A Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab in EGFR-Mutant, PD-L1+, Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLC

Deciphering the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in ALK- and EGFR-positive lung adenocarcinoma

Introduction

The advent of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has led to significantly improved disease outcome in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC), but response of ALK/EGFR-positive tumors to immune therapy is limited. The underlying immune biology is incompletely understood.

Methods

We performed comparative mRNA expression profiling of 31 ALK-positive, 40 EGFR-positive and 43 ALK/EGFR-negative lung ADC focused on immune gene expression. The presence and levels of tumor infiltration lymphocytes (TILs) as well as fourteen specific immune cell populations were estimated from the gene expression profiles.

Results

While total TILs were not lower in ALK-positive and EGFR-positive tumors compared to ALK/EGFR-negative tumors, specific immunosuppressive characteristics were detected in both subgroups: In ALK-positive tumors, regulatory T cells were significantly higher compared to EGFR-positive (fold change: FC = 1.9, p = 0.0013) and ALK/EGFR-negative tumors (FC = 2.1, p = 0.00047). In EGFR-positive tumors, cytotoxic cells were significantly lower compared to ALK-positive (FC =  − 1.7, p = 0.016) and to ALK/EGFR-negative tumors (FC =  − 2.1, p = 2.0E-05). A total number of 289 genes, 40 part of cytokine–cytokine receptor signaling, were differentially expressed between the three subgroups. Among the latter, five genes were differently expressed in both ALK-positive and EGFR-positive tumors, while twelve genes showed differential expression solely in ALK-positive tumors and eleven genes solely in EGFR-positive tumors.

Conclusion

Targeted gene expression profiling is a promising tool to read out tumor microenvironment characteristics from routine diagnostic lung cancer biopsies. Significant immune reactivity including specific immunosuppressive characteristics in ALK- and EGFR-positive lung ADC, but not a total absence of immune infiltration supports further clinical evaluation of immune-modulators as partners of ICB in such tumors.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00262-021-02981-w.

Classification of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer's Tumor Immune Micro-Environment and Strategies to Augment Its Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade

Simple Summary

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has become a major treatment for lung cancer. Better understanding of the tumor immune micro-environment (TIME) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is urgently needed to better treat it with this type of therapy. In this review, we describe and explore how NSCLC’s TIME relates to response to ICB, as well as how to treat those with unresponsive types of TIME, which will significantly impact future research in lung cancer immunotherapy.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with checkpoint inhibitors has led to significant and durable response in a subset of patients with advanced stage EGFR and ALK wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This has been consistently shown to be correlated with the unique characteristics of each patient’s tumor immune micro-environment (TIME), including the composition and distribution of the tumor immune cell infiltrate; the expression of various checkpoints by tumor and immune cells, such as PD-L1; and the presence of various cytokines and chemokines. In this review, the classification of various types of TIME that are present in NSCLC and their correlation with response to ICB in NSCLC are discussed. This is conducted with a focus on the characteristics and identifiable biomarkers of different TIME subtypes that may also be used to predict NSCLC’s clinical response to ICB. Finally, treatment strategies to augment response to ICB in NSCLC with unresponsive types of TIME are explored.

Anti-PD1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Actionable Oncogenic Driver Mutations

Anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy has emerged as a standard of care for stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the past decade. Patient selection is usually based on PD-L1 expression by tumor cells and/or tumor mutational burden. However, mutations in oncogenic drivers such as EGFR, ALK, BRAF, or MET modify the immune tumor microenvironment and may promote anti-PD1/PD-L1 resistance. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms associated with these mutations, which shape the immune tumor microenvironment and may impede anti-PD1/PD-L1 efficacy. We provide an overview of the current clinical data on anti-PD1/PD-L1 efficacy in NSCLC with oncogenic driver mutation.

MET amplification attenuates lung tumor response to immunotherapy by inhibiting STING

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer therapy. However, the response of patients to ICB is difficult to predict. Here, we examined 81 lung cancer patients under ICB treatment and found that patients with MET amplification were resistant to ICB and had a poor progress-free survival. Tumors with MET amplifications had significantly decreased STING levels and antitumor T cell infiltration. Furthermore, we performed deep single-cell RNA sequencing on more than 20000 single immune cells and identified an immunosuppressive signature with increased subsets of XIST- and CD96-positive exhausted NK cells and decreased CD8+ T cell and NK cell populations in patients with MET-amplification. Mechanistically, we found that oncogenic MET signaling induces phosphorylation of UPF1 and downregulates tumor cell STING expression via modulation of the 3'-UTR length of STING by UPF1. Decreased efficiency of ICB by MET amplification can be overcome by inhibiting MET.

Has programmed cell death ligand-1 MET an accomplice in non-small cell lung cancer?-a narrative review

Recently approved and highly specific small-molecule inhibitors of c-MET exon 14 skipping mutations (e.g., capmatinib, tepotinib) are a new and important therapeutic option for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harbouring c-MET alterations. Several experimental studies have provided compelling evidence that c-MET is involved in the regulation of the immune response by up-regulating inhibitory molecules (e.g., PD-L1) and down-regulating of immune stimulators (e.g., CD137, CD252, CD70, etc.). In addition, c-MET was found to be implicated in the regulation of the inflamed tumour microenvironment (TME) and thereby contributing to an increased immune escape of tumour cells from T cell killing. Moreover, it is a major resistance mechanism following treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (EGFRmut) with tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors (TKIs). In line with these findings c-MET alterations have also been shown to be associated with a worse clinical outcome and a poorer prognosis in NSCLC patients. However, the underlying mechanisms for these experimental observations are neither fully evaluated nor conclusive, but clearly multifactorial and most likely tumour-specific. In this regard the clinical efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and TKIs against EGFRmut in NSCLC patients harbouring c-MET alterations is also not yet established, and further research will certainly provide some guidance as to optimally utilise CPIs and c-MET inhibitors in the future.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been changed by the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Albeit great benefits are achieved with target therapies, resistance invariably occurs and recourse to alternative treatments is unavoidable. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) role and the best setting of immunotherapy administration in oncogene-driven NSCLC are matter of debate.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review through PubMed, in order to gather all the available information regarding ICI activity and efficacy in oncogene-addicted NSCLC, from both prospective trials and retrospective series. A meta-analysis of objective response rate in different molecular subgroups was provided. Combinatorial strategies including ICIs and related toxicities were also recorded.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven studies were included in the qualitative analysis. EGFR mutation may be a biomarker of poor response to single-agent ICIs (7% of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients achieved disease response in prospective trials), while encouraging results have been shown with combination strategies. KRAS-mutated disease (response rate, RR, 22%) has different clinical and pathological characteristics, and the co-existence of additional mutations (e.g., STK11 or TP53) influence tumor microenvironment and response to immunotherapy. Other molecular alterations have been marginally considered prospectively, and data from clinical practice are variegated, given poor effectiveness of ICIs in ALK-rearranged disease (RR 9.5%, pooling the data of retrospective studies) or some encouraging results in BRAF-(RR 25%, retrospective data) or MET-driven one (with estimations conditioned by the presence of both exon 14 skipping mutations and gene amplification in reported series).

CONCLUSIONS

In oncogene-addicted NSCLC (with the exception of KRAS-mutated), ICIs are usually administered at the failure of other treatment options, but administering single-agent immunotherapy in later disease phases may limit its efficacy. With the progressive administration of TKIs and ICIs in early-stage disease, molecular characterization will become fundamental in this setting.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Testing and Outcomes in EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Belgium: Results from the REVEAL Study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to evolve expeditiously.

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study investigated real-world treatment patterns and EGFR mutation testing in patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC in Belgium.

METHODS

Data were extracted from medical records of adults diagnosed with EGFRm locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2017. Patients were followed retrospectively from diagnosis until 1 September 2018, end of clinical activity or death. Data on demographics, patient outcomes and disease characteristics, treatment patterns and EGFR mutation testing at diagnosis and progression were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients were enrolled. At diagnosis, median age was 69 years, 63.1% were female, 88.7% had metastatic disease, 94.3% had adenocarcinoma histology, 76.6% had ECOG 0/1, 70.9% had common EGFR mutations and 29.1% had only rare mutations. In first line, 73.8% of patients received first/second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (1G/2G EGFR-TKIs), while 21.9% received other systemic treatments. Among 61 patients progressing on and discontinuing a first 1G/2G EGFR-TKI, 45 (73.8%) received subsequent systemic treatment while 16 (26.2%) did not; 20 (32.8%) received osimertinib. Among 65 patients progressing on a first 1G/2G EGFR-TKI, 47 (72.3%) were tested for T790M, of whom 25 (53.2%) were positive.

CONCLUSION

These real-world data from Belgium show that a substantial fraction of patients with EGFRm NSCLC do not receive 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs in first line and do not receive subsequent systemic treatment after progression on 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs. Only a third receive osimertinib upon progression on 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs. These observations should be considered in first-line treatment decisions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03761901-December 3, 2018.

Immunotherapy in oncogene addicted non-small cell lung cancer

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) has led to notable changes in treatment strategies for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and now forms a part of standard of care treatment in patients with advanced disease. However, most patients do not respond to ICI monotherapy, which may be explained by significant variations in efficacy according to different immune and molecular profiles in tumours. Improved response rates have been observed in smokers and are associated with tumors that have high mutation loads, with a higher tendency to form neoantigens. This premise itself defies the eventual significance of ICIs for oncogene-driven NSCLC, which in general are more common in never smokers and potentially have reduced capacity for neoantigen formation. Furthermore, pivotal trials investigating ICIs in advanced NSCLC have usually excluded patients with oncogenic drivers, hence the outcome of these agents in this population is poorly characterized. In this article, we aim to review the most current evidence, encompassing clinical and preclinical data focused on a wide range of oncogene-addicted NSCLCs.

Real-world study of PD-L1 testing patterns and treatment distribution in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in Israel

Aim: We describe PD-L1 testing patterns and first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in a 2.3 million-member state-mandated health service in Israel. Materials & methods: Newly diagnosed stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer patients initiating systemic anticancer treatment from 1 January 2017 until 31 December 2018 were identified from the national cancer registry and Maccabi Healthcare Service database and followed until 30 June 2019. Results: The cohort consisted of 410 patients; 58% males, median age 68 years, 70% current/former smokers, 81% adenocarcinoma, 14% had brain metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 46/17/37% for 0-1/2-4/unknown, respectively. A total of 80% tested for PD-L1 expression, of which 47% had tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50%. A total of 95% with TPS ≥ 50% and no known tumor aberrations (including EGFR mutations, and translocations in ALK and ROS1) received first-line PD-1/PD-L1-inhibitor monotherapy, and 80% of untested/TPS < 50% received platinum doublets. Conclusion: Fast uptake of testing was observed, and treatment patterns showed high adherence to guidelines.

Immunotherapy in Treating EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer: Current Challenges and New Strategies

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including monoclonal antibodies against programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), have dramatically improved the survival and quality of life of a subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Multiple predictive biomarkers have been proposed to select the patients who may benefit from the immune checkpoint inhibitors. EGFR-mutant NSCLC is the most prevalent molecular subtype in Asian lung cancer patients. However, patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC show poor response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. While small-molecule EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the preferred initial treatment for EGFR-mutant NSCLC, acquired drug resistance is severely limiting the long-term efficacy. However, there is currently no further effective treatment option for TKIs-refractory EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. The reasons mediating the poor response of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients to immunotherapy are not clear. Initial investigations revealed that EGFR-mutated NSCLC has lower PD-L1 expression and a low tumor mutational burden, thus leading to weak immunogenicity. Moreover, the use of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade prior to or concurrent with osimertinib has been reported to increase the risk of pulmonary toxicity. Furthermore, emerging evidence shows that PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in NSCLC patients can lead to hyperprogressive disease associated with dismal prognosis. However, it is difficult to predict the treatment toxicity. New biomarkers are urgently needed to predict response and toxicity associated with the use of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Recently, promising data have emerged to suggest the potentiation of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy by anti-angiogenic agents and a few other novel therapeutic agents. This article reviews the current investigations about the poor response of EGFR-mutated NSCLC to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, and discusses the new strategies that may be adopted in the future.

EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations: Clinicopathological Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20-ins) mutations are an uncommon and heterogeneous group of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), resistant to conventional EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Characteristics and outcomes of patients with EGFR ex20-ins have not been fully established; we sought to clarify them using a multinational patient database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with NSCLC from six Australian institutions with EGFR exon 20 mutations (ex20-mut), excluding T790M, were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical characteristics and outcomes with systemic treatments were collected and analyzed using comparative statistics.

RESULTS

Among 109 patients with ex20-mut, 61% were females and 75% were Caucasians. More males presented with de novo metastatic disease (84% vs. 51%; P = .002). Central nervous system (48%) and liver (24%) metastases were common within metastatic patients (n = 86). Thirty-nine patients received platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and achieved a 43% objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 6.9 months, and median overall survival (mOS) of 31.0 months. Twenty-three of the patients with ex20-ins received conventional TKIs, resulting in an ORR of 13%, mPFS of 3.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.91-6.25), and mOS of 31.0 months (95% CI, 15.09-not reached). Nine patients with S786I mutations received TKIs, resulting in an ORR of 50%, mPFS of 18.2 months (2.79-not reached), and mOS of 33.4 months (95% CI, 16.14-not reached). Twenty-three patients received immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (ICIm), resulting in an ORR of 4%, mPFS of 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.91-4.83), and mOS of 30.8 months (95% CI, 17.62-41.62).

CONCLUSION

Although phenotypically similar to patients with common EGFR mutations, patients with EGFR ex20-mut had worse survival, perhaps due to the lack of targeted therapies. Chemotherapy was superior to conventional EGFR TKIs in patients with EGFR ex20-ins, although there was moderate activity of TKIs in S768I mutations. ICIm was ineffective.

Inferior outcome of bone metastasis in non-small-cell-lung-cancer patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors

•

BoM was prone to multiple organs metastases and had more complex aberrations.

•

BoM was associated with worse prognosis which cannot be salvaged by Osimertinib.

•

BoM was an independent prognostic factor for EGFR-TKI treatment in PFS and OS.

Background

Targeted therapy has been established as the standard-of-care for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Among patients with advanced lung cancer, 30–40% have bone metastases (BoM) at first diagnosis. However, little is known on the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of BoM in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

Methods

Treatment-naive patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who were prescribed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were screened and enrolled between June 2009 and April 2019 from West China Hospital. Patients were dichotomized according to whether they had BoM. The demographic characteristics, gene mutation status and therapeutic efficacy, including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were collected.

Results

A cohort of 604 patients were enrolled. The BoM group had worse PFS (11.7 vs. 14.0 months, HR = 0.73, p = 0.00013) and OS (32.8 vs. 46.1 months, HR = 0.54, p < 0.0001) compared with the non-BoM group. No significant differences were observed in disease control rate (p = 0.407) or ORR (p = 0.537) between the two groups. The metastatic sites in the two groups exhibited obvious differences. In multivariate analysis, BoM was found to be an independent factor of worse prognosis.

Conclusion

BoM was identified as an independent inferior prognostic factor for EGFR-TKI treatment, and may have complex biological implications.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy/bevacizumab therapy for patients with advanced lung cancer and heavily treated with EGFR mutation: a retrospective analysis

Background

EGFR-mutated lung cancer poorly responded to anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy. Whether patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer can benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy combined with other drugs remains controversial. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of the PD-1 inhibitor combined with other drugs (chemotherapy and/or bevacizumab) in patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer, who have progressed on EGFR–TKI treatment to determine the activity of the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy combined with chemotherapy or/and bevacizumab therapy in heavily treated patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer.

Methods

We identified 56 patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or combined with the chemotherapy/bevacizumab therapy. The objective response rates were assessed using RECIST v1.1. Adverse events (AEs) were graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by the Academic Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital. (NO. 2019 160), and individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived.

Results

Objective responses were observed in 6 of 56 (10.7%) patients, and the disease control rate was 53.6% (30/56). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.33 months with 95% CI of 1.58–5.08 months. No patient achieved a complete response. All six patients that achieved PR were treated with the PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy or bevacizumab therapy. Three of the six patients who achieved PR were treated with radiotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy. Patients treated with the PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy as second-line therapy showed relatively longer PFS and higher objective response rates than those treated with PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy as third- or late-line therapy (PFS: 5.50 vs. 3.27 months, P=0.301; objective response rates: 25.0% vs. 6.82%, P=0.071). No additional AE profile was observed.

Conclusions

The PD-1 inhibitor combined with the chemotherapy/bevacizumab therapy showed acceptable toxicity profile and moderate efficacy on heavily treated advanced EGFR-mutated lung cancer after the exhaustion of target therapy.

Sensitivity to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations

Besides platinum-based chemotherapy, no established treatment option exists for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR exon 20 (Ex20ins) insertion mutations. We sought to determine the clinical outcome of patients with this EGFR mutation subtype in the immunotherapy era. Thirty NSCLCs with EGFR Ex20ins mutations were identified, of whom 15 had received immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) treatment as monotherapy (N = 12), in combination with chemotherapy (N = 2) or with another immunotherapeutic agent (N = 1). The response rate was observed in 1 out of 15 patients (6.7%), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.0 months and median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months. A trend towards an inferior outcome in terms of PFS and OS was observed for patients receiving ICB treatment in the first versus second line setting (PFS: 1.6 months versus 2.7 months, respectively, p = 0.16-OS: 2.0 months versus 8.1 months, respectively, p = 0.09). Median OS from the time of diagnosis of advanced disease was shorter for patients treated with ICB versus those who did not receive immunotherapy (12.9 months versus 25.2 months, respectively, p = 0.08), which difference remained associated with a worse survival outcome at multivariate analysis (p = 0.04). Treatment with ICB is poorly effective in NSCLCs with EGFR Ex20ins mutations, especially when given in the first-line setting. This information is crucial in order to select the optimal treatment strategy for patients with this subtype of EGFR mutation.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Dusk or Dawn?

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that target programmed cell death protein-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 axis have significantly shifted the treatment paradigm in advanced NSCLC, clinical benefits of these agents are limited in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Several predictive biomarkers (e.g., programmed cell death ligand-1 expression, tumor mutation burden), which have been validated in EGFR-wild type NSCLC, however, are not efficacious in EGFR-mutated tumors, suggesting the unique characteristics of tumor microenvironment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Here, we first summarized the clinical evidence on the efficacy of ICIs in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Then, the cancer immunogram features of EGFR-mutated NSCLC was depicted to visualize the state of cancer-immune system interactions, including tumor foreignness, tumor sensitivity to immune effectors, metabolism, general immune status, immune cell infiltration, cytokines, and soluble molecules. We further discussed the potential subpopulations with EGFR mutations that could benefit from ICI treatment. Lastly, we put forward future strategies to adequately maximize the efficacy of ICI treatment in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC in the upcoming era of combination immunotherapies.

Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy or Anlotinib vs. Pembrolizumab Alone in Patients With Previously Treated EGFR-Mutant NSCLC

Objectives

More and more encouraging evidence revealed that immunotherapy could improve clinical outcomes in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variations. However, immunotherapy is still a controversy for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation.

Method

In this retrospective analysis, we compared the clinical efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy (PM), pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy (P+C) and pembrolizumab combined with anlotinib (P+A) in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation who had failed on EGFR-TKI and platinum-based chemotherapy.

Result

Eighty-six patients were included in this study. The overall median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.24 months. Multivariate analysis suggested that EGFR ^L858R and combined therapy were positive prognostic factors of PFS. The overall median OS was 12.28 months. Multivariate analysis found that high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) and combined therapy seemed to be positive prognostic factors of OS. Among the population, 32 patients received PM, 26 patients received P+C and 28 patients received P+A. Up to Jan 30, 2021, the median progression-free survival was 1.5 months in the PM group, 4.30 months in the P+C group and 3.24 months in the P+A group. The median OS were 7.41, 14.92 and 15.97 months, respectively. The ORR were 3.1%, 23.1% and 21.4%.

Conclusion

The addition of chemotherapy or antiangiogenic therapy to pembrolizumab resulted in significantly longer PFS, OS and ORR than pembrolizumab alone in our study. EGFR ^L858R might be a positive prognostic factor of PFS and high PD-L1 expression might be a positive prognostic factor of OS.

Serum-derived exosomal PD-L1 expression to predict anti-PD-1 response and in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PD-L1 expression is the most useful predictive biomarker for immunotherapy efficacy on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8+ TILs) play an essential role in the clinical activity of immunotherapy. PD-L1 is found on the exosome’s surface, and PD-L1 expressing exosomes can inhibit antitumor immune responses. This study aimed to analyze tumor PD-L1 expression, serum exosomal PD-L1, and CD8+ TILs to investigate anti-PD-1 response and clinicopathological outcomes in NSCLC. One hundred twenty patients with stage I–III NSCLC were enrolled, and serum samples collected during the initial surgery were pooled. The Human CD274/PD-L1 ELISA kit was used to quantify the exosomal PD-L1. Exosomal PD-L1 levels were significantly correlated with tumor PD-L1 levels (p < 0.001) and the number of CD8+ TILs (p = 0.001). Patients with exosomal PD-L1 ≥ 166 pg/mL tended to have a worse RFS than those with < 166 pg/mL in all stage (p = 0.163) and stage I patients (p = 0.116). Seventeen patients exhibited postoperative recurrences and received anti-PD-1 treatment. The disease control rate of patients with exosomal PD-L1 ≥ 166 pg/mL was 100%. The measurement of serum exosomal PD-L1 as a quantitative factor with tumor PD-L1 status may help predict anti-PD-1 response and clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC.

Prognostic impact of KRAS mutation status for patients with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the lung treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Monotherapy with pembrolizumab is the preferred first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50 %, without targetable oncogenic drivers. Although targeted therapies are in development for patients with specific Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutations, these are not available in daily care yet. It is not clear whether there is a difference in survival on first-line pembrolizumab for patients with a high PD-L1 status with or without a KRAS mutation. We aim to compare this survival based on real-world data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a real-world retrospective population-based study using data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. We selected patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with PD-L1 expression ≥50 % diagnosed between January 2017 and December 2018, treated with first-line pembrolizumab. Patients with EGFR mutations, ALK translocations or ROS1 rearrangements were excluded. The primary outcome parameter was overall survival.

RESULTS

388 (57 %) of 595 patients had a KRAS mutation. KRAS was seen more frequently in women than in men (65 % versus 49 % respectively, p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 19.2 months versus 16.8 months for patients with and without KRAS mutation, respectively (p = 0.86). Multivariable analysis revealed WHO performance score, number of organs with metastases and PD-L1 percentage as independent prognostic factors. KRAS mutation status had no prognostic influence (hazard ratio = 1.03, 95 % CI 0.83-1.29).

CONCLUSION

The survival of KRAS mutated versus KRAS wild-type lung adenocarcinoma patients, treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy, is similar, suggesting that KRAS has no prognostic value with respect to treatment with pembrolizumab.

Advances in Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Translational Research

Over the past several years, we have witnessed a resurgence of interest in the biology and therapeutic vulnerabilities of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This has been driven in part through the development of a more extensive array of representative models of disease, including a diverse variety of genetically engineered mouse models and human tumor xenografts. Herein, we review recent progress in SCLC model development, and consider some of the particularly active avenues of translational research in SCLC, including interrogation of intratumoral heterogeneity, insights into the cell of origin and oncogenic drivers, mechanisms of chemoresistance, and new therapeutic opportunities including biomarker-directed targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Whereas SCLC remains a highly lethal disease, these new avenues of translational research, bringing together mechanism-based preclinical and clinical research, offer new hope for patients with SCLC.

Systemic Therapy for Mutation-Driven NSCLC

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, and patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer have traditionally had a poor prognosis. An improved understanding of targetable oncogenic molecular alterations has led to a growing number of effective and first-line therapies in targeted patient populations. This review provides an overview of systemic therapy options available for patients with mutation-driven nonsmall cell lung cancer, as well as a discussion of data regarding safety when combined with radiation therapy.

Characterization of the Immune Landscape of EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Identifies CD73/Adenosine Pathway as a Potential Therapeutic Target

INTRODUCTION

Lung adenocarcinomas harboring EGFR mutations do not respond to immune checkpoint blockade therapy and their EGFR wildtype counterpart. The mechanisms underlying this lack of clinical response have been investigated but remain incompletely understood.

METHODS

We analyzed three cohorts of resected lung adenocarcinomas (Profiling of Resistance Patterns of Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in Evaluation of Cancer of Thorax, Immune Genomic Profiling of NSCLC, and The Cancer Genome Atlas) and compared tumor immune microenvironment of EGFR-mutant tumors to EGFR wildtype tumors, to identify actionable regulators to target and potentially enhance the treatment response.

RESULTS

EGFR-mutant NSCLC exhibited low programmed death-ligand 1, low tumor mutational burden, decreased number of cytotoxic T cells, and low T cell receptor clonality, consistent with an immune-inert phenotype, though T cell expansion ex vivo was preserved. In an analysis of 75 immune checkpoint genes, the top up-regulated genes in the EGFR-mutant tumors (NT5E and ADORA1) belonged to the CD73/adenosine pathway. Single-cell analysis revealed that the tumor cell population expressed CD73, both in the treatment-naive and resistant tumors. Using coculture systems with EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells, T regulatory cell proportion was decreased with CD73 knockdown. In an immune-competent mouse model of EGFR-mutant lung cancer, the CD73/adenosine pathway was markedly up-regulated and CD73 blockade significantly inhibited tumor growth.

CONCLUSIONS

Our work revealed that EGFR-mutant NSCLC has an immune-inert phenotype. We identified the CD73/adenosine pathway as a potential therapeutic target for EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

The efficacy and safety of combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Combination therapies with immune checkpoint blockade demonstrate promising antitumor activity and safety in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). However, whether the combination therapy is superior to their monotherapies, and which combination regimen is most efficacious remain unknown. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize the current available evidences on the efficacy and safety of combination immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC were included.

RESULTS

We identified nine RCTs including a total of 5,142 patients. The study showed that the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for combination therapy were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63-0.86, p = 0.001) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56-0.73, p = 0.004); the pooled odds ratios (ORs) of objective response rates (ORRs) and grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were 1.51 (95% CI: 1.02-1.99, p < 0.001) and 1.30 (95% CI: 1.03-1.57, p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis showed that the OR of grade 3 or higher AEs for immunotherapy plus chemotherapy was higher than that of chemotherapy alone, but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.061) , and there was PFS and OS benefit for either immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, double agent immunotherapy or immunotherapy plus targeted plus chemotherapy combination regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors showed more clinical benefit for patients with NSCLC, with increased grade 3 or higher AEs, but toxicities were manageable.

Recognizing Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs)

Immunotherapy plays a central role in the treatment of NSCLC and biomarkers predicting response to ICIs are valuable therapeutic tools. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is integral in therapy selection as its positive predictive nature to ICIs in the metastatic setting is well documented. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has undergone much study and, while results are somewhat mixed, there is evidence for its positive predictive value with ICI use. Additional markers such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), gene expression profiling (GEP), mismatch repair (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI), somatic mutations, neutrophil to leukocyte ratio (NLR), smoking history, medication history, and immune-related adverse event (irAE) development can further guide clinicians.

Patients With Short PFS to EGFR-TKIs Predicted Better Response to Subsequent Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Based Immunotherapy in EGFR Common Mutation NSCLC

Background

Despite disappointing outcomes from immuno-monotherapy, studies reported that NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation may possibly benefit from combined immunotherapy. Whether the response to prior EGFR-TKI has association with the outcomes of subsequent immunotherapy remains unclear.

Patients and Methods

Advanced NSCLC patients with resistance to EGFR-TKIs and received ICI treatment from January 2016 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Single cell sequencing and flow cytometry were conducted to explore the difference of cell components in tumor microenvironments (TME). A 1:3 matched case–control study was conducted to compare the clinical effects of combined immunotherapy with standard chemotherapy as second-line treatment.

Results

Fifty-eight patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 based immunotherapy behind EGFR-TKI treatment were enrolled. Correlation analysis showed TKI-PFS had a significantly negative association with corresponding IO-PFS (r = −0.35, p = 0.006). TKI-PFS cutoff 10 months had the most significant predictive function for posterior immunotherapy and was validated to be an independent predictor by uni- and multivariate analyses. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that patients with TKI-PFS less than 10 months had significantly prolonged IO-PFS and higher ORR than those with long (median PFS, 15.1 vs 3.8 months; HR, 0.26, p = 0.0002; ORR, 31.8 versus 10%, p = 0.04). Single cell RNA-seq revealed that the cell components were varied among patients after treatment with EGFR-TKI. Patients with short TKI-PFS demonstrated a relatively higher proportion of CD8 effector cells and lower ratio of M2 like macrophage to M1 like macrophages, which was validated by flow cytometry. Case–control study demonstrated that combined immunotherapy achieved significantly longer PFS (HR, 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31–0.85, p = 0.02), longer OS (HR, 0.48, 95% CI: 0.26–0.89, p = 0.05) and higher ORR (33.3 vs 10.0%, p = 0.02) than traditional chemotherapy for patients with short TKI-PFS.

Conclusion

Patients with short TKI-PFS conferred better response to immunotherapy than those with long. The status of TME were different among those two populations. Combined ICI treatment could promisingly be a better choice than classical chemotherapy in second-line setting for patients with short TKI-PFS and no T790M mutation. Underlying mechanisms need to be further explored.

Relationship between PD-L1 expression and outcome in EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

Predictive biomarkers for poor response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is an area of ongoing research. This multicentre retrospective study sought to determine the impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumour proportional score (TPS) on outcome in EGFR TKI treated patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with Stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma harbouring a sensitising EGFR mutation treated with first-line TKI at five metropolitan hospitals were included. PD-L1 TPS was determined using the Ventana anti-PD-L1 (SP263) assay. High PD-L1 expression was defined as TPS ≥ 50 %. Determinants of progression and survival hazards were modelled using Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 186 patients were included. Mean age was 67 years, 66 % were female and 54 % were Asian. Patients with high PD-L1 expression (n = 23; 12 %) had significantly shorter progression free survival (6.6 vs 13.0 months, hazard ratio (HR) 2.6 95 % CI 1.6-4.2, p < 0.0001) and overall survival (11.5 vs 32.9 months, HR 3.3, 95 % CI 1.9-5.7, p < 0.0001) compared to patients with PD-L1 low/negative tumours. This remained significant in multivariate analyses. High PD-L1 in post-TKI progression biopsies was not associated with poorer survival.

CONCLUSION

In this large, real-world cohort of EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients, high PD-L1 expression was associated with early resistance to 1st generation EGFR TKIs and shorter survival, regardless of ethnicity.

Immunotherapy in lung cancer

Immunotherapy has emerged as an important treatment modality throughout oncology with a particularly important role in the treatment of lung cancer. Early signals showed responses could be achieved in nonsmall cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer and these monoclonal antibodies have become standards of care for advanced stage disease. They have also shown promise in earlier-stage disease as complements to radiation or surgery, offering the potential for durable, meaningful survival gains.

Long-term efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutations

INTRODUCTION

MET exon 14 skipping mutation, observed in 3-4% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is emerging as a targetable alteration. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been effective in treating several NSCLCs. Our research aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients with NSCLCs harboring MET exon 14 mutations and their response to ICI in Japan.

METHODS

Among the 1954 consecutive NSCLCs diagnosed at Saitama Cancer Center between 2010 and 2019, MET exon 14 skipping mutations were detected in 68 (3.5%) NSCLCs. We evaluated their characteristics such as programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.

RESULTS

Median age of patients with NSCLCs harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutations was 73 years. PD-L1 was highly expressed in 17 (70.8%) of the 24 patients examined. Seven patients received ICI monotherapy, and three out of seven had a remarkable treatment response, resulted in objective response rate (ORR) of 42.9% and progression-free survival of 24.7 months. Three patients with donor splice-site mutations showed a long-term treatment response, despite the fact that two with acceptor splice-site mutations demonstrated no response and experienced early disease progression with ICI monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that patients with NSCLCs harboring MET exon 14 mutations presented with a high rate of positive PD-L1 expression. ICI treatment showed a high ORR and long-term efficacy for NSCLCs harboring MET exon 14 mutations. Variants of MET exon 14 splice-site mutations may be associated with ICI response.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2021

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) address all aspects of management for NSCLC. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines regarding targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and their respective biomarkers.

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab with chemotherapy for the treatment of stage IIB-IIIB resectable lung squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Researches on programmed cell death (PD-1) as neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer is underway, which brings hope for individuals with the disease. However, a study dedicated to lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) specifically has yet to be conducted. Now, data from our pilot prospective research neoadjuvant study provide new insights in the field of neoadjuvant regimen for LUSC.

Methods

Between June 2019 and July 2020, 37 adults with untreated, surgically resectable stage IIB–IIIB LUSC were enrolled into this prospective study. Patients received 2 cycles of pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg) with chemotherapy (albumin-bound paclitaxel 100 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 + carboplatin AUC 5) via intravenous administration every 3 weeks, and underwent surgical treatment 3–4 weeks after the second cycle. The primary endpoint of the study was the tumor pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The toxicity profile, tumor major pathological remission, complete resection rate, response rate, and operative and postoperative complications were also evaluated.

Results

The postoperative pathological specimens of 17 (45.9%) patients suggested pCR. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab with chemotherapy had an acceptable side-effect profile, and no patients withdrew from the study preoperatively due to disease progression or toxicity. A major pathological response occurred in 24 (64.9%) resected tumors. All tumors were completely resected (R0, 100%). According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RESIST), a response was evaluated before surgery in 32 (86.5%) patients by computed tomography. Twenty-five (67.6%) patients underwent thoracoscopic surgery. No deaths or postoperative major complications requiring reoperation occurred. Recurrence or metastasis was found in 2 patients during follow-up of 2–14 months.

Conclusions

The early outcomes of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting as a novel treatment for resectable stage IIB–IIIB LUSC showed a high pCR rate that has not been seen previously, as well as a high R0 resection rate and a low toxicity profile. The long-term efficacy of this novel treatment and the validity of the present findings should be confirmed with longer follow-up and prospective comparative trials.

Toxicity with small molecule and immunotherapy combinations in non-small cell lung cancer

Treatment stratification in stage IV NSCLC is guided by identification of oncogene driver mutations. Actionable mutations with current licenced therapeutic agents include epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), rearrangements of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS-1 and BRAF V600. Alongside progress with small molecule therapy, developments in immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have transformed the landscape of stage III and stage IV NSCLC. The success of CPIs has led to evaluation with small molecule therapy in both concurrent and sequential settings. In this review we summarise recent results of combination CPIs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in stage IV NSCLC, detailing significant toxicity and its potential mechanisms with both concurrent and sequential approaches. As more therapeutic targets are being discovered it is becoming increasingly important for clinicians to correctly sequence therapy for delivery of safe and effective treatment. In addition to stage IV disease we suggest that comprehensive molecular profiling of key NSCLC drivers, particularly in stage III disease, will help to inform optimal treatment sequencing and minimise potential toxicity.

Efficacy and safety of treatment modalities across EGFR selected/unselected populations with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of treatment modalities across different populations with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases.

METHODS

A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, the ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international conferences. The main outcomes of interest were progression-free survival, overall survival, and severe adverse events. Bayesian network meta-analytical techniques were implemented, to compare treatment modalities based on efficacy and safety profiles. The protocol for this study has been registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42020155330).

RESULTS

15 randomized controlled trials with a total of 1216 patients were analyzed. Network meta-analysis generated six comparisons both in EGFR positive and EGFR unselected populations. For patients harboring EGFR positive mutations, osimertinib appears to significantly increase progression-free survival, compared to 1st generation EGFR-TKI (HR 0.46, 95 %CI 0.38-0.55), 2nd generation EGFR-TKI (HR: 0.59, 95 %CI 0.34-0.99), conventional chemotherapy (HR 0.30, 95 %CI 0.14-0.66), radiotherapy (HR 0.20, 95 %CI 0.14-0.29), and radiotherapy plus 1st generation TKI (HR 0.21, 95 %CI 0.14-0.32). Osimertinib also appears to increase the likelihood of survival and prolong overall survival. For EGFR unselected patients, combined anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody with conventional chemotherapy appears superior to radiotherapy (HR: 0.20, 95 % CI 0.14-0.29), conventional chemotherapy (HR: 0.42, 95 %CI 0.28-0.68), radiotherapy plus conventional chemotherapy (HR: 0.59, 95 %CI 0.32-0.98), radiotherapy plus 1st generation TKI (HR:0.49, 95 %CI 0.25-0.96), and immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy (HR:0.44, 95 %CI 0.28-0.69). However, combination therapies are generally more toxic causing an increased number of severe adverse events, particularly when anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody is combined with conventional chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Osimertinib appears to be the most effective and safest treatment in NSCLC patients with brain metastases, harboring EGFR positive mutations. The anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody and conventional chemotherapy combination increases survival for NSCLC patients with brain metastases who were not selected according to EGFR mutation, although this increased benefit positively correlates with an increased number of severe adverse events.

Immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Update and new insights

BACKGROUND

The treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has changed markedly in recent years as a result of two major treatment milestones: Targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Since 2015, immunotherapy has been changing the paradigm of NSCLC treatment in different settings and has contributed to improve the quality of life of these patients. The most widely used immunotherapy strategy in clinical practice is currently PD-1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibition-based immunotherapy. Initial successful results came from an improvement in overall survival for pretreated patients, and immunotherapy subsequently moved to a first-line palliative setting as monotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy or as double-checkpoint inhibition. With regard to earlier stages, consolidation immunotherapy after chemoradiation has also changed the paradigm of unresectable NSCLC, with marked benefits in terms of disease-free and overall survival. During the last few years, efforts have focused on the introduction of immunotherapy in earlier stages as neoadjuvant treatment for potentially resectable tumors and in an adjuvant setting, with some very promising results.

AIM

In this manuscript, we provide both an agile and thorough review of the role of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer, a critical analysis of the most important studies, current indications, the role of biomarkers, new insights, and future challenges.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients reaching better survival outcomes in first and second palliative setting and in unresectable stage III tumors. Next year's immunotherapy will also introduce in earlier stages. Through an extensive knowledge of the mechanisms of action and of immunotherapy-based studies, the best treatment alternative can be offered to patients, helping to improve their survival and cure rates.

Osimertinib plus Ramucirumab: The Best of Both Worlds?

Both osimertinib and the combination of erlotinib plus ramucirumab are approved for initial therapy of advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Osimertinib is also approved in previously treated T790M mutation-positive patients. The accompanying article reports on a study combining osimertinib with ramucirumab.See related article by Yu et al., p. 992.

The progress and challenge of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in treating non-small cell lung cancer

The use of programmed cell-death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors is the standard therapy for the first-line or second-line treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In contrast to current traditional treatments such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments can directly attenuate tumour-mediated exhaustion and effectively modulate the host anti-tumour immune response in vivo. In addition, compared with traditional therapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy can significantly prolong survival without obvious side effects in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Ideally, several biomarkers could be used to monitor the safety and effectiveness of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments; however, the current lack of optimal prognostic markers remains a widespread limitation and challenge for further clinical applications, as does the possibility of immune-related adverse events and drug resistance. In this review, we aimed to summarise the latest progress in anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 treatment of advanced NSCLC, worldwide, including in China. An exploration of underlying biomarker identification and future challenges will be discussed in this article to facilitate translational studies in cancer immunotherapy.

The cutting-edge progress of immune-checkpoint blockade in lung cancer

Great advances in immune checkpoint blockade have resulted in a paradigm shift in patients with lung cancer. Immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment, either as monotherapy or combination therapy, has been established as the standard of care for patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations or extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. An increasing number of clinical trials are also ongoing to further investigate the role of ICIs in patients with early-stage lung cancer as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Although PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden have been widely studied for patient selection, both of these biomarkers are imperfect. Due to the complex cancer-immune interactions among tumor cells, the tumor microenvironment and host immunity, collaborative efforts are needed to establish a multidimensional immunogram to integrate complementary predictive biomarkers for personalized immunotherapy. Furthermore, as a result of the wide use of ICIs, managing acquired resistance to ICI treatment remains an inevitable challenge. A deeper understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms of acquired resistance to ICIs is helpful to overcome these obstacles. In this review, we describe the cutting-edge progress made in patients with lung cancer, the optimal duration of ICI treatment, ICIs in some special populations, the unique response patterns during ICI treatment, the emerging predictive biomarkers, and our understanding of primary and acquired resistance mechanisms to ICI treatment.

Identifying the prognostic significance of B3GNT3 with PD-L1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma

Background

As a novel treatment, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor appears to be less effective in tumors of lung adenocarcinoma patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 3 (B3GNT3) has reported to be associated with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)/PD-1 interaction. However, the relationship between B3GNT3 and PD-L1 and its prognostic significance in

EGFR

mutant status are still unknown.

Methods

B3GNT3 was identified through transcriptome sequencing and The Cancer Genome Atlas Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-LUAD) database. Flow cytometry and real-time polymerase chain reaction were performed to investigate the association between B3GNT3, PD-L1, and EGFR. Then, B3GNT3 and PD-L1 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis in 145 surgically resected primary lung adenocarcinomas. The relationships between survival and B3GNT3, PD-L1, and EGFR status were assessed, and the potential prognostic factors in patients with B3GNT3 expression were identified.

Results

We found that EGFR activation induced PD-L1 expression, and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) could reduce PD-L1 protein in EGFR-TKI-sensitive HCC827 and PC9 cell lines. Subsequent analysis showed that EGFR inhibitor could also lead to both decreased PD-L1 and B3GNT3 mRNA expression. A total of 145 lung adenocarcinoma patients were included. PD-L1 >1% and B3GNT3-positive expression in patients might contribute to worse prognosis in both overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR), 2.63; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98–7.06; P=0.048] and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.13–8.14; P=0.019), especially in the PD-L1 ≥50% group. However, when patients were negative for B3GNT3, PD-L1, and EGFR (or “triple negative”), there were significant decreases in OS (HR, 5.44; 95% CI, 0.99–29.83; P=0.029) and DFS (HR, 7.24; 95% CI, 1.32–39.73; P=0.008). Positive B3GNT3 expression was a significant risk factor associated with lower DFS (HR, 3.30; P=0.043).

Conclusions

Our results indicate that the B3GNT3 expression is tightly correlated with PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutation status. B3GNT3 is associated with poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Collectively, these findings may offer new insight into enhancing immune therapy efficacy for lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Programmed death-ligand 1 expression level as a predictor of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor efficacy in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The main objective of this study was to investigate the impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This study analyzed 108 patients with NSCLC who had received EGFR-TKI as first-line systemic treatment at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Seoul National University Hospital between December 2012 and October 2018. The National Cancer Center Research Institute (NCCRI) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets were analyzed to investigate the mechanisms underlying EGFR-TKI-resistance in tumors with high PD-L1 expression.

RESULTS

Among the 108 patients, 55, 37, and 16 had negative (PD-L1 Tumor proportion score <1%), weak (1-49%), and strong (≥50%) PD-L1 expression, respectively. Patients with strong PD-L1 expression had significantly shorter median progression-free survival (PFS; 7.07 months) than patients with weak (14.73 months, P<0.001) or negative (12.70 months, P=0.001) PD-L1 expression. After adjustment for covariates by Cox regression, PD-L1 expression remained a significant indicator of adverse prognosis. In EGFR-TKI-refractory patients, the frequency of T790M mutation and the PFS following treatment with third-generation EGFR-TKI and PD-1 antibody were similar in the three groups. TCGA and NCCRI database analysis showed that high PD-L1 expression in EGFR-mutated NSCLCs correlated with IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling and high MUC16 mutation frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong PD-L1 expression in tumors might be a surrogate indicator of poor response to first-line EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations, and may reflect a de novo resistance mechanism involving JAK-STAT signaling.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor remodels tumor microenvironment by upregulating LAG-3 in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Previous clinical investigations have demonstrated that patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation have moderate responses to programmed cell death-1 and it's ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors, while some patients who failed EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy could benefit from immunotherapy. As a result, we have explored alterations in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) before and after EGFR-TKI treatment to detect the chances and proper timing of immunotherapy among patients.

METHODS

We identified 16 paired tissue samples pre- and post-EGFR-TKI treatment. Sections 4 μm thick were utilized to evaluate CD8, PD-L1, PD-1, LAG-3, and TIM-3 expressions by multiplexed fluorescent immunohistochemical staining. Five to ten representative original multispectral images of each sample were employed in the analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with positive CD8 + T-cell infiltration accounted for 37.5 % at baseline. Positive expression of PD-L1, PD1, LAG-3, and TIM-3 cells were observed in seven (43.8 %), four (25 %), one (6.25 %) and five (31.25 %) of the patients, respectively. PD-1 expression and infiltration of CD8⁺PD-1⁺-exhausted T cells increased significantly in patients with EGFR L858R mutation compared to patients with EGFR 19DEL. Patients who acquired T790 M after TKI treatment had less infiltrations of CD8⁺PD-1⁺ T cells and CD8⁺TIM-3⁺ T cells in the TIME at baseline. Positive expression of checkpoint proteins-including PD-1, TIM-3, and LAG-3-significantly correlated with shorter progression-free survival. LAG-3 was significantly upregulated after TKI treatment (p = 0.003), while other checkpoint proteins remained stationary.

CONCLUSION

The present study is the first work to report LAG-3 upregulation after EGFR-TKI failure in advanced NSCLC, which proposed novel insights for rational use of LAG-3 inhibitors in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation.

Subtypes of EGFR- and HER2-Mutant Metastatic NSCLC Influence Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is low among EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although prolonged responses have occasionally been reported. We investigated the association between mutation subtypes and ICI outcomes among HER2- and EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center study analyzed patients with EGFR- and HER2-mutated advanced NSCLC who received at least 1 cycle of ICI between 2013 and 2019. Patient characteristics, mutation subtype, and ICI outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 48 patients with advanced NSCLC, 14 (29%) had HER2 mutations and 34 (71%) had EGFR mutations. EGFR mutations included 16 (47%) exon 19 deletion, 7 (21%) L858R, 5 (15%) uncommon, and 6 (18%) exon 20 insertion. Compared to EGFR-sensitizing mutations (ESMs), HER2 and EGFR exon 20 mutations were associated with a trend toward better response (respectively, ESM, HER2, and EGFR exon 20: 11%, 29%, and 50%; P = .07) and significantly better disease control rates (respectively, 18%, 57%, and 67%; P = .008). Compared to ESM, HER2 mutations (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.35; P = .02) and EGFR exon 20 mutations (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.37; P = .10 trend) were also associated with improved PFS. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression remained an independent predictor of PFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.76; P = .004). The 6-month PFS rates were 29% (HER2), 33% (EGFR exon 20), and 4% (ESM). ICIs were generally well tolerated in this population. Importantly, no immune-related toxicity was observed in 10 patients who received a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as the immediate next line treatment after ICI.

CONCLUSION

HER2 and EGFR exon 20 mutations derive greater benefit from ICIs with comparable PFS to wild-type historical second/third-line unselected cohorts. ICIs remain a treatment option for this genomic subgroup, given the absence of approved targeted therapies for these rare mutations.

Regulation of PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on cancer cells engages with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) on immune cells, contributing to cancer immune escape. For multiple cancer types, the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is the major speed-limiting step of the anti-cancer immune response. In this context, blocking PD-1/PD-L1 could restore T cells from exhausted status and eradicate cancer cells. However, only a subset of PD-L1 positive patients benefits from α-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. Actually, PD-L1 expression is regulated by various factors, leading to the diverse significances of PD-L1 positivity. Understanding the mechanisms of PD-L1 regulation is helpful to select patients and enhance the treatment effect. In this review, we focused on PD-L1 regulators at the levels of transcription, post-transcription, post-translation. Besides, we discussed the potential applications of these laboratory findings in the clinic.

Checkpoint Blockade in Lung Cancer With Driver Mutation: Choose the Road Wisely

Immune checkpoint blockade with PD-(L)1 antibodies has revolutionized the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Similarly, the identification and targeting of oncogene drivers in metastatic NSCLC has dramatically improved patient outcomes with an expanding list of potentially actionable alterations and targeted therapies. Many of these molecular aberrations are more common in patients with little or no smoking history and adenocarcinoma histology. Certain molecular subsets of NSCLC, though gaining greatly from targeted therapy approaches, may derive less benefit from immune checkpoint blockade. The optimal identification, targeting, and sequencing of targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy are essential to continue to improve patient outcomes in advanced NSCLC. Herein, we review the role of immunotherapy in locally advanced and metastatic disease for patients with actionable driver alterations. Never-smoking patients have a high probability of having lung cancer that harbors one of these molecular aberrations that can be matched to a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with greatly improved clinical outcomes. Some of these patients with driver mutations may derive less benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor approaches (either alone or combined with chemotherapy), especially compared with smoking-associated NSCLC. Given that PD-1 blockade alone or with platinum-based chemotherapy is the de facto first-line therapy (depending on level of PD-L1 expression) for nontargetable metastatic NSCLC, we also review treatment in never-smoking patients for whom molecular testing results are pending and the likelihood of identifying a driver mutation is high.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in driver mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: is there a role?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite advances in immunotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer patients, the clinical efficacy of drugs for patients with oncogenic driver mutations remains limited. This article aimed to comprehensively review the currently available data on the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) for patients with driver mutation-positive lung cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the positive interaction between activation of oncogenic pathways and upregulated PD-L1 expression demonstrated in preclinical studies, the efficacy of single-agent ICB in patients with oncogenic mutation has largely been discouraging, except for those with KRAS mutations. The combination therapies using ICB with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for EGFR/ALK alteration raised a concern for the high incidence of treatment-related adverse events, notably hepatotoxicity and interstitial lung disease. A novel combination with bevacizumab demonstrated promising efficacy with tolerable safety profiles.

SUMMARY

Other than patients with the KRAS mutation who demonstrate relatively favorable response to ICB, a single-agent ICB therapy should be considered for those who retain good performance status but have no other therapeutic options available. Further studies on the combination of ICB and TKI are needed to identify the most viable pair regarding safety. Additional studies using novel combination partners, such as anti-VEGF inhibitors, are also warranted.

A Phase 1 study of gefitinib combined with durvalumab in EGFR TKI-naive patients with EGFR mutation-positive locally advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) induce cytolysis and release of tumour proteins, which can stimulate antigen-specific T cells. The safety and efficacy of durvalumab and gefitinib in combination for TKI-naive patients with advanced EGFRm NSCLC was evaluated.

METHODS

This Phase 1 open-label, multicentre trial (NCT02088112) was conducted in 56 patients with NSCLC. Dose expansion permitted TKI-naive patients, primarily with activating L858R or Ex19del EGFRm. Arms 1 + 1a received concurrent therapy; Arm 2 received 4 weeks of gefitinib induction followed by concurrent therapy.

RESULTS

From dose escalation, the recommended dose of durvalumab was 10 mg/kg Q2W with 250 mg QD gefitinib. Pharmacokinetics were as expected, consistent with inhibition of soluble PD-L1 and no treatment-emergent immunogenicity. In dose expansion, 35% of patients had elevated liver enzymes leading to drug discontinuation. In Arms 1 + 1a, objective response rate was 63.3% (95% CI: 43.9-80.1), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.1 months (95% CI: 5.5-15.2) and median response duration was 9.2 months (95% CI: 3.7-14.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Durvalumab and gefitinib in combination had higher toxicity than either agent alone. No significant increase in PFS was detected compared with historical controls. Therefore, concurrent PD-L1 inhibitors with gefitinib should be generally avoided in TKI-naive patients with EGFRm NSCLC.

PD-L1 polymorphisms predict survival outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with PD-1 blockade

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that PD-L1 polymorphisms are associated with the efficacy and immune-related adverse events of PD-1 blockade with nivolumab. However, the association between PD-L1 polymorphisms and survival outcomes under PD-1/PD-L1 blockade is still uncertain. Here, we aimed to investigate whether PD-L1 polymorphisms are associated with survival outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with nivolumab.

METHODS

PD-1/PD-L1 polymorphisms and survival outcomes were retrospectively analysed in two independent cohorts (133 patients treated with nivolumab and 96 patients with no treatment history of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (the non-ICI cohort)) with advanced NSCLC.

RESULTS

Among the 7 studied single-nucleotide polymorphisms, PD-L1 rs822339 and rs1411262 were associated with overall survival (OS) in patients treated with nivolumab. Patients with the A/A genotype of rs822339 had a significantly longer OS than those with A/G or G/G genotypes (not reached versus 12.0 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.18-0.64; p = 0.0008). A similar survival benefit with the A/A genotype was observed regardless of driver mutation status. In multivariate analysis, performance status (PS) and PD-L1 rs822339 genotype were independent prognostic factors for OS. In the non-ICI cohort, the PD-L1 rs822339 genotype did not correlate with OS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.31-1.70; p = 0.55). The T/T genotype of rs1411262 also showed a significant prolongation of OS compared to that with the C/T or C/C genotypes in patients treated with nivolumab.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 polymorphisms are associated with favourable OS in nivolumab-treated NSCLC patients and may be useful predictive biomarkers, regardless of driver mutation status.

Development of EGFR TKIs and Options to Manage Resistance of Third-Generation EGFR TKI Osimertinib: Conventional Ways and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) have been first-line therapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR sensitive mutations. Progression inevitably happens after 10–14 months of first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs treatment for acquired resistance. Owing to the successful identification of EGFR T790M, third-generation EGFR TKIs such as osimertinib were developed to target such resistance mutation. Nowadays, osimertinib has shown its efficacy both in first-line and second-line after resistance to previous generations of TKI treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, drug resistance also emerges on third-generation EGFR TKIs. Multiple mechanisms of acquired resistance have been identified, and some novel strategies were reported to overcome third-generation TKI resistance. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the prognosis of selected patients. For patients with EGFR-addicted metastatic NSCLC, ICIs have also revealed a potential role. In this review, we will take stock of mechanisms of acquired resistance to third-generation TKIs and discuss current challenges and future perspectives in clinical practice.

Concurrent Genetic Alterations and Other Biomarkers Predict Treatment Efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) greatly improve the survival and quality of life of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. However, many patients exhibit de novo or primary/early resistance. In addition, patients who initially respond to EGFR-TKIs exhibit marked diversity in clinical outcomes. With the development of comprehensive genomic profiling, various mutations and concurrent (i.e., coexisting) genetic alterations have been discovered. Many studies have revealed that concurrent genetic alterations play an important role in the response and resistance of EGFR-mutant NSCLC to EGFR-TKIs. To optimize clinical outcomes, a better understanding of specific concurrent gene alterations and their impact on EGFR-TKI treatment efficacy is necessary. Further exploration of other biomarkers that can predict EGFR-TKI efficacy will help clinicians identify patients who may not respond to TKIs and allow them to choose appropriate treatment strategies. Here, we review the literature on specific gene alterations that coexist with EGFR mutations, including common alterations (intra-EGFR [on target] co-mutation, TP53, PIK3CA, and PTEN) and driver gene alterations (ALK, KRAS, ROS1, and MET). We also summarize data for other biomarkers (e.g., PD-L1 expression and BIM polymorphisms) associated with EGFR-TKI efficacy.