Double-blind and placebo-controlled study of lithium for adolescent bipolar disorders with secondary substance dependency

Pediatric bipolar disease: current and future perspectives for study of its long-term course and treatment

AIM AND METHODS

Findings from recent long-term, prospective longitudinal studies of the course, outcome and naturalistic treatment of adults with bipolar illness are highlighted as background for long-term developmental study of pediatric bipolar illness.

RESULTS

Accumulating knowledge of bipolar illness in adults underscores a high risk for multiple recurrences through the lifespan, significant medical morbidity, high rates of self-harm, economic and social burden and frequent treatment resistance with residual symptoms between major episodes. At present, there is no empirical foundation to support any assumption about the long-term course or outcome of bipolar illness when it arises in childhood or adolescence, or the effects of conventional pharmacotherapies in altering its course and limiting potentially adverse outcomes. The proposed research articulates specific descriptive aims that draw on adult findings and outlines core methodological requirements for such an endeavor.

CONCLUSIONS

Innovations in the description and quantitative analysis of prospective longitudinal clinical data must now be extended to large, systematically ascertained pediatric cohorts recruited through multicenter studies if there is to be a meaningful scientific advance in our knowledge of the enduring effects of bipolar illness and the potential value of contemporary approaches to its management.

Adjunctive lamotrigine treatment for adolescents with bipolar disorder: retrospective report of five cases

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive lamotrigine in the treatment of adolescents with bipolar disorder.

METHOD

We evaluated all patients under age 18 with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) bipolar disorder in our outpatient clinic treated with lamotrigine, using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. We rated response with the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) scale.

RESULTS

Five patients (mean age = 15.5 +/- 1.8 years; range = 14-17), 1 male and 4 females, were included. One patient (20%) had bipolar I disorder, 1 (20%) had bipolar II disorder, and 3 (60%) had bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (NOS). The polarity of the episode at baseline was depressive in all patients. The mean lamotrigine dose was 100 +/- 87.5 mg/day (1.67 +/- 1.39 mg/kg/day). The mean duration of treatment was 28 +/- 28 weeks. CGI significantly improved from 5 at baseline to 3 +/- 1 at endpoint (p = 0.011). Improvement was marked or moderate in 4 patients (80%) and minimal in 1 patient (20%). One patient referred to dizziness, and there were no reports of increased cycling, worsening of mania, or skin rash.

CONCLUSIONS

This open, retrospective chart review suggests that lamotrigine may be effective and well tolerated as an adjunctive treatment in adolescents with bipolar disorder. Controlled trials are needed.

A one-year open-label trial of risperidone augmentation in lithium nonresponder youth with preschool-onset bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of risperidone augmentation of lithium in preschool-onset bipolar disorder (BD) among youth who insufficiently respond to lithium monotherapy.

METHOD

Thirty-eight subjects between the ages of 4 and 17 years (mean age = 11.37 +/- 3.8 years) with onset of BD in preschool years (manic or mixed episode) entered this 12-month trial. All subjects received lithium monotherapy. Patients who failed to adequately respond to lithium monotherapy after 8 weeks and those who relapsed after an initial response were given risperidone augmentation for up to 11 months. The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) was the primary outcome measure. Response was defined as a > or =50% decrease from baseline. Additional data were collected on diagnostic comorbidity, family history, number of hospitalizations, perinatal risk factors, history of physical or sexual abuse, Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale for BD (CGI-BP), Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS), and adverse medication effects.

RESULTS

Of the 38 subjects treated with lithium monotherapy, 17 responded, whereas 21 required augmentation with risperidone. Response rate in the youths treated with lithium + risperidone was 85.7% (n = 18/21). Significant predictors of inadequate response to lithium monotherapy requiring augmentation were: (1) attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), (2) severity at baseline, (3) history of sexual or physical abuse, and (4) preschool age. Combination treatment of lithium and risperidone was found to be safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of youth with a history of preschool-onset BD treated with lithium were either nonresponders or partial responders. Subsequent augmentation of lithium with risperidone in these cases was well tolerated and efficacious. Potential predictors of lithium nonresponse identified in this study may guide the choice of medications earlier in the treatment process.

Adolescent Substance Use and Suicidal Behavior: A Review With Implications for Treatment Research

Adolescent substance use (alcohol and other drugs) and suicidal behavior, independently, pose serious public health problems. Youths who report co-occurring substance use and suicidality are a particularly high-risk group. In this review, we explore four areas that are pertinent to research with substance-abusing and suicidal adolescent populations. First, we review epidemiological research that is relevant to the association between substance use and suicidal behavior. Results suggest that substance use heightens statistical risk for suicidal behavior in adolescent clinical and community populations. Alcohol intoxication may serve as a proximal risk factor for suicidal behavior among distressed youths through its psychopharmacological effects on the brain. Substance use may also serve as a distal risk factor for suicidal behavior by increasing stress and exacerbating co-occurring psychopathology. Second, we propose different theoretical models that might explain the high rates of co-occurring substance use and suicidal behavior among adolescents. Substance use may stem from an underlying syndrome of problem behavior among impulsive suicide attempters with predominant externalizing symptoms. In contrast, nonimpulsive suicide attempters with predominant internalizing symptoms may use substances to cope with negative affective states. Third, we explore the status of treatment research with substance abusing and suicidal adolescent populations. Studies of substance abuse treatment and suicidal behavior have neither adequately assessed nor incorporated treatment of the other co-occurring problem. Finally, we conclude with proposed directions for future research, including the development of integrated interventions tailored to adolescents with these co-occurring problems.

A double-blind randomized pilot study comparing quetiapine and divalproex for adolescent mania

OBJECTIVE

To determine the comparative efficacy of quetiapine and divalproex for the treatment of adolescent mania.

METHOD

Fifty adolescents (ages 12-18 years) with bipolar I disorder, manic or mixed episode, were randomized to quetiapine (400-600 mg/day) or divalproex (serum level 80-120 microg/mL) for 28 days for this double-blind study, which was conducted from July 2002 through January 2004. The primary efficacy measure was change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score across the study period.

RESULTS

Repeated measures analysis of variance using the last-observation carried forward data indicated no statistically significant group difference in YMRS scores across the 28 days of the study (p = 0.3). Mixed regression analyses (comparison of slopes) revealed that improvement in YMRS scores occurred more rapidly in the quetiapine than in the divalproex group for both the last-observation carried forward (p = 0.01) and observed data (p = 0.03). Response and remission rates were significantly greater in the quetiapine than in the divalproex group (p < .03). Rates of adverse events did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that quetiapine is at least as effective as divalproex in the treatment of acute manic symptoms associated with adolescent bipolar disorder; however, a quicker reduction of manic symptoms may occur with quetiapine as compared with divalproex. Quetiapine may be useful as monotherapy for the treatment of adolescents with manic or mixed episodes, although placebo-controlled studies are necessary.

[Prescription of psychotropic drugs in paediatry: approved indications and therapeutic perspectives]

In France, psychotropic drugs may be classified in four categories according to their official data. The first category corresponds to psychotropic drugs with an approved indication available in paediatry. Theyare old agents (e.g. haloperidol, amitriptyline, benzodiazepines...) with the exception of methylphenidate (hyperactivity). The second one corresponds to pharmacological agents approved for some indications obtained with adults but not for a1l (i.e. restricted indication: e.g. sertraline approved in paediatry only for OCD but not for depression, risperidone approved only for the treatment of disruptive behaviors in children with subaverage IQs). For the third category, the psychotropic agent is either contraindicated or unadvised under the age of 15 or 18 years, by lack of data (e.g. most of SSRI or atypical antipsychotic drugs). For the last category, official data available in brief summaries offer no information on paediatric use and consequently their administration does not appear possible. Up to now, no approved use has been delivered to injection route (IM or IV) in France, except for an IM formulation of zuclopenthixol. Prescribing psychotropic drug has to respect good practices including close psychological and somatic monitoring that associates the young patient and his relative (psycho-education program). Particular key-points should be taken into consideration (i.e. pharmacokinetic and physiological specificities, risk of false passage under the age of 6 years with capsules or tablets, presence of alcohol in some oral solution or bitter aroma...). Beside these official data, many studies have been published but must be carefully interpreted according to their level of pertinence. Meta-analysis gather all randomised controlled trials published or not, analyse their specific pertinence and thus provide clinically relevant elements. Randomised controlled trials present clinical interest but key-points in study design must be checked (e.g. number of patients, inclusion and exclusion criteria, length of the study and clinical relevance of clinical scales...). Other studies like open trials or clinical cases do not offersufficient guarantees. Some randomised controlled trials of clinical relevance have been carried out in this population with new pharmacological classes (eg SSRI, atypical antipsychotic drugs) and may lead to extended indications in children and adolescents. According to bibliographic and official data, the main criteria in the prescribing choice may take into consideration the following sis stressing a poor benefit/risk ratio. SSRI may offer better prospects but their use has not been approved in this indication, until now. In OCD, sertraline shows great interest to enhance clinical response and represents the molecule of reference. No drug has been approved for mood disorders in children or adolescent, in France, contrary to USA where lithium can be administered over the age of 12 years. In addition, antiepileptic drugs like carbamazepine or divalproate have conducted to clinical improvement in some studies. Benzodiazepines, hydroxyzine and meprobamate use should be strictly restricted in case of anxiety symptoms but are the only agents approved in this indication despise promising results obtained with SSRI. Transitory insomnia may take advantage of alimemazine prescription (approved use over the age of 36 months). Some typical neuroleptics are indicated in tics or in behaviour disorders associated to autism or related syndromes but present clinical limitations and poor tolerability. Promising clinical trials (randomised or not) have been conducted with new atypical antipsychotic drugs like risperidone. In conclusion, present data available for paediatric use of psychotropic agents emphasizes that safety and effectiveness are not always well established in particular for the treatment of chronic disorders (long term tolerability assessment). Moreover, studies should be carried out to specify factors promoting adherence and quality of life for this young population in order to optimise clinical benefit of drug prescription.

Management options for bipolar disorder in children and adolescents

During recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the use of psychotropic medication for the treatment of bipolar disorder (BPD) in children. There is an emerging set of data to support this use.Mood stabilizers, including lithium and valproic acid (valproate sodium), have generally formed the mainstay of treatment in children and adolescents with BPD. However, the atypical antipsychotics, such as risperidone, aripiprazole, and quetiapine may be more effective as first-line treatment options and in some ways easier to use than the traditional mood stabilizers. As in adults, mood stabilization is often difficult to achieve in pediatric patients with BPD, and combined treatment with mood stabilizers and atypical antipscyhotics is commonly used. Data from controlled trials of psychotropic medications in children and adolescents with BPD are very limited, and hence, in the majority of cases physicians base their treatment decisions on data from case reports, case series, or open trials. More controlled studies of both monotherapy and polypharmacotherapy for BPD in children and adolescents are needed.

Pediatric bipolar disorder: emerging diagnostic and treatment approaches

Children and adolescents who have bipolar disorder often are encountered in clinical settings and frequently require treatment with mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics. New screening and diagnostic tools are available to aid in the diagnosis of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents. Additional data supporting the use of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics in this population also are emerging. Combinations of existing psychotropics remain the most effective treatment of pediatric bipolar disorder at this point. This article reviews the phenomenology and clinical characteristics of pediatric bipolar disorder and current approaches to pharmacotherapy. It is becoming apparent that bipolar disorder is often a chronic disorder in children and adolescents, much like diabetes, and is best managed with a combination of medications and psychosocial therapy.

Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder: consensus and controversies

Since the previous publication of Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) guidelines in 1997, there has been a substantial increase in evidence-based treatment options for bipolar disorder. The present guidelines review the new evidence and use criteria to rate strength of evidence and incorporate effectiveness, safety, and tolerability data to determine global clinical recommendations for treatment of various phases of bipolar disorder. The guidelines suggest that although pharmacotherapy forms the cornerstone of management, utilization of adjunctive psychosocial treatments and incorporation of chronic disease management model involving a healthcare team are required in providing optimal management for patients with bipolar disorder. Lithium, valproate and several atypical antipsychotics are first-line treatments for acute mania. Bipolar depression and mixed states are frequently associated with suicidal acts; therefore assessment for suicide should always be an integral part of managing any bipolar patient. Lithium, lamotrigine or various combinations of antidepressant and mood-stabilizing agents are first-line treatments for bipolar depression. First-line options in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder are lithium, lamotrigine, valproate and olanzapine. Historical and symptom profiles help with treatment selection. With the growing recognition of bipolar II disorders, it is anticipated that a larger body of evidence will become available to guide treatment of this common and disabling condition. These guidelines also discuss issues related to bipolar disorder in women and those with comorbidity and include a section on safety and monitoring.

Patterns of adherence to treatment in adolescents with bipolar disorder

Despite relatively high rates of reported nonadherence in adults with bipolar disorder, no research has documented patterns of adherence in adolescents receiving treatment for this illness. This investigation sought to describe adherence in adolescents diagnosed with bipolar disorder and examine the relations between adherence, age, and chronicity of illness. Participants were 12-19 years of age and were receiving outpatient treatment for bipolar I, bipolar II, or bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (NOS). Parents were asked to estimate adherence to all prescribed treatments. Participants in this study were 38 adolescents (18 male, 20 female; mean age, 15.80 years, SD, 1.85). Parents reported an average of only 2.29 (SD, 2.90) missed medication dosages in the 1-month period prior to assessment. Full treatment adherence to a medication regimen, however, is reported in only 13 of 37 patients (34.2%) taking medication. Age is not associated with medication adherence. Participants with optimal adherence (no missed medication doses) are more recently diagnosed (M, 1.06 years; SD, 0.87) than patients who miss one or more medication doses (M, 3.12 years; SD, 3.36; t35=2.24; p=0.032). Rates of adherence in this sample of adolescents with bipolar disorder were somewhat higher than reports in adults and broadly consistent with findings in children with other psychiatric symptoms. Nonetheless, findings suggest vigilant monitoring of medication administration prior to assessing regimen effectiveness.

Naltrexone treatment of adolescent alcoholics: an open-label pilot study

OBJECTIVE

This 6-week open-label trial of naltrexone was conducted in a preliminary fashion to determine whether naltrexone would be safe, well tolerated, and lead to a reduction in alcohol consumption in adolescents with alcohol dependence.

METHOD

Five outpatient treatment-seeking adolescents who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria for alcohol dependence were recruited. The Child Schedule for Schizophrenia and Affective Disorders (K-SADS), Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), and the Family History Questionnaire were administered at baseline. The Time-Line Follow-Back (TLFB) and two craving scales (Adolescent Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale [A-OCDS] and a craving analog scale) were administered at baseline and weekly thereafter. Each subject received a 10-day supply of naltrexone (50 mg) and a 100-mg riboflavin capsule. Subjects were instructed to take naltrexone and riboflavin simultaneously.

RESULTS

Overall, the average drinks per drinking day (DDD) decreased significantly from baseline to the end of week 6 with an average reduction of 7.61 standard drinks. There was a significant reduction in the average A-OCDS total score, A-OCDS Irresistibility subscale score, and craving analog score. Nausea was the only side-effect reported, and there were no elevations of liver enzymes. Naltrexone was well tolerated by the alcohol-dependent adolescent.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that naltrexone is safe and well tolerated in adolescent alcoholics. Naltrexone may lead to a significant reduction in alcohol consumption and craving in adolescent alcoholics, but larger, randomized, controlled trials are needed.

Integrated substance use and mental health treatment for adolescents: aligning organizational and financial incentives

The high prevalence of the dual diagnosis of mental and substance use disorders (SUD) has been increasingly documented for both adolescents and adults (Crowley and Riggs 1995; Kandel et al. 1999; Whitmore et al. 1997). For more than a decade, the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) has included integrated treatment of comorbid psychiatric disorders as one of nine core treatment principles (National Institute on Drug Abuse 1999). Despite empirically supported practice guidelines, implementation of integrated treatment has been slow (New Freedom Commission on Mental Health 2003; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1999). In response to the growing call for integrated treatments and systems of care, this paper: (1) identifies systemic and economic barriers that have impeded widespread implementation of integrated care for adolescents with co-occurring SUD, specifically the supply of treatment providers, shifting priorities of gatekeepers to specialty care, and financing streams; and (2) describes possibilities for aligning economic incentives in order to facilitate the dissemination and implementation of integrated care for adolescents with co-occurring SUD.

Pharmacotherapy of adolescent substance use disorders: a review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Substance use disorders (SUD) are increasingly conceptualized as developing during adolescence. Moreover, adolescent SUD are viewed as one of the most difficult mental health conditions to treat. The role of pharmacotherapy for adolescents with SUD is not well delineated. We systematically reviewed existing pharmacotherapy studies of adolescent SUD.

METHODS

A computerized search of the literature addressing the pharmacotherapy of SUD in adolescents was performed. Data from relevant peer-reviewed scientific presentations were also included.

RESULTS

Five case reports (n = 8 subjects), six open studies that primarily addressed SUD with comorbid psychiatric disorders (n = 73 subjects), and five placebo-controlled studies (n = 156 subjects) on the pharmacological treatment of youths with SUD were identified. Pharmacological agents appear to reduce comorbid psychopathology with a milder reduction in SUD symptoms. The most robust evidence exists for the treatment of SUD comorbid with affective disorders. There is a limited database supporting the use of agents to reduce substance craving and the preventative effects of pharmacotherapy on subsequent SUD development in adolescents with specific psychiatric disorders.

CONCLUSION

Further controlled studies directed at reducing drug use and craving, and guiding the integration of pharmacotherapy and psychosocial interventions for SUD with the treatment of comorbid psychiatric illness, are necessary.

Patient characteristics and treatment implications of marijuana abuse among bipolar alcoholics: results from a double blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Marijuana abuse, primarily a disorder of adolescents and young adults, is highly prevalent among patients with severely ill psychiatric population, especially those with bipolar disorder. Additional marijuana abuse may impact on the clinical presentation of bipolar illness and may potentially act as mediator of treatment response in this population. However, the characterization of bipolar disorder patients with additional marijuana abuse and the impact of such abuse on treatment outcome has been rarely examined. The aim of this study was to characterize bipolar alcoholic patients with comorbid marijuana abuse and test the impact of marijuana abuse on alcohol and mood outcome of patients with bipolar disorder and comorbid alcohol dependence.

METHOD

We conducted secondary analyses of a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial testing valproate in 52 bipolar alcoholics. Subjects had a comprehensive assessment at baseline using structured diagnostic assessments, and they were then assessed every 2 weeks for 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-five subjects (48%) reported marijuana abuse. Those with co-occurring marijuana abuse were younger, had fewer years of education, and had significantly higher number of additional psychiatric comorbidity. They also had more severe alcohol and other drug use and were significantly more likely to present in the manic phase. The mixed model indicated that the placebo-treated marijuana abuse group had the worst alcohol use outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Marijuana abuse among patients with bipolar disorder and alcohol dependence is associated with higher degree of severity of alcohol and other drugs of abuse and may negatively impact on alcohol treatment outcome.

Substance abuse in patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder : therapeutic implications

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common disorder in children that frequently persists into adulthood. Studies have found that substance use disorders (SUD) are seen more commonly in those with ADHD than the general population. Although treatment with stimulant medications has been shown to be effective for individuals with ADHD, concern about the use of these agents in this population persists. This review article highlights the research in this area with a focus on the treatment of individuals who present with concomitant ADHD and SUD. Although stimulants can be abused, studies have shown that adolescents who are prescribed stimulants for ADHD have lower rates of SUD than those who are not treated with stimulants. It may be particularly difficult to evaluate adults for the diagnosis of ADHD when SUD is a co-morbid factor. Studies show that 20--30% of adults presenting with SUD have concomitant ADHD and approximately 20--40% of adults with ADHD have histories of SUD. Therefore, it is critical to perform careful diagnostic interviews to discern if patients have either or both of these disorders. Many clinical experts suggest that adults with ADHD and active SUD be treated for the SUD until a period of sobriety persists prior to initiation of specific treatment for ADHD. Since individuals with ADHD and active SUD are more likely to have more severe SUD and a worse prognosis, this approach may not serve many patients, as they relapse prior to obtaining ADHD treatment. Therefore, research has been directed towards determining if the treatment of ADHD with stimulant medications can be safe and effective for the individual with active SUD and concomitant ADHD. An initial trial of methylphenidate in a population of adults with active cocaine dependence and ADHD indicates that this is the case. Individuals with ADHD and SUD can present difficult diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. It appears that the most effective treatment option is to create a programme that uses the most effective treatment modalities available, including both behavioural and medical therapies, along with close supervision and monitoring. Newer medical treatment options of long-acting stimulants and non-stimulants (e.g. atomoxetine) offer effective treatment with a lower risk of abuse potential.

Pediatric bipolar disorder: a review of the past 10 years

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature of the past decade covering the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, assessment, longitudinal course, biological and psychosocial correlates, and treatment and prevention of pediatric bipolar disorder (BD).

METHOD

A computerized search for articles published during the past 10 years was made and selected studies are presented.

RESULTS

Pediatric BD is increasingly recognized, and there are several prevailing views on core features of this disorder. The incidence and prevalence of the disorder and the associated comorbidities vary according to study setting and criteria used. This disorder is highly recurrent and accompanied by substantial psychiatric and psychosocial morbidity. Familial studies, including "top down" (offspring of parents with BD) and "bottom up" (relatives of youths with BD) studies indicate that pediatric BD is aggregated in families with adult or later-onset BD and suggest the existence of genetic predisposition. Greater understanding of the risk factors for early onset BD and recognition of the phenomenology of prodromal symptoms offers hope for early identification and prevention. Neuroimaging studies indicate frontotemporal and frontostriatal pathology, but none of these findings seems to be disorder specific. Combination pharmacotherapies appear promising, and the field awaits further short- and long-term randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Preliminary studies of various psychotherapies, including psychoeducation strategies tailored specifically for BD in youths, look encouraging.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable advances have been made in our knowledge of pediatric BD; however, differing viewpoints on the clinical presentation of BD in children are the rule. Phenomenological and longitudinal studies and biological validation using genetic, neurochemical, neurophysiological, and neuroimaging methods may strengthen our understanding of the phenocopy. Randomized, controlled treatment studies for the acute and maintenance treatment of BD disorder are warranted.

Comorbid anxiety in phenotypes of pediatric bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

There has been limited research on anxiety in pediatric bipolar disorder (BPD). Adult BPD studies suggest comorbid anxiety disorders are common and impact treatment outcome. We explored the association of comorbid anxiety with two phenotypes of pediatric BPD.

METHODS

We studied two groups of children. The first group (BPD; N = 31) represents the "narrow phenotype" of pediatric BPD, meeting stringent DSM-IV criteria for mania, including duration and elevated/expansive mood. The second group (ED; N = 32) exhibited chronic, non-episodic irritability without elation or grandiosity ("broad phenotype").

RESULTS

Both samples demonstrate high prevalence of anxiety (BPD 77.4%; ED 46.9%). In the BPD sample, anxiety predates BPD onset, and those with comorbid anxiety have earlier age of onset of BPD than those without. Children with BPD plus anxiety have more hospitalizations than those without anxiety. ED subjects with and without comorbid anxiety did not differ with respect to onset of ED symptoms or number of hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Narrow and broad phenotype BPD children have high rates of comorbid anxiety, although only in the narrow phenotype group is comorbid anxiety associated with greater functional impairment BPD plus comorbid anxiety may represent a particularly severe phenotype of pediatric BPD.

Treating patients with bipolar disorder and substance dependence: lessons learned

Although bipolar disorder is the Axis I psychiatric disorder associated with the highest rate of co-occurring substance use disorders, little research has focused on treatments specifically designed for these patients. The author and his colleagues have developed and studied Integrated Group Therapy (IGT) for this population. This paper describes common themes that have emerged in carrying out IGT for patients with bipolar disorder and substance dependence. These include the strong emphasis on depression, as opposed to mania; the predominance of hopelessness; specific patterns of medication noncompliance; and the implications of patients' labeling their substance use as self-medication. Therapeutic aspects involved in addressing these themes are discussed.

A pilot controlled trial of topiramate for mania in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of topiramate monotherapy for acute mania in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder type I.

METHOD

This double-blind, placebo-controlled study was discontinued early when adult mania trials with topiramate failed to show efficacy. Efficacy end points included the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children, Children's Depression Rating Scale, Children's Global Assessment Scale, and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement.

RESULTS

Fifty-six children and adolescents (6-17 years) with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder type I received topiramate (n=29, 52%) or placebo (n=27, 48%). The only statistically significant differences in efficacy measures between treatment groups were the difference between slopes of the linear mean profiles of the YMRS (p=.003) using a post hoc repeated measures regression and the change in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children at day 28 (-14.9 versus-5.9, p=.048) using observed data. Adverse events with topiramate included decreased appetite, nausea, diarrhea, and paresthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Topiramate was well tolerated; however, the results are inconclusive because of premature termination resulting in a limited sample size. Adequately powered controlled trials are necessary to determine whether topiramate has efficacy in reducing symptoms of acute mania in children and adolescents.

Pharmacotherapy of children and adolescents with bipolar disorder

The identification and treatment of children and adolescents with a bipolar disorder is often challenging and difficult. Many of the psychotropic agents used to treat adults with bipolar disorder may also be-used to treat children and adolescents with these disorders. Further controlled trials using combination pharmacotherapy in children and adolescents with bipolar disorders are needed to advance the field of pediatric bipolarity and provide optimal care for these patients. There are multiple ongoing trials of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics that will provide important controlled data that are currently lacking in the field.

Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with substance use disorders

This practice parameter describes the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with substance use disorders and is based on scientific evidence and clinical consensus regarding diagnosis and effective treatment as well as on the current state of clinical practice. This parameter considers risk factors for substance use and related problems, normative use of substances by adolescents, the comorbidity of substance use disorders with other psychiatric disorders, and treatment settings and modalities.

Bipolar disorder and substance abuse

SUDs are common in people with BPD. The reasons for this association are not well understood and may be related to several factors. When present,SUDs in BPD patients seem to be associated with a poor prognosis. The treatment of patients with BPD and an SUD has been the subject of relatively little investigation, but medications that are effective mood stabilizers seem to decrease substance use in some reports.

The effectiveness and tolerability of aripiprazole for pediatric bipolar disorders: a retrospective chart review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective chart review was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of aripiprazole for the treatment of children and adolescents with bipolar disorders.

METHODS

The medical charts of all children and adolescents with a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar disorder, type I, type II, not otherwise specified (NOS), or schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, and who were treated with aripiprazole were reviewed by two child and adolescent psychiatrists who independently confirmed their DSM-IV diagnoses, severity, and the improvement of illness using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Improvement scores for bipolar disorder (CGI-BP) and the Clinical Global Assessment Scale (CGAS).

RESULTS

Thirty patients who were treated with aripiprazole were identified (mean starting dose=9 +/- 4 mg/day, mean final dose=10 +/- 3 mg/day). The overall response rate, defined by a CGI-Improvement score of < or = 2 at endpoint, was 67%. There was a statistically significant improvement in CGAS scores (48 +/- 11 to 65 +/- 11, signed rank = 191, p <0.0001) and CGI-S scores (4.2 +/- 0.8 to 2.8 +/- 1.0, signed rank=-172, p <0.0001, effect size=1.90) from baseline to endpoint. No serious adverse events were identified. Common side effects were sedation (n=10, 33%), akathisia (n=7, 23%), and gastrointestinal disturbances (n=2, 7%). Baseline and endpoint weights were available for 14 (47%) of the patients. Change in weight ranged from +5 to -21 kg and 12 (86%) of 14 patients lost weight (mean weight loss was 3 +/- 6 kg).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective chart review suggests that aripiprazole may be effective and well tolerated for children and adolescents with bipolar disorders. Controlled studies of aripiprazole for the treatment of pediatric bipolar disorder are necessary.

Prepubertal bipolar disorder: available pharmacological treatment options

Awareness of bipolar spectrum disorders in children is rapidly increasing, with a more precise definition of their clinical subtypes and early signs. Paediatric bipolar disorder can lead to an important impairment in scholastic, familial and social functioning, and to a higher risk for substance abuse and suicide. In the context of a multimodal approach, the core treatment of early-onset bipolar disorder is pharmacological. This review focuses on the empirical evidence for pharmacotherapy in paediatric bipolar disorder. Mood stabilizers, including lithium, and older and newer anticonvulsivants will be considered, in mono- or polypharmacy. Atypical antipsychotics will be considered in more severe and/or treatment-resistant manic or mixed episodes. Finally, the prophylaxis of intercritical phases and the management of specific challenging conditions, such as bipolar depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, with bipolar comorbidity, will be reviewed.

Prepubertal bipolar disorder: proper diagnosis should lead to better treatment response

Treatment research in prepubertal bipolar disorder remains in a rudimentary stage. Phenomenological evidence suggests it is a heterogeneous disorder with varying degrees of rapid cycling, aggression, and psychosis often accompanied by comorbid diagnoses of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and anxiety disorders including obsessive compulsive disorder. Longitudinal and family history studies suggest prepubertal bipolar disorder may be more treatment-resistant than later-onset bipolar disorder. Neurobiological studies to guide treatment, though promising, remain in their infancy. Clinical trials to date (mostly open studies) often have lumped together subjects with manic, hypomanic, and mixed presentations with different and/or undiagnosed comorbidities, making meaningful comparisons of treatment response difficult. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are needed to clarify best treatment options for bipolar subtypes with and without comorbid disorders. More homogeneous diagnostic groupings based on episode and duration criteria and a more patient-centered, symptom-based approach should be considered in treatment designs.

Treatment of mania in children and adolescents

Bipolar disorder (BPD) is a severe and complex illness that seriously disrupts the lives of those afflicted. Increased rates of suicide attempts and completions, poorer academic performances, disturbed interpersonal relationships, increased rates of substance abuse, legal difficulties, and multiple hospitalizations all have been associated with BPD. At least 1% of children and adolescents have this disorder. This commentary is designed to review and summarize the recent literature on the treatment of manic and/or hypomanic phases of BPD in children and adolescents.

Treatment guidelines for children and adolescents with bipolar disorder

Clinicians who treat children and adolescents with bipolar disorder desperately need current treatment guidelines. These guidelines were developed by expert consensus and a review of the extant literature about the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric bipolar disorders. The four sections of these guidelines include diagnosis, comorbidity, acute treatment, and maintenance treatment. These guidelines are not intended to serve as an absolute standard of medical or psychological care but rather to serve as clinically useful guidelines for evaluation and treatment that can be used in the care of children and adolescents with bipolar disorder. These guidelines are subject to change as our evidence base increases and practice patterns evolve.

Ziprasidone monotherapy in pediatric bipolar disorder

Four children, aged 7-16 years, with bipolar disorder were switched to ziprasidone from mood stabilizers, anticonvulsants, or other atypical antipsychotics because of poor response, troubling side effects, breakthrough symptoms, or concern over potential toxicity. Within 3 days, patients experienced a resolution of hypomania, hallucinations, aggression, irritability, depression, and insomnia. One 16-year-old, who was switched from carbamazapine, also required adjunctive lorazepam for situational anxiety; the others either responded to, or were ultimately managed with, ziprasidone monotherapy. Side effects were mostly mild and transitory. Patients experiencing sedation or wakefulness at dose escalation were maintained at the previous 20- or 40-mg dose level until side effects resolved. Ziprasidone's efficacy, fast onset of action, and good safety profile warrant a more systematic study of this agent in pediatric patients with bipolar disorder.

Neuropsychological deficits in adolescents with conduct disorder and comorbid bipolar disorder: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

We report pilot data on neuropsychological deficits in aggressive juvenile offenders with and without bipolar disorder compared with each other and healthy controls.

METHOD

We assessed 52 adolescents and their parent or guardians: 36 incarcerated juvenile offenders and 16 community controls using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children, Present and Life-Time Version and a neuropsychological testing battery. All incarcerated subjects (n=34) met criteria for Conduct Disorder (CD); 26 are classified as Non-BD-CD, and eight with CD and Bipolar disorder (CD-BD). These subjects were compared to community controls (n=16) matched for age, gender, SES and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Relative to controls, the Non-BD-CD subjects' impairments (p<0.05) were in cognitive ability, set shifting/inhibition, planning and verbal memory-language functioning. The CD-BD group displayed impairments (p<0.05) relative to controls in cognitive ability, set shifting, verbal memory-language functioning, and visuospatial tasks. The Non-BD-CD and CD-BD groups however did not display significant differences on most neuropsychological measures compared with each other. When we controlled for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, the Non-CD-BP subjects continued to show deficits on Verbal measures where the CD-BD subjects maintained deficits in measures of cognitive ability, verbal measures and visual spatial tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Juvenile offender with CD displayed a wide range of deficits on neuropsychological testing compared with controls. Although juvenile offenders with and without BD differed on their clinical presentation, differences on neuropsychological measures are not specific and may be related to comorbid diagnoses.

Treatment of co-occurring alcohol, drug, and psychiatric disorders

Comorbid psychiatric disorders and drug use disorders (DUDs) are common among adolescents with alcohol use disorders (AUDs). These comorbid disorders have a large potential significance on the clinical course of the AUDs among adolescents, and can predict a shorter time to relapse of alcohol use. The use of medication for treatment of the various comorbid adolescent populations has increased dramatically in recent years, despite the lack of double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that demonstrate their safety and efficacy. Consequently, to date, no empirically proven treatment exists for most of these comorbid disorders. This chapter reviews the state of the art regarding the treatment of comorbid adolescents. This chapter also identifies gaps in knowledge regarding the treatment of comorbid adolescents, and outlines directions for future research in this field.

Pharmacotherapy of comorbid mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders

Mood and anxiety disorders commonly co-occur with substance use disorders. Exploration of the neurobiology of substance use disorders and mood and anxiety disorders have found that the neural circuitry in mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders is clearly overlapping. These discoveries have encouraged the exploration of a number of pharmacotherapeutic agents in the treatment of co-occurring mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders. In this article, recent data on the pharmacotherapeutic treatment of mood and anxiety disorders in individuals with substance use disorders are reviewed. Some of the barriers to the use of pharmacotherapy in individuals with substance use disorders are discussed.

Diagnosis and treatment of co-occurring affective disorders and substance use disorders

There is growing interest in the co-occurrence of mood and substance use disorders. It is clear that co-occurrence of these disorders is common and has an impact on prognosis and course of both disorders. The diagnostic issues at the interface of substance or alcohol use disorders and affective illnesses are particularly difficult because of the substantial symptom overlap between substance intoxication and withdrawal and symptoms of affective disorders. Over the past few years, advances have been made in the treatment of co-occurring disorders. Further investigation of specifically tailored treatments for patients with co-occurring substance use and other mood disorders is underway. Because many advances have been made in pharmacotherapy of mood disorders in the past 10 years, this progress will impact individuals with co-occurring disorders, because newer agents with less toxicity and fewer adverse effects and interactions with substances of abuse will be evaluated for treating the comorbid condition. Specific considerations in choosing a pharmacologic agent for use in patients with substance use disorders include safety, toxicity, and abuse liability. Although there are few studies specifically targeting pharmacotherapy for co-occurring disorders, those that have been conducted indicate that similar pharmacotherapeutic agents work for mood disorders with or without substance use disorders. In conclusion, although the co-occurrence of substance abuse and mood disorders is an important area in which recent developments provide cause for considerable optimism, much work remains to be done.

Co-Occurring Disorders in the Adolescent Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment Systems

This article explores the rates of co-occurring disorders in two large federally-funded programs that target youth. In the mental health treatment system, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's (SAMHSA) Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) supports the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program. SAMHSA's Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) supports a number of grant programs providing substance abuse treatment for adolescents. The data from these programs underscores the need for the use of systematic, validated, biopsychosocial assessment instruments for all youth entering either the substance abuse or mental health treatment systems. The current evidence base for models of co-occurring treatment for youth is discussed and recommendations made for future activity related to adolescent co-occurring treatment.

New medication strategies for comorbid substance use and bipolar affective disorders

Comorbidity of substance abuse disorders (SUD) with bipolar disorders (BPD) is a serious treatment problem. Childhood BPD can be further complicated by comorbidity with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and later SUD during adolescence. The aim of this article is to review the literature on pharmacotherapies for these patients. Developing the ideal pharmacotherapy for BPD and SUD can be informed by the role of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the neurobiology of SUD. This ideal pharmacotherapy would have several key characteristics. These characteristics include treating the BPD, relieving withdrawal symptoms, and preventing relapse to SUD. The ideal medication should have low abuse liability, require infrequent dosing, be well tolerated, and have few side effects. A medication approaching this ideal is the GABA enhancer valproate. Adding atypical antipsychotic agents might not improve valproate's efficacy, but combining GABA medications with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors holds promise for SUD with depression. Pemoline might be the best option for minimizing the risk of SUD complicating comorbid ADHD with BPD.

Bipolar disorder and substance abuse

Substance use disorders are overrepresented in individuals with bipolar and bipolar spectrum disorders. Although awareness of this phenomenon has increased over the past 20 years, few empirically based treatment strategies have been developed for this challenging patient population. This review examines the relationship between bipolar and substance use disorders and treatment options that have been studied in this patient population. First, we examine the high prevalence rates of substance use disorders in individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder, the common problems associated with establishing a bipolar disorder diagnosis in individuals who abuse substances, the possible explanations for the frequent coexistence of bipolar and substance use disorders, and the negative effect of substance abuse on the course of and treatment outcomes for bipolar disorder. The review then focuses on treatment approaches for this patient population, including integrated group therapy for co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorders and pharmacotherapies that target both disorders. Finally, we present suggestions for medications that might be tested for their efficacy in treating both disorders in specific subgroups of patients with bipolar and substance use disorders.

Risk of substance use disorders in adolescents with bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

Previous work in adults and youths has suggested that juvenile onset bipolar disorder (BPD) is associated with an elevated risk of substance use disorders (SUD). Considering the public health importance of this issue, the authors now report on a controlled study of adolescents with and without BPD to evaluate the risk of SUD.

METHOD

Probands with DSM-IV BPD (n=57, mean age +/- SD=13.3 +/- 2.4 years) and without DSM-IV BPD (n=46, 13.6 +/- 2.2 years) were studied. Structured psychiatric interviews and multiple measures of SUD were collected.

RESULTS

Bipolar disorder was associated with a highly significant risk factor for SUD (32% versus 7%, Z=2.9, p=.004) that was not accounted for by conduct disorder (adjusted odds ratio=5.4, p=.018). Adolescent-onset BPD (> or =13 years) was associated with a higher risk of SUD compared with those with child-onset BPD (chi1=9.3, p=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings strongly indicate that BPD, especially adolescent onset, is a significant risk factor for SUD independently of conduct disorder.

The diagnosis of preschool bipolar disorder presenting with mania: open pharmacological treatment

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BPD) in preschool children is controversial, although preliminary data suggest that children with BPD may present with classic manic symptoms in a more chronic, rapid cycling presentation. While children with BPD are extremely dysfunctional, presenting symptoms and symptom expression remains to be further defined. Clarification of the presentation of BPD in children could result in better treatment.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients, ages 2-5 years, were identified by chart review of all children treated at our pediatric bipolar clinic. All available historical, symptom, and treatment information was collected and summarized.

RESULTS

Patients were approximately 2:1 male: female, predominantly Caucasian, with an average age of symptom onset of 3 years. Most frequent presenting symptoms (100%) included irritability, increased energy, and aggression. Prominent symptoms (>80%) included euphoria, grandiosity, decreased need for sleep, pressured speech, and distractibility. Eighty percent of patients had concurrent Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Twenty-one of the 31 patients reported prior treatment attempts with either a stimulant or antidepressant without the protective benefit of a mood stabilizer, and of these, 13 (62%) reported a worsening of mood symptoms during that treatment period. Twenty-six of 31 were initially treated in our clinic openly with a mood stabilizer, primarily valproic acid, with a significant decrease in manic symptoms (p=0.03) following initial treatment. Long-term treatment demonstrated continued improvements from baseline (p=0.01).

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective design of this study limits the conclusions that can be drawn. Due to the lack of a formal protocol, treatment was open and based on clinical judgment on an individual case basis.

CONCLUSIONS

The symptom expression in these patients allowed for diagnosis according to DSM-IV criteria. Treatment with mood stabilizers was clinically effective, with corresponding significant developmental benefits.

[Bipolar disorder in childhood and adolescence]

Many advances in the knowledge of childhood- and adolescent-onset bipolar disorder have been seen over the last 15 years. Current efforts focus on investigating clinical features, developing more instruments for early diagnosis and improving treatment research. The present study aims to present the main clinical characteristic of the disorder in children and adolescents, as well as the nomenclature, description of clinical phenotypes and the most common cycling pattern in youths. A discussion of comorbidity, differential diagnosis and advances in psychopharmacological treatment will also be presented.

A prospective 4-5 year follow-up of juvenile onset bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

Data on outcome of juvenile onset bipolar disorder is limited. This study examined the course and outcome of bipolar disorder and assessed the rate and predictors of recovery and relapse in a sample of children and adolescents over a 4-5 year period.

METHOD

Twenty-five consecutively ascertained subjects (9-16 years) with a diagnosis of mania (mean duration at intake of 4.6 +/- 3.9 weeks), were comprehensively assessed at baseline and at 6-month intervals using the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (revised) (DICA-R), the Missouri Assessment for Genetic Interview in Children (MAGIC), the Young's Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Children's Global Assessment (CGAS). The study phenotype required DSM-IV criteria of mania with elation and/or grandiosity as a criterion to distinguish them from those with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Subjects received the standard treatment as prescribed by their primary treating team.

RESULTS

During the course of the study period, all 25 subjects (100%) recovered from the index episode. The mean time to recovery was 44 +/- 46 days. The mean duration of follow-up was 51.6 +/- 4.1 months. Sixteen subjects (64%) relapsed after a mean period of 18 +/- 16.4 months. A majority of the relapses (72.4%) were while the subjects were on treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute juvenile onset mania has a high rate of recovery and low chronicity. The relapse rate was high and most of these occurred in the first 3 years despite aggressive prophylactic treatment. The effectiveness of currently used thymoleptics, in particular lithium, in the prophylaxis of juvenile bipolar disorder needs to be evaluated in controlled studies.

A review of the growing evidence base for pediatric psychopharmacology

This article provides an update of pediatric psychopharmacologic treatment evidence and focuses on six classes of medications in pediatric populations: psychostimulants, mood stabilizers, SSRIs, tricyclic antidepressants, antipsychotic agents, and other agents. The evidence is organized by disorder so that it is most useful to practicing clinicians. We begin each section with a brief introduction and summary of the findings published before January 1998. Priority is given to clinical trials that use random assignment and use of a comparison group (ie, placebo-control, head-to-head comparison, or cross-over design). Serious concerns remain about the efficacy and safety of many of these agents for use in children and adolescents. While a great progress is being made, there is clearly much work left to be done.

Family-focused treatment for adolescents with bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND

Research has begun to elucidate the optimal pharmacological treatments for pediatric-onset bipolar patients, but few studies have examined the role of psychosocial interventions as adjuncts to pharmacotherapy in maintenance treatment. This article describes an adjunctive family-focused psychoeducational treatment for bipolar adolescents (FFT-A). The adult version of FFT has been shown to be effective in forestalling relapses in two randomized clinical trials involving bipolar adults.

METHODS

FFT-A is administered to adolescents who have had an exacerbation of manic, depressed, or mixed symptoms within the last 3 months. It is given in 21 outpatient sessions of psychoeducation, communication enhancement training, and problem solving skills training. We describe modifications to the adult FFT model to address the developmental issues and unique clinical presentations of pediatric-onset patients.

RESULTS

An open treatment trial involving 20 bipolar adolescents (11 boys, 9 girls; mean age 14.8+/-1.6) found that the combination of FFT-A and mood stabilizing medications was associated with improvements in depression symptoms, mania symptoms, and behavior problems over 1 year.

LIMITATIONS

These early results are based on a small-scale open trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from an ongoing randomized controlled trial will clarify whether combining FFT-A with pharmacotherapy improves the 2-year course of adolescent bipolar disorder. If the results are positive, then a structured manual-based psychosocial approach will be available for clinicians who treat adolescent bipolar patients in the community.

Lithium treatment of acute mania in adolescents: a placebo-controlled discontinuation study

OBJECTIVE

There are no published placebo-controlled studies of any agent in the treatment of acute mania in children or adolescents. This is the first placebo-controlled study of lithium's efficacy in the treatment of acute mania in adolescents.

METHOD

In this discontinuation study, participants received open treatment with lithium at therapeutic serum levels (mean 0.99 mEq/L) for at least 4 weeks. Responders were randomly assigned to continue or discontinue lithium during a 2-week double-blind, placebo-controlled phase. This study had 80% power to detect a 40% difference in exacerbation rates between groups (10% on lithium versus 50% on placebo).

RESULTS

Twenty-three of 40 protocol participants (57.5%) experienced a clinically significant symptom exacerbation during the 2-week double-blind phase. However, the slightly lower exacerbation rate in the group maintained on lithium (10/19 or 52.6%) versus the group switched to placebo (13/21 or 61.9%) did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not support a large effect for lithium continuation treatment of adolescents with acute mania, mostly due to the unexpectedly high rate of exacerbations in the group that continued on lithium. Further studies are warranted to clarify whether acute mania in adolescents is lithium responsive.