Potentiation of NMDA receptor currents by dopamine D1 receptors in prefrontal cortex

Distinct roles for spinophilin and neurabin in dopamine-mediated plasticity

Protein phosphatase 1 plays a major role in the governance of excitatory synaptic activity, and is subject to control via the neuromodulatory actions of dopamine. Mechanisms involved in regulating protein phosphatase 1 activity include interactions with the structurally related cytoskeletal elements spinophilin and neurabin, synaptic scaffolding proteins that are highly enriched in dendritic spines. The requirement for these proteins in dopamine-related neuromodulation was tested using knockout mice. Dopamine D1-mediated regulation of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate receptor activity was deficient in both striatal and prefrontal cortical neurons from neurabin knockout mice; in spinophilin knockout mice this deficit was manifest only in striatal neurons. At corticostriatal synapses long-term potentiation was deficient in neurabin knockout mice, but not in spinophilin knockout mice, and was rescued by a D1 receptor agonist. In contrast, long-term depression was deficient in spinophilin knockout mice but not in neurabin knockout mice, and was rescued by D2 receptor activation. Spontaneous excitatory post-synaptic current frequency was increased in neurabin knockout mice, but not in spinophilin knockout mice, and this effect was normalized by D2 receptor agonist application. Both knockout strains displayed increased induction of GluR1 Ser(845) phosphorylation in response to D1 receptor stimulation in slices, and also displayed enhanced locomotor activation in response to cocaine administration. These effects could be dissociated from cocaine reward, which was enhanced only in spinophilin knockout mice, and was accompanied by increased immediate early gene induction. These data establish a requirement for synaptic scaffolding in dopamine-mediated responses, and further indicate that spinophilin and neurabin play distinct roles in dopaminergic signal transduction and psychostimulant response.

Targeting prefrontal cortical dopamine D1 and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor interactions in schizophrenia treatment

The prefrontal cortex plays a principal role in higher cognition and particularly in the fast online manipulation of appropriate information to guide forthcoming behavior. Dysfunction of this process represents a main feature in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Both dopamine D1 and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in the prefrontal cortex play a critical role in synaptic plasticity, memory mechanisms, and cognition. Recent data have shown that D1 and NMDA receptors interact bidirectionally and may greatly influence the output of the prefrontal cortex. Hypofunction of these receptor systems in the prefrontal cortex is found in schizophrenia. This review attempts to summarize some of the latest findings on the cellular mechanisms that underlie D1-NMDA receptor interactions. These findings have provided potential therapeutic strategies that aim to functionally up-regulate D1 and/or NMDA receptor safely via selective activation of D1 receptors or coagonist activation of NMDA receptors through blockade of the glycine transporter-1.

Direct receptor cross-talk can mediate the modulation of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission by dopamine

Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that can regulate both excitatory and inhibitory fast synaptic transmission. The overlapping dopaminergic, glutamatergic, and GABAergic systems provide a basis for the interaction between these three neurotransmitters. Although there is considerable evidence for the involvement of second-messenger systems to mediate receptor cross-talk between these receptor systems, there is emerging evidence that receptors can interact through direct protein-protein interactions. The functional implications and overall significance of the dopamine/glutamate/GABA interactions will be examined.

Aberrant regulation of NMDA receptors by dopamine D4 signaling in rats after phencyclidine exposure

Dopaminergic dysfunction in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) has been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. On the other hand, administration of the NMDAR antagonist phencyclidine (PCP) impairs PFC functions and induces a broad range of schizophrenic-like symptoms, thus has been widely used as an animal model for schizophrenia. This study sought to determine the mechanism by which PCP may alter the dopaminergic functions in PFC. In control rats, activation of dopamine D4 receptors produced a significant suppression of NMDA receptor transmission in PFC pyramidal neurons, which was dependent on the inhibition of active CaMKII. However, in PCP-treated rats, the D4 modulation of NMDA receptors was significantly impaired, with the concomitant loss of D4 regulation of CaMKII activity. In contrast, the D4 modulation of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels was intact following PCP administration. Furthermore, treatment with the antipsychotic drug clozapine restored the D4 regulation of NMDA receptors in PCP-treated rats. These findings suggest that the selective disruption of the interaction between D4 and NMDA receptors in the PCP model, which is attributable to the impaired D4-mediated downstream signaling, may contribute to the aberrant PFC neuronal activity in schizophrenia.

Animal models of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

Although animals cannot be used to study complex human behaviour such as language, they do have similar basic functions. In fact, human disorders that have animal models are better understood than disorders that do not. ADHD is a heterogeneous disorder. The relatively simple nervous systems of rodent models have enabled identification of neurobiological changes that underlie certain aspects of ADHD behaviour. Several animal models of ADHD suggest that the dopaminergic system is functionally impaired. Some animal models have decreased extracellular dopamine concentrations and upregulated postsynaptic dopamine D1 receptors (DRD1) while others have increased extracellular dopamine concentrations. In the latter case, dopamine pathways are suggested to be hyperactive. However, stimulus-evoked release of dopamine is often decreased in these models, which is consistent with impaired dopamine transmission. It is possible that the behavioural characteristics of ADHD result from impaired dopamine modulation of neurotransmission in cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuits. There is considerable evidence to suggest that the noradrenergic system is poorly controlled by hypofunctional α₂-autoreceptors in some models, giving rise to inappropriately increased release of norepinephrine. Aspects of ADHD behaviour may result from an imbalance between increased noradrenergic and decreased dopaminergic regulation of neural circuits that involve the prefrontal cortex. Animal models of ADHD also suggest that neural circuits may be altered in the brains of children with ADHD. It is therefore of particular importance to study animal models of the disorder and not normal animals. Evidence obtained from animal models suggests that psychostimulants may not be acting on the dopamine transporter to produce the expected increase in extracellular dopamine concentration in ADHD. There is evidence to suggest that psychostimulants may decrease motor activity by increasing serotonin levels. In addition to providing unique insights into the neurobiology of ADHD, animal models are also being used to test new drugs that can be used to alleviate the symptoms of ADHD.

Microtubule regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor channels in neurons

N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (NMDARs), which play a key role in synaptic plasticity, are dynamically regulated by many signaling molecules and scaffolding proteins. Although actin cytoskeleton has been implicated in regulating NMDAR stability in synaptic membrane, the role of microtubules in regulating NMDAR trafficking and function is largely unclear. Here we show that microtubule-depolymerizing agents inhibited NMDA receptor-mediated ionic and synaptic currents in cortical pyramidal neurons. This effect was Ca(2+)-independent, required GTP, and was more prominent in the presence of high NMDA concentrations. The NR2B subunit-containing NMDA receptor was the primary target of microtubules. The effect of microtubule depolymerizers on NMDAR currents was blocked by cellular knockdown of the kinesin motor protein KIF17, which transports NR2B-containing vesicles along microtubule in neuronal dendrites. Neuromodulators that can stabilize microtubules, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor, significantly attenuated the microtubule depolymerizer-induced reduction of NMDAR currents. Moreover, immunocytochemical studies show that microtubule depolymerizers decreased the number of surface NR2B subunits on dendrites, which was prevented by the microtubule stabilizer. Taken together, these results suggest that interfering with microtubule assembly suppresses NMDAR function through a mechanism dependent on kinesin-based dendritic transport of NMDA receptors.

The primate working memory networks

Working memory has long been associated with the prefrontal cortex, since damage to this brain area can critically impair the ability to maintain and update mnemonic information. Anatomical and physiological evidence suggests, however, that the prefrontal cortex is part of a broader network of interconnected brain areas involved in working memory. These include the parietal and temporal association areas of the cerebral cortex, cingulate and limbic areas, and subcortical structures such as the mediodorsal thalamus and the basal ganglia. Neurophysiological studies in primates confirm the involvement of areas beyond the frontal lobe and illustrate that working memory involves parallel, distributed neuronal networks. In this article, we review the current understanding of the anatomical organization of networks mediating working memory and the neural correlates of memory manifested in each of their nodes. The neural mechanisms of memory maintenance and the integrative role of the prefrontal cortex are also discussed.

Regulation of NMDA receptors by neuregulin signaling in prefrontal cortex

Recent linkage studies have identified a significant association of the neuregulin gene with schizophrenia, but how neuregulin is involved in schizophrenia is primarily unknown. Aberrant NMDA receptor functions have been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Therefore, we hypothesize that neuregulin, which is present in glutamatergic synaptic vesicles, may affect NMDA receptor functions via actions on its ErbB receptors enriched in postsynaptic densities, hence participating in emotional regulation and cognitive processes that are impaired in schizophrenia. To test this, we examined the regulation of NMDA receptor currents by neuregulin signaling pathways in prefrontal cortex (PFC), a prominent area affected in schizophrenia. We found that bath perfusion of neuregulin significantly reduced whole-cell NMDA receptor currents in acutely isolated and cultured PFC pyramidal neurons and decreased NMDA receptor-mediated EPSCs in PFC slices. The effect of neuregulin was mainly blocked by application of the ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor, IP3 receptor (IP3R) antagonist, or Ca2+ chelators. The neuregulin regulation of NMDA receptor currents was also markedly attenuated in cultured neurons transfected with mutant forms of Ras or a dominant-negative form of MEK1 (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1). Moreover, the neuregulin effect was prevented by agents that stabilize or disrupt actin polymerization but not by agents that interfere with microtubule assembly. Furthermore, neuregulin treatment increased the abundance of internalized NMDA receptors in cultured PFC neurons, which was also sensitive to agents affecting actin cytoskeleton. Together, our study suggests that both PLC/IP3R/Ca2+ and Ras/MEK/ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase) signaling pathways are involved in the neuregulin-induced reduction of NMDA receptor currents, which is likely through enhancing NR1 internalization via an actin-dependent mechanism.

Regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors by calpain in cortical neurons

The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor is a cation channel highly permeable to calcium and plays critical roles in governing normal and pathologic functions in neurons. Calcium entry through NMDA receptors (NMDARs) can lead to the activation of the Ca2+-dependent protease, calpain. Here we investigated the involvement of calpain in regulation of NMDAR channel function. After prolonged (5-min) treatment with NMDA or glutamate, the whole-cell NMDAR-mediated current was significantly reduced in both acutely dissociated and cultured cortical pyramidal neurons. The down-regulation of NMDAR current was blocked by bath application of selective calpain inhibitors. Intracellular injection of a specific calpain inhibitory peptide also eliminated the down-regulation of NMDAR current induced by prolonged NMDA treatment. In contrast, dynamin inhibitory peptide had no effect on the depression of NMDAR current, suggesting the lack of involvement of dynamin/clathrin-mediated NMDAR internalization in this process. Immunoblotting analysis showed that the NR2A and NR2B subunits of NMDARs were markedly degraded in cultured cortical neurons treated with glutamate, and the degradation of NR2 subunits was prevented by calpain inhibitors. Taken together, our results suggest that prolonged activation of NMDARs in neurons activates calpain, and activated calpain in turn down-regulates the function of NMDARs, which provides a neuroprotective mechanism against NMDAR overstimulation accompanying ischemia and stroke.

D1 but not D2 dopamine receptors or adrenoceptors mediate dopamine-induced potentiation of N-methyl-d-aspartate currents in the rat prefrontal cortex

Dopamine-glutamate interactions in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) are associated with higher order cognitive functions, and are involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and addiction. Recordings with intracellular sharp microelectrodes and patch-clamp pipettes were used to investigate these interactions in layer V pyramidal cells of brain slices obtained from the rat PFC. Dopamine (100 microM) potentiated N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA; 10mM)-evoked depolarizations, but did not change those elicited by alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA; 1mM). Dopamine (100 microM) increased the amplitude of the NMDA (30 microM)-induced currents as well, and 1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol (SKF 38393; 1, 10 microM), a D(1) receptor agonist, concentration-dependently reproduced this effect. Furthermore, 7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzapine hydrochloride (SCH 23390; 10 microM), a D(1) receptor antagonist, reversed both the dopamine- and the SKF 38393-evoked potentiation. The D(2) receptor agonists lisuride and quinpirole (10 microM both), as well as noradrenaline (100 microM) failed to mimic the stimulatory effect of dopamine. Isoproterenol (1, 10 microM) concentration-dependently facilitated NMDA responses. However, neither this effect at 10 microM nor that of dopamine at 100 microM could be antagonized by propranolol (10 microM), a non-selective beta adrenoceptor blocker. The isoproterenol-induced facilitation of NMDA currents was abolished by SCH 23390 (10 microM). The results indicate that dopamine potentiates NMDA responses in layer V pyramidal cells of the PFC solely by activating D(1) receptors. D(2) receptors and alpha or beta adrenoceptors are not involved in the dopamine-NMDA interaction.

Direct interactions between NMDA and D1 receptors: a tale of tails

Considerable evidence has accumulated describing a complex interaction between the dopaminergic and glutamatergic pathways. Efforts to describe the mechanisms underlying this complex interaction have implicated a functional interaction between dopamine and glutamate receptors. Classically, the interaction between D1 and NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors has been proposed to involve the activation of second-messenger signalling cascades after receptor stimulation. However, in recent years, another paradigm has emerged which involves the direct interaction between D1 and NMDA receptors. The physical association between D1 and NMDA receptors is unique in that two different regions of the D1 C-terminus are able to couple specifically and physically with two different NMDA subunits. The selective modulation of multiple NMDA receptor-mediated functions by direct interactions with D1 receptors may form a new avenue to identify specific targets for therapeutics to modulate NMDA receptor-governed synaptic plasticity, neuronal development and disease states.

Modulation of dopamine mediated phosphorylation of AMPA receptors by PSD-95 and AKAP79/150

Communication between dopaminergic and glutamatergic synapses is critical for several functions related to cognition and emotion. Here, we examined whether dopamine receptor activity regulates phosphorylation and trafficking of the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor subunit, GluR1. We find treatment with a dopamine D1 receptor agonist enhanced GluR1 phosphorylation at Ser845, the PKA phosphorylation site, in both striatal and prefrontal cortical neurons. Enhanced phosphorylation of GluR1 also correlated with increased amounts of GluR1 on the cell surface. These effects were disrupted by expression of mutant forms of the A-kinase anchoring protein (AKAP79/150) and the postsynaptic density protein, PSD-95, that fail to target synaptic sites. Similar enhancement of the phosphorylation of GluR1 was observed in the nucleus accumbens upon stimulation of dopamine release in vivo using electrical stimulation of dopamine cell bodies in the ventral tegmental area. These results suggest in vivo stimulation of dopamine release directly influences AMPA receptor phosphorylation and together with in vitro data indicate that coupling of the AMPA receptor to AKAP79/150 and PSD-95 modulate this process.

Psychomotor stimulants and neuronal plasticity

Considerable evidence suggests that neuroadaptations leading to addiction involve the same glutamate-dependent cellular mechanisms that enable learning and memory. Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) have therefore become an important focus of addiction research. This article reviews: (1) basic mechanisms underlying LTP and LTD, (2) the properties of LTP and LTD in ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, dorsal striatum and prefrontal cortex, (3) studies demonstrating that psychomotor stimulants influence LTP or LTD in these brain regions. In addition, we discuss our recent work on cellular mechanisms by which dopamine may influence LTP and LTD. Based on evidence that AMPA receptors are inserted into synapses during LTP and removed during LTD, we investigated the effects of D1 receptor stimulation on AMPA receptor trafficking using primary cultures prepared from nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex. Our results suggest that activation of the D1 receptor-protein kinase A signaling pathway leads to externalization of AMPA receptors and promotes LTP. This provides a mechanism to explain facilitation of reward-related learning by dopamine. When this mechanism is activated in an unregulated manner by psychostimulants, maladaptive forms of neuroplasticity may occur that contribute to the transition from casual to compulsive drug use.