Montelukast, a leukotriene-receptor antagonist, for the treatment of mild asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Role of MUC5AC in the pathogenesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) involves the release of mediators from several airway cells in response to exercise challenge, but the mechanism leading to airflow obstruction during EIB is incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of secreted mucin in the pathogenesis of EIB.

METHODS

Induced sputum was collected at baseline and 30 minutes after exercise challenge in patients with asthma with EIB. The expression of gel-forming mucins and epidermal growth factor receptor ligands were assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Secreted mucin 5AC (MUC5AC), the eicosanoids cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs) and 15S-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (15S-HETE), and tachykinins neurokinin A (NKA) and substance P (SP) were measured in induced sputum supernatant.

RESULTS

Among the gel-forming mucins, MUC5AC was expressed at the highest level. The gene expression of MUC5AC increased after exercise challenge compared with baseline and was associated with EIB severity by regression analysis. The relative levels of MUC5AC in induced sputum increased from a geometric mean of 9.5 at baseline to 18.4 postexercise challenge. Associations between the levels of MUC5AC and cysLTs and between the levels of cysLTs and NKA postexercise challenge were identified by regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that (1) the predominant gel-forming mucin expressed in induced sputum of patients with asthma with EIB is MUC5AC; (2) an increase in MUC5AC gene expression and release of MUC5AC protein occurs after exercise challenge; and (3) MUC5AC release may occur through the cysLT-associated activation of sensory airway nerves.

Evidence for placebo effects on physical but not on biochemical outcome parameters: a review of clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Recent reviews on placebo effects in clinical trials suggest that objective changes following placebo treatments may not exist or, at least, have been considerably overestimated. However, the possibility that yet unidentified subsets of parameters are responsive to placebo treatments has not been taken into account. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to examine the effects of placebo treatments on objectively measured outcome parameters by specifically focusing on peripheral disease processes.

METHODS

An initial dataset was collected from a MEDLINE search for placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials. Trials with stable disease conditions were identified, and the effects of placebo treatments on peripheral outcome parameters were estimated by the changes from baseline in the placebo groups. An explorative data analysis was conducted in order to identify parameter classes with differential responsiveness to placebo treatments. A subgroup meta-analysis of a second dataset was performed to test whether the preliminary classification would also apply to placebo effects derived from the comparison of placebo groups with untreated control groups.

RESULTS

The explorative analysis of outcome parameters and strength of placebo effects yielded a classification into responsive "physical" versus non-responsive "biochemical" parameters. In total, 50% of trials measuring physical parameters showed significant placebo effects, compared with 6% of trials measuring biochemical parameters. A subgroup meta-analysis substantiated the differential response (physical parameters: n = 14, Hedges' pooled effect size g = 0.34, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.46; biochemical parameters: n = 15, g = 0.03, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.10). The subanalysis of the second dataset supported the classification and revealed a significant improvement for physical parameters (n = 20, g = 0.22, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.36) and a deterioration for biochemical parameters (n = 6, g = -0.17, 95% CI -0.31 to -0.02).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that placebo interventions can improve physical disease processes of peripheral organs more easily and effectively than biochemical processes. This differential response offers a good starting point for theoretical considerations on possible mediating mechanisms, and for future investigations in this field.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: an update

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is a disease that is being recognized with increasing frequency. In children it is responsible for feeding disorders, vomiting, reflux symptoms and abdominal pain and in adults it causes dysphagia and esophageal food impactions. The diagnosis requires the histologic finding of > 20 eosinophils per high powered field in esophageal squamous mucosa. The most common treatment regimens in children and adults involve the ingestion of topical corticosteroids. Symptomatic relapse after one treatment course is common, and many patients require repeated courses of treatment. The long-term prognosis of EE is largely unknown.

Pharmacotherapy of diseases mediated by 5-lipoxygenase pathway eicosanoids

Inflammatory eicosanoids generated by the 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism are now known to have at least 6 receptors: OXE, which recognizes 5-HETE and 5-oxo-ETE; a putative receptor recognizing a potent 5-oxo-ETE metabolite, FOG(7); the LTB(4) receptors, BLT1 and BLT2; the cysteinyl leukotriene receptors, CysLT(1) and CysLT(2), which recognize leukotrienes LTC(4), LTD(4), LTE(4) and LTF(4). The 5-LO pathway is activated in many diseases and invokes inflammatory responses not affected by glucocorticoids, but therapy with selective BLT1 or CysLT(1) antagonists in asthma has met with variable success. Studies show that 5-LO pathway eicosanoids are not primary mediators in all cases of asthma, but may be especially important in severe persistent asthma, aspirin- and exercise-induced asthma, allergic rhinitis, COPD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, atherosclerosis, atopic dermatitis, acne and ischemia-related organ injury. These disorders appear to involve multiple 5-LO pathway eicosanoids and receptor subtypes, suggesting that inhibition of the pathway at the level of 5-LO may be necessary for maximal efficacy.

The expanding role of leukotriene receptor antagonists in chronic asthma

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review of studies that evaluate the effects of leukotriene receptor antagonists in adult chronic asthma.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search using MEDLINE, Clinical Evidence, and the Cochrane Library was performed using the following keywords: randomized controlled trial, asthma, cysteinyl leukotriene, leukotriene receptor antagonist, antileukotriene, montelukast, zafirlukast, pranlukast, inflammation, lung function, exacerbations, and symptoms.

STUDY SELECTION

Relevant peer-reviewed articles (mostly randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and reviews) published up to July 2006 were selected and extracted.

RESULTS

Leukotriene receptor antagonists are beneficial across a range of asthma severities and may have a particular role in exercise-induced asthma, aspirin-sensitive asthma, and individuals with concomitant allergic rhinitis.

CONCLUSION

In the management of chronic asthma, leukotriene receptor antagonists have emerged as a useful oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory adjunct both as monotherapy and in combination with other classes of drugs. Monitoring their effects in terms of lung function alone may result in clinicians missing beneficial effects on inflammatory biomarkers, airway hyperresponsiveness, and exacerbations.

Improvements in distal lung function correlate with asthma symptoms after treatment with oral montelukast

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The distal airways are likely to contribute to asthma pathobiology and symptoms but have rarely been specifically evaluated in relation to systemic oral therapy. We hypothesized that treatment with montelukast, an oral cysteinyl-leukotriene receptor antagonist, would improve both proximal and distal lung physiology in patients with mild asthma.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, crossover design.

SETTING

Academic referral center.

PATIENTS

Subjects with mild asthma limited to using short-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonists.

INTERVENTIONS

Nineteen subjects with mild asthma underwent a baseline assessment of lung function, lung mechanics, and symptoms, followed by randomization to therapy with montelukast, 10 mg taken in the evening, or placebo in a crossover, double-blind fashion. Each treatment phase lasted 4 weeks, with a 2-week washout period. A repeat evaluation was performed during the last week of each treatment phase.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Montelukast resulted in improvement in (mean +/- SD) proximal and distal lung function parameters (change in FEV(1): montelukast, 0.16 +/- 0.06 L; placebo, -0.05 +/- 0.05 L; p = 0.008); change in specific conductance: montelukast, 7.2 +/- 2.9% predicted; placebo, -17 +/- 8% predicted; p = 0.007; change in % predicted residual volume [RV]: montelukast, 18.4 +/- 8.3% predicted; placebo, 3.0 +/- 2.9% predicted; p = 0.05). Improvement in symptoms (ie, wheeze and chest tightness) correlated with improvements in RV while receiving montelukast, but not while receiving placebo (Pearson coefficients: 0.55 and 0.66, respectively; p < 0.008 and 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The systemically acting oral agent montelukast improves proximal and distal lung physiology. Improvements in distal lung function correlate with improvements in asthma symptoms.

Release of prostaglandin D2 and leukotriene C4 in response to hyperosmolar stimulation of mast cells

BACKGROUND

Mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction in subjects with exercise-induced asthma is associated with increased urinary excretion of 9alpha, 11beta-PGF(2), a metabolite of prostaglandin D(2) (PGD(2)) serving as a mast cell marker. It has however been questioned whether or not human mast cells release PGD(2) and leukotriene C(4) (LTC(4)) after osmotic challenge with mannitol in vitro.

METHODS

Cord blood-derived human mast cells were stimulated osmotically, immunologically or with a combination of both. Supernatants were analysed for PGD(2), LTC(4) and histamine contents with enzyme immunoassays.

RESULTS

Significant release of de novo synthesized eicosanoids, predominantly PGD(2) [12 (8.8, 14) pmol/10(6)cells; median (25th, 75th percentile) but also LTC(4) (0.1 (0.08, 0.15) pmol/10(6) cells] were found in mast cells in vitro in response to 0.7 M mannitol stimulation. A massive release of histamine [70 (5.3)% of total; mean (SEM)] was also found. There were no correlations between the levels of released mediators after mannitol stimulation. In contrast, there was a correlation between release of PGD(2) and LTC(4), following immunological stimulation.

CONCLUSION

The findings support that hyperosmolar challenge activates mast cells, but different than antigen stimulation.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of montelukast in children aged 3 to 6 months

The single-dose population estimate of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(pop)) from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), and time to C(max) (t(max)) of montelukast 4-mg oral granules were investigated in infants aged 3 to 6 months. Montelukast concentrations were quantitated after a single 4-mg dose of montelukast oral granules. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using a population-based approach with a nonlinear mixed-effect, 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for the AUC(pop) ratio (3 to 6 months/6 to 24 months) were determined. Safety and tolerability were assessed. Montelukast 4-mg oral granules in children 3 to 6 months of age yielded systemic exposure (AUC(pop) = 3644.3 +/- 481.5 ng x h/mL) similar to that observed in children aged 6 to 24 months (3226.6 +/- 250.0 ng x h/mL). Systemic exposure after a 4-mg dose of montelukast as oral granules is similar in children aged 3 to 6 months and 6 to 24 months.

Onset and duration of protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by a single oral dose of montelukast

BACKGROUND

Leukotriene modifiers have been shown to protect against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) with repeated, chronic dosing.

OBJECTIVE

To study the onset and duration of protection against EIB after a single dose of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist.

METHODS

In this randomized, crossover, double-blind study, 51 adult asthma patients with EIB (> or = 20% postexercise decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]) received a single oral dose of montelukast (10 mg), or placebo followed by exercise challenge 2, 12, and 24 hours after dosing. The primary end point was maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 from preexercise baseline during 60 minutes after the 2-hour challenge.

RESULTS

At 2, 12, and 24 hours after dosing, the maximum decrease in FEV1 was 10.8% +/- 7.9%, 8.4% +/- 7.5%, and 8.3% +/- 7.3% for montelukast and 22.3% +/- 13.1%, 16.1% +/- 10.2%, and 16.9% +/- 11.7% for placebo, respectively (P < or = .001 at each time point). Postexercise recovery was quicker with montelukast than with placebo (P < or = .001); mean (95% confidence interval) differences were -26.8 minutes (-35.1 to -18.4 minutes), -16.0 minutes (-22.9 to -9.2 minutes), and -17.4 minutes (-24.9 to -9.9 minutes) at the 3 time points, respectively. At all time points, area under the curve for percentage decrease in FEV1 during 60 minutes after exercise was smaller after montelukast (P < or = .001); montelukast protected more patients against EIB (P < or = .001). Fewer patients required postexercise beta-agonist rescue at 2 hours after dosing with montelukast (P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Montelukast provided significant protection against EIB as soon as 2 hours after a single oral dose, with persistent benefit up to 24 hours.

Differences in the evaluation and management of exercise-induced bronchospasm between family physicians and pulmonologists

Previous studies have demonstrated that specialists and generalists differ in the evaluation and management of asthma especially in terms of use of objective testing. We speculated that there also may be differences in the diagnosis and management of exercise-induced respiratory complaints. An Internet survey was sent to samples of pulmonologists and family physicians. Our data suggests that pulmonologists are much more likely to order bronchoprovocation testing than family physicians, and family physicians are more likely to start any empiric therapy than perform bronchoprovocation testing when exercise-induced bronchospasm is suspected. These differences may lead to inaccurate or missed diagnoses and unnecessary morbidity.

How does exercise cause asthma attacks?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To remind readers that evaporative water loss from the airway surface is the stimulus for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. To emphasize that recruitment of the peripheral airways determines severity of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. To draw attention to the potential for injury of the epithelium and for plasma exudation to contribute to the pathogenesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in athletes. To emphasize that many inflammatory mediators are involved in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and that some are found in both asthmatic and healthy subjects.

RECENT FINDINGS

That inflammatory mediators are released into the airways in response to exercise and can be measured by inducing sputum (histamine, cysteinyl leukotrienes) or collecting condensate from exhaled air (cysteinyl leukotrienes and adenosine). The concentration of mediators was reduced in response to a combination of loratadine and montelukast. Exercise is a stimulus for upregulating the genes coding for the 5-lipoxygenase pathway in healthy subjects.

SUMMARY

Dehydration of the airways results in release of mediators. The likely source of these mediators is the mast cell. Epithelial injury occurs in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The process of repair may contribute to the development of airway hyperresponsiveness in healthy subjects. Measuring the airway response to exercise, or a surrogate for exercise, as an indicator of airway hyperresponsiveness is warranted in patients with symptoms of asthma.

A critical appraisal of methods used in early clinical development of novel drugs for the treatment of asthma

Asthma is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by chronic airway inflammation, hyperresponsiveness and remodeling. Being the hallmark of asthma, airway inflammation has become the most important target for therapeutic agents. Consequently, during the past decade various semi-and non-invasive methods have been explored to sample the airway inflammation in asthma. In this review, we provide a practical overview of the current status of various sampling techniques including sputum induction, exhaled breath analysis, and bronchoprovocation tests (BPTs). We focus on their applicability for monitoring in clinical practice and in intervention trials in asthma.

Treatment of asthma with antileukotrienes: first line or last resort therapy?

Twenty five years after the structure elucidation of slow reacting substance of anaphylaxis, antileukotrienes are established as a new therapeutic modality in asthma. The chapter reviews the biochemistry and pharmacology of leukotrienes and antileukotrienes with particular focus on the different usage of antileukotrienes for treatment of asthma and rhinitis in Europe and the US. Further research needs and new areas for leukotriene involvement in respiratory diseases are also discussed.

Asthma and athletes: therapy to compete

Asthma presents special challenges to both the athletes who have it and to their health care providers. This article briefly reviews the problem of asthma--especially exercise-induced asthma--in the competitive athlete, and then describes treatments that are effective in controlling asthma. Drug-doping regulations are explained, as is the worldwide impact of drug doping on competitive athletes who have asthma. This review concludes with recommendations for competitive athletes and their health care providers regarding how to deal with asthma in this patient population.

Identifying exercise-induced bronchospasm: treatment hinges on distinguishing it from chronic asthma

Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) is an often-undiagnosed but common problem affecting both recreational and elite athletes. Although exercise can trigger exacerbation of chronic asthma, EIB should not be confused with the chronic inflammatory disease. In this article, Drs Hermansen and Kirchner review the incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of EIB and explain how to distinguish EIB from chronic asthma.

Asthma, airway inflammation and treatment in elite athletes

Highly trained athletes are repeatedly and strongly exposed to cold air during winter training and to many inhalant irritants and allergens all year round. Asthma occurs most commonly in athletes engaging in endurance events such as cross-country skiing, swimming, or long-distance running. As well as the type of training, a major risk factor is atopic disposition. A mixed type of eosinophilic and neutrophilic airway inflammation has been shown to affect elite swimmers, ice-hockey players, and cross-country skiers. The inflammation may represent a form of repeated thermal, mechanical, or osmotic airway trauma resulting in a healing or remodelling process. Elite athletes commonly use antiasthma drugs to treat exercise-induced bronchial symptoms. Only a few controlled studies have been conducted on the effects of antiasthma drugs on asthma symptoms, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation in elite athletes. Inhaled beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists are effective against exercise-induced bronchospasm. In contrast, airway inflammation, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and symptoms have responded poorly to inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene antagonists. As discontinuing high-level exercise has proved effective in reducing eosinophilic airway inflammation, exercise or training should be restricted in athletes having troublesome symptoms and sputum eosinophilia. Switching training to less irritating environments should be considered whenever possible. It appears to be difficult to change the 'natural course' of asthma in athletes by anti-inflammatory treatment.

Effect of montelukast on exhaled leukotrienes and quality of life in asthmatic patients

STUDY OBJECTIVES

In some patients with asthma treated with inhaled corticosteroids, suppression of inflammation is incomplete. This may be because the effect of corticosteroids on cysteinyl-leukotriene (cys-LT) biosynthesis is limited. Montelukast is a cys-LT antagonist that significantly improves asthma control in corticosteroid-treated asthmatic patients. However, not all patients treated with cys-LT antagonists show a clinical improvement.

DESIGN

We have studied the effect of treatment for 4 weeks with montelukast (10 mg/d) on exhaled cys-LTs and leukotriene B4 (LTB4), exhaled nitric oxide, asthma quality of life (AQL), and respiratory function in patients with stable asthma.

SETTING

Asthma clinics in general practice.

PATIENTS

We studied 50 patients (30 men; mean +/- SEM age, 53 +/- 2 years) who were treated with inhaled corticosteroids.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

We detected cys-LTs in exhaled breath condensate in 25 of 50 patients; however, in the normal nonasthmatic subjects, cys-LTs were below the limit of detection. After treatment with montelukast, there was a fall in cys-LT concentrations from 14.6 +/- 3.3 to 8.5 +/- 2.6 pg/mL after 2 weeks (p > 0.05) and to 3.9 +/- 1.3 pg/mL after 4 weeks (p < 0.01). Exhaled LTB4 levels were also elevated. After treatment with montelukast, LTB4 levels fell from 33.0 +/- 3.9 to 20.4 +/- 2.5 pg/mL after 2 weeks of treatment (p < 0.05), and to 17.0 +/- 2.2 pg/mL after 4 weeks of treatment (p < 0.01). These changes in exhaled cys-LT and LTB4 were associated with significant improvements in AQL scores.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that in some patients with stable asthma treated with inhaled corticosteroids, the suppression of inflammation is incomplete. Adding a leukotriene receptor antagonist can provide a complementary effect of controlling inflammation, with a significant improvement in quality of life.

Childhood asthma. Balancing efficacy and adherence for optimum management

In the United States, asthma is the most common cause of school absences due to chronic illness, and its incidence in the pediatric population is increasing. Although most cases of childhood asthma can be controlled with recently available medications, there is often a gap between the goal of optimal control and the actual persistence of symptoms. In this article, Dr Sveum explores one approach to the most advantageous management of childhood asthma-an approach that weighs the advantage of a higher rate of medication adherence in practice against greater medication efficacy in clinical trials.

Leukotriene modifiers as potential therapeutics for cardiovascular disease

Owing to their anti-inflammatory properties, leukotriene modifiers have been the primary therapeutics in asthma management for several years. Although blocking the inflammatory component of human disease is a long-standing and established concept, the use of leukotriene modifiers in treating the inflammatory component of cardiovascular disease encompassing atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, stroke and aortic aneurysm has, surprisingly, only been seriously contemplated in the past few years. As reviewed here, several exciting studies have recently contributed to this expanding area of interest, and so far one leukotriene modifier has entered Phase II clinical trials to assess its potential for reducing the risk of heart attacks.

Airway immunopathology of asthma with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a common cause of symptoms in a subgroup of asthmatic subjects. The pathobiology that makes this group of asthmatic subjects susceptible to bronchoconstriction after a brief period of exercise remains poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether there are differences in lower airway inflammation and production of cytokines and eicosanoids between asthmatic subjects with and without EIB.

METHODS

Two distinct groups of asthmatic subjects based on a priori definitions were identified, one with moderate-to-severe EIB and the other without significant bronchoconstriction after exercise challenge. Both groups met the definition of asthma on the basis of bronchodilator response, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, or both. A comparative immunopathology study was conducted by using induced sputum to identify differences in lower airway inflammation and production of cytokines and eicosanoids.

RESULTS

The groups had similar baseline lung function and bronchodilator response and did not have any asthma exacerbations within the prior year. The concentration of columnar epithelial cells was markedly higher in the group with EIB (1.4 x 10(5) vs 2.9 x 10(4) cells/mL, P=.01). The concentration of eosinophils was higher in the group with EIB (3.6 x 10(4) vs 4.9 x 10(3) cells/mL P=.04). Cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs; 727.7 vs 151.9 pg/mL, P=.01) and the ratio of CysLTs to prostaglandin E(2) (1.85 vs 1.04, P=.002) in the airways were higher in the group with EIB.

CONCLUSION

Injury to the airway epithelium, overexpression of CysLTs, relative under production of prostaglandin E(2), and greater airway eosinophilia are distinctive immunopathologic features of asthma with EIB.

Control of asthma under specialist care: is it achieved?

BACKGROUND

The goal of asthma treatment is control of asthma and good quality of life for asthmatic patients; however, many asthmatic patients experience symptoms and limitations.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To examine treatment outcome in asthmatic patients under specialist care.

DESIGN

Multicenter, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Four large outpatient asthma clinics in teaching hospitals in three Greek cities.

PATIENTS

Three hundred seventy-eight randomly selected patients with mild or moderate asthma (265 female patients; mean age, 42.3 years).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Patients completed a questionnaire structured with eight domains covering patient characteristics, drug use at baseline and during exacerbations, regular follow-up, emergency visits, asthma control, symptoms, and limitations. Results show that the majority of patients have symptoms and limitations in their physical and social activities and have frequent exacerbations, while > 40% of patients think that their asthma is not well controlled. Most of our patients receive preventive medication (primarily inhaled corticosteroids, but less so long-acting beta2-agonists [LABAs] and leukotriene antagonists), increase their use of medication in case of exacerbations and have regular follow-up. However, the report shows that 48% of patients tried to reduce their medication dose, a fact implying that compliance is not always good.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that the goals of asthma treatment are not achieved, even under specialist care. Perhaps more effort should be invested in patient education while an increase in the use of LABAs and leukotriene antagonists, medications that have been shown to prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and improve quality of life, may help better asthma outcomes.

An update of the leukotriene modulators for the treatment of asthma

Bronchial asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease involving many cells and mediators. Chronic inflammation constitutes an important predisposing condition for airway remodelling with secondary irreversible airflow obstruction. Current approaches for asthma treatment involve many classes of drugs, adequate patient education for their correct use, environmental exposure control and daily monitoring of pulmonary function. Unfortunately, the use of multiple therapies complicates treatment regimens, thus leading to a reduced compliance to therapy. Available evidence from randomised clinical trials and real-word experience derived from managing patients with asthma justifies a broader role for leukotriene receptor antagonist drugs in asthma management than that recommended in the National Asthma Education and Prevention Programme and National Health Lung and Blood Institute Treatment Guidelines. While a low dose of inhaled corticosteroids remains the reference drug as a controller in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma, oral therapy with an leukotriene-receptor antagonist drug represents a good option providing the clinical efficacy requested in common clinical practice. For this reason the recent Global Initiative for Asthma Guidelines allocate this drug to the second and third steps of asthma treatment.

Role of leukotriene receptor antagonists in the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: a review

Asthma is a very common disorder that still causes significant morbidity and mortality. A high percentage of individuals with asthma also experience exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). This article reviews the current literature and updates the reader on the safety, efficacy, and clinical applications of leukotriene modifiers in the treatment of EIB.

Inflammatory basis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

RATIONALE

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a highly prevalent condition with unclear pathogenesis. Two competing theories of the pathogenesis of EIB differ regarding the inflammatory basis of this condition.

OBJECTIVES

Our goals were to establish whether epithelial cell and mast cell activation with release of inflammatory mediators occurs during EIB and how histamine and cysteinyl leukotriene antagonists alter the airway events occurring during EIB.

METHODS

Induced sputum was used to measure mast cell mediators and eicosanoids at baseline and 30 minutes after exercise challenge in 25 individuals with asthma with EIB. In a randomized, double-blind crossover study, the cysteinyl leukotriene antagonist montelukast and antihistamine loratadine or two matched placebos were administered for two doses before exercise challenge.

MAIN RESULTS

The percentage of columnar epithelial cells in induced sputum at baseline was associated with the severity of EIB. After exercise challenge, histamine, tryptase, and cysteinyl leukotrienes significantly increased and prostaglandin E(2) and thromboxane B(2) significantly decreased in the airways, and there was an increase in columnar epithelial cells in the airways. The concentration of columnar epithelial cells was associated with the levels of histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes in the airways. Treatment with montelukast and loratadine inhibited the release of cysteinyl leukotrienes and histamine into the airways, but did not inhibit the release of columnar epithelial cells into the airways.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that epithelial cells, mast cell mediators, and eicosanoids are released into the airways during EIB, supporting an inflammatory basis for EIB.

Effects of montelukast on airway narrowing from eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation and cold air exercise

BACKGROUND

Exercise induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is common in elite athletes. Eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH) is a laboratory test recommended for the identification of EIB in athletes, secondary to a field exercise challenge. Montelukast attenuates EIB, but its protective effect against airway narrowing from EVH has not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of montelukast after exercise and after EVH.

METHODS

A randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, crossover study was performed with 11 physically active EIB positive subjects (eight men, three women; mean (SD) age 22.8 (6.8) years). Six hours before each of the following challenges 10 mg montelukast or placebo was ingested: (a) a six minute, cold air (-3 degrees C) maximal effort work accumulation cycle ergometer exercise; (b) EVH, breathing 5% CO(2) compressed air at 85% maximal voluntary ventilation for six minutes. Spirometry was performed before and 5, 10, and 15 minutes after the challenge. At least 48 hours was observed between challenges.

RESULTS

No differences in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) were found after the two challenges. Exercise and EVH resulted in falls in FEV(1) of 22.4 (18.0) and 25.6 (16.8) respectively. Falls in FEV(1) after montelukast were less than after placebo (10.6 (10.6) and 14.3 (11.3) after exercise and EVH respectively; p<0.05). Montelukast provided protection against bronchoconstriction (59% and 53%; p<0.05) for eight exercising subjects and 10 EVH subjects; no protection was afforded for three exercising and one EVH challenged subject.

CONCLUSIONS

Both exercise and EVH were potent stimuli of airway narrowing. A single dose of montelukast provided reasonable protection in attenuating bronchoconstriction from either exercise or EVH. The similar protection by montelukast suggests that EVH is a suitable laboratory surrogate for EIB evaluation.

Short-term and long-term asthma control in patients with mild persistent asthma receiving montelukast or fluticasone: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To determine whether montelukast is as effective as fluticasone in controlling mild persistent asthma as determined by rescue-free days.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Participants aged 15 to 85 years with mild persistent asthma (n = 400) were randomized to oral montelukast (10 mg once nightly) or inhaled fluticasone (88 mug twice daily) in a year-long, parallel-group, multicenter study with a 12-week, double-blind period, followed by a 36-week, open-label period.

RESULTS

The mean percentage of rescue-free days was similar between treatments after 12 weeks (fluticasone: 74.9%, montelukast: 73.1%; difference = 1.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.2% to 6.8%) but not during the open-label period (fluticasone: 77.3%, montelukast: 71.1%; difference = 6.2%, 95% CI: 0.8% to 11.7%). Although both fluticasone and montelukast significantly improved symptoms, quality of life, and symptom-free days during both treatment periods, greater improvements occurred with fluticasone in lung function during both periods and in asthma control during open-label treatment. Post hoc analyses revealed a difference in rescue-free days favoring fluticasone in participants in the quartiles for lowest lung function and greatest albuterol use at baseline.

CONCLUSION

In patients with mild persistent asthma, rescue-free days and most asthma control measures improved similarly with fluticasone or montelukast over the short term, but with prolonged open-label treatment, asthma control improved more with fluticasone. Improved asthma control with fluticasone appeared to occur in those with decreased lung function and greater albuterol use at baseline. In the remaining patients, the two treatments appeared to be comparable. These results suggest that classification criteria for mild persistent asthma may need to be re-evaluated.

Bronchoprotective Effects of Single Doses of Salmeterol Combined With Montelukast in Thermally Induced Bronchospasm

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Salmeterol (S) and montelukast (M) individually inhibit the obstructive consequences of thermal stimuli such as exercise and hyperventilation (HV), but there is no information on whether these drugs can interact positively.

DESIGN

Randomized trial.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Atopic asthmatic patients with sensitivity to thermal provocations.

INTERVENTIONS

Eleven asthmatic patients generated stimulus-response curves to isocapnic HV while breathing frigid air without any interventions and then after pretreatment with 42 mug of S, 10 mg of M, and the combination. The order of testing was randomly determined.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Minute ventilation (Ve) was increased in 20-L increments until FEV(1) fell >or= 15%. Measurements were obtained before and 1 h after drug administration, and then again 5 min after each bout of HV. In the nonintervention trial, the provocation commenced after the patients presented to the laboratory. In the control challenge, the mean (+/- SEM) FEV(1) decreased 24.6 +/- 1.7% from baseline. S and M both increased the mean prechallenge FEV(1) significantly (S, 10.4 +/- 1.7% [p < 0.01]; M, 4.1 +/- 1.3% [p = 0.02]; S + M, p = 0.01). The combination of S + M produced greater bronchodilatation (mean improvement, 12.4 +/- 2.3%) than M alone (p = 0.004), but not greater than S alone (p = 0.80). Both drugs blunted the obstructive response similarly (protection: M, 34.6 +/- 15.1%; S, 60 +/- 8.7%; p = 0.13). The benefits added arithmetically with the combined regimen (protection with S + M, 84.9 +/- 5.5%; p = 0.01 vs S alone; p = 0.003 vs M alone).

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that the concurrent administration of single standard doses of S and M appears to provide greater protection against thermal stimuli than does either drug alone. Further experimentation will be required to ascertain whether the combination will provide additional clinical benefits to patients over those of the single agents.

Single-dose agents in the prevention of exercise-induced asthma: a descriptive review

Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) refers to the transient narrowing of the airways that occurs after vigorous exercise in 50-60% of patients with asthma. The need to condition the air inspired during exercise causes water to be lost from the airway surface, and this is thought to cause the release of inflammatory mediators (histamine, leukotrienes, and prostaglandins) from mast cells. EIA is associated with airway inflammation and its severity is markedly reduced following treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Drugs that inhibit the release of mediators and drugs that inhibit their contractile effects are the most successful in inhibiting EIA. Single doses of short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists, given as aerosols immediately before exercise, are very effective in the majority of patients with asthma, providing about 80% protection for up to 2 hours. Long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) given in single doses can be effective for up to 12 hours when used intermittently, but tolerance to the protective effect occurs if they are taken daily. Drugs such as cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglicate) and nedocromil given as aerosols are less effective than beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists), providing 50-60% protection for only 1-2 hours, but they have some advantages. They do not induce tolerance, the aerosol dosage can be easily titrated for the individual, and the protective effect is immediate. Because they cause no significant adverse effects, multiple doses can be used in a day. Leukotriene receptor antagonists, such as montelukast and zafirlukast, are also used for the prevention of EIA and provide 50-60% protection for up to 24 hours when given as tablets. Tolerance to the protective effect does not develop with regular use. If breakthrough EIA occurs, a beta(2)-agonist can be used effectively for rescue medication. For those patients with more persistent symptoms, the use of a LABA in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid has raised a number of issues with respect to the choice of prophylactic treatment for EIA. The most important issue is the development of tolerance to the protective effect of a LABA such that extra treatment may be needed in the middle of a treatment period. Recommending extra doses of a beta(2)-agonist to control EIA is not advisable on the basis that multiple doses can enhance the severity of EIA, delay spontaneous recovery from bronchoconstriction, and enhance responses to other contractile stimuli. It is time to take into account the advantages and disadvantages of the different drugs available to prevent EIA and to recognize that there are some myths related to their use in EIA.

Bronchoconstriction provoked by exercise in a high-particulate-matter environment is attenuated by montelukast

Airborne ultrafine and fine particulate matter (PM1 from fossil-fueled internal combustion engines may cause abnormal airway narrowing. Because of high PM1 exposure from ice resurfacing machines, the ice-rink athlete is especially vulnerable to PM1 toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate protection by a single dose of montelukast in college ice hockey players following PM1 exposure exercise. Nine male ice hockey players (age 19.3+/-1.22 yr) performed 4 randomized, double-blinded, high-intensity, 6-min cycle ergometer trials in low [PM1] (2260+/-500 particles/cm3) and high [PM1] (348,600+/-121,600 particles/cm3) after placebo or montelukast. Pre- and postspirometry showed similar peak FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s) falls between placebo and montelukast after low [PM1] trials (14.5+/-18.06 vs. 9.5+/-11.75% of baseline, respectively). Peak FEV1 falls after high [PM1] trials were greater for placebo than for montelukast (17.3+/-9.79% vs. 1.7+/-5.77% of baseline; p<.0001). High [PM1] FEV1 fall after exercise following montelukast ingestion was less than after exercise following placebo ingestion under high and low [PM1] conditions and after exercise following montelukast ingestion under low [PM1] conditions at 5, 10, and 15 min postchallenge (p<.004, .0006, .009, respectively). Montelukast provided greater protection against bronchoconstriction after exercise during high [PM1] than low [PM1] exposure (approximately 90% vs. approximately 35%), suggesting that bronchoconstriction from PM1 exposure is predominately leukotriene mediated. The precise mechanism of airborne PM1-induced leukotriene-mediated airway narrowing remains unclear.

Exhaled breath condensate cysteinyl leukotrienes are increased in children with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND

It is recognized that airway inflammation has a central role in the pathogenesis of asthma, but how it relates to exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is not completely understood.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between EIB and baseline concentrations of cysteinyl leukotrienes (Cys-LTs) and other inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC).

METHODS

EBC was collected, and the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FE NO ) was measured in a group of 19 asthmatic children, after which they performed a treadmill exercise test. Fourteen healthy children were enrolled as control subjects.

RESULTS

The asthmatic children were divided into the EIB group (decrease in FEV 1 , > or =12%) and the non-EIB group. The EBC was analyzed for the presence of Cys-LTs, leukotriene B 4 , and ammonia. Asthmatic patients with EIB (mean FEV 1 decrease, 23% +/- 3%) had higher Cys-LT concentrations than either asthmatic patients without EIB or control subjects (42.2 pg/mL [median] vs 11.7 pg/mL and 5.8 pg/mL; P < .05 and P < .001, respectively). Ammonia concentrations were lower in both the EIB and non-EIB groups than in control subjects (253.2 microM and 334.6 microM vs 798.4 microM; P < .01 and P < .05, respectively). No difference in EBC leukotriene B 4 levels was found among the 3 groups. Both asthmatic groups had higher FE NO levels than control subjects ( P < .001). EBC Cys-LT ( P < .01; r = 0.7) and FE NO ( P < .05; r = 0.5) values both correlated significantly with the postexercise FEV 1 decrease.

CONCLUSION

this study shows that EBC Cys-LT values are higher in asthmatic children with EIB and correlate with the decrease in FEV 1 after exercise. These findings suggest that the pathways of both Cys-LT and nitric oxide are involved in the pathogenesis of EIB.

Therapeutic modulation of allergic airways disease with leukotriene receptor antagonists

Although asthma is one of the most common chronic respiratory conditions, it often remains unrecognized and undertreated, while patients are often reluctant to comply with regular inhaled anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator therapy. Allergic rhinitis co-exists with asthma in as many as 40% of patients, and can be regarded as a continuum of the same inflammatory disease process. Corticosteroids are the 'gold standard' first-line treatment for both conditions, and have a significant impact upon underlying inflammation, symptoms and long-term outcome. Cysteinyl leukotrienes are potent airway inflammatory mediators, suggesting that treatment antagonizing their effects could play a role in disease management. In recent years, leukotriene receptor antagonists have provided a further therapeutic option in the management of allergic airways disease. These drugs are orally active, can be administered once daily, and provide a systemic approach to the management of patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis. We review the pharmacology of leukotriene receptor antagonists, their potential role in clinical practice in patients with allergic airways disease, and likely areas for further research.

Steroid naive eosinophilic asthma: anti-inflammatory effects of fluticasone and montelukast

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists reduce airway eosinophilia and have been used as first line anti-inflammatory therapy for mild persistent asthma.

METHODS

A multicentre, randomised, placebo controlled, parallel group study was performed to compare the anti-inflammatory effects of fluticasone propionate and montelukast as measured by sputum eosinophils in 50 adults with symptomatic steroid naive asthma and sputum eosinophilia of > or =3.5%.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients received low dose fluticasone (250 mug/day), 19 received montelukast (10 mg/day), and 13 were given placebo for 8 weeks. Fluticasone treatment resulted in a greater reduction in sputum eosinophils (geometric mean (SD) 11.9 (2.3)% to 1.7 (5.1)%) than montelukast (10.7 (2.3)% to 6.9 (3.8)%; p = 0.04) or placebo (15.4 (2.4)% to 7.8 (4.2)%; p = 0.002), and improvement in FEV(1) (mean (SD) 2.6 (0.9) l to 3.0 (0.9) l) than montelukast (2.8 (0.7) l to 2.8 (0.9) l; p = 0.02) or placebo (2.4 (0.8) l to 2.4 (0.9) l; p = 0.01). Treatment with fluticasone suppressed sputum eosinophilia within a week while montelukast only attenuated it. The effect of montelukast was maximal at 1 week and was maintained over 4 weeks. The effect of fluticasone was maintained over 8 weeks while that of montelukast was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast is not as effective as low dose fluticasone in reducing or maintaining an anti-inflammatory effect in steroid naive eosinophilic asthma.

Prolonged effect of montelukast in asthmatic children with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Accumulating evidence shows that cysteinyl leukotrienes are the most important mediators in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). In contrast to several studies in adults, there are few long-term studies of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) in children with EIB. The aim of this study was to assess the prolonged clinical and bronchoprotective effects of montelukast in asthmatic children with EIB. We randomly assigned 64 asthmatic children with EIB. Forty subjects received montelukast (5 mg/day), and 24 subjects received placebo once daily for 8 weeks. Exercise challenge was performed before and after 8 weeks of treatment. Of the 40 patients in the montelukast group, 28 patients crossed over after 8 weeks. The response was measured as asthma symptom score, maximum percent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) from pre-exercise baseline, and time to recovery of FEV(1) to within 10% of pre-exercise baseline (time to recovery). Following 8 weeks of treatment with montelukast, the montelukast group compared with placebo showed significant improvements in all endpoints, including asthma symptom score, maximum percent fall in FEV(1) after exercise, and time to recovery. In the cross-over group, even 8 weeks after stopping montelukast treatment, all endpoints were significantly and persistently improved. These results indicate that montelukast provides clinical protection from airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic children with EIB, and suggest that LTRAs may be useful for the long-term management of asthmatic children with EIB.

The utility of the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) asthma measure to predict asthma-related outcomes

BACKGROUND

The Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures are used extensively to measure quality of care.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate selected aspects of the HEDIS measure of appropriate use of asthma medications.

METHODS

Claims data were analyzed for commercial health plan members who met HEDIS criteria for persistent asthma in 1999. The use of asthma medications was evaluated in the subsequent year with stratification by controller medication and a measure of adherence (days' supply). Multivariate logistic regressions were used to evaluate the association among long-term controller therapy for persistent asthma, adherence to therapy, and asthma-related hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits, controlling for demographic, preindex utilization, and other confounding characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 49,637 persistent asthma patients, approximately 35.7% were using 1 class of long-term controller medications, 18.4% were using more than 1 class, and 45.9% were not using such medication. More than 25% of the persistent asthma patients did not use any asthma medication in the subsequent year. Patients with low adherence to controller medication had a significantly higher risk (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-2.08) of ED visit or hospitalization relative to patients not using any controllers compared with persons with moderate (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.57-1.23) or high (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.34-1.44) adherence. Patients receiving a high days' supply of inhaled corticosteroids had the lowest risk of ED visit or hospitalization (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.05-2.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that refinements to the HEDIS measure method for identifying patients with persistent asthma may be needed.

Effects of montelukast and salmeterol on physical performance and exercise economy in adult asthmatics with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of montelukast and the long-acting beta(2)-agonist salmeterol on cardiopulmonary exercise economy and physical performance in adult patients with asthma during exercise.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Asthmatic patients (n = 18), aged 18 to 35 years with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), using a double-blind, double-dummy cross-over design. Montelukast, 10 mg/d, was compared to inhaled salmeterol, 50 microg bid. The study medication was administered for at least 5 days prior to testing, with a washout period of at least 5 days. Treadmill exercise tests (5.3% inclination, -15 degrees C ambient temperature) were performed at work loads of 80% of maximal oxygen uptake (Vo(2)max) [6 min], rest (4 min), 60% of Vo(2)max (6 min), and finally step increments until exhaustion.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

We investigated parameters of gas exchange, physical performance, and lung function. After montelukast, the oxygen pulse was higher than after salmeterol, at 80% of Vo(2)max (p = 0.035), and 6 min at 60% of Vo(2)max (p = 0.011). Lung function during exercise, running time to exhaustion, Borg score, lactate levels, Vo(2)max, carbon dioxide elimination, minute ventilation, ventilatory equivalents, respiratory exchange ratio, and heart rate were not significantly different between the two treatments. The maximal postexercise fall in FEV(1) from baseline occurred 2 min after run to exhaustion, and was greater after salmeterol than after montelukast: mean, 16.2% (SD, 11.0) vs 10.0% (SD, 12.2) [p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

In adult asthmatics with EIB, montelukast may have a more favorable effect on the oxygen pulse, thus suggesting improved gas exchange during exercise.

A comparison of the effects of oral montelukast and inhaled salmeterol on response to rescue bronchodilation after challenge

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of addition of montelukast or salmeterol to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on the response to rescue beta2-agonist use after exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed at 16 centers in the United States. Patients with asthma (n = 122, ages 15-58) whose symptoms were uncontrolled on Low-dose inhaled fluticasone and who had a history of exercise-induced worsening of asthma were randomized to receive either montelukast (10 mg once daily), salmeterol (50microg twice daily), or placebo for 4 weeks. Standardized spirometry after exercise challenge and beta2-agonist rescue was performed at baseline, week 1 and 4.

RESULTS

Maximum achievable forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) percent predicted after rescue beta2-agonist improved in the montelukast (+1.5%) and placebo (+1.2%) groups at 4 weeks, but diminished in the salmeterol (-3.9%) group (P < 0.001). Although pre-exercise FEV1 was greatest with salmeterol (P = 0.10), patients taking montelukast had significantly greater protection from an exercise-induced decrease in FEV1 than those taking salmeterol (P < 0.001). Both the magnitude and rate of rescue bronchodilation were greater with montelukast compared with salmeterol (P < 0.001). Five minutes after rescue beta2-agonist, 92% of patients taking montelukast and 68% of those taking placebo had recovered to pre-exercise levels, whereas only 50% of those taking salmeterol had recovered to pre-exercise levels.

CONCLUSION

In patients whose asthma symptoms remain uncontrolled using ICS, addition of montelukast permits a greater and more rapid rescue bronchodilation with a short-acting beta2-agonist than addition of salmeterol and provides consistent and clinically meaningful protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

Pharmacokinetics of montelukast in asthmatic patients 6 to 24 months old

Montelukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of asthma for those ages 1 year old to adult. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic comparability of a 4-mg dose of montelukast oral granules in patients > or = 6 to < 24 months old to the 10-mg approved dose in adults. This was an open-label study in 32 patients. Population pharmacokinetic parameters included estimates of AUC(pop), C(max), and t(max). Results were compared with estimates from adults (10-mg film-coated tablet [FCT]). Dose selection criteria were for the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the AUC(pop) estimate ratio (pediatric/adult 10 mg FCT) to be within comparability bounds of (0.5, 2.00). The AUC(pop) ratio and the 95% CI for children compared with adults were within the predefined comparability bounds. Observed plasma concentrations were also similar. Based on systemic exposure of montelukast, a 4-mg dose of montelukast appears appropriate for children as young as 6 months of age.

Montelukast Has No Ergogenic Effect on Cycle Ergometry in Cold Temperature

PURPOSE

To examine the effects of a single 10-mg dose of ML on physical performance in EIB- and EIB+ athletes.

METHODS

Twenty-four male college ice hockey players performed two 6-min maximal work accumulation bouts on an electronically braked cycle ergometer in subfreezing conditions (-2.5 +/- 0.4 degrees C) 6-8 h after either ML or placebo (PL) to obtain total work accumulated (kJ); subjects were evaluated for EIB after each exercise trial.

RESULTS

Eight (33%) subjects were identified as EIB+ (23.5 +/- 13.35% fall in FEV1); 16 were EIB- (1.8 +/- 3.03% fall in FEV1). ML provided an approximately 50% protection against postexercise fall in FEV1. No significant differences in kJ were found between PL and ML trials for pooled subjects (95.3 +/- 13.69 and 94.8 +/- 13.27 kJ, respectively), EIB- subjects (99.6 +/- 13.26 and 99.0 +/- 11.81 kJ, respectively), or EIB+ subjects (86.8 +/- 10.67 and 86.5 +/- 12.72 kJ, respectively). Total work accumulated for EIB- subjects was significantly greater than for EIB+ subjects for both PL and ML (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A single 10-mg dose of ML had no ergogenic effect for EIB- and EIB+ subjects performing short-duration high-intensity exercise in subfreezing temperature, supporting the use of ML as EIB prophylaxis during international sport competition.

Variability of symptoms in mild persistent asthma: baseline data from the MIAMI study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the variability of the asthma phenotype in patients with mild persistent asthma enrolled in the Mild Asthma Montelukast versus Inhaled Corticosteroid (MIAMI) study.

METHODS

The variability of asthma rescue-free days, asthma symptoms, albuterol use, medical resource use, and exercise Limitations among patients with documented mild persistent asthma was compared between the month before study enrollment and the last 2 weeks of the run-in period.

RESULTS

Patients eligible for randomization (n = 400), aged 15-85 years, exhibited symptoms (mean +/- SD) 3.6 +/- 1.3 days/week, beta-agonist use 3.5 +/- 1.3 days/week, and normal FEV1 (94.0 +/- 9.9% predicted) during the last 2 weeks of the run-in period. In the year before enrollment, medical intervention for asthma flares was common: 38.5% made office visits, 15.8% had oral corticosteroids, and 8.3% required emergency room or hospitalized care. In the month before enrollment, 11.8% experienced daily symptoms, and 28.3% had limitations of normal activity. Patients with daily symptoms in the month before study enrollment, compared with those having less-than-daily symptoms, experienced fewer rescue-free days (P = 0.024) and had more days per week with symptoms (P = 0.008) and requiring albuterol (P = 0.048) during the run-in; FEV1 was similar for both groups (93.1% vs. 94.2% predicted, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with mild persistent asthma reported a substantial disease burden in the year before enrollment. The asthma burden experienced by these patients both before and during the run-in period was of sufficient severity to support the recommendation that mild persistent asthma should be managed with daily controller therapy.

Budesonide and formoterol in a single inhaler controls asthma in adolescents

Despite the availability of effective treatments and national guidelines, morbidity from asthma remains high among adolescents. Adolescents need to be considered as a distinct group of individuals with different requirements to those of children and adults. In particular, their non-adherence to prescribed treatment regimens is of concern and is a significant factor contributing to the high rate of morbidity in adolescents. Studies in children aged 4 to 17 years suggest that the combination of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long-acting beta2-agonist effectively controls asthma symptoms in patients who remain symptomatic on ICS alone. In order to improve adherence to therapy, the use of combined therapy with an ICS and a long-acting beta2-agonist in a single inhaler should be considered and the dosing frequency should be adjusted according to the severity of asthma symptoms. This should empower patients with a greater degree of self-management and may be important in helping adolescents feel responsible for the management of their asthma. Results from a recent subanalysis demonstrate that the combination of budesonide and formoterol administered twice daily via a single inhaler (Symbicort Turbuhaler) rapidly gains and maintains control of asthma in adolescents whose asthma is not controlled on ICS alone. It is anticipated that this will lead to improved adherence to therapy in this difficult-to-treat population.

Montelukast in asthmatic patients 6 years-14 years old with an FEV1 > 75%

OBJECTIVES

Montelukast is a potent leukotriene receptor antagonist effective for treating asthma symptoms in adult and pediatric patients. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the clinical efficacy of montelukast, a potent leukotriene-receptor antagonist, in a subgroup analysis of patients aged 6 years-14 years with milder asthma, defined as a percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) > 75% using data from a clinical trial of pediatric patients with a broad range of asthma severities.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The original previously published clinical trial was an 8-week multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study conducted in 47 centers in the United States and Canada. The study compared the efficacy of once daily montelukast 5 mg to placebo in patients 6 years-14 years old with persistent asthma and an FEV1 ranging from 50% to 85% of predicted. A total of 87 patients in the montelukast group and 51 patients in the placebo group were selected from the original cohort of 336 patients based on percentage predicted FEV1 of > 75%. The primary endpoint was percentage change in FEV1 from baseline compared with placebo over 8 weeks of active treatment.

RESULTS

Montelukast significantly improved the primary endpoint of percentage change in FEV1 compared with placebo (p = 0.005). Other efficacy endpoints were significantly improved on montelukast similar to efficacy in the original study.

CONCLUSION

Montelukast significantly improved FEV1, clinic measured peak expiratory flow (PEF), reduced nocturnal awakenings, and improved quality of life in children with milder persistent asthma defined as an FEV1 > 75% of predicted.

Determinants of the severity of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma

AIM

In examining the mechanisms of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), it is important to determine which factors most strongly affect the severity of EIB. We determined such factors in patients with asthma by stepwise multiple-regression analysis.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with asthma underwent pulmonary function tests, methacholine provocation test, and sputum induction. Eosinophilic inflammatory indices and airway vascular permeability index (ratio of albumin concentrations in induced sputum and serum) were examined in sputum samples, and then an exercise test was performed by all asthmatics.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and degree of eosinophilic inflammation in induced sputum. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and airway vascular permeability index. Although we could not find a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and 1-sec forced expired volume, 20% provocation concentration of (PC20) methacholine tended to be correlated with the severity of EIB. By stepwise multiple-regression analysis, we also found that airway vascular permeability index, eosinophil cationic protein levels in sputum, and PC20 methacholine are independent predictors of the severity of EIB.

CONCLUSION

We found that airway vascular hyperpermeability, eosinophilic inflammation, and bronchial hyperreactivity are independent factors predicting the severity of EIB.

Clinical implications of airway inflammation in mild intermittent asthma

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether inhaled corticosteroids should be prescribed to patients with milder forms of asthma and whether markers of airway inflammation should be considered when making therapy decisions.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search was performed of the English-language literature published in the preceding 10 years (January 1, 1993, through December 31, 2003) concerning epidemiology, pathophysiology, therapy, and prognosis of mild intermittent asthma, with asthma, mild, and intermittent as indexing terms.

STUDY SELECTION

All relevant studies including author's expert opinions were selected.

RESULTS

Several studies have addressed the question of a possible benefit of maintenance therapy (ie, inhaled steroids) in patients with mild intermittent asthma. Although a diminishing effect on airway inflammation has been widely demonstrated, even in patients with mild disease, the impact of inhaled steroids on the long-term prognosis is much less clear. For patients with mild disease who are long-term inhaled steroid users, alternative therapy strategies, including low-dose inhaled steroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists, have been advocated.

CONCLUSIONS

Mild intermittent asthma is a disease characterized not only by infrequent symptoms and normal lung function but also by chronic airway inflammation, possibly resulting in irreversible airflow limitation if left unattended. Therefore, maintenance therapy, such as (low-dose) inhaled steroids or leukotriene receptor antagonists, should be considered in patients with mild disease. Future studies should give more insight into the impact of prolonged anti-inflammatory therapy on the long-term prognosis of mild intermittent asthma patients. Whether results from these studies will justify a more aggressive treatment for these patients remains to be answered.