Early treatment of Parkinson's disease with cabergoline delays the onset of motor complications. Results of a double-blind levodopa controlled trial. The PKDS009 Study Group

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) applied to Parkinson's disease treatment

This paper is a narrative review of the concept of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and its application in the movement disorders field. The paper has three parts: 1. Discussion of the generic concept of EBM and of the most commonly voiced criticisms; explanation of how relevant are for the comprehension of EBM procedures the notion of implicit and explicit knowledge; discussion of the scientific basis of the hierarchical organization of the evidence and the recent challenges to it; the different robustness of data pertaining to efficacy and to safety. 2. Accessibility of the evidence relevant for the treatment of Parkinson disease. Description of the most relevant tools to bring unbiased data to the hands of the practicing physician; namely the product of Movement Disorders Cochane Review Group and the Movement Disorders Society Evidence-Based Review of Parkinson Disease treatments. The concept of management guidelines is presented along with commentaries to the potential variability of recommendations across the world. 3. Limitations of the clinical trials on Parkinson disease treatment so far available.

The management of patients with early Parkinson's disease

A major problem in the management of early Parkinson's disease is to choose the first medication to prescribe. This decision should rely on the level of available clinical evidence, largely based, at least for efficacy, on the results of randomised clinical trials. Safety and costs are also crucial to consider. Other factors like for example pathophysiological concepts, individual experience, marketing pressure, socio-economical environment, patients needs and expectations have, however, also their own influence. Levodopa is efficacious and cheap, but induces long-term motor complications. The early use of dopamine agonists is more and more frequently promoted, because large prospective L-dopa-controlled trials demonstrated that this strategy reduces the risk of such long-term complications. Integrating individual clinical expertise to the best available external clinical evidence (evidence-based medicine) is the best strategy in making decisions about the care of individual patients.

'Sleep attacks' or 'unintended sleep episodes' occur with dopamine agonists: is this a class effect?

Controversial reports of sudden onset 'sleep attacks' resulting in road traffic accidents have recently been reported in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) taking the non-ergot dopamine D(2 )/D(3) receptor agonists pramipexole and ropinirole. These reports have generated considerable debate as the concept of 'sleep attacks' is disputed amongst sleep specialists and most believe that isolated 'sleep attacks' not preceded by warning on the background of chronic sleepiness or 'unintended sleepiness' do not exist. A series of case reports suggested that this phenomenon may not be exclusive to the non-ergot dopamine agonists such as pramipexole or ropinirole and indeed may occur with most dopaminergic agents. Recent evidence suggest that a 'sleepiness' or 'hypoactivity' reaction to dopaminergic therapy may be related to underlying dopamine deficiency of PD rather than a drug effect. In this report we provide the evidence for the phenomenon being a class effect attributable to all dopamine agonists currently employed in the management of PD. Controversy surrounding excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in PD and the use of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) in relation to PD is also discussed. In spite of variable reports, EDS is recognised to be common in PD and is likely to be related to both the disease process and drug therapy. Studies using multiple sleep latency tests have also reported differing results in PD although a recent study indicated that a subset of 'sleepy' patients with PD may experience pathological somnolence with resultant detrimental consequence on daytime and cognitive functions. We recommend that the issue of 'sleepiness' or 'sleep attacks' in PD should be routinely checked in all patients with PD and indirectly assessed by using either the ESS or the recently introduced Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale. Those with reported 'sleep attacks' or 'unintended sleep episodes' and excessive daytime sleepiness while taking dopamine agonists or dopaminergic agents such as levodopa should have a review of their medication, should not be driving a car on their own and some may merit formal sleep architecture studies. The latter may identify sleep disorders such as secondary narcolepsy which may benefit from the use of a wakefulness promoting agent.

Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of drugs used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Current research in Parkinson's disease (PD) focuses on symptomatic therapy and neuroprotective interventions. Drugs that have been used for symptomatic therapy are levodopa, usually combined with a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor, synthetic dopamine receptor agonists, centrally-acting antimuscarinic drugs, amantadine, monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors. Drugs for which there is at least some evidence for neuroprotective effect are certain dopamine agonists, amantadine and MAO-B inhibitors (selegiline). Levodopa remains the most effective drug for the treatment of PD. Several factors contribute to the complex clinical pharmacokinetics of levodopa: erratic absorption, short half-life, peripheral O-methylation and facilitated transport across the blood-brain barrier. In patients with response fluctuations to levodopa, the concentration-effect curve becomes steeper and shifts to the right compared with patients with stable response. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling can affect decisions regarding therapeutic strategies. The dopamine agonists include ergot derivatives (bromocriptine, pergolide, lisuride and cabergoline), non-ergoline derivatives (pramipexole, ropinirole and piribedil) and apomorphine. Most dopamine agonists have their specific pharmacological profile. They are used in monotherapy and as an adjunct to levodopa in early and advanced PD. Few pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are available regarding centrally acting antimuscarinic drugs. They are characterised by rapid absorption after oral intake, large volume of distribution and low clearance relative to hepatic blood flow, with extensive metabolism. The mechanism of action of amantadine remains elusive. It is well absorbed and widely distributed. Since elimination is primarily by renal clearance, accumulation of the drug can occur in patients with renal dysfunction and dosage reduction must be envisaged. The COMT inhibitors entacapone and tolcapone dose-dependently inhibit the formation of the major metabolite of levodopa, 3-O-methyldopa, and improve the bioavailability and reduce the clearance of levodopa without significantly affecting its absorption. They are useful adjuncts to levodopa in patients with end-of-dose fluctuations. The MAO-B inhibitor selegiline may have a dual effect: reducing the catabolism of dopamine and limiting the formation of neurotoxic free radicals. The pharmacokinetics of selegiline are highly variable; it has low bioavailability and large volume of distribution. The oral clearance is many-fold higher than the hepatic blood flow and the drug is extensively metabolised into several metabolites, some of them being active. Despite the introduction of several new drugs to the antiparkinsonian armamentarium, no single best treatment exists for an individual patient with PD. Particularly in the advanced stage of the disease, treatment should be individually tailored.

Frontiers in Neuropharmacotherapy Part II: Multiple Sclerosis and Parkinson’s Disease

Disease-modifying agents such as β-interferons and glatiramer acetate have a significant impact on slowing the course of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Therapeutic guidelines recommend initiating therapy with 1 of the 3 agents shortly after diagnosis of clinically definite MS, but there is insufficient data to specifically select one of the therapies. New research helps differentiate the therapies based on their induction of neutralizing antibodies, optimal dosing, and monitoring strategies. New treatments for secondary progressive MS are also emerging with evidence for the use of interferon β-1b and the approval of mitoxantrone. Future therapies for MS include oral glatiramer acetate and combination therapy.

Levodopa continues to be the standard of care for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, but the approval of newer therapies that spare the use of levodopa and improve safety profiles are changing the management of the disease. Dopamine agonists such as bromocriptine and pergolide have been used to manage complications of levodopa therapy in patients with advanced disease, but new research supports the use of the more selective dopamine agonists, pramipexole and ropinirole, as monotherapy in early Parkinson’s disease. The combination of a catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor with levodopa provides a new therapeutic option for treating patients with motor complications in advanced disease.

Treatment interventions for Parkinson's disease: an evidence based assessment

We did a systematic review, with a uniform method of assessment of efficacy and safety, to assess the different interventions available for the management of Parkinson's disease (drugs, surgical interventions, and physical treatments) with respect to the following indications: prevention of disease progression, symptomatic treatment of motor features (parkinsonism), symptomatic control of motor complications, prevention of motor complications, and symptomatic treatment of non-motor features. Our aim was not to define practice guidelines, but rather to improve clinicians' knowledge of the presently available published clinical evidence, based mainly on randomised controlled trials. We hope that our review will help doctors to incorporate this background into their own decision-making strategy to make appropriate choices with respect to the treatment of individual patients with Parkinson's disease.

Body weight influences pharmacokinetics of levodopa in Parkinson's disease

Changes in body weight may induce substantial variations in peripheral pharmacokinetics of drugs, but the relation between body weight and levodopa (LD) pharmacokinetics has never been investigated in Parkinson's disease. To address this issue, we conducted a pharmacokinetic study with 164 patients with sporadic Parkinson's disease. Patients underwent an oral acute LD test with 250 mg of LD, and pharmacokinetic variables were assessed at baseline and at 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes after LD administration. Plasmatic-LD areas under the curve and body weight were significantly and inversely correlated as well as the elimination of the half-life of LD and body weight. In our sample, women were significantly lighter and had a significantly greater area under the curve than men. Moreover, a greater percentage of women showed LD peak-dose dyskinesias compared with men. Our findings suggest that lighter patients with Parkinson's disease probably receive a greater cumulative dosage of LD per kilogram of body weight during long-term treatment, because in clinical practice, LD is administered without any adjustment of the dose to body weight. This could explain gender differences for the development of LD-induced peak-dose dyskinesias observed during the course of the disease.

Pergolide in the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease

Introduced on the market in 1989, pergolide, a D1/D2 dopamine receptor agonist, is still widely prescribed for the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Initially, pergolide was introduced as an adjunct therapy to levodopa treatment in patients exhibiting fluctuating motor responses and dyskinesias. Results of recent randomized controlled clinical trials in de novo patients with PD show that pergolide is able to improve parkinsonian symptoms when used as monotherapy. Moreover, preliminary results of a long-term monotherapy study in early PD suggest that pergolide is as effective as levodopa, and that a significant delay in the time of the onset of levodopa-induced motor complications can be obtained. A number of randomized studies have shown that pergolide is more effective than bromocriptine as adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with advanced PD; the greater benefit found with pergolide could be ascribed to its action on both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. However, controlled comparative studies with new dopamine agonists, such as ropinirole, cabergoline, and pramipexole, have not been performed yet. Interestingly, few open studies in patients with complicated PD have shown that high doses of pergolide (> 6 mg/d) are able to improve motor fluctuations and dyskinesias through a dramatic reduction of levodopa dosage. The side-effect profile of pergolide is similar to that of other dopamine agonists, and complications such as sleep attack and serosal fibrosis have been rarely reported.

Parkinson's disease: medical and surgical treatment

It has been over three decades since the introduction of L-dihydroxyphenylalanine or levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). The early levodopa trials were driven by recognition of a profound cerebral dopamine deficiency state in this disorder. Whereas dopamine fails to cross the blood brain barrier and hence is ineffective as therapy, the amino acid precursor, dopa, is transported across this barrier and provides a substrate for dopamine synthesis. Levodopa is converted to dopamine within the brain by dopa decarboxylase, replenishing central dopamine stores and potentially reversing the motor symptoms of PD.

Updated guidelines for the management of Parkinson's disease

New data on diagnosis, drug therapy, surgery and psychosocial concerns have emerged since the publication of the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Parkinson's Disease. This article reviews new data and addresses issues left unanswered in the previous guidelines.

Initial treatment of early Parkinson's disease: a review of recent, randomized controlled trials

Many studies have shown dopamine agonists to significantly improve parkinsonian symptoms compared with placebo in early Parkinson's disease (PD), but how do agonists compare with the standard treatment of levodopa? Recently, three large, multicenter, randomized controlled studies directly comparing a dopamine agonist with levodopa as initial therapy in early PD have been published. These studies suggest that although both agents effectively ameliorate parkinsonian symptoms, levodopa was superior to dopamine agonists as measured by improvement in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores. However, levodopa was more frequently associated with dopaminergic motor complications, and the dopamine agonists were more commonly associated with adverse events. Until further studies clearly demonstrate the beneficial effects of one therapeutic strategy over another, the decision to initiate treatment in early PD with either an agonist or levodopa will be based on the favorable motor complication profile of agonists versus the more potent antiparkinsonian effects and the favorable side-effect profile of levodopa.

Antiparkinsonian activity and dyskinesia risk of ropinirole and L-DOPA combination therapy in drug naïve MPTP-lesioned common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)

De novo administration of long-acting dopamine agonists, such as ropinirole, to patients with Parkinson's disease or to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated subhuman primates produces a lower incidence of dyskinesia than occurs with L-DOPA. This study compares the intensity of dyskinesia produced by combinations of L-DOPA and ropinirole and by these drugs alone, using the MPTP-treated common marmoset model of Parkinson's disease. The objective is to determine the optimum therapeutic strategy for the long-term control of Parkinson's disease with a minimal risk of dyskinesia. MPTP-treated marmosets received either L-DOPA alone, ropinirole alone, or one of two combinations of these drugs (either L-DOPA dominant or ropinirole dominant) daily for 28 days in doses titrated to produce a similar improvement in disability and increase in locomotion. In the group receiving L-DOPA alone, there was a trend for peak dose locomotor activity to increase and the duration of drug effect to decline over the period of the study. L-DOPA alone induced marked dyskinesia over the period of treatment, in contrast to ropinirole which produced a low intensity of involuntary movements. The L-DOPA dominant combination initially produced little dyskinesia, but this became increasingly intense as the study progressed. In contrast, the ropinirole dominant combination produced no greater intensity of dyskinesia than was produced by ropinirole alone. These data suggest that in early Parkinson's disease, the use of ropinirole alone or in combination with a low-dose L-DOPA might delay the induction of dyskinesias while improving motor performance.

Continuous transdermal dopaminergic stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease

The objective of the study was to determine the safety and efficacy of increasing doses of Rotigotine CDS in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. The development of motor complications in Parkinson's disease has been linked to intermittent stimulation of dopamine receptors. Continuous, noninvasive, dopaminergic stimulation has not been available to date. Rotigotine CDS is a lipid-soluble D2 dopamine agonist in a transdermal delivery system that could fill this void. This inpatient study consisted of a 2-week dose escalation phase followed by a 2-week dose maintenance phase at the highest dose (80 cm2). Each individual's L-Dopa dose was back-titrated as feasible. The primary outcome measure was L-Dopa dose, and secondary outcome measures included early morning "off"-L-Dopa Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores by a blinded evaluator and motor fluctuation data obtained from patient diaries ("on" without dyskinesia, "on" with dyskinesia, and "off"). Seven of 10 subjects provided data that could be evaluated. There were two administrative dropouts, and one individual was eliminated from the study because of recrudescence of hallucinations. The median daily L-Dopa dose decreased from 1,400 to 400 mg (p = 0.018, Wilcoxon test). Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores were unchanged. Although diary variables improved in most individuals, only the reduction in "off" time attained statistical significance. Adverse effects were mild and consisted mainly of dopaminergic side effects and local skin reactions. The data suggest that Rotigotine CDS is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease and permits patients to substantially lower L-Dopa doses without loss of antiparkinsonian efficacy. Full-scale controlled clinical trials are warranted. In addition to potential therapeutic benefits, this drug can be used to test the hypothesis that continuous dopaminergic stimulation from the initiation of Parkinson's disease therapy will limit the development of motor complications.

Long-term mortality results of the randomized controlled study comparing bromocriptine to which levodopa was later added with levodopa alone in previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease

The present paper compares, in terms of mortality, two treatment regimens for Parkinson's disease (PD), i.e., bromocriptine later combined with levodopa versus levodopa only. Between 1982 and 1989, 60 PD patients (29 treated with levodopa alone [group D] and 31 receiving first bromocriptine followed by an association of bromocriptine + levodopa [group B/D]) were recruited. Data were updated in January 2000. Survival functions were estimated using Kaplan Meier product-limit method and comparison between the two groups with the log-rank test. Mortality was also compared with that of the general French population using standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). The mean duration of follow-up was 10.3 +/- 3.0 years. Seventeen patients died during the follow-up: nine in the group B/D and eight in the group D. The probability of survival at 10 years was 79.0% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.4-86.6] in group B/D and 72.9% [95% CI: 63.3-82.6] in group D. In comparison with the general French population, SMRs were not statistically different from 1, in the whole sample of PD patients (1.21, 95 % CI [0.71-1.95]), in group D (0.98 [0.42-1.93]), or in group B/D (1.53 [0.70-2.92]). In this population, we were unable to find any favourable effect of an early use of bromocriptine on mortality in PD in comparison with levodopa alone.

Frequency of levodopa-related dyskinesias and motor fluctuations as estimated from the cumulative literature

There is no clear consensus regarding the frequency (and hence, the risk), of dyskinesias or motor fluctuations during chronic levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). Multiple clinical series have tabulated these frequencies since the advent of levodopa over 30 years ago. We were interested in determining: (1) the aggregate frequency figures in the existing literature; and (2) how clinical series from the early levodopa era, which included patients with longer durations of parkinsonism, compare to more recent (modern era) series. We searched MEDLINE for all English language publications reporting the cumulative frequency of levodopa-induced dyskinesias or motor fluctuations during discrete intervals of treatment. This generated 2,478 publications spanning 1966 through September 2000. Papers with appropriate titles or abstracts were reviewed; reference lists from published clinical series were a source of additional papers for review. This ultimately yielded 74 publications with adequate data, relating to 112 intervals of levodopa treatment. Series that included patients with PD-onset well before levodopa availability (pre-levodopa era) were separately analyzed from all subsequent series. Series were grouped by duration of levodopa therapy and the median frequencies of dyskinesias and motor fluctuations were tabulated for each group. The data were analyzed both with and without adjustment for the number (N) in each series. Among series containing pre-levodopa era patients, the median dyskinesia frequency was already 50% by 5-6 months of treatment. This contrasts with the modern era series where dyskinesias were reported later in treatment. The median dyskinesia frequency was slightly less than 40% by 4-6 years of levodopa therapy among modern era patients. Motor fluctuations (wearing-off) were not tabulated in most of the early levodopa series. Among modern era reports, motor fluctuations were nil during the first year of levodopa therapy but were experienced by approximately 40% of patients by 4-6 years of treatment. Similar results were found when the analyses were restricted to only prospective studies where levodopa motor complications were targeted outcome measures. The conclusions reached were: (1) patients from the pre-levodopa era experienced dyskinesias much earlier during levodopa treatment than modern era patients, perhaps because of longer durations of pre-existing PD; (2) in the present era, patients treated with levodopa therapy for 4-6 years have approximately a 40% likelihood of experiencing motor fluctuations and a risk of dyskinesias just short of 40%; and (3) these findings represent incident data and the prevalence of clinically important morbidity may be substantially less.

Treatment of early Parkinson's disease

Levodopa is still the most effective therapeutic agent for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Initially, levodopa provides a stable therapeutic response but, during long-term treatment its beneficial effect declines and a gradually increasing number of patients experience fluctuations in motor response. Therefore, in the management of PD it is important to minimise the risks for the development of motor fluctuations. In this context, recent double-blind long-term studies have confirmed the earlier results, suggesting that it appears advisable to initiate dopaminergic treatment in early PD by initially using a dopamine agonist and by adding levodopa when the benefit is no longer adequate with dopamine agonist alone. Another alternative would be to start with selegiline alone, then depending on the disability of the patient, add a dopamine agonist and finally levodopa.

Treatment of Parkinson's disease

The aim of current treatment of Parkinson's disease is to ameliorate the symptoms while seeking to lessen the potential development of late levodopa complications. To this end, there is ample evidence that the early use of dopamine agonists is beneficial in younger Parkinsonian patients but monotherapy with dopamine agonists is for only a select few. Nonergot dopamine agonists offer the potential for fewer side effects. Lower dose levodopa therapy delays the onset and reduces severity of dyskinesia and end of dose failure. However levodopa remains the treatment of choice in Parkinson's disease and should not be restricted unnecessarily in patients with disability. There is no evidence that levodopa is toxic to dopaminergic neurons in people with Parkinson's disease. As yet, no drugs are of proven neuroprotective value. Dopamine agonists, catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibitors, amantadine and apomorphine have differing but beneficial roles in the management of levodopa side effects. Ablative surgery and deep brain stimulation of thalamus, globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus are increasingly available but choice of procedure depends not just on patient symptomatology, but also on local experience and results. Ideally, deep brain stimulation is the treatment of choice as it offers less morbidity than bilateral ablative surgery, the possibility of postoperative adjustments and the potential for reversibility if better treatments become available.

Treatment of Parkinson's disease in Japan

In this paper, the course of therapy for Parkinson's disease is outlined. The rationale for the use of DA-receptor-agonist (DA agonist) monotherapy or early combination therapy using levodopa and a DA agonist is that these therapies are asociated with a lower incidence of motor complications. However, the disease progresses, the use of levodopa in combination with a DA agonist results in motor complications and development of levodopa dependency in parkinsonian patients, because the effect of levodopa on parkinsonism is very strong. In this study, a positive correlation between the Hoehn-Yahr severity score at off-periods and duration of illness was observed in parkinsonian patients with long duration of illness. This indicates that responsiveness to dopaminergic therapy still exists even in patients in advanced stages of Parkinson's disease, indicating that continuous stimulation of DA receptors and reducing the excessive fluctuation in the plasma levodopa level possibly improve motor complications. If the dose of the DA agonist is simply increased without reduction of levodopa doses, dyskinesia worsens. Although levodopa therapy is essential in the case of patients in advanced stages of Parkinson's disease, the therapeutic principle, which depends on levodopa efficacy, must be changed. Reduction of the levodopa dose and administration of a sufficient dose of a DA agonist, which is equivalent to levodopa dose reduction, is one of the possible means of effective therapy of the disease.

Dopamine agonists: the treatment for Parkinson's disease in the XXI century?

Levodopa combined with a peripheral dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (DCI) has been considered the therapy of choice for Parkinson's disease (PD). Levodopa is nearly always effective, but has a high incidence of adverse effects with long term use, including response fluctuations (on/off phenomena) and dyskinesias. Dopaminergic agonists, acting directly at the receptor level, would be able to decrease the incidence of these motor complications.In progressive neurodegenerative diseases, such as PD, modification of the rate of disease progression (often referred to as neuroprotection) is currently a highly debated topic. Increased oxidative stress is thought to be involved in nigral cell death, that is characteristic of PD. This oxidative stress may be further exacerbated by levodopa therapy. These mechanisms have been proven in vitro and animal models, but it's relevance in humans remains speculative.Based on the considerations above, the emerging therapeutic strategies for PD advocate early use of dopamine agonists in the treatment of PD. A number of recent well-controlled studies have proven the efficacy of dopamine agonists used as monotherapy. Moreover, as predicted by animal studies, on the long term, dopaminergic agonists induce significantly less motor complications than levodopa.In the last 2years, three new dopamine agonists have been launched, including ropinirole, pramipexole and cabergoline. These new agonists have been added, as therapeutical options to well-established drugs, like pergolide, bromocriptine or talipexole. The recently launched compounds have proven efficacy in monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy to levodopa. Unfortunately, only a very limited amount of comparative data among the different agonists is available. Pergolide has proven to be a superior drug to bromocriptine as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in a significant number of studies and is considered the gold standard dopamine agonist. Nevertheless, none of the recently launched compounds has compared itself against pergolide.A comparison of monotherapy trials is difficult, because of differences in design and populations. In a recently completed trial pergolide was statistically significantly better than placebo in all the efficacy parameters tested, with 57% of pergolide treated patients improving over 30% in the motor section of the UPDRS, as compared to 17% in the placebo arm. Interestingly, these results were obtained in the absence of any other antiparkinsonian drug during the trial. Recent monotherapy trials done with ropinirole and pramipexole achieved also significant improvements as monotherapy, but in these cases selegeline, a drug that causes a symptomatic improvement in PD, was allowed as co-medications during the trial. Not all trials used the same efficacy measures, i.e. monotherapy trials with pergolide and ropinirole used a "responder" based analysis (responder were all patients that improved 30% or more on the motor section of UPDRS), as well as a baseline to endpoint improvement in motor scores. Pramipexole monotherapy trials used only the latter approach, which is clinically less powerful than a responder analysis.Even with the difficulties mentioned above, all the recent trials with dopamine agonists have proven that these drugs are a useful symptomatic long term treatment for PD with or without levodopa and that the early use of dopamine agonists reduces the incidence of motor complications as compared to levodopa.

Striatal dopamine- and glutamate-mediated dysregulation in experimental parkinsonism

Characteristic changes involving interactions between dopamine and glutamate in striatal medium spiny neurons now appear to contribute to symptom production in Parkinson's disease (PD). The balance between kinase and phosphatase signaling modifies the phosphorylation state of glutamate receptors and thus their synaptic strength. Sensitization of spiny-neuron NMDA and AMPA receptors alters cortical glutamatergic input to the striatum and modifies striatal GABAergic output, and thus motor function. Conceivably, the pharmacological targeting of spiny-neuron mechanisms modified in PD will provide a safer and more effective therapy.

Dopamine-receptor stimulation: biobehavioral and biochemical consequences

The MPTP monkey is a well-characterized animal model of parkinsonism and provides an exceptional tool for the study of dyskinesias induced by dopamine-like agents. Several such agents have been tested during the past 15 years, and it has been found that the duration of action of these compounds is the most reliable variable with which to predict their dyskinesiogenic profile. It is proposed that L-dopa-induced dyskinesias represent a form of pathological learning caused by chronic pulsatile (nonphysiological) stimulation of dopamine receptors, which activates a cascade of molecular and biochemical events. These events include defective regulation of Fos proteins that belong to the deltaFosB family, increased expression of neuropeptides, and defective GABA- and glutamate-mediated neurotransmission in the output structures of the basal ganglia.

Continuous dopamine-receptor stimulation in early Parkinson's disease

Chronic L-dopa therapy is associated with the development of motor complications in the majority of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Although the precise mechanism responsible for these events is not known, increasing laboratory and clinical evidence points to a sequence of events that is initiated by abnormal pulsatile stimulation of dopamine receptors by the intermittent administration of agents with short half-lives such as L-dopa. Initiating therapy with a long-acting dopamine agonist has been shown to delay the onset and reduce the severity of motor complications in MPTP monkeys and PD patients. Administering L-dopa with a catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor to block its peripheral metabolism increases its plasma half-life and might have a similar effect. Thus, a rational strategy for treating PD would be to initiate therapy with a long-acting dopamine-receptor agonist and supplement at the appropriate time with L-dopa combined with a COMT inhibitor.

Prevention and therapeutic strategies for levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease

Levodopa-induced dyskinesias represent a major shortcoming of Parkinson's disease management, and its pharmacological treatment is generally unsatisfactory. However, the conclusive demonstration of the benefits associated with early prescription of a dopamine agonist, the antidyskinetic properties of 'old' antiparkinsonian compounds such as amantadine, and the striking results of functional stereotatic neurosurgery are extremely important advances for the treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesias.

Sustained cabergoline treatment reverses levodopa-induced dyskinesias in parkinsonian monkeys

The pathophysiology of L-Dopa-induced dyskinesias (LID), a common problem after long-term use of L-dopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), is not completely understood. Oscillations in L-Dopa concentrations in the brain are believed to be responsible, at least in part, for their pathogenesis. This study was aimed at verifying whether chronic administration of cabergoline, a long-acting dopamine D2-like receptor agonist, can reverse established LID. Four MPTP-treated cynomolgus monkeys with long-standing and stable parkinsonian syndrome and reproducible dyskinesias to L-Dopa, were used in this study. We compared the antiparkinsonian and dyskinetic responses of L-Dopa methyl ester (62.5 mg and 125 mg), given with benserazide (50 mg) (L-Dopa/benserazide), administered before and after a 6-week period during which the animals were treated only by daily administration of cabergoline (doses ranging from 0.125 to 0.185 mg/kg, subcutaneous). During cabergoline treatment, the monkeys initially showed marked dyskinesias, which were reduced significantly after 4 weeks of treatment. However, there was no tolerance to its antiparkinsonian effect. L-Dopa/benserazide given 4 days after cabergoline withdrawal produced a significant antiparkinsonian effect, but dyskinesias were dramatically reduced compared to what had been seen before chronic cabergoline treatment. The duration of the L-Dopa response was not increased after chronic administration of cabergoline. Our data suggest that sustained dopamine D2 receptor stimulation could be of value when trying to reduce or to reverse LID in patients with fluctuating advanced PD.

The putative neuroprotective role of dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease is probably caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors, which trigger a cascade of events that lead to the cell death of the dopamine-containing neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta. These processes include oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, excitotoxicity with excess of nitric oxide formation, glial and inflammatory abnormalities and apoptosis. Dopamine agonists are chemical compounds that act directly on the dopamine receptors without any previous enzymatic biotransformation. Besides their symptomatic antiparkinsonian effect, these drugs may have neuroprotective properties in Parkinson's disease through different possible mechanisms: (a) stimulation of dopamine auoreceptors, reducing thereby dopamine turnover; (b) direct antioxidant effects; (c) reduction of excitotoxicity induced by excessive subthalamic nucleus firing; (d) inhibition of mitochondrial permeability; (e) induction of trophic factors. Dopamine agonists have already shown neuroprotective effects on dopaminergic cells against a variety of neurotoxins in several in vitro and in vivo studies. Clinical studies to detect changes in the progression of the underlying neurodegenerative process in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with dopamine agonists, by assessing the dopamine terminal function in the striatum by means of PET and SPECT techniques are under way.

Comparative tolerability of the newer generation antiparkinsonian agents

In recent years, the treatment of Parkinson's disease has undergone an immense amount of research, resulting in the development of multiple new medications. This has largely been fuelled by dissatisfaction over the development of motor complications secondary to long term levodopa therapy. Different treatment approaches are applied depending on the stage of Parkinson's disease. In early and mild Parkinson's disease, selegiline offers a limited symptomatic effect. Its neuroprotective effect, although at present theoretical, has questionable clinical relevance. Increased mortality associated with selegiline has been reported, although a meta-analysis of 5 different trials did not support this finding. The newer, non-ergoline dopamine agonists, pramipexole and ropinirole, have undergone extensive studies to evaluate their efficacy as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease. These newer agonists are ideal initial symptomatic medications, primarily because they delay the onset of levodopa-induced motor fluctuations. Efficacy of the newer dopamine agonists in advanced disease seems to be comparable to that of the older agents, bromocriptine and pergolide. Adverse effects can be reduced by starting the medication at a very low dose and then slowly titrating upward. Catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors are indicated for the treatment of motor fluctuations in advanced disease, particularly the 'wearing-off' phenomenon. Tolcapone, a peripheral and central COMT inhibitor, appears to be quite effective, producing a 47% reduction in 'off' time. Unfortunately, 3 deaths have been observed, which are presumably secondary to tolcapone therapy. The drug has been withdrawn in many countries, and liver enzyme testing is mandatory in the US. Entacapone, a purely peripheral COMT inhibitor with a lower potency than tolcapone, has also proved to be effective and has not been associated with liver damage, obviating the need for testing.

Maximizing the benefit:risk ratio of levodopa therapy in Parkinson's disease

For over 30 years, levodopa has been the gold standard for managing the symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Treatment with levodopa has resulted in a marked decrease in disease-associated mortality and morbidity. However, one of its drawbacks is that many patients experience a shorter duration of response and increased motor fluctuations with disease progression and long-term levodopa therapy. These increased motor fluctuations, including dyskinesias, may be the consequence of oxidative stress or inability to store and regulate intrasynaptic dopamine concentrations with disease progression. Clinical investigations have demonstrated that continuous dopaminergic stimulation may widen the therapeutic window for levodopa and improve motor fluctuations. Strategies for providing continuous dopaminergic replacement include administration of levodopa by continuous infusion, controlled-release levodopa, long-acting dopamine agonists, and inhibitors of levodopa metabolism. The catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors that block a compensatory metabolic pathway for levodopa and prolong its duration may improve the consistency of the dopaminergic response.

Successful orchestration of antiparkinsonian pharmacotherapy

As is true with the orchestration of essentially all forms of pharmacotherapy, the overall quality of therapy should not be judged as a simple binary function (it is either good or bad). Rather, it should be judged along a continuum, spanning adequate through excellent and peaking at truly elegant, where two or more disease states are optimally managed with a single, simple drug. Because the difference between adequate and elegant therapy often depends on fine-tuning the drug choice, dosage, and route of administration, it is no surprise that pharmacists are often intimately involved in many highly successful specialty clinics, including Parkinson's disease clinics.

Treatment of Parkinson's disease should begin with a dopamine agonist

The occurrence of side effects with long-term levodopa therapy, such as fluctuations in motor performance or abnormal movements, led to a search for new antiparkinsonian drugs. Dopamine agonists include ergot derivatives such as bromocriptine, lisuride, pergolide, and cabergoline and other agents which do not possess the ergot structure such as pramipexole and ropinirole. They all are powerful stimulators of the D2 dopamine receptor which probably underlies their therapeutic effects. The clinical consequences of their binding to other dopamine receptor subtypes (D1 or D3) remains unknown. They are usually prescribed in combination with levodopa when late side effects begin to occur. This review summarizes the available pharmacologic and clinical data to support the early use of dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease. Several strategies can be used, such as monotherapy or "early" or "late" combination with levodopa. Results of recent well-performed, modern clinical trials show that early use of the new dopamine agonists is able to effectively control the clinical symptoms for more than 3 years thereby offering the possibility of delaying the occurrence of levodopa-induced late motor side effects.

Dopamine agonists: what is the place of the newer compounds in the treatment of Parkinson's disease?

Three new dopamine agonists (cabergoline, pramipexole, ropinirole) have been put on to the market within the past months to treat patients with Parkinson's disease. Like any marketed dopamine agonists, the new compounds bind to the D2-like receptors. Pramipexole and ropinirole appear to be quite close drugs. Both are selective non ergot D2 (and preferentially D3) agonists, with an elimination half-life of 5 to 10 hours. Conversely, cabergoline is an ergot derivative, less selective for the D2 receptors, with a much longer elimination half-life (60 hours or more). In moderately advanced levodopa treated patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations, cabergoline, pramipexole and ropinirole all do significantly better than placebo in reducing UPDRS motor examination scores, time spent off and daily dose of levodopa. None of the 3 newer agonists proved to do significantly better than bromocriptine in this indication, at the cost of very similar adverse effects. In de novo levodopa naive patients, pramipexole and ropinirole did significantly better than placebo in short-term (few months) follow-up trials, at the cost again of classical dopaminergic adverse effects. Ropinirole was marginally more effective than bromocriptine, while its use induced the same risk of psychosis than the "old" reference agonist. Early treatment with cabergoline, compared with levodopa, in a long-term (5 year) study reduced the relative risk of developping motor complication by more than 50%. A similar study is presently on-going to compare ropinirole and levodopa. Clinical trials to assess putative neuroprotective effects are also on going with ropinirole and pramipexole. Up to now, the available clinical controlled data suggest that the newer dopamine agonists have very similar clinical effects with only minor superiority, if any, versus bromocriptine.