151
|
Patel SG, May FP, Anderson JC, Burke CA, Dominitz JA, Gross SA, Jacobson BC, Shaukat A, Robertson DJ. Updates on Age to Start and Stop Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations From the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2022; 162:285-299. [PMID: 34794816 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This document is a focused update to the 2017 colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, which represents the American College of Gastroenterology, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. This update is restricted to addressing the age to start and stop CRC screening in average-risk individuals and the recommended screening modalities. Although there is no literature demonstrating that CRC screening in individuals under age 50 improves health outcomes such as CRC incidence or CRC-related mortality, sufficient data support the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force to suggest average-risk CRC screening begin at age 45. This recommendation is based on the increasing disease burden among individuals under age 50, emerging data that the prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in individuals ages 45 to 49 approaches rates in individuals 50 to 59, and modeling studies that demonstrate the benefits of screening outweigh the potential harms and costs. For individuals ages 76 to 85, the decision to start or continue screening should be individualized and based on prior screening history, life expectancy, CRC risk, and personal preference. Screening is not recommended after age 85.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati G Patel
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado; Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado.
| | - Folasade P May
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California; Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, and the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut
| | | | - Jason A Dominitz
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System and the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | - Aasma Shaukat
- GI Section, Minneapolis VA Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Douglas J Robertson
- VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, and the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Patel SG, May FP, Anderson JC, Burke CA, Dominitz JA, Gross SA, Jacobson BC, Shaukat A, Robertson DJ. Updates on age to start and stop colorectal cancer screening: recommendations from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:1-15. [PMID: 34794803 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This document is a focused update to the 2017 colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, which represents the American College of Gastroenterology, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. This update is restricted to addressing the age to start and stop CRC screening in average-risk individuals and the recommended screening modalities. Although there is no literature demonstrating that CRC screening in individuals under age 50 improves health outcomes such as CRC incidence or CRC-related mortality, sufficient data support the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force to suggest average-risk CRC screening begin at age 45. This recommendation is based on the increasing disease burden among individuals under age 50, emerging data that the prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in individuals ages 45 to 49 approaches rates in individuals 50 to 59, and modeling studies that demonstrate the benefits of screening outweigh the potential harms and costs. For individuals ages 76 to 85, the decision to start or continue screening should be individualized and based on prior screening history, life expectancy, CRC risk, and personal preference. Screening is not recommended after age 85.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati G Patel
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Folasade P May
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA; Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA and the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA; University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Jason A Dominitz
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System and the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | - Aasma Shaukat
- GI Section, Minneapolis VA Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Douglas J Robertson
- VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA and the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
153
|
Drogan C, Kupfer SS. Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendations and Outcomes in Lynch Syndrome. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:59-74. [PMID: 34798987 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome enables early detection and likely cancer prevention. CRC screening guidelines have evolved from universal to gene-specific recommendations based on lifetime neoplasia risks. Regular screening for Lynch syndrome reduces CRC-related mortality; however, high CRC incidence during regular colonoscopy screening suggests the possibility of nonpolypoid carcinogenesis. Colonoscopy is the primary modality for screening for Lynch syndrome with mixed and emerging data on quality metrics, chromoendoscopy, artificial intelligence, and nonendoscopic modalities. Screening adherence varies across studies. In this review, we present the current state of CRC screening recommendations, outcomes, and modalities in Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Drogan
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sonia S Kupfer
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Bhatti U, Jansson-Knodell C, Saito A, Han A, Krajicek E, Han Y, Imperiale TF, Fayad N. Not FIT for Use: Fecal Immunochemical Testing in the Inpatient and Emergency Settings. Am J Med 2022; 135:76-81. [PMID: 34508698 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is widely used for colorectal cancer screening, its only indication. Its effect on clinical decision-making beyond screening is unknown. We studied the use of FIT in emergency and inpatient settings and its impact on patient care. METHODS Using electronic medical records, we reviewed all non-ambulatory FITs performed from November 2017 to October 2019 at a tertiary care community hospital. We collected data on demographics, indications, gastroenterology consultations, and endoscopic procedures. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the effect of FIT on gastroenterology consultation and endoscopy. RESULTS We identified 550 patients with at least 1 FIT test. Only 3 FITs (0.5%) were performed for colorectal cancer screening. FITs were primarily ordered from the emergency department (45.3%) or inpatient hospital floor (42.2%). Anemia (44.0%), followed by gastrointestinal bleeding (40.9%), were the most common indications. FIT was positive in 253 patients (46.0%), and gastroenterology consultation was obtained for 47.4% (n = 120), compared with 14.5% (n = 43) of the 297 FIT-negative patients (odds ratio 3.28; 95% confidence interval, 2.23-4.82, P < .0001). A potential bleeding source was identified in 80% of patients with reported or witnessed overt gastrointestinal bleeding, a similar proportion (80.7%; P = .92) to patients who were FIT positive with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Multivariate analysis showed that melena, hematemesis, and a positive FIT were associated with gastroenterology consultation (all P < .05), while only melena (odds ratio 3.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-7.54) was associated with endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS Nearly all emergency department and inpatient FIT use was inappropriate. FIT resulted in more gastroenterology consultation but was not independently associated with inpatient endoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umer Bhatti
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Claire Jansson-Knodell
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Akira Saito
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Andrew Han
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Edward Krajicek
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Yan Han
- Division of Biostatistics & Health Data Science, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis
| | - Thomas F Imperiale
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Ind; Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Indianapolis, Ind
| | - Nabil Fayad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Ind.
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Oden K, Nelson M, Williams L. Colonoscopy Screening and Polyp Detection in the Southeastern United States. Gastroenterol Nurs 2022; 45:59-62. [PMID: 35020631 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Screening colonoscopy is recommended for polyp detection and colorectal cancer prevention for those aged 50-75 years. The aim of this study was to determine colon polyp incidence rates detected through screening colonoscopies in the Southeast United States. A retrospective chart review was conducted to determine polyp rates. Charts with a diagnostic code of "screening" colonoscopy were reviewed for age, gender, number of polyps, and type of polyps. The number of charts reviewed was 534, with a total of 239 found to have polyps. Polyp type was defined as hyperplastic and adenomatous, with all adenomatous types grouped together. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. The median age of participants was 62 years with 58% being male. The combined rate of colon polyp detection was 44.6%. Seventy percent of the overall sample was found to have at least one polyp. From 16% to 20% of the study population had mixed (adenomatous and hyperplastic) polyps. This study supports the need for continued screening colonoscopies for polyp detection and removal. Education is key and nurses are often the ones who have the greatest educational opportunity. This study indicates the need for further research that may support colorectal cancer screening beginning at an earlier age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristy Oden
- Kristy Oden, DNP, CRNP, is Associate Professor and Graduate Programs Department Chair, Anderson College of Nursing and Health Professions, University of North Alabama, Florence
- Michelle Nelson, PhD, RN, is Associate Professor and Director Post-licensure Programs and Allied Health, Anderson College of Nursing and Health Professions, University of North Alabama, Florence
- Laura Williams, PhD, CRNP, is Professor, Family Nurse Practitioner Track and Post-Licensure Program, Anderson College of Nursing and Health Professions, University of North Alabama, Florence
| | - Michelle Nelson
- Kristy Oden, DNP, CRNP, is Associate Professor and Graduate Programs Department Chair, Anderson College of Nursing and Health Professions, University of North Alabama, Florence
- Michelle Nelson, PhD, RN, is Associate Professor and Director Post-licensure Programs and Allied Health, Anderson College of Nursing and Health Professions, University of North Alabama, Florence
- Laura Williams, PhD, CRNP, is Professor, Family Nurse Practitioner Track and Post-Licensure Program, Anderson College of Nursing and Health Professions, University of North Alabama, Florence
| | - Laura Williams
- Kristy Oden, DNP, CRNP, is Associate Professor and Graduate Programs Department Chair, Anderson College of Nursing and Health Professions, University of North Alabama, Florence
- Michelle Nelson, PhD, RN, is Associate Professor and Director Post-licensure Programs and Allied Health, Anderson College of Nursing and Health Professions, University of North Alabama, Florence
- Laura Williams, PhD, CRNP, is Professor, Family Nurse Practitioner Track and Post-Licensure Program, Anderson College of Nursing and Health Professions, University of North Alabama, Florence
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Parekh A, Hochheimer CJ, Espinoza JM, Karlitz JJ, Lewis CL, Wani S, Patel SG. Primary Care Provider Knowledge and Practice in Risk Assessment for Early Age Onset Colorectal Cancer: Opportunities for Improvement. J Cancer Prev 2021; 26:298-303. [PMID: 35047456 PMCID: PMC8749316 DOI: 10.15430/jcp.2021.26.4.298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality are rising in individuals under age 50, termed early age onset (EAO) CRC. Lower endoscopy is recommended for all patients with unexplained iron deficiency anemia (IDA) or hematochezia to assess the EAO-CRC. For those without symptoms, professional societies recommend decreasing the age to start screening from 50 to 45. Primary care provider (PCP) knowledge and practices around EAO-CRC risk assessment and screening are unknown. We conducted a survey study in May, 2020 of multi-specialty PCPs from three large medical systems to assess PCP knowledge, risk stratification practices and barriers/facilitators they face to offer CRC screening in patients < 50. We conducted univariate analysis to assess factors associated with knowledge and diagnostic practices. Response rate was 27.7% (196/708). Although 77.6% of respondents were aware that EAO-CRC incidence is increasing, only 42.9% knew that EAO-CRC mortality is also increasing. Of note, 91.8% recommend starting average risk screening at age 50. For 40- to 49-year-old patients present with unexplained IDA or hematochezia, 71.9% and 50.5% of respondents, respectively, recommend a diagnostic colonoscopy. Trainees were less likely to be aware of rising EAO-CRC mortality (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.82) and non-internal medicine providers were less likely to recommend CRC screening in those with a first-degree relative with CRC (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.93). Ongoing education efforts will be required to improve recognition and management of high-risk symptoms, particularly among non-internists and trainees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali Parekh
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Camille J Hochheimer
- Center for Innovative Design & Analysis, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jeannine M Espinoza
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Denver Health Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Jordan J Karlitz
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Carmen L Lewis
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Swati G Patel
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Rațiu I, Lupușoru R, Vora P, Popescu A, Sporea I, Goldiș A, Dănilă M, Miuțescu B, Barbulescu A, Hnatiuc M, Diaconescu R, Tăban S, Lazar F, Șirli R. Opportunistic Colonoscopy Cancer Screening Pays off in Romania-A Single-Centre Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11122393. [PMID: 34943629 PMCID: PMC8700238 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed cancer in men (after prostate and lung cancers) and in women (after breast and lung cancer). It is the second cause of cancer death in men (after lung cancer) and the third one in women (after breast and lung cancers). It is estimated that, in EU-27 countries in 2020, colorectal cancer accounted for 12.7% of all new cancer diagnoses and 12.4% of all deaths due to cancer. Our study aims to assess the opportunistic colorectal cancer screening by colonoscopy in a private hospital. A secondary objective of this study is to analyse the adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), and colorectal cancer (CRC) detection rate. We designed a retrospective single-centre study in the Gastroenterology Department of Saint Mary Hospital. The study population includes all individuals who performed colonoscopies in 2 years, January 2019–December 2020, addressed to our department by their family physician or came by themselves for a colonoscopy. One thousand seven hundred seventy-eight asymptomatic subjects underwent a colonoscopy for the first time. The mean age was 59.0 ± 10.9, 59.5% female. Eight hundred seventy-three polyps were found in 525 patients. Five hundred and twenty-five had at least one polyp, 185 patients had two polyps, 87 had three polyps, and 40 patients had more than three polyps. The PDR was 49.1%, ADR 39.0%, advanced adenomas in 7.9%, and carcinomas were found in 5.4% of patients. In a country without any colorectal cancer screening policy, polyps were found in almost half of the 1778 asymptomatic patients evaluated in a single private center, 39% of cases adenomas, and 5.4% colorectal cancer. Our study suggests starting screening colonoscopy at the age of 45. A poor bowel preparation significantly impacted the adenoma detection rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iulia Rațiu
- Center for Advanced Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (I.R.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (B.M.); (A.B.); (M.H.); (R.Ș.)
| | - Raluca Lupușoru
- Center for Advanced Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (I.R.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (B.M.); (A.B.); (M.H.); (R.Ș.)
- Center for Modeling Biological Systems and Data Analysis, Department of Functional Sciences, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +40-733912028
| | - Prateek Vora
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saint Mary Hospital, 300203 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Alina Popescu
- Center for Advanced Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (I.R.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (B.M.); (A.B.); (M.H.); (R.Ș.)
| | - Ioan Sporea
- Center for Advanced Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (I.R.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (B.M.); (A.B.); (M.H.); (R.Ș.)
| | - Adrian Goldiș
- Center for Advanced Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (I.R.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (B.M.); (A.B.); (M.H.); (R.Ș.)
| | - Mirela Dănilă
- Center for Advanced Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (I.R.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (B.M.); (A.B.); (M.H.); (R.Ș.)
| | - Bogdan Miuțescu
- Center for Advanced Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (I.R.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (B.M.); (A.B.); (M.H.); (R.Ș.)
| | - Andreea Barbulescu
- Center for Advanced Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (I.R.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (B.M.); (A.B.); (M.H.); (R.Ș.)
| | - Madalina Hnatiuc
- Center for Advanced Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (I.R.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (B.M.); (A.B.); (M.H.); (R.Ș.)
| | - Razvan Diaconescu
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, “Vasile Goldiş” Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania;
| | - Sorina Tăban
- ANAPATMOL Research Center, Discipline of Morphopathology, Department of Microscopic Morphology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Fulger Lazar
- Department X, 2nd Surgical Clinic, Researching Future Chirurgie 2, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Roxana Șirli
- Center for Advanced Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (I.R.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (B.M.); (A.B.); (M.H.); (R.Ș.)
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
Markarian E, Fung BM, Girotra M, Tabibian JH. Large polyps: Pearls for the referring and receiving endoscopist. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 13:638-648. [PMID: 35070025 PMCID: PMC8716985 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i12.638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Polyps are precursors to colorectal cancer, the third most common cancer in the United States. Large polyps, i.e.,, those with a size ≥ 20 mm, are more likely to harbor cancer. Colonic polyps can be removed through various techniques, with the goal to completely resect and prevent colorectal cancer; however, the management of large polyps can be relatively complex and challenging. Such polyps are generally more difficult to remove en bloc with conventional methods, and depending on level of expertise, may consequently be resected piecemeal, leading to an increased rate of incomplete removal and thus polyp recurrence. To effectively manage large polyps, endoscopists should be able to: (1) Evaluate the polyp for characteristics which predict high difficulty of resection or incomplete removal; (2) Determine the optimal resection technique (e.g., snare polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, etc.); and (3) Recognize when to refer to colleagues with greater expertise. This review covers important considerations in this regard for referring and receiving endoscopists and methods to best manage large colonic polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Markarian
- Academy of Science and Medicine, Crescenta Valley High School, Los Angeles, CA 91214, United States
| | - Brian M Fung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ 85006, United States
- Division of Gastroenterology, Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ 85006, United States
| | - Mohit Girotra
- Section of Gastroenterology and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Digestive Health Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98104, United States
| | - James H Tabibian
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA 91342, United States
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| |
Collapse
|
159
|
The long term participation trend for the colorectal cancer screening after the 2011 triple disaster in Minamisoma City, Fukushima, Japan. Sci Rep 2021; 11:23851. [PMID: 34903779 PMCID: PMC8668878 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03225-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a well-established cancer screening method, and its effectiveness depends on maintaining a high participation rate in the target population. In this study, we analyzed the trends in CRC screening participation rates over 10 years in Minamisoma City, where residents were forced to evacuate after the 2011 triple disaster in Fukushima, Japan. The immunochemical fecal occult blood test is provided as municipal CRC screening. We calculated the annual CRC screening participation rate and analyzed the factors associated with participation in screening. Overall, 4069 (12.3%) and 3839 (11.7%) persons participated in CRC screening in 2009 and 2010, respectively; however, the number decreased significantly to 1090 (3.4%) in 2011 when the earthquake occurred. Over the following 3 years, the rate gradually recovered. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that age < 65 years, living alone, and evacuation were significant associated factors for non-participation after 2011 (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the CRC screening participation rate decreased significantly during the Great East Japan Earthquake but recovered over the next 3 years. Further analysis of factors preventing CRC screening participation and research on the long-term effects of its post-disaster decline are important to consider in assessing the need for intervention in post-disaster cancer screening.
Collapse
|
160
|
Denis B, Gendre I. Colonoscopy may be weak link in organised colorectal cancer screening programme with faecal immunochemical test. J Med Screen 2021; 29:84-91. [PMID: 34866481 DOI: 10.1177/09691413211061118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the quality of colonoscopies performed after a positive faecal immunochemical test in the French colorectal cancer screening programme. METHODS Retrospective analysis of all colonoscopies performed between 2015 and 2019 after a positive quantitative faecal immunochemical test in the population-based colorectal cancer screening programme organised in Alsace, part of the French programme. The following indicators were evaluated: annual colonoscopy volume, caecal intubation rate, adenoma detection rate, proximal serrated lesion detection rate and proportion of patients referred directly to surgery for benign polyp management. Endoscopists who performed <30 faecal immunochemical test positive colonoscopies were non-assessable. RESULTS Overall, 13,455 faecal immunochemical test-positive colonoscopies performed by 116 community gastroenterologists were included, 13,067 of them by 80 assessable endoscopists. The overall caecal intubation, adenoma detection and proximal serrated lesion detection rates were 97.9%, 57.6% and 7.6%, respectively. They were <90%, <45% and <1% for 1.3%, 12.5% and 6.3% of the endoscopists, respectively. Overall, 1028 (7.9%) individuals were examined by 13 low-performing endoscopists and 328 (2.4%) individuals by 33 low-volume non-assessable endoscopists. Among 9133 individuals harbouring polyps, 155 (1.7%) had unwarranted surgery for a benign polyp. Overall, 1487 individuals (11.1%; 95% confidence interval 10.5-11.6) were not given the best possible chances, whereas 5545 individuals (41.2%; 95% confidence interval 40.4-42.0) were offered the best possible chances by 37 endoscopists. CONCLUSIONS At programme level, the key performance indicators evaluated largely exceeded the target standards. At individual level, at least one in nine individuals was not given the best possible chances during faecal immunochemical test-positive colonoscopies by a minority of poor-performing and/or low-volume endoscopists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard Denis
- Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie, Hôpital Pasteur, France.,ADECA Alsace, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
161
|
Polyp Detection from Colorectum Images by Using Attentive YOLOv5. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11122264. [PMID: 34943501 PMCID: PMC8700704 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: High-quality colonoscopy is essential to prevent the occurrence of colorectal cancers. The data of colonoscopy are mainly stored in the form of images. Therefore, artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy based on medical images is not only a research hotspot, but also one of the effective auxiliary means to improve the detection rate of adenomas. This research has become the focus of medical institutions and scientific research departments and has important clinical and scientific research value. Methods: In this paper, we propose a YOLOv5 model based on a self-attention mechanism for polyp target detection. This method uses the idea of regression, using the entire image as the input of the network and directly returning the target frame of this position in multiple positions of the image. In the feature extraction process, an attention mechanism is added to enhance the contribution of information-rich feature channels and weaken the interference of useless channels; Results: The experimental results show that the method can accurately identify polyp images, especially for the small polyps and the polyps with inconspicuous contrasts, and the detection speed is greatly improved compared with the comparison algorithm. Conclusions: This study will be of great help in reducing the missed diagnosis of clinicians during endoscopy and treatment, and it is also of great significance to the development of clinicians’ clinical work.
Collapse
|
162
|
Eidensohn Y, Mond Y, Labowitz I, Greenberg P, Formanowski B, Eidensohn C, Dutta S, Dubin E. Magnesium Citrate Capsules in Colonoscopy Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus 2021; 13:e20506. [PMID: 35070543 PMCID: PMC8765591 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Screening colonoscopies are recommended for the detection and prevention of colon cancer. Liquid colonoscopy preparations may be poorly tolerated. We evaluated the adequacy and tolerability of a novel low-cost colonoscopy preparation consisting of magnesium citrate capsules and bisacodyl (MCCB). Methods: This is a single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial of 51 patients undergoing screening colonoscopies, who received a bowel preparation of either 4 liters of GoLYTELY (Braintree Laboratories, Inc., Braintree, MA) or MCCB. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate colon cleanliness, defined as a total score ≥ 6 on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale and no colon segment with a score of zero. The secondary outcome was patient satisfaction, assessed by a validated questionnaire. Results: A total of 100% of patients in both arms achieved adequate colon cleanliness, and the magnesium citrate arm had superior patient satisfaction (mean satisfaction score: 54.8 vs. 172.8; p < 0.001). Conclusions: A pill-based colonoscopy preparation of MCCB may be a low-cost option for patients reluctant to consume a liquid preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yisroel Mond
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, EndoCentre of Baltimore, Baltimore, USA
| | - Isaac Labowitz
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, EndoCentre of Baltimore, Baltimore, USA
| | | | | | - Chaya Eidensohn
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, EndoCentre of Baltimore, Baltimore, USA
| | - Sudhir Dutta
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, USA.,Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Ethan Dubin
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, EndoCentre of Baltimore, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps using a newly generated deep convolutional neural network: from development to first clinical experience. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33:e662-e669. [PMID: 34034272 PMCID: PMC8734627 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM The use of artificial intelligence represents an objective approach to increase endoscopist's adenoma detection rate (ADR) and limit interoperator variability. In this study, we evaluated a newly developed deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) for automated detection of colorectal polyps ex vivo as well as in a first in-human trial. METHODS For training of the DCNN, 116 529 colonoscopy images from 278 patients with 788 different polyps were collected. A subset of 10 467 images containing 504 different polyps were manually annotated and treated as the gold standard. An independent set of 45 videos consisting of 15 534 single frames was used for ex vivo performance testing. In vivo real-time detection of colorectal polyps during routine colonoscopy by the DCNN was tested in 42 patients in a back-to-back approach. RESULTS When analyzing the test set of 15 534 single frames, the DCNN's sensitivity and specificity for polyp detection and localization within the frame was 90% and 80%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.92. In vivo, baseline polyp detection rate and ADR were 38% and 26% and significantly increased to 50% (P = 0.023) and 36% (P = 0.044), respectively, with the use of the DCNN. Of the 13 additionally with the DCNN detected lesions, the majority were diminutive and flat, among them three sessile serrated adenomas. CONCLUSION This newly developed DCNN enables highly sensitive automated detection of colorectal polyps both ex vivo and during first in-human clinical testing and could potentially increase the detection of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
164
|
Bhurwal A, Rattan P, Sarkar A, Patel A, Haroon S, Gjeorgjievski M, Bansal V, Mutneja H. A comparison of 9-min colonoscopy withdrawal time and 6-min colonoscopy withdrawal time: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:3260-3267. [PMID: 34617312 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time is still a controversial topic. While several studies demonstrate that longer withdrawal time improves adenoma detection rate, others have contradicted these findings. METHODS Three independent reviewers performed a comprehensive review of all original articles published from inception to January 2021 and included studies reporting comparison of the two cohorts-(i) ≥ 6 but less than 9 min of colonoscopy withdrawal time (CWT) and (ii) ≥ 9 min of CWT. The outcome measures were the following: (i) adenoma detection rate (ADR), (ii) advanced ADR, and (iii) sessile serrated adenoma detection rate (SDR). The meta-analysis was performed, and the statistics were two-tailed. RESULTS A total of seven studies met the inclusion criteria after a thorough search of the literature was completed. The analysis revealed that ≥ 9 min of CWT had significantly higher odds of adenoma detection as compared with 6-9 min of CWT (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.82; I2 = 93.7). Additionally, a significantly higher odds of sessile serrated adenoma detection (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.28-2.22; I2 = 0) and a trend towards higher odds of advanced adenoma detection (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.98-1.95, I2 = 90) were seen with CWT of at least 9 min when compared with 6-9 min of CWT. CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis analysis provides further evidence that at least 9 min of CWT cohort had significantly higher ADR and SDR as compared with the at least 6 min but less than 9 min of cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Bhurwal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Puru Rattan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Avik Sarkar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Anish Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Shahid Haroon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Mihajlo Gjeorgjievski
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Vikas Bansal
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Hemant Mutneja
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John H. Stroger Cook County Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Li J, Hu P, Shi J, Fan Y, Ren J, Chen H, Li N, Liao X, Liu Y, Du L, Wu N, Tang W, Zhang Y, Zou S, Pinsky P, Prorok P, Fagerstrom R, Taylor M, Kramer B, Dai M, He J. Results of the cancer screening feasibility study in China: a multicentered randomized controlled trial of lung and colorectal cancer screening. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER 2021; 1:132-138. [PMID: 39036801 PMCID: PMC11256538 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To provide an understanding of important aspects of the participant recruitment and data collection, become aware of any potential problems, and obtain necessary information in order to design a large-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) for lung cancer and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in China. Methods This feasibility study was a multicentered, open-label, pilot randomized trial. A total of 2696 participants who were at high risk of lung cancer were recruited from three screening centers and randomly allocated to arm 1 (n = 894), annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) plus a baseline colonoscopy; arm 2 (n = 902), biennial LDCT plus annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT) with OC-Sensor (OC-FIT); and arm 3 (n = 900), annual Insure-FIT plus Septin 9 blood test. Information on randomization, compliance, positivity rate, cancer case detection, and contamination with screening for lung cancer and CRC were collected. Results Participant characteristics were similar across study arms. The compliance rate of annual LDCT screening in arm 1 was 86.4% (95% CI: 83.9%, 88.5%) at baseline (T0), and 69.0% (95% CI: 65.8%, 72.0%) and 70.7% (95% CI: 67.6%, 73.7%) at the following two rounds (T1 and T2). The compliance rates of biennial LDCT screening in arm 2 were similar to those in arm 1 in the corresponding rounds. The compliance rate was 55.5% (95% CI: 52.2%, 58.8%) for colonoscopy in arm 1, while the compliance rates of OC-FIT, Insure-FIT, and the Septin 9 test in arms 2 and 3 were all approximately 90% at T0, decreasing to 65%-80% at T1 and T2. The positivity rate, cancer case detection rate, and contamination rate of screening for lung cancer and CRC were also reported. Conclusion In this pilot study, the feasibility of an RCT in China of lung cancer and CRC screening was demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiang Li
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ping Hu
- National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - Jufang Shi
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yaguang Fan
- Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Jiansong Ren
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hongda Chen
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ni Li
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | | | - Yuqin Liu
- Gansu Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Lingbin Du
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ning Wu
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Tang
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yueming Zhang
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shuangmei Zou
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Min Dai
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jie He
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - China Cancer Screening Trial Feasibility Study Group
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
- Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
- Gansu Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Risk factors for the development of low anterior resection syndrome. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scrs.2021.100845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
167
|
Age-Specific Rates and Time-Courses of Gastrointestinal and Nongastrointestinal Complications Associated With Screening/Surveillance Colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116:2430-2445. [PMID: 34693917 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The rates of serious cardiac, neurologic, and pulmonary events attributable to colonoscopy are poorly characterized, and background event rates are usually not accounted for. METHODS We performed a multistate population-based study using changepoint analysis to determine the rates and timing of serious gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal adverse events associated with screening/surveillance colonoscopy, including analyses by age (45 to <55, 55 to <65, 65 to <75, and ≥75 years). Among 4.5 million persons in the Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases of California, Florida, and New York who underwent screening/surveillance colonoscopy in 2005-2015, we ascertained serious postcolonoscopy events in excess of background rates in Emergency Department (SEDD) and Inpatient Databases (SID). RESULTS Most serious nongastrointestinal postcolonoscopy events were expected based on the background rate and not associated with colonoscopy itself. However, associated nongastrointestinal events predominated over gastrointestinal events at ages ≥65 years, including more myocardial infarctions plus ischemic strokes than perforations at ages ≥75 years (361 [95% confidence intervals {CI} 312-419] plus 1,279 [95% CI 1,182-1,384] vs 912 [95% CI 831-1,002] per million). At all ages, the observed-to-expected ratios for days 0-7, 0-30, and 0-60 after colonoscopy were substantially >1 for gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation, but minimally >1 for most nongastrointestinal complications. Risk periods ranged from 1 to 125 days depending on complication type and age. No excess postcolonoscopy in-hospital deaths were observed. DISCUSSION Although crude counts substantially overestimate nongastrointestinal events associated with colonoscopy, nongastrointestinal complications exceed bleeding and perforation risk in older persons. The inability to ascertain modifications to antiplatelet therapy was a study limitation. Our results can inform benefit-to-risk determinations for preventive colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
168
|
Denis B, Gendre I, Perrin P, Tuzin N, Pioche M. Management of large polyps in a colorectal cancer screening program with fecal immunochemical test: a community- and population-based observational study. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E1649-E1657. [PMID: 34790527 PMCID: PMC8589537 DOI: 10.1055/a-1551-3306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The aim of this study was to analyze presentation, management, and outcomes of large polyps (LPs; ≥ 20 mm) detected in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program using a quantitative fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Patients and methods This was a retrospective community- and population-based observational study of all LPs detected in patients aged 50 to 74 years between 2015 and 2019 during FIT-positive colonoscopies within the screening program organized in Alsace (France). Results Among 13,633 FIT-positive colonoscopies, 1256 LPs (8.5 % malignant and 51.8 % nonpedunculated) were detected by 102 community gastroenterologists in 1164 patients (one in 12 colonoscopies). The sensitivity of optical diagnosis of malignancy was 54 % for nonpedunculated and 27 % for pedunculated T1 CRCs. The endoscopic resection rate was 82.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 80.3-84.9) for benign LPs (70.2 % [95 % CI 66.4-74.1]) nonpedunculated, 95.2 % [95 % CI 93.4-97.1] pedunculated), varying from 0 to 100 % depending on the endoscopist. It was correlated with cecal intubation (Pearson r = 0.49, P < 0.01) and adenoma detection rates ( r = 0.25, P = 0.01). Most endoscopists did not refer patients to more experienced endoscopists, and as a result, 60 % to 90 % of 183 surgeries for benign LPs were unwarranted. Endoscopic resection was curative for 4.3 % (95 % CI 0.9-12.0) of nonpedunculated and 37.8 % (95 % CI 22.5-55.2) of pedunculated T1 CRCs. Overall, 22 endoscopic submucosal dissections had to be performed to avoid one surgery. Conclusions Compared with current recommendations, there is tremendous room for improvement in community endoscopy practices in the diagnosis and management of LPs. Detection and polypectomy competencies are correlated and highly variable among endoscopists. Endoscopic resection is curative for 83 % of benign LPs and 16 % of T1 CRCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard Denis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Louis Pasteur Hospital, Colmar, France,ADECA Alsace, Colmar, France
| | - Isabelle Gendre
- ADECA Alsace, Colmar, France,CRCDC Grand Est, site de Colmar, Colmar, France
| | - Philippe Perrin
- ADECA Alsace, Colmar, France,CRCDC Grand Est, site de Colmar, Colmar, France
| | - Nicolas Tuzin
- Department of Public Health, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Department of Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
McEvoy CS, Shah NG, Roberts SE, Carroll AM, Platz TA, Oxner CR, Butler RE, Ricca RL. Universal Healthcare Coverage Does Not Ensure Adherence to Initial Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines. Mil Med 2021; 186:e1071-e1076. [PMID: 33211098 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usaa319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the USA, and screening tests are underutilized. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of individuals at average risk who utilized a recommended initial screening test in a universal healthcare coverage system. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of active duty and retired military members as well as civilian beneficiaries of the Military Health System. Individuals born from 1960 to 1962 and eligible for full benefits on their 50th birthday were evaluated. Military rank or rank of benefits sponsor was used to determine socioeconomic status. Adherence to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for initial colorectal cancer screening was determined using "Current Procedural Terminology" and "Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System" codes for colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, fecal occult blood test, and fecal immunohistochemistry test. Average risk individuals who obtained early screening ages 47 to 49 were also identified. RESULTS This study identified 275,665 individuals at average risk. Of these, 105,957 (38.4%) adhered to screening guidelines. An additional 19,806 (7.2%) individuals were screened early. Colonoscopy (82.7%) was the most common screening procedure. Highest odds of screening were associated with being active duty military (odds ratio [OR] 3.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.43 to 3.85), having highest socioeconomic status (OR 2.37, 95% CI 2.31 to 2.44), and having managed care insurance (OR 4.36, 95% CI 4.28 to 4.44). CONCLUSIONS Universal healthcare coverage does not ensure initial colorectal cancer screening utilization consistent with guidelines no does it eliminate disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian S McEvoy
- Department of Surgery, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA.,Health Analysis Department, Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center, Portsmouth, VA, USA
| | - Nina G Shah
- Health Analysis Department, Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center, Portsmouth, VA, USA
| | - Sarah E Roberts
- Health Analysis Department, Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center, Portsmouth, VA, USA
| | - Anna M Carroll
- Health Analysis Department, Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center, Portsmouth, VA, USA
| | - Timothy A Platz
- Department of Surgery, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA
| | - Christopher R Oxner
- Department of Surgery, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA
| | - Ralph E Butler
- Department of Surgery, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA
| | - Robert L Ricca
- Department of Surgery, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Jimba T, Kaneko H, Yano Y, Itoh H, Yotsumoto H, Seki H, Morita K, Kiriyama H, Kamon T, Fujiu K, Michihata N, Jo T, Takeda N, Morita H, Nishiyama A, Node K, Yasunaga H, Komuro I. Relation of the Metabolic Syndrome to Incident Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults Aged 20 to 49 Years. Am J Cardiol 2021; 158:132-138. [PMID: 34481589 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.07.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Onco-cardiology is the emerging field, and the concept of shared risk factor holds an important position in this field. The increasing prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in young adults is a critical epidemiological issue. Although metabolic syndrome, which is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is known to be associated with CRC incidence in middle-aged and elderly individuals, it is unclear whether this association is present in young adults. We assessed whether metabolic syndrome was associated with CRC events in young adults (aged <50 years), and whether the association differed by the definition of metabolic syndrome. We retrospectively analyzed 902,599 adults (20 to 49 years of age) enrolled in the JMDC Claims Database which is a nationwide epidemiological database in Japan between January 2005 and August 2018. Participants who had a history of CRC, colorectal polyps, or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. Study participants were categorized into 2 groups according to the presence of metabolic syndrome, defined using the Japanese criteria (waist circumference ≥85 cm for men and ≥90 cm for women, and ≥2 metabolic parameters including elevated blood pressure, elevated triglycerides, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or elevated fasting plasma glucose). Clinical outcomes were collected between January 2005 and August 2018. The primary outcome was CRC of any stage. Median (interquartile range) age was 41 (37 to 45), and 55.4% were men. Over a median follow-up of 1,008 (429 to 1,833) days, there were 1,884 incidences of CRC. After multivariable adjustment, the hazard ratio (HR) of metabolic syndrome for CRC events was 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07 to 1.49). Cox regression analysis after multiple imputation for missing values showed that metabolic syndrome was associated with CRC incidence (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.17 to 1.56). Metabolic syndrome was also associated with a higher incidence of CRC in individuals with a follow-up period of ≥365 days (HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.60). This association was observed when metabolic syndrome was defined according to the International Diabetes Federation criteria (HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.55) and the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria (HR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.72). In conclusion, metabolic syndrome was associated with a higher incidence of CRC among individuals aged <50 years. These results could be informative for risk stratification of subsequent CRC among young adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Jimba
- The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hidehiro Kaneko
- The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; The Department of Advanced Cardiology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Yuichiro Yano
- YCU Center for Novel and Exploratory Clinical Trials, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan; The Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Hidetaka Itoh
- The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruki Yotsumoto
- The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hikari Seki
- The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kojiro Morita
- The Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan; The Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kiriyama
- The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Kamon
- The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsuhito Fujiu
- The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; The Department of Advanced Cardiology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Michihata
- The Department of Health Services Research, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taisuke Jo
- The Department of Health Services Research, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norifumi Takeda
- The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Morita
- The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Nishiyama
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Koichi Node
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- The Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Issei Komuro
- The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Long-term cumulative incidence of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after colonoscopy and a novel risk factor: a cohort study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33:1341-1347. [PMID: 34402471 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Long-term cumulative incidence of and risk factors for metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia, including both advanced colorectal adenoma (≥10 mm, or with villous or high-grade dysplasia) and colorectal cancer, are critical for surveillance strategies. The aim of this study was to determine the cumulative incidence of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia and its risk factors. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 6720 consecutive individuals who underwent general health check-ups and colonoscopy. Colorectal adenomas at initial colonoscopy were categorized as low-risk (1-2 small [<10 mm] tubular adenomas) or high-risk adenoma (≥3 tubular adenomas of any size; at least one adenoma ≥10 mm; or villous adenoma or adenoma with high-grade dysplasia). Kaplan-Meier estimates and hazard ratio by Cox-proportional hazard regression were calculated. RESULTS The cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia at 5 and 10 years was 5.7% [4.6-7.1], and 11% [8.9-14] in the low-risk adenoma group, and 10% [8.6-13], and 17% [14-21] in high-risk adenoma group, respectively. Adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI] of low-risk adenoma (vs. no colorectal adenoma), high-risk adenoma (vs. no colorectal adenoma), current smoking and positive fecal immunochemical test were 1.34 [1.04-1.74], 1.94 [1.48-2.55], 1.55 [1.2-2.02] and 1.69 [1.35-2.1], respectively. Adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI] of positive fecal immunochemical test was 1.88 [1.29-2.74] in those with normal colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS Both low-risk and high-risk adenomas confer substantial risk for metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia at 10 years. Positive fecal immunochemical test was a significant risk factor for metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia despite normal colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
172
|
Ma W, Song M, Chan AT. Is Colorectal Cancer Screening Absolutely Beneficial for Older Adults? JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:1728-1729. [PMID: 34528999 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjie Ma
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Mingyang Song
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Andrew T Chan
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Aniwan S, Vanduangden K, Kerr SJ, Piyachaturawat P, Jangsirikul S, Luangsukrerk T, Kulpatcharapong S, Tiankanon K, Kongtab N, Wisedopas N, Kullavanijaya P, Rerknimitr R. Linked color imaging, mucosal exposure device, their combination, and standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:969-977. [PMID: 34081966 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS By different mechanisms, image-enhancement techniques (linked color imaging [LCI]) and mucosal exposure devices (Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy [EAC]) can improve the adenoma detection rate (ADR) during screening colonoscopy. The impact of the combination of the 2 techniques has never been studied. This study aimed to compare the ADR between the combination of LCI and EAC (LCI+EAC), LCI alone, EAC alone, and standard high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. METHODS This prospective randomized controlled trial included participants who underwent screening colonoscopy. Participants were randomized to LCI+EAC, LCI, EAC, and standard HD colonoscopy. All colonoscopies were performed by endoscopists with a recorded ADR ≥35%. The primary outcome was the ADR. Secondary outcomes were proximal ADR (pADR) and the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC). RESULTS One thousand participants were included in the study. The LCI+EAC group provided the highest ADR and pADR. The ADRs in the LCI+EAC, LCI, EAC, and standard HD colonoscopy groups were 57.2%, 52.8%, 51.6%, and 47.6%, respectively, with pADRs of 38.4%, 34.8%, 33.6%, and 28.0%, respectively. The mean numbers of APC were 1.28, 1.20, 1.16, and .89, respectively. After a multiple comparison adjustment, a significant difference in pADR was only observed between the LCI+EAC and standard HD colonoscopy groups (difference, 10.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, .02%-17.4%; P = .05). The incidence rate ratios of the adenoma numbers were significantly higher in the LCI+EAC (1.43), LCI (1.34), and EAC (1.30) groups relative to the standard HD colonoscopy group (.89) (P < .009 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS The combination of LCI and EAC can significantly improve the detection of pADR and APC but not ADR by high-ADR performers. (Clinical trial registration number: TCTR20190319001.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satimai Aniwan
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kunvadee Vanduangden
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Stephen J Kerr
- Biostatistics Excellence Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Panida Piyachaturawat
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sureeporn Jangsirikul
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thanawat Luangsukrerk
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Santi Kulpatcharapong
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kasenee Tiankanon
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Natanong Kongtab
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Naruemon Wisedopas
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pinit Kullavanijaya
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Rungsun Rerknimitr
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Foppa C, Tamburello S, Maroli A, Carvello M, Poliani L, Laghi L, Malesci A, Montorsi M, Perea J, Spinelli A. Early age of onset is an independent predictor for worse disease-free survival in sporadic rectal cancer patients. A comparative analysis of 980 consecutive patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:857-863. [PMID: 34740480 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND while interest on early-onset colorectal cancer (age ≤49) is on the rise, studies on early-onset rectal cancer (EORC) are limited. The aim of this study was to compare predictors for disease progression/recurrence between sporadic EORC and late-onset RC patients (LORC). METHODS 163 EORC and 830 LORC operated between January 1st, 2010 and April 30th, 2021 at a tertiary center were included. Demographics, tumor characteristics, microsatellite status, gene mutations (KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, PI3Kca) and oncologic outcomes were compared. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to ascertain the effect of variables on recurrence/progression and death. Recurrence/Progression free survival (R/PFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier estimator. RESULTS Mean age of EORC was 42.16, (46% aged 45-49). A majority of EORC patients had a family history for CRC (p = 0.01) and underwent total neoadjuvant treatment (p = 0.01). EORC patients showed a higher rate of low-grade tumor differentiation (p < 0.0001), stage III-IV (p = 0.001), microsatellite instability (p = 0.02), locoregional nodal (p = 0.001) and distant metastases (p < 0.0001). Accordingly, more EORC patients underwent adjuvant treatment (p < 0.0001). Mutations were mostly reported among LORC cases (p = 0.04), whereas EORC patients showed a worse R/PFS (p = 0.02), even at stage I (p = 0.04). CSS did not differ (p = 0.11) across groups. Multivariate analysis indicated age of onset (p = 0.04) was an independent predictor for progression/recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Age of onset was shown to be an independent unfavorable predictor. Delayed diagnosis could explain this effect in the more advanced stages, while the worse outcomes in stage I may suggest a more aggressive disease behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Foppa
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Tamburello
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Annalisa Maroli
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Carvello
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Poliani
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Laghi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43100, Parma, Italy
| | - Alberto Malesci
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Montorsi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - José Perea
- Department of Surgery, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Russian-speaking Immigrants: The Importance of Culture and Home Country Experiences. J Immigr Minor Health 2021; 24:1300-1308. [PMID: 34671898 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-021-01291-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
There is potential to improve low colorectal cancer screening rates, reduce mortality, and narrow health disparities, if the distinctive screening barriers among Russian-speaking immigrants were better understood. However, there is little relevant research about the topic. To address this gap, this study aimed to identify barriers to timely colorectal cancer screening, especially colonoscopies, among Russian-speakers in New York City. Thirteen key informant interviews were performed with providers, community leaders, and academics. Eight focus groups were then conducted with 81 Russian-speaking individuals, age 50-75, who had not had a timely colonoscopy. Results were translated, transcribed, coded and analyzed. Barriers identified included individual, communal, and structural issues. Distinctive barriers, such as those related to culture and to the experiences of living under the Soviet system, were uncovered. Barriers identified can potentially be reduced through interventions suggested by the research, including more education and more effective provider recommendations.
Collapse
|
176
|
Zhu X, Lee MK, Weiser E, Griffin JM, Limburg PJ, Finney Rutten LJ. Initial validation of a self-report questionnaire based on the Theoretical Domains Framework: determinants of clinician adoption of a novel colorectal cancer screening strategy. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:119. [PMID: 34666841 PMCID: PMC8527805 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00221-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for average risk adults age 45 and older continues to be underutilized in the USA. One factor consistently associated with CRC screening completion is clinician recommendation. Understanding the barriers and facilitators of clinical adoption of emerging CRC screening strategies is important in developing effective intervention strategies to improve CRC screening rates. We aimed to develop a questionnaire based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to assess determinants of clinical adoption of novel CRC screening strategies, using the multi-target stool DNA test (mt-sDNA; Cologuard®) as an example, and test the psychometric properties of this questionnaire on a sample of US clinicians. METHODS A web survey was administered between November and December 2019 to a national panel of clinicians including primary care clinicians (PCCs) and gastroenterologists (GIs) to assess 10 TDF constructs with 55 items. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine whether the a priori domain structure was supported by the data. Discriminant validity of domains was tested with Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio (HTMT). Internal consistency for each scale was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Criterion validity was assessed with self-reported mt-sDNA use and mt-sDNA recommendation as the outcomes. RESULTS Complete surveys were received from 814 PCCs and 159 GIs (completion rate, 24.7% of 3299 PCCs and 29.6% of 538 GIs). Providers were excluded from analysis if they indicated not recommending CRC screening to average-risk patients (final N = 973). The final questionnaire consisted of 38 items covering 5 domains: (1) knowledge; (2) skills; (3) identity and social influence; (4) optimism, beliefs about consequences, and intentions; and (5) environmental context and resources. CFA results confirmed a reasonable fit (CFI = 0.948, SRMR = 0.057, RMSEA = 0.080). The domains showed sufficient discriminant validity (HTMT < 0.85), good internal consistency (McDonald's omega > 0.76), and successfully differentiated providers who reported they had ordered mt-sDNA from those who never ordered mt-sDNA and differentiated providers who reported routinely recommending mt-sDNA from those who reported not recommending mt-sDNA. CONCLUSIONS Findings provide initial evidence for the validity and internal consistency of this TDF-based questionnaire in measuring potential determinants of mt-sDNA adoption for average-risk CRC screening. Further investigation of validity and reliability is needed when adapting this questionnaire to other novel CRC screening strategy contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Zhu
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Minji K Lee
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Joan M Griffin
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Paul J Limburg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
177
|
Murthy SK, Antonova L, Dube C, Benchimol EI, Le Gal G, Hae R, Burke S, Ramsay T, Rostom A. Multivariable models for advanced colorectal neoplasms in screen-eligible individuals at low-to-moderate risk of colorectal cancer: towards improving colonoscopy prioritization. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21:383. [PMID: 34663234 PMCID: PMC8524805 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01965-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advanced colorectal neoplasms (ACNs), including colorectal cancers (CRC) and high-risk adenomas (HRA), are detected in less than 20% of persons aged 50 years or older who undergo colonoscopy. We sought to derive personalized predictive models of risk of harbouring ACNs to improve colonoscopy wait times for high-risk patients and allocation of colonoscopy resources. Methods We characterized colonoscopy indications, neoplasia risk factors and colonoscopy findings through chart review for consecutive individuals aged 50 years or older who underwent outpatient colonoscopy at The Ottawa Hospital (Ottawa, Canada) between April 1, 2008 and March 31, 2012 for non-life threatening indications. We linked patients to population-level health administrative datasets to ascertain additional historical predictor variables and derive multivariable logistic regression models for risk of harboring ACNs at colonoscopy. We assessed model discriminatory capacity and calibration and the ability of the models to improve colonoscopy specificity while maintaining excellent sensitivity for ACN capture. Results We modelled 17 candidate predictors in 11,724 individuals who met eligibility criteria. The final CRC model comprised 8 variables and had a c-statistic value of 0.957 and a goodness-of-fit p-value of 0.527. Application of the models to our cohort permitted 100% sensitivity for identifying persons with CRC and > 90% sensitivity for identifying persons with HRA, while improving colonoscopy specificity for ACNs by 23.8%. Conclusions Our multivariable models show excellent discriminatory capacity for persons with ACNs and could significantly increase colonoscopy specificity without overly sacrificing sensitivity. If validated, these models could allow more efficient allocation of colonoscopy resources, potentially reducing wait times for those at higher risk while deferring unnecessary colonoscopies in low-risk individuals. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-01965-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay K Murthy
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. .,Division of Gastroenterology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada. .,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Unit W1212, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada. .,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - Lilia Antonova
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Unit W1212, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Catherine Dube
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Division of Gastroenterology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Unit W1212, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Eric I Benchimol
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gregoire Le Gal
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Unit W1212, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Richard Hae
- Department of Nephrology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Stephen Burke
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tim Ramsay
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Unit W1212, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Alaa Rostom
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Division of Gastroenterology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Unit W1212, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Renelus BD, Dixit D, Nguyen PT, Njoku KK, Patel PB, Pintor-Jimenez K, Yan F, Buscaglia JM, Woods KE, Jamorabo DS. Short-term aspirin and statin chemoprophylaxis did not reduce the risk of developing advanced adenomatous polyps in Black patients. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21:379. [PMID: 34657610 PMCID: PMC8520575 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01966-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemoprevention of colorectal neoplasia with aspirin and statins is under-investigated in Black patients. Since Black patients suffer disproportionately from colon cancer incidence and mortality compared to other populations, we investigated the utility of aspirin and statin in reducing advanced adenomatous polyp (AAP) risk in Black patients. METHODS We carried out a retrospective cohort study of screening colonoscopies performed at a large urban academic center from 1/1/2011 through 12/31/2019. We analyzed self-identified Black patients with > 1 colonoscopy and no personal history of either inflammatory bowel disease or colon cancer syndromes. Our primary endpoint was first AAP development after index colonoscopy among Black patients taking both aspirin and a statin compared to those taking one or neither medication. We used multivariate logistic regression modeling to investigate our outcomes. RESULTS We found data on chemoprophylaxis use in 560 patients. The mean observation period between index colonoscopy and AAP identification was 4 years. AAP developed in 106/560 (19%) of our cohort. We found no difference in AAP risk among Black patients taking both chemoprevention medications compared to partial or no chemoprophylaxis (20% vs 18% respectively, p = 0.49). This finding remained after adjusting for age, body mass index, and tobacco use (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.65-1.67; p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS Short-term aspirin-statin chemoprevention did not reduce the risk of AAP development in our cohort of Black patients. Larger and long-term prospective investigations are needed to investigate the utility of chemoprophylaxis in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin D Renelus
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Devika Dixit
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Phuong T Nguyen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kingsley K Njoku
- Department of Internal Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Parth B Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Fengxia Yan
- Department of Community Health and Preventative Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jonathan M Buscaglia
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stony Brook Medicine, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY, HSC T17-06011794, USA
| | | | - Daniel S Jamorabo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stony Brook Medicine, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY, HSC T17-06011794, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Desai M, Kennedy K, Aihara H, Van Dam J, Gross S, Haber G, Pohl H, Rex D, Saltzman J, Sethi A, Waxman I, Wang K, Wallace M, Repici A, Sharma P. External validation of blue light imaging (BLI) criteria for the optical characterization of colorectal polyps by endoscopy experts. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:2728-2734. [PMID: 33928679 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Recently, the BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification (BASIC) system was developed by European experts to differentiate colorectal polyps. Our aim was to validate the BASIC classification system among the US-based endoscopy experts. METHODS Participants utilized a web-based interactive learning system where the group was asked to characterize polyps using the BASIC criteria: polyp surface (presence of mucus, regular/irregular and [pseudo]depressed), pit appearance (featureless, round/non-round with/without dark spots; homogeneous/heterogeneous distribution with/without focal loss), and vessels (present/absent, lacy, peri-cryptal, irregular). The final testing consisted of reviewing BLI images/videos to determine whether the criteria accurately predicted the histology results. Confidence in adenoma identification (rated "1" to "5") and agreement in polyp (adenoma vs non-adenoma) identification and characterization per BASIC criteria were derived. Strength of interobserver agreement with kappa (k) value was reported for adenoma identification. RESULTS Ten endoscopy experts from the United States identified conventional adenoma (vs non-adenoma) with 94.4% accuracy, 95.0% sensitivity, 93.8% specificity, 93.8% positive predictive value, and 94.9% negative predictive value using BASIC criteria. Overall strength of interobserver agreement was high: kappa 0.89 (0.82-0.96). Agreement for the individual criteria was as follows: surface mucus (93.8%), regularity (65.6%), type of pit (40.6%), pit visibility (66.9%), pit distribution (57%), vessel visibility (73%), and being lacy (46%) and peri-cryptal (61%). The confidence in diagnosis was rated at high ≥4 in 67% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS A group of US-based endoscopy experts have validated a simple and easily reproducible BLI classification system to characterize colorectal polyps with >90% accuracy and a high level of interobserver agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhav Desai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Motility, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Kevin Kennedy
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jacques Van Dam
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Seth Gross
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gregory Haber
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Douglas Rex
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - John Saltzman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amrita Sethi
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Irving Waxman
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kenneth Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael Wallace
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Motility, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Karnes WE, Johnson DA, Berzin TM, Gross SA, Vargo JJ, Sharma P, Zachariah R, Samarasena JB, Anderson JC. A Polyp Worth Removing: A Paradigm for Measuring Colonoscopy Quality and Performance of Novel Technologies for Polyp Detection. J Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 55:733-739. [PMID: 34334765 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Leaving no significant polyp behind while avoiding risks due to unnecessary resections is a commonsense strategy to safely and effectively prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) with colonoscopy. It also alludes to polyps worth removing and, therefore, worth finding. The majority of "worthy" precancerous polyps are adenomas, which for over 2 decades, have received the most attention in performance research and metrics. Consequently, the detection rate of adenomas is currently the only validated, outcome-based measure of colonoscopy demonstrated to correlate with reduced risk of postcolonoscopy CRC. However, a third or more of postcolonoscopy CRCs originate from sessile serrated polyps (SSPs), which are notoriously difficult to find, diagnose and completely resect. Among serrated polyps, the agreement among pathologists differentiating SSPs from non-neoplastic hyperplastic polyps is moderate at best. This lack of ground truth precludes SSPs from consideration in primary metrics of colonoscopy quality or performance of novel polyp detection technologies. By instead leveraging the distinct endoscopic and clinical features of serrated polyps, including those considered important due to proximal location and larger size, clinically significant serrated polyps represent serrated polyps worth removing, enriched with subtle precancerous SSPs. With the explosion of technologies to assist polyp detection, now is the time to broaden benchmarks to include clinically significant serrated polypss alongside adenomas, a measure that is relevant both for assessing the performance of endoscopists, and for assessing new polyp detection technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William E Karnes
- Digestive Health Institute, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA
| | - David A Johnson
- Gastroenterology Division, Eastern VA Medical School, Norfolk, VA
| | - Tyler M Berzin
- Center for Advanced Endoscopy, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - John J Vargo
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Robin Zachariah
- Digestive Health Institute, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA
| | - Jason B Samarasena
- Digestive Health Institute, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- White River Junction VAMC, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Kolb JM, Hu J, DeSanto K, Gao D, Singh S, Imperiale T, Lieberman DA, Boland CR, Patel SG. Early-Age Onset Colorectal Neoplasia in Average-Risk Individuals Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:1145-1155.e12. [PMID: 34119517 PMCID: PMC8463452 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Incidence and mortality associated with early-age onset colorectal cancer (EAO-CRC) is increasing, prompting professional society recommendations to lower the screening age in average-risk individuals. The yield of screening individuals younger than 50 years is not known. METHODS A systematic review of 3 databases from inception through July 2020 was performed in all languages that reported colonoscopy findings in average-risk individuals younger than 50 years. The primary outcomes were EAO colorectal neoplasia (CRN) and advanced colorectal neoplasia (aCRN) prevalence. Subgroup analyses were performed based on sex, geographic location, time period, and age, including comparison with those aged 50-59 years. Generalized linear mixed model with random intercept logistic regression and fixed subgroup effects were performed. RESULTS Of 10,123 unique articles, 17 studies published between 2002 and 2020, including 51,811 average-risk individuals from 4 continents, were included. The pooled rate of EAO-CRN was 13.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.112%-0.168%) and EAO-aCRN was 2.2% (95% CI, 0.016%-0.031%). Prevalence of CRC was 0.05% (95% CI, 0.00029%-0.0008%). Rates of EAO-CRN were higher in men compared with women (relative risk, 1.71%; 95% CI, 1.49%-1.98%), and highest in the United States (15.6%; 95% CI, 12.2%-19.7%) compared with Europe (14.9%; 95% CI, 6.9%-29.3%), East Asia (13.4%; 95% CI, 10.3%-17.2%), and the Middle East (9.8%; 95% CI, 7.8%-12.2%) (P = .04) The rate of EAO-CRN in age groups 45-49 years and 50-59 years was 17.8% (95% CI, 14.5%-21.6%) and 24.8% (95% CI, 19.5%-30.8%), respectively (P = .04). The rate of EAO-aCRN in age group 45-49 years was 3.6% (95% CI, 1.9%-6.7%) and 4.2% (95% CI, 3.2%-5.7%), respectively (P = .69). CONCLUSIONS The rate of aCRN in individuals aged 45-49 years was similar to the rate observed in individual aged 50-59 years, suggesting that expanding screening to this population could yield a similar impact on colorectal cancer risk reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M. Kolb
- H.H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Junxiao Hu
- Department of Pediatrics, Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Kristen DeSanto
- Strauss Health Sciences Library, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Dexiang Gao
- Department of Pediatrics, Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Siddharth Singh
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Thomas Imperiale
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - C. Richard Boland
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Swati G. Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado,Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Hospital, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Ng OH, Lunevicius R, Arthur JD. Rising incidence of colorectal cancer in individuals younger than 50 years and increasing mortality from rectosigmoid cancer in England. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2637-2646. [PMID: 34310037 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim was to describe changes in incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) in England by analysing data available from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS, 2001-2017). METHODS Data analysis was undertaken to interpret trends and patterns in age-standardized incidence and death rates from CRC, including sub-analyses by six age groups (0-24, 25-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80+) and three sites of cancer-colonic, rectosigmoid and rectal. RESULTS Overall CRC incidence remained relatively stable-70.1 cases per 100 000 individuals (95% CI 69.3-71.0) in 2001 and 68.8 cases (95% CI 68.0-69.5) in 2017. Sub-analysis demonstrates a quarter fewer incidence of rectosigmoid cancer (-27%). This is counterbalanced by a 3% rise in colon cancers. The age-standardized incidence rate of CRC increased by 59% in the 25-49 age group. In the over 50s, CRC incidence remained stable, with reductions seen in rectosigmoid cancer (50-59 years, -19%; 60-69, -26%; 70-79, -39%; 80+, -27%). Overall, mortality improved (-18.7%), primarily as a result of the reduction in deaths from colon (-31.6%) and rectal cancers (-25.1%). Deaths from the small incident number of rectosigmoid cancers, however, demonstrated a significant increase overall (+166.7%). Grouped age-standardized death rate analyses showed increasing death rates in the under 50s (+28.3%) compared to declining rates in the over 50s (-15.8%). CONCLUSIONS There is a clear trend in increased incidence and mortality in individuals under 50 years old. There is also a trend to increased mortality from rectosigmoid cancer. These findings should have implications for national screening programme extension to under 50s and a call to arms for appropriate identification, staging and treatment of rectosigmoid cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oon-Hui Ng
- Department of General Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Raimundas Lunevicius
- Department of General Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - James D Arthur
- Department of General Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Petrick JL, Barber LE, Warren Andersen S, Florio AA, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L. Racial Disparities and Sex Differences in Early- and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer Incidence, 2001-2018. Front Oncol 2021; 11:734998. [PMID: 34568072 PMCID: PMC8459723 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.734998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates have increased in younger individuals worldwide. We examined the most recent early- and late-onset CRC rates for the US. Methods Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR, per 100,000) of CRC were calculated using the US Cancer Statistics Database’s high-quality population-based cancer registry data from the entire US population. Results were cross-classified by age (20-49 [early-onset] and 50-74 years [late-onset]), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian/Pacific Islander), sex, anatomic location (proximal, distal, rectal), and histology (adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine). Results During 2001 through 2018, early-onset CRC rates significantly increased among American Indians/Alaskan Natives, Hispanics, and Whites. Compared to Whites, early-onset CRC rates are now 21% higher in American Indians/Alaskan Natives and 6% higher in Blacks. Rates of early-onset colorectal neuroendocrine tumors have increased in Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics; early-onset colorectal neuroendocrine tumor rates are 2-times higher in Blacks compared to Whites. Late-onset colorectal adenocarcinoma rates are decreasing, while late-onset colorectal neuroendocrine tumor rates are increasing, in all racial/ethnic groups. Late-onset CRC rates remain 29% higher in Blacks and 15% higher in American Indians/Alaskan Natives compared to Whites. Overall, CRC incidence was higher in men than women, but incidence of early-onset distal colon cancer was higher in women. Conclusions The early-onset CRC disparity between Blacks and Whites has decreased, due to increasing rates in Whites—rates in Blacks have remained stable. However, rates of colorectal neuroendocrine tumors are increasing in Blacks. Blacks and American Indians/Alaskan Natives have the highest rates of both early- and late-onset CRC. Impact Ongoing prevention efforts must ensure access to and uptake of CRC screening for Blacks and American Indians/Alaskan Natives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Petrick
- Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Lauren E Barber
- Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Shaneda Warren Andersen
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States.,Cancer Prevention and Control, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Andrea A Florio
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Julie R Palmer
- Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Lynn Rosenberg
- Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
CRISPR/Cas13-Based Platforms for a Potential Next-Generation Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer through Exosomes Micro-RNA Detection: A Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13184640. [PMID: 34572866 PMCID: PMC8466426 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Colorectal cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers, whereas a significant number of cases are diagnosed in late cancer stages, and survival rates drop dramatically. Micro-RNAs (miRNAs) from cancer-derived exosomes have shown promising diagnosis potential. Our review aims to present CRISPR/Cas-based molecular platforms as an inexpensive, swift, and robust detection tool of cancer-derived exosome micro-RNAs to streamline future applications based on the novel CRISPR/Cas-based platforms to achieve early CRC diagnosis. Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer with the second highest mortality rate worldwide. CRC is a heterogenous disease with multiple risk factors associated, including obesity, smoking, and use of alcohol. Of total CRC cases, 60% are diagnosed in late stages, where survival can drop to about 10%. CRC screening programs are based primarily on colonoscopy, yet this approach is invasive and has low patient adherence. Therefore, there is a strong incentive for developing molecular-based methods that are minimally invasive and have higher patient adherence. Recent reports have highlighted the importance of extracellular vesicles (EVs), specifically exosomes, as intercellular communication vehicles with a broad cargo, including micro-RNAs (miRNAs). These have been syndicated as robust candidates for diagnosis, primarily for their known activities in cancer cells, including immunoevasion, tumor progression, and angiogenesis, whereas miRNAs are dysregulated by cancer cells and delivered by cancer-derived exosomes (CEx). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) has shown good results detecting specific cancer-derived exosome micro-RNAs (CEx-miRNAs) associated with CRC, but qPCR also has several challenges, including portability and sensitivity/specificity issues regarding experiment design and sample quality. CRISPR/Cas-based platforms have been presented as cost-effective, ultrasensitive, specific, and robust clinical detection tools in the presence of potential inhibitors and capable of delivering quantitative and qualitative real-time data for enhanced decision-making to healthcare teams. Thereby, CRISPR/Cas13-based technologies have become a potential strategy for early CRC diagnosis detecting CEx-miRNAs. Moreover, CRISPR/Cas13-based platforms’ ease of use, scalability, and portability also showcase them as a potential point-of-care (POC) technology for CRC early diagnosis. This study presents two potential CRISPR/Cas13-based methodologies with a proposed panel consisting of four CEx-miRNAs, including miR-126, miR-1290, miR-23a, and miR-940, to streamline novel applications which may deliver a potential early diagnosis and prognosis of CRC.
Collapse
|
185
|
A sex-specific propensity-adjusted analysis of colonic adenoma detection rates in a screening cohort. Sci Rep 2021; 11:17785. [PMID: 34493755 PMCID: PMC8423798 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97163-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of colorectal adenoma and advanced adenoma (AA) differs between sexes. Also, the optimal age for the first screening colonoscopy is under debate. We, therefore, performed a sex-specific and age-adjusted comparison of adenoma, AA and advanced neoplasia (AN) rates in a real-world screening cohort. In total, 2824 asymptomatic participants between 45- and 60-years undergoing screening colonoscopy at a single-centre in Austria were evaluated. 46% were females and mean age was 53 ± 4 years. A propensity score for being female was calculated, and adenoma, AA and AN detection rates evaluated using uni- and multivariable logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses for three age groups (group 1: 45 to 49 years, n = 521, 41% females, mean age 47 ± 1 years; group 2: 50 to 54 years, n = 1164, 47% females, mean age 52 ± 1 years; group 3: 55 to 60 years, n = 1139, 46% females, mean age 57 ± 2 years) were performed. The prevalence of any adenoma was lower in females (17% vs. 30%; OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.38–0.55; p < 0.001) and remained so after propensity score adjustment for baseline characteristics and lifestyle factors (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.41–0.66; p < 0.001). The same trend was seen for AA with a significantly lower prevalence in females (3% vs. 7%; OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.26–0.55; p < 0.001) that persisted after propensity score adjustment (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34–0.86; p = 0.01). Also, all age-group sensitivity analyses showed lower adenoma, AA and AN rates in females. Similar numbers needed to screen to detect an adenoma, an AA or AN were found in female age group 3 and male age group 1. Colorectal adenoma, AA and AN were consistently lower in females even after propensity score adjustment and in all age-adjusted sensitivity analyses. Our study may add to the discussion of the optimal age for initial screening colonoscopy which may differ between the sexes.
Collapse
|
186
|
Demb J, Gupta S. Realizing the Promise of Personalized Colorectal Cancer Screening in Practice. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1120-1122. [PMID: 33734403 PMCID: PMC8844589 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Demb
- Department of Veteran Affairs, San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Samir Gupta
- Department of Veteran Affairs, San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
187
|
Ladabaum U, Shepard J, Mannalithara A. Adenoma and Serrated Lesion Detection by Colonoscopy Indication: The ADR-ESS (ADR Extended to all Screening/Surveillance) Score. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1873-1882. [PMID: 33895358 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adenoma detection rate at screening (ADR) predicts interval colorectal cancer. Monitoring other lesion detection rates and colonoscopy indications has been proposed. We developed a comprehensive, automated colonoscopy audit program based on standardized clinical documentation, explored detection rates across indications, and developed the Adenoma Detection Rate - Extended to all Screening / Surveillance (ADR-ESS) score. METHODS In a prospective cohort study, we calculated overall and advanced adenoma and sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rates among 15,253 colonoscopies by 35 endoscopists from 4 endoscopy units across all colonoscopy indications. We explored correlations between detection rates, and the precision and stability of ADR-ESS versus ADR. RESULTS The overall "screening, first" ADR was 36.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5%-38.1%). The adenoma detection rate was lower for "screening, not first" (relative rate [RR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87) and "family history" (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96), and higher for "surveillance" (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15-1.31) and "follow-up, FIT" (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07-1.37). For "screening, first," the detection rates for advanced adenoma, SSL, and advanced SSL were 6.7% (95% CI, 5.7%-7.7%), 7.2% (95% CI, 6.2%-8.2%), and 2.6% (95% CI, 2.0%-3.2%), respectively. Adenoma and SSL detection were correlated (r = 0.44; P = .008). ADR-ESS had substantially narrower confidence intervals and less period-to-period variability than ADR, and was not improved by weighting for indication volume and correction for detection by indication. CONCLUSIONS Comprehensive, automated colonoscopy audit based on standardized clinical documentation is feasible. Adenoma detection is a fair but imperfect proxy for SSL detection. ADR-ESS increases the precision of adenoma detection assessments and emphasizes quality across colonoscopy indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| | - John Shepard
- Critical Care Quality and Strategic Initiatives, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California
| | - Ajitha Mannalithara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Kaltenbach T, Gawron A, Meyer CS, Gupta S, Shergill A, Dominitz JA, Soetikno RM, Nguyen-Vu T, A Whooley M, Kahi CJ. Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) Irrespective of Indication Is Comparable to Screening ADR: Implications for Quality Monitoring. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1883-1889.e1. [PMID: 33618027 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key measure of colonoscopy quality. However, efficient measurement of ADR can be challenging because many colonoscopies are performed for non-screening purposes. Measuring ADR without being restricted to screening indication may likely facilitate more widespread implementation of quality monitoring. We hypothesized that the ADR for all colonoscopies, irrespective of the indication, would be equivalent to the ADR for screening colonoscopies. METHODS We reviewed consecutive colonoscopies at two Veterans Affairs centers performed by 21 endoscopists over 6 months in 2015. We calculated the ADR for screening exams, non-screening (surveillance and diagnostic) exams, and all exams (irrespective of indication), correcting for within-endoscopist correlation. We then performed simulation modeling to calculate the ADRs under 16 hypothetical scenarios of various indication distributions. We simulated 100,000 trials with 3,000 participants, randomly assigned indication (screening, surveillance, diagnostic, and FIT+) from a multinomial distribution, randomly drew adenoma using the observed ADRs per indication, and calculated 95% confidence intervals of the mean differences in ADR of screening and non-screening indications. RESULTS Among 2628 colonoscopies performed by 21 gastroenterologists, the indication was screening in 28.9%, surveillance in 48.2% and diagnostic in 22.9%. There was no significant difference in the ADR, 50% (95%CI: 45-56%) for all colonoscopies vs 49% (95%CI: 43-56%) for screening exams (p=.55). ADRs were 56% for surveillance and 38% for diagnostic exams. In our simulation modeling, only one out of 16 scenarios (screening 10%, surveillance 70%, diagnostic 10% and FIT+ 10%) resulted in a significant difference between the calculated ADRs for screening and non-screening indications. CONCLUSIONS In our study, the overall ADR computed from all colonoscopies was not significantly different than the conventional ADR based on screening colonoscopies. Assessing ADR for colonoscopy irrespective of indication may be adequate for quality monitoring, and could facilitate the implementation of quality measurement and reporting. Future prospective studies should evaluate the validity of using overall ADR for quality reporting in other jurisdictions before adopting this method in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tonya Kaltenbach
- Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| | - Andrew Gawron
- Salt Lake City VA Specialty Care Center of Innovation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Craig S Meyer
- Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Samir Gupta
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Amandeep Shergill
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- Veterans Affairs Puget Sound, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Roy M Soetikno
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Tiffany Nguyen-Vu
- Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Mary A Whooley
- Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Charles J Kahi
- Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Murthy SK, Feuerstein JD, Nguyen GC, Velayos FS. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Surveillance and Management of Colorectal Dysplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:1043-1051.e4. [PMID: 34416977 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Improvements in disease management, as well as endoscopic technology and quality, have dramatically changed the way in which we conceptualize and manage inflammatory bowel disease-related dysplasia over the past 20 years. Based on evolving literature, we propose a conceptual model and best practice advice statements for the prevention, detection, and management of colorectal dysplasia in people with inflammatory bowel disease. This expert review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the American Gastroenterological Association Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the American Gastroenterological Association membership. It underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay K Murthy
- The Ottawa Hospital Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph D Feuerstein
- Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Beth Israel Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Geoffrey C Nguyen
- Mount Sinai Hospital Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fernando S Velayos
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
190
|
Foppa C, Francesca Bertuzzi A, Cianchi F, Carvello M, Maroli A, Wolthuis AM, Rimassa L, Laghi L, Montorsi M, D'Hoore AJL, Spinelli A. Rectal Cancer in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients: Pattern of Clinical Presentation and Case-Matched Comparison of Outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:1064-1073. [PMID: 34397557 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rectal cancer in adolescents and young adults (age ≤39) is increasing. Early diagnosis is a challenge in this subset of patients. OBJECTIVE This study aims to analyze the presentation pattern and outcomes of sporadic rectal cancer in adolescents and young adults. DESIGN This is a retrospective study. SETTING This study was conducted at 3 European tertiary centers. PATIENTS Data on adolescents and young adults operated on for sporadic rectal cancer (January 2008 through October 2019) were analyzed. To compare outcomes, adolescents and young adults were matched to a group of patients aged ≥40 operated on during the same period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes measured were clinical presentation and long-term outcomes. RESULTS Sporadic rectal cancers occurred in 101 adolescents and young adults (2.4%; mean age, 33.5; range, 18-39); 51.5% were male, and a smoking habit was reported by 17.8% of patients. The rate of a family history for colorectal cancer was 25.7%, and of these patients, 24.7% were obese. Diagnosis based on symptoms was reported in 92.1% patients, and the mean time from first symptoms to diagnosis was 13.7 months. The most common symptom at diagnosis was rectal bleeding (68.8%), and 12% and 34% of the adolescents and young adults presented with locally advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis. Consequently, 68.3% and 62.4% adolescents and young adults received neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments. The rate of complete pathological response was 24.1%; whereas 38.6% patients had stage IV disease, and 93.1% were microsatellite stable. At a mean follow-up of 5 years, no difference in cancer-specific survival, but a lower disease-free survival was reported in adolescents and young adults (p < 0.0001) vs the matched group. Adolescents and young adults with stages I to II disease had shorter cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival (p = 0.006; p < 0.0001); with stage III disease, they had a shorter disease-free survival (p = 0.01). LIMITATIONS This study was limited by its observational, retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS The significantly delayed diagnosis in adolescents and young adults may have contributed to the advanced disease at presentation and lower disease-free survival, even at earlier stages, suggesting a higher metastatic potential than in older patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B537. CNCER DE RECTO EN PACIENTES ADOLESCENTES Y ADULTOS JVENES CUADRO DE PRESENTACIN CLNICA Y COMPARACIN DE DESENLACES POR CASOS EMPAREJADOS ANTECEDENTES:El cáncer de recto en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes (edad ≤ 39) está aumentando. El diagnóstico temprano es un desafío en este subgrupo de pacientes.OBJETIVO:Analizar el cuadro de presentación y los desenlaces en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes con cáncer de recto esporádico.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo.ÁMBITO:Tres centros europeos de tercer nivel.PACIENTES:Se analizaron los datos de adolescentes y adultos jóvenes operados de cáncer de recto esporádico (enero de 2008 - octubre de 2019). Para comparar los desenlaces se emparejó a adolescentes y adultos jóvenes con un grupo de pacientes mayores de 40 años operados en el mismo período de tiempo.PRINCIPALES VARIABLES ANALIZADAS:Cuadro clínico, resultados a largo plazo.RESULTADOS:Los cánceres de recto esporádicos en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes fueron 101 (2,4%, edad media: 33,5, rango 18-39). El 51,5% eran hombres, el 17,8% de los pacientes fumaba. El 25,7% tentía antecedentes familiares de cáncer colorrectal. El 24,7% eran obesos. El diagnóstico con base en los síntomas se informó en el 92,1% de los pacientes, el tiempo promedio desde los primeros síntomas hasta el diagnóstico fue de 13,7 meses. El síntoma más común en el momento del diagnóstico fue el sangrado rectal (68,8%). 12% y 34% de adolescentes y adultos jóvenes presentaron enfermedad localmente avanzada o metastásica en el momento del diagnóstico. Por lo tanto, el 68,3% y el 62,4% de adolescentes y adultos jóvenes recibieron neoadyuvancia y adyuvancia. La tasa de respuesta patológica completa fue del 24,1%; mientras que el 38,6% estaban en estadio IV. El 93,1% eran microsatelite estable. Con una media de seguimiento de 5 años, no se observaron diferencias en la sobrevida específica del cáncer, pero se informó una menor sobrevida libre de enfermedad en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes (p <0,0001) frente al grupo emparejado. Los adolescentes y adultos jóvenes en estadios I-II tuvieron una sobrevida específica por cáncer y una sobrevida libre de enfermedad más corta (p = 0,006; p <0,0001); el estadio III tuvo una sobrevida libre de enfermedad más baja (p = 0,01).LIMITACIONES:Diseño observacional y retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:El diagnóstico notablemente demorado en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes puede contribuir a la presentación de una enfermedad avanzada y a una menor sobrevida libre de enfermedad, incluso en estadios más tempranas, lo cual implica un mayor potencial metastásico en comparación con pacientes mayores. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B537.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Foppa
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexia Francesca Bertuzzi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Cianchi
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Carvello
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Annalisa Maroli
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Albert M Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lorenza Rimassa
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Laghi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Montorsi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of General and Digestive Surgery, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - André J L D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Dominitz JA. A Tailored FIT for Improved Colorectal Cancer Screening. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174:1315-1316. [PMID: 34280331 DOI: 10.7326/m21-2748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A Dominitz
- National Gastroenterology and Hepatology Program, Veterans Health Administration Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
192
|
Lam AY, Lee JK, Levin TR. Simplifying ADR Reporting: A Worthy Goal, but the Devil is in the Details. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1793-1795. [PMID: 33905770 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Y Lam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jeffrey K Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Theodore R Levin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|
193
|
Barros RA, Monteverde MJ, Dumonceau JM, Barros AS, Rainero GL, Barros RF, Jaroslavsky MJ, de Elizalde S. Cold snare polypectomy without submucosal injection: safety and efficacy in 615 large serrated lesions. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E1421-E1426. [PMID: 34466368 PMCID: PMC8382506 DOI: 10.1055/a-1517-4054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aim Cold resection is becoming the standard of care for the resection of nonpedunculated colon lesions up to 10 mm in diameter. Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps), including those ≥ 10 mm, present various characteristics that make them ideal candidates for cold snare polypectomy (CSP). Patients and methods A prospectively maintained database was searched retrospectively for consecutive patients with lesions ≥ 10 mm resected between March 2013 and March 2018. During that period, all SSA/P-appearing lesions were resected using CSP without submucosal injection, except for lesions with endoscopic suspicion of dysplasia or submucosal invasion. Patients with a pathological diagnosis of SSA/P were included in the analysis. Adverse events were recorded up to 21 days following colonoscopy. Results 615 SSA/Ps ≥ 10 mm were resected during 452 colonoscopy procedures in 379 patients (mean age 54.1 years; standard deviation [SD] 11.9 years). Mean polyp size was 13.7 (SD 5.2) mm; 122 lesions (19.8 %) were ≥ 20 mm and 479 lesions (77.9 %) underwent piecemeal resection. Immediate adverse events included persistent abdominal pain that resolved spontaneously within 2 hours in three patients (0.8 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.2 %-2.3 %). One patient with persistent intraprocedural bleeding was successfully treated with a hemostatic clip. No late adverse events were detected. Surveillance colonoscopy was performed in 293 patients (77.3 %) at 23.4 (SD 11.6) months following index colonoscopy; residual/recurrent lesions were diagnosed in 23 patients (7.8 %; 95 %CI 5.0 %-11.6 %). Conclusion CSP without submucosal injection appeared to be safe and effective for the resection of large SSA/Ps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Augusto Barros
- CEGA (Centro de Gastroenterología Ambulatoria, Ambulatory Gastroenterology Center), Campana, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Maria Jose Monteverde
- CEGA (Centro de Gastroenterología Ambulatoria, Ambulatory Gastroenterology Center), Campana, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jean-Marc Dumonceau
- Gastroenterology Department, Charleroi University Hospitals, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Augusto Sebastian Barros
- CEGA (Centro de Gastroenterología Ambulatoria, Ambulatory Gastroenterology Center), Campana, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - German Luis Rainero
- CEGA (Centro de Gastroenterología Ambulatoria, Ambulatory Gastroenterology Center), Campana, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Roberto Federico Barros
- CEGA (Centro de Gastroenterología Ambulatoria, Ambulatory Gastroenterology Center), Campana, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
194
|
Done JZ, Fang SH. Young-onset colorectal cancer: A review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:856-866. [PMID: 34457191 PMCID: PMC8371519 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i8.856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the general decrease in overall incidence of colorectal cancer since the early 1990s, the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients less than 50 years old has nearly doubled. A systematic review was performed using the PubMed database (2011-2020) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011-2021) to identify studies (published in English) evaluating epidemiologic, clinical, hereditary, and molecular features; as well as evaluation, management, and prognosis of young-onset colorectal cancer patients. Our search yielded a total of 3401 articles, after applying our inclusion criteria. We fully reviewed 94 full-length studies. This systematic review demonstrates the increasing incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer and highlights the importance of being hypervigilant for the differential diagnosis colorectal cancer when evaluating a young adult who presents with gastrointestinal symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy Zhou Done
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Sandy H Fang
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| |
Collapse
|
195
|
Facciorusso A, Demb J, Mohan BP, Gupta S, Singh S. Addition of Financial Incentives to Mailed Outreach for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2122581. [PMID: 34432010 PMCID: PMC8387849 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Although screening decreases incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC), screening rates are low. Health-promoting financial incentives may increase uptake of cancer screening. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the relative and absolute benefit associated with adding financial incentives to the uptake of CRC screening. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 31, 2020. Keywords and Medical Subject Headings terms were used to identify published studies on the topic. The search strategy identified 835 studies. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were selected that involved adults older than 50 years who were eligible for CRC screening, who received either various forms of financial incentives along with mailed outreach or no financial incentives but mailed outreach and reminders alone, and who reported screening completion by using recommended tests at different time points. Observational or nonrandomized studies and a few RCTs were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS The review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). Data were abstracted and risk of bias was assessed by 2 independent reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, heterogeneity was examined through subgroup analysis and metaregression, and quality of evidence was appraised. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was CRC screening completion within 12 months of receiving the intervention. RESULTS A total of 8 RCTs that were conducted in the United States and reported between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020, were included. The trials involved 110 644 participants, of whom 53 444 (48.3%) were randomized to the intervention group (received financial incentives) and 57 200 (51.7%) were randomized to the control group (received no financial incentives). Participants were predominantly male, with 59 113 men (53.4%). Low-quality evidence (rated down for risk of bias and heterogeneity) suggested that adding financial incentives may be associated with a small benefit of increasing CRC screening vs no financial incentives (odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.49). With mailed outreach having a 30% estimated CRC screening completion rate, adding financial incentives may increase the rate to 33.5% (95% CI, 30.8%-36.2%). On metaregression, the magnitude of benefit decreased as the proportion of participants with low income and/or from racial/ethnic minority groups increased. No significant differences were observed by type of behavioral economic intervention (fixed amount: OR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.05-1.52] vs lottery: OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.80-1.40]; P = .32), amount of incentive (≤$5: OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.18] vs >$5: OR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.02-1.54]; P = .22), or screening modality (stool-based test: OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.92-1.41] vs colonoscopy: OR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.01-2.64]; P = .18). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Adding financial incentives appeared to be associated with a small benefit of increasing CRC screening uptake, with marginal benefits in underserved populations with adverse social determinants of health. Alternative approaches to enhancing CRC screening uptake are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joshua Demb
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Babu P. Mohan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City
| | - Samir Gupta
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla
- Section of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Abstract
CASE SUMMARY A healthy 52-year-old woman without any family history presents for a health maintenance appointment and opts for a fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening after reviewing her options. After a positive result, she is referred for colonoscopy. She is found to have 3 small (<10 mm) polyps that are completely resected via snare polypectomy and return as tubular adenomas on histologic examination. It is recommended that she return for repeat colonoscopy in 3 years, at which point she has a normal examination with excellent preparation by an experienced endoscopist and is given the option to return to her average-risk screening interval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kim C Lu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
197
|
Ramai D, Barakat M, Dhaliwal A, Dhindsa B, Chandan S, Ofosu A, Facciorusso A, Etienne D, Reddy M. Gender and racial disparities in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a national cancer registry study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:1801-1804. [PMID: 33616738 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03894-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of CRC is higher in minority racial and ethnic groups. However, studies assessing trends among sex and racial groups on the incidence and mortality of CRC are lacking. We aim to investigate disparities in CRC by reviewing a large national cancer registry. METHODS This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry (SEER) of individuals aged 45-79 years from 2000-2017. RESULTS During the study period, the incidence of CRC decreased for both males and females, respectively (APC -2.14 vs -1.81). Among all racial groups, African American showed the least decline in incidence of CRC. African American females showed the highest risk for CRC (IRR 1.34; 95% CI 1.32-1.36, p< 0.001) compared to other females or males from different racial groups. Subgroup analysis using Kaplan-Meier estimations showed that African American females had the poorest 5-year survival rate (56%) compared to other female racial groups. Among males, American Indian/Alaska Natives had the poorest 5-year survival (54%) compared to male of other racial groups. CONCLUSION Overall, the incidence of colorectal cancer is declining. However, the incidence of CRC remains highest in African Americans females who are also burden with poor survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Ramai
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
| | - Mohamed Barakat
- Division of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Amaninder Dhaliwal
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Banreet Dhindsa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Denzil Etienne
- Division of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Madhavi Reddy
- Division of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Geropoulos G, Aquilina J, Kakos C, Anestiadou E, Giannis D. Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy Versus Conventional Gastroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 55:577-585. [PMID: 33883514 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy overcame the restriction of passive capsule endoscopy movement, thus allowing an improved visualization of the gastrointestinal lumen, where other imaging studies seem to be unhelpful. The aim of this study is to systematically review the performance of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy and evaluate its potential as a less invasive diagnostic method in the detection of gastric lesions. METHODS A systematic search was performed in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus, Who Global Health Library (GHL), Virtual Health Library (VHL), Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science databases. Proportion meta-analyses were performed to estimate the pooled sensitivity of magnetically controlled capsuled endoscopy in the detection of gastrointestinal lesions. RESULTS Among the 3026 studies that were initially assessed, 7 studies were finally included, with a total of 916 patients and 745 gastric lesions. The mean capsule endoscopy examination time was 21.92±8.87 minutes. The pooled overall sensitivity of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy was 87% [95% confidence interval (CI), 84%-89%]. Subgroup analysis showed that the sensitivity of identifying gastric ulcers was 82% (95% CI: 71%-89%), gastric polyps was 82% (95% CI: 76%-87%), and gastric erosions was 95% (95% CI: 86%-98%). In general, magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy was well tolerated by the participants with minimal adverse events. CONCLUSION The magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy demonstrated an acceptable sensitivity of identifying gastric lesions. Further prospective comparative studies are needed to identify the risks and benefits of this new technique, as well as to determine its role as a replacement for conventional gastroscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julian Aquilina
- University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | - Christos Kakos
- Department of General Surgery, Ulster Hospital Dundonald, Belfast, UK
| | - Elisavet Anestiadou
- Fourth Surgical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital "G. Papanikolaou", Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Giannis
- Institute of Health Innovations and Outcomes Research, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 11030
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Li XP, Chen HM, Lei XH, Dou GS, Chen YC, Chen LP, Zhang Y, Zhao GM, Zhong W. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a community-based colorectal cancer screening program in Shanghai, China. J Dig Dis 2021; 22:452-462. [PMID: 34086400 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of a community-based colorectal cancer-screening program (C-CRCSP) in Shanghai, China, among the residents in the urban, suburban and rural areas. METHODS A Markov model was constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a 25-year annual C-CRCSP including 100 000 populations. Cost-effectiveness was determined by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER); referring to either life-years gained, or quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. The threshold was gross domestic product per capita. Univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the influence of compliance, prevalence, technological performance, medical cost and annual cost discount rate (3.5%) on ICER. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis evaluated the probability of the cost-effectiveness of C-CRCSP at different maximum acceptable ceiling ratios. RESULTS Compared with no screening, the C-CRCSP resulted in total gains of 7840 QALYs and 2210 life-years (LY), at a total cost of CNY 58.54 million; that is, the ICER were CNY 7460/QALYs and CNY 26650/LY. Stratifying by residency, the cumulative gains in QALYs and LY were estimated to be the lowest in the urban populations compared with the rural and suburban populations. The cost for the urban population was 3-fold and 6-fold that of the suburban and rural populations. The ICER for QALYs ranged from 2180 (rural) to 16 840 (urban). CONCLUSION The cost-effectiveness of a C-CRCSP in Shanghai was most favorable for the rural population, while the urban population benefits less in terms of QALYs. ICER could be enhanced by measures that increase compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Pan Li
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Office of Scientific Research and Information Management, Pudong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fudan University Pudong Institute of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hui Min Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Hong Lei
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guan Shen Dou
- Department of Health Economics, Key Laboratory For Health Technology Assessment, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Chen Chen
- Office of Scientific Research and Information Management, Pudong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fudan University Pudong Institute of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Ping Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yao Zhang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Gen Ming Zhao
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Zhong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Rozario MA, Walton A, Kang M, Padilla BI. Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Quality Improvement Initiative Using a Bilingual Patient Navigator, Mobile Technology, and Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Engage Hispanic Adults. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2021; 25:423-429. [PMID: 34269353 DOI: 10.1188/21.cjon.423-429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are an effective screening method to detect and prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) when done in appropriate intervals. The use of bilingual patient navigators (PNs) and secure short message service (SMS) has been demonstrated to increase CRC screening rates among Hispanic adults. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this quality improvement project is to increase CRC screening rates among Hispanic adults in a family clinic by 25% in the post-project implementation period using an unlicensed bilingual PN, secure SMS, and at-home FITs. METHODS A retrospective chart review was used. Spanish-translated educational videos were delivered using SMS, and instructional screening guidance was provided via telephone in Spanish by the PN. Participants were surveyed to determine satisfaction with the support received from the PN. FINDINGS Findings showed a 35% increase in the clinic's FIT rates. Findings also showed that having a PN's support influenced the decision to complete FIT as compared to the use of secure SMS.
Collapse
|