Crizotinib for the treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: a success story to usher in the second decade of molecular targeted therapy in oncology

Emerging paradigms in the development of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer

The success of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in select patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has transformed management of the disease, placing new emphasis on understanding the molecular characteristics of tumor specimens. It is now recognized that genetic alterations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) define two unique subtypes of NSCLC that are highly responsive to genotype-directed TKIs. Despite this initial sensitivity, however, the long-term effectiveness of such therapies is universally limited by the development of resistance. Identifying the mechanisms underlying this resistance is an area of intense, ongoing investigation. In this review, we provide an overview of recent experience in the field, focusing on results from preclinical resistance models and studies of patient-derived, TKI-resistant tumor specimens. Although diverse TKI resistance mechanisms have been identified within EGFR-mutant and ALK-positive patients, we highlight common principles of resistance shared between these groups. These include the development of secondary mutations in the kinase target, gene amplification of the primary oncogene, and upregulation of bypass signaling tracts. In EGFR-mutant and ALK-positive patients alike, acquired resistance may also be a dynamic and multifactorial process that may necessitate the use of treatment combinations. We believe that insights into the mechanisms of TKI resistance in patients with EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements may inform the development of novel treatment strategies in NSCLC, which may also be generalizable to other kinase-driven malignancies.

Current status of targeted therapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer

The identification of chromosomal rearrangements involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene in ~3-5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues and the demonstration that the first-in-class ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, crizotinib, can effectively target these tumors represent a significant advance in the evolution of personalized medicine for NSCLC. Single-arm studies demonstrating rapid and durable responses in the majority of ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib have been followed by a randomized phase III clinical trial in which superiority of crizotinib over chemotherapy was seen in previously treated ALK-positive NSCLC patients. However, despite the initial responses, most patients develop acquired resistance to crizotinib. Several novel therapeutic approaches targeting ALK-positive NSCLC are currently under evaluation in clinical trials, including second-generation ALK inhibitors, such as LDK378, CH5424802 (RO5424802802), and AP26113, and heat shock protein 90 inhibitors.

Mechanistic insight into ALK receptor tyrosine kinase in human cancer biology

The burgeoning field of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) in cancer encompasses many cancer types, from very rare cancers to the more prevalent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The common activation of ALK has led to the use of the ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib in a range of patient populations and to the rapid development of second-generation drugs targeting ALK. In this Review, we discuss our current understanding of ALK function in human cancer and the implications for tumour treatment.

Surgery in 2013 and beyond

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer related mortality. The role of surgery continues to evolve and in the last ten years there have been a number of significant changes in the surgical management of lung cancer. These changes extend across the entire surgical spectrum of lung cancer management including diagnosis, staging, treatment and pathology. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanning and ultrasound (EBUS) have redefined traditional staging paradigms, and surgical techniques, including video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS), robotic surgery and uniportal surgery, are now accepted as standard of care in many centers. The changing pathology of lung cancer, with more peripheral tumours and an increase in adenocarcinomas has important implications for the Thoracic surgeon. Screening, using Low-Dose CT scanning, is having an impact, with not only a higher percentage of lower stage cancers detected, but also redefining the role of sublobar resection. The incidence of pneumonectomy has reduced as have the rates of "exploratory thoracotomy". In general, lung resection is considered for stage I and II patients with a selected role in more advanced stage disease as part of a multimodality approach. This paper will look at these issues and how they impact on Thoracic Surgical practice in 2013 and beyond.

Smoking status and self-reported race affect the frequency of clinically relevant oncogenic alterations in non-small-cell lung cancers at a United States-based academic medical practice

INTRODUCTION

The identification of somatic genomic aberrations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is part of evidence-based practice guidelines for care of patients with NSCLC. We sought to establish the frequency and correlates with these changes in routine patient-tumor sample pairs.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data and tumor genotype were retrospectively compiled and analyzed from an overall cohort of 381 patient-tumor samples.

RESULTS

Of these patients, 75.9% self-reported White race, 13.1% Asian, 6.5% Black, 27.8% were never-smokers, 54.9% former-smokers and 17.3% current-smokers. The frequency of EGFR mutations was 23.9% (86/359), KRAS mutations 34.2% (71/207) and ALK FISH positivity 9.1% (23/252) in tumor samples, and almost all had mutually exclusive results for these oncogenes. In tumors from White, Black and Asian patients, the frequencies of EGFR mutations were 18.4%, 18.2% and 62%, respectively; of ALK FISH positivity 7.81%, 0% and 14.8%, respectively; and of KRAS mutations 41.6%, 20% and 0%. These patterns changed significant with increasing pack-year history of smoking. In White patients, the frequencies of EGFR mutations and ALK FISH positivity decreased with increasing pack-year cohorts; while the frequencies of KRAS mutations increased. Interestingly, in Asian patients the frequencies of EGFR mutations were similar in never smokers and in the cohorts with less than 45pack-year histories of smoking and only decreased in the 45pack-year plus cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequencies of somatic EGFR, KRAS, and ALK gene abnormalities using routine lung cancer tissue samples from our United States-based academic medical practice reflect the diverse ethnicity (with a higher frequency of EGFR mutations in Asian patients) and smoking patterns (with an inverse correlation between EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement) of our tested population. These results may help other medical practices appreciate the expected results from introduction of routine tumor genotyping techniques into their day-to-day care of NSCLC.

Multiomics medicine in oncology: assessing effectiveness, cost–effectiveness and future research priorities for the molecularly unique individual

The development of genomic technologies has ushered in the era of pharmacogenomics. However, discoveries and clinical use of targeted therapies are still in their infancy. A focus on monogenic pharmacogenetic traits may contribute to this lack of progress. Variation in drug response is likely a complex paradigm involving not only genomic factors but proteomic, metabolomic and epigenomic influences. The incorporation of these omics elements into pharmaceutical development and clinical decision-making will ultimately require the use of methods to determine clinical and economic value. Current methodologies and guidelines for determining clinical effectiveness and cost–effectiveness may have limited applicability to the increasingly personalized nature of omics treatment strategies. Using examples from oncology, this article argues for the adaptation and tailoring of three existing methods for ensuring development and clinical use of multiomics-guided therapies that are effective, safe and offer value for money.

Comparison of SILAC and mTRAQ quantification for phosphoproteomics on a quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer

Advances in mass spectrometric methodology and instrumentation have promoted a continuous increase in analytical performance in the field of phosphoproteomics. Here, we employed the recently introduced quadrupole Orbitrap (Q Exactive) mass spectrometer for quantitative signaling analysis to a depth of more than 15 000 phosphorylation sites. In parallel to the commonly used SILAC approach, we evaluated the nonisobaric chemical labeling reagent mTRAQ as an alternative quantification technique. Both enabled high phosphoproteome coverage in H3122 lung cancer cells. Replicate quantifications by mTRAQ identified almost as many significant phosphorylation changes upon treatment with ALK kinase inhibitor crizotinib as found by SILAC quantification. Overall, mTRAQ was slightly less precise than SILAC as evident from a somewhat higher variance of replicate phosphosite ratios. Direct comparison of SILAC- and mTRAQ-quantified phosphosites revealed that the majority of changes were detected by either quantification techniques, but also highlighted the aspect of false negative identifications in quantitative proteomics applications. Further inspection of crizotinib-regulated phosphorylation changes unveiled interference with multiple antioncogenic mechanisms downstream of ALK fusion kinase in H3122 cells. In conclusion, our results demonstrate a strong analytical performance of the Q Exactive in global phosphoproteomics, and establish mTRAQ quantification as a useful alternative to metabolic isotope labeling.

Clinical next-generation sequencing successfully applied to fine-needle aspirations of pulmonary and pancreatic neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Next-generation sequencing was performed on pulmonary and pancreatic fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) and on paired FNAs and resected primary tumors from the same patient.

METHODS

DNA was isolated in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell blocks from 16 pulmonary FNAs, 23 pancreatic FNAs, and 5 resected pancreatic primary tumors. Next-generation sequencing was performed for 4561 exons of 287 cancer-related genes and for 47 introns of 19 genes on indexed, adaptor-ligated, hybridization-captured libraries using a proprietary sequencing system (the Illumina HiSeq 2000).

RESULTS

Genomic profiles were generated successfully from 16 of 16 (100%) pulmonary FNAs, which included 14 nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and 2 small cell lung cancers (SCLCs). The NSCLC group included 6 adenocarcinomas, 5 squamous cell carcinomas, and 3 NSCLCs not otherwise specified. Genomic profiles were successfully obtained from 23 of 23 (100%) pancreatic FNAs and from 5 of 5 (100%) matched pancreatic primary tumors, which included 17 ductal adenocarcinomas, 3 mucinous adenocarcinomas, 2 adenocarcinomas NOS, and 1 neuroendocrine tumor. Eighty-one genomic alterations were identified in the 16 pulmonary FNAs (average, 5.1 genomic alterations per patient); and the most common genomic alterations were TP53, RB1, SOX2, PIK3CA, and KRAS. Eighty-seven genomic alterations were identified in the 23 pancreatic tumor FNAs (average, 3.8 genomic alterations per patient); and the most common genomic alterations were KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A/B, SMAD4, and PTEN. Among the pancreatic tumors, there was 100% concordance of 20 genomic alterations that were identified in 5 patient-matched FNA and surgical primary tumor pairs.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors were able to perform next-generation sequencing reliably on FNAs of pulmonary and pancreatic tumors, and the genomic alterations discovered correlated well with those identified in matched resected pancreatic tumors.

Treatment and detection of ALK-rearranged NSCLC

The recent approval of crizotinib for the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the US and other countries has provoked intense interest in ALK rearrangements as oncogenic drivers, and promises to revolutionise the way in which NSCLC is diagnosed and treated. Here, we review clinical data to date for the use of crizotinib to treat patients with advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC and consider issues surrounding the detection of ALK-positivity including the use of fluorescence in situ hybridisation and the other potential techniques available, and their suitability for ALK screening. We also discuss the emergence of resistance to crizotinib therapy and the range of other ALK inhibitors currently in development.

Detection of circulating tumor cells harboring a unique ALK rearrangement in ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The diagnostic test for ALK rearrangement in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for crizotinib treatment is currently done on tumor biopsies or fine-needle aspirations. We evaluated whether ALK rearrangement diagnosis could be performed by using circulating tumor cells (CTCs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The presence of an ALK rearrangement was examined in CTCs of 18 ALK-positive and 14 ALK-negative patients by using a filtration enrichment technique and filter-adapted fluorescent in situ hybridization (FA-FISH), a FISH method optimized for filters. ALK-rearrangement patterns were determined in CTCs and compared with those present in tumor biopsies. ALK-rearranged CTCs and tumor specimens were characterized for epithelial (cytokeratins, E-cadherin) and mesenchymal (vimentin, N-cadherin) marker expression. ALK-rearranged CTCs were monitored in five patients treated with crizotinib.

RESULTS

All ALK-positive patients had four or more ALK-rearranged CTCs per 1 mL of blood (median, nine CTCs per 1 mL; range, four to 34 CTCs per 1 mL). No or only one ALK-rearranged CTC (median, one per 1 mL; range, zero to one per 1 mL) was detected in ALK-negative patients. ALK-rearranged CTCs harbored a unique (3'5') split pattern, and heterogeneous patterns (3'5', only 3') of splits were present in tumors. ALK-rearranged CTCs expressed a mesenchymal phenotype contrasting with heterogeneous epithelial and mesenchymal marker expressions in tumors. Variations in ALK-rearranged CTC levels were detected in patients being treated with crizotinib.

CONCLUSION

ALK rearrangement can be detected in CTCs of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC by using a filtration technique and FA-FISH, enabling both diagnostic testing and monitoring of crizotinib treatment. Our results suggest that CTCs harboring a unique ALK rearrangement and mesenchymal phenotype may arise from clonal selection of tumor cells that have acquired the potential to drive metastatic progression of ALK-positive NSCLC.

Lung cancer in never-smokers. Does smoking history matter in the era of molecular diagnostics and targeted therapy?

Lung cancer in never-smokers was recognised as a distinct clinical entity around the mid-2000s because these patients tended to be Asian women and diagnosed at a younger age with a preponderance of adenocarcinoma and better survival outcome despite a more advanced stage of presentation. It was soon discovered that lung cancer in never-smokers had a higher prevalence of activating EGFR mutations and we tend to classify lung cancer by smoking status for screening purpose. With the discoveries of many actionable driver mutations such as activating EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangement in adenocarcinoma of the lung we have switched to classifying non-small cell lung cancer into different individual molecular subgroups based on the presence of a dominant driver mutation. Although many actionable driver mutations are found in never-smokers with adenocarcinoma, this review will summarise that a substantial proportion of patients with these actionable driver mutations had a previous smoking history. Alternatively among the driver mutations that are associated with smoking history, a fair amount of these patients were never-smokers. Thus smoking status should not be used as a screen strategy for identifying driver mutations in clinical practice. Finally smoking history may have predictive and/or prognostic significance within individual molecular subgroups and identifying the difference according to smoking history may help optimise future targeted therapy.

Fool's gold, lost treasures, and the randomized clinical trial

Background

Randomized controlled trials with a survival endpoint are the gold standard for clinical research, but have failed to achieve cures for most advanced malignancies. The high costs of randomized clinical trials slow progress (thereby causing avoidable loss of life) and increase health care costs.

Discussion

A malignancy may be caused by several different mutations. Therapies effective vs one mutation may be discarded due to lack of statistical significance across the entire population. Conversely, expensive large randomized trials may have sufficient statistical power to demonstrate benefit despite the therapy only working in subgroups. Non-cost-effective therapy is then applied to all patients (including subgroups it cannot help). Randomized trials comparing therapies with different mechanisms of action are misleading since they may conclude the therapies are “equivalent” despite benefitting different subpopulations, or may erroneously conclude that one therapy is superior simply because it targets a larger subpopulation. Furthermore, minor variances in patient selection may determine study outcome, a therapy may be discarded as ineffective despite substantial benefit in one subpopulation if harmful in another, randomized trials may more effectively detect therapies with minor benefit in most patients vs marked benefit in subpopulations, and randomized trials in unselected patients may erroneously conclude that “shot-gun” combinations are superior to single agents when sequential administration of personalized single agents might work better and spare patients treatment with drugs that cannot help them. We must identify predictive biomarkers early by comparing responding to progressing patients in phase I-II trials. Enriching randomized trials for biomarker-positive patients can markedly reduce required patient numbers and costs despite expensive screening for biomarker-positive patients. Available data support approval of new drugs without randomized trials if they yield single-agent sustained responses in patients refractory to standard therapies. Conversely, new approaches are needed to guide development of drug combinations since both standard phase II approaches and phase II-III randomized trials have a high risk of misleading.

Summary

Traditional randomized clinical trials approaches are often inefficient, wasteful, and unreliable. New clinical research paradigms are needed. The primary outcome of clinical research should be “Who (if anyone) benefits?” rather than “Does the overall group benefit?”

PROFILing non-small-cell lung cancer patients for treatment with crizotinib according to anaplastic lymphoma kinase abnormalities: translating science into medicine

INTRODUCTION

In the recent years, the growing attention to the molecular background of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) led to the identification of different molecular subtypes according to genetic abnormalities driving the disease development and progression. Whereas the addicted pathways were successfully inhibited (such as the mutant epidermal growth factor receptor), clinicians have witnessed a dramatic survival improvement. In this regard, the molecular portrait of adenocarcinoma was recently enriched by the identification of a specific patients' subgroup characterized by abnormalities in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), with unclear prognostic features but impressive response to specific inhibitors.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, updated data derived from the development and the use of crizotinib (the most advanced in development among tyrosine kinase ALK inhibitors) in comparison with standard second-line chemotherapy for patients affected by ALK-altered NSCLC are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Taking into account the available data, pretreated NSCLC patients carrying the ALK-translocation require a selected targeted therapy which significantly improves activity, efficacy and symptoms control versus chemotherapy. In this context, the identification of this disease entity and the availability of such impressive therapeutic targeting represent a further step toward the understanding of the molecular complexity behind the adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world. “Driver” and “passenger” mutations identified in lung cancer indicate that genetics play a major role in the development of the disease, progression, metastasis and response to therapy. Survival rates for lung cancer treatment have remained stagnant at ~15% over the past 40 years in patients with disseminated disease despite advances in surgical techniques, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Resistance to therapy; either intrinsic or acquired has been a major hindrance to treatment leading to great interest in studies seeking to understand and overcome resistance. Genetic information gained from molecular analyses has been critical in identifying druggable targets and tumor profiles that may be predictors of therapeutic response and mediators of resistance. Mutated or overexpressed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and translocations in the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) genes (EML4-ALK) are examples of genetic aberrations resulting in targeted therapies for both localized and metastatic disease. Positive clinical responses have been noted in patients harboring these genetic mutations when treated with targeted therapies compared to patients lacking these mutations. Resistance is nonetheless a major factor contributing to the failure of targeted agents and standard cytotoxic agents. In this review, we examine molecular mechanisms that are potential drivers of resistance in non-small cell lung carcinoma, the most frequently diagnosed form of lung cancer. The mechanisms addressed include resistance to molecular targeted therapies as well as conventional chemotherapeutics through the activity of multidrug resistance proteins.