A pooled analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer in elderly patients

A newly synthesized nickel chelate can selectively target and overcome multidrug resistance in cancer through redox imbalance both in vivo and in vitro

Induction of undesired toxicity and emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR) are the major obstacles for cancer treatment. Moreover, aggressive cancers are less sensitive towards existing chemotherapeutics. Therefore, selective targeting of cancers without inducing undesired side effects and designing proper strategies to overcome MDR has utmost importance in modern chemotherapy. Previously we revealed the anticancer properties of some transition metal chelates of Schiff base, but the effectiveness of nickel complex is still unrevealed. Herein, we synthesized and characterized a Schiff base nickel chelate, nickel-(II) N-(2-hydroxyacetophenone) glycinate (NiNG), through different spectroscopic means. NiNG proves to be a broad spectrum anticancer agent with considerable efficacy to overcome MDR in cancer. Antiproliferative effects of NiNG was evaluated using drug-resistant (CEM/ADR5000; NIH-MDR-G185; EAC/Dox), drug-sensitive aggressive (Hct116; CCRF-CEM; EAC/S) and normal (NIH-3T3) cells that reveal the selective nature of NiNG towards drug resistant and sensitive cancer cells without inducing any significant toxicity in normal cells. Moreover, NiNG involves reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated redox imbalance for induction of caspase 3-dependent apoptosis in aggressive drug-sensitive Hct116 and drug-resistant NIH-MDR-G185 cells through disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential. Moreover, intraperitoneal (i.p.) application of NiNG at non-toxic doses caused significant increase in the life-span of Swiss albino mice bearing sensitive and doxorubicin-resistant subline of Ehrlich ascites carcinoma cells. It is noteworthy that, in vitro NiNG can only overcome P-glycoprotein-mediated MDR while in vivo NiNG can overcome MRP1-mediated MDR in cancer. Therefore, NiNG has therapeutic potential to target and overcome MDR in cancer.

A pilot study of an accelerometer-equipped smartphone to monitor older adults with cancer receiving chemotherapy in Mexico

OBJECTIVES

Older adults with cancer in developing countries face challenges accessing healthcare due to a lack of personnel and infrastructure. A decline in physical activity (defined as a decrease in the number of daily steps) may be a novel method for the timely detection of toxicity in older adults receiving chemotherapy in resource-constrained settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this feasibility study, patients aged ≥65years starting first-line chemotherapy for solid tumors were given a smartphone with a pedometer application. Daily steps were monitored daily for one cycle. If a ≥15% decrease from baseline was identified, the patient was called and the presence of toxicity assessed. The intervention would be feasible if ≥75% of the subjects recorded steps for ≥75% of the planned chemotherapy days.

RESULTS

Forty patients (median age 73; 57% [N=23] female) were included. Seventy percent (N=28) had stage III-IV disease with 45% (N=18) gastrointestinal, 23% (N=9) breast, and 32% (N=13) other malignancies. Mean pre-treatment daily steps was 3111 (Standard Deviation [SD] 1731), and median follow-up was 21days (range 2-28). Despite having limited exposure to mobile technology, most (93%) patients used the smartphone appropriately, and 85% found it easy to use. Sixty percent of patients (N=24) had toxicities managed over the phone, 27.5% (N=10) were sent for urgent medical attention and 15% (N=6) were hospitalized.

CONCLUSION

Using smartphones to monitor older adults with cancer receiving chemotherapy in a resource-constrained setting is feasible and acceptable. A decrease in the number of daily steps was common and helped to identify chemotherapy toxicity.

Age and factors associated with access and time to post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer: a French epidemiological study

Background

Studies have shown the negative prognostic impact of increased time between colectomy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in colon cancer (CC). Our aim was to investigate the role of age and non-organizational factors on access and time to AC.

Methods

All adult patients undergoing surgery for stage II or III CC in the "Région Centre-Val de Loire" in 2013, were selected. Time to AC and socio-demographic factors were collected. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with access to AC, and a multivariate analysis performed to identify factors associated with time to AC.

Results

Among 404 stage II or III patients who underwent colectomy, 182 (45%; sex ratio 1.5; mean age 67.6 years; range 32-90) received AC. AC patients were younger than those without AC (67.6 vs. 77.9 years) and the difference was even greater for stage III patients (69.0 vs. 82.4). The median time to AC was 48 days, exceeding 42 days in 60% of cases. Living alone, postoperative morbidities, and emergency colectomy were independently associated with increased time to AC. Age and other factors were not associated with delayed AC.

Conclusions

Emergency colectomy, postoperative morbidities, and living alone are associated with increased time to AC. Organizational measures to reduce the time to AC are therefore unlikely to have an impact. In contrast, age is not associated with increased time to AC, but to access to AC. Reasons for omitting AC in older patients requires further study.

Administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients with Stage III colon cancer: an observational study

AIM

According to established guidelines, patients with Stage III colon cancer should receive adjuvant chemotherapy. However, a significant proportion do not. This study assessed factors associated with the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and causes of death.

METHODS

Patients with Stage III colon cancer who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2009 were selected from two hospitals in the Netherlands. Patient characteristics including comorbidities and treatment preferences, tumour characteristics and follow-up were extracted from the medical records. The patient and tumour characteristics of patients who did receive chemotherapy were compared with those who did not using chi-squared analysis. Differences between the groups in causes of death were recorded together with the duration of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 348 patients were included. The median age was 73 years (range 33-93). Over half of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (50.6%). Patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly older (P < 0.001), had more comorbidities (P < 0.001) and were more often living alone (P < 0.001). Patients who received no adjuvant chemotherapy had a reduced overall survival, and the cause of death was more often attributed to other causes (60%) than colon cancer (40%). For patients who received chemotherapy, the cause of death was usually attributed to colon cancer (71%).

CONCLUSION

Patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had a worse overall survival and the majority died due to other causes than colon cancer. In our aging society it will become even more important to develop tools to estimate remaining life expectancy in order to improve the selection of older patients for adjuvant treatments.

Factors Predicting Adherence to a Tailored-Dose Adjuvant Treatment on the Basis of Geriatric Assessment in Elderly People With Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Selecting elderly people with colorectal cancer (CRC) for adjuvant chemotherapy is challenging. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can help by classifying them according to their frailty profile. The supposed benefit of chemotherapy is on the basis of the rate of treatment adherence. In this study we evaluated tolerance and adherence to tailored-dose adjuvant therapy on the basis of CGA in a cohort of older patients with high-risk stage II and stage III CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study in 193 consecutive patients aged 75 years or older. On the basis of CGA results, we classified patients as fit, medium fit, or unfit, administering standard therapy, adjusted treatment, and best supportive care, respectively. We recorded planned chemotherapy, toxicity, and completion of the treatment. A logistic multivariate analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

Seventeen (15%) of the 141 candidates for chemotherapy (n = 86 fit and n = 55 medium fit) refused treatment; associated factors included polypharmacy (odds ratio [OR], 5.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-18.40) and rectal location (OR, 5.61; 94% CI, 1.45-21.49). Of the 105 (74%) patients receiving chemotherapy, 20 (27%) fit and 4 (13%) medium fit patients experienced Grade 3 to 4 toxicity (P = .11) without association to explanatory variables. Approximately 55% of patients treated with chemotherapy received at least 80% of the planned dose (55% fit and 58% medium fit patients; P = .7). Factors associated with completion of chemotherapy were the absence of toxicity (OR, 7.67; 95% CI, 2.41-24.43) and social support (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.04).

CONCLUSION

CGA is useful for selecting elderly patients for adjuvant chemotherapy, adapting the dose to their frailty profile, and identifying adherence-related factors amenable to modification through CGA-based interventions.

Muscle mass at the time of diagnosis of nonmetastatic colon cancer and early discontinuation of chemotherapy, delays, and dose reductions on adjuvant FOLFOX: The C-SCANS study

BACKGROUND

For many chemotherapy regimens dosed based on body surface area (BSA), patients experience dose reductions or delays or discontinue treatment, thereby reducing survival. Consideration of body composition may be useful in individualizing chemotherapy dosing, but to the authors' knowledge few studies to date have examined the association of body composition with chemotherapy tolerance in patients with colon cancer.

METHODS

The authors identified patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer who were diagnosed from 2006 through 2011 at Kaiser Permanente and who received leucovorin calcium/calcium folinate, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) as initial adjuvant chemotherapy (533 patients). Patients' muscle mass was quantified using clinically acquired computed tomography scans. The authors quantified chemotherapy doses, treatment dates, and related toxicities using the electronic medical record. In logistic regression models adjusting for age, sex, and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of disease, the authors examined associations of muscle tertiles with early treatment discontinuation (<6 cycles), treatment delay (>3 days off schedule for ≥3 times), and/or dose reduction (relative dose intensity ≤ 0.70, based on planned treatment).

RESULTS

The average age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 58.7 years; BSA was 1.9 m² and body mass index was 28.7 kg/m² . Compared with the highest sex-specific tertile of muscle mass, patients in the lowest tertile were more likely to experience toxicities and had twice the risk of adverse outcomes while receiving FOLFOX; for early discontinuation, the odds ratio (OR) was 2.34 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.04-5.24; P for trend = .03), whereas the ORs were 2.24 (95% CI, 1.37-3.66; P for trend = .002) for treatment delay and 2.28 (95% CI, 1.19-4.36; P for trend = .01) for dose reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower muscle mass is associated with greater toxicity and poor chemotherapy adherence among patients receiving FOLFOX. Many chemotherapy drugs are dosed based on BSA, but treatment may be better individualized if muscle mass is considered. Cancer 2017;123:4868-77. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Factors Affecting Adjuvant Therapy in Stage III Pancreatic Cancer-Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant therapy after curative resection is associated with survival benefit in stage III pancreatic cancer. We analyzed the factors affecting the outcome of adjuvant therapy in stage III pancreatic cancer and compared overall survival with different modalities of adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients with stage III pancreatic cancer listed in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2012. Patients were stratified based on adjuvant therapy they received. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

We analyzed a cohort included 1731 patients who were recipients of adjuvant therapy for stage III pancreatic cancer within the limits of our database. Patients who received adjuvant chemoradiation had the longest postdiagnosis survival time, followed by patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, and finally patients who received no adjuvant therapy. On multivariate analysis, advancing age and patients with Medicaid had worse survival, whereas Spanish origin and lower Charlson comorbidity score had better survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the largest trial using the NCDB addressing the effects of adjuvant therapy specifically in stage III pancreatic cancer. Within the limits of our study, survival benefit with adjuvant therapy was more apparent with longer duration from date of diagnosis.

Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients: Lack of Evidence

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy has become the standard form of treatment for all patients with stage III colorectal cancer and is also recommended for patients with stage II disease and defined risk factors. However, clinical studies that evaluate the effect of adjuvant treatment regimens have a selection bias in favor of younger patients, so that even retrospective subgroup analyses cannot define the best therapeutic procedure in elderly patients with comorbidities.

SUMMARY

As long as the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly colorectal cancer patients is not investigated in comprehensive trials, no clear recommendations are possible.

KEY MESSAGE

An exploratory review of the relevant literature revealed that a formal meta-analysis concerning adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer is not feasible due to varying definitions of elderly patients, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a plethora of chemotherapeutic regimens.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Given the high incidence of colorectal cancer and the median age of 68 years for patients at the time of diagnosis, health economic considerations should promote randomized controlled trials regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in the elderly.

Guidelines for the Treatment of Elderly Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

The management of elderly patients with cancer is influenced by several factors that can vary widely among aging individuals. As the proportion of elderly individuals increases, the need for specific care guidelines for this population is critical. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has developed guidelines to address these factors when formulating optimal treatment regimens for elderly patients and to avoid significant toxicity and maintain their quality of life.

METHODS

Factors that influence the appropriate treatment choices for the elderly, such as functional status, comorbidity, polypharmacy, and the presence of anemia, are reviewed, and the guidelines developed by the NCCN for treatment elderly patients are discussed.

RESULTS

The guidelines address these factors when defining the goal of therapy and formulating individualized treatment approaches for the elderly to provide optimal care for these patients, avoid significant toxicity, and maintain their quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The goal of therapy must be clearly defined, whether survival, remission, cure, or palliation of symptoms. Enrollment of elderly cancer patients onto clinical trials is encouraged so the guidelines can be validated.

Pharmacokinetics of Chemotherapy in the Older Patient

Background

The number of individuals aged 65 years and older is growing rapidly, and the majority of cancers are diagnosed in this age group. Age-related changes in physiology can affect chemotherapy pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in older patients.

Methods

We review the literature regarding the impact of age on the pharmacokinetics of commonly used chemotherapy drugs and discuss age-related changes in physiology and pharmacology that can affect chemotherapy tolerance in older patients.

Results

The data on age-related changes in chemotherapy pharmacokinetics are conflicting. While a few studies report age-related differences in chemotherapy pharmacokinetics, most found no significant difference or subtle differences in pharmacokinetics with aging. A difference in pharmacodynamics was commonly seen, however, with older patients at increased risk of myelosuppression and toxicity from age-related decline in organ function. The majority of these studies were performed in a small cohort of patients, thus limiting the generalizability of these results.

Conclusions

Additional studies are needed to address the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cancer therapies in the older patient. Multicenter pharmacokinetic studies of adequate sample size, which include a thorough evaluation of physiologic factors and geriatric assessment parameters, would provide further insight into the factors affecting treatment tolerance. These studies would also help to guide appropriate chemotherapy dosing and interventions in order to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity in the older patient.

Tolerance to Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Cancer

Background

Due to demographic changes, the number of elderly people with cancer will increase in the next decades. In the past, elderly patients with cancer were often excluded from clinical trials. Chronological age has been considered a risk factor for increased toxicity and reduced tolerance to chemotherapy.

Methods

We present a review on toxicity of chemotherapy and factors associated with toxicity in elderly patients with cancer, and we discuss chemotherapeutic agents and treatment options in treating this patient population.

Results

Age is a risk factor for increased toxicity to chemotherapy and decreased tolerance. However, few trials have been reported with adjustment for age-associated changes such as impairment of functional status and increased comorbidity, which also show an independent association with increased toxicity. Published data may include several biases, such as referral and publication bias.

Conclusions

Decision making in elderly cancer patients should be based on the results of a geriatric assessment. Patients with few or no limitations should be treated as younger patients are treated. Data with a high level of evidence are unavailable for patients showing moderate or severe limitations in a geriatric assessment.

Association of pre-chemotherapy peripheral blood pro-inflammatory and coagulation factors with reduced relative dose intensity in women with breast cancer

Background

Chemotherapy decreases the risk of relapse and mortality in early-stage breast cancer (BC), but it comes with the risk of toxicity. Chemotherapy efficacy depends on relative dose intensity (RDI), and an RDI < 85% is associated with worse overall survival. The pro-inflammatory (interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein (CRP)) and coagulation factors (D-dimer) serve as biomarkers of aging. The purpose of this study is to determine if these biomarkers are associated with reduced RDI in women with stage I–III BC.

Methods

This study enrolled women with stage I–III BC. Prior to adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, peripheral blood was collected for biomarker measurement. Dose reductions and delays were captured and utilized to calculate the RDI delivered. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to describe the association between pre-chemotherapy IL-6, CRP, and D-dimer levels and an RDI < 85%, controlling for relevant tumor and patient factors (age, stage, receptor status, chemotherapy regimen, and pre-chemotherapy physical function and comorbidity).

Results

A total of 159 patients (mean age 58 years, range 30–81, SD 11.3) with stage I–III BC were enrolled. An RDI < 85% occurred in 22.6% (N = 36) of patients and was associated with higher pre-chemotherapy IL-6 (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04–1.25; p = 0.006) and D-dimer (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.27–4.24; p = 0.006) levels, increased age (p = 0.001), increased number of comorbidities (p = 0.01), and decreased physical function by the Medical Outcomes Survey Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale (p = 0.009) in univariate analysis. A multivariate model, including two biomarkers (IL-6 and D-dimer), age, ADL, BC stage, and chemotherapy regimen, demonstrated a significant association between the increased biomarkers and reduced RDI < 85% (OR 2.54; p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Increased pre-chemotherapy biomarkers of aging (IL-6 and D-dimer) are associated with reduced RDI (<85%). Future studies are underway to validate these findings.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01030250. Registered on 3 November 2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0895-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

iRGD-functionalized PEGylated nanoparticles for enhanced colon tumor accumulation and targeted drug delivery

AIM

To enhance the tumor accumulation and targeted drug delivery for colon cancer therapy, iRGD peptide was introduced to the surface of PEGylated camptothecin-loaded nanoparticles (NPs).

METHODS

Cellular uptake, targeting specificity, biodistribution and antitumor capacity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The functionalization of iRGD facilitated tumor accumulation and cellular uptake of NPs by Colon-26 cells. Furthermore, the resultant iRGD-PEG-NPs remarkably improved the therapeutic efficacy of camptothecin in vitro and in vivo by inducing a higher degree of tumor cell apoptosis compared with PEG-NPs.

CONCLUSION

iRGD-PEG-NP is a desired drug delivery system to facilitate the drug accumulation in orthotopic colon tumor tissues and further drug internalization by colon cancer cells.

Impact of venous invasion on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with stage III colorectal cancer

One of the reasons for the underuse of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with stage III colorectal cancer is a small survival benefit. This retrospective study sought to identify the predictive factors for elderly patients who could obtain a sufficient survival benefit. We reviewed the data of 1354 elderly patients (aged ≥70 years) with stage III colorectal cancer who underwent complete resection between January 1997 and December 2006. The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy was assessed, and the risk factors for recurrence were determined. The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy was also assessed after stratification for the above-mentioned risk factors for recurrence. There was a tendency for adjuvant chemotherapy to be effective in elderly patients (hazard ratio 0.84; 95% CI 0.70-1.01). Age, tumor location, pathology findings, tumor depth, venous invasion and lymph node metastasis were identified to be independent risk factors for recurrence by univariate and multivariate analyses. Among these factors, adjuvant chemotherapy was much effective in the elderly patients with high venous invasion (v2-3) (hazard ratio 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.91). High venous invasion (v2-3) was identified to be a predictive factor for elderly patients with stage III colorectal cancer who gained a sufficient survival benefit.

Mortality and Survival after Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Cancer in Patients Aged over 80 Years

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify the clinical factors and tumor characteristics that predict the outcome of colorectal cancer patients aged >80 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 186 patients aged >80 years with colorectal cancer were collected from a computer database, and the variables were analyzed by both uni- and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality was 4% and the 90-day mortality 10%. The 1-year survival was 76%, and 27 (61%) of the 44 deaths were unrelated to cancer. The overall 5-year survival was 36%, the median survival 38 months, and the cancer-specific survival 40%. The recurrence rate after radical surgery was 22% and it was not affected by age. Kaplan-Meier estimates indicated that age, number of underlying diseases, radical operation, Union for International Cancer Control stage of the tumor, tumor size, number of lymph nodes involved, venous invasion, and recurrent disease were significant predictors of survival, but in the Cox regression model, only radical operation and venous invasion were independent prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

After good surgical selection, low early mortality and acceptable long-term survival can be achieved even in the oldest old patients with colorectal cancer. However, low early mortality seems to underestimate the effects of surgery during the first postoperative year.

The effect of geriatric intervention in frail elderly patients receiving chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a randomized trial (GERICO)

Background

Better surgical techniques, chemotherapy and biological therapy have improved survival in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), most markedly in younger patients. About half of patients over 70 years receive dose reductions or early treatment discontinuation of the planned adjuvant or first-line treatment due to side effects. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a multidisciplinary evaluation of an elderly individual’s health status. This assessment in older patients with cancer can predict survival, chemotherapy toxicity and morbidity.

Methods

This randomized phase II trial (GERICO) is designed to investigate whether comprehensive geriatric assessment and intervention before and during treatment with chemotherapy in frail elderly patients with stages II–IV CRC will increase the number of patients completing chemotherapy. All patients ≥70 years in whom chemotherapy for CRC is planned to start at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital are screened for frailty using the G8 questionnaire at the first visit to the outpatient clinic. The G8 questionnaire is a multi-domain screening tool to identify frail or vulnerable patients at risk of increased toxicity and morbidity. Frail patients are offered inclusion and are then randomized to two groups (the intervention group and the control group). Patients in the intervention group receive a full geriatric assessment of comorbidity, medication, psycho-cognitive function, physical, functional and nutrition status, and interventions are undertaken on identified health issues. Simultaneously, they are treated for their cancer according to international guidelines. Patients in the control group receive the same chemotherapy regimens and standard of care. Primary outcome is number of patients completing scheduled chemotherapy at starting dose. Secondary outcomes are dose reductions, treatment delays, toxicity, time to recurrence, survival, cancer-related mortality and quality of life.

Discussion

This ongoing trial is one of the first to evaluate the effect of geriatric intervention in frail elderly patients with CRC. The trial will provide new and valuable knowledge about whether it is beneficial for the elderly patient undergoing chemotherapy to be treated simultaneously by a geriatrician.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02748811. The trial was registered retrospectively; registration date 04/28/2016.

Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate survival in patients with colorectal cancer: cohort study

Objective To develop and externally validate risk prediction equations to estimate absolute and conditional survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Design Cohort study.Setting General practices in England providing data for the QResearch database linked to the national cancer registry.Participants 44 145 patients aged 15-99 with colorectal cancer from 947 practices to derive the equations. The equations were validated in 15 214 patients with colorectal cancer from 305 different QResearch practices and 437 821 patients with colorectal cancer from the national cancer registry.Main outcome measures The primary outcome was all cause mortality and secondary outcome was colorectal cancer mortality.Methods Cause specific hazards models were used to predict risks of colorectal cancer mortality and other cause mortality accounting for competing risks, and these risk estimates were combined to obtain risks of all cause mortality. Separate equations were derived for men and women. Several variables were tested: age, ethnicity, deprivation score, cancer stage, cancer grade, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, smoking status, alcohol consumption, body mass index, family history of bowel cancer, anaemia, liver function test result, comorbidities, use of statins, use of aspirin, clinical values for anaemia, and platelet count. Measures of calibration and discrimination were determined in both validation cohorts at 1, 5, and 10 years.Results The final models included the following variables in men and women: age, deprivation score, cancer stage, cancer grade, smoking status, colorectal surgery, chemotherapy, family history of bowel cancer, raised platelet count, abnormal liver function, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, prescribed aspirin at diagnosis, and prescribed statins at diagnosis. Improved survival in women was associated with younger age, earlier stage of cancer, well or moderately differentiated cancer grade, colorectal cancer surgery (adjusted hazard ratio 0.50), family history of bowel cancer (0.62), and prescriptions for statins (0.77) and aspirin (0.83) at diagnosis, with comparable results for men. The risk equations were well calibrated, with predicted risks closely matching observed risks. Discrimination was good in men and women in both validation cohorts. For example, the five year survival equations on the QResearch validation cohort explained 45.3% of the variation in time to colorectal cancer death for women, the D statistic was 1.86, and Harrell's C statistic was 0.80 (both measures of discrimination, indicating that the scores are able to distinguish between people with different levels of risk). The corresponding results for all cause mortality were 42.6%, 1.77, and 0.79.Conclusions Risk prediction equations were developed and validated to estimate overall and conditional survival of patients with colorectal cancer accounting for an individual's clinical and demographic characteristics. These equations can provide more individualised accurate information for patients with colorectal cancer to inform decision making and follow-up.

Comparative effectiveness of chemotherapy vs resection of the primary tumour as the initial treatment in older patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer

AIM

The objectives were to determine trends in the use of chemotherapy as the initial treatment and to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of initial chemotherapy vs resection of the primary tumour on survival (intention-to-treat analysis) in Stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHOD

This cohort study used 2000-2011 data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database, including patients ≥ 66 years of age presenting with Stage IV CRC. Cox proportional hazards models and instrumental variable analysis were used to compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy as the initial treatment with resection of the primary tumour as the initial treatment, with 2-year survival as the end point.

RESULTS

The use of chemotherapy as the first treatment increased over time, from 26.8% in 2001 to 46.9% in 2009 (P < 0.0001). The traditional Cox model showed that chemotherapy as the initial treatment was associated with a higher risk of mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.27-1.44]. When accounting for known and unknown confounders in an instrumental variable analysis, chemotherapy as the initial treatment suggested benefit on 2-year survival (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.44-1.04); however, the association did not reach statistical significance. The study findings were similar in six subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION

The use of chemotherapy as the initial therapy for CRC increased substantially from 2001 to 2009. Instrumental variable analysis found that, compared with resection, chemotherapy as the initial treatment offers similar or better 2-year survival in patients with Stage IV CRC. Given the morbidity and mortality associated with colorectal resection in elderly patients, chemotherapy provides an option to patients who are not good candidates for resection.

Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve disease-free survival in patients with rectal cancer positive for MRI-detected extramural venous invasion following chemoradiation

AIM

MRI-detected extramural venous invasion (mrEMVI) is a poor prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) can cause regression in the severity of EMVI and subsequently improve survival whereas mrEMVI persisting after CRT confers an increased risk of recurrence. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following CRT on survival in rectal cancer remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a survival advantage for AC given to patients with mrEMVI persisting after CRT.

METHOD

A prospective analysis was conducted of consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer between 2006 and 2013. All patients underwent CRT followed by surgery. AC was given to selected patients based on the presence of specific 'high-risk' features. Comparison was made between patients offered AC with observation alone. The primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Of 631 patients, 227 (36.0%) demonstrated persistent mrEMVI following CRT. Patients were grouped on the basis of AC or observation and were matched for age, performance status and final histopathological staging. Three-year DFS in the AC group was 74.6% compared with 53.7% in the observation only group. AC had a survival benefit on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.458; 95% CI: 0.271-0.775, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Patients with persistent mrEMVI following CRT who receive AC may have a decreased risk of recurrence and an improved 3-year DFS compared with patients not receiving AC, irrespective of age and performance status.

Geriatric Assessment Predicts Survival and Competing Mortality in Elderly Patients with Early Colorectal Cancer: Can It Help in Adjuvant Therapy Decision-Making?

BACKGROUND

The challenge when selecting elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) for adjuvant therapy is to estimate the likelihood that death from other causes will preclude cancer events from occurring. The aim of this paper is to evaluate whether comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can predict survival and cancer-specific mortality in elderly CRC patients candidates for adjuvant therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred ninety-five consecutive patients aged ≥75 with high-risk stage II and stage III CRC were prospectively included from May 2008 to May 2015. All patients underwent CGA, which evaluated comorbidity, polypharmacy, functional status, geriatric syndromes, mood, cognition, and social support. According to CGA results, patients were classified into three groups-fit, medium-fit, and unfit-to receive standard therapy, adjusted treatment, and best supportive care, respectively. We recorded survival and cause of death and used the Fine-Gray regression model to analyze competing causes of death.

RESULTS

Following CGA, 85 (43%) participants were classified as fit, 57 (29%) as medium-fit, and 53 (28%) as unfit. The univariate 5-year survival rates were 74%, 52%, and 27%. Sixty-one (31%) patients died due to cancer progression (53%), non-cancer-related cause (46%), and unknown reasons (1%); there were no toxicity-related deaths. Fit and medium-fit participants were more likely to die due to cancer progression, whereas patients classified as unfit were at significantly greater risk of non-cancer-related death.

CONCLUSION

CGA showed efficacy in predicting survival and discriminating between causes of death in elderly patients with high-risk stage II and stage III resected CRC, with potential implications for shaping the decision-making process for adjuvant therapies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Adjuvant therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer is controversial due to the high risk for competing events among these patients. In order to effectively select older patients for adjuvant therapy, we have to weigh the risk of cancer-related mortality and the potential survival benefits with treatment against the patient's life expectancy, irrespective of cancer. This prospective study focused on the prognostic value of geriatric assessment for survival using a competing-risk analysis approach, providing an important contribution on the treatment decision-making process and helping clinicians to identify elderly patients who might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy among those who will not.

Management of stage III colon cancer in the elderly: Practice patterns and outcomes in the general population

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have established surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) as the standard management for stage III colon cancer; however, the extent to which these results apply to elderly patients in routine practice is unclear. This article describes the management and outcomes of elderly patients with stage III colon cancer.

METHODS

All cases of surgically resected colon cancer from 2002 to 2008 were identified with the population-based Ontario Cancer Registry. Pathology reports were obtained for a random sample (25% of all cases); those with stage III disease constituted the study population. The utilization of ACT, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) in elderly patients (≥70 years) and nonelderly patients (<70 years) were compared.

RESULTS

The study population included 2920 patients, and 1521 (52%) were elderly. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates increased with advanced age: <70 years, 2% and 5%; 70 to 74 years, 3% and 7%; 75 to 79 years, 5% and 8%, and ≥80 years, 9% and 16% (P < .001). ACT was delivered to 48% of elderly patients and to 81% of younger patients (P < .001). Factors independently associated with ACT utilization among the elderly were a younger age (P < .001), male sex (P = .041), and no comorbidities (P = .001). Among elderly patients, ACT was associated with improved CSS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.88) and OS (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.83); however, the magnitude of the benefit was smaller for elderly patients than younger patients (HR for CSS, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42-0.67; HR for OS 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45-0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Half of elderly patients with stage III colon cancer do not receive ACT. Although the effect size is smaller than that in younger patients, ACT is associated with improved long-term survival. Cancer 2017;123:2840-49. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Neurotoxicity Outcomes in a Population-based Cohort of Elderly Patients Treated With Adjuvant Oxaliplatin for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The addition of oxaliplatin to adjuvant treatment regimens for colorectal cancer has been shown to improve overall survival at the expense of increased toxicity. The incidence and severity of toxicity might be greater among older patients who might also derive less benefit from oxaliplatin. We evaluated the association between adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and neurotoxicity outcomes in an elderly cohort of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A population-based cohort of patients aged > 65 years with stage II and III colorectal cancer treated with adjuvant therapy in Ontario, Canada was identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Cause-specific hazard models were used to estimate the effect of oxaliplatin exposure on the cause-specific hazard ratio (CHR) of peripheral neuropathy after accounting for the competing risk of death.

RESULTS

We identified 3607 patients aged > 65 years with stage II and III colorectal cancer. Of these patients, 1541 (43%) had been treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. Compared with subjects receiving non-oxaliplatin-based regimens, patients aged ≥ 70 years at the time of cancer diagnosis who are subsequently treated with oxaliplatin were more likely to develop peripheral neuropathy (CHR, 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-3.35; P < .0001). This association was not significant in patients aged 66 to 69 years (CHR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.50-1.72; P = .812). Formal interaction testing confirmed that the effect of oxaliplatin on neuropathy was more pronounced in patients aged ≥ 70 years compared with patients aged 66 to 69 years (P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Colorectal cancer patients aged ≥ 70 years at the time of cancer diagnosis who are subsequently treated with oxaliplatin have a significant risk of developing peripheral neuropathy. This should be considered in clinical decision making, especially because of the limited data supporting an oxaliplatin benefit in this age group.

Octogenarian patients with colorectal cancer: Characterizing an emerging clinical entity

AIM

To characterize colorectal cancer (CRC) in octogenarians as compared with younger patients.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective cohort study which included patients diagnosed with CRC at the age of 80 years or older between 2008-2013. A control group included consecutive patients younger than 80 years diagnosed with CRC during the same period. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and outcome were compared between the groups. Fisher’s exact test was used for dichotomous variables and χ² was used for variables with more than two categories. Overall survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with the log-rank test. Cancer specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival were assessed by the Cox proportional hazards model, with the Fine and Gray correction for non-cancer death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

The study included 350 patients, 175 patients in each group. Median follow-up was 40.2 mo (range 1.8-97.5). Several significant differences were noted. Octogenarians had a higher proportion of Ashkenazi ethnicity (64.8% vs 47.9%, P < 0.001), a higher rate of personal history of other malignancies (22.4% vs 13.7%, P = 0.035) and lower rates of family history of any cancer (36.6% vs 64.6%, P < 0.001) and family history of CRC (14.4% vs 27.3%, P = 0.006). CRC diagnosis by screening was less frequent in octogenarians (5.7% vs 20%, P < 0.001) and presentation with performance status (PS) of 0-1 was less common in octogenarians (71% vs 93.9%, P < 0.001). Octogenarians were more likely to have tumors located in the right colon (45.7% vs 34.3%, P = 0.029) and had a lower prevalence of well differentiated histology (10.4% vs 19.3%, P = 0.025). They received less treatment and treatment was less aggressive, both in patients with metastatic and non-metastatic disease, regardless of PS. Their 5-year CSS was worse (63.4% vs 77.6%, P = 0.009), both for metastatic (21% vs 43%, P = 0.03) and for non-metastatic disease (76% vs 88%, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

Octogenarians presented with several distinct characteristics and had worse outcome. Further research is warranted to better define this growing population.

A randomised phase II trial and feasibility study of palliative chemotherapy in frail or elderly patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer (321GO)

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients are commonly under-represented in cancer clinical trials. The 321GO was undertaken in preparation for a definitive phase three trial assessing different chemotherapy regimens in a frail and/or elderly population with advanced gastroesophageal (GO) cancer.

METHODS

Patients with advanced GO cancer considered unfit for conventional dose chemotherapy were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio to: epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine (EOX); oxaliplatin and capecitabine (OX); and capecitabine alone (X) (all 80% of full dose and unblinded). The primary end point was patient recruitment over an 18-month period. A registration study recorded treatment choice for all patients with advanced GO cancer at trial centres.

RESULTS

A total of 313 patients were considered for palliative chemotherapy for GO cancer over the 18-month period: 115 received full dose treatment, 89 less than standard treatment or entered 321GO and 111 no treatment. Within 321GO, 55 patients were randomly assigned (19 to OX and X; 17 to EOX). Progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 4.4 months and by arm 5.4, 5.6 and 3.0 months for EOX, OX and X, respectively. The number of patients with a good overall treatment utility (OTU), a novel patient-centred endpoint, at 12 weeks was 3 (18%), 6 (32%) and 1 (6%) for EOX, OX and X, respectively. At 6 weeks, 22 patients (41%) had experienced a non-haematologic toxicity ⩾grade 3, most commonly lethargy or diarrhoea. The OTU was prognostic for overall survival in patients alive at week 12 (logrank test P=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to recruit elderly and/or frail patients with advanced GO cancer to a randomised clinical trial. The OX is the preferred regimen for further study. Overall treatment utility shows promise as a comparator between treatment regimens for feasibility and randomised trials in the elderly and/or frail GO cancer population.

[Colorectal cancer in the elderly. Surgical treatment, chemotherapy, and contribution from geriatrics]

Age is the biggest risk factor for colorectal cancer, with 70% of the cases in patients over 70 years old. For this reason, a review is presented on the surgical treatment and chemotherapy of cancer of colon and rectum in the elderly. A search was performed in PubMed, including words such as elderly, surgery, colorectal cancer, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and oncogeriatrics, and review articles and originals on treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly were selected. A narrative form was developed from the latest evidence with the results obtained on the treatment of this pathology. Although the treatment of colorectal cancer is standardised, a prior comprehensive geriatric assessment is required in the case of the elderly, before deciding the type of treatment in order to offer these robust elderly-standardised guidelines for the robust elderly and adapt them for use in fragile patients.

Adjuvant Therapy Trials

In 2015, ramucirumab and TAS-102 became the 10th and 11th drugs approved by the Food and Drug administration for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer, not counting leucovorin, and yet only 3 agents, 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin, have proven benefit in adjuvant treatment. In fact, there have been no additions (and 1 subtraction levamisole) to our arsenal of therapies for patients with stages II and III colon cancer for more than a decade. How did we get here? Are we stuck? And how do we move forward?

Functioning of people with colorectal cancer during chemotherapy. Demographic and clinical determinants of quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy. Pilot study

Cancer of the colon is one of the most common malignant tumours in both genders. Thanks to the development of diagnostic techniques, lesions can be detected early fostering full patient's recovery. The aim of this study was to investigate factors affecting quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) during chemotherapy. The research tool was a questionnaire of our own design that allows collecting demographic and clinical data and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale-Colorectal (FACT-C). The study included 90 patients. The analysis confirmed the difference between Social-Family Well-Being (SWB) and Emotional Well-Being (EWB) and in the overall assessment of quality of life and age. Taking into account the presence of stoma, a statistically significant difference was found only in the Colorectal Cancer Subscale (CCS p = .01321). Regarding the number of cycles of chemotherapy, a statistically significant difference was shown in the overall evaluation (p = .0459) and the SWB (p = .0463) area. In patients with CRC in the general assessment of quality of life, which is at a medium level, non-modifiable factors like age and gender play a minor role when compared with the group of variables related to the process and treatment of the disease.

Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for stages II and III colon cancer after complete resection: a clinical practice guideline

BACKGROUND

Updated practice guidelines on adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected colon cancer are lacking. In 2008, Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care developed a guideline on adjuvant therapy for stages ii and iii colon cancer. With newer regimens being assessed in this patient population and older agents being either abandoned because of non-effectiveness or replaced by agents that are more efficacious, a full update of the original guideline was undertaken.

METHODS

Literature searches (January 1987 to August 2015) of medline, embase, and the Cochrane Library were conducted; in addition, abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the European Cancer Congress were reviewed (the latter for January 2007 to August 2015). A practice guideline was drafted that was then scrutinized by internal and external reviewers whose comments were incorporated into the final guideline.

RESULTS

Twenty-six unique reports of eighteen randomized controlled trials and thirteen unique reports of twelve meta-analyses or pooled analyses were included in the evidence base. The 5 recommendations developed included 3 for stage ii colon cancer and 2 for stage iii colon cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with completely resected stage iii colon cancer should be offered adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5fu)-based chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin (based on definitive data for improvements in survival and disease-free survival). Patients with resected stage ii colon cancer without "high-risk" features should not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with "high-risk" features, 5fu-based chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin should be offered, although no clinical trials have been conducted to conclusively demonstrate the same benefits seen in stage iii colon cancer.

The C-Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio as a Predictor of Severe Side Effects of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage III Colorectal Cancer Patients

Background/Aims

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) has been reported to improve the prognosis for patients with Stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, some patients experience severe side effects and must stop AC. The C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR) is a novel inflammation-based score that could reflect the patient’s general condition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the CAR for side effects of AC in CRC.

Methods

A total of 136 CRC patients who received AC were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were subdivided into two groups by the CAR level (CAR ≥0.1, n = 30; CD < 0.1, n = 106).

Results

The presence of lymphatic invasion, severe side effects, and discontinuation of AC were associated with high CAR levels (p = 0.02, <0.01, and 0.02; respectively). High levels of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) appeared to be associated with the CAR (p = 0.04, p<0.01; respectively). Multivariate analysis identified CAR≥0.1 (HR: 7.06, 95% CI: 2.51–19.88, p<0.01) as a significant determinant of severe side effects of AC. CAR had the highest area under the curve (0.79) among several inflammation-based scores.

Conclusion

The present study showed that the CAR is a novel and promising inflammation-based score for ≥ grade 3 side effects of AC in node-positive CRC.

Decision-making in geriatric oncology: systemic treatment considerations for older adults with colon cancer

Colon cancer is common and can be considered a disease of older adults with more than half of cases diagnosed in patients aged over 70 years. Decision-making about treatment with chemotherapy for older adults may be complicated by age-related physiological changes, impaired functional status, limited social supports, concerns regarding the occurrence of and ability to tolerate treatment toxicity, and the presence of comorbidities. This is compounded by a lack of high quality evidence guiding cancer treatment decisions for older adults. Areas covered: This narrative review evaluates the evidence for adjuvant and palliative systemic therapy in older adults with colon cancer. The value of an adequate assessment prior to making a treatment decision is addressed, with emphasis on the geriatric assessment. Guidance in making a treatment decision is provided. Expert commentary: Treatment decisions should consider goals of care, a patient's treatment preferences, and weigh up relative benefits and harms.

A comparative analysis and guidance for individualized chemotherapy of stage II and III colorectal cancer patients based on pathological markers

Adjuvant chemotherapy is considered the standard of care for patients with colorectal cancer after curative resection. Although current guidelines provide clear instructions for chemotherapy for stage II high-risk and stage III colorectal cancer, it is insufficient to individualize therapy. We analyzed the outcomes of 902 patients with colorectal cancer treated with or without chemotherapy in our hospital. We found Chinese survival benefit for chemotherapy was consistent with current guidelines. Moreover, our data added to the evidence that chemotherapy might be used for elderly patients with stage II high-risk colorectal cancer. Pathological markers could predict response to individualize therapy in a convenient, fast and inexpensive way. We compared survivals of patients with stage II high-risk and stage III colorectal cancer with chemotherapy in different pathological markers expression, and furthermore used 458 colon adenocarcinoma samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas to verify our preliminary results. We confirmed TOPIIα, EGFR and P170 may be sufficiently predictive markers to individualize chemotherapy. FOLFOX was the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II high-risk and stage III colorectal cancer when TOPIIα was positive or EGFR or P170 was negative.

Association between renal function and chemotherapy-related toxicity in older adults with cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between renal function (RF) and chemotherapy-related toxicity (CRT) in older adults with cancer and to compare the effect of different RF formulas and body weight measurements on this association.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of data from a prospective multicenter study of patients ≥ age 65 who were starting a new chemotherapy regimen. RF was estimated with 4 formulas (modified Jelliffe [Jelliffe], Cockcroft-Gault [CG], Wright, and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD]), using actual, ideal and adjusted body weights for 492 patients. The association between baseline RF and grade 3-5 CRT was evaluated by unconditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

As a continuous variable, decreased creatinine clearance (CrCl) calculated by CG with actual body weight was associated with increased odds of CRT (OR 1.12, P<0.01; 95% CI 1.04-1.20) indicating that on average for every 10mL/min decrease in CrCl the odds of CRT increased by 12%. Very low RF (in the lowest 10%) with all formulas (CG, Jelliffe, Wright and MDRD) was associated with increased odds for CRT. This association is independent of the type of chemotherapy received (those requiring dose adjustment for renal function vs not). Neither primary dose reduction nor chemotherapy duration was associated with CRT. Serum creatinine alone was not associated with increased odds of CRT (OR 0.67, P=0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased RF is associated with increased odds of CRT and should be considered when assessing risk of CRT in older adults with cancer. Serum creatinine alone is not adequate for risk assessment.

Efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: the ACCORE study

Background

Elderly patients with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) are less frequently treated with adjuvant chemotherapy than younger patients due to concerns regarding toxicity and efficiency. We investigated how age, performance status (PS) and comorbidity influence treatment outcomes.

Patients and methods

A retrospective single-centre study of 529 patients with stages II–III CRC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil/capecitabine+/÷oxaliplatin) from 2001 to 2011 at Herlev Hospital, Denmark. Baseline characteristics, chemotherapy and outcome were analysed with respect to age after adjusting for PS and comorbidity.

Results

Elderly patients (>70 years) had significantly more comorbidity (p<0.001) and poorer PS (p=0.001) than younger patients. Elderly were more frequently treated with single-agent therapy (p=0.001) and at lower initial dose (p<0.001). There was no age-dependent difference in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS; HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.47, p=0.59), in grade 3–5 toxicity (29% vs 28%, p=0.86) or in 10-year CRC mortality (28%, HR 1.07, p=0.71). In elderly patients, a reduction in chemotherapy dose intensity compared with full dose had no impact on DFS or CRC mortality. Elderly patients receiving <50% of planned cycles had shorter DFS (HR=1.78, p=0.020) and higher CRC mortality (HR=2.17, p=0.027) than elderly receiving all cycles. Poor PS in younger and elderly patients was related to shorter DFS (HR=1.95, p=0.002; HR=1.6, p=0.035, respectively) and overall survival (OS; HR=2.28, p<0.001; HR=2.03, p=0.002). Comorbidity in younger patients was significantly related to shorter DFS (HR 2.72, p<0.001), OS (HR 3.16, p<0.001) and higher CRC mortality (HR 2.70, p=0.001).

Conclusions

Choice of regimen, primary dose reduction and given dose intensity in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC were highly dependent on age. However, age had no impact on DFS and CRC mortality. Comorbidity in younger patients and PS in all patients were associated with shorter DFS and higher CRC mortality.

Colorectal cancer care in elderly patients: Unsolved issues

Colorectal cancers are common in elderly patients. However, cancer screening is poorly used after 75. Elderly patients form a heterogeneous population with specific characteristics. Standards of care cannot therefore be transposed from young to elderly patients. Tumour resection is frequently performed but adjuvant chemotherapy is rarely prescribed as there are no clearly established standards of care. In a metastatic setting, recent phase III studies have demonstrated that doublet front-line chemotherapy provided no survival benefit. Moreover, several studies have established the benefit of bevacizumab in association with chemotherapy. There is a lack of evidence for the efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor antibodies in elderly patients. Geriatric assessments could help to select the adequate treatment strategy for individual patients. Geriatric oncology is now the challenge we have to face, and more specific trials are needed.

Optimizing adjuvant therapy and survivorship care of stage III colon cancer

The MOSAIC trial demonstrated nearly a decade ago that the addition of oxaliplatin to 5-fluorouracil improves outcomes in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer, but no new agents have been shown to be superior to standard FOLFOX therapy. Oncologists have refined the use of oxaliplatin containing regimens to optimize outcomes, improved patient selection for multi-agent chemotherapy and expanded survivorship care to meet the needs of the growing number of survivors. In this article, we review the historical contexts of current therapy, appropriate staging investigations, the importance of timely initiation of therapy and key survivorship issues. We also discuss exciting opportunities for change, including reduced duration of adjuvant chemotherapy and the use of circulating tumor cells and DNA in surveillance.

Prevalence and survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer patients: Comparison of overall and age-stratified results by multivariable modeling and propensity score methodology in a population-based cohort

BACKGROUND

Few population-based studies have assessed the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in stage III colon cancer patients according to age. We sought to quantify the prevalence of ACT use and the absolute and relative survival benefit of ACT overall and by age in a population-based cohort.

METHODS

Stage III patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon identified by the Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Registry for the years 2000-07 were eligible (final N=3057). We utilized Poisson regression to obtain adjusted mortality rates (MR) and Cox proportional hazards models to obtain adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for 5-year overall survival. We evaluated control of confounding by comparing HRs obtained via multivariable modeling (MM), propensity score weighting (PSW), and propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Just over one-third of colon cancer patients did not receive ACT, and the proportion increased with age. Overall, receipt of ACT conferred an absolute (MR difference [No ACT rate-ACT rate] 25.4 deaths/1000 person-years [py], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.1-32.7 deaths/1000 py) and relative (MM HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.59-0.76) survival benefit. The survival benefit was demonstrated across age groups. MM and propensity score methods yielded highly similar HRs.

CONCLUSION

Unless contraindicated, efforts to ensure receipt of ACT for stage III colon cancer patients up to 84 years of age are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with node-positive disease.

Lower body mass index predicts worse cancer-specific prognosis in octogenarians with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

High body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for colorectal cancer. However, the prognostic impact of BMI and other factors may differ between elderly and younger colorectal cancer patients. We analyze here prognostic factors in the surgical management of octogenarians with colorectal cancer and clarify the prognostic impact of BMI.

METHODS

Cox regression analysis and propensity score methods were used to retrospectively examine the association of BMI with mortality in 1613 octogenarian patients who underwent curative surgery for stage 0-III colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

In the Cox regression analysis, lower BMI (<18.5 kg/m(2); p = 0.001), age ≥83 years (p = 0.008), American Society of Anesthesiology class ≥3: (p = 0.001), performance status ≥2 (p = 0.003), Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage ≥III (p = 0.001), and postoperative adverse events (p = 0.001) were independently associated with decreased overall survival. Lower BMI (p = 0.001) and UICC stage ≥III (p = 0.001) were independently associated with decreased cancer-specific survival. After covariate adjustment, lower BMI was a risk factor for overall [hazard ratio (HR) 1.62; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.26-2.05; p = 0.0004] and cancer-specific survival (HR 2.00; 95 % CI 1.39-2.87; p = 0.0038) compared with normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower BMI is significantly and independently associated with increased mortality risk in octogenarians who undergo curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Lower BMI should be used for prognosis assessment in octogenarians with colorectal cancer.

Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with lymph node-positive colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Several guidelines state that postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) confers survival benefits to patients with lymph node-positive colorectal cancer. However, older patients are usually not administered AC due to the higher risk of side effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of AC for elderly patients (EP) and examine its tolerability.

METHODS

Data from 204 patients with lymph node-positive colon cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were subdivided into two groups: EP, >75 years old (n = 53) and young patients (YP), <75 years old (n = 151). Clinicopathological features, type of chemotherapy, and outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Frequency of comorbidities and performance status were significantly higher in EP (p < 0.01 each), a greater proportion of YP (76 %) than EP received AC (40 %, p < 0.01), and YP received combination therapy more frequently than EP (p < 0.01). In terms of side effects, few EP showed severe side effects. Both YP and EP gained survival benefits from AC (p = 0.07 and p < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

AC should not be withheld from eligible EP purely because of age.

Validity of Adjuvant! Online in older patients with stage III colon cancer based on 2967 patients from the ACCENT database

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant! Online is a tool used for clinical decision making in patients with early stage colon cancer. As details of the tool's construction are not published, the ability of Adjuvant! Online to accurately predict outcomes for older patients (age 70+) with node positive colon cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear.

METHODS

Individual data from older patients with stage III colon cancer who enrolled into multiple trials within the ACCENT database were entered into the Adjuvant! Online program to obtain predicted probabilities of 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Median predictions were compared with known rates. As co-morbidities were not known for ACCENT patients, but required for calculator entry, patients were assumed to have either "minor" or "average for age" co-morbidities.

RESULTS

2967 older patients from 10 randomized studies were included. When "minor" co-morbidities were assumed, the median predicted 5-year OS rate of 64% nearly matched the actual rate of 65%; when "average for age" co-morbidities were assumed, the median prediction dropped to 58%, outside the CI for the actual rate. On the other hand, assuming "minor" co-morbidities gave a median 5-year RFS prediction of 62%, outside the 95% CI for the actual rate of 58%, while assuming "average for age" co-morbidities yielded a better median prediction of 57%.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant! Online is reasonably accurate overall for predicting outcomes in older trial patients with stage III colon cancer, though accuracy may differ between 5-year RFS and 5-year OS predictions when a fixed degree of co-morbidities is assumed.

Pragmatic study designs for older adults with cancer: Report from the U13 conference

Cancer is a disease occurring disproportionately in older adults. However, the evidence base regarding how best to care for these patients remains limited due to their underrepresentation in cancer clinical trials. Pragmatic clinical trials represent a promising approach for enhancing the evidence base in geriatric oncology by allowing investigators to enroll older, frailer patients onto cancer clinical trials. These trials are more accessible, less resource intensive, and place minimal additional burden on participating patients. Additionally, these trials can be designed to measure endpoints directly relevant to older adults, such as quality of life, functional independence and treatment tolerability which are often not addressed in standard clinical trials. Therefore, pragmatic clinical trials allow researchers to include patients for whom the treatment will ultimately be applied and to utilize meaningful endpoints. Examples of pragmatic studies include both large, simple trials and cluster randomized trials. These study designs allow investigators to conduct clinical trials within the context of everyday practice. Further, researchers can devise these studies to place minimal burden on the patient, the treating clinicians and the participating institutions. In order to be successful, pragmatic trials must efficiently utilize the electronic medical record for data capture while also maximizing patient recruitment, enrollment and retention. Additionally, by strategically utilizing pragmatic clinical trials to test therapies and interventions that have previously shown efficacy in younger, fitter patients, these trials represent a potential mechanism to improve the evidence base in geriatric oncology and enhance care for older adults with cancer.

PIK3CA Mutation, Aspirin Use after Diagnosis and Survival of Colorectal Cancer. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Epidemiological Studies

AIMS

Regular aspirin use has been associated with inhibition of the whole spectrum of colorectal carcinogenesis, including prevention of metastases and reduced total mortality in colorectal cancer. Preclinical data show that aspirin down-regulates PI3 kinase (PI3K) signalling activity through cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibition, leading to the hypothesis that the effect of aspirin might be different according to PIK3CA mutational status, but epidemiological studies have led to conflicting results. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between PIK3CA status and the efficacy of regular use of aspirin after diagnosis on overall survival in colorectal cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified studies that compared post-diagnosis aspirin efficacy in colorectal cancer patients identified by PIK3CA status. Hazard ratios for overall survival were meta-analysed according to PIK3CA status by inverse variance weighting. A pooled test for treatment by PIK3CA status interaction was carried out by weighted linear meta-regression. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

The overall effect of aspirin was not significant (summary risk estimate = 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.63-1.08, P = 0.16; I(2) = 57%). In PIK3CA mutant disease (n = 588), aspirin use reduced total mortality by 29% (summary risk estimate = 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.99, P = 0.04; I(2) = 0%), whereas in PIK3CA wild-type disease (n = 4001), aspirin use did not reduce overall mortality (summary risk estimate = 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.61-1.40; P = 0.7; I(2) = 80%) (P interaction = 0.39). There was a beneficial trend for aspirin on cancer-specific survival in PI3KCA mutated subjects (summary risk estimate = 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.11-1.32, P = 0.1), albeit with high heterogeneity (Q chi-squared = 3.41, P = 0.07, I(2) = 70.7%).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the benefit of post-diagnosis aspirin treatment on overall mortality in colorectal cancer may be more marked in PIK3CA mutated tumours, although the low number of studies prevents definitive conclusions. Trials addressing this issue are warranted to assess the efficacy of aspirin in the adjuvant setting.