Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria who remain symptomatic on H1 antihistamines: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

Antihistamine-resistant chronic spontaneous urticaria: 1-year data from the AWARE study

BACKGROUND

Previous reports indicate that patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) are undertreated and that physicians show poor adherence to guideline recommendations. Awareness of CSU has improved in recent years, but it remains unclear if this has improved the management of these patients in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To describe disease burden, quality of life (QoL), and treatment patterns of patients with H₁ -antihistamine-refractory CSU in Germany.

METHOD

A World-wide Antihistamine-Refractory chronic urticaria (CU) patient Evaluation (AWARE) is a global prospective, non-interventional study of CU in the real-world setting, supported by the manufacturer of omalizumab. Patients (18-75 years) were included who had H₁ -antihistamine-refractory CSU for ≥2 months. Disease characteristics, pharmacological treatments, and QoL (dermatology life quality index [DLQI], CU-QoL questionnaire, and angioedema QoL questionnaire) are reported for patients enrolled in Germany.

RESULTS

After 1 year in AWARE, CSU remained uncontrolled (urticaria control test [UCT] score <12) in 432 of 1032 (42.2%) patients. QoL impairment remained high after 1 year, with 28.2% of patients reporting that CSU had a moderate/very large/extremely large effect on the DLQI. Most patients did not receive guideline-recommended treatments at the end of the 1-year observation period. Changes in treatments were most evident at the first patient visit, with an increase in patients receiving omalizumab vs prior therapy from 8.5% to 21.4%, and a decrease in those receiving no treatment from 29.9% to 12.8%. These changes were associated with reduced hives, angioedema, UCT scores, and QoL scores at Month 3, but only modest improvements thereafter. Of 528 patients with uncontrolled CSU and who were eligible for treatment escalation, only 3% received up-dosing of H₁ -antihistamines and only 5% were initiated on omalizumab during 1 year of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS & CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study highlights a significant discrepancy between recommendations for managing CSU in international guidelines, and in real-world clinical practice in Germany.

Predictors of response to omalizumab and relapse in chronic spontaneous urticaria: a study of 470 patients

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is defined as spontaneous occurrence of wheals and/or angioedema for ≥6 weeks. Omalizumab is a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody effective in refractory CSU, but its mechanism of action and markers predictive of response remain not completely defined.

OBJECTIVES

To correlate baseline levels of two proposed biomarkers, total IgE (bIgE) and d-dimer (bd-dimer), and clinical parameters to omalizumab response and to relapses after drug withdrawal.

METHODS

In this retrospective Italian multicentre study, clinical data were collected in 470 CSU patients, and bIgE and bd-dimer were measured in 340 and 342 patients, respectively. Disease activity was determined by Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7) at week 1 and 12 after omalizumab starting. Relapses were evaluated during a 2- and 3-month interval after a first and a second course of treatment, respectively.

RESULTS

bIgE correlated to a good response to omalizumab since levels were significantly higher in responders than non-responders (P = 0.0002). Conversely, bd-dimer did not correlate to response. There was no correlation between both bIgE and d-dimer and either first or second relapse. Disease duration was significantly longer in patients who experienced either first or second relapse (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0105, respectively), while baseline UAS7 correlated only to first relapse (P = 0.0023).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms bIgE as a reliable biomarker predicting response to omalizumab in CSU, while it does not support the usefulness of bd-dimer unlike previous findings. CSU duration before omalizumab and baseline UAS7 may be clinical markers of relapse risk.

Down-titration of omalizumab in a patient with chronic spontaneous urticaria

Background: Omalizumab was demonstrated to be effective in patients with chronic urticaria resistant to antihistamines and is recommended as an add-on, third line treatment for such subjects. Patient and results: This article reports the history of a patient affected by chronic spontaneous urticaria, unresponsive to antihistamines, who received omalizumab, according to a personalized schedule. Prolonged administration of low dosage drug provided a good and long-lasting control of symptoms. Conclusion: This experience suggests that omalizumab could be used at low dose, with personalized plans, to reduce the risk of adverse events and costs of treatment.

Real-World Characteristics and Treatment Patterns in Patients with Urticaria Initiating Omalizumab in the United States

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab is indicated for the management of chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) in patients aged 12 years or older with persistent hives that are not adequately controlled by H1 antihistamines. While its safety and efficacy in CIU patients have been evaluated in multiple clinical trials, real-world use of omalizaumab in CIU has not been well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To assess demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of CIU patients who initiated omalizumab to better understand the usage of this agent in CIU management in the real world.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used medical and pharmacy claims data in the United States from the HealthCore Integrated Database to identify patients with CIU newly treated with omalizumab (≥ 4 omalizumab claims within 6 months of the initial claim) between March 21, 2014, and October 31, 2015 (study intake period). The index date was defined as the date of the first claim for omalizumab during the study intake period. Demographic and clinical characteristics were described for patients treated with omalizumab, as were treatment patterns associated with omalizumab and concomitant medications associated with CIU treatment. Descriptive and inferential statistics were reported. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to examine omalizumab treatment patterns.

RESULTS

This study included 298 omalizumab-treated patients (mean [SD] age of 43.5 [13.64] years; 70.8% female); approximately 84% were seen by an allergist/immunologist. All patients had ≥ 12 months of continuous enrolment and a subset of 138 patients had ≥ 18 months of follow-up. For patients with ≥ 12 months of post-index follow-up, 12.1% (n = 36), 28.5% (n = 85), and 32.9% (n = 98) discontinued omalizumab within the 6-month, 12-month, and the entire post-index periods (mean 530 days), respectively; the mean number of days patients were continuously treated with omalizumab was 443.1 (95% CI = 425.0-461.3); the probabilities of continuous treatment (95% CI) were 0.879 (0.836-0.911), 0.711 (0.656-0.759), and 0.647 (0.585-0.703) for the 6-, 12-, and 18-month post-index periods, respectively. For the 98 patients who discontinued omalizumab during the entire post-index period, 28.6% restarted omalizumab after the first discontinuation within the post-index period (mean time from first discontinuation to first restart=329 days). Use of medications such as oral corticosteroids, montelukast, cyclosporine, and prescription H1 and H2 antihistamines decreased during the 1- to 6-month and 7- to 12-month post-index periods compared with those within the 6-month pre-index period.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of CIU patients who were newly prescribed omalizumab, the majority were treated by allergists/immunologists as expected, and approximately 60% of patients continued on therapy beyond 18 months. Concomitant medication use decreased after omalizumab initiation. These data on the real-world use of omalizumab for CIU may help to better inform decision-making processes for health care payers by quantifying omalizumab and concomitant medication treatment patterns over a longer time frame relative to previous studies.

DISCLOSURES

This study was sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals, which provided funding support for the conduct of the study. Kavati, Ortiz, and Paknis are employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Ke, Wertz, Huang, Wang, Willey, and Stephenson are employees of HealthCore, an independent research organization that received funding from Novartis Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this study. Beck is an employee of the University of Rochester Medical Center, who was under contract with Novartis Pharmaceuticals to provide consulting services to this study, and reports grants from Genentech, outside the currently submitted work. Bernstein is affiliated with Bernstein Clinical Research Center, which was under contract with Novartis Pharmaceuticals to provide consulting services to this study, and reports receiving grants and personal fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals, grants and personal fees from Genentech outside of the submitted work, and is an author on the Joint Task Force for Practice Parameters for Urticaria and the GALEN international guidelines for urticaria under preparation. Selected study data were presented in a poster at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) 22nd Annual International Meeting on May 20-24, 2017, in Boston, MA. A poster based on this dataset was presented at the 2017 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI) Annual Scientific Meeting on October 26-30, 2017, in Boston, MA.

Efficacy of Treatment of Non-hereditary Angioedema

Non-hereditary angioedema (AE) with normal C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH) can be presumably bradykinin- or mast cell-mediated, or of unknown cause. In this systematic review, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus to provide an overview of the efficacy of different treatment options for the abovementioned subtypes of refractory non-hereditary AE with or without wheals and with normal C1INH. After study selection and risk of bias assessment, 61 articles were included for data extraction and analysis. Therapies were described for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced AE (ACEi-AE), for idiopathic AE, and for AE with wheals. Described treatments consisted of ecallantide, icatibant, C1INH, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), tranexamic acid (TA), and omalizumab. Additionally, individual studies for anti-vitamin K, progestin, and methotrexate were found. Safety information was available in 26 articles. Most therapies were used off-label and in few patients. There is a need for additional studies with a high level of evidence. In conclusion, in acute attacks of ACEi-AE and idiopathic AE, treatment with icatibant, C1INH, TA, and FFP often leads to symptom relief within 2 h, with limited side effects. For prophylactic treatment of idiopathic AE and AE with wheals, omalizumab, TA, and C1INH were effective and safe in the majority of patients.

Algorithm for Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria with Omalizumab

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pivotal trials with omalizumab for treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) are generally run over 12 to 24weeks. However, in clinical practice, many patients need longer treatment. In this article, we present an algorithm for treatment with omalizumab.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The consensus document we present is the result of a series of meetings by the CSU working group of "Xarxa d'Urticària Catalana i Balear" (XUrCB) at which data from the recent literature were presented, discussed, compared, and agreed upon.

RESULTS

Treatment with omalizumab should be initiated at the authorized dose, and is adjusted at 3-monthly intervals according to the Urticaria Activity Score Over 7days, the Urticaria Control Test, or both.

CONCLUSIONS

The algorithm proposed is designed to provide guidance on how to adjust omalizumab doses, how and when to discontinue the drug, and how to reintroduce it in cases of relapse.

The effect of omalizumab treatment on IgE and other immunoglobulin levels in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria and its association with treatment response

Introduction

Suppression of free immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels and an increase in total IgE levels are observed during omalizumab treatment. However, whether omalizumab has any effect on other immunoglobulins is unknown.

Aim

To investigate the effect of omalizumab treatment on serum IgE and other immunoglobulins, and demonstrate any association with response to treatment in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU).

Material and methods

The study included 41 patients diagnosed with CSU. Baseline and post-12-week-treatment total IgE, IgA, IgM, and IgG levels and blood eosinophil, neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet levels were compared. Patients were grouped based on weekly urticaria activity score (UAS-7) responses and these parameters were compared.

Results

There was a significant increase in baseline and post-12-week-treatment total IgE levels, while there was no significant difference in other immunoglobulin levels. A significant reduction was found in neutrophil counts after the treatment, whereas there was no significant difference in eosinophil, lymphocyte and platelet levels. There was no difference in these parameters between groups with complete response and without complete response.

Conclusions

Omalizumab treatment can also be used in patients with immunoglobulin deficiency. Due to the observed reduction in neutrophil counts after the treatment, patients must be closely followed for whole blood parameters.

The EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria

This evidence- and consensus-based guideline was developed following the methods recommended by Cochrane and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group. The conference was held on 1 December 2016. It is a joint initiative of the Dermatology Section of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the EU-founded network of excellence, the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA²LEN), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and the World Allergy Organization (WAO) with the participation of 48 delegates of 42 national and international societies. This guideline was acknowledged and accepted by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). Urticaria is a frequent, mast cell-driven disease, presenting with wheals, angioedema, or both. The lifetime prevalence for acute urticaria is approximately 20%. Chronic spontaneous urticaria and other chronic forms of urticaria are disabling, impair quality of life and affect performance at work and school. This guideline covers the definition and classification of urticaria, taking into account the recent progress in identifying its causes, eliciting factors and pathomechanisms. In addition, it outlines evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for the different subtypes of urticaria.

Omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria: Efficacy, safety, predictors of treatment outcome, and time to response

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab is a recombinant anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody used in the treatment of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU).

OBJECTIVE

This multicentric study assessed the safety and efficacy of omalizumab in patients (n=322) with CSU refractory to second-generation antihistamines, also investigating predictors of poor treatment outcome and time lag to response to anti-IgE therapy by serum auto-reactivity.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study comprised a 4-week pretreatment period, a 24-week treatment period with omalizumab (300 mg/month), and a 16-week follow-up period. Primary efficacy endpoints were mean and median change in 7-day urticaria activity score (UAS7), weekly itch severity score (ISS), and hive score from baseline to 4-, 12-, and 24-week values. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients (defined "responders") with well-controlled urticaria (UAS7 ≤ 6) and complete treatment response (UAS7=0). Safety in terms of side effects was also assessed.

RESULTS

Omalizumab significantly and consistently reduced the mean UAS7, ISS, and hive score from baseline to weeks 4, 12, and 24, with a clear decreasing trend over time. At the end of the treatment period (week 24), 84.2% of patients had a UAS7 score of 6 or less and 66.7% had a UAS7 of 0. Higher pretreatment IgE levels were less likely to be associated with poor treatment response (ie, UAS7 > 6). Patients with a positive autologus serum skin test (ASST) were significantly more likely to be "slow responders" to omalizumab treatment (ie, response beyond 8 days since omalizumab administration) than ASST-negative patients (P < .001). No treatment-related adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Monitoring baseline characteristics of patients before introduction of omalizumab therapy may help to predict treatment outcome in CSU patients.

Effectiveness of omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria assessed with patient-reported outcomes: a prospective study

AIM

To examine the effectiveness of omalizumab (anti-IgE) on symptoms and disease-related quality of life in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and to identify possible patient-specific factors associated with response to omalizumab in patients with antihistamine refractory CSU.

METHODS

Six months prospective trial of omalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks among patients with CSU from a dermatological university department. The primary outcome was the urticaria activity score in the past week (UAS7) at 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients (39 men and 78 women) with a mean age of 42 years were included. The mean baseline UAS7 score was 29.3 points (SD = 10.8), which improved to 11.9 points (SD = 12.9) at 3 months follow-up, difference = 17.4 points (95% CI: 14.8-19.9), P < 0.0001. Other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) also improved significantly during 3 months of treatment. No significant further improvement was seen between three and 6 months follow-up. None of the following patient-specific factors: sex, age, age of onset of CSU, symptom duration, presence of chronic inducible urticaria (CINDU), comorbidities, positive urticaria HR test, smoking, ethnicity, angio-oedema, serum total IgE level, CRP, leucocytes, absolute neutrophil count or previous treatment with prednisolone or montelukast were significantly associated with response to omalizumab at 3 months, P > 0.05 for all comparisons. Previous treatment with traditional immunosuppressant drugs (azathioprine, cyclosporine or methotrexate) was associated with poorer treatment response to omalizumab at 3 months, P < 0.001. A strong correlation was seen between different patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline and 3 months follow-up. Fifteen patients (12.8%) reported side-effects of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Omalizumab is a highly effective therapy for antihistamine refractory CSU with treatment effects similar to those observed in randomized controlled trials. Validated PROs to assess disease activity, disease control and impairment of quality of life are valuable tools in the clinical management of CSU. Identification of patient-specific predictors of effect and safety of omalizumab in CSU is still warranted.

Critical appraisal of the unmet needs in the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria with omalizumab: an Italian perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The humanized anti-IgE antibody omalizumab has been available for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in Italy since 2015. This review summarizes the unresolved issues and unmet therapeutic needs associated with omalizumab and discusses practical recommendations for its use in the management of CSU.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although modern second-generation H1-antihistamines are the standard of care for patients with CSU, adjunctive treatments (including omalizumab) may be required for effective control of symptoms in many patients. Evidence from clinical trials and experience from daily clinical practice suggest that the use of omalizumab in patients with CSU who have inadequate response to H1-antihistamines remains challenging.

SUMMARY

Based on current international guidelines, omalizumab labelling information and our experience in clinical practice, we provide treatment recommendations regarding the use of omalizumab in patients with CSU. These include: optimal treatment duration, the use of concomitant antihistamine therapy, the definition and management of disease relapse after treatment, and the management of patients with late or no response to treatment.

A Comparison of the United States and International Perspective on Chronic Urticaria Guidelines

Urticaria is a heterogeneous skin disorder that may be acute or chronic and is defined by the appearance of wheals, angioedema, or both. The European perspective is expressed in a recent international guideline and the American perspective has been based on the US Joint Task Force chronic urticaria practice parameter published in 2014. Both the international guideline (initiated by the European societies European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology [EAACI]/Global Allergy and Asthma European Network [GA²LEN]/European Dermatology Forum [EDF] in collaboration with the World Allergy Organization [WAO]) and the US (American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology/American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology) guideline have been developed to help direct primary care physicians and specialists in the management of their patients with urticaria. The EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guideline applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to developing consensus recommendations and these were then discussed in a Delphi conference including more than 250 specialists in the field and have been endorsed by more than 40 international societies. In contrast, the US Joint Task Force CU practice parameter made recommendations based on scientific evidence whenever possible; however, when there was insufficient evidence, recommendations were based on expert consensus opinion. Although both agree on most points regarding the definition, general evaluation, and treatment, there are some differences that exist between the 2 guidelines. Most of these differences pertain to recommendations based on expert opinion because of weak scientific evidence. Within this document, we compare the recommendations of these 2 groups, highlighting the key similarities and differences.

Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Refractory to Conventional Therapy: An Italian Retrospective Clinical Analysis with Suggestions for Long-Term Maintenance Strategies

INTRODUCTION

Omalizumab is indicated for the treatment of patients affected by chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refractory to antihistamines. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and recurrence of symptoms in a real-life experience of omalizumab as an add-on therapy for H₁-antihistamine-refractory CSU patients (refractory CSU).

METHODS

A retrospective review of the clinical records of all refractory CSU treated with omalizumab at our dermatology center from June 2014 to April 2017 was performed. Patients previously treated with second-generation antihistamines at a fourfold increased dose without clinical responses at 4 weeks of treatment were selected. Omalizumab was administered at a single dosage of 300 mg every 4 weeks for 6 months. Disease severity was assessed using the 7-day Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7).

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (14 women; mean age 51 years, range 25-74) were enrolled. Mean UAS7 at baseline was 27.3 (range 15-38). Symptoms improved in all patients at 4 weeks (UAS7 = 16.1, range 0-36). Treatment was completed in 17 patients (94.4%), and among these, a complete response (UAS7 = 0) was registered in 10 patients (58.8%). Adverse events included thrombocytopenia in 1 patient (5.6%) at 16 weeks; therapy was suspended after 20 weeks and the complication was resolved, resulting in a freedom from major adverse events of 94.4%. Symptom recurrence occurred in 3 patients (17.6%) at 4, 5, and 7 months from the end of the primary therapy. Retreatment with omalizumab was successful without any adverse effects. Mean follow-up was 9.5 months (range 1-28).

CONCLUSION

Add-on omalizumab therapy for refractory CSU in a real-life setting seems to be effective and safe with a relatively low incidence of symptom recurrence. Further research should investigate personalized omalizumab treatment dosages and administration intervals, and the identification of biomarkers for future treatment algorithms.

Update on Omalizumab for Urticaria: What's New in the Literature from Mechanisms to Clinic

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since omalizumab has been approved for urticaria, numerous randomized and real-life observational trials have been published. We reviewed the period January 2017-February 2018.

RECENT FINDINGS

Omalizumab is effective for the control of urticaria recalcitrant to antihistamines in different populations globally. The ratio of total serum IgE 4-week/baseline ≥2 can predict response with a high likelihood. In observational real-life trials, doses have been adjusted on an individual basis: in some populations, up to two-thirds of the patients can be controlled with 150 mg/month; however, others are still not controlled with 300 mg/month. In these, 150 mg bimonthly could be tried, before up-dosing to 450 mg/month. On the long run (up to 3 years) omalizumab kept its efficacy. In many patients, dosing intervals could be augmented (6-8 weeks, some even more). After a 12-month treatment, about 20% showed long-term remission without relapse. Some biomarkers are being detected. Adjusting omalizumab doses in urticaria patients could enhance efficacy (shortening dosing interval and/or augmenting dose) and save costs (after 12 months: extending dosing interval and/or reducing dose).

Real-world use of omalizumab in patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria in the United States

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab was approved for the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU)/chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in the United States in March 2014.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to describe real-world omalizumab use, in the United States, in a large cohort of patients with CIU/CSU.

METHODS

Patients with CIU/CSU (ages ≥12 years) initiated on omalizumab (index date) with ≥12 months of pre- and postindex data were identified in the an insurance claims data base (January 1, 2013, to July 31, 2016). Treatment patterns, including the dosing regimen and continuous use of omalizumab (no gaps for ≥60 days), were described during the 12-month postindex follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 1546 patients (mean ± standard deviation [SD] ages, 44 ± 14.5 years; 73.1% women) were identified. Most of the patients (84.5%) were initiated on omalizumab 300-mg dose; 90% maintained the initial dose, 7.5% had a dose increase, and 4.6% had a dose decrease. The mean ± SD omalizumab treatment duration was 9.1 ± 3.8 months, the mean ± SD number of omalizumab administrations was 8.3 ± 4.8, and the mean ± SD administration frequency was 44 ± 29 days. A proportion of the patients continuously treated with omalizumab for 6, 9, and 12 months was 67.3, 54.8, and 47.4%, respectively. Among the patients who discontinued omalizumab for ≥3 months (39.8%), 21% restarted the treatment after a mean ± SD of 4.4 ± 1.3 months. The proportion of patients who used other CIU/CSU-related medications decreased pre- to postindex (94.8 to 81.1%), with the highest decrease observed in oral corticosteroids (75.7 to 49.9%).

CONCLUSION

In this large real-world study, the majority of the patients with CIU/CSU were initiated on a 300-mg omalizumab dose and treated without titration up or down for 9 months on average. Most of the patients were continuously treated with omalizumab for ≥6 months, and one-fourth of the patients who discontinued treatment resumed it. Moreover, compared with baseline levels, the use of other CIU/CSU-related medications was lower after omalizumab initiation, with the most prominent decrease observed in oral corticosteroids.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria in children - a systematic review on interventions and comorbidities

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is not frequent in children. Management guidelines have been developed for adults and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included teenagers aged 12-18, but data for children under age 12 are limited. We performed a systematic review to assess comorbidities in children <12 years old with CSU and the efficacy and safety of treatments.

METHODS

We searched for original articles of epidemiologic and treatment data in children <12 years old with CSU that were published from 2005 to July 2016 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and LILACS. Article selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate.

RESULTS

Our systematic review included 9 reports on epidemiologic data (633 children). Five comorbidities and laboratory anomalies associated with CSU found were atopy (28.1%), positive autologous serum skin test (36.8%), thyroid biologic anomalies (6.4%) and detectable antinuclear antigen (10.4%), seroprevalence for Helicobacter pylori (21.1%), low vitamin D level (69.1%), and psychiatric disorders (70.4%). Only one study allowed for comparison with a control group. Our review included 10 studies (322 children), describing 5 different drug families, mostly H1-antihistamines (n = 297). One randomized controlled study compared single-dose rupatadine with single-dose desloratadine and placebo. Cyclosporine was effective and had no adverse effects in 18 children. Omalizumab, montelukast, and cefuroxime were reported in very small series (5, 1, and 1 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

H1-antihistamines are effective for CSU in children <12 years old, with reassuring safety data at licensed doses. Cyclosporine seems effective, but the level of evidence is low.

Effectiveness of omalizumab in adolescent and adult patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria: a systematic review of 'real-world' evidence

INTRODUCTION

Chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU) is a dermatological condition characterized by itchy wheals and/or angioedema of continuous or intermittent duration of ≥6 weeks with a high burden of disease and impact on quality of life. Omalizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the binding of IgE to high affinity receptors, and is approved for the CIU/CSU indication. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate and synthesize the evidence on the real-world effectiveness of omalizumab in CIU/CSU in daily clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

This review of 84 observational effectiveness studies covers treatments (dosing, medication use), clinical outcomes (treatment response, disease activity, quality of life), and safety.

EXPERT OPINION

The clinical outcomes observed across studies underscore the real-world effectiveness of omalizumab in the management of CIU/CSU. Continued treatment may assist patients showing an initial response to achieve a complete treatment response. Response rates are aligned with observed changes in disease activity, symptom experience, and quality of life, and this across subtypes of CIU/CSU. The positive therapeutic profile is complemented by a positive safety profile. The real-world evidence summarized here points convincingly at the high degree of effectiveness of omalizumab in the treatment of CIU/CSU in daily clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of omalizumab for the treatment of refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria in Japanese patients: Subgroup analysis of the phase 3 POLARIS study

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab, a humanized anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, proved efficacious and well tolerated in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refractory to H₁ antihistamines (H₁AH) in the POLARIS study (NCT02329223), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in East Asian patients. However, data in Japanese patients, who have specific baseline characteristics (e.g., low angioedema incidence, different background medications) that may impact clinical outcomes, are lacking. This pre-specified analysis presents additional patient-level data over time, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics data for omalizumab and IgE, and efficacy and safety data for omalizumab in Japanese patients.

METHODS

Japanese patients (N = 105) were randomized 1:1:1 to omalizumab 300 mg, 150 mg, or placebo by subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks. Efficacy and safety were assessed primarily based on changes from baseline to Week 12 in weekly itch-severity scores (ISS7) and weekly urticaria activity scores (UAS7), and incidence of adverse events (AEs), respectively. Patient-level UAS7 data over time were also reviewed.

RESULTS

At Week 12, least squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline in ISS7 were greater with omalizumab vs. placebo (-9.54 and -7.29 for omalizumab 300 mg and 150 mg, respectively, vs. placebo [-5.17]). Corresponding LSM changes from baseline in UAS7 were -21.61 and -15.59 (vs. placebo [-10.88]). Most responders in the omalizumab 300 mg group displayed improvement of disease activity within 2-4 weeks and had well-controlled symptoms during the treatment period. Overall AE incidence was similar across treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

This subgroup analysis demonstrated that omalizumab is a well-tolerated, beneficial option for treatment of CSU in H₁AH-refractory Japanese patients.

Omalizumab rapidly improves angioedema-related quality of life in adult patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: X-ACT study data

Background

The X‐ACT study aimed to examine the effect of omalizumab treatment on quality of life (QoL) in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients with angioedema refractory to high doses of H₁‐antihistamines.

Methods

In X‐ACT, a phase III, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, CSU patients (18‐75 years) with ≥4 angioedema episodes during the 6 months before inclusion were randomized (1:1) to receive omalizumab 300 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 28 weeks. Angioedema‐related QoL, skin‐related QoL impairment, and psychological well‐being were assessed.

Results

Ninety‐one patients were randomized and 68 (omalizumab, n = 35; placebo, n = 33) completed the 28‐week treatment period. At baseline, the mean (SD) total Angioedema QoL (AE‐QoL; 56.2 [18.7] and 59.9 [19.2]) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; 14.6 [5.7] and 16.6 [7.3]) score were high in the omalizumab and placebo group, respectively. At Week 4 (after the first treatment), the least squares mean difference in the AE‐QoL and DLQI score between groups was −17.6 (P < .001) and −7.2 (P < .001), respectively. Significant QoL improvements in the omalizumab vs placebo groups continued until Week 28, but returned to placebo levels at the follow‐up visit. The mean (SD) baseline 5‐item World Health Organization Well‐being Index was 10.0 (5.5, omalizumab) and 7.7 (5.3, placebo), which increased above the depression threshold (<13) from Week 4 and throughout with omalizumab but not placebo treatment. Compared to placebo, omalizumab was also associated with decreased fear of suffocation due to angioedema.

Conclusions

Our findings support omalizumab treatment in patients with severe H1‐antihistamine‐refractory CSU with angioedema.

Treatment response to omalizumab in patients with refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria

BACKGROUND

Previous clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the anti-IgE monoclonal antibody omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) not responding to antihistamine treatment. The primary aim of our study was to describe the response patterns of patients with refractory CSU treated with omalizumab in a real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of medical records of 20 patients with refractory CSU was performed. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory features were retrieved and analyzed in correlation with treatment data.

RESULTS

Mean age of our patient population was 54.5 years, while the majority were females (15/20 cases, 75%). Mean disease duration prior to omalizumab administration was 21.8 months. All patients had a history of chronic urticaria, refractory to high antihistamine and corticosteroid treatment, and responded favorably to omalizumab after administration of 1-5 doses of omalizumab; complete response was observed in 17/20 patients (85%) and well-controlled disease in the remaining 3/20 patients (15%). In a subset of cases (6/20, 30%), best response to omalizumab was achieved after interval administration of a 9-day course of methylprednisolone (total dose of 188 mg). Late response to omalizumab (after three-month treatment) was significantly correlated (P = 0.026) with shorter disease duration before initiation of omalizumab.

CONCLUSION

In the present series, omalizumab, either alone or in combination with a short-term course of corticosteroids, was highly effective in resolution of refractory CSU. Furthermore, disease duration prior to omalizumab had a significant effect on timing of response.

How to manage chronic urticaria 'beyond' guidelines: a practical algorithm

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a disease characterized by pruritic weals, angio-oedema or both occurring for at least 6 weeks. It encompasses spontaneous and inducible urticarias. The national and international guidelines outline the principles of treatment. Omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E monoclonal antibody, has transformed the management of many severe and treatment-refractory patients. However, current UK guidance on its use does not address the needs of those with less severe disease, inducible urticarias, idiopathic histaminergic angio-oedema without weals as a presentation of CU and omalizumab non-responders. Our algorithm and a summary of the evidence to support its principles offers guidance and a more systematic targeted approach to using a range of 'off-label' agents for specific phenotypes of CU. It will be of use when guideline-recommended mast cell mediator antagonists fail to control symptoms and/or using omalizumab is ineffective, not practical or unfunded.

Treatment and retreatment with omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria: Real life experience with twenty-five patients

BACKGROUND

Previous data have shown the high efficacy of omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). However, factors that may be effective on the response to therapy, relapse rates after drug discontinuation, and efficacy of retreatment remain unclear. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of omalizumab in CSU refractory to conventional therapy, to identify possible factors affecting treatment response and relapse, and also to evaluate the efficacy of retreatment on relapsed disease.

METHODS

The data of CSU patients treated with 300 mg/month omalizumab for at least 3 months were retrospectively analyzed. In order to evaluate the efficacy of treatment and retreatment, baseline and follow-up concomitant medication score (CMS) and urticaria activity score (UAS) were calculated. Possible factors affecting treatment response and relapse were identified.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included. The median duration of omalizumab therapy was 6 (6-12) months. Of the patients with baseline UAS 6 (5.5-6) and CMS 13 (10-15), 8 (32%) had complete response (UAS = 0) and 2 (8%) were non-responders after 3 months of therapy. None of the complete responders were positive for IgG-anti-TPO. After discontinuation of omalizumab therapy, 11 (61%) patients experienced relapse and 10 of them received retreatment with omalizumab. Half of the patients had complete response, and half had partial response (UAS = 1-4) after retreatment. No treatment related adverse events were documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Omalizumab has high efficacy in both the treatment and retreatment of CSU; however, relapse rates after discontinuation are high. Autoimmune markers may be helpful in predicting treatment response and relapse.

Amelioration of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria in treatment with vitamin D supplement

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous urticaria is a common allergic skin condition affecting 0.5-1% of individuals and may burden on health care expenditure or may be associated with remarkable morbidity.

AIM

In this study, we measured the effect of vitamin D supplementation in patients with a diagnosis of CSU. Furthermore, quality of life and cytokine changes were evaluated.

METHODS

The clinical trial was conducted on 20 patients with idiopathic chronic urticaria. Vitamin D was administered orally for 8 weeks and disease activity was measured pre- and post-treatment using USS and DLQI. On the other hand expressions of IL-17, IL-10, Foxp3, and TGF-β by Real-time RT-PCR were assessed.

RESULTS

USS questionnaire showed that severity of idiopathic urticaria after the intervention, which compared with the first day reached a significant 55% reduction. The DLQI quality of life questionnaire 2 months after treatment showed 55% improvement. Along with the significant improvement of clinical symptoms, use of vitamin D increase FOXP3 gene expression and downregulation of IL-10, TGF-B, and FOXP3, IL-17, but these changes were not statistically significant.

LIMITATION

These might happen due to lack of enrolled population in the investigation.

CONCLUSION

Vitamin D can be used along with standard medical care and it's a safe and cost-effective method for the treatment of chronic urticaria with deficiency of vitamin D.

Real-World Characteristics and Treatment Patterns in Patients with Urticaria Initiating Omalizumab in the United States

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab is indicated for the management of chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) in patients aged 12 years or older with persistent hives that are not adequately controlled by H1 antihistamines. While its safety and efficacy in CIU patients have been evaluated in multiple clinical trials, real-world use of omalizaumab in CIU has not been well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To assess demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of CIU patients who initiated omalizumab to better understand the usage of this agent in CIU management in the real world.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used medical and pharmacy claims data in the United States from the HealthCore Integrated Database to identify patients with CIU newly treated with omalizumab (≥ 4 omalizumab claims within 6 months of the initial claim) between March 21, 2014, and October 31, 2015 (study intake period). The index date was defined as the date of the first claim for omalizumab during the study intake period. Demographic and clinical characteristics were described for patients treated with omalizumab, as were treatment patterns associated with omalizumab and concomitant medications associated with CIU treatment. Descriptive and inferential statistics were reported. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to examine omalizumab treatment patterns.

RESULTS

This study included 298 omalizumab-treated patients (mean [SD] age of 43.5 [13.64] years; 70.8% female); approximately 84% were seen by an allergist/immunologist. All patients had ≥ 12 months of continuous enrolment and a subset of 138 patients had ≥ 18 months of follow-up. For patients with ≥ 12 months of post-index follow-up, 12.1% (n = 36), 28.5% (n = 85), and 32.9% (n = 98) discontinued omalizumab within the 6-month, 12-month, and the entire post-index periods (mean 530 days), respectively; the mean number of days patients were continuously treated with omalizumab was 443.1 (95% CI = 425.0-461.3); the probabilities of continuous treatment (95% CI) were 0.879 (0.836-0.911), 0.711 (0.656-0.759), and 0.647 (0.585-0.703) for the 6-, 12-, and 18-month post-index periods, respectively. For the 98 patients who discontinued omalizumab during the entire post-index period, 28.6% restarted omalizumab after the first discontinuation within the post-index period (mean time from first discontinuation to first restart=329 days). Use of medications such as oral corticosteroids, montelukast, cyclosporine, and prescription H1 and H2 antihistamines decreased during the 1- to 6-month and 7- to 12-month post-index periods compared with those within the 6-month pre-index period.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of CIU patients who were newly prescribed omalizumab, the majority were treated by allergists/immunologists as expected, and approximately 60% of patients continued on therapy beyond 18 months. Concomitant medication use decreased after omalizumab initiation. These data on the real-world use of omalizumab for CIU may help to better inform decision-making processes for health care payers by quantifying omalizumab and concomitant medication treatment patterns over a longer time frame relative to previous studies. DISCLOSURES This study was sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals, which provided funding support for the conduct of the study. Kavati, Ortiz, and Paknis are employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Ke, Wertz, Huang, Wang, Willey, and Stephenson are employees of HealthCore, an independent research organization that received funding from Novartis Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this study. Beck is an employee of the University of Rochester Medical Center, who was under contract with Novartis Pharmaceuticals to provide consulting services to this study, and reports grants from Genentech, outside the currently submitted work. Bernstein is affiliated with Bernstein Clinical Research Center, which was under contract with Novartis Pharmaceuticals to provide consulting services to this study, and reports receiving grants and personal fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals, grants and personal fees from Genentech outside of the submitted work, and is an author on the Joint Task Force for Practice Parameters for Urticaria and the GALEN international guidelines for urticaria under preparation. Study concept and design were primarily contributed by Kavati, Ortiz, and Paknis, with assistance from the other authors. Huang, Wang, and Ke took the lead in data collection, with assistance from Wertz, Willey, and Stephenson. Data interpretation was performed by Ke, Wertz, and Willey, assisted by the other authors. The manuscript was written by Stephenson, Ke, and Wang, along with Willey, Wertz, and Huang, and revised by Bernstein and Beck, with assistance from the other authors. Selected study data were presented in a poster at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) 22nd Annual International Meeting on May 20-24, 2017, in Boston, Massachusetts. A poster based on this dataset was presented at the 2017 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI) Annual Scientific Meeting on October 26-30, 2017, in Boston, Massachusetts.

Does omalizumab modify a course of recalcitrant chronic spontaneous urticaria?: A retrospective study in Asian patients

Omalizumab has been approved for the treatment of recalcitrant chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). However, it remains unanswered whether omalizumab modifies a CSU course. We aimed to study a course of CSU after omalizumab treatment in an Asian population. Medical records of recalcitrant CSU patients who attended Siriraj Hospital between 2013 and 2017 were reviewed. All patients receiving omalizumab treatment were followed after the first injection for at least 1 year. Of 15 patients receiving omalizumab treatment, 11 patients (73.3%) responded well to 150 mg while the rest required 300 mg. The median follow-up period was 18 months (range, 13.5-25.3). Three patterns of response were proposed and measured: excellent (disease remission over than 6 months) was found in 20%; good (injection interval extended longer than 6 months) was found in 27%; and modest (frequently required injections) was found in 53%. The mean duration of complete remission was 33 weeks (range, 26-38). Two-thirds of patients had disease relapse and required omalizumab injections to control symptoms. The other third did not show relapses for at least 69 weeks of the follow-up period. After 1 year of treatment, Kaplan-Meier curves estimated that a higher percentage (86.7%) of recalcitrant CSU patients receiving omalizumab treatment would be free of symptoms (weekly Urticaria Activity Score = 0) without prednisolone and/or cyclosporin as compared with 42% of patients not receiving omalizumab treatment. In conclusion, patients seem to be easily and safely manageable with omalizumab. Prednisolone and cyclosporin could be discontinued in all patients. Further studies are needed to conclude whether omalizumab can exactly modify CSU.

Anti-IgE Treatment for Disorders Other Than Asthma

Immunoglobulin E (IgE) plays a key role in the pathogenesis of many allergic diseases. Thus, IgE-mediated immunologic pathways are an attractive target for intervention in allergic diseases. Omalizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that binds IgE and has been used treat allergic asthma for over a decade. Currently, omalizumab is approved for the treatment of both allergic asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria. Since IgE plays a critical role in other allergic diseases, anti-IgE therapy has been evaluated in other allergic diseases in small clinical trials and case reports. Omalizumab has demonstrated efficacy in treating allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, physical urticarias, mast cell disorders, food allergy, and other allergic diseases. In addition, the use of omalizumab with conventional allergen immunotherapy improves both safety and effectiveness.

Biologics and biomarkers for asthma, urticaria, and nasal polyposis

Many patients with allergic disorders continue to have uncontrolled symptoms despite new and better pharmacologic options. Novel biologic agents that target specific and critical pathophysiologic pathways have been developed to better manage these patients. The utility of biologic agents for the management of allergic diseases has been facilitated by recent advances in better characterizing patients, including identification of relevant biomarkers that predict clinical responsiveness. This has led to the ability to phenotype and endotype patients, allowing for a more rational approach to picking a specific biologic agent for a specific patient. In this review I focus on point-of-care biomarkers that enhance the usefulness of biologics to manage uncontrolled asthma, urticaria, and nasal polyposis. I discuss biologic agents already approved for the management of allergic and respiratory disorders and biologics currently in development or recently abandoned because of a lack of efficacy or intolerable side effects. The successes and failures of biologics in clinical trials have facilitated our ability to better understand which molecules and pathways are most important in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases and in the development of symptoms and impairment in individual patients.

Clinical features of adolescents with chronic idiopathic or spontaneous urticaria: Review of omalizumab clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Adults and adolescents were included in 3 phase 3 omalizumab trials in chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU): ASTERIA I, ASTERIA II, and GLACIAL.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the baseline clinical profile of adolescent patients with CIU enrolled in the omalizumab trials to add to the limited literature available on CIU in this population.

METHODS

Data for patient demographics, baseline clinical disease characteristics, medical history, and previous CIU medication information (not efficacy assessments) from phase 3 omalizumab trials were pooled and descriptive statistical analyses performed for adolescent (12 to <18 years old) and adult (≥18 years old) subgroups. Inferential analysis was inappropriate, partly because of small sample size in the adolescent subgroup.

RESULTS

The pooled population of 975 patients with CIU included 39 adolescents (4.0%). Demographics of adolescents and adults with CIU were similar, but compared with adults, fewer adolescents had positive Chronic Urticaria Index test results. Baseline clinical disease characteristics were also similar between the subgroups, with the number of previous CIU medications slightly lower in adolescents compared with adults. Medical history and existing conditions in adolescents tended to be more allergy than cardiovascular related, and fewer experienced angioedema compared with adults.

CONCLUSION

Pooled data indicate differences in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between adult and adolescent patient subgroups. This finding helps augment our understanding of the clinical profile of CIU in adolescents, but larger-scale studies in this population are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01287117 (ASTERIA I), NCT01292473 (ASTERIA II), and NCT01264939 (GLACIAL).

The Expanding Field of Biologics in the Management of Chronic Urticaria

Chronic urticaria (CU) is the occurrence of urticaria with or without angioedema for at least 6 weeks. Management has traditionally involved antihistamines as first-line therapy with various alternative therapies for refractory cases. Largely based on the success of biologics for various diseases, this class of drugs has come to the forefront of medical research. The first and only Food and Drug Administration-approved biologic for the management of CU is omalizumab (humanized anti-IgE mAb). In the past decade, a substantial amount of research has been centered on the mechanism of action, efficacy, dosing, and safety of omalizumab. This review will focus on the data surrounding the management of CU with omalizumab, off-label use of other biologics for CU, and biologics currently under investigation for use in CU. We will also discuss management considerations and areas of interest for future research.

Omalizumab substantially improves dermatology-related quality of life in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria

Background

Chronic spontaneous/idiopathic urticaria (CSU/CIU) has substantial detrimental effects on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) with an effect comparable to or worse than many other skin diseases.

Objective

To assess the effect of omalizumab on CSU patients' HRQoL, measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in three phase III studies ASTERIA I, ASTERIA II and GLACIAL.

Methods

A post hoc analysis examined changes in DLQI scores, distribution of patients across DLQI bands and the proportion reaching minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following omalizumab vs. placebo.

Results

Omalizumab 300 mg significantly improved total DLQI scores vs. placebo, with a mean decrease from baseline to week 12 of −10.3 vs. −6.1 (P < 0.0001) in ASTERIA I, −10.2 vs. −6.1 (P = 0.0004) in ASTERIA II and −9.7 vs. −5.1 (P < 0.0001) in GLACIAL. A significant shift from high disease impact on life at baseline towards less impact at week 12 was seen with omalizumab 300 mg vs. placebo (P < 0.001; all studies). The proportion of patients where change in mean total DLQI score from baseline to week 12 reached an MCID of ≥4 was 74.1%, 76.0% and 77.2% in ASTERIA I, II and GLACIAL, respectively (P < 0.01; all studies).

Limitations

Maximum duration of omalizumab treatment was 24 weeks.

Conclusion

This additional analysis assessed the impact of CSU and benefit of treatment with omalizumab by exploring different facets of DLQI data by treatment arm at multiple assessment points. The original aspects of analysis included applying the concept of the recently validated score for the MCID of the DLQI, changes in DLQI domain scores and in the distribution of subjects based on validated total DLQI score bands. It showed consistently that omalizumab provides significant and clinically relevant improvements in many aspects of HRQoL that are important to patients with CSU. These results contribute to a better understanding of the impact of CSU and its treatment on patients and can support clinical decision‐making in routine medical practice.

Emerging roles of basophils in allergic inflammation

Basophils have long been neglected in immunological studies because they were regarded as only minor relatives of mast cells. However, recent advances in analytical tools for basophils have clarified the non-redundant roles of basophils in allergic inflammation. Basophils play crucial roles in both IgE-dependent and -independent allergic inflammation, through their migration to the site of inflammation and secretion of various mediators, including cytokines, chemokines, and proteases. Basophils are known to produce large amounts of IL-4 in response to various stimuli. Basophil-derived IL-4 has recently been shown to play versatile roles in allergic inflammation by acting on various cell types, including macrophages, innate lymphoid cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. Basophil-derived serine proteases are also crucial for the aggravation of allergic inflammation. Moreover, recent reports suggest the roles of basophils in modulating adaptive immune responses, particularly in the induction of Th2 differentiation and enhancement of humoral memory responses. In this review, we will discuss recent advances in understanding the roles of basophils in allergic inflammation.

Long-term management of chronic spontaneous urticaria with omalizumab

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have shown the efficacy of omalizumabs efficacy in refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU), but real-life management strategies are lacking.

AIM

To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab, and to identify predictive factors and optimum dosage regimens.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 13 patients (11 women, 2 men) with severe CSU [weekly urticaria activity score (UAS7) > 28] resistant to anti-H1 antihistamines. Patients were started on omalizumab 150 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks. Dose and interval between administrations were adjusted according to clinical response (189 administrations; treatment duration range 2-38 months).

RESULTS

Mean UAS7 was 36.3 ± 5.4. Of the 13 patients, all had experienced angio-oedema, while in addition, 7 had delayed pressure urticaria (DPU) and 1 had solar urticaria (SU). After omalizumab treatment, 4 (30.8%) of the 13 patients had complete response (CR), and the remaining 8 (61.5%) had partial response. CR was achieved with a dose of 150 mg every 4 (n = 2 patients) or 5 (n = 2) weeks. One of these patients remained disease-free after stopping treatment. Partial responses were achieved with 150 mg every 4 weeks (n = 4) and with 300 mg (n = 4) at intervals of 5 weeks (n = 1), 4 weeks (n = 2) or 3 weeks (n = 1). Only one patient (7.7%) did not show significant improvement, despite a dose of 300 mg every 4 weeks. There were no significant differences in epidemiological, clinical and laboratory data between the different response groups. Only two adverse events were observed: one was mild headache and the other was severe angio-oedema and aggravation of urticaria within 6 h of omalizumab administration.

CONCLUSION

Omalizumab dose and interval between administrations could be individualized for long-term management of CSU.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in chronic urticaria

Chronic urticaria is an itching skin disease which persists for more than 6 weeks. Chronic urticaria has great impact on the daily life of the patient, and the fluctuating nature of the symptoms complicates the monitoring and treatment of the disease. Currently, there are no reliable biomarkers to identify and measure disease activity in chronic spontaneous urticaria. Consequently, use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is crucial when evaluating and monitoring different aspects of chronic urticaria such as disease activity/severity, disease control, and quality of life. We present an overview of seven different PROs used in chronic urticaria and highlight their strengths, limitations, and use in clinical practice and research.

Controversies and challenges in the management of chronic urticaria

This supplement reports proceedings of the second international Global Urticaria Forum, which was held in Berlin, Germany in November 2015. Despite the clear international guideline, there remain a number of controversies and challenges in the management of patients with chronic urticaria (CU). As a result of major advancements in urticaria over the past 4 years, the current EAACI/GA(2) LEN/EDF/WAO urticaria guideline treatment algorithm requires updating. Case studies from patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) [also called chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU)], chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) or diseases and syndromes related to CU are useful in describing and exploring challenges in disease management. Case studies of specific CSU patient populations such as children with CU or patients with angio-edema but no hives also require consideration as potentially challenging groups with unmet needs. The current EAACI/GA(2) LEN/EDF/WAO urticaria guideline provides a general framework for the management of patients with CU but, as these cases highlight, a personalized approach based on the expert knowledge of the physician may be required.

Clinical management of urticaria using omalizumab: the first licensed biological therapy available for chronic spontaneous urticaria

This supplement reports proceedings of the second international Global Urticaria Forum, which was held in Berlin, Germany in November 2015. Omalizumab is approved for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in adult and adolescent (12 years and above) patients with inadequate response to/who remain symptomatic despite H1 -antihistamine treatment, and has demonstrated good efficacy and safety in the clinical trial setting. Real-life clinical experience with omalizumab can be explored to address important practical questions relating to its use in CSU patients. Some experts have proposed that a consensus algorithm, covering various aspects to consider when using omalizumab in real-life clinical practice for the management of CSU, could answer many of these questions.