151
|
Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019. World J Surg 2020; 44:2056-2084. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05462-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
152
|
Mendonça FT, Pellizzaro D, Grossi BJ, Calvano LA, de Carvalho LS, Sposito AC. Synergistic effect of the association between lidocaine and magnesium sulfate on peri-operative pain after mastectomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2020; 37:224-234. [DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
153
|
Nakajima D, Kawakami H, Mihara T, Sato H, Goto T. Effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in pediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0227904. [PMID: 31990953 PMCID: PMC6986726 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intravenous lidocaine in adults undergoing general anesthesia has been shown to reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). However, the anti-postoperative vomiting (POV) effect of lidocaine in pediatric patients remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis to evaluate the effect of intravenous lidocaine on prevention of POV/PONV. METHODS Six databases including trial registration sites were searched. Randomized clinical trials evaluating the incidence of POV/PONV after intravenous lidocaine compared with control were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of POV within 24 hours after general anesthesia. The incidence of POV was combined as a risk ratio with 95% confidence interval using a random-effect model. We used the I2 to assess heterogeneity. We evaluated the quality of trials using the Cochrane methodology, and we assessed quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We also assessed adverse events. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Six trials with 849 patients were included, of whom 433 received intravenous lidocaine. Three trials evaluated the incidence of POV, and 3 evaluated the incidence of PONV. The overall incidence of POV within 24 hours after anesthesia was 45.9% in the lidocaine group and 63.4% in the control group (risk ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.00; I2 = 32%; p = 0.05). The incidence of PONV within 24 hours after anesthesia was 3.73% in the lidocaine group and 4.87% in the control group (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.36-1.59; I2 = 0%; p = 0.47). The quality of evidence was downgraded to "very low" due to the study designs, inconsistency, imprecision, and possible publication bias. CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis suggests that intravenous lidocaine infusion may reduce the incidence of POV, however, the evidence quality was "very low." Further trials with a low risk of bias are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Nakajima
- Intensive Care Department, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
- * E-mail:
| | - Hiromasa Kawakami
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takahiro Mihara
- Education and Training Department, YCU Center for Novel and Exploratory Clinical Trials, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Sato
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takahisa Goto
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Pain management in trauma patients affected by the opioid epidemic: A narrative review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020; 87:430-439. [PMID: 30939572 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Acute and chronic pain in trauma patients remains a challenging entity, particularly in the setting of the escalating opioid epidemic. It has been reported that chronic opioid use increases the likelihood of hospital admissions as a result of traumatic injuries. Furthermore, patients admitted with traumatic injuries have a greater than average risk of developing opioid use disorder after discharge. Practitioners providing care to these patients will encounter the issue of balancing analgesic goals and acute opioid withdrawal with the challenge of reducing postdischarge persistent opioid use. Additionally, the practitioner is faced with the worrisome prospect that inadequate treatment of acute pain may lead to the development of chronic pain and overtreatment may result in opioid dependence. It is therefore imperative to understand and execute alternative nonopioid strategies to maximize the benefits and reduce the risks of analgesic regimens in this patient population. This narrative review will analyze the current literature on pain management in trauma patients and highlight the application of the multimodal approach in potentially reducing the risks of both short- and long-term opioid use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Narrative review, moderate to High.
Collapse
|
155
|
Bailey MA, Toner AJ, Corcoran TB. A survey of perioperative intravenous lidocaine use by anaesthetists in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesth Intensive Care 2020; 48:53-58. [DOI: 10.1177/0310057x19889367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Perioperative intravenous lidocaine administration by anaesthetists is purported to confer a variety of benefits across a range of surgical procedures. It remains unclear whether the available evidence regarding efficacy and safety is sufficient to influence Australasian practice broadly, and whether significant barriers to uptake exist. We therefore conducted a survey of Fellows of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists to evaluate patterns of lidocaine use, and perceptions relating to benefit and safety. Of 979 survey invitations, 295 (30.1%) responded. Of these, 51.9% of anaesthetists incorporate lidocaine administration into their practice. Amongst users, the most common indication is open abdominal or pelvic surgery (88.9%), with the principal intent of reducing acute pain and opioid use (both 92.2%). Only 51% perceive lidocaine to have a role in the prevention of chronic post-surgical pain, and less than a third administer it for operations strongly linked to this condition. Nearly all (91%) users deliver the drug by intraoperative bolus and infusion, with the majority using doses between 1.0 and 1.5 mg/kg for both the bolus and the hourly infusion rate. When parallel local anaesthetic techniques are employed, 44.4% restrict the dose, 37.3% turn the lidocaine infusion off first and 15.7% make no modifications. Most respondents terminate infusions by the end of surgery (52.3%) or in the post-anaesthesia care unit (26.8%). Few deliver postoperative infusions without electrocardiographic monitoring (5.9%). There were no reports of life-threatening events. The dichotomy in Australasian use of perioperative lidocaine revealed by this survey confirms that large multicentre trials are now required to guide practice accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A Bailey
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Taranaki Base Hospital, New Plymouth, New Zealand
| | - Andrew J Toner
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Tomas B Corcoran
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Raine Foundation/WA Health Department, Nedlands, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Kramer ME, Holtan EE, Ives AL, Wall RT. Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Adverse Reaction: A Case Report. A A Pract 2020; 13:96-98. [PMID: 30920426 DOI: 10.1213/xaa.0000000000001002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Intravenous lidocaine is increasingly being utilized as an opioid-sparing analgesic. A 55-year-old man with well-controlled human immunodeficiency virus on highly active antiretroviral therapy was prescribed a lidocaine infusion at 1 mg/kg/h for postoperative pain. On postoperative day 2, the patient experienced 4 unresponsive episodes with tachycardia, hypertension, and oxygen desaturation. Serum lidocaine level was available 2 days later (high 6.3 µg/mL, therapeutic range 2.5-3.5 µg/mL). There is significant pharmacokinetic interaction between lidocaine and this patient's human immunodeficiency virus medications. This case highlights the need for a readily accessible list of medications that caution against lidocaine. We propose in-house serum lidocaine levels to monitor patients at an increased risk for toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MaryJo E Kramer
- From the Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | | | - Amy L Ives
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | | |
Collapse
|
157
|
Chakravarthy V, Yokoi H, Manlapaz MR, Krishnaney AA. Enhanced Recovery in Spine Surgery and Perioperative Pain Management. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2020; 31:81-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
158
|
Kościelniak-Merak B, Batko I, Fleszar M, Kocot-Kępska M, Gamian A, Kobylarz K, Sztefko K, Tomasik PJ. Effect of intravenous, perioperative-administered lidocaine on serum levels of endocannabinoids and related N-acylethanolamines in children. Minerva Anestesiol 2020; 86. [DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.19.13703-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
|
159
|
An Enhanced Recovery Protocol that Facilitates Same-day Discharge for Simple Laparoscopic Appendectomies. Pediatr Qual Saf 2019; 4:e243. [PMID: 32010869 PMCID: PMC6946221 DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute appendicitis is the most common gastrointestinal condition requiring urgent operation in the pediatric population with laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) being the current surgical technique. We describe the implementation of a standardized protocol to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and facilitate same-day discharge after LA.
Collapse
|
160
|
|
161
|
Iranpour A, Boddapati R. Multimodality post proctologic surgery pain control. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scrs.2019.100701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
162
|
De la Gala F, Piñeiro P, Reyes A, Simón C, Vara E, Rancan L, Huerta LJ, Gonzalez G, Benito C, Muñoz M, Grande P, Paredes SD, Aznar PT, Perez A, Martinez D, Higuero F, Sanz D, De Miguel JP, Cruz P, Olmedilla L, Lopez Gil E, Duque P, Sanchez-Pedrosa G, Valle M, Garutti I. Effect of intraoperative paravertebral or intravenous lidocaine versus control during lung resection surgery on postoperative complications: A randomized controlled trial. Trials 2019; 20:622. [PMID: 31694684 PMCID: PMC6836654 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3677-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of minimally invasive surgical techniques for lung resection surgery (LRS), such as video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS), has increased in recent years. However, there is little information about the best anesthetic technique in this context. This surgical approach is associated with a lower intensity of postoperative pain, and its use has been proposed in programs for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). This study compares the severity of postoperative complications in patients undergoing LRS who have received lidocaine intraoperatively either intravenously or via paravertebral administration versus saline. METHODS/DESIGN We will conduct a single-center randomized controlled trial involving 153 patients undergoing LRS through a thoracoscopic approach. The patients will be randomly assigned to one of the following study groups: intravenous lidocaine with more paravertebral thoracic (PVT) saline, PVT lidocaine with more intravenous saline, or intravenous remifentanil with more PVT saline. The primary outcome will be the comparison of the postoperative course through Clavien-Dindo classification. Furthermore, we will compare the perioperative pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response by monitoring biomarkers in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and blood, as well as postoperative analgesic consumption between the three groups of patients. We will use an ANOVA to compare quantitative variables and a chi-squared test to compare qualitative variables. DISCUSSION The development of less invasive surgical techniques means that anesthesiologists must adapt their perioperative management protocols and look for anesthetic techniques that provide good analgesic quality and allow rapid rehabilitation of the patient, as proposed in the ERAS protocols. The administration of a continuous infusion of intravenous lidocaine has proven to be useful and safe for the management of other types of surgery, as demonstrated in colorectal cancer. We want to know whether the continuous administration of lidocaine by a paravertebral route can be substituted with the intravenous administration of this local anesthetic in a safe and effective way while avoiding the risks inherent in the use of regional anesthetic techniques. In this way, this technique could be used in a safe and effective way in ERAS programs for pulmonary resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT, 2016-004271-52; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03905837 . Protocol number IGGFGG-2016 version 4.0, 27th April 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco De la Gala
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia Piñeiro
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Almudena Reyes
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Simón
- Department Thoracic Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Vara
- Biochemical Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lisa Rancan
- Biochemical Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Javier Huerta
- Department Thoracic Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Guillermo Gonzalez
- Department Thoracic Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Benito
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Muñoz
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar Grande
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sergio D Paredes
- Biochemical Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Tomas Aznar
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alvaro Perez
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Martinez
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Higuero
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Sanz
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Pedro De Miguel
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia Cruz
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Olmedilla
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Lopez Gil
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia Duque
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Mayte Valle
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Garutti
- Department Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Scholzen E, Zeng AM, Schroeder KM. Perioperative Management and Analgesia for Patients Taking Buprenorphine and Other Forms of Medication-Assisted Treatment for Substance Abuse Disorders. Adv Anesth 2019; 37:65-86. [PMID: 31677660 DOI: 10.1016/j.aan.2019.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Scholzen
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, B6/319 CSC, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | - Angela M Zeng
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, B6/319 CSC, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | - Kristopher M Schroeder
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, B6/319 CSC, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Matas M, Sotošek V, Kozmar A, Likić R, Sekulić A. Effect of local anesthesia with lidocaine on perioperative proinflammatory cytokine levels in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in cerebral aneurysm patients: Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e17450. [PMID: 31626100 PMCID: PMC6824720 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000017450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cerebral aneurysm surgery has significant mortality and morbidity rate. Inflammation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of intracranial aneurysms, their rupture, subarachnoid hemorrhage and neurologic complications. Proinflammatory cytokine level in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an indicator of inflammatory response. Cytokines contribute to secondary brain injury and can worsen the outcome of the treatment. Lidocaine is local anesthetic that can be applied in neurosurgery as regional anesthesia of the scalp and as topical anesthesia of the throat before direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Besides analgesic, lidocaine has systemic anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effect.Primary aim of this trial is to determine the influence of local anesthesia with lidocaine on the perioperative levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α in plasma and CSF in cerebral aneurysm patients. METHODS We will conduct prospective randomized clinical trial among patients undergoing craniotomy and cerebral aneurysm clipping surgery in general anesthesia. Patients included in the trial will be randomly assigned to the lidocaine group (Group L) or to the control group (Group C). Patients in Group L, following general anesthesia induction, will receive topical anesthesia of the throat before endotracheal intubation and also regional anesthesia of the scalp before Mayfield frame placement, both done with lidocaine. Patients in Group C will have general anesthesia only without any lidocaine administration. The primary outcomes are concentrations of cytokines interleukin-1β, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α in plasma and CSF, measured at specific timepoints perioperatively. Secondary outcome is incidence of major neurological and infectious complications, as well as treatment outcome in both groups. DISCUSSION Results of the trial could provide insight into influence of lidocaine on local and systemic inflammatory response in cerebrovascular surgery, and might improve future anesthesia practice and treatment outcome. TRIAL IS REGISTERED AT CLINICALTRIALS.GOV:: NCT03823482.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijana Matas
- Department of Anesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb,
| | - Vlatka Sotošek
- Department of Anesthesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka,
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Hospital Rijeka, Rijeka,
| | - Ana Kozmar
- Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Center Zagreb,
| | - Robert Likić
- Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Center Zagreb,
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Zagreb Medical School,
| | - Ante Sekulić
- Department of Anesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb,
- Department of Anesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Zagreb Medical School, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Kim DH, Park JY, Yu J, Lee SA, Park S, Hwang JH, Koh GH, Kim YK. Intravenous Lidocaine for the Prevention of Postoperative Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in Male Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg 2019; 131:220-227. [DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000004405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
166
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ross F Goldberg
- Department of Surgery, Maricopa Integrated Health System, 2601 East Roosevelt Street, Hogan Building, Phoenix, AZ 85008, USA; Creighton University School of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to describe the anesthesiologist's perioperative challenges when caring for the patient with substance use disorder and, in particular, opioid use disorder. RECENT FINDINGS With the introduction of the fifth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, psychiatric literature recently changed the criteria for defining substance use disorder. In patients with known opioid use disorder, who are undergoing elective surgery and also on maintenance therapy, use of multimodal analgesia is essential to treat postoperative pain. SUMMARY Patients with substance use disorders and, in particular, those addicted to opioids, present a challenge to the anesthesiologist. Whether the diagnosis of substance use disorder is known or unknown and whether on maintenance therapy, in withdrawal, or remission, patients with this condition represent a special surgical population whose perioperative care can influence their postoperative and disease course for many years.
Collapse
|
168
|
Abstract
Balanced general anesthesia, the most common management strategy used in anesthesia care, entails the administration of different drugs together to create the anesthetic state. Anesthesiologists developed this approach to avoid sole reliance on ether for general anesthesia maintenance. Balanced general anesthesia uses less of each drug than if the drug were administered alone, thereby increasing the likelihood of its desired effects and reducing the likelihood of its side effects. To manage nociception intraoperatively and pain postoperatively, the current practice of balanced general anesthesia relies almost exclusively on opioids. While opioids are the most effective antinociceptive agents, they have undesirable side effects. Moreover, overreliance on opioids has contributed to the opioid epidemic in the United States. Spurred by concern of opioid overuse, balanced general anesthesia strategies are now using more agents to create the anesthetic state. Under these approaches, called “multimodal general anesthesia,” the additional drugs may include agents with specific central nervous system targets such as dexmedetomidine and ones with less specific targets, such as magnesium. It is postulated that use of more agents at smaller doses further maximizes desired effects while minimizing side effects. Although this approach appears to maximize the benefit-to-side effect ratio, no rational strategy has been provided for choosing the drug combinations. Nociception induced by surgery is the primary reason for placing a patient in a state of general anesthesia. Hence, any rational strategy should focus on nociception control intraoperatively and pain control postoperatively. In this Special Article, we review the anatomy and physiology of the nociceptive and arousal circuits, and the mechanisms through which commonly used anesthetics and anesthetic adjuncts act in these systems. We propose a rational strategy for multimodal general anesthesia predicated on choosing a combination of agents that act at different targets in the nociceptive system to control nociception intraoperatively and pain postoperatively. Because these agents also decrease arousal, the doses of hypnotics and/or inhaled ethers needed to control unconsciousness are reduced. Effective use of this strategy requires simultaneous monitoring of antinociception and level of unconsciousness. We illustrate the application of this strategy by summarizing anesthetic management for 4 representative surgeries.
Collapse
|
169
|
Gabapentin Decreases Narcotic Usage: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway in Free Autologous Breast Reconstruction. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2019; 7:e2350. [PMID: 31592040 PMCID: PMC6756647 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The opioid crisis is public health emergency, in part due to physician prescribing practices. As a result, there is an increased interest in reducing narcotic use in the postsurgical setting.
Collapse
|
170
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcel E Durieux
- From the Departments of Anesthesiology.,Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
|
172
|
Bishop DG, Gibbs MW, Dyer RA. Post-caesarean delivery analgesia in resource-limited settings: a narrative review. Int J Obstet Anesth 2019; 40:119-127. [PMID: 31230992 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2018] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Post-caesarean pain is an important and often neglected outcome. It causes suffering, affects breastfeeding and is associated with postpartum depression and the development of chronic pain syndromes. Pain control is often difficult even in resource-rich environments; it is likely far worse in resource-limited settings, where emphasis is on reducing the high maternal mortality rate. Lack of adequate staffing, education, and postoperative monitoring severely limit the options in resource-limited settings. Resource-limited settings are further compromised by limited access to essential analgesic drugs and equipment for their administration. Solutions using affordable and accessible medications as part of a multimodal analgesic strategy are possible, supplemented by education and training programmes. More research is required, both to establish current practice and to test methods for improving maternal pain control. While government involvement is necessary to improve infrastructure and resources in individual countries, other solutions should also be sought, empowering local institutions and harnessing individual cultural characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G Bishop
- Perioperative Research Group, Department of Anaesthetics, Critical Care and Pain Management, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
| | - M W Gibbs
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - R A Dyer
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Nair AS. Nonopioid Analgesics for Managing Postoperative Pain after Cardiothoracic Surgeries. Ann Card Anaesth 2019; 22:233. [PMID: 30971612 PMCID: PMC6489393 DOI: 10.4103/aca.aca_208_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Abhijit S Nair
- Department of Anesthesiology, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Makhoul T, Kelly G, Schult RF, Acquisto NM. Intravenous lidocaine for renal colic in the emergency department (ED). Am J Emerg Med 2019; 37:775. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
175
|
Chakravarthy VB, Yokoi H, Coughlin DJ, Manlapaz MR, Krishnaney AA. Development and implementation of a comprehensive spine surgery enhanced recovery after surgery protocol: the Cleveland Clinic experience. Neurosurg Focus 2019; 46:E11. [DOI: 10.3171/2019.1.focus18696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been shown to be effective at reducing perioperative morbidity and costs while improving outcomes. To date, spine surgery protocols have been limited in scope, focusing only on specific types of procedures or specific parts of the surgical episode. The authors describe the creation and implementation of one of the first comprehensive ERAS protocols for spine surgery. The protocol is unique in that it has a comprehensive perioperative paradigm encompassing the entire surgical period that is tailored based on the complexity of each individual spine patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hana Yokoi
- 3Case Western School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
176
|
Husser T, Marcom J, Mark J, Buonora J, Benham B. Effectiveness of non-opioid pharmacological adjuncts for adult surgical patients: an umbrella review protocol. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 17:1319-1325. [PMID: 30889076 DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to determine the effectiveness of non-opioid pharmacological adjuncts for decreasing perioperative morphine equivalents and acute postoperative pain scores in adult surgical patients. INTRODUCTION Opioids are commonly administered during anesthesia to dull the senses, relieve pain and induce sleep. However, there are significant adverse effects associated with intraoperative opioid use. Anesthesia providers can impact the current opioid epidemic by administering non-opioid-centric anesthetic medications. A large-scale evidence-based review is needed to inform a standardized non-opioid pain treatment strategy in the perioperative period. INCLUSION CRITERIA This review will consider studies of adults 19 years or older who are undergoing surgical procedures and receiving non-opioid oral or intravenous perioperative analgesic medications administered by the anesthesia team. Studies that include patients who receive non-opioid medication as a local infiltrate by the surgical team will be excluded, as will studies with patients who receive regional or neuraxial opioid-sparing techniques. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English after 2007 will be considered. METHODS MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase will be searched, as well as two trial registers and two sources of unpublished reviews. Titles and abstracts will be screened to identify potentially relevant papers. Retrieval of full-text studies, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses will be performed if possible, and a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Summary of Findings presented. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42019135852.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Travis Husser
- The Center for Translational Research: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence.,U.S. Army Graduate Program in Anesthesia Nursing, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
| | - Jason Marcom
- The Center for Translational Research: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence.,U.S. Army Graduate Program in Anesthesia Nursing, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
| | - Jordan Mark
- The Center for Translational Research: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence.,U.S. Army Graduate Program in Anesthesia Nursing, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
| | - John Buonora
- The Center for Translational Research: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence.,U.S. Army Graduate Program in Anesthesia Nursing, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
| | - Brian Benham
- The Center for Translational Research: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence.,U.S. Army Graduate Program in Anesthesia Nursing, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
177
|
Abstract
Critically ill patients commonly experience pain, and the provision of analgesia is an essential component of intensive care unit (ICU) care. Opioids are the mainstay of pain management in the ICU but are limited by their adverse effects, risk of addiction and abuse, and recent drug shortages of injectable formulations. A multimodal analgesia approach, utilizing nonopioid analgesics as adjuncts to opioid therapy, is recommended since they may modulate the pain response and reduce opioid requirements by acting on multiple pain mediators. Nonopioid analgesics discussed in detail in this article are acetaminophen, α-2 receptor agonists, gabapentinoids, ketamine, lidocaine, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This literature review describes the clinical pharmacology, supportive ICU and relevant non-ICU data, and practical considerations associated with the administration of nonopioid analgesics in critically ill adult patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kathryn E Smith
- 1 Department of Pharmacy, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, Rockall TA, Young-Fadok TM, Hill AG, Soop M, de Boer HD, Urman RD, Chang GJ, Fichera A, Kessler H, Grass F, Whang EE, Fawcett WJ, Carli F, Lobo DN, Rollins KE, Balfour A, Baldini G, Riedel B, Ljungqvist O. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS ®) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg 2019; 43:659-695. [PMID: 30426190 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1056] [Impact Index Per Article: 211.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is the fourth updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery and providing graded recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS® protocol. METHODS A wide database search on English literature publications was performed. Studies on each item within the protocol were selected with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and large prospective cohorts and examined, reviewed and graded according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS All recommendations on ERAS® protocol items are based on best available evidence; good-quality trials; meta-analyses of good-quality trials; or large cohort studies. The level of evidence for the use of each item is presented accordingly. CONCLUSIONS The evidence base and recommendation for items within the multimodal perioperative care pathway are presented by the ERAS® Society in this comprehensive consensus review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U O Gustafsson
- Department of Surgery, Danderyd Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - M J Scott
- Department of Anesthesia, Virginia Commonwealth University Hospital, Richmond, VA, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - M Hubner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - J Nygren
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - N Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - N Francis
- Colorectal Unit, Yeovil District Hospital, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, BA21 4AT, UK
- University of Bath, Wessex House Bath, BA2 7JU, UK
| | - T A Rockall
- Department of Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Trust, and Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit (MATTU), Guildford, UK
| | - T M Young-Fadok
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - A G Hill
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - M Soop
- Irving National Intestinal Failure Unit, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - H D de Boer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, Martini General Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - G J Chang
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A Fichera
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - H Kessler
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA
| | - F Grass
- Department of Visceral Surgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - E E Whang
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - W J Fawcett
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - F Carli
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - D N Lobo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - K E Rollins
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - A Balfour
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Services, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - G Baldini
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - B Riedel
- Department of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - O Ljungqvist
- Department of Surgery, Örebro University and University Hospital, Örebro & Institute of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Gabriel RA, Swisher MW, Sztain JF, Furnish TJ, Ilfeld BM, Said ET. State of the art opioid-sparing strategies for post-operative pain in adult surgical patients. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019; 20:949-961. [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1583743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney A. Gabriel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Matthew W. Swisher
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jacklynn F. Sztain
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Timothy J. Furnish
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Brian M. Ilfeld
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Engy T. Said
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Intravenous infusion of lidocaine significantly reduces propofol dose for colonoscopy: a randomised placebo-controlled study. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121:1059-1064. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
|
181
|
A Review of Perioperative Analgesic Strategies in Cardiac Surgery. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2018; 56:e56-e83. [PMID: 30204605 DOI: 10.1097/aia.0000000000000200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
182
|
Harrison TK, Kornfeld H, Aggarwal AK, Lembke A. Perioperative Considerations for the Patient with Opioid Use Disorder on Buprenorphine, Methadone, or Naltrexone Maintenance Therapy. Anesthesiol Clin 2018; 36:345-359. [PMID: 30092933 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2018.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
As part of a national effort to combat the current US opioid epidemic, use of currently Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs for the treatment of opioid use disorder/opioid addiction (buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone) is on the rise. To provide optimal pain control and minimize the risk of relapse and overdose, providers need to have an in-depth understanding of how to manage these medications in the perioperative setting. This article reviews key principles and discusses perioperative considerations for patients with opioid use disorder on buprenorphine, methadone, or naltrexone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Kyle Harrison
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Avenue (112A), Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| | - Howard Kornfeld
- Pain Fellowship Program, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, 3 Madrona Avenue, Mill Valley, CA 94941, USA
| | - Anuj Kailash Aggarwal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, 450 Broadway, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Anna Lembke
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Beaussier M, Delbos A, Maurice-Szamburski A, Ecoffey C, Mercadal L. Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine. Drugs 2018; 78:1229-1246. [DOI: 10.1007/s40265-018-0955-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
184
|
e Silva LOJ, Scherber K, Cabrera D, Motov S, Erwin PJ, West CP, Murad MH, Bellolio MF. Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Pain Management in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review. Ann Emerg Med 2018; 72:135-144.e3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2017] [Revised: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
185
|
Murthy TK K, Kumar PV V. Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lignocaine Infusion on Haemodynamic Responses and postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgeries. Anesth Pain Med 2018; 8:e63490. [PMID: 30009150 PMCID: PMC6035376 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.63490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During general anaesthesia, intubation of trachea and extubation of trachea are often associated with increase in haemodynamic response. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a minimal access surgery; postoperatively patients may experience moderate to severe pain. It is well known that lignocaine is useful in attenuating haemodynamic response to intubation and extubation. Previous studies also state that perioperative lignocaine infusion provides postoperative analgesia as well. We hypothesize that perioperative intravenous lignocaine infusion can both attenuate haemodynamic responses to intubation and extubation of trachea and also provide good postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgeries. METHODS Double blinded randomized controlled trial was undertaken at the department of anesthesia, Sri Siddartha medical college. In group A, 0.9% normal saline was used as placebo for perioperative intravenous infusion. In group B, preservative free 1.5 mg/kg 2 % lignocaine (Loxicard) diluted with normal saline to 1% given at 10 minutes to induction as bolus, followed by an infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h. till 1 hour postoperatively. RESULTS In Group B there was a statistically less rise in heart rate [HR] and mean blood pressure [MBP] during intubation and extubation of trachea compared to group A. In group B there was a statistically significant increase in the mean pain free period postoperatively compared to group A. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative intravenous infusion of lignocaine attenuates haemodynamic response during the intubation and extubation of the trachea. In addition, it also increases the mean pain free period postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vinay Kumar PV
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur
| |
Collapse
|
186
|
Intravenous lidocaine infusion. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 65:269-274. [PMID: 29496229 DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2018.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Revised: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Systemic lidocaine used in continuous infusion during the peri-operative period has analgesic, anti-hyperalgesic, as well as anti-inflammatory properties. This makes it capable of reducing the use of opioids and inhalational anaesthetics, and the early return of bowel function, and patient hospital stay. The aim of this narrative review was to highlight the pharmacology and indications for clinical application, along with new and interesting research areas. The clinical applications of peri-operative lidocaine infusion have been reviewed in several recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses in patients undergoing open and laparoscopic abdominal procedures, ambulatory procedures, and other types of surgery. Peri-operative lidocaine infusion may be a useful analgesic adjunct in enhanced recovery protocols. Potential benefits of intravenous lidocaine in chronic post-surgical pain, post-operative cognitive dysfunction, and cancer recurrence are under investigation. Due to its immunomodulation properties over surgical stress, current evidence suggests that intravenous lidocaine could be used in the context of multimodal analgesia.
Collapse
|
187
|
|
188
|
Sun J, Li N, Duan G, Liu Y, Guo S, Wang C, Zhu C, Zhang X. Increased Na v1.7 expression in the dorsal root ganglion contributes to pain hypersensitivity after plantar incision in rats. Mol Pain 2018; 14:1744806918782323. [PMID: 29790813 PMCID: PMC6050993 DOI: 10.1177/1744806918782323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2017] [Revised: 05/06/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Postoperative pain remains a complex problem that is difficult to manage in the clinical context, seriously affecting rehabilitation and the quality of life of patients after surgery. Nociceptors, of which the cell bodies are located in the dorsal root ganglion, are crucial for initiating and conducting the pain signal. The peripheral voltage-gated sodium channels, including Nav1.7, which is mainly expressed in the dorsal root ganglion, are key to understanding the mechanism underlying postoperative pain. Nav1.7, in particular, of which mutations in the encoding gene ( SCN9A) can determine whether pain occurs, has aroused most attention. Previous studies have shown that Nav1.7 in dorsal root ganglion is critical for the development of inflammatory pain and some neuropathic pain. However, the expression of Nav1.7 in the dorsal root ganglion after surgery and its role in postoperative pain hypersensitivity remain unclear. Therefore, in this study, in order to gain a better understanding of the role of dorsal root ganglion Nav1.7 in pain hypersensitivity following operation, we dynamically examined the pain-related behavior and expression of Nav1.7 in L4-L6 dorsal root ganglion before and after plantar incision in rats (an acute postoperative pain model). After plantar incision, the mechanical and thermal pain threshold decreased significantly, the cumulative pain score was increased significantly, meanwhile quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting results showed that expression of Nav1.7 in L4-L6 dorsal root ganglion was enhanced significantly. After pretreatment using SCN9A-RNAi-LV delivered via an intrathecal tube, immunohistochemistry showed that increased expression of Nav1.7 in L4-L6 dorsal root ganglion after plantar incision was inhibited, as also confirmed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. Moreover, pain hypersensitivity was alleviated. These results suggested that Nav1.7 of L4-L6 dorsal root ganglion plays an important role in the development of pain hypersensitivity after plantar incision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaoli Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical
College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People’s
Republic of China
| | - Ningbo Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical
College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People’s
Republic of China
| | - Guangyou Duan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical
College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People’s
Republic of China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical
College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People’s
Republic of China
| | - Shanna Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical
College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People’s
Republic of China
| | - Cong Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical
College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People’s
Republic of China
| | - Changmao Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical
College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People’s
Republic of China
| | - Xianwei Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical
College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People’s
Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
González MM, Altermatt F. Is intravenous lidocaine effective for decreasing pain and speeding up recovery after surgery? Medwave 2017; 17:e7121. [PMID: 29286359 DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2017.09.7121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lidocaine is widely used in anesthesia due to its multiple properties, including its role as analgesic. However, it is not entirely clear which are the real benefits of its use in the perioperative setting. METHODS To answer this question we used Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS We identified 15 systematic reviews including 53 studies overall, all of them randomized controlled trials. We concluded the use of intravenous perioperative lidocaine probably results in a clinically irrelevant difference in pain and length of hospital stay, but it probably prevents postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Magdalena González
- Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Proyecto Epistemonikos, Santiago, Chile
| | - Fernando Altermatt
- Proyecto Epistemonikos, Santiago, Chile; Departamento de Anestesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. . Address: Centro Evidencia Uc, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Centro de Innovación UC Anacleto Angelini, Avda. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
190
|
Chamaraux-Tran TN, Piegeler T. The Amide Local Anesthetic Lidocaine in Cancer Surgery-Potential Antimetastatic Effects and Preservation of Immune Cell Function? A Narrative Review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2017; 4:235. [PMID: 29326939 PMCID: PMC5742360 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgical removal of the primary tumor in solid cancer is an essential component of the treatment. However, the perioperative period can paradoxically lead to an increased risk of cancer recurrence. A bimodal dynamics for early-stage breast cancer recurrence suggests a tumor dormancy-based model with a mastectomy-driven acceleration of the metastatic process and a crucial role of the immunosuppressive state during the perioperative period. Recent evidence suggests that anesthesia could also influence the progress of the disease. Local anesthetics (LAs) have long been used for their properties to block nociceptive input. They also exert anti-inflammatory capacities by modulating the liberation or signal propagation of inflammatory mediators. Interestingly, LAs can reduce viability and proliferation of many cancer cells in vitro as well. Additionally, retrospective clinical trials have suggested that regional anesthesia for cancer surgery (either with or without general anesthesia) might reduce the risk of recurrence. Lidocaine, a LA, which can be administered intravenously, is widely used in clinical practice for multimodal analgesia. It is associated with a morphine-sparing effect, reduced pain scores, and in major surgery probably also with a reduced incidence of postoperative ileus and length of hospital stay. Systemic delivery might therefore be efficient to target residual disease or reach cells able to form micrometastasis. Moreover, an in vitro study has shown that lidocaine could enhance the activity of natural killer (NK) cells. Due to their ability to recognize and kill tumor cells without the requirement of prior antigen exposure, NKs are the main actor of the innate immune system. However, several perioperative factors can reduce NK activity, such as stress, pain, opioids, or general anesthetics. Intravenous lidocaine as part of the perioperative anesthesia regimen would be of major interest for clinicians, as it might bear the potential to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence or progression patients undergoing cancer surgery. As a well-known pharmaceutical agent, lidocaine might therefore be a promising candidate for oncological drug repurposing. We urgently need clinical randomized trials assessing the protective effect of lidocaine on NKs function and against recurrence after cancer surgery to achieve a “proof of concept.”
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thiên-Nga Chamaraux-Tran
- Département d'Anesthésie et Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Hautepierre, CHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7104, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, U964 Institut National de Santé et de Recherche Médicale, Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch, France
| | - Tobias Piegeler
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Situations Where Intravenous Lidocaine Should Not Be Used as an Analgesic Adjunct? Anesthesiology 2017; 127:1038. [DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000001913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
192
|
In Reply. Anesthesiology 2017; 127:1038. [DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000001914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
193
|
Hah JM, Bateman BT, Ratliff J, Curtin C, Sun E. Chronic Opioid Use After Surgery: Implications for Perioperative Management in the Face of the Opioid Epidemic. Anesth Analg 2017; 125:1733-1740. [PMID: 29049117 PMCID: PMC6119469 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000002458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 464] [Impact Index Per Article: 66.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Physicians, policymakers, and researchers are increasingly focused on finding ways to decrease opioid use and overdose in the United States both of which have sharply increased over the past decade. While many efforts are focused on the management of chronic pain, the use of opioids in surgical patients presents a particularly challenging problem requiring clinicians to balance 2 competing interests: managing acute pain in the immediate postoperative period and minimizing the risks of persistent opioid use after the surgery. Finding ways to minimize this risk is particularly salient in light of a growing literature suggesting that postsurgical patients are at increased risk for chronic opioid use. The perioperative care team, including surgeons and anesthesiologists, is poised to develop clinical- and systems-based interventions aimed at providing pain relief in the immediate postoperative period while also reducing the risks of opioid use longer term. In this paper, we discuss the consequences of chronic opioid use after surgery and present an analysis of the extent to which surgery has been associated with chronic opioid use. We follow with a discussion of the risk factors that are associated with chronic opioid use after surgery and proceed with an analysis of the extent to which opioid-sparing perioperative interventions (eg, nerve blockade) have been shown to reduce the risk of chronic opioid use after surgery. We then conclude with a discussion of future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Hah
- From the *Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; †Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and ‡Department of Neurosurgery, §Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (by courtesy), ‖Division of Hand and Plastic Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, ¶Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, and #Department of Health Research and Policy (by courtesy), Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
194
|
Prevention of Surgical Site Infections and Biofilms: Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous Cefazolin and Metronidazole in a Tumescent Lidocaine Solution. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2017; 5:e1351. [PMID: 28607871 PMCID: PMC5459654 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000001351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2016] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumescent anesthesia antibiotic delivery (TAAD) consists of subcutaneous infiltration of antibiotic(s) dissolved tumescent lidocaine anesthesia. Tumescent lidocaine anesthesia contains lidocaine (≤ 1 g/L), epinephrine (≤ 1 mg/L), sodium bicarbonate (10 mEq/L) in 0.9% saline. Our aim was to measure cefazolin and metronidazole concentrations over time in subcutaneous tumescent interstitial fluid (TISF) after TAAD, in serum after TAAD and after intravenous antibiotic delivery (IVAD). We hypothesize that the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of TAAD + IVAD are superior to IVAD alone for the prevention of surgical site infections and biofilms. METHODS Concentrations of cefazolin and metronidazole in TISF and serum following TAAD and in serum following IVAD were compared in 5 female volunteers. Subjects received cefazolin or cefazolin plus metronidazole by IVAD alone and by TAAD alone. One subject also received concomitant IVAD and TAAD of these 2 antibiotics. Sequential samples of serum or subcutaneous TISF were assayed for antibiotic concentration. RESULTS Cefazolin (1 g) by TAAD resulted in an area under the curve of the concentration-time profile and a maximum concentration (Cmax) in subcutaneous tissue that were 16.5 and 5.6 times greater than in serum following 1 g by IVAD. Metronidazole (500 mg) by TAAD resulted in an area under the curve and Cmax that were 8.1 and 24.7 times greater in TISF, than in serum after 500 mg by intravenous delivery. IVAD + TAAD resulted in superior antibiotic concentrations to IVAD alone. CONCLUSIONS TAAD + IVAD produced superior antibiotic bioavailability in both subcutaneous interstitial fluid and serum compared with IVAD alone. There was no evidence that TAAD of cefazolin and metronidazole poses a significant risk of harm to patients.
Collapse
|
195
|
|