Long-term findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study of ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for myelofibrosis

JAK2 inhibitor persistence in MPN: uncovering a central role of ERK activation

The Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocytosis, and myelofibrosis, are driven by hyper activation of the JAK2 tyrosine kinase, the result of mutations in three MPN driving genes: JAK2, MPL, and CALR. While the anti-inflammatory effects of JAK2 inhibitors can provide improved quality of life for many MPN patients, the upfront and persistent survival of disease-driving cells in MPN patients undergoing JAK2 inhibitor therapy thwarts potential for remission. Early studies indicated JAK2 inhibitor therapy induces heterodimeric complex formation of JAK2 with other JAK family members leading to sustained JAK2-dependent signaling. Recent work has described novel cell intrinsic details as well as cell extrinsic mechanisms that may contribute to why JAK2 inhibition may be ineffective at targeting MPN driving cells. Diverse experimental strategies aimed at uncovering mechanistic details that contribute to JAK2 inhibitor persistence have each highlighted the role of MEK/ERK activation. These approaches include, among others, phosphoproteomic analyses of JAK2 signaling as well as detailed assessment of JAK2 inhibition in mouse models of MPN. In this focused review, we highlight these and other studies that collectively suggest targeting MEK/ERK in combination with JAK2 inhibition has the potential to improve the efficacy of JAK2 inhibitors in MPN patients. As MPN patients patiently wait for improved therapies, such studies should further strengthen optimism that pre-clinical research is continuing to uncover mechanistic insights regarding the ineffectiveness of JAK2 inhibitors, which may lead to development of improved therapeutic strategies.

Momelotinib: an emerging treatment for myelofibrosis patients with anemia

The suite of marked anemia benefits that momelotinib has consistently conferred on myelofibrosis (MF) patients stem from its unique inhibitory activity on the BMP6/ACVR1/SMAD and IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathways, resulting in decreased hepcidin (master iron regulator) expression, higher serum iron and hemoglobin levels, and restored erythropoiesis. Clinical data on momelotinib from the phase 2 and the two phase 3 SIMPLIFY trials consistently demonstrated high rates of sustained transfusion-independence. In a recent phase 2 translational study, 41% of the patients achieved transfusion independence for ≥ 12 weeks. In the phase 3 trials SIMPLIFY-1 and SIMPLIFY-2, 17% more JAK inhibitor-naïve patients and two-fold more JAK inhibitor-treated patients achieved or maintained transfusion independence with momelotinib versus ruxolitinib and best available therapy (89% ruxolitinib), respectively. Anemia is present in approximately a third of MF patients at diagnosis, eventually developing in nearly all patients. The need for red blood cell transfusions is an independent adverse risk factor for both overall survival and leukemic transformation. Presently, FDA-approved medications to address anemia are lacking. Momelotinib is one of the prime candidates to durably address the critical unmet needs of MF patients with moderate/severe anemia. Importantly, momelotinib may have overall survival benefits in frontline and second-line MF patients. MOMENTUM is an international registration-track phase 3 trial further assessing momelotinib’s unique constellation of anemia and other benefits in second-line MF patients; the results of the MOMENTUM trial are keenly awaited and may lead to regulatory approval of momelotinib.

Real-life ruxolitinib experience in intermediate-risk myelofibrosis

Background

In this retrospective cohort of patients with primary, post-polycythemia vera, or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, 57 patients with MF who received ruxolitinib for MF-related symptoms or symptomatic splenomegaly were evaluated.

Methods

The median age of the patients in this cohort was approximately 58 years. Of these, there were 33 patients (57.9%) in INT-1, 23 patients (40.4%) in INT-2, and 1 patient (1.8%) at high risk. Overall, spleen size reduction of at least 35% (spleen response) was achieved in 56.6% and 63.3% of all cohort and INT-1 risk at any time, respectively.

Results

Symptom response and clinical improvement were observed in 21.7% and 60.7% of patients, respectively. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were prevalent, but manageable. About 73.7% of patients continued treatment during a median follow-up of 22 months. Two-year OS probability was approximately 84.5% (95% CI, 63.1‒94.0%) and 62.3% (95% CI, 37.5‒79.6%) for the intermediate-1 and -2 risk groups, respectively.

Conclusion

Real-life experience in a community-based hospital confirms the efficacy and safety profile of ruxolitinib in intermediate-risk myelofibrosis. Treatment discontinuation rates were lower than those in clinical trials.

Updated recommendations on the use of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis

OBJECTIVES

Myelofibrosis is a rare bone marrow disorder associated with a high symptom burden, poor prognosis, and shortened survival. While allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis, the only approved and reimbursed pharmacotherapy for non-HSCT candidates in Belgium is ruxolitinib.

METHODS

These updated recommendations are based on a consensus reached during two meetings and provide guidance for ruxolitinib administration in myelofibrosis patients considering the particularities of Belgian reimbursement criteria.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In Belgium, ruxolitinib is indicated and reimbursed for transplant-ineligible myelofibrosis patients from intermediate-2- and high-risk groups and from the intermediate-1-risk group with splenomegaly. Our recommendation is to also make ruxolitinib available in the pre-transplant setting for myelofibrosis patients with splenomegaly or heavy symptom burden. Before ruxolitinib initiation, complete blood cell counts are recommended, and the decision on the optimal dosage should be based on platelet count and clinical parameters. In anemic patients, we recommend starting doses of ruxolitinib of 10 mg twice daily for 12 weeks and we propose the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with endogenous erythropoietin levels ≤500 mU/mL. Increased vigilance for opportunistic infections and second primary malignancies is needed in ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis patients. Ruxolitinib treatment should be continued as long as there is clinical benefit (reduced splenomegaly or symptoms), and we recommend progressive dose tapering when stopping ruxolitinib.

CONCLUSION

Based on new data and clinical experience, the panel of experts discussed ruxolitinib treatment in Belgian myelofibrosis patients with a focus on dose optimization/monitoring, adverse events, and interruption/rechallenge management.

JAK2 mutation may predict response and guide first line treatment in rheumatoid arthritis

Background

JAK (Janus kinase) inhibitors work by inhibiting the activity of one or more of the enzyme Janus kinase with a therapeutic application for treatment of cancer and inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to study impact of JAK2 mutation in serum of rheumatoid arthritis patients on response to first line with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARDS) at 3rd month by evaluating DAS28 and ACR response criteria. The study included 85 newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis patients and 50 matched controls. Basal JAK2 mutation assessed by PCR in blood samples, TNF-α and IL 6 were measured by ELISA in serum of patient and control groups. All patients started therapy with csDMARDs. Response assessment at 3rd month was evaluated by DAS28 and ACR response criteria. JAK2 mutation was correlated with different clinical and laboratory parameters of patients.

Results

Seventeen females (83.5%) and 14 males (16.5%) with age mean ± SD (years); (48.7 ± 7.2). Pretreatment JAK2 mutation, TNF-α and IL 6 were significantly high in patients. JAK2 mutation was detected in 45 (52.9%) patients while 40 (47.1%) patients were JAK2 non-mutant. Mutant JAK2 was significantly linked to severity of disease evaluated by DAS28; 14 (70%) of patients with DAS28 (≤ 2.6) were non-mutant JAK2 vs sex (30%) patients mutant JAK2 while 19 (73.1%) of patients with DAS28 (> 5.1) were mutant JAK2 vs 7 (26.9%) patients non-mutant JAK2 (P 0.02). JAK2 mutation found to be significantly correlated with ACR 20, 50, and 70 response criteria; 68.2% of patients with non-mutant JAK2 showed ACR 70 vs 31.8% in mutant group, 52% of patients with non-mutant JAK2 showed ACR 50 vs 48% in mutant group while 31.6% of patients with non-mutant JAK2 showed ACR 20 vs 68.4% in mutant group (P 0.02). JAK2 mutation were more presented in young age patients (mean ± SD; 47.1 ± 7.2 vs 50.4 ± 6.9 in mutant vs non-mutant JAK2 patients, respectively with P 0.03). JAK2 mutation was associated with high pretreatment TNFα and IL6 level in serum. Mean ± SD of TNFα; 49.4 ± 41.9 in mutant vs 26 ± 24.4 pg/ml in non-mutant group, with P (0.003) while mean ± SD of IL6; 83.5 ± 56.8 in mutant vs 47 ± 46.9 pg/ml in non-mutant group, with P (0.002).

Conclusions

Adult RA with pretreatment JAK2 mutation significantly showed high disease activity and high pretreatment TNFα and IL6 levels. Patients with JAK2 mutation found to be linked to poor response to 1st line csDMARDs including MTX so they could get more benefit with early introduction of JAK inhibitors as first line monotherapy or when combined with csDMARDS especially those with moderate to severe active RA.

Trial registration

Institutional Research Board (IRB)-Faculty of Medicine: IRB Proposal Code: R.20.11.1075-2020/11/16. Clinicaltrials.gov registration date: 8/12/2020, code: NCT04667988.

Novel therapies vs hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: who, when, how?

Myelofibrosis is one of the classical Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms characterized by progressive marrow failure and chronic inflammation. Discovery of the JAK2 mutation paved the way for development of small molecular inhibitors and further facilitated the research in understanding of molecular biology of the disease. Development of novel medications and synergistic combinations with standard JAK inhibitor (JAKi) therapy may have the potential to improve depth and duration of disease control and symptomatic benefit, whereas advancements in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) have improved tolerability and donor availability, allowing for more patients to pursue this potentially curative therapy. The increase in options for medical therapy and changing risk profile of HCT is leading to increased complexity in counseling patients on choice of management strategy. In this case-based review, we summarize our approach to symptom-directed medical therapy, including the use of novel drugs and combination therapies currently under study in advanced clinical trials. We outline our recommendations for optimal timing of HCT, including risk-adapted selection for early HCT as opposed to delayed HCT after upfront JAKi therapy, as well as the use of pretransplant JAKi and alternative donor sources.

Risk of mortality and second malignancies in primary myelofibrosis before and after ruxolitinib approval

BACKGROUND

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is associated with morbidity and mortality. Ruxolitinib gained US FDA approval for treatment of intermediate/high-risk PMF in November 2011. We evaluated differences in survival and second primary malignancy (SPM) incidence among US PMF patients in the years before and after ruxolitinib approval.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study utilizing the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 database for PMF patients. We divided patients into five-year cohorts pre- (2007-2011) and post-ruxolitinib (2012-2016) approval and compared relative survival rates (RSRs) to the standard population and standardized incidence rates (SIRs) of SPMs between cohorts.

RESULTS

We included 2020 patients diagnosed with PMF from 2007-2016 in this study. There was no difference in the four-year RSRs between cohorts (54 % vs. 57 %, p = 0.776). More patients developed SPMs in the post-ruxolitinib cohort (8% vs. 6%, p = 0.041). The majority of SPMs were hematologic with higher incidence of AML transformation in the post-ruxolitinib cohort (SIR 125.29 vs. 70.55).

CONCLUSIONS

PMF prognosis remains poor in the years following ruxolitinib's approval. SPM incidence including AML transformation is higher in the years after approval. Further studies are needed to determine the true impact of ruxolitnib on population outcomes.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of myelofibrosis: phase II & III clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Myelofibrosis is a clonal hematologic malignancy with clinical manifestations that include cytopenias, debilitating constitutional symptoms, splenomegaly, bone marrow fibrosis and a propensity toward leukemic progression. While allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can be curative, this therapy is not available for the majority of patients. Ruxolitinib and fedratinib are approved JAK2 inhibitors that have produced meaningful benefits in terms of spleen reduction and symptom improvement, but there remain several unmet needs.

AREAS COVERED

We discuss novel therapies based upon published data from phase II or III clinical trials. Specifically, we cover novel JAK inhibitors (momelotinib and pacritinib), and agents that target bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (pelabresib), the antiapoptotic proteins BCL-2/BCL-xL (navitoclax), MDM2 (navtemadlin), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (parsaclisib), or telomerase (imetelstat).

EXPERT OPINION

Patients with disease related cytopenias are ineligible for currently approved JAK2 inhibitors. However, momelotinib and pacritinib may be able to fill this void. Novel therapies are being evaluated in the upfront setting to improve the depth and duration of responses with ruxolitinib. Future evaluation of agents must be judged on their potential to modify disease progression, which current JAK2 inhibitors lack. Combination therapy, possibly with an immunotherapeutic agent might serve as key components of future myelofibrosis treatment options.

Immune Dysregulation and Infectious Complications in MPN Patients Treated With JAK Inhibitors

BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are burdened by a reduced life expectancy mostly due to an increased risk of thrombo-hemorrhagic events, fibrotic progression/leukemic evolution, and infectious complications. In these clonal myeloid malignancies, JAK2V617F is the main driver mutation, leading to an aberrant activation of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling pathway. Therefore, its inhibition represents an attractive therapeutic strategy for these disorders. Several JAK inhibitors have entered clinical trials, including ruxolitinib, the first JAK1/2 inhibitor to become commercially available for the treatment of myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera. Due to interference with the JAK-STAT pathway, JAK inhibitors affect several components of the innate and adaptive immune systems such as dendritic cells, natural killer cells, T helper cells, and regulatory T cells. Therefore, even though the clinical use of these drugs in MPN patients has led to a dramatic improvement of symptoms control, organ involvement, and quality of life, JAK inhibitors–related loss of function in JAK-STAT signaling pathway can be a cause of different adverse events, including those related to a condition of immune suppression or deficiency. This review article will provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge on JAK inhibitors’ effects on immune cells as well as their clinical consequences, particularly with regards to infectious complications.

Impact of donor-derived CD34 + infused cell dose on outcomes of patients undergoing allo-HCT following reduced intensity regimen for myelofibrosis: a study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

The optimal CD34 + cell dose in the setting of RIC allo-HCT for myelofibrosis (MF) remains unknown. We retrospectively analyzed 657 patients with primary or secondary MF transplanted with use of peripheral blood (PB) stem cells after fludarabine/melphalan or fludarabine/busulfan RIC regimen. Median patient age was 58 (range, 22-76) years. Donors were HLA-identical sibling (MSD) or unrelated (UD). Median follow-up was 46 (2-194) months. Patients transplanted with higher doses of CD34 + cells (>7.0 × 10⁶/kg), had an increased chance of achievement of both neutrophil (hazard ratio (HR), 1.46; P < 0.001) and platelet engraftment (HR, 1.43; P < 0.001). In a model with interaction, for patients transplanted from a MSD, higher CD34 + dose was associated with improved overall survival (HR, 0.63; P = 0.04) and relapse-free survival (HR, 0.61; P = 0.02), lower risk of non-relapse mortality (HR, 0.57; P = 0.04) and higher rate of platelet engraftment. The combined effect of higher cell dose and UD was apparent only for higher neutrophil and platelet recovery rate. We did not document any detrimental effect of high CD34 + dose on transplant outcomes. More bulky splenomegaly was an adverse factor for survival, engraftment and NRM. Our analysis suggests a potential benefit for MF patients undergoing RIC PB-allo-HCT receiving more than 7.0 × 10⁶/kg CD34 + cells.

Impact of prior JAK-inhibitor therapy with ruxolitinib on outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a study of the CMWP of EBMT

JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved in patients with myelofibrosis but the impact of pretreatment with RUX on outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains to be determined. We evaluated the impact of RUX on outcome in 551 myelofibrosis patients who received HSCT without (n = 274) or with (n = 277) RUX pretreatment. The overall leukocyte engraftment on day 45 was 92% and significantly higher in RUX responsive patients than those who had no or lost response to RUX (94% vs. 85%, p = 0.05). The 1-year non-relapse mortality was 22% without significant difference between the arms. In a multivariate analysis (MVA) RUX pretreated patients with ongoing spleen response at transplant had a significantly lower risk of relapse (8.1% vs. 19.1%; p = 0.04)] and better 2-year event-free survival (68.9% vs. 53.7%; p = 0.02) in comparison to patients without RUX pretreatment. For overall survival the only significant factors were age > 58 years (p = 0.03) and HLA mismatch donor (p = 0.001). RUX prior to HSCT did not negatively impact outcome after transplantation and patients with ongoing spleen response at time of transplantation had best outcome.

Janus kinases restrain chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells in patients on ibrutinib: Results of a phase II trial

Preclinical observations that killing of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells was dexamethasone (DEX) were enhanced by concomitant inhibition of Bruton's tyrosine kinase and janus kinases (JAKs) motivated a phase II trial to determine if clinical responses to ibrutinib could be deepened by DEX and the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib. Patients on ibrutinib at 420 mg daily for 2 months or with abnormal serum β2M levels after 6 months or with persistent lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly after 12 months were randomized to receive DEX 40 mg on days 1-4 of a 4-week cycle for six cycles alone (three patients) or with ruxolitinib 15 mg BID on days 1-21 of each cycle (five patients). Ruxolitinib dosing was based on a previous phase I trial. Steroid withdrawal symptoms and significantly decreased serum IgG levels occurred in all patients regardless of their exposure to ruxolitinib. A fatal invasive fungal infection was seen in a patient taking DEX without ruxolitinib. Complete responses anticipated with addition of ruxolitinib were not seen. Gene expression studies suggested ruxolitinib had turned off interferon signaling in CLL cells and turned on genes associated with the activation of NFκB by TNF-α. Ruxolitinib increased blood levels of TNF-α by cycle 3 and decreased the inhibitory cytokine IL-10. These results suggest ruxolitinib releases activating signals for CLL cells that persist in patients on ibrutinib. This inhibitory JAK signaling may contribute to the therapeutic activity of ibrutinib. Thus JAK inhibitors provide no added value with ibrutinib for disease control and should be used with caution in CLL patients. Combining glucocorticoids with ibrutinib may increase the risk of serious infects.

Extramedullary hematopoiesis in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Pathophysiology and treatment strategies

Extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH) is often a physiologic response to ineffective marrow production of hematologic cells. While this can be found incidentally in various physiologic and pathophysiologic states, the myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are some of the most common underlying conditions found in patients with EMH. Although this process can assist with hematologic production in defective states, the burden of EMH can lead to symptomatic discomfort and mechanical obstructive complications, most commonly in the spleen and liver. Here we describe the pathophysiology of EMH, treatment options, including medical, surgical and radiation-based approaches.

Biology and Treatment Advances in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the second most common skin cancer diagnosed worldwide. CSCC is generally localized and managed with local therapies such as excision and/or radiotherapy. For patients with unresectable or metastatic disease, recent improvements in our understanding of the underlying biology have led to significant advancements in treatment approaches-including the use of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI)-which have resulted in substantial gains in response and survival compared to traditional cytotoxic approaches. However, there is a lack of understanding of the biology underpinning CSCC in immunocompromised patients, in whom the risk of developing CSCC is hundreds of times higher compared to immunocompetent patients. Furthermore, current ICI approaches are associated with significant risk of graft rejection in organ transplant recipients who make up a significant proportion of immunocompromised patients. Ongoing scientific and clinical research efforts are needed in order to maintain momentum to increase our understanding and refine our therapeutic approaches for patients with CSCC.

Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in ineffective erythropoiesis suppression as a pretransplantation treatment for pediatric patients with beta-thalassemia major

BACKGROUND

Ineffective erythropoiesis (IE) is the most prominent feature of transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia (TDT), which leads to extramedullary hemopoiesis. The rejection rate in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is high in heavily transfused patients with TDT accompanied by prominent IE. Therefore, a pretransplantation treatment bridging to HSCT is often used to reduce allosensitization and IE. Ruxolitinib is a JAK-1/JAK-2 inhibitor and has showed its efficacy in suppressing IE and the immune system. A previously published study on RUX in adult patients with TDT has revealed that this treatment significantly reduces spleen size and is well tolerated.

PROCEDURE

Ten patients (5-14 years old) with TDT and an enlarged spleen were enrolled. The dose of ruxolitinib was adjusted for age: for patients <11 years: 40-100 mg/m² total daily dose and for patients >11 years: 20-30 mg/m² total daily dose. HSCT was performed in 8 of 10 patients.

RESULTS

After the first 3 months of ruxolitinib therapy, spleen volume decreased in 9 of 10 cases by 9.1%-67.5% (M = 35.4%) compared with the initial size (P = 0.003). The adverse events of ruxolitinib (infectious complications, moderate thrombocytopenia, and headache) were successfully managed by reducing the dose. The outcomes of HSCT were favorable in seven of eight cases.

CONCLUSION

Ruxolitinib is promising as a short-term pre-HSCT treatment for pediatric patients with TDT and pronounced IE.

New Horizons in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Treatment: A Review of Current and Future Therapeutic Options

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are aggressive diseases characterized by clonal proliferation of myeloid stem cells. The clonal process leads to excessive red cells production, platelets production, and bone marrow fibrosis. According to the phenotype, MPN can be classified as polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). MPN patients have shortened survival due to the increased risk of thrombosis, hemorrhages, and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Prognosis is variable, with a shorter life expectancy in myelofibrosis. Currently, drug therapy can reduce symptoms, splenomegaly, and risk of thrombosis. Still, some patients can be resistant or intolerant to the treatment. At the same time, allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the only treatment modality with the potential to cure the disease. Nevertheless, the ASCT is reserved for high-risk leukemic progression patients due to the risk of treatment-related death and comorbidity. Therefore, there is a need for new drugs that can eradicate clonal hematopoiesis and prevent progression to more aggressive myeloid neoplasms. Thanks to the better understanding of the disease’s molecular pathogenesis, many new potentially disease-modifying drugs have been developed and are currently in clinical trials. This review explores the most promising new drugs currently in clinical trials.

New Markers of Disease Progression in Myelofibrosis

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm due to the clonal proliferation of a hematopoietic stem cell. The vast majority of patients harbor a somatic gain of function mutation either of JAK2 or MPL or CALR genes in their hematopoietic cells, resulting in the activation of the JAK/STAT pathway. Patients display variable clinical and laboratoristic features, including anemia, thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, thrombotic complications, systemic symptoms, and curtailed survival due to infections, thrombo-hemorrhagic events, or progression to leukemic transformation. New drugs have been developed in the last decade for the treatment of PMF-associated symptoms; however, the only curative option is currently represented by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, which can only be offered to a small percentage of patients. Disease prognosis is based at diagnosis on the classical International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and Dynamic-IPSS (during disease course), which comprehend clinical parameters; recently, new prognostic scoring systems, including genetic and molecular parameters, have been proposed as meaningful tools for a better patient stratification. Moreover, new biological markers predicting clinical evolution and patient survival have been associated with the disease. This review summarizes basic concepts of PMF pathogenesis, clinics, and therapy, focusing on classical prognostic scoring systems and new biological markers of the disease.

Clinical Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Myelofibrosis: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Korea

Previous studies have reported the survival benefit after ruxolitinib treatment in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). However, population-based data of its efficacy are limited. We analyzed the effects of ruxolitinib in MF patients with data from the Korean National Health Insurance Database. In total, 1199 patients diagnosed with MF from January 2011 to December 2017 were identified, of which 731 were included in this study. Patients who received ruxolitinib (n = 224) were matched with those who did not receive the drug (n = 507) using the 1:1 greedy algorithm. Propensity scores were formulated using five variables: age, sex, previous history of arterial/venous thrombosis, and red blood cell (RBC) or platelet (PLT) transfusion dependence at the time of diagnosis. Cox regression analysis for overall survival (OS) revealed that ruxolitinib treatment (hazard ratio (HR), 0.67; p = 0.017) was significantly related to superior survival. In the multivariable analysis for OS, older age (HR, 1.07; p < 0.001), male sex (HR, 1.94; p = 0.021), and RBC (HR, 3.72; p < 0.001) or PLT (HR, 9.58; p = 0.001) transfusion dependence were significantly associated with poor survival, although type of MF did not significantly affect survival. Considering evidence supporting these results remains weak, further studies on the efficacy of ruxolitinib in other populations are needed.

Diverse landscape of dermatologic toxicities from small-molecule inhibitor cancer therapy

BACKGROUND

Advances in molecular biology and genetics have contributed to breakthrough treatments directed at specific pathways associated with the development of cancer. Small-molecule inhibitors (Nibs) aimed at a variety of cellular pathways have been efficacious; however, they are associated with significant dermatologic toxicities.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of dermatologic toxicities associated with Nibs categorized into the following five groups: (a) mitogen-activated protein kinase; (b) growth factor/multi-tyrosine kinase; (c) cell division/DNA repair; (d) signaling associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms; and (e) other signaling pathways. Prospective phase I, II, or III clinical trials, retrospective literature reviews, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and case reviews/reports were included for analysis.

RESULTS

Dermatologic toxicities reviewed were associated with every class of Nibs and ranged from mild to severe or life-threatening adverse skin reactions. Inflammatory reactions manifesting as maculopapular, papulopustular/acneiform, and eczematous lesions were frequent types of dermatologic toxicities seen with Nibs. Squamous cell carcinoma with keratoacanthoma-like features was associated with a subset of Nibs. Substantial overlap in dermatologic toxicities was found between Nibs.

CONCLUSIONS

Dermatologic toxicities from Nibs are diverse and may overlap between classes of Nibs. Recognition of the various types of toxicities from Nibs is critical for patient care in the era of "oncodermatology/dermatopathology."

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Identifying and Treating "Progression" in Myelofibrosis

Over the last decade, the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib has become widely established as the cornerstone of pharmacologic therapy for most patients with myelofibrosis (MF), providing dramatic and durable benefits in terms of splenomegaly and symptoms, and prolonging survival. Ruxolitinib does not address all aspects of the disease, however; notably cytopenias, and its ability to modify the underlying biology of the disease remains in question. Furthermore, patients eventually lose response to ruxolitinib. Multiple groups have reported the median overall survival of MF patients after ruxolitinib discontinuation to be 13 to 14 months. While consensus criteria only recognize splenic and blast progression as "progressive disease" in patients with MF, disease progression can occur in a variety of ways. Besides increasing splenomegaly and progression to accelerated phase/leukemic transformation, patients may develop worsening disease-related symptoms, cytopenias, progressive leukocytosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, etc. As in the frontline setting, treatment needs to be tailored to the clinical needs of the patient. Current treatment options for patients with MF who fail ruxolitinib remain unsatisfactory, and this continues to represent an area of major unmet medical need. The regulatory approval of fedratinib has introduced an important option in the postruxolitinib setting. Fortunately, a plethora of novel agents, both new JAK inhibitors and drugs from other classes, eg, bromodomain and extraterminal (BET), murine double minute 2 (MDM2) and telomerase inhibitors, activin receptor ligand traps, BH3-mimetics and more, are poised to greatly expand the therapeutic armamentarium for patients with MF if successful in pivotal trials.

Classical Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs): A continuum of different disease entities

Classical Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell-derived disorders characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of differentiated myeloid cells and close pathobiologic and clinical features. According to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, MPNs include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The 2016 revision aimed in particular at strengthening the distinction between masked PV and JAK2-mutated ET, and between prefibrotic/early (pre-PMF) and overt PMF. Clinical manifestations in MPNs include constitutional symptoms, microvascular disorders, thrombosis and bleeding, splenomegaly secondary to extramedullary hematopoiesis, cytopenia-related symptoms, and progression to overt MF and acute leukemia. A dysregulation of the JAK/STAT pathway is the unifying mechanistic hallmark of MPNs, and is guided by somatic mutations in driver genes including JAK2, CALR and MPL. Additional mutations in myeloid neoplasm-associated genes have been also identified, with established prognostic relevance, particularly in PMF. Prognostication of MPN patients relies on disease-specific clinical models. The increasing knowledge of MPN biology led to the development of integrated clinical and molecular prognostic scores that allow a more refined stratification. Recently, the therapeutic landscape of MPNs has been revolutionized by the introduction of potent, selective JAK inhibitors (ruxolitinib, fedratinib), that proved effective in controlling disease-related symptoms and splenomegaly, yet leaving unmet critical needs, owing the lack of disease-modifying activity. In this review, we will deal with molecular, clinical, and therapeutic aspects of the three classical MPNs aiming at highlighting either shared characteristics, that overall define a continuum within a single disease family, and uniqueness, at the same time.

Management of Myelofibrosis-Associated Anemia: Focus on Standard Agents and Novel Therapeutics in Phase 3 Clinical Trials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of myelofibrosis is risk-adapted when considering transplant eligibility and symptom-directed, prioritizing the most burdensome symptoms for the patient. Unfortunately, myelofibrosis-anemia is common, multifactorial in its origin, and impactful regarding prognosis. While clinical trials are advised, not all patients have convenient access, and therefore, hematologists should be aware of the data supporting the use of conventional agents such as erythropoietin-stimulating agents, steroid treatments (danazol and prednisone), and immunomodulatory drugs (thalidomide and lenalidomide). This review summarizes the conventional approach to treating myelofibrosis-anemia and highlights recent data from 3 novel agents that are under phase 3 evaluation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Momelotonib is a JAK1/2 and ACVR1 inhibitor that has demonstrated not only improvements in splenomegaly and symptoms, but also amelioration of anemia on the SIMPLIFY 1 and 2 clinical trial program. This may occur through suppression of hepcidin production. Luspatercept promotes late-stage hematopoiesis, and the phase 2 study has shown promise in ameliorating anemia as a monotherapy, and especially in combination with ruxolitinib. Finally, CP-0160, a BET inhibitor, has shown efficacy as an anemia-directed agent, when used as monotherapy and in combination. This agent reduces cytokine production and promotes erythroid differentiation. Results have been presented for patients previously treated with JAK inhibitors, as well as those who were naïve to JAK inhibitor therapy. Safety and effectiveness are reviewed for both conventional and selected novel agents used in the treatment of MF-anemia. A practical approach to treatment is presented, and data from ASH 2020 are presented.

Effects of ruxolitinib on infection in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Infections in ruxolitinib-treated myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients were reported frequently. This work aimed to systematically estimate the risk of infection associated with ruxolitinib in MPN patients.

METHODS

The PUBMED, CNKI, EMBASE, Cochrane and CBM databases were searched to identify all related studies. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to express the difference between groups. I² was calculated to evaluate heterogeneity. Revman software was used to conduct the analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven randomized control trials were included in this analysis. The risk of overall infections was not different at the early stage of ruxolitinib use (OR, 95%CI: 1.23, [0.91, 1.67]). In the extension phase, overall infection was significantly lower in patients receiving ruxolitinib (OR, 95%CI: 0.53, [0.36, 0.79]). Herpes zoster infection was at higher risk both at early stage and in the extension phase (OR, 95%CI: 7.39, [1.33, 41.07]), (OR, 95%CI: 5.23, [1.46, 18.79]), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that ruxolitinib increased the risk of herpes zoster infection. However, current studies were not enough to estimate the effects of ruxolitinib on the risk of overall infection in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Ruxolitinib-treated polycythemia vera patients and their risk of secondary malignancies

Recently, there has been increased concern about a risk of secondary malignancies (SM) occurring in myelofibrosis (MF) patients receiving ruxolitinib (RUX). In polycythemia vera (PV), on the other hand, only limited data on the risk of SM under RUX treatment are available. To investigate the association between RUX therapy in PV and SM, we conducted a retrospective, single-center study that included 289 PV patients. RUX was administered to 32.9% (95/289) of patients for a median treatment duration of 48.0 months (range 1.0–101.6). Within a median follow-up of 97 months (1.0–395.0) after PV diagnosis, 24 SM occurred. Comparing the number of PV patients with RUX-associated SM (n = 10, 41.7%) with the 14 (58.3%) patients who developed SM without RUX, no significant difference (p = 0.34, chi square test) was found. No increased incidences of melanoma, lymphoma, or solid “non-skin” malignancies were observed with RUX (p = 0.31, p = 0.60, and p = 0.63, respectively, chi square test). However, significantly more NMSC occurred in association with RUX treatment (p = 0.03, chi-squared test). The “SM-free survival” was not significantly different by log rank test for all 289 patients (p = 0.65), for the patients (n = 208; 72%) receiving cytoreductive therapy (p = 0.48) or for different therapy sequences (p = 0.074). In multivariate analysis, advanced age at PV diagnosis (HR 1.062 [95% CI 1.028, 1.098]) but not administration of RUX (HR 1.068 [95% CI 0.468, 2.463]) was associated with an increased risk for SM (p = 0.005). According to this retrospective analysis, no increased risk of SM due to RUX treatment could be substantiated for PV.

Bone marrow morphological features and therapy in patients with Philadelphia-negative neoplasms

Introduction Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPNs) are clonal malignant bone marrow (BM) diseases, arising from a hematopoietic stem cell. All therapies for these neoplasms have peculiar effects on the bone marrow, but little evidence has been described in the literature.Areas covered This review examines BM morphological changes following the main treatments in Philadelphia-negative MPNs. Hydroxyurea can reduce the cellularity of the erythroid and megakaryocyte lineages but has minimal impact on fibrotic evolution. There is general agreement on its dysplastic effects, with a high incidence of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Interferon treatment can reduce or normalize BM cellularity, improve erythropoiesis, and reduce the number and atypicality of megakaryocytes. Most data describe reduction or complete resolution of marrow fibrosis; dysplastic effects are not reported. Anagrelide may induce an increase in the number of BM megakaryocytes, especially immature megakaryocytes or precursors, and a worsening of marrow fibrosis or increased transformation of essential thrombocythemia into myelofibrosis. Ruxolitinib can improve or stabilize BM fibrosis and reduces the frequency and dense clustering of megakaryocytes.Expert opinion Since previous therapy can modify BM features, it is essential to obtain information on previous or current therapies and to collect complete clinical information.

Improving symptom burden and quality of life in patients with myelofibrosis: current strategies and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a complex and aggressive hematologic malignancy resulting from JAK/STAT-driven myeloproliferation and abnormal fibrogenesis. The clinical manifestations are heterogeneous and negatively impact quality of life and survival. JAK inhibitors improve symptoms and splenomegaly to a variable degree in a proportion of patients, but the effects for many patients are insufficient or short-lived.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the constellation of symptoms that befall patients with MF, describes methods to quantify and serially monitor these symptoms, and evaluates pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions for disease-related symptoms. The review also includes a discussion of areas of unmet medical need, and proposes future methods for meeting this need.

EXPERT OPINION

The treatment landscape for MF is evolving rapidly. The most effective therapies or combinations of therapies will likely simultaneously impact both the malignant hematopoietic stem cell and mechanisms of aberrant fibrogenesis that drive this disease. The goals of treatment for patients with myelofibrosis should be to improve length and quality of life. Clinical trials must be designed with these goals in mind, with endpoints focused on overall survival and symptom reduction, as opposed to surrogate endpoints such as spleen volume reduction.

The JAK-STAT pathway: an emerging target for cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis and myeloproliferative neoplasms

Inflammation contributes centrally to cardiovascular diseases, and anti-inflammatory treatments can reduce cardiovascular events. The JAK-STAT pathway is an emerging target in inflammation, mainly in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), disorders that heighten cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study was to review the international literature on the relationship between dysregulation of the JAK-STAT pathway in RA/MPNs and cardiovascular risk and on the potential cardiovascular effects of JAK-STAT inhibitors. The JAK-STAT pathway sustains inflammatory and thrombotic events in autoimmune disorders such as RA and MPNs. Here, an imbalance exists between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines [increased levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1-β, tumour necrosis factor-α, decreased levels of IL-10] and the over-expression of some prothrombotic proteins, such as protein kinase Cε, on the surface of activated platelets. This pathway also operates in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. JAK-STAT inhibitors may reduce cardiovascular events and related deaths in such conditions, but the potential of these agents requires more studies, especially with regard to cardiovascular safety, and particularly for potential prothrombotic effects. JAK-STAT inhibitors merit consideration to curb heightened cardiovascular risk in patients with RA and MPNs, with rigorous assessment of the potential benefits and risks.

Integration of Molecular Information in Risk Assessment of Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal disorders of a hematopoietic stem cell, characterized by an abnormal proliferation of largely mature cells driven by mutations in JAK2, CALR, and MPL. All these mutations lead to a constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT signaling, which represents a target for therapy. Beyond driver ones, most patients, especially with myelofibrosis, harbor mutations in an array of "myeloid neoplasm-associated" genes that encode for proteins involved in chromatin modification and DNA methylation, RNA splicing, transcription regulation, and oncogenes. These additional mutations often arise in the context of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). The extensive characterization of the pathologic genome associated with MPN highlighted selected driver and non-driver mutations for their clinical informativeness. First, driver mutations are enlisted in the WHO classification as major diagnostic criteria and may be used for monitoring of residual disease after transplantation and response to treatment. Second, mutation profile can be used, eventually in combination with cytogenetic, histopathologic, hematologic, and clinical variables, to risk stratify patients regarding thrombosis, overall survival, and rate of transformation to secondary leukemia. This review outlines the molecular landscape of MPN and critically interprets current information for their potential impact on patient management.

JAK Be Nimble: Reviewing the Development of JAK Inhibitors and JAK Inhibitor Combinations for Special Populations of Patients with Myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm hallmarked by uncontrolled blood counts, constitutional symptoms, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and an increased risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are the most common treatment for MF due to their ability to reduce spleen size and improve disease-related symptoms; however, JAK inhibitors are not suitable for every patient and their impact on MF is limited in several respects. Novel JAK inhibitors and JAK inhibitor combinations are emerging that aim to enhance the treatment landscape, providing deeper responses to a broader population of patients with the continued hope of providing disease modification and improving long-term outcomes. In this review, we highlight several specific areas of unmet need within MF. Subsequently, we review agents that target those areas of unmet need, focusing specifically on the JAK inhibitors, momelotinib, pacritinib, itacitinib, and NS-018 as well as JAK inhibitor combination approaches using CPI-0610, navitoclax, parsaclisib, and luspatercept.

Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation following ruxolitinib treatment in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

Objectives The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess the incidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) during and after ruxolitinib treatment. Methods Between February 2013 and February 2020, 224 patients with MPN were treated using ruxolitinib at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Of these, 6 had chronic, and 56 had resolved HBV infection, including 43 patients who received combination treatment with thalidomide, prednisone, and stanozolol (TSP) during ruxolitinib treatment. Results Two patients with chronic HBV infection who did not take any antiviral prophylaxis developed HBV reactivation and hepatitis flare. The other four patients with chronic HBV infection, who took antiviral prophylaxis before ruxolitinib treatment, did not develop HBV reactivation. Also, no patients with resolved HBV infection received antiviral prophylaxis and developed HBV reactivation. Conclusion This study demonstrated that HBV reactivation and hepatitis flare might commonly occur a few months after initiating ruxolitinib treatment in patients with chronic HBV infection who did not take antiviral prophylaxis, especially in combination with TSP. Still, it was extremely rare in patients with resolved HBV infection.

Crucial role of hematopoietic JAK2 V617F in the development of aortic aneurysms

JAK2 V617F is the most frequent driver mutation in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and is associated with vascular complications. However, the impact of hematopoietic JAK2 V617F on aortic aneurysms (AA) remains unknown. Our cross-sectional study indicated that nine (23%) of 39 MPN patients with JAK2 V617F exhibited the presence of AA. In order to clarify whether the hematopoietic JAK2 V617F contributes to the AA, we applied bone marrow transplantation (BMT) with the donor cells from Jak2 V617F transgenic (JAK2^V617F) mice or control wild-type (WT) mice into lethally irradiated apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Five weeks after BMT, the JAK2^V617F-BMT mice and WT-BMT mice were subjected to continuous angiotensin II infusion to induce AA formation. Four weeks after angiotensin II infusion, the abdominal aorta diameter in the JAK2^V617F-BMT mice was significantly enlarged compared to that in the WT-BMT mice. Additionally, the abdominal AA-free survival rate was significantly lower in the JAK2^V617F-BMT mice. Hematopoietic JAK2 V617F accelerated aortic elastic lamina degradation as well as activation of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 in the abdominal aorta. The numbers of infiltrated macrophages were significantly upregulated in the abdominal aorta of the JAK2^V617F-BMT mice accompanied by STAT3 phosphorylation. The accumulation of BM-derived hematopoietic cells carrying JAK2 V617F in the abdominal aorta was confirmed by use of the reporter green fluorescent proteintransgene. BM-derived macrophages carrying JAK2 V617F showed increases in mRNA expression levels of Mmp2, Mmp9, and Mmp13. Ruxolitinib decreased the abdominal aorta diameter and the incidence of abdominal AA in the JAK2^V617F-BMT mice. Our findings provide a novel feature of vascular complications of AA in MPN with JAK2 V617F.

Molecular pathogenesis of the myeloproliferative neoplasms

The Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) compromise a heterogeneous group of clonal myeloid stem cell disorders comprising polycythaemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia and primary myelofibrosis. Despite distinct clinical entities, these disorders are linked by morphological similarities and propensity to thrombotic complications and leukaemic transformation. Current therapeutic options are limited in disease-modifying activity with a focus on the prevention of thrombus formation. Constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT signalling pathway is a hallmark of pathogenesis across the disease spectrum with driving mutations in JAK2, CALR and MPL identified in the majority of patients. Co-occurring somatic mutations in genes associated with epigenetic regulation, transcriptional control and splicing of RNA are variably but recurrently identified across the MPN disease spectrum, whilst epigenetic contributors to disease are increasingly recognised. The prognostic implications of one MPN diagnosis may significantly limit life expectancy, whilst another may have limited impact depending on the disease phenotype, genotype and other external factors. The genetic and clinical similarities and differences in these disorders have provided a unique opportunity to understand the relative contributions to MPN, myeloid and cancer biology generally from specific genetic and epigenetic changes. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular pathophysiology of MPN exploring the role of driver mutations, co-occurring mutations, dysregulation of intrinsic cell signalling, epigenetic regulation and genetic predisposing factors highlighting important areas for future consideration.

Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis: a retrospective and multicenter experience in Turkey

Background/aim

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis.

Materials and methods

From 15 centers, 176 patients (53.4% male, 46.6% female) were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

The median age at ruxolitinib initiation was 62 (28–87) and 100 (56.8%) of all were diagnosed as PMF. Constitutional symptoms were observed in 84.7%. The median initiation dose of ruxolitinib was 30 mg (10–40). Dose change was made in 69 (39.2%) patients. Forty seven (35.6%) and 20 (15.2%) of 132 patients had hematological and nonhematological adverse events, respectively. The mean spleen sizes before and after ruxolitinib treatment were 219.67 ± 46.79 mm versus 199.49 ± 40.95 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no correlation between baseline features and subsequent spleen response. Overall survival at 1-year was 89.5% and the median follow up was 10 (1–55) months. We could not show any relationship between survival and reduction in spleen size (p = 0.73).

Conclusion

We found ruxolitinib to be safe, well tolerated, and effective in real-life clinical practice in Turkey. Ruxolitinib dose titration can provide better responses in terms of not only clinical benefit but also for long term of ruxolitinib treatment.

The Next Generation of JAK Inhibitors: an Update on Fedratinib, Momelotonib, and Pacritinib

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ruxolitinib is the first FDA-approved JAK inhibitor for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms and is an effective means of controlling symptom burden and improving splenomegaly. However, a majority of patients will develop disease progression with long-term use. Fedratinib, momelotinib, and pacritinib are three newer-generation JAK inhibitors being prospectively evaluated and we will discuss their roles in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fedratinib has a role in both JAK-inhibitor naive intermediate-/high-risk myelofibrosis patients and in patients that have previously received ruxolitinib. It has recently received FDA approval for these indications as well. Momelotinib does not appear to have an advantage over ruxolitinib with regards to improving splenomegaly in intermediate-/high-risk JAK-inhibitor naive myelofibrosis. However, increased rates of transfusion independence have been noted with momelotinib. Pacritinib has been studied in myelofibrosis patients with significant baseline anemia and thrombocytopenia; these trials support the use of pacritinib in myelofibrosis patients with significant thrombocytopenia. While ruxolitinib is effective in reducing the symptom burden and splenomegaly of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, a majority of patients will ultimately progress on therapy. Newer-generation JAK inhibitors including fedratinib, momelotinib, and pacritinib are being prospectively evaluated to determine their appropriate roles in the management of myeloproliferative neoplasms. In addition, both combination therapies with JAK inhibitors and novel investigational therapies are being actively explored.

Untwining Anti-Tumor and Immunosuppressive Effects of JAK Inhibitors-A Strategy for Hematological Malignancies?

Simple Summary

The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway is aberrantly activated in many malignancies. Inhibition of this pathway via JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) is therefore an attractive therapeutic strategy underlined by Ruxolitinib (JAK1/2 inhibitor) being approved for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. As a consequence of the crucial role of the JAK-STAT pathway in the regulation of immune responses, inhibition of JAKs suppresses the immune system. This review article provides a thorough overview of the current knowledge on JAKinibs’ effects on immune cells in the context of hematological malignancies. We also discuss the potential use of JAKinibs for the treatment of diseases in which lymphocytes are the source of the malignancy.

Abstract

The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway propagates signals from a variety of cytokines, contributing to cellular responses in health and disease. Gain of function mutations in JAKs or STATs are associated with malignancies, with JAK2^V617F being the main driver mutation in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Therefore, inhibition of this pathway is an attractive therapeutic strategy for different types of cancer. Numerous JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) have entered clinical trials, including the JAK1/2 inhibitor Ruxolitinib approved for the treatment of MPN. Importantly, loss of function mutations in JAK-STAT members are a cause of immune suppression or deficiencies. MPN patients undergoing Ruxolitinib treatment are more susceptible to infections and secondary malignancies. This highlights the suppressive effects of JAKinibs on immune responses, which renders them successful in the treatment of autoimmune diseases but potentially detrimental for cancer patients. Here, we review the current knowledge on the effects of JAKinibs on immune cells in the context of hematological malignancies. Furthermore, we discuss the potential use of JAKinibs for the treatment of diseases in which lymphocytes are the source of malignancies. In summary, this review underlines the necessity of a robust immune profiling to provide the best benefit for JAKinib-treated patients.

RAS/CBL mutations predict resistance to JAK inhibitors in myelofibrosis and are associated with poor prognostic features

The dysregulation of the JAK/STAT pathway drives the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis (MF). Recently, several JAK inhibitors (JAKis) have been developed for treating MF. Select mutations (MTs) have been associated with impaired outcomes and are currently incorporated in molecularly annotated prognostic models. Mutations of RAS/MAPK pathway genes are frequently reported in cancer and at low frequencies in MF. In this study, we investigated the phenotypic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications of NRASMTs, KRASMTs, and CBLMTs (RAS/CBLMTs) in 464 consecutive MF patients. A total of 59 (12.7%) patients had RAS/CBLMTs: NRASMTs, n = 25 (5.4%); KRASMTs, n = 13 (2.8%); and CBLMTs, n = 26 (5.6%). Patients with RAS/CBLMTs were more likely to present with high-risk clinical and molecular features. RAS/CBLMTs were associated with inferior overall survival compared with patients without MTs and retained significance in a multivariate model, including the Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System (MIPSS70) risk factors and cytogenetics; however, inclusion of RAS/CBLMTs in molecularly annotated prognostic models did not improve the predictive power of the latter. The 5-year cumulative incidence of leukemic transformation was notably higher in the RAS/CBLMT cohort. Among 61 patients treated with JAKis and observed for a median time of 30 months, the rate of symptoms and spleen response at 6 months was significantly lower in the RAS/CBLMT cohort. Logistic regression analysis disclosed a significant inverse correlation between RAS/CBLMTs and the probability of achieving a symptom or spleen response that was retained in multivariate analysis. In summary, our study showed that RAS/CBLMTs are associated with adverse phenotypic features and survival outcomes and, more important, may predict reduced response to JAKis.

Persistence of myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib: biology and clinical implications

Activation of JAK-STAT signaling is one of the hallmarks of myelofibrosis, a myeloproliferative neoplasm that leads to inflammation, progressive bone marrow failure, and a risk of leukemic transformation. Around 90% of patients with myelofibrosis have a mutation in JAK2, MPL, or CALR: so-called 'driver' mutations that lead to activation of JAK2. Ruxolitinib, and other JAK2 inhibitors in clinical use, provide clinical benefit but do not have a major impact on the abnormal hematopoietic clone. This phenomenon is termed 'persistence', in contrast to usual patterns of resistance. Multiple groups have shown that type 1 inhibitors of JAK2, which bind the active conformation of the enzyme, lead to JAK2 becoming resistant to degradation with consequent accumulation of phospho-JAK2. In turn, this can lead to exacerbation of inflammatory manifestations when the JAK inhibitor is discontinued, and it may also contribute to disease persistence. The ways in which JAK2 V617F and CALR mutations lead to activation of JAK-STAT signaling are incompletely understood. We summarize what is known about pathological JAK-STAT activation in myelofibrosis and how this might lead to future novel therapies for myelofibrosis with greater disease-modifying potential.

Pharmacological Inhibition of Insulin Growth Factor-1 Receptor (IGF-1R) Alone or in Combination With Ruxolitinib Shows Therapeutic Efficacy in Preclinical Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Models

Even after development of the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients require novel therapeutic options. While ruxolitinib can considerably improve quality of life and prolong survival, it does not modify the natural disease course in most patients. Moreover, resistance develops with prolonged use. Therefore, various combination treatments are currently being investigated. Published data provide a compelling rationale for the inhibition of insulin growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) signaling in MPN. Here we report that genetic and pharmacological inhibition of IGF-1R selectively reduced Jak2^V617F-driven cytokine-independent proliferation ex vivo. Two different structurally unrelated IGF-1R inhibitors ameliorated disease phenotype in a murine MPN model and significantly prolonged survival. Moreover, in mice, low-dose ruxolitinib synergized with IGF-1R inhibition to increase survival. Our data demonstrate preclinical efficacy of IGF-1R inhibition in a murine MPN model.

The clinical role of interferon alpha in Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell malignancies. Chronic inflammation and a dysregulated immune system are central to the pathogenesis and progression of MPNs. Interferon alpha (IFNα) was first used for the treatment of MPNs approximately 40 years ago. It has significant antiviral effects and plays a role in anti-proliferative, pro-apoptotic, and immunomodulatory responses. IFNα is an effective drug that can simultaneously induce significant rates of clinical, hematological, molecular, and histopathological responses, suggesting that the disease may be cured in some patients. However, its frequent dosage and toxicity profile are major barriers to its widespread use. Pegylated IFNα (peg-IFNα), and more recently, ropeginterferon alpha-2b (ropeg-IFNα-2b), are expected to overcome these drawbacks. The objective of this article is to discuss the clinical role of IFNα in Philadelphia-negative MPNs through a review of recent studies. In particular, it is expected that new IFNs, such as peg-IFNα and ropeg-IFNα-2b, with lower rates of discontinuation due to fewer adverse effects, will play important clinical roles.

Fedratinib Improves Myelofibrosis-related Symptoms and Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Myelofibrosis Previously Treated with Ruxolitinib: Patient-reported Outcomes from the Phase II JAKARTA2 Trial

Myelofibrosis symptoms compromise health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Ruxolitinib can reduce myelofibrosis symptom severity, but many patients discontinue ruxolitinib due to loss of response or unacceptable toxicity. Fedratinib is an oral, selective JAK2 inhibitor approved in the United States for treatment of patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis. The single-arm, phase II JAKARTA2 trial assessed fedratinib 400 mg/d (starting dose) in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib. Patient-reported changes in myelofibrosis symptom severity using the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF), and overall HRQoL and functional status using the EORTC QLQ-C30, were evaluated at each cycle. Clinically meaningful changes from baseline HRQoL scores were based on effect sizes. Ninety patients were MFSAF-evaluable. Myelofibrosis symptoms were mild-to-moderate at baseline. Patients showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in total symptom scores from baseline on the MFSAF at all post baseline visits through the end of cycle 6 (EOC6). Baseline global health status/QoL and functional domain scores on the EORTC QLQ-C30 were meaningfully worse than in the general population. At EOC6, 44% of patients reported clinically meaningful improvements in global health status/QoL, and 30%–53% of patients experienced clinically meaningful improvement in QLQ-C30 functional domains across post baseline timepoints. Over 80% of ongoing patients perceived fedratinib as beneficial on the Patient’s Global Impression of Change questionnaire. Fedratinib effects were consistent among prognostically relevant patient subgroups. Patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib experienced clinically meaningful improvements in myelofibrosis symptom burden, overall HRQoL, and functional status in the first 6 months of fedratinib treatment.

Next Generation Therapeutics for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, bone marrow fibrosis, and a propensity towards transformation to acute leukemia. JAK inhibitors are the only approved therapy for myelofibrosis and have been successful in reducing spleen and symptom burden. However, they do not significantly impact disease progression and many patients are ineligible due to coexisting cytopenias. Patients who are refractory to JAK inhibition also have a dismal survival. Therefore, non-JAK inhibitor-based therapies are being explored in pre-clinical and clinical settings. In this review, we discuss novel treatments in development for myelofibrosis with targets outside of the JAK-STAT pathway. We focus on the mechanism, preclinical rationale, and available clinical efficacy and safety information of relevant agents including those that target apoptosis (navitoclax, KRT-232, LCL-161, imetelstat), epigenetic modulation (CPI-0610, bomedemstat), the bone marrow microenvironment (PRM-151, AVID-200, alisertib), signal transduction pathways (parsaclisib), and miscellaneous agents (tagraxofusp. luspatercept). We also provide commentary on the future of therapeutic development in myelofibrosis.

Overview of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: History, Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Criteria, and Complications

Myeloproliferative disorders are a group of diseases morphologically linked by terminal myeloid cell expansion that frequently evolve from one clinical phenotype to another and eventually progress to acute myeloid leukemia. Diagnostic criteria for the Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have been established by the World Health Organization and they are recognized as blood cancers. MPNs have a complex and incompletely understood pathogenesis that includes systemic inflammation, clonal hematopoiesis, and constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT pathway. Complications, such as thrombosis and progression to overt forms of myelofibrosis and acute leukemia, contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality of patients with MPN.

Age- and breed-matched retrospective cohort study of malignancies and benign skin masses in 660 dogs with allergic dermatitis treated long-term with versus without oclacitinib

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cumulative incidences of malignancies and benign skin masses and the mean age at death or euthanasia in dogs with allergic dermatitis treated long-term with versus without oclacitinib.

ANIMALS

660 client-owned dogs.

PROCEDURES

Medical records were searched to identify dogs with allergic dermatitis treated for ≥ 6 months with oclacitinib (exposed dogs; n = 339) versus other available treatments before the introduction of oclacitinib (nonexposed dogs; 321) and with ≥ 24 months of follow-up information available. Nonexposed dogs were age and breed matched with 321 of the exposed dogs; data for the remained 18 exposed dogs were included in statistical analyses. Results for cumulative incidences of malignancies and other variables were compared between groups, and the effect of daily maintenance dosage of oclacitinib on cumulative incidences of malignancies and other skin masses was evaluated within the exposed group.

RESULTS

No meaningful differences were detected in the cumulative incidences of malignancies and overall skin masses or the mean age at death or euthanasia for dogs in the exposed group (16.5% [56/339], 56.6% [192/339], and 11.2 years [n = 80], respectively) versus the nonexposed group (12.8% [41/321], 58.3% [187/321], and 11.8 years [71], respectively). There was no association identified between daily maintenance dosage of oclacitinib and odds of malignancy or benign skin masses for dogs in the exposed group.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results indicated that long-term treatment with oclacitinib did not pose additional risk for malignancy in dogs; however, veterinarians should continue to observe FDA-approved label warning and precaution statements for oclacitinib and regularly screen for neoplasia in dogs with allergic skin disease treated with or without oclacitinib.

Ruxolitinib as adjunctive therapy for secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: A case series

INTRODUCTION

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a cytokine storm syndrome associated with mortality rates of up to 88%. Standard therapy with high-dose glucocorticoids and etoposide used in adults is extrapolated from pediatric trials, with significant toxicity in older patients and those with poor performance status. The JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib has recently gained attention as a treatment option for HLH due to its broad cytokine-modulating abilities and safety profile. Herein we report our center's experience using ruxolitinib in the treatment of adult-onset secondary HLH.

CASE SERIES

We report four patients with profound secondary HLH provoked by diverse triggers, including invasive pulmonary aspergillosis on background systemic lupus erythematosus, disseminated tuberculosis, and T-cell lymphoma treated with ruxolitinib as monotherapy or combination therapy in upfront and salvage settings.

RESULTS

All four patients had rapid, sustained improvement in clinical status, inflammatory markers, and hematological cell counts followed by durable remission. Three patients developed manageable infectious complications postruxolitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

This series demonstrates the effective use of JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib to control pathological immune activation in critically ill patients with secondary HLH and otherwise limited therapeutic options. JAK inhibition is also an area of urgent investigation for the treatment of cytokine storm associated with COVID-19.

Clinical Significance of Bone Marrow Blast Percentage in Patients With Myelofibrosis and the Effect of Ruxolitinib Therapy

BACKGROUND

The effect of bone marrow (BM) blasts on the outcome of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) is poorly understood, unless they are ≥ 10% and represent a more aggressive accelerated phase. Similarly, the role of the JAK inhibitor, ruxolitinib (RUX), has not been assessed in correlation with BM blasts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Herein, we present clinical characteristics and outcomes of 1412 patients with MF stratified by BM blasts and therapy.

RESULTS

Seven percent and 4% of patients had 5% to 9% and ≥ 10% BM blasts, respectively. Forty-four percent of patients were treated with RUX throughout their disease course. Overall survival (OS) differed among patients with 0% to 1%, 2% to 4%, and 5% to 9% BM blasts, with median OS of 64, 48, and 22 months, respectively (P < .001). Patients with 5% to 9% BM blasts had similar OS as patients with ≥ 10% BM blasts (22 vs. 14 months; P = .73). All patients with < 10% blasts who were treated with RUX showed superior OS to patients who did not receive RUX.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that patients with MF with ≥ 5% BM blasts represent a high-risk group with adverse clinical characteristics and inferior outcome. However, they still appear to derive substantial survival benefit from therapy with RUX.

Immunotherapy and Immunomodulation in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms are characterized by chronic inflammation. The discovery of constitutively active JAK-STAT signaling associated with driver mutations has led to clinical and translational breakthroughs. Insights into the other pathways and novel factors of potential importance are being actively investigated. Various classes of agents with immunomodulating or immunosuppressive properties have been used with varying degrees of success in treating myeloproliferative neoplasms. Early clinical trials are investigating the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors, cell-based immunotherapies, and SMAC mimetics. The dynamic landscape of immunotherapy and immunomodulation in myeloproliferative neoplasms is the topic of the present review.