Nivolumab versus docetaxel in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057): 3-year update and outcomes in patients with liver metastases

Safety and Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Compared With Docetaxel for NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors versus docetaxel for non-small cell lung cancer by meta-analysis.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors versus docetaxel on the treatment of NSCLC were searched in CNKI, WF, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of eligible studies. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan5.3 software.

Results: Compared with the use of docetaxel chemotherapy for NSCLC, the overall survival and progression-free survival of the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors regimen are better [overall survival: (HR= 0.73, 95%CI:0.69∼0.77, P<0.00001], progression-free survival: (HR= 0.89, 95%CI:0.83∼0.94, P<0.00001]), and lower incidence of treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events ([OR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.13∼0.31, P<0.00001]).

Conclusion: Compared with the docetaxel chemotherapy regimen, the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors has certain advantages in terms of efficacy and safety. The results still need to be confirmed by a multi-center, large sample, and high-quality research.

Small cell lung cancer transformation during antitumor therapies: A systematic review

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are the two major histological categories of lung cancers. Drug resistance is a great challenge for cancer treatment, and histological transformation from NSCLC to SCLC is one of the mechanisms underlying drug resistance in NSCLC patients. SCLC-transformed patients show combined characteristics of NSCLC and SCLC; however, they lack timely diagnoses and effective treatment strategies. Thus, we reviewed the clinical characteristics of SCLC transformation patients with a literature search to enhance clinical consciousness, diagnosis, and personalized treatment for patients with it.

PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: heterogeneity by pathologic types, tissue sampling and metastasis

Background

Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is a predictive marker of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy response. Intra-tumour heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression has been reported in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but comprehensive studies regarding the determination of PD-L1 expression in different materials are still lacking. Therefore, we aimed to compare PD-L1 expression in paired tumour samples and in different specimen types.

Methods

A total of 1,002 resected NSCLC specimens, 35 biopsy specimens and 54 endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) samples were performed PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing using the 22C3 assay. PD-L1 expression was evaluated using the tumour proportion score (TPS) and categorized into three levels: negative (TPS <1%), low expression (TPS 1–49%) and high expression (TPS ≥50%).

Results

A total of 1,002 resected NSCLC specimens, including 852 adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and 150 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs); 35 paired biopsy and resected samples; 54 paired cell block and biopsy samples; 53 paired blocks from the same resected tissue and 49 paired primary and metastatic lesion samples were included in this study. Interestingly, high PD-L1 expression was significantly more frequent in poorly differentiated subtypes than in well-differentiated subtypes in the ADC subgroup (P<0.001). In the SCC subgroup, high PD-L1 expression was significantly more associated with the nonkeratinizing type than the keratinizing type (P=0.001). PD-L1 expression differed between cell blocks and matched biopsy specimens (discordance rate =11.1%, 6/54) and between biopsy and matched resected specimens (discordance rate =31.4%, 11/35). PD-L1 expression differed between different paraffin blocks from the same resected specimen (discordance rate =35.8%, 19/53), and the discordance rate of PD-L1 expression between primary tumours and matched lymph node metastases was 28.6% (14/49).

Conclusions

Discordant PD-L1 expression is not uncommon in NSCLC and warrants additional studies and serious consideration when interpreting PD-L1 test results. Initial negative test results may lead to repeat PD-L1 testing in additional samples or the use of a different clone if necessary.

Durvalumab after concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The standard of care for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab. Although doses higher than 66 Gy are standard in our center, they were used in only 6.9% of patients in the PACIFIC trial. We report our experience with durvalumab after high-dose radiotherapy. The database of a tertiary hospital for patients with stage III NSCLC who were treated with CRT and adjuvant durvalumab was evaluated. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and local-regional failure (LRF) were measured from the administration of durvalumab. Thirty-nine patients were included. All were treated with intensity-modulated radiation (mean dose 69.9 Gy); Median follow-up time was 20.4 months (range 1–35.4). At 12 months, PFS was 49%, OS 79%, and LRF 14%. Intrathoracic failure at first progression was demonstrated in 8 (21%) patients. Adverse events requiring corticosteroids occurred in 10(25.6%) patients: pneumonitis – 6 (15.4%), hepatitis – 2 (5.1%), and arthralgia and pericarditis – 1 (2.6%). One patient (2.6%) died of pneumonitis. The occurrence of pneumonitis was significantly associated with lung V5 (55% vs. 42%, p = .04) and V20 (28% vs. 19%, p = .01) and mean lung dose (14.8 Gy vs.11.6 Gy, p = .05). The similar 12-month PFS and OS rates of our cohort and the PACIFIC trial support the use of high-dose radiotherapy in patients with stage III NSCLC. Treatment-related mortality was similar to the PACIFIC results. The intrathoracic failure rate in our cohort was lower than that reported from the PACIFIC trial, suggesting that radiation dose escalation may improve local control.

Three models that predict the efficacy of immunotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Many tools have been developed to predict the efficacy of immunotherapy, such as lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), EPSILoN [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), smoking, liver metastases, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR)], and modified lung immune predictive index (mLIPI) scores. The aim of this study was to determine the ability of three predictive scores to predict the outcomes in Chinese advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 429 patients with aNSCLC treated with ICIs at our institution. The predictive ability of these models was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test (H–L test) and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were generated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

The AUC values of LIPI, mLIPI, and EPSILoN scores predicting PFS at 6 months were 0.642 [95% confidence interval (CI):0.590–0.694], 0.720 (95% CI: 0.675–0.762), and 0.633 (95% CI: 0.585–0.679), respectively (p < 0.001 for all models). The AUC values of LIPI, mLIPI, and EPSILON scores predicting objective response rate (ORR) were 0.606 (95% CI: 0.546–0.665), 0.683 (95% CI: 0.637–0.727), and 0.666 (95% CI: 0.620–0.711), respectively (p < 0.001 for all models). The C‐indexes of LIPI, mLIPI, and EPSILoN scores for PFS were 0.627 (95% CI 0.611–6.643), 0.677 (95% CI 0.652–0.682), and 0.631 (95% CI 0.617–0.645), respectively.

Conclusions

As mLIPI scores had the highest accuracy when used to predict the outcomes in Chinese aNSCLC patients, this tool could be used to guide clinical immunotherapy decision‐making.

PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Data from a Referral Center in Spain

Anti-programmed cell death (PD1)/ligand-1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors have improved the survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Additionally, PD-L1 has emerged as a predictive biomarker of response. Our goal was to examine the histological features of all PD-L1 cases of NSCLC analyzed in our center between 2017 and 2020, as well as to correlate the expression values of the same patient in different tested samples. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was carried out on 1279 external and internal samples: 482 negative (tumor proportion score, TPS < 1%; 37.7%), 444 low-expression (TPS 1–49%; 34.7%) and 353 high-expression (TPS ≥ 50%; 27.6%). Similar results were observed with samples from our institution (N = 816). Significant differences were observed with respect to tumor histological type (p = 0.004); squamous carcinoma was positive in a higher proportion of cases than other histological types. There were also differences between PD-L1 expression and the type of sample analyzed (surgical, biopsy, cytology; p < 0.001), with a higher frequency of negative cytology. In addition, there were cases with more than one PD-L1 determination, showing heterogeneity. Our results show strong correlation with the literature data and reveal heterogeneity between tumors and samples from the same patient, which could affect eligibility for treatment with immunotherapy.

Lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with an estimated 2 million new cases and 1·76 million deaths per year. Substantial improvements in our understanding of disease biology, application of predictive biomarkers, and refinements in treatment have led to remarkable progress in the past two decades and transformed outcomes for many patients. This seminar provides an overview of advances in the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer, with a particular focus on targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Comparing syngeneic and autochthonous models of breast cancer to identify tumor immune components that correlate with response to immunotherapy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The heterogeneity of the breast tumor microenvironment (TME) may contribute to the lack of durable responses to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB); however, mouse models to test this are currently lacking. Proper selection and use of preclinical models are necessary for rigorous, preclinical studies to rapidly move laboratory findings into the clinic.

METHODS

Three versions of a common syngeneic model derived from the MMTV-PyMT autochthonous model were generated by inoculating 1E6, 1E5, or 1E4 cells derived from the MMTV-PyMT mouse into wildtype recipient mice. To elucidate how tumor latency and TME heterogeneity contribute to ICB resistance, comprehensive characterization of the TME using quantitative flow-cytometry and RNA expression analysis (NanoString) was performed. Subsequently, response to ICB was tested. These procedures were repeated using the EMT6 breast cancer model.

RESULTS

The 3 syngeneic versions of the MMTV-PyMT model had vastly different TMEs that correlated to ICB response. The number of cells used to generate syngeneic tumors significantly influenced tumor latency, infiltrating leukocyte populations, and response to ICB. These results were confirmed using the EMT6 breast cancer model. Compared to the MMTV-PyMT autochthonous model, all 3 MMTV-PyMT syngeneic models had significantly more tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs; CD3⁺, CD4⁺, and CD8⁺) and higher proportions of PD-L1-positive myeloid cells, whereas the MMTV-PyMT autochthonous model had the highest frequency of myeloid cells out of total leukocytes. Increased TILs correlated with response to anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy, but PD-L1expression on tumor cells or PD-1 expression of T cells did not.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies reveal that tumor cell number correlates with tumor latency, TME, and response to ICB. ICB-sensitive and resistant syngeneic breast cancer models were identified, in which the 1E4 syngeneic model was most resistant to ICB. Given the lack of benefit from ICB in breast cancer, identifying robust murine models presented here provides the opportunity to further interrogate the TME for breast cancer treatment and provide novel insights into therapeutic combinations to overcome ICB resistance.

Isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency induced by nivolumab treatment for advanced gastric cancer

Isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) deficiency is a rare immune-related adverse event associated with immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors for malignant tumors. A 68-year-old man had previously undergone a complete gastrectomy with regional lymph-node dissection for remnant gastric cancer, with a final diagnosis of T4aN2M1, Stage IV. Because he developed lymph-node metastases during postoperative chemotherapy using S-1 plus oxaliplatin, he was treated with ramucirumab plus nab-paclitaxel. Eight months after the operation, the patient developed multiple liver metastases and was treated with nivolumab (3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks). After four cycles of nivolumab treatment, the cortisol level decreased, and the patient reported general fatigue and appetite loss. Pituitary stimulation testing using a combination of corticotropin-releasing hormone, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, and thyrotropin-releasing hormone revealed markedly low ACTH and cortisol responses. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed no enlargement of the pituitary gland or thickening of the stalk. After steroid replacement therapy using hydrocortisone, the patient's symptoms of general fatigue improved. After discharge, nivolumab and steroid replacement were continued. During the subsequent 6 months, the clinical course of the patient was mostly uneventful. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a marked shrinkage of liver and lymph-node metastases, which indicated a partial response with a 95.0% decrease in target lesions compared with baseline. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reported in the English literature of a patient who developed isolated ACTH deficiency during nivolumab treatment for a metastatic advanced gastric cancer.

A clinical variable-based nomogram could predict the survival for advanced NSCLC patients receiving second-line atezolizumab

Objective

A nomogram model based on clinical variables was conducted to predict the survival in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving second‐line atezolizumab.

Methods

Four hundred and twenty‐four patients with NSCLC receiving atezolizumab from OAK study were regarded as the training cohort. Next, a nomogram model based on clinical variables in the training cohort was established to predict the survival of patients receiving atezolizumab. The concordance index, area under curve (AUC), and calibration plots were used to assess the performance of the nomogram model. In addition, 144 patients with NSCLC receiving atezolizumab from POPLAR study were regarded as the test cohort to validate the nomogram model. Using Kaplan–Meier and log‐rank test, we compared the survival difference between the high‐ and low‐risk groups, atezolizumab and docetaxel treatment groups, respectively.

Results

We successfully constructed a nomogram model based on different variable scores for predicting the survival in NSCLC patients receiving atezolizumab using the training cohort. According to risk score, patients receiving atezolizumab were divided into the high‐ and low‐risk groups. Importantly, in the training cohort, patients had worse overall survival (OS) in high‐risk group compared with the low‐risk group (median survival: 252.3 vs. 556.9 days; p < 0.0001). As expected, in the test cohort, the high‐risk patients also showed a worse OS (median survival: 288.8 vs. 529.3 days, p = 0.0003). In addition, all the patients from the training and test cohorts could be found the OS benefit from atezolizumab compared with docetaxel (all, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The clinical variable‐based nomogram model could predict the survival benefit for NSCLC patients receiving second‐line atezolizumab.

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib With and Without Immunotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Aims

Combination of anti-angiogenesis therapy and immunotherapy has showed synergistic effects in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib with and without immunotherapy in NSCLC.

Methods

Pathologically confirmed NSCLC patients (stage IIIB-IV) receiving anlotinib between November 2018 and February 2020 were enrolled for retrospective analysis. The outcomes and safety of overall patients were evaluated, and the efficacies of anlotinib plus immunotherapy and anlotinib alone was compared. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 80 patients (median age: 62 years, range: 29-86 years) were included. Overall median PFS was 4.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7-5.9 months). In univariate analysis, patients without EGFR mutation, previous EGFR target therapy, and brain metastasis had significantly longer PFS. Cox regression analysis showed that only brain metastasis was an independent predictor of PFS. The median PFS of patients receiving anlotinib plus immunotherapy was slightly longer than that of patients receiving anlotinib alone (4.2 vs 3.1 months); however, the difference was not statistically significant. A tendency of longer median PFS was observed in patients with adenocarcinoma, EGFR wild type, stage IV, no liver metastasis, former smoker, ≥2 previous treatment lines, no previous VEGF or EGFR target therapies in anlotinib plus immunotherapy group. Treatments with anlotinib alone or anlotinib plus immunotherapy were well tolerable. The most common adverse events were fatigue, decreased hemoglobin count, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, oral mucositis and hoarseness.

Conclusion

Anlotinib is well tolerable and effective in advanced NSCLC patients. Brain metastasis is an independent predictor of PFS in NSCLC patients receiving anlotinib. Future prospective studies with larger sample size and extended follow-up are needed to confirm the clinical benefit in NSCLC patients treated with anlotinib combined with immunotherapy.

A vision of immuno-oncology: the Siena think tank of the Italian network for tumor biotherapy (NIBIT) foundation

BACKGROUND

The yearly Think Tank Meeting of the Italian Network for Tumor Biotherapy (NIBIT) Foundation, brings together in Siena, Tuscany (Italy), experts in immuno-oncology to review the learnings from current immunotherapy treatments, and to propose new pre-clinical and clinical investigations in selected research areas. MAIN: While immunotherapies in non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma led to practice changing therapies, the same therapies had only modest benefit for patients with other malignancies, such as mesothelioma and glioblastoma. One way to improve on current immunotherapies is to alter the sequence of each combination agent. Matching the immunotherapy to the host's immune response may thus improve the activity of the current treatments. A second approach is to combine current immunotherapies with novel agents targeting complementary mechanisms. Identifying the appropriate novel agents may require different approaches than the traditional laboratory-based discovery work. For example, artificial intelligence-based research may help focusing the search for innovative and most promising combination partners.

CONCLUSION

Novel immunotherapies are needed in cancer patients with resistance to or relapse after current immunotherapeutic drugs. Such new treatments may include targeted agents or monoclonal antibodies to overcome the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment. The mode of combining the novel treatments, including vaccines, needs to be matched to the patient's immune status for achieving the maximum benefit. In this scenario, specific attention should be also paid nowadays to the immune intersection between COVID-19 and cancer.

Efficacy and safety profile of combining programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and antiangiogenic targeting agents as subsequent therapy for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated that PD‐1 inhibitors are effective in the treatment of advanced or metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether the combination of PD‐1 inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents benefit advanced NSCLC patients as subsequent therapy remains unknown. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the efficacy and safety profile of this combination strategy as subsequent therapy for NSCLC patients in a real‐world setting.

Methods

A total of 30 patients with advanced NSCLC, who progressed after at least two cycles of platinum‐based chemotherapy or targeted therapy and subsequently received combination therapy with a PD‐1 inhibitor and antiangiogenic agent, were included in this study. The safety profile and efficacy were also investigated.

Results

At the time of a median follow‐up period of 10.7 months, 28 patients had experienced progression of disease and 16 patients had died. The median progression‐free survial (mPFS) was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.179–6.821), and the median overall survival (mOS) was 14.3 months (95% CI: 8.912–19.659). The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 10.3% and 72.4%, respectively (0 complete remission, three partial responses and 18 stable disease in 29 patients with measurable lesions). Patients with PD‐L1 expression of at least 1% of tumor cells (n = 5) had relatively longer mPFS compared to those with PD‐L1‐negative tumors (n = 14), (11.6 months vs. 3.7 months). Treatment was suspended in two patients due to grade 3 immune‐related pneumonia and pancreatitis, respectively. No novel adverse events (AEs) or grade 4 AEs were observed.

Conclusions

A combination of PD‐1 inhibitors and antiangiogenic targeting agents may be beneficial for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC as subsequent treatment, especially for patients with PD‐L1 protein expression positive, and treatment is well tolerated.

How to optimize the incorporation of immunotherapy in trials for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

Patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are considered as a subgroup of metastatic NSCLC that can obtain long-term survival or even cure. Oligometastatic refers to a state of a limited number of metastases in a limited number of organs. In clinical guidelines it is stated that patients with oligometastatic NSCLC can benefit from the addition of local radical therapy (LRT) to systemic therapy. With the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, advances in interventional radiology and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), LRT is becoming feasible for more and more patients. Furthermore, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the treatment landscape of advanced NSCLC has improved the survival of these patients. Importantly, the use of ICI in combination with LRT is also of interest in the subgroup of NSCLC patients with OMD. For example, it has been suggested that SRT may synergize with ICI as several preclinical studies reported an increased tumor antigen release, improved antigen presentation, and T-cell infiltration in irradiated tumors. In this narrative review, we describe the current evidence of immunotherapy treatment in OMD NSCLC, with a focus on future trial design and problems that need to be addressed.

Development and Evaluation of a Method to Correct Misinterpretation of Clinical Trial Results With Long-term Survival

Importance

In immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials, long tails and crossovers in survival curves-which violate the proportional hazards (PH) assumption-are commonly observed, making cure or restricted mean survival time models preferable for analysis of ICI survival data. Cox PH analysis, however, still appears in major medical journals, leading to potential misinterpretation of clinical significance.

Objective

To convert inappropriate Cox hazard ratios (HRs) to appropriate PH cure model treatment-effect estimates (HR for short-term survivors and difference in proportions [DP] for long-term survivors) for more accurate interpretation of published ICI trials.

Design and Setting

This study uses the Taylor expansion technique to demonstrate the mathematical relationship between Cox PH and PH cure models for data with long-term survival, and based on this relationship, proposes the Cox-TEL (Cox PH-Taylor expansion adjustment for long-term survival data) adjustment method. The proposed Cox-TEL method requires only 2 inputs: the reported Cox HRs and Kaplan-Meier-estimated survival probabilities.

Results

Comprehensive simulations show the strength of the proposed method in terms of power, bias, and type I error rate; these results, which are close to PH cure model estimates, were further verified in a melanoma data set (N = 285; Cox HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91; Cox-TEL HR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.60-1.07; PH cure HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.61-1.11; Cox-TEL DP = 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.23; PH cure DP = 0.10; 95% CI, 0.00-0.21). The magnitude of potential difference between reported and adjusted HRs using real-world ICI trial results is demonstrated. For example, in the CheckMate 067 trial (nivolumab/ipilimumab combination therapy vs ipilimumab), the Cox HR was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.44-0.67), and the Cox-TEL HR was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.73-1.11).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this study suggest the need to revisit published ICI survival data analysis to address potential misinterpretation. The Cox-TEL method not only is designed for this purpose, but also is user friendly and easy to implement using published clinical trial data and a freely available R software package.

Pan-Cancer Analysis Identifies Liver Metastases as Negative Predictive Factor for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of liver metastases (LM) in patients with various advanced cancers received immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). First, clinical and survival data from a published cohort of 1,661 patients who received ICIs therapy were downloaded and analyzed. Second, a retrospective review of 182 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy was identified. Third, a meta-analysis of published trials was performed to explore the impact of LM on the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 based therapy in advanced lung cancers. Pan-cancer analysis revealed that patients with LM had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than those without LM (10 vs. 20 months; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that the presence of LM was associated with markedly shorter OS than those without LM in ICI monotherapy group (P < 0.0001), but it did not reach the statistical significance in ICI-based combination therapy (P = 0.0815). In NSCLC, the presence of LM was associated with significantly inferior treatment outcomes in both pan-cancer and real-world cohort. Interestingly, ICI-based monotherapy and combination therapy could simultaneously prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and OS than chemotherapy in patients without LM. However, ICI-based monotherapy could not prolong PFS than chemotherapy in patients with LM while ICI-based combination therapy could dramatically prolong both PFS and OS. Together, these findings suggested that the presence of LM was the negative predictive factor in cancer patients received ICIs monotherapy, especially in NSCLC. ICI-based combination therapy might overcome the intrinsic resistance of LM to ICIs while the optimal combinatorial strategies remain under further investigation.

Combined strategies for effective cancer immunotherapy with a novel anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody

CD47 is a widely expressed cell-surface protein that regulates phagocytosis mediated by cells of the innate immune system, such as macrophages and dendritic cells. CD47 serves as the ligand for a receptor on these innate immune cells, signal regulatory protein (SIRP)-α, which in turn inhibits phagocytosis. Several targeted CD47 therapeutic antibodies have been investigated clinically; however, how to improve its therapeutic efficacy remains unclear. Herein, we developed a CD47 blocking antibody, named IBI188, that could specifically block the CD47-SIRP-α axis, which transduces the "don't eat me" signal to macrophages. In vitro phagocytosis assays demonstrated the pro-phagocytosis ability of IBI188. Furthermore, several in vivo models were chosen to evaluate the anti-tumor efficacy of IBI188. IBI188 treatment upregulated cell movement- and inflammation-related genes in macrophages. Synergism was observed when combined with an anti-CD20 therapeutic antibody, whose function depends on antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity/phagocytosis (ADCC/ADCP). CD47 expression was evaluated following azacytidine (AZA) treatment, a standard-of-care for patients with multiple myeloma; enhanced anti-tumor efficacy was observed in the combination group in AML xenograft models. Notably, IBI188 treatment increased vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) levels in a solid tumor model, and combined treatment with an anti-VEGF-A antibody and IBI188 resulted in an enhanced anti-tumor effect. These data indicate that IBI188 is a therapeutic anti-CD47 antibody with anti-tumor potency, which can be enhanced when used in combination with standard-of-care drugs for cancer treatment.

Advancing to the era of cancer immunotherapy

Cancer greatly affects the quality of life of humans worldwide and the number of patients suffering from it is continuously increasing. Over the last century, numerous treatments have been developed to improve the survival of cancer patients but substantial progress still needs to be made before cancer can be truly cured. In recent years, antitumor immunity has become the most debated topic in cancer research and the booming development of immunotherapy has led to a new epoch in cancer therapy. In this review, we describe the relationships between tumors and the immune system, and the rise of immunotherapy. Then, we summarize the characteristics of tumor‐associated immunity and immunotherapeutic strategies with various molecular mechanisms by showing the typical immune molecules whose antibodies are broadly used in the clinic and those that are still under investigation. We also discuss important elements from individual cells to the whole human body, including cellular mutations and modulation, metabolic reprogramming, the microbiome, and the immune contexture. In addition, we also present new observations and technical advancements of both diagnostic and therapeutic methods aimed at cancer immunotherapy. Lastly, we discuss the controversies and challenges that negatively impact patient outcomes.

PD-1 Inhibitors Could Improve the Efficacy of Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Biliary Tract Cancers: A Propensity Score Matching Based Analysis

Background

There are limited treatment options for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs), including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic bile duct cancer, gallbladder cancer. We compared the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in patients with advanced BTC.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with BTC treated at the oncology department of the Chinese PLA general hospital receiving PD-1 inhibitor with chemotherapy (anti-PD-1+C group) or chemotherapy alone (C group). Propensity Score Matching (PSM) (1:1) was performed to balance potential baseline confounding factors. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves with log-rank tests. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were also analyzed.

Results

This study included 75 patients who received PD-1 inhibitors (including Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, Sintilimab, Toripalimab) plus chemotherapy and 59 patients who received chemotherapy alone. After matching, there were no significant differences between the two groups for baseline characteristics. Within the matched cohort, the median PFS was 5.8m in the anti-PD-1+C group, which was significantly longer than the C group, at 3.2m (HR: 0.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.76, P = 0.004). The ORR was 21.7% and DCR was 80.4% in the anti-PD-1+C group, while the ORR was 15.2% and DCR was 69.6% in the C group. No significant differences were found in the ORR and DCR between the two groups (P=0.423, P=0.231). Grade 3 or 4 treatment was related to adverse events (AEs) that occurred in the anti-PD-1+C group, namely hypothyroidism (n=3, 6.5%), rash (n=2, 4.2%), and hepatitis (n=1, 2.2%). There was no AE-related death. The grade 3-4 leukopenia rate was similar in the two groups (4.3% vs. 6.5%).

Conclusions

Anti-PD-1 therapy plus chemotherapy prolonged the PFS compared with chemotherapy alone in advanced BTC with controllable AEs. Further clinical trials are needed to confirm this result.

Evaluation of efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab combined with or without docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC

Background

The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and chemotherapy has been clinically confirmed to be beneficial as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This study aimed to assess the effect of nivolumab + docetaxel versus nivolumab monotherapy in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy.

Materials and methods

The efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy were compared in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

Results

Between November 2017 and December 2019, 77 patients were included in this study, with 58 patients in the nivolumab group and 19 in the nivolumab + docetaxel group. The median follow-up was 18 months, and the PFS was 8 months for patients receiving nivolumab + docetaxel and 2 months for those receiving nivolumab alone (p = 0.001), respectively. Nivolumab + docetaxel showed superior OS compared with nivolumab, with the median OS unreached versus 7 months (p = 0.011). Among patients without EGFR/ALK variation, compared to nivolumab monotherapy, nivolumab + docetaxel showed better PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p  = 0.05). There was no significant difference in grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups (p = 0.253).

Conclusions

The combination of nivolumab and docetaxel demonstrated a meaningful improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to nivolumab monotherapy, in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy, irrespective of EGFR/ALK variation status.

The Position of EGF Deprivation in the Management of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has faced a therapeutic revolution with the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) approved for first and subsequent therapies. CIMAvax-EGF is a chemical conjugate between human-recombinant EGF and P64, a recombinant protein from Neisseria meningitides, which induces neutralizing antibodies against EGF. In the last 15 years, it has been extensively evaluated in advanced NSCLC patients. CIMAvax-EGF is safe, even after extended use, and able to keep EGF serum concentration below detectable levels. In a randomized phase III study, CIMAvax-EGF increased median overall survival of advanced NSCLC patients with at least stable disease after front-line chemotherapy. Patients bearing squamous-cell or adenocarcinomas and serum EGF concentration above 870 pg/ml had better survival compared to control patients treated with best supportive care as maintenance, confirming tumors' sensitivity to the EGF depletion. This manuscript reviews the state-of-the-art NSCLC therapy and proposes the most promising scenarios for evaluating CIMAvax-EGF, particularly in combination with TKIs or ICIs. We hypothesize that the optimal combination of CIMAvax-EGF with established therapies can further contribute to transform advanced cancer into a manageable chronic disease, compatible with years of good quality of life.

Efficacy and Treatment Strategies in Advanced Cancers with Liver Metastasis Receiving Atezolizumab Therapy

BACKGROUND

Atezolizumab has been used to treat patients with liver metastasis (LM). However, whether atezolizumab is superior to standard of care therapy in an all-comer or selective population with LM is still uncertain.

METHODS

A pooled analysis based on 10 randomized controlled trials was conducted to evaluate the clinical benefit of atezolizumab versus standard therapy in patients stratified by liver metastatic status, followed by biomarker-based individual analyses of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohort (OAK and POPLAR studies) and urothelial cancer cohort (IMvigor210 study).

RESULTS

The pooled analysis demonstrated an overall survival (OS) improvement using atezolizumab treatment versus standard therapy across cancer types and treatment lines regardless of liver metastatic status. However, the efficacy of atezolizumab in patients with LM from the second-line setting was limited, based on the individual analysis of NSCLC cohorts (P = 0.053). PD-L1 strong expression emerged as a predominant biomarker (P = 0.015) to screen atezolizumab-advantageous patients with LM. Notably, the combination of PD-L1 and LM improved the predictive power for atezolizumab therapy in both NSCLC and urothelial cancer cohorts. Exploratory translational analysis revealed that strong expression of PD-L1 might have reversed the non-inflamed immune phenotype of liver metastasis, thus sensitizing these patients to immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated a preferable efficacy of atezolizumab in patients with LM as first-line therapy over standard of care therapy, while sensitive patients should be selected in second-line settings. PD-L1 was demonstrated as the most effective biomarker for screening atezolizumab-advantageous patients with LM.

Dual but not single PD-1 or TIM-3 blockade enhances oncolytic virotherapy in refractory lung cancer

Background

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade therapy fails in the majority of patients with cancer. Oncolytic viruses represent a new class of therapeutic agents, yet the therapeutic efficacy is still disappointing. Moreover, intratumoral injection of viruses is the main approach and preclinical studies mainly employ syngeneic or xenograft models.

Methods

Use an endogenous mouse lung cancer model that faithfully recapitulates human lung cancer, and various in vivo, ex vivo and in vitro assays, to investigate the efficacy, mechanism of action and resistance of systemically administered oncolytic vaccinia virus (oVV), immunotherapy and their combination, to find an effective therapy for refractory lung cancer.

Results

Resembling human lung cancers, the majority of which are largely resistant to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and with decreased PD-L1 expression and T-cell activation by our analysis, urethane-induced endogenous lung tumors in mice show reduced PD-L1 expression, low tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and innate resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Intravenous administration of oVV has efficacy and synergizes with simultaneous but not single blockade of PD-1 and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM-3) in this cancer model. Besides direct tumor cell killing, oVV induces T-cell lung recruitment, tumor infiltration, along with expression of PD-1 and TIM-3 on T cells and PD-1 and TIM-3 ligands on tumor cells and tumor-associated immune cells. Blockade of PD-1 or TIM-3 also causes their mutual induction on T cells.

Conclusions

While systemic administration of oVV shows efficacy in lung cancer by killing tumor cells directly and recruiting and activating T cells for indirect tumor killing, its induction of PD-1 and TIM-3 on T cells and PD-1 and TIM-3 ligands on tumors and tumor-associated immune cells as well as mutual induction of PD-1 or TIM-3 on T cells by their blockade restricts the efficacy of oVV or its combination with single PD-1 or TIM-3 blockade. The triple combination therapy is more effective for refractory lung cancer, and possibly other cold cancers as well.

Response Rate and Survival at Key Timepoints With PD-1 Blockade vs Chemotherapy in PD-L1 Subgroups: Meta-Analysis of Metastatic NSCLC Trials

Background

Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells with or without immune cells is widely reported in clinical trials of programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) blockade in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Various cutpoints have been studied.

Methods

We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and conference proceedings up to December 2019 for randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. We retrieved data on objective response rate (ORR), 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), and 2-year and 3-year overall survival (OS) in various PD-L1 subgroups. Results were pooled and analyzed based on different cutpoints, with nonrandomized comparisons made with pooled chemotherapy outcomes.

Results

A total of 9810 patients in 27 studies were included. In treatment-naïve patients, benefits with PD-1 blockade over chemotherapy were seen in ORR in patients having PD-L1 50% or greater, in 2-year OS for PD-L1 1% or greater, and in 1-year PFS, 2-year PFS, and 3-year OS for unselected patients. First-line PD-1 blockade compared with chemotherapy demonstrated higher ORR, 2-year PFS, and 3-year OS if PD-L1 was 50% or greater; lower ORR, higher 2-year PFS, and similar 3-year OS if PD-L1 was 1%-49%; and lower ORR, similar 1-year PFS, and lower 2-year OS if PD-L1 was less than 1%. In previously treated patients, PD-1 blockade demonstrated similar or superior outcomes to chemotherapy in all PD-L1 subgroups.

Conclusions

PD-L1 should guide the choice of PD-1 blockade vs chemotherapy in treatment-naïve patients. In previously treated patients, PD-1 blockade provides a favorable outcome profile to chemotherapy in all PD-L1 subgroups.

Blocking circ_0014130 suppressed drug resistance and malignant behaviors of docetaxel resistance-acquired NSCLC cells via regulating miR-545-3p-YAP1 axis

Recent evidences have claimed that circular RNAs are deregulated in docetaxel (DTX) resistance in malignant tumors, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Hsa_circ_0014130 (circ_0014130) is a new biomarker in NSCLC. However, its role in DTX-resistant NSCLC remained to be annotated. In this study, real-time PCR was used to measure expression of circ_0014130, and circ_0014130 was upregulated in NSCLC tumors and DTX-resistant NSCLC cells (NCI-H1299/DTX and A549/DTX). MTT assay analyzed the half inhibitory concentration (IC50) of DTX, and it was lowered by circ_0014130 interference in DTX-resistant NSCLC cells. Moreover, colony formation assay, flow cytometry, transwell assays, and xenograft tumor model revealed that silencing circ_0014130 facilitated apoptosis rate of DTX-resistant NSCLC cells, suppressed the colony formation, migration and invasion, and retarded xenograft tumor growth in nude mice. Dual-luciferase reporter assay and RNA immunoprecipitation confirmed that circ_0014130 was one competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) for miRNA (miR)-545-3p, and circ_0014130 modulated expression of yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1), a target gene for miR-545-3p. YAP1 upregulation and miR-545-3p downregulation were allied with circ_0014130 upregulation in NSCLC tumors and DTX-resistant NSCLC cells. Functionally, downregulating miR-545-3p could abate the effects of circ_0014130 knockdown in DTX-resistant NSCLC cells in vitro, whereas its overexpression exerted similar effects of circ_0014130 knockdown. Either, restoring YAP1 partially reversed miR-545-3p effects in DTX-resistant NSCLC cells. Collectively, there might be a novel circ_0014130-miR-545-3p-YAP1 ceRNA pathway in regulation of chemoresistance and malignant behaviors of DTX-resistant NSCLC cells, suggesting a potential therapeutic approach for DTX resistance.

Immune-related genes and gene sets for predicting the response to anti-programmed death 1 therapy in patients with primary or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Although antibodies targeting the immune checkpoint protein programmed death-1 (PD-1) exert therapeutic effects in patients with primary or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the majority of patients exhibit partial or complete resistance to anti-PD1 treatment. Thus, the aim of the present study was to identify reliable biomarkers for predicting the response to anti-PD-1 therapy. The present study analyzed tumor specimens isolated from 24 patients (13 with primary and 11 with metastatic NSCLC) prior to treatment with approved PD1-targeting antibodies. The expression profile of 395 immune-related genes was examined using RNA immune-oncology panel sequencing. The results demonstrated that six immune-related differently expressed genes (DEGs), including HLA-F-AS1, NCF1, RORC, DMBT1, KLRF1 and IL-18, and five DEGs, including HLA-A, HLA-DPA1, TNFSF18, IFI6 and PTK7, may be used as single biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of anti-PD-1 treatment in patients with primary and with metastatic NSCLC, respectively. In addition, two DEG sets comprising either six (HLA-F-AS1, NCF1, RORC, DMBT1, KLRF and IL-18) or two (HLA-A and TNFSF18) DEGs as potential combination biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with NSCLC. Patients with a calculated expression level of the DEG sets >6.501 (primary NSCLC) or >6.741 (metastatic NSCLC) may benefit from the anti-PD-1 therapy. Overall, these findings provided a basis for the identification of additional biomarkers for predicting the response to anti-PD-1 treatment.

Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review

Background

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) have been progressively used in cancer treatment and produced unique toxicity profiles. This systematic review aims to comprehend the patterns and occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) based on ICI.

Methods

PICOS/PRISMA methods were used to identify published English-language on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from 2015 to 2020. Published clinical trials on ICI monotherapy, combined ICIs, and ICI plus other treatment with tabulated data on grade≥3 trAEs were included. Odds ratio (OR), χ² tests were used to analyze for effect size and associations.

Results

This review included 145 clinical trials involving 21786 patients. Grade 3-5 trAEs were more common with ICI when they were plused with other treatments compared with ICI monotherapy(54.3% versus 17.7%, 46.1%, p<0.05). Grade 3-5 trAEs were also more common with CTLA-4 mAbs compared with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 (34.2% versus 15.1%, 13.6%, p<0.05). Hyperthyroidism (OR 3.8, 95%CI 1.7–8.6), nausea (OR 3.7, 95%CI 2.5–5.3), diarrhea (OR 2.7, 95%CI 2.2–3.2), colitis (OR 3.4, 95%CI 2.7–4.3), ALT increase (OR 4.9, 95%CI 3.9–6.1), AST increase (OR 3.8, 95%CI 3.0–4.9), pruritus (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.5–3.9), rash (OR 2.8, 95%CI 2.1–3.8), fatigue (OR 2.8, 95%CI 2.2–3.7), decreased appetite (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.5–3.8), and hypophysitis (OR 2.0, 95%CI 1.2–3.3) were more frequent with combined ICIs. Diarrhea (OR 8.1, 95%CI 6.4–10.3), colitis (OR 12.2, 95%CI 8.7–17.1), ALT increase (OR 5.1, 95%CI 3.5–7.4), AST increase (OR 4.2, 95%CI 2.8–6.3), pruritus (OR 4.1, 95%CI 2.0–8.4), rash (OR 4.4, 95%CI 2.9–6.8), hypophysitis (OR 12.1, 95%CI 6.3–23.4) were more common with CTLA-4 mAbs; whereas pneumonitis (OR 4.7, 95% CI 2.1–10.3) were more frequent with PD-1 mAbs.

Conclusions

Different immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with different treatment-related adverse events profiles. A comprehensive data in this systematic review will provide comprehensive information for clinicians.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable stage IIIA/IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

Background

A small proportion of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience objective clinical benefit after neoadjuvant programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade. A neoadjuvant therapeutic regimen combining immune checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy might improve the treatment effect, but such a regimen has not been tested in patients with resectable stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC.

Methods

A retrospective study of 35 patients with resectable stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC who were treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIO) was performed. Patients were evaluated for pathological complete response (pCR), major pathologic response (MPR), safety, and feasibility. The correlations of pathologic response with various clinical factors were studied to identify predictors of pathological response.

Results

NCIO was associated with few immediate adverse events. NCIO did not delay planned surgery and led to a pCR rate of 51.43% and an MPR rate of 74.29% for the primary tumor. No association was observed between programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression before NCIO and the pathologic response (Pearson’s r=−0.071; P=0.685). However, a significant difference was observed in pathological response in patients with intracavitary and extracavitary tumors (P<0.05). Patients with intracavitary type had a higher pCR (76.47% vs. 31.58%) and MPR (100% vs. 50.00%) rate than patients with extracavitary type (Pearson’s r=0.7280; P=0.0009).

Conclusions

NCIO was associated with few side effects, did not delay surgery, and achieved a pCR in 51.43% and MPR in 74.29% of resected tumors. No significant correlation was found between pathologic response and PD-L1 expression. While the intracavitary and extracavitary tumors type T was predictive of the pathological response to NCIO.

Two-year survival with nivolumab in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A real-world pooled analysis of patients from France, Germany, and Canada

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become the standard of care for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Real-world clinical practice tends to represent more diverse patient characteristics than randomized clinical trials. We sought to evaluate overall survival (OS) outcomes in the total study population and in key subsets of patients who received nivolumab for previously treated advanced NSCLC in real-world settings in France, Germany, or Canada.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were pooled from two prospective observational cohort studies, EVIDENS and ENLARGE, and a retrospective registry in Canada. Patients included in this analysis were aged ≥18 years, had stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, and received nivolumab after at least one prior line of systemic therapy. OS was estimated in the pooled population and in various subgroups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Timing of data collection varied across cohorts (2015-2019).

RESULTS

Of the 2585 patients included in this analyses, 1235 (47.8 %) were treated in France, 881 (34.1 %) in Germany, and 469 (18.1 %) in Canada. Median OS for the total study population was 11.3 months (95 % CI: 10.5-12.2); this was similar across France, Germany, and Canada. The OS rate was 49 % at 1 year and 28 % at 2 years for the total study population. In univariable Cox analyses, the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in nonsquamous disease, liver, or bone metastases were associated with significantly shorter OS, whereas tumor programmed death ligand 1 expression and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 were associated with significantly prolonged OS. Similar OS was noted across subgroups of age and prior lines of therapy.

CONCLUSION

OS rates in patients receiving nivolumab for previously treated advanced NSCLC in real-world clinical practice closely mirrored those in phase 3 studies, suggesting similar effectiveness of nivolumab in clinical trials and clinical practice.

Integrative evaluation of primary and metastatic lesion spectrum to guide anti-PD-L1 therapy of non-small cell lung cancer: results from two randomized studies

Objectives: Clinical benefits of immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) versus standard chemotherapy have been established in unselected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the response to ICB therapy among patients is heterogeneous in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively assessed the predicitive effect of the primary and metastatic lesion spectrum (baseline sum of the longest diameters [SLD], number of metastatic sites and specific organ metastases) on the efficacy of atezolizumab over docetaxel in OAK and POPLAR trial cohorts. A decision model, termed DSO (Diameter-Site-Organ), based on the spectrum was developed and validated for guiding ICB. Results: Higher SLD (>38 mm) and more metastatic sites (≥2) were characterized with pronounced overall survival (OS) benefits from atezolizumab versus docetaxel. Specifically, adrenal gland and brain metastases were identified as favorable predictors of atezolizumab treatment. The DSO model was developed in the discovery cohort to integrate the directive effect of the primary and metastatic lesion spectrum. Remarkably, a general pattern of enhanced efficacy of atezolizumab versus docetaxel was observed along with the increase of the DSO score. For patients with DSO score > 0, atezolizumab yielded a significantly prolonged OS than docetaxel, whereas OS was generally similar between two treatments in patients with DSO score ≤ 0. Equivalent findings were also seen in the internal and external validation cohorts. Conclusions: The response to anti-PD-L1 therapy among patients varied with the primary and metastatic lesion spectrum. The DSO-based system might provide promising medication guidance for ICB treatment in NSCLC patients.

Long-term immune-related adverse events after discontinuation of immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of various cancers but are notorious for their potential to cause severe side effects. While most side effects occur during ongoing therapy, an increasing number of reports of late onset have emerged. It is also not yet clear how long side effects can last. Resolution is achieved under symptomatic therapy, but the side effects may persist latently. We present a patient case with recurrence of colitis after closure of an ileostomy over 1 year after discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab. To the best of our knowledge, no other case with severe colitis still lasting after more than a year of suspension of therapy has yet been reported.

Liver metastases

Liver metastases are commonly detected in a range of malignancies including colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic cancer, melanoma, lung cancer and breast cancer, although CRC is the most common primary cancer that metastasizes to the liver. Interactions between tumour cells and the tumour microenvironment play an important part in the engraftment, survival and progression of the metastases. Various cells including liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, parenchymal hepatocytes, dendritic cells, resident natural killer cells as well as other immune cells such as monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils are implicated in promoting and sustaining metastases in the liver. Four key phases (microvascular, pre-angiogenic, angiogenic and growth phases) have been identified in the process of liver metastasis. Imaging modalities such as ultrasonography, CT, MRI and PET scans are typically used for the diagnosis of liver metastases. Surgical resection remains the main potentially curative treatment among patients with resectable liver metastases. The role of liver transplantation in the management of liver metastasis remains controversial. Systemic therapies, newer biologic agents (for example, bevacizumab and cetuximab) and immunotherapeutic agents have revolutionized the treatment options for liver metastases. Moving forward, incorporation of genetic tests can provide more accurate information to guide clinical decision-making and predict prognosis among patients with liver metastases.

The Ratio of IP10 to IL-8 in Plasma Reflects and Predicts the Response of Patients With Lung Cancer to Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy Combined With Chemotherapy

Antibodies against checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) have shown clinical efficacy in the treatment of multiple cancers. However, there are only a few studies on biomarkers for these targeted immunotherapies, especially in peripheral blood. We first studied the role of interferon-induced protein-10 (IP10) combined with interleukin-8 (IL-8) in peripheral blood as a biomarker of immune-combined chemotherapy for lung cancer and multiple cancers. We used the high-throughput cytokine detection platform and performed bioinformatics analysis of blood samples from 67 patients with lung cancer and 24 with multiple cancers. We selected the ratio of IP-10 to IL-8 (S2/S0, ratio of changes at 10-12 weeks after treatment to baseline) to predict the response to immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and evaluate the survival of lung cancer patients and mixed cancer patients. In patients treated with the combination therapy, the specificity and sensitivity of IL-8 and IP10 together as predictors were improved compared with those of IL-8 and IP10 alone. Our conclusion was verified in not only lung cancer but also multiple cancer research cohorts. We then further validated the predictive effect of biomarkers in different histologic types of NSCLC and chemotherapy combined with different PD-1 drug groups. Subsequent validation should be conducted with a larger number of patients. The proposed marker IP10 (S2/S0)/IL-8 (S2/S0), as a predictive immunotherapy biomarker, has broad prospects for future clinical applications in treating patients with multiple intractable neoplasms.

Impact of copy number variant and single nucleotide polymorphism of the programmed death-ligand 1 gene, programmed death-ligand 1 protein expression and therapy regimens on overall survival in a large group of Caucasian patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma

Anti-programmed death-1 or anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade may be ineffective in some patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high percentage of tumor cells with PD-L1 expression. In addition, immunotherapy may provide great benefits in patients without PD-L1 expression. The present study assessed PD-L1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry, copy number variation (CNV) of PD-L1 and two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs822335 and rs822336, in the promoter of PD-L1 by quantitative PCR in 673 patients with NSCLC. Overall survival time of patients with NSCLC depending on the assessed predictive factors (PD-L1 CNV or SNP) and the treatment methods (immunotherapy in first/second line of treatment or chemotherapy) was analyzed. The present study revealed significantly higher PD-L1 copies number in patients with ≥10% and ≥50% of tumor cells with PD-L1 expression compared to patients with lower percentage of PD-L1-positive tumor cells (P=0.02 and P=0.0002, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation (R=0.2; P=0.01) between number of PD-L1 copies and percentage of tumor cells with PD-L1 protein expression. Percentage of tumor cells with PD-L1 expression was lower in patients with TT genotype of the rs822335 polymorphism compared to those with CC genotype (P=0.03). The present study observed significantly higher risk of death in patients treated with chemotherapy compared to those treated with immunotherapy (P<0.0001; hazard ratio=2.4768; 95% confidence interval, 2.0120–3.0490). The present study demonstrated a close relationship between PD-L1 copies number, genotype of rs822335 PD-L1 polymorphism and PD-L1 protein expression on tumor cells. However, the impact of CNV and SNPs of PD-L1 on overall survival of patients with NSCLC requires further investigation.

In Vivo Evaluation and Dosimetry Estimate for a High Affinity Affibody PET Tracer Targeting PD-L1

PURPOSE

In vivo imaging of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) during immunotherapy could potentially monitor changing PD-L1 expression and PD-L1 expression heterogeneity within and across tumors. Some protein constructs can be used for same-day positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Previously, we evaluated the PD-L1-targeting Affibody molecule [18F]AlF-NOTA-ZPD-L1_1 as a PET tracer in a mouse tumor model of human PD-L1 expression. In this study, we evaluated the affinity-matured Affibody molecule ZPD-L1_4, to determine if improved affinity for PD-L1 resulted in increased in vivo targeting of PD-L1.

PROCEDURES

ZPD-L1_4 was conjugated with NOTA and radiolabeled with either [18F]AlF or 68Ga. [18F]AlF-NOTA-ZPD-L1_4 and [68Ga]NOTA-ZPD-L1_4 were evaluated in immunocompromised mice with LOX (PD-L1+) and SUDHL6 (PD-L1-) tumors with PET and ex vivo biodistribution measurements. In addition, whole-body PET studies were performed in rhesus monkeys to predict human biodistribution in a model with tracer binding to endogenous PD-L1, and to calculate absorbed radiation doses.

RESULTS

Ex vivo biodistribution measurements showed that both tracers had > 25 fold higher accumulation in LOX tumors than SUDHL6 ([18F]AlF-NOTA-ZPD-L1_4: LOX: 8.7 ± 0.7 %ID/g (N = 4) SUDHL6: 0.2 ± 0.01 %ID/g (N = 6), [68Ga]NOTA-ZPD-L1_4: LOX: 15.8 ± 1.0 %ID/g (N = 6) SUDHL6: 0.6 ± 0.1 %ID/g (N = 6)), considerably higher than ZPD-L1_1. In rhesus monkeys, both PET tracers showed fast clearance through kidneys and low background signal in the liver ([18F]AlF-NOTA-ZPD-L1_4: 1.26 ± 0.13 SUV, [68Ga]NOTA-ZPD-L1_4: 1.11 ± 0.06 SUV). PD-L1-expressing lymph nodes were visible in PET images, indicating in vivo PD-L1 targeting. Dosimetry estimates suggest that both PET tracers can be used for repeated clinical studies, although high kidney accumulation may limit allowable radioactive doses.

CONCLUSIONS

[18F]AlF-NOTA-ZPD-L1_4 and [68Ga]NOTA-ZPD-L1_4 are promising candidates for same-day clinical PD-L1 PET imaging, warranting clinical evaluation. The ability to use either [18F] or [68Ga] may expand access to clinical sites.

Particle Beam Therapy for Cardiac-Sparing Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Radiation therapy plays an integral role in the treatment of all stages of non-small cell lung cancer. Survival outcomes are improving, but radiation therapy remains associated with long-term toxicity. Recently, it has become evident that the heart is an important organ at risk for treatment-related morbidity. In this review, we discuss the hypothesis that particle radiation therapy offers superior dosimetry compared with photon-based treatment, and that this comparative advantage translates into clinically meaningful cardiac toxicity reduction with similar local tumor control. We discuss the evidence in non-small cell lung cancer to date, the ongoing prospective trials that may provide additional insight, and the opportunities to optimally integrate particle therapy into future prospective investigation.

Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Beyond PD-L1

Immunotherapy has markedly improved the survival rate of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and has introduced a new era in lung cancer treatment. Although some patients achieve durable responses to checkpoint blockade, not all experience such benefits, and some suffer from significant immunotoxicities. Thus, it is crucial to identify potential biomarkers suitable for screening the population that may benefit from immunotherapy. Based on the current clinical trials, the aim of the present study was to review the biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition that may have the potential to predict the response to immunotherapy in patients with lung cancer. A non-systematic literature review was done. We searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2015 to January 2021. The keywords included biomarkers, immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibition, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and non-small cell lung cancer. Additional biomarkers beyond PD-L1 that have been shown to have predictive capacity include tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, lung immune prognostic index, gut microbiome, and certain alterations in genes (eg, STK11 deletion, LKB1 kinase mutation, MDM2/4 amplification) that confer immunoresistance. The biomarkers reviewed in this article could help us better select the appropriate immunotherapy treatment for patients with NSCLC.

Effectiveness and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients with Advanced Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Real-World: Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

The benefit of programmed death-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy, particularly of nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, in the second-line setting of patients with non-small cell lung cancer has been documented in randomized clinical trials, showing improvements in global survival and in the overall response rate. Nevertheless, patients enrolled in these studies met strict eligibility criteria, allowing for the treatment of patients that do not reflect the broader oncology patient population. Experiences from real-world data are useful in providing further evidence of the benefit of treatment in a wider range of patients, including those underrepresented in clinical trials. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated in everyday practice with these drugs as the second line, and more generally with immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), showing that the efficacy and safety were comparable to those in selected studies. Results may encourage to treat patients excluded from randomized studies.

Abstract

Immunotherapy based on anti PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is the new standard of advanced non-small cell lung cancers. Pembrolizumab, nivolumab and atezolizumab are used in clinical practice. The strict eligibility criteria of clinical trials do not allow researchers to fully represent treatment effects in the patients that will ultimately use these drugs. We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these drugs, and more generally of ICIs, as second-line therapy in NSCLC patients in real world practice. MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched to include original studies published between January 2015 and April 2020. A total of 32 studies was included in the meta-analysis. The overall radiological response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21%, 52%, 3.35 months and 9.98 months, respectively. The results did not change when analysis was adjusted for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) and age. A unitary increase in the percent of patients with liver and CNS metastases reduced the occurrence of DCR by 7% (p < 0.001) and the median PFS by 2% (p = 0.010), respectively. The meta-analysis showed that the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in everyday practice is comparable to that in clinical trials.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy Alone and in Combination With Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

There is a lack of direct cross-comparison studies in clinical trials between immunotherapy alone and combination treatment, especially in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with high PD-L1 expression. To determine if anti-PD-(L)1 antibody combined with chemotherapy is more efficient than immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy for advanced NSCLC patients in the real-world data. We retrospectively collected 325 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI alone with or without chemotherapy from 11th July 2016 to 26th May 2020 to investigate which treatment scenario is the most efficient, and how clinical factors impact response. Patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with ICI monotherapy (178/325, 54.8%) or in combination with chemotherapy (147/325, 45.2%). The objective response rate and disease control rate were higher in the combination group than the monotherapy group. Patients (including those with distant metastasis) treated with chemo-immunotherapy were associated with a significantly longer median PFS and OS compared with the monotherapy group, irrespective of the PD-L1 expression level and previous treatment lines. No significant increase in the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was found after combination with chemotherapy (50.6 vs. 57.8%). IrAEs predicted better PFS of immunotherapy in the monotherapy group, especially for patients with late irAEs (after ≥4 cycles). Collectively, we demonstrated that ICI monotherapy plus chemotherapy might have better anti-tumor activity and an acceptable side-effect profile regardless of PD-L1 level or previous treatment lines. Both regimens were well-tolerated and cost-effective, the more efficient is usually recommended.

The Current Landscape of Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Metastatic Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma

In addition to surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy, immunotherapy has emerged as a standard pillar of cancer treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as targeting programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have been integrated into standard-of-care regimens for patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), who were previously limited by the lack of treatment options. Atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab are all currently used as part of standard-of-care treatment for different stages of lung cancer. Recent successes and failures of immune checkpoint blockade-based combination therapies have provided significant insights into implementing combination strategies in LUSC. Therefore, there is an urgent need to correctly select patients who are more likely to respond to immunotherapy and understand the mechanisms of primary or acquired resistance. In this review, we aim at summarizing the emerging clinical data on the promise and challenge of ICIs, discussing the unmet need of potential biomarkers for predicting response or resistance to immunotherapy, and providing an overview of the current immune landscape and future directions in advanced LUSC.

Five-Year Outcomes From the Randomized, Phase III Trials CheckMate 017 and 057: Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In two phase III trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057), nivolumab showed an improvement in overall survival (OS) and favorable safety versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated, advanced squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC, respectively. We report 5-year pooled efficacy and safety from these trials.

METHODS

Patients (N = 854; CheckMate 017/057 pooled) with advanced NSCLC, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and progression during or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point for both trials was OS; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Exploratory landmark analyses were investigated.

RESULTS

After the minimum follow-up of 64.2 and 64.5 months for CheckMate 017 and 057, respectively, 50 nivolumab-treated patients and nine docetaxel-treated patients were alive. Five-year pooled OS rates were 13.4% versus 2.6%, respectively; 5-year PFS rates were 8.0% versus 0%, respectively. Nivolumab-treated patients without disease progression at 2 and 3 years had an 82.0% and 93.0% chance of survival, respectively, and a 59.6% and 78.3% chance of remaining progression-free at 5 years, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 8 of 31 (25.8%) nivolumab-treated patients between 3-5 years of follow-up, seven of whom experienced new events; one (3.2%) TRAE was grade 3, and there were no grade 4 TRAEs.

CONCLUSION

At 5 years, nivolumab continued to demonstrate a survival benefit versus docetaxel, exhibiting a five-fold increase in OS rate, with no new safety signals. These data represent the first report of 5-year outcomes from randomized phase III trials of a programmed death-1 inhibitor in previously treated, advanced NSCLC.

Immuno-oncology: a narrative review of gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities

Vaccines, cytokines, and adoptive cellular therapies (ACT) represent immuno-therapeutic modalities with great development potential, and they are currently approved for the treatment of a limited number of advanced malignancies. The most up-to-date knowledge on the regulation of the anti-cancer immune response has recently led to the development and approval of inhibitors of immune checkpoints, which have produced unprecedented clinical activity in several hard to treat solid malignancies. However, severe adverse events (AEs) represent a limitation to the use of these drugs. Currently approved checkpoint inhibitors block cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), resulted in increased survival of patients with several solid and hematologic malignancies. The most common treatment AEs associated with these drugs are fatigue, rash, and auto-immune/inflammatory reactions. Many of the immune-related AEs are reversible and the strategies for their management include supportive care either with or without treatment withdrawal; nevertheless, in severe cases, hospitalization and treatment with immune suppressants, and/or immunomodulators may be required. Steroid therapy is a critical component of the treatment algorithm; nevertheless, the associated immunosuppression may compromise the antitumor response. This article provides a comprehensive and narrative review of luminal gastrointestinal and hepatic complications, including recommendations for their investigation and management.

2020 Innovation-Based Optimism for Lung Cancer Outcomes

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in both males and females in the U.S. and worldwide. Owing to advances in prevention, screening/early detection, and therapy, lung cancer mortality rates are decreasing and survival rates are increasing. These innovations are based on scientific discoveries in imaging, diagnostics, genomics, molecular therapy, and immunotherapy. Outcomes have improved in all histologies and stages. This review provides information on the clinical implications of these innovations that are practical for the practicing physicians, especially oncologists of all specialities who diagnose and treat patients with lung cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Lung cancer survival rates have improved because of new prevention, screening, and therapy methods. This work provides a review of current standards for each of these areas, including targeted and immunotherapies. Treatment recommendations are provided for all stages of lung cancer.

Clinical sequencing to assess tumor mutational burden as a useful biomarker to immunotherapy in various solid tumors

Background:

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become established as a new therapeutic paradigm in various solid cancers. Predictive biomarkers to ICIs have not yet been fully established. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has been considered as a useful marker to indicate patients who benefit from ICIs.

Methods:

We performed next-generation sequencing, including TMB analysis, as a routine clinical practice in 501 patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), or rare cancers. The TruSight^™ Oncology 500 assay from Illumina was used as a cancer panel.

Results:

In total, 11.6% (58/501) were identified with tumors with high TMB and MSI-high status was confirmed in seven out of 501 cases (1.4%). High TMB was observed in 11.6% of patients with various solid tumors, including: GU cancers (36.0%, 9/25), colorectal cancer (15.2%, 23/151), biliary tract cancer (14.6%, 7/48), melanoma (14.3%, 3/21), gastric cancer (11.2%, 13/116), hepatocellular carcinoma (8.3%, 1/12), other GI tract cancers (4.5%, 1/22), and sarcoma (1.7%, 1/60). The objective response rate (ORR) to ICIs was 75% (nine out of 12) in solid tumor patients with high TMB and 25% (30 out of 40) in those with non-high TMB. Patients with high TMB had better ORR to ICIs than those with non-high TMB (p = 0.004). Univariate analysis revealed that the status of PD-L1 expression and of TMB (high versus non-high) had significant association in response to ICIs. However, in multivariate analysis, the status of TMB (high versus non-high) was only significantly related to the response to ICIs (p = 0.036).

Conclusion:

In the present study, we analyzed the TMB using a cancer panel for various solid tumor patients in routine clinical practice and also demonstrated the usefulness of TMB to predict the efficacy for ICIs.

Characterizing tumor shrinkage as a measure of clinical benefit for immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

We explored whether the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be characterized by incorporating a composite of duration of response (DOR) to complement traditional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria for objective response rate (ORR) in an intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Furthermore, the correlation of this novel endpoint, characterized by the restricted mean time in response (RMTR), with overall survival (OS) will be examined.

METHODS

We analyzed ORR alone or in combination with DOR (RMTR) in available phase I, II, and III trials evaluating nivolumab monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab across solid tumor types. ORR was evaluated per RECIST V.1.1. DOR was estimated using individual patient data in ITT populations regardless of RECIST response, with non-responders imputed as zero. Associations between ORR alone or RMTR and OS were evaluated in the ITT population. DOR curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method, and 6-month RMTR, a measure of response durability, was derived from the area under the curves. For ORR and RMTR in the ITT population, the strength of association with OS was analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients (r).

RESULTS

Nivolumab treatment was associated with longer response durations than active control in responder and ITT populations. Similarly, ORR and RMTR were both significantly correlated with OS (ORR vs OS: r=0.684, p=0.02; RMTR vs OS: r=0.695, p=0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining ORR and DOR (RMTR) to objectively characterize tumor shrinkage in an ITT patient population is a novel approach that appears to correlate well with OS in patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab. This endpoint may provide a more complete characterization of tumor shrinkage to incorporate into the design of future ICI clinical trials. However, confirmation of this approach will require further research.

Second-line nivolumab in relapsed small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 331☆

BACKGROUND

Patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have few treatment options and dismal survival. Phase I/II data show activity of nivolumab in previously treated SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CheckMate 331 is a randomized, open-label, phase III trial of nivolumab versus standard chemotherapy in relapsed SCLC. Patients with relapse after first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks or chemotherapy (topotecan or amrubicin) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Overall, 284 patients were randomized to nivolumab and 285 to chemotherapy. Minimum follow-up was 15.8 months. No significant improvement in OS was seen with nivolumab versus chemotherapy [median OS, 7.5 versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.04; P = 0.11]. A survival benefit with nivolumab was suggested in patients with baseline lactate dehydrogenase ≤ upper limit of normal and in those without baseline liver metastases. OS (nivolumab versus chemotherapy) was similar in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score ≥1% versus <1%. Median progression-free survival was 1.4 versus 3.8 months (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.18-1.69). Objective response rate was 13.7% versus 16.5% (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.50-1.27); median duration of response was 8.3 versus 4.5 months. Rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were 13.8% versus 73.2%.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab did not improve survival versus chemotherapy in relapsed SCLC. No new safety signals were seen. In exploratory analyses, select baseline characteristics were associated with improved OS for nivolumab.

The landscape of immune checkpoints expression in non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

With the increasing clinical potential of tumor immunotherapy, more and more clinical trials are undergoing with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Immune checkpoints (ICs) have been identified as crucial regulators of the immune response and have improved ICIs-inhibitor therapeutic strategies. The most important ICs in lung cancer include programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3), major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II), T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM-3), and Galectin-9 (GAL-9), OX-40, OX40L. However, the expression and prognostic value of these ICs are still controversial. Among them, high expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells (>50%) predicts a better therapeutic effect of anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody compared to patients with low PD-L1 expression. However, only 20–30% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients seem to get benefit from immunotherapy. In order to improve the immunotherapy outcomes, more and more attention is paid to combination immunotherapy. Analyzing the co-expression of ICs can give us a more comprehensive basis for combination immunotherapy. This review article summarized our comprehensive expression of ICs based on our previous research, and analyzed their correlation with prognosis in NSCLC patients. We also provided suggestions for potentially personalized combination immunotherapy in NSCLC.

Circ_0003998 Regulates the Progression and Docetaxel Sensitivity of DTX-Resistant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells by the miR-136-5p/CORO1C Axis

Background:

Drug resistance in cancer cells is a major challenge for anti-cancer therapy. Circular RNA (circRNA) circ_0003998 has been identified as an important regulator in the chemoresistance development of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the molecular basis underlying the resistance control of circ_0003998 in NSCLC.

Methods:

The levels of circ_0003998, miR-136-5p and coronin 1C (CORO1C) were gauged by the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) or western blot. Cell viability, colony formation and apoptosis were evaluated by the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), colony formation and flow cytometry assays, respectively. Targeted relationships among circ_0003998, miR-136-5p and CORO1C were confirmed by the dual-luciferase reporter and RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays. Animal studies were performed to evaluate the function of circ_0003998 in vivo.

Results:

Our data indicated that circ_0003998 expression was associated with NSCLC resistance to docetaxel (DTX). The knockdown of circ_0003998 promoted DTX sensitivity, suppressed cell colony formation, and enhanced cell apoptosis of A549/DTX and H1299/DTX cells in vitro. Moreover, circ_0003998 knockdown hampered tumor growth and enhanced DTX sensitivity in vivo. Mechanistically, circ_0003998 directly targeted miR-136-5p, and miR-136-5p was a molecular mediator of circ_0003998 function in vitro. Furthermore, CORO1C was a functionally important target of miR-136-5p in regulating DTX-resistant NSCLC cell colony formation, apoptosis and DTX sensitivity in vitro. Additionally, circ_0003998 modulated CORO1C expression by working as a miR-136-5p sponge.

Conclusion:

Our present work identified that circ_0003998 regulated DTX-resistant NSCLC cell colony formation, apoptosis and DTX sensitivity at least partially by controlling CORO1C expression by sponging miR-136-5p, illuminating a rationale for developing circ_0003998 as a therapeutic target of chemoresistant NSCLC.

Delayed immune thrombocytopenia after discontinuation of nivolumab therapy: A case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Nivolumab, a programmed death-1(PD-1) inhibitor antibody, have demonstrated anti-tumor activity for multiple malignancies. Such immune checkpoint inhibitors induce novel and distinctive adverse effects, which are collectively named immune-related adverse events. Immune-related adverse events can theoretically occur at any part of the body, including the haemopoietic system. Most immune-related adverse events developed within 10 weeks of receiving immunotherapy. Thus far, there is no report of immune thrombocytopenia as an immune-related adverse event developed after discontinuation of immunotherapy.

CASE REPORT

We describe a 62-year-old male with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer developed immune thrombocytopenia nearly two months after discontinuation of nivolumab. When thrombocytopenia was detected, the patient was undergoing radiotherapy of supraclavicular lymph nodes. After complex diagnosis-by-exclusion process, nivolumab-induced immune thrombocytopenia was diagnosed.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

Intravenous immunoglobulins 20 g daily for 5 days, intravenous methylprednisolone 40 mg daily for 14 days followed by oral prednisone, intermittent platelet transfusion and oral thrombopoietin receptor (eltrombopag 25 mg daily) were administered. After 30 days, his platelet count had achieved a level of adequate hemostasis and continued to improvement during the tapering period.

DISCUSSION

Most immune-related developed 6 months of immunotherapy. Clinicians need to be aware of a clinical diagnostic complex, developing months to years after discontinuation of immunotherapy, which recently is termed delayed immune-related events. This case is the first report of immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced thrombocytopenia that developed nearly 2 months after discontinuation of treatment with nivolumab for metastatic NSCLC. In future clinical practice, patients who have received immune checkpoint inhibitors develop new or unexplained symptom, irrespective of interval post-immunotherapy, immune-related adverse events should be considered.

Clinical utility of the C-reactive protein:albumin ratio in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab is a second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study explored the impact of clinical biomarkers such as neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein:albumin ratio (CAR), and modified Glasgow prognostic score on the efficacy and outcome of nivolumab monotherapy in previously treated NSCLC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed advanced or postoperative recurrence of NSCLC in 113 patients in two Japanese facilities from January 2015 to December 2019. Optimal cutoff values of NLR and CAR were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves predicting death events to conduct regression analysis. Baseline values and values collected eight weeks after nivolumab treatment were measured to investigate time-series changes of these markers.

RESULTS

The patients showed median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.0 months and 2.3 months, respectively, with both being significantly longer in patients with partial response (PR) than in patients with progressive disease (PD). Optimal cutoff levels for NLR and CAR were 5.8 and 0.83, with significant decrease in CAR (P = 0.002) from baseline levels in PR patients and significant increase in PD patients. Baseline CAR ≥0.83 was significantly associated with one-year mortality events and overall survival (OS), and multivariate analysis showed significant association of age ≤70 years, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or 3, and a baseline CAR ≥0.83 with inferior OS.

CONCLUSIONS

For second-line nivolumab therapy, evaluation of baseline CAR and subsequent changes in CAR may be predictive of therapeutic response to nivolumab and long-term survival in NSCLC patients.

KEY POINTS

Significant findings of the study The baseline value of C-reactive protein:albumin ratio was significantly associated with one-year mortality and overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab. What this study adds Time-series change of C-reactive protein:albumin ratio may be useful for predicting the treatment efficacy in patients treated with nivolumab.