to the heart and left anterior descending artery (LAD) in a series of patients with left-sided breast cancer (BC) or ductal carcinoma in situ treated with multicatheter-accelerated partial breast irradiation (MC-APBI) at a single institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with left-sided BC or ductal carcinoma in situ treated consecutively from 2005 to 2011 with MC-APBI were retrospectively identified. Cardiac and LAD contours were generated for each patient. Cardiac dosimetry and distance to the planning target volume were recorded. Patient health records were reviewed and cardiac events were recorded based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS Twenty consecutive patients with left-sided BC treated with MC-APBI were retrospectively identified. Median followup was 41.4 months. Mean equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions delivered to the heart and LAD were 1.3 (standard deviation: 0.7, range: 0.2-2.9) and 3.8 (standard deviation: 3.0, range: 0.4-11.3) Gy, respectively. There was an inverse linear relationship (R2 = 0.52) between heart-to-lumpectomy cavity distance and mean heart equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions. One patient (5%) experienced symptomatic cardiac toxicity. CONCLUSIONS MC-APBI consistently delivers average doses to the heart and LAD that are similar to those achieved in most series with deep inspiration breath-hold and lower than free-breathing radiotherapy techniques. Distance from the heart to the lumpectomy cavity and the availability of other heart-sparing technologies should be considered to minimize the risk of cardiac toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob S Witt
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Robert W Gao
- Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Lisa J Sudmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - David M Francis
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Charles R Wallace
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Rupak K Das
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Bethany M Anderson
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Banks A, Coronado G, Zimmerman R, Iyengar G, Holmes DR. Breast conserving surgery with targeted intraoperative radiotherapy for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Surg Oncol 2018; 119:409-420. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.25347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Banks
- Department of Surgery; Helen Rey Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Los Angeles California
| | - Gerald Coronado
- Department of Surgery; Helen Rey Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Los Angeles California
| | - Robert Zimmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Los Angeles Radiation Oncology Center; Los Angeles California
| | - Geeta Iyengar
- Department of Radiology; Medical Imaging Center of Southern California; Santa Monica California
| | - Dennis R. Holmes
- Department of Surgery; Helen Rey Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Los Angeles California
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Chin C, Consul N, Jadeja P, Kwak E, Patel S, Wynn R, Hershman D, Connolly EP, Ha R. Utility of preoperative breast MRI in patient selection for accelerated partial breast irradiation by different consensus guidelines. Breast J 2018; 25:160-162. [PMID: 30576036 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Revised: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Chin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Nikita Consul
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Priya Jadeja
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ellie Kwak
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Sejal Patel
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ralph Wynn
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Dawn Hershman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Eileen P Connolly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard Ha
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Gaudet M, Pharand-Charbonneau M, Wright D, Nguyen J, Trudel-Sabourin J, Chelfi M. Long-term results of multicatheter interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy for accelerated partial-breast irradiation. Brachytherapy 2018; 18:211-216. [PMID: 30554991 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Revised: 11/03/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to report the long-term results of women treated in one center with accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) with interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed data from women treated in one center with adjuvant interstitial HDR brachytherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Treatment regimen was homogeneous for all women with treatment dose 32Gy in 8 fractions twice daily given to the tumor bed with interstitial HDR brachytherapy. RESULTS About 364 women were treated with interstitial HDR brachytherapy as APBI from March 2000 to March 2014. Mean age at diagnosis was 62 years. Stage distribution was as follows: T1a = 12%, T1b = 33%, T1c = 40%, T2 = 14%, and Tis = 1%. 97% of patients were N0. 88% had invasive ductal carcinoma. 86% had positive hormone receptor status. 14 ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences were identified with 12 deemed local recurrences and 2 deemed to be second ipsilateral primaries. Actuarial 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 95.1% and 92.2%, respectively. Actuarial 5-year and 10-year local relapse-free survival rates were 96.2% and 88.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The results of this previously unreported series of women treated with a homogeneous APBI method exclusively with interstitial HDR brachytherapy present further data justifying that in appropriately selected women, APBI with interstitial brachytherapy provides rates of local control and survival comparable with whole-breast irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Gaudet
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Outaouais, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Mathieu Pharand-Charbonneau
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Outaouais, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
| | - Debbie Wright
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Outaouais, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jonathan Nguyen
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Mustapha Chelfi
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Outaouais, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Struik GM, Hoekstra N, Klem TM, Ghandi A, Verduijn GM, Swaak-Kragten AT, Schoonbeek A, de Vries KC, Sattler MA, Verhoef K, Birnie E, Pignol JP. Injection of radiopaque hydrogel at time of lumpectomy improves the target definition for adjuvant radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 131:8-13. [PMID: 30773191 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Revised: 10/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE During oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (BCS), the surgical cavity is closed to reduce seroma formation. This makes the radiotherapy target definition using clips challenging, leading to poor inter-observer agreement and potentially geographical misses. We hypothesize that injecting a radiopaque hydrogel in the lumpectomy cavity before closure improves radiotherapy target definition and agreement between observers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Women undergoing BCS in a single university hospital were prospectively accrued in the study. Three to 9 ml of iodined PolyEthylene Glycol (PEG) hydrogel and clips were inserted in the lumpectomy cavity. A CT-scan was performed at 4 to 6 weeks. CT images of BCS patients with standard clips only were used as control group, matched on age, specimen weight, and distance between clips. Six radiation oncologists delineated the tumor bed volumes and rated the cavity visualization scores (CVS). The primary endpoint was the agreement between observers measured using a Conformity Index (Cx). RESULTS Forty-two patients were included, 21 hydrogel procedures and 21 controls, resulting in 315 observer pairs. The feasibility of the intervention was 100%. The median Cx was higher in the intervention group (Cx = 0.70, IQR [0.54-0.79]) than in the control group (Cx = 0.54, IQR [0.42-0.66]), p < 0.00, as were the CVS (3.5 [2.5-4.5] versus 2.5 [2-3.5], p < 0.001). The rate of surgical site infections was similar to literature. CONCLUSIONS The use of radiopaque PEG enables to identify the lumpectomy cavity, resulting in a high inter-observer agreement for radiotherapy target definition. This intervention is easy to perform and blend well into current practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerson M Struik
- Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke Hoekstra
- Erasmus MC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Taco M Klem
- Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ali Ghandi
- Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Department of Radiology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerda M Verduijn
- Erasmus MC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Alja Schoonbeek
- Erasmus MC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kim C de Vries
- Erasmus MC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Margriet A Sattler
- Erasmus MC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kees Verhoef
- Erasmus MC, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erwin Birnie
- Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Department of Statistics and Education, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jean-Philippe Pignol
- Erasmus MC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Dalhousie University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Halifax, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Struik GM, Godart J, Verduijn GM, Kolkman-Deurloo IK, de Vries KC, de Boer R, Koppert LB, Birnie E, Ghandi A, Klem TM, Pignol JP. A randomized controlled trial testing a hyaluronic acid spacer injection for skin toxicity reduction of brachytherapy accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI): a study protocol. Trials 2018; 19:689. [PMID: 30558672 PMCID: PMC6298013 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-3035-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is a treatment option for selected early stage breast cancer patients. Some APBI techniques lead to skin toxicity with the skin dose as main risk factor. We hypothesize that a spacer injected between the skin and target volume reduces the skin dose and subsequent toxicity in permanent breast seed implant (PBSI) patients. METHODS In this parallel-group, single-center, randomized controlled trial, the effect of a subcutaneous spacer injection on skin toxicity among patients treated with PBSI is tested. Eligibility for participation is derived from international guidelines for suitable patients for partial breast radiotherapy, e.g. women aged ≥ 50 years with a histologically proven non-lobular breast carcinoma and/or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), tumor size ≤ 3 cm, node-negative, and PBSI technically feasible. Among exclusion criteria are neoadjuvant chemotherapy, lymphovascular invasion, and allergy for hyaluronic acid. For the patients allocated to receive spacer, after the PBSI procedure, 4-10 cc of biodegradable hyaluronic acid (Barrigel™, Palette Life Sciences, Santa Barbara, CA, USA or Restylane SubQ®, Galderma Benelux, Breda, the Netherlands) is injected directly under the skin using ultrasound guidance to create an extra 0.5-1 cm space between the treatment volume and the skin. The primary outcome is the rate of telangiectasia at two years, blindly assessed using Bentzen's 4-point scale. Secondary outcomes include: local recurrence; disease-free and overall survival rates; adverse events (pain, redness, skin/subcutaneous induration, radiation dermatitis, pigmentation, surgical site infection); skin dose; cosmetic and functional results; and health-related quality of life. A Fisher's exact test will be used to test differences between groups on the primary outcome. Previous studies found 22.4% telangiectasia at two years. We expect the use of a spacer could reduce the occurrence of telangiectasia to 7.7%. A sample size of 230 patients will allow for a 10% lost to follow-up rate. DISCUSSION In this study, the effect of a subcutaneous spacer injection on the skin dose, late skin toxicity, and cosmetic outcome is tested in patients treated with PBSI in the setting of breast-conserving therapy. Our results will be relevant for most forms of breast brachytherapy as well as robotic radiosurgery, as skin spacers could protect the skin with these other techniques. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register, NTR6549 . Registered on 27 June 2017.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Brachytherapy/adverse effects
- Brachytherapy/methods
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy
- Breast Neoplasms/surgery
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery
- Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage
- Dermal Fillers/adverse effects
- Female
- Humans
- Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage
- Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects
- Hyaluronic Acid/analogs & derivatives
- Injections, Subcutaneous
- Mastectomy, Segmental
- Middle Aged
- Netherlands
- Radiation Dosage
- Radiodermatitis/diagnosis
- Radiodermatitis/etiology
- Radiodermatitis/prevention & control
- Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Telangiectasis/diagnosis
- Telangiectasis/etiology
- Telangiectasis/prevention & control
- Time Factors
- Treatment Outcome
- Tumor Burden
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerson M. Struik
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, PO Box 10900, 3004 BA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeremy Godart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerda M. Verduijn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Kim C. de Vries
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond de Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linetta B. Koppert
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erwin Birnie
- Department of Statistics and Education, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, PO Box 10900, 3004 BA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Genetics, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ali Ghandi
- Department of Radiology, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, PO Box 10900, 3004 BA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Taco M. Klem
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, PO Box 10900, 3004 BA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Philippe Pignol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, 5820 University Avenue, Halifax, NS B3H1V7 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Becherini C, Meattini I, Livi L, Garlatti P, Desideri I, Scotti V, Orzalesi L, Sanchez LJ, Bernini M, Casella D, Nesi S, Nori J, Bianchi S, Pallotta S, Marrazzo L. External accelerated partial breast irradiation for ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term follow-up from a phase 3 randomized trial. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 105:205-209. [DOI: 10.1177/0300891618811278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: For a long time, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) effectiveness for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been debated, due to conflicting published results. Recent encouraging data from phase 3 trials reopened new perspectives for this radiation approach. The aim of the present study was to analyze the long-term efficacy and safety results of the series of patients with DCIS enrolled in the APBI arm of the APBI-IMRT-Florence phase 3 trial (NCT02104895). Methods: Patients were treated in a phase 3 randomized trial comparing whole breast irradiation (50 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole breast, plus 10 Gy in 5 fractions to the tumor bed) to APBI (30 Gy in 5 nonconsecutive fractions) using the intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique. Results: Overall, 22 patients were treated in the APBI arm. Median age was 62 years (mean 59; range 42–75 years). At a median follow-up of 9.2 years (mean 8.8; range 3.8–12.1 years), no contralateral invasive/DCIS occurrence, distant metastasis, or breast cancer–related death were recorded. The 5- and 10-year local recurrence, distant metastasis–free survival, and breast cancer–specific survival were 100%. The 10-year overall survival rate was 90.9%. No late toxicity at 5 and 10 years was recorded. Conclusions: Waiting for pending studies and mature follow-up, we confirmed the efficacy and safety of APBI for low-risk DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlotta Becherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Pietro Garlatti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Vieri Scotti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Orzalesi
- Breast Surgery Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Luis Jose Sanchez
- Breast Surgery Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Bernini
- Breast Surgery Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Donato Casella
- Breast Surgery Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Silvia Nesi
- Breast Surgery Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Jacopo Nori
- Diagnostic Senology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Simonetta Bianchi
- Division of Pathological Anatomy, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefania Pallotta
- Medical Physics Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Livia Marrazzo
- Medical Physics Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Comparison of Outcome between Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC) and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) Patients Treating with Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) and Radical Dose of Intraoperative Electron Radiotherapy (IOERT). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT 2018. [DOI: 10.5812/ijcm.80985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
174
|
Wöckel A, Festl J, Stüber T, Brust K, Krockenberger M, Heuschmann PU, Jírů-Hillmann S, Albert US, Budach W, Follmann M, Janni W, Kopp I, Kreienberg R, Kühn T, Langer T, Nothacker M, Scharl A, Schreer I, Link H, Engel J, Fehm T, Weis J, Welt A, Steckelberg A, Feyer P, König K, Hahne A, Baumgartner T, Kreipe HH, Knoefel WT, Denkinger M, Brucker S, Lüftner D, Kubisch C, Gerlach C, Lebeau A, Siedentopf F, Petersen C, Bartsch HH, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hahn M, Hanf V, Müller-Schimpfle M, Henscher U, Roncarati R, Katalinic A, Heitmann C, Honegger C, Paradies K, Bjelic-Radisic V, Degenhardt F, Wenz F, Rick O, Hölzel D, Zaiss M, Kemper G, Budach V, Denkert C, Gerber B, Tesch H, Hirsmüller S, Sinn HP, Dunst J, Münstedt K, Bick U, Fallenberg E, Tholen R, Hung R, Baumann F, Beckmann MW, Blohmer J, Fasching P, Lux MP, Harbeck N, Hadji P, Hauner H, Heywang-Köbrunner S, Huober J, Hübner J, Jackisch C, Loibl S, Lück HJ, von Minckwitz G, Möbus V, Müller V, Nöthlings U, Schmidt M, Schmutzler R, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Wesselmann S, Bücker A, Buck A, Stangl S. Interdisciplinary Screening, Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Breast Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/045OL, December 2017) - Part 2 with Recommendations for the Therapy of Primary, Recurrent and Advanced Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:1056-1088. [PMID: 30581198 PMCID: PMC6261741 DOI: 10.1055/a-0646-4630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this official guideline coordinated and published by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Cancer Society (DKG) was to optimize the screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of breast cancer. Method The process of updating the S3 guideline published in 2012 was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines. They were combined with reviews of evidence compiled using PICO (Patients/Interventions/Control/Outcome) questions and with the results of a systematic search of literature databases followed by the selection and evaluation of the identified literature. The interdisciplinary working groups took the identified materials as their starting point and used them to develop suggestions for recommendations and statements, which were then modified and graded in a structured consensus process procedure. Recommendations Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the therapy of primary, recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Loco-regional therapies are de-escalated in the current guideline. In addition to reducing the safety margins for surgical procedures, the guideline also recommends reducing the radicality of axillary surgery. The choice and extent of systemic therapy depends on the respective tumor biology. New substances are becoming available, particularly to treat metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achim Wöckel
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jasmin Festl
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Stüber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Brust
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter U. Heuschmann
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (IKE-B), Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Steffi Jírů-Hillmann
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (IKE-B), Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Ina Kopp
- AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Kühn
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Monika Nothacker
- AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Marburg, Germany
| | - Anton Scharl
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum St. Marien Amberg, Amberg, Germany
| | | | - Hartmut Link
- Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Jutta Engel
- Tumorregister München, Institut für medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Joachim Weis
- Stiftungsprofessur Selbsthilfeforschung, Tumorzentrum/CCC Freiburg, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anja Welt
- Innere Klinik (Tumorforschung), Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Petra Feyer
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Vivantes Klinikum, Neukölln Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus König
- Berufsverband der Frauenärzte, Steinbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Wolfram Trudo Knoefel
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Denkinger
- AGAPLESION Bethesda Klinik, Geriatrie der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Sara Brucker
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Kubisch
- Institut für Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christina Gerlach
- III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, uct, Interdisziplinäre Abteilung für Palliativmedizin, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Cordula Petersen
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Markus Hahn
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik Nathanstift, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | | | | | - Renza Roncarati
- Frauenselbsthilfe nach Krebs – Bundesverband e. V., Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexander Katalinic
- Institut für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Christoph Heitmann
- Ästhetisch plastische und rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Camparihaus München, München, Germany
| | | | - Kerstin Paradies
- Konferenz Onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Abteilung für Gynäkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Friedrich Degenhardt
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frederik Wenz
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Oliver Rick
- Klinik Reinhardshöhe Bad Wildungen, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | - Dieter Hölzel
- Tumorregister München, Institut für medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Matthias Zaiss
- Praxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie & Hämatologie, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Volker Budach
- Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Pathologisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Karsten Münstedt
- Frauenklinik Offenburg, Ortenau Klinikum Offenburg-Gengenbach, Offenburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Bick
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva Fallenberg
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie, Referat Bildung und Wissenschaft, Köln, Germany
| | - Roswita Hung
- Frauenselbsthilfe nach Krebs, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Freerk Baumann
- Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie Köln, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jens Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie incl. Brustzentrum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik, Universität München (LMU), München, Germany
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans Hauner
- Lehrstuhl für Ernährungsmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | | | | | - Jutta Hübner
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Volker Möbus
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ute Nöthlings
- Institut für Ernährungs- und Lebensmittelwissenschaften, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mai, Germany nz, Mainz
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Arno Bücker
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie am UKS, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Nuklearmedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik des Universitätsklinikums Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stangl
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (IKE-B), Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Meattini I, Poortmans P, Livi L, Kaidar Person O, Pallotta S, Becherini C, Marrazzo L. Partial breast irradiation for ductal carcinoma in situ: The Goldilocks principle? Breast J 2018; 24:1118-1119. [PMID: 30230142 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 09/16/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Stefania Pallotta
- Medical Physics Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Livia Marrazzo
- Medical Physics Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Pohanková D, Sirák I, Jandík P, Kašaova L, Grepl J, Motyčka P, Asqar A, Paluska P, Ninger V, Bydžovská I, Kopecky V, Petera J. Accelerated partial breast irradiation with perioperative multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy-A feasibility study. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:949-955. [PMID: 30227977 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Revised: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the feasibility of high-dose-rate perioperative multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in selected patients with early breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Perioperative multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy for APBI has been used at our department since 2012 for patients with low-risk breast cancer. Interstitial catheters were inserted perioperatively via hollow needles immediately following tumorectomy with sentinel node biopsy. APBI started on Day 6 after surgery. The prescribed dose was 34 Gy (10 fractions of 3.4 Gy bid). Hormonal therapy was prescribed in all cases. RESULTS Between June 2012 and December 2017, 125 patients were scheduled for APBI. Of these, APBI was not performed in 12 patients (9.6%) due to adverse prognostic factors identified on the definitive biopsy. We observed wound dehiscence in 2/113 cases (1.8%), inflammatory complications requiring antibiotics in 7/113 cases (6.2%), transient Grade I radiodermatitis in 6/113 patients (4.4%), and seroma which resolved spontaneously in 3/113 patients (2.7%). With median followup of 39 months (range 3.3-75.3) no relapses were observed. No late complications in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 or higher were documented. Cosmetic outcome in patients with followup > 2 years was excellent or good in 92%. CONCLUSION Our preliminary results show that the perioperative multicatheter interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy for APBI in selected patients with early breast cancer is feasible. This treatment schedule reduces treatment duration, spares the patients of repeated anesthesia, and enables precise application of the afterloading tubes under direct visual control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denisa Pohanková
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Igor Sirák
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
| | - Pavel Jandík
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Linda Kašaova
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Jakub Grepl
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Motyčka
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Ahmed Asqar
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Paluska
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Vladimír Ninger
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Chrudim, Chrudim, Czech Republic
| | - Ivana Bydžovská
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Chrudim, Chrudim, Czech Republic
| | - Viliam Kopecky
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Chrudim, Chrudim, Czech Republic
| | - Jiří Petera
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
177
|
Kinj R, Chand ME, Gal J, Gautier M, Montagné L, Lam Cham Kee D, Hannoun-Lévi JM. Single fraction of accelerated partial breast irradiation in the elderly: early clinical outcome. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:174. [PMID: 30208914 PMCID: PMC6136182 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1119-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To analyze the clinical outcome of elderly women with early breast cancer who underwent accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) based on a post-operative single fraction of multicatheter interstitial high dose–rate brachytherapy (MIB). Methods A single institution retrospective cohort study was performed focusing on elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) presenting a low-risk breast carcinoma treated by lumpectomy plus axillary evaluation followed by MIB. A single fraction of 16 Gy was prescribed on the 100% isodose. Clinical outcome at 3 years was reported based on local relapse free survival (3-y LRFS), specific survival (SS) and overall survival (OS). Acute (< 180 days after APBI) and late toxicity were evaluated. Cosmetic results were clinically evaluated by the physician. Results Between January 2012 and August 2015, 48 women (51 lesions) were treated. Median age was 77.7 years (range: 65–92) with a median tumor size of 12 mm (range: 3–32). Five patients (pts) presented an axillary lymph node involvement (4 Nmic, 1 N1). Invasive ductal carcinoma was the most frequent histology type (86.3%). With a median follow–up of 40 months (range: 36–42), no local relapse occurred while 1 pt. developed axillary relapse (2.1%). The 3-y LRFS, SS and OS rates were 100%, 100% and 93.1% respectively. Forty-five acute events were remained. The most frequent acute toxicity was grade (G) 1 hyperpigmentation (26.7%), 3 pts. (6.3%) presented G3 acute toxicity (2 breast hematomas, 1 breast abscess). No ≥ G3 late toxicity was observed while 15 late toxicities occurred (G1: 13 events - 86.7%) mainly breast fibrosis). The rate of excellent cosmetic outcome was 76.4%. Conclusion We reported promising and encouraging clinical outcome of a post-operative single fraction of MIB ABPI in the elderly. This approach leads to consider a sfAPBI as an attractive alternative to intra-operative radiation therapy while all the patients will be good candidates for APBI in regards to the post-operative pathological report. More mature results (number of patients and follow-up) are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémy Kinj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne - University of Cote d'Azur, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06000, Nice, France
| | - Marie-Eve Chand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne - University of Cote d'Azur, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06000, Nice, France
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Biostatistic unit, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, 33 av de Valombrose, 06189, Nice, France
| | - Mathieu Gautier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne - University of Cote d'Azur, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06000, Nice, France
| | - Lucile Montagné
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne - University of Cote d'Azur, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06000, Nice, France
| | - Daniel Lam Cham Kee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne - University of Cote d'Azur, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06000, Nice, France
| | - Jean Michel Hannoun-Lévi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne - University of Cote d'Azur, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06000, Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Kowalchuk RO, Romano KD, Trifiletti DM, Dutta SW, Showalter TN, Morris MM. Preliminary toxicity results using partial breast 3D-CRT with once daily hypo-fractionation and deep inspiratory breath hold. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:135. [PMID: 30053864 PMCID: PMC6064058 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1079-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients treated with 3D conformal Hypo-fractionated, deep Inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH), Partial breast radiotherapy, termed "HIP." HIP was implemented to merge the schedule of once-daily breast hypofractionation with partial breast treatment. METHODS We identified 38 breast cancers in 37 patients from 2013 to 2014 treated at our institution with HIP following lumpectomy for early stage breast cancer. Patients received a hypo-fractionated course (≤ 20 fractions) of once daily radiation to the partial breast (lumpectomy cavity + margin) utilizing DIBH regardless of laterality. Clinical and treatment-related characteristics were obtained, including target volume and organ at risk (OAR) dosimetric characteristics. Patients were followed clinically and with at least yearly mammograms for up to 36 months (range 5-36 months). Acute and late toxicity was scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03. RESULTS Patients received a median dose of 42.56 Gy in 16 Fractions (Fx) (range 40.05-53.2 Gy; and 15-20 Fx). OAR doses were low, with a mean heart dose of 0.37 Gy, an ipsilateral lung V20 mean of 4%, and a contralateral lung V5 of 1%. Acute toxicity (≤ grade 2) was present in 79% (n = 30) of the cases, with dermatitis being the most common finding (63%). Late grade 1-2 toxicity was present in 42% (n = 16) of the cases, with hyperpigmentation being the most common finding (n = 9). There were no severe acute or late toxicities (≥ grade 3). At a median follow up of 21 months, there were no local, regional, or distant failures. CONCLUSIONS We report limited toxicity in this low risk cohort of patients with early stage breast cancer treated with HIP, a unique and logical combination of 3-D conformal external beam radiotherapy, moderate hypo-fractionation, and DIBH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman O. Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee Street, Box 800383, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
| | - Kara D. Romano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee Street, Box 800383, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
| | - Daniel M. Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee Street, Box 800383, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
| | - Sunil W. Dutta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee Street, Box 800383, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
| | - Timothy N. Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee Street, Box 800383, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
| | - Monica M. Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee Street, Box 800383, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA USA
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Intraoperative Electron Radiotherapy (IOERT) Boost Versus External Beam
Radiotherapy (EBRT) Boost in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Breast Cancer
Cases. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT 2018. [DOI: 10.5812/ijcm.69364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
180
|
Dosimetric study to assess the feasibility of intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) as partial breast irradiation for patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 171:693-699. [PMID: 29978418 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4878-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report in-vivo dosimetry in the infraclavicular region, a potential site of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) and to evaluate the absorbed dose from intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT). METHODS 27 non-cardiopathic breast cancer (BC) patients without CIED received quadrantectomy and ELIOT as partial breast irradiation. Before delivering ELIOT, two catheters, each containing eight thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), were positioned in the infraclavicular region. TLDs internal catheter was located deep in the tumor bed while the external catheter was placed on patient's skin. RESULTS Data were available for 24/27 patients. The absorbed doses were referred to the dose of 21 Gy. Values measured by the external catheter were low, although statistically significant higher doses were found close to the applicator (mean values 0.26-0.49 Gy). External TLD doses in proximity of the applicator were lower than those detected by their internal counterparts. Values measured by the internal catheter TLDs varied according to the distance from the applicator while no correlation with tumor site and beam energy was found. The distance from the applicator to deliver < 2 Gy to a CIED was 2 cm, while from 2.5 cm the dose measured in all the patients became negligible. CONCLUSIONS This dosimetric study provided data to support the clinical use of ELIOT in BC patients having CIEDs as long as the suggested minimum safe distance of 2.5 cm is taken from the RT field in case of ELIOT single dose of 21 Gy, in the energy range of 6-10 MeV.
Collapse
|
181
|
A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:254-259. [PMID: 30038646 PMCID: PMC6052379 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.76981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To review brachytherapy resources and to explore current practice patterns in Italy. Material and methods In 2016, on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO), the Brachytherapy Study Group proposed conducting a survey in order to identify brachytherapy practice patterns. An electronic questionnaire was sent to all radiotherapy centres in Italy, asking for: 1. General information on the Radiation Oncology Centre (affiliation, whether brachytherapy was delivered or not); 2. Brachytherapy equipment and human resources; 3. Brachytherapy procedures; 4. Brachytherapy assessment (number of patients treated annually, treated sites, and different modalities of treatments). Results A total of 66 questionnaires were returned (33.5% of all brachytherapy centers in Italy), out of which 48 (74%) from non-academic hospitals, 6 (10%) from academic hospitals, and 12 (16%) from private institutions. Most centers (84%) had only one brachytherapy machine; 44% did not deliver brachytherapy treatments or delivered less than demanded because of the lack of staff or expertise, need of modernization, or other reasons. The majority of treatments were administered to outpatients for gynecological tumors. Conclusions This survey illustrates the current status of brachytherapy in Italy and should encourage collaboration to develop, implement, and monitor its use when appropriate.
Collapse
|
182
|
Long-term risks of secondary cancer for various whole and partial breast irradiation techniques. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:428-433. [PMID: 29914648 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2018] [Revised: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For early stage breast cancer patients, non-breast cancer mortality including secondary cancers and cardiac events can overshadow the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy. This study evaluates the excess risk of secondary cancer for various breast radiotherapy techniques including accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS Secondary cancers Lifetime Attributable Risks (LAR) were calculated using a modified BEIR-VII formalism to account for the specific survival of breast cancer patients. Those survivals were extracted from the SEER database. Doses scattered to various organs were measured into a Rando phantom with custom-made breast phantoms. Treatments delivered typical doses of brachytherapy APBI (34 Gy in 10 fractions), external beam APBI (38.5 Gy in 10 fractions) using 3D-conformal, Cyberknife stereotactic (CK), or VMAT, as well as whole breast irradiation (WBI) delivering 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions. RESULTS WBI resulted in the highest total LAR, with 4.3% excess risk of secondary cancer for a patient treated at age 50 years. Lung cancers accounted for 75-97% of secondary malignancies. For a typical early stage patient irradiated at 50, the excess risks of secondary lung cancer were 1.1% for multicatheter HDR, between 2.2% and 2.5% for 3D-CRT or CK, 3.5% for VMAT APBI, and 3.8% for WBI. CONCLUSIONS APBI reduces the risk of secondary cancer 2-4 fold compared to WBI. These techniques are well suited for long-living early stage breast cancer patients. HDR brachytherapy and 3D-conformal APBI achieve mean lung doses between 1 and 1.5 Gy, which could serve as reference.
Collapse
|
183
|
Guenzi M, Bonzano E, Corvò R, Merolla F, Pastorino A, Cavagnetto F, Garelli S, Cutolo CA, Friedman D, Belgioia L. Comparison of Local Recurrence Among Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Electron Intraoperative Radiotherapy vs Hypofractionated Photon Radiotherapy an Observational Study. Front Oncol 2018; 8:207. [PMID: 29922596 PMCID: PMC5996045 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate local recurrence (LR) in women with early breast cancer (BC) who underwent intraoperative radiation therapy with electrons particles (IORT-E) or adjuvant hypofractionated external radiotherapy (HYPOFX). Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed 470 patients with early BC treated at our center from September 2009 to December 2012. 235 women were treated with breast-conserving surgery and immediate IORT-E (21 Gy/1 fraction) while 235 patients underwent wide excision followed by hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation. Radiotherapy modality was chosen according to an individualized decision based on tumor features, stage, technical feasibility, age, and acceptance to be enrolled in the IORT-E group. Results After a median follow-up of 6 years, we observed 8 (3.4%) and 1 (0.42%) LR in the IORT-E and in the HYPOFX group (p = 0.02), respectively. The two groups differed in the prevalence of clinical characteristics (p < 0.05): age, tumor size, surgical margins, receptors, ki67, and histology. 4 and 1 woman in the IORT-E and HYPOFX group died of BC, respectively (p = 0.167). OS and DFS hazard ratio [HR] were 2.14 (95% IC, 1.10–4.15) and 2.09 (95% IC, 1.17–3.73), respectively. Conclusion Our comparison showed that IORT-E and HYPOFX are two effective radiotherapy modalities after conservative surgery in early BC. However, at 6 years a significant higher rate of LR occurred in patients submitted to IORT-E with respect to HYPOFX. This finding may be correlated to some subsets of patients who, depending on the biological characteristics of the BC, may be less suitable to IORT-E.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Guenzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Bonzano
- Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Renzo Corvò
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Merolla
- Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alice Pastorino
- Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Cavagnetto
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefania Garelli
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Daniele Friedman
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino and University, Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Liliana Belgioia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy for breast cancer. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:341-344. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Revised: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
185
|
Outcomes of Node-positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Via Multicatheter Interstitial Brachytherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 2018; 41:538-543. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
186
|
Evaluating Candidacy for Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy, Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation, and Endocrine Therapy After Breast Conserving Surgery. Am J Clin Oncol 2018; 41:526-531. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
187
|
Kauer-Dorner D, Berger D. The Role of Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Breast Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2018; 13:157-161. [PMID: 30069174 DOI: 10.1159/000489638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays an important part in the management of breast cancer. Especially after breast-conserving surgery, external whole breast irradiation, occasionally with an additional local boost, is an integral part of breast conservation. Besides external radiation techniques, brachytherapy (BT) has long been among the treatment options, especially with regard to local boost application. With the emerging implementation of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), BT in general and interstitial multi-catheter BT in particular, are gaining an increasing role in the management of a selected group of early breast cancer patients. APBI is an approach to reduce the irradiated area to the former tumor bed rather than treating the whole breast tissue in patients with a low baseline local recurrence risk. After a variety of phase I-III clinical studies, it is clearly evident that APBI will play a role in the treatment of this selected patient group. In this review, we focus on the clinical development and different available techniques of breast BT and provide a preview of prospects for its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel Berger
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Harris EER. Precision Medicine for Breast Cancer: The Paths to Truly Individualized Diagnosis and Treatment. Int J Breast Cancer 2018; 2018:4809183. [PMID: 29862084 PMCID: PMC5971283 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4809183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2017] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine in oncology seeks to individualize each patient's treatment regimen based on an accurate assessment of the risk of recurrence or progression of that person's cancer. Precision will be achieved at each phase of care, from detection to diagnosis to surgery, systemic therapy, and radiation therapy, to survivorship and follow-up care. The precision arises from detailed knowledge of the inherent biological propensities of each tumor, rather than generalizing treatment approaches based on phenotypic, or even genotypic, categories. Extensive research is being conducted in multiple disciplines, including radiology, pathology, molecular biology, and surgical, medical, and radiation oncology. Clinical trial design is adapting to the new paradigms and moving away from grouping heterogeneous patient populations into limited treatment comparison arms. This review touches on several areas invested in clinical research. This special issue highlights the specific work of a number of groups working on precision medicine for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor E. R. Harris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Abstract
Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive of the available imaging modalities to characterize breast cancer. Breast MRI has gained clinical acceptance for screening high-risk patients, but its role in the preoperative imaging of breast cancer patients remains controversial. This review focuses on the current indications for staging breast MRI, the evidence for and against the role of breast MRI in the preoperative staging workup, and the evaluation of treatment response of breast cancer patients.
Collapse
|
190
|
Kirby AM. Updated ASTRO guidelines on accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI): to whom can we offer APBI outside a clinical trial? Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20170565. [PMID: 29513031 PMCID: PMC6190767 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2017] [Revised: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The American Society of Radiation Oncology has recently updated its guidelines on the role of accelerated partial breast irradiation in the management of breast cancer. This commentary discusses the new recommendations and how we might advise patients in the light of existing data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M Kirby
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Appropriate timing for postimplant imaging in permanent breast seed implant: Results from a serial CT study. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:609-614. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
192
|
Five-field IMRT class solutions and dosimetric planning guidelines for implementing accelerated partial breast irradiation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2018; 8:e99-e107. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Revised: 08/29/2017] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
193
|
Advantages of intraoperative implant for interstitial brachytherapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation either frail patients with early-stage disease or in locally recurrent breast cancer. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:97-104. [PMID: 29789758 PMCID: PMC5961524 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.75594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To describe the intraoperative multicatheter implantation technique for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) delivered with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). Secondarily, to evaluate outcomes and toxicity in a series of 83 patients treated with this technique at our institution. Material and methods Retrospective analysis of a series of patients treated with HDR-BT APBI after intraoperative multicatheter interstitial implant between November 2006 and June 2017 at our institution. We assessed cosmesis, toxicity, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results Eighty-three patients were included: 59 patients (71.1%) with primary early-stage breast cancer and 24 (28.9%) with locally recurrent breast cancer. Tumorectomy was performed in all cases, with intraoperative tumor margin assessment and sentinel node biopsy. Median age was 82 years (range, 44-92). The total prescribed dose was 32 Gy (8 treatment fractions) in 60 patients (72.3%), and 34 Gy (10 fractions) in 23 patients (27.7%). Median follow-up was 40 months (range, 1-136 months). Three-year OS and DFS in the recurrent and primary cancer groups were 87% vs. 89%, and 96 % vs. 97.8%, respectively. Five patients died from non-cancer related causes. No local relapses were observed. Rates of acute and late toxicity were low in both groups. The cosmesis was good or excellent in most of patients treated for primary disease; in patients who underwent salvage brachytherapy for local recurrence, cosmesis was good in 49 patients and fair in 6. Conclusions This technique, although time-consuming, achieves good local disease control with a satisfactory toxicity profile in both early-stage and local recurrent breast cancer patients. It may be especially suitable for frail patients.
Collapse
|
194
|
Strnad V, Major T, Polgar C, Lotter M, Guinot JL, Gutierrez-Miguelez C, Galalae R, Van Limbergen E, Guix B, Niehoff P, Lössl K, Hannoun-Levi JM. ESTRO-ACROP guideline: Interstitial multi-catheter breast brachytherapy as Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation alone or as boost - GEC-ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group practical recommendations. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:411-420. [PMID: 29691075 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Revised: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This consensus statement from the Breast Cancer Working Group of Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) aims at generating practical guidelines for multi-catheter image-guided brachytherapy in the conservative management of breast cancer patients used for either Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) or for a breast boost. METHODS Recent advances in techniques of multi-catheter brachytherapy were summarized and all the relevant literature was reviewed by a panel of experts. Panel members of the GEC-ESTRO experts participated in a series of conferences, supplemented their clinical experience, were surveyed to determine their current practices and patterns, performed a literature review, and formulated recommendations for implementing APBI with multi-catheter brachytherapy, focusing on treatment planning issues, catheter insertion, dosimetry and quality assurance. This document was reviewed and approved by the full panel, the GEC-ESTRO executive board and by the ACROP (Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practice). RESULTS Three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning, catheter insertion techniques, dosimetry and methods of quality assurance for APBI and boost with multi-catheter image-guided brachytherapy after breast conserving surgery are described. Detailed recommendations for daily practice including dose constraints are given. CONCLUSIONS Recent standards and guidelines for the use of APBI with different multi-catheter image-guided brachytherapy techniques have been defined. Different techniques are used to insert the catheters. Guidelines are mandatory to assure precise catheter insertion for coverage of the target volume and to guarantee high-quality dosimetry. The same rules apply for brachytherapy based boost irradiation for breast cancer after whole breast irradiation as well as for partial breast re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Tibor Major
- Center of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csaba Polgar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Michael Lotter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jose-Luis Guinot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Razvan Galalae
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Evangelische Kliniken, Gelsenkirchen, Germany
| | - Erik Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Benjamin Guix
- IMOR Foundation, Medical Institute for Radiotherapy and Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter Niehoff
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sana Hospital Offenbach, Germany
| | - Kristina Lössl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
195
|
Abstract
The management of early-stage breast cancer in older patients is complex and requires a careful balance of the risk of cancer death with the competing risks of comorbidities and treatment-related toxicity in women with largely favorable disease. As the US population continues to age, oncologists will increasingly encounter this clinical challenge. Several strategies involving each core component of breast cancer therapy have been investigated to minimize treatment in these patients while still maintaining acceptable outcomes. These include omission of primary tumor resection, surgical axillary evaluation, systemic chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy, as well as reduction in radiotherapy treatment volume (partial breast irradiation) or total treatment time (hypofractionation). We review these strategies and the literature supporting their use, as well as future directions for treatment minimization.
Collapse
|
196
|
Meattini I, Livi L, Pallotta S, Marrazzo L. Partial breast irradiation: The time is there! Breast 2018; 38:98-100. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Revised: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
197
|
Lozza L, Fariselli L, Sandri M, Rampa M, Pinzi V, De Santis MC, Franceschini M, Trecate G, Maugeri I, Fumagalli L, Bonfantini F, Bianchi G, Pignoli E, De Martin E, Agresti R. Partial breast irradiation with CyberKnife after breast conserving surgery: a pilot study in early breast cancer. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:49. [PMID: 29566762 PMCID: PMC5865347 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-0991-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local recurrences after breast conserving treatment are mainly close to the original tumor site, and as such shorter fractionation strategies focused on and nearest mammary gland, i.e. accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), have been developed. Stereotactic APBI has been attempted, although there is little experience using CyberKnife (CK) for early breast cancer. METHODS This pilot study was designed to assess the feasibility of CK-APBI on 20 evaluable patients of 29 eligible, followed for 2 years. The primary endpoint was acute/sub-acute toxicity; secondary endpoints were late toxicity and the cosmetic result. RESULTS Mean pathological tumor size was 10.5 mm (±4.3, range 3-18), 8 of these patients were classified as LumA-like, 11 as LumB-like, and 1 as LumB-HER2-enriched. Using CK-APBI with Iris, the treatment time was approximately 60 min (range~ 35 to ~ 120). All patients received 30 Gy in five fractions delivered to the PTV. The median number of beams was 180 (IQR 107-213; range:56-325) with a median PTV isodose prescription of 86.0% (IQR 85.0-88.5; range:82-94). The median PTV was 88.1 cm3 (IQR 63.8-108.6; range:32.3-238.8). The median breast V100 and V50 was 0.6 (IQR 0.1-1.5; range:0-13) and 18.6 (IQR 13.1-21.7; range:7.5-37), respectively. The median PTV minimum dose was 26.2 Gy (IQR 24.7-27.6; range 22.3-29.3). Mild side effects were recorded during the period of observation. Cosmetic evaluations were performed by three observers from the start of radiotherapy up to 2 years. Patients' evaluation progressively increase from 60% to 85% of excellent rating; this trend was similar to that of external observer. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary results showed the safe feasibility of CK-APBI in early breast cancer, with mild acute and late toxicity and very good cosmetic results. TRIAL REGISTRATION The present study is registered at Clinicaltrial.gov ( NCT02896322 ). Retrospectively egistered August 4, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Lozza
- Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Fariselli
- Health Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Sandri
- Molecular Targeting Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Rampa
- Breast Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Pinzi
- Health Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marzia Franceschini
- Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanna Trecate
- Radiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Maugeri
- Breast Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Luisa Fumagalli
- Health Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Bonfantini
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Bianchi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Pignoli
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena De Martin
- Health Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Agresti
- Breast Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Hannoun-Lévi JM, Cham Kee DL, Gal J, Schiappa R, Hannoun A, Gautier M, Boulahssass R, Peyrottes I, Barranger E, Ferrero JM, Chand ME, Doyen J. Accelerated partial breast irradiation for suitable elderly women using a single fraction of multicatheter interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy: Early results of the Single-Fraction Elderly Breast Irradiation (SiFEBI) Phase I/II trial. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:407-414. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Revised: 11/12/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
199
|
Should molecular subtype be recommended as one of the selection criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation? Preliminary results from an Asian cohort. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:47-57. [PMID: 29619056 PMCID: PMC5881594 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.74137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to report clinical outcomes in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), stratified as per molecular subtype and American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ASTRO/GEC-ESTRO) patient selection criteria in order to determine whether molecular subtype should be recommended as one of the selection criteria for APBI. Material and methods 157 early-stage breast cancers patients, treated with APBI using multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy with ≥ 6 months follow-up were included. Molecular subtype was assigned based on estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR), Her2neu and tumor grade. Patients were stratified into ASTRO and GEC-ESTRO risk groups, as per updated ASTRO consensus statement (CS) and GEC-ESTRO recommendation, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the time to event data of clinical outcomes. Results With a median follow-up of 35 months, local control (LC) and locoregional control (LRC) were not significantly different among the different molecular subtypes (p = 0.19, p = 0.41, respectively). None of the APBI guidelines predicted risk of local or locoregional recurrence. Re-analyzing the data by replacing ER status with molecular subtype in the ASTRO-CS did not show any significant difference in LC/LRC across the various categories. Her2neu subtype was associated with significantly lower disease-free survival, cause specific survival, and overall survival than the luminal subtypes. Conclusions None of the mentioned APBI guidelines predicted local or locoregional recurrence risk in our study population. Additional follow-up will be needed to recommend inclusion of molecular subtype (or at least HER2 receptor status) in the patient selection criteria for APBI.
Collapse
|
200
|
Acute toxicity of intraoperative radiotherapy and external beam-accelerated partial breast irradiation in elderly breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 169:549-559. [PMID: 29460031 PMCID: PMC5953978 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4712-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose We investigated the acute toxicity of accelerated partial breast irradiation using external beam (EB-APBI) or intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) techniques in elderly breast cancer patients. Materials and methods Women ≥ 60 years with unifocal breast tumors of ≤ 30 mm were eligible for this prospective multi-center cohort study. IORT was applied with electrons following lumpectomy (23.3 Gy). EB-APBI was delivered using 3D-CRT or IMRT in 10 daily fractions of 3.85 Gy within 6 weeks after surgery. Acute toxicity was scored using the CTCAE v3.0 at 3 months after treatment. Patient-reported symptoms were analyzed using visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain and fatigue (scale 0–10), and single items from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and Breast Cancer questionnaires. Results In total, 267 (IORT) and 206 (EB-APBI) patients were available for toxicity analysis. More patients experienced ≥ grade 2 CTCAE acute toxicity in the IORT group (10.4% IORT and 4.9% EB-APBI; p = 0.03); grade 3 toxicity was low (3.3% IORT and 1.5% EB-APBI; ns); and no grade 4 toxicity occurred. EB-APBI patients experienced less fatigue direct postoperatively (EORTC p < 0.00, VAS p < 0.00). After 3 months only pain, according to the VAS scale, was significantly worse in the EB-APBI group (p < 0.00). Conclusion Acute toxicity after IORT and EB-APBI treatment is acceptable.
Collapse
|