Effect of nebulized ipratropium on the hospitalization rates of children with asthma

Management of acute pediatric asthma

Pediatric asthma prevalence, morbidity, and severity are increasing. Direct costs associated with providing emergency department and inpatient care account for more than 40% of overall dollars spent for this disease in the United States. Physicians in many health care settings may be required to treat a child in severe respiratory distress caused by acute asthma. This article reviews the pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment of severe asthma exacerbations, or status asthmaticus.

The evaluation and management of acute, severe asthma

This article provides a systematic approach to the patient with acute, severe asthma. After a brief, focused evaluation prompt treatment with inhaled beta 2-agonists and systemic corticosteroids remains the cornerstone of treatment. Ipratropium bromide is now recognized as a useful addition for both adult and pediatric populations, whereas consideration of intravenous MgSO4 and theophylline is warranted for refractory patients. Ongoing evaluation of antileukotriene agents offers a possibility of these agents as alternative bronchodilators. Further research with a number of potential acute asthma agents will further expand treatment options for rapid symptomatic airway improvement and prevention of progressing airway obstruction, hospitalization, and potential respiratory failure.

Management of acute, severe asthma in children

OBJECTIVE

To briefly present the current options available for the treatment of acute, severe asthma in children, with a special focus on emergency department and inpatient treatment, and to describe newer therapies that may aid treatment in the future.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

A MEDLINE search (1966-May 2001) of the English-language literature pertaining to drug therapy of acute asthma was performed. Key word searches included acute asthma, albuterol, ipratropium, corticosteroids, magnesium, and theophylline. Additional articles from these sources and published national guidelines were identified. Relevant studies pertaining to current therapy of acute asthma in pediatric patients were selected; if there were minimal pediatric data, adult data were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Asthma is a chronic, inflammatory disorder of the airways. Acute exacerbations can occur and are challenging to manage. Albuterol, ipratropium, and systemic corticosteroids have been shown to be effective in acute asthma exacerbations. Because some patients do not respond to maximal therapy, older therapies such as magnesium and theophylline are being reevaluated. Theophylline may have some therapeutic effect, but given its toxicity profile, it is unclear whether it offers any advantage over maximal beta(2)-agonist therapy. There are only minimal published data evaluating the use of magnesium in pediatrics, and most are small trials or case reports. Newer therapies such as ventilation strategies with heliox and intravenous leukotriene modifiers currently being evaluated may or may not prove to be beneficial in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

beta(2)-agonists, ipratropium, and corticosteroids remain the most useful therapeutic agents for acute asthma exacerbations in pediatric patients. However, these agents are not ideal in all patients and, given the existing questions regarding safety and/or efficacy of available alternatives, more effective options are needed.

The role of anticholinergics in acute asthma treatment: an evidence-based evaluation

The role for anticholinergic medications in acute asthma is not well-defined. Thus, the use of therapy with anticholinergics and beta(2)-agonists, either simultaneously or in sequence, has produced positive as well as negative results in trials. Therefore, the current recommendations for the use of these drugs in the emergency department (ED) and hospital management of asthma exacerbations are not precise. This review answers the following question: what level of evidence is available in the literature to support the use of anticholinergic medications in combination with beta(2)-agonists in acute asthma patients? We limited the search on our therapy question to systematic reviews of randomized trials and/or randomized controlled trials not included in the reviews. After an extensive review of the most relevant evidence, the following conclusions may be emphasized. (1) The use of multiple doses of ipratropium bromide are indicated in the ED treatment of children and adults with severe acute asthma. The studies reported a substantial reduction in hospital admissions (30 to 60%; number needed to treat, 5 to 11) and significant differences in lung function favoring the combined treatment. No apparent increase in the occurrence of side effects was observed. (2) The use of single-dose protocols of ipratropium bromide with beta(2)-agonist treatment produced, particularly in children with more severe acute asthma, a modest improvement in pulmonary function without reduction in hospital admissions; in adults, the data showed a similar increase in pulmonary function with an approximately 35% reduction in the hospital admission rate. In patients with mild-to-moderate acute asthma, there is no apparent benefit from adding a single dose of an anticholinergic medication.

Clinical pathways in treatment of asthma

Although the number of medications for the treatment of status asthmaticus is relatively limited, strategies for the management of acute asthma vary widely both among and within institutions. The choice of drugs, doses, timing of administration, duration of treatment, and assessment measures are often left to the discretion of individual physicians; plans are often not formulated on the basis of data showing efficacy, but rather on local availability and the experience and preference of physicians. The elimination of treatment that adds cost but not improved quality of care can be an effective strategy to optimize the care of acute asthma.

Levalbuterol hydrochloride

Racemic albuterol, a commonly used bronchodilator, is an exact 50:50 mixture of two enantiomers, R- and S-albuterol. Concern regarding increased mortality associated with the use of this beta-2 (beta 2) agonist triggered the study of both of these enantiomers separately. In vitro studies suggest that the two enantiomers have different binding affinities for beta-adrenoreceptors, may exert opposing effects on inflammation, demonstrate different effects on mucocilary transport, and display differing pharmacokinetics. Clinical studies comparing both enantiomers are few, of short duration, and often in small patient populations, and their results vary. R-albuterol has greater bronchodilatory effects than the racemate and may have anti-inflammatory properties. S-albuterol has markedly less affinity for the beta-adrenoreceptor. It was found to cause bronchoconstriction in animal models, but neither bronchoconstrictive nor pro-inflammatory effects have been conclusively demonstrated in human studies. The data available at present, while suggestive, are insufficient to conclusively recommend R-albuterol over the racemate. Further basic research and investigations in humans comparing both enantiomers at increasing doses over longer time periods are required to clarify the precise roles of R- and S-albuterol.

[Benefits of ipratropium bromide in the management of asthmatic crises in the emergency department]

BACKGROUND

To determine if the addition of ipratropium bromide in the emergency department (ED) for the treatment of childhood asthma reduces rates of hospitalization and relapses for moderate and severe exacerbations.

METHODS

Patients were given an oral corticosteroid treatment (2 mg/kg) and received every 20 minutes either three nebulizations with albuterol (0.15 mg/kg) and ipratropium bromide (250 micrograms) or six nebulizations with albuterol alone (control group). The primary end point was the need for hospitalization, additional nebulizations or a relapse during the following week. Secondary end point included the effect of age.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty three children, two to 15 years old, were randomized to ipratropium or control groups and 121 were evaluated on day seven. As a whole, the control group was less often hospitalized or in relapse than those treated with three nebulizations of albuterol and ipratropium (17.5% vs 37.9%, p < 0.02). The ipratropium group reached the same result after three additional albuterol nebulizations. The benefit of anticholinergic therapy was observed for children less than six years of age who had a similar rate of success (73.5 vs 75.7%).

CONCLUSION

The association of ipratropium bromide to the first three doses of the albuterol protocol for acute asthma did not act as well as six nebulizations of albuterol alone. The effect was age dependent and two to six years old children needed more attention. Nevertheless the hospitalization rate did not support the use of ipratropium compared with repeated albuterol nebulizations.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous salbutamol and nebulized ipratropium bromide in early management of severe acute asthma in children presenting to an emergency department

BACKGROUND

In acute severe asthma, treatment must be initiated early to reverse the pathophysiology that may render airways less responsive to bronchodilation. The addition of nebulized ipratropium bromide to initial emergency department therapy improves pulmonary function, but it is unclear whether this approach results in earlier hospital discharge. The early use of bolus intravenous salbutamol has also been shown to improve outcome, including earlier discharge. We therefore assessed the relative benefits of intravenous salbutamol and nebulized ipratropium bromide in the early management of acute severe asthma in children by a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

METHODS

This study was undertaken at a tertiary children's hospital, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, The Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Westmead, Sydney, Australia. Only children with severe acute asthma as determined by the National Asthma Campaign guidelines criteria and pulmonary index were included. All children received initial nebulized salbutamol therapy (2.5-5 mg salbutamol in 4 mL of normal saline depending on age) at initial emergency department presentation. If asthma remained severe 20 mins later, an intravenous cannula was inserted and intravenous methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg) was administered to all children receiving nebulized salbutamol every 20 mins. Children were then randomized to one of three groups: intravenous salbutamol (15 microg/kg as a single bolus over 10 mins), ipratropium bromide (250 microg), or intravenous salbutamol plus ipratropium bromide. All observers were blinded to treatment groups. Children were randomly assigned to receive a single-dose intravenous bolus of either saline or salbutamol and either nebulized saline or ipratropium bromide determined by a number generated randomly in the hospital pharmacy. The primary outcomes were recovery time and discharge time of each group. Respiratory and hemodynamic monitoring were continuous during the first 2 hrs of the study and then children were monitored clinically for 24 hrs.

RESULTS

A total of 55 children with acute severe asthma were entered into the study over an 18-month period. The three groups were similar demographically, with a mean age of 5.9 yrs, and mean duration of attack of 19.6 hrs. No side effects or treatment intolerance were reported. Children in the groups that received intravenous salbutamol had a significant reduction in recovery time to achieving second hourly inhaled salbutamol (p =.008) compared with those administered inhaled bronchodilator alone. The addition of ipratropium bromide to intravenous salbutamol provided no significant further benefit in terms of nebulizer therapy (intravenous salbutamol compared with intravenous salbutamol plus ipratropium bromide). Children administered intravenous salbutamol ceased supplemental oxygen therapy earlier than those administered ipratropium alone at 12 hrs post-randomization (p =.0003). Children administered intravenous salbutamol could be discharged from the hospital 28 hrs earlier than those administered ipratropium bromide (p =.013).

CONCLUSION

Children administered intravenous salbutamol for severe acute asthma showed a more rapid recovery time, which resulted in earlier discharge from the hospital than those administered inhaled ipratropium bromide. There was no additional benefit obtained by combining ipratropium bromide and intravenous salbutamol administration.

Contemporary approach to the emergency department management of pediatric asthma

Asthma continues to be an enormous health problem and economic burden in US society. EDs probably will continue to provide a substantial amount of care for those affected by the disease. Pediatric asthma patients frequently are encountered in EDs. Emergency physicians must remain current in their approach to providing expert care while the management of acute asthma exacerbations continues to evolve, older therapies are challenged and new therapies are developed, tested, and implemented.

The use of ipratropium bromide for the management of acute asthma exacerbation in adults and children: a systematic review

Ipratropium bromide is a quaternary anticholinergic bronchodilator that is commonly used to treat obstructive lung disease. Although ipratropium is not usually employed as a first-line bronchodilator to treat chronic asthma, it has been used extensively in hospital emergency departments as adjunctive therapy for the emergency treatment of acute asthma exacerbation. This review will summarize the physiological actions of ipratropium and the rationale for its use as an anticholinergic bronchodilator. Evidence available from randomized trials and from two meta-analyses is summarized to determine whether the addition of inhaled ipratropium to inhaled beta2-agonist therapy is effective in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbation in children and adults. Published reports of randomized, controlled trials assessing the use of ipratropium and concurrent beta2-agonists in adult acute asthma exacerbation were identified by a search of electronic databases, as well as by hand searching. Data from 10 studies of adult asthmatics, reporting on a total of 1377 patients, were pooled in a meta-analysis using a weighted-average method. Use of nebulized ipratropium/beta2-agonist combination therapy was associated with a pooled 7.3% improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.8-10.9%] and a 22.1% improvement in peak expiratory flow (95% CI, 11.0-33.2%) compared with patients who received beta2-agonist without ipratropium. For the three trials in adults reporting hospital admission data (n = 1064), adult patients receiving ipratropium had a relative risk of hospitalization of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61-1.06). Similarly, randomized controlled studies of pediatric asthma exacerbation and a meta-analysis of pediatric asthma patients suggest that ipratropium added to beta2-agonists improves lung function and also decreases hospitalization rates, especially among children with severe exacerbations of asthma. The adult and pediatric studies did not report any severe adverse effects attributable to ipratropium when it was used in conjunction with beta2-agonists. In conclusion, there is a modest statistical improvement in airflow obstruction when ipratropium is used as an adjunctive to beta2-agonists for the treatment of acute asthma exacerbation. In pediatric asthma exacerbation, use of ipratropium also appears to improve clinical outcomes; however, this has not been definitively established in adults. It would seem reasonable to recommend the use of combination ipratropium/beta2-agonist therapy in acute asthmatic exacerbation, since the addition of ipratropium seems to provide physiological evidence of benefit without risk of adverse effects.

Comparative efficacy of oral dexamethasone versus oral prednisone in acute pediatric asthma

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to determine whether 2 days of oral dexamethasone (DEX) is more effective than 5 days of oral prednisone/prednisolone (PRED) in improving symptoms and preventing relapse in children with acute asthma.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective randomized trial of children (2 to 18 years old) who presented to the emergency department with acute asthma. PRED 2 mg/kg, maximum 60 mg (odd days) or DEX 0.6 mg/kg, maximum 16 mg (even days) was used. At discharge children in the PRED group were prescribed 4 daily doses (1 mg/kg/d, maximum 60 mg); children in the DEX group received a prepackaged dose (0.6 mg/kg, maximum 16 mg) to take the next day. The primary outcome was relapse within 10 days.

RESULTS

When DEX was compared with PRED, relapse rates (7.4% of 272 vs 6.9% of 261), hospitalization rates from the emergency department (11% vs 12%) or after relapse (20% vs 17%), and symptom persistence at 10 days (22% vs 21%) were similar. In the PRED group more children were excluded for vomiting in the emergency department (3% vs 0.3%; P =.008), more parents were noncompliant (4% vs. 0.4%; P =.004), and more children missed > or =2 days of school (19.5% vs. 13.2%; P =.05).

CONCLUSION

In children with acute asthma, 2 doses of dexamethasone provide similar efficacy with improved compliance and fewer side effects than 5 doses of prednisone.

Pharmacologic treatment of the adult hospitalized asthma patient

Acute severe asthma calls for aggressive and early therapy of a multifaceted and all-inclusive approach (Fig. 2). Therapy merely begins in the ED and manifold distinct issues need to find consideration during ongoing hospital care. Currently, beta-agonists, anti-cholinergic agents, and corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy. Methylxanthines and magnesium may find consideration in carefully selected patients. Multiple new therapeutic avenues, such as the anti-leukotriene drugs, seem promising and future studies will hopefully extend our armamentarium against life threatening complication of a common disease. Asthma education begun in the hospital may provide the platform for preventing severe acute exacerbations and hospitalization.

The Management of Acute Severe Asthma

Acute severe asthma exacerbations resulting in emergency department visits and hospitalization usually constitute a failure of long-term control therapy. However, even patients with relatively mild asthma can have severe life-threatening episodes. In both children and adults, viral respiratory infections are the major triggering event, although outbreaks of severe asthma have been associated with high concentrations of aeroallergens. Patients should be provided with written action plans on what to do for acute deterioration, and more severe patients may keep prednisone at home to begin after consultation with their physician. The primary therapy of acute asthma exacerbations remains frequent administration of aerosol β2-agonists and systemic corticosteroids for those patients not fully responding to the β2-agonists. Mild exacerbations may be treated with an increased dosage of inhaled corticosteroids. Patients at risk for acute exacerbations may benefit from peak flow measurement, particularly those who have difficulty perceiving airway obstruction. It is recommended that patients remain on full dose of prednisone until they achieve 70-80 percent of predicted normal or personal best peak flow. In the emergency department, the use of β2-agonists by metered-dose inhaler and holding chamber is as effective as nebulizer if given in a sufficient dose 6-10 puffs equivalent to 5 mg via nebulizer. In those patients not responding completely, the addition of ipratropium bromide has shown to produce additive bronchodilation and reduce hospitalizations. Other therapies such as magnesium sulfate, intravenous β2-agonists, heliox and ketamine have been used, but data demonstrating efficacy are insufficient to warrant recommending their general use.

Asthma, asthma medication and autonomic nervous system dysfunction

Asthma is associated with autonomic nervous imbalance: an increased bronchial sensitivity to cholinergic constrictors and possibly a decreased sensitivity to beta2-adrenergic dilators have been reported in this disease. Also, non-adrenergic and non-cholinergic (NANC) mediators have a small regulatory effect on airway function. These mediators contribute to the pathogenesis of asthma not only by regulating smooth muscle tone in the airways but also by affecting pulmonary blood flow, endothelial permeability and airway secretions. In many studies increased parasympathetic responsiveness has been associated with clinical asthma or the worsening of asthma in adults. However, most of the studies in children have not found association between autonomic dysfunction and asthma. Therefore, the autonomic dysfunction in asthma may be related to more advanced disease or long-term asthma medication in adults. This article briefly reviews the relationships between airway inflammation, beta2-agonist, anticholinergic and glucocorticoid medication as well as autonomic nervous function in asthma.

Ipratropium bromide plus nebulized albuterol for the treatment of hospitalized children with acute asthma

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the addition of repeated doses of nebulized ipratropium bromide (IB) to a standardized inpatient asthma care algorithm (ACA) for children with status asthmaticus improves clinical outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

Children with acute asthma (N = 210) age 1 to 18 years admitted to the ACA were assigned to the intervention or placebo group in randomized double-blind fashion. Both groups received nebulized albuterol, systemic corticosteroids, and oxygen according to the ACA. The intervention group received 250 microg IB combined with 2.5 mg albuterol by jet nebulization in a dosing schedule determined by the ACA phase. The placebo group received isotonic saline solution substituted for IB. Progression through each ACA phase occurred based on assessments of oxygenation, air exchange, wheezing, accessory muscle use, and respiratory rate performed at prescribed intervals.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between treatment groups in hospital length of stay (P =.46), asthma carepath progression (P =.37), requirement for additional therapy, or adverse effects. Children >6 years (N = 70) treated with IB had shorter mean hospital length of stay (P =.03) and more rapid mean asthma carepath progression (P =.02) than children in the placebo group. However, after adjustment was done for baseline group differences, the observed benefit of IB therapy in older children no longer reached statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The routine addition of repeated doses of nebulized IB to a standardized regimen of systemic corticosteroids and frequently administered beta-2 agonists confers no significant enhancement of clinical outcome for the treatment of hospitalized children with status asthmaticus.

New medications for asthma

The therapy for chronic stable asthma and acute asthma exacerbations continues to evolve as the pathogenesis of asthma becomes better understood. Although the role of many standard therapies for asthma is well established, some carry significant side effects. The newer anti-inflammatory medications have demonstrated both therapeutic benefit as well as reassuring safety profiles. The challenge of the future is to incorporate the newer medications described, as well as those still being examined, into a treatment regimen that can deliver maximal therapeutic benefit with the lowest possible incidence of side effects.

Intravenous magnesium sulfate treatment for acute asthma in the emergency department: a systematic review of the literature

STUDY OBJECTIVES

There is some evidence that magnesium, when infused into asthmatic patients, can produce bronchodilation in addition to that obtained from standard treatments. This systematic review examined the effect of intravenous magnesium sulfate used for patients with acute asthma managed in the emergency department.

METHODS

Only randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. Studies were included if patients presented with acute asthma and were treated with intravenous magnesium sulfate versus placebo. Trials were identified from the Cochrane Airways Review Group register, which consists of a combined search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases and hand-searching of 20 key respiratory journals. Bibliographies from included studies and known reviews were searched. Primary authors and content experts were contacted. Data were extracted and methodologic quality was assessed independently by 2 reviewers. Missing data were obtained from authors.

RESULTS

Seven trials (5 adult, 2 pediatric) involving a total of 668 patients were included. Overall, admission to hospital was not statistically reduced using magnesium sulfate (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09 to 1.02). In the severe subgroup, admissions were reduced in those receiving magnesium sulfate (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.27). Overall, patients receiving magnesium sulfate demonstrated nonsignificant improvements in peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) when all studies were pooled (weighted mean difference [WMD] 29 L/min, 95% CI -3 to 62). In studies of patients with severe acute asthma, PEFR WMD improved by 52 L/min (95% CI 27 to 78) favoring magnesium sulfate treatment. The absolute FEV(1) also improved by 10% predicted (95% CI 4 to 16) in patients with severe acute asthma. No clinically important changes in vital signs or side effects were reported.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence does not clearly support routine use of intravenous magnesium sulfate in all patients with acute asthma presenting to the ED. However, magnesium sulfate appears to be safe and beneficial for patients who present with severe acute asthma. Practice guidelines need to be changed to reflect these results.

Efficacy of adding multiple doses of oxitropium bromide to salbutamol delivered by means of a metered-dose inhaler with a spacer device in adults with acute severe asthma

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of combination therapy adding multiple doses of anticholinergics to beta(2)-agonists to improve outcome has not been established in adults with acute severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to compare the outcome of adults with acute severe asthma treated with 4 puffs of salbutamol (100 microg/actuation) every 20 minutes for 3 doses plus 4 puffs of oxitropium bromide (100 microg/actuation) with each of the 3 salbutamol doses versus salbutamol alone administered by means of a metered-dose inhaler with a spacer device.

METHODS

A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 74 patients between 18 and 55 years old presenting to the emergency department (ED) for treatment of acute asthma with a peak expiratory flow (PEF) of 50% or less than the normal predicted value. The primary endpoint was improvement in PEF over the course. The secondary endpoint was the need for additional ED treatment at 120 minutes.

RESULTS

The increase in PEF over the course was significantly greater in the oxitropium plus salbutamol treatment group (P <.0001). The mean absolute difference in PEF at 120 minutes for combination therapy compared with salbutamol alone was 37.8 L/min (P =.001). In addition, the proportion of need for additional ED treatment was less in the combination group than the group receiving salbutamol alone (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.90).

CONCLUSION

Adding multiple doses of oxitropium bromide to salbutamol delivered by means of a metered-dose inhaler with a spacer device for acute severe asthma produces a significant improvement in lung function and reduces the need for additional ED treatment.

State of the art: therapeutic controversies in severe acute asthma

This is a transcript of the 1999 SAEM State-of-the-Art session on "Therapeutic Controversies in Severe Acute Asthma," presented at the 1999 SAEM annual meeting in Boston. The aim of this session was to address some of the current controversies in the management of acute asthma exacerbations, a major issue in emergency medicine. Despite many recent advances in asthma management, morbidity and mortality remain high. While many of us have strong feelings on how asthma patients should be treated, many of our assertions are not based on good science, and there are numerous areas of controversy. This discussion focuses on the controversy over beta agonist treatment for acute asthma, the physiology of corticosteroids in asthma, and the emergency use of leukotriene-modifying agents.

First-line therapy for adult patients with acute asthma receiving a multiple-dose protocol of ipratropium bromide plus albuterol in the emergency department

We designed a larger, double-blind, randomized, prospective trial to test our hypothesis that patients with acute asthma given combination high dose therapy with ipratropium bromide (IB) and beta(2)-agonists will have greater improvement in pulmonary function and fewer hospital admissions than those given beta(2)-agonists alone. One hundred eighty patients (mean age +/- SD, 34.3 +/- 10.5 yr) who presented to an emergency department (ED) for treatment of an exacerbation of asthma (baseline FEV(1) < 50% of predicted) were assigned in a randomized, double-blind fashion to receive albuterol and placebo (n = 92) or albuterol and IB (n = 88). Both drugs were administered through a metered-dose inhaler and spacer at 10-min intervals for 3 h (24 puffs or 2,880 microg of albuterol and 504 microg of IB each hour). Primary outcome measures were improvement in pulmonary function (FEV(1) or peak expiratory flow [PEF]), and hospital admission rates. In both groups, pulmonary function improved significantly over baseline values (p < 0.01). Subjects who received IB had an overall 20.5% (95% CI: 2.6 to 38.4%) (p = 0.02) greater improvement in PEF and a 48.1% (95% CI: 19.8 to 76.4%) (p = 0.001) greater improvement in FEV(1) from the control group. At the end of protocol (3 h), 39% (n = 36) of patients in the control group and 20% (n = 18) in the IB group were admitted (p = 0.01). The use of high doses of IB reduced the risk of hospital admission 49% (relative risk = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.83). Five (95% CI: 3 to 17) patients would need to be treated with high doses of IB to prevent a single admission. Kaplan-Meier-estimated curves of the proportion of patients who reached the discharge threshold during the 3 h of treatment, showed a significant difference in favor of the IB group (log-rank test = 0.005). A subgroup analysis showed that patients most likely to benefit from the addition of high doses of IB were those with more severe obstruction (FEV(1) </= 30% of predicted) and long duration of symptoms before the ED presentation (>/= 24 h). On the contrary, previous use of inhaled beta(2)-agonists did not modify the admission rate and the pulmonary function response to IB. In conclusion, our data support a substantial therapeutic benefit from the addition of IB to albuterol administered in high doses through MDI plus spacer, particularly in patients with FEV(1) less than 30%, and with long duration of symptoms before the ED presentation (>/= 24 h).

Treatment of acute asthma. A new look at the old and at the new

beta-Agonists remain the mainstay of therapy for acute asthma and, for most patients, standard doses are acceptable. Although the onset of action of systemic steroids is still not clear, steroids promote recovery and should be given to patients with acute illness. Intravenous magnesium sulfate appears to improve pulmonary function in the most severely ill patients but is not useful in patients with more moderate episodes. Ipratropium bromide is a weak bronchodilator that still needs to be tested as an adjunct to standard treatment regimens before its role in adults with asthma can be determined; given its ease of use and favorable safety profile it could be considered for patients with more severe acute illness. Aminophylline has not been found by most studies to improve outcomes and the narrow therapeutic range and unfavorable safety profile relegate it to a last-line agent or no use at all. Helium-oxygen mixtures currently have no role in moderately ill patients but have a theoretical advantage as a temporizing measure in severely ill patients. Drugs used in the management of chronic asthma, such as inhaled steroids and leukotriene-modifying agents, are making their way into the acute treatment arena, and other newly developed specific mediator inhibitors or blockers deserve attention. The use of isomers of beta-agonists is another area that is attracting attention and study. Systemic steroids are used to prevent relapse after emergency department discharge and the addition of other agents such as leukotriene-modifying agents or inhaled steroids may further prevent the need for urgent visits or hospitalization. The search for optimal treatment strategies for acutely ill patients is challenging and exciting and, with more attention and resources being devoted to this area, newer treatments will be found that will eventually have a greater impact on the high morbidity associated with acute asthma.

Improved outcomes for hospitalized asthmatic children using a clinical pathway

BACKGROUND

Although asthma clinical pathways are used with increasing frequency, few controlled studies have evaluated the clinical and cost effectiveness of these pathways.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of an inpatient asthma clinical pathway on cost and quality of care for children with asthma.

METHODS

One hundred forty-nine children were treated for status asthmaticus using an asthma clinical pathway in a children's hospital between September and December 1997. Thirty-four of 149 children treated with the clinical pathway were randomly selected. A retrospective cohort control group of non-pathway patients (N = 34) was matched with each pathway patient by age, race, gender, co-morbidities, asthma severity score, ICU admission, and time of year admitted. Differences between the two groups in length of stay, total costs, readmission rate, inpatient management, and discharge medications were compared.

RESULTS

Length of stay was significantly lower in the clinical pathway group compared with the control group (36 hours versus 71 hours, P < .001) and total costs decreased significantly ($1685 versus $2829, P < .001) as a result of the pathway. Asthmatic children on the clinical pathway were significantly more likely than the control group to complete asthma teaching while hospitalized (65% versus 18%, P < .001), to be discharged with a prescription for a controller medication (88% versus 53%, P < .01), and to have a peak flow meter (57% versus 23%, P < .05) and a spacer device (100% versus 71%, P < .001) for home use.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of this inpatient clinical pathway led to a decrease in length of stay and a reduction in total cost while improving quality of care for hospitalized asthmatic children.

Inhaled budesonide for the treatment of acute wheezing and dyspnea in children up to 24 months old receiving intravenous hydrocortisone

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are highly effective in the treatment of asthma at all ages, and their use in younger children is increasing. There are no data currently available on the treatment of infants with acute wheeze and dyspnea with nebulized budesonide.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to assess the clinical effect of nebulized budesonide in infants with acute wheeze and dyspnea.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed comparing the addition of nebulized budesonide 0.25 mg every 6 hours (group A, n = 32) and nebulized ipratropium bromide 0.1 mg every 6 hours (group B, n = 39) with the normal treatment regimen with intravenous fluid, hydrocortisone, and nebulized fenoterol. A clinical score was made at admission and every 12 hours. The score included wheezing and costal retraction (0-6) and respiratory rate (counts per minute).

RESULTS

Seventy-one infants aged 3 to 24 months were studied (42 boys). A statistically significant reduction was seen in clinical score and respiratory rate in both groups 12 hours after admission. The children who received budesonide improved significantly faster than the children who received ipratropium bromide, and the hospitalization period was significantly lower in the budesonide group (66.4 hours) compared with the ipratropium bromide group (93 hours) (P <.01). Three patients from the budesonide group and 2 from the ipratropium bromide group were readmitted within the first 4 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of infants with acute wheeze with nebulized budesonide is associated with faster clinical improvement and reduction in hospital stay period.

Management of respiratory failure in patients with asthma

The goal of management of patients with respiratory failure is to restore them to a state of quiet breathing, without complication. This goal is often achieved by pharmacotherapy alone. Inhaled albuterol sulfate, oxygen, and systemic corticosteroids are mainstays of acute care drug management, whereas other data support the use of inhaled steroids, ipratropium bromide, magnesium sulfate, theophylline, and heliox. Assisted ventilation by face mask or endotracheal tube may be required in refractory patients. In intubated patients, a ventilatory strategy that prolongs exhalation time and accepts hypercapnia minimizes lung hyperinflation and generally results in a good outcome. Acute asthma often represents failure of outpatient management; key aspects of the outpatient program should be addressed in the acute care setting to help prevent recurrent attacks.

Combined inhaled anticholinergic agents and beta-2-agonists for initial treatment of acute asthma in children

BACKGROUND

Anti-cholinergic agents and beta2-agonist drugs are both bronchodilators used to reverse acute bronchospasm in children with asthma. These drugs have different modes of action, so may have complementary or additive effects.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of adding inhaled anti-cholinergics to beta2-agonists in acute paediatric asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Medline (1966 to 1996), Embase (1980 to 1995), Cinahl (1982 to 1995) and reference lists of studies. We also contacted drug manufacturers and researchers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing the combination of inhaled anti-cholinergics and beta2-agonists with beta2-agonists alone in children aged 18 months to 17 years with acute asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Assessments of trial quality and data extraction were done by two reviewers independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials involving a total of 836 children were included. Most trials were of high quality. When only one dose of anti-cholinergic inhalation was added to beta2-agonist therapy, there was an improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second after 60 minutes with combination therapy (weighted mean difference 16.1%, 95% confidence interval 5.5 to 26. 7% reduction). There was no reduction in hospital admission (odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 1.82, using a random effects model). For multiple doses in children with severe asthma, there was a reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (weighted mean difference 9.8% predicted, 95% confidence interval 6. 5 to 13.1% predicted). There may also be a reduction in hospital admission (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.99). Eleven children would need to be given multiple doses of anti-cholinergics in combination with beta2-agonists to avoid one hospital admission compared to children given beta2-agonists alone.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

In children with acute asthma, the addition of multiple doses of anti-cholinergics to inhaled beta2-agonists appears to improve lung function modestly and may decrease hospital admission. There is no associated increase in adverse effects. Single doses of anti-cholinergics may improve lung function in children with severe asthma, but do not appear to reduce hospital admissions.

Ensaio clínico, aberto, controlado sobre a adição de brometo de ipratrópio ao fenoterol no tratamento da crise de asma em adultos

No tratamento da crise de asma, empregam-se doses repetidas de drogas b2-agonistas por via inalatória. O efeito da adição do brometo de ipratrópio (BI) ao b2-agonistas é controverso em adultos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar se adição de BI ao fenoterol, em tratamentos inalatórios repetidos, induz a maior broncodilatação, com reversibilidade da crise e alta da emergência em pacientes em crise grave de asma. LOCAL DO ESTUDO: Serviço de Pronto-Atendimento de Pneumologia, Disciplina de Pneumologia da Unifesp-Hospital São Paulo, no período de julho de 1995 a fevereiro de 1997. TIPO DE ESTUDO: Aberto, randomizado, paralelo. Alta da emergência determinada pelo VEF1 e PFE > 60% do previsto. CASUÍSTICA E MÉTODOS: Cento e vinte pacientes em crise de asma foram divididos em dois grupos (N = 60): fenoterol (F) e brometo de ipratrópio + fenoterol (BIF) com VEF1 e PFE < 50% do previsto. Cada grupo recebeu três tratamentos inalatórios, através de nebulímetro e câmara de expansão, administrados em intervalos de 30 minutos. No grupo F foram administrados 4 jatos de fenoterol (400mcg) e no grupo BIF, 160mcg de BI e 400mcg de fenoterol (4 jatos). RESULTADOS: A média (± DP) do PFE basal (F = 36 ± 7% vs. BIF = 35 ± 9% previsto) e do VEF1 basal (F = 33 ± 9% vs. BIF = 32 ± 9%). Trinta e dois pacientes no grupo F e 33 pacientes no grupo BIF tiveram alta após tratamentos inalatórios. O VEF1 e PFE ao final dos tratamentos inalatórios foram, respectivamente, F = 60 ± 13% vs. BIF = 61 ± 11% e F = 74 ± 18% vs. BIF = 77 ± 13% (NS). CONCLUSÃO: A adição de brometo de ipratrópio ao fenoterol resulta em efeito funcional insignificante e sem impacto clínico no tratamento da crise de asma em adultos.

Acute asthma in the pediatric emergency department

The management of children with acute asthma remains a difficult and challenging process. Although newer asthma medications are being developed, they are unlikely to have a large impact on the management of children with acute asthma. The leukotriene inhibitors are new anti-inflammatory agents for asthma and are beneficial for the treatment of patients with chronic asthma but have no therapeutic effect during the acute phase of an exacerbation. Older treatments, including the use of magnesium and heliox, have been revisited. Although some children with severe asthma may respond, these do not provide relief for most children with acute exacerbation. The new challenge for asthma care is finding ways to link children with their primary care providers so that regular asthma care can be established. The NHLBI recommends that children with asthma have regular visits with their primary care providers (e.g., four times a year). Regular care results in better adherence to medical and preventive management plans and improves the relationship between patients and physicians. Instituting an asthma action plan, which instructs families on when and how to begin therapy for an acute exacerbation, may prevent progression to a more severe condition.

A meta-analysis of the effects of ipratropium bromide in adults with acute asthma

PURPOSE

To review the literature to determine whether inhaled ipratropium bromide provides additive benefits to adults with acute asthma who are being treated with beta-agonists in an emergency department.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

English-language studies, both published (1978 to 1999) and unpublished, were retrieved using Medline, Science Citation Index, Current Contents, bibliographic reviews of primary research, review articles, consultation with experts, and the register of Medical Editors' Trial Amnesty. Only randomized, double-blind, controlled trials that enrolled patients having an exacerbation of asthma were included. The main outcome measure was pulmonary function; hospital admission rate was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Ten studies including 1,483 adults with acute asthma were selected (mean age 32 +/- 13 years, 36% men). The overall effect size in SD units of pulmonary function showed a significant benefit from ipratropium (effect size 0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04 to 0.24, P = 0.008). Study-specific effect sizes ranged from 0.03 to 0.63. This pooled effect size was equivalent to a 10% (95% CI: 2% to 18%) increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) or peak expiratory flow in the ipratropium group compared with the control group. Analysis of the four studies that included patients with extreme obstruction (FEV1 or peak flow <35% of predicted at presentation) showed substantial improvement with ipratropium therapy (effect size 0.38, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.67). In the five trials (1,186 patients) that studied the effect of ipratropium administration on hospital admissions, pooled results revealed that ipratropium reduced admission rates significantly (odds ratio 0.62, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.88, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of ipratropium to beta-agonist therapy offers a statistically significant, albeit modest, improvement in pulmonary function, as well as a reduction in the rate of hospital admissions.