The chemotherapeutic oxaliplatin alters voltage-gated Na(+) channel kinetics on rat sensory neurons

Transient bilateral abducens neuropathy with post-tetanic facilitation and acute hypokalemia associated with oxaliplatin: a case report

Introduction

Oxaliplatin is a cytotoxic platinum compound that is in widespread use in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers. It has been occasionally associated with acute motor neuropathy, but the precise mechanism is uncertain. To the best of our knowledge, we report the first case of a patient demonstrating post-tetanic facilitation in the setting of transient bilateral abducens neuropathy and hypokalemia, after being infused with oxaliplatin.

Case presentation

A 47-year-old Indian woman with metastatic gastric cancer was receiving an oxaliplatin infusion at the initiation of her third cycle of palliative chemotherapy. She developed acute bilateral abducens neuropathy with post-tetanic facilitation alongside acute laryngopharyngodysesthesia and hypokalemia. Following supportive management, including potassium infusion and warming, her neurological signs and symptoms were spontaneously resolved. This syndrome did not recur in subsequent cycles following prolongation of infusion duration and the addition of supportive calcium and magnesium infusions.

Conclusion

The novel clinical observation of post-tetanic facilitation highlights a possible involvement of voltage-gated channels at the presynaptic terminals in the mechanism of acute oxaliplatin neurotoxicity.

Amelioration of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity by drugs in humans and experimental animals: a minireview of recent literature

The broad spectrum anti-neoplastic drug oxaliplatin is a third-generation platinum compound that inhibits DNA synthesis, mainly by causing intrastrandal cross-links in DNA. The drug is particularly useful alone and in combination with fluoruracil and leucovorin in colorectal cancer, but it is also used for other cancers such as those of the ovary, lung, breast and liver, as well as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The drug is known to cause neurological, gastrointestinal and haematological toxicities. Neurotoxicity occurs in most of the treated patients and is considered to be a serious limitation for the use of the drug. The mechanism of the neurotoxicity is not known with certainty but may involve prolongation of sodium channels opening. Strategies to ameliorate oxaliplatin neurotoxicity include the use of several 'neuroprotective' drugs. This MiniReview attempts to list and comment on the action and use of some of these agents, which include carbamazepine, gabapentin, calcium and magnesium salts, reduced glutathione, N-acetylcysteine and a few others. None of these drugs have been proven to be effective in large, controlled, clinical trials.

Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor BSI-401 has antitumor activity and synergizes with oxaliplatin against pancreatic cancer, preventing acute neurotoxicity

PURPOSE

Development of novel agents and drug combinations are urgently needed for treatment of pancreatic cancer. Oxaliplatin belongs to an important class of DNA-damaging organoplatinum agents, useful in pancreatic cancer therapy. However, increased ability of cancer cells to recognize and repair DNA damage enables resistance to these agents. Poly (ADP ribose) polymerase-1 is a sensor of DNA damage with key roles in DNA repair. Here, we report the therapeutic activity of the poly (ADP ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor BSI-401, as a single agent and in combination with oxaliplatin in orthotopic nude mouse models of pancreatic cancer, and its effect on oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We determined in vitro the effect of BSI-401 and its synergism with oxaliplatin on the growth of pancreatic cancer cells. Activity of different dosages of parenteral and oral BSI-401, alone and in combination with oxaliplatin, was evaluated in orthotopic nude mouse models with luciferase-expressing pancreatic cancer cells. The effect of BSI-401 in preventing oxaliplatin-induced acute cold allodynia was measured in rats using a temperature-controlled plate.

RESULTS

BSI-401 alone and in synergism with oxaliplatin significantly inhibited the growth of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. In nude mice, i.p. [200 mg/kg once a week (QW) x 4] and oral [400 mg/kg days 1-5 of each week (QD5 + R2) x 4] administration of BSI-401 significantly reduced tumor burden and prolonged survival (46 versus 144 days, P = 0.0018; 73 versus 194 days, P = 0.0017) compared with no treatment. BSI-401 combined with oxaliplatin had potent synergistic antitumor activity (46 versus 132 days, P = 0.0063), and significantly (P = 0.0148) prevented acute oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

BSI-401, alone or in combination with oxaliplatin, is a promising new therapeutic agent that warrants further evaluation for treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Targeting neuroprotection as an alternative approach to preventing and treating neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain syndromes arise from dysfunction of the nerve itself, through traumatic or nontraumatic injury. Unlike acute pain syndromes, the pain is long-lasting and does not respond to common analgesic therapies. Drugs that disrupt nerve conduction and transmission or central sensitization, currently the only effective treatments, are only modestly effective for a portion of the patients suffering from neuropathic pain and come with the cost of serious adverse effects. Neurodegeneration, as a reaction to nerve trauma or chronic metabolic or chemical intoxication, appears to be an underlying cause of neuropathic pain. Identifying mechanisms of neurodegeneration and designing neuroprotective therapies is an ambitious goal toward treating or even preventing the development of these disabling disorders.

Oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity: changes in axonal excitability precede development of neuropathy

Administration of oxaliplatin, a platinum-based chemotherapy used extensively in the treatment of colorectal cancer, is complicated by prominent dose-limiting neurotoxicity. Acute neurotoxicity develops following oxaliplatin infusion and resolves within days, while chronic neuropathy develops progressively with higher cumulative doses. To investigate the pathophysiology of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity and neuropathy, clinical grading scales, nerve conduction studies and a total of 905 axonal excitability studies were undertaken in a cohort of 58 consecutive oxaliplatin-treated patients. Acutely following individual oxaliplatin infusions, significant changes were evident in both sensory and motor axons in recovery cycle parameters (P < 0.05), consistent with the development of a functional channelopathy of axonal sodium channels. Longitudinally across treatment (cumulative oxaliplatin dose 776 +/- 46 mg/m(2)), progressive abnormalities developed in sensory axons (refractoriness P < or = 0.001; superexcitability P < 0.001; hyperpolarizing threshold electrotonus 90-100 ms P < or = 0.001), while motor axonal excitability remained unchanged (P > 0.05), consistent with the purely sensory symptoms of chronic oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. Sensory abnormalities occurred prior to significant reduction in compound sensory amplitude and the development of neuropathy (P < 0.01). Sensory excitability abnormalities that developed during early treatment cycles (cumulative dose 294 +/- 16 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin; P < 0.05) were able to predict final clinical outcome on an individual patient basis in 80% of patients. As such, sensory axonal excitability techniques may provide a means to identify pre-clinical oxaliplatin-induced nerve dysfunction prior to the onset of chronic neuropathy. Furthermore, patients with severe neurotoxicity at treatment completion demonstrated greater excitability changes (P < 0.05) than those left with mild or moderate neurotoxicity, suggesting that assessment of sensory excitability parameters may provide a sensitive biomarker of severity for oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity.

Axonal ion channels from bench to bedside: a translational neuroscience perspective

Over recent decades, the development of specialised techniques such as patch clamping and site-directed mutagenesis have established the contribution of neuronal ion channel dysfunction to the pathophysiology of common neurological conditions including epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, peripheral neuropathy, episodic ataxia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and neuropathic pain. Recently, these insights from in vitro studies have been translated into the clinical realm. In keeping with this progress, novel clinical axonal excitability techniques have been developed to provide information related to the activity of a variety of ion channels, energy-dependent pumps and ion exchange processes activated during impulse conduction in peripheral axons. These non-invasive techniques have been extensively applied to the study of the biophysical properties of human peripheral nerves in vivo and have provided important insights into axonal ion channel function in health and disease. This review will provide a translational perspective, focusing on an overview of the investigational method, the clinical utility in assessing the biophysical basis of ectopic symptom generation in peripheral nerve disease and a review of the major findings of excitability studies in acquired and inherited neurological disease states.

Incidence and characteristics of peripheral neuropathy during oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for metastatic colon cancer

AIM

The current prospective study sought to trace the incidence and severity of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OXLIPN) and to determine its clinical and electrophysiological pattern.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five adult patients scheduled to be treated with 12 courses of the oxaliplatin-based regimen, FOLFOX-4, for metastatic colon cancer participated in this study. Patients were clinically and electrophysiologically monitored at baseline and followed-up during chemotherapy. The severity of OXLIPN was summarized by means of a modified Total Neuropathy Score (TNS).

RESULTS

Evidence of OXLIPN was disclosed in 16 of the 25 patients (64%). The mean TNS values for patients manifesting some grade of OXLIPN were 13.9 +/- 5.8 (range 7-28). All longitudinal comparisons concerning the motor conduction parameters failed to reach significance. By contrast, comparisons of the median changes at baseline and each of the follow-up studies revealed significant decrease in all sensory action potentials examined.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the majority of patients treated with the FOLFOX-4 regimen would manifest an axonal, predominately sensory peripheral neuropathy, of mild to moderate severity.

Mice with cisplatin and oxaliplatin-induced painful neuropathy develop distinct early responses to thermal stimuli

Background

Cisplatin has been in use for 40 years for treatment of germ line and other forms of cancer. Oxaliplatin is approved for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Thirty to forty percent of cancer patients receiving these agents develop pain and sensory loss. Oxaliplatin induces distinctive cold-associated dysesthesias in up to 80% of patients.

Results

We have established mouse models of cisplatin and oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy using doses similar to those used in patients. Adult male C57BL6J mice were treated with daily intraperitoneal injection for 5 days, followed by 5 days of rest, for two cycles. Total cumulative doses of 23 mg/kg cisplatin and 30 mg/kg oxaliplatin were used. Behavioral evaluations included cold plate, von Frey, radiant heat, tail immersion, grip strength and exploratory behavior at baseline and at weekly intervals for 8 weeks. Following two treatment cycles, mice in the cisplatin and oxaliplatin treatment groups demonstrated significant mechanical allodynia compared to control mice. In addition, the cisplatin group exhibited significant thermal hyperalgesia in hind paws and tail, and the oxaliplatin group developed significant cold hyperalgesia in hind paws.

Conclusion

We have therefore established a model of platinum drug-induced painful peripheral neuropathy that reflects the differences in early thermal pain responses that are observed in patients treated with either cisplatin or oxaliplatin. This model should be useful in studying the molecular basis for these different pain responses and in designing protective therapeutic strategies.

Comparison of oxaliplatin- and cisplatin-induced painful peripheral neuropathy in the rat

Although platinum-based cancer chemotherapies produce painful peripheral neuropathy as dose-limiting side effects, there are important differences in the pain syndromes produced by members of this class of drugs. In the rat, cisplatin-induced hyperalgesia has latency to onset of 24 to 48 hours, is maximal by 72 to 96 hours, and is attenuated by inhibitors of caspase signaling but not by inhibitors of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (mETC) and antioxidants. In contrast, oxaliplatin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia is already present by 5 minutes and peaks by 20 minutes. Whereas oxaliplatin hyperalgesia persists for weeks, starting around day 10 to 15, its severity decreases to a lower 2nd plateau level. The rapid-onset 1st plateau in oxaliplatin-induced hyperalgesia was characterized by prominent cold allodynia and in contrast to cisplatin was attenuated by inhibitors of the mETC and antioxidants but not inhibitors of caspase signaling. However, tested later during the 2nd plateau, it was characterized by less intense hyperalgesia and no cold allodynia and was attenuated by inhibitors of caspase signaling as well as by inhibitors of the mETC and by antioxidants.

PERSPECTIVE

The findings of this study distinguish between the neuropathic pain syndromes produced by members of a single chemical class of anticancer drugs and suggest that the underlying mechanisms of various forms of peripheral neuropathy may be different. Further, it defines the need for selective therapy for different types of neuropathy.

Phase 1 study of an oxaliplatin and etoposide regimen in pediatric patients with recurrent solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The combination of a platinating agent and etoposide has induced responses in various pediatric tumors. The study estimated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of an oxaliplatin and etoposide regimen in children with recurrent solid tumors.

METHODS

Oxaliplatin was administered on Day 1 and etoposide on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day course. Cohorts of 3 to 6 patients were enrolled at 3 dose levels: 1) oxaliplatin at a dose of 130 mg/m(2) and etoposide at a dose of 75 mg/m(2), 2) oxaliplatin at a dose of 130 mg/m(2) and etoposide at a dose of 100 mg/m(2), and 3) oxaliplatin at a dose of 145 mg/m(2) and etoposide at a dose of 100 mg/m(2). Calcium and magnesium infusions were used at dose level 3 in an attempt to escalate the oxaliplatin dose past the single-agent MTD.

RESULTS

The 16 patients received a total of 63 courses. At dose level 1, dose-limiting epistaxis, neuropathy, and neutropenia occurred in 1 of 6 patients. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred at dose level 2 (n = 6). At dose level 3, 2 of 4 patients experienced dose-limiting neutropenia; none experienced grade 3 or 4 acute neuropathy. Six patients required prolongation of the oxaliplatin infusion because of acute sensory neuropathy. Responses were observed in patients with medulloblastoma (1 complete response) and pineoblastoma (1 partial response); 3 others with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor, ependymoma, and soft tissue sarcoma had prolonged disease stabilization.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of this regimen was found to be oxaliplatin at a dose of 130 mg/m(2) given on Day 1 and etoposide at a dose of 100 mg/m(2)/d given on Days 1 to 3. Neutropenia was found to be the DLT. Calcium and magnesium infusions did not allow escalation of the oxaliplatin dose. The combination was well-tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity.

Acute abnormalities of sensory nerve function associated with oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity

PURPOSE

Neurotoxicity is becoming increasingly recognized as the major dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin. Because the mechanism of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity remains unclear, the present study investigated the potential of axonal excitability techniques in identifying pathophysiologic mechanisms and early markers of nerve dysfunction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Measures of sensory axonal excitability were recorded before and after infusion over 88 treatment cycles in 25 patients with colorectal cancer, who received a total oxaliplatin dose of 766 +/- 56 mg/m(2). Neurologic assessment, clinical rating scales, and routine nerve conduction studies were performed.

RESULTS

By completion of treatment, 16% of patients had developed severe (grade 3) neurotoxicity, and oxaliplatin dose reduction or cessation as a result of neurotoxicity was required in 40% of patients. Changes in axonal excitability occurred after infusion and could be explained on the basis of alterations in axonal membrane sodium (Na+) channel function (refractoriness: 7.6% +/- 1.7% before infusion v 4.5% +/- 1.4% after infusion; P = .03; superexcitability: -22.8% +/- 0.8% before infusion v -20.1% +/- 1.1% after infusion; P = .0002). Changes became less pronounced in later treatment cycles, suggesting that chronic nerve dysfunction and sensory loss masked acute effects at higher cumulative doses. Importantly, patients who demonstrated reductions in superexcitability in early treatment were subsequently more likely to develop moderate to severe neurotoxicity. The findings suggest that the degree of acute nerve dysfunction may relate to the development of chronic neurotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Sensory axonal excitability techniques may facilitate identification of Na+ channel dysfunction in oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity and thereby provide a method to identify patients at risk for neurotoxicity to target those most likely to benefit from future neuroprotective strategies.

Oxaliplatin neurotoxicity--no general ion channel surface-charge effect

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin is a platinum-based chemotherapeutic drug. Neurotoxicity is the dose-limiting side effect. Previous investigations have reported that acute neurotoxicity could be mediated via voltage-gated ion channels. A possible mechanism for some of the effects is a modification of surface charges around the ion channel, either because of chelation of extracellular Ca2+, or because of binding of a charged biotransformation product of oxaliplatin to the channel. To elucidate the molecular mechanism, we investigated the effects of oxaliplatin and its chloride complex [Pt(dach)oxCl](-) on the voltage-gated Shaker K channel expressed in Xenopus oocytes. The recordings were made with the two-electrode and the cut-open oocyte voltage clamp techniques.

CONCLUSION

To our surprise, we did not see any effects on the current amplitudes, on the current time courses, or on the voltage dependence of the Shaker wild-type channel. Oxaliplatin is expected to bind to cysteines. Therefore, we explored if there could be a specific effect on single (E418C) and double-cysteine (R362C/F416C) mutated Shaker channels previously shown to be sensitive to cysteine-specific reagents. Neither of these channels were affected by oxaliplatin. The clear lack of effect on the Shaker K channel suggests that oxaliplatin or its monochloro complex has no general surface-charge effect on the channels, as has been suggested before, but rather a specific effect to the channels previously shown to be affected.

The effects of oxaliplatin, an anticancer drug, on potassium channels of the peripheral myelinated nerve fibres of the adult rat

Oxaliplatin is a novel chemotherapeutic agent which is effective against advanced colorectal cancer, but at the same time causes severe neuropathy in the peripheral nerve fibres, affecting mainly the voltage-gated sodium (Na(+)) channels (VGNaCs), according to literature. In this study the effects of oxaliplatin on the peripheral myelinated nerve fibres (PMNFs) were investigated in vitro using the isolated sciatic nerve of the adult rat. The advantage of this nerve-preparation was that stable in amplitude evoked compound action potentials (CAP) were recorded for over 1000min. Incubation of the sciatic nerve fibres in 25, 100 and 500microM oxaliplatin, for 300-700min caused dramatic distortion of the waveform of the CAP, namely broadening the repolarization phase, repetitive firing and afterhyperpolarization (AHP), related to the malfunction of voltage-gated potassium (K(+)) channels (VGKCs). At a concentration of 5microM, oxaliplatin caused broadening of the repolarization phase of the CAP only, while the no observed effect concentration was estimated to be 1microM. These findings are indicative of severe effects of oxaliplatin on the VGKCs. In contrast, the amplitude and the rise-time of the depolarization of the CAP did not change significantly, a clear indication that the VGNaCs of the particular nerve preparation were not affected by oxaliplatin. The effects of oxaliplatin on the PMNFs were similar to those of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), a classical antagonist of VGKCs. These similarities in the pattern of action between oxaliplatin and 4-AP combined with the fact that the effects of oxaliplatin were more pronounced and developed at lower concentrations suggest that oxaliplatin acts as a potent VGKCs antagonist.

A review on oxaliplatin-induced peripheral nerve damage

Platinum compounds are a class of chemotherapy agents that posses a broad spectrum of activity against several solid malignancies. Oxaliplatin (OXL) is a third-generation organoplatinum compound with significant activity mainly against colorectal cancer (CRC). Peripheral neuropathy is a well recognized toxicity of OXL, usually resulting in dose modification. OXL induces two types of peripheral neuropathy; acute and chronic. The acute oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OXLIPN) may be linked to the rapid chelation of calcium by OXL-induced oxalate and OXL is capable of altering the voltage-gated sodium channels through a pathway involving calcium ions. On the other hand, decreased cellular metabolism and axoplasmatic transport resulting from the accumulation of OXL in the dorsal root ganglia cells is the most widely accepted mechanism of chronic oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OXLIPN). As a result, OXL produces a symmetric, axonal, sensory distal primary neuronopathy without motor involvement. The incidence of OXLIPN is usually related to various risk factors, including treatment schedule, dosage, cumulative dose and time of infusion. The assessment of OXLIPN is primarily based on neurologic clinical examination and quantitative methods, such as nerve conduction study. To date, several neuroprotective agents including thiols, neurotrophic factors, anticonvulsants and antioxidants have been tested for their ability to prevent OXLIPN. However, the clinical data are still controversial. We herein review and discuss the pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, characteristics and management of OXLIPN. We also highlight areas of future research.

Pain in oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy – Sensitisation in the peripheral and central nociceptive system

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the somatosensory characteristics and pain types in patients with acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy and to relate this profile to the hereby detected underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients treated with oxaliplatin for cancer were characterised with neurological assessment and a standardised and validated set for quantitative sensory testing (QST). Patients were allocated to two groups depending on the presence or absence of pain symptoms of acute neuropathy.

RESULTS

Comparison with normative data revealed in patients with pain symptoms a characteristic somatosensory profile of cold and mechanical hyperalgesia. Group-to-group analysis revealed additional heat hyperalgesia and warm hypoesthesia.

CONCLUSION

Pain symptoms of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy are related to signs of sensitisation within the peripheral (cold and heat hyperalgesia) and central nervous nociceptive system (mechanical hyperalgesia). This strengthens the rationale for treatment with anticonvulsants and antidepressants and fosters research on ion channel and receptor related mechanisms.

Schmerzhaftes Hyperexzitabilitätssyndrom unter Oxaliplatin-haltiger Chemotherapie

The platinum derivative oxaliplatin is widely used in colorectal cancer. Its side effects differ from those of the other platinum compounds cisplatin and carboplatin. An acute, painful hyperexcitability syndrome (HES) accompanied by cold induced paresthesia, dysesthesia and myotonia is unique to oxaliplatin, whereas a chronic, peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) can be caused by all platinum compounds. It is believed that HES is the result of peripheral nerve hyperexcitability as a consequence of voltage-gated sodium channel dysfunction, which may be caused by calcium level imbalance. Therapeutic options for HES are the administration of calcium and magnesium, the serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) venlafaxine and the thiophosphate amifostine.

Behavioral and immunohistological assessment of painful neuropathy induced by a single oxaliplatin injection in the rat

In clinical use, a single infusion of oxaliplatin, widely used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer, induces specific sensory neurotoxicity signs triggered or aggravated by exposure to cold. To study the pathophysiology of these symptoms, we developed and characterized an animal model that reproduces the effects of a single intraperitoneal oxaliplatin administration (3, 6 and 12 mg/kg). Significant allodynia and hyperalgesia to cold stimuli were rapidly observed from 24 h to day 5 with a maximum lowering of 76% at t+30 h versus control. Other behavioral assessments revealed rapid persistent mechanical allodynia, but no thermal hyperalgesia or allodynia to heat and no hyperalgesia to mechanical stimuli. An immunohistochemical study in the superficial layers of the spinal dorsal horn revealed a marked increase in substance P immunoreactivity versus controls (12% versus 4%), whereas calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) immunoreactivity was unchanged. This new animal model for the first time closely mimics the effects observed in humans after a single oxaliplatin infusion, especially onset and highly intense sensory disturbances, hypersensitivity to cold with allodynia and hyperalgesia signs. This model may help to elucidate the mechanisms of this thermal hypersensitivity, especially the possible involvement of small-diameter A-fibers in cold allodynia symptoms. These selective effects may clue up the mechanistic basis for the acute oxaliplatin neuropathy leading to a better understanding of the clinical condition and to optimize its treatment.

Oxaliplatin in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Significant advances in the treatment of colorectal cancer have been observed over the past several years. With the introduction of oxaliplatin combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer has nearly doubled. The incorporation of biologic agents that target angiogenesis (bevacizumab) and tumor growth pathways (cetuximab, panitumimab) extends survival even further, in addition to increasing response rates in patients with metastatic disease. The benefit of these newer drugs is also being realized in the adjuvant setting, where the addition of oxaliplatin to infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin has led to improvements in 3-year disease-free survival. Future challenges with the use of oxaliplatin include defining strategies to optimize its use while avoiding treatment-limiting neurotoxicity and identification of markers predictive of response.

Behavioral and pharmacological description of oxaliplatin-induced painful neuropathy in rat

We describe an animal model of nociceptive sensory neuropathy induced by repeat intravenous administration of oxaliplatin in which treated animals partly reproduce the characteristic pain symptoms in oxaliplatin-treated patients. We tested the ability of 1, 2 and 4 mg/kg oxaliplatin doses injected twice-weekly for four-and-a-half consecutive weeks to induce a nociceptive peripheral neuropathy in male Sprague-Dawley rats. The behavioral assessment revealed cold allodynia (10 degrees C) and hyperalgesia (4 degrees C) symptoms associated with a mechanical allodynia. The rats maintained a good general clinical status without motor dysfunction. The 2mg/kg oxaliplatin dose and the tail-immersion test in cold water (10 degrees C) were selected to compare pharmacological sensitivity between single administered drugs as morphine, lidocaine, carbamazepine, gabapentin and repeated administration of drugs as clomipramine, venlafaxine, calcium and magnesium solutions. Magnesium solution (90 mg/kg) and venlafaxine (7.5 mg/kg) administration induced an antinociceptive effect whereas gabapentin (300 mg/kg), clomipramine (2.5 mg/kg) and lidocaine (3 and 6 mg/kg) only induced an antiallodynic effect.

Carbamazepine for prevention of oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: Final results of a randomised, controlled, multicenter phase II study

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity is a growing, relevant clinical problem. In this study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of carbamazepine for prevention of oxaliplatin-associated neuropathy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Chemotherapeutic treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) given biweekly and weekly folinic acid 500 mg/m(2) followed by a 24-h infusion of 5-FU 2000 mg/m(2) (FUFOX). One cycle consisted of six consecutive weeks of treatment followed by two weeks of rest (=Treatment B). For Treatment A carbamazepine was added in a dosage for targeted plasma levels of 4-6 mg/L. Neurotoxicity was regularly assessed using a specific scale. Moreover, an evaluation of chronic sensory symptoms and a neurologic examination including tests for vibrational sense, strength and deep tendon reflexes were added creating a peripheral neuropathy (PNP) score.

RESULTS

The prospectively defined adequate number of patients needed to provide power for the primary outcome could not be achieved. 19 patients were assigned to Treatment A and 17 to Treatment B. At baseline, the distribution of all clinicopathologic variables was comparable between the two groups. Overall response rates were 16% and 24% and overall survival 15.1 months and 17.4 months for Treatment A and Treatment B, respectively. Between Treatment A and Treatment B there were no major differences when considering worst neurotoxicity during the study period (p=0.46). Grade 3/4 neurotoxicity occured in 4 patients with Treatment A vs. 6 patients with Treatment B. There were no major differences between both groups in each category of the PNP score.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the small number of patients and low statistical power of our study definite conclusions regarding efficacy and safety of carbamazepine for prevention of oxaliplatin-associated neuropathy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer cannot be drawn.

Oxaliplatin and Axonal Na+ Channel Function In vivo

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to investigate the pathophysiology of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity using clinical nerve excitability techniques that provide information about axonal ion channel function.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Excitability studies were combined with standard nerve conduction studies and clinical assessment in 22 patients undergoing treatment with oxaliplatin.

RESULTS

Excitability studies recorded before and immediately after oxaliplatin infusion for 89 treatment cycles revealed significant increases in refractoriness and relative refractory period postinfusion in all patients, consistent with an effect of oxaliplatin on axonal Na(+) channels. However, those patients that developed chronic neuropathy had significantly greater changes. Following cessation of oxaliplatin treatment, 41% of patients had persistent symptoms and nerve conduction abnormalities consistent with the development of chronic neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

The present study provides evidence that oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity is mediated through an effect on axonal Na(+) channels. Clinical nerve excitability techniques may prove beneficial in monitoring for early signs of neurotoxicity and in the assessment of future prophylactic therapies.

Oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity: how and why?

In early clinical trials, oxaliplatin has demonstrated significant activity against colorectal cancer in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA), both in metastatic as in radically resected disease. The drug differs from the other two most important platinum compounds (cisplatin and carboplatin) for the absence of nephrotoxicity or for the reduced drug-induced ototoxicity. During its administration, two different types of neurological symptoms can be experienced: the first one occurs during or immediately after the end of the infusion and it appears as a transient peripheral sensory neuropathy manifesting as paresthesias and dysesthesia in the extremities sometimes accompanied by muscular contractions of the extremities or the jaw (triggered or enhanced by exposure to cold). The second one occurs after long-term administration of oxaliplatin presenting with deep sensory loss, sensory ataxia and functional impairment (similar to those observed with cisplatin). This type of neurotoxicity is usually late-onset and correlated with the cumulative-dose of oxaliplatin. The aim of this review is to analyse the mechanism underlying induction of neurotoxicity and the possible treatments to prevent and to treat it.

Axonal function and activity-dependent excitability changes in myotonic dystrophy

To investigate peripheral nerve function and its potential contribution to symptoms of weakness in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (MD), nerve excitability was assessed in 12 MD patients. Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were recorded at rest from abductor pollicis brevis (APB) following stimulation of the median nerve. Stimulus-response behavior, threshold electrotonus, a current-threshold relationship, and recovery cycles were successfully recorded in each patient. Compared with controls, there was significant reduction in CMAP amplitude in MD patients. This was accompanied by reduction in depolarizing threshold electrotonus and an increase in refractoriness and in the duration of the relative refractory period. To determine whether alteration in axonal resting membrane potential was a factor underlying these changes, axonal excitability was assessed following maximal contraction of APB for 60 seconds. Following contraction, there was reduction in CMAP amplitude for a submaximal stimulus (by 51.5+/-11.8%) and an increase in super-excitability (of 22.2+/-12.0%), consistent with activity-dependent hyperpolarization, with a greater increase in threshold for MD patients compared to controls (MD group, 22.3+/-5.1%; controls, 11.7+/-2.1%; P<0.04) and prolonged recovery to baseline. The present study has established that greater activity-dependent changes in excitability may be induced in MD patients by maximal voluntary contraction when compared to controls. The excitability changes and prolonged recovery of threshold following contraction are likely to contribute to symptoms of fatigue and weakness in MD patients.

Diagnosis, management, and evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Peripheral neuropathy induced by cancer chemotherapy represents a large unmet need for patients due to the absence of treatment that can prevent or mitigate this common clinical problem. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) diagnosis and management is further compounded by the lack of reliable and standardized means to diagnose and monitor patients who are at risk for, or who are symptomatic from, this complication of treatment. The pathogenesis and pathophysiology of CIPN are not fully elucidated, but there is increasing evidence of damage or interference with tubulin function. The diagnosis of CIPN may present a diagnostic dilemma due to the large number of potential toxic etiologies and conditions, which may mimic some of the clinical features; the diagnosis must be approached with care in such patients. The incidence and severity of CIPN is commonly under-reported by physicians as compared with patients. The development of new and reliable methods for the assessment of CIPN as well as safe and effective treatments to prevent this complication of treatment would represent important medical advancements for cancer patients.

Oxaliplatin induces hyperexcitability at motor and autonomic neuromuscular junctions through effects on voltage-gated sodium channels

Oxaliplatin, an effective cytotoxic treatment in combination with 5-fluorouracil for colorectal cancer, is associated with sensory, motor and autonomic neurotoxicity. Motor symptoms include hyperexcitability while autonomic effects include urinary retention, but the cause of these side-effects is unknown. We examined the effects on motor nerve function in the mouse hemidiaphragm and on the autonomic system in the vas deferens. In the mouse diaphragm, oxaliplatin (0.5 mM) induced multiple endplate potentials (EPPs) following a single stimulus, and was associated with an increase in spontaneous miniature EPP frequency. In the vas deferens, spontaneous excitatory junction potential frequency was increased after 30 min exposure to oxaliplatin; no changes in resting Ca(2+) concentration in nerve terminal varicosities were observed, and recovery after stimuli trains was unaffected. In both tissues, an oxaliplatin-induced increase in spontaneous activity was prevented by the voltage-gated Na(+) channel blocker tetrodotoxin (TTX). Carbamazepine (0.3 mM) also prevented multiple EPPs and the increase in spontaneous activity in both tissues. In diaphragm, beta-pompilidotoxin (100 microM), which slows Na(+) channel inactivation, induced multiple EPPs similar to oxaliplatin's effect. By contrast, blockers of K(+) channels (4-aminopyridine and apamin) did not replicate oxaliplatin-induced hyperexcitability in the diaphragm. The prevention of hyperexcitability by TTX blockade implies that oxaliplatin acts on nerve conduction rather than by effecting repolarisation. The similarity between beta-pompilidotoxin and oxaliplatin suggests that alteration of voltage-gated Na(+) channel kinetics is likely to underlie the acute neurotoxic actions of oxaliplatin.

Clinical management of oxaliplatin-associated neurotoxicity

In recent years, oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy protocols, particularly oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX or FUFOX), have emerged as the standard of care in first- and second-line therapy of advanced-stage colorectal cancer. Although oxaliplatin by itself has only mild hematologic and gastrointestinal side effects, its clinically dominating toxicity affects the peripheral sensory nervous system in the form of 2 distinct types of neurotoxicity: (1) a unique, frequent, acute sensory neuropathy that is triggered or aggravated by exposure to cold but at the same time is rapidly reversible without persistent impairment of sensory functions; (2) the dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin, a cumulative, chronic sensory neurotoxicity that resembles that of cisplatin with the important difference of its being more rapidly and completely reversible. This chronic sensory neurotoxicity is highly predictable, being closely associated with the cumulative dose of oxaliplatin that is administered. Various strategies have been proposed to prevent or treat oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. The stop-and-go concept uses the predictability and reversibility of neurologic symptoms to allow patients to stay on an oxaliplatin-containing first-line therapy for a prolonged period. Several neuromodulatory agents such as calcium-magnesium infusions; antiepileptic drugs like carbamazepine, gabapentin, and venlafaxine; amifostine; a-lipoic acid; and glutathione have demonstrated some activity in the prophylaxis and treatment of oxaliplatin-induced acute neuropathy. However, randomized trials demonstrating a prophylactic or therapeutic effect on oxaliplatin's cumulative neurotoxicity are still lacking. The predictability of neurotoxicity associated with oxaliplatin-based therapy should allow patients and doctors to develop strategies to manage this side effect in view of the individual patient's clinical situation. This is of increasing importance, because the addition of bevacizumab to FOLFOX will conceivably further prolong the progression-free survival achieved with FOLFOX so that neurotoxicity and not tumor progression could become the dominating treatment-limiting issue in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer.

Oxaliplatin causes selective atrophy of a subpopulation of dorsal root ganglion neurons without inducing cell loss

Peripheral neuropathy is induced by multiple doses of oxaliplatin and interferes with the clinical utility of the drug in patients with colorectal cancer. In this study, we sought to determine whether cell loss or selective neuronal damage was the basis for the peripheral neuropathy caused by oxaliplatin. Adult female rats were given 1.85 mg/kg oxaliplatin twice per week for 8 weeks. Nerve conduction and L5 dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were studied 1 week after the completion of all treatment. No mortality occurred during oxaliplatin treatment, but the rate of body weight gain was reduced compared to age-matched vehicle-treated controls. Oxaliplatin slowed conduction velocity and delayed conduction times in peripheral sensory nerves, without affecting central or motor nerve conduction. In L5 DRG, total numbers of neurons were unchanged by oxaliplatin, but there were significant reductions in neuronal size distribution, ganglion volume, average cell size and the relative frequency of large cells. In addition, the relative frequency of small DRG cells was increased by oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin significantly altered the size distribution and average cell body area of the predominantly large parvalbumin-immunoreactive DRG neurons without affecting the frequency of parvalbumin staining. On the contrary, neither the staining frequency nor the size distribution of the predominantly small substance P-immunoreactive DRG neurons was changed by oxaliplatin. In conclusion, oxaliplatin causes selective atrophy of a subpopulation of DRG neurons with predominantly large parvalbumin-expressing cells without inducing neuronal loss. Because DRG cell body size and axonal conduction velocity are positively correlated, neuronal atrophy may be the morphological basis for the development of decreased sensory nerve conduction velocity that characterizes oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is a major clinical problem because it represents the dose-limiting side effects of a significant number of antineoplastic drugs. The incidence of CIPN varies depending on the drugs and schedules used, and this can be quite high, particularly when neurophysiological methods are used to make a diagnosis. However, even when CIPN is not a dose-limiting side effect, its onset may severely affect the quality of life of cancer patients and cause chronic discomfort. In this review the features of CIPN due to the administration of the most widely used drugs, such as platinum drugs, taxanes and vinca alkaloids, and of two old drugs with new clinical applications, suramin and thalidomide, will be discussed. Moreover, the earliest data regarding the neurotoxicity of some new classes of very promising antineoplastic agents, such as epothilones and proteasome inhibitors, will be discussed. Finally, the data available on neuroprotectants, evaluated in the attempt to prevent CIPN, will be summarised.

Oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity and the development of neuropathy

The pathophysiology of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity remains unclear, although in vitro studies suggest involvement of voltage-gated Na+ channels. In the present study, clinical assessment was combined with nerve conduction studies (NCS) and nerve excitability studies in 16 patients after completion of oxaliplatin therapy. Chronic neuropathic symptoms persisted in 50% of patients. NCS confirmed abnormalities in symptomatic patients: sensory potentials were significantly low, whereas motor studies remained essentially normal. At 12-month follow-up of symptomatic patients, positive sensory symptoms improved but NCS abnormalities persisted. Cumulative oxaliplatin dose was a predictor of neuropathy, and long-term effects appeared to be minimized by low single-infusion dosages. Nerve excitability measures in symptomatic patients established that axons were of high threshold. Refractoriness was significantly greater in patients (symptomatic group, 56.3 +/- 24.9%; entire patient group, 46.3 +/- 12.5%; controls, 27.1 +/- 1.9%; P < 0.05). Thus, although positive sensory symptoms of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy improved, negative sensory symptoms and abnormalities of sensory nerve conduction persisted. Differences in nerve excitability measures, particularly refractoriness, support in vitro studies indicating involvement of voltage-gated transient Na+-channel dysfunction in the development of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity.

Oxaliplatin-associated neuropathy: a review

OBJECTIVE

To review the incidence, mechanism, signs, symptoms, and management of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity.

DATA SOURCES

English-language publications from the MEDLINE database (1995-August 2004), published articles, and meeting abstracts were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant data were extracted from published reports and abstracts on studies and case reports of humans with cancer who received oxaliplatin chemotherapy and in vitro studies of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Neurotoxicity is a common adverse effect of oxaliplatin that usually presents as peripheral neuropathy. There are 2 forms of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity: acute and chronic. The acute form occurs in >90% of patients and may begin during the infusion or within hours of completion, is usually self-limited, and may be exacerbated by exposure to cold. Chronic neuropathy is cumulative and is most commonly seen in patients who have received total doses > or =540 mg/m2. Although it is a sensory neuropathy, the intensity can increase to the point that it impairs physical functions, such as holding objects and writing. Preventive measures include administration of calcium and magnesium solutions, gabapentin, carbamazepine, amifostine, and glutathione. Treatment measures include calcium and magnesium solutions, gabapentin, and alpha-lipoic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral neuropathy is seen in the majority of patients who receive oxaliplatin. The acute form is usually transient and self-limited; however, the chronic form can be dose-limiting. Calcium and magnesium solutions are an effective and convenient means of treating and reducing the severity of neuropathic symptoms. Additional studies, including controlled trials, are needed to determine the best way to prevent and treat this complication.

Guillain-Barré syndrome in a patient with metastatic colon cancer receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy

We report Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), developed in a patient with metastatic colon cancer, receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The 53-year-old patient was treated with first-line chemotherapy consisting of oxaliplatin 45 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 450 mg/m2 and folinic acid 200 mg/m2, all given on the same day in a weekly schedule. After 13 weeks of treatment and a cumulative oxaliplatin dose of 585 mg/m2, the patient developed unsteadiness of gait, dysphagia, and weakness of both the upper and lower limbs, as well as impairment of all sensory modalities. Clinical examination, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans of the brain, blood tests, nerve conduction studies, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis confirmed the diagnosis of GBS. Intravenous immunoglobulin G was administered for 5 days and the patient recovered fully. Oxaliplatin can cause acute and delayed neurotoxicity, but this is the first report of GBS in a patient receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6, induced by oxaliplatin, may represent the relevant causal links involved in the cascade of events which have led to the immune-mediated demyelination in the peripheral nervous system in this patient.

Prevention of Oxaliplatin-Related Neurotoxicity by Calcium and Magnesium Infusions

PURPOSE

Oxaliplatin is active in colorectal cancer. Sensory neurotoxicity is its dose-limiting toxicity. It may come from an effect on neuronal voltage-gated Na channels, via the liberation one its metabolite, oxalate. We decided to use Ca and Mg as oxalate chelators.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A retrospective cohort of 161 patients treated with oxaliplatin + 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for advanced colorectal cancer, with three regimens of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)/2w, 100/2w, 130/3w) was identified. Ninety-six patients received infusions of Ca gluconate and Mg sulfate (1 g) before and after oxaliplatin (Ca/Mg group) and 65 did not.

RESULTS

Only 4% of patients withdrew for neurotoxicity in the Ca/Mg group versus 31% in the control group (P = 0.000003). The tumor response rate was similar in both groups. The percentage of patients with grade 3 distal paresthesia was lower in Ca/Mg group (7 versus 26%, P = 0.001). Acute symptoms such as distal and lingual paresthesia were much less frequent and severe (P = 10(-7)), and pseudolaryngospasm was never reported in Ca/Mg group. At the end of the treatment, 20% of patients in Ca/Mg group had neuropathy versus 45% (P = 0.003). Patients with grade 2 and 3 at the end of the treatment in the 85 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin group recovered significantly more rapidly from neuropathy than patients without Ca/Mg.

CONCLUSIONS

Ca/Mg infusions seem to reduce incidence and intensity of acute oxaliplatin-induced symptoms and might delay cumulative neuropathy, especially in 85 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin dosage.

Oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity: acute hyperexcitability and chronic neuropathy

Oxaliplatin, a platinum-based chemotherapeutic agent, is effective in the treatment of solid tumors, particularly colorectal cancer. During and immediately following oxaliplatin infusion, patients may experience cold-induced paresthesias, throat and jaw tightness, and occasionally focal weakness. We assessed nerve conduction studies and findings on needle electromyography of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer before and during treatment with oxaliplatin. Twenty-two patients had follow-up studies within 48 h following oxaliplatin infusions, and 14 patients had follow-up studies after 3-9 treatment cycles. Repetitive compound muscle action potentials and neuromyotonic discharges were observed in the first 24-48 h following oxaliplatin infusion, but resolved by 3 weeks. After 8-9 treatment cycles, sensory nerve action potential amplitudes declined, without conduction velocity changes or neuromyotonic discharges. The acute neurological symptoms reflect a state of peripheral nerve hyperexcitability that likely represents a transient oxaliplatin-induced channelopathy. Chronic treatment causes an axonal neuropathy similar to other platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents.

Neurotoxicity of platinum compounds: comparison of the effects of cisplatin and oxaliplatin on the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y

The main dose-limiting side effect of cancer treatment with platinum compounds is peripheral neurotoxicity. To investigate the intracellular mechanisms of platinum drugs neurotoxicity we have studied the effects of cisplatin and oxaliplatin on the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y. Both platinum compounds are toxic causing cellular death by inducing apoptosis but oxaliplatin is less neurotoxic than cisplatin. The study of the proteins involved in the intracellular transduction pathways that may cause apoptotic death, revealed a very similar pattern of changes after exposure to cisplatin or oxaliplatin. In particular, as demonstrated by densitometric analysis, after exposure to both platinum compounds the total amount of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 was significantly reduced. Conversely, the amount of the pro-apoptotic protein p53 significantly increased. Caspases 3 and 7 were activated, but their activation was a late event, indicating a secondary role in the apoptotic process. Among the mitogen activated protein kinases, only the p38 protein was activated (phosphorylated) early enough to have a possible role in inducing apoptosis, possibly through p53 stabilization. The results of the present study and the data of the literature demonstrate that the ways in which cisplatin and oxaliplatin are neurotoxic are very similar and include not only DNA damage, but also the modulation of specific molecules involved in regulating the cellular equilibrium between apoptotic death and the cell cycle.

Neurotoxic complications of chemotherapy in patients with cancer: clinical signs and optimal management

Neurotoxic side effects of chemotherapy occur frequently and are often a reason to limit the dose of chemotherapy. Since bone marrow toxicity, as the major limiting factor in most chemotherapeutic regimens, can be overcome with growth factors or bone marrow transplantation, the use of higher doses of chemotherapy is possible, which increases the risk of neurotoxicity. Chemotherapy may cause both peripheral neurotoxicity, consisting mainly of a peripheral neuropathy, and central neurotoxicity, ranging from minor cognitive deficits to encephalopathy with dementia or even coma. In this article we describe the neurological adverse effects of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. The vinca-alkaloids, cisplatin and the taxanes are amongst the most important drugs inducing peripheral neurotoxicity. These drugs are widely used for various malignancies such as ovarian and breast cancer, and haematological cancers. Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy is clearly related to cumulative dose or dose-intensities. Patients who already have neuropathic symptoms due to diabetes mellitus, hereditary neuropathies or earlier treatment with neurotoxic chemotherapy are thought to be more vulnerable for the development of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Methotrexate, cytarabine (cytosine arabinoside) and ifosfamide are primarily known for their central neurotoxic side effects. Central neurotoxicity ranges from acute toxicity such as aseptic meningitis, to delayed toxicities comprising cognitive deficits, hemiparesis, aphasia and progressive dementia. Risk factors are high doses, frequent administration and radiotherapy preceding methotrexate chemotherapy, which appears to be more neurotoxic than methotrexate as single modality. Data on management and neuroprotective agents are discussed. Management mainly consists of cumulative dose-reduction or lower dose-intensities, especially in patients who are at higher risk to develop neurotoxic side effects. None of the neuroprotective agents described in this article can be recommended for standard use in daily practise at this moment, and further studies are needed to confirm some of the beneficial effects described.

Toxicity of platinum compounds

Since the introduction of platinum-based combination chemotherapy, particularly cisplatin, the outcome of the treatment of many solid tumours has changed. The leading platinum compounds in cancer chemotherapy are cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin. They share some structural similarities; however, there are marked differences between them in therapeutic use, pharmacokinetics and adverse effects profiles [1-4]. Compared to cisplatin, carboplatin has inferior efficacy in germ-cell tumour, head and neck cancer and bladder and oesophageal carcinoma, whereas both drugs seem to have comparable efficacy in advanced non-small cell and small cell lung cancer as well as ovarian cancer [5-7]. Oxaliplatin belongs to the group of diaminocyclohexane platinum compounds. It is the first platinum-based drug that has marked efficacy in colorectal cancer when given in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid [8,9]. Other platinum compounds such as oral JM216, ZD0473, BBR3464 and SPI-77, which is a pegylated liposomal formulation of cisplatin, are still under investigation [10-13], whereas nedaplatin has been approved in Japan for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and other solid tumours. This review focuses on cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin.