Effect of differing doses of inhaled budesonide on markers of airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma

Analysis of montelukast in mild persistent asthmatic patients with near-normal lung function

Few studies have specifically evaluated controller therapy in patients with mild persistent asthma. We used a subgroup analysis to investigate the effects of montelukast, a potent cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, on adult patients on the milder end of the asthma severity spectrum. We have identified seven double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of adult patients with mild-to-moderate chronic asthma in which montelukast was investigated. Subsets of patients with baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) > 80% and > 75% predicted or further restricted by less than daily rescue beta-agonist use were included as four cohorts (A, B, C, D), and efficacy measures, including change in FEV1 rescue-free days, beta-agonist use, nocturnal awakenings and blood eosinophil counts were evaluated. Cohorts A to D comprised 21%, 8%, 11%, and 4%, respectively, of patients from these studies. Mean pretreatment FEV1 ranged from 81% to 84% predicted and daily beta-agonist use from 2.4 to 4.5 puffs day(-1) in the four cohorts. Pooled results demonstrated a treatment effect for montelukast over placebo in all cohorts, for all endpoints. There was a significant improvement in FEV1 in montelukast-treated patients (7-8% over baseline) compared with placebo (1-4% over baseline, between-group difference P < or = 0.02) for all cohorts. Similarly, the percentage of rescue-free days increased substantially more with montelukast (22-30%) than with placebo (8-13%). This subgroup analysis indicates that montelukast produced improvements in parameters of asthma control in patients with milder persistent asthma that should be confirmed in additional prospective trials.

Exhaled nitric oxide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: relationship to pulmonary function

The following study was undertaken in order to determine how exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) levels in former smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared to eNO levels in patients with asthma and in healthy nonsmoking volunteers. The study also aimed to determine any relationship between eNO levels in COPD and: 1) conventional measures of lung function; and 2) inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use. In former smokers with COPD, nonsmokers with asthma and volunteers, eNO levels, spirometry, lung volumes, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity of the lung (DL,CO) and resting oxygen saturation (Sa,O2) were measured. Median eNO was significantly higher among patients with COPD than among healthy volunteers (p = 0.003) but lower than among patients with asthma (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in eNO levels between COPD patients using ICS and those not using ICS. By contrast, eNO was lower among asthma patients who used ICS (median 32 parts per billion (ppb); 25-75% range 16-54) than among asthma patients who did not (51 ppb; 32-87) (p = 0.034). Among patients with COPD, eNO was inversely correlated with forced expiratory volume in one second, DL,CO and Sa,O2, and was positively correlated with the residual lung volume/total lung capacity ratio. Among patients with asthma, no significant correlations were found. Exhaled nitric oxide is increased in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, an increase that is influenced by structural abnormalities of tobacco-induced lung damage.

Dose-Response Relationship and Reproducibility of the Fall in Exhaled Nitric Oxide After Inhaled Beclomethasone Dipropionate Therapy in Asthma Patients

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a marker of asthmatic airway inflammation. We determined the dose response and the reproducibility of the FENO fall following inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (iBDP) therapy in nonsteroid-treated asthmatic patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Study A: For four 1-week periods (period 1 to period 4), the following regimens were administered in sequential order to 15 nonsteroid-treated asthmatic patients: period 1, placebo; period 2, 100 microg/d of iBDP; period 3, 400 microg/D of iBDP; and period 4, 800 microg/d of iBDP. Spirometry, FENO, and provocative concentration of methacholine resulting in a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)) were measured at each of five visits (visit 1 to visit 5). Study B: During four periods, 12 nonsteroid-treated asthmatic patients received placebo treatment for 7 days (period 1), 200 microg/d of iBDP for 14 days (period 2), washout on placebo treatment until the FENO was within 15% of baseline (period 3), and 200 microg/d of iBDP for 14 days (period 4).

RESULTS

Study A: Mean FEV(1) rose progressively from 3.10 L (visit 1) to 3.41 L (visit 5; p = 0.001). All iBDP doses caused a significant FEV(1) rise compared to placebo treatment, but with no significant separation of doses using FEV(1). FENO geometric mean (95% confidence limits) fell progressively from 103.5 parts per billion (ppb) (78.5 to 136.7) to 37.4 ppb (29.1 to 48.0) from visit 1 to visit 5 (p = 0.001). All doses of iBDP resulted in a significant change in FENO from placebo treatment, but with significant separation of only the 100-microg and 800-microg doses by FENO. Geometric mean (95% confidence limits) PC(20) rose progressively from 0.01 mg/mL (0.00 to 0.19) to 0.48 mg/mL (0.01 to 8.1) from visit 1 to visit 5 (p = 0.002). All doses of iBDP resulted in a significant change in PC(20) from baseline or placebo treatment, but with no significant separation of active iBDP doses using PC(20). Study B: FENO fell from 111.56 ppb (80.3 to 155.1) to 66.3 ppb (49.2 to 89.5; p < 0.001) from period 1 to period 2, and from 110.2 ppb (79.3 to 153.1) to 61.7 ppb (42.9 to 88.8; p < 0.001) from period 3 to period 4. There were no significant differences between FENO in period 1 and period 3 (p = 0.83) or between period 2 and period 4 (p = 0.220).

CONCLUSIONS

FENO was superior to FEV(1) and PC(20) in separating doses of iBDP. The fall in FENO after two identical administrations of iBDP separated by placebo washout was highly reproducible.

Role of exhaled nitric oxide in asthma

Nitric oxide (NO), an evanescent atmospheric gas, has recently been discovered to be an important biological mediator in animals and humans. Nitric oxide plays a key role within the lung in the modulation of a wide variety of functions including pulmonary vascular tone, nonadrenergic non-cholinergic (NANC) transmission and modification of the inflammatory response. Asthma is characterized by chronic airway inflammation and increased synthesis of NO and other highly reactive and toxic substances (reactive oxygen species). Pro- inflammatory cytokines such as TNFalpha and IL-1beta are secreted in asthma and result in inflammatory cell recruitment, but also induce calcium- and calmodulin-independent nitric oxide synthases (iNOS) and perpetuate the inflammatory response within the airways. Nitric oxide is released by several pulmonary cells including epithelial cells, eosinophils and macrophages, and NO has been shown to be increased in conditions associated with airway inflammation, such as asthma and viral infections. Nitric oxide can be measured in the expired air of several species, and exhaled NO can now be rapidly and easily measured by the use of chemiluminescence analysers in humans. Exhaled NO is increased in steroid-naive asthmatic subjects and during an asthma exacerbation, although it returns to baseline levels with appropriate anti-inflammatory treatment, and such measurements have been proposed as a simple non-invasive method of measuring airway inflammation in asthma. Here the chemical and biological properties of NO are briefly discussed, followed by a summary of the methodological considerations relevant to the measurement of exhaled NO and its role in lung diseases including asthma. The origin of exhaled NO is considered, and brief mention made of other potential markers of airway inflammation or oxidant stress in exhaled breath.

Evaluation of salmeterol or montelukast as second-line therapy for asthma not controlled with inhaled corticosteroids

OBJECTIVE

To assess the addition of a leukotriene receptor antagonist and a long-acting beta(2)-agonist as second-line therapy in asthma.

DESIGN

Placebo-controlled, double-dummy, crossover study.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic.

PATIENTS

Twenty patients with persistent asthma not controlled with inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

Montelukast 10 mg once daily, or salmeterol, 50 microg bid, each for 2 weeks with 1-week run-in and washout placebo periods.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge, blood eosinophil count (EOS), exhaled nitric oxide, and lung function after both placebo periods and after the first and last doses of each active treatment. Patients recorded their domiciliary peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and rescue bronchodilator requirement (RES) twice daily throughout the study. For the primary end point of the provocative concentration of AMP causing a 20% fall in FEV(1), compared to placebo (47.5 +/- 13.0 mg/mL), there were significant differences with the first (114.1 +/- 36.9 mg/mL) and last (94.2 +/- 30.4 mg/mL) doses of montelukast as well as the first (160.1 +/- 64.5 mg/mL) but not the last (70.1 +/- 23.7 mg/mL) dose of salmeterol. Only montelukast produced significant suppression of the EOS. Neither drug affected exhaled nitric oxide levels. There were significant improvements with the first doses of salmeterol for all parameters of lung function. After 2 weeks of treatment, there were significant improvements with both drugs for RES and morning PEF. There were no significant differences between drugs for any end points except EOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast and salmeterol exhibited significant improvements in asthma control when given as second-line therapy. Montelukast also produced significant effects on AMP challenge and EOS suggesting anti-inflammatory activity.

FeNO measured at fixed exhalation flow rate during controlled tidal breathing in children from the age of 2 yr

We have outlined a new method to measure exhaled nitric oxide on-line at fixed flow rate during controlled tidal breathing (FeNO [controlled]) in young children aged 2 yr and older. FeNO(controlled) measures NO on-line during operator-controlled tidal breathing. The operator targets the exhaled flow of the child within preset limits of 0.4-0.6 L/s by continuously adjusting an expiratory resistance. FeNO(controlled) is estimated during end exhalation. We have validated this method against the reference method of the single breath on-line (SBOL) maneuvre (FeNO[SBOL]) and compared it with NO in mixed exhaled air collected in a bag (FeNO [mixed]). Sixty-seven children were studied: 16 school children and 51 children aged 2-5 yr; 14 of the young children were healthy, 22 had asthma treated with regular inhaled budesonide, and 15 had mild episodic wheeze treated with inhaled terbutaline as necessary. FeNO (controlled) showed good agreement with FeNO(SBOL) (factor difference 0.7-1.4), whereas FeNO(mixed) showed poor agreement with FeNO(SBOL) (factor difference 0.51-5.37). FeNO(controlled) (mean [95% confidence interval]) was 6 ppb (4-8 ppb) in young children with asthma, 5 ppb (3-7 ppb) in young children with mild episodic wheeze, and 3 ppb (2-4 ppb) in healthy control subjects (asthma versus control subjects: p = 0.006; episodic wheeze versus control subjects: p = 0.057). FeNO(controlled) increased from 4 ppb (2-7 ppb) to 13 ppb (10-18 ppb) (p < 0.0001) when the mean daily maintenance dose of budesonide was tapered in nine young children with asthma. FeNO(controlled) is feasible in young children from age 2 and shows better agreement with FeNO(SBOL) than FeNO(mixed). FeNO(controlled) covaries with asthma disease severity and steroid dose. FeNO(controlled) is therefore suggested as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for monitoring asthma disease activity in young children with asthma from the age of 2 yr.

Predictive markers of asthma exacerbation during stepwise dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids

To determine predictors for failed reduction of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), in 50 subjects with well-controlled asthma (age 43.7 [18-69]; 22 males) taking a median dose of 1,000 microg ICS/d (100-3,600 microg/d), ICS were halved every 8 wk. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to a bronchial provocation test (BPT) with histamine was measured at baseline. AHR to BPT with mannitol, spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), and, in 31 subjects, sputum inflammatory cells were measured at baseline and at monthly intervals. Thirty-nine subjects suffered an asthma exacerbation. Seven subjects were successfully weaned off ICS. Using a Kaplan- Meier survival analysis, the significant predictors of a failure of ICS reduction were being hyperresponsive to both histamine and mannitol at baseline (p = 0.039), and being hyperresponsive to mannitol during the dose-reduction phase of the study (p = 0.02). Subjects older than 40 yr of age tended to be at greater risk of ICS reduction failure (p = 0.059). Response to mannitol and percentage sputum eosinophils were significantly greater before a failed ICS reduction than before the last successful ICS reduction, whereas there were no significant differences in symptoms, spirometry, or eNO. These findings suggest that documentation of patient's AHR or sputum eosinophils may be useful in guiding the reduction of ICS doses.

Acute anti-inflammatory effects of inhaled budesonide in asthma: a randomized controlled trial

Corticosteroids can have acute effects on airway function and methacholine airway responsiveness in asthma as early as 6 h after dosing, suggesting there may be an acute anti-inflammatory effect of inhaled corticosteroid in asthma. This study aimed to determine the effects of a single dose of inhaled budesonide on sputum eosinophils and mast cells in adults with asthma, and to examine whether the mechanism of clearance of eosinophils was by apoptosis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted. At the screening visit, adults with stable asthma (n = 41) ceased inhaled corticosteroid therapy for 4 d and those with significant sputum eosinophilia (> or = 7%) were randomized (n = 26) to a single dose of budesonide 2,400 microg or placebo via Turbuhaler, on two separate study days. Symptoms and lung function were followed for 6 h, then sputum was induced and airway responsiveness to hypertonic saline determined. Sputum eosinophils (mean, SE) were significantly lower 6 h after budesonide (25%, 4.5), compared with placebo (37%, 6.2, p < 0.05). There was a 2.2-fold (95% CI 1.45 to 3.33) improvement in airway responsiveness with budesonide. No significant difference was seen on mast cells, apoptotic eosinophils, symptoms, or lung function. In conclusion, a single dose of inhaled corticosteroids has beneficial effects on airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness as early as 6 h after dosing. This may be clinically useful as therapy during mild exacerbations of asthma.

Budesonide at different doses for chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled budesonide (BUD) is available in a range of doses for treating chronic asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To quantitatively assess the efficacy and safety of budesonide at different doses in order to establish whether a clinically significant dose response profile exists.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was carried out for Controlled and Randomised Clinical Trials (RCTs) using the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, correspondence with trial authors and the manufacturer.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing one dose of budesonide to a second dose in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer extracted data; authors were contacted to clarify missing information. Quantitative analyses where undertaken using Review Manager.

MAIN RESULTS

24 studies were selected for inclusion in the review (3907 subjects). In non-oral steroid treated, mild to moderately severe asthma no clinically worthwhile differences in FEV1, morning PEFR, symptom scores or rescue beta2 agonist use were apparent across a dose range of 200-1600 mcg/d. However, in moderate to severe asthma there was a significant reduction in the likelihood of trial withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation with BUD 800 mcg/d compared to 200 mcg/d: RR 3.93 (95% CI, 1.4 to 10.9). This result was largely weighted by a single large high quality RCT. In a single study in patients receiving oral corticosteroids, clinically significant improvements favouring high dose BUD (1600 mcg/d) over low dose (200 mcg/d) were apparent for FEV1 and morning PEFR. In two studies there was no dose dependent oral steroid sparing effect for BUD 1600 mcg/d v 800 or 400 mcg/d. Statistically significant, dose dependent suppression of 24 hour urinary free cortisol excretion and serum cortisol post synthetic ACTH infusion over the dose range 800-3200 mcg/d were apparent but the clinical significance of these findings is unclear.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide exhibits a clinically significant dose response effect for improvement in FEV1 in severe asthma and reduction of exacerbations in moderate to severe asthma. No significant dose dependent improvements in FEV1, PEFR or symptoms are evident in non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild to moderate disease. Dose dependent alterations in sensitive measures of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function were evident but the clinical significance of these changes is unclear.

A simple flow-driven method for online measurement of exhaled NO starting at the age of 4 to 5 years

NO is increased in exhaled air of asthmatic patients, and may be used as a marker of airway inflammation. The online method is a standardized technique for measuring exhaled nitric oxide (ENO). However, this method has proven difficult for some children, who may have trouble maintaining a constant expiratory flow. The aim of this study was to validate a modified technique for online ENO measurement that utilizes a flow regulator to overcome the patient problem of having to actively maintain a constant expiratory flow. We measured ENO levels with two methods in 105 asthmatic and 10 healthy subjects, comparing the standardized (ST) single-breath method with a modified single-breath, flow-driven (FD) method. With the ST method and visual monitoring, the subjects inhaled NO-free air to TLC, and exhaled with a target flow of 50 ml/s. With the FD method, the subjects exhaled from TLC and flow was kept constant (50 ml/s) by the operator, using a flow regulator. The subjects were divided into two groups, one consisting of children aged 4 to 8 yr (n = 74) and the other of children aged 9 to 16 yr (n = 41). In the group aged 4 to 8 yr, 38 children (51%) were unable to perform the ST method, whereas only five children (7%) failed to perform the FD technique. In the group aged 9 to 16 yr, only four children (10%) were unable to perform the ST maneuver, and all successfully performed the FD maneuver. The mean concentrations of ENO in the 73 children who performed both types of maneuver were similar (36.1 +/- 3.4 [mean +/- SEM] ppb with the ST method and 33.8 +/- 3.3 ppb with the FD technique, p = NS) and were highly correlated with one another (r = 0.99, p < 0.0001). ENO values were significantly higher in steroid-naive than in steroid-treated asthmatic children. In conclusion, we describe a modified online method for measuring ENO that is simple, does not require active cooperation to maintain a constant expiratory flow, and can be easily performed by children from 4 to 5 yr of age onward.

Budesonide inhalation suspension: a review of its use in infants, children and adults with inflammatory respiratory disorders

Budesonide, a topically active corticosteroid, has a broad spectrum of clinically significant local anti-inflammatory effects in patients with inflammatory lung diseases including persistent asthma. In infants and young children with persistent asthma, day- and night-time symptom scores, and the number of days in which beta2-agonist bronchodilators were required, were significantly lower during randomised, double-blind treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 to 2 mg/day than placebo in 3 multicentre trials. Significantly fewer children discontinued therapy with budesonide inhalation suspension than with placebo because of worsening asthma symptoms in a study that included children who were receiving inhaled corticosteroids at baseline. Recent evidence indicates that budesonide inhalation suspension is significantly more effective than nebulised sodium cromoglycate in improving control of asthma in young children with persistent asthma. At a dosage of 2 mg/day, budesonide inhalation suspension significantly reduced the number of asthma exacerbations and requirements for systemic corticosteroids in preschool children with severe persistent asthma. In children with acute asthma or wheezing, the preparation was as effective as, or more effective than oral prednisolone in improving symptoms. In children with croup, single 2 or 4mg dosages of budesonide inhalation suspension were significantly more effective than placebo and as effective as oral dexamethasone 0.6 mg/kg or nebulised L-epinephrine (adrenaline) 4mg in alleviating croup symptoms and preventing or reducing the duration of hospitalisation. Early initiation of therapy with budesonide inhalation suspension 1 mg/day appears to reduce the need for mechanical ventilation and decrease overall corticosteroid usage in preterm very low birthweight infants at risk for chronic lung disease. In adults with persistent asthma, budesonide inhalation suspension < or =8 mg/day has been compared with inhaled budesonide 1.6 mg/day and fluticasone propionate 2 mg/day administered by metered dose inhaler. Greater improvements in asthma control occurred in patients during treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension than with budesonide via metered dose inhaler, whereas fluticasone propionate produced greater increases in morning peak expiratory flow rates than nebulised budesonide. Several small studies suggest that the preparation has an oral corticosteroid-sparing effect in adults with persistent asthma and that it may be as effective as oral corticosteroids during acute exacerbations of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The frequency of adverse events was similar in children receiving budesonide inhalation suspension 0.25 to 2 mg/day or placebo in 12-week studies. During treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 to 1 mg/day in 3 nonblind 52-week studies, growth velocity in children was generally unaffected; however, a small but statistically significant decrease in growth velocity was detected in children who were not using inhaled corticosteroids prior to the introduction of budesonide inhalation suspension. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function was not affected by short (12 weeks) or long (52 weeks) term treatment with nebulised budesonide. In conclusion, budesonide inhalation suspension is the most widely available nebulised corticosteroid, and in the US is the only inhaled corticosteroid indicated in children aged > or =1 year with persistent asthma. The preparation is suitable for use in infants, children and adults with persistent asthma and in infants and children with croup.

Effects of once-daily formoterol and budesonide given alone or in combination on surrogate inflammatory markers in asthmatic adults

OBJECTIVES

We wished to evaluate the effects of once-daily combination therapy on surrogate inflammatory markers.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with atopic persistent asthma were evaluated (mean age, 32.4 years; FEV(1), 75.2% predicted) in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled crossover study with a 1-week placebo washout period, comparing the following once-daily nighttime treatments: (1) formoterol (FM), 12 microg, for 2 weeks and FM, 24 microg, for 2 weeks; or (2) budesonide (BUD), 400 microg, for 2 weeks and BUD, 800 microg, for 2 weeks; or (3) FM, 12 microg, plus BUD, 400 microg, for 2 weeks and FM, 24 microg, plus BUD, 800 microg, for 2 weeks. Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), and serum eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) were evaluated at 12 h postdosing after administration of each placebo and after 2 and 4 weeks of each treatment.

RESULTS

The results of AMP challenge (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1)) at 4 weeks showed significant (p<0.05) improvements after patients had received all active treatments compared to placebo (20 mg/mL), with FM plus BUD, 261 mg/mL, being superior (p<0.05) to FM alone, 82 mg/mL, but not to BUD, 201 mg/mL. NO and ECP showed significant (p<0.05) reductions compared to placebo with FM plus BUD or BUD alone but not with FM alone. Combination therapy was associated with optimal patient preference (rank order, FM plus BUD > FM > BUD; p<0.0005), highest domiciliary peak expiratory flow, and lowest rescue inhaler usage. All three treatments produced equivalent improvements in spirometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients preferred once-daily combination therapy, but this had no greater effect on inflammatory markers than therapy with BUD alone. FM alone had no anti-inflammatory activity but exhibited bronchoprotection. This emphasizes the importance of first optimizing anti-inflammatory control with inhaled corticosteroids before considering adding a regular long-acting beta(2)-agonist.

Antiasthmatic effects of mediator blockade versus topical corticosteroids in allergic rhinitis and asthma

To compare the antiasthmatic efficacy of inflammatory mediator blockade versus topical corticosteroid therapy in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and asthma, 14 patients were enrolled into a single-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled crossover study comparing 2 wk therapy of (1) 400 microgram orally inhaled budesonide plus 200 microgram intranasal budesonide (BUD) or (2) 10 mg oral montelukast plus 10 mg oral cetirizine (ML + CZ). Before each treatment period, patients received 7 to 10 d placebo washout. All treatments were given once daily in the morning. Throughout the study, patients recorded the following domiciliary measures: peak expiratory flow (PEF), rescue inhaler requirement, asthma symptoms, and daily activity score. Laboratory measurements were made at trough of adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge and exhaled nitric oxide (NO). Compared with pooled placebo (PL), there were significant (p < 0.05) improvements in all domiciliary measures with both treatments (mean PEF [L/min] PL: 463; BUD: 478; ML + CZ: 483). For geometric mean AMP PC(20) (mg/ml), there was an improvement (p < 0.05), compared with PL (47), for ML + CZ (133) but not for BUD (51); whereas for NO (ppb) there was significant suppression with BUD (7.6) but not ML + CZ (11.5) compared with PL (13.6). In conclusion, both combined mediator blockade and combined topical corticosteroids are equally effective antiasthma therapy in patients with asthma and SAR.

A comparison of exhaled nitric oxide and induced sputum as markers of airway inflammation

BACKGROUND

Exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) has been proposed as a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation in asthma.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the relationships among ENO, eosinophilic airway inflammation as measured by induced sputum, and physiologic parameters of disease severity (spirometry and methacholine PC(20)). We also examined the effect of corticosteroid treatment and atopy on ENO levels and eosinophil counts in induced sputum.

METHODS

Measurements were taken on one day in 22 healthy nonatopic subjects, 28 healthy atopic subjects, 38 asthmatic subjects not taking inhaled steroids, 35 asthmatic subjects taking inhaled steroids, and 8 subjects with eosinophilic bronchitis without asthma.

RESULTS

ENO levels showed significant but weak correlations with eosinophil differential counts in the steroid-naive asthmatic and healthy atopic groups (r (s) < 0.05). ENO levels were significantly lower in the asthmatic subjects taking steroids compared with the asthmatic subjects not taking steroids, despite there being no difference in the sputum cell counts, and a tendency to increased airflow limitation. ENO levels and sputum eosinophil counts were equally good at differentiating from steroid-naive asthmatic subjects. ENO levels were consistently raised in subjects with eosinophilic bronchitis without asthma. Atopy had no effect on ENO levels in the healthy subjects.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that ENO is likely to have limited utility as a surrogate clinical measurement for either the presence or severity of eosinophilic airway inflammation, except in steroid-naive subjects.

Adolescents in clinical remission of atopic asthma have elevated exhaled nitric oxide levels and bronchial hyperresponsiveness

Symptoms of atopic asthma often decrease or even seem to disappear around puberty. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this so-called clinical remission is accompanied by remission of airway inflammation, since symptoms relapse in a substantial proportion of subjects later in life. To assess indicators of inflammation and/or structural damage of the airways, exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) and bronchial responsiveness to adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP) and methacholine (MCh) were determined in 21 subjects in clinical remission of atopic asthma. Clinical remission was defined as complete absence of symptoms of asthma without the use of any medication in the year preceding the study. Results were compared with those of 21 patients with current asthma and 18 healthy control subjects. We found significantly higher eNO values in the remission group than in healthy controls (geometric mean, 18.9 and 1.0 ppb, respectively; p < 0.001) whereas eNO values of the remission group and those of the subjects with current asthma (geometric mean, 21.9 ppb) were similar (p = 0.09). The responsiveness to both AMP and MCh of subjects in clinical remission was significantly higher as compared with responsiveness of healthy controls, and lower than responsiveness of subjects with current asthma. A significant correlation could be established between eNO and responsiveness to AMP, but not between eNO and responsiveness to MCh. The results of this study are suggestive of persistent airway inflammation during clinical remission of atopic asthma. We speculate that subclinical inflammation is a risk factor for asthma relapse later in life, and that eNO and responsiveness to both AMP and MCh can be used as different, noninvasive indices of the inflammatory process of the airways.

Induced sputum: diagnostic value in interstitial lung disease

Induced sputum by inhalation of hypertonic saline solution is a noninvasive technique used to collect cellular and soluble material from lung airways. During the past decade, this method has been widely used to assess airway inflammation in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, since it produces reliable results and compares favorably to other invasive techniques, such as biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Induced sputum has been recently used to study interstitial lung disease (ILD), more specifically pneumoconiosis, sarcoidosis, and nongranulomatous ILD. Moreover, results from induced sputum supplied information comparable to BAL findings for occupational lung disease and were able to distinguish sarcoidosis patients from healthy subjects and from patients with nongranulomatous ILD. Although induced sputum had previously provided promising results in assessing patients with ILD, its diagnostic role has not yet been well defined. Further studies of the evaluation by induced sputum of grading of severity, follow-up of disease, and effects of treatment are needed. Additionally, to date no specific studies have been undertaken to evaluate the safety and functional effects of sputum induction on patients with ILD. In conclusion, we think that induced sputum can be used as a complementary tool to BAL both in research and in clinical monitoring of patients with ILD.

Effects of adding a leukotriene antagonist or a long-acting beta(2)-agonist in asthmatic patients with the glycine-16 beta(2)-adrenoceptor genotype

PURPOSE

In the United Kingdom, about 40% of patients with asthma are homozygous for the glycine-16 beta(2)-adrenoceptor polymorphism, which predisposes them to agonist-induced down-regulation and desensitization of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor. We assessed the effects of adding treatment with either a long-acting beta(2)-agonist (inhaled formoterol, 12 microg twice daily) or a leukotriene receptor antagonist (oral zafirlukast, 20 mg twice daily) to inhaled corticosteroid therapy in patients with this genotype.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 24 patients with mild to moderate asthma who were being treated with inhaled corticosteroids. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments (placebo, zafirlukast, or formoterol in addition to inhaled corticosteroids) for 1 week each in a crossover fashion, separated by a 1-week placebo run-in and washout period. Measurements of bronchoprotection (measured as the provocative dose of methacholine that produced a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)]), exhaled nitric oxide (a surrogate marker of airway inflammation), and symptoms were made before each treatment and 12 hours after the last dose of each treatment.

RESULTS

Both formoterol and zafirlukast were equally effective in maintaining asthma control compared with placebo: the geometric mean-fold difference in the methacholine provocative dose was 1.5-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1- to 2.2-fold) for zafirlukast and 1.9-fold (95% CI: 1.2- to 2.9-fold) for formoterol. As compared with placebo, zafirlukast caused a significant suppression in exhaled nitric oxide (1.7-fold difference in geometric mean values, 95% CI: 1.1- to 2.6-fold) but formoterol did not (1.2-fold difference, 95% CI: 0.8- to 1.9-fold). Diary cards showed significant (P <0.05) improvements in the peak flow with formoterol (morning and evening) and zafirlukast (evening) as compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Formoterol and zafirlukast maintained asthma control in patients who might be genetically predisposed to fare worse with long-acting beta(2)-agonists. The reduction in exhaled nitric oxide with zafirlukast suggests that it may have anti-inflammatory effects in addition to those seen with inhaled corticosteroids.

Noninvasive measurement of airway inflammation using exhaled nitric oxide and induced sputum. Current status and future use

The recent use of IS and the analysis of exhaled mediators such as NO are important steps forward in our ability to noninvasively assess airway inflammation without the need to resort to bronchoscopy. Exhaled NO and IS are complementary techniques that provide different information (Table 1). Induced sputum can provide knowledge regarding the cells and mediators participating in the inflammatory response, but is time consuming and expensive. Exhaled NO measurement is performed simply and quickly, and is a nonspecific marker of an inflammatory process. The initial capital costs of equipment for NO analysis are high, however. Once the problems of standardized collection and oropharyngeal contamination have been dealt with, BC may also prove to be an additional tool for the assessment of airway inflammation. It is likely that the next 10 years will see the establishment of these noninvasive tools for the clinical assessment of airway inflammation and oxidative stress, and change the entire way we manage asthma.

Endogenous nitric oxide in allergic airway disease

There has been intense research into the role nitric oxide (NO) plays in physiologic and pathologic mechanisms. The presence of NO in exhaled breath and the high concentrations in nasal airways stimulated many studies examining exhaled and nasal NO as potential markers of airway inflammation, enabling repeated monitoring of airway inflammation not possible with invasive tests (eg, bronchoscopy). In airway inflammation, NO is not merely a marker but may have anti-inflammatory and proinflammatory effects. Nasal NO measurement may be used in the noninvasive diagnosis and monitoring of nasal disease. This review was compiled by speakers who gave presentations on NO at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology in 1999 on exhaled and nasal NO, in vitro studies of NO, the chemistry of airway NO formation, and standardized measurement of exhaled mediators.

A long-term study of the antiinflammatory effect of low-dose budesonide plus formoterol versus high-dose budesonide in asthma

Adding inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonists to a low dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), results in better clinical asthma control than increasing the dose of ICS. However, this approach may mask underlying airway inflammation. In a double-blind parallel-group study, we evaluated the effect of adding formoterol to a low dose of budesonide, compared with a higher dose of budesonide, on the composition of induced sputum. After a 4-wk run-in period of treatment with budesonide (800 microg, twice daily), 60 patients with moderate asthma were randomly assigned to a 1-yr treatment with 400 microg of budesonide plus placebo, twice daily (BUD800), or 100 microg of budesonide plus 12 microg of formoterol, twice daily (BUD200+F). All drugs were administered via Turbuhaler. Budesonide (800 microg, twice daily) during run-in significantly reduced median sputum eosinophils from 4.5 to 0.68%. No significant changes in the proportion of eosinophils, EG2(+) cells, other inflammatory cells, or ECP levels in sputum were observed over the ensuing 1-yr treatment with BUD200+F or BUD800. Clinical asthma control was not significantly different between both groups. In conclusion, no significant differences in sputum markers of airway inflammation were observed during a 1-yr treatment with a low dose of inhaled budesonide plus formoterol compared with a higher dose of budesonide.

Dose-response evaluation of the therapeutic index for inhaled budesonide in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma

PURPOSE

Inhaled corticosteroids have beneficial effects on pulmonary function and inflammation in patients with asthma, but they also cause systemic adverse effects, such as adrenal suppression. We evaluated the therapeutic index of inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients by comparing their dose-response effects on lung function, surrogate markers of airway inflammation, and tests of adrenal function.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

After a 10-day placebo run-in, we evaluated the effects of 200 microg, 400 microg, and 800 microg of inhaled budesonide, each dose given twice daily sequentially for 3 weeks in 26 patients, aged 35 +/- 12 years (mean +/- SD), with mild-to-moderate asthma. Measurements were made of bronchial reactivity, exhaled nitric oxide (a marker of airway inflammation), spirometry, serum eosinophilic cationic protein concentration, and 10-hour overnight urinary cortisol excretion. Plasma cortisol levels were measured at 8 AM and after stimulation with human corticotropin releasing factor.

RESULTS

For measurements of pulmonary function and exhaled nitric oxide, there was a plateau in the mean response to budesonide between 400 microg (low dose) and 800 microg (medium dose) per day, whereas for eosinophilic cationic protein and bronchial challenge, maximal benefits occurred between 800 and 1,600 microg (high dose) per day. Effects on plasma cortisol levels showed maximal suppression at 1,600 microg of budesonide per day. The proportion of patients with an optimal therapeutic index, in terms of a good airway response (fourfold decrease in bronchial hyperreactivity) and minimal systemic response (overnight urinary cortisol greater than 20 nmol), was similar at low-dose (46%) and at high-dose (52%) budesonide. The proportion of patients with a suboptimal therapeutic index, a good airway response with a marked systemic response (overnight urinary cortisol greater than 20 nmol), increased from 4% at low dose to 38% at high dose.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mild-to-moderate atopic asthma, there were dose-related effects of budesonide on surrogate markers of inflammation (bronchial hyperreactivity and serum eosinophilic cationic protein), although higher doses were associated with adrenal suppression and a decrease in the therapeutic index.

Nitric oxide and asthma: a review

Nitric oxide (NO) is synthesized from the amino acid arginine by enzymes called nitric oxide synthases. NO has an important physiologic role in the regulation of vascular tone, response to vascular injury, and hemostasis. It also acts as a neurotransmitter for the nonadrenergic noncholinergic nerves and has important antimicrobial, immunologic, and proinflammatory activities. The lung is rich in nitric oxide synthases, and NO is normally present in the exhaled air. Use of NO in the treatment of asthma has not withstood the test of time and is not recommended. With the advent of analyzers capable of measuring NO rapidly and reliably, however, the analysis of NO in exhaled air is being increasingly recognized as a potential noninvasive test for the evaluation of the inflammatory component of the pathology of patients with asthma. An increase in the exhaled NO has been shown to accompany eosinophilic inflammation and to correlate with other indices of inflammation in asthma. Exhaled NO increases during exacerbation and decreases with recovery in patients with asthma. As exhaled NO is not increased during bronchospasm in the absence of coexisting inflammation, it could serve to differentiate between the inflammatory and bronchospastic components in asthma, thereby guiding therapy with steroids and other anti-inflammatory medications. Levels of NO also can be increased in certain other conditions, for example, allergic rhinitis and adult respiratory distress syndrome, but these can be clinically differentiated from asthma and do not lessen the diagnostic value of exhaled NO. Measurements of exhaled NO are influenced by several physiologic and technical variables, which results in a wide variation in the levels reported from the different laboratories. Standardization of technique, a better understanding of the confounding effects of physiologic and environmental variables, and establishment of the normal range and variability of exhaled NO are needed before its measurement could gain wide acceptance as a clinically useful test. Development of less expensive NO analyzers is also an important consideration.

Changes in sputum eosinophils predict loss of asthma control

Exacerbations of asthma are likely to be due to an increase in airway inflammation. We have studied noninvasive markers of airway inflammation in asthma exacerbations induced by reducing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids. Following a 2-wk run-in period, mild exacerbations were induced in subjects with stable asthma controlled with medium- to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (beclomethasone dipropionate >/= 800 microg or equivalent daily) by switching them to budesonide 200 microg daily given from a dry-powder inhaler (Turbohaler). Fifteen subjects were enrolled and were seen twice weekly for 8 wk after steroid reduction. At each visit, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), and methacholine airway responsiveness were measured and spirometry and sputum induction were performed. Mild exacerbation was defined as: (1) a decrease in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) of >/= 20% but < 30% on at least two consecutive days as compared with the mean for the last 7 d of the run-in period; (2) awakening on two consecutive nights because of asthma; or (3) increased use of a short-acting beta(2)-agonist to eight or more puffs daily. Eight subjects did not develop exacerbations during the 8-wk study, whereas seven subjects developed mild exacerbations at Week 4 (n = 1), Week 6 (n = 1), and Week 8 (n = 5). The only significant difference between these two groups at baseline was a higher baseline sputum eosinophil count in subjects with subsequent exacerbations (p < 0.05). The increases in sputum eosinophils and exhaled NO were correlated with decreases in airway function, including decreases in morning PEF and FEV(1). However, multiple regression analysis suggested that the change in sputum eosinophils is a potentially useful marker in predicting loss of asthma control reflected by loss of airway function.

A dose-dependent effect of the novel inhaled corticosteroid ciclesonide on airway responsiveness to adenosine-5'-monophosphate in asthmatic patients

Inhaled corticosteroids decrease airway responsiveness in asthma partly through suppression of airway inflammation. We have previously demonstrated that inhaled budesonide reduced airway responsiveness to the mast cell stimulus adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP) to a threefold greater extent than to methacholine and sodium metabisulfite, suggesting that AMP responsiveness may be a more sensitive marker of airway inflammation and steroid action in order to assess a dose-response relationship. To investigate this, we studied the effects of three doses of the novel corticosteroid ciclesonide (50 micrograms, 200 micrograms, and 800 micrograms) inhaled as a dry powder twice daily on airway responsiveness to AMP and inflammatory parameters in induced sputum. In a three-parallel-dose group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study, with a washout period of 3 to 8 wk, a total of 29 patients with mild to moderate allergic asthma underwent AMP challenge and sputum induction before and after 14 d of treatment with ciclesonide or matched placebo. Compared with placebo, ciclesonide 100 micrograms, 400 micrograms, and 1,600 micrograms daily reduced airway responsiveness to AMP by 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1 to 3.4, not significant [NS]), 2.0 (95% CI, 0.4 to 3.6, p < 0.05), and 3.4 (95% CI, 2.3 to 4. 4, p < 0.05) doubling doses, respectively, and this reduction in airway responsiveness was dose-dependent (p = 0.039). A significant reduction in the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum was observed after 400 micrograms and 1,600 micrograms daily ciclesonide (p < 0. 05), but this was not dose-dependent. Sputum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) was significantly reduced after 400 micrograms daily ciclesonide only (p < 0.05). Thus, in patients with mild to moderate asthma, assessment of airway responsiveness to AMP, rather than inflammatory parameters in induced sputum, represents a sensitive method to evaluate a dose-response relationship of an inhaled corticosteroid and may have applications in evaluating other novel inhaled corticosteroids.