Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial

New Insights into the Phenotype Switching of Melanoma

Melanoma is considered one of the deadliest skin cancers, partly because of acquired resistance to standard therapies. The most recognized driver of resistance relies on acquired melanoma cell plasticity, or the ability to dynamically switch among differentiation phenotypes. This confers the tumor noticeable advantages. During the last year, two new features have been included in the hallmarks of cancer, namely "Unlocking phenotypic plasticity" and "Non-mutational epigenetic reprogramming". Such are inextricably intertwined as, most of the time, plasticity is not discernable at the genetic level, as it rather consists of epigenetic reprogramming heavily influenced by external factors. By analyzing current literature, this review provides reasoning about the origin of plasticity and clarifies whether such features already exist among tumors or are acquired by selection. Moreover, markers of plasticity, molecular effectors, and related tumor advantages in melanoma will be explored. Ultimately, as this new branch of tumor biology opened a wide landscape of therapeutic possibilities, in the final paragraph of this review, we will focus on newly characterized drugs targeting melanoma plasticity.

Targeting the epigenome in malignant melanoma: Facts, challenges and therapeutic promises

Malignant melanoma is the most lethal type of skin cancer with high rates of mortality. Although current treatment options provide a short-clinical benefit, acquired-drug resistance highlights the low 5-year survival rate among patients with advanced stage of the disease. In parallel, the involvement of an aberrant epigenetic landscape, (e.g., alterations in DNA methylation patterns, histone modifications marks and expression of non-coding RNAs), in addition to the genetic background, has been also associated with the onset and progression of melanoma. In this review article, we report on current therapeutic options in melanoma treatment with a focus on distinct epigenetic alterations and how their reversal, by specific drug compounds, can restore a normal phenotype. In particular, we concentrate on how single and/or combinatorial therapeutic approaches have utilized epigenetic drug compounds in being effective against malignant melanoma. Finally, the role of deregulated epigenetic mechanisms in promoting drug resistance to targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors is presented leading to the development of newly synthesized and/or improved drug compounds capable of targeting the epigenome of malignant melanoma.

Adaptive therapy to circumvent drug resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer: is it clinically relevant?

INTRODUCTION

Cancer is highly adaptable and is constantly evolving against current targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Despite advances in recent decades, the emergence of drug resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors constantly hampers therapeutic efficacy of cancer treatment. Continuous therapy versus intermittent clinical regimen has been a debate in drug administration of cancer patients. An ecologically-inspired shift in cancer treatment known as 'adaptive therapy' intends to improve the drug administration of drugs to cancer patients that can delay emergence of drug resistance.

AREAS COVERED

We discuss improved understanding of the concept of drug resistance, the basis of continuous therapy, intermittent clinical regimens, and adaptive therapy will be reviewed. In addition, we discuss how adaptive therapy provides guidance for future cancer treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

The current understanding of drug resistance in cancer leads to poor prognosis and limited treatment options in patients. Fighting drug resistance mutants is constantly followed by new forms of resistance. In most reported cases, continuous therapy leads to drug resistance and an intermittent clinical regimen vaguely delays it. However, adaptive therapy, conceptually, exploits multiple parameters that can suppress the growth of drug resistance and provides safe treatment for cancer patients in the future.

The lipid transporter HDLBP promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through BRAF-dependent epithelial-mesenchymal transition

Tumor metastasis is a major cause of cancer mortality. However, little is known regarding the regulation of abnormal cholesterol metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) metastasis. Here, we show that the expression of high-density lipoprotein binding protein (HDLBP), a lipid transporter, is clinically correlated with tumor metastasis in HCC patients. Moreover, HDLBP was required for cholesterol-induced HCC metastasis. We revealed that knockdown and overexpression of HDLBP significantly inhibited and enhanced, respectively, the metastasis, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of HCC cells in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, coimmunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry screening uncovered BRAF as a protein target of HDLBP. HDLBP was found to promote EMT signaling in a BRAF-dependent manner. Furthermore, HDLBP interacts with BRAF and inhibits its ubiquitinated degradation by abrogating BRAF-ITCH interactions. Notably, further studies suggest that dabrafenib exhibited a greater metastasis-suppressive effect in HDLBP knockout HCC than isolated treatment. Overall, our findings imply that cholesterol-induced HDLBP contributes to the metastasis and invasion of HCC through BRAF-dependent EMT signaling and that HDLBP may be applied as a biomarker and therapeutic target for HCC.

Upfront BRAF/MEK inhibitors for treatment of high-grade glioma: A case report and review of the literature

Background

High-grade gliomas (HGG) with BRAFV600E mutation represent a unique subset of central nervous system tumors. Targeted therapies including BRAF and MEK inhibitors are now being explored as possible new treatment options.

Methods

We report an 18-year-old female with a grade 3 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma treated upfront with dabrafenib and trametinib. We also conducted a systematic literature review of patients with HGG and BRAFV600E mutations treated with BRAF inhibitors.

Results

Despite local recurrences resected surgically, the patient has been on dabrafenib and trametinib for more than 54 months. Thirty-two patients with HGG and BRAFV600E mutations treated with BRAF inhibitors were retrieved through our systematic review of the literature. Only 1 young patient with an anaplastic ganglioglioma was treated upfront with a BRAF inhibitor with a curative intent. Best response reported with radiation therapy and systemic therapy was a stable disease (SD) for 18 patients (56.3%) and progressive disease (PD) for 9 patients (28.1%). Responses to treatment regimens that included BRAF inhibitors were reported in 31 patients and included 4 complete responses (12.9%), 23 partial responses (74.2%), 2 SDs (6.5%), and 2 PDs (6.5%).

Conclusions

Our patient had durable disease control with dabrafenib and trametinib. Given favorable responses reported in patients with HGG treated with BRAF inhibitors, we believe that upfront targeted therapy is a possible treatment approach that should be studied in the context of a clinical trial.

Triple Combination of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and BRAF/MEK Inhibitors in BRAFV600 Melanoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), namely programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or cytotoxic t-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, are currently the standard of care for the treatment of advanced melanoma, with robust and durable responses in a subset of patients. For BRAFV600-mutant melanoma, treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has resulted in high objective response rates, but most responses are short-lived. Preclinical data suggest that BRAF and MEK inhibitors result in immunomodulatory changes in the tumor microenvironment; early data in murine models further suggest that these changes could enhance sensitivity to ICIs. Subsequently, the notion of combining the two therapy modalities for a more effective response was further evolved in early phase clinical trials. In this review, we analyzed the results of recent phase 2 and 3 clinical trials investigating the combination of ICIs with targeted therapy in BRAFV600-mutated advanced melanoma. Furthermore, we evaluated the results of recent studies investigating the first-line treatment sequencing of ipilimumab/nivolumab and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in these patients. We discussed the study limitations and interpreted how these recent advances could be incorporated into the treatment landscape of advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma.

PTEN regulates invasiveness in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors through DUSP19-mediated VEGFR3 dephosphorylation

Background

Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a tumor suppressor. Low PTEN expression has been observed in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) and is associated with increased liver metastasis and poor survival. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR3) is a receptor tyrosine kinase and is usually activated by binding with vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC). VEGFR3 has been demonstrated with lymphangiogenesis and cancer invasiveness. PTEN is also a phosphatase to dephosphorylate both lipid and protein substrates and VEGFR3 is hypothesized to be a substrate of PTEN. Dual-specificity phosphatase 19 (DUSP19) is an atypical DUSP and can interact with VEGFR3. In this study, we investigated the function of PTEN on regulation of pNET invasiveness and its association with VEGFR3 and DUSP19.

Methods

PTEN was knocked down or overexpressed in pNET cells to evaluate its effect on invasiveness and its association with VEGFR3 phosphorylation. In vitro phosphatase assay was performed to identify the regulatory molecule on the regulation of VEGFR3 phosphorylation. In addition, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence staining were performed to evaluate the molecule with direct interaction on VEGFR3 phosphorylation. The animal study was performed to validate the results of the in vitro study.

Results

The invasion and migration capabilities of pNETs were enhanced by PTEN knockdown accompanied with increased VEGFR3 phosphorylation, ERK phosphorylation, and increased expression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition molecules in the cells. The enhanced invasion and migration abilities of pNET cells with PTEN knockdown were suppressed by addition of the VEGFR3 inhibitor MAZ51, but not by the VEGFR3-Fc chimeric protein to neutralize VEGFC. VEGFR3 phosphorylation is responsible for pNET cell invasiveness and is VEGFC-independent. However, an in vitro phosphatase assay failed to show VEGFR3 as a substrate of PTEN. In contrast, DUSP19 was transcriptionally upregulated by PTEN and was shown to dephosphorylate VEGFR3 via direct interaction with VEGFR3 by an in vitro phosphatase assay, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence staining. Increased tumor invasion into peripheral tissues was validated in xenograft mouse model. Tumor invasion was suppressed by treatment with VEGFR3 or MEK inhibitors.

Conclusions

PTEN regulates pNET invasiveness via DUSP19-mediated VEGFR3 dephosphorylation. VEGFR3 and DUSP19 are potential therapeutic targets for pNET treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12929-022-00875-2.

Upfront molecular targeted therapy for the treatment of BRAF-mutant pediatric high-grade glioma

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for patients with pediatric high-grade glioma (pHGG) is poor despite aggressive multimodal therapy. Objective responses to targeted therapy with BRAF inhibitors have been reported in some patients with recurrent BRAF-mutant pHGG but are rarely sustained.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional review of patients with BRAF-mutant pHGG treated with off-label BRAF +/- MEK inhibitors as part of their initial therapy.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were identified, with a median age of 11.7 years (range, 2.3-21.4). Histologic diagnoses included HGG (n = 6), glioblastoma (n = 3), anaplastic ganglioglioma (n = 4), diffuse midline glioma (n = 3), high-grade neuroepithelial tumor (n = 1), anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 1), and anaplastic astroblastoma (n = 1). Recurrent concomitant oncogenic alterations included CDKN2A/B loss, H3 K27M, as well as mutations in ATRX, EGFR, and TERT. Eight patients received BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Eleven patients received combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Most patients tolerated long-term treatment well with no grade 4-5 toxicities. Objective and durable imaging responses were seen in the majority of patients with measurable disease. At a median follow-up of 2.3 years (range, 0.3-6.5), three-year progression-free and overall survival for the cohort were 65% and 82%, respectively, and superior to a historical control cohort of BRAF-mutant pHGG patients treated with conventional therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Upfront targeted therapy for patients with BRAF-mutant pHGG is feasible and effective, with superior clinical outcomes compared to historical data. This promising treatment paradigm is currently being evaluated prospectively in the Children's Oncology Group ACNS1723 clinical trial.

Comparative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for BRAF-mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma: Results from a systematic literature review and a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic melanoma using a network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) identified studies in Medline, Embase and Cochrane published until November 2020. Screening used prespecified eligibility criteria. Following a transitivity assessment across included studies, Bayesian NMA was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 43 publications reporting 15 targeted therapy trials and 42 reporting 18 immunotherapy trials were retained from the SLR and considered for the NMA. Due to substantial between-study heterogeneity with immunotherapy trials, the analysis considered a network restricted to targeted therapies. Among combination therapies, encorafenib + binimetinib was superior to dabrafenib + trametinib for overall response rate (OR = 1.86; 95 % credible interval [CrI] 1.10, 3.17), superior to vemurafenib + cobimetinib with fewer serious adverse events (SAEs) (OR = 0.51; 95 % CrI 0.29, 0.91) and fewer discontinuations due to AEs (OR = 0.45; 95 % CrI 0.21, 0.96), and superior to atezolizumab + vemurafenib + cobimetinib with fewer SAEs (OR = 0.41; 95 % CrI 0.21, 0.82). Atezolizumab + vemurafenib + cobimetinib and encorafenib + binimetinib were generally comparable for efficacy endpoints. Among double combination therapies, encorafenib + binimetinib showed high probabilities of being better for all efficacy and safety endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

This NMA confirms that combination therapies are more efficacious than monotherapies. Encorafenib + binimetinib has a favourable efficacy profile compared to other double combination therapies and a favourable safety profile compared to both double and triple combination therapies.

New Directions in the Therapy of Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is the most common histologic type of all gliomas and contributes to 57.3% of all cases. Despite the standard management based on surgical resection and radiotherapy, it is related to poor outcome, with a 5-year relative survival rate below 6.9%. In order to improve the overall outcome for patients, the new therapeutic strategies are needed. Herein, we describe the current state of knowledge on novel targeted therapies in glioblastoma. Based on recent studies, we compared treatment efficacy measured by overall survival and progression-free survival in patients treated with selected potential antitumor drugs. The results of the application of the analyzed inhibitors are highly variable despite the encouraging conclusions of previous preclinical studies. This paper focused on drugs that target major glioblastoma kinases. As far, the results of some BRAF inhibitors are favorable. Vemurafenib demonstrated a long-term efficacy in clinical trials while the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib improves PFS compared with both vemurafenib and dabrafenib alone. There is no evidence that any MEK inhibitor is effective in monotherapy. According to the current state of knowledge, BRAF and MEK inhibition are more advantageous than BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Moreover, mTOR inhibitors (especially paxalisib) may be considered a particularly important group. Everolimus demonstrated a partial response in a significant proportion of patients when combined with bevacizumab, however its actual role in the treatment is unclear. Neither nintedanib nor pemigatinib were efficient in treatment of GBM. Among the anti-VEGF drugs, bevacizumab monotherapy was a well-tolerated option, significantly associated with anti-GBM activity in patients with recurrent GBM. The efficacy of aflibercept and pazopanib in monotherapy has not been demonstrated. Apatinib has been proven to be effective and tolerable by a single clinical trial, but more research is needed. Lenvatinib is under trial. Finally, promising results from a study with regorafenib may be confirmed by the ongoing randomized AGILE trial. The studies conducted so far have provided a relatively wide range of drugs, which are at least well tolerated and demonstrated some efficacy in the randomized clinical trials. The comprehensive understanding of the molecular biology of gliomas promises to further improve the treatment outcomes of patients.

Integrating a Comprehensive Cancer Genome Profiling into Clinical Practice: A Blueprint in an Italian Referral Center

The implementation of cancer molecular characterization in clinical practice has improved prognostic re-definition, extending the eligibility to a continuously increasing number of targeted treatments. Broad molecular profiling technologies better than organ-based approaches are believed to serve such dynamic purposes. We here present the workflow our institution adopted to run a comprehensive cancer genome profiling in clinical practice. This article describes the workflow designed to make a comprehensive cancer genome profiling program feasible and sustainable in a large-volume referral hospital.

BRAF Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

RAF family proteins are serine–threonine kinases that play a central role in the MAPK pathway which is involved in embryogenesis, cell differentiation, cell proliferation and death. Deregulation of this pathway is found in up to 30% of all human cancers and BRAF mutations can be identified in 1.5–3.5% of NSCLC patients. Following the positive results obtained through the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF-mutant melanoma, the same combination was prospectively assessed in BRAF-mutant NSCLC. In cohort B of the BRF113928 trial, 57 pretreated NSCLC patients were treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib: an ORR of 68.4%, a disease control rate of 80.7%, a median PFS of 10.2 months and a median OS of 18.2 months were observed. Similar results were reported in the first-line setting (cohort C), with an ORR of 63.9%, a DCR of 75% and a median PFS and OS of 10.2 and 17.3 months, respectively. The combination was well tolerated: the main adverse events were pyrexia (64%), nausea (56%), diarrhoea (56%), fatigue (36%), oedema (36%) and vomiting (33%). These positive results led to the approval of the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib for the treatment of BRAF V600E metastatic NSCLC patients regardless of previous therapy. Ongoing research should better define the role of new generation RAF inhibitors for patients with acquired resistance, the activity of chemo-immunotherapy or the combination of TKIs with chemotherapy or with immunotherapy in patients with BRAF-mutated cancers.

Application of histology-agnostic treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer

Cancer treatment is increasingly focused on targeting molecular alterations identified across different tumor histologies. While some oncogenic drivers such as microsatellite instability (MSI) and NTRK fusions are actionable with the very same approach regardless of tumor type ("histology-agnostic"), others require histology-specific therapeutic adjustment ("histology-tuned") by means of adopting specific inhibitors and ad hoc combinations. Among histology-agnostic therapies, pembrolizumab or dostarlimab demonstrated comparable activity in MSI metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as in other tumors with MSI status (ORR 38% vs 40% and 36% vs 39%, respectively), while entrectinib or larotrectinib proved effective in NTRK rearranged mCRC even though less dramatically than in the overall population (ORR 20% vs 57%, and 50% vs 78%, respectively). Histology-tuned approaches in mCRC are those targeting BRAF^V600E mutations and ERBB2 amplification, highlighting the need of simultaneous anti-EGFR blockade or careful choice of companion inhibitors in this tumor type. Anti-RET and anti-ALK therapies emerged as a potential histology-agnostic indications, while anti-KRAS^G12C strategies could develop as future histology-tuned therapies. Targeting of ERBB2 mutations and NRG1 fusion provided discrepant results. In conclusion, agnostic targets such as MSI and NTRK fusions are already exploitable in mCRC, while the plethora of emerging histology-tuned targets represent a challenging opportunity requiring concurrent evolution of molecular diagnostic tools.

Treatment reality of patients with BRAF-mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma in Switzerland in the era of choice

Cutaneous melanoma represents a major cause of cancer death in Europe. Without adequate therapy, the 5-year survival rate is 15-20% in distant metastatic disease. Evaluating the status quo of treatment standards in advanced melanoma and rationale for therapy decisions in Switzerland between January 2016 and September 2018. In this retrospective, anonymized registry, data of male and female patients with unresectable advanced/metastatic BRAF-positive cutaneous melanoma treated in first-, second- and third-line with registered substances were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Forty-one patients (56.1% male) were included providing a total of 70 treatment lines (first-line: n = 41; second-line: n = 18; and third-line: n = 11). Within the patients presenting with stage III or IV melanoma, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors was more frequently administered as first-line treatment than targeted therapy (TT) (70.7% vs. 29.3%). Across all lines, patients received TT in 47.1% (predominantly combined BRAF-MEK-inhibition) and immunotherapy in 52.9% of the cases (anti-PD-1 monotherapy in 62.2% and anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 combinations in 37.8%). Most commonly, the treatment type was switched from TT to immunotherapy or vice versa upon disease progression. The most frequent rationales for prescribing either TT or immunotherapy were physician's preference (40.0%) or remission pressure (28.6%), respectively. Disease progression led to treatment discontinuation more frequently than undesired events. Patients in Switzerland with unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma predominantly receive guideline-recommended treatments. IO was used as predominant front-line therapy, with TT/immunotherapy switch being the predominant treatment principle. Sequencing studies are underway to identify the optimal treatment regimen for those patients. 32: 366-372 Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Unravelling Tumour Microenvironment in Melanoma at Single-Cell Level and Challenges to Checkpoint Immunotherapy

Melanoma is known as one of the most immunogenic tumours and is often characterised by high mutation burden, neoantigen load and immune infiltrate. The application of immunotherapies has led to impressive improvements in the clinical outcomes of advanced stage melanoma patients. The standard of care immunotherapies leverage the host immunological influence on tumour cells, which entail complex interactions among the tumour, stroma, and immune cells at the tumour microenvironmental level. However, not all cancer patients can achieve a long-term durable response to immunotherapy, and a significant proportion of patients develops resistance and still die from their disease. Owing to the multi-faceted problems of tumour and microenvironmental heterogeneity, identifying the key factors underlying tumour progression and immunotherapy resistance poses a great challenge. In this review, we outline the main challenges to current cancer immunotherapy research posed by tumour heterogeneity and microenvironment complexities including genomic and transcriptomic variability, selective outgrowth of tumour subpopulations, spatial and temporal tumour heterogeneity and the dynamic state of host immunity and microenvironment orchestration. We also highlight the opportunities to dissect tumour heterogeneity using single-cell sequencing and spatial platforms. Integrative analyses of large-scale datasets will enable in-depth exploration of biological questions, which facilitates the clinical application of translational research.

Improving the predictive power of xenograft and syngeneic anti-tumour studies using mice humanised for pathways of drug metabolism

Drug development is an expensive and time-consuming process, with only a small fraction of drugs gaining regulatory approval from the often many thousands of candidates identified during target validation. Once a lead compound has been identified and optimised, they are subject to intensive pre-clinical research to determine their pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties, procedures which inevitably involve significant numbers of animals - mainly mice and rats, but also dogs and monkeys in much smaller numbers and for specific types of drug candidates. Many compounds that emerge from this process, having been shown to be safe and efficacious in pre-clinical studies, subsequently fail to replicate this outcome in clinical trials, therefore wasting time, money and, most importantly, animals. The poor predictive power of animal models in pre-clinical studies is predominantly due to lack of efficacy or safety reasons, which in turn can be attributed mainly to the significant species differences in drug metabolism between humans and animals. To circumvent this, we have developed a complex transgenic mouse model – 8HUM - which faithfully replicates human Phase I drug metabolism (and its regulation), and which will generate more human-relevant data [REFINEMENT] from fewer animals [REDUCTION] in a pre-clinical setting and reduce attrition in the clinic. One key area for the pre-clinical application of animals in an oncology setting – almost exclusively mice - is their use in anti-tumour studies. We now further demonstrate the utility of the 8HUM mouse using a murine melanoma cell line as a syngeneic tumour and also present an immunodeficient version 8HUM_Rag2-/- - for use in xenograft studies. These models will be of significant benefit not only to Pharma for pre-clinical drug development work, but also throughout the drug efficacy, toxicology, pharmacology, and drug metabolism communities, where fewer animals will be needed to generate more human-relevant data.

NAD/NAMPT and mTOR Pathways in Melanoma: Drivers of Drug Resistance and Prospective Therapeutic Targets

Malignant melanoma represents the most fatal skin cancer due to its aggressive behavior and high metastatic potential. The introduction of BRAF/MEK inhibitors and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the clinic has dramatically improved patient survival over the last decade. However, many patients either display primary (i.e., innate) or develop secondary (i.e., acquired) resistance to systemic treatments. Therapeutic resistance relies on the rewiring of multiple processes, including cancer metabolism, epigenetics, gene expression, and interactions with the tumor microenvironment that are only partially understood. Therefore, reliable biomarkers of resistance or response, capable of facilitating the choice of the best treatment option for each patient, are currently missing. Recently, activation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) metabolism and, in particular, of its rate-limiting enzyme nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) have been identified as key drivers of targeted therapy resistance and melanoma progression. Another major player in this context is the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, which plays key roles in the regulation of melanoma cell anabolic functions and energy metabolism at the switch between sensitivity and resistance to targeted therapy. In this review, we summarize known resistance mechanisms to ICIs and targeted therapy, focusing on metabolic adaptation as one main mechanism of drug resistance. In particular, we highlight the roles of NAD/NAMPT and mTOR signaling axes in this context and overview data in support of their inhibition as a promising strategy to overcome treatment resistance.

Pharmacologic Inhibition of SHP2 Blocks Both PI3K and MEK Signaling in Low-epiregulin HNSCC via GAB1

Preclinical and clinical studies have evidenced that effective targeted therapy treatment against receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) in different solid tumor paradigms is predicated on simultaneous inhibition of both the PI3K and MEK intracellular signaling pathways. Indeed, re-activation of either pathway results in resistance to these therapies. Recently, oncogenic phosphatase SHP2 inhibitors have been developed with some now reaching clinical trials. To expand on possible indications for SHP099, we screened over 800 cancer cell lines covering over 25 subsets of cancer. We found HNSCC was the most sensitive adult subtype of cancer to SHP099. We found that, in addition to the MEK pathway, SHP2 inhibition blocks the PI3K pathway in sensitive HNSCC, resulting in downregulation of mTORC signaling and anti-tumor effects across several HNSCC mouse models, including an HPV+ patient-derived xenograft (PDX). Importantly, we found low levels of the RTK ligand epiregulin identified HNSCCs that were sensitive to SHP2 inhibitor, and, adding exogenous epiregulin mitigated SHP099 efficacy. Mechanistically, epiregulin maintained SHP2-GAB1 complexes in the presence of SHP2 inhibition, preventing downregulation of the MEK and PI3K pathways. We demonstrate HNSCCs were highly dependent on GAB1 for their survival and knockdown of GAB1 is sufficient to block the ability of epiregulin to rescue MEK and PI3K signaling. These data connect the sensitivity of HNSCC to SHP2 inhibitors and to a broad reliance on GAB1-SHP2, revealing an important and druggable signaling axis. Overall, SHP2 inhibitors are being heavily developed and may have activity in HNSCCs, and in particular those with low levels of epiregulin.

Trametinib for Refractory Chylous Effusions and Systemic Complications in Children with Noonan Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of the RAS-MAPK pathway inhibitor trametinib on medically refractory chylous effusions in 3 hospitalized patients with Noonan syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN

Pharmacologic MEK1/2 inhibition has been used to treat conditions associated with Noonan syndrome, given that activation of RAS-MAPK pathway variants leads to downstream MEK activation. We describe our experience with 3 patients with Noonan syndrome (owing to variants in 3 distinct genes) and refractory chylous effusions treated successfully with MEK inhibition. A monitoring protocol was established to standardize medication dosing and monitoring of outcome measures.

RESULTS

Subjects demonstrated improvement in lymphatic leak with additional findings of improved growth and normalization of cardiac and hematologic measurements. Trametinib was administered safely, with only moderate skin irritation in 1 subject.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements in a variety of quantifiable measurements highlight the potential utility of MEK1/2 inhibition in patients with Noonan syndrome and life-threatening lymphatic disease. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm efficacy and assess long-term safety.

Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma at First Diagnosis: Review of the Literature

Metastatic melanoma (MM) is a pathological entity with a very poor prognosis that, until a few decades ago, had a low response rate to systemic treatments. Fortunately, in the last few years, new therapies for metastatic melanoma have emerged. Currently, targeted therapy and immunotherapy are the mainstays of the therapeutic arsenal available for patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. However, both clinical evolution and drug efficacy in melanoma patients are very different depending on the stage at which it is diagnosed. In fact, the aggressiveness of melanoma is different depending on whether it debuts directly as metastatic disease or if what occurs is a relapse after a first diagnosis at an early stage, although the biological determinants are largely unknown. Another key aspect in the clinical management of metastatic melanoma at first diagnosis strives in the different prognosis of melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) compared to melanoma of known primary (MPK). Understanding the mechanisms behind this, and the repercussion of implementing targeted and immune therapies in this specific form is crucial for designing diagnosis and treatment decision algorithms that optimize the current strategies. In this review article, we recapitulate the information available thus far regarding the epidemiology and response to immunotherapy treatments or targeted therapy in patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma as a first diagnosis, with especial emphasis on the emerging specific information of the subpopulation formed by MUP patients.

Immune Modulatory Effects of Molecularly Targeted Therapy and Its Repurposed Usage in Cancer Immunotherapy

The fast evolution of anti-tumor agents embodies a deeper understanding of cancer pathogenesis. To date, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy are three pillars of the paradigm for cancer treatment. The success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) implies that reinstatement of immunity can efficiently control tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. However, only a fraction of patients benefit from ICI therapy, which turns the spotlight on developing safe therapeutic strategies to overcome the problem of an unsatisfactory response. Molecular-targeted agents were designed to eliminate cancer cells with oncogenic mutations or transcriptional targets. Intriguingly, accumulating shreds of evidence demonstrate the immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive capacity of targeted agents. By virtue of the high attrition rate and cost of new immunotherapy exploration, drug repurposing may be a promising approach to discovering combination strategies to improve response to immunotherapy. Indeed, many clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of the combination of targeted agents and immunotherapy have been completed. Here, we review and discuss the effects of targeted anticancer agents on the tumor immune microenvironment and explore their potential repurposed usage in cancer immunotherapy.

Precision neuro-oncology: a pilot analysis of personalized treatment in recurrent glioma

PURPOSE

When brain cancer relapses, treatment options are scarce. The use of molecularly matched targeted therapies may provide a feasible and efficacious way to treat individual patients based on the molecular tumor profile. Since little information is available on this strategy in neuro-oncology, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical course of 41 patients who underwent advanced molecular testing at disease relapse.

METHODS

We performed Sanger sequencing, targeted next generation sequencing, and immunohistochemistry for analysis of potential targets, including programmed death ligand 1, cyclin D1, phosphorylated mechanistic target of rapamycin, telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B deletion, or BRAF-V600E mutation. In selected patients, whole exome sequencing was conducted.

RESULTS

The investigation included 41 patients, of whom 32 had isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype glioblastoma. Molecular analysis revealed actionable targets in 31 of 41 tested patients and 18 patients were treated accordingly (matched therapy group). Twenty-three patients received molecularly unmatched empiric treatment (unmatched therapy group). In both groups, 16 patients were diagnosed with recurrent IDH wildtype glioblastoma. The number of severe adverse events was comparable between the therapy groups. Regarding the IDH wildtype glioblastoma patients, median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were longer in the matched therapy group (mPFS: 3.8 versus 2.0 months, p = 0.0057; mOS: 13.0 versus 4.3 months, p = 0.0357).

CONCLUSION

These encouraging data provide a rationale for molecularly matched targeted therapy in glioma patients. For further validation, future study designs need to additionally consider the prevalence and persistence of actionable molecular alterations in patient tissue.

Norcantharidin overcomes vemurafenib resistance in melanoma by inhibiting pentose phosphate pathway and lipogenesis via downregulating the mTOR pathway

Melanoma is the most aggressive type of skin cancer with a high incidence and low survival rate. More than half of melanomas present the activating BRAF mutations, along which V600E mutant represents 70%–90%. Vemurafenib (Vem) is an FDA-approved small-molecule kinase inhibitor that selectively targets activated BRAF V600E and inhibits its activity. However, the majority of patients treated with Vem develop acquired resistance. Hence, this study aims to explore a new treatment strategy to overcome the Vem resistance. Here, we found that a potential anticancer drug norcantharidin (NCTD) displayed a more significant proliferation inhibitory effect against Vem-resistant melanoma cells (A375R) than the parental melanoma cells (A375), which promised to be a therapeutic agent against BRAF V600E-mutated and acquired Vem-resistant melanoma. The metabolomics analysis showed that NCTD could, especially reverse the upregulation of pentose phosphate pathway and lipogenesis resulting from the Vem resistance. In addition, the transcriptomic analysis showed a dramatical downregulation in genes related to lipid metabolism and mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway in A375R cells, but not in A375 cells, upon NCTD treatment. Moreover, NCTD upregulated butyrophilin (BTN) family genes, which played important roles in modulating T-cell response. Consistently, we found that Vem resistance led to an obvious elevation of the p-mTOR expression, which could be remarkably reduced by NCTD treatment. Taken together, NCTD may serve as a promising therapeutic option to resolve the problem of Vem resistance and to improve patient outcomes by combining with immunomodulatory therapy.

Clinical Activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Targeted Therapies in Patients With Non-V600 BRAF-Mutant Tumors

PURPOSE

Non-V600 mutations comprise approximately 35% of all BRAF mutations in cancer. Many of these mutations have been identified as oncogenic drivers and can be classified into three classes according to molecular characteristics. Consensus treatment strategies for class 2 and 3 BRAF mutations have not yet been established.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with published reports of individual patients with cancer harboring class 2 or 3 BRAF mutations from 2010 to 2021, to assess treatment outcomes with US Food and Drug Administration-approved mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway targeted therapy (MAPK TT) according to BRAF class, cancer type, and MAPK TT type. Coprimary outcomes were response rate and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 18,167 studies were screened, identifying 80 studies with 238 patients who met inclusion criteria. This included 167 patients with class 2 and 71 patients with class 3 BRAF mutations. Overall, 77 patients achieved a treatment response. In both univariate and multivariable analyses, response rate and progression-free survival were higher among patients with class 2 compared with class 3 mutations, findings that remain when analyses are restricted to patients with melanoma or lung primary cancers. MEK ± BRAF inhibitors demonstrated greater clinical activity in class 2 compared with class 3 BRAF-mutant tumors than BRAF or EGFR inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that MAPK TTs have clinical activity in some class 2 and 3 BRAF-mutant cancers. BRAF class may dictate responsiveness to current and emerging treatment strategies, particularly in melanoma and lung cancers. Together, this analysis provides clinical validation of predictions made on the basis of a mutation classification system established in the preclinical literature. Further evaluation with prospective clinical trials is needed for this population.

Case report: response to the ERK1/2 inhibitor ulixertinib in BRAF D594G cutaneous melanoma

Melanoma is characterized by oncogenic mutations in pathways regulating cell growth, proliferation, and metabolism. Greater than 80% of primary melanoma cases harbor aberrant activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (MEK/ERK) pathway, with oncogenic mutations in BRAF, most notably BRAF V600E, being the most common. Significant progress has been made in BRAF-mutant melanoma using BRAF and MEK inhibitors; however, non-V600 BRAF mutations remain a challenge with limited treatment options. We report the case of an individual diagnosed with stage III BRAF D594G-mutant melanoma who experienced an extraordinary response to the ERK1/2 inhibitor ulixertinib as fourth-line therapy. Ulixertinib was obtained via an intermediate expanded access protocol with unique flexibility to permit both single-agent and combination treatments, dose adjustments, breaks in treatment to undergo surgery, and long-term preventive treatment following surgical resection offering this patient the potential for curative treatment.

Precision Medicine of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers: Focusing on Clinical Trial Outcomes

Tumor-agnostic precision medicine employing comprehensive genome profiling (CGP) and using next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been progressing recently. This review focuses on precision medicine for advanced unresectable hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers. In this paper, for biliary tract cancer (BTC), therapies that target several regulators of cancer cell growth, including isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusion, proto-oncogene B-Raf (BRAF), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) alterations, are reviewed. For pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), therapies for Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) gene mutation G12C, neuregulin (NRG)1, and breast cancer type 1 and 2 susceptibility (BRCA1/2), gene alterations are summarized. On the other hand, precision medicine targets were not established for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), tumor protein P53 (TP53), and Wnt/β catenin signaling alterations have been recognized as HCC driver oncogenes. Tumor-agnostic therapies for microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and neurotropic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion cancers effectively treat biliary and pancreatic cancers. Precision medicine methods developed using NGS of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and utilizing a liquid biopsy technique are discussed.

Histological changes associated with laser interstitial thermal therapy for radiation necrosis: illustrative cases

BACKGROUND

Patients with lung cancer and melanoma remain the two largest groups to develop brain metastases. Immunotherapy has been approved for treatment of stage IV disease in both groups. Many of these patients are additionally treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for their brain metastases during ongoing immunotherapy. Use of immunotherapy has been reported to increase the rates of radiation necrosis (RN) after radiosurgery, causing neurological compromise due to growth of the enhancing lesion as well as worsening of associated cerebral edema.

OBSERVATIONS

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a surgical approach that has been shown effective in the management of RN, especially given its efficacy in early reduction of perilesional edema. However, little remains known about the pathology of the post-LITT lesions and how LITT works in this condition. Here, we present two patients who needed surgical decompression after LITT for RN. Clinical, histopathological, and imaging features of both patients are presented.

LESSONS

Criteria for selecting the best patients with RN for LITT therapy remains unclear. Given two similarly sized lesions and not too dissimilar clinical histories but with differing outcomes, further investigation is clearly needed to identify predictors of response to LITT in the setting of SRS and immunotherapy-induced RN.

CCND1 Amplification Profiling Identifies a Subtype of Melanoma Associated With Poor Survival and an Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment

Background

Although melanoma is generally regarded as an immunogenic cancer that will respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), melanomas with CCND1 amplification respond poorly to these therapies. Further understanding how CCND1 amplification impacts the effectiveness of ICI therapy is important for the design of future clinical trials.

Methods

We used data from tumor samples taken from Chinese patients with melanoma analyzed at the Geneplus Institute (n=302), as well as data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (n=367) and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) database (n=350) to estimate the prevalence of CCND1 amplification in melanoma, interrogate the relationship between CCND1 amplification and survival in patients with melanoma, and explore the molecular mechanisms of CCND1 amplification. We also established a murine model of melanoma harboring CCND1 amplification and utilized RNA-seq to verify the findings from human tissue samples.

Results

Data from all three sources revealed a low frequency of CCND1 amplification co-occurring with BRAF V600, NRAS, NF1, and KIT mutations. Data from TCGA did not show a statistically significant correlation between CCND1 amplification and prognosis, irrespective of ICI use. In contrast, the MSKCC cohort showed that CCND1 amplification was an unfavorable prognostic factor for patients with melanoma, especially for patients who received ICIs and had a high tumor mutation burden (TMB). The TCGA data showed that CCND1 amplification was associated with a higher proportion of immunosuppressive cells (Treg cells and M2 macrophages) and a lower proportion of immune boosting cells (follicular helper T cells naïve B cells, CD8+ T cells). Murine models supported the association between a suppressive immune microenvironment and CCND1 amplification; tumors with CCND1 amplification had reduced mRNA expression of CD8, Gzm, B2m and Tap1, significantly higher proportions of resting CD4 memory T cells and significantly lower proportions of plasma cells, CD8 T cells, and T follicular helper cells. Furthermore, a Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) analysis of data from the TCGA database suggested that signaling pathways involved in oxidative phosphorylation, reactive oxygen species, adipogenesis, fatty acid metabolism, DNA repair, and Myc targets were differentially enriched in melanoma tumors with CCND1 amplification. Finally, we observed a notable reduction in levels of angiogenesis-related molecules (encoded by HIF1A, VEGFA, VEGFR1, FGF2, FGFR1, FGFR4, HGF, PDGFA, PDGFRA, ANGPT1, and ANGPT2) in a high CCND1 amplification group from the TCGA database.

Conclusions

Melanoma with CCND1 amplification is an independent genomic subtype associated with a poor prognosis, an immunosuppressive TME, activated oxidative and lipid metabolism, and down-regulated angiogenesis. Therefore, avoiding ICIs and antiangiogenic agents, while employing CDK4/6 inhibitors alone or in combination with ICIs, and targeting oxidative and lipid metabolism pathways, may be effective therapeutic strategies for melanoma patients harboring CCND1 amplification.

Cancer Immunotherapy and Uveitis: Balancing Anti-Tumor Immunity and Ocular Autoimmunity

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies are two classes of pharmacologic therapies used to treat metastatic malignancy by amplifying the immune system activity against cancerous cells. However, these drugs can consequently cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Albeit rare, cases of ocular IRAEs occurring among patients taking these drugs have been documented in literature, including a spectrum of uveitis findings. The classes of immune checkpoint inhibitors explored here include anti-CTLA4 (ipilimumab), anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and anti-PDL-1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab). Targeted therapies include the MEK inhibitors (trametinib) and BRAF enzyme inhibitors (dabrafenib, vemurafenib), both of which are involved in the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway responsible for cell proliferation. Reported cases of ocular irAEs caused by these drugs include anterior uveitis, posterior uveitis, panuveitis, and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH)-like syndrome. Treatment can be determined on a case-by-case basis and depending on the severity of the irAE, may include temporary cessation of the offending drug, local corticosteroids, or systemic corticosteroids. Although the mechanism by which these ocular toxicities occur is not clearly elucidated, it is hypothesized that they are secondary to increased activity of auto-reactive T-cells. Further investigation into mechanisms underlying these inflammatory findings are relevant for cancer targeting, as well as insights into ocular autoimmune diseases.

The efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade for melanoma in-transit with or without nodal metastases - A multicenter cohort study

PURPOSE

Guidelines addressing melanoma in-transit metastasis (ITM) recommend immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as a first-line treatment option, despite the fact that there are no efficacy data available from prospective trials for exclusively ITM disease. The study aims to analyze the outcome of patients with ITM treated with ICI based on data from a large cohort of patients treated at international referral clinics.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients treated between January 2015 and December 2020 from Australia, Europe, and the USA, evaluating treatment with ICI for ITM with or without nodal involvement (AJCC8 N1c, N2c, and N3c) and without distant disease (M0). Treatment was with PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and/or CTLA-4 inhibitor (ipilimumab). The response was evaluated according to the RECIST criteria modified for cutaneous lesions.

RESULTS

A total of 287 patients from 21 institutions in eight countries were included. Immunotherapy was first-line treatment in 64 (22%) patients. PD-1 or CTLA-4 inhibitor monotherapy was given in 233 (81%) and 23 (8%) patients, respectively, while 31 (11%) received both in combination. The overall response rate was 56%, complete response (CR) rate was 36%, and progressive disease (PD) rate was 32%. Median PFS was ten months (95% CI 7.4-12.6 months) with a one-, two-, and five-year PFS rate of 48%, 33%, and 18%, respectively. Median MSS was not reached, and the one-, two-, and five-year MSS rates were 95%, 83%, and 71%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Systemic immunotherapy is an effective treatment for melanoma ITM. Future studies should evaluate the role of systemic immunotherapy in the context of multimodality therapy, including locoregional treatments such as surgery, intralesional therapy, and regional therapies.

Safety of combining dabrafenib plus trametinib in elderly BRAF V600 mutation-positive advanced melanoma patients: real-world data analysis of Spanish patients (ELDERLYMEL)

Efficacy and safety of dabrafenib and trametinib in metastatic melanoma have been demonstrated in two-phase III and one-phase I/II clinical trials. However, patients at least 75 years old (y.o.) were largely underrepresented. Additionally, the safety profile of dabrafenib and trametinib based on age is unknown. ELDERLYMEL is a retrospective noninterventional multicenter study, describing the effectiveness and safety of at least 75 y.o. patients compared with less than 75 y.o. patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutated melanoma treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib or dabrafenib monotherapy. A total of 159 patients were included, 130 less than 75 y.o. and 29 at least 75 y.o. Clinical features were similar between the groups, except in the number of comorbidities, number of metastatic sites, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and BRAF V600-mutation type. Five patients per group received dabrafenib monotherapy. There were no differences in adverse events (AEs) rate or grade between the groups. However, AE profiles were different between the groups, being pyrexia infrequent in patients at least 75 y.o. (13.8% vs. 42.3%; P = 0.005). Dabrafenib and trametinib dose intensities were lower in at least 75 y.o. patients (P = 0.018 and P = 0.020), but there were no differences in effectiveness between the groups. Finally, in a multivariate analysis, sex (female) was the only variable independently associated with an increased risk of AE grade ≥3. Data from the ELDERLYMEL study demonstrate that dabrafenib plus trametinib is safe and effective in at least 75 y.o. patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutated melanoma without increasing toxicity. Additionally, we describe a different safety profile depending on age and sex.

Acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors is mediated by BRAF splicing variants in BRAF V600E mutation-positive colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), a poorly differentiated subtype of neuroendocrine neoplasms, are aggressive and have a poor prognosis. Colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas (CRC-NECs) are observed in about 0.6% of all patients with CRC. Interestingly, patients with CRC-NECs show higher frequencies of BRAF mutation than typical CRC. BRAF V600E mutation-positive CRC-NECs were shown to be sensitive to BRAF inhibitors and now are treated by BRAF inhibitors. Similar to the other BRAF V600E mutated cancers, resistances against BRAF inhibitors have been observed, but the resistance mechanisms are still unclear. In this study, we established BRAF V600E mutated CRC-NEC cell line directly from surgical specimens and experimentally obtained BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib resistant cell lines. The resistant cells are revealed to express at least three types of BRAF splicing variants harboring V600E-mutation, and contribute to RAF/MEK/ERK pathway activation. In these cells, MEK and ERK inhibitors but not dabrafenib significantly suppressed cell growth and survival. Thus, in BRAF V600E mutation-positive CRC-NECs, BRAF splicing variants activate the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and contribute to acquire BRAF inhibitor resistance. Hence, MEK or ERK are potential therapeutic targets to overcome BRAF resistance.

Combination of Whole-Body Baseline CT Radiomics and Clinical Parameters to Predict Response and Survival in a Stage-IV Melanoma Cohort Undergoing Immunotherapy

Simple Summary

The use of immunotherapeutic agents significantly improved stage-IV melanoma patients’ overall progression-free survival. To identify patients who do not benefit from immunotherapy, both clinical parameters and experimental biomarkers such as radiomics are currently being evaluated. However, no radiomic biomarker is widely accepted for routine clinical use. In a large cohort of 262 stage-IV melanoma patients given first-line immunotherapy treatment, we investigated whether radiomics—based on the segmentation of all baseline metastases in the whole body—in combination with clinical parameters offered added value compared to the usage of clinical parameters alone in a machine-learning prediction model. The primary endpoints were response at three months, and survival rates at six and twelve months. The study indicated a potential, but non-significant, added value of radiomics for six-month and twelve-month survival prediction, thus underlining the relevance of clinical parameters.

Abstract

Background: This study investigated whether a machine-learning-based combination of radiomics and clinical parameters was superior to the use of clinical parameters alone in predicting therapy response after three months, and overall survival after six and twelve months, in stage-IV malignant melanoma patients undergoing immunotherapy with PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors and CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: A random forest model using clinical parameters (demographic variables and tumor markers = baseline model) was compared to a random forest model using clinical parameters and radiomics (extended model) via repeated 5-fold cross-validation. For this purpose, the baseline computed tomographies of 262 stage-IV malignant melanoma patients treated at a tertiary referral center were identified in the Central Malignant Melanoma Registry, and all visible metastases were three-dimensionally segmented (n = 6404). Results: The extended model was not significantly superior compared to the baseline model for survival prediction after six and twelve months (AUC (95% CI): 0.664 (0.598, 0.729) vs. 0.620 (0.545, 0.692) and AUC (95% CI): 0.600 (0.526, 0.667) vs. 0.588 (0.481, 0.629), respectively). The extended model was not significantly superior compared to the baseline model for response prediction after three months (AUC (95% CI): 0.641 (0.581, 0.700) vs. 0.656 (0.587, 0.719)). Conclusions: The study indicated a potential, but non-significant, added value of radiomics for six-month and twelve-month survival prediction of stage-IV melanoma patients undergoing immunotherapy.

Double Trouble: Immunotherapy Doublets in Melanoma-Approved and Novel Combinations to Optimize Treatment in Advanced Melanoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly anti-PD-1-based immune checkpoint inhibitors, have dramatically improved outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma and are currently deemed a standard of care. Ipilimumab/nivolumab is the first combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors to improve progression-free survival and overall survival in the first-line setting, with durable responses and the longest median overall survival, 72.1 months, of any drug therapy approved for advanced melanoma. However, its use is limited by the high rate of severe (grade 3-4) treatment-related adverse events. More recently, the novel immune checkpoint inhibitor combination of nivolumab/relatlimab (anti-PD-1/anti-LAG3) showed improved progression-free survival compared with nivolumab alone in the first-line setting and was well tolerated; thus, it is likely this combination will be added to the armamentarium as a first-line treatment for advanced melanoma. These changes in the treatment landscape have several treatment implications for decision-making. The choice of first-line systemic drug therapy, and the decision between immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy, requires a comprehensive assessment of disease-related factors and patient characteristics. Despite this striking progress, many patients' disease still progresses. Several new agents and therapeutic approaches are under investigation in clinical trials. Intralesional treatments hold promise for accessible metastases, although their broad application in the clinic will be limited. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers, as well as strategies to reduce treatment-related toxicities and overcome resistance, are required and are now the focus of clinical and translational research.

Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy (NAST) in Patients with Melanoma: Surgical Considerations by the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium (INMC)

Exciting advances in melanoma systemic therapies have presented the opportunity for surgical oncologists and their multidisciplinary colleagues to test the neoadjuvant systemic treatment approach in high-risk, resectable metastatic melanomas. Here we describe the state of the science of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) for melanoma, focusing on the surgical aspects and the key role of the surgical oncologist in this treatment paradigm. This paper summarizes the past decade of developments in melanoma treatment and the current evidence for NAST in stage III melanoma specifically. Issues of surgical relevance are discussed, including the risk of progression on NAST prior to surgery. Technical aspects, such as the definition of resectability for melanoma and the extent and scope of routine surgery are presented. Other important issues, such as the utility of radiographic response evaluation and method of pathologic response evaluation, are addressed. Surgical complications and perioperative management of NAST related adverse events are considered. The International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium has the goal of harmonizing NAST trials in melanoma to facilitate rapid advances with new approaches, and facilitating the comparison of results across trials evaluating different treatment regimens. Our ultimate goals are to provide definitive proof of the safety and efficacy of NAST in melanoma, sufficient for NAST to become an acceptable standard of care, and to leverage this platform to allow more personalized, biomarker-driven, tailored approaches to subsequent treatment and surveillance.

STARBOARD: encorafenib + binimetinib + pembrolizumab for first-line metastatic/unresectable BRAF V600-mutant melanoma

Despite the significant progress in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma, there remains two primary treatment options: targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Targeted therapy or immunotherapy alone is associated with efficacy limitations including efficacy limited to select patient subsets. With separate mechanisms of action and different response patterns, the combination of targeted agents and immunotherapy to treat patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma may further improve patient outcomes. Current treatment guidelines recommend treatment with targeted agents alone, immunotherapy, or the combination of targeted agents and immunotherapy. The randomized, double-blind STARBOARD trial aims to evaluate efficacy and safety of encorafenib, binimetinib and pembrolizumab in treatment-naive patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma in comparison to pembrolizumab.

Prevalence and Clinicopathologic Features of Canine Metastatic Melanoma Involving the Central Nervous System: A Retrospective Analysis and Comparative Review

Background

Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is the leading cause of death in malignant melanoma. Rodent models, while vital to mechanistic investigation, have had limited success identifying effective therapies for melanoma brain metastases. The companion dog with de novo melanoma is a promising complementary model for developmental therapeutic investigation, as these tumors occur in an immunologically outbred host that has shared environmental exposures with humans. However, relatively little is known regarding the prevalence and clinicopathological features of canine melanoma metastasis to the CNS. To further validate the dog as an appropriate model for human metastatic melanoma, the aims of this study were to determine the rate of CNS metastasis and associated clinicopathologic features in canine malignant melanoma.

Methods

Medical records of dogs diagnosed with malignant melanoma from 1985-2019 at the University of California Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital were assessed retrospectively. Clinicopathologic features were compared between dogs with CNS metastasis (CNS+) and dogs without CNS metastasis (CNS-). Site of CNS involvement and associated neurological signs were analyzed via Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney rank sum and Fisher’s exact tests. Survival data were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Results

CNS metastasis was identified in 38% of dogs in this study (20/53). The oral cavity was the most common site of primary melanoma in both groups [CNS+: n=12 (60%) vs. CNS-: n=22 (67%); p>0.99]. The total burden of metastatic disease was higher in the CNS+ group (CNS+: 4, 95% CI 3-5 vs. CNS-: 3, 95% CI 1-3; p<0.001). The cerebrum was the most common site of CNS metastasis (n=15, 75%) and seizures were the most observed neurological sign (n=9, 64%). There was no difference in overall survival between CNS+ and CNS- groups. However, the median survival time following onset of neurological signs was 9.5 days (95% CI 1-43), with 5 dogs euthanized within 24 hours of the onset of neurological signs.

Conclusions

Canine and human MM patients share similar rates of CNS metastasis and clinical presentation. This study will guide clinical management of canines with malignant melanoma and inform future studies using dogs with spontaneously occurring melanoma as a preclinical model for human melanoma brain metastases.

Acceptability of Drugs in the Treatment of Unresectable/Metastatic BRAF V600-Mutant Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background

Although many novel regimens have entered the treatment paradigm for unresectable/metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma, there is still a lack of head-to-head comparison in terms of security. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the risk of adverse events (AEs) across different treatments and to provide an acceptability ranking for patients.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted in Embase, PubMed, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Clinical Trials.gov with a time frame from database inception to December 24, 2021. We retrieved evidence on the cumulative incidence of any-grade AEs means grades 1-5 AEs (regardless of severity) and severe AEs based on the pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% credible intervals (95% CrI).

Results

Twelve publications and thirteen treatments enrolling 5,803 patients were included. For any-grade AEs, the acceptability of combined dabrafenib and trametinib is superior to the combination of vemurafenib and cobimetinib (RR: 0.94; Crl: 0.89, 0.98). Furthermore, nivolumab combined with ipilimumab increases any-grade AEs than single-agent ipilimumab (RR: 0.90; Crl: 0.83, 0.96) or nivolumab (RR: 0.90; Crl: 0.84, 0.97). For severe AEs, dabrafenib has the best acceptability than single-agent vemurafenib (RR: 0.66; Crl: 0.50, 0.87) or encorafenib (RR: 0.64; Crl: 0.43, 0.94). In addition, ipilimumab (SUCRA: 0.87) ranks first in the acceptability for any-grade AEs, and nivolumab (SUCRA: 0.95) ranks first in the acceptability for severe AEs. The ranking of the combination of vemurafenib and cobimetinib (SUCRA: 0.66) is superior to encorafenib in combination with binimetinib (SUCRA: 0.39) and combination of vemurafenib and cobimetinib (SUCRA: 0.18).

Conclusions

We identified the lowest AE risk treatment options for BRAF V600-mutant melanoma patients. In general, immunotherapy (ipilimumab or nivolumab) has better acceptability than most targeted therapies, and triplet therapies are related with the worst acceptability. Moreover, single-agent dabrafenib can be used as the first choice in monotherapy, and the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib is the preferred combination therapy. Overall, the combination of immunotherapy drugs increases any-grade and severe AEs than a single agent, whereas the condition of targeted therapy drugs cannot be simply generalized. Therefore, this information can facilitate evidence-based decision-making and support optimizing treatment and outcomes in clinical practice.

Potential Biomarkers of Skin Melanoma Resistance to Targeted Therapy—Present State and Perspectives

Simple Summary

Around 5–10% of advanced melanoma patients progress early on anti-BRAF targeted therapy and 20–30% respond only with the stabilization of the disease. Presumably, these patients could benefit more from first-line immunotherapy. Resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors is generated by genetic and non-genetic factors inherent to a tumor or acquired during therapy. Some of them are well documented as a cause of treatment failure. They are potential predictive markers that could improve patients’ selection for both standard and also alternative therapy as some of them have therapeutic potential. Here, a summary of the most promising predictive and therapeutic targets is presented. This up-to-date knowledge may be useful for further study on implementing more accurate genetic/molecular tests in melanoma treatment.

Abstract

Melanoma is the most aggressive skin cancer, the number of which is increasing worldwide every year. It is completely curable in its early stage and fatal when spread to distant organs. In addition to new therapeutic strategies, biomarkers are an important element in the successful fight against this cancer. At present, biomarkers are mainly used in diagnostics. Some biological indicators also allow the estimation of the patient’s prognosis. Still, predictive markers are underrepresented in clinics. Currently, the only such indicator is the presence of the V600E mutation in the BRAF gene in cancer cells, which qualifies the patient for therapy with inhibitors of the MAPK pathway. The identification of response markers is particularly important given primary and acquired resistance to targeted therapies. Reliable predictive tests would enable the selection of patients who would have the best chance of benefiting from treatment. Here, up-to-date knowledge about the most promising genetic and non-genetic resistance-related factors is described. These are alterations in MAPK, PI3K/AKT, and RB signaling pathways, e.g., due to mutations in NRAS, RAC1, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, and NF1, but also other changes activating these pathways, such as the overexpression of HGF or EGFR. Most of them are also potential therapeutic targets and this issue is also addressed here.

Long-term non-invasive drug treatments in adult zebrafish that lead to melanoma drug resistance

Zebrafish embryos are widely used for drug discovery, however, administering drugs to adult zebrafish is limited by current protocols that can cause stress. Here, we developed a drug formulation and administration method for adult zebrafish by producing food-based drug pellets that are consumed voluntarily. We applied this to zebrafish with BRAF-mutant melanoma, a model that has significantly advanced our understanding of melanoma progression, but not of drug resistance due to the limitations of current treatment methods. Zebrafish with melanomas responded to short-term, precise and daily dosing with drug pellets made with the BRAFV600E inhibitor, vemurafenib. On-target drug efficacy was determined by phospho-Erk staining. Continued drug treatment led to the emergence, for the first time in zebrafish, of acquired drug resistance and melanoma relapse, modelling the responses seen in melanoma patients. This method presents a controlled, non-invasive approach that permits long-term drug studies and can be widely applied to adult zebrafish models.

Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between the MEK1/MEK2 Inhibitor Trametinib and Oral Contraceptives Containing Norethindrone and Ethinyl Estradiol in Female Patients With Solid Tumors

This phase 1 postapproval study assessed the effect of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase enzyme 1/enzyme 2 inhibitor trametinib (2 mg once daily, repeat dosing) on the pharmacokinetics of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing norethindrone (NE; 1 mg daily) and ethinyl estradiol (EE; 0.035 mg daily) in 19 female patients with solid tumors. Compared with NE/EE administered without trametinib, NE/EE administered with steady-state trametinib was associated with a clinically nonrelevant 20% increase in NE exposure (area under the curve [AUC]) and no effect on EE exposure (geometric mean ratio [geo-mean] of NE/EE + trametinib to NE/EE [90%CI]: NE AUC calculated to the end of a dosing interval at steady-state [AUCtau ] 1.20 [1.02-1.41]; NE AUC from time zero to the last measurable concentration sampling time [AUClast ] 1.2 [0.999-1.45]; EE AUCtau 1.06 [0.923-1.22]; EE AUClast 1.05 [0.883-1.25]). Maximum serum concentration (Cmax ) of NE increased by 13% and Cmax of EE decreased by 8.5% when dosed with steady-state trametinib compared with COCs administered alone (geo-mean ratio [90%CI]: NE Cmax 1.13 [0.933-1.36]; EE Cmax 0.915 [0.803-1.04]). These results indicate that repeat-dose trametinib does not lower exposure to NE or EE and, hence, is unlikely to impact the contraceptive efficacy of COCs. The pharmacokinetic parameters of trametinib and its metabolite M5 were consistent with historic data of trametinib alone. Coadministration of trametinib and COCs was generally well tolerated in this study, with observed safety signals consistent with the known safety profile of trametinib and no new reported safety events. Overall, the findings indicate that hormonal COCs can be coadministered in female patients who receive trametinib monotherapy without compromising the contraceptive efficacy.