Effect of statins on a wide range of health outcomes: a cohort study validated by comparison with randomized trials

Statins for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in clinical practice. The efficacy of statins in the primary prevention of VTE remains unproven.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of statins in the primary prevention of VTE.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases (PVD) Group searched their Specialised Register (last searched April 2011) and CENTRAL (2011, Issue 2). The authors searched MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2011); EMBASE (1974 to March 2011); ISI Web of Knowledge (2001 to March 2011); the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (1978 to March 2011) and other resources (including clinical trials registers, reference lists and presentations at various conferences.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed statins were considered. The outcomes we evaluated were the rates of VTE, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, death and adverse events. Two authors independently selected RCTs against inclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with a third author.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction was independently carried out by two authors. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with a third author. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias according to a standard quality checklist provided by the PVD Group.

MAIN RESULTS

We included one RCT (17 citations) with 17,802 participants that assessed rosuvastatin for preventing VTE. Our analysis showed that rosuvastatin reduced the incidence of VTE (odds ratio (OR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37 to 0.86) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.79), the risk of any (fatal and non-fatal) myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.69), any (fatal and non-fatal) stroke (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.78), but did not reduce the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.46) and death after VTE (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.24). Rosuvastatin did not reduce the incidence of any serious adverse event (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.06).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence showed that rosuvastatin was associated with a reduced incidence of VTE, but the evidence was limited to a single RCT. Randomised controlled trials of statins (including rosuvastatin) are needed to evaluate the efficacy of statins in the prevention of VTE.

Pharmacological actions of statins: a critical appraisal in the management of cancer

Statins, among the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide, are cholesterol-lowering agents used to manage and prevent cardiovascular and coronary heart diseases. Recently, a multifaceted action in different physiological and pathological conditions has been also proposed for statins, beyond anti-inflammation and neuroprotection. Statins have been shown to act through cholesterol-dependent and -independent mechanisms and are able to affect several tissue functions and modulate specific signal transduction pathways that could account for statin pleiotropic effects. Typically, statins are prescribed in middle-aged or elderly patients in a therapeutic regimen covering a long life span during which metabolic processes, aging, and concomitant novel diseases, including cancer, could occur. In this context, safety, toxicity, interaction with other drugs, and the state of health have to be taken into account in subjects treated with statins. Some evidence has shown a dichotomous effect of statins with either cancer-inhibiting or -promoting effects. To date, clinical trials failed to demonstrate a reduced cancer occurrence in statin users and no sufficient data are available to define the long-term effects of statin use over a period of 10 years. Moreover, results from clinical trials performed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of statins in cancer did not suggest statin use as chemotherapeutic or adjuvant agents. Here, we reviewed the pharmacology of the statins, providing a comprehensive update of the current knowledge of their effects on tissues, biological processes, and pathological conditions, and we dissected the disappointing evidence on the possible future use of statin-based drugs in cancer therapy.

Contribution of deletion in angiotensin-converting enzyme but not A1166C angiotensin II type-1 receptor gene polymorphisms to clinical outcomes in atherothrombotic disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion (rs4340) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor A1166C (rs5186) gene polymorphisms may be involved in coronary heart disease (CHD). This study was designed to evaluate potential relationships between these polymorphisms and the risk of long-term all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients requiring revascularization for atherothrombotic disease (ATD) lesions.

METHOD

This prospective observational study concerned patients referred for supra-aortic vessel disease (SVD), CHD, peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD) or visceral artery disease (VAD). Collected data included ATD referral site, ATD symptoms, personal and familial medical histories, ATD extent, vascular risk factors, biological values, medication use and rs4340 and rs5186 polymorphisms. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. The secondary end point, MACE, included cardiovascular death, clinical ischemic event related to SVD, CHD, PAOD or VAD.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 956 patients of whom 872 (91.2%) were genotyped and followed for 21.1 ± 9.9 months. Patients were referred for SVD (25.9%), CHD (42.3%), PAOD (35.2%) or VAD (1.6%). All-cause mortality and MACE rates were 7.6 and 27.2%, respectively. When comparing I/D + D/D vs. I/I genotypes, rs4340 polymorphism was associated with higher all-cause mortality rates according to uni- and multivariate analyses (p=0.008 and 0.011, respectively). Other differences were not significant (rs4340 polymorphism and MACE, rs5186 polymorphism and all-cause mortality and MACE). No interaction was found between the polymorphisms. Other independent predictors of all-cause mortality included PAOD history, SVD history, body mass index <25 kg/m(2), HbA(1c) ≥6.5%, absence of dyslipidemia and no use of aspirin.

CONCLUSION

rs4340 polymorphism is associated with long-term all-cause mortality in advanced ATD patients requiring revascularization, whereas rs5186 polymorphism does not.

Cholesterol-independent neuroprotective and neurotoxic activities of statins: perspectives for statin use in Alzheimer disease and other age-related neurodegenerative disorders

Statins, long known to be beneficial in conditions where dyslipidemia occurs by lowering serum cholesterol levels, also have been proposed for use in neurodegenerative conditions, including Alzheimer disease. However, it is not clear that the purported effectiveness of statins in neurodegenerative disorders is directly related to cholesterol-lowering effects of these agents; rather, the pleiotropic functions of statins likely play critical roles. Moreover, it is becoming more apparent with additional studies that statins can have deleterious effects in preclinical studies and lack effectiveness in various recent clinical trials. This perspective paper outlines pros and cons of the use of statins in neurodegenerative disorders, with particular emphasis on Alzheimer disease.

Effect of statin treatment on short term mortality after pneumonia episode: cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether statins protect against all cause mortality after a diagnosis of pneumonia.

DESIGN

Cohort study using propensity score based method to control for differences between people prescribed and not prescribed statins.

SETTING

United Kingdom Health Improvement Network database, which contains electronic primary care medical records of more than six million patients.

PARTICIPANTS

Every patient starting a statin between 1995 and 2006 (129,288) matched with up to five non-statin users (n = 600,241); 9073 patients had a recorded diagnosis of pneumonia, of whom 1398 were using a statin.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

All cause mortality within six months of diagnosis of pneumonia.

RESULTS

Among users and non-users of statins with comparable propensity scores, 95/942 users and 686/3615 non-users died on the day that pneumonia was diagnosed. In the following six month period, 109/847 statin users died compared with 578/2927 non-users, giving an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.67 (0.49 to 0.91). If these observed benefits translated into clinical practice, 15 patients would need to be treated with a statin for six months after pneumonia to prevent one death.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with people who were not taking statins, the risk of dying in the six month period after pneumonia was substantially lower among people who were already established on long term statin treatment when the pneumonia occurred. Whether some or all of this protective effect would be obtained if statin treatment begins when a patient first develops pneumonia is not known. However, given that statins are cheap, safe, and well tolerated, a clinical trial in which people with pneumonia are randomised to a short period of statin treatment is warranted.

Lipids and age-related macular degeneration

Given the considerable public health burden imposed by age-related macular degeneration (AMD), much effort has been directed towards elucidating principles of pathogenesis in order to identify risk factors and develop preventive measures and treatments. Together with epidemiological evidence linking cardiovascular risk factors with AMD risk and basic science work examining the role of lipid metabolism in AMD, numerous human studies have assayed a potential relationship between dietary lipids and the development of AMD. We examine the evidence for a role for lipid metabolism in AMD, highlighting key basic biochemical principles, work in animal models, and relevant human studies. The topics of lipoprotein modulation and omega-3 fatty acid intake receive special attention from both a basic science and clinical study standpoint. The evidence suggests that consumption of omega-3 fatty acids, perhaps in concert with antioxidants, may constitute a rational preventative strategy against AMD development, though, absent an appropriately developed double-blind, randomized control trial, insufficient data exist to recommend implementation in the clinical setting at this time.

Dynamics of long-term statin therapy

PURPOSE

Knowledge of the different usage patterns that emerge during a long-term statin therapy is limited. The aim of this study was to characterize statin use, including the rates of reinitiation after extended periods of non-use, transitions between good and poor adherence, and the effect of the length of a drug-free period on the identification of new users.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised individuals aged 45-84 years who were identified in the Finnish prescription register as having purchased statins between 1997 and 2007. New users in 1997, including those with no statin purchases during the preceding 3 years, were followed-up until institutionalization, death, or 31 December 2007. Reinitiation rates after ≥180 days with no refill for statins were analyzed using survival analysis. Annual adherence levels and the prevalences of good (proportion of days covered ≥0.80) and poor (<0.80) adherence were calculated for ten 1-year periods following initiation. For statin users in 2007, purchases were captured over the previous 10 years.

RESULTS

Based on the data extracted from the Finnish prescription register, 32,760 persons initiated statin treatment in 1997, of whom 48.1% had discontinued it for at least 180 days by the end of the follow-up period. Of the discontinuers, 46.7% restarted the treatment within 1 year and 88.7% by the end of the follow-up. Of those followed up for ≥10 years, 51.8% had ≥6 years of treatment with good adherence. In 2007, 27.7% of the initiators having no statin purchases within the previous year had refills during the preceding 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Statin use is dynamic. This should be taken into consideration in clinical practice and when studying the incidence, patterns, and health outcomes of statin use.

Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid alone and in combination with clopidogrel and other medications

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) associated with use of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) alone and in combination with other gastrotoxic medications.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Health Improvement Network UK primary care database was used to identify individuals 40 to 84 years of age with a UGIB diagnosis in 2000 to 2007 (n = 2049). An age-, sex-, and calendar year-matched control group (n = 20,000) was identified from the same source population. The relative risk (RR) of UGIB associated with use of low-dose ASA (75 to 300 mg/d), clopidogrel, and other commonly coadministered medications was estimated by multivariate logistic regression. The risk of UGIB was increased in current users of low-dose ASA (RR, 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59 to 2.03) or clopidogrel (RR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.24) compared with nonusers. Compared with low-dose ASA monotherapy, the risk of UGIB was significantly increased when low-dose ASA was coadministered with clopidogrel (RR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.21), oral anticoagulants (RR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.45), low-/medium-dose nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (RR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.93 to 3.60), high-dose nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (RR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.88 to 3.76), or high-dose oral corticosteroids (RR, 4.43; 95% CI, 2.10 to 9.34); this was not apparent with coadministration of statins (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.21) or low-dose oral corticosteroids (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of low-dose ASA is associated with an almost 2-fold increase in the risk of UGIB compared with nonuse. This risk is increased further in individuals taking low-dose ASA along with clopidogrel, oral anticoagulants, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, or high-dose oral corticosteroids.

Incident venous thromboembolic events in the Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER)

Background

Venous thromboembolic events (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, are common in older age. It has been suggested that statins might reduce the risk of VTE however positive results from studies of middle aged subjects may not be generalisable to elderly people. We aimed to determine the effect of pravastatin on incident VTE in older people; we also studied the impact of clinical and plasma risk variables.

Methods

This study was an analysis of incident VTE using data from the Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pravastatin in men and women aged 70-82. Mean follow-up was 3.2 years. Risk for VTE was examined in non-warfarin treated pravastatin (n = 2834) and placebo (n = 2865) patients using a Cox's proportional hazard model, and the impact of other risk factors assessed in a multivariate forward stepwise regression analysis. Baseline clinical characteristics, blood biochemistry and hematology variables, plasma levels of lipids and lipoproteins, and plasma markers of inflammation and adiposity were compared. Plasma markers of thrombosis and hemostasis were assessed in a nested case (n = 48) control (n = 93) study where the cohort was those participants, not on warfarin, for whom data were available.

Results

There were 28 definite cases (1.0%) of incident VTE in the pravastatin group recipients and 20 cases (0.70%) in placebo recipients. Pravastatin did not reduce VTE in PROSPER compared to placebo [unadjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.42 (0.80, 2.52) p = 0.23]. Higher body mass index (BMI) [1.09 (1.02, 1.15) p = 0.0075], country [Scotland vs Netherlands 4.26 (1.00, 18.21) p = 0.050 and Ireland vs Netherlands 6.16 (1.46, 26.00) p = 0.013], lower systolic blood pressure [1.35 (1.03, 1.75) p = 0.027] and lower baseline Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score [1.19 (1.01, 1.41) p = 0.034] were associated with an increased risk of VTE, however only BMI, country and systolic blood pressure remained significant on multivariate analysis. In a nested case control study of definite VTE, plasma Factor VIII levels were associated with VTE [1.52 (1.01, 2.28), p = 0.044]. However no other measure of thrombosis and haemostasis was associated with increased risk of VTE.

Conclusions

Pravastatin does not prevent VTE in elderly people at risk of vascular disease. Blood markers of haemostasis and inflammation are not strongly predictive of VTE in older age however BMI, country and lower systolic blood pressure are independently associated with VTE risk.

Trial Registration

Not applicable when study undertaken.

Statin use and the prevention of venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis

AIMS

Statins are thought to have antithrombotic properties and may attenuate patients' odds of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), but clinical studies have yielded variable estimates of this effect. The aim was to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of statin use on development of VTE.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating the effects of statins on the incidence of VTE were selected from MEDLINE (1996 to August 2009), Cochrane CENTRAL (second quarter, 2009), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (second quarter, 2009) and a manual review of references. While no further restrictions were placed on RCTs, observational studies were only included if they reported adjusted effect sizes using appropriate methods. Development of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) and any VTE from RCTs and observational studies were pooled using traditional meta analytic techniques with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Ten studies were identified and eligible for meta-analysis. Upon meta-analysis, statin use was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the odds of developing VTE (AOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.86), DVT (AOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.82) and PE (AOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.94).

DISCUSSION

Statin use is associated with significantly reduced odds of developing VTE, DVT or PE by 32%, 41% and 30% respectively. Our meta-analysis included one RCT, JUPITER, which alone provided statistically significant reduction in the odds of developing VTE and DVT (43% and 55% respectively), and a nonsignificant reduction on PE.

CONCLUSION

Currently available evidence suggests that statins can reduce patients' odds of developing VTE.

Statin use and cancer risk: a comprehensive review

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

HMG-CoA inhibitors (statins), a class of drugs that reduce cholesterol, are used to manage and prevent coronary heart disease. They are among the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide. Contrary to early concerns over the carcinogenicity of statins, a growing body of evidence suggests statins may in fact have a chemopreventive potential against cancer.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

In this paper, we review evidence on the association between statin use and cancer risk. Specifically, we report on clinical trials and observational studies that measured all cancer or site-specific cancers of the breast, colorectal, lung, prostate and reproductive organs associated with statin use.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

An understanding of the evidence, including strengths and limitations, to support an association between statins and cancer. Information on the current state of the field and future directions are also discussed.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Few strong or consistent associations between statins and cancer incidence overall or for any of the sites reviewed were detected. Data for any effects of statins on cancer prognosis and secondary prevention are lacking; with the exception of consistent evidence that statins are associated with reduced risk of advanced/aggressive prostate cancer. Statins appear safe in relation to cancer risk but any chemopreventive effect in humans remains to be established and should not be recommended outside the context of clinical trials. It is encouraging that numerous trials are ongoing. The prospect of reducing the incidence and burden of some of the most prevalent cancers with safe, affordable and tolerable medication that already reduces the risk of the leading cause of death and cardiovascular disease warrants further exploration in clinical trials and observational studies of prognosis and survival.

Statin treatment and mortality in bacterial infections--a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported improved survival in severe bacterial infections among statin treated patients. In addition, statins have been ascribed beneficial anti-inflammatory effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of statin-treatment on mortality in patients with bacterial infections, by means of a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Studies investigating the association between statin use and mortality in patients with bacterial disease were identified in a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis was performed to calculate the overall odds ratio of mortality in statin users. The literature search identified 947 citations from which 40 relevant studies were extracted. In all, 15 studies comprising 113,910 patients were included in the final analysis. Statin use was associated with a significantly (p<0.0001) reduced mortality in patients suffering from bacterial infections (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.42-0.66). However, all studies included were of observational design and funnel plot analyses indicated influence by a possible publication bias (Egger's bias test p<0.05). When a precision estimate test was used to adjust for publication bias the effect of statin treatment was no longer significant, with an OR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.58-1.07).

CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE

According to the meta-analysis of observational studies presented here, patients on statin therapy seem to have a better outcome in bacterial infections. However, the association did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for apparent publication bias. Thus, there is a great need for randomised controlled trials investigating the possible beneficial effect of statins in bacterial infections.

An assessment of the effect of statin use on the incidence of acute respiratory infections in England during winters 1998-1999 to 2005-2006

Statins reduce cardiovascular mortality and related risks associated with pneumonia suggesting potentially beneficial use in influenza pandemics. We investigated the effect of current statin use on acute respiratory infections in primary care. Data from anonymized electronic medical records of persons aged 45 years were examined for statin use, chronic morbidity, respiratory diagnoses, vaccination procedures, and immune suppression. Logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for statin users vs. non-users in respiratory infection outcomes. A total of 329 881 person-year observations included 18% statin users and 46% influenza vaccinees. Adjusted ORs for statin users vs. non-users were: influenza-like illness, 1.05 (95% CI 0.92-1.20); acute bronchitis, 1.08 (95% CI 1.01-1.15); pneumonia, 0.91 (95% CI 0.73-1.13); all acute respiratory infections, 1.03 (95% CI 0.98-1.07); and urinary tract infections, 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.98). We found no benefit in respiratory infection outcomes attributable to statin use, although uniformly higher ORs in non-vaccinated statin users might suggest synergism between statins and influenza vaccination.

Serum Abeta levels as predictors of conversion to mild cognitive impairment/Alzheimer disease in an ADAPT subcohort

Recent evidence suggests an association of beta-amyloid (Abeta) with vascular risk factors and the medications to treat them, which could potentially obfuscate the usefulness of Abeta for prediction of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer disease (AD). In a subcohort from the Alzheimer's Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (enriched for family history of AD), we investigated whether systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, triglycerides, serum creatinine, apolipoprotein E, and use of statins and antihypertensives influenced the predictive value of serum Abeta for MCI/AD during a 2-year period. We collected blood samples to quantify serum Abeta from cognitively normal participants (n = 203) at baseline and ascertained the outcome of MCI/AD (n = 24) for a period of approximately 2 years. In an unadjusted model, the lowest quartile of Abeta(1-42) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.93, 95% CI [1.02-8.32], P = 0.04) and of the Abeta(1-42)/Abeta(1-40) ratio (HR = 3.53, 95% CI [1.24-10.07], P = 0.02), compared with the highest quartile, predicted conversion to MCI/AD, but no impact of Abeta(1-40) was observed. No relationship between nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug interventions and Abeta on MCI/AD risk was evident. Once data were adjusted for potential confounders (age, sex, and education), vascular risk factors, and the medications listed above, the lowest quartiles of Abeta(1-42) (HR = 4.47, 95% CI [1.39-14.39], P = 0.01), and of the Abeta(1-42/)Abeta(1-40) ratio (HR 4.87, 95% CI [1.50-15.87], P = 0.01) became strong predictors of conversion to MCI/AD. In this subcohort of individuals at risk for AD, the association of Abeta with vascular risk factors and medications to treat these conditions did not interfere with Abeta's predictive value for MCI/AD.

Statins for age-related macular degeneration

BACKGROUND

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive late onset disorder of the macula affecting central vision. Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness in people over 65 years in industrialized countries (Congdon 2003). Recent epidemiologic, genetic and pathological evidence has shown AMD shares a number of risk factors with atherosclerosis, leading to the hypothesis that statins may exert protective effects in AMD.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effectiveness of statins compared with other treatments, no treatment, or placebo in delaying the onset and/or progression of AMD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS on 30 April 2009 and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform on 11 May 2009. We searched reference lists and the Science Citation Index. There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared statins with other treatments, no treatment, or placebo in participants who were either susceptible to or diagnosed as having early stages of AMD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently evaluated the search results against the selection criteria. Two Italian speaking colleagues extracted data. One author entered data. We did not perform a meta-analysis because only one completed RCT was identified.

MAIN RESULTS

Two studies met the selection criteria. One trial reported insufficient details to assess the risk of bias; the other trial is ongoing.Of the completed trial, the analyses of 30 participants did not show a statistically significant difference between the simvastatin and the placebo arm in visual acuity at three months of treatment (decimal visual acuity 0.21+/- 0.56 in simvastatin and 0.19+/- 0.40 in placebo arm) or 45 days after the completion of treatment (decimal visual acuity 0.20+/- 0.50 in simvastatin and 0.19+/- 0.48 in placebo arm). The lens and retina status were unchanged during and after the treatment period for both groups.Of the ongoing trial, the preliminary analyses of 42 participants who completed 12 months follow-up did not show a statistically significant difference between the simvastatin and the placebo arm in visual acuity, drusen score or visual function (effect estimates and confidence intervals were not available). We contacted the investigators and will update the review as data become available.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from currently available RCTs was insufficient to conclude that statins have any role in preventing or delaying the onset or progression of AMD.

A randomized trial of rosuvastatin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Controversy persists regarding the extent of shared pathways between arterial and venous thrombosis and whether treatments of known efficacy for one disease process have consistent benefits for the other. Observational studies have yielded variable estimates of the effect of statin therapy on the risk of venous thromboembolism, and evidence from randomized trials is lacking.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 17,802 apparently healthy men and women with both low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of less than 130 mg per deciliter (3.4 mmol per liter) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels of 2.0 mg per liter or higher to receive rosuvastatin, 20 mg per day, or placebo. We followed participants for the first occurrence of pulmonary embolism or deep-vein thrombosis and performed analyses of the data on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up period of 1.9 years (maximum, 5.0), symptomatic venous thromboembolism occurred in 94 participants: 34 in the rosuvastatin group and 60 in the placebo group. The rates of venous thromboembolism were 0.18 and 0.32 event per 100 person-years of follow-up in the rosuvastatin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio with rosuvastatin, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.86; P=0.007); the corresponding rates for unprovoked venous thromboembolism (i.e., occurring in the absence of a known malignant condition, trauma, hospitalization, or surgery) were 0.10 and 0.17 (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.09; P=0.09) and for provoked venous thromboembolism (i.e., occurring in patients with cancer or during or shortly after trauma, hospitalization, or surgery), 0.08 and 0.16 (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.96; P=0.03). The rates of pulmonary embolism were 0.09 in the rosuvastatin group and 0.12 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.45; P=0.42), whereas the rates of deep-vein thrombosis only were 0.09 and 0.20, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.79; P=0.004). Consistent effects were observed in all the subgroups examined. No significant differences were seen between treatment groups in the rates of bleeding episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial of apparently healthy persons, rosuvastatin significantly reduced the occurrence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00239681.)

Statin adherence and risk of accidents: a cautionary tale

BACKGROUND

Bias in studies of preventive medications can occur when healthier patients are more likely to initiate and adhere to therapy than less healthy patients. We sought evidence of this bias by examining associations between statin exposure and various outcomes that should not be causally affected by statin exposure, such as workplace and motor vehicle accidents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of statin patients using data from British Columbia, Canada, a multiethnic society with a population of 4.3 million people. Study subjects were 141 086 patients who initiated statins for primary prevention. We examined the association between adherence and multiple outcomes such as accidents and screening procedures using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. The study population was 49% female and had an average age of 61 years. The results from our multivariable-adjusted models showed that more adherent patients were less likely to have accidents than less adherent patients. This effect was greatest for motor vehicle accidents (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.79) and workplace accidents (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.81). More adherent patients had a greater likelihood of using screening services (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 1.20) and a lower likelihood of developing other diseases likely to be unrelated to a biological affect of a statin (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study contributes compelling evidence that patients who adhere to statins are systematically more health seeking than comparable patients who do not remain adherent. Caution is warranted when interpreting analyses that attribute surprising protective effects to preventive medications.

ASH evidence-based guidelines: statins in the prevention of venous thromboembolism

A 42-year-old woman under your care for the management of obesity calls you because she has a sister who had a pulmonary embolism. The patient recently read that statin medications are associated with a lower risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and wonders whether she should take a statin drug to prevent the development of pulmonary emboli.

ASH evidence-based guidelines: statins in the prevention of venous thromboembolism

A 42-year-old woman under your care for the management of obesity calls you because she has a sister who had a pulmonary embolism. The patient recently read that statin medications are associated with a lower risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and wonders whether she should take a statin drug to prevent the development of pulmonary emboli.