Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Longitudinal trajectories of illness perception regarding breast cancer-related lymphedema among women with breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To identify longitudinal trajectories of illness perception (IP) regarding breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) in the first six months after surgery among women with breast cancer and to explore the predictive effects of demographics and clinical factors on IP trajectories.

METHODS

From August 2019 to August 2021, a total of 352 patients participated in this study, 328 of whom were included in the data analysis. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline (1-3 days after surgery). The BCRL-specific revised illness perception questionnaire was used to measure IP regarding BCRL at baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-surgery. A multilevel model was conducted to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Over the first six months post-surgery, the "timeline acute/chronic" and "illness coherence" dimensions showed positive growth trajectories; the "personal control" and "treatment control" dimensions presented negative growth trajectories; and the trajectories of identity, consequences, cyclicality and emotional influence perceptions regarding BCRL showed no significant changes. Age, education level, marital status, employment status, family monthly income per person, cancer stage and status of removed lymph nodes were indicated to be predictive factors of IP trajectories.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study determined significant changes over the first six months post-surgery in four IP dimensions and predictive effects of some demographics and clinical details on IP trajectories. These findings may help healthcare providers know more about the dynamic characteristics of IPs regarding BCRL in patients with breast cancer and assist them in identifying patients with a tendency toward improper IP regarding BCRL.

Advances in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema

PURPOSE

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a lifelong risk for breast cancer survivors and once acquired becomes a lifelong burden. This review summarizes current BCRL prevention and treatment strategies.

FINDINGS

Risk factors for BCRL have been extensively studied and their identification has affected breast cancer treatment practice, with sentinel lymph node removal now standard of care for patients with early stage breast cancer without sentinel lymph node metastases. Early surveillance and timely management aim to reduce BCRL incidence and progression, and are further facilitated by patient education, which many breast cancer survivors report not having adequately received. Surgical approaches to BCRL prevention include axillary reverse mapping, lymphatic microsurgical preventative healing (LYMPHA) and Simplified LYMPHA (SLYMPHA). Complete decongestive therapy (CDT) remains the standard of care for patients with BCRL. Among CDT components, facilitating manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) using indocyanine green fluorescence lymphography has been proposed. Intermittent pneumatic compression, nonpneumatic active compression devices, and low-level laser therapy appear promising in lymphedema management. Reconstructive microsurgical techniques such as lymphovenous anastomosis and vascular lymph node transfer are growing surgical considerations for patients as well as liposuction-based procedures for addressing fatty fibrosis formation from chronic lymphedema. Long-term self-management adherence remains problematic, and lack of diagnosis and measurement consensus precludes a comparison of outcomes. Currently, no pharmacological approaches have proven successful.

CONCLUSION

Progress in prevention and treatment of BCRL continues, requiring advances in early diagnosis, patient education, expert consensus and novel treatments designed for lymphatic rehabilitation following insults.

Therapeutic Lymphangiogenesis Is a Promising Strategy for Secondary Lymphedema

Secondary lymphedema is caused by lymphatic insufficiency (lymphatic drainage failure) following lymph node dissection during the surgical treatment or radiation therapy of breast or pelvic cancer. The clinical problems associated with lymphedema are reduced quality of life in terms of appearance and function, as well as the development of skin ulcers, recurrent pain, and infection. Currently, countermeasures against lymphedema are mainly physical therapy such as lymphatic massage, elastic stockings, and skin care, and there is no effective and fundamental treatment with a highly recommended grade. Therefore, there is a need for the development of a fundamental novel treatment for intractable lymphedema. Therapeutic lymphangiogenesis, which has been attracting attention in recent years, is a treatment concept that reconstructs the fragmented lymphatic network to recover lymphatic vessel function and is revolutionary to be a fundamental cure. This review focuses on the translational research of therapeutic lymphangiogenesis for lymphedema and outlines the current status and prospects in the development of therapeutic applications.

Risk factors for the development of severe breast cancer-related lymphedema: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Severe lymphedema presents a challenge in terms of treatment due to the significant formation of scar tissue that accompanies it. The aim of this study was to identify intraoperative and preoperative risk factors of severe lymphedema and to develop a nomogram for estimating the risk of severe lymphedema within 3 years of surgery.

METHOD

Data was collected from a retrospective cohort of 326 patients with BCRL at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from November 2015 to November 2018. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictive indicators of severe lymphedema. A nomogram was developed to further improve the clinical applicability.

RESULTS

In the retrospective cohort, the ratio of severe/non-severe lymphedema within 3 years of surgery was 1:3. Independent risk factors for severe lymphedema were determined to be age, positive lymph nodes, interpectoral (Rotter's) lymph nodes (IPNs) dissection, and educational level. IPNs dissection was found to contribute greatly to the development of severe lymphedema with a higher odds ratio (7.76; 95% CI: 3.87-15.54) than other risk factors. A nomogram was developed by integrating age, positive lymph nodes, IPNs dissection, and educational level, which yielded a C-index of 0.810 and 0.681 in the training and validation cohort, respectively. This suggested a moderate performance of the nomogram in predicting the risk of severe lymphedema within 3 years of surgery. The cut-off values of the low-, medium- and high-risk probabilities were 0.0876 and 0.3498, and the severe lymphedema exhibited a significantly higher risk probability as compared with the non-severe lymphedema.

CONCLUSION

This study identified the risk factors of severe lymphedema and highlighted the substantial contribution of IPNs dissection to the severity of lymphedema.

Body mass index increases the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema at 6-18 months after surgery: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is an incurable complication occurring after breast cancer treatment. The influence of obesity/overweight on the development of BCRL at different points after surgery was seldom verified. We aimed to determine the cut-off BMI/weight value associated with an increased risk of BCRL at different postoperative time in Chinese breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

Patients who underwent breast surgery plus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were retrospectively evaluated. Disease and treatment characteristics of participants were collected. BCRL was diagnosed by circumference measurements. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship of lymphedema risk with BMI/weight and other disease- and treatment-related factors.

RESULTS

518 patients were included. Lymphedema occurred more frequently among breast cancer patients with preoperative BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² (37.88%) than among those with preoperative BMI < 25 kg/m²(23.32%), with significant differences at 6-12 and 12-18 months after surgery (χ² = 23.183, P = 0.000; χ² = 5.279, P = 0.022). By multivariable logistics analysis, preoperative BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² presented a significantly greater risk of lymphedema than a preoperative BMI < 25 kg/m² (OR [95% CI] = 2.928 [1.565, 5.480]). Other factors, including radiation (breast/chest wall + axilla vs. none: OR [95% CI] = 3.723[2.271-6.104]), was an independent risk factor for lymphedema.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative obesity was an independent risk factor for BCRL in Chinese breast cancer survivors, and a preoperative BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² indicated greater likelihood of lymphedema development within 6-18 months postoperatively.

Risk factors of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: protocol of an umbrella review

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) is a progressive and debilitating complication post-breast cancer treatment. Identifying potential risk factors facilitates the prevention and management of BCRL. Multiple systematic reviews have been conducted to address the variables correlated with the occurrence of BCRL. This study aims to identify and examine factors predicting the development of BCRL, to clarify the predicting mechanism of these factors, as well to determine the credibility of risk factors for BCRL.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This umbrella review will be conducted with the methodological guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Cochrane handbook. A comprehensive systematic search will be performed in ten databases: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, SinoMed, Wangfang database, the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The search for unpublished studies will include ProQuest and the PROSPERO register. Reference lists will also be hand searched. Two reviewers will independently screen the studies, extract data and assess the methodological quality using the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 and the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews. The degree of overlap between included reviews will be assessed by calculating the Corrected Covered Area. The credibility of the associations between risk factors and lymphoedema will be graded into four classes: convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive and weak, referring to the classification system of recent umbrella reviews. A descriptive, narrative synthesis and suggestions for clinical practice and future research will be made based on included systematic reviews, considering the quality of the evidence.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this umbrella review. We will seek to submit the results for publication in a peer-reviewed journal or present it at conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022375710.

Incorporating Lymphovenous Anastomosis in Clinically Node-Positive Women Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Shared Decision-Making Model and Nuanced Approached to the Axilla

Introduction: Lymphedema remains a risk for 13–34% of breast cancer patients who require an axillary dissection (ALND) and radiation. Immediate lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) may mitigate lymphedema by up to 30% by restoring the physiologic lymphatic drainage immediately after ALND. Currently, completion of ALND (cALND) versus radiation after neoadjuvant therapy (NAC) is being addressed by the Alliance A11202 trial, leaving a paucity of data to guide practice. Our study describes the implementation process of LVA into clinical practice after NAC for node-positive breast cancer in the current clinical context. Methods: We reviewed a prospective database of LVA in node-positive patients (cT1-4,Nany) who received NAC followed by axillary surgery ± immediate LVA from October 2021 to 2022. The evolution of the surgical approach is described. Specifically, patients who downstaged to clinically negative nodes post-NAC were offered targeted SLNB with dual-tracer and intraoperative frozen section (FS). Patients were reminded that the standard of care for any node positive is cALND. Immediate cALND with LVA was performed for grossly positive nodes or all positive SLNs; cALND was omitted for those with negative SLNs. For a microscopic disease on a frozen section, a shared decision was made pre-operatively, given each patient’s differing valuations of the benefit and risks of cALND ± LVA versus no cALND with planned regional radiation postoperatively. LVA was offered as an option as part of our institutional evaluation of the procedure. Results: A total of 15 patients were included; the mean age was 49.9 (range 32–75) with stage IIA to IIIB breast cancer. Of these, 6 (40%) were triple negative, 5 (33.3%) HER-2 positive, and 4 (26.7%) ER/PR+ HER-2 negative. There were 13 women (86.7%) who had persistent axillary adenopathy based on clinical and/or ultrasound assessment, with 8 patients proceeding directly to ALND with LVA. Among these patients, 3 (37.5%) had pathologic nodal disease, and 5 (62.5%) were node negative, confirming the limitations of pre-operative imaging. As a result, the subsequent 7 (46.7%) underwent targeted SLNB with FS, with 3 patients (42.9%) avoiding an ALND as a result of a negative FS. A total of 4 patients (57.1%) had 1 or more positive lymph nodes on FS: 3 proceeded with a cALND and LVA, and 1 patient (14.2%) opted for no cALND based on a pre-operative discussion and received adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. Of the 11 patients who underwent ALND and LVA, 1 patient (9.1%) developed lymphedema at 6.9 months following their surgery. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of pre-operative US were 46.7%, 85.7%, and 12.5% and intraoperative FS were 88.0%, 72.7%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: As adjuvant nodal radiation and systemic therapy continue to improve, the benefit of a cALND in patients with the limited residual disease remains unclear as we await the outcomes from clinical trials. In the era of clinical uncertainty, we propose a nuanced approach to the axilla by utilizing a shared decision model with patients, incorporating targeted SLNB with FS and completion node dissection when required and desired by the patient, coupled with LVA in a simple stepwise treatment pathway.

Impact of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Upper Limb Morbidity in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) on upper limb (UL) morbidity in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND

Axillary de-escalation is motivated by a desire to reduce harm of ALND. Understanding the impact of axillary surgery and disparities in operative procedures on postoperative arm morbidity would better direct resources to the point of need and cement the need for de-escalation strategies.

METHODS

Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched from 1990 until March 2020. Included studies were randomized-controlled and observational studies focusing on UL morbidities, in breast surgery patients. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The prevalence of UL morbidity comparing SLNB and ALND at <12 months, 12 to 24 months, and beyond 24 months were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies were included. All studies reported a higher rate of lymphedema and pain after ALND compared with SLNB. The difference in lymphedema and pain prevalence between SLNB and ALND was 13.7% (95% confidence interval: 10.5-16.8, P <0.005) and 24.2% (95% confidence interval: 12.1-36.3, P <0.005), respectively. Pooled estimates for prevalence of reduced strength and range of motion after SLNB and ALND were 15.2% versus 30.9% and 17.1% versus 29.8%, respectively. Type of axillary surgery, greater body mass index, and radiotherapy were some of the predictors for UL morbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of lymphedema after ALND was higher than previously estimated. ALND patients experienced greater rates of lymphedema, pain, reduced strength, and range of motion compared with SLNB. The findings support the continued drive to de-escalate axillary surgery.

Patient education for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim was to identify the impact of the (a) components of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) educational content, (b) modes of education, and (c) timing of education on arm volume, quality of life, function, complications associated with BCRL, adherence to interventions, and knowledge acquisition in individuals diagnosed with breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

This review followed the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42021253084). Databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus from January 2010 to December 2021. Study quality and bias were assessed using the American Physical Therapy Association's Critical Appraisal Tool for Experimental Intervention Studies.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were eligible, and 15 met the inclusion criteria (4 acceptable and 11 low quality). This review was unable to determine the optimal content, mode, and timing for BCRL education across survivorship. Content included a brief overview of BCRL, early signs and symptoms, risk reduction practices, and a point of contact. Delivery was multi-modal, and knowledge acquisition was rarely assessed. Education was provided pre/post operatively and after BCRL developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualized BCRL education via a multi-modal approach, repeated at multiple time points, and assessment of survivors' knowledge acquisition is recommended. Consideration of the survivors' phase of treatment, content volume, and time required to complete the program is advised when developing the educational intervention.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Survivors of BC may need to advocate for BCRL education based on their individual risk and needs, request a point of contact for questions/follow up, and express their preferred style of learning.

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Upper Limb Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire in breast cancer-related lymphedema patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to translate and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Upper Limb Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (C-ULLQoL).

METHODS

Eighty-five participants completed the C-ULLQoL and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (C-FACT-B). The Cronbach's alpha (α) was used to determine the internal consistency, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) - to evaluate the test-retest reliability. The content validity index (CVI) was assessed by a group of experts. Construct validity was examined by performing factor analysis and criterion validity by observing the correlations between C-ULLQoL with C-FACT-B.

RESULTS

Cronbach's α of the total scale was 0.930. ICC scores ranged from 0.874 to 0.938. The content validity of C-ULLQoL was acceptable. Two factors (65.488% of the variance) were extracted by exploratory factor analysis. A significant correlation was observed between C-ULLQoL and C-FACT-B (r = -0.611, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The C-ULLQoL is a reliable and valid questionnaire that can be used in clinic and scientific practice for evaluating health-related quality of life in Chinese patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONAn effective and comprehensive scale to measure the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is essential because breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) leads to various complications for patients, caregivers, and society.The Chinese version of the Upper Limb Lymphedema Quality of Life Scale (C-ULLQoL) is a valid, reliable, and practical instrument to comprehensively assess HRQoL in Chinese patients with BCRL.The C-ULLQoL can be used in both clinical and research settings to evaluate HRQoL of BCRL patients in China.

Surgical-site infection is associated with increased risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgical-site infection (SSI) is one of the most common short-term complications following breast cancer treatment and can inhibit lymphatic drainage. It is currently not known whether SSI increases the risk of long-term breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Thus, the objective of this study was to examine the association between surgical-site infection and the risk of BCRL METHODS: This nationwide study identified all patients treated for unilateral, primary invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer in Denmark between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016 (n = 37,937). A redemption of antibiotics after breast cancer treatment was used as a disease proxy for SSI, included as a time-varying exposure. The risk of BCRL was analyzed up to 3 years after breast cancer treatment using multivariate Cox regression and adjusted for cancer treatment, demographics, comorbidities, and socioeconomic variables.

RESULTS

There were 10,368 (27.33%) patients with a SSI and 27,569 (72.67%) without a SSI (incidence rate per 100 patients, 33.10 (95%CI, 32.47-33.75). The BCRL incidence rate per 100 person-years for patients with SSI was 6.72 (95%CI: 6.41-7.05) and 4.86 (95%CI: 4.70-5.02) for patients without an SSI. There was an overall significant increased risk of BCRL in patients with an SSI (adjusted HR, 1.11; 95%CI: 1.04-1.17), with the highest risk 3 years after breast cancer treatment (adjusted HR, 1.28; 95%CI: 1.08-1.51) CONCLUSION: This large nationwide cohort study showed that SSI was associated with an overall 10% increased risk of BCRL. These findings may be used to identify patients at high risk of BCRL that would benefit from enhanced BCRL surveillance.

Rate of Incidental Edema in the Contralateral Arm of Patients with Unilateral Postsurgical Secondary Upper Extremity Lymphedema

Background: Secondary upper extremity lymphedema occurs after an insult such as surgery. One theory suggests underlying lymphatic dysfunction predisposing certain patients into developing secondary lymphedema. We aim to determine the rate of incidental edema in the contralateral upper extremity of patients with secondary unilateral lymphedema. Methods and Results: MRI of the upper extremities were obtained in patients with lymphedema who were referred by a lymphedema clinic from 2017 to 2019. Axial short-tau inversion recovery MR images of the symptomatic and contralateral arms were retrospectively reviewed and edema severity was graded. Interobserver agreement was calculated. Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography was compared against MRI stage in symptomatic and contralateral. Age, symptom duration, body mass index (BMI), and history of chemotherapy were compared between patients with and without contralateral limb lymphedema. ICG severity was compared against MRI stage. Seventy-eight patients were analyzed. The MRI stages of symptomatic versus contralateral arms were 1.7 ± 1.1 versus 0.1 ± 0.4 (p < 0.00001). Interobserver agreement was 0.86 (0.79-0.94). Of the patients with MRI Stage 1 or above in the symptomatic arm (n = 64), 55 (82.1%) patients demonstrated no abnormality in the contralateral arm. Nine patients (14.1%) demonstrated asymptomatic edema (MRI Stage 1). The mean ICG lymphography stage of symptomatic versus contralateral arms was 1.83 ± 0.96 versus 0.04 ± 0.25 (p < 0.00001). There was no difference in the age, symptom duration, BMI, or history of chemotherapy between patients with or without edema in the contralateral arm. Conclusion: Asymptomatic contralateral edema was detected in 14.1% of patients with unilateral secondary upper extremity lymphedema using MRI modality.

Prospective, early longitudinal assessment of lymphedema-related quality of life among patients with locally advanced breast cancer: The foundation for building a patient-centered screening program

BACKGROUND

We examined how breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) affects health-related quality of life (HRQOL), productivity, and compliance with therapeutic interventions to guide structuring BCRL screening programs.

METHODS

We prospectively followed consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with arm volume screening and measures assessing patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and perceptions of BCRL care. Comparisons by BCRL status were made with Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, Fisher's exact, or t tests. Trends over time from ALND were assessed with linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 8 months in 247 patients, 46% self-reported ever having BCRL, a proportion that increased over time. About 73% reported fear of BCRL, which was stable over time. Further in time from ALND, patients were more likely to report that BCRL screening reduced fear. Patient-reported BCRL was associated with higher soft tissue sensation intensity, biobehavioral, and resource concerns, absenteeism, and work/activity impairment. Objectively measured BCRL had fewer associations with outcomes. Most patients reported performing prevention exercises, but compliance decreased over time; patient-reported BCRL was not associated with exercise frequency. Fear of BCRL was positively associated with performing prevention exercises and using compressive garments.

CONCLUSIONS

Both incidence and fear of BCRL were high after ALND for breast cancer. Fear was associated with improved therapeutic compliance, but compliance decreased over time. Patient-reported BCRL was more strongly associated with worse HRQOL and productivity than was objective BCRL. Screening programs must support patients' psychological needs and aim to sustain long-term compliance with recommended interventions.

Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes During Breast Cancer Surgery: A Literature Overview

Introduction. Detecting metastases is an important part of successful breast cancer treatment. Usually, the tumor tissue first spreads to the sentinel lymph nodes. Removal of the latter during surgery and histological examination allows to assess the patient’s di­sease stage, prognosis and treatment. The literature provides more than one approach or a combination of them, allowing us to accurately identify the breast’s sentinel lymph nodes and avoid removing all axillary lymph nodes. Purpose. To review the methods of intraoperative detection of breast sentinel lymph nodes presented in the literature. Research material and methods. Publications were searched using the specialized information search system Google Scholar. Keywords used in the search: breast sentinel lymph nodes, intraoperative detection. After evaluating the exclusion criteria, the review was based on 25 scientific publications. Results. 4 individual measures and 2 combinations of them can be used to detect sentinel breast lymph nodes during surgery. The materials used can be injected in 6 different ways. Conclusions. The combination of technetium-99m radiocolloid and methylene blue can be evaluated as the best method for intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. On the other hand, due to radiation and operating costs, more attention is being paid to the use of indocyanine green, superparamagnetic iron oxide, methylene blue dye, and the detection of metastases without surgery. Superficial methods of injecting the substance should be combined with deep ones due to the possibility of detecting extra-axillary sentinel lymph nodes of the breast. Ultimately, all decisions must be made on a case-by-case basis.

Evaluating telehealth for the education and monitoring of lymphoedema and shoulder dysfunction after breast cancer surgery

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to compare the attendance rates at a group lymphoedema education and same-day individual surveillance appointment between telehealth (TH) and in-person (IP) care for participants following breast cancer (BC) surgery. Secondary aims included evaluating participant satisfaction and costs between the two service models, while also determining the extent of technical issues and clinician satisfaction towards TH.

METHODS

Participants following axillary lymph node dissection surgery attended a group lymphoedema education and same-day 1:1 monitoring session via their preferred mode (TH or IP). Attendance rates, satisfaction and costs were recorded for both cohorts, and technical disruption and clinician satisfaction for the TH cohort.

RESULTS

Fifty-five individuals participated. All 28 participants who nominated the IP intervention attended, while 22/27 who nominated the TH intervention attended an appointment. Overall reported participant experience was positive with no significant differences between cohorts. All TH appointments were successfully completed. Clinicians reported high satisfaction for delivery of education (median = 4[IQR 4-5]) and individual assessment (median = 4[IQR 3-4]) via TH. Median attendance costs per participant were Australian $39.68 (Q1-Q3 $28.52-$68.64) for TH and Australian $154.26 (Q1-Q3 $81.89-$251.48) for the IP cohort.

CONCLUSION

Telehealth-delivered lymphoedema education and assessment for individuals following BC surgery was associated with favourable satisfaction, cost savings and minimal technical issues despite lower attendance than IP care. This study contributes to the growing evidence for TH and its potential applicability to other populations where risk for cancer-related lymphoedema exists.

The Development of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema After Mastectomy in a Rural Population

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a lifelong condition that can impact the quality of life, affecting approximately 20% of breast cancer patients. Risk factors for the development of BCRL after mastectomy in rural populations have not been studied.Retrospective review of mastectomy patients from 2017 to 2021 was performed at a single institution. Statistical analysis included logistic and linear regression models.475 patients were included, and 40 (8.4%) patients were diagnosed with BCRL. Increased odds of developing BCRL were significantly associated with tumor-involved lymph nodes, radiation therapy, axillary lymphadenectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy. Postmastectomy reconstruction significantly reduced the odds of developing BCRL. There was no significant association in our population with age, body mass index, diabetes, tobacco use, cancer type, or complications.This study demonstrates that individuals underrepresented in the literature, such as patients in largely rural communities, have some differences in risk factors for developing BCRL when compared to national studies.

Early Disturbance of Lymphatic Transport as a Risk Factor for the Development of Breast-Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Introduction: Breast-cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a frequently occurring and debilitating condition. When lymphedema is diagnosed late, treatment can be expected to be less effective. Lymphofluoroscopy can provide details about the superficial lymphatic architecture and can detect an early disturbance of lymphatic transport (i.e., dermal backflow) before the lymphedema is clinically visible. The main objective of this study is to investigate whether this early disturbance of lymphatic transport visualized by lymphofluoroscopy is a risk factor for the development of BCRL. Methodology: All patients scheduled for unilateral breast cancer surgery with axillary lymph node dissection or sentinel node biopsy were considered. Patients were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months postoperatively. During each visit, a clinical assessment was performed to determine the volume difference between both arms and hands (through circumference measurements and water displacement). Clinical BCRL was defined as a ≥5% increase in relative arm volume difference compared to the baseline value. Variables related to (1) the disturbance of lymphatic transport (through lymphofluoroscopy), (2) the demographics and general health of the patient and (3) the breast cancer and treatment of the patient were collected. Results: We included data of 118 patients in the present study. Thirty-eight patients (39.8%) developed BCRL. Early disturbance of lymphatic transport was identified as a risk factor for the development of clinical BCRL (HR 2.808). Breast-cancer- and treatment-related variables such as axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (HR 15.127), tumor stage (HR 1.745), mastectomy (HR 0.186), number of positive lymph nodes (HR 1.121), number of removed lymph nodes (HR 1.055), radiotherapy of the axilla (HR 2.715), adjuvant taxanes (HR 3.220) and postsurgical complications (HR 2.590) were identified as significant risk factors for the development of BCRL. In the multivariate analysis, age and ALND were withheld as independent risk factors for the development of BCRL. Conclusion: Lymphofluoroscopy can identify an early disturbance of lymphatic transport after breast cancer treatment. Patients with an early disturbance of lymphatic transport are considered to be a high-risk group for the development of BCRL. This study also confirms that age and ALND are predictors for the development of BCRL. Therefore, a surveillance program of these patients with lymphofluoroscopy could be useful to identify lymphedema in subclinical stages.

The effect of combined risk factors on breast cancer-related lymphedema: a study using decision trees

BACKGROUND

The effect of combined risk factors on breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) development has not yet been investigated. This study aimed to determine the combination of risk factors associated with BCRL development in patients who underwent breast cancer resection, including axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

METHODS

The participants included 129 women who were diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer and underwent breast cancer resection in this retrospective observational study. We performed a decision tree analysis to detect the combination of risk factors associated with BCRL development using age, body mass index (BMI), surgical side, mastectomy, the extent of ALND, and adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and radiation therapy).

RESULTS

Of the 129 participants, 11 (8.5%) developed BCRL. Postoperative chemotherapy was the optimal variable selected to classify patients who developed BCRL and those who did not. In participants with postoperative chemotherapy, the extent of ALND was selected as the second layer of the decision tree. When ALND was at level 3, BMI was selected as the third layer. We found that BCRL incidence was 44.4% in individuals with a BMI of 23.0 or higher.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of postoperative chemotherapy, level 3 ALND, and BMI of 23.0 or higher may further increase the risk of developing BCRL. The decision tree model will enable the identification of patients with a high risk of developing BCRL, and thus, preventive intervention, careful monitoring, and early treatment will be possible.

Comorbidities and their management in women with breast cancer-an Australian survey of breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Breast cancer survivors experience significant burden from comorbid chronic conditions, but little is known about how well these conditions are managed. We conducted a national survey of Australian breast cancer survivors to examine the burden of chronic conditions, their impact and care alignment with the principles of chronic condition management.

METHODS

A study-specific survey incorporated questions about chronic conditions using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), functional status using the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES) and perceived quality of care for cancer and non-cancer conditions using the Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions Survey (PACIC). Members of Breast Cancer Network Australia (BCNA) were invited via email to complete the survey either online or through direct mail.

RESULTS

The survey was sent to 2198 BCNA members and 177 responses were received (8.1%). Respondents were women aged 32-88 years (median 60.1 years). The majority were married (116; 67.7%) and had private insurance (137; 80.0%) and reported good to excellent health (119; 73.5%). Other health conditions were reported by 157 (88.7%), the most common being chronic pain (27.1%) and fatigue (22.0%). When asked about management of comorbidities or cancer, less than 20% were routinely asked about management goals, helped to set goals or asked about health habits.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population of survivors with good health status and high rates of private insurance, comorbidities were common and their management, as well as management of breast cancer, was poorly aligned with chronic condition management principles.

Population-Level Impact of Omitting Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Early Breast Cancer Women: Evidence from an Economic Evaluation in Germany

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial showed that complete axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) did not improve survival benefits in patients with one or two tumour-involved sentinel lymph nodes and undergoing breast conservation. Still, a considerable number of the Z0011-eligible patients continue to be treated with cALND in various countries. Given the potential economic gain from implementation of the Z0011 recommendations, we quantified population-level impacts of omitting cALND among Z0011-eligible patients in clinical practice.

METHODS

This 2-year economic analysis adopted both the perspective of patients under statutory insurance and the societal perspective, using data collected prospectively from 179 German breast cancer units between 2008 and 2015. The estimation of cost savings and health gain relied on a single decision tree, which considered three scenarios: clinical practice at the baseline; actual implementation in routine care; and hypothetical full implementation in all eligible patients.

RESULTS

Data for 188,909 patients with primary breast cancer were available, 13,741 (7.3%) of whom met the Z0011 inclusion criteria. The use of cALND decreased from 94.3% in 2010 to 46.9% in 2015, resulting in a gain of 335 quality-adjusted life-years and a saving of EUR50,334,756 for the society. Had cALND been omitted in all eligible patients, the total gain would have been more than double.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of the Z0011 recommendations resulted in substantial savings and health gain in Germany. Our findings suggest that it is beneficial to introduce additional policy measures to promote further uptake of the Z0011 recommendations in clinical practice.

Bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema before and after lymphaticovenular anastomosis

OBJECTIVE

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) as a measure of lymphedema has been gaining popularity because of its measurement simplicity and noninvasiveness. This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of BIA for assessment of the outcomes of lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema.

METHODS

This study involved 25 patients with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema who underwent LVA. Segmental multifrequency BIA and conventional circumferential volume measurement were performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively from June 2018 to June 2021 at Hiroshima University Hospital International Center for Lymphedema. The patients' clinicopathological data, operative details, and preoperative and postoperative BIA results were investigated.

RESULTS

Segmental multifrequency BIA and circumferential volume measurement were strongly correlated in the lymphedema-affected upper limb both before and after LVA. The interlimb volume, interlimb extracellular water ratio (r = 0.784; P < .001), and interlimb extracellular water/total body water ratio were positively correlated (r = 0.612; P < .01), whereas the phase angle was negatively associated (r = -0.556; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Segmental multifrequency BIA can be a useful tool for assessing the severity of lymphedema and monitoring the outcomes of LVA.

A comparative study between deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction and DIEP flap breast reconstruction coupled with vascularized lymph node transfer: Improving the quality of life of patients with breast cancer related lymphedema without affecting donor site outcomes

BACKGROUND

Despite simultaneous microvascular breast reconstruction (MBR) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) gaining wide popularity as a potential treatment for breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL), there is a lack of evidence supporting the procedure. There are few reports in the literature, and no study has compared simple deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) to simultaneous DIEP flap and VLNT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of our series of DIEP flaps was conducted. Patients presenting with BCRL who had delayed MBR and simultaneous VLNT were selected. Thirty-two patients were included and compared with a control group of delayed MBR with DIEP flap alone. Clinical evaluation, circumference reduction rate, and LYMQOL questionnaire were used to compare preoperative and postoperative findings in the study group. A digital version of BREAST Q questionnaire was administered to all patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study group, with a mean follow-up of 42.5 ± 25.7 months and mean age of 54.1 ± 7.8 years. The mean circumference reduction rate was 46.1 ± 52.3, 39 ± 42.3, 47.5 ± 53.5, 39.2 ± 52.4, 33.6 ± 50.1 at the deltoid insertion, above the elbow, below the elbow, at the mid-forearm and wrist respectively. Postoperative LYMQOL scores significantly improved (function 1.21, appearance 1.15, symptoms 1.34, mood 1.33, overall QOLscore 8.6) from preoperative baseline (p < .001). There was no significant difference in term of outcomes and complications rate of the donor site between the study and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous DIEPandVLNT improves the HRQOL of patients with lymphedema. Coupling VLNT with abdominal flap does not increase the morbidity of donor site.

Prevention of lymphoedema after axillary clearance by external compression sleeves PLACE randomised trial results. Effects of high BMI

Around 25% of women undergoing Axillary Clearance (ANC) develop lymphedema (LE). Intervention with a compression garment is recommended to prevent LE but no randomised evidence exists to support this strategy.

METHODS

A randomised trial tested standard management versus application of graduated compression garments (20-24 mmHg) to affected arm, for 1 year. Women with node positive breast cancer (n = 1300) undergoing ANC consented to arm volume measurements and those developing a 4-9% relative arm volume increase (RAVI) (subclinical LE) within 9 months post-surgery were randomised. Primary outcome was proportion of patients developing LE (RAVI > 10%) by 24-months in each group. Secondary endpoints included Quality of life in each group.

RESULTS

In total 143 patients were randomised (74 no sleeve: 69 compression sleeve) between October 2010 and November 2015. The lymphoedema rate at 24 months in the 'no sleeve' group was at 41%, similar to the 'sleeve' group (30%: p = 0.32). Thirtytwo patients randomised to the 'no sleeve' group had a sleeve applied within 24 months. Body Mass Index (BMI) at randomisation predicted LE at any time point HR 1.04 (CI 1.01-1.08; p = 0.01). Patients with obesity (BMI > 30) had higher rates of LE in both groups (46%) compared to those with BMI < 30 (24%). No difference between patients was found in either group in changes in QoL. Compression sleeves applied after development of LE improved QoL scores (FACT-B p = 0.007:TOI p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

Early intervention with External Compression garments does not prevent clinical LE, particularly in women with a high BMI > 30. The use of prophylactic garments in subclinical LE (RAVI < 9%) is unwarranted.

Risk prediction models for breast cancer-related lymphedema: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To review and critically evaluate currently available risk prediction models for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, SinoMed, WangFang Data, VIP Database were searched from inception to April 1, 2022, and updated on November 8, 2022. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. Meta-analysis of AUC values of model external validations was performed using Stata 17.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included, reporting twenty-two prediction models, with the AUC or C-index ranging from 0.601 to 0.965. Only two models were externally validated, with the pooled AUC of 0.70 (n = 3, 95%CI: 0.67 to 0.74), and 0.80 (n = 3, 95%CI: 0.75 to 0.86), respectively. Most models were developed using classical regression methods, with two studies using machine learning. Predictors most frequently used in included models were radiotherapy, body mass index before surgery, number of lymph nodes dissected, and chemotherapy. All studies were judged as high overall risk of bias and poorly reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Current models for predicting BCRL showed moderate to good predictive performance. However, all models were at high risk of bias and poorly reported, and their performance is probably optimistic. None of these models is suitable for recommendation in clinical practice. Future research should focus on validating, optimizing, or developing new models in well-designed and reported studies, following the methodology guidance and reporting guidelines.

Breast cancer radiation therapy: A bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature

Background and purpose

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and radiation therapy (RT) is crucial in its multimodality management. Since bibliometrics is a powerful tool to reveal the scientific literature, we decided to perform a bibliometric analysis of the literature on breast cancer radiotherapy. We explored emerging trends and common patterns in research, tracking collaboration and networks, and foreseeing future directions in this clinical setting.

Material and methods

The electronic Scopus database was searched using the keywords "breast cancer" and "radiotherapy" to include manuscripts published in English, between 2000 and 2021. Data analysis was performed using R-Studio 0.98.1091 software with a machine-learning bibliometric method, based on the bibliometrix R package. The most relevant authors were quantified per number and fractionalized number of authored documents. Author productivity was analysed through Lotka's law. Bradford's law was applied to identify the nucleus of journals focused on the addressed topic. Mainstream themes area included isolated topics (niche themes), new topics (emerging themes), hot topics (motor themes) and essential topics (basic themes).

Results

A total of 27 184 documents was found, mainly original articles (76 %). The annual growth rate was 6.98 %, with an increase in scientific production from 485 to 2000 documents between 2000 and 2021. Overall, 2 544 journals published ≥ 1 documents. The most relevant authors were affiliated in the United States. Surgical procedures, cancer type and treatment strategies represented basic themes, while primary systemic therapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy were emerging themes. Health-related quality of life was a niche theme, while RT techniques had high centrality.

Conclusion

The primary interests of breast cancer radiation oncologists have evolved over time, adding safety, health related quality of life, sustainability of treatments and combination to systemic therapies to radiotherapy efficacy and effectiveness and treatment outcomes.

The Effectiveness of Fluoroscopy-Guided Manual Lymph Drainage as Part of Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy on the Superficial Lymphatic Architecture in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphoedema: A Randomised Controlled Trial

The objective of this trial was to investigate the effectiveness of fluoroscopy-guided manual lymph drainage (MLD), as part of decongestive lymphatic therapy (DLT), on the superficial lymphatic architecture in patients with chronic mild to moderate breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL). This trial was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial involving 194 participants with BCRL. Participants were randomised into (1) DLT with fluoroscopy-guided MLD (intervention group), (2) DLT with traditional MLD (control group), or (3) DLT with placebo MLD (placebo group). Superficial lymphatic architecture was evaluated as a secondary outcome, visualised by ICG lymphofluoroscopy at the baseline (B0), post-intensive (P), and post-maintenance phases (P6). Variables were (1) number of efferent superficial lymphatic vessels leaving the dermal backflow region, (2) total dermal backflow score, and (3) number of superficial lymph nodes. The traditional MLD group showed a significant decrease in the number of efferent superficial lymphatic vessels at P (p = 0.026), and of the total dermal backflow score at P6 (p = 0.042). The fluoroscopy-guided MLD and placebo group showed significant decreases in the total dermal backflow score at P (p < 0.001 and p = 0.044, respectively) and at P6 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively); the placebo MLD group showed a significant decrease in the total number of lymph nodes at P (p = 0.008). However, there were no significant between-group differences for the changes in these variables. In conclusion, based on lymphatic architecture outcomes, the added value of MLD, in addition to the other parts of DLT, could not be demonstrated in patients with chronic mild to moderate BCRL.

The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on skin biophysical properties in patients with breast cancer at risk for breast lymphedema: A prospective study

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer among women. Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the main and primary treatment options for BC, especially in breast-conserving surgery (BCS). BC patients who underwent RT experience a wide range of symptoms, in which breast oedema and irritation of the skin take the lion's share. Breast oedema/lymphedema, which is also a prominent side effect after RT should be well determined in earlier settings due to the chronicity of lymphedema. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the biophysical parameters of skin on the ipsilateral (IL) and contralateral (CL) sites via Tissue dielectric constant (TDC) and Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) methods in terms of oedema and skin barrier function (SBF). The following reference points before and after the RT were measured: (R1: Pectoralis muscle, R2: Upper breast, R3: Lower breast, R4: Lateral site of the thorax). A total of 24 BC patients (mean age and BMI: 52.78 ± 9.85 years and 28.42 ± 5.64 kg/m² ) were evaluated. In the IL site, the SBF was not found significant in R1-R3, whereas significantly lower SBF was observed in R4 after RT (t = -3.361, p = 0.003). A significant increase in TDC was observed in R2 at the 5.0 mm depth (t = -2.500, p = 0.02). We suggest that a longer period of follow-up should be carefully carried out to track changes in terms of SBF and oedema in the irradiated breast. The increased need for early detection of changes associated with breast lymphedema can be achievable via noninvasive, safe, cheap, and easily repeatable devices.

Recent Advances in Optimizing Radiation Therapy Decisions in Early Invasive Breast Cancer

Adjuvant whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery is a well-established treatment standard for early invasive breast cancer. Screening, early diagnosis, refinement in surgical techniques, the knowledge of new and specific molecular prognostic factors, and now the standard use of more effective neo/adjuvant systemic therapies have proven instrumental in reducing the rates of locoregional relapses. This underscores the need for reliably identifying women with such low-risk disease burdens in whom elimination of radiation from the treatment plan would not compromise oncological safety. This review summarizes the current evidence for radiation de-intensification strategies and details ongoing prospective clinical trials investigating the omission of adjuvant whole breast irradiation in molecularly defined low-risk breast cancers and related evidence supporting the potential for radiation de-escalation in HER2+ and triple-negative clinical subtypes. Furthermore, we discuss the current evidence for the de-escalation of regional nodal irradiation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, we also detail the current knowledge of the clinical value of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and liquid-based biomarkers as prognostic factors for locoregional relapse.

Long-term survival in patients with node-positive breast cancer who undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with breast cancer who are initially node-positive but convert to clinically/radiologically node-negative remains controversial. The primary aim was to assess pooled 5-year disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival for patients who are initially node-positive but have a negative SLNB after NACT, and do not proceed to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

METHODS

The study was performed using PRISMA guidelines. A systematic literature search of relevant databases was conducted. The Der Simonian-Laird and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel methods were used to calculate weighted pooled estimates for OS and DFS for this group compared with patients who had NACT and proceeded to ALND after a negative or positive SLNB.

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 915 patients who had a negative SLNB after NACT were included. Pooled estimates of 5-year DFS and OS in patients with a negative SLNB after NACT were 86 (95 per cent c.i. 82.1 to 90.3) and 93.1 (87.8 to 97.0) per cent respectively. Patients with a positive SLNB who underwent ALND had reduced 5-year DFS (OR 0.49, 95 per cent c.i. 0.35 to 0.69; P < 0.001) and OS (OR 0.41, 0.16 to 1.02; P = 0.06) compared with those who had a negative SLNB after NACT. There were no differences in DFS for patients who had a negative SLNB only compared with those undergoing ALND with a pCR (OR 1.65, 0.71 to 3.79; P = 0.24).

CONCLUSION

Patients who are initially node-positive and who achieve a complete clinical/radiological axillary response after NACT with a subsequent negative SLNB have high rates of DFS and OS after 5 years. Patients with residual disease have significantly reduced DFS and further axillary treatment may still be warranted.

Effect of Probiotics in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Probiotics may have the potential to protect against breast cancer, partly through systemic immunomodulatory action and active impact upon intestinal microbiota. Given a few clinical studies on their curative role, we conducted a systematic review of the potential effects of probiotics in breast cancer patients and survivors of breast cancer, aiming to support further clinical studies. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the CENTRAL databases from inception through to March 2022. A total of eight randomized clinical trials were identified from thirteen articles published between 2004 and 2022. We evaluated quality-of-life measures, observed bacterial species and diversity indices, probiotic-related metabolites, inflammatory biomarkers, and other responses in breast cancer patients and survivors. Results were synthesized qualitatively and quantitatively using random-effects meta-analysis. Different probiotics supplements utilized included Lactobacillus species alone (Lacto), with or without estriol; probiotic combinations of Lactobacillus with Bifidobacterium (ProLB), with or without prebiotic fructooligosaccharides (FOS); ProLB plus Streptococcus and FOS (ProLBS + FOS); and ProLB plus Enterococcus (ProLBE). We found that use of ProLBS with FOS in breast cancer patients and use of ProLBE in survivors of breast cancer show potential benefits in countering obesity and dyslipidemia. ProLBS with FOS use decreases pro-inflammatory TNF-α in breast cancer survivors and improves quality of life in those with breast-cancer-associated lymphedema. Supplementing probiotics capsules (10⁹ CFU) with a prebiotic and using an intake duration of 10 weeks could provide a better approach than probiotics alone.

Development and Validation of a Normal Tissue Complication Probability Model for Lymphedema After Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To develop and test a multivariable normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model predicting lymphedema in patients with breast cancer receiving radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed 1345 patients with breast cancer who received radiation therapy from 2 independent institutions. The patients were divided into a training cohort (institution A, n = 368, all treated with 3-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy [RT] with 2 Gy/fraction) and an external validation cohort (institution B, n = 977, treated either with 3-dimensional conformal external beam RT or with volumetric modulated RT and either with 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction or with 2.67 Gy/fraction). Axillary-lateral thoracic vessel juncture (ALTJ) was delineated. The multivariable model was generated using dosimetric and clinical parameters. The performance of the model was comprehensively validated internally and externally.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 78.7 months for the entire cohort, 97 patients (7.2%) developed lymphedema. The multivariable model that took into account the number of lymph nodes dissected, as well as the volume of the ALTJ receiving a dose ≥35 Gy equivalent doses in 2-Gy fractions (ALTJ V35), showed good agreement between predicted and observed results for both internal and external validation (Hosmer-Lemeshow P value > .05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and negative log-likelihood values for the multivariable NTCP model were 0.89 and 0.19 in internal validation and 0.83 and 0.19 in external validation. In addition, the multivariable model performance was acceptable for hypofractionated regimens (AUC 0.70) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (AUC 0.69). The number of lymph nodes dissected and ALTJ V35 were found to be the most important factors influencing lymphedema after radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We first developed and validated the multivariable NTCP model for the lymphedema incidence in patients with breast cancer after radiation therapy. The multivariable NTCP model showed excellent performance and robustness in predicting lymphedema in both internal and completely independent external validations. The multivariable model for lymphedema prediction was robust and reliable for different treatment modalities and fractionation regimens.

Does Venipuncture Increase Lymphedema by Triggering Inflammation or Infection? An Experimental Rabbit Ear Lymphedema Model Study

Background: Recent guidelines recommend avoiding venipuncture to prevent lymphedema for breast cancer patients. This study investigated whether single or multiple sterile venipuncture procedures develop a systemic inflammation or infection and increase lymphedema in the rabbit ear lymphedema model. Methods and Results: Eighteen New Zealand white female rabbits were included. The right ear lymphedema model was created by surgical procedure; then, rabbits were divided into three randomized groups. Single and multiple venipuncture procedures were applied at least the 60th day after surgery for Group I and II, respectively. Group III was a control group. C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels were analyzed to determine inflammation and infection. Ear thickness measurements were applied using a vernier caliper to assess the differences in lymphedema between the ears. All rabbits were euthanized on the 90th day after surgery. Histopathological analysis was performed to evaluate lymphedema by measuring tissue thicknesses. Ear thickness measurements showed that ear lymphedema was developed and maintained with surgical operation in all groups (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the ear thickness measurements between and within-groups results (p > 0.05). CRP and PCT levels were below the lower detection levels in all groups. According to the differences of histopathological ear distances, there were significant differences within-groups for all groups (p < 0.05), and no differences were identified between groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: This experimental study demonstrated that single or multiple sterile venipuncture procedures did not trigger infection or inflammation and did not exacerbate ear lymphedema in the rabbit ear lymphedema model.

Adipose Tissue in Lymphedema: A Central Feature of Pathology and Target for Pharmacologic Therapy

Lymphedema is a chronic condition of impaired lymphatic flow that results in limb swelling and debilitation. The pathophysiology of lymphedema is characterized by lymphatic stasis that triggers inflammation, fibrosis, and adipose tissue deposition in the extremities. Most often, this condition occurs in cancer survivors in the years after treatment with combinations of surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy, with the major risk factor being lymph node dissection. Interestingly, obesity and body mass index are independent risk factors for development of lymphedema, suggesting interactions between adipose and lymphatic tissue biology. Currently, treatment of lymphedema involves palliative approaches, including compression garments and physical therapy, and surgical approaches, including liposuction, lymphovenous bypass, and vascularized lymph node transfer. Emerging lymphedema therapies that focus on weight loss or reducing inflammation have been tested in recent clinical trials, yielding mixed results with no effect on limb volumes or changes in bioimpedance measurements. These studies highlight the need for novel therapeutic strategies that target the driving forces of lymphedema. In this light, animal models of lymphedema demonstrate a role of adipose tissue in the progression of lymphedema and suggest these processes may be targeted in the treatment of lymphedema. Herein, we review both conventional and experimental therapies for lymphedema as well as the defining characteristics of its pathophysiology. We place emphasis on the aberrant fibroadipose tissue accumulation in lymphedema and propose a new approach to experimental treatment at the level of adipocyte metabolism.

Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach for the Primary Prevention of Lymphedema: A 4-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains the leading cause of lymphedema nationally, and there is still no cure for the disease. The lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA) is a promising option for lymphedema prophylaxis in patients undergoing ALND, but long-term outcomes of the LYMPHA are not well established.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing ALND at their center from November of 2012 to November of 2016 and assembled two cohorts, those who received the LYMPHA and those who did not (non-LYMPHA). Patient data were collected to evaluate lymphedema risk and long-term lymphedema incidence of each group.

RESULTS

Forty-five women were included in both our LYMPHA and non-LYMPHA cohorts. Mean body mass index (27.7 kg/m2 versus 29.9 kg/m2; P = 0.15) and radiation therapy rates (60.0% versus 68.9%; P = 0.51) did not differ between groups. Non-LYMPHA patients underwent complete mastectomy more frequently than LYMPHA patients (97.8% versus 77.8%; P = 0.007), but had a similar number of nodes removed during ALND (14.4 versus 15.8; P = 0.32). Median follow-up time was greater than 4 years for both LYMPHA and non-LYMPHA groups (57.0 months versus 63.0 months; P = 0.07). Overall, lymphedema incidence was 31.1% in the LYMPHA group and 33.3% in the non-LYMPHA group (P > 0.99). No significant differences in lymphedema incidences were observed between the LYMPHA and non-LYMPHA groups for patients with obesity, patients who received radiation therapy, or patients with obesity who also received radiation therapy (P > 0.05 for all subgroups).

CONCLUSIONS

The LYMPHA may not prevent lymphedema long-term in patients who undergo ALND. More long-term studies are needed to determine the true potential of the procedure.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Safety and Efficacy of a Mobiderm Compression Bandage During Intensive Phase of Decongestive Therapy in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) after primary therapy is a common condition, causing physical and psychological distress. Decongestive lymphedema therapy (DLT) using multi-layered compression bandages is an effective treatment. We conducted a randomized controlled trial evaluating the use of a specific mobilizing bandage (Mobiderm^®) on lymphedema volume reduction during the intensive phase of DLT. Methods and Results: Fifty female BCRL patients were randomized to receive either conventional multi-layered bandages or mobilizing bandaging by using Mobiderm. Affected limb volume and excess volume were evaluated at baseline (D0) and after 15 days. The primary outcome was change in affected limb volume after adjustment for baseline. Symptom scores were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS); safety and tolerability were also assessed. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Affected limb volume reduction was observed in both study groups after 15 days: by 19.0% in the Mobiderm arm and 8.6% in controls (adjusted values). The between-group mean difference in adjusted volume reduction at day 15 was 256 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.5 to 421.3 mL; p = 0.003) favoring Mobiderm. Reductions in excess volume of 57.3% (Mobiderm) and 25.1% (controls) were observed (adjusted values); with between-group mean difference in adjusted excess volume of 220.2 mL (95% CI, 69.3 to 371.3 mL; p = 0.006) favoring Mobiderm. Pain/heaviness VAS scores fell significantly in both groups, with mean reductions of 1.84 (Mobiderm) versus 0.83 (control; p = 0.001). Both regimens were well tolerated. Conclusion: The use of Mobiderm in multilayer compression bandaging shows benefit in lymphedema reduction and in alleviating functional symptoms/pain in patients with BRCL.

New Technology for the Breast Surgeon

New innovations aid the breast surgeon with better ability to localize tumors using wireless techniques, reduce re-excision rates by intraoperative margin evaluation and perform aesthetically; pleasing, and safe surgeries. In addition to improving oncological outcomes, we can continue to improve the quality of life for our patients through evolving surgeries including nerve-sparing mastectomies, robotic mastectomies, and lymphovascular surgeries (LYMPHA). Our article reviews current and evolving techniques and technology that all breast surgeons should add to his or her armamentarium to provide optimal surgical care.

Surgical lymphology. Therapy option for lymphoedema and lipohyperplasia dolorosa

The typical therapy in lymphology is conservative. However, reconstructive and resective treatments for primary and secondary lymphoedema as well as resective procedures for lipohyperplasia dolorosa (LiDo) "lipedema" have been available for several decades. Each of these procedures has its clear indication and decades of successful history. These therapies represent a paradigm shift in lymphology. In reconstruction, the basic idea is to restore lymph flow, to bypass the obstacle to drainage in the vascular system. The combination procedures of two-stage application of resection and reconstruction in lymphoedema are just as much a "work in progress" as the concept of prophylactic lymphatic venous anastomosis (LVA). In the case of resective procedures, the focus is not only on improving the silhouette, but also on reducing the complex decongestion therapy (CDT) and - in the case of LiDo - freedom from pain by improving imaging procedures and the early use of surgical therapy options, the development of higher stages of lymphoedema should be a thing of the past. For LiDo, the application of surgical procedures avoids lifelong CDT and achieves painlessness. All surgical procedures, but especially the resection procedures, are now possible in a way that is gentle on the lymphatic vessels and should be offered to patients with lymphoedema or lipohyperplasia dolorosa without reservation if the goals - reduction in circumference, avoidance of lifelong CDT and, in the case of LiDo, painlessness - cannot be achieved by other means.

Association between Immediate Breast Reconstruction and the Development of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

BACKGROUND

With the increasing number of patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy, the impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema has become an emerging area of interest. This study aimed to identify the association between immediate breast reconstruction and postoperative lymphedema.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2006 to 2016 with 5900 consecutive patients who underwent mastectomy for primary breast cancer with or without immediate breast reconstruction. After excluding patients with synchronous contralateral breast cancer, lymphedema before mastectomy, history of procedures performed in the axillary region, and follow-up data of less than 1 year, the cumulative incidence of lymphedema after immediate breast reconstruction and after no reconstruction was calculated and compared using multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 5497 patients (mean age, 51.7 years) were included, and 630 developed lymphedema. The 5-year cumulative incidence rate of lymphedema was significantly reduced in patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction versus control patients (9.6% versus 12.2%; P = 0.02). In the multivariate analysis, immediate breast reconstruction status (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.99; P = 0.042) was an independent predictor for lymphedema. Similar significant associations were observed in the subgroup analyses of patients with a body mass index less than 30 kg/m2 (P = 0.024), in those with fewer than 10 dissected lymph nodes (P = 0.042), or in those with adjuvant radiotherapy (P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate breast reconstruction was associated with a reduced risk of lymphedema. These results may be used for predicting the development of lymphedema following breast reconstruction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema With Topical Tacrolimus: A Prospective, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Pilot Trial

PURPOSE

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic, progressive side effect of breast cancer treatment, occurring in one-third of patients treated with axillary lymph node dissection and nodal radiotherapy. Cluster of differentiation 4-positive (CD4⁺) cells plays a key role in BCRL by facilitating inflammation and inhibiting lymphangiogenesis. Tacrolimus is an anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive macrolide that targets CD4⁺ cells. Treatment of lymphedema with topical tacrolimus has revealed promising results in preclinical trials. This clinical trial was aimed at evaluating the feasibility, safety, and effect of tacrolimus in women with stage I or II BCRL, according to the International Society of Lymphology.

METHODS

We conducted this open-label, single-arm, phase II pilot trial from September 2020 to April 2021. Eighteen women with BCRL stage I or II BCRL were treated with topical tacrolimus for 6 months and followed up at 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome was arm volume, and secondary outcomes were the lymphedema index (L-Dex), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), lymph flow and function, and safety and feasibility of the trial design.

RESULTS

The mean lymphedema arm volume and L-Dex reduced significantly by 130.44 ± 210.13 mL (p < 0.05; relative reduction: 3.6%) and 3.54 ± 4.98 (p < 0.05), respectively, and health-related quality of life scores was improved significantly (p < 0.05). According to the MD Anderson scale, in terms of lymph flow and function, three patients (16.7%) showed improvement, while none showed worsening. Lymph flow or function showed no change according to the Arm Dermal Backflow scale.

CONCLUSION

In this trial, treatment with tacrolimus was safe and feasible in women with stage I or II BCRL. Tacrolimus alleviated BCRL in terms of improved arm volume, L-Dex, and HRQoL. Assessments of lymph flow and function were positive, although inconclusive. Larger randomized controlled trials are required to verify these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04541290.

Exosomes and cancer immunotherapy: A review of recent cancer research

As phospholipid extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by various cells, exosomes contain non-coding RNA (ncRNA), mRNA, DNA fragments, lipids, and proteins, which are essential for intercellular communication. Several types of cells can secrete exosomes that contribute to cancer initiation and progression. Cancer cells and the immune microenvironment interact and restrict each other. Tumor-derived exosomes (TDEs) have become essential players in this balance because they carry information from the original cancer cells and express complexes of MHC class I/II epitopes and costimulatory molecules. In the present study, we aimed to identify potential targets for exosome therapy by examining the specific expression and mechanism of exosomes derived from cancer cells. We introduced TDEs and explored their role in different tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), with a particular emphasis on gastrointestinal cancers, before briefly describing the therapeutic strategies of exosomes in cancer immune-related therapy.

Algorithm-Based Risk Identification in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) could be one consequence of breast cancer (BC). Although several risk factors have been identified, a predictive algorithm still needs to be made available to determine the patient's risk from an ensemble of clinical variables. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize the risk of BCRL by investigating the characteristics of autogenerated clusters of patients. Methods: The dataset under analysis was a multi-centric data collection of twenty-three clinical features from patients undergoing axillary dissection for BC and presenting BCRL or not. The patients' variables were initially analyzed separately in two low-dimensional embeddings. Afterward, the two models were merged in a bi-dimensional prognostic map, with patients categorized into three clusters using a Gaussian mixture model. Results: The prognostic map represented the medical records of 294 women (mean age: 59.823±12.879 years) grouped into three clusters with a different proportion of subjects affected by BCRL (probability that a patient with BCRL belonged to Cluster A: 5.71%; Cluster B: 71.42%; Cluster C: 22.86%). The investigation evaluated intra- and inter-cluster factors and identified a subset of clinical variables meaningful in determining cluster membership and significantly associated with BCRL biological hazard. Conclusions: The results of this study provide potential insight for precise risk assessment of patients affected by BCRL, with implications in prevention strategies, for instance, focusing the resources on identifying patients at higher risk.

Effect of standardised surgical assessment and shared decision-making on morbidity and patient satisfaction after breast conserving therapy: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The role of oncoplastic breast conserving therapy (OPBCT) on physical function, morbidity and patient satisfaction has yet to be defined. Additionally, technique selection should be individualised and incorporate patient preference. The study aim was to investigate differences between "standard" (sBCT) and oncoplastic breast conservation (OPBCT) in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) when patients have been assessed in a standardised manner and technique selection has been reached through shared decision-making (SDM).

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study of 215 women treated at a tertiary referral centre. Standardised surgical assessment included breast and lesion volumetry, definition of resection ratio, patient-related risk factors and patient preference. Postoperative morbidity and patient satisfaction were assessed by validated PROs tools (Diseases of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-DASH and Breast-Q). Patient experience was assessed by semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

There was no difference of the median values between OPBCT and sBCT in postoperative morbidity of the upper extremity (DASH 3.3 vs 5, p = 0.656) or the function of the chest wall (Breast-Q 82 vs 82, p = 0.758). Postoperative satisfaction with breasts did not differ either (Breast-Q 65 vs 61, p = 0.702). On the individual level, women that opted for OPBCT after SDM had improved satisfaction when compared to baseline (+3 vs -1, p = 0.001). Shared decision-making changed patient attitude in 69.8% of patients, leading most often to de-escalation from mastectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support that a combination of standardised surgical assessment and SDM allows for tailored treatment and de-escalation of oncoplastic surgery without negatively affecting patient satisfaction and morbidity.

What do we know about treating breast-cancer-related lymphedema? Review of the current knowledge about therapeutic options

Breast-cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common consequence of oncological treatment. Its management is a complicated, chronic, and arduous process. Therapeutic options can be divided on non-surgical and surgical methods, although there is still no clear consensus about their effectiveness in preventing or stopping the disease. That brings problems in everyday practice, as there are no guidelines about proper time for starting therapy and no agreement about which management will be beneficial for each patient. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge about possible treatment choices, non-surgical so as surgical, indicate knowledge gaps, and try to direct pathways for future studies.

Risk factors for arm lymphedema following breast cancer surgery: a Japanese nationwide database study of 84,022 patients

BACKGROUND

Although arm lymphedema is a well-known complication following breast cancer surgery, previous studies involving a small population showed inconsistent results regarding the risk. Therefore, we examined the risk factors using a Japanese nationwide database.

METHODS

Female patients who underwent breast cancer surgery from April, 2016, to March, 2020, were identified from a Japanese nationwide database. Multivariable survival analyses for 19 baseline factors (12 patient characteristics, four tumor characteristics, and three surgical procedures) were conducted to investigate risk factors associated with treatments for postoperative lymphedema (such as lymphatic bypass, compositive drainage therapy, hospitalization, and Kampo use) with a multilevel model to adjust for within-hospital clustering. We also conducted multivariable analysis for five postoperative factors (two local complications and three postoperative therapies) with adjustment for 19 baseline factors.

RESULTS

The study included 84,022 patients; 1547 (1.8%) received treatments for lymphedema during a median follow-up of 119 weeks (interquartile range, 59-187 weeks). Young age, obesity, smoking, collagen diseases, advanced cancer stage, total mastectomy, axillary dissection, postoperative bleeding, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were identified as risk factors. Postoperative chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 3.78 [95% confidence interval, 3.35-4.26]) and axillary dissection (2.46 [1.95-3.11]) showed the highest odds ratio among the risk factors. The cumulative probabilities in high-risk patients reached approximately 3% at 1 year and 6% at 4 years after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified several risk factors for postoperative lymphedema in breast cancer surgery. The treatment initiation increased markedly within the first year and gradually after 1 year post-surgery.

Effects of esters' cetylated fatty acids taping for chronic neck pain with mobility deficit in patients with breast cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of a protocol treatment based on inelastic adhesive tape with cetylated fatty acids (CFAs) esters in breast cancer survivors with chronic neck pain.

METHODS

In this observational study, patients have been visited for chronic neck pain using numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain assessment, Neck Disability Index (NDI) for disability caused by neck pain, and range of movement (ROM) measures for cervical mobility. Scales have been performed at T0, after 15 days of treatment (T1) and successively after 15 days of stop treatment (T2). Patients have been treated with an inelastic adhesive tape with CFA esters (Cetilar® Tape, Pharmanutra Spa, Italy) positioned, 8 h/day for 15 days, on specific anatomic sites (upper trapezius, paravertebral cervical muscles, sub-occipitals, and/or levator scapulae muscles).

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were included in the study. A statistically significant reduction in pain has been reported from T0 to T1 and maintained at T2 (p < 0.05); a statistically significant improvement in the mobility of the cervical spine, as evidenced by ROMs, and in disability, as resulted by Neck Disability Index, have been reported from T0 to T1 and maintained at T2; moreover, ROM at T0 correlates inversely and statistically significantly with NRS and all NDI variables at T0, similarly at T1 and T2 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CFA ester taping is a simple, effective, and side-effect-free treatment in order to reduce pain and improve cervical mobility in breast cancer survivors with chronic neck pain.

Identification of lymph vessels using an indocyanine green camera-integrated operative microscope for lymphovenous anastomosis in the treatment of secondary lymphedema

OBJECTIVE

Lymphedema is a debilitating disease that impairs a patient's quality of life. Although lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) can cure lymphedema, successful LVAs rely on the precise identification of the lymph vessels. In the present study, we assessed the use of a near-infrared camera-integrated operating microscope for preoperative mapping of the lymphatic vessels and evaluated the outcome of LVAs in patients with secondary lymphedema of a limb.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with secondary unilateral lymphedema who had undergone LVA surgery with the lymph vessels identified using a near-infrared camera-integrated operating microscope (Moller 3-1000; Möller-Wedel Optical GmbH, Wedel, Germany) between 2020 and 2021. The lymph vessels identified using near-infrared fluorescence lymphography, diameter of the vessels used for anastomosis, anastomosis configuration, and perioperative limb circumference were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 35 LVAs were performed in six patients with secondary lymphedema, with a mean number of 5.8 LVAs per limb. The anastomotic configurations were end-to-end in 26 LVAs, side-to-end in 2 LVAs, and end-to-side in 7 LVAs. The diameter of the lymph vessels ranged from 0.3 to 0.9 mm (mean, 0.62 ± 0.18 mm) and that of the vein from 0.4 to 1.2 mm (mean, 0.75 ± 0.21 mm). The changes in the lymphedema index and estimated limb volume indicated a postoperative decrease in edema.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a near-infrared camera-integrated operating microscope useful for the preoperative identification of functional lymph vessels. Our results have shown that microsurgical LVAs can be performed using an integrated indocyanine green camera without an independent indocyanine green detector.