151
|
van Akkooi ACJ, Zijlker LP, Wouters MWJM. Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Melanoma: Efficacy, Safety and Timing. BioDrugs 2022; 36:373-380. [PMID: 35397089 PMCID: PMC9148869 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-022-00525-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of effective systemic therapies has significantly changed the treatment of stage III and IV melanoma. Both immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies have improved recurrence-free survival in the adjuvant setting. Recent interest has sparked for neoadjuvant systemic therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The intended benefit of pre-operative treatment with immunotherapy is amongst others to enable tailoring of the surgery and adjuvant systemic therapy according to the treatment response. Most importantly, recurrence-free survival might be improved by neoadjuvant systemic therapy over the current standard of care of surgery followed by adjuvant systemic therapy. The first phase I and II trials investigating anti-PD1 inhibitors, both as a single agent and in combination with anti-CTLA-4 inhibitors or other therapeutic agents, have shown promising results. Pathological complete response on neoadjuvant systemic therapy seems a valid surrogate endpoint for relapse-free and overall survival. Pathological complete response rates in these trials vary between 30 and 70%. The optimal dose with respect to efficacy and toxicity and the interval between systemic and surgical treatment remain important issues to address. Accumulating follow-up data and ongoing phase III studies must prove if neoadjuvant systemic therapy is superior to surgery followed by standard-of-care adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Crows Nest, PO Box 1479, Sydney, NSW, 1585, Australia.
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | | | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Dieng M, Lord SJ, Turner RM, Nieweg OE, Menzies AM, Saw RPM, Einstein AJ, Emmett L, Thompson JF, Lo SN, Morton RL. The Impact of Surveillance Imaging Frequency on the Detection of Distant Disease for Patients with Resected Stage III Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:2871-2881. [PMID: 35142966 PMCID: PMC8990943 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11231-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is not known whether there is a survival benefit associated with more frequent surveillance imaging in patients with resected American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III melanoma. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate distant disease-free survival (DDFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), post distant recurrence MSS (dMSS), and overall survival for patients with resected stage III melanoma undergoing regular computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT surveillance imaging at different intervals. PATIENTS AND METHODS A closely followed longitudinal cohort of patients with resected stage IIIA-D disease treated at a tertiary referral center underwent 3- to 4-monthly, 6-monthly, or 12-monthly surveillance imaging between 2000 and 2017. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests assessed the significance of survival differences between imaging frequency groups. RESULTS Of 473 patients (IIIA, 19%; IIIB, 31%; IIIC, 49%; IIID, 1%) 30% underwent 3- to 4-monthly imaging, 10% underwent 6-monthly imaging, and 60% underwent 12-monthly imaging. After a median follow-up of 6.2 years, distant recurrence was recorded in 252 patients (53%), with 40% detected by surveillance CT or PET/CT, 43% detected clinically, and 17% with another imaging modality. Median DDFS was 5.1 years (95% confidence interval 3.9-6.6). Among 139 IIIC patients who developed distant disease, the median dMSS was 4.4 months shorter in those who underwent 3- to 4-monthly imaging than those who underwent 12-monthly imaging. CONCLUSION Selecting patients at higher risk of distant recurrence for more frequent surveillance imaging yields a higher proportion of imaging-detected distant recurrences but is not associated with improved survival. A randomized comparison of low versus high frequency imaging is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mbathio Dieng
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| | - Sarah J Lord
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Robin M Turner
- Centre for Biostatistics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew J Einstein
- Seymour, Paul, and Gloria Milstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
153
|
Rogiers A, Lobon I, Spain L, Turajlic S. The Genetic Evolution of Metastasis. Cancer Res 2022; 82:1849-1857. [PMID: 35476646 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-3863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Cancer is an evolutionary process that is characterized by the emergence of multiple genetically distinct populations or clones within the primary tumor. Intratumor heterogeneity provides a substrate for the selection of adaptive clones, such as those that lead to metastasis. Comparative molecular studies of primary tumors and metastases have identified distinct genomic features associated with the development of metastases. In this review, we discuss how these insights could inform clinical decision-making and uncover rational antimetastasis treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aljosja Rogiers
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.,Renal and Skin Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Irene Lobon
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lavinia Spain
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.,Medical Oncology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Medical Oncology Department, Eastern Health, Melbourne Australia.,Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Australia
| | - Samra Turajlic
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.,Renal and Skin Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,Melanoma and Kidney Cancer Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Cai R, Wang Z, Sun Y, Yang X, Wen M, Zheng L, Wang D, Yu L, Fan X, Su L. Genotype-guided Targeted Treatment of KRAS-mutated Arteriovenous Malformations. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 36:e708-e710. [PMID: 35445448 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ren Cai
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Multidisciplinary Team of Vascular Anomalies, Shanghai Ninth People's hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Zhenfeng Wang
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Multidisciplinary Team of Vascular Anomalies, Shanghai Ninth People's hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Yi Sun
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Multidisciplinary Team of Vascular Anomalies, Shanghai Ninth People's hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Xitao Yang
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Multidisciplinary Team of Vascular Anomalies, Shanghai Ninth People's hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Mingzhe Wen
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Multidisciplinary Team of Vascular Anomalies, Shanghai Ninth People's hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Lianzhou Zheng
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Multidisciplinary Team of Vascular Anomalies, Shanghai Ninth People's hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Deming Wang
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Multidisciplinary Team of Vascular Anomalies, Shanghai Ninth People's hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Lan Yu
- Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, National Children's Regional Medical Center, Hangzhou, 310052, China
| | - Xindong Fan
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Multidisciplinary Team of Vascular Anomalies, Shanghai Ninth People's hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Lixin Su
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Multidisciplinary Team of Vascular Anomalies, Shanghai Ninth People's hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Zijlker LP, van Akkooi ACJ. Stage III melanoma: role of lymph node dissection and (neo-)adjuvant systemic therapies. Br J Surg 2022; 109:397-398. [PMID: 35136944 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne P Zijlker
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
156
|
Knochelmann HM, Ware MB, Rali A, Linderman S, Shantha JG, Lawson DH, Yushak M, Swerlick R, Paulos CM, Yeh S, Kudchadkar R. Case Report: Delayed Onset Multi-Organ Toxicities in a Melanoma Patient Achieving Complete Response to BRAF/MEK Inhibition. Front Oncol 2022; 12:836845. [PMID: 35433480 PMCID: PMC9008700 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.836845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune toxicities, while common following treatment with cancer immunotherapies, are not well-characterized in patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Emerging data suggest that autoimmune effects may be linked with superior responses to both treatment modalities; however, there is little evidence describing mechanisms of immune-related toxicity for patients on BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Here we describe the experience of a 59-year-old HLA-A2, A29, B27-positive male with recurrent/metastatic melanoma. After progression on checkpoint inhibitor therapy, he was treated with dabrafenib/trametinib followed by encorafenib/binimetinib, which were well-tolerated and resulted in a complete response. Eighteen months into BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy, and three months after initially finding a complete response, he developed a series of sudden-onset, severe toxicities: namely, bilateral panuveitis, cytopenias, joint pain, skin rash, hypercalcemia, and interstitial nephritis, which led to BRAF/MEKi cessation. Immunological analyses revealed induction of a peripheral type-17 cytokine signature characterized by high IL-23, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A/F, IL-1β, and IL-21 among other cytokines in plasma corresponding with the height of symptoms. These findings highlight a novel instance of delayed autoimmune-like reaction to BRAF/MEK inhibition and identify a possible role for Th/Tc17 activation in their pathogenesis thus warranting future clinical and immunological characterization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M Knochelmann
- Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.,Department of Surgery: Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Michael Brandon Ware
- Department of Surgery: Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Aditya Rali
- Emory Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Susanne Linderman
- Emory Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.,Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Jessica G Shantha
- Emory Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - David H Lawson
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Melinda Yushak
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Robert Swerlick
- Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Chrystal M Paulos
- Department of Surgery: Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Steven Yeh
- Emory Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.,Truhlsen Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Ragini Kudchadkar
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Ma EZ, Terhune JH, Zafari Z, Blackburn KW, Olson JA, Mullins CD, Hu Y. Treat Now or Treat Later: Comparative Effectiveness of Adjuvant Therapy in Resected Stage IIIA Melanoma. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:521-528. [PMID: 35290271 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant therapy for most sentinel-node-positive (stage IIIA) melanoma may have limited clinical benefit for older patients given the competing risk of non-cancer death. The objective of this study is to model the clinical effect and cost of adjuvant therapy in stage IIIA melanoma across age groups. STUDY DESIGN A Markov decision analysis model simulated the overall survival of patients with resected stage IIIA melanoma treated with adjuvant therapy vs observation. In the adjuvant approach, patients are modeled to receive adjuvant pembrolizumab (BRAF wild type) or dabrafenib/trametinib (BRAF mutant). In the observation approach, treatment is deferred until recurrence. Transition variables were derived from landmark randomized trials in adjuvant and salvage therapy. The model was analyzed for age groups spanning 40 to 89 years. The primary outcome was the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one melanoma-related death at 10 years. Cost per mortality avoided was estimated using Medicare reimbursement rates. RESULTS Projections for NNT among BRAF wild type patients increased by age from 14.71 (age 40 to 44) to 142.86 (age 85 to 89), with patients in cohorts over the age of 75 having an NNT over 25. The cost per mortality avoided ranged from $2.75 million (M) (age 40 to 44) to $27.57M (age 85 to 89). Corresponding values for BRAF mutant patients were as follows: NNT 18.18 to 333.33; cost per mortality avoided ranged from $2.75M to $54.70M. CONCLUSION Universal adjuvant therapy for stage IIIA melanoma is costly and provides limited clinical benefit in patients older than 75 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Z Ma
- Department of Surgery/Division of General and Oncologic Surgery (Ma, Terhune, Zafari, Blackburn, Olson, Hu), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Julia H Terhune
- Department of Surgery/Division of General and Oncologic Surgery (Ma, Terhune, Zafari, Blackburn, Olson, Hu), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Zafar Zafari
- Department of Surgery/Division of General and Oncologic Surgery (Ma, Terhune, Zafari, Blackburn, Olson, Hu), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kyle W Blackburn
- Department of Surgery/Division of General and Oncologic Surgery (Ma, Terhune, Zafari, Blackburn, Olson, Hu), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - John A Olson
- Department of Surgery/Division of General and Oncologic Surgery (Ma, Terhune, Zafari, Blackburn, Olson, Hu), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - C Daniel Mullins
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research (Mullins), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yinin Hu
- Department of Surgery/Division of General and Oncologic Surgery (Ma, Terhune, Zafari, Blackburn, Olson, Hu), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
Johnson DB, Nebhan CA, Moslehi JJ, Balko JM. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors: long-term implications of toxicity. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:254-267. [PMID: 35082367 PMCID: PMC8790946 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00600-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 419] [Impact Index Per Article: 209.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has heralded a new era in cancer treatment, enabling the possibility of long-term survival in patients with metastatic disease, and providing new therapeutic indications in earlier-stage settings. As such, characterizing the long-term implications of receiving ICIs has grown in importance. An abundance of evidence exists describing the acute clinical toxicities of these agents, although chronic effects have not been as well catalogued. Nonetheless, emerging evidence indicates that persistent toxicities might be more common than initially suggested. While generally low-grade, these chronic sequelae can affect the endocrine, rheumatological, pulmonary, neurological and other organ systems. Fatal toxicities also comprise a diverse set of clinical manifestations and can occur in 0.4-1.2% of patients. This risk is a particularly relevant consideration in light of the possibility of long-term survival. Finally, the effects of immune-checkpoint blockade on a diverse range of immune processes, including atherosclerosis, heart failure, neuroinflammation, obesity and hypertension, have not been characterized but remain an important area of research with potential relevance to cancer survivors. In this Review, we describe the current evidence for chronic immune toxicities and the long-term implications of these effects for patients receiving ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - Caroline A Nebhan
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Javid J Moslehi
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Justin M Balko
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
159
|
Mordoh A, Aris M, Carri I, Bravo AI, Podaza E, Pardo JCT, Cueto GR, Barrio MM, Mordoh J. An Update of Cutaneous Melanoma Patients Treated in Adjuvancy With the Allogeneic Melanoma Vaccine VACCIMEL and Presentation of a Selected Case Report With In-Transit Metastases. Front Immunol 2022; 13:842555. [PMID: 35432383 PMCID: PMC9011367 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.842555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The CSF-470 vaccine (VACCIMEL) plus BCG and GM-CSF as adjuvants has been assayed in cutaneous melanoma patients. In the adjuvant randomized Phase II study CASVAC-0401, vaccinated patients had longer distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) than those treated with IFNα2b. Five years after locking the data, an actualization was performed. The benefit in DMFS was maintained in the vaccinated group versus the IFNα2b-treated group (p = 0.035), with a median DMFS of 96 months for VACCIMEL and 13 months for IFNα2b. The favorable risk-benefit ratio was maintained. DMFS was also analyzed as a single cohort in all the IIB, IIC, and III patients (n = 30) who had been treated with VACCIMEL. The median DMFS was 169 months, and at 48 months follow-up, it was 71.4%, which was not statistically different from DMFS of previously published results obtained in adjuvancy with ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or dabrafenib/trametinib. The possible toxicity of combining VACCIMEL with anti-immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICKi) was analyzed, especially since VACCIMEL was co-adjuvated with BCG in every vaccination. A patient with in-transit metastases was studied to produce a proof of concept. During treatment with VACCIMEL, the patient developed T-cell clones reactive towards tumor-associated antigens. Three years after ending the VACCIMEL study, the patient progressed and was treated with ICKi. During ICKi treatment, the patient did not reveal any toxicity due to previous BCG treatment. When she recurred after a 4-year treatment with nivolumab, a biopsy was obtained and immunohistochemistry and RNA-seq were performed. The tumor maintained expression of tumor-associated antigens and HLA-I and immune infiltration, with immunoreactive and immunosuppressive features. VACCIMEL plus BCG and GM-CSF is an effective treatment in adjuvancy for stages IIB, IIC, and III cutaneous melanoma patients, and it is compatible with subsequent treatments with ICKi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Mordoh
- División Dermatología, Hospital de Clínicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mariana Aris
- Centro de Investigaciones Oncológicas Fundación Cáncer, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ibel Carri
- Laboratorio de Inmunoinformática y Machine Learning, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alicia Inés Bravo
- Laboratorio de Cancerología, Fundación Instituto Leloir, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Enrique Podaza
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Gerardo Rubén Cueto
- Grupo de Bioestadística Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - José Mordoh
- Centro de Investigaciones Oncológicas Fundación Cáncer, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Laboratorio de Cancerología, Fundación Instituto Leloir, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Departamento de Bioterapia, Instituto Alexander Fleming, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
160
|
Arteaga Ceballos DP, Saeed-Kamil Z, King I, Stockley T, Liu D, Muniz TP, Saibil SD, Hogg D, Spreafico A, Butler MO. Turnaround Times in Melanoma BRAF Testing and the Impact on the Initiation of Systemic Therapy at a Single Tertiary Care Cancer Center. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e642-e647. [PMID: 35363503 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The identification of BRAF mutations in melanoma enables targeted therapy and improves patient outcomes. Barriers to BRAF molecular testing affect the quality of care and therapeutic options. METHODS This retrospective study mapped BRAF testing timelines in adult patients with melanoma at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre to identify obstacles to timely BRAF reporting and its impact on the initiation of therapy. RESULTS Sixty-six cases were included. The median time between BRAF request and result was 12 days (95% CI, 8 to 15) when the BRAF test was ordered by pathology, compared with 20 days (95% CI, 16 to 23) if the test was requested by another specialist (P < .001). When the BRAF test and biopsy were performed within the same institution, the BRAF median turnaround time (TAT) was 13 days (95% CI, 6 to 19) compared with 19 days (95% CI, 16 to 21) if the sample was transferred from another institution (P = .02). Forty-seven patients received systemic therapy, and 20 had metastatic disease. In the metastatic subgroup, if the BRAF result was available at the first medical oncology visit, the initiation of treatment was 20 days (95% CI, 9.6 to 30.3), but was delayed to 31 days (95% CI, 10.8 to 51.1) if the BRAF result was not available (P = .03). CONCLUSION This study showed variations in BRAF test results in TAT. One factor affecting this timeline is the transfer time, which can be streamlined by pathology reflex testing. Delays in TAT affect the timing and type of therapeutic intervention, especially in patients with stage IV disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Paola Arteaga Ceballos
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Zaid Saeed-Kamil
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ian King
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Clinical Laboratory Genetics, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tracy Stockley
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Clinical Laboratory Genetics, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Diane Liu
- Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Thiago P Muniz
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Samuel D Saibil
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - David Hogg
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marcus O Butler
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Ernst M, Giubellino A. The Current State of Treatment and Future Directions in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. Biomedicines 2022; 10:822. [PMID: 35453572 PMCID: PMC9029866 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10040822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant melanoma is the leading cause of death among cutaneous malignancies. While its incidence is increasing, the most recent cancer statistics show a small but clear decrease in mortality rate. This trend reflects the introduction of novel and more effective therapeutic regimens, including the two cornerstones of melanoma therapy: immunotherapies and targeted therapies. Immunotherapies exploit the highly immunogenic nature of melanoma by modulating and priming the patient's own immune system to attack the tumor. Treatments combining immunotherapies with targeted therapies, which disable the carcinogenic products of mutated cancer cells, have further increased treatment efficacy and durability. Toxicity and resistance, however, remain critical challenges to the field. The present review summarizes past treatments and novel therapeutic interventions and discusses current clinical trials and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessio Giubellino
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Szatkowska L, Sieczek J, Tekiela K, Ziętek M, Stachyra-Strawa P, Cisek P, Matkowski R. Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma-A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071672. [PMID: 35406444 PMCID: PMC8997072 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This study assessed risk factors and the results of treatment with anti-PD-1 antibodies and BRAF/MEK inhibitors for advanced malignant melanoma. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 52 patients treated with immunotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors for disseminated malignant melanoma. Results: The median follow-up was 31 months (6−108 months). The median PFS1 was 6 months (1−44 months). Second-line systemic treatment was applied in 27 patients (52%). The median PFS2 was 2 months (0−27 months), and the median OS was 31 months (6−108 months). Among the analyzed risk factors, only the presence of the BRAF mutation was statistically significant for disease recurrence after surgery. In patients undergoing anti-BRAF/MEK therapy, the median PFS1 was 7 months, and in patients undergoing mono-immunotherapy, 4 months. The 12- and 24-month PFS1 rates in the group treated with BRAF inhibitors were 29 and 7%, respectively, and in patients treated with mono-immunotherapy 13 and 0%, respectively (Z = 1.998, p = 0.04). The type of treatment used had no effect on OS (Z = 0.237, p > 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with the V600 mutation should be closely monitored. In the event of disease recurrence, treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors should be considered. The type of treatment used has no effect on OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Szatkowska
- Clinical Department of Cardiology, 4th Military Hospital, Rudolfa Weigla 5, 50-981 Wrocław, Poland
- Correspondence:
| | - Jan Sieczek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Provincial Specialist Hospital, Kamieńskiego 73A, 51-124 Wrocław, Poland;
| | - Katarzyna Tekiela
- Department of Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Plac Hirszfelda 12, 53-413 Wrocław, Poland;
| | - Marcin Ziętek
- Department of Oncology, Wrocław Medical University, wyb. L. Pasteura 1, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland; (M.Z.); (R.M.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Plac Hirszfelda 12, 53-413 Wrocław, Poland
| | - Paulina Stachyra-Strawa
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 7, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.S.-S.); (P.C.)
| | - Paweł Cisek
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 7, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.S.-S.); (P.C.)
| | - Rafał Matkowski
- Department of Oncology, Wrocław Medical University, wyb. L. Pasteura 1, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland; (M.Z.); (R.M.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Plac Hirszfelda 12, 53-413 Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma in the Elderly. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:825-833. [PMID: 35316844 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01257-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This study aims to review the clinical experience of melanoma treatments in patients with advanced age. RECENT FINDINGS During the last decade, the treatment paradigm for melanoma has changed dramatically with the use of checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viruses, and targeted therapies. We reviewed both the clinical trial and real-world experience of these therapies in patients of advanced age, and discuss how a personalized approach should be taken for these patients with consideration of incidence and management of side effects. Although special consideration should be taken, immunotherapy, oncolytic viruses, and targeted therapy have shown efficacy and tolerability in older patients with melanoma.
Collapse
|
164
|
Comparison of Two Rapid Assays for the Detection of BRAF V600 Mutations in Metastatic Melanoma including Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12030751. [PMID: 35328303 PMCID: PMC8947166 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Testing for the BRAF mutation is mandatory for the management of patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma. Molecular analysis based on DNA sequencing remains the gold-standard method for the screening of the different BRAF mutations. These methods must be rapid, sensitive, and specific enough to allow optimal therapeutic management in daily practice and also to include patients in clinical trials. Here, we compared the Idylla BRAF Mutation Test and the anti-BRAF V600E (clone VE1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 90 melanoma samples, with a focus on a challenging cohort of 32 positive sentinel lymph nodes. The BRAF status was assessed with both methods independently of the percentage of tumor cells. The concordance rate was calculated excluding both non-contributory analyses and BRAFV600K/R/M mutants due to the specific V600E-IHC test design. The incidence of the BRAFV600E mutation was 33% with both BRAF Idylla and BRAF IHC. The agreement rate was 91% (72/79). Although the agreement rate was high, we suggest that the use of IHC is more suitable for rapid BRAF testing on sentinel lymph node biopsies when associated with a low percentage and scattered tumor cells, which gave a high risk of non-contributory analysis and/or false negative results with the IdyllaTMBRAF Mutation Test.
Collapse
|
165
|
Prescription Patterns, Recurrence, and Toxicity Rates of Adjuvant Treatment for Stage III/IV Melanoma—A Real World Single-Center Analysis. BIOLOGY 2022; 11:biology11030422. [PMID: 35336796 PMCID: PMC8945449 DOI: 10.3390/biology11030422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Simple Summary Adjuvant treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) pembrolizumab or nivolumab, or the targeted therapies dabrafenib and trametinib is recommended for patients with completely resected stage III melanoma and significantly decreases recurrence risk. Currently, limited data are available on physicians’ prescription preferences regarding ICI and targeted therapies and patient outcome in clinical practice. This study investigates the real-world situation of 109 patients from the Cancer Center of the University Hospital Bern, Switzerland, with an indication for adjuvant treatment since 2018. We describe treatment patterns, recurrence, and toxicity rates under immune checkpoint inhibitors, and targeted therapies. Abstract Approved adjuvant treatment options for stage III melanoma are the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) pembrolizumab and nivolumab, and in presence of a BRAF V600E/K mutation additionally dabrafenib in combination with trametinib (BRAFi/MEKi). This study aims to describe prescription patterns and recurrence and toxicity rates of adjuvant-treated melanoma patients from the Cancer Center of the University Hospital Bern, Switzerland. One hundred and nine patients with an indication for adjuvant treatment were identified. Five (4.6%) had contraindications and, as such, were not proposed any adjuvant treatment, while 10 patients (9.2%) declined treatment. BRAF status was known for 91 (83.5%) patients. Of 40 (36.7%) patients with BRAF V600E/K melanoma, pembrolizumab was prescribed to 18 (45.0%), nivolumab to 16 (40.0%), and dabrafenib/trametinib to three (7.5%) patients. Grade 3–4 toxicity was reported in 18.9% and 16.7% of all the patients treated with pembrolizumab and nivolumab, respectively. No toxicities were observed for dabrafenib/trametinib. Thirty-eight percent of the patients treated with pembrolizumab and 40.0% of those treated with nivolumab relapsed. No relapses were reported for dabrafenib/trametinib. Prescription patterns indicate a clear preference for adjuvant ICI treatment.
Collapse
|
166
|
Gordon LG, Leung W, Johns R, McNoe B, Lindsay D, Merollini KMD, Elliott TM, Neale RE, Olsen CM, Pandeya N, Whiteman DC. Estimated Healthcare Costs of Melanoma and Keratinocyte Skin Cancers in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand in 2021. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:3178. [PMID: 35328865 PMCID: PMC8948716 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand have the highest incidence of melanoma and KC in the world. We undertook a cost-of-illness analysis using Markov decision-analytic models separately for melanoma and keratinocyte skin cancer (KC) for each country. Using clinical pathways, the probabilities and unit costs of each health service and medicine for skin cancer management were applied. We estimated mean costs and 95% uncertainty intervals (95% UI) using Monte Carlo simulation. In Australia, the mean first-year costs of melanoma per patient ranged from AU$644 (95%UI: $642, $647) for melanoma in situ to AU$100,725 (95%UI: $84,288, $119,070) for unresectable stage III/IV disease. Australian-wide direct costs to the Government for newly diagnosed patients with melanoma were AU$397.9 m and AU$426.2 m for KCs, a total of AU$824.0 m. The mean costs per patient for melanoma ranged from NZ$1450 (95%UI: $1445, $1456) for melanoma in situ to NZ$77,828 (95%UI $62,525, $94,718) for unresectable stage III/IV disease. The estimated total cost to New Zealand in 2021 for new patients with melanoma was NZ$51.2 m, and for KCs, was NZ$129.4 m, with a total combined cost of NZ$180.5 m. These up-to-date national healthcare costs of melanoma and KC in Australia and New Zealand accentuate the savings potential of successful prevention strategies for skin cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa G. Gordon
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (T.M.E.); (R.E.N.); (C.M.O.); (N.P.); (D.C.W.)
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre and School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia;
| | - William Leung
- Wellington School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington 6242, New Zealand;
| | - Richard Johns
- Kenmore Skin Clinic, Moggill Rd, Brisbane, QLD 4069, Australia;
| | - Bronwen McNoe
- Social and Behavioural Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand;
| | - Daniel Lindsay
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia;
| | - Katharina M. D. Merollini
- School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD 4558, Australia;
- Sunshine Coast Health Institute, Birtinya, QLD 4575, Australia
| | - Thomas M. Elliott
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (T.M.E.); (R.E.N.); (C.M.O.); (N.P.); (D.C.W.)
| | - Rachel E. Neale
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (T.M.E.); (R.E.N.); (C.M.O.); (N.P.); (D.C.W.)
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia;
| | - Catherine M. Olsen
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (T.M.E.); (R.E.N.); (C.M.O.); (N.P.); (D.C.W.)
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia;
| | - Nirmala Pandeya
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (T.M.E.); (R.E.N.); (C.M.O.); (N.P.); (D.C.W.)
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia;
| | - David C. Whiteman
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (T.M.E.); (R.E.N.); (C.M.O.); (N.P.); (D.C.W.)
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Witt RG, Erstad DJ, Wargo JA. Neoadjuvant therapy for melanoma: rationale for neoadjuvant therapy and pivotal clinical trials. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221083052. [PMID: 35251322 PMCID: PMC8894940 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221083052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment of malignant melanoma has drastically changed over the past decade with the advent of immune checkpoint blockade, targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibition, and other novel therapies such as oncolytic virus intralesional therapy. Despite improvements in patient response rates and survival with these new treatments, there exists a large portion of patients with surgically resectable disease that are high risk for relapse. Patients with high-risk resectable melanoma account for up to 20% of newly diagnosed cases. For this high-risk group of patients, neoadjuvant therapy has many purposed advantages over adjuvant therapy, including a more robust immune response due to abundant tumor antigens at treatment initiation, the ability to assess pathologic response to therapy, tumor downstaging leading to increased disease resectability, and a potential decreased need for extensive lymphadenectomies. These findings have been backed by preclinical models and multiple neoadjuvant trials are underway. In this review, we will discuss the trials that have set the foundation for the current treatment standards and discuss the role and rationale for neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk malignant melanomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell G. Witt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Derek J. Erstad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer A. Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1484, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Tivey A, Britton F, Scott JA, Rothwell D, Lorigan P, Lee R. Circulating Tumour DNA in Melanoma-Clinic Ready? Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:363-373. [PMID: 35133615 PMCID: PMC8885536 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01151-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Liquid biopsies, including circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), can inform a variety of clinical questions. This review examines the potential role of ctDNA as a clinical tool to inform clinical decision-making from early to late stage cutaneous melanoma. RECENT FINDINGS In pre-clinical studies, ctDNA has been shown to detect minimal residual disease and molecular relapse; predict and monitor response to therapy; and identify key resistance mechanisms. Here, we examine the potential utility of ctDNA and discuss its limitations for use in patients with melanoma. We present novel clinical trials, which are testing its value as a tool to augment clinical decision-making. Finally, we discuss the steps that are needed to ensure that ctDNA is used optimally in order to improve outcomes for patients with melanoma. Preclinical studies have shown that ctDNA has huge potential to provide real-time information about disease status in patients with melanoma. It is now time to test it rigorously within clinical trials to assess how it can be optimally used to benefit patients in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Tivey
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Fiona Britton
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Julie-Ann Scott
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Dominic Rothwell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- Nucleic Acids Biomarker Team, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Cancer Biomarker Centre, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, SK10 4TG, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Rebecca Lee
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Grossmann KF, Othus M, Patel SP, Tarhini AA, Sondak VK, Knopp MV, Petrella TM, Truong TG, Khushalani NI, Cohen JV, Buchbinder EI, Kendra K, Funchain P, Lewis KD, Conry RM, Chmielowski B, Kudchadkar RR, Johnson DB, Li H, Moon J, Eroglu Z, Gastman B, Kovacsovics-Bankowski M, Gunturu KS, Ebbinghaus SW, Ahsan S, Ibrahim N, Sharon E, Korde LA, Kirkwood JM, Ribas A. Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus IFNα2b or Ipilimumab in Resected High-Risk Melanoma. Cancer Discov 2022; 12:644-653. [PMID: 34764195 PMCID: PMC8904282 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-1141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
We conducted a randomized phase III trial to evaluate whether adjuvant pembrolizumab for one year (647 patients) improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) in comparison with high-dose IFNα-2b for one year or ipilimumab for up to three years (654 patients), the approved standard-of-care adjuvant immunotherapies at the time of enrollment for patients with high-risk resected melanoma. At a median follow-up of 47.5 months, pembrolizumab was associated with significantly longer RFS than prior standard-of-care adjuvant immunotherapies [HR, 0.77; 99.62% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-0.99; P = 0.002]. There was no statistically significant association with OS among all patients (HR, 0.82; 96.3% CI, 0.61-1.09; P = 0.15). Proportions of treatment-related adverse events of grades 3 to 5 were 19.5% with pembrolizumab, 71.2% with IFNα-2b, and 49.2% with ipilimumab. Therefore, adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved RFS but not OS compared with the prior standard-of-care immunotherapies for patients with high-risk resected melanoma. SIGNIFICANCE Adjuvant PD-1 blockade therapy decreases the rates of recurrence, but not survival, in patients with surgically resectable melanoma, substituting the prior standard-of-care immunotherapies for this cancer. See related commentary by Smithy and Shoushtari, p. 599. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 587.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan Othus
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle
| | - Sapna P. Patel
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Justine V. Cohen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (during conduct of trial), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (current)
| | | | | | | | | | - Robert M. Conry
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham (during conduct of trial), Clearview Cancer Institute, Anniston (current)
| | - Bartosz Chmielowski
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles
| | | | | | - Hongli Li
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle
| | - James Moon
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle
| | - Zeynep Eroglu
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Elad Sharon
- National Cancer Institute, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bethesda
| | - Larissa A. Korde
- National Cancer Institute, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bethesda
| | | | - Antoni Ribas
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Glen C, Tan YY, Waterston A, Evans TRJ, Jones RJ, Petrie MC, Lang NN. Mechanistic and Clinical Overview Cardiovascular Toxicity of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review. JACC CardioOncol 2022; 4:1-18. [PMID: 35492830 PMCID: PMC9040125 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.01.096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma B-type (BRAF) and mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitors have revolutionized melanoma treatment. Approximately half of patients with melanoma harbor a BRAF gene mutation with subsequent dysregulation of the RAF-MEK-ERK signaling pathway. Targeting this pathway with BRAF and MEK blockade results in control of cell proliferation and, in most cases, disease control. These pathways also have cardioprotective effects and are necessary for normal vascular and cardiac physiology. BRAF and MEK inhibitors are associated with adverse cardiovascular effects including hypertension, left ventricular dysfunction, venous thromboembolism, atrial arrhythmia, and electrocardiographic QT interval prolongation. These effects may be underestimated in clinical trials. Baseline cardiovascular assessment and follow-up, including serial imaging and blood pressure assessment, are essential to balance optimal anti-cancer therapy while minimizing cardiovascular side effects. In this review, an overview of BRAF/MEK inhibitor-induced cardiovascular toxicity, the mechanisms underlying these, and strategies for surveillance, prevention, and treatment of these effects are provided.
Collapse
Key Words
- ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme
- AF, atrial fibrillation
- BRAF inhibitor
- BRAF, rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma B-type
- CVAE, cardiovascular adverse event
- EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor
- ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase
- LVSD, left ventricular systolic dysfunction
- MEK inhibitor
- MEK, mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase
- RAF, rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma
- VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor
- cardio-oncology
- cardiovascular toxicity
- hypertension
- left ventricular systolic dysfunction
- melanoma
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Glen
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Yun Yi Tan
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Ashita Waterston
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas R. Jeffry Evans
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Robert J. Jones
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Mark C. Petrie
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Ninian N. Lang
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Atkinson V, Robert C, Grob JJ, Gogas H, Dutriaux C, Demidov L, Gupta A, Menzies AM, Ryll B, Miranda F, Banerjee H, Lau M, Del Vecchio M. Improved pyrexia-related outcomes associated with an adapted pyrexia adverse event management algorithm in patients treated with adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib: Primary results of COMBI-APlus. Eur J Cancer 2022; 163:79-87. [PMID: 35042070 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COMBI-AD demonstrated long-term benefit of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with resected stage III BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma; however, 9% of patients permanently discontinued therapy due to pyrexia. COMBI-APlus evaluated whether an adapted pyrexia management algorithm reduces high-grade pyrexia and pyrexia-related adverse outcomes. METHODS COMBI-APlus is an open-label, phase IIIb trial evaluating an adapted pyrexia management algorithm in patients with high-risk resected stage III BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma treated with up to 12 months of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib. Both drugs were interrupted for pyrexia (temperature ≥38°C) or the occurrence of pyrexia syndrome for suspected recurrent pyrexia. Treatment was restarted at the same dose once patients were symptom free for ≥24 h. The primary endpoint was the composite rate of grade 3/4 pyrexia, hospitalisation due to pyrexia, or permanent discontinuation due to pyrexia versus historical COMBI-AD control (20.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16.3%-24.1%). RESULTS At data cutoff (5 October 2020), COMBI-APlus met its primary endpoint of significant improvement in the composite rate of pyrexia (8.0% [95% CI, 5.9%-10.6%]), with rates of 3.8% for grade 3/4 pyrexia, 4.3% for hospitalisation due to pyrexia, and 2.4% for discontinuation due to pyrexia. Estimated 12-month relapse-free survival was 91.8% (95% CI, 89.0%-93.9%). The most common adverse events were consistent with those in COMBI-AD, and 14.7% of patients permanently discontinued treatment due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The adapted pyrexia management algorithm appears to reduce the incidence of severe pyrexia outcomes, enables patients to manage pyrexia at home, and helps patients remain on treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03551626.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Atkinson
- Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia.
| | - Caroline Robert
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, Orsay, France
| | - Jean J Grob
- Dermatology and Skin Cancer Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Helen Gogas
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Caroline Dutriaux
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Lev Demidov
- Tumor Biotherapy, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Avinash Gupta
- Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Department of Medical Oncology, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bettina Ryll
- Medical Oncology, Melanoma Patient Network Europe, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Flora Miranda
- Clinical Operations, Global Medical Affairs, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA
| | - Hiya Banerjee
- Analytics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA
| | - Mike Lau
- Global Medical Affairs, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michele Del Vecchio
- Unit of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Truong TG, Kennedy LB, Patel SP. 25 Years of Adjuvant Therapy in Melanoma: A Perspective on Current Approvals and Insights into Future Directions. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:533-542. [PMID: 35192117 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01232-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thach-Giao Truong
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 975 Sereno Drive, Vallejo, CA, 94589, USA
| | - Lucy Boyce Kennedy
- The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-60, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Sapna P Patel
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0430, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Queiroz MM, Bertolli E, Belfort FA, Munhoz RR. Management of In-Transit Metastases. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:573-583. [PMID: 35192119 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01216-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this study is to discuss the current knowledge and future perspectives regarding the treatment options for in-transit metastases (ITM), along with the optimal algorithms for patients presenting with this adverse manifestation of melanoma. RECENT FINDINGS In addition to procedures historically accepted for the management of ITM, encompassing surgery and regional techniques, novel medications in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies now represent standard options, allowing for the possibility of combined approaches, with an expanding role of systemic therapies. Melanoma in-transit metastases consist of intralymphatic neoplastic implants distributed between the primary site and the regional nodal basin, within the subepidermal and dermal lymphatics. Distinct risk factors may influence the development of ITM, and the clinical presentation can be highly heterogeneous, enhancing the complexity of the management of ITM. Surgical resection, when feasible, continues to represent a standard approach for patients with curative intent. Patients with extensive or unresectable disease may also benefit from regional approaches that include isolated limb perfusion or infusion, electrochemotherapy, and a wide variety of intralesional therapies. Over the past decade, regimens with ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitors dramatically expanded the benefit of systemic treatments for patients with melanoma, both in the adjuvant setting and for those with advanced disease, and the combination of these modalities with regional treatments, as well as neoadjuvant approaches, may represent the future for the treatment of patients with ITM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eduardo Bertolli
- Cutaneous Oncology and Sarcomas Group, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Skin Cancer Department, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Melanoma and Sarcoma Group, Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Rodrigo Ramella Munhoz
- Oncology Center, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil. .,Cutaneous Oncology and Sarcomas Group, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Cochran AJ, Wen DR, Huang RR, Abrishami P, Smart C, Binder S, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF, Stern S, Van Kreuningen L, Elashoff DE, Sim MS, Wang HJ, Faries MB, Kirkwood J, Daly J, Kutner M, Mihm M, Smith G, Urist M, Beegun N, Thompson JF, Mozzillo N, Nieweg OE, Roses DF, Hoekstra HJ, Karakousis CP, Reintgen DS, Leong SP, Coventry BJ, Kraybill WG, Smithers BM, Nathanson SD, Huth JF, Wong JH, Fraker DL, McKinnon JG, Paul E, Morton DL, Botti G, Tiebosch A, Strutton GM, Whitehead FJ, Peterse HJ, Epstein HD, Goodloe S, Scolyer RA, McCarthy SW, Melamed J, Messina J, Moffitt HL, Turner RR, Wunsch PH. Sentinel lymph node melanoma metastases: Assessment of tumor burden for clinical prediction of outcome in the first Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-I). Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:1280-1287. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
|
175
|
Martinez R, Huang W, Buck H, Rea S, Defnet AE, Kane MA, Shapiro P. Proteomic Changes in the Monolayer and Spheroid Melanoma Cell Models of Acquired Resistance to BRAF and MEK1/2 Inhibitors. ACS OMEGA 2022; 7:3293-3311. [PMID: 35128241 PMCID: PMC8811929 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c05361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 (ERK1/2) pathway inhibitors are important therapies for treating many cancers. However, acquired resistance to most protein kinase inhibitors limits their ability to provide durable responses. Approximately 50% of malignant melanomas contain activating mutations in BRAF, which promotes cancer cell survival through the direct phosphorylation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase MAPK/ERK 1/2 (MEK1/2) and the activation of ERK1/2. Although the combination treatment with BRAF and MEK1/2 inhibitors is a recommended approach to treat melanoma, the development of drug resistance remains a barrier to achieving long-term patient benefits. Few studies have compared the global proteomic changes in BRAF/MEK1/2 inhibitor-resistant melanoma cells under different growth conditions. The current study uses high-resolution label-free mass spectrometry to compare relative protein changes in BRAF/MEK1/2 inhibitor-resistant A375 melanoma cells grown as monolayers or spheroids. While approximately 66% of proteins identified were common in the monolayer and spheroid cultures, only 6.2 or 3.6% of proteins that significantly increased or decreased, respectively, were common between the drug-resistant monolayer and spheroid cells. Drug-resistant monolayers showed upregulation of ERK-independent signaling pathways, whereas drug-resistant spheroids showed primarily elevated catabolic metabolism to support oxidative phosphorylation. These studies highlight the similarities and differences between monolayer and spheroid cell models in identifying actionable targets to overcome drug resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramon Martinez
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of
Maryland School of Pharmacy, 20 Penn Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United
States
| | - Weiliang Huang
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of
Maryland School of Pharmacy, 20 Penn Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United
States
| | - Heather Buck
- Nathan
Schnaper Internship Program in Translational Cancer Research, Marlene
and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22S. Greene Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
| | - Samantha Rea
- Nathan
Schnaper Internship Program in Translational Cancer Research, Marlene
and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22S. Greene Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
| | - Amy E. Defnet
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of
Maryland School of Pharmacy, 20 Penn Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United
States
| | - Maureen A. Kane
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of
Maryland School of Pharmacy, 20 Penn Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United
States
| | - Paul Shapiro
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of
Maryland School of Pharmacy, 20 Penn Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United
States
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Genes Involved in Immune Reinduction May Constitute Biomarkers of Response for Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with Targeted Therapy. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10020284. [PMID: 35203494 PMCID: PMC8869294 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10020284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Targeted therapy in metastatic melanoma often achieves a major tumour regression response and significant long-term survival via the release of antigens that reinduce immunocompetence. The biomarkers thus activated may guide the prediction of response, but this association and its mechanism have yet to be established. Blood samples were collected from nineteen consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma before, during, and after treatment with targeted therapy. Differential gene expression analysis was performed, which identified the genes involved in the treatment, both in the first evaluation of response and during progression. Although clinical characteristics of the patients were poorer than those obtained in pivotal studies, radiological responses were similar to those reported previously (objective response rate: 73.7%). In the first tumour assessment, the expression of some genes increased (CXCL-10, SERPING1, PDL1, and PDL2), while that of others decreased (ARG1, IL18R1, IL18RAP, IL1R1, ILR2, FLT3, SLC11A1, CD163, and S100A12). The analysis of gene expression in blood shows that some are activated and others inhibited by targeted therapy. This response pattern may provide biomarkers of the immune reinduction response, which could be used to study potential combination treatments. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to validate these results.
Collapse
|
177
|
Plant-Derived Terpenoids: A Promising Tool in the Fight against Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030502. [PMID: 35158770 PMCID: PMC8833325 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Despite the numerous therapies, melanoma remains the deadliest of all skin cancers; however, plant-derived terpenoids are defense molecules that have proven anti-cancer properties. In this review, we present the results of the search for anti-melanoma plant terpenoids. Additionally, we show the effects of combining terpenoids with standard drugs, radiation therapy, or other plant substances on melanoma cell lines and animal models. Finally, we present some examples of drug delivery systems that increase the uptake of terpenoids by melanoma tissue. Abstract Melanoma is responsible for the highest number of skin cancer-caused deaths worldwide. Despite the numerous melanoma-treating options, the fight against it remains challenging, mainly due to its great heterogeneity and plasticity, as well as the high toxicity of standard drugs. Plant-derived terpenoids are a group of plant defense molecules that have been proven effective in killing many different types of cancer cells, both in in vitro experiments and in vivo models. In this review, we focus on recent results in the search for plant terpenoids with anti-melanoma activity. We also report on the synergistic action of combining terpenoids with other plant-derived substances, MAP kinase inhibitors, or radiation. Additionally, we present examples of terpenoid-loaded nanoparticle carriers as anti-melanoma agents that have increased permeation through the cancer tissue.
Collapse
|
178
|
Gogia A, Ganguly S, Bhargva S. Pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy in melanoma. CANCER RESEARCH, STATISTICS, AND TREATMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/crst.crst_349_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
|
179
|
Thielmann CM, Matull J, Zaremba A, Murali R, Chorti E, Lodde G, Jansen P, Herbst R, Terheyden P, Utikal J, Pföhler C, Ulrich J, Kreuter A, Mohr P, Gutzmer R, Meier F, Dippel E, Weichenthal M, Kretz J, Möller I, Sucker A, Paschen A, Livingstone E, Zimmer L, Hadaschik E, Ugurel S, Schadendorf D, Griewank KG. TERT promoter mutations are associated with longer progression-free and overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy. Eur J Cancer 2022; 161:99-107. [PMID: 34936949 PMCID: PMC9431961 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Around 50% of cutaneous melanomas harbour therapeutically targetable BRAF V600 mutations. Reliable clinical biomarkers predicting duration of response to BRAF-targeted therapies are still lacking. Recent in vitro studies demonstrated that BRAF-MEK inhibitor therapy response is associated with tumour TERT promoter mutation status. We assessed this potential association in a clinical setting. METHODS The study cohort comprised 232 patients with metastatic or unresectable BRAF V600-mutated melanoma receiving combined BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, including a single-centre retrospective discovery cohort (N = 120) and a prospectively collected multicenter validation cohort (N = 112). Patients were excluded if they received BRAF or MEK inhibitors in an adjuvant setting, as monotherapy, or in combination with immunotherapy. Kaplan-Meier and univariate/multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed as appropriate. RESULTS median age at first diagnosis was 54 years (range 16-84 years). The majority of patients were men 147/232 (63.4%). Most tumours harboured TERT promoter mutations (72%, N = 167). A survival advantage was observed in both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with TERT promoter-mutant versus wild-type tumours in both the discovery cohort (mPFS of 9.6 months [N = 87] vs 5.0 months [N = 33]; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.33-0.96] and mOS of 33.6 months vs 15.0 months; HR = 0.47 [95%CI 0.32-0.70]) as well as the validation cohort (mPFS of 7.3 months [N = 80] vs 5.8 months [N = 32]; HR = 0.67 [95%CI 0.41-1.10] and mOS of 51.1 months vs 15.0 months; HR = 0.33 [95%CI 0.18-0.63]). In the pooled cohort of TERT promoter-mutant (N = 167) versus wild-type (N = 65) tumours, respectively, PFS was 8.9 versus 5.5 months, (HR = 0.62; 95%CI 0.45-0.87; P = 0.004), and OS was 33.6 versus 17.0 months, (HR = 0.51; 95%CI 0.35-0.75, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In patients with melanoma receiving BRAF/MEK-targeted therapies, TERT promoter mutations are associated with longer survival. If validated in larger studies, TERT promoter mutation status should be included as a predictive biomarker in treatment algorithms for advanced melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl M. Thielmann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Johanna Matull
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Anne Zaremba
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Rajmohan Murali
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Eleftheria Chorti
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Georg Lodde
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Jansen
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Rudolf Herbst
- Skin Cancer Unit, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | | | - Jochen Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudia Pföhler
- Department of Dermatology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Jens Ulrich
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Harzklinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben, Quedlinburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Kreuter
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, HELIOS St. Elisabeth Klinik Oberhausen, University Witten/Herdecke, Oberhausen, Germany
| | - Peter Mohr
- Dermatological Center Buxtehude, Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany and Department of Dermatology, Mühlenkreiskliniken Minden, Minden, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Department of Dermatology, Dermatooncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden Germany
| | - Edgar Dippel
- Department of Dermatology Ludwigshafen, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein gGmbH, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Julia Kretz
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Inga Möller
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Antje Sucker
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Annette Paschen
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Livingstone
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Eva Hadaschik
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | - Klaus G. Griewank
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Alipour R, Iravani A, Hicks RJ. PET Imaging of Melanoma. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00123-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
181
|
Newcomer K, Robbins KJ, Perone J, Hinojosa FL, Chen D, Jones S, Kaufman CK, Weiser R, Fields RC, Tyler DS. Malignant melanoma: evolving practice management in an era of increasingly effective systemic therapies. Curr Probl Surg 2022; 59:101030. [PMID: 35033317 PMCID: PMC9798450 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2021.101030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Newcomer
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Jennifer Perone
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | | | - David Chen
- e. Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Susan Jones
- f. Department of Pediatrics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Roi Weiser
- University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Czarnecka AM, Ostaszewski K, Borkowska A, Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A, Kozak K, Świtaj T, Rogala P, Kalinowska I, Koseła-Paterczyk H, Zaborowski K, Teterycz P, Tysarowski A, Makuła D, Rutkowski P. Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy for Borderline Resectable III B-D or IV Stage BRAF V600 Mutation-Positive Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010110. [PMID: 35008274 PMCID: PMC8744603 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease or potentially resectable metastatic melanoma is expected to improve operability and clinical outcomes over upfront surgery. 46 patients were treated with BRAFi/MEKi or BRAFi before surgery with 78% R0 resection. In patients with a major pathological response with no, or less than 10%, viable cells in the tumor, median DFS and PFS were significantly longer than in patients with a minor pathological response. Abstract Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease or potentially resectable metastatic melanoma is expected to improve operability and clinical outcomes over upfront surgery and adjuvant treatment as it is for sarcoma, breast, rectal, esophageal, or gastric cancers. Patients with locoregional recurrence after initial surgery and those with advanced regional lymphatic metastases are at a high risk of relapse and melanoma-related death. There is an unmet clinical need to improve the outcomes for such patients. Patients with resectable bulky stage III or resectable stage IV histologically confirmed melanoma were enrolled and received standard-dose BRAFi/MEKi for at least 12 weeks before feasible resection of the pre-therapy target and then received at least for the next 40 weeks further BRAFi/MEKi. Of these patients, 37 were treated with dabrafenib and trametinib, three were treated with vemurafenib and cobimetinib, five with vemurafenib, and one with dabrafenib alone. All patients underwent surgery with 78% microscopically margin-negative resection (R0) resection. Ten patients achieved a complete pathological response. In patients with a major pathological response with no, or less than 10%, viable cells in the tumor, median disease free survival and progression free survival were significantly longer than in patients with a minor pathological response. No patient discontinued neoadjuvant BRAFi/MEKi due to toxicity. BRAFi/MEKi pre-treatment did not result in any new specific complications of surgery. Fourteen patients experienced disease recurrence or progression during post-operative treatment. We confirmed that BRAFi/MEKi combination is an effective and safe regimen in the perioperative treatment of melanoma. Pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment may be considered as a surrogate biomarker of disease recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M. Czarnecka
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.O.); (A.B.); (K.K.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.); (I.K.); (H.K.-P.); (K.Z.); (P.T.); (P.R.)
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +48-22-546-24-55; Fax: +48-22-643-93-75
| | - Krzysztof Ostaszewski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.O.); (A.B.); (K.K.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.); (I.K.); (H.K.-P.); (K.Z.); (P.T.); (P.R.)
| | - Aneta Borkowska
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.O.); (A.B.); (K.K.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.); (I.K.); (H.K.-P.); (K.Z.); (P.T.); (P.R.)
| | - Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (A.S.-C.); (A.T.)
| | - Katarzyna Kozak
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.O.); (A.B.); (K.K.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.); (I.K.); (H.K.-P.); (K.Z.); (P.T.); (P.R.)
| | - Tomasz Świtaj
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.O.); (A.B.); (K.K.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.); (I.K.); (H.K.-P.); (K.Z.); (P.T.); (P.R.)
| | - Paweł Rogala
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.O.); (A.B.); (K.K.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.); (I.K.); (H.K.-P.); (K.Z.); (P.T.); (P.R.)
| | - Iwona Kalinowska
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.O.); (A.B.); (K.K.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.); (I.K.); (H.K.-P.); (K.Z.); (P.T.); (P.R.)
| | - Hanna Koseła-Paterczyk
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.O.); (A.B.); (K.K.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.); (I.K.); (H.K.-P.); (K.Z.); (P.T.); (P.R.)
| | - Konrad Zaborowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.O.); (A.B.); (K.K.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.); (I.K.); (H.K.-P.); (K.Z.); (P.T.); (P.R.)
| | - Paweł Teterycz
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.O.); (A.B.); (K.K.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.); (I.K.); (H.K.-P.); (K.Z.); (P.T.); (P.R.)
| | - Andrzej Tysarowski
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (A.S.-C.); (A.T.)
- Department of Molecular and Translational Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Donata Makuła
- Department of Radiology I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.O.); (A.B.); (K.K.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.); (I.K.); (H.K.-P.); (K.Z.); (P.T.); (P.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Scolyer RA, Atkinson V, Gyorki DE, Lambie D, O'Toole S, Saw RP, Amanuel B, Angel CM, Button-Sloan AE, Carlino MS, Ch'ng S, Colebatch AJ, Daneshvar D, Pires da Silva I, Dawson T, Ferguson PM, Foster-Smith E, Fox SB, Gill AJ, Gupta R, Henderson MA, Hong AM, Howle JR, Jackett LA, James C, Lee CS, Lochhead A, Loh D, McArthur GA, McLean CA, Menzies AM, Nieweg OE, O'Brien BH, Pennington TE, Potter AJ, Prakash S, Rawson RV, Read RL, Rtshiladze MA, Shannon KF, Smithers BM, Spillane AJ, Stretch JR, Thompson JF, Tucker P, Varey AH, Vilain RE, Wood BA, Long GV. BRAF mutation testing for patients diagnosed with stage III or stage IV melanoma: practical guidance for the Australian setting. Pathology 2021; 54:6-19. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
184
|
Amagai R, Muto Y, Kato H, Matsushita S, Maekawa T, Fukushima S, Yoshino K, Uchi H, Fujisawa Y, Yamamoto Y, Ohuchi K, Kambayashi Y, Fujimura T. Retrospective analysis of adjuvant therapy using dabrafenib plus trametinib in Japanese patients with advanced melanoma: analysis of 36 cases. Melanoma Res 2021; 31:575-578. [PMID: 34524222 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Patients with resected stage IIIB, IIIC and IIID melanomas have a high risk of recurrence. Therefore, an appropriate protocol for stage III melanoma is needed. Since adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib (D+T) combined therapy and anti-PD1 antibody (Ab) therapy reduce the risk of recurrence in patients with resected stage III BRAF-mutated melanoma, selecting the adjuvant therapy for BRAF-mutated melanoma is controversial. The efficacy and safety profiles of D+T combined therapy in the adjuvant setting were retrospectively analyzed in 36 Japanese. BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma patients. The relapse-free rate (RFR) at 12 months was 82.1% (95% confidential interval (CI), 63.9-92.6%). In the 21 patients who completed the protocol, the RFR at 12 months was 85.7% (95% CI, 64.5-95.9%). In the seven patients whose protocol was interrupted by adverse events, the RFR was 71.4% (95% CI, 35.2-92.4%). The incidence rate of any AEs for all patients was 69.7% (95% CI, 52.5-82.8%), including 13 cases of pyrexia, five cases of skin rash and four cases of liver dysfunction. The present study suggested that D+T therapy in the adjuvant setting is a useful and very tolerable protocol for BRAF-mutated melanoma in the Japanese population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryo Amagai
- Department of Dermatology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai
| | - Yusuke Muto
- Department of Dermatology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai
| | - Hiroshi Kato
- Department of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya
| | - Shigeto Matsushita
- Department of Dermato-Oncology/Dermatology, National Hospital Organization Kagoshima Medical Center, Kagoshima
| | - Takeo Maekawa
- Department of Dermatology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke
| | - Satoshi Fukushima
- Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto
| | - Koji Yoshino
- Department of Dermato-Oncology/Dermatology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo
| | - Hiroshi Uchi
- Department of Dermato-Oncology/Dermatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka
| | - Yasuhiro Fujisawa
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba
| | - Yuki Yamamoto
- Department of Dermatology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Kentaro Ohuchi
- Department of Dermatology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai
| | - Yumi Kambayashi
- Department of Dermatology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai
| | - Taku Fujimura
- Department of Dermatology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai
| |
Collapse
|
185
|
Hieken TJ, Price DL, Piltin MA, Turner HJ, Block MS. Surgeon Assessment of the Technical Impact of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy on Operable Stage III Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:780-786. [PMID: 34825282 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11112-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The effect of neoadjuvant systemic therapies (NST) on technical aspects of operation for resectable stage III melanoma is unknown. Prospective capture of the estimated and actual degree of difficulty of therapeutic lymphadenectomy at presentation and after NST may inform the relative merits of NST versus surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. METHODS We designed surgeon survey tools to capture key impressions at baseline prior to NST and postoperatively. We conducted a sub-study within a multi-institutional clinical trial for high-risk operable stage III melanoma (NeoACTIVATE, NCT03554083) which enrolls clinically node-positive patients to 12 weeks of combinatorial NST determined by BRAF status. Survey data were analyzed. RESULTS Surveys were completed for 24 of 25 patients (96%). Affected nodal basins were cervical (3, 13%) axillary (9, 38%), inguinal ± pelvic (14, 58%); 2 (8%) involved ≥ 2 basins. Baseline estimates included largest affected node size (median/range 4/1.4-11 cm), number of involved nodes (median/range 3/1-10) and tumor fixation (present in 12, 50%). At operation, actual degree of difficulty increased from the baseline estimate in 4 (17%) and decreased in 6 (25%). Surgery was less difficult, average, or more difficult versus usual operation in 4, 9, and 11 cases (17%, 38%, 46%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although many operations were judged to be more difficult than the usual therapeutic lymphadenectomy, operation following NST was more often perceived as easier than more difficult versus baseline impression. Engaging surgical oncologists to perform similar structured assessments across clinical trials will permit cross-study analysis of the effect of NSTs on the technical conduct of lymphadenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast & Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. .,Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Daniel L Price
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mara A Piltin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast & Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Heidi J Turner
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew S Block
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
186
|
Amabile S, Roccuzzo G, Pala V, Tonella L, Rubatto M, Merli M, Fava P, Ribero S, Fierro MT, Queirolo P, Quaglino P. Clinical Significance of Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) in Melanoma: A Narrative Review from Adjuvant Clinical Trials. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235475. [PMID: 34884176 PMCID: PMC8658595 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is the most dangerous skin cancer, with high death rates in advanced stages. To assess the impact of each treatment on patient outcomes, most studies use relapse-free survival (RFS) as a primary endpoint and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) as a secondary endpoint. The aim of this narrative review of the main adjuvant studies for resected stage III/IV melanoma, with a specific focus on DMFS, is to evaluate DMFS trends and their potential association with RFS, identify which treatments are possibly associated with better outcomes in terms of DMFS and their potential predictive factors, and discuss DMFS trends in terms of patient management in daily practice. We outline the impact of each available treatment option on DMFS and RFS according to the years of follow-up and compare data from different studies. Overall, the trends of DMFS closely follow those of RFS, with most patients relapsing at visceral rather than regional sites. As it captures the burden of patients who develop distant relapse, DMFS could be considered a primary endpoint, in addition to RFS, in adjuvant trials, identifying patients whose relapse is associated with a worse prognosis and who may need further systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Amabile
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy; (S.A.); (V.P.); (L.T.); (M.R.); (M.M.); (P.F.); (S.R.); (M.T.F.); (P.Q.)
| | - Gabriele Roccuzzo
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy; (S.A.); (V.P.); (L.T.); (M.R.); (M.M.); (P.F.); (S.R.); (M.T.F.); (P.Q.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-01-1633-5843
| | - Valentina Pala
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy; (S.A.); (V.P.); (L.T.); (M.R.); (M.M.); (P.F.); (S.R.); (M.T.F.); (P.Q.)
| | - Luca Tonella
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy; (S.A.); (V.P.); (L.T.); (M.R.); (M.M.); (P.F.); (S.R.); (M.T.F.); (P.Q.)
| | - Marco Rubatto
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy; (S.A.); (V.P.); (L.T.); (M.R.); (M.M.); (P.F.); (S.R.); (M.T.F.); (P.Q.)
| | - Martina Merli
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy; (S.A.); (V.P.); (L.T.); (M.R.); (M.M.); (P.F.); (S.R.); (M.T.F.); (P.Q.)
| | - Paolo Fava
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy; (S.A.); (V.P.); (L.T.); (M.R.); (M.M.); (P.F.); (S.R.); (M.T.F.); (P.Q.)
| | - Simone Ribero
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy; (S.A.); (V.P.); (L.T.); (M.R.); (M.M.); (P.F.); (S.R.); (M.T.F.); (P.Q.)
| | - Maria Teresa Fierro
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy; (S.A.); (V.P.); (L.T.); (M.R.); (M.M.); (P.F.); (S.R.); (M.T.F.); (P.Q.)
| | - Paola Queirolo
- Division of Medical Oncology for Melanoma, Sarcoma, and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), European Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Pietro Quaglino
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy; (S.A.); (V.P.); (L.T.); (M.R.); (M.M.); (P.F.); (S.R.); (M.T.F.); (P.Q.)
| |
Collapse
|
187
|
Zeng H, Liu F, Zhou H, Zeng C. Individualized Treatment Strategy for Cutaneous Melanoma: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going? Front Oncol 2021; 11:775100. [PMID: 34804979 PMCID: PMC8599821 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.775100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
In the past several decades, innovative research in cancer biology and immunology has contributed to novel therapeutics, such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy, which have transformed the management of patients with melanoma. Despite the remarkable therapeutic outcomes of targeted treatments targeting MAPK signaling and immunotherapy that suppresses immune checkpoints, some individuals acquire therapeutic resistance and disease recurrence. This review summarizes the current understanding of melanoma genetic variations and discusses individualized melanoma therapy options, particularly for advanced or metastatic melanoma, as well as potential drug resistance mechanisms. A deeper understanding of individualized treatment will assist in improving clinical outcomes for patients with cutaneous melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huihua Zeng
- Department of General Medicine, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Fen Liu
- Department of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hairong Zhou
- Department of General Medicine, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Changchun Zeng
- Department of Medical Laboratory, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Hieken TJ, Piltin MA, Block MS. ASO Author Reflections: Adding Value to Multidisciplinary Care by Incorporating Structured Surgeon Survey Assessment of the Effect of Neoadjuvant Therapies on Melanoma Operations. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:787-788. [PMID: 34802106 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11117-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
189
|
Mulder EEAP, Smit L, Grünhagen DJ, Verhoef C, Sleijfer S, van der Veldt AAM, Uyl-de Groot CA. Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant systemic therapies for patients with high-risk melanoma in Europe: a model-based economic evaluation. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100303. [PMID: 34781194 PMCID: PMC8599106 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of adjuvant systemic treatment has significantly improved recurrence-free survival in patients with resectable high-risk melanoma. Adjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy, however, substantially impacts health care budgets, while the number of patients with melanoma who are treated in the adjuvant setting is still increasing. To evaluate the socioeconomic impact of the three adjuvant treatments, a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was carried out. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were obtained from the three pivotal registration phase III clinical trials on the adjuvant treatment of patients with resected high-risk stage III in melanoma (KEYNOTE-054, CheckMate 238, and COMBI-AD). For this CEA, a Markov model with three health states (no evidence of disease, recurrent/progressive disease, and death) was applied. From a societal perspective, different adjuvant strategies were compared according to total costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. To evaluate model uncertainty, sensitivity analyses (deterministic and probabilistic) were carried out. RESULTS In the adjuvant setting, total costs (per patient) were €168 826 for nivolumab, €194 529 for pembrolizumab, and €211 110 for dabrafenib-trametinib. These costs were mainly determined by drug acquisition costs, whereas routine surveillance costs varied from €126 096 to €134 945. Compared with routine surveillance, LYs improved by approximately 1.41 for all therapies and QALYs improved by 2.02 for immune checkpoint inhibitors and 2.03 for targeted therapy. This resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of €21 153 (nivolumab), €33 878 (pembrolizumab), and €37 520 (dabrafenib-trametinib) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS This CEA compared the three EMA-approved adjuvant systemic therapies for resected stage III melanoma. Adjuvant treatment with nivolumab was the most cost-effective, followed by pembrolizumab. Combination therapy with dabrafenib-trametinib was the least cost-effective. With the increasing number of patients with high-risk melanoma who will be treated with adjuvant treatment, there is an urgent need to reduce drug costs while developing better prognostic and predictive tools to identify patients who will benefit from adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E E A P Mulder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - L Smit
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C A Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
190
|
Vuoristo M, Muhonen T, Koljonen V, Juteau S, Hernberg M, Ilmonen S, Jahkola T. Pelvic sentinel lymph nodes have minimal impact on survival in melanoma patients. BJS Open 2021; 5:6460898. [PMID: 34904646 PMCID: PMC8669789 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Lower limb or trunk melanoma often presents with femoral and pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). The benefits of harvesting pelvic lymph nodes remain controversial. In this retrospective study, the frequency and predictors of pelvic SLNs (PSLNs), and the impact of PSLNs on survival and staging was investigated. Methods Altogether 285 patients with cutaneous melanoma located in the lower limb or trunk underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy of the inguinal/iliac lymph node basin at Helsinki University Hospital from 2009–2013. Patient characteristics, detailed pathology reports and follow-up data were retrieved from hospital files. Subgroups of patients categorized by presence of PSLNs were compared for outcome parameters including progression-free survival, melanoma-specific survival and groin recurrence. Results Superficial femoral/inguinal SLNs were present in all patients and 199 (69.8 per cent) also had PSLNs removed. Median number of SLNs per patient was five and median number of PSLNs was two. Sixty-three patients (22.1 per cent) had metastases in their SLNs and seven (2.5 per cent) had metastases in PSLNs. A single patient had metastases solely in PSLNs, while superficial SLNs remained negative. Harvesting PSLNs or the number of PSLNs retrieved had no impact on progression-free survival or overall survival. The removal of PSLNs did not affect the risk of postoperative seroma or lymphoedema. The only predictor of positive PSLNs was radioactivity count equal to or more than that of the hottest superficial SLNs. Conclusion Pelvic SLNs have minimal clinical impact on the outcome of melanoma patients especially in cases with negative superficial femoral/inguinal SLNs. Removal of PSLNs should be considered when they are the most radioactive nodes or equal to the hottest superficial femoral/inguinal SLNs in lymphoscintigraphy or during surgery. Preliminary results were presented in part at the International Sentinel Node Society Biennial Meeting, Tokyo, Japan, 11–13 October 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikko Vuoristo
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Timo Muhonen
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Virve Koljonen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Susanna Juteau
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Micaela Hernberg
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Suvi Ilmonen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tiina Jahkola
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Scarpato L, Festino L, Vanella V, Madonna G, Mastroianni M, Palla M, Ascierto PA. Dermatologic adverse events associated with targeted therapies for melanoma. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 21:385-395. [PMID: 34595993 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.1986000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The development of new targeted therapies has considerably changed the therapeutic paradigm of melanoma, significantly increasing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). However, skin-related adverse sequelae might occur and impact on patients' quality of life. AREAS COVERED In this article we will cover the most important dermatological toxicities related to BRAF and MEK-inhibitors, along with updated management strategies. EXPERT OPINION BRAF inhibitors have represented a revolution in the treatment of melanoma. They have improved the outcome of the disease and therefore represent an important option in the management and care of patients with advanced melanoma. Skin toxicity (especially the onset of squamous skin carcinomas) has been considered a major cutaneous side effect and, although the addition of MEK inhibitors in combination has significantly reduced the incidence of skin sequelae, serious skin adverse events might develop anyway and impact significantly on patients'quality of life and on national health system budget. The introduction of BRAF and MEK inhibitors as a new effective adjuvant treatment option for stage III and ulcerated melanoma has proved a significant impact on the risk of recurrence, and may have interesting developments in the near future as a further therapeutic tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Scarpato
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Lucia Festino
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Vito Vanella
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Gabriele Madonna
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Massimo Mastroianni
- Department of Otolaryngology Surgery and Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Marco Palla
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Antonio Ascierto
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
192
|
Ma EZ, Hoegler KM, Zhou AE. Bioinformatic and Machine Learning Applications in Melanoma Risk Assessment and Prognosis: A Literature Review. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:1751. [PMID: 34828357 PMCID: PMC8621295 DOI: 10.3390/genes12111751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Over 100,000 people are diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma each year in the United States. Despite recent advancements in metastatic melanoma treatment, such as immunotherapy, there are still over 7000 melanoma-related deaths each year. Melanoma is a highly heterogenous disease, and many underlying genetic drivers have been identified since the introduction of next-generation sequencing. Despite clinical staging guidelines, the prognosis of metastatic melanoma is variable and difficult to predict. Bioinformatic and machine learning analyses relying on genetic, clinical, and histopathologic inputs have been increasingly used to risk stratify melanoma patients with high accuracy. This literature review summarizes the key genetic drivers of melanoma and recent applications of bioinformatic and machine learning models in the risk stratification of melanoma patients. A robustly validated risk stratification tool can potentially guide the physician management of melanoma patients and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Albert E. Zhou
- Department of Dermatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21230, USA; (E.Z.M.); (K.M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
193
|
Moncrieff M, Pywell S, Snelling A, Gray M, Newman D, Beadsmoore C, Pawaroo D, Heaton M. Effectiveness of SPECT/CT Imaging for Sentinel Node Biopsy Staging of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma and Patient Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:767-775. [PMID: 34704182 PMCID: PMC8724187 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10911-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Coregistered SPECT/CT can improve accuracy of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for staging melanoma. This benefit has implications for pathology services and surgical practice with increased diagnostic and surgical workload. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of SPECT/CT imaging. Methods SNB data were collected over a 10-year period. Preoperative SLN mapping was performed by using planar lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) for all patients (n = 1522) and after October 2015, patients underwent a second co-registered SPECT/CT scan (n = 559). The patients were stratified according to the imaging protocol. The number of nodes and nodal basins were assessed. The reasons for cancellation also were assessed. Results A total of 95% (1446/1522) of patients underwent a successful SNB procedure. Significantly more sentinel nodes were identified by the SPECT/CT protocol (3 vs. 2; p < 0.0001). More patients were cancelled in the SPECT/CT cohort (9.3% vs. 2.5%; p < 0.0001). Head & neck, lower limb, and AJCC IB primaries were significantly less likely to proceed to SNB. SPECT/CT identified significantly more positive SNBs (20.9% vs. 16.5%; p = 0.038). SPECT/CT imaging was associated with improved disease-free (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54–1.0); p = 0.048) and disease-specific survival (HR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.3–0.78; p = 0.003). Patients who did not proceed to SNB had a significantly increased nodal relapse rate (23.5% vs. 6.8%; HR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.9–6.2; p < 0.0001) compared with those who underwent SNB. Conclusions This large cohort study confirms the increased accuracy of SPECT/CT for identifying SLN metastases, which would appear to have a significant therapeutic benefit, although an increased risk of cancellation of the SNB procedure on the day of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Moncrieff
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK. .,Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - Sarah Pywell
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK
| | - Andrew Snelling
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK
| | - Matthew Gray
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Norwich, UK
| | - David Newman
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Norwich, UK
| | - Clare Beadsmoore
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Norwich, UK
| | - Davina Pawaroo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Norwich, UK
| | - Martin Heaton
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Weitemeyer MB, Helvind NM, Brinck AM, Hölmich LR, Chakera AH. More sentinel lymph node biopsies for thin melanomas after transition to AJCC 8th edition do not increase positivity rate: A Danish population-based study of 7148 patients. J Surg Oncol 2021; 125:498-508. [PMID: 34672372 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the outcome of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) in patients with thin melanoma before and after the implementation of AJCC 8th edition (AJCC8) and identified predictors of positive sentinel lymph nodes (+SLN). METHODS Patients diagnosed with T1 melanomas (Breslow thickness ≤1 mm) during 2016-2017 as per AJCC 7th edition (AJCC7) (n = 3414) and 2018-2019 as per AJCC8 (n = 3734) were identified in the Danish Melanoma Database. RESULTS More SLNBs were performed in the AJCC8 cohort compared to the AJCC7 (22.2% vs. 16.2%, p < 0.001), with no significant difference in +SLN rates (4.7% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.118). In the AJCC7 + SLN subgroup, no melanomas were ulcerated, 94.6% had mitotic rate (MR) ≥ 1, 67.6% were ≥0.8 mm and 32.4% would be T1a according to AJCC8. In the AJCC8 + SLN subgroup, 10.3% were ulcerated, 74.4% had MR≥ 1, 97.4% were ≥0.8 mm and 23.1% would be T1a according to AJCC7. On multivariable analysis younger age and MR ≥ 1 were significant predictors of +SLN. CONCLUSION More SLNBs were performed in T1 melanomas after transition to AJCC8 without an increase in +SLN rate. None of the AJCC8 T1b criteria were significant predictors of +SLN. We suggest that mitosis and younger age should be considered as indications for SLNB in thin melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie B Weitemeyer
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Neel M Helvind
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne M Brinck
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Lisbet R Hölmich
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Annette H Chakera
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
195
|
Indirect treatment comparison of nivolumab versus placebo as adjuvant treatment for resected melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2021; 158:225-233. [PMID: 34663559 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nivolumab (an anti-programmed death-1 antibody) is an adjuvant standard of care for patients with high-risk resected melanoma, although a watch-and-wait strategy remains an option. In the absence of head-to-head evidence, an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) of adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo, the proxy for a watch-and-wait strategy, was conducted in patients with high-risk resected melanoma. METHODS An ITC using the Bucher method compared nivolumab with placebo using intention-to-treat population data from the phase III CheckMate 238 (nivolumab vs ipilimumab; minimum follow-up, 4 years; NCT02388906) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 18071 (ipilimumab vs placebo; minimum follow-up, ≈4.5 years; NCT00636168) trials. The end-points were recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). To account for cross-trial differences in staging and subsequent therapy, additional analyses examined patients with stage IIIB/IIIC disease and adjusted post-recurrence survival in EORTC 18071, respectively. RESULTS Nivolumab versus placebo was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.68) and OS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45-0.89). Nivolumab versus placebo was also associated with clinically meaningful improvements in RFS (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40-0.69), DMFS (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46-0.83) and OS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.97) in patients with stage IIIB/IIIC disease and in OS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.92) in the overall population after adjusting post-recurrence survival in EORTC 18071. CONCLUSION This ITC shows that adjuvant nivolumab provides clinically meaningful improvements in RFS, DMFS and OS versus a watch-and-wait strategy in high-risk resected melanoma.
Collapse
|
196
|
Eggermont AM, Meshcheryakov A, Atkinson V, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Barrow C, Di Giacomo AM, Fisher R, Sandhu S, Kudchadkar R, Ortiz Romero PL, Svane IM, Larkin J, Puig S, Hersey P, Quaglino P, Queirolo P, Stroyakovskiy D, Bastholt L, Mohr P, Hernberg M, Chiarion-Sileni V, Strother M, Hauschild A, Yamazaki N, van Akkooi AC, Lorigan P, Krepler C, Ibrahim N, Marreaud S, Kicinski M, Suciu S, Robert C. Crossover and rechallenge with pembrolizumab in recurrent patients from the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote-054 phase III trial, pembrolizumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2021; 158:156-168. [PMID: 34678677 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the phase III double-blind European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial, pembrolizumab improved recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival in patients with stage III cutaneous melanoma with complete resection of lymph nodes. In the pembrolizumab group, the incidence of grade I-V and of grade III-V immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was 37% and 7%, respectively. METHODS Patients were randomised to receive intravenous (i.v.) pembrolizumab 200 mg (N = 514) or placebo (N = 505) every 3 weeks, up to 1 year. On recurrence, patients could enter part 2 of the study: pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks up to 2 years, for crossover (those who received placebo) or rechallenge (those who had recurrence ≥6 months after completing 1-year adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy). For these patients, we present the safety profile and efficacy outcomes. RESULTS At the clinical cut-off (16-Oct-2020), in the placebo group, 298 patients had a disease recurrence, in which 155 (52%) crossed over ('crossover'). In the pembrolizumab group, 297 patients completed the 1-year treatment period; 47 had a recurrence ≥6 months later, in which 20 (43%) entered the rechallenge part 2 ('rechallenge'). In the crossover group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7-15.2) and the 3-year PFS rate was 32% (95% CI 25-40%). Among 80 patients with stage IV evaluable disease, 31 (39%) had an objective response: 14 (18%) patients with complete response (CR) and 17 (21%) patients with partial response. The 2-year PFS rate from response was 69% (95% CI 48-83%). In the rechallenge group, the median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI 2.6-NE). Among 9 patients with stage IV evaluable disease, 1 had an objective response (CR). Among the 175 patients, 51 (29%) had a grade I-IV irAE and 11 (6%) had a grade III-IV irAE. CONCLUSIONS Pembrolizumab treatment after crossover yielded an overall 3-year PFS rate of 32% and a 39% ORR in evaluable patients, but the efficacy (11% ORR) was lower in those rechallenged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Mm Eggermont
- Princess Máxima Center and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584 CS, the Netherlands.
| | - Andrey Meshcheryakov
- Federal State Budgetary Institution "Russian Oncology Scientific Centre named after N.N. Blokhin RAMS", Moscow, Russia
| | - Victoria Atkinson
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Christian U Blank
- Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mario Mandala
- Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy; Ospedale Santa Maria Della Misericordia, Perrugia, Italy
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Mater and Royal North Shore Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Anna Maria Di Giacomo
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Rosalie Fisher
- North Shore Hospital, Waitemata DHB, Takapuna, Auckland, New Zealand; Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Pablo Luis Ortiz Romero
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Institute i+12, CIBERONC, Medical School, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - James Larkin
- Royal Marsden Hospital - Chelsea, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susana Puig
- Hospital Clinic Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter Hersey
- David Maddison Clinical Sciences, Gateshead, Australia
| | - Pietro Quaglino
- Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Ospedale San Lazzaro, Torino, Italy
| | - Paola Queirolo
- Istituto Nazionale Per La Ricerca Sul Cancro, Genova, Italy; European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Axel Hauschild
- Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel - Klinik Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Kiel, Germany
| | | | | | - Paul Lorigan
- The University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Caroline Robert
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris and University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
197
|
Mulder EEAP, Grünhagen DJ, Sleijfer S, Uyl-de Groot CA, van der Veldt AAM. Adjuvant treatment in patients with melanoma: The planning of scanning. Eur J Cancer 2021; 157:306-307. [PMID: 34555650 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Evalyn E A P Mulder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carin A Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management and Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Stege H, Haist M, Nikfarjam U, Schultheis M, Heinz J, Pemler S, Loquai C, Grabbe S. The Status of Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Melanoma Therapy, New Developments and Upcoming Challenges. Target Oncol 2021; 16:537-552. [PMID: 34554353 PMCID: PMC8484171 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-021-00840-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The global incidence of malignant melanoma, the leading cause of skin cancer death, has steadily increased in recent years. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice for early-stage melanoma. However, 40-60% of patients with high-risk melanoma or with nodal involvement eventually experience loco-regional relapse or tumor progression. Adjuvant therapy aims to reduce the rate of recurrence in radically operated high-risk patients with melanoma and thus improves survival. Interferon-α has long been the only approved drug for adjuvant melanoma therapy, despite an unclear survival benefit. The landmark success of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK-directed targeted therapies in the treatment of patients with stage IV melanoma led to the initiation of clinical trials in the adjuvant setting. These trials demonstrated the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies for the adjuvant treatment of high-risk patients with melanoma, as shown both by an increase in recurrence-free survival and the emergence of long-term survivors, finally resulting in the approval of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibitor ipilimumab, PD1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), and BRAF/MEK inhibitors for adjuvant melanoma therapy. This review aims to delineate the advances in adjuvant melanoma therapy, issuing particularly recent results from clinical trials. Moreover, we also discuss pending issues and future challenges, which comprise the adequate selection of adjuvant regimens for patient subgroups and the identification of markers likely to predict the individual response to adjuvant treatments. Last, we outline the role of emerging neoadjuvant approaches, which may complement adjuvant strategies and are currently investigated in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henner Stege
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Maximilian Haist
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nikfarjam
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Schultheis
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jaqueline Heinz
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Saskia Pemler
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Carmen Loquai
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Stephan Grabbe
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Wolfe AR, Chablani P, Siedow MR, Miller ED, Walston S, Kendra KL, Wuthrick E, Williams TM. BRAF mutation correlates with worse local-regional control following radiation therapy in patients with stage III melanoma. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:181. [PMID: 34537078 PMCID: PMC8449455 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01903-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with stage III melanoma, the use of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after lymph node dissection (LND) may be currently considered in selected high-risk patients to improve tumor control. Melanomas harbor BRAF mutations (BRAF+) in 40–50% of cases, the majority of which are on the V600E residue. This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes after RT between patients with BRAF+ and BRAF− melanoma. Methods This was a retrospective review of 105 Stage III melanoma patients treated at our institution with LND followed by adjuvant RT from 2006 to 2019. BRAF mutational status was determined on the primary skin or nodal tissue samples from all patients. We compared characteristics of the BRAF+ and BRAF− groups using Fisher’s exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test and performed univariate and multivariate analysis using Kaplan–Meier estimates, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards modeling with the clinical outcomes of local–regional lymph node control, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Fifty-three (50%) patients harbored a BRAF mutation (92%, pV600E). BRAF+ patients were younger and had primary tumors more commonly found in the trunk vs head and neck compared to BRAF- patients (p < 0.05). The 5 year local–regional control in the BRAF + patients was 60% compared to 81% in the BRAF- patients (HR 4.5, 95% CI 1.3–15.5, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in 5-year DMFS, RFS, and OS rates between the two BRAF patient groups. The presence of 4 or more positive LNs remained a significant prognostic factor for local–regional lymph node control, RFS, and OS in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Stage III melanoma patients with BRAF mutation treated with adjuvant RT had > 4 times increased risk of local recurrence or regional lymph node recurrence. These results could be useful for adjuvant RT consideration in lymph node positive melanoma patients and supports other data that BRAF mutation confers radiation resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam R Wolfe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, The Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Priyanka Chablani
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael R Siedow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Steve Walston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kari L Kendra
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Evan Wuthrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Terence M Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Thawer A, Miller WH, Gregorio N, Claveau J, Rajagopal S, Savage KJ, Song X, Petrella TM. Management of Pyrexia Associated with the Combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib: Canadian Consensus Statements. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3537-3553. [PMID: 34590600 PMCID: PMC8482100 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The combination of dabrafenib and trametinib is a well-established treatment for BRAF-mutated melanoma. However, the effectiveness of this approach may be hindered by the development of treatment-related pyrexia syndrome, which occurs in at least 50% of treated patients. Without appropriate intervention, pyrexia syndrome has the potential to worsen and can result in hypotension secondary to dehydration and associated organ-related complications. Furthermore, premature treatment discontinuation may result in a reduction in progression-free and overall survival. Despite existing guidance, there is still a wide variety of therapeutic approaches suggested in the literature for both the definition and management of dabrafenib and trametinib-related pyrexia. This is reflected in the practice variation of its prevention and treatment within and between Canadian cancer centres. A Canadian working group was formed and consensus statements were constructed based on evidence and finalised through a two-round modified Delphi approach. The statements led to the development of a pyrexia treatment algorithm that can easily be applied in routine practice. The Canadian working group consensus statements serve to provide practical guidance for the management of dabrafenib and trametinib-related pyrexia, hopefully leading to reduced discontinuation rates, and ultimately improve patients' quality of life and cancer-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alia Thawer
- Department of Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada;
| | - Wilson H. Miller
- Departments of Medicine and Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada;
| | - Nancy Gregorio
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada;
| | - Joël Claveau
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dermatology Division, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1Y 0A1, Canada;
| | | | - Kerry J. Savage
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada;
| | - Xinni Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada;
| | - Teresa M. Petrella
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|