Continuous intravenous heparin compared with intermittent subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis

How I treat venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in cancer patients and represents an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Especially in patients who have a poor life expectancy, preventing death from pulmonary embolism is the mainstay of treatment. Critically ill patients should promptly be administered thrombolytic drugs. Except for selected patients requiring aggressive therapy, the initial VTE treatment should be conducted with either adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin or fixed-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). LMWHs have the potential to greatly simplify the initial treatment of VTE, making the treatment of suitable patients feasible in an outpatient setting. During anticoagulant therapy, cancer patients have a 2- to 4-fold higher risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding complications when compared with noncancer patients. The long-term administration of LMWH should be considered as an alternative to anti-vitamin K drugs in patients with advanced disease and in those with conditions limiting the use of oral anticoagulants. Prolongation of anticoagulation should be considered for as long as the malignant disorder is active. The evidence of lowered cancer mortality in patients on LMWH has stimulated renewed interest in these agents as antineoplastic drugs and raises the distinct possibility that cancer and thrombosis share common mechanisms.

Delays in Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism

PURPOSES

To investigate delays in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We prospectively identified 1,152 patients in whom DVT or PE had been diagnosed at 70 North American medical centers. We recorded demographic characteristics and dates of symptom onset, initial medical evaluation, and confirmatory diagnostic tests.

RESULTS

We identified substantial numbers of patients for whom there were delays in the diagnosis of DVT, PE, or both. For acute DVT, 170 of 808 patients (21%) received diagnoses > 1 week after symptom onset, and 40 of 808 patients (5%) received diagnoses > 3 weeks after symptom onset. On average, 80% of the delay in diagnosis of DVT occurred between symptom onset and medical evaluation. Acute PE was diagnosed in 59 of 344 patients (17%) > 1 week after symptom onset, and in 17 of 344 patients (5%) > 3 weeks after the onset of symptoms. Delays in the diagnosis of PE represented both delays in seeking medical attention (mean, 3 days; upper limit of 95% confidence interval [CI], 12 days); and delays from the first medical evaluation to diagnosis (mean, 2 days; upper limit of 95% CI, 9 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the majority of patients with DVT and PE seek medical attention and receive diagnoses promptly after symptom onset, substantial delays exist in the diagnosis of DVT and PE for many patients. There is a need to develop and test strategies that reduce delays in diagnosis.

Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin compared with low-molecular-weight heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Low-molecular-weight heparin is the preferred choice for the initial treatment of acute, uncomplicated venous thromboembolism. In this context, unfractionated heparin is as safe and effective as low-molecular-weight heparin but requires strict laboratory monitoring. Twice-daily subcutaneous unfractionated heparin is more effective than, and as safe as, intravenous unfractionated heparin and may simplify patient treatment in or out of the hospital, being possibly cost saving, especially if it is used in weight-based, fixed, unadjusted doses. The present review focuses on the relative values of low-molecular-weight heparin and subcutaneous unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism.

RECENT FINDINGS

The major advantages of low-molecular-weight heparin over unfractionated heparin seem to be ease of administration and cost savings associated with home therapy or early hospital discharge; however, many patients with venous thromboembolism are still admitted to the hospital for treatment, and unfractionated heparin is extensively used to this purpose, especially in the United States. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin, adjusted according to activated partial thromboplastin time algorithms, is as safe and effective as low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, allows for quick mobilization and early discharge of suitable patients, and represents a cost-effective strategy. Fixed-dose unfractionated heparin, like low-molecular-weight heparin, may be used for the home treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

SUMMARY

Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin, targeted on activated partial thromboplastin time results or in fixed doses, may be used in or out of the hospital for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, being possibly cost effective; however, these findings need confirmation through appropriate, large-sample, randomized clinical trials.

Ambulation and Compression After Deep Vein Thrombosis: Dispelling Myths

The traditional dogma of putting mobile patients with acute deep vein thrombosis into bed for several days has been challenged by some studies that showed a better clinical outcome with walking exercises under good compression. Repeated lung scans did not show an increased risk of new pulmonary embolism. There was a faster and more intense reduction of pain and swelling and a clear quality-of-life benefit. Immediate ambulation with compression reduces the propagation of thrombi and has a positive impact regarding development of postthrombotic syndrome. Patients selected for home therapy should not only be instructed how to inject their low-molecular-weight heparin but should also be educated to walk around with good compression. Until now the important principle of avoiding the venous stasis associated with bed rest has found broad acceptance in the field of primary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Modern antithrombotic management of patients with acute venous thrombosis should include early ambulation in conjunction with appropriate compression therapy.

Deep venous thrombosis: withholding anticoagulation therapy after negative complete lower limb US findings

PURPOSE

To establish the safety of withholding anticoagulation therapy after negative findings at a complete lower limb ultrasonographic (US) examination of the symptomatic leg for suspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Regional ethics committee approval and patient consent were obtained. A total of 542 consecutive ambulatory patients presented to the emergency department and were prospectively recruited from April 2001 to May 2003. Of these patients, 16 were excluded, and radiology residents and sonographers performed a complete lower limb US examination by means of compression and Doppler US in 526 patients. Patients with negative US findings received no anticoagulation therapy, and they were observed for occurrence of any thromboembolic event for 3 months. Patients with progressive or new symptoms that were indicative of thromboembolism within the follow-up period underwent objective testing with US, computed tomographic (CT) pulmonary angiography, or both.

RESULTS

There were 413 patients (78.5%) with US findings that were negative for DVT and 113 patients (21.5%) with findings that were positive. There were 64 patients (56.6%) with DVT isolated to the calf and 49 (43.4%) with proximal DVT. Of the 413 patients with negative initial US findings, 16 (3.9%) underwent a second US examination for new or progressive symptoms of DVT, one patient (0.25%) underwent CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism, and one patient (0.25%) underwent both US and CT pulmonary angiography during the 3-month follow-up period. One of these patients (0.24%; 95% confidence interval: 0.01%, 1.3%) developed pulmonary embolism, which was diagnosed with CT pulmonary angiography. DVT was not diagnosed in any patient, and no patient died during follow-up. The negative predictive value of a complete single lower limb US examination to exclude clinically important DVT is 99.6% (95% confidence interval: 98.4%, 99.9%).

CONCLUSION

A single negative complete lower limb US examination is sufficient to exclude clinically important DVT, and it is safe to withhold anticoagulation therapy after negative complete lower limb US findings were obtained in patients suspected of having symptomatic lower limb DVT. New or progressive symptoms require further objective imaging.

Inferior Vena Caval Filters: Key Considerations

Surgical interruption of the inferior vena cava (IVC) as a means to prevent pulmonary embolism and its consequences has been entertained since the end of the 19th century. Initial methods were crude, however, but their deficiencies led to the development of newer techniques. Despite increasing indications and use of permanent IVC filters there remains controversy regarding their efficacy and complications. The purpose of this article is to review the pertinent literature and, it is hoped, aid in the development of a rational approach to the use of IVC filters. The evolving data regarding the retrievable filters are also discussed.

Anticoagulation Monitoring Part 2: Unfractionated Heparin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin

OBJECTIVE

To review the availability, mechanisms, limitations, and clinical application of point-of-care (POC) devices used in monitoring anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs).

DATA SOURCES

Articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (1966–August 2004), device manufacturer Web sites, additional references listed in articles and Web sites, and abstracts from scientific meetings.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

English-language literature from clinical trials was reviewed to evaluate the accuracy, reliability, and clinical application of POC monitoring devices.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and activated clotting time (ACT) are common tests for monitoring anticoagulation with UFH. Multiple devices are available for POC aPTT, ACT, and heparin concentration testing. The aPTT therapeutic range for UFH will vary depending upon the reagent and instrument employed. Although recommended by the American College of Chest Physicians Seventh Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy, establishing a heparin concentration–derived therapeutic range for UFH is rarely performed. Additional research evaluating anti-factor Xa monitoring of LMWHs using POC testing is necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple POC devices are available to monitor anticoagulation with UFH. For each test, there is some variability in results between devices and between reagents used in the same device. Despite these limitations, POC anticoagulation monitoring of UFH using aPTT and, more often, ACT is common in clinical practice, particularly when evaluating anticoagulation associated with interventional cardiology procedures and cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Tinzaparin in the treatment of venous thromboembolism

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been widely used for the initial treatment of patients presenting with venous thromboembolism. The LMWH, tinzaparin, has been shown in randomised clinical trials to be as effective and safe as unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism and in clinical trials, it has been used in place of warfarin for the long-term treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Tinzaparin can safely be given to patients with significant renal impairment (creatinine clearance of > or = 20 ml/min) and the dose of tinzaparin does not need to be altered in patients with a body mass index of > 25.

Procedures for the outpatient management of patients with deep venous thrombosis1

Although deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is now widely managed on an outpatient basis, at a practical level there remains a potential for uncertainty as to which patient might prove suitable and in particular in regard to the lines of responsibility of each department involved in the delivery of clinical care. This guideline sets out recommendations for the standardization of the outpatient management of patients with DVT.

Negative D-dimer result to exclude recurrent deep venous thrombosis: a management trial

BACKGROUND

All of the available diagnostic tests for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) have limitations for excluding acute recurrent DVT. Measurement of plasma d-dimer by using an automated quantitative assay may be useful as a rapid exclusion test in patients with suspected recurrent DVT.

OBJECTIVE

To test the safety of withholding additional diagnostic testing and heparin treatment in patients who have a negative d-dimer result at presentation (using the automated quantitative assay STA-Liatest D-di), regardless of their symptoms.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic medical center in the United States.

PATIENTS

300 consecutive patients with suspected recurrent DVT.

INTERVENTION

Patients underwent d-dimer testing at presentation. In patients with negative D-dimer results, heparin therapy was withheld, and no further diagnostic testing for DVT was done as part of the initial evaluation. Patients with positive D-dimer results underwent compression ultrasonography.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome measure was a diagnosis of new symptomatic venous thromboembolism confirmed by diagnostic testing during the 3-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Of the 300 study patients, the d-dimer result was negative at presentation in 134 patients (45%; negative cohort) and positive at presentation in 166 patients. Of the 166 patients, compression ultrasonography documented new DVT in 54 patients. Compression ultrasonography findings were normal in 79 patients and were inconclusive in 33 patients. After 3 months of follow-up, 1 of 134 patients in the negative cohort had confirmed venous thromboembolism (0.75% [95% CI, 0.02% to 4.09%]). Venous thromboembolism on follow-up could not be definitively excluded in 5 patients with recurrent leg symptoms and in 1 patient who died. If these patients are considered to have venous thromboembolism, the incidence during the 3-month follow-up period would be 6.0% (CI, 2.6% to 11.4%) (8 of 134 patients).

LIMITATIONS

There is no accepted diagnostic reference standard for recurrent DVT. The precision of the estimate of the incidence of venous thromboembolism on follow-up and the generalizability to settings other than an academic health center should be evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of plasma d-dimer by using the automated quantitative assay STA-Liatest D-di seems to provide a simple method for excluding acute recurrent DVT in symptomatic patients.

Antithrombotic therapy for coronary artery disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

This chapter about antithrombotic therapy for coronary artery disease (CAD) is part of the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndrome (ACS), we recommend immediate and then daily oral aspirin (Grade 1A). For patients with an aspirin allergy, we recommend immediate treatment with clopidogrel, 300-mg bolus po, followed by 75 mg/d indefinitely (Grade 1A). In all NSTE ACS patients in whom diagnostic catheterization will be delayed or when coronary bypass surgery will not occur until > 5 days, we recommend clopidogrel as bolus therapy (300 mg), followed by 75 mg/d for 9 to 12 months in addition to aspirin (Grade 1A). In NSTE ACS patients in whom angiography will take place within 24 h, we suggest beginning clopidogrel after the coronary anatomy has been determined (Grade 2A). For patients who have received clopidogrel and are scheduled for coronary bypass surgery, we recommend discontinuing clopidogrel for 5 days prior to the scheduled surgery (Grade 2A). In moderate- to high-risk patients presenting with NSTE ACS, we recommend either eptifibatide or tirofiban for initial (early) treatment in addition to treatment with aspirin and heparin (Grade 1A). For the acute treatment of NSTE ACS, we recommend low molecular weight heparins over unfractionated heparin (UFH) [Grade 1B] and UFH over no heparin therapy use with antiplatelet therapies (Grade 1A). We recommend against the direct thrombin inhibitors as routine initial antithrombin therapy (Grade 1B). For patients after myocardial infarction, after ACS, and with stable CAD, we recommend aspirin in doses from 75 to 325 mg as initial therapy and in doses of 75 to 162 mg as indefinite therapy (Grade 1A). For patients with contraindications to aspirin, we recommend long-term clopidogrel (Grade 1A). For primary prevention in patients with at least moderate risk for a coronary event, we recommend aspirin, 75 to 162 mg/d, over either no antithrombotic therapy or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [Grade 2A]; for patients at particularly high risk of events in whom the international normalized ratio (INR) can be monitored without difficulty, we suggest low-dose VKA (target INR, 1.5) [Grade 2A].

Fixed dose subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins versus adjusted dose unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have been shown to be effective and safe in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE), and may also be effective for the initial treatment of VTE.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of LMWH compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the initial treatment of VTE.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified from the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group's Specialised Register, CENTRAL and LILACS. Colleagues and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing fixed dose subcutaneous LMWH with adjusted dose intravenous or subcutaneous UFH in people with VTE.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two reviewers assessed trials for inclusion and quality, and extracted data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included (n = 8867). Thrombotic complications occurred in 151/4181 (3.6%) participants treated with LMWH, compared with 211/3941 (5.4%) participants treated with UFH (odds ratio (OR) 0.68; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.55 to 0.84, 18 trials). Thrombus size was reduced in 53% of participants treated with LMWH and 45% treated with UFH (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.81, 12 trials). Major haemorrhages occurred in 41/3500 (1.2%) participants treated with LMWH, compared with 73/3624 (2.0%) participants treated with UFH (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.83, 19 trials). In eighteen trials, 187/4193 (4.5%) participants treated with LMWH died, compared with 233/3861 (6.0%) participants treated with UFH (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.92). Nine studies (n = 4451) examined proximal thrombosis; 2192 participants treated with LMWH and 2259 with UFH. Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant reductions favouring LMWH in thrombotic complications and major haemorrhage. By the end of follow up, 80 (3.6%) participants treated with LMWH had thrombotic complications, compared with 143 (6.3%) treated with UFH (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.75). Major haemorrhage occurred in 18 (1.0%) participants treated with LMWH, compared with 37 (2.1%) treated with UFH (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.85). Nine studies (n = 4157) showed a statistically significant reduction favouring LMWH with respect to mortality. By the end of follow up, 3.3% (70/2094) of participants treated with LMWH had died, compared with 5.3% (110/2063) of participants treated with UFH (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.84).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

LMWH is more effective than UFH for the initial treatment of VTE. LMWH significantly reduces the occurrence of major haemorrhage during initial treatment and overall mortality at follow up.

Hemorrhagic Complications of Anticoagulant Treatment

This chapter about hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant treatment is part of the seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Bleeding is the major complication of anticoagulant therapy. The criteria for defining the severity of bleeding varies considerably between studies, accounting in part for the variation in the rates of bleeding reported. The major determinants of vitamin K antagonist-induced bleeding are the intensity of the anticoagulant effect, underlying patient characteristics, and the length of therapy. There is good evidence that vitamin K antagonist therapy, targeted international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0), is associated with a lower risk of bleeding than therapy targeted at an INR > 3.0. The risk of bleeding associated with IV unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is < 3% in recent trials. This bleeding risk may increase with increasing heparin dosages and age (> 70 years). Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is associated with less major bleeding compared with UFH in acute VTE. UFH and LMWH are not associated with an increase in major bleeding in ischemic coronary syndromes, but are associated with an increase in major bleeding in ischemic stroke. Information on bleeding associated with the newer generation of antithrombotic agents has begun to emerge. In terms of treatment decision making for anticoagulant therapy, bleeding risk cannot be considered alone, ie, the potential decrease in thromboembolism must be balanced against the potential increased bleeding risk.

The Diagnostic Evaluation of Deep Vein Thrombosis

Due to the morbidity and mortality associated with either untreated disease or inappropriate anticoagulant therapy, accurate diagnosis of venous thromboembolism is essential. As venography, the current gold standard test for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is both invasive and costly, noninvasive diagnostic strategies for diagnosing DVT have been developed. Noninvasive tests often have to be combined to either raise the post-test probability of disease to a level justifying treatment or lower it to a level at which withholding treatment is warranted. Diagnostic algorithms involving clinical assessment, venous ultrasonography, and D-dimer testing have been validated in management trials of patients with DVT. The optimal strategy at individual institutions is dependent on local expertise and cost. Magnetic resonance venography has the potential to be used as a stand-alone test for DVT but requires further evaluation.

Unfractionated heparin in cardiology: redefining the standard of practice

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) consist of unstable angina (UA), non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI). Timely intervention with effective, predictable antithrombin therapy is critically important in the early management of these conditions. Platelet aggregation is also an important component of thrombus formation in arterial thrombosis. Historically, unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been combined with aspirin to suppress thrombin propagation and fibrin formation; however, its effectiveness has been questioned in this setting. Unlike newer anticoagulant alternatives, UFH paradoxically stimulates platelet aggregation, which may further promote clot formation. In addition, obtaining a valid therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in cardiology patients is a major challenge, and dosing is complex. Due to substantial variation in reagents and instruments, target aPTT ranges for UFH in ACS clinical trials cannot be extrapolated to individual institutions. Further, the risk of ischemic events is greater shortly after abrupt discontinuation of UFH compared with alternative agents with longer half-lives and less stimulation of platelet aggregation. Key UA-NSTEMI clinical trials have demonstrated that UFH is inferior to newer agents, such as the low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). Consistent with this evidence, the most recent practice guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association in UA-NSTEMI identify the LMWH enoxaparin as the agent of choice. In patients with STEMI receiving the fibrinolytic tenecteplase as reperfusion therapy, enoxaparin has also been superior to UFH in combination. In percutaneous procedures, newer indirect (enoxaparin) and direct (bivalirudin) antithrombins have demonstrated safety and efficacy. There is little doubt that as we move forward in optimizing adjunctive anticoagulation in the cardiology setting, UFH will largely be replaced by better antithrombin agents.

Heparin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin

This article about unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is part of the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines. UFH is a heterogeneous mixture of glycosaminoglycans that bind to antithrombin via a pentasaccharide, catalyzing the inactivation of thrombin and other clotting factors. UFH also binds endothelial cells, platelet factor 4, and platelets, leading to rather unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Variability in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents necessitates site-specific validation of the aPTT therapeutic range in order to properly monitor UFH therapy. Lack of validation has been an oversight in many clinical trials comparing UFH to LMWH. In patients with apparent heparin resistance, anti-factor Xa monitoring may be superior to measurement of aPTT. LMWHs lack the nonspecific binding affinities of UFH, and, as a result, LMWH preparations have more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. LMWHs have replaced UFH for most clinical indications for the following reasons: (1) these properties allow LMWHs to be administered subcutaneously, once daily without laboratory monitoring; and (2) the evidence from clinical trials that LMWH is as least as effective as and is safer than UFH. Several clinical issues regarding the use of LMWHs remain unanswered. These relate to the need for monitoring with an anti-factor Xa assay in patients with severe obesity or renal insufficiency. The therapeutic range for anti-factor Xa activity depends on the dosing interval. Anti-factor Xa monitoring is prudent when administering weight-based doses of LMWH to patients who weigh > 150 kg. It has been determined that UFH infusion is preferable to LMWH injection in patients with creatinine clearance of < 25 mL/min, until further data on therapeutic dosing of LMWHs in renal failure have been published. However, when administered in low doses prophylactically, LMWH is safe for therapy in patients with renal failure. Protamine may help to reverse bleeding related to LWMH, although anti-factor Xa activity is not fully normalized by protamine. The synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux is a promising new antithrombotic agent for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Initial Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism

Adequate initial anticoagulant therapy of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is required to prevent thrombus growth and pulmonary embolism (PE). Intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) is being replaced by low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) as the anticoagulant of choice for initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Both agents are relatively safe and effective when used to treat VTE, with LMWH suitable for outpatient therapy because of improved bioavailability and more predictable anticoagulant response. Serious potential complications of heparin therapy, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and osteoporosis, seem less common with LMWH. The potential for fetal harm and changes in maternal physiology complicate the treatment of VTE during pregnancy. Although systemic thrombolysis is used in patients with massive PE and in some patients with proximal DVT, controversy persists with respect to appropriate patient selection for this intervention.

Challenges in Variation and Responsiveness of Unfractionated Heparin

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been in clinical use for more than half a century. Despite its undoubted contribution to the treatment and prevention of thrombosis, heparin is significantly limited by its variable biochemical composition and unpredictable pharmacokinetics. The situation is compounded by the fact that methods for monitoring heparin do not necessarily reflect its therapeutic effect. The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is a method for monitoring heparin therapy that is simple, cheap, and readily available. However, it is also poorly standardized and is affected by numerous factors-both analytic and preanalytic-that are unrelated to the heparin effect. Establishing an appropriate therapeutic range for the aPTT is challenging for smaller clinical laboratories, and the antifactor Xa method of measuring heparin levels is not widely available. The College of American Pathologists published consensus guidelines in an effort to improve the laboratory monitoring of UFH therapy. However, it seems unlikely that the laboratory problems associated with monitoring UFH will be resolved. Unfractionated heparin is highly antigenic and carries a significant risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Even in the absence of thrombocytopenia or thrombosis, the presence of heparin-associated antibodies may predict adverse clinical outcomes and strengthen the rationale for the ultimate replacement of UFH. Fortunately, alternatives to UFH, such as low-molecular-weight heparins, direct thrombin inhibitors, and more specific factor Xa inhibitors, are becoming available for clinical use. The pharmacokinetics of these agents are more predictable and rely much less on laboratory monitoring. Nonheparin agents also eliminate the risk of HIT. The emergence of these newer anticoagulants makes the continued use of UFH increasingly difficult to justify.

Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism: Challenging the Unfractionated Heparin Standard

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major public health problem leading to high morbidity and mortality in the United States. Since more then 50% of patients with VTE may have asymptomatic disease, the start of appropriate therapy often is delayed. Traditionally, intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been used to manage the acute phase of VTE. Although an effective agent, numerous limitations are associated with the use of UFH therapy, such as the need for careful monitoring and frequent dosing adjustments. In addition, the assay used to monitor UFH--the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)--does not correlate reliably with plasma heparin levels or antithrombotic activity. In the early 1990s, the low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) emerged as alternative anticoagulants to UFH and began to successfully challenge the UFH standard for treatment of VTE. Clinical evidence has consistently demonstrated that LMWHs given subcutaneously are at least as safe and as effective, if not better, than intravenous UFH. This anticoagulant class has a much more predictable dose-response relationship, requires little or no monitoring, and provides cost-saving opportunities for outpatient management of VTE. The LMWHs are now considered the treatment of choice for many patients with VTE and are largely replacing UFH for this indication. In the last decade, additional agents, such as direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors, have emerged as potential future alternatives for treatment of VTE. As clinical data regarding these new agents for treatment of VTE continue to evolve, their role in clinical practice will be elucidated.

Anti-Xa Activity Relates to Survival and Efficacy in Unselected Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Treated With Enoxaparin

Background— Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended in the treatment of unstable angina (UA)/non–ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), but no relationship has ever been shown between anticoagulation levels obtained with LMWH treatment and clinical outcomes.

Methods and Results— In all, 803 consecutive patients with UA/NSTEMI were treated with subcutaneous enoxaparin and were followed up for 30 days. The recommended dose of enoxaparin of 1 mg/kg BID was used throughout the population except when physicians decided on dose reduction because of a history of a recent bleeding event or because of a high bleeding risk. Anti–factor Xa activity was >0.5 IU/mL in 93% of patients; subtherapeutic anti-Xa levels (<0.5 IU/mL) were associated with lower doses of enoxaparin. The 30-day mortality rate was significantly associated with low anti-Xa levels (<0.5 IU/mL), with a >3-fold increase in mortality compared with the patients with anti-Xa levels in the target range of 0.5 to 1.2 IU/mL ( P =0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed low anti-Xa activity as an independent predictor of 30-day mortality at least as strong as age, left ventricular function, and renal function. In contrast, anti-Xa activity did not predict major bleeding complications within the range of anti-Xa levels observed in this study.

Conclusions— In this large unselected cohort of patients with UA/NSTEMI patients, low anti-Xa activity on enoxaparin treatment is independently associated with 30-day mortality, which highlights the need for achieving at least the minimum prescribed anti-Xa level of 0.5 IU/mL with enoxaparin whenever possible.

Anticoagulation therapy in children

Thromboembolic disease (TED) is increasingly recognized as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in tertiary pediatrics. Children younger than 1 year of age and teenage girls are at greatest risk of thromboembolism. Although anticoagulation therapy is the treatment of choice for TED, the treatment strategy is often difficult, especially in children. Treatment relies largely on anticoagulation with heparin and warfarin. Recommendations for antithrombotic therapy in children have been loosely extrapolated from recommendations for adults; however, it is likely that optimal treatment of children with TED differs from adults because of important ontogenic features of hemostasis that affect both the pathophysiology of the thrombotic processes and the response to antithrombotic agents. Until recently, the primary treatment for TED has been unfractionated heparin (UFH) in conjunction with warfarin. Warfarin, the most commonly used oral anticoagulant, acts through inhibition of the vitamin K-dependent transcarboxylation reactions that convert precursors of clotting factors into their active form. Appropriate use of UFH and warfarin requires close patient monitoring and dosage adjustments to ensure tolerability and efficacy. In recent years, low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have become available as alternatives to UFH and warfarin, for both the prevention and treatment of TED. Potentially, LMWH have significant advantages. They have superior pharmacokinetics, which results in minimal laboratory monitoring, offering important benefits to children with poor venous access. Based on available data, LMWHs are at least as effective and well tolerated as UFH, and are more convenient. Although LMWHs are more expensive than UFH, the expense is likely to be offset by savings from a reduced hospital stay.

Current perspectives on the treatment of venous thromboembolism: need for effective, safe and convenient new antithrombotic drugs

Treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has evolved significantly over the last decade. Low-molecular-weight heparins have largely replaced unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) but the majority of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) continue to be treated with unfractionated heparin. Fondaparinux is the first synthetic selective inhibitor of factor Xa. It has recently been proved to be more effective than, and as safe as, a low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of VTE after major orthopaedic surgery. The two large randomised MATISSE trials demonstrated that fondaparinux was at least as effective and as safe as previous reference heparin therapies in the treatment of VTE. Fondaparinux should further simplify the treatment of this frequent disease since a single once-daily fixed dosage regimen may effectively and safely treat both DVT and PE, an important point especially considering the frequent though clinically silent concomitance of these two thrombotic events.

Avoidance of Bleeding During Surgery in Patients Receiving Anticoagulant and/or Antiplatelet Therapy

Perioperative management of chronically anticoagulated patients and/or patients treated with antiplatelet therapy is a complex medical problem. This review considers the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of commonly used antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs with special emphasis on loss of effects after discontinuation and possible counteracting (or antidote) strategies. These drugs are aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), ticlopidine/clopidogrel, abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide, heparin (unfractionated and low-molecular-weight), warfarin and direct thrombin inhibitors. Since the pharmacological mechanisms of some of these drugs are based on irreversible or slowly reversible effects, their pharmacokinetic profiles are not necessarily predictive for their pharmacodynamic profiles. A close and direct relationship between plasma concentrations and effects is seen only for the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors tirofiban and eptifibatide with a fast off-rate for dissociation from the GPIIb/IIIa receptor, and for direct thrombin inhibitors (hirudin and argatroban). For other compounds, drug concentrations in plasma and pharmacodynamic effects are not closely correlated because of, for example, irreversible binding to their target (aspirin, clopidogrel and abciximab), inhibition of the generation of a subset of clotting factors with differing regeneration and degradation rates (coumarins) or sustained binding to the vascular wall (heparins). Surgery in patients on anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy may be categorised as: (i) elective versus urgent; and (ii) cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) versus non-CPB. Monotherapy with clopidogrel or aspirin need not be discontinued in elective non-CPB surgery, and temporary discontinuation of warfarin should be accompanied by preoperative intravenous heparin only in selected high-risk patients. Vitamin K as an antidote for warfarin should only be used subcutaneously and solely in urgent/emergency surgery. In elective surgery requiring CPB (coronary artery bypass grafting), it is recommended to discontinue aspirin 7 days preoperatively in patients with a low risk profile. Patients requiring urgent CPB surgery (e.g. after failure of a percutaneous coronary angioplasty with or without coronary stent deployment) are usually pretreated with several antiplatelet agents (e.g. aspirin and clopidogrel, together with a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor) together with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin. With judicious planning, urgent/emergency cardiac surgery can be safely performed on these patients. Delaying surgery (e.g. for 12 hours in patients treated with abciximab) should be considered if possible. Standard heparin doses should be given to achieve optimal anticoagulation for CPB. Prophylactic use of aprotinin (intra- and/or postoperatively), aminocaproic acid or tranexamic acid should be considered. Early (in the operating theatre prior to chest closure) and judicious use of replacement blood products (platelets) should be commenced when clinically indicated.

Dosing errors may impact the risk of rt-PA for stroke: the multicenter rt-PA acute stroke survey

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is given for acute ischemic stroke using a weight-based dosing regimen, and potential medication dosing errors may impact the relative risks and benefits of this therapy. Weight is frequently estimated by the patient, the family, the nurse, or the treating physician. Discrepancies between actual and estimated weight result in an incorrect dose, but errors of this type have not been previously studied in clinical practice. We hypothesized that such errors may impact the risks and benefits of rt-PA for stroke. The Multicenter rt-PA Acute Stroke Survey included data on 1205 acute stroke patients treated in routine clinical practice with intravenous rt-PA. We calculated the actual unit dose (in mg/kg) by dividing the dose of rt-PA given by the actual weight, and correlated this with risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and likelihood of good recovery (modified Rankin score of 0 or 1). Seven hundred and sixty-nine patients (64%) had data on both weight and rt-PA dosage. Forty-one patients (5.4%) had a symptomatic hemorrhage while 51 (6.6%) had an asymptomatic hemorrhage. There were non-significant trends towards increased risk of any ICH as the degree of overdosage increased, particularly in the highest dose quintile compared to the four lower quintiles (15.8% v 11.0%, P = .097). Adjustment for age, baseline NIHSS, and major early computed tomography (CT) changes strengthened this association (16.5% v 9.3%; P = .025). There was no association between actual dose and likelihood of good recovery (P = .57). Overdosage of rt-PA cause by an overestimation of weight resulted in a modest increase in the risk of ICH in the highest quintile, but there did not appear to be any reduction in effectiveness caused by underdosing. Every effort should be made to obtain the most accurate weight.

The Management of Venous Thromboembolic Disease in Older Adults

The incidence and prevalence of venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) increase progressively with age. Although the clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of VTED are generally similar in older and younger adults, prevalent comorbidities often complicate the management of VTED in the elderly. The Sixth American College of Chest Physicians Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy provides comprehensive recommendations for the management of VTED. This article summarizes these recommendations as they apply to older adults and highlights factors that may modulate the diagnosis and treatment of VTED in the elderly patient.

Simultaneous testing of the heparin effect on the soluble phase and platelet component of hemostasis

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the anticoagulant effect of heparin on both platelet activity and soluble phase coagulation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Blood samples were collected from 32 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization before and 5 minutes after a heparin injection (2000 U). Activated clotting time (ACT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and whole blood platelet aggregation [adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and collagen] were compared with the flow device variables platelet hemostasis time (PHT) and collagen-induced thrombus formation (CITF). Before heparin, all patients had a normal aPTT and all but 1 had a normal ACT. After heparin, all patients showed a prolonged aPTT and ACT. In contrast, the flow device showed considerable variability after heparin. Only 47% of patients increased both PHT and CITF above the upper limit of normal, and 13% did not prolong either. After heparin, enhanced platelet aggregation to ADP and collagen occurred in 53% and 63% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients seem to have an anticoagulant effect after heparin based on ACT and aPTT results, the flow device identified a lack of any hemostatic impairment in 25 to 41% of patients. These findings probably reflect the variable effect of heparin on platelet function and may explain the poor heparin effect or, alternatively, the excessive bleeding after heparin administration that occurs in some patients.

Do anticoagulants improve survival in patients presenting with venous thromboembolism?

Anticoagulants have been available since around 1940 and have become the standard of treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) for over four decades. However, as with other treatments which became established before the evidence-based era, there is a paucity of evidence from randomized controlled trials validating their effectiveness in preventing the most feared complication of VTE, recurrent fatal pulmonary embolism (PE). Only two such trials have been performed, the results of which conflict. The bulk of data supporting their use are derived from three sources. First, studies of thromboprophylaxis, and comparisons of shorter and longer courses of anticoagulants in high-risk patients with established VTE have clearly demonstrated their effectiveness in primary and late secondary prevention. Given that heparin has an immediate onset of action, anticoagulants should therefore also be effective in early secondary prevention, the proposed mechanism of action in the acute treatment of VTE. Secondly, studies of inadequately treated patients have consistently shown higher recurrence rates than in those adequately treated. Finally, comparisons of outcomes in untreated and treated historical series, and of untreated historical series to treated series in the modern era have shown substantially lower rates of fatal PE in anticoagulated patients. Because these differences are so marked, harmonize with our current understanding of the mechanism of action of anticoagulants and are supported by other evidence, it is much more likely that they at least partly reflect the effectiveness of anticoagulants as opposed to being explicable purely in terms of accumulated biases and a changing distribution of disease severity.

Patients with inferior vena caval filters should receive chronic thromboprophylaxis

A 32-year-old man with testicular carcinoma is diagnosed with an acute left leg deep venous thrombosis (DVT) during his fourth cycle of combination chemotherapy. Because of anticipated moderate to severe thrombocytopenia, anticoagulation is initially avoided and an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter is placed to prevent pulmonary embolism (PE). After completion of all chemotherapy he is deemed to be in remission and anticoagulation is begun. The optimal duration of anticoagulation in this patient is pondered.

Calf deep venous thrombosis should be treated with anticoagulation

A 50-year-old man with hypertension presents with a 2-day history of right calf swelling and pain. Venous duplex ultrasound reveals a right soleal vein thrombosis. He denies history of bleeding, renal disease, and symptoms suggestive of pulmonary embolism (PE). Physical examination is unrevealing except for calf tenderness, redness, warmth, and swelling. He is ambulatory. A decision is made to treat the calf deep venous thrombosis (DVT) with anticoagulation.

Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

The standard initial treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism is intravenous unfractionated heparin, requiring laboratory monitoring and hospitalization.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, open-label trial involving 2213 patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism to compare the efficacy and safety of the synthetic antithrombotic agent fondaparinux with those of unfractionated heparin and to document noninferiority in terms of efficacy. Patients received either fondaparinux (5.0, 7.5, or 10.0 mg in patients weighing less than 50, 50 to 100, or more than 100 kg, respectively) subcutaneously once daily or a continuous intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin (ratio of the activated partial-thromboplastin time to a control value, 1.5 to 2.5), both given for at least five days and until the use of vitamin K antagonists resulted in an international normalized ratio above 2.0. The primary efficacy outcome was the three-month incidence of the composite end point of symptomatic, recurrent pulmonary embolism (nonfatal or fatal) and new or recurrent deep-vein thrombosis.

RESULTS

Forty-two of the 1103 patients randomly assigned to receive fondaparinux (3.8 percent) had recurrent thromboembolic events, as compared with 56 of the 1110 patients randomly assigned to receive unfractionated heparin (5.0 percent), for an absolute difference of -1.2 percent in favor of fondaparinux (95 percent confidence interval, -3.0 to 0.5). Major bleeding occurred in 1.3 percent of the patients treated with fondaparinux and 1.1 percent of those treated with unfractionated heparin. Mortality rates at three months were similar in the two groups. Of the patients in the fondaparinux group, 14.5 percent received the drug in part on an outpatient basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily, subcutaneous administration of fondaparinux without monitoring is at least as effective and is as safe as adjusted-dose, intravenous administration of unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism.

Oral heparin administration with a novel drug delivery agent (SNAC) in healthy volunteers and patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is safe and effective for thromboprophylaxis, but its use is limited to parenteral administration. A novel drug delivery agent (SNAC) has been developed to accomplish the oral delivery of heparin.

OBJECTIVE

This report describes the foundation for dose selection and use of oral heparin/SNAC in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To develop a treatment regimen for clinical study, a multiple dose Phase I pharmacokinetic (PK) study in healthy volunteers compared oral heparin/SNAC (90 000 U heparin) with subcutaneous UFH (5000 U). On this basis, we carried out a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study comparing subcutaneous UFH (5000 U) with oral heparin/SNAC at either 60 000 or 90 000 U heparin in 123 patients undergoing elective THA. Patients received, postoperatively, one of the three treatments every 8 h for a total of 12 doses and were followed for 35 days post surgery.

RESULTS

In the Phase I study, anti-factor Xa activity peaked at 45-60 min following oral heparin/SNAC, returning to baseline at 4 h. RESULTS of the randomized trial in THA patients showed that venous thromboembolic events (n = 6), major bleeding events (n = 5) and need for transfusion (n = 23) were distributed evenly among the three treatment groups, UFH and both doses of oral heparin/SNAC.

CONCLUSION

This is the first demonstration that oral heparin/SNAC can be safely delivered to the postoperative THA patient, and provides the basis for a larger clinical trial to assess the prophylactic efficacy of heparin/SNAC.

Heparin monitoring in sheep by activated partial thromboplastin time

Heparin anticoagulation is utilized during and after vascular surgery in animals to reduce the risk of acute or chronic thromboembolic problems. In this study, we examined variation of activated partial thromboplastin time APTT) after the intravenous bolus IV bolus) and subcutaneous SC) heparin injection in order to monitor heparin therapy in sheep. Nine healthy sheep were assigned to 3 groups A, B, and C) according to their body weights: less than 40 kg, 40 to 80 kg, and more than 80 kg, respectively. All animals were treated with heparin 300 IU/kg body weight) through two routes, and the APTT, fibrinogen, and platelet count were measured before and every hour after treatment. This showed that the APTT was increased significantly between 1 to 4 hours after IV bolus injection and between 2 to 6 hours after SC injection P < 0.05). The APTT was returned to baseline values 6 and 10 hours after the respective treatments. The APTT in Group C was consistently higher than in Group A and B after heparin treatment by the two routes. The APTT ratio entered the subtherapeutic range 5 and 8 hours after IV bolus and SC injection, respectively. The APTT ratio was maintained in the therapeutic range for about 1 and 4 hours after IV bolus and SC injection, respectively. The highest APTT ratio in Group C after SC injection of heparin was significantly higher than that in Groups A and B P < 0.05). The mean platelet counts in Groups A, B, and C before the injection were 3197 +/- 365.6, 2886 +/- 78.2, and 1861 +/- 298.0 102/microL, respectively. The mean platelet count gradually decreased without significant variation after IV bolus and SC injection. These results produced elementary data for monitoring in sheep using APTT, and suggested that heparin should be administrated by the SC route at 4-hour intervals in order to remain in the therapeutic range, after an initial IV bolus dose.

The evolution and impact of the American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on antithrombotic therapy

The evolution of the American College of Chest Physicians consensus on antithrombotic therapy is reviewed, specifically with regard to the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and the rules of evidence applied. A perspective on the impact of the recommendations is offered.

Thromboprophylaxis and thrombosis in medical, surgical, trauma, and obstetric/gynecologic patients

The International Consensus and the ACCP Sixth Consensus had a great impact on the clinical acceptance of LMWHs. These recommendations have been instrumental in initiating further clinical trial to answer key questions regarding thromboprophylaxis and in setting a new standard for patient care. Also, the key to cost containment in management of DVT/PE is to (1) define the etiology (blood coagulation protein or platelet defect), institute appropriate long-term therapy as indicated, and assess appropriate family members as indicated if a hereditary defect is found and (2) use LMWH as inpatient management. saving a minimum of 210,000.00 dollars per 1000 patients simply from cost savings of recurrence, saving 17 lives per 1000 patients, and saving exorbitant costs of care for patients with recurrence and development of chronic venous insufficiency. The use of outpatient LMWH will save 4,900,000.00 dollars per 1000 patients if applied to the 70% of patients with DVT who fit the criteria of no comorbid condition requiring hospitalization and who arrive early enough to allow a diagnosis to be sent home or hospitalized for 24 hours or less. The simple defining of defects leading to unexplained thrombosis will add another 3,000,000.00 dollars in savings per 1000 patients with DVT and approximately 350,000.00 dollars per 100 patients with thrombotic stroke. In those with transient ischemic attacks, defining the defect and instituting appropriate antithrombotic therapy, thereby potentially saving approximately 30% from developing a thrombotic stroke, amounts to approximately 350,500.00 dollars (= 30% of 1,168,500.00 dollars) in savings per 100 patients.

The low molecular weight heparin, tinzaparin, in thrombosis and beyond

Standard unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been in clinical use for over 50 years. The commercial use of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) began in the mid 1980s for hemodialysis and the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Initially, the clinical development of LMWHs was concentrated on the European continent. Subsequently, LMWHs were introduced in North America as well. In the initial stages of development of these drugs only nadroparin, dalteparin and enoxaparin were used. Subsequently, several other LMWHs such as ardeparin, tinzaparin, reviparin and parnaparin were introduced. LMWHs constitute a group of important medications with total sales reaching nearly 2.5 billion dollars with expanded indications reaching far beyond the initial indications for the prophylaxis of post-surgical DVT. This review highlights the pharmacology of tinzaparin. Unlike other LMWHs, tinzaparin is prepared by enzymatic hydrolysis with heparinase, while various chemical depolymerization methods are used for the synthesis of other LMWHs. As compared with the standard heparin, LMWHs have different pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic properties; they also differ in clinical benefits.

Bed rest versus ambulation in the initial treatment of patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis

A large number of trials have shown that many patients with venous thromboembolism can be treated as outpatients by using low molecular weight heparin. However, the amount of physical activity is neither mentioned in the study protocols nor in the instruction brochures, which are given to the patients. In most institutions, the fear of dislodging clots by ambulation is more common than the consideration of thrombus propagation and of recurrence; therefore, bed rest is recommended at least for the initial stage. There have been two randomized trials showing that bed rest as a part of the initial treatment of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is not able to substantially reduce the incidence of pulmonary emboli detected by repeat lung scanning. In one study performed in patients with proximal DVT, it could be demonstrated that leg compression and walking exercises are able to reduce edema and pain more rapidly and more effectively than bed rest. Progression of the thrombus size assessed by an independent Duplex examiner was statistically significantly greater in those patients confined to bed when compared with ambulatory patients with compression therapy. By counteracting against venous stasis, walking exercises and compression therapy have an important impact on the clinical outcome and should therefore be addressed in future studies.

Heparin dosing and outcome in acute coronary syndromes: the GUSTO-IIb experience. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries

BACKGROUND

This study analyzed relationships among heparin dosage, patient characteristics, and 30-day outcome because optimal unfractionated-heparin dosing in acute coronary syndromes remains uncertain.

METHODS

Patients (n = 5335) randomized to heparin therapy in the Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) IIb trial were studied. The heparin dose was adjusted to a target activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and normalized for the patient's weight. Mortality and cardiac (re)infarction within 30 days and their association with patient characteristics and heparin dosing were evaluated.

RESULTS

The lowest mortality rate appeared with a heparin dose of approximately 14 U/kg/h or an aPTT of approximately 70 seconds. Heparin dosing was a significant predictor of outcome after adjusting for presenting coronary syndrome; a trend remained after adjusting for other baseline differences. This association was lost when adjusted for the aPTT result. Patients who died early appeared to have lower heparin dosing than those with later mortality (P =.012). Heparin "resistance" with relatively high heparin dosages and low aPTT values did not increase the risk for adverse outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a defined, dose-associated benefit of unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndromes similar to that seen previously in thrombolytic-treated infarctions. Heparin therapy is complicated by its complex biologic interactions and relatively crude measures of its effect. Better measures of heparin effectiveness and strategies need to be developed with either better antithrombin agents or adjunctive therapies such as antiplatelet regimens to treat patients who require benefits beyond that supplied by unfractionated heparin.

Issues in the utilization of low molecular weight heparins

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are parenteral anticoagulants that are widely used for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. These agents possess several advantages compared to standard heparin, including a more predictable anticoagulant response, better bioavailability allowing for subcutaneous therapy, and a longer half-life. Laboratory monitoring of the LMWHs uses an anti-factor Xa assay, but monitoring is generally not necessary for most patients. However, certain patient populations do benefit from an individualized approach to therapy and, in some cases, therapeutic monitoring, because of an increased bleeding risk and/or relative contraindications to anticoagulant therapy. For example, since LMWHs are cleared by the kidney, they must be used with caution in renal insufficiency. LMWHs are safe and effective during pregnancy but may not be the optimal antithrombotic agent in pregnant women with prosthetic valves. In addition, management around the time of delivery can be difficult because of the bleeding risk, particularly associated with epidural anesthesia. Therapeutic monitoring also may be useful for the morbidly obese, in children, and for patients with malignancy.

Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism

Venous thromboembolic disease, including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is an under-diagnosed and under-appreciated medical problem that results in significant patient morbidity and mortality. Inadequate venous thromboprophylaxis in surgical as well as medically ill patients results in DVT and PE that negatively impact patient outcomes and increase health-care costs. A high index of clinical suspicion combined with an evidence-based use of diagnostic tests helps identify patients with acute thrombosis. Failure to accurately and promptly diagnose and treat DVT and PE can result in excess morbidity and mortality due to postthrombotic syndrome, pulmonary hypertension, and recurrent thrombosis. Conversely, unnecessary anticoagulation provides risk in the absence of any tangible benefit. The immediate commencement of parenteral anticoagulant therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin or a subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) upon presentation with DVT or PE (often even before objective diagnosis confirmation) is necessary to minimize propagation, embolization, and recurrence rates. We favor weight-based LMWH therapy in most of our patients with DVT because of the ability to treat exclusively or primarily in the outpatient setting. We still admit patients with PE for a minimum duration of 2 days for close observation. Subsequent conversion to oral anticoagulation with warfarin (target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 in most patients) should include an overlap with parenteral therapy of at least 4 to 5 days and until a stable target INR has been achieved. A minimum of 3 to 6 months of anticoagulation is recommended following a first episode of idiopathic DVT and any PE. A shorter course of therapy may be sufficient following a situational (eg, after surgery and postpartum) or calf DVT. Long-term, and at times lifelong, therapy should be considered in patients with thrombosis in the setting of a persistent acquired or inherited hypercoagulable state. Thrombolytic therapy probably should be reserved for young patients with iliofemoral DVT, any patient with a threatened limb due to impending venous limb gangrene, and those with PE who have objective evidence of cardiopulmonary compromise. Unfavorable risk-to-benefit and cost-to-benefit ratios make more extensive use of thrombolytics undesirable. The prevention of the postthrombotic syndrome with fitted, graduated compression garments and age- and gender-appropriate cancer screening are indicated in all patients with DVT in an attempt to minimize morbidity and mortality. Hypercoagulable state testing is indicated when the results of individual tests will significantly impact the choice of anticoagulant, intensity of therapy, therapeutic monitoring, family screening, family planning, prognosis determination, and most of all, duration of therapy.

Major pulmonary embolism: review of a pathophysiologic approach to the golden hour of hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism

Major pulmonary embolism (PE) results whenever the combination of embolism size and underlying cardiopulmonary status interact to produce hemodynamic instability. Physical findings and standard data crudely estimate the severity of the embolic event in patients without prior cardiopulmonary disease (CPD) but are unreliable indicators in patients with prior CPD. In either case, the presence of shock defines a threefold to sevenfold increase in mortality, with a majority of deaths occurring within 1 h of presentation. A rapid integration of historical information and physical findings with readily available laboratory data and a structured physiologic approach to diagnosis and resuscitation are necessary for optimal therapeutics in this "golden hour." Echocardiography is ideal because it is transportable, and is capable of differentiating shock states and recognizing the characteristic features of PE. Spiral CT scanning is evolving to replace angiography as a confirmatory study in this population. Thrombolytic therapy is acknowledged as the treatment of choice, with embolectomy reserved for those in whom thrombolysis is contraindicated.

Markers of hemostatic system activation during treatment of deep vein thrombosis with subcutaneous unfractionated or low-molecular weight heparin

Prothrombin fragments (F1+2), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT) and D-dimers, markers of hemostatic system activation, were measured in 59 consecutive patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Patients were randomly treated either with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UH) administered in two to three subcutaneous doses adjusted to activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) or with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (dalteparin) administered in a fixed dose of 200 IU/kg body weight in one subcutaneous injection daily. Before treatment, F1+2, TAT and D-dimer were above the cut-off level in 27/59 (46%), 34/59 (58%) and all (100%) patients, respectively. Significant associations were observed between F1+2 and TAT (r=.66, P<.001), TAT and D-dimer (r=.36, P<.005) and F1+2 and D-dimer (r=.30, P<.050). On the third day of treatment, F1+2 and TAT significantly decreased to reference values in almost all patients (in 64/66 determinations of both F1+2 and TAT) and remained low on the seventh day of treatment. Compared to pretreatment values, a nonsignificant decrease of D-dimer was noted in both groups, but all values remained above the cut-off value. When markers of hemostatic system activation in the UH and LMWH groups were compared, no significant differences were observed. It was concluded that subcutaneous UH in an APTT-adjusted dose and subcutaneous LMWH in a once-daily weight-adjusted dose controlled these markers of hemostatic system activation in a similar manner.

Dose-effect relationship for several coagulation markers during administration of the direct thrombin inhibitor S 18326 in healthy subjects

AIMS

We conducted a phase I placebo-controlled trial with two i.v. doses (0.5 mg h-1 and 3 mg h-1) of S 18326, a selective thrombin inhibitor that interacts with the catalytic site of thrombin, with the aim to study the relationships between increasing plasma levels of S 18326 and changes in coagulation tests and thrombin generation markers.

METHODS

Thirty-six healthy male volunteers were divided into three groups. In each group, 10 volunteers were randomly assigned to receive S 18326 and two to receive a placebo. Following a bolus of 4.5 mg, doses were 0.5 mg h-1 in the first group and 3 mg h-1 in the two other groups, administered as an i.v. infusion for 24 h. Blood was drawn repeatedly up to 36 h after the bolus, and tested for the activated clotting time (ACT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). The APTT reagent was chosen among five commercial reagents to yield a linear increase in the clotting time among possible therapeutic S 18326 concentrations in vitro. To accurately measure the thrombin-inhibiting effects of low doses of S 18326 (< 0.5 microm), we developed a specific chromogenic assay. We also measured F1 + 2 prothrombin fragment levels to assess the effect of S 18326 on thrombin generation in vivo.

RESULTS

A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model was fitted to the S 18326 plasma concentration vs time data by using population pharmacokinetic methods. Results of the pharmacodynamic-pharmacokinetic relationships showed that both the ACT and APTT methods yielded a linear increase according to the S 18326 concentration measured using a highly sensitive analytical method. At the end of infusion, ACT was prolonged 1.20 and 1.95-fold in the 0.5 mg h-1 and the 3 mg h-1 groups, respectively, and APTT was prolonged 1.27 and 2.75-fold. Thrombin inhibition plateaued above 0.5 microm of S 18326 according to an Emax model, confirming that the test was highly sensitive. F1 + 2 levels fell significantly after the 24 h S 18326 infusion (0.83 nm to 0.6 nm and 0.80 nm to 0.44 nm in the 0.5 mg h-1 and the 3 mg h-1 groups, respectively), but remained stable after the placebo infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support specific monitoring of the thrombin inhibitor S 18326 with ACT and APTT to establish the safety range of the drug in further studies. Moreover, the fall in F1 + 2 prothrombin fragments suggests that S 18326 effectively reduces the retroactivation of factors V and VIII by thrombin.

Prospective evaluation of the quality of oral anticoagulation management in an outpatient clinic and in general practices

OBJECTIVE

To compare the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy (QOAT), before and after referral of patients on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) from a hospital outpatient clinic (HOC) to general practitioners (GPs).

DESIGN

Prospective observational study. Patients were identified by using the Laboratory Information System (LIS), containing all prescribed International Normalised Ratio of Prothrombin Time (INR) tests, from the HOC and GPs in the hospital submission area.

SETTING

The HOC in a rural hospital, Aarhus County, Denmark (55,000 inhabitants), and GPs in the submission area.

SUBJECTS

124 OAT patients (59.7% males. Median age 70.0: 25-75 percentile: 62.0-76.0).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The QOAT in terms of time spent within therapeutic INR interval (TI). The QOAT was compared 8 months before with 8 months after altering the monitoring organization. For patients monitored less than 8 months before the alteration, the QOAT was compared to a corresponding time period after the alteration.

RESULTS

We identified 124 OAT patients, and found a significant increase in the QOAT from 65.0% before to 69.1% after referral of the patients to the GPs (P<.0001). In 75 patients with full follow-up, the QOAT increased from 67.5% before to 69.7% after the alteration (P<.0001).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that the QOAT in this geographical area is adequate, and that the quality performed by the GPs was at least as good as in the HOC. In order to document and increase the QOAT, continuous quality surveillance using the LIS has been initiated.

Direct medical cost of managing deep vein thrombosis according to the occurrence of complications

BACKGROUND

Management of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has evolved from hospitalisation for intravenous heparin therapy to treatment options that include acute management as an outpatient. While efficacy and safety remain the principal basis for choosing a therapy, the economic consequences of that choice should be considered as well.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the average cost of various DVT management options from the perspective of US health payers.

DESIGN

Inpatient and outpatient management strategies were examined. Inpatient cases were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Edition, Clinical Modification codes and were classified into subgroups according to complication status. A cost estimate was developed by applying unit costs to the corresponding course of treatment. Cost estimates included initial acute care and that occurring in the following 6 months. Resource use profiles and unit costs were derived from several statewide inpatient, emergency room and ambulatory care databases supplemented by national fee schedules, published reports and peer-reviewed literature. All costs are reported in 1999 US dollars.

RESULTS

The mean 6-month treatment costs for inpatient management ranged from US dollars 3906 to US dollars 17,168, depending on complication status. For outpatient management, the cost ranged from US dollars 2394 to US dollars 3369, depending on frequency of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) injection and need for professional assistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The management strategy selected for DVT has an important economic impact. Self-administered LMWH in a homecare setting results in the lowest cost. However, as some patients either cannot, or will not, be treated this way, it is important for decision makers to consider the costs of other strategies.

Treatment options for deep venous thrombosis

Once the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) has been established the focus shifts to management of the disease. The goals of acute treatment of DVT are several: arrest growth of the thrombus, dissolve or remove the thrombus, and prevent embolizations of the thrombus. Although these goals have remained constant, the initial management of DVT has undergone a series of evolutions during the past decade, affecting both acute treatment and disposition decisions. As this article discusses, emergency medicine is at the cutting edge of these changes.