151
|
Kuo WT, Banerjee A, Kim PS, DeMarco FJ, Levy JR, Facchini FR, Unver K, Bertini MJ, Sista AK, Hall MJ, Rosenberg JK, De Gregorio MA. Pulmonary Embolism Response to Fragmentation, Embolectomy, and Catheter Thrombolysis (PERFECT): Initial Results From a Prospective Multicenter Registry. Chest 2015; 148:667-673. [PMID: 25856269 DOI: 10.1378/chest.15-0119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 327] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic thrombolysis for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) carries up to a 20% risk of major bleeding, including a 2% to 5% risk of hemorrhagic stroke. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of catheter-directed therapy (CDT) as an alternative treatment of acute PE. METHODS One hundred one consecutive patients receiving CDT for acute PE were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter registry. Massive PE (n = 28) and submassive PE (n = 73) were treated with immediate catheter-directed mechanical or pharmacomechanical thrombectomy and/or catheter-directed thrombolysis through low-dose hourly drug infusion with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or urokinase. Clinical success was defined as meeting all the following criteria: stabilization of hemodynamics; improvement in pulmonary hypertension, right-sided heart strain, or both; and survival to hospital discharge. Primary safety outcomes were major procedure-related complications and major bleeding events. RESULTS Fifty-three men and 48 women (average age, 60 years [range, 22-86 years]; mean BMI, 31.03 ± 7.20 kg/m2) were included in the study. The average thrombolytic doses were 28.0 ± 11 mg tPA (n = 76) and 2,697,101 ± 936,287 International Units for urokinase (n = 23). Clinical success was achieved in 24 of 28 patients with massive PE (85.7%; 95% CI, 67.3%-96.0%) and 71 of 73 patients with submassive PE (97.3%; 95% CI, 90.5%-99.7%). The mean pulmonary artery pressure improved from 51.17 ± 14.06 to 37.23 ± 15.81 mm Hg (n = 92) (P < .0001). Among patients monitored with follow-up echocardiography, 57 of 64 (89.1%; 95% CI, 78.8%-95.5%; P < .0001) showed improvement in right-sided heart strain. There were no major procedure-related complications, major hemorrhages, or hemorrhagic strokes. CONCLUSIONS CDT improves clinical outcomes in patients with acute PE while minimizing the risk of major bleeding. At experienced centers, CDT is a safe and effective treatment of both acute massive and submassive PE. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01097928; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William T Kuo
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
| | - Arjun Banerjee
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Paul S Kim
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Spectrum Medical Group, South Portland, ME
| | | | - Jason R Levy
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Northside Radiology Associates, Atlanta, GA
| | - Francis R Facchini
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Adventist Midwest Health, Hinsdale, IL
| | - Kamil Unver
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Matthew J Bertini
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Adventist Midwest Health, Hinsdale, IL
| | - Akhilesh K Sista
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Michael J Hall
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Memorial Hospital of South Bend, South Bend, IN
| | - Jarrett K Rosenberg
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Miguel A De Gregorio
- Minimally Invasive Techniques Research Group (GITMI), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Sista AK, Horowitz JM, Goldhaber SZ. Four key questions surrounding thrombolytic therapy for submassive pulmonary embolism. Vasc Med 2015; 21:47-52. [DOI: 10.1177/1358863x15614388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a vexing entity, and the appropriate use of thrombolytic therapy for this subgroup continues to be actively debated. Catheter-directed thrombolysis has shown efficacy for submassive PE and is gaining momentum because of theoretically improved safety. This review poses and responds to four questions that explore the complex issues surrounding optimal therapy of submassive PE.
Collapse
|
153
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thrombolytic therapy (powerful anticoagulation drugs) is usually reserved for patients with clinically serious or massive pulmonary embolism (PE). Evidence suggests that thrombolytic agents may dissolve blood clots more rapidly than heparin and reduce the death rate associated with PE. However, there are still concerns about the possible risk of adverse effects of thrombolytic therapy, such as major or minor haemorrhages. This is the second update of the Cochrane review first published in 2006. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. SEARCH METHODS For this update the Cochrane Vascular Group searched their Specialised Register (last searched September 2014) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library (last searched Issue 8, 2014). We also searched individual trial collections and private databases, along with bibliographies of relevant articles. We handsearched relevant medical journals. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared thrombolytic therapy followed by heparin versus heparin alone, heparin plus placebo or surgical intervention in patients with acute PE. We did not include trials comparing two different thrombolytic agents or different doses of the same thrombolytic drug. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors (BD and QH) assessed the eligibility and quality of trials and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS We identified 18 trials with a total of 2197 participants for inclusion in the review. We were not able to include one study in the meta-analysis because it had no data to extract. Most of the studies carried a high risk of bias because of high or unclear risk relating to randomisation and blinding. Meta-analysis showed that, compared with heparin alone, or heparin plus placebo, thrombolytics plus heparin can reduce the odds of death (odds ratio (OR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37 to 0.87, P = 0.02, low quality evidence) and recurrence of PE (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.89, P = 0.02, low quality evidence). The effects of death weakened when we excluded four studies at high risk of bias from analysis: OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.06, P = 0.08. The incidence of major and minor haemorrhagic events was higher in the thrombolytics group than in the control group, and this difference was statistically significant (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.95 to 4.31, P < 0.001, low quality evidence; OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.58 to 6.06, P = 0.001, very low quality evidence, respectively). Length of hospital stay (mean difference (MD) -1.35, 95% CI -4.27 to 1.58) and quality of life were similar between the two treatment groups. Stroke was reported in one study and occurred more often in the thrombolytics group than in the control group, although the confidence interval was wide (OR 12.10, 95% CI 1.57 to 93.39). Limited information from a small number of trials indicated that thrombolytics may improve haemodynamic outcomes, perfusion lung scanning, pulmonary angiogram assessment, echocardiograms, pulmonary hypertension, coagulation parameters, clinical outcomes and survival time to a greater extent than heparin alone. However, the heterogeneity of the studies and small number of participants involved warrant caution when interpreting results. Similarily, fewer patients from the thrombolytics group required escalation of treatment. None of the included studies reported on post-thrombotic syndrome or compared the cost of the different treatments. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is low quality evidence that thrombolytics reduce death following acute pulmonary embolism compared with heparin. Furthermore, thrombolytic therapies included in the review were heterogeneous. Thrombolytic therapy may be helpful in reducing the recurrence of pulmonary emboli but may cause more major and minor haemorrhagic events and stroke. More high quality double blind RCTs assessing safety and cost-effectiveness are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiukui Hao
- Center of Geriatrics and Gerontology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
154
|
Thrombolysis for acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: A meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2015; 136:932-7. [PMID: 26384442 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2015] [Revised: 08/14/2015] [Accepted: 09/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of thrombolytic therapy in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism is controversial. To compare with anticoagulation alone, no analysis before has determined whether thrombolytic therapy is associated with improved survival or lower incidence of adverse clinical outcomes for intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis was performed to assess mortality benefits, bleeding and recurrent pulmonary embolism risks associated with thrombolytic therapy compared with anticoagulation in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. METHODS The Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized clinical trials comparing thrombolytic therapy with anticoagulation in intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism patients (in which the mortality data were reported) from inception to August 5, 2014. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes were recurrent pulmonary embolism and minor bleeding. The pooled relative risk (RR), Mantel-Haenszel corresponding method and fixed-effect model were used to estimate the efficacy and safety of thrombolytic therapy with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Eight clinical randomized controlled trials involving 1755 patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism were included. Patients treated with thrombolytics presented lower mortality than patients in the anticoagulation cohort (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.97; 1.39% [12/866] vs. 2.92% [26/889]). Compared with anticoagulation, thrombolytic therapy was associated with a higher risk of major (RR, 3.35; 95% CI, 2.03-5.54; 7.80% [64/820] vs. 2.28% [19/834]) and minor (RR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.77-4.84; 32.78% [197/601] vs. 8.94% [53/593]) bleeding. Furthermore, thrombolytic therapy was associated with a lower incidence of recurrent pulmonary embolism (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15-0.73; 0.73% [6/826] vs. 2.72% [23/846]). CONCLUSION Compared with anticoagulation, thrombolytic therapy in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism is associated with lower all-cause mortality and recurrent pulmonary embolism risk despite increased major and minor bleeding risks.
Collapse
|
155
|
|
156
|
Xu Q, Huang K, Zhai Z, Yang Y, Wang J, Wang C. Initial thrombolysis treatment compared with anticoagulation for acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 2015; 7:810-21. [PMID: 26101636 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.04.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2015] [Accepted: 04/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of thrombolysis in patients with acute, intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains controversial. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis and anticoagulation treatments for intermediate-risk PE patients. METHODS Two investigators independently reviewed the literature and collected data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of thrombolysis for intermediate-risk PE in the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Databases (CBM). RESULTS A total of 1,631 intermediate-risk PE patients from seven studies were included. Significant differences were not found regarding the 30-day, all-cause mortality rates between the thrombolytic and anticoagulant groups [odds ratio (OR), 0.60; 95% confident interval (CI), 0.34-1.06; P=0.08]. The rate of clinical deterioration in the thrombolytic group was lower than that in the anticoagulant group (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.18-0.41; P<0.01). Recurrent PE in the thrombolytic group was also significantly lower than that in the anticoagulant group (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.77; P=0.01). Comparing the thrombolytic and anticoagulation groups, the incidence of minor bleeding was significantly higher in the thrombolytic group (OR, 5.33; 95% CI, 2.85-9.97; P<0.00001), but there were no difference in the incidences of major bleeding events (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 0.60-7.16; P=0.25). CONCLUSIONS Thrombolytic treatment for intermediate-risk PE patients, if not contraindicated, could reduce clinical deterioration and recurrence of PE, and trends towards a decrease in all-cause, 30-day mortality. Despite thrombolytic treatment having an increased total bleeding risk, there was no difference in the incidence of major bleeding events, compared with patients receiving anticoagulation treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qixia Xu
- 1 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China ; 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Respiratory and Pulmonary Circulation Disorders, Beijing 100069, China ; 3 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China ; 4 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100029, China ; 5 Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China ; 6 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China ; 7 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Ke Huang
- 1 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China ; 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Respiratory and Pulmonary Circulation Disorders, Beijing 100069, China ; 3 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China ; 4 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100029, China ; 5 Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China ; 6 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China ; 7 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Zhenguo Zhai
- 1 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China ; 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Respiratory and Pulmonary Circulation Disorders, Beijing 100069, China ; 3 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China ; 4 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100029, China ; 5 Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China ; 6 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China ; 7 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Yuanhua Yang
- 1 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China ; 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Respiratory and Pulmonary Circulation Disorders, Beijing 100069, China ; 3 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China ; 4 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100029, China ; 5 Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China ; 6 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China ; 7 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Jun Wang
- 1 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China ; 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Respiratory and Pulmonary Circulation Disorders, Beijing 100069, China ; 3 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China ; 4 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100029, China ; 5 Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China ; 6 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China ; 7 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Chen Wang
- 1 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China ; 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Respiratory and Pulmonary Circulation Disorders, Beijing 100069, China ; 3 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China ; 4 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100029, China ; 5 Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China ; 6 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China ; 7 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Abstract
Advances in image-guided, catheter-based interventions have shown great potential to improve outcomes in patients with venous thromboembolism. Catheter-directed thrombolysis has been shown in one randomized controlled trial to reduce the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome in patients with acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis; data from a larger national institute of health trial are expected in early 2017. The use of catheter-directed thrombolysis is also being increasingly considered for patients with submassive or massive pulmonary embolism. Preliminary studies suggest that endovascular stent placement and ablative therapies may be used to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life in severely affected patients with established post-thrombotic syndrome. In this article, we summarize the risks and benefits of endovascular venous thromboembolism therapies as currently understood, highlight clinical situations where their benefit may outweigh risks, and describe ongoing and upcoming pivotal research initiatives with multidisciplinary participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Vedantham
- Interventional Radiology Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
Meyer G, Planquette B, Sanchez O. Pulmonary embolism: whom to discharge and whom to thrombolyze? J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13 Suppl 1:S252-8. [PMID: 26149032 DOI: 10.1111/jth.12944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Patients with pulmonary embolism can be divided in two groups according to their risk of death or major complication: a small group of high-risk patients defined by the presence of systemic hypotension or cardiogenic shock and a large group of normotensive patients. Among normotensive patients, further risk stratification, based on clinical grounds alone or on the combination of clinical data, biomarkers, and imaging tests, allows selection of low-risk patients and intermediate-risk patients. The safety of outpatient treatment for low-risk patients has been established mainly on the basis of retrospective and prospective cohorts using different selection tools. In most studies, about 50% of the patients have been safely treated at home. Although thrombolytic therapy has a favorable benefit to risk profile in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism, the risk of major and especially intracranial bleeding outweighs the benefits in terms of hemodynamic decompensation in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Meyer
- Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM UMRS 970, CIC 1418, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
- GIRC Thrombose, Paris, France
| | - B Planquette
- Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM UMRS 970, CIC 1418, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
- GIRC Thrombose, Paris, France
| | - O Sanchez
- Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM UMRS 970, CIC 1418, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
- GIRC Thrombose, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
159
|
The Essentials of Bedside Ultrasound for Pulmonary Embolism. CURRENT EMERGENCY AND HOSPITAL MEDICINE REPORTS 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s40138-015-0074-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
160
|
Treatment of Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: Knowing When to be Aggressive and When to be Conservative. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE 2015; 17:385. [DOI: 10.1007/s11936-015-0385-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
161
|
Wang TF, Squizzato A, Dentali F, Ageno W. The role of thrombolytic therapy in pulmonary embolism. Blood 2015; 125:2191-9. [PMID: 25631770 PMCID: PMC4383796 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-08-559278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2014] [Accepted: 01/20/2015] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tzu-Fei Wang
- Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and
| | - Alessandro Squizzato
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Francesco Dentali
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Walter Ageno
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Daley MJ, Murthy MS, Peterson EJ. Bleeding risk with systemic thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism: scope of the problem. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2015; 6:57-66. [PMID: 25922654 PMCID: PMC4406921 DOI: 10.1177/2042098615572333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute pulmonary embolism represents a major complication of venous thromboembolism that is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Guidelines recommend the rapid initiation of anticoagulation and consideration of thrombolytic therapy in select patients, including those with hypotension or at high risk of developing hypotension. Evaluation for thrombolytic therapy should only be considered after assessment of contraindications and risk for major bleeding. The objective of this perspective article is to evaluate the bleeding risk associated with systemic thrombolytic therapy in the management of acute pulmonary embolism and discuss strategies to minimize this risk. Risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism will be discussed to identify patient populations that warrant specific consideration of risk for major bleeding with thrombolytic therapy. In addition, the incidence, patient-specific risk factors, and pharmacologic characteristics, including concurrent anticoagulation and thrombolytic therapy, will be evaluated in the context of risk for major hemorrhage. Finally, supporting evidence for strategies to minimize risk of hemorrhage, including evaluation of contraindications, weight adjusted dosing, infusion strategy and catheter-directed thrombolytic administration will be evaluated. Despite published guidelines and review articles, select aspects to thrombolytic therapy for the management of pulmonary embolism remain controversial and under recognized, including risk of major hemorrhage. When making decisions about the role of thrombolytic therapy in pulmonary embolism, clinicians must be knowledgeable about the associated risks of thrombolytic therapy and individually evaluate patient risk factors prior to determining appropriate candidacy for thrombolytic therapy. For patients considered to be at high risk of major bleeding, strategies to minimize risk should be considered, including weight-adjusted doses and catheter directed therapy. Additional research is needed specific to the acute pulmonary embolism setting to validate risk factors and strategies to minimize major hemorrhage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell J Daley
- University Medical Center Brackenridge, Seton Healthcare Family, Department of Pharmacy, Austin, USA
| | - Manasa S Murthy
- Seton Medical Center Williamson, Seton Healthcare Family, Department of Pharmacy, Round Rock, TX, USA
| | - Evan J Peterson
- Seton Medical Center Austin, Seton Healthcare Family, Department of Pharmacy, Austin, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Minardi J, Marshall T, Massey G, Setzer E. Focused cardiac ultrasound: uncommon but critical diagnoses made at the point of care. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2015; 34:727-736. [PMID: 25792590 DOI: 10.7863/ultra.34.4.727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Cardiovascular and respiratory conditions in acute care require rapid, critical decision making, often with limited clinical information. Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) can aid in diagnosis by providing information that may not be evident from a patient's medical history, physical examination, and ancillary tests. Eight cases are presented in which FOCUS drastically altered the management of patient care, shortened the differential diagnosis, or allowed for the development of a definitive diagnosis. In 3 cases, diagnoses that were not initially suspected were identified by FOCUS. In the remaining cases, uncommon yet critical diagnoses were established at early stages along the patients' courses of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Minardi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia USA.
| | - Tom Marshall
- Department of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia USA
| | - Greta Massey
- Department of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia USA
| | - Erin Setzer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia USA
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Konstantinides SV, Wärntges S. Acute phase treatment of venous thromboembolism: advanced therapy. Systemic fibrinolysis and pharmacomechanical therapy. Thromb Haemost 2015; 113:1202-9. [PMID: 25789580 DOI: 10.1160/th14-11-0998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2014] [Accepted: 02/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism, which encompasses deep-vein thrombosis and acute pulmonary embolism (PE), represents a major contributor to global disease burden worldwide. For patients who present with cardiogenic shock or persistent hypotension (acute high-risk PE), there is consensus that immediate reperfusion treatment applying systemic fibrinolysis or, in the case of a high bleeding risk, surgical or catheter-directed techniques, is indicated. On the other hand, for the large, heterogeneous group of patients presenting without overt haemodynamic instability, the indications for advanced therapy are less clear. The recently updated guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology emphasise the importance of clinical prediction rules in combination with imaging procedures (assessment of right ventricular function) and laboratory biomarkers (indicative of myocardial stress or injury) for distinguishing between an intermediate and a low risk for an adverse early outcome. In intermediate-high-risk PE defined by the presence of both right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography (or computed tomography) and a positive troponin (or natriuretic peptide) test, the bleeding risks of full-dose fibrinolytic treatment have been shown to outweigh its potential clinical benefits unless clinical signs of haemodynamic decompensation appear (rescue fibrinolysis). Recently published trials suggest that catheter-directed, ultrasound-assisted, low-dose local fibrinolysis may provide an effective and particularly safe treatment option for some of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros V Konstantinides
- Stavros V. Konstantinides, MD, FESC, Center for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, University Medical Centre Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Bldg. 403, 55131 Mainz, Germany, Tel.: +49 6131 178382, Fax: +49 6131 173456, E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
165
|
McCabe JM, Huang PH, Riedl L, Eisenhauer AC, Sobieszczyk P. Usefulness and safety of ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis for submassive pulmonary emboli. Am J Cardiol 2015; 115:821-4. [PMID: 25633189 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2014] [Revised: 12/19/2014] [Accepted: 12/19/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
The optimal treatment for intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains unclear. Our goal was to describe the safety and efficacy of the EkoSonic ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis system (EKOS Corporation, Bothell, Washington) in a real-world registry of patients with intermediate-risk PE. Fifty-three consecutive patients with intermediate-risk PE treated with ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis at Brigham and Women's Hospital from 2010 to 2014 were analyzed. The primary outcome was a change in directly measured pulmonary artery pressures as assessed using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to account for serial measurements. Patients received an average of 24.6 ± 9 mg of alteplase using the EKOS catheter with an average treatment time of 15.9 ± 3 hours. After treatment, there was a 7.2- and a 11.4-mm Hg reduction in mean and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (95% confidence interval 4.7 to 9.7 mm Hg, p <0.001, and 95% confidence interval 7.8 to 15.0 mm Hg, p <0.001), respectively. In this cohort, 9.4% had any bleeding complication noted during their hospital stay. One patient's alteplase was prematurely discontinued for access site bleeding although no other interventions were required related to bleeding complications.
Collapse
|
166
|
Meyer G, Sanchez O, Planquette B. Embolie pulmonaire de gravité intermédiaire : thrombolyse ou non ? MEDECINE INTENSIVE REANIMATION 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s13546-015-1039-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
167
|
Avgerinos ED, Chaer RA. Catheter-directed interventions for acute pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61:559-65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2014] [Accepted: 10/16/2014] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
168
|
Abstract
Acute pulmonary embolism is a frequent cause of hospitalization and is associated with a wide range of symptom severity. Anticoagulants are the mainstay of treatment for acute pulmonary embolism; however, in patients with massive or submassive pulmonary embolism, advanced therapy with thrombolytics may be considered. The decision to use thrombolytic therapy for acute pulmonary embolism should be based on careful risk-benefit analysis for each patient, including risk of morbidity and mortality associated with the embolism and risk of bleeding associated with the thrombolytic. Alteplase is currently the thrombolytic agent most studied and with the most clinical experience for this indication, although the most appropriate dose remains controversial, especially in patients with low body weight. When considering thrombolysis, unfractionated heparin is the preferred initial anticoagulant due to its short duration of action and its reversibility should bleeding occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Billie Bartel
- Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center , Sioux Falls, SD , USA
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Transthoracic echocardiography assessment of early pulmonary revascularization for a sub-massive pulmonary embolism: A case report. MEDECINE INTENSIVE REANIMATION 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s13546-014-1017-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
170
|
Thrombolysis for hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism: Time to close the book? Thromb Res 2014; 134:1169-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2014] [Revised: 10/17/2014] [Accepted: 10/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
171
|
Riera-Mestre A, Becattini C, Giustozzi M, Agnelli G. Thrombolysis in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism: A meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2014; 134:1265-71. [DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2014] [Revised: 09/24/2014] [Accepted: 10/03/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
172
|
Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galiè N, Gibbs JSR, Huisman MV, Humbert M, Kucher N, Lang I, Lankeit M, Lekakis J, Maack C, Mayer E, Meneveau N, Perrier A, Pruszczyk P, Rasmussen LH, Schindler TH, Svitil P, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Zamorano JL, Zompatori M. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 2014; 35:3033-69, 3069a-3069k. [PMID: 25173341 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1856] [Impact Index Per Article: 185.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
173
|
Stein PD, Dalen JE. Thrombolytic therapy for acute pulmonary embolism: when do the benefits exceed the risks? Am J Med 2014; 127:1031-1032. [PMID: 25019361 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.06.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2014] [Revised: 06/30/2014] [Accepted: 06/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul D Stein
- Professor, Osteopathic Medical Specialties, Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Detroit.
| | - James E Dalen
- Dean Emeritus and Professor Emeritus, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Lee JS. Respiratory review of 2014: pulmonary thromboembolism. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2014; 77:105-10. [PMID: 25309604 PMCID: PMC4192307 DOI: 10.4046/trd.2014.77.3.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2014] [Revised: 07/01/2014] [Accepted: 07/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this review is to summarize the findings from clinically important publications over the last year in the area of VTE. In this review, we discuss 11 randomized controlled trials published from March 2013 to April 2014. The COAG and the EU-PACT trials indicate that pharmacogenetic testing has either no usefulness in the initial dosing of vitamin K antagonists or marginal usefulness in the Caucasian population. Recent clinical trials with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have demonstrated that the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran are not inferior to those of conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of VTE. The PEITHO and ULTIMA trials suggested that rescue thrombolysis or catheter-directed thrombolysis may maximize the clinical benefits and minimize the bleeding risk. Lastly, riociguat has a proven efficacy in treating chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. In the future, NOACs, riociguat, and catheter-directed thrombolysis have the potential to revolutionize the management of patients with VTE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Seung Lee
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Pulmonary Hypertension and Venous Thrombosis Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Engelhardt TC. Acute pulmonary embolus: the next frontier in venous thromboembolic interventions. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE 2014; 16:336. [PMID: 25074264 DOI: 10.1007/s11936-014-0336-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) represents a patient population that is under-recognized and under-treated. Recent clinical trials demonstrated the hemodynamic benefit of IV thrombolytic therapy among these patients; however, it came at the cost of a significantly increased risk of major, particularly intracranial, hemorrhage. Catheter-based treatment modalities have garnered considerable clinical interest in recent years. In particular, ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis, a catheter-based technology that enhances the process of thrombolytic delivery into the thrombus, has emerged as a treatment modality with an increasing number of single-center studies, as well as randomized, controlled clinical trials. Results from these experiences are consistent in achieving outcomes of thrombus resolution and hemodynamic recovery with a low dose thrombolytic infusion protocol, but without the high risk of bleeding complications associated with IV thrombolysis. The clinical data will hopefully be impactful to the development of the next edition of the treatment guidelines, in support of overall recommendations for catheter-based interventions. When available and with appropriate expertise, this modality should be considered as the preferred treatment of both massive and submassive PE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tod C Engelhardt
- Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Louisiana Heart, Lung and Vascular Institute, East Jefferson General Hospital, 4228 Houma Blvd Ste 300, Metairie, LA, 70006, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Nakamura S, Takano H, Kubota Y, Asai K, Shimizu W. Impact of the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy on the mortality of patients with acute submassive pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 12:1086-95. [PMID: 24829097 DOI: 10.1111/jth.12608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2014] [Accepted: 05/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) remains unclear. Previous meta-analyses have not separately reported the proportion of patients with submassive PE. OBJECTIVE We assessed the effect of thrombolytic therapy on mortality, recurrent PE, clinical deterioration requiring treatment escalation and bleeding in patients with submassive PE. METHODS The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials comparing adjunctive thrombolytic therapy with heparin alone as initial treatments in patients with acute submassive PE, and reported 30-day mortality or in-hospital clinical outcomes. RESULTS A total of 1510 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. No significant differences were apparent in the composite endpoint of all-cause death or recurrent PE between the adjunctive thrombolytic therapy arm and the heparin-alone arm (3.1% vs. 5.4%; RR, 0.64 [0.32-1.28]; P = 0.2). Adjunctive thrombolytic therapy significantly reduced the incidence of the composite endpoint of all-cause death or clinical deterioration (3.9% vs. 9.4%; RR, 0.44; P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant associations for major bleeding when adjunctive thrombolytic therapy was compared with heparin therapy alone (6.6% vs. 1.9%; P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis shows that adjunctive thrombolytic therapy does not significantly reduce the risk of mortality or recurrent PE in patients with acute submassive PE, but that adjuvant thrombolytic therapy prevents clinical deterioration requiring the escalation of treatment in patients with acute submassive PE. Bleeding risk assessment might be the most successful approach for improving clinical outcomes and patient-specific benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Nakamura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
177
|
Cho JH, Kutti Sridharan G, Kim SH, Kaw R, Abburi T, Irfan A, Kocheril AG. Right ventricular dysfunction as an echocardiographic prognostic factor in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2014; 14:64. [PMID: 24884693 PMCID: PMC4029836 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2014] [Accepted: 05/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated whether right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) as assessed by echocardiogram can be used as a prognostic factor in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Short-term mortality has been investigated only in small studies and the results have been controversial. METHODS A PubMed search was conducted using two keywords, "pulmonary embolism" and "echocardiogram", for articles published between January 1st 1998 and December 31st 2011. Out of 991 articles, after careful review, we found 12 articles that investigated the implications of RVD as assessed by echocardiogram in predicting short-term mortality for hemodynamically stable patients with acute PE. We conducted a meta-analysis of these data to identify whether the presence of RVD increased short-term mortality. RESULTS Among 3283 hemodynamically stable patients with acute PE, 1223 patients (37.3%) had RVD, as assessed by echocardiogram, while 2060 patients (62.7%) had normal right ventricular function. Short-term mortality was reported in 167 (13.7%) out of 1223 patients with RVD and in 134 (6.5%) out of 2060 patients without RVD. Hemodynamically stable patients with acute PE who had RVD as assessed by echocardiogram had a 2.29-fold increase in short-term mortality (odds ratio 2.29, 95% confidence interval 1.61-3.26) compared with patients without RVD. CONCLUSIONS In hemodynamically stable patients with acute PE, RVD as assessed by echocardiogram increases short-term mortality by 2.29 times. Consideration should be given to obtaining echocardiogram to identify high-risk patients even if they are hemodynamically stable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Hyung Cho
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, OH, 9500 Euclid Avenue, M2-Annex, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|