New and emerging etiologies for community-acquired pneumonia with implications for therapy. A prospective multicenter study of 359 cases

Antibiotic treatment and survival of nursing home patients with lower respiratory tract infection: a cross-national analysis

PURPOSE

Although lower respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of death in frail elderly patients, few studies have compared treatments and outcomes. We assessed the effects of different antibiotic treatment strategies on survival of elderly nursing home residents with lower respiratory tract infections in the United States and the Netherlands, where treatment approaches are quite different.

METHODS

We combined data from 2 prospective cohort studies of lower respiratory tract infections conducted in 36 nursing homes in the United States and 61 in the Netherlands. We included residents whose infections were treated with antibiotics: 806 in the United States and 415 in the Netherlands. Outcome measures were 1-month and 3-month mortality. We used logistic regression to adjust for differing illness severity.

RESULTS

Dutch residents had higher mortality than US residents (28.1% vs 15.1% at 1 month, respectively; P <.001). After adjusting for illness severity with logistic regression, the differences between the Dutch and US populations were not significant (odds ratio 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.90). Predicted mortality was overestimated for more severely ill US residents at 1 month but not at 3 months. No antibiotic regimen was consistently associated with increased or decreased mortality.

CONCLUSION

Despite differences in illness severity and treatment, adjusted mortality did not differ between the 2 countries. Although we cannot exclude a short-term survival benefit from more aggressive treatment in the United States, differences in baseline health appear prognostically more important than the type of antibiotic treatment.

Community-acquired pneumonia by Legionella pneumophila serogroups 1-6 in Brazil

A prospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized due to community-acquired pneumonia was carried out for 1 year in a Brazilian university general hospital to detect the incidence of community-acquired pneumonia by Legionella pneumophila serogroups 1-6. During a whole year, a total of 645 consecutive patients who were hospitalized due to a initial presumptive diagnosis of respiratory disease by ICD-10 (J00-J99), excluding upper respiratory diseases, were screened to detect the patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Fifty-nine consecutive patients hospitalized due to community-acquired pneumonia between July 19, 2000 and July 18, 2001, were included in the study. They had determinations of serum antibodies to L. pneumophila serogroups 1-6 by indirect immunofluorescence antibody test at the Infectious Diseases Laboratory of University of Louisville (KY, USA) and urinary antigen tests for L. pneumophila serogroup 1. Three patients had community-acquired pneumonia by L. pneumophila serogroups 1-6, two patients being diagnosed by seroconversion and positive urinary antigen tests; the other had negative serologies but strongly positive urinary antigen test. The incidence of community-acquired pneumonia by L. pneumophila serogroups 1-6 in our hospital was 5.1%.

Value of intensive diagnostic microbiological investigation in low- and high-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia

In a prospective study to evaluate the diagnostic yield of different microbiological tests in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia, material for microbiological investigation was obtained from 262 patients. Clinical samples consisted of the following: sputum for Gram staining, culture, and detection of pneumococcal antigen; blood for culture and serological tests; urine for detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen and pneumococcal antigen; and specimens obtained by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. A pathogen was identified in 158 (60%) patients, with Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=97) being the most common causative agent of community-acquired pneumonia. In 82% of the 44 patients with an adequate sputum specimen, a positive Gram stain was confirmed by positive sputum culture. S. pneumoniae infections were detected principally when adequate sputum specimens were examined by Gram stain and culture and when adequate and inadequate sputum specimens were tested for the presence of pneumococcal antigen (n=58; 60%). The urinary pneumococcal antigen test was the most valuable single test for detection of S. pneumoniae infections (n=52; 54%) when sputum pneumococcal antigen determination was not performed. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was of additive diagnostic value in 49% of the patients who did not expectorate sputum and in 52% of those in whom treatment failed. Investigation of sputum by a combination of Gram stain, culture, and detection of pneumococcal antigen was the most useful means of establishing an aetiological diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia, followed by testing of urine for pneumococcal antigen. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy may be of additional value when treatment failure occurs.

Nicotine modulates cytokine production by Chlamydia pneumoniae infected human peripheral blood cells

Nicotine, the addictive component of cigarette smoke, has been shown to have immunomodulatory effects. This drug alters proinflammatory cytokine production by immune cells, including lymphocytes, monocytes, and macrophages. The present study focuses on the effects of nicotine on infection by Chlamydia pneumoniae (Cpn), a ubiquitous intracellular pathogen which causes acute and chronic inflammatory diseases such as pulmonary infections, and may be associated with arthritis and atherosclerosis. Previous studies in our laboratory showed that lymphocytes and macrophages are susceptible to Cpn infection. The present study aimed at investigating the effect of nicotine on TGF-beta1, IL-10, IL-12, and TNF-alpha production in Cpn-infected human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Cytokine levels in the supernatant were assessed by ELISA. The results showed that Cpn infection alters the expression levels of IL-10, IL-12, and TNF-alpha in a time-dependent fashion. Nicotine treatment of the Cpn-infected cells up-regulated IL-10, but not TNF-alpha and IL-12, and also resulted in significant down-regulation of TGF-beta1 production which was marked in the Cpn-infected control cells. The combined action of nicotine and Cpn on cytokine production may have an impact in chronic inflammatory diseases.

Pneumonies communautaires graves de l'adulte

Les pneumonies aiguës communautaires sont des causes fréquentes d'hospitalisation et de mortalité. La reconnaissance immédiate des formes sévères sur des critères simples, cliniques, radiologiques et biologiques, est une étape importante pour une prise en charge rapide en réanimation afin de contrôler les défaillances d'organes. Les prélèvements appropriés microbiologiques précèdent l'antibiothérapie qui doit être instituée très rapidement après le diagnostic de pneumonie. Malgré les techniques d'identification, la moitié seulement des pneumonies sont documentées. Cette antibiothérapie, initialement probabiliste, intègre les germes pathogènes les plus souvent responsables, extra- et intracellulaires ; elle doit toujours être active sur le pneumocoque, bactérie la plus fréquente. L'association d'une β-lactamine et d'un macrolide ou d'une fluoroquinolone répond le mieux à cet objectif. Les fluoroquinolones actives sur le pneumocoque se sont substituées aux précédentes dans les plus récentes recommandations. Dans le cas exceptionnel des patients ayant des facteurs de risque particuliers, le traitement probabiliste doit prendre en compte Pseudomonas aeruginosa. La gravité d'une partie des pneumonies communautaires justifie le recours à des traitements adjuvants. L'antibiothérapie doit être réévaluée dans les 72 heures dans le but d'apprécier son efficacité, de l'adapter éventuellement et de la simplifier. La poursuite des antibiotiques à large spectre expose le patient à des effets indésirables et contribue aux résistances bactériennes. Pour les pneumonies dues au pneumocoque, les fluoroquinolones actives sur le pneumocoque pourront constituer une alternative en cas d'évolution importante des résistances du pneumocoque aux β-lactamines. La mortalité persistante des pneumonies reste sévère. Ceci doit stimuler l'amélioration de la prise en charge initiale et faire rechercher de nouvelles thérapeutiques.

Significance of atypical pathogens among community-acquired pneumonia adult patients admitted to hospital in Kuwait

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to determine the microbial etiology and severity of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Kuwait.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The severity of consecutive adult CAP cases admitted to 3 hospitals over a 1-year period was classified according to the Pneumonia Outcome Research Team (PORT) severity index. The microbial etiology was determined using standard methods for bacteria and serological tests for atypical and viral pathogens.

RESULTS

The study population was 124 of the 135 admissions; 63 female, 61 male; mean age 41.3+/-18 years. The severity class distribution was: class I 31%, class II 37%, class III 17%, class IV 13%, and class V 2%. Etiological agents were identified from 44 patients (35%), with one pathogen in 31 (25%), two in 9 (7%), and three or more in 4 (3%). The most common pathogens identified were: Mycoplasma pneumoniae in 14 patients (11%), Legionella pneumophila in 10 (8%), Chlamydia pneumoniae in 8 (6%), influenza B virus in 8 (6%), influenza A virus in 5 (4%), Haemophilus influenzae in 4 (3%), Streptococcus pneumoniae in 3 (2%), Staphylococcus aureus in 3 (2%), gram-negative enterobacteria in 5 (4%), Moraxellacatarrhalis in 2 (2%), and viruses in 4 (3%). The yields from laboratory tests were 48% for paired serology, 20% from adequate sputum sample, and 3% from blood culture.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that a large percentage of mild CAP cases are admitted to hospitals in Kuwait. Atypical pathogens have a significant role in the etiology of CAP. There is overtreatment of CAP with a combination treatment consisting mainly of third-generation chephalosporins and macrolides.

Community-acquired pneumonia of mixed etiology: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcome

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) of mixed etiology has increasingly been appreciated in the literature, but its clinical significance remains unknown. The aim of this analysis was to describe the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcome of CAP of mixed etiology. Data were obtained from a 2-year prospective study of consecutive patients with CAP in whom an extensive microbiological workup was performed. Predefined strict criteria were used to establish the etiology. A total of 493 patients were included. A single pathogen was detected in 222 (45%) cases and two or more pathogens in 28 (5.7%) cases. Mixed infections were seen across all age groups and in patients treated both in hospital and as outpatients. The most frequent combinations of pathogens were those of a bacterium plus an "atypical" organism (28.6%) and of two bacterial organisms (28.6%). Compared with patients with monomicrobial pneumonia, patients with mixed pneumonia were more likely to have underlying conditions (64% vs. 45%, p=0.04) and dementia (25% vs. 10%, p=0.02). The incidence of a defined series of complications was higher in patients with mixed pneumonia (39.3% vs. 18.6%; OR=2.84; p=0.02). Community-acquired pneumonia of mixed etiology is uncommon. Patients with mixed pneumonia are more likely to have underlying medical conditions, and they may have a more severe course of disease.

Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia treated in an ambulatory setting

BACKGROUND

Very few studies have addressed the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treated in an ambulatory setting.

METHODS

Patients were recruited from physicians' offices and from Emergency Rooms in Canada. Pneumonia was defined as two or more respiratory symptoms and signs and a new opacity on chest radiograph interpreted by a radiologist as pneumonia. Blood and sputum for culture as well as acute and convalescent serum samples for serology were obtained. Antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

RESULTS

Five hundred and seven patients were enrolled in the study; 419 (82%) had blood cultures done, seven (1.4%) of which were positive for Streptococcus pneumoniae; 241 (47.5%) had a sputum processed for culture, 31% of which were positive for a potential respiratory pathogen. 437 (86.2%) had both acute and convalescent serum samples obtained, 148 (33.8%) of which gave a positive result. Overall an etiological diagnosis was made in 48.4% of the patients. M. pneumoniae accounted for 15% of the cases, C. pneumoniae 12%, S. pneumoniae 5.9% and Haemophilus influenzae 4.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite considerable effort an etiological diagnosis of CAP treated on an ambulatory basis was made in only half the patients. The most commonly identified pathogens were M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae, S. pneumoniae,

[Clinical picture and prognostic factors for severe community-acquired pneumonia in adults admitted to the intensive care unit]

OBJECTIVE

In Chile very little information is available on severe community-acquired pneumonia treated in intensive care units. This study describes the clinical picture, prognostic factors, and treatment of adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit for severe community-acquired pneumonia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 113 consecutive patients were included in this prospective, descriptive study.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) age of the 113 patients was 73 (15). Of these, 95% had associated comorbidity, and 81% were in the high-risk classes of the Pneumonia Severity Index. Etiology was identified in 31%, and the most common pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (40%), gram negative bacilli (17%), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (6%). The main complications were the need for mechanical ventilation (45%), septic shock (26%), heart failure (24%), and arrhythmias (15%). Mortality at 30 days was 16.8%, and multivariate analysis revealed the following factors to be associated with a greater risk of death: acute renal failure (odds ratio: 5.1), and glycemia above 300 mg/dL (odds ratio: 7.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with severe pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit are elderly, with a high level of comorbidity and complications, but most survive.

Management of nonsevere pneumonia in military trainees with the urinary antigen test for Streptococcus pneumoniae: an innovative approach to targeted therapy

BACKGROUND

The drug of choice for treatment of Streptococcus pneumoniae infection is generally a penicillin (including amoxicillin). Targeted therapy is, however, rarely used, because results of definitive diagnostic tests for pneumonia are not available for several days. Thus, broad-spectrum antibiotics are used for empirical treatment of pneumonia to cover both typical and atypical pathogens. Our purpose was to assess the usefulness of a strategy of targeted antimicrobial therapy based on the results of a rapid urinary antigen test for S. pneumoniae.

METHODS

Military trainees with pneumonia were prospectively assigned to 2 groups: patients with positive urinary antigen test results who were treated with amoxicillin (1000 mg 3 times per day), and patients with negative urinary antigen test results who were treated with clarithromycin (500 mg 2 times per day). The duration of therapy was 5-10 days for both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 219 evaluable patients were enrolled in the study. The most common causes of pneumonia were S. pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Patients with positive urinary antigen test results had illness of greater severity at the time of study entry. Twenty-two percent of patients had positive urinary antigen test results (i.e., the amoxicillin group), and 78% had negative urinary antigen test results (i.e., the clarithromycin group). The clinical success rates were 94% for the clarithromycin group and 90% for the amoxicillin group (P = not significant). None of the patients who were classified as having treatment failure died. Resolution of clinical manifestations was slower for patients with pneumococcal pneumonia defined by a positive urinary antigen test result.

CONCLUSIONS

The urine antigen test allowed targeted use of a penicillin (amoxicillin) for young immunocompetent individuals with nonsevere, community-acquired pneumonia. Clarithromycin was highly effective against both S. pneumoniae pneumonia and pneumonia due to atypical pathogens.

Microbiological profile of community-acquired pneumonia in adults over the last 20 years

OBJECTIVES

To assess any change in the microbiological profile of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in our region over the last 20 years.

METHODS

We compared hospital admissions aged between 15 and 74 (n = 61) in Norfolk (UK) for CAP over a 19-month period in 1982-3 (ST1) with all admissions aged over 16 (n = 99) over a 14-month period in 1999-2000 (ST2). Data were collected for ST1 as part of a prospective multicentred research study, in a period of high Mycoplasma pneumoniae activity. ST2 was a prospective study of clinical practice. Chlamydophila species were differentiated in ST2 using whole-cell immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

A microbiological diagnosis was made in 38 (62%) in ST1 compared with 48 (48%) in ST2. Streptococcus pneumoniae remained the most common pathogen (26% in ST1, 25% in ST2). The incidence of M. pneumoniae was 18% in ST1 and 4% in ST2. The proportion of viral pathogens identified was similar: nine (15%) in ST1 and 14 (14%) in ST2. No cases of Chlamydophila pneumoniae were diagnosed in ST2.

CONCLUSIONS

The microbiological profile of CAP in Norfolk (UK) has not changed over the last 20 years and C. pneumoniae is not a frequent pathogen.

Clinical items not helpful in differentiating viral from bacterial lower respiratory tract infections in general practice

OBJECTIVE

Incorrect and unnecessary antibiotic prescribing enhancing bacterial resistance rates might be reduced if viral and bacterial lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) could be differentiated clinically. Whether this is possible is often doubted but has rarely been studied in general practice.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

This was an observational cohort study in 15 general practice surgeries in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

Etiologic diagnoses were obtained in 112 of 234 patients with complete data (48%). Viral pathogens were found as often as bacterial pathogens. Haemophilus (para-) influenzae was most frequently found. None of the symptoms and signs correlated statistically significantly with viral or bacterial LRTI. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate >50 (odds ratio [OR] 2.3-3.3) and C-reactive protein (CRP) >20 (OR 2.1-4.6) were independent predictors for viral LRTI and bacterial LRTI when compared with microbiologically unexplained LRTI.

CONCLUSION

Extensive history-taking and physical examination did not provide items that predict viral or bacterial LRTI in adult patients in daily general practice. We could not confirm CRP to differentiate between viral and bacterial LRTI.

Clinical Outcomes for Hospitalized Patients with Legionella Pneumonia in the Antigenuria Era: The Influence of Levofloxacin Therapy

BACKGROUND

Although the reduction in case-fatality rate recently observed among patients with Legionella pneumonia has been largely attributed to the progressive utilization of urine antigen testing, other factors, such as changes in empirical antibiotic therapy, may also have contributed. We have analyzed more-recent outcomes of Legionella pneumonia in an institution where urine antigen testing was reflexly performed in cases of community-acquired pneumonia without an etiological diagnosis.

METHODS

From a prospective series of 1934 consecutive cases of community-acquired pneumonia in nonimmunocompromised adults, 139 cases of Legionella pneumophila pneumonia were selected for observational review. Legionella cases were analyzed for outcome with respect to antibiotic treatment, mortality, complications, length of stay, time to defervescence, and stability.

RESULTS

The early case-fatality rate was 2.9% (4 of 139 patients), and the overall case-fatality rate was 5% (7 of 139 patients). One hundred twenty patients (86.3%) received an appropriate initial therapy, which included macrolides (i.e., erythromycin or clarithromycin) in 80 patients and levofloxacin in 40. Levofloxacin progressively replaced macrolides as the initial therapy during the study period. Compared with patients who received macrolides, patients who received levofloxacin had a faster time to defervescence (2.0 vs. 4.5 days; P<.001) and to clinical stability (3 vs. 5 days; P=.002). No differences were found regarding the development of complications (25% vs. 25%; P=.906) and case-fatality rate (2.5% vs. 5%; P=.518). The median length of hospital stay was 8 days in patients treated with levofloxacin and 10 days in those who received macrolides (P=.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Legionella pneumonia is still associated with significant complications in hospitalized patients, but recent mortality is substantially lower than that found in earlier series. Levofloxacin may produce a faster clinical response than older macrolides, allowing for shorter hospital stay.

Nonresolving Pneumonia

Uncertainty over the expected clinical course of a community-acquired or nosocomial pneumonia is a common reason for pulmonary consultation. Determining which patients with prolonged pneumonia and at what point during therapy they should undergo further evaluation can be challenging. This article reviews "normal" resolution times for the most common pneumonias, risk factors for delayed resolution, and infectious and noninfectious conditions that can cause nonresolving pneumonia. An approach to the evaluation of the patient with this common problem is described.

Role of beta-lactam agents in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common illness associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The beta-lactam antibacterial agents have been the mainstay of therapy for CAP for over four decades and remain as first-line therapy. However, the impact of the substantial prevalence of resistance seen among the common respiratory pathogens, particularly penicillin and macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae, is now an area for concern. CAP treatment guidelines often recommend the use of a macrolide or fluoroquinolone in conjunction with, or as an alternative to, beta-lactam agents, but whether this is necessary is uncertain. This review outlines the historical use of beta-lactam antibacterial agents in the treatment of CAP along with their ongoing therapeutic utility.

Nonresponses and treatment failures with conventional empiric regimens in patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Although most patients with suspected CAP respond to empiric therapy,a small number of patients do not respond in the expected fashion. Age and underlying comorbid conditions have a strong influence on the course of illness. Less common causes of treatment failures include overwhelming infection, antimicrobial resistance, and misdiagnosis. It is a common practice for empiric antimicrobial treatment of CAP to be initiated without microbiologic studies. Clinicians carefully should observe these patients for unusual or slow responses and should be ready to pursue a more extensive search for the cause of treatment failure.

Antibacterial drug resistance: implications for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia

In contrast to the tremendous number of articles and meetings devoted to elucidating the mechanisms of antibacterial drug resistance and describing the emergence of drug resistance patterns, little research has been completed on the impact of bacterial drug resistance on clinical outcomes. Moreover.among the studies that have been completed, the better-designed studies generally have failed to detect an effect of most current levels of antibacterial drug resistance on clinical outcomes for patients who have CAP. Yet, practice patterns are shifting in response to the perception that current levels of drug resistance necessitate changes in treatment patterns. This is unfortunate because it severely limits one's ability to continue to monitor the effectiveness of available therapies in light of changing patterns of antibacterial drug resistance. If levels of drug resistance continue to rise, it is likely that outcomes from those drug treatments will be affected adversely. In this regard, the recent licensing of a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for infants and young children may have an important effect on future trends in antibacterial drug resistance. The vaccine reduces childhood carriage of vaccine serotypes,which are among the most common serotypes found among drug-resistant isolates, and may reduce transmission of these serotypes to adults [65]. In conclusion, antibacterial drug resistance has not reduced substantially the effectiveness of first-line treatments for CAP. Whether levels of drug resistance will continue to increase or decline is unknown. Therefore,carefully designed outcomes studies likely will continue to be essential to help define optimal therapy for patients who have CAP.

Community-acquired pneumonia: severity of illness evaluation

Severity-of-illness assessment is now an accepted part of clinical practice and clinical research for the management of adults who have community-acquired pneumonia. Several approaches to this issue have been devised based on severity-of-illness scores or rules, some related to site of management. No single approach has been found to be superior to others, but further research into their effect on outcome in clinical practice is required. It is likely that different approaches may suit different populations and health care systems.

Antimicrobial therapy of community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common disorder that is potentially life-threatening, especially in older adults and patients with comorbid disease. Despite substantial progress in therapeutic options, CAP remains a primary cause of death from infectious disease in the United States. The mainstay of treatment for most patients is appropriate antimicrobial therapy This article reviews the principles for initial antimicrobial therapy, highlights some of the differences in approaches to antimicrobial drug selection in selected guidelines, and includes new recommendations for empiric and pathogen-directed therapy of CAP.

Diagnostic test for etiologic agents of community-acquired pneumonia

Diagnostic tests for the detection of the etiologic agent of pneumonia are neither recommended nor done for most outpatients with CAP (Table 4).Most of these patients have no clear diagnosis but seem to do well with empiric antibiotic treatment, which often costs less than the diagnostic tests. For hospitalized patients, a pre-treatment blood culture and an expectorated sputum gram stain and culture should be done. Testing for Legionella spp is appropriate in hospitalized patients, especially those who are seriously ill. New tests that merit use in selected patients are the urinary antigen assay for S pneumoniae and the PCR test for L pneumophila. Anticipated developments in the near future are PCR tests for detection of C pneumoniae and M pneumoniae.

Re-evaluation of the therapy of severe pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae

Pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most deadly form of community-acquired pneumonia. The death rate of bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia has remained constant over the past 50 years. Several retrospective reviews of bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia suggest that dual therapy with a beta-lactam and a macrolide antimicrobial agent is associated with a lower case fatality rate than therapy with a beta-lactam alone. These studies are reviewed, potential mechanisms are suggested, and future studies are discussed.

Antimicrobial selection for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections in the 21st century: a review of gemifloxacin

Community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are more prevalent in the elderly than in children and younger adults and form a significant proportion of all consultations and hospital admissions in this older age group. Furthermore, in a world of increasing life expectancy the trend seems unlikely to be reversed. Antimicrobial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) must cover Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, and in many circumstances should also cover the intracellular (atypical) pathogens. In contrast, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) are mainly associated with H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae and not with atypical bacteria: in severe cases, other Gram-negative bacteria may be involved. Frequently in LRTIs, the aetiology of the infection cannot be identified from the laboratory specimens and treatment has to be empirical. In such situations it is important to not only to use an antibiotic that covers all likely organisms, but also one that has good activity against these organisms given the local resistance patterns. Gemifloxacin is a new quinolone antibiotic that targets pneumococcal DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV and is highly active against S. pneumoniae including penicillin-, macrolide- and many ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, as well as H. influenzae and the atypical pathogens. In clinical trials in CAP and AECB, gemifloxacin has been shown to be as effective a range of comparators and demonstrated an adverse event profile that was in line with the comparator agents. In one long-term study in AECB significantly more patients receiving gemifloxacin than clarithromycin remained free of recurrence after 26 weeks. The improved potency, broad spectrum of activity and proven clinical and bacteriological efficacy and safety profile should make it a useful agent in the 21st century battle against community-acquired LRTIs.

Comparative efficacies and tolerabilities of intravenous azithromycin plus ceftriaxone and intravenous levofloxacin with step-down oral therapy for hospitalized patients with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of ceftriaxone plus azithromycin with those of levofloxacin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label multicenter trial with 1 : 1 treatment allocation in an inpatient setting.

PATIENTS

212 male or female inpatients with a clinical diagnosis of CAP were included in the study. In each treatment group >50% of patients had a pneumonia severity index of IV or V.

INTERVENTIONS

Open-label treatment with either intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone 1g and IV azithromycin 500 mg daily or IV levofloxacin 500 mg daily. Patients who improved clinically were switched to oral follow-on therapy with either azithromycin 500 mg/day or levofloxacin 500 mg/day. At the clinician's discretion, oral cefuroxime axetil was added to the treatment regimen of patients who received oral azithromycin if a macrolide resistant pneumococcal isolate was documented.

RESULTS

Overall, both study treatments were well tolerated. Favorable clinical outcomes in clinically evaluable patients were demonstrated in 91.5% of patients treated with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin and 89.3% (95% CI -7.1%, 11.4%) of patients treated with levofloxacin at the end of therapy visit and in 89.2% and 85.1% (95% CI -6.7%, 14.8%) patients, respectively, at the end of study visit. Bacteriological eradication rates for both treatments were equivalent with the exception of Streptococcus pneumoniae; 44% of isolates were eradicated with levofloxacin compared with 100% of isolates with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin.

CONCLUSIONS

As acknowledged by international CAP treatment guidelines, the combination of a third-generation cephalosporin and a macrolide is at least as efficacious as monotherapy with a fluoroquinolone with enhanced anti-pneumococcal activity, for hospitalized patients with moderate to severe CAP. Combined medication with a macrolide and third-generation cephalosporin may be preferred over fluoroquinolones as first-line therapy of hospitalized patients with CAP to minimize the development of multiresistant nosocomial Gram-negative bacilli.

Guide to selection of fluoroquinolones in patients with lower respiratory tract infections

Newer fluoroquinolones such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and gemifloxacin have several attributes that make them excellent choices for the therapy of lower respiratory tract infections. In particular, they have excellent intrinsic activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and the atypical respiratory pathogens. Fluoroquinolones may be used as monotherapy to treat high-risk patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, and for patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalisation, but not admission to intensive care. Overall, the newer fluoroquinolones often achieve clinical cure rates in > or =90% of these patients. However, rates may be lower in hospital-acquired pneumonia, and this infection should be treated on the basis of anticipated organisms and evaluation of risk factors for specific pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this setting, an antipseudomonal fluoroquinolone may be used in combination with an antipseudomonalbeta-lactam. Concerns are now being raised about the widespread use, and possibly misuse, of fluoroquinolones and the emergence of resistance among S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. A number of pharmacokinetic parameters such as the peak concentration of the antibacterial after a dose (C(max)), and the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) and their relationship to pharmacodynamic parameters such as the minimum inhibitory and the mutant prevention concentrations (MIC and MPC, respectively) have been proposed to predict the effect of fluoroquinolones on bacterial killing and the emergence of resistance. Higher C(max)/MIC or AUC24/MIC and C(max)/MPC or AUC24/MPC ratios, either as a result of dose administration or the susceptibility of the organism, may lead to a better clinical outcome and decrease the emergence of resistance, respectively. Pharmacokinetic profiles that are optimised to target low-level resistant minor subpopulations of bacteria that often exist in infections may help preserve fluoroquinolones as a class. To this end, optimising the AUC24/MPC or C(max)/MPC ratios is important, particularly against S. pneumoniae, in the setting of lower respiratory tract infections. Agents such as moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin with high ratios against this organism are preferred, and agents such as ciprofloxacin with low ratios should be avoided. For agents such as levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, with intermediate ratios against S. pneumoniae, it may be worthwhile considering alternative dose administration strategies, such as using higher dosages, to eradicate low-level resistant variants. This must, of course, be balanced against the potential of toxicity. Innovative approaches to the use of fluoroquinolones are worth testing in further in vitro experiments as well as in clinical trials.

Treatment of Legionnaires??? Disease

Legionnaires' disease is pneumonia, usually caused by Legionella pneumophila, which can range in severity from mild to quite severe. While it is commonly acquired in the community, it can just as easily be acquired nosocomially from water sources that have not been appropriately decontaminated. While historically initial treatment was always with erythromycin, current case series and treatment recommendations suggest that outpatients receive immediate treatment with one of the following antibacterials: azithromycin, erythromycin, clarithromycin, telithromycin, doxycycline or an extended-spectrum fluoroquinolone. If the symptoms are severe enough to warrant hospitalisation then the patient should receive treatment with parenteral azithromycin or extended-spectrum fluoroquinolones followed by step-down to oral formulations to complete the regimens. While a shorter course of 7-10 days for more severe infections may be possible for intravenous/oral azithromycin, other antibacterials should be administered for a total of 10-21 days and started as soon as possible upon presentation to optimise outcomes.

Is it possible to distinguish between atypical pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia?: evaluation of the guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia in Japan

The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) published the guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in 2000. The guidelines set up nine parameters and criteria for the differential diagnosis of atypical pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia based on clinical symptoms, physical signs and laboratory data. To evaluate the performance of these guideline criteria, 91 cases of Chlamydia pneumoniae (53 cases were pure-C. pneumoniae and 38 cases were mixed-C. pneumoniae pneumonia), 103 cases of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (86 cases were pure-M. pneumoniae and 17 cases were mixed-M. pneumoniae pneumonia) and 144 cases of bacterial (Streptococcus pneumoniae and/or Haemophilus influenzae) pneumonia were analyzed. The accordance rate for a suspected atypical pneumonia with the guideline criteria was 84.8% for pure-M. pneumoniae pneumonia and 60.3% for pure-C. pneumoniae pneumonia, but only 9.0% for bacterial pneumonia, 12.1% for mixed-C. pneumoniae pneumonia and 16.6% for mixed-M. pneumoniae pneumonia. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of the criteria in the JRS guidelines were 75.5% and 90.9%, respectively. Our results indicated that the differentiation of pneumonia in the JRS guidelines is useful for the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae pneumonia, but difficult to apply to the diagnosis of C. pneumoniae pneumonia.

Epidemiology and etiology of community-acquired pneumonia

The seriousness of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), despite being a reasonably common and potentially lethal disease, often is under estimated by physicians and patients alike. CAP results in more than 10 million visits to physicians, 64 million days of restricted activity, and 600,000 hospitalizations. This article discusses the epidemiology and bacterial causes of CAP in immunocompetent adults and the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus.

Azithromycin for acute lower respiratory tract infections

BACKGROUND

The spectrum of acute lower respiratory tract infection ranges from acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis to pneumonia. Annually approximately five million people die of acute respiratory tract infections. Among these, pneumonia represents the most frequent cause of mortality, hospitalization and medical consultation. Azithromycin is a new macrolide antibiotic, structurally modified from erythromycin and is noted for its activity against some gram-negative organisms associated with respiratory tract infections, particularly Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae).

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of azithromycin to amoxycillin or amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (amoxyclav) in the treatment of LRTI, in terms of clinical failure, incidence of adverse events and microbial eradication.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to January Week 3, 2004), and EMBASE (January 1988 to 2003).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials, which compared azithromycin to amoxycillin or amoxycillin/clavulanic acid in patients with clinical evidence of acute LRTI: acute bronchitis, pneumonia, and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis were studied.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The criteria for assessing study quality were generation of allocation sequence, concealment of treatment allocation, blinding, and completeness of the trial. All types of acute lower respiratory tract infections were initially pooled in the meta-analyses. Funnel plot was used to examine publication bias. The heterogeneity of results was investigated by the forest plot and Chi-square test. Index of I(2) was also used to measure inconsistency results among trials. Subgroup analysis was conducted for age, types of respiratory tract infection and types of antibiotic in control groups. Sensitivity analysis was conducted under the condition of trial size and concealment of treatment allocation.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen trials with 2,521 enrolled patients used 2,416 patients in the analysis. A total of 1,350 patients received azithromycin and 1,066 received amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. The pooled analysis of all trials showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of clinical failure on about day 10 to 14 after therapy started between the two groups (relative risk (RR) (random effects) 0.96; 95% CI 0.58 to 1.57). Sensitivity analysis showed that a reduction of clinical failure in azithromycin-treated patients (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.12) in three adequately concealed studies, compared to RR 1.14 (95% CI 0.62 to 2.08) in eleven studies with inadequate concealment. Eleven trials reported the incidence of microbial eradication and there was no significant difference between the two groups (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.07). The reduction of adverse events in azithromycin group was RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.00).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There is unclear evidence that azithromycin is superior to amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in treating acute LRTI. Future trials with high methodological quality are needed.

Cefepime versus ceftazidime for treatment of pneumonia

Consecutive patients with pneumonia, treated with cefepime (n = 66) or ceftazidime (n = 132), were evaluated in a retrospective, observational study. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups with respect to age, underlying diseases, acute physical and chronic health evaluation score, intensive care unit admission, presence of sepsis, community or hospital acquisition, causative organism, duration of therapy, death, cure or improvement in infection, adverse events, superinfections, presence of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) and resistance to therapy. Post-therapy hospitalization (days) and vancomycin co-administration were significantly lower, and time to vancomycin initiation significantly higher, in the cefepime compared with the ceftazidime group. The results suggest a trend towards less resistance on therapy, less VRE, reduced vancomycin use and shorter post-therapy hospitalization in patients treated with cefepime compared with ceftazidime. The clinical outcomes for hospitalized patients treated for serious pneumonia were similar between the two groups.

Antibiotic agents in the elderly

Diagnosis and treatment of infections in the elderly is challenging and complicated because of age-related physiologic changes and lack of classical clinical symptoms. Elderly patients are more vulnerable to infections because of their underlying diseases. This article reviews the pharmacologic issues in treating the elderly with antibiotics, the most frequently encountered infections in this patient population, and the suggested antibiotic regimens. The discussion also includes the special challenges of treating these most frequently encountered infections in the elderly who reside in long-term care facilities.

Once-daily oral gatifloxacin vs three-times-daily co-amoxiclav in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia

A double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, multinational, parallel-group study was designed to establish proof of equivalence between oral gatifloxacin and oral co-amoxiclav in the treatment of 462 patients with mild-to-moderate community-acquired pneumonia. Eligible patients were randomised equally to either gatifloxacin 400 mg once-daily plus matching placebo for 5-10 days, or amoxycillin 500 mg + clavulanic acid 125 mg three-times-daily for 5-10 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical response (clinical cure plus improvement) at the end of treatment. Overall, a successful clinical response was achieved in 86.8% of gatifloxacin-treated patients, compared with 81.6% of those receiving co-amoxiclav, while corresponding rates of bacteriological efficacy (eradication plus presumed eradication) were 83.1% and 78.7%, respectively. The safety and tolerability profile of gatifloxacin was comparable to that of co-amoxiclav, with adverse gastrointestinal events, e.g., diarrhoea and nausea, being the most common treatment-related adverse events in both groups. The study showed no evidence of gatifloxacin-induced phototoxicity, musculoskeletal disorders, or hepatic and renal problems. Overall, this study showed that gatifloxacin was equivalent clinically to a standard course of co-amoxiclav in patients with community-acquired pneumonia, and that gatifloxacin was safe and well-tolerated.

Antibody response to the patient's own Haemophilus influenzae isolate can support the aetiology in lower respiratory tract infections

In order to understand the clinical importance of Haemophilus influenzae isolated from sputum samples, an indirect immunofluorescence (IF) assay was developed, using the patient's own isolate as the antigen. The method was tested on samples from six patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and H. influenzae isolated from blood (n=2), sputum (n=3) or both (n=1), and on two healthy adults with H. influenzae isolated from the nasopharynx. Between acute and convalescent sera, a four-fold IgG antibody increase was achieved in five of six LRTI patients, including the three blood culture-positive patients. One LRTI patient and the two asymptomatic carriers showed stable antibody levels against their own isolate. Although small, the study indicates that indirect IF can be a promising tool for determining whether a H. influenzae strain represents the probable cause of infection or just a strain colonising the airways. More extensive studies should be performed in order to establish the usefulness of the assay.

Gemifloxacin once daily for 7 days compared to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid thrice daily for 10 days for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia of suspected pneumococcal origin

CONTEXT

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is common among adults and contributes considerably to morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of gemifloxacin to high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of CAP of suspected pneumococcal origin.

DESIGN

Randomized, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group Phase III study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

From September 1998 to July 1999, 324 patients with CAP were randomized at 102 centers in France, Poland and the Republic of South Africa.

INTERVENTION

Patients were double-blind randomized to receive either oral gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 7 days or oral amoxicillin/clavulanate 1 g/125 mg three times daily for 10 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were clinical, bacteriological, and radiological responses at the end of therapy (day 12-14) and follow-up (day 24-30) visits.

RESULTS

In 228 PP patients, clinical resolution at follow-up was 88.7% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 87.6% for 10-day amoxicillin/clavulanate [95% CI, -7.3, 9.5]. In 249 PP patients, clinical resolution at end of therapy was 95.3% for 7-day gemifloxacin vs. 90.1% for 10-day amoxicillin/clavulanate [95% CI, -1.2, 11.7]. Bacteriologic response rates for the PP patients at end of therapy were 96.3% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 91.8% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group [95% CI, -4.7, 13.6]. Bacteriologic response rates at follow-up were 87.2% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 89.1% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group [95% CI, -15.0, 11.2]. Specifically gemifloxacin eradicated 95.7% of Streptococcus pneumoniae including penicillin and macrolide resistant strains. Radiological response rates for the PP patients at end of therapy were 89.1% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 87.6% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group. The most frequently reported drug-related events were in the gemifloxacin group, diarrhea (6.0%) and rash (3.0%) and in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group, diarrhea (11.1%) and fungal infection, vaginitis and vomiting (each 2.0%). Overall there were statistically fewer withdrawals due to lack of therapeutic effect in the gemifloxacin group compared with the amoxicillin/clavulanate cohort, (95% CI, -8.8;0.6; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 7 days was found to be clinically, bacteriologically, and radiologically as effective as 10 days of amoxicillin/clavulanate 1 g/125 mg three times daily for the treatment of suspected pneumococcal CAP.

Diagnostic value of microscopic examination of Gram-stained sputum and sputum cultures in patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia

Clinicians continue to question the usefulness of microscopic examination of Gram-stained sputum specimens ("Gram staining") and sputum culture for diagnosis of pneumonia. We analyzed the sensitivity of these techniques in 105 patients with pneumococcal pneumonia proven by blood culture. Gram staining revealed gram-positive cocci in pairs and chains, and culture yielded pneumococci in only 31% and 44% of all cases, respectively. However, sputum specimens were never submitted for examination in 31 cases; in 16 others, the specimen was inadequate and a culture was not done. Excluding these cases, the sensitivities of Gram staining and culture were 57% and 79%, respectively. If patients receiving antibiotics for >24 h had been excluded, Gram staining would have suggested pneumococci in 63%, and culture results would have been positive in 86%. Sensitivity increased in inverse proportion to the duration of antibiotic therapy (P<.05). Microscopic examination of sputum samples before antibiotics were administered and performance of culture within 24 h of receipt of such treatment yielded the correct diagnosis in >80% of cases of pneumococcal pneumonia.

Pneumonias adquiridas na comunidade em pacientes idosos: aderência ao Consenso Brasileiro sobre Pneumonias

INTRODUÇÃO: A pneumonia é uma doença comum, com alta mortalidade, e é a sexta causa de morte nos EUA e a quinta no Brasil, na população idosa. O tratamento inicial das pneumonias é empírico, porque o agente etiológico é identificado, aproximadamente, em apenas 50% dos casos. Assim, várias sociedades científicas definiram guias para orientar a terapêutica antimicrobiana inicial. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a aderência ao Consenso Brasileiro sobre Pneumonias para o tratamento de pneumonias adquiridas na comunidade por pacientes idosos. MÉTODO: Foram avaliados os pacientes com 60 anos ou mais, internados em um hospital universitário por pneumonia adquirida na comunidade, segundo a mortalidade em 30 dias, tempo médio para estabilização clínica, tempo médio de internação, custo do tratamento e índice de severidade em pneumonias, no período de 02/08/1999 a 02/08/2000. RESULTADOS: Foram estudados 54 pacientes e a idade média foi de 74,1 anos. O esquema antimicrobiano recomendado pelo consenso foi utilizado em 61,1% dos pacientes. Não houve diferenças em relação ao tempo de internação, custo do tratamento, tempo para estabilização clínica e índice de gravidade em pneumonia entre os dois grupos, mas houve em relação à mortalidade. Os pacientes tratados de acordo com o consenso e com ídice de gravidade em pneumonia mais alto (IV e V) apresentaram maior mortalidade que o grupo não tratado de acordo com o consenso (p = 0,04). Os pacientes com índice de gravidade em pneumonia classes II e III apresentaram mortalidade de 9,5% enquanto nas classes IV e V a mortalidade foi de 30,3%. CONCLUSÃO: A aderência ao Consenso Brasileiro sobre Pneumonias, para pacientes idosos hospitalizados, foi boa e não houve diferença nos resultados entre os pacientes tratados e os não tratados de acordo com o consenso. O índice de gravidade em pneumonias demonstrou associação positiva com a mortalidade.

The plasma level of soluble urokinase receptor is elevated in patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteraemia and predicts mortality

This multicentre prospective study was conducted to investigate whether the level of the soluble form of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is elevated during pneumococcal bacteraemia and is of predictive value in the early stage of the disease. Plasma levels of suPAR were increased significantly (median 5.5; range 2.4-21.0 ng/mL) in 141 patients with pneumococcal bacteraemia, compared to 31 healthy controls (median 2.6, range 1.5-4.0 ng/mL, p 0.001). Furthermore, suPAR levels were elevated significantly in patients who died from the infection (n = 24) compared to survivors (n = 117; p < 0.001). No correlation was found between suPAR levels and C-reactive protein. In univariate logistic regression analysis, hypotension, renal failure, cerebral symptoms and high serum concentrations of protein YKL-40 and suPAR were associated significantly with mortality (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, only suPAR remained a significant predictor of death (mortality rate of 13 for suPAR levels of > 10 ng/mL; 95% CI: 1.1-158). The increase in suPAR levels may reflect increased expression by vascular or inflammatory cells in the setting of pneumococcal sepsis. This plasma protein may be used to identify patients who are severely ill with pneumococcal bacteraemia.

Treatment and outcome of 104 hospitalized patients with legionnaires' disease

BACKGROUND

Large outbreaks of Legionella pneumonia are rare, but when they occur provide an opportunity to assess predictors of mortality and efficacy of drug therapy. Although erythromycin has been the treatment of choice for many years, newer antimicrobials with increased activity against Legionella are available. A large outbreak of legionnaires' disease associated with the Melbourne Aquarium occurred in April 2000.

AIM

To describe the patterns and impact of Legionella therapy, and predictors of outcome in a large group of hospitalized patients with legionnaires' disease.

METHODS

A 6-month retrospective audit of hospitalized patients with proven legionnaires' disease around the time of the Melbourne Aquarium outbreak was conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 8.0 (SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA).

RESULTS

Data were obtained on 104 patients (71 aquarium related, 33 not related). There were six deaths (mortality rate 5.8%), three of which were attributable directly to progressive legionnaires' disease. The major predictors of death were pre-existing cardiac failure (P = 0.0035) and renal disease (P = 0.026). Erythro-mycin is still the most commonly used antibiotic (80% received i.v. erythromycin) with clinicians prescribing more than one active Legionella drug in the majority of cases (76%). Choice of initial antibiotic therapy did not statistically affect outcome as measured by death, length of hospital stay or time to defervescence, although there was a trend towards improved survival with i.v. erythromycin (P = 0.063). Intravenous erythromycin was associated with a 19% rate of phlebitis, whereas side-effects from other antibiotics were uncommon.

CONCLUSION

The most commonly used Legionella therapy in Australia remains erythromycin. This continues to be an effective agent, however, side-effects are common.

Management of community-acquired pneumonia: a focus on conversion from hospital to the ambulatory setting

Patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are treated in hospital or in the ambulatory care setting depending on the severity of illness. Despite numerous guidelines proposed, there is no agreement on specific criteria for hospitalization other than the clinicians' experience. The purpose of this review is to discuss the importance of the appropriate choice and timely administration of antibacterial agents, either in the hospital or in the outpatient setting. Since a high proportion of CAP patients will not have an etiologic agent identified at the time of initiation of treatment, the choice of antibacterial therapy is usually empiric. Antibacterial agents with activity against pneumococci and atypical pathogens causing pneumonia are the preferred choices. Macrolides, doxycycline, or respiratory fluoroquinolones have been recommended by various guidelines committees in North America for the treatment of pneumonia in patients with or without underlying comorbidities. Because of the increasing resistance to beta-lactams as well other antibacterial agents such as macrolides, doxycycline, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (cotrimoxazole), it is important that clinicians are aware of local statistics on resistance to Streptococcus pneumoniae, as infection with this bacterium is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. More recently, fluoroquinolone resistance has been reported, but the percentage of pneumococcal strains resistant to this agent is relatively low compared with the other antibacterial agents. Switch (intravenous to oral) therapy is recommended for hospitalized patients with CAP to facilitate early discharge, which has been shown to improve patient satisfaction and reduce hospital costs. Early conversion to oral therapy has not been shown to be associated with increased complications or higher mortality. Following prompt intravenous therapy and stabilization, patients with CAP should be treated with oral therapy in the ambulatory setting.

Community-acquired and nosocomial pneumonia

Pneumonia is one of the leading causes of morbidity, hospitalization, and mortality in both industrialized and developing countries. In particular, pulmonary infections acquired in the community, and pneumonias arising in the hospital setting, represent a major medical and economic problem and thus a continuous challenge to health care. For the radiologist, it is important to understand that community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and nosocomial pneumonia (NP) share a number of characteristics, but should, in many respects be regarded as separate entities. CAP and NP arise in different populations, host different spectra of causative pathogens, and pose different challenges to both the clinician and the radiologist. CAP is generally seen in outpatients, is most frequently caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Chlamydia, and its radiologic diagnosis is relatively straightforward. NP, in contrast, develops in the hospital setting, is commonly caused by gram-negative bacteria, and may generate substantial problems for the radiologist. Overall, both for CAP and NP, imaging is an integral component of the diagnosis, important for classification and differential diagnosis, and helpful for follow-up.

Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, southern Chile

We analyzed data from 25 consecutive patients with hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) admitted to the Puerto Montt and Osorno Regional Hospitals, southern Chile, from 1997 to 2001, emphasizing epidemiologic, clinical, radiographic, treatment, and laboratory aspects. Hemorrhage was frequent (64%), and 48% of patients showed alterations in renal function. Ten patients died (40%). We identified three groups of patients, which included the following: 1) those with the least severe form who had prodromic symptoms without pulmonary involvement; 2) those with moderate illness who had interstitial pulmonary infiltrates, usually needed supplemental nasal oxygen, were hemodynamically stable, and had an APACHE II <12 (none of whom died); and 3) those with the severe form who required mechanical ventilation, frequently had hemodynamic instability (93%), experienced a high mortality rate (77%), and had an APACHE II >12. Mild forms of HPS also exist, which are poorly known; the symptoms could be confounded with those of other viral diseases, leading to underdiagnosis.

Cost and incidence of social comorbidities in low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to a public hospital

CONTEXT

There are up to 1 million patients treated in acute-care hospitals for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with an estimated annual cost > 8 billion dollars. A newly validated CAP outcomes prediction rule developed by Fine and colleagues has been advocated as a guide to hospitalization decisions.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical characteristics, costs of care, and resource utilization of patients with low-risk CAP at an urban public hospital serving an indigent population.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Prospective cohort study from June 1, 1994 to May 31, 1996.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical characteristics and costs of care of patients with low-risk CAP and features associated with low-risk CAP in this population.

RESULTS

A total of 522 patients were identified at the time of hospital admission as having CAP; 97 patients (19%) were HIV positive on hospital admission and excluded. Of the remaining 425 patients, 253 patients (60%) were classified as pneumonia severity index (PSI) class I-III (low risk). Of the patients with low-risk CAP, only four patients (1.6%; 95% confidence interval, 0.4 to 4.0%) died during hospitalization. Low-risk CAP was both costly and accounted for significant resource use (35.4% of total CAP costs, and 45% of all CAP bed days). Of the patients with low-risk CAP, there were 138 patients (55%) who could potentially have been treated as outpatients (absence of altered mental status, hypotension, hypoxia on hospital admission, or direct ICU admission). However, 49% of these patients had a history of alcoholism, 20% had a blood alcohol level > 50 mg/dL, and 44% were homeless.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of the patients admitted with CAP to a public hospital had low-risk CAP and accounted for a significant proportion of the CAP bed days and costs. The use of the PSI accurately predicted which patients would be at low risk for death; however, the utility of using the PSI to reduce low-risk CAP hospital admissions would have been of limited benefit. High rates of homelessness, substance abuse, and medical needs not captured in the PSI would preclude many of these patients from unsupervised outpatient treatment.

Blood cultures in ambulatory patients who are discharged from emergency with community-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

To determine the factors that predict whether or not ambulatory patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treated in an emergency room (ER) setting will have blood cultures drawn and the factors that predict a positive blood culture.

METHODS

Prospective observational study of all patients with a diagnosis of CAP, as made by an ER physician, who presented to any of seven Edmonton-area ERs over a two-year period.

RESULTS

Seven hundred ninety-three (19.2%) of 4124 patients with CAP had blood cultures drawn. The site-specific blood culture rates ranged from 7.8% to 25% (P<0.001); 41 of 793 (5.1%) were positive. Streptococcus pneumoniae accounted for 58.5% of the isolates while Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli each accounted for 14.6%, or six patients each. Only two of the 24 patients with S pneumoniae bacteremia were subsequently admitted to hospital while all six of the patients with S aureus were admitted. Only one of the six patients with E coli bacteremia was treated at home. No factors were predictive of positive blood cultures on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians are selective in ordering blood cultures on patients with ambulatory pneumonia who present to an ER, and the positivity rate of 5.1% is quite high. No factors are predictive of positive blood cultures on multivariate analysis, thus clinical judgment has to prevail in the decision to perform blood cultures. Breakthrough bacteremia can occur with microorganisms susceptible to the antibiotics that the patient is receiving.