Evaluation of kidney function throughout the heart failure trajectory – a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Feature and impact of guideline-directed medication prescriptions for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction accompanied by chronic kidney disease

Background: With respect to total mortality and cardiovascular mortality, the feature and impact of guideline-directed medication (GDM) prescriptions for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine these aspects. Methods: GDM prescriptions and their impact on discharged patients with and without CKD were analyzed. To analyze differences in one-year clinical outcomes, propensity score matching was conducted on a cohort of patients with concomitant HFrEF and CKD who received more and fewer GDM prescriptions. Results: A total of 1509 patients were enrolled in Taiwan's HFrEF registry from May 2013 to October 2014, and 1275 discharged patients with complete one-year follow-up were further analyzed. Of these patients, 468 (36.7%) had moderate CKD, whereas 249 (19.5%) had advanced CKD. Patients with advanced CKD received fewer prescribed GDMs than other patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that peripheral arterial occlusive disease, thyroid disorder, advanced HF at discharge, diastolic blood pressure, digoxin use, and fewer prescribed GDMs were independent predictors of one-year total mortality. After propensity score matching, patients with fewer prescribed GDMs had higher one-year total mortality rate than those with more prescribed GDMs (P=0.036). Conclusions: CKD at discharge from HF hospitalization was associated with fewer GDM prescriptions, particularly in patients with more advanced CKD. The propensity-matched analysis indicated that more GDM prescriptions led to better clinical outcomes in HFrEF patients with CKD. Careful interpretation of changes in renal function during HF hospitalization may improve GDM prescriptions.

Intrarenal Doppler ultrasonography reflects hemodynamics and predicts prognosis in patients with heart failure

We aimed to clarify clinical implications of intrarenal hemodynamics assessed by intrarenal Doppler ultrasonography (IRD) and their prognostic impacts in heart failure (HF). We performed a prospective observational study, and examined IRD and measured interlobar renal artery velocity time integral (VTI) and intrarenal venous flow (IRVF) patterns (monophasic or non-monophasic pattern) to assess intrarenal hypoperfusion and congestion in HF patients (n = 341). Seven patients were excluded in VTI analysis due to unclear imaging. The patients were divided into groups based on (A) VTI: high VTI (VTI ≥ 14.0 cm, n = 231) or low VTI (VTI < 14.0 cm, n = 103); and (B) IRVF patterns: monophasic (n = 36) or non-monophasic (n = 305). We compared post-discharge cardiac event rate between the groups, and right-heart catheterization was performed in 166 patients. Cardiac index was lower in low VTI than in high VTI (P = 0.04), and right atrial pressure was higher in monophasic than in non-monophasic (P = 0.03). In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, cardiac event rate was higher in low VTI and monophasic groups (P < 0.01, respectively). In the Cox proportional hazard analysis, the combination of low VTI and a monophasic IRVF pattern was a predictor of cardiac events (P < 0.01). IRD imaging might be associated with cardiac output and right atrial pressure, and prognosis.

Acute heart failure – The ‘real’ Malaysian experience: An observational study from a single non-cardiac centre

Background:

Cardiovascular care in Malaysia adopts a ‘spoke-and-hub’ model, leaving the majority of acute heart failure (AHF) care to non-cardiac centres. Granular data on AHF care are essential and yet remain scarce.

Objectives:

This study aimed to illustrate the baseline characteristics, management and outcome of AHF patients.

Methods:

A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 1307 AHF patients admitted between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016.

Results:

The younger and Malay-predominant population reflects the distribution of ischaemic heart disease in Malaysia, highlighting the need to tackle metabolic risks factors. The majority are precipitated by ischaemia (61.8%). Common co-morbidities include hypertension (70.9%), coronary artery disease (57.8%) and diabetes (62.2%). The majority were of New York Heart Association Class II (31.9%) and Class III (25.6%). A total of 14.5% required inotropes and vasopressors, 12.9% required intravenous nitrates and 8.6% required dialysis. A further 4.9% of patients required intubation and mechanical ventilation, and 25.9% required non-invasive ventilation. Readmission and mortality were extremely high in our population. Short inpatient stays, restricting optimisation of medication, and gaps in the provision of coronary intervention and stress testing are possible contributing factors. When compared to global and regional registries, disparities were noted specifically surrounding mortality rate and optimum use of guideline-directed medical therapy.

Conclusion:

Although smaller and single centred, our study provides a unique insight into a pure Malaysian-only cohort from a hospital with no cardiology services in-house, which is more reflective of the majority of hospitals in Malaysia, unlike previous studies and registries.

Elevated plasma endothelin-1 is related to low natriuresis, clinical signs of congestion, and poor outcome in acute heart failure

AIMS

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor, which regulates renal and vascular function. We aimed to relate plasma levels of ET-1 with the clinical picture and outcomes in acute heart failure (AHF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 113 patients with AHF [mean age 65 ± 13 (years), median (upper and lower quartiles) N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, 5422 (2689; 8582) (pg/mL)], in whom plasma levels of ET-1 were serially measured at admission (10.8 ± 5.2), Day 1 (9.5 ± 3.4), and Day 2 (8.9 ± 3.8) (pg/mL). The population was divided into tertiles across baseline ET-1 levels. Patients in the highest ET-1 tertile had predominant clinical signs of peripheral congestion; however, no difference was observed in pulmonary congestion and severity of dyspnoea. They also presented lower spot urine sodium at admission (75 ± 35 vs. 99 ± 43 vs. 108 ± 30), 6 h (84 ± 34 vs. 106 ± 43 vs. 106 ± 35), and Day 1 (75 ± 38 vs. 96 ± 36 vs. 100 ± 35) (mmol/L), when compared with the second and first tertile, respectively (all P < 0.05); furthermore, they received higher doses of intravenous furosemide from Day 2 and had longer intravenous diuretics, as median switch to oral furosemide was 4 (3; 4) vs. 3 (2; 4) vs. 2 (2; 3) (days), respectively, P < 0.05. There was no difference in serum creatinine, urea, and renal injury biomarkers (kidney injury molecule-1, serum cystatin C, and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) between the ET-1 tertiles. Higher values of ET-1 measured at each time point were related with a higher risk of 1 year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevation of ET-1 is related to clinical signs of peripheral congestion, low urine sodium excretion, and poor outcome in AHF.

Renal profiling based on estimated glomerular filtration rate and spot urine sodium identifies high-risk acute heart failure patients

AIMS

In acute heart failure (AHF), assessment of renal function comprises estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which does not provide any information about renal sodium/water handling. We describe the interactions between urinary sodium concentration and eGFR to better characterize AHF patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 219 patients with AHF, spot urine sodium (UNa⁺ ) and eGFR were assessed on admission, day 1 and day 2 of hospitalization. We found no correlation between UNa⁺ and eGFR (calculated on each consecutive day, as an average of all three values, and as changes from baseline; all P > 0.05). The population was subsequently divided into four profiles based on eGFR (preserved vs. impaired; cutoff of 60 mL/min/1.73 m² ) and UNa⁺ (sodium excreter vs. non-excreter; cutoff of 60 mmol/L). At day 1, there were 70 (31.9%) patients classified as preserved eGFR/sodium excreter, 37 (16.8%) as impaired eGFR/sodium non-excreter, 72 (32.9%) as impaired eGFR/sodium excreter, and 40 (18%) as preserved eGFR/sodium non-excreter. Both sodium non-excreter profiles were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital heart failure worsening [odds ratio (OR) 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-6.4], inotrope use (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.7) and rehospitalization due to AHF (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.2; all P < 0.05). The preserved eGFR/sodium non-excreter profile was associated with highest 1-year mortality (52.5%) and remained an independent prognosticator after adjustment for other prognosticators (hazard ratio 2.9, 95% CI 1.7-5.2; P < 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

In AHF, values of spot UNa⁺ and eGFR are not interrelated. Concomitant assessment of eGFR and spot UNa⁺ may be useful for better clinical and therapeutic profiling of patients.

Role of comorbidities in heart failure prognosis Part 2: Chronic kidney disease, elevated serum uric acid

Despite improvements in pharmacotherapy, morbidity and mortality rates in community-based populations with chronic heart failure still remain high. The increase in medical complexity among patients with heart failure may be reflected by an increase in concomitant non-cardiovascular comorbidities, which are recognized as independent prognostic factors in this population. Heart failure and chronic kidney disease share many risk factors, and often coexist. The presence of kidney failure is associated with incremented risk of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in heart failure patients. Chronic kidney disease is also linked with underutilization of evidence-based heart failure therapy that may reduce morbidity and mortality. More targeted therapies would be important to improve the prognosis of patients with these diseases. In recent years, serum uric acid as a determinant of cardiovascular risk has gained interest. Epidemiological, experimental and clinical data show that patients with hyperuricaemia are at increased risk of cardiac, renal and vascular damage and cardiovascular events. Moreover, elevated serum uric acid predicts worse outcome in both acute and chronic heart failure. While studies have raised the possibility of preventing heart failure through the use of uric acid lowering agents, the literature is still inconclusive on whether the reduction in uric acid will result in a measurable clinical benefit. Available evidences suggest that chronic kidney disease and elevated uric acid could worsen heart failure patients' prognosis. The aim of this review is to analyse a possible utilization of these comorbidities in risk stratification and as a therapeutic target to get a prognostic improvement in heart failure patients.

Intensification of pharmacological decongestion but not the actual daily loop diuretic dose predicts worse chronic heart failure outcome: insights from TIME-CHF

BACKGROUND

Both loop diuretics (LDs) and congestion have been related to worse heart failure (HF) outcome. The relationship between the cause and effect is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the interaction between congestion, diuretic use and HF outcome.

METHODS

Six hundred and twenty-two chronic HF patients from TIME-CHF were studied. Congestion was measured by means of a clinical congestion index (CCI). Loop diuretic dose was considered at baseline and month 6. Treatment intensification was defined as the increase in LD dose over 6 months or loop diuretic and thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic co-administration. The end-points were survival and HF hospitalisation-free survival.

RESULTS

High-LD dose at baseline and month 6 (≥ 80 mg of furosemide per day) was not identified as an independent predictor of outcome. CCI at baseline remained independently associated with impaired survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.34, (95% confidence interval) (95% CI) (1.20-1.50), p < 0.001] and HF hospitalisation-free survival [HR 1.09, 95% CI (1.02-1.17), p = 0.015]. CCI at month 6 was independently associated with HF hospitalisation-free survival [HR 1.24, 95% CI (1.11-1.38), p < 0.001]. Treatment intensification was independently associated with survival [HR 1.75, 95% CI (1.19-1.38), p = 0.004] and HF hospitalisation-free survival [HR 1.69, 95% CI (1.22-2.35), p = 0.002]. Patients undergoing treatment intensification resulting in decongestion had better outcome than patients with persistent (worsening) congestion despite LD dose up-titration (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Intensification of pharmacological decongestion but not the actual LD dose was related to poor outcome in chronic HF. If treatment intensification translated into clinical decongestion, outcome was better than in case of persistent or worsening congestion.

Self-care of heart failure patients: practical management recommendations from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Self-care is essential in the long-term management of chronic heart failure. Heart failure guidelines stress the importance of patient education on treatment adherence, lifestyle changes, symptom monitoring and adequate response to possible deterioration. Self-care is related to medical and person-centred outcomes in patients with heart failure such as better quality of life as well as lower mortality and readmission rates. Although guidelines give general direction for self-care advice, health care professionals working with patients with heart failure need more specific recommendations. The aim of the management recommendations in this paper is to provide practical advice for health professionals delivering care to patients with heart failure. Recommendations for nutrition, physical activity, medication adherence, psychological status, sleep, leisure and travel, smoking, immunization and preventing infections, symptom monitoring, and symptom management are consistent with information from guidelines, expert consensus documents, recent evidence and expert opinion.

Practical management of worsening renal function in outpatients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: Statement from a panel of multidisciplinary experts and the Heart Failure Working Group of the French Society of Cardiology

Renal function is often affected in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The complex interplay between heart and renal dysfunction makes renal function and potassium monitoring mandatory. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers are a life-saving treatment for patients with HFrEF, regardless of worsening renal function. Uptitration to the maximum-tolerated dose should be a constant goal. This simple fact is all too often forgotten (only 30% of patients with heart failure receive the target dosage of RAAS blockers), and the RAAS blocker effect on renal function is sometimes misunderstood. RAAS blockers are not nephrotoxic drugs as they only have a functional effect on renal function. In many routine clinical cases, RAAS blockers are withheld or stopped because of this misunderstanding, combined with suboptimal assessment of the clinical situation and underestimation of the life-saving effect of RAAS blockers despite worsening renal function. In this expert panel, which includes heart failure specialists, geriatricians and nephrologists, we propose therapeutic management algorithms for worsening renal function for physicians in charge of outpatients with chronic heart failure. Firstly, the essential variables to take into consideration before changing treatment are the presence of concomitant disorders that could alter renal function status (e.g. infection, diarrhoea, hyperthermia), congestion/dehydration status, blood pressure and intake of nephrotoxic drugs. Secondly, physicians are invited to adapt medication according to four clinical scenarios (patient with congestion, dehydration, hypotension or hyperkalaemia). Close biological monitoring after treatment modification is mandatory. We believe that this practical clinically minded management algorithm can help to optimize HFrEF treatment in routine clinical practice.

Acute cardiorenal syndrome in acute heart failure: focus on renal replacement therapy

Almost half of hospitalised patients with acute heart failure develop acute cardiorenal syndrome. Treatment consists of optimisation of fluid status and haemodynamics, targeted therapy for the underlying cardiac disease, optimisation of heart failure treatment and preventive measures such as avoidance of nephrotoxic agents. Renal replacement therapy may be temporarily needed to support kidney function, mostly in case of diuretic resistant fluid overload or severe metabolic derangement. The best timing to initiate renal replacement therapy and the best modality in acute heart failure are still under debate. Several modalities are available such as intermittent and continuous renal replacement therapy as well as hybrid techniques, based on two main principles: haemofiltration and haemodialysis. Although continuous techniques have been associated with less haemodynamic instability and a greater chance of renal recovery, cohort data are conflicting and randomised controlled trials have not shown a difference in recovery or mortality. In the presence of diuretic resistance, isolated ultrafiltration with individualisation of ultrafiltration rates is a valid option for decongestion in acute heart failure patients. Practical tools to optimise the use of renal replacement therapy in acute heart failure-related acute cardiorenal syndrome were discussed.

Mortality and pathophysiology of acute kidney injury according to time of occurrence in acute heart failure

Aims

Acute kidney injury (AKI) during acute heart failure (AHF) is common and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The underlying pathophysiological mechanism appears to have prognostic relevance; however, the differentiation of true, structural AKI from hemodynamic pseudo‐AKI remains a clinical challenge.

Methods and results

The Basics in Acute Shortness of Breath Evaluation Study (NCT01831115) prospectively enrolled adult patients presenting with AHF to the emergency department. Mortality of patients was prospectively assessed. Haemoconcentration, transglomerular pressure gradient (n = 231) and tubular injury patterns (n = 253) were evaluated to investigate pathophysiological mechanisms underlying AKI timing (existing at presentation vs. developing during in‐hospital period). Of 1643 AHF patients, 755 patients (46%) experienced an episode of AKI; 310 patients (19%; 41% of AKI patients) presented with community‐acquired AKI (CA‐AKI), 445 patients (27%; 59% of AKI patients) developed in‐hospital AKI. CA‐AKI but not in‐hospital AKI was associated with higher mortality compared with no‐AKI (adjusted hazard ratio 1.32 [95%‐CI 1.01–1.74]; P = 0.04). Independent of AKI timing, haemoconcentration was associated with a lower two‐year mortality. Transglomerular pressure gradient at presentation was significantly lower in CA‐AKI compared to in‐hospital AKI and no‐AKI (P < 0.01). Urinary NGAL ratio concentrations were significantly higher in CA‐AKI compared to in‐hospital AKI (P < 0.01) or no‐AKI (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

CA‐AKI but not in‐hospital AKI is associated with increased long‐term mortality and marked by decreased transglomerular pressure gradient and tubular injury, probably reflecting prolonged tubular ischemia due to reno‐venous congestion. Adequate decongestion, as assessed by haemoconcentration, is associated with lower long‐term mortality independent of AKI timing.