Causes and consequences of portal vein thrombosis in 1,243 patients with cirrhosis: results of a longitudinal study

Anticoagulation and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunting for Treatment of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Portal vein thromboses (PVTs) are associated with hepatic decompensation, worse survival, and worse liver transplant outcomes. We evaluated the impact of anticoagulation (AC) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS) on recanalization and mortality in patients with cirrhosis and PVT. Systematic search of electronic databases was performed. Clinical trials and observational studies that evaluated primary outcomes of recanalization and survival in patients with cirrhosis having PVT treated with AC or TIPS were included. Risk of bias was assessed. Summary odds ratios (ORs) for pooled data from the included studies were generated using a random effects model. A total of 505 studies were screened for inclusion. After review, 7 studies were ultimately included. Data from 327 patients in total were evaluated. Overall, treatment with either AC or TIPS resulted in partial or complete recanalization (OR: 4.56 [95% confidence interval, CI: 2.46-8.47]) but did not significantly impact mortality (OR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.21-1.57]). The summary OR of AC for recanalization was 6.00 (95% CI: 2.38-15.07). The summary OR of TIPS for recanalization was 3.80 (95% CI: 1.47-9.83). The summary OR of mortality in patients treated with AC for PVT was 0.28 (95% CI: 0.08-0.95). The mortality summary OR was 1.10 (95% CI 0.23-5.16) in patients who underwent TIPS. There was insufficient data to assess complications such as hepatic encephalopathy or bleeding. Both AC and TIPS have a significant effect on recanalization. Anticoagulation appears to have a protective effect on mortality that is not seen with TIPS. More studies with control groups are need.

A prediction model for successful anticoagulation in cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication in cirrhosis, and when complete, it increases morbidity and mortality in liver transplant candidates. The aim of the study was to assess the hemostatic status, as well as clinical characteristics of thrombus and patients, as predictors of therapeutic efficacy of anticoagulation for the treatment of PVT in cirrhotics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with cirrhosis consecutively treated for PVT with enoxaparin were enrolled. All patients underwent evaluation of coagulation status and thrombophilia screening. Thrombus characteristics and extension were evaluated at baseline and during follow-up. Anticoagulation was continued until recanalization or up to 12 months. Variables correlated with the response to anticoagulation were used to create a predictive score that was validated in an external multicenter cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients were included and had partial PVT in most cases (72%). Treatment with enoxaparin resulted in an overall response rate of 66% (43/65) after a median time of 4.4 months and 76% (33/43) within the first 6 months. At multivariate analysis, efficacy of anticoagulation correlated with the severity of liver disease, complete verus partial PVT, age of the thrombus, and time interval from treatment start (<6 months). The areas under the curve of the statistical model for predicting the response to anticoagulation were 0.84 and 0.76 for the training (n=65) and validation (n=60) cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis and early treatment are key factors for the successful management of PVT in cirrhosis, so that screening of PVT and prompt start of anticoagulant treatment should be mandatory.

Covered TIPS versus endoscopic band ligation plus propranolol for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Limited data are available on the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). This study aimed to compare transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with covered stents versus endoscopic band ligation (EBL) plus propranolol for the prevention of variceal rebleeding among patients with cirrhosis and PVT.

DESIGN

Consecutive cirrhotic patients (94% Child-Pugh class A or B) with PVT who had variceal bleeding in the past 6 weeks were randomly assigned to TIPS group (n=24) or EBL plus propranolol group (EBL+drug, n=25), respectively. Primary endpoint was variceal rebleeding. Secondary endpoints included survival, overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), portal vein recanalisation and rethrombosis, other complications of portal hypertension and adverse events.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 30 months in both groups, variceal rebleeding was significantly less frequent in the TIPS group (15% vs 45% at 1 year and 25% vs 50% at 2 years, respectively; HR=0.28, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.76, p=0.008), with a significantly higher portal vein recanalisation rate (95% vs 70%; p=0.03) and a relatively lower rethrombosis rate (5% vs 33%; p=0.06) compared with the EBL+drug group. There were no statistically significant differences in survival (67% vs 84%; p=0.152), OHE (25% vs 16%; p=0.440), other complications of portal hypertension and adverse events between groups.

CONCLUSION

Covered TIPS placement in patients with PVT and moderately decompensated cirrhosis was more effective than EBL combined with propranolol for the prevention of rebleeding, with a higher probability of PVT resolution without increasing the risk of OHE and adverse effects, but this benefit did not translate into improved survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01326949.

Cancer-Associated Thrombosis in Cirrhotic Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

It is common knowledge that cancer patients are more prone to develop venous thromboembolic complications (VTE). It is therefore not surprising that patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) present with a significant risk of VTE, with the portal vein being the most frequent site (PVT). However, patients with HCC are peculiar as both cancer and liver cirrhosis are conditions that can perturb the hemostatic balance towards a prothrombotic state. Because HCC-related hypercoagulability is not clarified at all, the aim of the present review is to summarize the currently available knowledge on epidemiology and pathogenesis of non-malignant thrombotic complications in patients with liver cirrhosis and HCC. They are at increased risk to develop both PVT and non-splanchnic VTE, indicating that both local and systemic factors can foster the development of site-specific thrombosis. Recent studies have suggested multiple and often interrelated mechanisms through which HCC can tip the hemostatic balance of liver cirrhosis towards hypercoagulability. Described mechanisms include increased fibrinogen concentration/polymerization, thrombocytosis, and release of tissue factor-expressing extracellular vesicles. Currently, there are no specific guidelines on the use of thromboprophylaxis in this unique population. There is the urgent need of prospective studies assessing which patients have the highest prothrombotic profile and would therefore benefit from early thromboprophylaxis.

Venous thrombosis in unusual sites: A practical review for the hematologist

Thrombosis of unusual venous sites encompasses a large part of consultative hematology and is encountered routinely by practicing hematologists. Contrary to the more commonly encountered lower extremity venous thrombosis and common cardiovascular disorders, the various thromboses outlined in this review have unique presentations, pathophysiology, workup, and treatments that all hematologists should be aware of. This review attempts to outline the most up to date literature on cerebral, retinal, upper extremity, hepatic, portal, splenic, mesenteric, and renal vein thrombosis, focusing on the incidence, pathophysiology, provoking factors, and current recommended treatments for each type of unusual thrombosis to provide a useful and practical review for the hematologist.

Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients - it is always the small pieces that make the big picture

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent and serious complication in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). Recently, a new classification of PVT was proposed, although the functional component was not completed included. The status of liver disease (compensated/decompensated) should be added to this classification. Reduced portal flow velocity and the acquired hypercoagulable status associated with LC are the main risk factors for PVT development, although endothelial dysfunction may play an important role that needs to be further evaluated. The European Association for the Study of the Liver and the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease recommend that the anticoagulant treatment should be consider in cirrhotic patients with PVT. Low molecular weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists proved their efficacy and relatively safety in PVT treatment, although in addition to recanalization rates, more complex end-points such as mortality and decompensation rate should be evaluated. The new oral anticoagulant therapies offers the advantage of oral administration in the absence of laboratory monitoring, however, there are a few reports regarding their use in cirrhotic patients, most of them referring to compensated isolated cases. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt could be an alternative if thrombosis progresses despite anticoagulatant therapy and/or when PVT is associated with portal hypertension complications. The aim of this editorial is to discuss the different aspects of pathophysiology, clinical relevance, diagnosis and management of PVT in patients with LC.

Anticoagulant therapy in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis: insights for the clinician

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent complication in the natural history of patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). The prevalence of PVT in LC is highly variable, ranging from 0.6% to 25% according to different reports. The impact of PVT on the natural history of LC is unclear, but it seems to negatively affect the prognosis of patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) by increasing post-LT mortality and delaying waiting time. The antithrombotic treatment of PVT is still challenging as PVT may often remain asymptomatic and incidentally diagnosed, and a spontaneous partial/total regression of PVT is observed in an important proportion of patients, even in the absence of anticoagulation. Recent evidence suggested that the anticoagulant treatment for PVT may favorably affect both ischemic and bleeding outcomes in LC patients. Anticoagulant therapies so far available include unfractioned heparin, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and fondaparinux for acute treatment, and LMWHs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for long-term treatment. No robust data currently support the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with LC and PVT, as the safety and efficacy of DOACs in this setting is still unclear. This review summarizes current evidence for the evaluation and management of patients with LC and PVT.

Long-Term Outcome of Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis

Introduction

Little is known about the long-term outcome of cirrhotic patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). This prospective cohort study aimed to describe the clinical presentation, bleeding incidence, thrombotic events, and mortality in patients with SVT associated with cirrhosis.

Methods

Among 604 consecutive patients with SVT enrolled over 2 years, 149 had cirrhosis. Major bleeding, thrombotic events, and all-cause mortality were recorded during a 2-year follow-up. In a subgroup, the degree of recanalization with or without anticoagulation therapy, and the correlation between clinical events and liver disease severity were also investigated.

Results

The most common thrombosis sites were the portal (88%) and mesenteric veins (34%). At presentation, 50% of patients were asymptomatic. Anticoagulation was administered to 92/149 patients for a median of 6.5 months. Vessel recanalization was documented in 47/98 patients with a radiological follow-up. Anticoagulation was associated with a 3.33-fold higher of recanalization rate, and a lower recurrent thrombosis rate, while patients with and without anticoagulation experienced a similar rate of major bleeding episodes. Mortality rates were 6.8 per 100 patient-years for patients with thrombosis completely or partially resolving during the follow-up, and 15.4 per 100 patient-years for those with stable or progressing thrombosis. An impact of SVT on survival was only apparent in patients with more advanced liver disease (Child–Pugh B-C).

Conclusions

Patients with SVT and cirrhosis have a substantial long-term risk of recurrent thrombotic events, which is reduced by anticoagulation therapy without any increase in bleeding risk. Anticoagulation can improve the likelihood of vessel recanalization, and is associated with a lower risk of death for decompensated patients.

Management of Coagulation and Anticoagulation in Liver Transplantation Candidates

Hemostasis is a complex balance of clot formation and dissolution that is largely modulated by protein synthesis and degradation in the liver. In the state of end-stage liver disease, there is a disruption of the hemostatic system due to hepatic protein synthetic dysfunction. Because historical clinical laboratory testing often only analyzes a portion of the hemostasis system, the clinician may be misled into believing that cirrhosis patients are imbalanced with a tendency toward bleeding. The modern understanding of hemostasis in cirrhosis involves a rebalance of hemostasis with a tenuous equilibrium between clotting and bleeding, but an equilibrium nonetheless. The clinician should be aware of this rebalance and not depend on limited and flawed laboratory testing in making judgments about the tendency for bleeding or clotting based on these values alone. Prophylactic protocol transfusions including large doses of fresh frozen plasma to "correct" the international normalized ratio are good examples of ineffective and potentially harmful interventions based on an outdated understanding of hemostasis in cirrhosis. Conversely, a thrombotic state is increasingly recognized in patients with cirrhosis, and conditions such as portal vein thrombosis are now becoming important therapeutic targets in many liver transplantation (LT) candidates and other patients with chronic liver disease. This article will introduce the reader to the modern understanding of hemostasis in cirrhosis, describe the common pitfalls and opportunities in treating hemostasis system abnormalities in the LT candidate particularly in regards to preprocedural prophylactic transfusions, and discuss therapeutic targets and interventions for thrombotic complications in the end-stage liver disease population.

Imaging and minimally invasive endovascular therapy in the management of portal vein thrombosis

Thrombosis of the portal venous system, although rare in the general population, is commonly diagnosed in patients with specific underlying conditions including prothrombotic diseases, cirrhosis, hepatobiliary malignancy, and intraabdominal inflammation. Recent improvements in imaging have played a fundamental role in increased detection of portal vein thrombosis (PVT), frequently reported in asymptomatic patients as an incidental finding. Minimally invasive, endovascular therapy is a medically rational option to achieve recanalization of the portal vein as an adjunct to conservative medical management. This review focuses on the advances in imaging modalities to diagnose, stage and follow-up PVT, and gives a short overview of the available endovascular techniques in this field.

Algorithms for managing coagulation disorders in liver disease

Patients with advanced liver disease have traditionally been considered at risk for bleeding complications. However, although bleeding in patients with cirrhosis frequently occurs due to complications of portal hypertension, research performed within the last 15 years has increasingly shown that hemostasis in patients with liver failure generally achieves a state of "rebalance", whereby compensatory systems restore a relatively neutral or even slightly pro-thrombotic state. Much recent clinical and in vitro research has, in fact, shown over-compensation, such that patients with acute and stable chronic liver failure may have a thrombotic tendency, which may participate in the progression of liver disease and cause systemic and portal thrombosis. Investigators have started to identify differences in hemostasis in patients with unstable cirrhosis, the newly defined syndrome of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), compared to those with stable cirrhosis. The following discussion will summarize much of the background of rebalanced hemostasis in patients with cirrhosis and acute liver failure (ALF), and suggest management algorithms for coagulation abnormalities before invasive procedures, during active bleeding, and for prophylaxis and treatment of thrombotic complications.

Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in non-malignant portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Treatment for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is not well established. Nevertheless, anticoagulation therapy can seemingly be used as first-line therapy. However, there are limited data on the role of this treatment in patients with PVT and cirrhosis. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation therapy in a series of patients with non-malignant PVT and liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 32 patients with cirrhosis and PVT between March 2009 and September 2015. All patients received anticoagulation treatment. PVT was diagnosed within the context of biannual hepatocellular carcinoma screening in these patients.

RESULTS

Recanalisation was achieved in 23 patients: complete in 17 patients (53.1%) and partial in 6 patients (18.7%). The median time for achieving a complete response was 7 months (95% CI: 6-8). We did not discover any risk factors associated with repermeation (partial or complete). None of the patients presented with thrombosis progression while receiving anticoagulation. Nine patients who achieved complete recanalisation and stopped anticoagulation therapy suffered rethrombosis (52%). There were no differences between the patients who achieved complete or partial recanalisation (35%) and those who did not (33%) in relation to the onset of hepatic events during follow-up. Three patients (9%) presented with bleeding complications: two variceal bleeding episodes and one brain hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

In cirrhotic patients with non-malignant PVT, anticoagulation therapy led to partial or complete recanalisation in 70% of patients, with a broad safety profile. Due to the existing rethrombosis rate, long-term anticoagulation should be considered.

Harmful and Beneficial Effects of Anticoagulants in Patients With Cirrhosis and Portal Vein Thrombosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) promote recanalization of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with cirrhosis. However, the benefit of PVT recanalization might be offset by major and minor bleeding associated with use of anticoagulants. We evaluated harmful and beneficial effects of VKA in patients with PVT and cirrhosis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 63 consecutive patients with cirrhosis given anticoagulants for the first detection of non-neoplastic PVT from 2003 to 2015 in Italy. We collected data on bleeding events in these patients and compared them with those from patients without cirrhosis with venous thromboembolism (VTE) (n = 160) for up to 4 years. Time in the therapeutic range, based on the international normalized ratio, was used to determine the quality of anticoagulation. We also collected data from 139 patients with cirrhosis who did not receive VKAs (controls), to analyze portal hypertension-related events. We performed survival analyses to determine the effects of VKA in patients with PVT vs controls.

RESULTS

The group with VTE and the group with PVT were comparable in age, sex, and time in the therapeutic range, but patients with VTE received VKAs for a longer time period (31.1 ± 16.9 mo vs 23.3 ± 16.2 mo; P = .002). The incidence of major or minor bleeding was higher in patients with PVT than patients with VTE (major, 24% vs 7%; P = .012; minor, 29% vs 19%; P = .024). Patients with PVT had a higher rate of major bleeding from the upper-gastrointestinal tract than patients with VTE (P = .019), but there were no significant differences in other types of major bleeding (P = .376). Patients with PVT and controls had the same rate of upper-gastrointestinal bleeding. Complete recanalization in patients with PVT receiving VKA (n = 31) was independently associated with increased portal hypertension-related event-free and transplantation-free survival times.

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective analysis of 63 patients with cirrhosis given anticoagulants for PVT, we found VKA use to increase risk of minor bleeding, compared with patients without cirrhosis given VKA. However, this risk is offset by the ability of VKA to increase portal hypertension-related, event-free, and transplantation-free survival of patients with PVT recanalization. Portal hypertension, rather than anticoagulants, could account for the difference in risk of major bleeding between patients with PVT vs patients with VTE.

Anticoagulation in non-malignant portal vein thrombosis is safe and improves hepatic function

Background

Non-malignant portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is common in patients with advanced liver disease. Anticoagulation (AC) increases the chances of recanalization and may improve liver function in patients with cirrhosis.

Aim

We retrospectively assessed the course of non-malignant PVT in patients receiving AC.

Methods

Parameters related to hepatic injury (aspartate aminotransferase [AST]/alanine aminotransferase [ALT]), severity of disease (ascites) and synthesis function (albumin) as well as AC, rates of PVT regression/progression and AC-associated complications were documented.

Results

Among 122 patients with PVT, 51 patients with non-malignant PVT (27 incomplete, 24 complete) were included, 12 patients (25%) received long-term AC therapy (≥9 months) as compared to 36 patients without long-term AC. We observed a trend towards higher regression rates with long-term AC of 58% (vs. 28% without AC; p = 0.08) and lower progression rates of 25% (vs. 42% without AC; p = 0.15). In the subgroup of patients with decompensation prior to PVT diagnosis (n = 39), long-term AC (n = 10, 25.6%) resulted in a significantly higher rate of PVT regression/resolution (70% vs. 24%, p = 0.031). Interestingly, AST/ALT tended to decrease (−19%/−16%) and the proportion of patients with ascites became lower (−33%) with long-term AC (without AC: ±0%). Furthermore, there was a significant improvement in albumin levels (+9%/+3.6 g/dl) when compared to patients without long-term AC (−2%/−0.8 g/dl; p = 0.04). Additionally, 10 patients were treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for splanchnic vein thrombosis. Importantly, there were no AC-associated bleeding events in patients with conventional AC and one bleeding event in patients with DOAC treatment (10%).

Conclusion

Our findings support anticoagulation in patients with non-malignant PVT, since AC seems safe and associated with superior PVT regression rates and might also decrease hepatic injury and improve liver synthesis.

Transient portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis

In real-world clinical practice, the acceptance of anticoagulation therapy in the management of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with cirrhosis is limited by the fear of an increased bleeding risk. Additionally, accumulating evidence indicates that spontaneous recanalization of PVT may occur in the absence of antithrombotic treatment. Therefore, risk stratification based on outcomes in such patients is crucial for determining a therapeutic strategy. In this paper, we draw attention to the distinct clinical entity, "transient PVT" by introducing two cases with PVT that spontaneously recanalized in the absence of antithrombotic treatment. We reviewed the available data regarding the probability of and predictors for spontaneous recanalization of PVT. Available data suggest singling out transient thrombosis in the natural history of PVT in patients with cirrhosis because of its prognostic and management implications.

Acute portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy in a patient with hepatolithiasis: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

Portal vein thrombosis is defined as any thrombosis that develops in the portal vein system. It is considered a very rare and extremely lethal complication of hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Acute portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy in patients with hepatolithiasisis very rare. Acute portal vein thrombosis is considered as a dangerous complication after hepatectomy. It is easy to ignore the symptom of acute portal vein thrombosis. Once the appropriate time of treatment is past, it would lead to patients' death.

DIAGNOSE

Acute portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy in a patient with hepatolithiasis INTERVENTIONS:: We consider anticoagulation therapy and percutaneous transhepatic portal vein puncture and thrombectomy once the diagnosis of acute portal vein thrombosis is confirmed.

OUTCOMES

The patient's liver function continued to deteriorate, eventually resulting in death.

LESSONS

Acute portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy is difficult to diagnose. The management of acute portal vein thrombosis remains controversial according to its severity, location or time of discovering.

Visceral Thromboses in Pancreas Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review

Within gastrointestinal malignancies, primary hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are frequently associated with visceral thromboses (VT). Thrombus formation in the portal (PVT), mesenteric (MVT), or splenic vein (SVT) system leads to portal hypertension and intestinal ischemia. VT in PDAC may convey a risk of increased distal thrombosis and poses therapeutic uncertainty regarding the role of anticoagulation. An increasing number of reports describe VT associated with PDAC. It is possible that early diagnosis of these events may help reduce morbidity and speculatively improve oncologic outcomes. To perform a systematic review to study PVT, MVT, and SVT associated with PDAC, and to provide a comprehensive review. Medline/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Data Extraction and Assessment: Two blinded independent observers extracted and assessed the studies for diagnosis of PVT, MVT, and SVT in PDAC. Studies were restricted to English-language literature published between 2007 and 2016. Eleven articles were identified. Five case reports and 7 retrospective studies were found, with a total of 127 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The mean age at diagnosis was 64 years. PVT was found in 35% (n = 46), SVT in 52% (n = 65), and MVT in 13% (n = 15). Mean follow-up time was 26 months. Only 3 of the selected articles studied the impact of anticoagulation in VT. All patients with nonvisceral thrombosis (eg, deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary emboli) were therapeutically treated; in contrast, patients with VT only rarely received treatment. VT in PDAC is a frequent finding at diagnosis or during disease progression. Evidence to guide treatment choices is limited, and current management is based on inferred experience from nononcologic settings. Anticoagulation appears to be safe in VT, with most of the large studies recommending a careful assessment for patients at a high risk of bleeding.

Anticoagulation treatment of portal vein thrombosis in a patient with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation: A case report

RATIONALE

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is relatively common in patients with liver cirrhosis waiting for liver transplantation (LT). Anticoagulation is an important non-invasive treatment strategy for patients with cirrhosis and PVT.

PATIENT CONCERNS

This is the case of a 51-year-old man who presented with cryptogenic liver cirrhosis associated with ascites. Computed tomography (CT) and Doppler ultrasonography (US) showed a partially obstructive thrombus of the portal vein (Yerdel Grade II).

DIAGNOSIS

Portal vein thrombosis (Yerdel Grade II); liver cirrhosis.

INTERVENTIONS

The PVT was completely recanalized after 4 months of treatment with the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) medication enoxaparin but discontinuation of anticoagulants led to PVT recurrence. The patient's condition deteriorated, even though re-treating the anticoagulation with enoxaparin significantly reduced the PVT.

OUTCOMES

The thrombus was removed by a thrombectomy and LT was performed successfully without any vascular complications.

LESSONS

Patients with cirrhosis and PVT who are waiting LT can be effectively treated with LMWH anticoagulants. Careful use of anticoagulation is generally safe. Early initiation of anticoagulation treatment may be associated with a high rate of portal vein recanalization.

Thromboembolic Events Secondary to Endoscopic Cyanoacrylate Injection: Can We Foresee Any Red Flags?

BACKGROUND

Gastric varices (GV) are associated with high morbidity and mortality in patients with portal hypertension. Endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection is the first-line recommended therapy for GV obliteration. This study aims to explore the reason behind related adverse events and better prevent its occurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective case series study was conducted from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016, to identify patients who experienced severe adverse events secondary to endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection. A literature review of similar cases was performed on two medical databases, Medline and Embase.

RESULTS

A total of 652 patients underwent cyanoacrylate injection at our center within the study duration. Five cases of severe adverse events related to the use of tissue adhesives were identified. Detailed clinical presentation, patient treatment, and outcomes were reviewed and analyzed. Twenty-seven similar cases were identified based on the literature review providing further insight into the study.

CONCLUSION

Although rare in incidence, systemic embolism associated with cyanoacrylate injection is often fatal or debilitating. This report may raise awareness in treatment protocol, including the necessity of preoperative angiographic studies, to avoid similar adverse events in clinical practice.

Vascular liver diseases on the clinical side: definitions and diagnosis, new concepts

The components of the hepatic vascular system (hepatic arteries, portal and hepatic veins, sinusoids, and lymphatics) can be damaged by various types of injury. Each of the resulting conditions is rare, which has limited knowledge and awareness. In the last two decades, international collaborations have allowed to reach critical masses of data, which has driven significant progresses in understanding and management of vascular disorders of the liver. The present paper discusses definitions, denominations, and diagnosis of such vascular disorders with the exception of those affecting hepatic arteries. Evolving pathogenic or pathophysiologic views relevant to the clinical aspects are also overviewed.

Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: diagnosis, natural history, and therapeutic challenges

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent complication in cirrhosis and its prevalence increases with disease severity. Several factors are involved in the development and progression of PVT. The challenge for the management of PVT is the precise evaluation of the bleeding risk as opposed to life-threatening extension of thrombosis. Nevertheless, the impact on the progression and outcome of liver disease is unclear. A critical evaluation of the available data discloses that treating PVT in cirrhotics is safe and effective. However, there are open issues, such as which anticoagulant could represent a safer therapeutic option, and when and for how long this treatment should be administered to cirrhotic patients with PVT.

Short-Term Outcome of Patients with Cirrhosis and Concurrent Portal Cavernoma Presenting with Acute Variceal Bleeding

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The outcome of cirrhotic patients with main portal vein occlusion and portal cavernoma after the first episode of acute variceal bleeding (AVB) is unknown. We compared short-term outcomes after AVB in cirrhotic patients with and without portal cavernoma.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and September 2014, 28 patients with cirrhosis and portal cavernoma presenting with the first occurrence of AVB and 56 age-, sex-, and Child-Pugh score-matched cirrhotic patients without portal cavernoma were included. The primary endpoints were 5-day treatment failure and 6-week mortality.

RESULTS

The 5-day treatment failure rate was higher in the cavernoma group than in the control group (32.1% versus 12.5%; p = 0.031). The 6-week mortality rate did not differ between the cavernoma and control group (25% versus 12.5%, p = 0.137). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses revealed that 5-day treatment failure (HR = 1.223, 95% CI = 1.082 to 1.384; p = 0.001) independently predicted 6-week mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Cirrhotic patients with AVB and portal cavernoma have worse short-term prognosis than patients without portal cavernoma. The 5-day treatment failure was an independent risk factor for 6-week mortality in patients with cirrhosis and portal cavernoma.

The use of nonselective beta blockers is a risk factor for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

A reduction in portal vein inflow velocity seems to predispose to the emergence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Nonselective β-blockers (NSBBs), used to prevent variceal bleeding, may increase the development of PVT by reducing portal vein inflow velocity. In this retrospective case-control study, we evaluated the risk factors and clinical features of a first event of PVT in 130 cirrhotics, 19 (15%) with (PVT group) and 111 (85%) without PVT (non-PVT group).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient evaluation and NNBB treatment were carried out according to the AASLD guidelines.

RESULTS

PVT was prevalently partial (84%) and asymptomatic (84%). Patients with PVT were treated with different regimens, and resolution of thrombosis was observed in about 50% of the cases. In both groups, HCV was the most frequent cause of cirrhosis and Child-Pugh score A was prevalent. Ascites and esophageal varices were more frequent in the PVT group (P = 0.05 and <0.000, respectively). Treatment with NSBBs was significantly more frequent in the PVT group than in the non-PVT group (P < 0.000). PVT was associated with higher prevalence of chronic renal disease (P = 0.002), higher PT impairment (P = 0.003) and lower AST and ALT (P = 0.000). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, history of esophageal varices (P = 0.007) and NSBB treatment (P = 0.0003) were independent risk factors significantly associated with PVT.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal varices and NSBB treatment were independent risk factors of PVT. Larger studies should evaluate the risk between variceal bleeding and portal vein thrombosis of using NSBBs, particularly in the prevention of first bleeding in nonadvanced liver cirrhosis.

Efficacy and safety of edoxaban for treatment of portal vein thrombosis following danaparoid sodium in patients with liver cirrhosis

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of edoxaban and warfarin for treatment of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) following danaparoid sodium in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

Fifty cirrhotic patients with PVT treated initially for 2 weeks with danaparoid sodium were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Treatment was later switched to either edoxaban (n = 20) or warfarin (n = 30). We compared the efficacy and safety of edoxaban and warfarin for up to 6 months. The PVT volume was measured by dynamic computed tomography before treatment, at 2 weeks, and at 1, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics of patients in the two groups. Treatment with edoxaban reduced the volume of PVT from 1.42 cm³ at 2 weeks to 0.42 cm³ at 6 months, and prevented exacerbation of PVT at 6 months after treatment with danaparoid sodium (P = 0.016). In contrast, treatment with warfarin resulted in increased PVT volume from 1.73 cm³ at 2 weeks to 2.85 cm³ at 6 months, despite the control of the international normalized ratio in 57% of the patients (P = 0.005). Multivariate regression analysis identified edoxaban therapy as the single significant and independent determinant of PVT reduction at 6 months (P = 0.0014, hazard ratio 6.400). Clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding was encountered in 3 of 20 (15%) patients of the edoxaban group and 2 of 30 (7%) of the warfarin group (P = 0.335).

CONCLUSION

Edoxaban following danaparoid sodium is an effective anticoagulant and could be potentially considered as one of the treatment options for PVT in cirrhotic patients.

Decreased portal vein velocity is predictive of the development of portal vein thrombosis: A matched case-control study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in cirrhosis may lead to hepatic decompensation and increased mortality. We aimed to investigate if decreased portal vein (PV) velocity is associated with future PVT.

METHODS

Data on adult patients with cirrhosis and PVT between January 1, 2005 and July 30, 2015 were obtained. Cases with PVT were matched by age, gender and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score to corresponding controls without PVT. Cox proportional hazards models, receiver operator curves and Kaplan Meier curves were constructed.

RESULTS

One hundred subjects (50 matched pairs) with mean age 53.8±13.1 y and MELD score 14.9±5.5 were included in our analysis. Sixty-four percent were male and 76% were Child-Turcotte-Pugh Class A or B. Baseline characteristics (prior to development of PVT) were similar, except for baseline PV velocity (16.9 cm/s, 95% CI 13.9-20.0 PVT vs 25.0, 95% CI 21.8-28.8 no PVT, P<.001). 30 PVT subjects had PV velocity <15 cm/s compared to five without PVT (P<.001). On adjusted multivariable analysis, PV velocity was the strongest independent risk factor predicting PVT development (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.93). The predictive value for PVT development was greatest for flow <15 cm/s (c-statistic 0.77). PV velocity <15 cm/s had a highly significant association with future PVT (HR 6.00, 95% CI 2.20-16.40, P=<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased PV velocity is associated with increased risk of future PVT. Patients with cirrhosis and decreased PV velocity are a high-risk subgroup that warrants further investigation with prospective study.

Coagulopathy in Children With Liver Disease

It was thought that a high international normalized ratio predicted bleeding in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and patients were "autoanticoagulated." Contrary to this belief, while patients with CLD experienced bleeding, they also developed thromboses. In the last decade, the prevailing literature challenged the idea that an elevated international normalized ratio increased bleeding risk. The global assays of coagulation such as thromboelastography (TEG)/rotational thromboelastometry and thrombin generation assays provide additional insight into coagulation processes. It has become apparent that a parallel reduction of procoagulant and anticoagulant factors leave patients in a new "balanced" state, albeit a fragile one, where the balance can be easily disrupted. The inherent differences in coagulation between children and adults such as differences in levels of procoagulant and anticoagulant factors, underlying liver disease, and the paucity of studies in children make extrapolation of these findings to the pediatric population problematic. Ultimately, this is an area that requires further investigation to avoid inappropriate use of blood products and medication.

Austrian consensus guidelines on the management and treatment of portal hypertension (Billroth III)

The Billroth III guidelines were developed during a consensus meeting of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH) and the Austrian Society of Interventional Radiology (ÖGIR) held on 18 February 2017 in Vienna. Based on international guidelines and considering recent landmark studies, the Billroth III recommendations aim to help physicians in guiding diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in patients with portal hypertension.

Bleeding Risk with Invasive Procedures in Patients with Cirrhosis and Coagulopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Previous perceptions of cirrhosis as a hypocoagulable state have resulted in empirical blood product transfusions prior to invasive procedures. We evaluate procedure-related bleeding risks in patients with cirrhosis, assess the utility of conventional and newer global coagulation tests, and explore evidence surrounding prophylactic transfusion strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature supports the concept of a rebalanced, albeit fragile, haemostasis equilibrium in cirrhosis, with a potential hypercoagulable tendency in stable patients. Standard coagulation tests provide a poor reflection of bleeding risks and yet are relied upon for transfusion thresholds. Consequently, a sizeable proportion of patients receive unnecessary blood products. The role of viscoelastic tests to guide transfusions requires further evaluation. In stable cirrhotic patients, procedure-related bleeding rates appear low. Prophylactic transfusion strategies based on arbitrary thresholds lack evidence of clinical benefit. There is a pressing need for point-of-care coagulation tests that represent the complex coagulopathy of cirrhosis and well-powered randomised controlled trials to develop evidence-based pre-procedure transfusion guidelines.

Reno-portal shunt for liver transplant, an alternative inflow for recipients with grade III-IV portal vein thrombosis: Tips for a better outcome

INTRODUCTION

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) poses an extremely difficult problem in cirrhotic patients who are in need of a liver transplant. The prevalence of PVT in patients with cirrhosis ranges from 0.6% to 26% Nery et al. (2015) [1]. The presence of PVT is associated with more technically difficult liver transplant and in certain cases can be a contraindication to liver transplant. The only option for these patients with extensive PVT would be a multi-visceral transplant, the later unfortunately has a much higher morbidity and mortality compared to liver only transplant Smith et al. (2016) [2]. An alternative approach is needed to provide a safe and reliable outcome.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

In this case series, we present our experience with reno-portal shunt as an alternative inflow for the liver allograft.

DISCUSSION

This approach appears to be safe with good long-term outcome.Although this technique has been described before, we provide additional considerations that produced good outcomes in our patients.

CONCLUSION

We believe that meticulous preoperative planning with high-resolution triple phase CT imaging with a measurement of the diameter of the spleno-renal shunt along with a duplex scan measuring flow through the shunt is key to a successful transplantation. Moreover, appropriate donor liver size is also of extreme importance to avoid portal hypoperfusion.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in the cirrhotic population is a challenging clinical phenomenon requiring a nuanced management approach. Uncertainty exists regarding the clinical significance of PVT in the cirrhotic population because the data for PVT are based mainly on retrospective, small cohort studies. Therefore, strong recommendations regarding the optimal timing, modality, and duration of therapy for PVT in the cirrhotic population cannot be made. However, this review aims to summarize the current literature and provide stepwise guidance in diagnosing and managing PVT in patients with cirrhosis.

Hematological Issues in Liver Disease

Acute and chronic liver failure are associated with numerous alterations in different features of the coagulation system. Consequently, there is widespread confusion regarding the potential for both bleeding and thrombosis in patients with liver disease. The risk of bleeding is related to the hemodynamic changes in portal pressures and venous congestion whereas the thrombotic risk stems from changes in the coagulation system. Antithrombotic prophylaxis and treatment of patients with hemorrhage and thrombosis requires careful assessment, interpretation of laboratory workup, and attention to coexistent morbidities. A framework for the management of these conditions is presented for clinicians.