151
|
Hanson LC, Bennett AV, Jonsson M, Kelley A, Ritchie C, Saliba D, Teno J, Zimmerman S. Selecting Outcomes to Ensure Pragmatic Trials Are Relevant to People Living with Dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021; 68 Suppl 2:S55-S61. [PMID: 32589279 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2020] [Revised: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Outcome measures for embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) should reflect the lived experience of people living with dementia (PLWD) and their caregivers, yet patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes (PCROs) are rarely available in large clinical and administrative data sources. Although pragmatic methods may lead to use of existing administrative data rather than new data collected directly from PLWD, interventions are truly impactful only when they change outcomes prioritized by PLWD and their caregivers. The Patient- and Caregiver-Reported Outcomes Core (PCRO Core) of the IMbedded Pragmatic Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and AD-Related Dementias Clinical Trials (IMPACT) Collaboratory aims to promote optimal use of outcomes relevant to PLWD and their caregivers in pragmatic trials. The PCRO Core will address key scientific challenges limiting outcome measurement, such as gaps in existing measures, methodologic constraints, and burdensome data capture. PCRO Core investigators will create a searchable library of AD/AD-related dementias (ADRD) clinical outcome measures, including measures in existing data sources with potential for AD/ADRD ePCTs, and will support best practices in measure development, including pragmatic adaptation of PCROs. Working together with other Cores and Teams within the IMPACT Collaboratory, the PCRO Core will support investigators to select from existing outcome measures, and to innovate in methods for measurement and data capture. In the future, the work of the IMPACT Collaboratory may galvanize broader embedded use of outcomes that matter to PLWD and their care partners in large health systems. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:S55-S61, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C Hanson
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Center for Aging and Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Antonia V Bennett
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Patient Reported Outcomes Core, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mattias Jonsson
- Patient Reported Outcomes Core, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amy Kelley
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christine Ritchie
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Debra Saliba
- Borun Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Los Angeles VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.,RAND, Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - Joan Teno
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Sheryl Zimmerman
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Schools of Social Work and Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Wagatsuma S, Yamaguchi T, Berge LI, Husebo B, Habiger TF, Nouchi R, Angeles RC. How, Why and Where it Hurts—Breaking Down Pain Syndrome Among Nursing Home Patients With Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the COSMOS Trial. Pain Manag Nurs 2021; 22:319-326. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
153
|
Hassan T, Seus D, Wollenberg J, Weitz K, Kunz M, Lautenbacher S, Garbas JU, Schmid U. Automatic Detection of Pain from Facial Expressions: A Survey. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE 2021; 43:1815-1831. [PMID: 31825861 DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2019.2958341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Pain sensation is essential for survival, since it draws attention to physical threat to the body. Pain assessment is usually done through self-reports. However, self-assessment of pain is not available in the case of noncommunicative patients, and therefore, observer reports should be relied upon. Observer reports of pain could be prone to errors due to subjective biases of observers. Moreover, continuous monitoring by humans is impractical. Therefore, automatic pain detection technology could be deployed to assist human caregivers and complement their service, thereby improving the quality of pain management, especially for noncommunicative patients. Facial expressions are a reliable indicator of pain, and are used in all observer-based pain assessment tools. Following the advancements in automatic facial expression analysis, computer vision researchers have tried to use this technology for developing approaches for automatically detecting pain from facial expressions. This paper surveys the literature published in this field over the past decade, categorizes it, and identifies future research directions. The survey covers the pain datasets used in the reviewed literature, the learning tasks targeted by the approaches, the features extracted from images and image sequences to represent pain-related information, and finally, the machine learning methods used.
Collapse
|
154
|
Cecchi F, Cassio A, Lavezzi S, Scarponi F, Gatta G, Montis A, Bernucci C, Franceschini M, Bargellesi S, Paolucci S, Taricco M. Redefining a minimal assessment protocol for stroke rehabilitation: the new "Protocollo di Minima per l'ICtus" - PMIC2020. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 57:669-676. [PMID: 34042407 DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.21.06638-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of standardized assessment protocols is strongly recommended to identify patient's needs, outcomes, and predictors of response to specific interventions in Stroke rehabilitation. In 2008, the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER) published the minimal protocol for the person with stroke (PMIC), in reference to the International classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. AIM In 2019, the SIMFER appointed a working group (WG) to provide a revised, updated version in line with the most recent literature and suitable for all rehabilitation settings: the PMIC2020. DESIGN descriptive study based on the consensus of a panel of experts. SETTING all the rehabilitation settings. POPULATION stroke survivor people with disability. METHODS the coordinator of the SIMFER national Stroke Section appointed the WG, including the 8 Stroke Section board members, and 4 more experts (3 physiatrists; 1 neurologist). An extensive revision of the international literature on stroke assessment recommendations was performed; each proposed change from PMIC was written and motivated, discussed and voted. RESULTS The PMIC2020 is a single form, to be administered at any time of the rehabilitation pathway, including a minimum set of variables, consisting of a demographic/anamnestic section, and a clinical/functional assessment section. Newly introduced tools included measures of malnutrition (BMI<18,5); pain in verbal and non-verbal patients (Numeric Rating Scale-pain, Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale); neurological impairment (National Institute of Health-stroke scale); activity (Modified Barthel Index, Short Physical Performance Battery); and participation (Frenchay Activity Index). CONCLUSIONS The PMIC2020 provides an updated tool for the multidimensional rehabilitation assessment of the stroke patient, at any stage of the rehabilitation pathway; it aims to provide a shared minimum set of variables defining patient's needs and outcomes across different rehabilitation facilities and settings. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT The PMIC2020 identifies patient's needs, outcomes, and predictors of response to specific interventions in Stroke rehabilitation and provide ground for a highly needed Stroke Registry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Cecchi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Firenze and IRCCS Fondazione don Carlo Gnocchi Scientific Institute, Firenze, Italy
| | - Anna Cassio
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine AUSL Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Susanna Lavezzi
- Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Department, Ferrara University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Federico Scarponi
- Brain Injury Unit, Rehabilitation Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Giordano Gatta
- Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER), Ravenna, Italy
| | - Andrea Montis
- Neurorehabilitation Department, ASSL Oristano, San Martino Hospital, Oristano, Italy
| | - Chiara Bernucci
- AUSL of Romagna, Primary Care Department - Community Medicine, Infermi Hospital of Rimini, Rimini, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Bargellesi
- AULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana, Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine Unit- Severe Brain Injury & Spinal Cord Unit, Ca' Foncello Treviso Hospital, Treviso, Italy -
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
155
|
Bentur N, Cohen-Mansfield J, Radomyslsky Z. Is Pain Assessment of Community-Dwelling Persons With Advanced Dementia by Family and Paid Care Workers Feasible? J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 61:1028-1034. [PMID: 33186731 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The experience of pain is aggravated among older persons with advanced dementia (OPAD). It is often undetected and therefore untreated because of their limited capacity to identify and report their symptoms. Therefore, it is crucial to improve the pain identification skills of those who know and live with them. OBJECTIVES To compare the identification of pain among OPAD between family members and paid care workers and to compare the detection of pain through the use of two common assessment tools. METHODS This study is a cross-sectional comparison conducted between 82 dyads of informants: the family member of OPAD and the paid care worker, a total of 164 individuals. MEASUREMENTS The study used two previously validated pain assessment tools for persons suffering from dementia: the Pain Assessment in Noncommunicative Elderly persons tool (PAINE) and Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia tool (PAINAD), and a general impression question. RESULTS Both family members and paid care workers were able to successfully use both tools. The correlation between family members' ratings and paid care workers' ratings was statistically significant for all the assessments. The correlations between raters were higher when family members lived with the OPAD. The correlations between PAINE and PAINAD scores were moderate and significant, both among family members and paid care workers. CONCLUSION This study shows that it is feasible to improve the assessment and identification of pain among OPAD, through the use of validated tools by family members and paid care workers, suggesting the potential to improve quality of care and quality of life of OPAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Netta Bentur
- Tel Aviv University Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Stanley Steyer School of Health Professionals, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Jiska Cohen-Mansfield
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Department of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Minerva Center for the Interdisciplinary Study of End of Life, Igor Orenstein Chair for the Study of Geriatric, TelAviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
156
|
Boltz M, Resnick B, Kuzmik A, Mogle J, Jones JR, Arendacs R, BeLue R, Cacchione P, Galvin JE. Pain Incidence, Treatment, and Associated Symptoms in Hospitalized Persons with Dementia. Pain Manag Nurs 2021; 22:158-163. [PMID: 32921569 PMCID: PMC7943650 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Moderate to severe pain has been frequently reported in hospitalized older adults. Pain in hospitalized persons with dementia within the context of other common symptoms, functional decline, delirium, and behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), has received little attention. AIMS Describe the incidence of pain, the pharmacologic management of pain, and the association of pain with physical function, delirium, and BPSD in hospitalized persons with dementia. DESIGN Descriptive, cross-sectional study. SETTING Six medical units in three hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Baseline data from 299 hospitalized persons with dementia enrolled in the Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC) cluster randomized trial. METHODS Descriptive analyses of pain used the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale and the use of medication for pain management. Linear regression analyses tested relationships between pain and:1) physical function (Barthel Index), 2) delirium severity (Confusion Assessment Method Severity Short Form) and 3) BPSD severity (Neuropsychiatric Inventory- Questionnaire). RESULTS The majority of the sample was female (61.9%), non-Hispanic (98%), and Black (53.2%), with a mean age of 81.58 (SD=8.54).Of the 299 patients, 166 (56%) received pain medication. Of the 108 individuals who demonstrated pain, 40% (n=43) did not receive pain medication. When controlling for age, gender, cognition, and comorbidities, pain was significantly associated with function, delirium severity, and BPSD severity. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that pain may be undertreated in hospitalized persons with dementia, and should be considered upon admission to optimize function, decrease delirium, and prevent or decrease BPSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Boltz
- College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
| | | | - Ashley Kuzmik
- College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
| | | | | | - Rachel Arendacs
- College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
| | | | - Pamela Cacchione
- College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
157
|
Correlation between Biomarkers of Pain in Saliva and PAINAD Scale in Elderly People with Cognitive Impairment and Inability to Communicate. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10071424. [PMID: 33915996 PMCID: PMC8037327 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The pain assessment in advanced dementia (PAINAD) appears to be a clinically useful tool. However, the salivary determination of tumor necrosis factor receptor type II (sTNF-RII) and secretory IgA (sIgA) as pain biomarkers is still incipient. The aim was to correlate the PAINAD score with sTNF-RII and sIgA biomarker levels in the saliva of patients with advanced dementia. In this regard, a cross-sectional study was conducted. The sample consisted of 75 elderly patients with a clinical diagnosis of dementia and a global deterioration scale (GDS) score of 5 to 7. The PAINAD scale was determined by a previously trained professional and the collection of salivary samples was performed using the passive secretion method. Human sTNF-RII and sIgA using ELISA kits. The results showed a correlation between the PAINAD scale (numeric, binary, and recoded) and sTNF-RII and sIgA (p < 0.001). No association between the sociodemographic and clinical variables and the PAINAD scale was found (p > 0.05). Between 97.3% and 96.2% of patients with pain on the PAINAD scale also showed pain based on the sTNF-RII levels; in all of them, sIgA levels did not fit the logistic models. Therefore, the correlation highlights the usefulness of this scale and confirms the usefulness of sTNF-RII and sIgA as biomarkers of pain.
Collapse
|
158
|
Affiliation(s)
- Wilco Achterberg
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, Niederlande.
| | | | - Bettina Husebo
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norwegen
| | - Ane Erdal
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norwegen
| | - Keela Herr
- University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
159
|
Isaac V, Kuot A, Hamiduzzaman M, Strivens E, Greenhill J. The outcomes of a person-centered, non-pharmacological intervention in reducing agitation in residents with dementia in Australian rural nursing homes. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:193. [PMID: 33743597 PMCID: PMC7980426 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02151-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited best- practice evidence to address behavioral and psychiatric symptoms for those with dementia in Australian rural nursing homes. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of a person-centered, non-pharmacological dementia care model, 'Harmony in the Bush', based on the Progressively Lowered Stress Threshold principles and person-centered music in rural Australia. METHODS A quasi-experimental (nonrandomized, pre-post) intervention study was conducted in five rural nursing homes in Queensland and South Australia. Seventy-four residents with dementia participated in this intervention study, which yielded a sample power of 80%. Eighty-seven staff completed the Caregiver Stress Inventory at pre-post four-weeks of intervention. Staff training workshops focused on the theory of the Progressively Lowered Stress Threshold principles and delivery of person-centered care plan with integrated music intervention. We used reported changes in agitation of the residents, measured using Cohen- Mansfield Agitation Inventory, and staff's caregiving stress, using Caregivers Stress Inventory. This study adheres to the CONSORT guidelines. RESULTS Mean age of residents with dementia was 82.4 (7.7) years and 69% were females. The mean age of admission was 80.1(8.4) years. Baseline measures indicated that 32.7% had mild- severe pain and 30.5% reported mild-severe sadness. The results showed statistically significant decline in aggressive behaviors, physically non-aggressive behaviors, verbally agitated behavior and hiding and hoarding. There was similar reduction in staff stress in the domains of aggressive behaviors, inappropriate behaviors, resident safety, and resource deficiency. CONCLUSIONS The Harmony in the Bush model is effective in reducing agitation among dementia residents with significant reduction in staff stress levels in nursing homes in rural Australia. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 20/2/2018 (Registration No: ACTRN12618000263291p). https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374458.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Isaac
- Rural and Remote Health South Australia, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Po Box 852, Ral Ral Avenue, Renmark, SA, 5341, Australia.
| | - Abraham Kuot
- Rural and Remote Health South Australia, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Po Box 852, Ral Ral Avenue, Renmark, SA, 5341, Australia
| | - Mohammad Hamiduzzaman
- Rural and Remote Health South Australia, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Po Box 852, Ral Ral Avenue, Renmark, SA, 5341, Australia
| | - Edward Strivens
- James Cook University & Clinical Director, Older Persons Health Services, Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, Cairns, Queensland, 4870, Australia
| | - Jennene Greenhill
- Rural and Remote Health South Australia, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Po Box 852, Ral Ral Avenue, Renmark, SA, 5341, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
160
|
Brunkert T, Simon M, Zúñiga F. Use of Pain Management Champions to Enhance Guideline Implementation by Care Workers in Nursing Homes. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2021; 18:138-146. [PMID: 33735505 DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Underutilization of evidence-based pain management in nursing homes (NHs) is common. Evidence toward effective approaches to improve adoption of evidence-based practices in NHs is limited. Application of theory in evaluation approaches can increase understanding of implementation challenges. AIM To get a better understanding of the impact of implementation strategies by exploring the underlying mechanisms using behavioral theory. METHODS This mixed-methods study is embedded in an implementation-effectiveness study of a pain management guideline in four Swiss NHs. To evaluate our implementation strategies, training workshops were held, and trained pain champions were introduced. We also developed a conceptual framework. Based on Bandura's self-efficacy theory, we hypothesized how our implementation strategies might affect changes in care workers' behavior. Care workers' questionnaire surveys were conducted at baseline (n = 136), after 3 months (n = 99), and after 6 months (n = 83) to assess self-efficacy in pain management and self-reported guideline adoption. We computed linear mixed-effect models to assess changes over time in self-efficacy and logistic regressions to assess associations between self-efficacy and guideline adoption. Concurrently, we conducted focus groups with care workers (n = 8) to explore their response to the implementation strategies. RESULTS Overall, there was a significant increase in self-efficacy at both time points (p < .001). We found significant associations between self-efficacy and adoption of two guideline components, that is, performing a comprehensive pain assessment and using observational pain assessment tools in cognitively impaired residents. Qualitative findings showed that implementation strategies were received positively by care workers. Focus group participants reported more attentiveness to residents' pain experience. The participants also reported increases in assessment and documentation of pain with more detail than before. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION Our findings highlighted that the training and use of pain champions increased self-efficacy and thereby induced behavior change leading to guideline adoption. Regarding persistent implementation challenges, a theory-based conceptual model contributes to the overall understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thekla Brunkert
- Nursing Science (INS), Department Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Simon
- Nursing Science (INS), Department Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Nursing Research Unit, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Franziska Zúñiga
- Nursing Science (INS), Department Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Eagles D, Khoujah D. Rapid Fire: Acute Brain Failure in Older Emergency Department Patients. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2021; 39:287-305. [PMID: 33863460 DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Delirium is common in older emergency department (ED) patients. Although associated with significant morbidity and mortality, it often goes unrecognized. A consistent approach to evaluation of mental status, including use of validated tools, is key to diagnosing delirium. Identification of the precipitating event requires thorough evaluation, including detailed history, medication reconciliation, physical examination, and medical work-up, for causes of delirium. Management is aimed at identifying and treating the underlying cause. Meaningful improvements in delirium care can be achieved when prevention, identification, and management of older delirious ED patients is integrated by physicians and corresponding frameworks implemented at the health system level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra Eagles
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Danya Khoujah
- Emergency Medicine, MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, 9000 Franklin Square Dr, Baltimore, MD 21237, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. https://twitter.com/DanyaKhoujah
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Reliability and Feasibility of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale-Korean Version (PAINAD-K). Pain Manag Nurs 2021; 22:660-667. [PMID: 33676858 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2021.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is currently no observational instrument for assessing pain in aged patients who are unable to provide self-report in long-term care hospitals in Korea. AIMS The goal of this research was to culturally adapt and test the validity, reliability, and feasibility of the Korean version of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale. DESIGN This was a methodologic study aiming to translate the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS The inpatients in a 270-bed LTC hospital in D metropolitan city were assessed pain levels. METHODS The Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) Scale was used as an observation scale to assess 192 long-term care hospital patients, with observation durations of 1 and 5 minutes. RESULTS The interrater reliability (1 minute) for the scale showed substantial kappa agreement of .62, and scores for the 1- and 5-minute observations showed almost perfect agreement of .95. The criterion validity of the scale (1 minute) was high relative to the Face-Legs-Activity-Cry-Consolability (FLACC) Scale, and low compared with the numeric rating scale (NRS). Discriminant validity was established between patients with and without pain. The feasibility of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale-Korean Version (PAINAD-K) (1 minute) indicated low sensitivity of 41.3% and high specificity of 92.6%. CONCLUSIONS Therefore, the PAINAD-K is a valid and reliable tool to determine the absence of pain in non-verbal aged patients.
Collapse
|
163
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite established benefits of palliative care in the oncology population, it remains an underutilized resource particularly among older adults. The illness trajectory and needs of an older adult with cancer are unique. The purpose of this paper is to review the current literature on providing comprehensive palliative and end-of-life care for the older adult with cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Though the difficulties of applying traditional palliative care principles in the older patients with cancer have been discussed, this review reveals a clear gap in the literature in discussing the provision of comprehensive palliative and end-of-life care in this population. Very few articles have been published in this domain with even fewer published within the past 18 months. SUMMARY As such, this article reviews key aspects of palliative and geriatric medicine that need to be considered and integrated in order to provide comprehensive palliative care to the older adult with cancer. This includes a discussion of proper pain and symptoms assessment, performance status assessment, advance care planning, and end-of-life care while considering the nuances of geriatric syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise Huynh
- Division of Palliative Care, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
164
|
Hughes LD. Changes in clinical manifestation of fibromyalgia syndromes after Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2021; 34:523-526. [PMID: 34219947 PMCID: PMC8224185 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2021.1882279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is defined by chronic widespread pain persisting for more than 3 months without an apparent physical cause. The prevalence of FMS peaks between 50 and 70 years old, and it can be difficult to diagnose and treat due to other comorbid conditions. Recent work has suggested that neurodegenerative conditions can be complicated by chronic pain. This case study presents four patients with FMS residing in nursing homes. In all four cases, with the progression of Alzheimer's disease, patients saw improvements in pain syndromes, albeit to different degrees, and marked improvements in mobility. All four patients also developed challenging behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia requiring psychotropic prescriptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lloyd D Hughes
- East Practice Springfield Medical Centre, Arbroath, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Riganello F, Soddu A, Tonin P. Addressing Pain for a Proper Rehabilitation Process in Patients With Severe Disorders of Consciousness. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:628980. [PMID: 33679413 PMCID: PMC7926206 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.628980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Consciousness constitutes a fundamental prerequisite in the individual appraisal and experience of pain. In the same way, a person needs to be able to report on pain perception. Patients who suffered a severe brain injury with disorders of consciousness (DOC) represent a spectrum of pathologies affecting patients' capacity to interact with the external world. In these patients, the most relevant aspects in response to pain are physiologic and behavioral. The treatments and management of pain are challenging issues in these patients, arising serious ethical concerns and bringing emotional load among medical staff, caregivers, and relatives. In this review, we report the importance of having a correct pain management in DOC patients, to individuate the best pharmacological treatment that can make the difference in detecting a behavioral response, indicative of a change in the level of consciousness, and in planning a more effective rehabilitative approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. Riganello
- Research in Advanced NeuroRehabilitation, Istituto Sant’Anna, Crotone, Italy
| | - A. Soddu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - P. Tonin
- Research in Advanced NeuroRehabilitation, Istituto Sant’Anna, Crotone, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Achterberg WP, Erdal A, Husebo BS, Kunz M, Lautenbacher S. Are Chronic Pain Patients with Dementia Being Undermedicated? J Pain Res 2021; 14:431-439. [PMID: 33623425 PMCID: PMC7894836 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s239321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In dementia, neuropathological changes alter the perception and expression of pain. For clinicians and family members, this knowledge gap leads to difficulties in recognizing and assessing chronic pain, which may consequently result in persons with dementia receiving lower levels of pain medication compared to those without cognitive impairment. Although this situation seems to have improved in recent years, considerable geographical variation persists. Over the last decade, opioid use has received global attention as a result of overuse and the risk of addiction, while the literature on older persons with dementia actually suggests undertreatment. This review stresses the importance of reliable assessment and the regular evaluation and monitoring of symptoms in persons with dementia. Based on current evidence, we concluded that chronic pain is still undertreated in dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilco P Achterberg
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, RC Leiden, 2300, the Netherlands
| | - Ane Erdal
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, 5020, Norway
| | - Bettina S Husebo
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, 5020, Norway
| | - Miriam Kunz
- Department of Medical Psychology, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, 86156, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
167
|
Abstract
Adequate analgesia is one of the most important measures of emergency care in addition to treatment of vital function disorders and, if indicated, should be promptly undertaken; however, a large proportion of emergency patients receive no or only inadequate pain therapy. The numeric rating scale (NRS) is recommended for pain assessment but is not applicable to every group of patients; therefore, vital signs and body language should be included in the assessment. Pain therapy should reduce the NPRS to <5 points. Ketamine and fentanyl, which have an especially rapid onset of action, and also morphine are suitable for analgesia in spontaneously breathing patients. Basic prerequisites for safe and effective analgesia by healthcare professionals are the use of adequate monitoring, the provision of well-defined emergency equipment, and the mastery of emergency procedures. In a structured competence system, paramedics and nursing personnel can perform safe and effective analgesia.
Collapse
|
168
|
Awad M, Raouf MM, Mikhail HK, Megalla SA, Hamawy TY, Mohamed AH. Efficacy of transforaminal epidural magnesium administration when combined with a local anaesthetic and steroid in the management of lower limb radicular pain. Eur J Pain 2021; 25:1274-1282. [PMID: 33559245 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower limb radicular pain resulting from a herniated intervertebral disc is a cause of functional disability and could lead to increased consumption of opioids. We evaluated the efficacy of epidural magnesium combined with a local anaesthetic and steroid in the management of this pain. METHODS This was a prospective, case-control, randomized, double-blind study. Fifty patients each received 2 ml bupivacaine, 1 ml (40 mg) methylprednisolone and 1 ml saline (0.9%) (group C) or magnesium (200 mg) instead of saline (group M). The primary outcome measure was the improvement in the pain score (assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS)), and the secondary outcome was the improvement in the functional ability (assessed using the Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ)). The VAS and MODQ scores were assessed before and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months post-intervention. RESULTS The VAS and MODQ scores were significantly better in group M compared to those in group C at all times post-injection (p-value < 0.001). Comparisons within the same group showed that the VAS and MODQ scores were significantly better at all post-injection time points compared to the pre-injection scores in both group C and group M (p-values < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Adding magnesium to a local anaesthetic and steroid to be injected in the transforaminal epidural space could improve the pain and the quality of life in patients suffering from lower limb radicular pain due to lumbo-sacral disc herniation, and this improvement could last for up to 3 months. SIGNIFICANCE Magnesium is efficient when added to local anaesthetics and steroids for management of lower limb radicular pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Awad
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Fayoum Univeresity, Al-Fayoum, Egypt
| | - Mina M Raouf
- Faculty of medicine, ElMinia university, ElMinia, Egypt
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
169
|
An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients. Pain Res Manag 2021; 2021:6695741. [PMID: 33628355 PMCID: PMC7884155 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6695741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Although numerous studies have looked at the numeric rating scale (NRS) in chronic pain patients and several studies have evaluated objective pain scales, no known studies have assessed an objective pain scale for use in the evaluation of adult chronic pain patients in the outpatient setting. Subjective scales require patients to convert a subjective feeling into a quantitative number. Meanwhile, objective pain scales utilize, for the most part, the patient's behavioral component as observed by the provider in addition to the patient's subjective perception of pain. This study aims to examine the reliability and validity of an objective Chronic Pain Behavioral Pain Scale for Adults (CBPS) as compared to the traditional NRS. Methods In this cross-sectional study, patients were assessed before and after an interventional pain procedure by a researcher and a nurse using the CBPS and the NRS. Interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity were analyzed. Results Interrater reliability revealed a fair-good agreement between the nurse's and researcher's CBPS scores, weighted kappa values of 0.59 and 0.65, preprocedure and postprocedure, respectively. Concurrent validity showed low positive correlation for the preprocedure measurements, 0.34 (95% CI 0.16-0.50) and 0.47 (95% CI 0.31-0.61), and moderate positive correlation for the postprocedure measurements, 0.68 (95% CI 0.56-0.77) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.55-0.77), for the nurses and researchers, respectively. Construct validity demonstrated an equally average significant reduction in pain from preprocedure to postprocedure, CBPS and NRS median (IQR) scores preprocedure (4 (2-6) and 6 (4-8)) and postprocedure (1 (0-2) and 3 (0-5)), p < 0.001. Discussion. The CBPS has been shown to have interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity. However, further testing is needed to show its potential benefits over other pain scales and its effectiveness in treating patients with chronic pain over a long-term. This study was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov with National Clinical Trial Number NCT02882971.
Collapse
|
170
|
Jadczak AD, Robson L, Cooper T, Bell JS, Visvanathan R. The Frailty In Residential Sector over Time (FIRST) study: methods and baseline cohort description. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:99. [PMID: 33535968 PMCID: PMC7857100 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01974-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Frailty In Residential Sector over Time (FIRST) Study is a 3-year prospective cohort study investigating the health of residents living in residential aged care services (RACS) in South Australia. The study aims to examine the change in frailty status and associated health outcomes. METHODS This interim report presents data from March 2019-October 2020. The study setting is 12 RACS from one organisation across metropolitan and rural South Australia involving 1243 residents. All permanent (i.e. respite or transition care program excluded) residents living in the RACS for at least 8 weeks were invited to participate. Residents who were deemed to be medically unstable (e.g. experiencing delirium), have less than 3 months to live, or not fluent in English were excluded. Data collected included frailty status, medical diagnoses, medicines, pain, nutrition, sarcopenia, falls, dementia, anxiety and depression, sleep quality, quality of life, satisfaction with care, activities of daily living, and life space use at baseline and 12-months. Data Linkage will occur over the 3 years from baseline. RESULTS A total of 561 permanent residents (mean age 87.69 ± 7.25) were included. The majority of residents were female (n = 411, 73.3%) with 95.3% (n = 527) being classified as either frail (n = 377, 68.2%) or most-frail (n = 150, 27.1%) according to the Frailty Index (FI). Most residents were severely impaired in their basic activities of daily living (n = 554, 98.8%), and were at-risk of malnutrition (n = 305, 55.0%) and at-risk of sarcopenia (n = 492, 89.5%). Most residents did not experience pain (n = 475, 85.4%), had normal daytime sleepiness (n = 385, 69.7%), and low anxiety and depression scores (n = 327, 58.9%). CONCLUSION This study provides valuable information on the health and frailty levels of residents living in RACS in South Australia. The results will assist in developing interventions that can help to improve the health and wellbeing of residents in aged care services. TRIAL REGISTRATION Prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12619000500156 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agathe Daria Jadczak
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence Frailty and Healthy Aging, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
- Adelaide Geriatrics Training and Research with Aged Care (G-TRAC) Centre, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
- Aged and Extended Care Services, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research and The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Leonie Robson
- Resthaven Incorporated, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tina Cooper
- Resthaven Incorporated, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - J Simon Bell
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Renuka Visvanathan
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence Frailty and Healthy Aging, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Geriatrics Training and Research with Aged Care (G-TRAC) Centre, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Aged and Extended Care Services, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research and The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Anderson AR, Hyden K, Failla MD, Carter MA. Policy Implications for Pain in Advanced Alzheimer's Disease. Pain Manag Nurs 2021; 22:3-7. [PMID: 32684495 PMCID: PMC7854970 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Untreated pain in people with Alzheimer's disease continues to be a serious public health problem. Pain is a subjective and complex experience that becomes increasingly challenging to assess as cognition declines. Our understanding of pain processing is incomplete, particularly for special populations such as people living with Alzheimer's disease, and especially in the advanced stages of the disease. Pain-processing networks in the brain are altered in Alzheimer's disease, yet evidence suggests people living with Alzheimer's disease do not experience less pain. Rather, their pain is not adequately recognized or treated. Although scholarly publications provide important assistance, recent widespread reports and guidelines do not include sufficient guidance, especially as Alzheimer's disease progresses to the last stages. Additionally, current pain measurements may not accurately evaluate pain in this condition, and the existing definitions of pain are not adequate when considering the effects of Alzheimer's disease on pain-processing in the brain. There is a need for new, widespread policies, guidelines, and definitions to help clinicians adequately manage pain in people with Alzheimer's disease. These will need to hinge on continued research because it remains unclear how Alzheimer's disease impacts central pain processing, pain expression, and communication of pain. In the meantime, policies and guidelines need to highlight current best practices as well as the fact that pain continues in Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karen Hyden
- University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado
| | - Michelle D Failla
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Michael A Carter
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Nursing, Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Vitou V, Gély-Nargeot MC, Bayard S. Interrater Variability in Pain Assessment of Long-term Care Residents with Dementia. Pain Manag Nurs 2021; 22:377-385. [PMID: 33446451 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE People with dementia are at great risk of their pain being undetected. In long-term care facilities, certified nursing assistants are on the front-line to detect whether a resident with dementia is experiencing pain, but research on certified nursing assistants' abilities to accurately assess pain are scarce. This study aims to examine certified nursing assistants' pain assessment skills using a simulated standardized video context. DESIGN A cross-sectional study was conducted. METHODS Fifty certified nursing assistants and 40 individuals with no professional experience in the field of care (controls) watched the same video of an older adult woman with dementia experiencing pain. Afterwards, they completed visual analog scales (pain intensity, affective distress), an observational pain assessment scale (Algoplus), and a set of questionnaires. RESULTS In both groups, pain intensity assessment and empathic reaction scores showed important interrater variability. Moreover, certified nursing assistants and controls did not differ in detecting the presence of pain or assessing its intensity. But certified nursing assistants displayed lower empathic reactions and dispositions. Certified nursing assistants pain assessment scores decreased with experience and expertise. CONCLUSIONS The practice of pain assessment is challenging for certified nursing assistants in long-term care facilities. Their professional status does not prevent inter-personal inconsistency and tends to lower their empathic dispositions. Personal determinants may interfere with their assessment behaviors and must be considered to enhance pain management for residents with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valérie Vitou
- University Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Fondation Partage et Vie, Montrouge, France.
| | | | - Sophie Bayard
- University Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Authors' response to Atee et al. Maturitas 2021; 145:87-88. [PMID: 33472756 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
174
|
Pu L, Lion KM, Todorovic M, Moyle W. Portable EEG monitoring for older adults with dementia and chronic pain - A feasibility study. Geriatr Nurs 2021; 42:124-128. [PMID: 33385771 DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Given the reduced ability of people with dementia to self-report pain, this study examined the feasibility of using a portable electroencephalography (EEG) headband (MUSE 2) as a pain measurement tool for long-term care residents with dementia. Ten minutes of resting-state EEG was acquired by MUSE 2 from people with dementia experiencing ongoing pain (n = 3) and without current pain (n = 1) over three days. The MUSE 2 was acceptable and feasible for use in people with dementia while challenges regarding software, data collection and analysis in using this device are reported. Compared to the resident not experiencing pain, EEG signals of residents with ongoing pain showed different EEG patterns, and this could be a potential biomarker to support pain measurement in people with dementia. Further research with larger sample size is warranted to verify study results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihui Pu
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, QLD, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, 2.10 Health Sciences (N48), 170 Kessel Rd, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia
| | - Katarzyna Malgorzata Lion
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, 2.10 Health Sciences (N48), 170 Kessel Rd, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia
| | - Michael Todorovic
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, QLD, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, 2.10 Health Sciences (N48), 170 Kessel Rd, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia
| | - Wendy Moyle
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, QLD, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, 2.10 Health Sciences (N48), 170 Kessel Rd, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Appel L, Ali S, Narag T, Mozeson K, Pasat Z, Orchanian-Cheff A, Campos JL. Virtual reality to promote wellbeing in persons with dementia: A scoping review. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng 2021; 8:20556683211053952. [PMID: 35024166 PMCID: PMC8743938 DOI: 10.1177/20556683211053952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Virtual Reality (VR) technologies have increasingly been considered potentially valuable tools in dementia-related research and could serve as non-pharmacological therapy to improve quality of life (QoL) and wellbeing for persons with dementia (PwD). In this scoping review, we summarize peer-reviewed articles published up to Jan-21, 2021, on the use of VR to promote wellbeing in PwD. Eighteen manuscripts (reporting on 19 studies) met the inclusion criteria, with a majority published in the past 2 years. Two reviewers independently coded the articles regarding A) intended clinical outcomes and effectiveness of the interventions, B) study sample (characteristics of the participants), C) intervention administration (by whom, what setting), D) experimental methods (design/instruments), and E) technical properties of the VR-systems (hardware/devices and software/content). Emotional outcomes were by far the most common objectives of the interventions, reported in seventeen (89.5%) of the included articles. Outcomes addressing social engagement and personhood in PwD have not been thoroughly explored using VR. Based on the positive impact of VR, future opportunities lie in identifying special features and customization of the hardware/software to afford the most benefit to different sub-groups of the target population. Overall, this review found that VR represents a promising tool for promoting wellbeing in PwD, with positive or neutral impact reported on emotional, social, and functional aspects of wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lora Appel
- School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Suad Ali
- School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tanya Narag
- School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Krystyna Mozeson
- School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zain Pasat
- McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jennifer L Campos
- KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Resnick B, Kolanowski A, Van Haitsma K, Galik E, Boltz M, Ellis J, Behrens L, Eshraghi K, Zhu S. Current Psychotropic Medication Use and Contributing Factors Among Nursing Home Residents With Cognitive Impairment. Clin Nurs Res 2021; 30:59-69. [PMID: 30943786 PMCID: PMC6776729 DOI: 10.1177/1054773819838678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
This study described current use and predictors of psychotropics among residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment. This was a secondary data analysis using baseline data from the first 341 residents in an ongoing trial. Predictive measures included age, gender, race, depressive symptoms, agitation, resistiveness to care, depression, cognition, pain, comorbidities, facility factors, and state. Overall 63% (n = 211) received at least one psychotropic medication, 16% (n = 52) an anti-seizure medication, 23% (n = 77) an anxiolytic, 30% (n = 99) an antidepressant, 2% (n = 8) a sedative hypnotic, 28% (n = 93) an antipsychotic medication, and 9% (n = 29) an opioid. Testing of models explained 9% to 15% of psychotropic medication use. There were high rates of psychotropic medication use and a limited association between demographic factors, behavioral symptoms, and psychotropic medication use. Continued research is needed to explore the impact of deprescribing, person-centered behavioral interventions, and beliefs of providers on psychotropic medication use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ann Kolanowski
- Pennsylvania State University College of Nursing, University Park, USA
| | | | | | - Marie Boltz
- Pennsylvania State University College of Nursing, University Park, USA
| | - Jeanette Ellis
- University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, USA
| | - Liza Behrens
- Pennsylvania State University College of Nursing, University Park, USA
| | - Karen Eshraghi
- Pennsylvania State University College of Nursing, University Park, USA
| | - Shijun Zhu
- University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
177
|
Hum A, George PP, Tay RY, Wu HY, Ali NB, Leong I, Chin JJ, Lee A, Tan L, Koh M. Prognostication in Home-Dwelling Patients with Advanced Dementia: The Palliative Support DEMentia Model (PalS-DEM). J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 22:312-319.e3. [PMID: 33321077 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Difficulties with prognostication prevent more patients with advanced dementia from receiving timely palliative support. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a prognostic model for 6-month and 1-year mortality in home-dwelling patients with advanced dementia. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS The data set of 555 home-dwelling patients with dementia at Functional Assessment Staging Test stage 7 was split into derivation (n = 275) and validation (n = 280) cohorts. METHODS Cox proportional hazards regression modeled survival in the derivation cohort using prognostic variables identified in univariate analysis. The model was validated internally and using 10-fold cross-validation. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve measured the accuracy of the final model. RESULTS Four hundred nineteen (75.5%) patients died with a median follow-up of 47 days [interquartile range (IQR) 161]. Prognostic variables in the multivariate model included serum albumin level, dementia etiology, number of homecare admission criteria fulfilled, presence of moderate to severe chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, quality of life in late-stage dementia scores, housing type, and the Australian National Sub-Acute and Non-Acute Patient palliative care phase. The model was refined into a parsimonious 6-variable model [Palliative Support DEMentia Model (PalS-DEM)] consisting of age, dementia etiology, Functional Assessment Staging Test stage, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, Australian National Sub-Acute and Non-Acute Patient palliative care phase, and 30-day readmission frequency for the prediction of 1-year mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.59-0.70). Risk scores categorized patients into 3 prognostic groups, with a median survival of 175 days (IQR 365), 104 days (IQR 246), and 19 days (IQR 88) for the low-risk (0‒1 points), moderate-risk (2‒4), and high-risk (≥5) groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The PalS-DEM identifies patients at high risk of death in the next 1 year. The model produced consistent survival results across the derivation, validation, and cross-validation cohorts and will help healthcare providers identify patients with advanced dementia earlier for palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyn Hum
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; The Palliative Care Center for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore; Dover Park Hospice, Singapore.
| | | | - Ri Yin Tay
- The Palliative Care Center for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore; Dover Park Hospice, Singapore
| | - Huei Yaw Wu
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; The Palliative Care Center for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore; Dover Park Hospice, Singapore
| | - Noorhazlina Binte Ali
- The Palliative Care Center for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Ian Leong
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jing Jih Chin
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Angel Lee
- St Andrew's Community Hospital, Singapore
| | - Laurence Tan
- The Palliative Care Center for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Yishun Health System, Singapore
| | - Mervyn Koh
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; The Palliative Care Center for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore; Dover Park Hospice, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Sharp B, Henderson J, Brown M, Jack-Waugh A, Macrae R. Palliative and end of life care for people with advanced dementia. Nurs Older People 2020; 33:e1191. [PMID: 33295157 DOI: 10.7748/nop.2020.e1191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Despite growing understanding in recent years of the biological, psychological, social, environmental and spiritual aspects of dementia, people with advanced dementia continue to experience inequalities in accessing healthcare capable of improving their lives. The complexities of advanced dementia challenge professional competence and demand the highest level of skilled, compassionate care. This article, the last in a series on living with advanced dementia, considers the status and direction of palliative care as it applies to people with dementia and explores contemporary issues regarding advanced dementia and end of life, with a focus on guidance for practitioners and support for best practice. It identifies that open communication, clear information and a person-centred approach adopted as early as possible in the syndrome can make this period less distressing. Crucially, people at the end of life should be offered care in line with best practice in palliative and end of life approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Margaret Brown
- Alzheimer Scotland Centre for Policy and Practice, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, Scotland
| | | | - Rhoda Macrae
- University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Gregory J. Holistic pain assessment in older people and older people living with dementia. Nurs Older People 2020; 33:e1293. [PMID: 33403836 DOI: 10.7748/nop.2021.e1293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Pain occurs in a wide range of diseases and long-term conditions associated with ageing and can affect every aspect of an individual's life, reducing their ability to recover, their independence and their quality of life. The assessment of pain is an important aspect of nurses' role and requires them to obtain detailed information on how the older person experiences pain and how pain is affecting their life. However, there are many challenges to effective pain assessment in older people, including challenges concerning communication and cognition. This article provides an overview of pain assessment in older people, particularly those living with dementia, based on the author's expertise and on relevant literature, notably the recently revised UK national guidelines on the assessment of pain in older people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Gregory
- East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, England
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Tsai YIP, Browne G, Inder KJ. The effectiveness of interventions to improve pain assessment and management in people living with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analyses. J Adv Nurs 2020; 77:1127-1140. [PMID: 33222273 DOI: 10.1111/jan.14660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To synthesize and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for nurses to improve the assessment and management of pain in people living with dementia. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. DATA SOURCES CINAHL, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) EBP, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched for all journal articles published between 2009 -2019. REVIEW METHODS Papers were included under population intervention comparator outcome (PICO) framework for: (a) people living with dementia aged 65 years and over; (b) interventions developed for nurses or other health professionals; (c) comparison group of standard care or control; and (d) outcome that measures the intervention effects on nurses and people living with dementia. Independent reviewers undertook critical appraisal, data abstraction, and synthesis. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the effectiveness of interventions. RESULTS Of 2099 titles and abstracts screened, six interventions with low-to-moderate risk of bias met inclusion criteria. Studies that implemented a routine pain assessment tool showed no effect on nurses' analgesic management. Studies that developed a comprehensive pain model involving multidisciplinary health professionals showed overall effects on pain assessment and management in dementia care. Physician involvement had an impact on analgesic management. CONCLUSION Comprehensive pain models improve nurses' pain assessment and management. A lack of balance between analgesia use and non-pharmacological pain management in dementia care is evident. Multidisciplinary health professionals' involvement is essential for effective intervention design for pain management in dementia. IMPACT Various pain assessment tools have been considered to assist identification and management of pain in people living with dementia. Nevertheless, challenges exist when caring for people living with dementia in pain. These findings support the development of a comprehensive pain model, which may be a more effective strategy than routine use of a pain tool alone for nurses to improve pain management in dementia care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvette I-Pei Tsai
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Graeme Browne
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Kerry Jill Inder
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Wound Pain and Wound Healing Biomarkers From Wound Exudate: A Scoping Review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2020; 47:559-568. [PMID: 33201141 DOI: 10.1097/won.0000000000000703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Effective management of wound pain is essential for optimal wound healing. Nevertheless, the outcomes of wound pain interventions are based on subjective measures, which can prove problematic in patients with cognitive impairment. Identification of biomarkers associated with wound pain and wound healing can be used to more objectively estimate wound pain and contribute to the development of precise management options to reduce wound pain and promote wound healing. This scoping review aimed to identify wound pain and wound healing biomarkers from wound exudates and to describe different wound collection methods to identify these biomarkers. METHODS We searched the literature (PROSPERO database registration number: CRD42018103843) via a scoping review. SEARCH STRATEGY The PubMed database was searched for articles that explored relationships between cutaneous wound pain, wound healing, and biomolecules. Inclusion criteria were articles that reported original data, used adult human samples, and were published in English. FINDINGS Twenty-one articles were retrieved: 17 investigated molecules from wound exudate associated with wound healing status, and 4 reported molecules associated with wound pain. The most frequently observed wound pain biomarkers were proinflammatory cytokines; the most frequently observed wound healing biomarkers were proteases including those in the matrix metalloproteinase family. Six wound exudate collection methods were identified to extract potential wound pain and wound healing biomarkers from wound exudate. IMPLICATIONS The results can guide future wound exudate research to validate these wound pain and wound healing biomarkers and to develop therapies targeting these biomarkers to reduce wound pain and promote wound healing.
Collapse
|
182
|
Gallant NL, Peckham A, Marchildon G, Hadjistavropoulos T, Roblin B, Stopyn RJN. Provincial legislative and regulatory standards for pain assessment and management in long-term care homes: a scoping review and in-depth case analysis. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:458. [PMID: 33167897 PMCID: PMC7650170 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01758-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among Canadian residents living in long-term care (LTC) facilities, and especially among those with limited ability to communicate due to dementia, pain remains underassessed and undermanaged. Although evidence-based clinical guidelines for the assessment and management of pain exist, these clinical guidelines are not widely implemented in LTC facilities. A relatively unexplored avenue for change is the influence that statutes and regulations could exert on pain practices within LTC. This review is therefore aimed at identifying the current landscape of policy levers used across Canada to assess and manage pain among LTC residents and to evaluate the extent to which they are concordant with evidence-based clinical guidelines proposed by an international consensus group consisting of both geriatric pain and public policy experts. METHODS Using scoping review methodology, a search for peer-reviewed journal articles and government documents pertaining to pain in Canadian LTC facilities was carried out. This scoping review was complemented by an in-depth case analysis of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Ontario statutes and regulations. RESULTS Across provinces, pain was highly prevalent and was associated with adverse consequences among LTC residents. The considerable benefits of using a standardized pain assessment protocol, along with the barriers in implementing such a protocol, were identified. For most provinces, pain assessment and management in LTC residents was not specifically addressed in their statutes or regulations. In Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Ontario, regulations mandate the use of the interRAI suite of assessment tools for the assessment and reporting of pain. CONCLUSION The prevalence of pain and the benefits of implementing standardized pain assessment protocols has been reported in the research literature. Despite occasional references to pain, however, existing regulations do not recommend assessments of pain at the frequency specified by experts. Insufficient direction on the use of specialized pain assessment tools (especially in the case of those with limited ability to communicate) that minimize reliance on subjective judgements was also identified in current regulations. Existing policies therefore fail to adequately address the underassessment and undermanagement of pain in older adults residing in LTC facilities in ways that are aligned with expert consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha L. Gallant
- Department of Psychology and Center on Aging and Health, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2 Canada
| | - Allie Peckham
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 425–155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6 Canada
| | - Gregory Marchildon
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 425–155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6 Canada
| | - Thomas Hadjistavropoulos
- Department of Psychology and Center on Aging and Health, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2 Canada
| | - Blair Roblin
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 425–155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6 Canada
| | - Rhonda J. N. Stopyn
- Department of Psychology and Center on Aging and Health, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Evans CRD, Kovach CR. The Association Between Physiological Sources of Pain and Sleep Quality in Older Adults With and Without Dementia. Res Gerontol Nurs 2020; 13:297-308. [PMID: 33034650 DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20201002-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The association of musculoskeletal pain, respiratory distress, gastrointestinal discomfort, and genitourinary pain to sleep quality in 89 persons with and without dementia was examined in the current exploratory, cross-sectional, observational quantitative design. Sources of pain were recorded, with 37.1% of the sample reporting urinary retention, 30.3% reporting genitourinary discomfort, and 53.9% reporting gastrointestinal discomfort. Mild scores of musculoskeletal pain and respiratory discomfort were elicited in >75% of the sample. An actigraph was used to measure sleep variables. Findings from this research illustrated dementia, gender, pillow use, respiratory distress, and urinary retention were statistically significantly associated with nighttime sleep quality. Results suggest comprehensive assessments of pain and sleep for older adults with and without dementia are needed. Developing and testing interventions that address factors contributing to sleep quality may improve outcomes. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 13(6), 297-308.].
Collapse
|
184
|
Tapper CX, Curseen K. Rehabilitation Concerns in the Geriatric Critically Ill and Injured - Part 1. Crit Care Clin 2020; 37:117-134. [PMID: 33190765 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2020.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Elderly patients who are critically ill have unique challenges that must be considered when attempting to prognosticate survival and determine expectations for physical rehabilitation and meaningful recovery. Furthermore, frail elderly patients present unique rehabilitation and clinical challenges when suffering from critical illness. There are multiple symptoms and syndromes that affect morbidity and mortality of elderly patients who require intensive care unit management including delirium, dementia, pain, and constipation. Rehabilitation goals should be based on patient values, clinical course, and functional status. Patients and families need accurate prognostic information to choose the appropriate level of care needed after critical illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey X Tapper
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 East Monument Street, Suite 8021, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| | - Kimberly Curseen
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Supportive and Palliative Care Outpatient Services, Emory Healthcare, 1821 Clifton Road, Northeast, Suite 1017, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| |
Collapse
|
185
|
Long DA, Koyfman A, Long B. Oncologic Emergencies: Palliative Care in the Emergency Department Setting. J Emerg Med 2020; 60:175-191. [PMID: 33092975 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative care is an essential component of emergency medicine, as many patients with terminal illness will present to the emergency department (ED) for symptomatic management at the end of life (EOL). OBJECTIVE This narrative review evaluates palliative care in the ED, with a focus on the literature behind management of EOL symptoms, especially dyspnea and cancer-related pain. DISCUSSION As the population ages, increasing numbers of patients present to the ED with severe EOL symptoms. An understanding of the role of palliative care in the ED is crucial to effectively communicating with these patients to determine their goals and provide medical care in line with their wishes. Beneficence, nonmaleficence, and patient autonomy are essential components of palliative care. Patients without medical decision-making capacity may have an advance directive, do not resuscitate or do not intubate order, or Portable Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment available to assist clinicians. Effective and empathetic communication with patients and families is vital to EOL care discussions. Two of the most common and distressing symptoms at the EOL are dyspnea and pain. The most effective treatment of EOL dyspnea is opioids, with literature showing little efficacy for other therapies. The most effective treatment for cancer-related pain is opioids, with expeditious pain control achievable with a rapid fentanyl titration. It is also important to address nausea, vomiting, and secretions, as these are common at the EOL. CONCLUSIONS Emergency clinicians play a vital role in EOL patient care. Clear, empathetic communication and treatment of EOL symptoms are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drew A Long
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
| | - Alex Koyfman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Brit Long
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
186
|
Dube CE, Morrison RA, Mack DS, Jesdale BM, Nunes AP, Liu SH, Lapane KL. Prevalence of Pain on Admission by Level of Cognitive Impairment in Nursing Homes. J Pain Res 2020; 13:2663-2672. [PMID: 33116808 PMCID: PMC7586014 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s270689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide contemporary estimates of pain by level of cognitive impairment among US nursing home residents without cancer. METHODS Newly admitted US nursing home residents without cancer assessed with the Minimum Data Set 3.0 at admission (2010-2016) were eligible (n=8,613,080). The Cognitive Function Scale was used to categorize level of cognitive impairment. Self-report or staff-assessed pain was used based on a 5-day look-back period. Estimates of adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) were derived from modified Poisson models. RESULTS Documented prevalence of pain decreased with increased levels of cognitive impairment in those who self-reported pain (68.9% no/mild, 32.9% severe) and those with staff-assessed pain (50.6% no/mild, 37.2% severe staff-assessed pain). Relative to residents with no/mild cognitive impairment, pharmacologic pain management was less prevalent in those with severe cognitive impairment (self-reported: 51.3% severe vs 76.9% in those with no/mild; staff assessed: 52.0% severe vs 67.7% no/mild). CONCLUSION Pain was less frequently documented in those with severe cognitive impairment relative to those with no/mild impairments. Failure to identify pain may result in untreated or undertreated pain. Interventions to improve evaluation of pain in nursing home residents with cognitive impairment are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine E Dube
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Reynolds A Morrison
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Deborah S Mack
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Bill M Jesdale
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Anthony P Nunes
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Shao-Hsien Liu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Kate L Lapane
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
187
|
Tohidast SA, Mansuri B, Dabirmoghadam P, Choubineh M, Bagheri R, Ebadi A, Azimi H. Development and Preliminary Validation of a Pain Scale Specific to Patients With Voice Disorders: The Voice-Related Pain Scale (VRPS). J Voice 2020; 36:876.e1-876.e7. [PMID: 33060005 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2020] [Revised: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although pain is one of the complaints reported by voice patients, still there is no valid and reliable scale to evaluate pain in Patients with Voice Disorders (PWVDs). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop and validate the Voice-Related Pain Scale (VRPS). METHODS The present study was conducted in two stages: (1) development of the VRPS based on semistructured interviews with PWVDs and experts in the field of voice disorders and an in-depth literature review, and (2) Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the VRPS. Determining the validity and reliability of the VRPS was performed using qualitative and quantitative content validity, the qualitative face validity, and the test-retest reliability. Content validity of the VRPS was assessed by Speech and Language Pathologists who are experts in the assessment and treatment of voice patients and laryngologist. The reliability of the scale was determined using test-retest reliability. RESULTS Based on the interviews with PWVDs and experts, and a thorough review of the related literature, a self-reported scale with 11 items and three sections was developed. The three items included ear, temporomandibular joint, and shoulder all of which were divided into right and left pairs based on the experts' suggestion. One item was eliminated because it had a content validity ratio less than 0.62. The content validity index (CVIs) for all the remaining items were higher than 0.79 and the scale content validity index was equal to 0.93. The test-retest reliability was satisfactory with weighted kappa ranging from 0.64 to 1 for VRPS items. The final version of the VRPS comprised of 13 items related to the pain location in the human body. Each of these items has three sections: frequency of pain, severity of pain, and time of pain occurrence. CONCLUSION The present study indicated that VRPS is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate pain in PWVDs. The VRPS is a useful tool for clinical and research purposes. However, more studies are needed in this regard for further evaluation of the VRPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Abolfazl Tohidast
- Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
| | - Banafshe Mansuri
- Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
| | - Payman Dabirmoghadam
- Otolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehran Choubineh
- Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran; Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
| | - Rasool Bagheri
- Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran; Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
| | - Abbas Ebadi
- Behavioral sciences Research Center, life style institute, Faculty of Nursing. Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Azimi
- English Language Teaching Department, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
García-Gollarte JF, García-Andrade MM, Santaeugenia-González SJ, Solá Hermida JC, Baixauli-Alacreu S, Santabalbina FJT. Risk Factors for Mortality in Nursing Home Residents: An Observational Study. Geriatrics (Basel) 2020; 5:geriatrics5040071. [PMID: 33050016 PMCID: PMC7709674 DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics5040071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Identifying mortality risk factors in people living in nursing homes could help healthcare professionals to individualize or develop specific plans for predicting future care demands and plan end-of-life care in this population. This study aims to identify mortality risk factors in elderly nursing home (NH) residents, based on variables adapted to this environment, routinely collected and easily accessible to their healthcare professionals. Methods: A prospective, longitudinal, observational study of NH residents aged 65 years and older was carried out collecting sociodemographic, functional and cognitive status, nutritional variables, comorbidities, and other health variables. These variables were analyzed as mortality risk factors by Cox proportional hazard models. Results: A total of 531 residents (75.3% female; average age 86.7 years (SD: 6.6)) were included: 25.6% had total dependence, 53.4% had moderate to severe cognitive impairment, 84.5% were malnourished or at risk of malnutrition, and 79.9% were polymedicated. Risk of mortality (hazard ratio, HR) increased in totally dependent residents (HR = 1.52; p = 0.02) and in those with moderate or severe cognitive impairment ((HR = 1.59; p = 0.031) and (HR = 1.93; p = 0.002), respectively). Male gender (HR = 1.88; p < 0.001), age ≥80 years (HR = 1.73; p = 0.034), hypertension (HR = 1.53; p = 0.012), atrial fibrillation/arrhythmia (HR = 1.43; p = 0.048), and previous record of pneumonia (HR = 1.65; p = 0.029) were also found to be mortality drivers. Conclusion: Age and male gender (due to the higher prevalence of associated comorbidity in these two variables), certain comorbidities (hypertension, atrial fibrillation/arrhythmia, and pneumonia), higher functional and cognitive impairment, and frequency of medical emergency service care increased the risk of mortality in our study. Given their importance and their easy identification by healthcare professionals in nursing homes, these clinical variables should be used for planning care in institutionalized older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Fermín García-Gollarte
- Medical Department Grupo Ballesol, Universidad Católica de Valencia, La Eliana, 46183 Valencia, Spain;
- Correspondence:
| | | | - Sebastiá J. Santaeugenia-González
- Chronic Care Program, Ministry of Health, Central Catalonia Chronicity Research Group (C3RG), Centre for Health and Social Care, 08500 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - José Carlos Solá Hermida
- Medical Department Grupo Ballesol, Universidad Católica de Valencia, La Eliana, 46183 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Susana Baixauli-Alacreu
- Department of Nursing, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, 46001 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Francisco José Tarazona Santabalbina
- Geriatric Service, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, 46600 Alzira, Spain;
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, 7GPR+3M Doha, Qatar
- CIBERFES, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable, 0 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Tyler KR, Hullick C, Newton BA, Adams CB, Arendts G. Emergency department pain management in older patients. Emerg Med Australas 2020; 32:840-846. [PMID: 32594659 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.13562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Katren R Tyler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Carolyn Hullick
- Emergency Department, Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brittany A Newton
- Department of Pharmacy Services, UC Davis Health System, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Christopher B Adams
- Department of Pharmacy Services, UC Davis Health System, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Glenn Arendts
- School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Emergency Department, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
190
|
Kennedy M, Koehl J, Shenvi CL, Greenberg A, Zurek O, LaMantia M, Lo AX. The agitated older adult in the emergency department: a narrative review of common causes and management strategies. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2020; 1:812-823. [PMID: 33145525 PMCID: PMC7593470 DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Agitation and aggression are common in older emergency department (ED) patients, can impede the expedient diagnosis of potentially life-threatening conditions, and can adversely impact ED functioning and efficiency. Agitation and aggression in older adults may be due to multiple causes, but chief among them are primary psychiatric disorders, substance use, hyperactive delirium, and symptoms of dementia. Understanding the etiology of agitation in an older adult is critical to proper management. Effective non-pharmacologic modalities are available for the management of mild to moderate agitation and aggression in patients with dementia. Pharmacologic management is indicated for agitation related to a psychiatric condition, severe agitation where a patient is at risk to harm self or others, and to facilitate time-sensitive diagnostic imaging, procedures, and treatment. Emergency physicians have several pharmacologic agents at their disposal, including opioid and non-opioid analgesics, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, ketamine, and combination agents. Emergency physicians should be familiar with geriatric-specific dosing, contraindications, and common adverse effects of these agents. This review article discusses the common causes and non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic management of agitation in older adults, with a specific focus on dementia, delirium, and pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maura Kennedy
- Department of Emergency MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of Emergency MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Jennifer Koehl
- Department of Emergency MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of PharmacyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Christina L. Shenvi
- Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Allyson Greenberg
- Department of PharmacyNorthwestern Memorial HospitalChicagoIllinoisUSA
- Department of Emergency MedicineNorthwestern Memorial HospitalChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Olivia Zurek
- Department of PsychiatryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of PsychiatryHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Michael LaMantia
- Division of Geriatric MedicineUniversity of VermontBurlingtonVermontUSA
| | - Alexander X. Lo
- Department of Emergency MedicineNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Hachimi-Idrissi S, Coffey F, Hautz WE, Leach R, Sauter TC, Sforzi I, Dobias V. Approaching acute pain in emergency settings: European Society for Emergency Medicine (EUSEM) guidelines-part 1: assessment. Intern Emerg Med 2020; 15:1125-1139. [PMID: 32930965 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-020-02477-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Pain management is a vital component of patient care, particularly in the emergency setting. Pain can hinder the opportunities to treat and manage pain-causing conditions and remains one of the primary reasons patients seek emergency medical care, yet despite this, pain often remains under-acknowledged, under-assessed and undertreated. Despite the importance of effective management of acute pain, there are currently no well-defined emergency medicine guidelines at a European level to support healthcare professionals in achieving this goal. The European Society for Emergency Medicine (EUSEM) identified this as a significant unmet requirement, for improving day-to-day patient management and for providing guidance to trainees and non-emergency medicine physicians. Under the auspices of EUSEM, a programme-the European Pain Initiative-was launched with the aim of providing information, advice and guidance on pain management in pre-hospital and emergency department settings. Search terms were developed to search MEDLINE, Cochrane database, Google Scholar and EMBASE online databases to return English language articles published in the last 10 years. A working package of reference materials was evaluated against inclusion and exclusion criteria and levels of evidence ascribed. A short survey was developed by the European Pain Initiative Steering Committee for completion by EUSEM members to evaluate actual clinical practice. A working document of > 800 publications was identified for further review and evaluation against agreed criteria. Some further publications were included by the Steering Committee to explore older literature for long-established analgesics, or newly emergent literature that was considered important for inclusion but was identified as the guideline development was underway. This article provides the methodology used to inform the guidelines, including survey results of EUSEM members on assessment and treatment of acute pain. A companion manuscript in this issue presents an evidence-based review and recommendations for individualised evaluation of acute pain in patients in emergency settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saïd Hachimi-Idrissi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Frank Coffey
- Nottingham University Hospitals' NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Wolf E Hautz
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Robert Leach
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de Wallonie Picarde, Tournai, Belgium
| | - Thomas C Sauter
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
192
|
Danilov AB, Danilov AB. [Multidomain approach in chronic non-specific back pain patient's treatment]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2020; 120:113-120. [PMID: 32790985 DOI: 10.17116/jnevro2020120071113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The concept of chronic nonspecific back pain (CNBP) as a pathology of the spine (osteochondrosis, spondylosis, intervertebral disc herniation, facet syndrome) is extremely outdated and has not justified itself, first of all, from the therapeutic view point. Numerous studies, including meta-analyzes and systematic reviews, have convincingly shown the ineffectiveness of the methods of CNBP treatment, aimed only at solving the problems of the spine itself and / or surrounding tissues. A substantial amount of special imaging studies have proven the dissociation between morphological vertebral changes and the clinical picture of pain. CNBP is the overall result of the interaction of numerous factors in the spine tissues (changes in the discs, joints, ligaments, fascia, muscles) and factors beyond the spine. The latter include, first of all, psychological and social factors, cognitive functions, the quality of night sleep, the level of physical activity, concomitant diseases (comorbidity). In each patient, the interaction of these factors determines the development of specific pathophysiological mechanisms of pain and, as a result, an individual clinical picture of pain (phenotype). Understanding these processes will allow for the reconsideration of the approach of searching for an anatomical pain source as the main pathogenetic factor; recognizing the multifocal generation of chronic pain as the result of a complex interaction of biological, psychological and social factors; the development of new principles and therapy algorithms. The authors propose to introduce into practice a multidomain screening approach for evaluating patients with CNBP, which would take into account the phenotype of pain, factors affecting its perception, and allow personalized treatment for each patient based on the biopsychosocial approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A B Danilov
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Al B Danilov
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
193
|
Robinson L, Poole M, McLellan E, Lee R, Amador S, Bhattarai N, Bryant A, Coe D, Corbett A, Exley C, Goodman C, Gotts Z, Harrison-Dening K, Hill S, Howel D, Hrisos S, Hughes J, Kernohan A, Macdonald A, Mason H, Massey C, Neves S, Paes P, Rennie K, Rice S, Robinson T, Sampson E, Tucker S, Tzelis D, Vale L, Bamford C. Supporting good quality, community-based end-of-life care for people living with dementia: the SEED research programme including feasibility RCT. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar08080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
In the UK, most people with dementia die in the community and they often receive poorer end-of-life care than people with cancer.
Objective
The overall aim of this programme was to support professionals to deliver good-quality, community-based care towards, and at, the end of life for people living with dementia and their families.
Design
The Supporting Excellence in End-of-life care in Dementia (SEED) programme comprised six interlinked workstreams. Workstream 1 examined existing guidance and outcome measures using systematic reviews, identified good practice through a national e-survey and explored outcomes of end-of-life care valued by people with dementia and family carers (n = 57) using a Q-sort study. Workstream 2 explored good-quality end-of-life care in dementia from the perspectives of a range of stakeholders using qualitative methods (119 interviews, 12 focus groups and 256 observation hours). Using data from workstreams 1 and 2, workstream 3 used co-design methods with key stakeholders to develop the SEED intervention. Worksteam 4 was a pilot study of the SEED intervention with an embedded process evaluation. Using a cluster design, we assessed the feasibility and acceptability of recruitment and retention, outcome measures and our intervention. Four general practices were recruited in North East England: two were allocated to the intervention and two provided usual care. Patient recruitment was via general practitioner dementia registers. Outcome data were collected at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 months. Workstream 5 involved economic modelling studies that assessed the potential value of the SEED intervention using a contingent valuation survey of the general public (n = 1002). These data informed an economic decision model to explore how the SEED intervention might influence care. Results of the model were presented in terms of the costs and consequences (e.g. hospitalisations) and, using the contingent valuation data, a cost–benefit analysis. Workstream 6 examined commissioning of end-of-life care in dementia through a narrative review of policy and practice literature, combined with indepth interviews with a national sample of service commissioners (n = 20).
Setting
The workstream 1 survey and workstream 2 included services throughout England. The workstream 1 Q-sort study and workstream 4 pilot trial took place in North East England. For workstream 4, four general practices were recruited; two received the intervention and two provided usual care.
Results
Currently, dementia care and end-of-life care are commissioned separately, with commissioners receiving little formal guidance and training. Examples of good practice rely on non-recurrent funding and leadership from an interested clinician. Seven key components are required for good end-of-life care in dementia: timely planning discussions, recognising end of life and providing supportive care, co-ordinating care, effective working with primary care, managing hospitalisation, continuing care after death, and valuing staff and ongoing learning. Using co-design methods and the theory of change, the seven components were operationalised as a primary care-based, dementia nurse specialist intervention, with a care resource kit to help the dementia nurse specialist improve the knowledge of family and professional carers. The SEED intervention proved feasible and acceptable to all stakeholders, and being located in the general practice was considered beneficial. None of the outcome measures was suitable as the primary outcome for a future trial. The contingent valuation showed that the SEED intervention was valued, with a wider package of care valued more than selected features in isolation. The SEED intervention is unlikely to reduce costs, but this may be offset by the value placed on the SEED intervention by the general public.
Limitations
The biggest challenge to the successful delivery and completion of this research programme was translating the ‘theoretical’ complex intervention into practice in an ever-changing policy and service landscape at national and local levels. A major limitation for a future trial is the lack of a valid and relevant primary outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention that influences outcomes for both individuals and systems.
Conclusions
Although the dementia nurse specialist intervention was acceptable, feasible and integrated well with existing care, it is unlikely to reduce costs of care; however, it was highly valued by all stakeholders (professionals, people with dementia and their families) and has the potential to influence outcomes at both an individual and a systems level.
Future work
There is no plan to progress to a full randomised controlled trial of the SEED intervention in its current form. In view of new National Institute for Health and Care Excellence dementia guidance, which now recommends a care co-ordinator for all people with dementia, the feasibility of providing the SEED intervention throughout the illness trajectory should be explored. Appropriate outcome measures to evaluate the effectiveness of such a complex intervention are needed urgently.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN21390601.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research, Vol. 8, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Robinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Marie Poole
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Emma McLellan
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Richard Lee
- Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sarah Amador
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nawaraj Bhattarai
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew Bryant
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dorothy Coe
- North East and North Cumbria Local Clinical Research Network, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Anne Corbett
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Catherine Exley
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Zoe Gotts
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Sarah Hill
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Denise Howel
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Susan Hrisos
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Ashleigh Kernohan
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Helen Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christopher Massey
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Paul Paes
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Katherine Rennie
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Professional Services, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephen Rice
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tomos Robinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Elizabeth Sampson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Dimitrios Tzelis
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Claire Bamford
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Perioperative Management of Elderly patients (PriME): recommendations from an Italian intersociety consensus. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32:1647-1673. [PMID: 32651902 PMCID: PMC7508736 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01624-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical outcomes in geriatric patients may be complicated by factors such as multiple comorbidities, low functional performance, frailty, reduced homeostatic capacity, and cognitive impairment. An integrated multidisciplinary approach to management is, therefore, essential in this population, but at present, the use of such an approach is uncommon. The Perioperative Management of Elderly patients (PriME) project has been established to address this issue. AIMS To develop evidence-based recommendations for the integrated care of geriatric surgical patients. METHODS A 14-member Expert Task Force of surgeons, anesthetists, and geriatricians was established to develop evidence-based recommendations for the pre-, intra-, and postoperative care of hospitalized older patients (≥ 65 years) undergoing elective surgery. A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus, and the strength of recommendations and quality of evidence was rated using the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force criteria. RESULTS A total of 81 recommendations were proposed, covering preoperative evaluation and care (30 items), intraoperative management (19 items), and postoperative care and discharge (32 items). CONCLUSIONS These recommendations should facilitate the multidisciplinary management of older surgical patients, integrating the expertise of the surgeon, the anesthetist, the geriatrician, and other specialists and health care professionals (where available) as needed. These roles may vary according to the phase and setting of care and the patient's conditions.
Collapse
|
195
|
Trexler LE, Corrigan JD, Davé S, Hammond FM. Recommendations for Prescribing Opioids for People With Traumatic Brain Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020; 101:2033-2040. [PMID: 32771395 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Our objective was to make recommendations intended to reduce the rate of opioid misuse and overdose for a particularly high-risk group of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A consensus process conducted with TBI researchers and expert practitioners developed practical recommendations to inform prescribing of opioids for people with TBI. After determining key general principles for prescribing opioids for people with TBI, 6 TBI-specific recommendations were developed, 1 for acute pain in the agitated patient with TBI, 3 recommendations to be considered before prescribing an opioid, and 2 for follow-up and use by mental health and substance use disorder providers. While there is much needed research to examine the relationship between opioid misuse and TBI, the present recommendations provide at least some clinical considerations that might serve to prevent further deaths among a high-risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lance E Trexler
- Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
| | - John D Corrigan
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Shashank Davé
- Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Flora M Hammond
- Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Reinhardt JP, Burack OR, Cimarolli VR, Weiner AS. Dementia-Focused Person-Directed Care Training With Direct Care Workers in Nursing Homes: Effect on Symptom Reduction. J Gerontol Nurs 2020; 46:7-11. [PMID: 32936924 DOI: 10.3928/00989134-20200707-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The majority of older adult nursing home residents have dementia and are at risk of not having their care needs met, largely due to communication deficits. Promoting comfort and minimizing distress for these residents is important. Direct care workers (DCW) and clinical staff completed a 6-day training on a person-directed care (PDC) model-a model guided by the needs of the individual that focuses on empowering DCW to understand and support resident preferences and remaining abilities supported by relationship development and consistent staffing. A retrospective comparison was conducted of residents in two PDC communities with matched residents (n = 72) and three traditional communities (n = 72) on functional and clinical outcomes over a 6-month period. A two-way analysis of variance showed a significant interaction between group and time, where only those in the PDC group had a decreased number of clinical symptoms (e.g., pain, depression, agitation) over time. This study found support for the benefit of PDC on clinical outcomes of interest over time. PDC training for DCW and clinical staff promotes quality care and the reduction of clinical symptoms, leading to improved quality of life. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 46(8), 7-11.].
Collapse
|
197
|
Casafont C, Risco E, Piazuelo M, Ancín-Pagoto M, Cobo-Sánchez JL, Solís-Muñoz M, Zabalegui A. Care of older people with Cognitive Impairment or Dementia Hospitalized in Traumatology Units (CARExDEM): a quasi-experiment. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:246. [PMID: 32677894 PMCID: PMC7367239 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01633-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In our context, as in other European countries, care of patients with cognitive disorders or dementia still represents a major challenge in hospital settings. Thus, there is a need to ensure quality and continuity of care, avoiding preventable readmissions, which involve an increase in public expenses. Healthcare professionals need to acquire the necessary knowledge and skills to care for hospitalized patients with cognitive disorders and dementia. METHODS A quasi-experimental design with repeated observations, taken at baseline, post-intervention, and at one and three months post-intervention, in people hospitalized with cognitive disorders or dementia. The study will be carried out in four general hospitals in Spain and will include 430 PwD and their caregivers. The intervention was previously developed using the Balance of Care methodology where nurses, physicians, social workers and informal caregivers identified the best practices for this specific care situation. We aim to personalize the intervention, as recommended in the literature. The study has an innovative approach that includes new technologies and previous scientific evidence. Valid, reliable instruments will be used to measure the intervention outcomes. Quality of care and comorbidity will be analyzed based on the use of restraints and psychotropic medication, pain control, falls, functional capacity and days of hospitalization. Continuity of care will be measured based on post-discharge emergency hospital visits, visits to specialists, cost, and inter-sectorial communication among healthcare professionals and informal caregivers. Statistical analysis will be performed to analyze the effect of the intervention on quality of care, comorbidity and continuity of care for patients with dementia. DISCUSSION Our aim is to helping healthcare professionals to improve the management of cognitive disorders or dementia care during hospitalization and the quality of care, comorbidity and continuity of care in patients with dementia and their informal caregivers. Moving towards dementia-friendly environments is vital to achieving the optimum care outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered in Clinical Trials. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04048980 retrospectively registered on the 6th August 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ Protocol Record HCB/2017/0499. SPONSOR Hospital Clinic Barcelona.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Casafont
- Consultant Nurse in Research, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Assistant lecturer Universitat de Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ester Risco
- Associate Nursing Director. Hospital d’Atenció Intermèdia Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili, Esteve Terrades,30, 08023 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercè Piazuelo
- Nurse Unit Manager in Traumatology Unit, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Ancín-Pagoto
- Vice director of Nursing Care in Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pabellón G. Irunlarrea,3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - José Luis Cobo-Sánchez
- Consultant Nurse in Research, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander. Pabellón 16 Planta baja. Avenida Valdecilla s/n., 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Montserrat Solís-Muñoz
- Head of the Care Research Unit, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital. Head of the Nursing and Health Care Research Group, Puerta de Hierro-Segovia de Arana Health Research Institute, Joaquín Rodrigo, 2, 28222 Madrid, Majadahonda Spain
| | - Adelaida Zabalegui
- Vice director of Research and Education in Nursing in Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Assistant lecturer Universitat de Barcelona, Escala 1 planta 7. Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Wheelchair Seated Posture and Health Outcomes of Older Veterans in Community Living Centers. Rehabil Nurs 2020; 46:52-61. [PMID: 32657850 DOI: 10.1097/rnj.0000000000000274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Nursing home residents sit in wheelchairs (WCs) for extended periods, often with slumped posture. They often experience pneumonia, pressure ulcers, and pain. This study described WC seated posture with its selected predictors and outcomes in the nursing home environment, throughout the daytime hours of 1 day. DESIGN AND METHODS This observational study (n = 45) in two Veterans Administration Community Living Centers introduced a new measure of WC fit and described WC seated posture of older Veterans, with selected predictors and outcomes. FINDINGS Wheelchair seated posture was predicted by cognitive status, WC fit, WC skills, and duration of sitting, but not by level of sitting ability. Poor posture measured by the Seated Posture Scale was associated with pain. Highest interface pressures measurable were seen in peak pressure index (PPI = 200 mm Hg), indicating risk of pressure injury. Veterans often denied discomfort, possibly lowering overall pain scores, while reporting severe pain in specific body parts. CONCLUSIONS Wheelchair seated posture was predicted by cognitive status, WC fit, WC skills, and duration of sitting. Poor posture was associated with pain, and poor posture was an outcome of poor WC fit. Poor WC fit in this study supported earlier findings in non-Veterans Administration nursing homes.
Collapse
|
199
|
Gélinas C, Joffe AM, Szumita PM, Payen JF, Bérubé M, Shahiri T S, Boitor M, Chanques G, Puntillo KA. A Psychometric Analysis Update of Behavioral Pain Assessment Tools for Noncommunicative, Critically Ill Adults. AACN Adv Crit Care 2020; 30:365-387. [PMID: 31951666 DOI: 10.4037/aacnacc2019952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
This is an updated, comprehensive review of the psychometric properties of behavioral pain assessment tools for use with noncommunicative, critically ill adults. Articles were searched in 5 health databases. A total of 106 articles were analyzed, including 54 recently published papers. Nine behavioral pain assessment tools developed for noncommunicative critically ill adults and 4 tools developed for other non-communicative populations were included. The scale development process, reliability, validity, feasibility, and clinical utility were analyzed using a 0 to 20 scoring system, and quality of evidence was also evaluated. The Behavioral Pain Scale, the Behavioral Pain Scale-Nonintubated, and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool remain the tools with the strongest psychometric properties, with validation testing having been conducted in multiple countries and various languages. Other tools may be good alternatives, but additional research on them is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Gélinas
- Céline Gélinas is Associate Professor, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, 680 Sherbrooke West, Room 1838, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3A 2M7; and Researcher, Centre for Nursing Research and Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Aaron M Joffe
- Aaron M. Joffe is Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paul M Szumita
- Paul M. Szumita is Clinical Pharmacy Practice Manager and Program Director - PGY2 Critical Care Pharmacy Practice Residency, Department of Pharmacy Services, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jean-Francois Payen
- Jean-Francois Payen is Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, and Researcher, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Mélanie Bérubé
- Mélanie Bérubé is Assistant Professor, Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval; and Researcher, CHU de Québec, Université Laval Research Center (Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Shiva Shahiri T
- Shiva Shahiri T is a PhD Student, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University
| | - Madalina Boitor
- Madalina Boitor is a Student, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University
| | - Gerald Chanques
- Gerald Chanques is Professor, Department of Anesthesia & Critical Care Medicine, Montpellier University Hospital Saint Eloi, and PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM, CNRS, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France
| | - Kathleen A Puntillo
- Kathleen A. Puntillo is Professor of Nursing Emeritus, University of California San Francisco School of Nursing, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Using a clinical judgement model to understand the impact of validated pain assessment tools for burn clinicians and adult patients in the ICU: A multi-methods study. Burns 2020; 47:110-126. [PMID: 33277094 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.05.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensive care (ICU) patients' burn pain is difficult to assess, communicate and address, risking chronic pain syndromes and psychological morbidity. AIMS To understand how the introduction of validated pain tools (Critical Care Pain Observation Tool [CPOT], Numerical Rating Scale [NRS], Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia [PAINAD]) affected clinical judgement processes, analgesia/sedation administration and the experience of burn-injured patients. METHODS Consecutive chart review compared type and amount of analgesia/sedation administered, ventilation time and length of ICU/hospital stay between consecutive burn patients pre- and 6-months post-intervention (n=70). Analysis of 36 qualitative interviews with ICU clinicians (n=12) and burn-injured adults (n=12) pre- and post-intervention was guided by Tanner's (2006) Clinical Judgement Model. RESULTS Overall, there was a significant increase in morphine (P=0.04) and propofol (P=0.04) use and a trend towards increased paracetamol (P=0.06) use post-intervention. There was a trend towards greater Midazolam use for TBSA<20% (P=0.06), and significantly increased propofol use for TBSA≥20% (P=0.03). Ventilation time and ICU/hospital length of stay were unchanged. Qualitative analysis revealed complex clinical judgement dependent on the context of the patient's situation, unit culture, background beliefs of clinicians and in knowing the patient. Whilst the CPOT and NRS enhanced analytic reasoning and pain advocacy, the PAINAD appeared redundant. CONCLUSIONS Effective pain assessment, management and advocacy are assisted by evidence-based assessment practices.
Collapse
|