Uric acid restores endothelial function in patients with type 1 diabetes and regular smokers

Serum uric acid, mortality and glucose control in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a PreCIS database study

AIMS

To determine the association of serum uric acid with all-cause mortality and hyperglycaemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis of 535 consecutive patients who had uric acid determinations between 1998 and 2004 and whose subsequent vital status was determined at a median of 4.5 years. The association with mortality was analysed with Cox proportional hazards models. The incremental predictive value of uric acid was examined with concordance indexes. The proportional risk of mortality was represented with the Kaplan-Meier survival curves by uric acid quartiles.

RESULTS

We studied 370 men and 165 women aged 59.3 +/- 11.5 years. Mean uric acid was 371.7 +/- 106.2 micromol/l. Patients with glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) > or = 9% had lower uric acid vs. the rest (342.2 +/- 112.1 vs. 383.5 +/- 106.2, P = 0.002). Overall mortality was 10.8%. For each 59 micromol/l increase in uric acid there was a 41% increase in risk of death (unadjusted analysis). The association of uric acid with mortality remained after adjustment for covariates (hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.45) and after gender subanalyses. Uric acid increased the accuracy of prediction when added to a model including Framingham risk factors, components of metabolic syndrome and fibrinogen (P = 0.03). Mortality was higher in patients taking diuretics vs. the rest (15.9 vs. 7.3%), but uric acid predicted mortality in both subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum uric acid predicts mortality in Type 2 diabetic patients regardless of gender, HbA(1c), renal function and diuretic use. Intervention studies should determine whether uric acid is a potential therapeutic target or only a marker of mortality risk.

Is the fructose index more relevant with regards to cardiovascular disease than the glycemic index?

The glycemic index (G.I.) is a means for categorizing carbohydrates based on their ability to raise blood glucose, subsequently this index has been popularized as a way for selecting foods to reduce the risk for obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. We suggest that the G.I. is better aimed at identifying foods that stimulate insulin secretion rather than foods that stimulate insulin resistance. In this regard, fructose has a low G.I. but may be causally linked with the obesity and cardiovascular disease epidemic. The reported association of high G.I. with cardiovascular disease may be due to the association of sugar intake which contains fructose, but which has a high G.I. due to its glucose content. We propose the use of a fructose index to categorize foods and propose studies to determine the effect of low fructose diets as a means to prevent obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease in the population.