Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature

Diagnosis and Management of Long-term Central Venous Catheter Infections

The pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of central venous catheter infections differ between short-term and long-term catheters. This review summarizes available data regarding the diagnosis and management of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) associated with long-term catheters. A review of various diagnostic modalities is provided, including methods of CRBSI diagnosis for catheters that are retained. Management of CRBSIs for long-term catheters is also addressed, with an emphasis on differentiating infections that require catheter removal from those that may allow catheter salvage. Data regarding catheter salvage with use of antibiotic lock therapy are also reviewed.

Watchful waiting versus immediate catheter removal in ICU patients with suspected catheter-related infection: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To find a subset of patients with suspected central venous catheter (CVC)-related infection (CRI) in whom CVC removal is not needed.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Thirty-three-bed ICU.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and forty four patients with suspected CRI in which a change of CVCs was planned were evaluated for inclusion.

INTERVENTIONS

Hemodynamically stable patients without proven bacteremia, no insertion site infection, and no intravascular foreign body were randomized to a standard-of-care group (SOC, all CVCs were changed as planned) or a watchful waiting group (WW, CVCs changed when bacteremia was subsequently confirmed or hemodynamic instability occurred).

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

Study groups were compared for incidence of CVC-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI), resolution of fever, C-reactive protein, SOFA score, duration of ICU stay, and mortality. Of 144 patients with suspected CRI, 80 patients met exclusion criteria. Sixty-four were randomized. Forty-seven of 80 excluded patients were shown to be bacteremic, 20 (25%) of whom had a CR-BSI. Five of 64 (8%) included patients had a CR-BSI during their subsequent ICU stay (two in SOC and three in WW group). All 38 CVCs were changed in the SOC group versus 16 of 42 in the WW group (62% reduction, P<0.01). Resolution of fever, C-reactive protein, SOFA score, duration of ICU stay, and ICU mortality did not differ between SOC and WW group ( P>0.1 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a simple clinical algorithm permits a substantial decrease in the number of unnecessarily removed CVCs without increased morbidity.

A prospective, randomized study in critically ill patients using the Oligon Vantex® catheter

Microbial colonization and the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) associated with Oligon Vantex silver central venous catheters (CVC) in critically ill patients were determined. A prospective, randomized, controlled 17-month trial was carried out in an intensive care unit (ICU). All patients requiring a triple-lumen CVC for four days or longer were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive a standard polyurethane CVC or an Oligon Vantex silver CVC. Before removal of the catheter either due to discharge from the ICU or suspected infection, blood for cultures was taken via the CVC and a peripheral site. Skin and hub swabs and catheter-tips were also cultured. Two hundred and six catheters, 103 in both groups, were evaluated. In the control group (CG) 45/103 (44%) and in the silver group (SG) 30/103 (29%) were colonized or had a CR-BSI (P=0.04). The SG was less likely to be colonized than the CG when the catheter remained in situ for eight days or less (P=0.03) or over 15 days (P=0.01); a second or subsequent catheter was present in the same patient (P=0.002), or if the CVC was placed in the internal jugular vein (P=0.05). Multivariate logistic-regression showed predisposing factors for catheter colonization were jugular and femoral sites, second or subsequent catheter, and being a member of the CG. CR-BSI occurred in five cases (four in CG). Rates of CR-BSI per 1000 catheter-days in the CG were 2.8 and in the SG, 0.8 (P<0.001). The Oligon Vantex silver catheter reduced the incidence of catheter-colonization and may decrease the risk of CR-BSI.

Risk of Colonization of Central Venous Catheters: Catheters for Total Parenteral Nutrition Vs Other Catheters

• Background Infected central venous catheters cause morbidity and mortality.

• Objective To compare the risk for colonization of central venous catheters used for total parenteral nutrition with that of catheters used for other purposes.

• Methods Retrospective review of prospectively acquired data on 260 patients with a stay in a surgical intensive care unit longer than 3 days. Single-lumen catheters used solely for total parenteral nutrition were inserted into the subclavian vein and cared for by a dedicated team. Catheters for other purposes were placed and cared for by other staff. Catheters were cultured if clinical findings suggested infection.

• Results Of 854 central venous catheters, 61 (7%) were used for total parenteral nutrition. During 4712 catheter days of observation, 89 catheters of all types were colonized. Risk factors for colonization included duration of catheterization (P &lt; .001), having 3 or more lumens (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1–2.6), pulmonary artery catheterization (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1–2.7), and placement in the internal jugular vein (hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1–2.5). Catheters used for total parenteral nutrition (hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04–0.57) and those in the subclavian vein (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.3–0.8) were at lower risk of colonization. In a multivariate Cox model, the only significant factor was a 5-fold lower risk of infection for catheters used for total parenteral nutrition (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04–0.83).

• Conclusion Rates of colonization were lowest for catheters used solely for total parenteral nutrition, suggesting that a team approach improves patients’ care.

An educational intervention to prevent catheter-associated bloodstream infections in a nonteaching, community medical center

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of an evidence-based intervention to prevent catheter-associated bloodstream infections among intensive care unit patients at a nonteaching, community hospital.

DESIGN

Nonrandomized pre/post observational trial.

SETTING

Two intensive care units at Missouri Baptist Medical Center, Saint Louis, MO.

PARTICIPANTS

Nurses and critical care physicians.

INTERVENTION

A ten-page, self-study module on the prevention of catheter-associated bloodstream infections, lectures, and posters given between July and September 1999.

MEASUREMENTS

The incidence of nosocomial catheter-associated bloodstream infection and patient demographics were measured for patients admitted between March 1998 and July 2000.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty cases of catheter-associated bloodstream infections during 6110 catheter-days were noted in the preintervention period (4.9 cases/1000 catheter-days) vs. 11 cases during the 5210 catheter-days in the postintervention period (2.1 cases/1000 catheter-days). The relative risk for catheter-associated infection in the postintervention period was 0.43 (95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.84). Among catheterized patients, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (25.2 preintervention vs. 25.1 postintervention; p =.86), hemodialysis (91 of 647 [14%] patients vs. 69 of 541 [13%]; p =.70), and the mean number of catheter days per patient (9.1 vs. 9.6 days; p =.46) did not differ between the pre- and postintervention periods.

CONCLUSIONS

A focused, educational intervention among nurses and physicians in a nonteaching community hospital resulted in a significant, sustained reduction in the incidence of catheter-associated bloodstream infection.

Nosocomial infections in adult intensive-care units

Nosocomial infections affect about 30% of patients in intensive-care units and are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Several risk factors have been identified, including the use of catheters and other invasive equipment, and certain groups of patients-eg, those with trauma or burns-are recognised as being more susceptible to nosocomial infection than others. Awareness of these factors and adherence to simple preventive measures, such as adequate hand hygiene, can limit the burden of disease. Management of nosocomial infection relies on adequate and appropriate antibiotic therapy, which should be selected after discussion with infectious-disease specialists and adapted as microbiological data become available.

Central venous catheter related infections: risk factors and the effect of glycopeptide antibiotics

BACKGROUND

We undertook a prospective study of all new central venous catheters inserted into patients in the intensive care units, in order to identify the risk factors and to determine the effect of glycopeptide antibiotics on catheter - related infections.

METHODS

During the study period 300 patients with central venous catheters were prospectively studied. The catheters used were nontunneled, noncuffed, triple lumen and made of polyurethane material. Catheters were cultured by semiquantitative method and blood cultures done when indicated. Data were obtained on patient age, gender, unit, primary diagnosis on admission, catheter insertion site, duration of catheterization, whether it was the first or a subsequent catheter and glycopeptide antibiotic usage.

RESULTS

Ninety-one (30.3%) of the catheters were colonized and infection was found with 50 (16.7%) catheters. Infection was diagnosed with higher rate in catheters inserted via jugular vein in comparison with subclavian vein (95% CI: 1.32-4.81, p = 0.005). The incidence of infection was higher in catheters which were kept in place for more than seven days (95% CI 1.05-3.87, p = 0.03). The incidence of infection was lower in patients who were using glycopeptide antibiotic during catheterization (95% CI: 1.49-5.51, p = 0.005). The rate of infection with Gram positive cocci was significantly lower in glycopeptide antibiotic using patients (p = 0.01). The most commonly isolated organism was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 52, 37.1%).

CONCLUSION

Duration of catheterization and catheter insertion site were independent risk factors for catheter related infection. Use of glycopeptide antibiotic during catheterization seems to have protective effect against catheter related infection.

Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections

BACKGROUND

Although many catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are preventable, measures to reduce these infections are not uniformly implemented.

OBJECTIVE

To update an existing evidenced-based guideline that promotes strategies to prevent CRBSIs.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE database, conference proceedings, and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles.

STUDIES INCLUDED

Laboratory-based studies, controlled clinical trials, prospective interventional trials, and epidemiologic investigations.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reduction in CRBSI, catheter colonization, or catheter-related infection.

SYNTHESIS

The recommended preventive strategies with the strongest supportive evidence are education and training of healthcare providers who insert and maintain catheters; maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; use of a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; no routine replacement of central venous catheters for prevention of infection; and use of antiseptic/antibiotic-impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (ie, education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions, and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis).

CONCLUSION

Successful implementation of these evidence-based interventions can reduce the risk for serious catheter-related infection.

Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections

These guidelines have been developed for practitioners who insert catheters and for persons responsible for surveillance and control of infections in hospital, outpatient, and home health-care settings. This report was prepared by a working group comprising members from professional organizations representing the disciplines of critical care medicine, infectious diseases, health-care infection control, surgery, anesthesiology, interventional radiology, pulmonary medicine, pediatric medicine, and nursing. The working group was led by the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), in collaboration with the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), Surgical Infection Society (SIS), American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), American Thoracic Society (ATS), American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists (ASCCA), Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), Infusion Nurses Society (INS), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (SCVIR), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and is intended to replace the Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular Device–Related Infections published in 1996. These guidelines are intended to provide evidence-based recommendations for preventing catheter-related infections. Major areas of emphasis include 1) educating and training health-care providers who insert and maintain catheters; 2) using maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; 3) using a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; 4) avoiding routine replacement of central venous catheters as a strategy to prevent infection; and 5) using antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (i.e., education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions, and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis). These guidelines also identify performance indicators that can be used locally by health-care institutions or organizations to monitor their success in implementing these evidence-based recommendations.

Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections

BACKGROUND

Although many catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs) are preventable, measures to reduce these infections are not uniformly implemented.

OBJECTIVE

To update an existing evidenced-based guideline that promotes strategies to prevent CR-BSIs.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE database, conference proceedings, and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles.Studies Included: Laboratory-based studies, controlled clinical trials, prospective interventional trials, and epidemiological investigations.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reduction in CR-BSI, catheter colonization, or catheter-related infection.

SYNTHESIS

The recommended preventive strategies with the strongest supportive evidence are education and training of healthcare providers who insert and maintain catheters; maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; use of a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; no routine replacement of central venous catheters for prevention of infection; and use of antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (i.e. education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis).

CONCLUSION

Successful implementation of these evidence-based interventions can reduce the risk for serious catheter-related infection.

A review of risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by percutaneously inserted, noncuffed central venous catheters: implications for preventive strategies

Strategies for preventing central venous catheter (CVC)-related bloodstream infection are most likely to be effective if guided by an understanding of the risk factors associated with these infections. In this critical review of published studies of risk factors for CVC-related bloodstream infection that were prospective and used multivariable techniques of data analysis or that were randomized trials of a preventive measure, a significantly increased risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection was associated with inexperience of the operator and nurse-to-patient ratio in the intensive care unit, catheter insertion with less than maximal sterile barriers, placement of a CVC in the internal jugular or femoral vein rather than subclavian vein, placement in an old site by guidewire exchange, heavy colonization of the insertion site or contamination of a catheter hub, and duration of CVC placement > 7 days. Prospective studies or randomized trials of control measures focusing on these risk factors have been shown to reduce risk significantly: formal training in CVC insertion and care, use of maximal sterile barriers at insertion, use of chlorhexidine rather than povidone-iodine for cutaneous antisepsis, applying a topical anti-infective cream or ointment or a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing to the insertion site, and the use of novel catheters with an anti-infective surface or a contamination resistant hub. Better prospective studies of sufficient size to address all potential risk factors, including insertion site and hub colonization, insertion technique, and details of follow-up care, would enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis of CVC-related bloodstream infection and guide efforts to develop more effective strategies for prevention.

Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S

These guidelines have been developed for practitioners who insert catheters and for persons responsible for surveillance and control of infections in hospital, outpatient, and home health-care settings. This report was prepared by a working group comprising members from professional organizations representing the disciplines of critical care medicine, infectious diseases, health-care infection control, surgery, anesthesiology, interventional radiology, pulmonary medicine, pediatric medicine, and nursing. The working group was led by the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), in collaboration with the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), Surgical Infection Society (SIS), American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), American Thoracic Society (ATS), American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists (ASCCA), Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), Infusion Nurses Society (INS), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (SCVIR), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and is intended to replace the Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular Device-Related Infections published in 1996. These guidelines are intended to provide evidence-based recommendations for preventing catheter-related infections. Major areas of emphasis include 1) educating and training health-care providers who insert and maintain catheters; 2) using maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; 3) using a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; 4) avoiding routine replacement of central venous catheters as a strategy to prevent infection; and 5) using antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (ie, education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions, and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis). These guidelines also identify performance indicators that can be used locally by health-care institutions or organizations to monitor their success in implementing these evidence-based recommendations.

Central line infections

Central venous catheters are commonly used in the critical care setting. Unfortunately, their use is often associated with complications, including fatal infections. Making the diagnosis of central venous catheter infection can be difficult. Additionally, resistance among the more common organisms that cause catheter-related infection is increasing. However, our understanding of the pathogenesis of catheter infection is improving through examination of biofilms. Also, our ability to diagnose catheter-related infections more accurately is improving with new techniques. There is new hope for ruling out catheter-related infection before removal by several methods, including a rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the use of time differential for microbial growth between blood cultures obtained from a peripheral site and the catheter itself. Prevention through the use of barrier techniques and antimicrobial-coated catheters has been demonstrated to be of value in reducing catheter-related infection with these devices.

Preventing intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infections in the critical care setting

Although intravascular catheters are indispensable for managing the care of critically ill patients, they can be associated with serious infection. Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the critical care setting. These infections are largely preventable. This article reviews the epidemiology and pathogenesis of these infections, the role of the critical care nurse in the diagnostic evaluation of CR-BSI, and strategies for their prevention.

Infection in the chronically critically ill: unique risk profile in a newly defined population

Although CCI is defined as prolonged ventilatory failure with tracheotomy stemming from preceding critical illness, the contention that multisystem debilities impact on most CCI patients' care and recovery is a central thesis of this volume. Perhaps reflecting the combined debilities inherent in CCI, infectious complications take their toll in morbidity, mortality, and persistent ventilatory insufficiency. Enhanced susceptibility to infection results from a potent admixture of barrier breakdown, exposure to virulent and resistant nosocomial pathogens, and postulated "immune exhaustion" that stems from the combined impact of comorbidities and the sequellae of critical illness. Strategies to improve outcome in CCI-related infection include standard measures of support especially nutrition, reducing environmental inoculum through pulmonary hygiene measures, skin care, and limiting barrier breaches, and appropriate antimicrobials directed at likely pathogens. Future stratification of patient risk on the basis of immune phenotype or genotype and potential immunomodulatory prophylaxis may be around the corner, as new prospects in the pharmaceutical armamentarium are presently undergoing testing.

Catheter replacement in continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration: the balance between infectious and mechanical complications

OBJECTIVE

To assess the optimal moment of central vascular catheter replacement balancing infectious and mechanical complications in continuous renal replacement therapies in critically ill patients with acute renal failure.

METHODS

Prospective sequential trial with historical controls to compare liberal catheter replacement when clinically indicated with routine catheter replacement every 5 days in consecutive patients treated by continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration in a level I secondary referral intensive care unit of a university-affiliated teaching hospital. Intention-to-treat analysis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two patients underwent catheter replacement when clinically indicated (group II), and 21 patients served as historical controls (group I). The groups were comparable for sex, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, comorbidity, and creatinin and urea levels at the start of continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration. In group I, 71 catheters were used for 346 treatment days, and in group II, 68 catheters were used for 495 treatment days. The mean duration of catheterization was 4.9 +/- 2.0 days vs. 7.3 +/- 4.5 days, respectively (Student's t-test p <.001). There was no significant difference between the incidence of colonization of catheters (46.8% in group I vs. 39.1% in group II; chi-square p =.35) In group I, bacteremia and catheter sepsis occurred in two patients, whereas this did not occur in group II. The occurrence of mechanical complications was comparable in both groups (15.5% in group I vs. 19.1% in group II). There were significantly more mechanical complications with arterial vs. venous catheters (17 vs. 7; chi-square p =.027).

CONCLUSION

When catheters were changed as clinically indicated, they remained significantly longer in situ vs. being replaced routinely every 5 days; infectious and mechanical complications were comparable. The incidence of catheter sepsis was low (2.2%), and no prosthesis infection occurred. Catheter replacement when clinically indicated seems to be as safe as routine replacement every 5 days.

Applying the science to the prevention of catheter-related infections

BACKGROUND

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) remains a leading cause of nososcomial infection, despite the fact that many CR-BSIs are preventable. Simple principles of infection control and the use of novel devices to reduce these infections are not uniformly implemented.

OBJECTIVE

To review and summarize the evidence that promotes strategies to prevent CR-BSIs.

DATA SOURCES

The Medline database and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles.

STUDIES INCLUDED

In vitro and in vivo laboratory-based studies, controlled clinical trials, prospective interventional trials, and epidemiologic investigations.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reduction in CR-BSI, catheter colonization, tunnel infection, or local site infection.

SYNTHESIS

The recommended prevention strategies with strong supportive evidence include educating and training of health care providers who insert and maintain catheters; using full barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; using a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; eliminating the practice of scheduled replacement of central venous catheters for prevention of infection; and using antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters.

CONCLUSION

Simple interventions can reduce the risk for serious catheter-related infection. Health care provider awareness and adherence to these prevention strategies is critical to reducing the risk for CR-BSI, improving patient safety, and promoting quality health care.

Saturday night fever: finding and controlling the source of sepsis in critical illness

Fever is a daily concern in the intensive care unit. Although about half of all febrile cases are due to non-infectious causes, fear of sepsis frequently leads to diagnostic tests and escalation of therapy, including broadening antibiotic therapy. Using a case to illustrate this dilemma, we discuss the commonest non-infectious and infectious causes of fever, and suggests approaches to their management. Any unexplained fever in intensive care unit patients warrants investigation, which includes complete clinical assessment and blood cultures. When the source of fever is not immediately apparent, non-infectious and infectious causes should be considered. If stable, non-neutropenic patients should be monitored before further tests or empiric antibiotics are started. In an era of rapid emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens and intense scrutiny of resources, optimal diagnosis and management of patients with suspected infection entails much more than the escalation of antimicrobial therapy.

Qualitative review of intensive care unit quality indicators

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to (1) conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify interventions that improve patient outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU); (2) evaluate potential measures of quality based on the impact, feasibility, variability, and the strength of evidence to support each measure and to categorize these measures as outcome, process, access, or complication measures; and (3) select a list of candidate quality measures that can be broadly applied to improve ICU care.

METHODS

We identified and independently reviewed all studies in Medline (1965-2000) and The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2001) that met the following criteria: design: observational studies, experimental trials, or systematic reviews; population: critically ill adults; and intervention: process or structure measure that was associated with improved patient outcomes: morbidity, mortality, complications, errors, costs, length of stay (LOS), and patient reported outcomes. Studies were grouped into categories by the type of outcome that was improved by the intervention. Potential quality measures were evaluated for: impact on morbidity, mortality, and costs; feasibility of the measure; and variability in the measure. We evaluated the strength of evidence for each intervention used to improve outcomes and using the Delphi method, assigned an over-all recommendation for each quality measure.

RESULTS

A total of 3,014 citations were identified. Sixty-six studies that met selection criteria reported on a variety of interventions that were associated with improved patient outcomes. We identified 6 outcome measures: ICU mortality rate, ICU LOS greater than 7 days, average ICU LOS, average days on mechanical ventilation, suboptimal management of pain, and patient/family satisfaction; 6 process measures: effective assessment of pain, appropriate use of blood transfusions, prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia, appropriate sedation, appropriate peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis, and appropriate deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis; 4 access measures: rate of delayed admissions, rate of delayed discharges, cancelled surgical cases, and emergency department by-pass hours; and 3 complication measures: rate of unplanned ICU readmission, rate of catheter-related blood stream infections, and rate of resistant infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Further work is needed to create operational definitions and to pilot test the selected measures. The value of these measures will be determined by our ability to evaluate our current performance and implement interventions designed to improve the quality of ICU care.

Central venous catheters in pediatric patients--subclavian venous approach as the first choice

BACKGROUND

It is critical to establish a safe and functional i.v. access in severely sick patients. We evaluated the frequency of application and complications of central venous catheters in a pediatric intensive care unit.

METHODS

Pediatric patients in whom central venous catheters were inserted between March 1997 and May 1999 in the Pediatric Emergency Room and Intensive Care Unit were enrolled in this study. Patients were evaluated with respect to age, sex, weight, central venous catheter indication, site, duration of catheter stay and complications.

RESULTS

During the study period a total of 156 central venous catheters were successfully inserted into 146 patients. Of the 156 central venous catheter attempts, 148 (94.9%) were placed into the subclavian vein, six were inserted into the femoral vein, and two into the jugular vein. In 156 attempts, arterial injuries occurred in 20 cases (12.8%). Pneumothorax developed in two patients on mechanical ventilation. Three catheters had to be removed due to catheter related infections. The mortality rate was 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that subclavian central venous catheterization is a safe procedure with minimal complications in pediatric patients. Arterial injury was the most frequent complication. In experienced hands, the success rate was 100%. Subclavian central venous catheter insertion may be considered as the first approach in critically ill patients.

Mechanisms and risk factors for infection of pulmonary artery catheters and introducer sheaths in cancer patients admitted to an intensive care unit

Pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) are typically inserted for short periods, and the extra-luminal route is assumed to be the overriding source of contamination and/or infection. Our aim was to assess the incidence of PAC and introducer colonization in cancer patients, and to study the mechanisms and risk factors for infection. Patients with a Swan-Ganz catheter admitted to an intensive care unit were prospectively analyzed over 14 months. As soon they were no longer necessary, PACs and introducer sheaths were removed and cultured. We recorded the mean duration of placement, the number of times PACs were handled and the site of insertion. Seventy-nine catheters were inserted in 68 patients. The median (range) duration was three days (0-10) for PACs, and 3.6 days (0-18) for introducers. PAC and/or percutaneous introducer sheath colonization was diagnosed in seven patients (8.9%), but in only one case were both colonized. Colonization rates were 15.5 per 1000 days for PACs and 14.1 per 1000 days for introducers. Introducers were mainly colonized before the 5th day, while PACs were mainly colonized after the 5th day. No PAC or introducer-related local infection or bacteraemia was diagnosed. Colonization was more frequent on catheters inserted into the internal jugular vein. The colonization rate was 5% for PACs and introducers. Our findings suggest that contamination of introducers and PACs may be dissociated and could result from either extraluminal or endoluminal colonization. As three of four PAC colonizations occurred after 5 days, the duration of catheter placement should be considered important. There was little clinical impact of microbial colonization.

[Catheter-related infection in intensive care. Physiopathology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention]

PURPOSE

To review the mechanisms, diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of catheter-related sepsis in intensive care unit patients.

DATA SOURCES

A Medline research of the English- or French-language reports published between 1966 and 2000 and a manual research of references of relevant papers.

STUDY SELECTION

Experimental, clinical and basic research studies related to catheter-related sepsis.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data in selected articles were reviewed, and relevant clinical information was extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Infection remains the major complication related to catheter insertion. No bacteriological exam or systematic catheter change is required in the absence of infection suspicion. In the intensive care unit, and without septic shock, the surveillance of skin cultures at the catheter insertion site or the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood culture determination may reduce the number of unnecessary removed catheters. Catheter change over a guidewire is not recommended because of the risk of dissemination of infection. When the catheter is removed, a quantitative culture is warranted. The treatment of catheter-related sepsis is based on catheter removal. The use of antibiotics is limited to some organisms or when the infection is complicated. The persistence of fever and positive blood cultures 72 h after catheter removal require to look for dissemination of infection or septic thrombophlebitis, especially if S. aureus or Candida are incriminated. The treatment of infection without catheter removal is not recommended in the intensive care unit because of a high risk of treatment failure. Compliance with catheter care guidelines and continuing quality improvement programs are the two major procedures in reducing catheter infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved understanding of the pathophysiology of catheter-related sepsis has led to improved prevention. Compliance with catheter care guidelines and continuing quality improvement programs are majors procedures to reduce the risk of catheter infection.

Central line mechanical complication rate in emergency medicine patients

Central line (CL) placement in the emergency department (ED) is a common practice. Previously published small-scale studies have quoted mechanical complication rates in emergency medicine patients of 10-15%.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the mechanical complication rate of central venous catheterization in a large (65,000 visits/year) academic urban ED.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all ED-placed CLs over a three-year period from May 1995 to May 1998. Data were collected as part of a monthly quality assurance project and analyzed using Fisher's exact test (significance = p < 0.05). Central lines were defined as subclavian, internal jugular, femoral, and interosseous lines. Mechanical complication was defined as a pneumothorax, hematoma, line misplacement, or hemothorax.

RESULTS

There were 22 complications of a total of 643 CLs placed [complication rate 3.4% (95% CI = 1.9% to 4.8%)]. The complication rate for patients with a confirmatory chest x-ray receiving a subclavian or internal jugular CL (excluding all patients who died prior to x-ray evaluation of CL) was 6.2% (22/355) (95% CI = 3.9% to 9.3%). There were 402 (63%) CLs placed during a code with a complication rate of 2.2% (95% CI = 1.0% to 4.2%), 79% (317/402) medical and 21% (85/402) trauma codes. Thirty-seven percent (241) of the CLs were placed on an "elective urgent" basis. Residents placed the majority of CLs (567/643), with a complication rate of 3%. There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates based on level of resident training.

CONCLUSIONS

The CL mechanical complication rate in the ED at this institution is 3.4%. This is substantially lower than previously reported mechanical complication rates.

Quality improvement in parenteral nutrition care

The therapeutic objective of parenteral nutrition, as well as any other pharmacological treatment, must be organized for and focused on the patient, to obtain outcomes associated with an improvement in health status and quality of life. On this basis, the present article starts with a view of quality improvement in health care, identifying the structure, process and outcome paradigm for drug therapy and parenteral nutrition elements of quality assessment, as well as strategies for quality improvement will be described. A model of the organization assigned to parenteral nutrition care is proposed. In the future, computerized programs of parenteral nutrition may increase the risk of uncoordinated and fragmented care. The programs must improve health care of patient by exposing caregivers to the full alternatives of decisions with clinical and therapeutic data on patient individual.

Can we achieve consensus on central venous catheter-related infections?

Central venous catheter-related bacteraemia is a substantial and preventable source of iatrogenic morbidity and mortality. A single episode of catheter-related bacteraemia has an estimated cost of A$50,000, with an attributable mortality between 10 and 35%. Catheter colonization is diagnosed with standard culture techniques. Diagnostic criteria for catheter-related bacteraemia include the results of cultures from the catheter tip, the peripheral blood and other possible sites of infection. The presence of clinical symptoms and subsequent defervescence may assist in making the diagnosis. This review explores the existing definitions of catheter-related infections and proposes a new and more rigorous classification with criteria for definite, probable and possible catheter-related bacteraemia. The authors hope that this classification will enhance the interpretation of the literature and the planning of new investigations. Infection rates can be reduced by appropriate site selection, adequate skin preparation, sterile technique and appropriate dressings. Decreased manipulation of administration sets, with more careful technique and less frequent set replacement, may reduce hub contamination. Infection rates increase with the duration in situ of the catheter, however are not reduced by regular scheduled catheter replacement or guide-wire exchanges. A range of antimicrobial catheter materials and coatings are under investigation, some of which are effective in reducing the rate of catheter-related bacteraemia. Chorhexidine-silver sulphadiazine and rifampicin-minocycline are the best studied combinations to date. Further developments are expected, although none are likely to be as effective as not inserting or removing the central venous catheter when it is not required.

Infusional 5-fluorouracil can be a pain in the neck: A case for repositioning displaced Hickman lines

Increasing numbers of patients receive infusional chemotherapy or total parenteral nutrition via Hickman or Grochong lines. Although the insertion of these indwelling catheters is generally performed under radiological guidance and their positions verified by chest radiography, it is still feasible for them to become displaced at a later date. This possibility should be excluded in patients who develop unusual symptoms during the course of their infusional therapy. We review the reported complications associated with Hickman lines, and present a case history demonstrating that interventional radiology has a valuable role in displaced line repositioning, after the exclusion of thrombosis and infection.

Semiquantitative culture of subcutaneous segment for conservative diagnosis of intravascular catheter-related infection

BACKGROUND

Sensitivity and negative predictive values of combined surface cultures (skin and hub) are high in the presumptive diagnosis of catheter-related infection, but specificity and PPVs are poor. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the yield of the semiquantitative culture of the subcutaneous segment in the diagnosis of colonization of the catheter tip without removal of the catheter.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed in 124 nontunneled central venous catheters that were removed because of suspected infection or the end of therapy. Catheter colonization was considered if >15 colony-forming units (CFU) in the roll procedure or > 1,000 CFU in the quantitative Cleri procedure were recovered from the tip cultures ("gold standard"). Before removing the catheter, a semiquantitative culture of skin surrounding the point of insertion, a semiquantitative culture of the subcutaneous segment (after removing the catheter only 2 cm), a semiquantitative cultures of the hub, and a pareated quantitative blood culture were performed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to estimate the cutoff points, and a culture was considered positive when CFUs were > or =15, > or =15, and > or =5 for skin, hub, and subcutaneous segment cultures, respectively.

RESULTS

Catheter colonization was detected in 51 catheters. The mean duration of catheterization was 14 +/- 8 days, and the rates of incidence of tip colonization and bacteremia were 2.9 per 100 catheter days and 1.2 per 100 catheter days, respectively. Sensitivity of skin, subcutaneous, and hub cultures analyzed individually were < or =61%; however, specificity and positive predictive values (PPVs) of subcutaneous segment cultures were significantly higher than skin cultures (94% and 88.5% vs 71.6% (p = .001) and 62% (p = .014), respectively). Sensitivity of the combined skin and hub cultures and of the combined subcutaneous segment and hub cultures were similar: 86.2% and 84.3%, respectively; however, specificity and PPVs of this latter combination were significantly higher than former: 82% and 78.1% vs 59.7% (p = .008) and 61.9% (p = .07), respectively. The likelihood ratio of a positive test for the combined subcutaneous segment and hub culture was 4.68, and only 2.13 for the combined skin and hub culture.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the combined subcutaneous segment and hub culture constitutes an easy, effective procedure for the conservative diagnosis of catheter colonization.

[The risk factors associated with colonization and bacteremia in non-tunnelled central venous catheters]

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for colonization and bacteremia among patients with non-tunnelled central venous catheters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted of a cohort of patients carrying non-tunnelled central venous catheters. Different parameters were obtained and the degree of its association with colonization of the distal portion of the catheter or with bacteremia associated with colonization was estimated. The CDC (centers for Disease Control) diagnostic criteria of colonization and catheter-related bacteremia were used.

RESULTS

A total of 118 catheters were eventually analyzed, corresponding to 114 patients, with a catheterization mean time of 14 +/- 8 days (mean +/- SD); out of these 114 patients, 51 were colonized and in 22 the presence of associated bacteremia was confirmed. The parameters associated with a higher risk for catheter colonization included length of colonization, femoral location, number of lumina and a vital prognosis lower than one month. All these factors, with the exception of the increase in the number of lumina, showed an independent association with colonization on the multivariate analysis [catheterization length (in weeks): OR 1.46; 95% CI: 1.0-2.11; femoral location: OR 3.73; 95% CI: 1.16-11.9; vital prognosis lower than one month: OR 12.7; 95% CI: 1.4-112.7]. As for risk for catheter-related bacteremia, the univariate analysis showed an association with catheterization length and a vital prognosis lower than one month; the latter was the only factor that maintained an independent association in the multivariate analysis (OR 5.75; 95% CI: 1.17-28.27).

CONCLUSION

The present study documents the relevance of prolonged catheterization as a consistent risk for colonization of non-tunnelled central venous catheters. This risk increases independently in canalization at femoral site and particularly among severely ill patients. The presence of these factors allows the identification of a high risk population for the development of catheter related bacteremia.

Fever in the ICU

Fever is a common problem in ICU patients. The presence of fever frequently results in the performance of diagnostic tests and procedures that significantly increase medical costs and expose the patient to unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures and the inappropriate use of antibiotics. ICU patients frequently have multiple infectious and noninfectious causes of fever, necessitating a systematic and comprehensive diagnostic approach. Pneumonia, sinusitis, and blood stream infection are the most common infectious causes of fever. The urinary tract is unimportant in most ICU patients as a primary source of infection. Fever is a basic evolutionary response to infection, is an important host defense mechanism and, in the majority of patients, does not require treatment in itself. This article reviews the common infectious and noninfectious causes of fever in ICU patients and outlines a rational approach to the management of this problem.

The use of a blood conservation pressure transducer system in critically ill patients

We tried to determine if a blood conservation pressure transducer system reduced blood transfusions, increased haemoglobin concentration or reduced line infections in critically ill patients. One hundred patients were randomly allocated to conventional or blood conserving systems attached to systemic and pulmonary arterial catheters. Intravascular lines were cultured after removal. There were no significant differences in transfusions or haemoglobin concentration. Blood conservation: median units transfused, 2 (range 0-19); mean haemoglobin at 7 days, 11.2 g.dl-1 (SD, 1.0). Conventional: median units, 2 (range 0-34); mean haemoglobin at 7 days, 11.1 g.dl-1 (SD 1.0). Thirty-seven of 99 arterial lines were colonised in the controls compared with 29 of 96 in the blood conservation group. Patients who required haemofiltration in both groups had significantly increased transfusion requirements. Haemofiltration: median 6 units (range 0-34) vs. non-haemofiltered: median 1 (range 0-14; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in transfusions, haemoglobin concentration or line colonisation with the blood conservation system. There is considerable potential for blood conservation during haemofiltration.

Variables affecting outcome in critically ill patients

Critical care medicine has evolved as a field of science and clinical care. Despite important contributions to our understanding of the molecular basis of critical illness, we still remain troubled by our lack of insight into why some patients have favorable outcomes from critical illness and others do not. This article explores the hypothesis that at least five important variables may alter the outcome of patients suffering from a variety of critical illnesses. These variables include the premorbid immune or genetic status of the patient, the patient's gender, the circulating cholesterol concentration, the patient's age, and various iatrogenic and nosocomial events. Insights into the importance of these five variables may provide opportunities for physicians and scientists to improve outcome in patients suffering from critical illness. Clearly, altering iatrogenic and nosocomial events is already within the realm of opportunity.

Haemodialysis catheter bacteraemia: evolving strategies

This article reviews the new trends in the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of catheter-related bacteraemia in clinical nephrology. Among these are the newer diagnostic techniques of evaluating and obtaining culture specimens from central lines, such as timed cultures and use of the endoluminal brush. In general, attempts to salvage infected haemodialysis lines are unsuccessful. We review the data that pertain to the use of antibiotic-coated catheters in non-dialysis patients and discuss how these observations may be applied to end-stage renal disease patients.

An evidence-based approach to central venous catheter management to prevent catheter-related infection in critically ill patients

A systematic search of the literature yielded 102 randomized controlled trials of interventions aimed at reducing central venous catheter-related infections in critically ill patients. The process of critically appraising these trials has begun and clinicians have performed meta-analyses of the data in some areas. There are three main components to the production of evidence-based guidelines in this area: identification of effective interventions, comparison of the relative merit of effective interventions aimed at the source of infection, and assessment of the applicability of the evidence to diverse sub-populations of critically ill patients.