Amoxicillin and amoxicillin plus clavulanate: a safety review

Despite the considerable number of newer antibacterials made available over the past decades, amoxicillin, alone or in combination with clavulanic acid, still accounts among the most widely used antibacterial agents. Although they are often considered 'twin drugs', they are different both in terms of antibacterial activities and of safety profile. It is well documented that the clavulanate component may cause adverse reactions by itself, thus exposing patients to further, and sometimes undue, risks. Although amoxicillin/clavulanate should be considered as an alternative agent only for the treatment of resistant bacteria, evidence shows that it is often used also when a narrow-spectrum antibiotic would have been just as effective. This prescription habit may have serious consequences in terms of patients' safety, as well as in terms of the development of bacterial resistance.

Hospitalization for peptic ulcer and bleeding in users of selective COX-2 inhibitors and nonselective NSAIDs with special reference to celecoxib

PURPOSE

To assess the relative incidence of peptic ulcer bleeding and perforation (PUBP) in users of selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study based on insurance claims, with chart review to confirm cases. The base population consisted of 2.2 million adult users of celecoxib, diclofenac, ibuprofen, naproxen, rofecoxib, or valdecoxib who were covered by commercial health insurance in the United States from 1999-2003. For 790 persons hospitalized for PUBP and 7887 controls, most recent NSAID/COX-2 use and a variety of medical and pharmacy risk factors were ascertained from the insurance files and analyzed by conditional logistic regression. The main outcome measure was the odds ratio (OR) associated with use of each drug by comparison to naproxen, and in successive intervals after last dispensing.

RESULTS

Hospitalization for PUBP was highest from the date of NSAID/COX-2 dispensing through the end of an exposure period that corresponded to the days supply; the rate dropped steadily thereafter. The covariate-adjusted ORs by comparison to naproxen were: ibuprofen 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68, 1.09), rofecoxib 0.79 (0.62, 1.02), diclofenac 0.66 (0.47, 0.94), valdecoxib 0.50 (0.26, 0.97), and celecoxib 0.45 (0.35, 0.58). The nonselective NSAIDs had an OR for PUBP of 1.51 (1.26, 1.98) compared to the selective COX-2 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Nonselective NSAIDs convey half again as much risk of hospitalization for PUBP as do COX-2 inhibitors. Celecoxib users had about half the hospitalization rate of users of naproxen.

Transient elastography and other noninvasive tests to assess hepatic fibrosis in patients with viral hepatitis

The limitations of liver biopsy (invasive procedure, sampling errors, inter-observer variability and nondynamic fibrosis evaluation) have stimulated the search for noninvasive approaches for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with viral hepatitis. A variety of methods including the measurement of liver stiffness, using transient elastography, and serum markers, ranging from routine laboratory tests to more complex algorithms or indices combining the results of panels of markers, have been proposed. Among serum indices, Fibrotest has been the most extensively studied and validated. Transient elastography appears as a promising method but has been mostly validated in chronic hepatitis C with performance equivalent to that of serum markers for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis. The combination of both approaches as first-line assessment of liver fibrosis could avoid the performance of liver biopsy in the majority of patients with chronic hepatitis C, a strategy that deserves further evaluation in patients with hepatitis B or HIV-HCV coinfection. Transient elastography also appears to be an excellent tool for early detection of cirrhosis and may have prognostic value in this setting. Guidelines are now awaited for the use of noninvasive methods in clinical practice.

Management of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity: focus on proton pump inhibitors

The association between NSAIDs and the presence of upper gastrointestinal (GI) complications is well established. Evidence that acid aggravates NSAID-induced injury provides a rationale for minimizing such damage by acid suppression. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) appear to be very effective in treating NSAID-related dyspepsia, and also in healing gastric and duodenal ulcers in patients continuing to receive the NSAID. An analysis of data from comparative studies of PPIs versus ranitidine, misoprostol and sucralfate shows a therapeutic advantage in favour of the PPI. Several studies now confirm the efficacy of co-therapy with PPIs in the short- and long-term prevention of NSAID-induced upper GI injury. PPIs are more effective than histamine H(2)-receptor antagonists at standard dosages in reducing the risk of gastric and duodenal ulcer, and are superior to misoprostol in preventing duodenal but not gastric lesions. However, when balancing effectiveness and tolerance, PPIs may be considered the treatment of choice in the short- and long-term prevention of NSAID-related mucosal lesions. To date, there are only a few published articles dealing with the role of PPIs in the prevention of upper GI complications. Recent epidemiological and interventional studies provide some evidence that PPIs are of benefit. However, more controlled studies using clinical outcomes are needed to establish the best management strategy (PPIs combined with traditional NSAIDs or with cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors) especially in patients with multiple risk factors, in patients using concomitant low-dose aspirin, corticosteroids or anticoagulants (high risk group), or in patients with a history of ulcer complications (very high risk group). Furthermore, it should be underlined that Helicobacter pylori infection positively interacts with the gastroprotective effect of PPIs; therefore, the true efficacy of these drugs in preventing NSAID-related ulcer complications should be reassessed without the confounding influence of this microorganism.

Synchronous incidental gastrointestinal stromal and epithelial malignant tumors

AIM: To investigate the incidence of incidental gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and its etiopathogenesis.

METHODS: From January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2007, 13 804 cases of gastrointestinal epithelial malignant tumor (EMT) and 521 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) were successfully treated with surgery at the Department of General Surgery and the Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China. The clinical and pathologic data of 311 cases of primary GIST, including 257 cases with clinical GIST and 54 cases of incidental GIST were analyzed.

RESULTS: Of the 311 patients, 54 had incidental GIST, accounting for 17.4%. Of these tumors, 27 were found in 1.13% patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), 22 in 0.53% patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), 2 in 0.38% patients with PAC, 2 in 0.03% patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma, and 1 in one patient with GAC accompanying ESCC, respectively. Patients with incidental GIST presented symptoms indistinguishable from those with EMT. All incidental GIST lesions were small in size, and the majority had a low mitotic activity while only 1.9% (5/257) of clinical GIST lesions had a high risk.

CONCLUSION: Incidental GIST may occur synchronously with other tumors and has a high prevalence in males. Surgery is its best treatment modality.

Practical guidelines for diagnosis and early management of drug-induced liver injury

The spectrum of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is both diverse and complex. The first step in diagnosis is a suspicion of DILI based on careful consideration of recent comprehensive reports on the disease. There are some situations in which the suspicion of DILI is particularly strong. Exclusion of other possible etiologies according to the pattern of liver injury is essential for the diagnosis. In patients with suspected DILI, diagnostic scales, such as the Councils for International Organizations of Medical Sciences/Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (CIOMS/RUCAM) scale, may be helpful for the final diagnosis. Early management of DILI involves prompt withdrawal of the drug suspected of being responsible, according to serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and total bilirubin (T-Bil). However, as DILI patients may show resolution of liver injury without discontinuation of the drug, it should be carefully evaluated whether the suspected drug should be discontinued immediately with adequate consideration of the importance of the medication.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study: rationale, design and conduct

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an uncommon adverse drug reaction of increasing importance to the medical community, pharmaceutical industry, regulatory agencies and the general public.

OBJECTIVES

The Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) was established to advance understanding and research into DILI by initiating a prospective registry of patients with bona fide DILI for future studies of host clinical, genetic, environmental and immunological risk factors. The DILIN was also charged with developing standardized nomenclature, terminology and causality assessment instruments.

METHODS

Five clinical sites, a data coordinating centre and senior scientists from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases initiated the DILIN prospective study in September 2004. Eligible patients are required to meet minimal laboratory or histological criteria within 6 months of DILI onset and have other competing causes of liver injury excluded. Patients in the general community setting with pre-existing HIV, hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infections and/or abnormal baseline liver biochemistries are eligible for enrollment. In addition, subjects with liver injury due to herbal products are eligible to participate. Control patients without DILI are also to be recruited in the future.

RESULTS

All referred subjects undergo an extensive review of available laboratory, pathology and imaging studies. Subjects who meet pre-defined eligibility criteria at the 6-month study visit are followed for 2 years to better define the natural history of chronic DILI. Causality assessment is determined by a panel of three hepatologists who independently assign a causality score ranging from 1 (definite) to 5 (unlikely) as well as a severity score ranging from 1 (mild) to 5 (fatal). During the first 3 years, 367 subjects were enrolled into the DILIN prospective study.

CONCLUSION

DILIN is a multicentre research network charged with improving our understanding of the aetiologies, risk factors and outcomes of DILI in the US. The network is meeting the targeted enrollment of ten patients per month and is developing a repository of clinical data and biological samples for future studies of DILI pathogenesis and outcome.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study: rationale, design and conduct

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an uncommon adverse drug reaction of increasing importance to the medical community, pharmaceutical industry, regulatory agencies and the general public.

OBJECTIVES

The Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) was established to advance understanding and research into DILI by initiating a prospective registry of patients with bona fide DILI for future studies of host clinical, genetic, environmental and immunological risk factors. The DILIN was also charged with developing standardized nomenclature, terminology and causality assessment instruments.

METHODS

Five clinical sites, a data coordinating centre and senior scientists from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases initiated the DILIN prospective study in September 2004. Eligible patients are required to meet minimal laboratory or histological criteria within 6 months of DILI onset and have other competing causes of liver injury excluded. Patients in the general community setting with pre-existing HIV, hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infections and/or abnormal baseline liver biochemistries are eligible for enrollment. In addition, subjects with liver injury due to herbal products are eligible to participate. Control patients without DILI are also to be recruited in the future.

RESULTS

All referred subjects undergo an extensive review of available laboratory, pathology and imaging studies. Subjects who meet pre-defined eligibility criteria at the 6-month study visit are followed for 2 years to better define the natural history of chronic DILI. Causality assessment is determined by a panel of three hepatologists who independently assign a causality score ranging from 1 (definite) to 5 (unlikely) as well as a severity score ranging from 1 (mild) to 5 (fatal). During the first 3 years, 367 subjects were enrolled into the DILIN prospective study.

CONCLUSION

DILIN is a multicentre research network charged with improving our understanding of the aetiologies, risk factors and outcomes of DILI in the US. The network is meeting the targeted enrollment of ten patients per month and is developing a repository of clinical data and biological samples for future studies of DILI pathogenesis and outcome.

Noninvasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with HIV infection and HCV/HBV co-infection

The measurement of fibrosis stage critically affects the identification of the progression of liver disease, the establishment of a prognosis and therapeutic decision making. Liver biopsy has been the single, most useful method to determine the degree of liver fibrosis (LF), but with recognized limitations, mainly associated with its invasiveness. In recent years, alternative noninvasive methods have been developed, including imaging methods, such as transient elastometry, and assays based on serum biomarkers. This article reviews the available studies evaluating the value of various noninvasive methods for the assessment of LF in patients with HIV-infection and HBV/HCV co-infection, and makes recommendations on how to best use and combine them in clinical practice.

Upper endoscopy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and upper gastrointestinal bleeding: results of a decision analysis

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) can present a challenge. The utility of upper endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy, EGD) and endoscopic therapy must be weighed against safety considerations.

AIM

To assess the utility and safety of EGD in patients with UGIB and AMI.

METHODS

Using decision analysis, patients with UGIB and AMI were assigned to one of two strategies: (1) EGD prior to cardiac catheterization (EGD strategy) and (2) cardiac catheterization without EGD (CATH strategy).

RESULTS

In patients with overt UGIB, the EGD strategy resulted in 97 deaths per 10,000 patients, compared with 600 deaths in the CATH strategy. The EGD strategy resulted in fewer non-fatal complications (1,271 vs. 6,000 per 10,000 patients). In patients with occult blood loss, the EGD strategy resulted in more deaths (59 vs. 16 per 10,000) and more non-fatal complications (888 vs. 160 per 10,000) than the CATH strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis supports EGD prior to cardiac catheterization in patients with AMI and overt UGIB. This strategy results in fewer deaths and complications compared with a strategy of proceeding directly to catheterization. Our analysis does not support routine EGD prior to cardiac catheterization in patients with fecal occult blood.

Differences in Managing Anticoagulants and Antiplatelets for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy between East and West

Decreasing the bleeding risk associated with gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures and minimizing the thromboembolic risk of withdrawing medications are very important for the patients taking anticoagulants and antiplatelets. Western guidelines on managing anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications in GI endoscopy suggest a polypectomy with aspirin medication or a biopsy with warfarin medication. However, Eastern endoscopists’ adherence to Western guidelines may be responsible for Easteners experiencing massive bleedings. During the cessation of drugs, it should be emphasized that Asians may be predisposed to different forms of embolism more likely to be of the cerebrovascular system, whereas Westerners more likely to be of the cardiovascular variety. To better understand the differences between the East and West, differences in drug metabolism should be considered that results in greater body weight-normalized plasma unbound clearance of drug in Easterners. Taken as a whole, different managements are required for GI endoscopy in patients on anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet medications based on differences in metabolism of drugs, risk of hemorrhage, and forms of thromboembolism.

Drug-induced liver injury following positive drug rechallenge

Drug rechallenge (or reinitiation), following an event of drug-induced liver injury, can lead to serious or fatal liver injury. A retrospective review of a large pharmaceutical safety database was conducted to assess clinical outcomes of positive drug rechallenge following possible drug-induced liver injury. Positive rechallenge with suspect drug was reported in 770 of 36,795 hepatic adverse events. A total of 88 cases met inclusion criteria for analysis. Mean age was 44 years (range 0.5-83) and 56% were male. A broad spectrum of suspect drugs were identified. Many patients exhibited hepatitis symptoms or jaundice on the initial and rechallenge liver event. Twelve patients (14%) exhibited clinically worrisome severe hepatocellular injury and jaundice on either initial or rechallenge event and two died, reflecting a 2.3% fatality rate in those with positive rechallenge. The two fatalities developed severe hepatocellular injury with jaundice only upon rechallenge. Liver injury recurred in most rechallenges. Improved identification and communication of possible drug-induced liver injury is needed to avoid potentially serious and/or fatal drug rechallenges. Clinicians should generally avoid such rechallenges.

Prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastropathy

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for their analgesic, antipyretic, and antiinflammatory properties, and aspirin is increasingly employed in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and ischemic stroke. Despite undisputed therapeutic efficacy for these indications, all NSAIDs impart a considerable risk of peptic ulcer disease and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. A growing body of evidence supports an association between non-aspirin NSAIDs and acute coronary syndromes, and an expanding understanding of the gastroduodenal effects of aspirin, COX-2 selective agents, clopidogrel, and Helicobacter pylori synergism fuel controversies in NSAID use. In this review, we discuss risk stratification of patients taking NSAIDs and the appropriate application of proven gastro-protective strategies to decrease the incidence of gastrointestinal hemorrhage based upon an individualized assessment of risk for potential toxicities. Prevention of NSAID-related gastropathy is an important clinical issue, and therapeutic strategies for both the primary and secondary prevention of adverse events are continually evolving.

Recent advances in coeliac disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Worldwide awareness of coeliac disease in all ages continues to grow. This article aims to summarize critically the recent research advances in coeliac disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Large multicentre studies have provided further evidence of the role of environmental and nonhuman leucocyte antigen genetic factors in coeliac disease. Siblings of coeliac patients carry a high risk, but those found to have negative coeliac serology are very unlikely to develop the disease. Advances in the efficacy of serological antibody testing potentiate the possibility of future accurate screening programmes in the community. Adherence to a gluten-free diet remains paramount as the recognition of coeliac related complications increases.

SUMMARY

Despite the encouraging progress that has taken place in our genetic and immunological knowledge of coeliac disease, early introduction of a gluten-free diet remains the cornerstone of treatment. Alternatives, however, aimed at altering the toxicity of cereal proteins are now looking more promising.

Canadian consensus guidelines on long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy and the need for gastroprotection: benefits versus risks

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used, but are not without risks.

AIM

To provide evidence-based management recommendations to help clinicians determine optimal long-term NSAID therapy and the need for gastroprotective strategies based on an assessment of both gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) risks.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of 21 voting participants revised and voted on the statements and the strength of evidence (assessed according to GRADE) at a consensus meeting.

RESULTS

An algorithmic approach was developed to help manage patients who require long-term NSAID therapy. The use of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid in patients with high CV risk was assumed. For patients at low GI and CV risk, a traditional NSAID alone may be acceptable. For patients with low GI risk and high CV risk, full-dose naproxen may have a lower potential for CV risk than other NSAIDs. In patients with high GI and low CV risk, a COX-2 inhibitor plus a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) may offer the best GI safety profile. When both GI and CV risks are high and NSAID therapy is absolutely necessary, risk should be prioritized. If the primary concern is GI risk, a COX-2 inhibitor plus a PPI is recommended; if CV risk, naproxen 500 mg b.d. plus a PPI would be preferred. NSAIDs should be used at the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible duration.

CONCLUSION

More large, long-term trials that examine clinical outcomes of complicated and symptomatic upper and lower GI ulcers are needed.

Treatment Choices and Patterns in Migraine Patients With and Without a Cardiovascular Risk Profile

Treatment patterns in migraine patients with cardiovascular risk factors are largely unknown. A retrospective observational study was conducted to characterize the baseline cardiovascular risk profile of new users of specific abortive migraine drugs, and to investigate treatment choices and patterns in patients with and without a known cardiovascular risk profile. New users of a triptan, ergotamine or Migrafin® ( n = 36 839) from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2006 were included. Approximately 90 of all new users did not have a clinically recognized cardiovascular risk profile. The percentage of new users with a cardiovascular risk profile did not differ between new users of a triptan, ergotamine or Migrafin® and also did not change during the study period of 17 years. Differences in treatment choices and patterns between migraine patients with and without a known cardiovascular risk profile reveal a certain reticence in prescribing vasoconstrictive antimigraine drugs to patients at cardiovascular risk.

Aspirin in cardiology--benefits and risks

AIMS

To review the current knowledge of the benefits and risks of long-term aspirin therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

Relevant articles published in English between 1996 and 2006 were obtained from the Current Contents Science Edition, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases.

RESULTS

Secondary aspirin prophylaxis is effective in reducing the risk of ischaemic events in patients with cardiovascular disease. However, its utility in reducing primary ischaemic events is more controversial; it appears to reduce the incidence of ischaemic stroke, but increase the incidence of haemorrhagic stroke. Aspirin therapy can also lead to an increased risk of gastrointestinal ulcers, upper gastrointestinal bleeding and other haemorrhagic complications. Lower doses of aspirin are associated with a reduced risk of gastrointestinal side effects and are equally effective in reducing cardiovascular risk. Co-therapy with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, clopidogrel or warfarin increases the risk of gastrointestinal side effects, while co-therapy with proton pump inhibitors reduces it.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the benefits and risks need to be considered carefully when prescribing aspirin, particularly in primary prevention. Patients should be prescribed lower doses rather than higher doses of aspirin in line with prescribing guidelines. Co-prescription of a proton pump inhibitors may be necessary in patients at high risk for upper gastrointestinal complications.

The long-term follow-up after idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury with jaundice

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Chronic evolution after drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has been reported. How often this leads to liver-related morbidity and mortality is unexplored.

METHODS

Patients who survived DILI and concomitant jaundice reported to the Swedish Adverse Drug Reaction Advisory Committee (1970-2004) were linked to the Swedish Hospital Discharge and Cause of Death Registries.

RESULTS

Among the 712 survivors, 27 could not be retrieved but 685 patients could be linked to the registries, 392 females (57.2%) and 293 males (42.8%) median age 58 (41-74), a mean follow-up of 10 years. A total of 23/685 (3.4%) patients had been hospitalized for liver disease and 5 had liver-related mortality. Eight patients developed cirrhosis (7 decompensated, 5 died), 5 had "cryptogenic" cirrhosis in which DILI might have played a role in this development. Duration of therapy before DILI was longer in patients with liver-related morbidity/mortality (135+/-31 days vs. 53+/-3; p<0.0001). Autoimmune hepatitis developed in 5/23 (22%), all of female gender after a mean of 5.8 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of clinically important liver disease after severe DILI associated with jaundice is rare after acute DILI. However decompensated "cryptogenic" cirrhosis developed in some patients with fatal outcome in which DILI might have played a role in this development.

Guidelines for prevention of NSAID-related ulcer complications

Guidelines for clinical practice are intended to indicate preferred approaches to medical problems as established by scientifically valid research. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are preferable, but compassionate use reports and expert review articles are used in a thorough review of the literature conducted through Medline with the National Library of Medicine. Only when data that will not withstand objective scrutiny are available is a recommendation identified as a consensus of experts. Guidelines are applicable to all physicians who address the subject, without regard to specialty training or interests, and are intended to indicate the preferable, but not necessarily the only, acceptable approach to a specific problem. Guidelines are intended to be flexible and must be distinguished from standards of care, which are inflexible and rarely violated. Given the wide range of specifics in any health-care problem, the physician must always choose the course best suited to the individual patient and the variables in existence at the moment of decision. These guidelines were developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology by a committee of experts in the field, reviewed by its Practice Parameters Committee, and approved by the Board of Trustees. The recommendations of these guidelines are therefore considered valid at the time of production based on the data available. New developments in medical research and practice pertinent to each guideline will be reviewed at an established time and indicated at publication to assure continued validity. Owing to the volume of new data on the subject of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract, i.e., the advent of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, new data on interactions between these agents, as well as traditional NSAIDs, with aspirin and H. pylori, it was elected by the Committee to confine these guidelines to upper gastrointestinal (GI) injury and to leave post-duodenal injury as the subject of a separate guideline.

[Pharmacological and pharmacogenetic study of two immunomodulators: azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine. Strategies for preventing complications]

Thiopurines are frequently used in gastroenterology for Crohn's disease or hemorrhagic rectocolitis. Their metabolism is regulated by a particular enzyme, thiopurine S-methyltransferase or TPMT. There are three ways to evaluate the effectiveness and the risk of side effects associated with this treatment. TPMT activity measurement or genotyping are recommended to decide for treatment, while metabolites determination is a used as marker of monitoring. Phenotypic approach (TPMT activity measurement or metabolites determination) requires delicate techniques and interindividual variations make the interpretation difficult. Genotyping is easier to interpret but cannot exclude some risk of side effects.

Identification and molecular characterization of triple- and quadruple-resistant Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates in Germany

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to estimate the frequency of triple- and quadruple-resistant Helicobacter pylori isolated in Germany, to characterize those isolates molecular genetically and to identify risk factors for the development of multiresistance.

METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility to metronidazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin and rifampicin in 1118 clinical isolates obtained between July 2006 and December 2007 was tested by the Etest method. For patients harbouring triple- or quadruple-resistant strains (n = 169), data on prior eradication therapies and underlying diseases were collected and evaluated. A select number of quadruple- and triple-resistant strains were examined for resistance-mediating mutations in their 23S rRNA, 16S rRNA, gyrA and rpoB genes, respectively.

RESULTS

From 1118 clinical isolates, 13.4% (n = 150) showed phenotypic resistance to metronidazole, clarithromycin and quinolones and 0.9% (n = 10) to metronidazole, clarithromycin and rifampicin; one isolate exhibited resistance to clarithromycin, quinolones and rifampicin. In eight isolates (0.7%), we detected phenotypic quadruple resistance to metronidazole, clarithromycin, quinolones and rifampicin or tetracycline. Triple- and quadruple-resistant strains harboured resistance-associated mutations in their 23S rRNA, 16S rRNA, gyrA or rpoB genes and were nearly exclusively isolated from patients who had already been unsuccessfully treated on multiple occasions.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that more than 15% of H. pylori strains isolated from routine samples in the German National Reference Centre are resistant to three or more antimicrobials and identified prior unsuccessful eradication therapies as a key factor for the development of multiresistance. Our data emphasize the need for further comprehensive surveillance studies monitoring the role of treatment regimens in antimicrobial resistance in H. pylori.

[Optimising azathioprine treatment: determination of thiopurine methyltransferase activity and thiopurine metabolites]

INTRODUCTION

Individualised doses of azathioprine (AZA) may be prescribed by monitoring the levels of the enzyme thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT). The measurements of thiopurine metabolites of AZA, 6-thioguanine (6-TGN) and 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP), have also been reported as new markers of AZA activity.

OBJECTIVES

To describe TPMT phenotype in our population and to establish a relationship between thiopurine metabolites,and therapeutic activity and adverse effects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data on TPMT were retrospectively collected from 107 patients, and 6-TGN and 6-MMP levels in 18 patients currently on treatment with AZA (Crohn's disease 5, ulcerative colitis 5, autoimmune hepatitis 5).

RESULTS

Mean value of TPMT was 20.19U/ml. None of the patients had a TPMT activity<5U/ml. Of the 18 patients on treatment, 13 showed sub-therapeutic levels of 6-TGN (<235pmol/8x10(8) red blood cells). Clinical remission was maintained in 45% of patients. Mean levels of 6-TGN in patients with clinical remission were 259pmol/8x10(8) red blood cells versus 209pmol/8x10(8) red blood cells in non-responders (p=0.37). There was an inverse relationship (r=-0.28) between TPMT and 6-TGN levels. Toxic effects occurred in 6 of 18 patients, with leukopenia in 5 and hyperamylasemia in 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Determination of TPMT and monitoring of thiopurine metabolites allows AZA treatment to be optimised, although further studies are necessary to establish therapeutic effectiveness and toxicity ranges.

Potential role of NKG2D and its ligands in organ transplantation: new target for immunointervention

NKG2D is one of the best characterized activating receptors on Natural Killer (NK) and CD8+ T cells. This receptor recognizes several different ligands (MICA/MICB and ULBPs) induced by cellular stress and infection. In addition to the role described in cancer surveillance, recent data highlight the importance of NKG2D and its ligands in organ transplantation. Allografts show evidence of MICA and MICB expression in both acute and chronic rejection. The presence of anti-MICA antibodies has been correlated with incidence of graft rejection. Furthermore, NKG2D-ligand engagement activates NK cells, which provides T-cell costimulation, and enhances antigen specific CTL-mediated cytotoxicity. Activated NK cells may function as a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity associated with transplantation. Activated NK cells in response to IL-15 can also trigger organ rejection through NKG2D and affect the maturation of both donor and recipient antigen presenting cells (APCs) and ultimately the T-cell allogeneic response. Regulatory T cells, which modulate T-cell responses in organ transplantation and infections, were reduced in numbers by NK cells exposed to intracellular pathogens, possibly via interaction with one NK2GD receptor. Blockage of NKG2D-NKG2D-L interactions provides a novel pathway for development of inhibitors. These studies have important clinical and therapeutic implications in solid organ transplantation.

Perception of improved state of health and subjective quality of life in Crohn's disease patients treated with Infliximab

BACKGROUND AND AIMS AND METHOD: Although Infliximab is a very potent therapy of refractory Crohn's disease, its administration requires iterative infusions in hospital and there are concerns regarding its long-term safety. The aim of this study was to assess in a sample of 51 patients suffering from CD the impact of type of treatment (intravenous Infliximab versus conventional therapy without Infliximab) on the evaluation of the state of health (CGI) and the quality of life (MOS-SF36). Secondary variables were also assessed: the impact of depression (MADRS), the impact of activity of the disease (Harvey-Bradshaw Index).

RESULTS

Overall, the assessments made using the CGI and the SF-36 revealed that the two types of treatment did not differ on the assessment of state of health and quality of life. A downward influence of depression and activity of the disease was observed.

CONCLUSION

Patients considered more efficacy of Infliximab than its potential side effects. It seems important to assess and to consider depression in order to improve medical care setting of Crohn's disease.

Understanding the nutrigenomic definitions and concepts at the food-genome junction

The marked differences in individual response to dietary factors have led to major controversies in nutrition and puzzled nutrition scientists over the last century. The emerging field of nutrigenomics helps us to understand the basis for some of these differences and also promises us the ability to tailor diet based on individual genetic makeup. Great advances in Human Genome Project, documentation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate genes and their association with metabolic imbalances have gradually added new tests to the nutrigenomic panel. Studies based on ethnopharmacology and phytotherapy concepts showed that nutrients and botanicals can interact with the genome causing marked changes in gene expression. This has led to the commercial development of nutraceuticals and functional foods that can modify negative health effects of individual genetic profile bringing the field to the "food/genome" junction. Despite the promise of nutrigenomics to personalize diet, there is skepticism whether it can truly bring about meaningful modification of the risk factors connected to chronic diseases, due to the lack of large scale nutrition intervention studies. Several intervention studies currently underway in the United States and abroad (Israel, Spain, and France) will further help validate nutrigenomic concepts. France has already introduced a National Nutrition and Health Program to assess nutritional status and risk of major metabolic diseases. As the field(s) related to nutritional genomics advance in their scope, it is essential that: (a) strict guidelines be followed in the nomenclature and definition of the subdisciplines; and (b) the state/federal regulatory guidelines be updated for diagnostic laboratories, especially for those offering tests directly to the public (without a physician's request) to help protect the consumer.

Gastrointestinal bleeding in the setting of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy

GOAL

To review the literature on the significance, risk factors, and management of occult and gross gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients on antiplatelets and/or anticoagulants.

STUDY

Relevant original and review articles and their bibliographies were analyzed. Estimates of risks and therapeutic outcomes were obtained from randomized trials, whereas risk factor identification was gathered from cross-control and prospective cohort studies.

RESULTS

Antiplatelets and anticoagulants do not diminish the positive predictive value of fecal occult blood testing to find GI pathology. They increase the risk of gross GI bleeding, and predictors of hemorrhage include history of GI bleeding or ulcer disease, higher intensity of anticoagulation, combination therapy, and presence of comorbid conditions. A bleeding site is identified in most patients with peptic ulcer being the most common. In case of significant bleeding, complete or partial reversal of anticoagulation is undertaken on the basis of the balance of risks between bleeding and thromboembolic events. Early endoscopy can reveal lesions requiring endoscopic hemostasis, which can be performed in the setting of low-intensity anticoagulation. In patients with history of peptic disease or bleeding from an acid-related lesion, proton-pump inhibitors and Helicobacter pylori eradication reduce the risk of upper GI bleeding even when antiplatelet therapy is continued.

CONCLUSIONS

Predictors of bleeding on antiplatelets and/or antithrombotics therapy have been identified, but formulation and validation of a GI bleeding index for stratification of risk in individual patients is suggested. Reversal of anticoagulation in bleeding patients is associated with a low risk of thromboembolic events and permits the performance of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy. Proton-pump inhibitors and H. pylori eradication reduce the risk of rebleeding in those with acid-related disease.

Myths and facts in the use of anti-inflammatory drugs

BACKGROUND

Because of the prominence of pain-related conditions and the growing complexities of clinical management we aimed to explore and attempt to dispel the several myths that surround these serious therapeutic issues.

AIMS

We aimed to provide a careful analysis of the evidence and draw factually based guidance for physicians who manage the broad range of patients with pain.

METHODS

Current myths were identified based on the authors' clinical, scientific, and academic experience. Each contributor addressed specific topics and made his own selection of primary references and systematic reviews by searching in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases (1990-2008) as well as in the proceedings of the major digestive and rheumatology meetings. The writing and references provided by each contributor were collectively analyzed and discussed by all authors during several meetings until the final manuscript was prepared and approved.

RESULTS

Seven major 'historical' myths that may perpetuate habits and beliefs in clinical practice were identified. Each of them was thoroughly examined and dispelled, drawing conclusions that should help guide physicians to better manage patients with pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain relief must be considered a human right, and patients with osteoarthritis pain should be treated appropriately with analgesic or/and anti-inflammatory drugs. The risk of gastrointestinal (GI) complications with traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (t-NSAIDs) is present from the first dose (with both short-term and long-term use), and strategies to prevent GI complications should be considered regardless of the duration of therapy. Compared with t-NSAIDs, coxib use is associated with a small but significant reduction of dyspepsia. While protecting the stomach, proton pump inhibitors do not prevent NSAID-induced intestinal damage. To this end, coxib therapy could be the preferred option, although further randomized studies are needed. A substantial number of patients who need NSAIDs are also taking low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis. From a GI perspective, the combination of aspirin plus a coxib provides a preferred option compared with aspirin plus a t-NSAID, for patients at high GI risk. As the incidence of renovascular adverse effects with t-NSAIDs and coxibs is similar, blood pressure should be monitored and managed appropriately in patients taking these drugs, although they should be avoided in those with severe congestive heart failure. Due to increased cardiovascular risk, which is dependent on the dose, duration of therapy, and base-line cardiovascular risk, both t-NSAIDs and coxibs should be used with caution in patients with underlying prothrombotic states and/or concomitant cardiovascular risk factors.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study: rationale, design and conduct

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an uncommon adverse drug reaction of increasing importance to the medical community, pharmaceutical industry, regulatory agencies and the general public.

OBJECTIVES

The Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) was established to advance understanding and research into DILI by initiating a prospective registry of patients with bona fide DILI for future studies of host clinical, genetic, environmental and immunological risk factors. The DILIN was also charged with developing standardized nomenclature, terminology and causality assessment instruments.

METHODS

Five clinical sites, a data coordinating centre and senior scientists from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases initiated the DILIN prospective study in September 2004. Eligible patients are required to meet minimal laboratory or histological criteria within 6 months of DILI onset and have other competing causes of liver injury excluded. Patients in the general community setting with pre-existing HIV, hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infections and/or abnormal baseline liver biochemistries are eligible for enrollment. In addition, subjects with liver injury due to herbal products are eligible to participate. Control patients without DILI are also to be recruited in the future.

RESULTS

All referred subjects undergo an extensive review of available laboratory, pathology and imaging studies. Subjects who meet pre-defined eligibility criteria at the 6-month study visit are followed for 2 years to better define the natural history of chronic DILI. Causality assessment is determined by a panel of three hepatologists who independently assign a causality score ranging from 1 (definite) to 5 (unlikely) as well as a severity score ranging from 1 (mild) to 5 (fatal). During the first 3 years, 367 subjects were enrolled into the DILIN prospective study.

CONCLUSION

DILIN is a multicentre research network charged with improving our understanding of the aetiologies, risk factors and outcomes of DILI in the US. The network is meeting the targeted enrollment of ten patients per month and is developing a repository of clinical data and biological samples for future studies of DILI pathogenesis and outcome.

Severe hepatotoxicity following ingestion of Herbalife nutritional supplements contaminated with Bacillus subtilis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Nutritional supplements are widely used. Recently, liver injury after consumption of Herbalife preparations was reported but the underlying pathogenesis remained cryptic.

METHODS

Two patients presented with cholestatic hepatitis and pruritus, and cirrhosis, respectively. Viral, alcoholic, metabolic, autoimmune, neoplastic, vascular liver diseases and synthetic drugs as the precipitating causes of liver injury were excluded. However, both patients reported long-term consumption of Herbalife products. All Herbalife products were tested for contamination with drugs, pesticides, heavy metals, and softeners, and examined for microbial contamination according to standard laboratory procedures. Bacteria isolated from the samples were identified as Bacillus subtilis by sequencing the 16S rRNA and gyrB genes.

RESULTS

Causality between consumption of Herbalife products and disease according to CIOMS was scored "probable" in both cases. Histology showed cholestatic and lobular/portal hepatitis with cirrhosis in one patient, and biliary fibrosis with ductopenia in the other. No contamination with chemicals or heavy metals was detected, and immunological testing showed no drug hypersensitivity. However, samples of Herbalife products ingested by both patients showed growth of Bacillus subtilis of which culture supernatants showed dose- and time-dependent hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Two novel incidents of severe hepatic injury following intake of Herbalife products contaminated with Bacillus subtilis emphasize its potential hepatotoxicity.

Telithromycin-associated hepatotoxicity: Clinical spectrum and causality assessment of 42 cases

Telithromycin is the first of a new class of ketolide antibiotics with increased activity against penicillin-resistant and erythromycin-resistant pneumococci. This agent received approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2004 for treatment of upper and lower respiratory infections. Following market introduction, spontaneous reports of telithromycin-associated hepatotoxicity, including frank liver failure, were received. To address these reports, an ad hoc group with expertise in spontaneous adverse events reporting and experience in evaluating drug-induced liver injury was formed, including members of the FDA, other federal agencies, and academia. The primary objective of this group was to adjudicate case reports of hepatic toxicity for causal attribution to telithromycin. After an initial screening of all cases of liver injury associated with telithromycin reported to FDA as of April 2006 by one of the authors, 42 cases were comprehensively reviewed and adjudicated. Five cases included a severe outcome of either death (n = 4) or liver transplantation (n = 1); more than half were considered highly likely or probable in their causal association with telithromycin. Typical clinical features were: short latency (median, 10 days) and abrupt onset of fever, abdominal pain, and jaundice, sometimes with the presence of ascites even in cases that resolved. Concurrence in assignment of causality increased after agreement on definitions of categories and interactive discussions.

CONCLUSION

Telithromycin is a rare cause of drug-induced liver injury that may have a distinctive clinical signature and associated high mortality rate. Consensus for attribution of liver injury to a selected drug exposure by individual experts can be aided by careful definition of terminology and discussion.

Gross lower gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy: endoscopic findings, management, and clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Gross gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a serious complication of anticoagulant/antiplatelet drug therapy. This study compares the frequencies of colorectal pathologies, endoscopic and resuscitative management measures, and clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized with lower GI bleeding (LGIB) while using anticoagulants/antiplatelets with those of patients not using them.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the records of 166 admissions for patients with gross LGIB over 12 years was conducted. The colonoscopic findings, management measures, and clinical outcomes were compared between 2 groups. Group A composed of 100 patients using any antiplatelet/anticoagulant, and group B 66 patients not using any such drugs. Independent t tests and chi were used to test for association between taking antiplatelet/anticoagulant and other variables.

RESULTS

Patients in group A were older and had more comorbidities than patients in group B. Severe LGIB occurred in 55.1% and 35.4% in groups A and B, respectively (P=0.01). Severity was not related to old age or the presence of comorbidities. A higher percentage of patients in group A had a hospital stay > or =6 days (44% vs. 27.3%; P<0.03), required blood transfusions (68% vs. 51.5%; P=0.03), and had in-hospital complications (37% vs. 22.7%; P=0.052). The most common source of bleeding was diverticulosis in both groups. Colorectal abnormalities were present in most patients; and in those using warfarin, colon cancer was common.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of antiplatelets/anticoagulant drugs is an independent predictor of severe LGIB and is associated with adverse outcomes. Colonoscopy is required in patients who bleed while using such drugs.

The effect of drug interactions on bleeding risk associated with warfarin therapy in hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND

Bleeding is a serious adverse drug reaction associated with warfarin therapy, often induced by interacting co-medication.

METHODS

We investigated the frequency and clinical consequences of warfarin drug interactions utilizing medical records of 6,772 warfarin-treated in-patients of Turku University Hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 48% of warfarin-treated in-patients were exposed to interacting co-medication. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) for bleeding was highest for cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) inhibitors (OR 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4-5.6). Non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and coxibs were associated with a bleeding risk of a similar magnitude (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.6-4.2 and OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.4-6.7, respectively). Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRI) were associated with a remarkably higher bleeding risk than non-SSRIs (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.5-4.3 and OR 1.2; 95% CI 0.3-4.3, respectively). Odds ratio for bleeding in the platelet aggregation inhibitor group was 1.6 (95% CI 0.8-3.1).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that co-medication in warfarin-treated in-patients is common and should be carefully evaluated to decrease the bleeding risk associated with warfarin therapy.

Prevalence of celiac disease in adult patients with refractory functional dyspepsia: value of routine duodenal biopsy

AIM

To investigate the prevalence of celiac disease (CD) in adult patients referred to an open access gastroenterology clinic in the south of Italy and submitted to esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) for evaluation of refractory functional dyspepsia.

METHODS

Seven hundred and twenty six consecutive dyspeptic patients (282 male, 444 female; mean age 39.6 years, range 18-75 years) with unexplained prolonged dyspepsia were prospectively enrolled. Duodenal biopsies were taken and processed by standard staining. Histological evaluation was carried out according to the Marsh-Oberhuber criteria.

RESULTS

The endoscopic findings were: normal in 61.2%, peptic lesions in 20.5%, malignancies in 0.5%, miscellaneous in 16.7%. CD was endoscopically diagnosed in 8 patients (1.1%), histologically in 15 patients (2%). The endoscopic features alone showed a sensitivity of 34.8% and specificity of 100%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% and a negative predictive value (NPP) of 97.9%.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study showed that CD has a high prevalence (1:48) in adult dyspeptic patients and suggests the routine use of duodenal biopsy in this type of patient undergoing EGD.

[Risk assessment in pain therapy]

Analgesic therapy is not without risk. However, the risk of most analgesic interventions is minor compared to the risk of the inadequate treatment of pain and insufficient treatment may lead to chronic pain.A correct diagnosis should be the basis of any specific treatment of pain disorders. Only a diagnosis which implicates a multi-disciplinary assessment and which considers both the pathoanatomical, functional and biopsychosocial dysfunctions can lead to an adequate therapeutic intervention. Furthermore, therapeutic planning should include the personal needs of the patient and should have realistic aims.Pharmacological treatment is guided by the WHO pain ladder. The risks of the relevant substance groups must be considered. NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) which are included in all steps of the WHO pain ladder carry specific risks for the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular and renal systems and are contraindicated in many patients in need of analgesic therapy, e.g. in many elderly patients. Opioids which are recommended at steps 2 and 3 of the WHO pain ladder have less organ toxicity but they are still used reluctantly. Coanalgetics, especially antidepressants bear specific risks and the discussion on suicide rates under antidepressant medication is ongoing.Invasive methods such as the intrathecal application of analgesics are valuable procedures if the indication is correct and the treating physician has sufficient experience. Pain therapy is essential and the risks of the procedures are manageable. Considering the current knowledge on the mechanisms of pain sensitisation, the lack of adequate pain control can lead to chronic pain with severe consequences for the patient.

Is there any requirement for celiac disease screening routinely in postmenapausal women with osteoporosis?

Screening studies indicate a prevalence of celiac disease (CD) of up to 1% in populations of European ancestry, yet the majority of cases remain undiagnosed. One of the common complication of CD is intestinal osteopathy or osteoporosis [bone mineral density (BMD) based diagnosis]. Available data regarding the prevalence of CD in the patients with osteoporosis are limited and controversial. The objective of this study was to perform serological testing to screen for CD among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. We studied 192 postmenopausal women with low BMD with a mean age of 62.75 +/- 8.58 years. Among the patients, a total of 137 had osteoporosis and 55 had osteopenia. Venous blood samples were obtained for serological screening of CD and evaluation of bone metabolism. The serological screening protocol consisted of determining serum level of IgA antigliadin antibodies (AGA), IgG-AGA, IgA endomysial antibody (EMA), IgG-EMA. Subjects who were positive for both IgA-AGA and IgA-EMA were classified as having CD. Bone metabolism was evaluated by serum calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, parathyroid hormone, 25 (OH) vitamin D, osteocalcin, serum C-telopeptide cross-linked collagen type I levels. Of the 192 patients evaluated, only one (0.5%) was found to have positive for both IgA-AGA and IgA EMA tests and accepted as having CD. Prevelance of CD in postmenopausal women with low BMD (0.5%) did not differ from prevelance of CD in normal healthy population (0.3-1%). BMD values at proximal femur level were significantly lower in IgA-AGA (+) patients when compared to IgA-AGA (-) patients. However, the mean levels of bone metabolism markers were found similiar in both IgA-AGA (+) and (-) patients. In conclusion, the results of our study suggest that there is no need for routine screening of CD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Practical guidelines for diagnosis and early management of drug-induced liver injury

The spectrum of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is both diverse and complex. The first step in diagnosis is a suspicion of DILI based on careful consideration of recent comprehensive reports on the disease. There are some situations in which the suspicion of DILI is particularly strong. Exclusion of other possible etiologies according to the pattern of liver injury is essential for the diagnosis. In patients with suspected DILI, diagnostic scales, such as the Councils for International Organizations of Medical Sciences/Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (CIOMS/RUCAM) scale, may be helpful for the final diagnosis. Early management of DILI involves prompt withdrawal of the drug suspected of being responsible, according to serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and total bilirubin (T-Bil). However, as DILI patients may show resolution of liver injury without discontinuation of the drug, it should be carefully evaluated whether the suspected drug should be discontinued immediately with adequate consideration of the importance of the medication.

Practical guidelines for diagnosis and early management of drug-induced liver injury

The spectrum of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is both diverse and complex. The first step in diagnosis is a suspicion of DILI based on careful consideration of recent comprehensive reports on the disease. There are some situations in which the suspicion of DILI is particularly strong. Exclusion of other possible etiologies according to the pattern of liver injury is essential for the diagnosis. In patients with suspected DILI, diagnostic scales, such as the Councils for International Organizations of Medical Sciences/Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (CIOMS/RUCAM) scale, may be helpful for the final diagnosis. Early management of DILI involves prompt withdrawal of the drug suspected of being responsible, according to serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and total bilirubin (T-Bil). However, as DILI patients may show resolution of liver injury without discontinuation of the drug, it should be carefully evaluated whether the suspected drug should be discontinued immediately with adequate consideration of the importance of the medication.

Role of coxibs in the strategies for gastrointestinal protection in patients requiring chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly prescribed drugs due to their high efficacy in the treatment of pain, fever, inflammation and rheumatic disorders. However, their use is associated with the occurrence of adverse effects at the level of digestive tract, ranging from dyspeptic symptoms, gastrointestinal erosions and peptic ulcers to more serious complications, such as overt bleeding or perforation. To overcome problems related to NSAID-induced digestive toxicity, different therapeutic strategies can presently be considered, including the co-administration of drugs endowed with protective activity on the upper gastrointestinal tract, such as the proton pump inhibitors, or the prescription of coxibs, which have been clinically developed as anti-inflammatory/analgesic drugs characterized by reduced damaging activity on gastrointestinal mucosa. The availability of different treatment options, to reduce the risk of NSAID-induced adverse digestive effects, has fostered intensive preclinical and clinical research aimed at addressing a number of unresolved issues and to establish rational criteria for an appropriate use of coxibs in the medical practice. Particular attention is being paid to the management of patients with high degrees of digestive risk, resulting by concomitant treatment with low-dose aspirin for anti-thrombotic prophylaxis or ongoing symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcers. The present review discusses the most relevant lines of evidence concerning the position of coxibs in the therapeutic strategies for gastrointestinal protection in patients who require NSAID therapy and hold different levels of risk of developing adverse effects at the level of digestive tract.