Hirudin in acute myocardial infarction. Thrombolysis and Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 9B trial

Interventional procedures in acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of death in the United States. There is evidence that primary (direct) percutaneous intervention (PCI) may improve survival and reduce morbidity in patients with acute MI.

METHODS

We present a concise, comprehensive, evidence-based literature review of modern techniques of primary PCI in patients with acute MI. A comparison to thrombolytic therapy, especially in selected patient subgroups is made. Rescue angioplasty is also addressed. Adjunctive pharmacology, economic implications, and feasibility of implementation are discussed. A brief discussion of experimental therapies is included.

RESULTS

Primary PCI is an acceptable alternative to thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute MI and may result in superior outcomes in select patient populations, especially the elderly, patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery, those with congestive heart failure, and those in cardiogenic shock.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trials support the use of primary PCI as first-line therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Patients in whom thrombolytic therapy is contraindicated or known to have reduced efficacy are also excellent candidates for this therapy. Ongoing advancements in equipment and adjunctive therapies continue to enhance delivery of this treatment as well as improve patient outcome.

Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study

BACKGROUND: Limited information has been published regarding how specific processes for event adjudication can affect event rates in trials. We reviewed nonfatal myocardial infarctions (MIs) reported by site investigators in the international Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin (Eptifibatide) Therapy (PURSUIT) trial and those adjudicated by a central clinical events committee (CEC) to determine the reasons for differences in event rates. METHODS: The PURSUIT trial randomised 10,948 patients with acute coronary syndromes to receive eptifibatide or placebo. The primary end-point was death or post-enrolment MI at 30 days as assessed by the CEC; this end-point was also constructed using site-reported events. The CEC identified suspected MIs by systematic review of clinical, cardiac enzyme, and electrocardiographic data. RESULTS: The CEC identified 5005 (46%) suspected events, of which 1415 (28%) were adjudicated as MI. The site investigator and CEC assessments of whether a MI had occurred disagreed in 983 (20%) of the 5005 patients with suspected MI, mostly reflecting site misclassification of post-enrolment MIs (as enrolment MIs) or underreported periprocedural MIs. Patients for whom the CEC and site investigator agreed that no end-point MI had occurred had the lowest mortality at 30 days and between 30 days and 6 months, and those with agreement that a MI had occurred had the highest mortality. CONCLUSION: CEC adjudication provides a standard, systematic, independent, and unbiased assessment of end-points, particularly for trials that span geographic regions and clinical practice settings. Understanding the review process and reasons for disagreement between CEC and site investigator assessments of MI is important to design future trials and interpret event rates between trials.

Exploring the issues of appropriate dosing in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: potential benefits of bolus fibrinolytic agents

The Institute of Medicine report on the frequency and consequences of medical errors in clinical practice has stimulated physicians to evaluate current practice and means of improving medical care. In the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction, previous studies have found that dosing of fibrinolytic therapy is closely related to outcomes, with too low a dose associated with lower rates of infarct-related artery patency and higher doses associated with increased intracranial hemorrhage. Thus there is a narrow "therapeutic window" for fibrinolytic-antithrombotic regimens, and the potential for adverse outcomes is high if incorrect doses are administered. The first demonstration of this concept came from the GUSTO-I trial, in which 13.5% of patients treated with streptokinase and 11.5% of patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) had a dosing regimen that deviated from the protocol, that is, an incorrect total dose or infusion length. In patients with protocol deviations, 24-hour and 30-day mortality rates were significantly higher compared with those of patients with per-protocol dosing: for t-PA, patients who received incorrect dosing had a 30-day mortality rate of 7.7% versus 5.5% for patients who received correct t-PA dosing (P <.001), with similar findings for streptokinase. More recent data from the InTIME-II trial have shown that the use of a bolus fibrinolytic agent significantly increases the percentage of patients who receive complete and optimally dosed fibrinolysis. Thus use of the simpler bolus fibrinolytic agents may reduce medication errors and thus may optimize clinical outcomes.

Reducing medication errors: potential benefits of bolus thrombolytic agents

A recent Institute of Medicine report highlighted the high incidence of medical errors in clinical practice, and the important fact that errors are associated with increased mortality. The administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction is a particularly high-risk situation for emergency physicians. The combination of extreme time pressure with a narrow "therapeutic window" increases the potential for adverse outcomes due to dosing errors. Numerous trials have found that the dose of thrombolytic therapy is closely related to outcomes, with too low a dose associated with lower rates of infarct-related artery patency and higher doses associated with increased bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. In the GUSTO-I trial, 13.5% of patients treated with streptokinase and 11.5% of patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) had a medication error (i.e., incorrect dose or infusion length). Most importantly, 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with medication errors: for t-PA dosing errors mortality was 7.7% vs 5.5% for patients who received the correct t-PA dose (p < 0.001), with similar findings for streptokinase. More recent data from the InTIME2 trial and other studies showed that use of a bolus thrombolytic agent reduced the rate of medication errors. Thus, use of the simpler bolus thrombolytic agents may reduce emergency department medication errors, and thus improve overall clinical outcome.

Medical treatment for acute coronary syndromes

The medical treatment of acute coronary syndromes with thrombolytic, antithrombin, and antiplatelet agents is a major area of research and a vast topic for clinical review. This review summarizes important recent findings on the background of existing pathological and clinical knowledge to provide an understanding of the basis of current therapy and the new therapies that are likely to be introduced in the near future. Current controversies regarding the management of these conditions and the choice between medical, interventional, and combined strategies in different situations are also discussed.

Hirudin-based anticoagulant strategies for patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions and bypass grafting

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse drug reaction that is associated with thrombotic events of the venous and arterial circulatory systems stemming from an intense and well-characterized prothrombotic triad of platelet activation, coagulation cascade stimulation and vascular endothelial cell injury. Although heparin (or other sulfated mucopolysaccharide compound) cessation represents a vital first step in management, patients remain susceptible to life-threatening thrombosis for up to several weeks, providing a strong rationale for a 'proactive approach' to care that includes prompt initiation of an alternative anticoagulant strategy throughout the high-risk period. The importance of alternative options for anticoagulation is most evident in clinical situations wherein treatment is a recognized standard of care and prerequisite for an optimal outcome. The following review highlights the use of recombinant hirudin (lepirudin) among patients with suspected HIT requiring precutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and coronary arterial bypass grafting.

Antihirudin antibodies in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia treated with lepirudin: incidence, effects on aPTT, and clinical relevance

Hirudin, a potent and specific thrombin inhibitor, is a protein of nonhuman origin and therefore potentially immunogenic. The primary objectives of this investigation were to determine the incidence of antihirudin antibodies (ahir-ab) in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) who received lepirudin as parenteral anticoagulation and to determine the incidence of death, limb amputation, new thromboembolic complications (TECs), and major hemorrhage in patients who had ahir-ab, compared with patients who were ahir-ab negative. The investigation used data from 2 prospective multicenter studies with the same study protocol, in which HIT patients received 1 of 4 intravenous lepirudin dosage regimens. The treatment duration was 2 to 10 days. Ahir-ab were determined by a newly developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Eighty-seven of 196 evaluable patients (44.4%) had ahir-ab of the IgG class. Development of ahir-ab was dependent on the duration of treatment (ahir-ab–positive patients 18.6 days vs ahir-ab–negative patients 11.8 days; P = .0001). Fewer ahir-ab–positive than ahir-ab–negative patients died (P = .001). Ahir-ab did not cause an increase in limb amputation (P = .765), new TECs (P &gt; .99), or major bleedings (P = .549). In 23 of 51 (45.1%) evaluable patients in whom ahir-ab developed during treatment with lepirudin ( = 12% of all lepirudin treated patients), the ahir-ab enhanced the anticoagulatory effect of lepirudin. Ahir-ab are frequent in patients treated with lepirudin for more than 5 days. Ahir-ab are the first example for a drug-induced immune response causing enhanced activity of a drug. Therefore, during prolonged treatment with lepirudin, anticoagulatory activity should be monitored daily to avoid bleeding complications.

Combination of a direct thrombin inhibitor and a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blocking peptide facilitates and maintains reperfusion of platelet-rich thrombus with alteplase

We sought to determine the efficacy of the combination of argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, and G4120, a platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blocker, to enhance thrombolysis with alteplase. Platelet-rich thrombus in the rabbit arterial thrombosis model is relatively resistant to alteplase despite the addition of aspirin and heparin. The adjunctive use of either direct thrombin inhibitors or GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in thrombolysis has been investigated with encouraging, but limited, success. The usefulness of combining both agents as adjunctive therapy to thrombolysis has not been fully explored. Following platelet-rich thrombus formation in the rabbit, argatroban (3 mg/kg), G4120 (0.5 mg/kg), G4120 plus heparin (200 U/kg), or G4120 plus argatroban were intravenously infused over 60 minutes. Alteplase was given as intravenous boluses (0.45 mg/kg) at 15-minute intervals up to 4 doses or until reperfusion. Blood flow and bleeding time were monitored for 2 hours. The combination of G4120 plus argatroban resulted in a persistent patency in 5 of 7 animals compared with 0 of 6 for argatroban alone (p=0.02), 1 of 6 for G4120 alone (p=0.08), and 2 of 6 for G4120 plus heparin (p=0.2). Although during the infusion the bleeding times were longer in the groups that received G4120 (26+/-7.7 minutes vs. 14+/-10 minutes, p<0.05), by the end of the experiment there were no statistically significant differences. Similarly, during the infusion the activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT) was higher in groups that received heparin or argatroban (99+/-51 seconds vs. 32+/-7.6 seconds, p<0.001), but by the end of the experiment the aPTTs had returned to close to baseline in all groups except the G4120 plus heparin group. These results suggest that lysis of platelet-rich thrombus with alteplase requires the addition of both potent platelet and thrombin inhibitors. Specifically designed agents, G4120 and argatroban, are effective without additional increased risk for bleeding.

Antihirudin antibodies in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia treated with lepirudin: incidence, effects on aPTT, and clinical relevance

Hirudin, a potent and specific thrombin inhibitor, is a protein of nonhuman origin and therefore potentially immunogenic. The primary objectives of this investigation were to determine the incidence of antihirudin antibodies (ahir-ab) in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) who received lepirudin as parenteral anticoagulation and to determine the incidence of death, limb amputation, new thromboembolic complications (TECs), and major hemorrhage in patients who had ahir-ab, compared with patients who were ahir-ab negative. The investigation used data from 2 prospective multicenter studies with the same study protocol, in which HIT patients received 1 of 4 intravenous lepirudin dosage regimens. The treatment duration was 2 to 10 days. Ahir-ab were determined by a newly developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Eighty-seven of 196 evaluable patients (44.4%) had ahir-ab of the IgG class. Development of ahir-ab was dependent on the duration of treatment (ahir-ab–positive patients 18.6 days vs ahir-ab–negative patients 11.8 days; P = .0001). Fewer ahir-ab–positive than ahir-ab–negative patients died (P = .001). Ahir-ab did not cause an increase in limb amputation (P = .765), new TECs (P > .99), or major bleedings (P = .549). In 23 of 51 (45.1%) evaluable patients in whom ahir-ab developed during treatment with lepirudin ( = 12% of all lepirudin treated patients), the ahir-ab enhanced the anticoagulatory effect of lepirudin. Ahir-ab are frequent in patients treated with lepirudin for more than 5 days. Ahir-ab are the first example for a drug-induced immune response causing enhanced activity of a drug. Therefore, during prolonged treatment with lepirudin, anticoagulatory activity should be monitored daily to avoid bleeding complications.

Management of venous and cardiovascular thrombosis: enoxaparin

Enoxaparin has strong clinical evidence that supports its license in a broad spectrum of therapeutic indications, including thromboprophylaxis in surgical patients, medical patients bedridden because of acute illness, the once-daily treatment of venous thromboembolism and the treatment of unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction.

Lepirudin dosing in dialysis-dependent renal failure

Lepirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor indicated for parenteral anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. In patients with normal renal function, a bolus dose of 0.4 mg/kg is injected over 15-20 seconds, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.15 mg/kg/hour adjusted to prolong the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) to 1.5-2.5 times the patient's baseline. Because renal function directly influences lepirudin elimination, patients with renal impairment require significant adjustments in the initial infusion rate. Current recommendations suggest that patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure should receive an initial bolus of 0.2 mg/kg, followed by 0.1 mg/kg every other day if the aPTT falls below the lower limit of the therapeutic range; however, this dosing may result in significant and prolonged overanticoagulation. A review of available literature regarding pharmacokinetics of lepirudin in renal failure suggests considerable variability in patient response over a narrow creatinine clearance range. Because there is no antidote for lepirudin if significant bleeding occurs, lower and less frequent dosing, guided by aPTT results, is recommended.

Use of direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome

OBJECTIVE

This paper examines the rationale for using direct thrombin inhibitors in the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

BACKGROUND

With traditional management of ACS using aspirin and unfractionated heparin (UH), refractory angina and new myocardial infarction (MI) continue to develop. Growing understanding of the pathophysiology of ACS has led to the search for more effective therapies directed toward preventing formation of fibrin- and platelet-rich thrombi in the coronary arteries. Current pharmacologic approaches include use of direct thrombin inhibitors (lepirudin, desirudin, and bivalirudin).

METHODS

We reviewed all published clinical trials abstracted in MEDLINE from 1966 to April 2000, excluding pilot studies enrolling <500 patients.

RESULTS

Use of lepirudin at medium doses (0.4-mg/kg bolus + 0.15 mg/kg/h) resulted in lower rates of death, new MI, and refractory angina at 7 days compared with UH (3.0% vs 6.5%; P = 0.047), although the incidence of minor bleeding was increased (7.6% vs 4.5%; P < 0.05). Bivalirudin was as effective as UH in preventing complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (11.4% vs 12.2%; NS) and carried a lower bleeding risk (7.8% vs 19.2%; NS); however, its use in the management of ACS has not been studied. Desirudin used at low doses (0.1-mg/kg bolus + 0.1 mg/kg/h) in large-scale clinical trials in patients with acute MI treated with alteplase or streptokinase appeared to be at least as effective as UH (8.9% vs 9.8% at 30 days; NS). However, its therapeutic index was narrow, since it was associated with significantly more moderate bleeding (8.8% vs 7.7%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

All clinical trials to date have studied relatively short-term use (3-5 days) of direct thrombin inhibitors, and long-term benefits on morbidity and mortality have not been demonstrated. Until further data are available, direct thrombin inhibitors should be restricted to use as a possible alternative in patients who require anticoagulant therapy but experience UH-induced thrombocytopenia.

Angiographic and clinical characteristics associated with increased in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous intervention (a pooled analysis of the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials)

Advanced age is associated with increased mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but the mechanism remains unclear. We performed a pooled analysis of 3,032 patients from the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI)-2, Stent-PAMI, and PAMI-No Surgery On Site trials to determine which clinical, hemodynamic, and angiographic characteristics in the elderly were associated with in-hospital death. There were 452 patients aged >/=75 years and 2,580 patients aged <75 years. Older patients had a lower number of risk factors for coronary artery disease but more comorbidities. Acute catheterization demonstrated more 3-vessel disease, higher left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure, lower LV ejection fraction, and higher initial rates of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial 2 or 3 flow. Elderly patients were equally likely to undergo percutaneous intervention but had a lower procedural success rate and lower rates of final TIMI 3 flow, and older patients were more likely to have post-AMI complications. In-hospital mortality was 10.2% and 1.8%, respectively (p = 0.001). Cardiac and noncardiac mortality was higher in elderly patients, and no significant differences in causes of death were identified. Multivariate analysis revealed that the strongest predictors of death were age >/=75 years, lower LV ejection fraction, lower final TIMI flow, higher Killip class, need for an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), and post-AMI stroke/transient ischemic attack, or significant arrhythmia. Despite avoiding thrombolysis, elderly patients remain at increased risk of bleeding, stroke, and other post-AMI complications, and death. Cardiac risk factor analysis and acute catheterization offer prognostic information but do not completely explain the mechanism of increased in-hospital mortality in the elderly.

Thrombolysis medication errors: benefits of bolus thrombolytic agents

A recent report has highlighted the high incidence of medical errors in clinical practice and the important fact that errors are associated with increased mortality. This issue is now being examined closely in the field of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Numerous trials have found that the dose of the thrombolytic agent is closely related to outcome, with too low a dose associated with lower rates of infarct-related artery patency and higher doses associated with increased bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. Thus, the "therapeutic window" for thrombolytic therapy is small, and the potential for adverse outcome from dosing errors is high. In the Global Use of Strategies To Open occluded arteries (GUSTO)-I trial, 13.5% of patients treated with streptokinase and 11.5% of patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) were subjected to a medication error (e.g., incorrect dose or infusion length). Most importantly, 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with medication errors: For t-PA dosing errors, mortality was 7.7% versus 5.5% for patients who received the correct t-PA dose (p<0.001); findings were similar for streptokinase. More recent data from the Intravenous n-PA for Treatment of Infarcting Myocardium Early (InTIME)-II trial and other studies showed that use of a bolus thrombolytic agent reduced the rate of medication errors. Thus, use of the simpler bolus thrombolytic agents may improve overall clinical outcome.

Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction

Early reperfusion of thrombotically occluded coronary arteries by thrombolytic therapy has become a routine option in initial therapy of acute myocardial infarction. Many efforts have been made to improve the biological properties of thrombolytic agents in terms of fibrin specificity, plasma half-life and resistance to natural plasma inhibitors, to improve adjuvant therapy and to shorten the 'pain to reperfusion' time. Numerous randomised, multicentre trials have analysed the benefit of the various thrombolytic agents and regimens, which has enabled the creation of a 'current standard of therapy'. This review presents an update on available thrombolytic agents, their biochemical and pharmacological properties and results from clinical trials.

Lepirudin blunts endotoxin-induced coagulation activation

During sepsis, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) triggers the development of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) via the tissue factor-dependent pathway of coagulation resulting in massive thrombin generation and fibrin polymerization. Recently, animal studies demonstrated that hirudin reduced fibrin deposition in liver and kidney and decreased mortality in LPS-induced DIC. Accordingly, the effects of recombinant hirudin (lepirudin) was compared with those caused by placebo on LPS-induced coagulation in humans. Twenty-four healthy male subjects participated in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. Volunteers received 2 ng/kg LPS intravenously, followed by a bolus-primed continuous infusion of placebo or lepirudin (Refludan, bolus: 0.1 mg/kg, infusion: 0.1 mg/kg/h for 5 hours) to achieve a 2-fold prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). LPS infusion enhanced thrombin activity as evidenced by a 20-fold increase of thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT), a 6-fold increase of polymerized soluble fibrin, termed thrombus precursor protein (TpP), and a 4-fold increase in D-dimer. In the lepirudin group, TAT increased only 5-fold, TpP increased by only 50%, and D-dimer only slightly exceeded baseline values (P &lt; .01 versus placebo). Concomitantly, lepirudin also blunted thrombin generation evidenced by an attenuated rise in prothrombin fragment levels (F1 + 2,P &lt; .01 versus placebo) and blunted the expression of tissue factor on circulating monocytes. This experimental model proved the anticoagulatory potency of lepirudin in LPS-induced coagulation activation. Results from this trial provide a rationale for a randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of lepirudin in DIC.

Recombinant hirudin anticoagulation for aortic valve replacement in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE

To report the case of a patient with HIT that received a prolonged infusion of r-hirudin (lepirudin; Refludan; Hoechst, France) before, during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for aortic surgery. Although administration of r-hirudin for CPB anticoagulation has previously been reported, many questions persist concerning the best therapeutic regimen for CPB anticoagulation as well as the time of onset and the doses for postoperative anticoagulation.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 65-yr-old man was admitted for surgery of aortic stenosis after an episode of acute pulmonary edema complicated by deep venous thrombosis in the context of documented HIT. The patient received r-hirudin for 13 dy before surgery at doses (0.4 mg x kg(-1) bolus followed by 0.15 mg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) continuous infusion) that maintained activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratios between 2 and 2.5. Anticoagulation for CPB was performed with r-hirudin given as 0.1 mg x kg(-1) i.v. bolus and 0.2 mg kg(-1) in the CPB priming volume. Anticoagulation during CPB was monitored with the whole blood activated coagulation time and ecarin clotting time (ECT) performed in the operating room with values corresponding to r-hirudin concentrations >5 microg x ml(-1) during CPB. Anticoagulation during CPB was uneventful. Two bleeding episodes, related to the r-hirudin regimen and necessitating allogeneic blood transfusion, occurred after surgery.

CONCLUSION

This case report confirms previous experience of the use of r-hirudin for anticoagulation during CPB and provides additional information in the context of prolonged r-hirudin infusion before and after CPB.

Contribution of in vivo models of thrombosis to the discovery and development of novel antithrombotic agents

Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases continue to be the leading cause of death throughout the world. Over the past two decades, great advances have been made in the pharmacological treatment and prevention of thrombotic disorders (e.g., tissue plasminogen activators, platelet GPIIb/IIIa antagonists, ADP receptor antagonists such as clopidogrel, low-molecular weight heparins, and direct thrombin inhibitors). New research is leading to the next generation of antithrombotic compounds such as direct coagulation FVIIa inhibitors, tissue factor pathway inhibitors, gene therapy, and orally active direct thrombin inhibitors and coagulation Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors. Animal models of thrombosis have played a crucial role in discovering and validiting novel drug targets, selecting new agents for clinical evaluation, and providing dosing and safety information for clinical trials. In addition, these models have provided valuable information regarding the mechanisms of these new agents and the interactions between antithrombotic agents that work by different mechanisms. This review briefly presents the pivitol preclinical studies that led to the development of drugs that have proven to be effective clinicallly. The role that animal models of thrombosis are playing in the discovery and development of novel antithrombotic agents is also described, with specific emphasis on FXa inhibitors. The major issues regarding the use of animal models of thrombosis, such as the use of positive controls, appropriate pharmacodynamic markers of activity, safety evaluation, species-specificity, and pharmacokinetics, are highlighted. Finally, the use of genetic models in thrombosis/hemostasis research and pharmacology is presented using gene-therapy for hemophilia as an example of how animal models have aided in the development of these therapies that are now being evaluated clinically. In summary, animal models have contributed greatly to the discovery of currently available antithrombotic agents and will play a primary role in the discovery and characterization of the novel antithrombotic agents that will provide safe and effective pharmacological treatment for life-threatening thrombotic diseases.

Antithrombotic efficacy of RPR208566, a novel factor Xa inhibitor, in a rat model of carotid artery thrombosis

Coagulation factor Xa is the sole enzyme responsible for activating the zymogen prothrombin to thrombin, resulting in fibrin generation, platelet activation, and subsequent thrombus formation. Our objective was to evaluate the antithrombotic efficacy of the novel factor Xa inhibitor, 2-(3-carbamimidoyl-benzyl)-3-[(3', 4'dimethoxy-biphenyl-4-carbonyl)-amino]-butyric acid methyl ester-trifluoroacetate (RPR208566), in a well-established rat model of arterial thrombosis, and to compare the results with those obtained with argatroban and heparin, direct and indirect inhibitors of thrombin, respectively. Thrombus formation was initiated by placing a filter paper saturated with FeCl(2) on the adventia of the carotid artery for 10 min. Time-to-occlusion was measured from initiation of injury until blood flow reached zero. Formed thrombi were removed and weighed 60 min after the placement of the filter paper. RPR208566, heparin, and argatroban dose-dependently increased time-to-occlusion and reduced thrombus mass. When administered at 500 microgram/kg+50 microgram/kg/min, RPR208566 prolonged time-to-occlusion to 56+/-4 min (vs. 18+/-2 min for vehicle) and reduced thrombus mass to 3.0+/-0.7 mg (vs. 7.3+/-0.6 mg for vehicle). The highest doses of argatroban (500 microgram/kg+50 microgram/kg/min) and heparin (300 U/kg+10 U/kg/min) increased time-to-occlusion to the maximum of 60 min and decreased thrombus mass to 5.5+/-0.8 and 2.6+/-0.3, respectively. The antithrombotic effects of heparin and argatroban at these doses were associated with increases in activated partial thromboplastin time of 5.6+/-0.9- and 2.9+/-0.3-fold over baseline, respectively. However, the highest dose of RPR208566 produced a modest 1.3+/-0.1-fold increase in activated partial thromboplastin time. These results indicate that factor Xa inhibition with compounds such as RPR208566 may be an attractive mechanism for novel antithrombotic drug therapy.

Streptokinase-induced platelet activation involves antistreptokinase antibodies and cleavage of protease-activated receptor-1

Streptokinase activates platelets, limiting its effectiveness as a thrombolytic agent. The role of antistreptokinase antibodies and proteases in streptokinase-induced platelet activation was investigated. Streptokinase induced localization of human IgG to the platelet surface, platelet aggregation, and thromboxane A2production. These effects were inhibited by a monoclonal antibody to the platelet Fc receptor, IV.3. The platelet response to streptokinase was also blocked by an antibody directed against the cleavage site of the platelet thrombin receptor, protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1), but not by hirudin or an active site thrombin inhibitor, Ro46-6240. In plasma depleted of plasminogen, exogenous wild-type plasminogen, but not an inactive mutant protein, S741A plasminogen, supported platelet aggregation, suggesting that the protease cleaving PAR-1 was streptokinase-plasminogen. Streptokinase-plasminogen cleaved a synthetic peptide corresponding to PAR-1, resulting in generation of PAR-1 tethered ligand sequence and selectively reduced binding of a cleavage-sensitive PAR-1 antibody in intact cells. A combination of streptokinase, plasminogen, and antistreptokinase antibodies activated human erythroleukemic cells and was inhibited by pretreatment with IV.3 or pretreating the cells with the PAR-1 agonist SFLLRN, suggesting Fc receptor and PAR-1 interactions are necessary for cell activation in this system also. Streptokinase-induced platelet activation is dependent on both antistreptokinase-Fc receptor interactions and cleavage of PAR-1.

The Narrow Therapeutic Index of Thrombin Inhibition: Implications for Newer Antithrombotic Therapies

Recent trials have compared direct thrombin inhibitors with heparin as adjunctive therapy with thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction or as antithrombotic therapy following coronary angioplasty. The results suggest that these agents are comparable to heparin in terms of efficacy, and can be safely administered; however, like that of heparin, the therapeutic index of direct thrombin inhibitors is narrow. Thus, one must excercise caution in trial design and data interpretation from studies of these antithrombotic agents in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The potential applicability of these agents to patients with acute coronary syndromes, the appropriate dosing regimen, and the patient population in whom the therapeutic index is optimal all await further study.

Thrombin Hypothesis: The TIMI 9B and GUSTO IIB Trials Have Successfully Disproven/Proven the Thrombin Hypothesis

The direct thrombin inhibitor, hirudin, was tested in two trials. The TIMI 9B trial randomized patients receiving thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction to receive hirudin or heparin. The GUSTO IIB trial randomized patients with or without electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation (i.e. thrombolytic- and non-thrombolytic-eligible patients). In the combined trials at 30 days there was a non-significant 14% reduction in myocardial infarction, but no effect on mortality. There are a number of factors in these two trials, including dose selection, timing of administration and duration of drug therapy, that may have led to an underestimate of the potential benefits of hirudin. Further trials are therefore required to test the thrombin hypothesis.

Inhibition of platelet aggregation with a glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonist does not prevent thrombin generation in patients undergoing thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction

Thrombin activity has been implicated as a mechanism for failed reperfusion and reocclusion following thrombolysis. Aggregating platelets provide a phospholipid surface on which prothrombin is cleaved to form thrombin. We examined markers of thrombin generation and activity in patients enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose escalating trial of the platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide (Integrilintrade mark) administered concomitantly with tissue plasminogen activator for the treatment of myocardial infarction. Measurements were obtained at baseline, at 90 minutes, and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after starting therapy. Eptifibatide inhibited platelet aggregation in response to 20 microM ADP. Levels of fibrinopeptide A (FPA), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT), and prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F1.2) were not lower in patients treated with eptifibatide than in the control group. In the course of dose escalation, two groups of patients received the same 135 microg/kg bolus of eptifibatide, one with and one without a heparin bolus. FPA levels were dramatically lower in the heparin-treated patients. Levels of FPA, TAT, and F1.2 were not higher in patients with than in those without recurrent ischemia, or in patients without than in those with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 angiographic flow at 90 minutes. These data suggest that thrombin generation and activity persist following thrombolysis, despite inhibition of platelet aggregation, and that treatment with inhibitors of thrombin activity may be required even when glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors are used.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis

Heparin remains the most commonly used parenteral medication in hospitalized patients. Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and heparin induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis syndrome or the white clot syndrome are important complications of heparin use. This article provides an in-depth review of the etiopathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management options in patients with HIT. Clinical problems associated with HIT such as antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and venous gangrene are described. The management options of HIT patients during cardiac interventional procedures and coronary surgery as well as recent advances in therapeutic options are summarized.

Newer antithrombin agents in acute coronary syndromes

Thrombin, through its procoagulant and prothrombotic actions, plays a central role in the pathogenesis of unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction. Antithrombin therapy with unfractionated heparin has several important disadvantages, such as a variable anticoagulant effect, sensitivity to platelet factor 4, an inability to inhibit clot-bound thrombin, and the potential to cause thrombocytopenia. Alternative approaches have focused on novel anticoagulants, including direct antithrombins (eg, hirudin) and low-molecular-weight heparins (eg, enoxaparin). Direct antithrombins bind tightly to thrombin without requiring the cofactor antithrombin. Low-molecular-weight heparins display enriched anti-factor Xa activity, improved bioavailability, and facilitated administration versus unfractionated heparin. Recent trials demonstrate that direct antithrombins reduce rates of death and myocardial infarction early in patients without ST elevation, but the treatment effect diminishes over time. In contrast, treatment with enoxaparin shows superiority versus unfractionated heparin, and the treatment effect is durable over time. Whether thrombolysis with adjunctive treatment with low-molecular-weight heparins will show efficacy in patients with ST-segment elevation is the subject of ongoing trials.

Overcoming thrombolytic resistance: rationale and initial clinical experience combining thrombolytic therapy and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition for acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

We sought to review the emerging data and the clinical rationale for combining glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Although thrombolytic therapy has been a major advance in the treatment of acute ST segment elevation MI, new single-bolus thrombolytic agents have been unable to break the "thrombolytic ceiling" in infarct-related artery (IRA) patency.

METHODS

Recent literature on GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes was reviewed.

RESULTS

A new approach toward improving current thrombolytic-antithrombotic regimens focuses on "targeted therapy" for each component of the occlusive coronary thrombus: fibrin, thrombin and platelets. For the fibrin component, front-loading and/or bolus dosing of plasminogen activators (PAs) has identified the currently available doses of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-PA). For the thrombin component, several recent trials have shown that lower doses of heparin improve the safety profile of the thrombolytic-antithrombotic regimen. For the platelet component, aspirin has been shown to be effective, but the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors offer the potential for more effective platelet inhibition and improved clinical efficacy. The benefits of GPIIb/IIIa inhibition in reducing death, MI or urgent revascularization in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention are well established. Emerging experimental and clinical data now suggest that combining GPIIb/IIIa inhibition with reduced-dose thrombolytic therapy may improve early IRA patency without increasing bleeding risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the strong clinical and physiologic rationale, clinical investigation in acute ST segment elevation MI is currently focused on combining the potent GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors with reduced-dose fibrinolytic agents in acute MI, with the goal of overcoming "thrombolytic resistance."

Thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: analysis of studies comparing accelerated t-PA and streptokinase

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes from accelerated alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, t-PA) and streptokinase use in acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Review of available studies identified by Medline and other literature searches that met the criteria of being a prospective, randomised clinical trial enrolling over 1000 patients with acute myocardial infarction. The studies had to contain an intervention arm comprising accelerated infusion t-PA, or an intervention arm comprising streptokinase provided accelerated t-PA that was compared in the same trial. Interventions compared were streptokinase 1.5 million units given over one hour compared with accelerated t-PA infusion, with concomitant use of aspirin and heparin, and main outcome measure of 30 day mortality.

RESULTS

Four studies met prespecified criteria, these being the GUSTO I, GUSTO IIb Angioplasty Substudy, GUSTO III, and COBALT trials. There was a total study population of 64,387 patients of whom 20,251 received streptokinase, 19,474 received t-PA, with others receiving different treatment. Pooled data show that accelerated t-PA produces a marginal 30 day mortality advantage compared with streptokinase (6.6% v 7.3%, p = 0.02, Bonferroni adjusted p = 0.12, that is borderline significance, relative risk 0.918, 95% confidence interval 0.854 to 0.986). Any benefit is attributable entirely to patients recruited in the United States in the GUSTO I study. There is an increased incidence of stroke with t-PA.

CONCLUSIONS

The data do not consistently show a 30 day mortality benefit from using t-PA compared with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction, but do show increased risk of stroke. Streptokinase can be considered the thrombolytic agent of choice.

Efegatran sulfate as an adjunct to streptokinase versus heparin as an adjunct to tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute myocardial infarction. ESCALAT Investigators

BACKGROUND

Previous clinical studies have shown that direct antithrombins can accelerate clot lysis after treatment with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction (MI). Efegatran is a new direct antithrombin, which in experimental animals has been shown to enhance thrombolysis, reduce rate of reocclusion, and limit infarct size. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of efegatran plus streptokinase versus heparin plus accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) in coronary reperfusion in acute MI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this randomized, dose-finding study (n = 245), we initially explored 4 doses of efegatran sulfate in combination with streptokinase (1.5 million U) given intravenously within 12 hours of symptom onset. The optimal dosage group of 0.5 mg/kg per hour was expanded and compared with heparin plus accelerated TPA. The primary end point was complete patency (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 3) at 90 minutes after thrombolytic therapy, assessed in a core angiographic laboratory. Infarct-related vessel patency (TIMI grade 2 or 3) and complete patency (TIMI grade 3) were 73% and 40% in the efegatran/streptokinase group versus 79% and 53% in the heparin/TPA group (P = not significant). In-hospital mortality rate was 5% for the efegatran/streptokinase group versus 0% for the heparin/TPA group (P = not significant). Major bleeding occurred in 23% of patients in the efegatran/streptokinase group versus 11% in the heparin/TPA group (P = not significant). No intracranial hemorrhage occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of efegatran plus streptokinase is not superior to the current therapy of heparin and accelerated TPA in achieving early patency. In addition, there is no indication that this experimental treatment can achieve better clinical outcome.

Recombinant hirudin (lepirudin) for the improvement of thrombolysis with streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the HIT-4 trial

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare recombinant hirudin and heparin as adjuncts to streptokinase thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Experimental studies and previous small clinical trials suggest that specific thrombin inhibition improves early patency rates and clinical outcome in patients treated with streptokinase.

METHODS

In a randomized double-blind, multicenter trial, 1,208 patients with AMI < or =6 h were treated with aspirin and streptokinase and randomized to receive recombinant hirudin (lepirudin, i.v. bolus of 0.2 mg/kg, followed by subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of 0.5 mg/kg b.i.d. for 5 to 7 days) or heparin (i.v. placebo bolus, followed by s.c. injections of 12,500 IU b.i.d. for 5 to 7 days). A total of 447 patients were included in the angiographic substudy in which the primary end point, 90-min Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 of the infarct-related artery, was evaluated, while the other two-thirds served as "safety group" in which only clinical end points were evaluated. As an additional efficacy parameter the ST-segment resolution at 90 and 180 min was measured in all patients.

RESULTS

TIMI flow grade 3 was observed in 40.7% in the lepirudin and in 33.5% in the heparin group (p = 0.16), respectively. In the entire study population the proportion of patients with complete ST resolution at 90 min (28% vs. 22%, p = 0.05) and at 180 min (52% vs. 48%, p = 0.18) after start of therapy tended to be higher in the lepirudin group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hemorrhagic stroke (0.2% vs. 0.3%) or total stroke (1.2% vs. 1.5%), reinfarction rate (4.6% vs. 5.1%) and total mortality rate (6.8% vs. 6.4%) at 30 days, as well as the combined end point of death, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal reinfarction, rescue-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and refractory angina (22.7 vs. 24.3%) were not statistically different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Lepirudin as adjunct to thrombolysis with streptokinase did not significantly improve restoration of blood flow in the infarct vessel as assessed by angiography, but was associated with an accelerated ST resolution. There was no increase in the risk of major bleedings with lepirudin compared to heparin.

[Practice guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for the use of antithrombotic treatment in cardiology]

The indications for the use of antithrombotic therapy are evolving as new drugs become available or new indications or dosages are recommended for drugs already in use. This document reviews and updates the former one published in 1994. To that end, an exhaustive revision of the literature published in the last 15 years has been undertaken. Following the evidence based medicine dictates, and aiming to select all the relevant publications for each pathology, all studies were selected through MEDLINE, using the specified key words for each subject, and were filtered using the following steps: a) only randomized, controlled studies, meta-analysis, guidelines and review articles were chosen; b) then, the Best-Evidence and Cochrane Collaboration databases were consulted; c) finally, the evidence based medicine validation, relevance and applicability criteria were assessed for each publication. The use of antiaggregants and anticoagulants are given for the following conditions: a) prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism; b) prevention of systemic emboli in patients with lone atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation associated or not with rheumatic heart disease, in patients with biological or mechanical cardiac valvular prostheses and in dilated cardiomyopathy; c) antithrombotic therapy in coronary heart disease and in coronary intervention; d) the interactions with oral anticoagulants and how to control these therapies are also discussed.

Implications of the Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes-2 (OASIS-2) study and the results in the context of other trials

Although unfractionated heparin is widely used for thrombin inhibition in the management of unstable coronary artery disease, clinical and experimental evidence suggests that it is suboptimal. Recent pharmaceutical strategies to improve upon unfractionated heparin's efficacy profile have centered on the development of 2 major classifications of thrombin inhibition medications: the naturally occurring leech protein hirudin (and synthetic analogs) and low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparins. In the Organisation to Assess Strategies for Ischaemic Syndromes-2 (OASIS-2) trial, hirudin was demonstrably more effective than heparin in diminishing rates of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and angina at both 72 hours and 7 days after unstable coronary artery disease index events, with risk ratios on the order of 0.8. Similarly, in the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) study, the LMW heparin enoxaparin emerged superior to unfractionated heparin in attenuating rates of unstable coronary artery disease at 14 days, 30 days, and 1 year. On the other hand, findings involving other LMW heparins (dalteparin sodium, Fragmin, and fraxaparin) are equivocal. Although the Fragmin During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease (FRISC) study demonstrated statistically significant superiority of this LMW heparin over aspirin/placebo in driving down death/MI/revascularization rates, the Fragmin in Unstable Coronary Artery Disease (FRIC) trial showed no such superiority, but had wide confidence intervals. Similarly, the Fraxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes (FRAXIS) trial with fraxaparin failed to show superiority over unfractionated heparin. The favorable efficacy findings associated with hirudin and enoxaparin regimens, compared with unfractionated heparin, accrued without significant increases in the incidences of life-threatening bleeding events (e.g., hemorrhagic stroke), but did include more frequent lesser bleeding events. In summary, both hirudin and enoxaparin have demonstrated clinically important improvements in outcome compared with standard treatments in unstable coronary artery disease.

Design, baseline characteristics, and preliminary clinical results of the Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes-2 (OASIS-2) trial

Despite use of heparin and aspirin, 5-10% of patients with unstable angina develop myocardial infarction (MI) or refractory angina in the hospital. We tested the hypothesis that recombinant hirudin (lepirudin), a direct thrombin inhibitor, is superior to heparin, an indirect thrombin inhibitor, in patients with acute ischemic syndromes who were receiving aspirin. Patients (n = 10,141) with unstable angina or suspected acute MI without ST-segment elevation were randomly assigned heparin (5,000-U bolus, then 15-U/kg per hour infusion; n = 5,058) or hirudin (0.4-mg/kg bolus, then 0.15-mg/kg per hour infusion; n = 5,083) for 72 hours in a double-blind trial. The primary outcome measure was cardiovascular death or new MI at 7 days. Analysis was by intention to treat. At 7 days, 213 patients (4.2%) in the heparin group and 182 (3.6%) in the hirudin group had experienced cardiovascular death or new MI (relative risk = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.69-1.02; p = 0.077). The number of patients with cardiovascular death, new MI, or refractory angina at 7 days was 340 (6.7%) with heparin and 284 (5.6%) with hirudin (relative risk = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.70-0.96; p = 0.0125). These differences were primarily observed during the 72-hour treatment period (cardiovascular death or MI relative risk = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.59-0.99; p = 0.039; cardiovascular death, MI, or refractory angina relative risk = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.63-0.96; p = 0.019). Although there was an excess of major bleeding with hirudin requiring transfusion (59 [1.2%] vs 34 [0.7%] with heparin; p = 0.01), there was no excess in life-threatening episodes (20 in each group) or strokes (14 in each group). Data from the Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS)-2 trial suggest that a direct thrombin inhibitor, recombinant hirudin, is more effective than an indirect thrombin inhibitor, heparin, in preventing cardiovascular death, MI, or refractory angina. Recombinant hirudin also has an acceptable safety profile in patients with unstable angina or acute MI without ST-segment elevation.

Thrombin inhibitors as anticoagulant agents

Hirudin and its analogues and the synthetic antithrombin agents are interesting new antithrombotic agents that have been studied in a number of well-designed randomized clinical trials and further studies are underway. These agents offer certain advantages over heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin, and at least one agent is orally bioavailable. Studies have shown that the specific thrombin inhibitors can significantly decrease the incidence of composite cardiac endpoints in acute ischemic syndromes (following thrombolysis for myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and non-Q wave myocardial infarction and coronary angioplasty), but it is disappointing that the benefits obtained during short-term treatment are not sustained in the long term. Recent data are reviewed here from clinical trials supporting the use of the specific antithrombin agents in the treatment of acute cardiac ischemic syndromes, the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, and the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Low molecular weight heparin in acute coronary syndromes

Traditionally, unfractionated heparin has played an important role in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), is a promising new type of heparin, which is fractionated to include only heparin molecules of lower molecular weight. LMWHs are administered subcutaneously and do not require monitoring of the activated partial thromboplastin time, making them much easier to use. LMWHs are combined inhibitors of both thrombin and Factor Xa inhibitors. Several recent large trials in unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction have shown that LMWH is effective, and one agent has been shown to be superior to unfractionated heparin in reducing death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent angina. They also are very low cost (approximately $50 per day) and appear to be very cost effective in the treatment of unstable angina. Thus, LMWHs appear to be the new anticoagulant agent in acute coronary syndromes.

Fibrinolytic and antithrombotic regimens in recently completed, ongoing and planned clinical trials in myocardial infarction

Myocardial infarction carries significant short-term and long-term risks of morbidity and mortality. Traditional treatment for acute myocardial infarction has significantly improved the outcomes of patients suffering from this condition. Recent clinical trials have focused on the use of novel fibrinolytics, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors and myocardial protection, in an attempt to improve the prognosis of these patients. This clinical trials report reviews the rationale and design of recently completed, ongoing and planned major Phase II and III clinical trials on fibrinolytic and antithrombotic regimens for the treatment of myocardial infarction.

What do new lytics add to t-PA?

Current thrombolytic therapy fails to induce early, complete, and sustained reperfusion in +/-50% of the patients with ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. There are two complementary approaches to improve thrombolytic therapy: the development of new fibrinolytics with enhanced fibrin specificity and/or reduced plasma clearance and the coadministration of new antithrombotic agents. The results obtained so far suggest that single-bolus fibrinolytic therapy is likely to replace the current infusions in the near future. This may result in a significantly earlier (prehospital) treatment of patients. The concomitant intravenous administration of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist (in combination with a reduced dose of a fibrinolytic) appears to be able to further enhance the efficacy for clot lysis without increasing the risk for bleeding complications.

Advances in antithrombotic therapy of acute myocardial infarction

The aim of the acute treatment of myocardial infarction is to restore, as promptly as possible, blood flow in the culprit vessel. Thrombolysis is a cornerstone of treatment, and direct coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is emerging as a valuable or even better alternative reperfusion strategy. The activation of hemostasis after plaque disruption, thrombolysis, or PTCA represents a strong rationale for the use of antithrombotic drugs. The results of the ISIS-2 trial and the data from the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration indicated that aspirin is mandatory in patients with acute myocardial infarction and for secondary prevention. Recently, the efficacy of abciximab and other glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was proven in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes and after PTCA, and their early use in patients with acute myocardial infarction is presently under evaluation. Anticoagulation with heparin appears to be only slightly effective in acute myocardial infarction not treated with thrombolysis; however, a rationale exists for its use in patients undergoing percutaneous and/or surgical revascularization and in conjunction with fibrin-specific thrombolytic agents. Further studies are under way on the possible usefulness of low-molecular-weight heparin. Direct antithrombin agents (hirudin, hirulog, and others) have been recently studied as an adjunct to thrombolysis. The data from these studies indicate the presence of a narrow therapeutic window, with only marginal advantage over heparin; studies with newer compounds are ongoing. Aspirin is still a mandatory drug in patients with acute myocardial infarction; the most promising agents in this setting seem to be glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins are indicated in selected cases, and further studies are needed to assess the value of newer direct thrombin inhibitors.

Combination therapy for acute myocardial infarction: glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors plus thrombolysis

Although thrombolytic therapy has been a major advance in the treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), new thrombolytic agents have been unable to improve early reperfusion. Because aspirin has been shown to be a very effective adjunctive agent in patients with acute MI, it has been hypothesized that the use of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors combined with thrombolytic agents would lead to more effective platelet inhibition and improved angiographic and clinical efficacy. Emerging experimental and clinical data, including the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)-14 trial, suggest that combining GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition with reduced-dose thrombolytic therapy improves early infarct-related artery patency without increasing bleeding risk. Thus, given the strong clinical and physiologic rationale, clinical investigation in patients with acute ST-segment elevation MI is currently focused on combining GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors with reduced-dose fibrinolytic agents in acute MI.

Optimal management of acute myocardial infarction at the dawn of the next millennium

At the dawn of the next millennium, the optimal management of acute myocardial infarction will have been defined by multiple clinical trials of acute reperfusion strategies, in conjunction with adjunctive pharmacotherapy. Reperfusion therapy with thrombolytic agents or primary angioplasty is the standard of care for many patients examined with ST-segment elevation or left bundle branch block within approximately 12 hours of symptoms. The superiority of fibrin-specific agents over streptokinase has been established, as have the advantages of primary angioplasty in selected institutions with the requisite expertise and logistical capabilities. The key to successful reperfusion lies more in the efficiency of delivery than in the choice of modality. Reocclusion remains the "Achilles' heel" of reperfusion therapy, as does the presence of reperfusion injury microvascular dysfunction and the "no-reflow" phenomenon. These entities are major targets for further investigation in the next 5 years. The wealth of adjunctive pharmacologic agents currently available presents a challenge to the optimal treatment of myocardial infarction. A major objective is to define the magnitude of the incremental benefits and risks of using the available and new drugs, both alone and in combination. Moreover, community-wide studies indicate a marked underutilization of therapies that are available and are of proven effectiveness. The key to optimal management, as we enter the new millennium, lies in the search for new therapies in concert with the most effective use of those agents already at our disposal.

Immunologic response to recombinant hirudin in HIT type II patients during long-term treatment

We prospectively investigated 27 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II who were subsequently treated with r-hirudin. Patients with venous or arterial thromboembolism were treated with activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-controlled intravenous r-hirudin (n = 19; mean 19.3 d) followed by subcutaneous r-hirudin (n = 6; mean 22.5 d) and oral anticoagulation. Patients without thromboembolism were treated with subcutaneous r-hirudin (n = 8; mean 25.9 d). Four patients were readmitted to subcutaneous r-hirudin for a mean duration of 32 d. The incidence of r-hirudin antibodies was 84% for intravenously treated patients and 50% in subcutaneously treated patients. The patients (n = 27) showed a 74% overall incidence of r-hirudin antibodies, mainly of the IgG-subclass, without seroconversion before day 6 and after day 32 of r-hirudin treatment or during r-hirudin treatment. None of the patients showed onset or recurrence of venous or arterial thromboembolism, systemic allergic reactions or IgE-antibody development. During intravenous and subcutaneous administration of r-hirudin the aPTT and the ecarin clotting time was increased in the antibody-positive patients compared to antibody-negative patients. Therefore we assume that r-hirudin antibodies may reduce r-hirudin metabolism.