Unusual oligomerization required for activity of NtrC, a bacterial enhancer-binding protein

Domain switching between hrpR and hrpS affects the regulatory function of the hybrid genes in Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola

Abstract In prokaryotes, a diverse set of physiological processes is regulated by transcription factors which belong to the well-conserved, enhancer-binding protein (EBP) family. These regulatory proteins function together with the alternate sigma factor (sigma(54)). Structurally, the EBPs are characterized by a central activator domain, containing the recognition motif for the RNA polymerase/sigma(54) complex (Esigma(54)), and the C-terminal domain, containing a DNA-binding helix-turn-helix motif. A regulatory system of the EBP type also exists in Pseudomonas syringae, where it controls the expression of genes required for the induction of disease symptoms and resistance responses in plants. The system consists of the two genes, hrpR and hrpS, which belong to the hrp (hypersensitive response and pathogenicity) gene cluster. The two genes show a high degree of structural and sequence similarities, but function at different positions in the hrp regulatory cascade of the bean pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola. In this paper, we were interested in the basis of the difference in specificity between hrpR and hrpS. The functional specificities of the two domains of hrpS and hrpR were analysed by domain switching. Complementation analyses with the hybrid genes and retardation experiments with the protein products showed significant differences between the respective domains of hrpS and hrpR.

Regulation of quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi by LuxO and sigma-54

The bioluminescent marine bacterium Vibrio harveyi controls light production (lux) by an elaborate quorum-sensing circuit. V. harveyi produces and responds to two different autoinducer signals (AI-1 and AI-2) to modulate the luciferase structural operon (luxCDABEGH) in response to changes in cell-population density. Unlike all other Gram-negative quorum-sensing organisms, V. harveyi regulates quorum sensing using a two-component phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cascade. Each autoinducer is recognized by a cognate hybrid sensor kinase (called LuxN and LuxQ). Both sensors transduce information to a shared phosphorelay protein called LuxU, which in turn conveys the signal to the response regulator protein LuxO. Phospho-LuxO is responsible for repression of luxCDABEGH expression at low cell density. In the present study, we demonstrate that LuxO functions as an activator protein via interaction with the alternative sigma factor, sigma54 (encoded by rpoN). Our results suggest that LuxO, together with sigma54, activates the expression of a negative regulator of luminescence. We also show that phenotypes other than lux are regulated by LuxO and sigma54, demonstrating that in Vibrio harveyi, quorum sensing controls multiple processes.

Reciprocal domain evolution within a transactivator in a restricted sequence space

offhough the concept of domain merging and shuffling as a major force in protein evolution is well established, it has been difficult to demonstrate how domains coadapt. Here we show evidence of coevolution of the Sinorhizobium meliloti NifA (SmNifA) domains. We found that, because of the lack of a conserved glycine in its DNA-binding domain, this transactivator protein interacts weakly with the enhancers. This defect, however, was compensated by evolving a highly efficient activation domain that, contrasting to Bradyrhizobium japonicum NifA (BjNifA), can activate in trans. To explore paths that lead to this enhanced activity, we mutagenized BjNifA. After three cycles of mutagenesis and selection, a highly active derivative was obtained. Strikingly, all mutations changed to amino acids already present in SmNifA. Our artificial process thus recreated the natural evolution followed by this protein and suggests that NifA is trapped in a restricted sequence space with very limited solutions for higher activity by point mutation.

Reciprocal domain evolution within a transactivator in a restricted sequence space

offhough the concept of domain merging and shuffling as a major force in protein evolution is well established, it has been difficult to demonstrate how domains coadapt. Here we show evidence of coevolution of the Sinorhizobium meliloti NifA (SmNifA) domains. We found that, because of the lack of a conserved glycine in its DNA-binding domain, this transactivator protein interacts weakly with the enhancers. This defect, however, was compensated by evolving a highly efficient activation domain that, contrasting to Bradyrhizobium japonicum NifA (BjNifA), can activate in trans. To explore paths that lead to this enhanced activity, we mutagenized BjNifA. After three cycles of mutagenesis and selection, a highly active derivative was obtained. Strikingly, all mutations changed to amino acids already present in SmNifA. Our artificial process thus recreated the natural evolution followed by this protein and suggests that NifA is trapped in a restricted sequence space with very limited solutions for higher activity by point mutation.

Single-molecular AFM probing of specific DNA sequencing using RecA-promoted homologous pairing and strand exchange

The specific sequence in a linearlized double-stranded DNA target has been identified at a single-molecular level by atomic force microscopy (AFM). This was accomplished using RecA-coated, single-stranded DNA probes which were paired with a specific complementary DNA sequence in a linear double-stranded DNA target by strand-exchange reaction at a homologous sequence site with target DNA. The sites of interaction between the nucleoprotein filaments and the double-stranded DNA targets were directly visualized by AFM in solution containing 4 mM magnesium acetate. Measurements of the position of RecA-coated probes paired to individual target DNA showed that DNA probes specifically paired at their corresponding homologous target sequences. Strand exchange promoted by RecA and the visualization by AFM provided a rapid and efficient way to identify homologous sequence on a single-molecule target DNA.

Cell cycle regulator phosphorylation stimulates two distinct modes of binding at a chromosome replication origin

In Caulobacter crescentus, the global response regulator CtrA controls chromosome replication and determines the fate of two different cell progenies. Previous studies proposed that CtrA represses replication by binding to five sites, designated [a-e], in the replication origin. We show that phosphorylated CtrA binds sites [a-e] with 35- to 100-fold lower K(d) values than unphosphorylated CtrA. CtrA phosphorylation stimulates two distinct modes of binding to the replication origin. Phosphorylation stimulates weak intrinsic protein-protein cooperation between half-sites and does not stimulate CtrA-P binding unless protein-DNA contacts are made at both half-sites. CtrA phosphorylation also stimulates cooperative binding between complete sites [a] and [b]. However, binding to each of the other CtrA-binding sites [c], [d] and [e] is completely independent and suggests a modular organization of replication control by CtrA. We therefore propose a model where a phosphorelay targets separate biochemical activities inside the replication origin through both cooperative and independent CtrA-binding sites.

The PspA protein of Escherichia coli is a negative regulator of sigma(54)-dependent transcription

In Eubacteria, expression of genes transcribed by an RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the alternate sigma factor sigma(54) is positively regulated by proteins belonging to the family of enhancer-binding proteins (EBPs). These proteins bind to upstream activation sequences and are required for the initiation of transcription at the sigma(54)-dependent promoters. They are typically inactive until modified in their N-terminal regulatory domain either by specific phosphorylation or by the binding of a small effector molecule. EBPs lacking this domain, such as the PspF activator of the sigma(54)-dependent pspA promoter, are constitutively active. We describe here the in vivo and in vitro properties of the PspA protein of Escherichia coli, which negatively regulates expression of the pspA promoter without binding DNA directly.

Beryllofluoride mimics phosphorylation of NtrC and other bacterial response regulators

Two-component systems, sensor kinase-response regulator pairs, dominate bacterial signal transduction. Regulation is exerted by phosphorylation of an Asp in receiver domains of response regulators. Lability of the acyl phosphate linkage has limited structure determination for the active, phosphorylated forms of receiver domains. As assessed by both functional and structural criteria, beryllofluoride yields an excellent analogue of aspartyl phosphate in response regulator NtrC, a bacterial enhancer-binding protein. Beryllofluoride also appears to activate the chemotaxis, sporulation, osmosensing, and nitrate/nitrite response regulators CheY, Spo0F, OmpR, and NarL, respectively. NMR spectroscopic studies indicate that beryllofluoride will facilitate both biochemical and structural characterization of the active forms of receiver domains.

Structural transitions in the FixJ receiver domain

BACKGROUND

Two-component signal transduction pathways are sophisticated phosphorelay cascades widespread in prokaryotes and also found in fungi, molds and plants. FixL/FixJ is a prototypical system responsible for the regulation of nitrogen fixation in the symbiotic bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti. In microaerobic conditions the membrane-bound kinase FixL uses ATP to transphosphorylate a histidine residue, and the response regulator FixJ transfers the phosphoryl group from the phosphohistidine to one of its own aspartate residues in a Mg(2+)-dependent mechanism.

RESULTS

Seven X-ray structures of the unphosphorylated N-terminal receiver domain of FixJ (FixJN) have been solved from two crystal forms soaked in different conditions. Three conformations of the protein were found. In the first case, the protein fold impairs metal binding in the active site and the structure reveals a receiver domain that is self-inhibited for catalysis. In the second conformation, the canonical geometry of the active site is attained, and subsequent metal binding to the protein induces minimal conformational changes. The third conformation illustrates a non-catalytic form of the protein where unwinding of the N terminus of helix alpha 1 has occurred. Interconversion of the canonical and self-inhibited conformations requires a large conformational change of the beta 3-alpha 3 loop region.

CONCLUSIONS

These unphosphorylated structures of FixJN stress the importance of flexible peptide segments that delineate the active site. Their movements may act as molecular switches that define the functional status of the protein. Such observations are in line with structural and biochemical results obtained on other response regulator proteins and may illustrate general features that account for the specificity of protein-protein interactions.

"Switch I" mutant forms of the bacterial enhancer-binding protein NtrC that perturb the response to DNA

NtrC (nitrogen regulatory protein C) is a bacterial enhancer-binding protein of 469 residues that activates transcription by sigma(54)-holoenzyme. A region of its transcriptional activation (central) domain that is highly conserved among homologous activators of sigma(54)-holoenzyme-residues 206-220-is essential for interaction with this RNA polymerase: it is required for contact with the polymerase and/or for coupling the energy from ATP hydrolysis to a change in the conformation of the polymerase that allows it to form transcriptionally productive open complexes. Several mutant NtrC proteins with amino acid substitutions in this region, including NtrC(A216V) and NtrC(G219K), have normal ATPase activity but fail in transcriptional activation. We now report that other mutant forms carrying amino acid substitutions at these same positions, NtrC(A216C) and NtrC(G219C), are capable of activating transcription when they are not bound to a DNA template (non-DNA-binding derivatives with an altered helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif at the C terminus of the protein) but are unable to do so when they are bound to a DNA template, whether or not it carries a specific enhancer. Enhancer DNA remains a positive allosteric effector of ATP hydrolysis, as it is for wild-type NtrC but, surprisingly, appears to have become a negative allosteric effector for some aspect of interaction with sigma(54)-holoenzyme. The conserved region in which these amino acid substitutions occur (206-220) is equivalent to the Switch I region of a large group of purine nucleotide-binding proteins. Interesting analogies can be drawn between the Switch I region of NtrC and that of p21(ras).

The hydrophobic heptad repeat in Region III of Escherichia coli transcription factor sigma 54 is essential for core RNA polymerase binding

Escherichia coli transcription factor sigma 54 contains motifs that resemble closely those used for RNA polymerase II in mammalian cells, including two hydrophobic heptad repeats, a very acidic region and a glutamine-rich region. Triple changes in hydrophobic or multiple changes in acidic residues in Region III are known to severely impair core-binding ability. To investigate whether all the changes in triple mutants are necessary for core binding, site-directed mutagenesis was performed to create single and double mutants in the leucine or isoleucine residues in the heptad repeat in Region III. Single mutants showed no discernible loss of function. Double mutants showed partial protection of the -12 promoter element of the glnAp2 promoter due to the partial loss of their ability to bind core RNA polymerase. These mutations were deleterious to the function of sigma 54, which retained only 30-40% of wild-type mRNA levels. However, double mutants retained nearly normal ability to form open complexes. Two triple mutants created during previous work lost most, if not all, of their ability to bind core RNA polymerase, to protect the -12 promoter element of the glnAp2 promoter and to open the transcription start site. The two triple mutants produced about 20% or less than 10% of the wild-type transcripts from the glnAp2 promoter. These results demonstrate that the hydrophobic heptad repeat in Region III is essential for core RNA polymerase binding. Progressive loss of hydrophobicity of the hydrophobic heptad repeat in Region III of sigma 54 resulted in a progressive loss of core-binding ability, leading to the loss of -12 promoter element recognition and mRNA production.

The use of elements of the E. coli Ntr-system for the design of an optimized recombinant expression system for high cell density cultivations

The inducible glnA promoter 2 of the E. coli glutamine synthetase gene is suitable as an expression unit for the production of recombinant proteins at low and high cell densities. It is active when the concentration of ammonium as the sole nitrogen source in the culture medium is below 1 mM. This nitrogen regulatory system was optimized by introduction of expression cassettes consisting of additional elements of the ntr-system. These artificial constructions result in enhanced recombinant gene expression in the production phase. Furthermore, the basic recombinant protein level during the growth phase is reduced due to a tighter promoter control. A three- to four-fold higher accumulation of chloramphenicol-acetyltransferase (as reporter protein) and of anti-EGF-receptor miniantibodies was achieved by increasing the amount of the final regulator molecule NtrC approximately P via plasmidal co-expression of the ntrC gene. The introduction of a modified glnA promoter 1 inverse to glnAp2 lowered the basic activity of glnAp2 to about one half. It is assumed that under nitrogen excess conditions sigma 70-RNA polymerase binds at glnAp1 and thereby prevents most of the binding of sigma 54-RNA polymerase at glnAp2. The optimized expression systems were successfully applied in low and high cell density cultivations. In the fed-batch phase of high cell density cultivations recombinant protein formation was induced through external nitrogen limitation under FIA-controlled concentration of glucose as carbon source.

Polymerase activities and RNA structures in the atomic force microscope

The structures of the reaction products are the basis for novel polymerase assays using the atomic force microscope (AFM). Polymerases are the enzymes involved in transcription and replication of DNA. Rapid semiquantitative estimates of the activity of DNA polymerases such as Sequenase, Taq polymerase, and AMV reverse transcriptase and RNA polymerases (RNAP) such as Escherichia coli RNAP were obtained from AFM images of the nucleic acids after polymerase reactions. DNA polymerases were assayed via replication of the single-stranded φX-174 virion. RNAP was assayed via transcription, using a rolling circle DNA template that produces long strands of RNA. In some cases, AFM was better than agarose gel electrophoresis for assaying DNA polymerase activity, since aggregation prevented the DNA from entering the agarose gel. Extended molecules of single-stranded RNA synthesized with the rolling circle DNA template showed varied conformations and degrees of stretching. Some structural differences were observed between two RNAs-a ribozyme concatamer and an RNA with 90% purines.

Systematic analysis of sigma54 N-terminal sequences identifies regions involved in positive and negative regulation of transcription

The conserved amino-terminal region of sigma 54 (Region I) contains sequences that allow response to activator proteins, and inhibit initiation in the absence of activator. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis has been used to systematically define Region I elements that contribute to each of these functions. Amino acid residues from 6 to 50 were substituted with alanine in groups of three consecutive residues, making a total of 15 mutants. Mutants were tested for their ability to mediate activation in vivo, and in vitro, and to support transcription in the absence of activator in vitro. Most mutations located between residues 15 and 47 altered sigma function, while mutations between residues 6 and 14, and 48-50 had little effect. The defective mutants ala 15-17, 42-44, and 45-47 define new amino acids required for normal sigma function. In general, there is an inverse correlation between the levels of activated and activator-independent transcription, suggesting that the two functions are linked. When activated, the defective sigma mutants, except for ala 24-26, formed heparin-resistant open complexes similar to wild-type sigma. Mutant ala 24-26 formed heparin-unstable open complexes, suggesting that this mutation interferes with a different step in the initiation pathway.

A- and T-tract-mediated intrinsic curvature in native DNA between the binding site of the upstream activator NtrC and the nifLA promoter of Klebsiella pneumoniae facilitates transcription

The nif promoters of Klebsiella pneumoniae must be activated by proteins bound to upstream sequences which are thought to interact with the sigma54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme by DNA looping. NifA is the activator for most of the promoters, and integration host factor (IHF) mediates the DNA looping. While NtrC is the activator for the nifLA promoter, no IHF appears to be involved. There are two A tracts and one T tract between the upstream enhancer and the nifLA promoter. This DNA segment exhibits anomalous electrophoretic mobility, suggesting intrinsic sequence-induced curvature in the DNA. On the one hand, mutation of the A tracts or T tract individually or together, or deletion of the A tracts and the T tract reduces the anomaly; on the other hand, creation of two additional A tracts enhances the anomaly. Intrinsic curvature in the DNA has been confirmed by circular permutation analysis after cloning the DNA fragment in the vector pBend 2 and also by electron microscopy. Computer simulation with the DNA base sequence is also suggestive of intrinsic curvature. A transcriptional fusion with the Escherichia coli lacZ gene of the DNA fragment containing the nifLA promoter and the wild-type or the mutated upstream sequences was constructed, and in vivo transcription in K. pneumoniae and E. coli was monitored. There was indeed very good correlation between the extent of intrinsic curvature of the DNA and transcription from the promoter, suggesting that DNA curvature due to the A tracts and the T tract was necessary for transcription in vivo from the nifLA promoter of K. pneumoniae.

Mutations affecting motifs of unknown function in the central domain of nitrogen regulatory protein C

The positive control function of the bacterial enhancer-binding protein NtrC resides in its central domain, which is highly conserved among activators of sigma54 holoenzyme. Previous studies of a small set of mutant forms specifically defective in transcriptional activation, called NtrC repressor [NtrC(Rep)] proteins, had enabled us to locate various functional determinants in the central domain. In this more comprehensive survey, the DNA encoding a major portion of the central domain was randomly mutagenized and mutated ntrC genes were introduced into the cell via multicopy expression plasmids. DNA sequencing of 95 isolates identified by a preliminary phenotypic screen revealed that the lesions in them caused 55 distinct single amino acid substitutions at 44 different positions. Assays of glnA transcription in vivo and in vitro yielded two conclusions. First, of the 41 mutant proteins that could be purified, 17 (1 known, 16 new) showed no detectable activity in either assay, thus qualifying them as true NtrC(Rep) proteins. These contained residue changes in six of the seven highly conserved regions in the central domain, including two never studied before. Second, some mutant proteins were inactive in vivo but were either marginally or fully active in vitro. Their surprising lack of activity in vivo may be accounted for by high levels of expression, which apparently decreased activation by these mutant proteins but not by wild-type NtrC (NtrCWT). Of particular interest were a subset of these proteins that exhibited greater transcriptional activation than NtrCWT at low concentrations. Their elevated activation capacities remain to be explained.

MgATP binding and hydrolysis determinants of NtrC, a bacterial enhancer-binding protein

When phosphorylated, the dimeric form of nitrogen regulatory protein C (NtrC) of Salmonella typhimurium forms a larger oligomer(s) that can hydrolyze ATP and hence activate transcription by the sigma(54)-holoenzyme form of RNA polymerase. Studies of Mg-nucleoside triphosphate binding using a filter-binding assay indicated that phosphorylation is not required for nucleotide binding but probably controls nucleotide hydrolysis per se. Studies of binding by isothermal titration calorimetry indicated that the apparent K(d) of unphosphorylated NtrC for MgATPgammaS is 100 microM at 25 degrees C, and studies by filter binding indicated that the concentration of MgATP required for half-maximal binding is 130 microM at 37 degrees C. Filter-binding studies with mutant forms of NtrC defective in ATP hydrolysis implicated two regions of its central domain directly in nucleotide binding and three additional regions in hydrolysis. All five are highly conserved among activators of sigma(54)-holoenzyme. Regions implicated in binding are the Walker A motif and the region around residues G355 to R358, which may interact with the nucleotide base. Regions implicated in nucleotide hydrolysis are residues S207 and E208, which have been proposed to lie in a region analogous to the switch I effector region of p21(ras) and other purine nucleotide-binding proteins; residue R294, which may be a catalytic residue; and residue D239, which is the conserved aspartate in the putative Walker B motif. D239 appears to play a role in binding the divalent cation essential for nucleotide hydrolysis. Electron paramagnetic resonance analysis of Mn(2+) binding indicated that the central domain of NtrC does not bind divalent cation strongly in the absence of nucleotide.

Probing the Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromeric DNA (CEN DNA)-binding factor 3 (CBF3) kinetochore complex by using atomic force microscopy

Yeast centromeric DNA (CEN DNA) binding factor 3 (CBF3) is a multisubunit protein complex that binds to the essential CDEIII element in CEN DNA. The four CBF3 proteins are required for accurate chromosome segregation and are considered to be core components of the yeast kinetochore. We have examined the structure of the CBF3-CEN DNA complex by atomic force microscopy. Assembly of CBF3-CEN DNA complexes was performed by combining purified CBF3 proteins with a DNA fragment that includes the CEN region from yeast chromosome III. Atomic force microscopy images showed DNA molecules with attached globular bodies. The contour length of the DNA containing the complex is approximately 9% shorter than the DNA alone, suggesting some winding of DNA within the complex. The measured location of the single binding site indicates that the complex is located asymmetrically to the right of CDEIII extending away from CDEI and CDEII, which is consistent with previous data. The CEN DNA is bent approximately 55 degrees at the site of complex formation. A significant fraction of the complexes are linked in pairs, showing three to four DNA arms, with molecular volumes approximately three times the mean volumes of two-armed complexes. These multi-armed complexes indicate that CBF3 can bind two DNA molecules together in vitro and, thus, may be involved in holding together chromatid pairs during mitosis.

The hexamerization domain of N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor: structural clues to chaperone function

The hexameric structure of the D2 ATP-binding module of N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF), a chaperone involved in SNARE complex disassembly, was recently determined. This structure and the previously determined structure of the DNA polymerase III delta' subunit have far-reaching biological significance because these modules are related to diverse ATPases that promote the assembly, disassembly and operation of various protein complexes.

Four dimers of lambda repressor bound to two suitably spaced pairs of lambda operators form octamers and DNA loops over large distances

Transcription factors that are bound specifically to DNA often interact with each other over thousands of base pairs [1] [2]. Large DNA loops resulting from such interactions have been observed in Escherichia coli with the transcription factors deoR [3] and NtrC [4], but such interactions are not, as yet, well understood. We propose that unique protein complexes, that are not present in solution, may form specifically on DNA. Their uniqueness would make it possible for them to interact tightly and specifically with each other. We used the repressor and operators of coliphage lambda to construct a model system in which to test our proposition. lambda repressor is a dimer at physiological concentrations, but forms tetramers and octamers at a hundredfold higher concentration. We predict that two lambda repressor dimers form a tetramer in vitro when bound to two lambda operators spaced 24 bp apart and that two such tetramers interact to form an octamer. We examined, in vitro, relaxed circular plasmid DNA in which such operator pairs were separated by 2,850 bp and 2,470 bp. Of these molecules, 29% formed loops as seen by electron microscopy (EM). The loop increased the tightness of binding of lambda repressor to lambda operator. Consequently, repression of the lambda PR promoter in vivo was increased fourfold by the presence of a second pair of lambda operators, separated by a distance of 3,600 bp.

Amino-terminal sequences of sigmaN (sigma54) inhibit RNA polymerase isomerization

In bacteria, association of the specialized sigmaN protein with the core RNA polymerase subunits forms a holoenzyme able to bind promoter DNA, but unable to melt DNA and initiate transcription unless acted on by an activator protein. The conserved amino-terminal 50 amino acids of sigmaN (Region I) are required for the response to activators. We have used pre-melted DNA templates, in which the template strand is unpaired and accessible for transcription initiation, to mimic a naturally melted promoter and explore the function of Region I. Our results indicate that one activity of Region I sequences is to inhibit productive interaction of holoenzyme with pre-melted DNA. On pre-melted DNA targets, either activation of sigmaN-holoenzyme or removal of Region I allowed efficient formation of complexes in which melted DNA was sequestered by RNA polymerase. Like natural pre-initiation complexes formed on conventional DNA templates through the action of activator, such complexes were heparin-resistant and transcriptionally active. The inhibitory sigmaN Region I domain functioned in trans to confer heparin sensitivity to complexes between Region I-deleted holoenzyme and pre-melted promoter DNA. Evidence that Region I senses the conformation of the promoter was obtained from protein footprint experiments. We suggest that one function for Region I is to mask a single-strand DNA-binding activity of the holoenzyme. On the basis of extended DNA footprints of Region I-deleted holoenzyme, we also propose that Region I prevents RNA polymerase isomerization, a conformational change necessary for access to and the subsequent stable association of holoenzyme with melted DNA.

In vivo and in vitro activities of the Escherichia coli sigma54 transcription activator, PspF, and its DNA-binding mutant, PspFDeltaHTH

Transcription of the phage-shock protein (psp) operon in Escherichia coli is driven by a sigma54 promoter, stimulated by integration host factor and dependent on an upstream, cis-acting sequence and an activator protein, PspF. PspF belongs to the enhancer binding protein family but lacks an N-terminal regulatory domain. Purified PspF is not modified and has an ATPase activity that is increased twofold in the presence of DNA carrying the psp cis-acting sequence. Purified mutant His-tagged PspF that lacks the C-terminal DNA-binding motif has a DNA-independent ATPase activity when present at 30-fold the concentration of the wild-type protein. Both proteins oligomerize in solution in an ATP and DNA-independent manner. The wild-type activator protein, but not the DNA-binding mutant, binds specifically to the cis-acting sequence. Analysis of the sequence protected by PspF demonstrates the presence of two upstream binding sites within the sequence, UAS I and UAS II, which together constitute the psp enhancer. Protection at low protein concentrations is more pronounced and more extensive on a supercoiled DNA than on a linear template. Full expression of the psp operon upon hyperosmotic shock depends on wild-type PspF, but only partially requires the presence of the psp enhancer.

ToxR co-operative interactions are not modulated by environmental conditions or periplasmic domain conformation

ToxR is a transmembrane regulatory protein that controls virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae. Previous experiments using lambda repressor-ToxR chimeric proteins and a lambda repressor-controlled reporter system (OR1 PR-lacZY) established that ToxR sequences can effectively dimerize the amino-terminal domain of lambda repressor in Escherichia coli. However, in E. coli, ToxR does not respond to environmental signals that control virulence gene expression in V. cholerae. Here, we report the results of experiments designed to test whether environmental signals that modulate virulence gene expression in V. cholerae also modulate a monomer to dimerization transition of lambda-ToxR chimeras. When the OR1 PR-lacZY reporter fusion and chimeric proteins were transferred to V. cholerae, we unexpectedly found that lambda-ToxR chimeras did not dimerize significantly. Interestingly, experiments evaluating the ability of lambda-ToxR proteins to form tetramers in E. coli suggested that lambda-ToxR dimers could act co-operatively. Using a redesigned reporter system containing multiple lambda operator sites (OR1 OR2 OR3 PR-lacZY), we found that lambda-ToxR could dimerize quite efficiently in V. cholerae. These data imply that multiple DNA binding sites might enhance the ability of ToxR to dimerize in V. cholerae and suggest that ToxR dimers might be capable of co-operative interactions. However, we falled to correlate a monomer-dimer transition of the lambda-ToxR chimeras with changes in virulence gene expression in response to environmental signals in V. cholerae. Finally, because of conflicting results in the literature, the importance of membrane localization of ToxR and dimerization of the ToxR periplasmic domain was re-evaluated. This was accomplished by measuring the ability of various chimeric proteins to activate toxin gene expression in both E. coli and V. cholerae. These assays suggest that, in V. cholerae, deletion of the transmembrane domain has a profound effect on ToxR activity, although it is not an absolute requirement when ToxR is dimerized by a heterologous domain. In addition, we noted differences in chimeric protein activity when expressed in E. coli and V. cholerae. A construct substituting the monomeric MalE domain for the periplasmic domain of ToxR was unable to activate a ctx::lacZ reporter fusion in E. coli. Although the addition of leucine zipper sequences to this construct resulted in enhanced activity of the chimera in E. coli, both chimeras were able to produce wild-type levels of toxin in V. cholerae. These data support the notion that dimerization of ToxR stimulates its activity as a transcriptional activator in E. coli. In V. cholerae, however, we present data that do not demonstrate a correlation between dimerization of the periplasmic domain and ToxR activity.

AAA+: A Class of Chaperone-Like ATPases Associated with the Assembly, Operation, and Disassembly of Protein Complexes

Using a combination of computer methods for iterative database searches and multiple sequence alignment, we show that protein sequences related to the AAA family of ATPases are far more prevalent than reported previously. Among these are regulatory components of Lon and Clp proteases, proteins involved in DNA replication, recombination, and restriction (including subunits of the origin recognition complex, replication factor C proteins, MCM DNA-licensing factors and the bacterial DnaA, RuvB, and McrB proteins), prokaryotic NtrC-related transcription regulators, the Bacillus sporulation protein SpoVJ, Mg2+, and Co2+ chelatases, theHalobacterium GvpN gas vesicle synthesis protein, dynein motor proteins, TorsinA, and Rubisco activase. Alignment of these sequences, in light of the structures of the clamp loader δ′ subunit ofEscherichia coli DNA polymerase III and the hexamerization component of N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein, provides structural and mechanistic insights into these proteins, collectively designated the AAA+ class. Whole-genome analysis indicates that this class is ancient and has undergone considerable functional divergence prior to the emergence of the major divisions of life. These proteins often perform chaperone-like functions that assist in the assembly, operation, or disassembly of protein complexes. The hexameric architecture often associated with this class can provide a hole through which DNA or RNA can be thread; this may be important for assembly or remodeling of DNA–protein complexes.

Visualization of trp repressor and its complexes with DNA by atomic force microscopy

We used tapping mode atomic force microscopy to visualize the protein/protein and the protein/DNA complexes involved in transcriptional regulation by the trp repressor (TR). Plasmid fragments bearing the natural operators trp EDCBA and trp R, as well as nonspecific fragments, were deposited onto mica in the presence of varying concentrations of TR and imaged. In the presence of L-tryptophan, both specific and nonspecific complexes of TR with DNA are apparent, as well as free TR assemblies directly deposited onto the mica surface. We observed the expected decrease in specificity of TR for its operators with increasing protein concentration (1-5 nM). This loss of DNA-binding specificity is accompanied by the formation of large protein assemblies of varying sizes on the mica surface, consistent with the known tendency of the repressor to oligomerize in solution. When the co-repressor is omitted, no repressor molecules are seen, either on the plasmid fragments or free on the mica surface, probably because of the formation of larger aggregates that are removed from the surface upon washing. All these findings support a role for protein/protein interactions as an additional mechanism of transcriptional regulation by the trp repressor.

Integration host factor and cyclic AMP receptor protein are required for TyrR-mediated activation of tpl in Citrobacter freundii

The tpl gene of Citrobacter freundii encodes an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of L-tyrosine to phenol, pyruvate, and ammonia. This gene is known to be positively regulated by TyrR. The amplitude of regulation attributable to this transcription factor is at least 20-fold. Three TyrR binding sites, designated boxes A, B, and C, centered at coordinates -272.5, -158.5, and -49.5, respectively, were identified in the upstream region of the tpl promoter. The results of mutational experiments suggest that TyrR binds in cooperative fashion to these sites. The nonavailability of any TyrR site impairs transcription. Full TyrR-mediated activation of tpl required integration host factor (IHF) and the cAMP receptor protein (CRP). By DNase I footprinting, it was shown that the IHF binding site is centered at coordinate -85 and that there are CRP binding sites centered at coordinates -220 and -250. Mutational alteration of the IHF binding site reduced the efficiency of the tpl promoter by at least eightfold. The proposed roles of CRP and IHF are to introduce bends into tpl promoter DNA between boxes A and B or B and C. Multimeric TyrR dimers were demonstrated by a chemical cross-linking method. The formation of hexameric TyrR increased when tpl DNA was present. The participation of both IHF and CRP in the activation of the tpl promoter suggests that molecular mechanisms quite different from those that affect other TyrR-activated promoters apply to this system. A model wherein TyrR, IHF, and CRP collaborate to regulate the expression of the tpl promoter is presented.

Mapping a protein-binding site on straightened DNA by atomic force microscopy

We have developed an Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)-based method for mapping protein-binding sites on individual, long DNA molecules (> 5 kb) at nanometer resolution. The protein is clearly detected at the apex of the bent DNA molecules. Randomly coiled DNA molecules or protein:DNA complexes were extended by a motor-controlled moving meniscus on an atomically flat surface. The immobilized molecules were detected by AFM. The straightened DNA displayed a sharp bend at the site of bound protein with the two DNA segments linearly extending from the protein-binding site. Using GAL4, a yeast transcription factor, we demonstrate good agreement of the position of the observed binding site on straightened DNA templates to the predicted binding site. The technique is expected to have significant implications in elucidating DNA and protein interactions in general, and specifically, for the measurement of promoter occupancy with unlabeled regulatory proteins at the single-molecule level.

Involvement of the N-finger in the self-association of GATA-1

Zinc fingers are recognized as small protein domains that bind to specific DNA sequences. Recently however, zinc fingers from a number of proteins, in particular the GATA family of transcription factors, have also been implicated in specific protein-protein interactions. The erythroid protein GATA-1 contains two zinc fingers: the C-finger, which is sufficient for sequence-specific DNA-binding, and the N-finger, which appears both to modulate DNA-binding and to interact with other transcription factors. We have expressed and purified the N-finger domain and investigated its involvement in the self-association of GATA-1. We demonstrate that this domain does not homodimerize but instead makes intermolecular contacts with the C-finger, suggesting that GATA dimers are maintained by reciprocal N-finger-C-finger contacts. Deletion analysis identifies a 25-residue region, C-terminal to the core N-finger domain, that is sufficient for interaction with intact GATA-1. A similar subdomain exists C-terminal to the C-finger, and we show that self-association is substantially reduced when both subdomains are disrupted by mutation. Moreover, mutations that impair GATA-1 self-association also interfere with its ability to activate transcription in transfection studies.

Scanning force microscopy of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.sigma54 holoenzyme complexes with DNA in buffer and in air

Scanning force microscopy (SFM) was used to visualize complexes of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.sigma54 (RNAP.sigma54) and a 1036 base-pair linear DNA fragment containing the glnA promoter. In order to preserve the native hydration state of the protein-DNA complexes, the samples were injected directly into the SFM fluid cell and imaged in buffer. With this protocol, an apparent bending angle of 26(+/-34) degrees was determined for the specific complexes at the promoter. The bending angle of the unspecifically bound RNAP.sigma54 showed a somewhat broader distribution of 49(+/-48) degrees, indicating the existence of conformational differences as compared to the closed complex. In about two-thirds of the closed complexes, the RNA polymerase holoenzyme was located in a lateral position with respect to the DNA and the bend of the DNA was pointing away from the protein. This conformation was consistent with the finding that for the complexes at the promoter, the apparent contour length was reduced by only about 6 nm in buffer as compared to the free DNA. From these results we conclude that in the closed complex of RNAP. sigma54, the DNA was not wrapped around the polymerase, and we present a model for the trajectory of the DNA with respect to the RNA polymerase. The images acquired in buffer were compared to samples that were washed with water and then dried before imaging. Two artefacts of the washing and drying process were detected. First, extensive washing of the sample reduced the number of the specific complexes bound at the promoter (closed complex of RNAP.sigma54) from about 70% to 30%. This is likely to be a result of sliding of the RNAP.sigma54 holoenzyme along the DNA induced by the washing process. Second, the apparent DNA shortening of the contour length of RNAP.sigma54-DNA complexes at the promoter as compared to the contour length of the free DNA was 22 nm for the dried samples as opposed to only 6 nm for the undried samples imaged in buffer. This suggests an artefact of the drying process.

Atomic force microscopy and other scanning probe microscopies

The highlight of the past year is the unfolding and refolding of the muscle protein titin in the atomic force microscope. A related highlight in the intersection between experiment and theory is a recent review of the effects of molecular forces on biochemical kinetics. Other advances in scanning probe microscopy include entropic brushes, molecular sandwiches and applications of atomic force microscopy to gene therapy.

Mutations in toxR and toxS that separate transcriptional activation from DNA binding at the cholera toxin gene promoter

ToxR and ToxS are integral membrane proteins that activate the transcription of virulence genes in Vibrio cholerae. ToxR can be separated into three different domains: an N-terminal cytoplasmic DNA binding domain, a central transmembrane domain, and a C-terminal periplasmic domain. ToxS is thought to enhance ToxR-mediated transcriptional activation through a periplasmic interaction. By P22 challenge phage selection for DNA binding, in combination with a screen for cholera toxin gene transcription, 12 toxR and toxS positive control mutants producing variant ToxR proteins from the toxRS operon that bind to the cholera toxin promoter but that fail to activate transcription were isolated. One mutation in toxR specifies an E82K change in the predicted helix-loop-helix DNA binding domain and destroys ToxR-mediated activation. Seven toxR mutations included frameshifts and stop codons introduced into the periplasmic domain, and six of these mutations appeared to produce proteolytically processed shorter forms of ToxR, suggesting that even short periplasmic deletions alter the folding of ToxR in the periplasm. Deletion of toxS did not alter the steady-state level of ToxR, and ToxR was found to be capable of binding to DNA in the absence of ToxS even though it did not activate transcription. However, the ToxS L33S variant rendered ToxR susceptible to proteolysis, suggesting that the natural function of ToxS is to complex with ToxR. Therefore, certain alterations that map to the ToxR cytoplasmic DNA binding domain, to the periplasmic domain, or to ToxS separate DNA binding activity from activator function. These data support a model where proper assembly or stability of the periplasmic domain of ToxR is enhanced by ToxS. This chaperone-like activity of ToxS may be required for the formation of the transcriptional activation complex but not the ToxR-DNA complex.

Evolution of new protein function: recombinational enhancer Fis originated by horizontal gene transfer from the transcriptional regulator NtrC

New protein function is thought to evolve mostly by gene duplication and divergence. Here we present phylogenetic evidence that the multifunctional protein Fis of the gamma proteobacterial species derived from the COOH-terminal domain of an ancestral alpha proteobacterial NtrC transcriptional regulatory protein. All of the known enterobacterial fis genes are preceded by an open reading frame, named yhdG, that is highly similar to nifR3, a gene that forms an operon with ntrC in several alpha proteobacterial species. Thus, we propose that yhdG and fis were acquired by a lineage ancestral to the gamma proteobacteria in a single horizontal gene transfer event, and later diverged to their present functions.

A post-recruitment function for the RNA polymerase III transcription-initiation factor IIIB

Transcription factor (TF) IIIB, which directs RNA polymerase (pol) III to its promoters, is made up of three components: the TATA box-binding protein, the TFIIB-related Brf, and the pol III-specific B". Certain mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Brf and B" retain TFIIIB transcription factor activity with supercoiled DNA but are inactive with linear duplex DNA. Further analysis shows that these inactive TFIIIB-DNA complexes bind pol III and position it appropriately over the transcriptional start site but do not form DNA strand-separated open promoter complexes. It is proposed that the normal function of TFIIIB combines pol III recruitment with an active role in a subsequent step of transcriptional initiation leading to promoter opening.

A bacterial ATP-dependent, enhancer binding protein that activates the housekeeping RNA polymerase

A commonly accepted view of gene regulation in bacteria that has emerged over the last decade is that promoters are transcriptionally activated by one of two general mechanisms. The major type involves activator proteins that bind to DNA adjacent to where the RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme binds, usually assisting in recruitment of the RNAP to the promoter. This holoenzyme uses the housekeeping sigma70 or a related factor, which directs the core RNAP to the promoter and assists in melting the DNA near the RNA start site. A second type of mechanism involves the alternative sigma factor (called sigma54 or sigmaN) that directs RNAP to highly conserved promoters. In these cases, an activator protein with an ATPase function oligomerizes at tandem sites far upstream from the promoter. The nitrogen regulatory protein (NtrC) from enteric bacteria has been the model for this family of activators. Activation of the RNAP/sigma54 holoenzyme to form the open complex is mediated by the activator, which is tethered upstream. Hence, this class of protein is sometimes called the enhancer binding protein family or the NtrC class. We describe here a third system that has properties of each of these two types. The NtrC enhancer binding protein from the photosynthetic bacterium, Rhodobacter capsulatus, is shown in vitro to activate the housekeeping RNAP/sigma70 holoenzyme. Transcriptional activation by this NtrC requires ATP binding but not hydrolysis. Oligomerization at distant tandem binding sites on a supercoiled template is also necessary. Mechanistic and evolutionary questions of these systems are discussed.

Direct visualization of dynamic protein-DNA interactions with a dedicated atomic force microscope

Photolyase DNA interactions and the annealing of restriction fragment ends are directly visualized with the atomic force microscope (AFM). To be able to interact with proteins, DNA must be loosely bound to the surface. When MgCl2 is used to immobilize DNA to mica, DNA is attached to the surface at distinct sites. The pieces of DNA in between are free to move over the surface and are available for protein interaction. After implementation of a number of instrumental improvements, the molecules can be visualized routinely, under physiological conditions and with molecular resolution. Images are acquired reproducibly without visible damage for at least 30 min, at a scan rate of 2 x 2 microm2/min and a root mean square noise of less than 0.2 nm. Nonspecific photolyase DNA complexes were visualized, showing association, dissociation, and movement of photolyase over the DNA. The latter result suggests a sliding mechanism by which photolyase can scan DNA for damaged sites. The experiments illustrate the potential that AFM presents for modern molecular biology.

Association states of the transcription activator protein NtrC from E. coli determined by analytical ultracentrifugation

The transcription activator protein NtrC (nitrogen regulatory protein C) can catalyze the transition of E. coli RNA polymerase complexed with the sigma54 factor (RNAP.sigma54) from the closed complex (RNAP.sigma54 bound at the promoter) to the open complex (melting of the promoter DNA). This process involves phosphorylation of NtrC, assembly of a multimeric NtrC complex at the enhancer DNA sequence, interaction of this complex with promoter bound RNAP. sigma54 via DNA looping, and hydrolysis of ATP. We have used analytical ultracentrifugation to study the different NtrC association states and to derive hydrodynamic models for the conformation of the various NtrC species. The following results were obtained. (i) The unphosphorylated wild-type protein formed a dimer with a measured molecular weight of 102(+/-3) kDa, which compares to a calculated molecular weight of 54 kDa for a monomer (concentration range studied 2 to 8 microM NtrC monomer). (ii) In the unphosphorylated state one NtrC dimer was bound to one binding site as determined with DNA oligonucleotide duplexes containing one or two binding sites (concentration range studied 50 to 1000 nM NtrC dimer). (iii) The data obtained at protein concentrations that were below the concentration of binding sites indicate that binding to the DNA duplex with two binding sites occurred with essentially no cooperativity. The experiments were conducted in the absence of ATP. (iv) The phosphorylated protein formed a specific complex at the DNA duplex with the enhancer sequence (two NtrC binding sites) that consisted of four dimers (concentration range studied 100 to 1000 nM NtrC dimer). (v) The formation of this octameric complex was highly cooperative, and the data suggest that two DNA strands could bind simultaneously to this complex. (vi) From the sedimentation data a model was derived in which the NtrC dimer adopts a V shaped structure with the DNA binding domains being located at the bottom and the two receiver domains at the top of the V. In this conformation higher order NtrC complexes can be stabilized by interaction between the phosphorylated receiver domain and the central activation domain of different NtrC dimers.

Translational activation by an NtrC enhancer-binding protein

The Rhodobacter capsulatus NtrC protein is a bacterial enhancer-binding protein that activates the transcription of at least five genes by a mechanism that does not require the RpoN RNA polymerase sigma factor. The nifR3-ntrB-ntrC operon in R. capsulatus codes for the nitrogen-sensing two component regulators NtrB and NtrC, as well as for NifR3, a protein of unknown function that is highly conserved in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Evidence of a unique translational control of NifR3 mediated directly by the NtrC enhancer-binding protein is reported. The nifR3-ntrB-ntrC operon is expressed from a single promoter upstream of nifR3 with the levels of transcript equivalent in wild-type and ntrC mutants under nitrogen-limited or nitrogen-sufficient conditions. LacZ reporter analyses of this operon and immunological quantitation of NifR3 and NtrC demonstrate that, unlike NtrC levels which remain constant, production of NifR3 is at least ten to 40-fold reduced in NtrC- strains. NifR3 is increased at least fivefold upon nitrogen limitation whereas NtrC production is constitutive. Surprisingly, the purified NtrC protein binds cooperatively to the nifR3 promoter region in vitro at two sets of tandem binding sites centered at +1 and -81 nucleotides relative to the transcriptional start site. Deletion analysis demonstrates that the upstream tandem sites are essential for nitrogen and NtrC-dependent production of NifR3 in vivo , but are not necessary for nifR3 transcription. These experiments indicate that NtrC stimulates the translation of the NifR3 messenger RNA while tethered to the promoter DNA. This is in contrast to five other promoters (nifA1, nifA2, glnB, mopA and anfA) in R. capsulatus which are transcriptionally activated by NtrC bound to one set of tandem binding sites that are centered greater than 100 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site.

In vivo studies on the positive control function of NifA: a conserved hydrophobic amino acid patch at the central domain involved in transcriptional activation

The eubacterial enhancer-binding proteins activate transcription by binding to distant sites and, simultaneously, contacting the RNA polymerase r54 promoter complex (Esigma54). The positive control function is located at the central domain of these proteins, but it is not know which specific region has the determinants for the interaction with Esigma54. Here, we present genetic evidence that a small region of hydrophobic amino acids, previously denominated C3, at the central domain of Bradyrhizobium japonicum NifA is involved in positive control. We obtained 26 missense mutants along this conserved region. Among these, only strains expressing the NifA(F307-->Y) and NifA(A310-->S) mutant proteins retained some of the transcriptional activity (<20%), whereas those carrying NifA(E298-->D) and NifA(T308-->S) had very low but detectable activity (< 1.0%). The rest of the NifA mutants did not induce any measurable transcriptional activity. When expressed in the presence of wild-type NifA, the great majority of the mutants displayed a dominant phenotype, suggesting that their oligomerization determinants were not altered. In vivo dimethyl-sulphate footprinting experiments for a subset of the NifA mutants showed that they were still able to bind specifically to DNA. Analysis of intragenic supressors highlight the functional role of a hydroxyl group at position 308 to activate transcription.

Signal transduction in bacteria: molecular mechanisms of stimulus-response coupling

In bacteria, adaptive responses to changing environmental conditions are mediated by signal transduction systems that involve modular protein domains. Despite great diversity in the integration of domains into different systems, studies of individual components have revealed molecular strategies that are widely applicable. Studies of receptors have advanced our understanding of how information is transmitted across membranes, the determination of three-dimensional structures of domains of histidine protein kinase domains and response regulator proteins has begun to reveal the molecular basis of signaling via two-component phosphoryltransfer pathways, and the description of 'eukaryotic-like' protein domains involved in bacterial signaling has emphasized the universality of intracellular signaling mechanisms.

DNA binding and oligomerization of NtrC studied by fluorescence anisotropy and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

Fluorescence anisotropy and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy measurements of rhodamine-labeled DNA oligonucleotide duplexes have been used to determine equilibrium binding constants for DNA binding of the prokaryotic transcription activator protein NtrC. Measurements were made with wild-type NtrC from Escherichia coli and the constitutively active mutant NtrCS160Ffrom Salmonella using DNA duplexes with one or two binding sites. The following results were obtained: (i) the dissociation constant K d for binding of one NtrC dimer to a single binding site was the same for the wild-type and mutant proteins within the error of measurement. (ii) The value of K d decreased from 1.4 +/- 0.7 x 10(-11) M at 15 mM K acetate to 5.8 +/- 2.6 x 10(-9) M at 600 mM K acetate. From the salt dependence of the dissociation constant we calculated that two ion pairs form upon binding of one dimeric protein to the DNA. (iii) Binding of two NtrC dimers to the DNA duplex with two binding sites occured with essentially no cooperativity. Titration curves of NtrCS160Fbinding to the same duplex demonstrated that more than two protein dimers of the mutant protein could bind to the DNA.

CRP interacts with promoter-bound sigma54 RNA polymerase and blocks transcriptional activation of the dctA promoter

The cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is an activator of sigma70-dependent transcription. Analysis of the sigma54-dependent dctA promoter reveals a novel negative regulatory function for CRP. CRP can bind to two distant sites of the dctA promoter, sites which overlap the upstream activator sequences for the DctD activator. CRP interacts with Esigma54 bound at the dctA promoter via DNA loop formation. When the CRP-binding sites are deleted, CRP still interacts in a cAMP-dependent manner with the stable Esigma54 closed complex via protein-protein contacts. CRP is able to repress activation of the dctA promoter, even in the absence of specific CRP-binding sites. CRP affects both the final level and the kinetics of activation. The establishment of the repression and its release by the NtrC activator proceed via slow processes. The kinetics suggest that CRP favours a new form of closed complex which interconverts slowly with the classical closed intermediate. Only the latter is capable of interacting with an activator to form an open promoter complex. Thus, Esigma54 promoters are responsive to CRP, a protein unrelated to sigma54 activators, and the repression exerted is the direct result of an interaction between Esigma54 and the CRP-cAMP complex.

Activation of the toluene-responsive regulator XylR causes a transcriptional switch between sigma54 and sigma70 promoters at the divergent Pr/Ps region of the TOL plasmid

The mechanism by which XylR, the toluene-responsive activator of the sigma54-dependent Pu and Ps promoters of the Pseudomonas TOL plasmid pWW0, downregulates its own sigma70 promoter Prhas been examined. An in vitro transcription system was developed in order to reproduce the repression of Probserved in cells of P. putida (pWW0) both in the presence and in the absence of the XylR inducer, benzyl alcohol. DNA templates bearing the two sigma70-RNA polymerase (RNAP) binding sites of Pr, which overlap the upstream activating sequences (UAS) for XylR in the divergent sigma54 promoter Ps, were transcribed in the presence of a constitutively active XylR variant deleted of its N-terminal domain (XylRdeltaA). The addition of ATP, known to trigger multimerization of the regulator at the UAS, enhanced the repression of Pr by XylR. Furthermore, we observed activation of the divergent sigma54 promoter Ps during Pr downregulation by XylRdeltaA. These results support the notion that activation of XylR by aromatic inducers in vivo triggers a transcriptional switch between Pr and Ps. Such a switch is apparently caused by the ATP-dependent multimerization and strong DNA binding of the protein required for activation of the sigma54 promoter. This device could reset the level of XylR expression during activation of the sigma54 Pu and Ps promoters of the TOL plasmid.

Structural and functional analyses of activating amino acid substitutions in the receiver domain of NtrC: evidence for an activating surface

The bacterial enhancer-binding protein NtrC activates transcription when phosphorylated on aspartate 54 in its amino (N)-terminal regulatory domain or when altered by constitutively activating amino acid substitutions. The N-terminal domain of NtrC, which acts positively on the remainder of the protein, is homologous to a large family of signal transduction domains called receiver domains. Phosphorylation of an aspartate residue in a receiver domain modulates the function of a downstream target, but the accompanying structural changes are not clear. In the present work we examine structural and functional differences between the wild-type receiver domain of NtrC and mutant forms carrying constitutively activating substitutions. Combinations of such substitutions resulted in both increased structural changes in the N-terminal domain, monitored by NMR chemical shift differences, and increased transcriptional activation by the full-length protein. Structural changes caused by substitutions outside the active site (D86N and A89T) were not only local but extended over a substantial portion of the N-terminal domain including the region from alpha-helix 3 to beta-strand 5 ("3445 face") and propagating to the active site. Interestingly, the activating substitution of glutamate for aspartate at the site of phosphorylation (D54E) also triggered structural changes in the 3445 face. Thus, the active site and the 3445 face appear to interact. Implications with respect to how phosphorylation may affect the structure of receiver domains and how structural changes may be communicated to the remainder of NtrC are discussed.

Bacillus subtilis PhoP binds to the phoB tandem promoter exclusively within the phosphate starvation-inducible promoter

Several gene products, including three two-component systems, make up a signal transduction network that controls the phosphate starvation response in Bacillus subtilis. Epistasis experiments indicate that PhoP, a response regulator, is furthest downstream of the known regulators in the signaling pathway that regulates Pho regulon genes. We report the overexpression, purification, and use of PhoP in investigating its role in Pho regulon gene activation. PhoP was a substrate for both the kinase and phosphatase activities of its cognate sensor kinase, PhoR. It was not phosphorylated by acetyl phosphate. Purified phosphorylated PhoP (PhoPP) had a half-life of approximately 2.5 h, which was reduced to about 15 min by addition of the same molar amount of *PhoR (the cytoplasmic region of PhoR). ATP significantly increased phosphatase activity of *PhoR on PhoPP. In gel filtration and cross-linking studies, both PhoP and PhoPP were shown to be dimers. The dimerization domain was located within the 135 amino acids at the N terminus of PhoP. Phosphorylated or unphosphorylated PhoP bound to one of the alkaline phosphatase gene promoters, the phoB promoter. Furthermore, PhoP bound exclusively to the -18 to -73 region (relative to the transcriptional start site +1) of the phosphate starvation-inducible promoter (Pv) but not to the adjacent developmentally regulated promoter (Ps). These data corroborate the genetic data for phoB regulation and suggest that activation of phoB is via direct interaction between PhoP and the phoB promoter. Studies of the phosphorylation, oligomerization, and DNA binding activity of the PhoP protein demonstrate that its N-terminal phosphorylation and dimerization domain and its C-terminal DNA binding domain function independently of one another, distinguishing PhoP from other response regulators, such as PhoB (Escherichia coli) and NtrC.

Transcriptional activation via DNA-looping: visualization of intermediates in the activation pathway of E. coli RNA polymerase x sigma 54 holoenzyme by scanning force microscopy

Scanning force microscopy (SFM) has been used to study transcriptional activation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase x sigma 54 (RNAP x sigma 54) at the glnA promoter by the constitutive mutant NtrC(D54E,S160F) of the NtrC Protein (nitrogen regulatory protein C). DNA-protein complexes were deposited on mica and images were recorded in air. The DNA template was a 726 bp linear fragment with two NtrC binding sites located at the end and about 460 bp away from the RNAP x sigma 54 glnA promoter. By choosing appropriate conditions the structure of various intermediates in the transcription process could be visualized and analyzed: (1) different multimeric complexes of NtrC(D54E,S160F) dimers bound to the DNA template; (2) the closed complex of RNAP x sigma 54 at the glnA promoter; (3) association between DNA bound RNAP x sigma 54 and NtrC(D54E,S160F) with the intervening DNA looped out; and (4) the activated open promoter complex of RNAP x sigma 54. Measurements of the DNA bending angle of RNAP x sigma 54 closed promoter complexes yielded an apparent bending angle of 49(+/-24) degrees. Under conditions that allowed the formation of the open promoter complex, the distribution of bending angles displayed two peaks at 50(+/-24) degrees and 114(+/-18) degrees, suggesting that the transition from the RNAP x sigma 54 closed complex to the open complex is accompanied by an increase of the DNA bending angle.

Paths to activation of transcription

In bacteria, transcription—the synthesis of RNA from DNA—is carried out by the enzyme RNA polymerase, which binds to the start site of a gene, the promoter. Now two reports in this week's issue, Wyman (p. 1658 ) and Miller (p. 1655 ), show two ways that this complex can be triggered to start transcription, both by proteins that act to change the configuration of the RNA polymerase enzyme itself. In his Perspective, Geiduschek discusses these and other examples of transcriptional regulation, suggesting that each may act on the step in the transcription process in which the RNA polymerase-promoter complex is reconfigured in preparation for RNA synthesis.