Whole-breast irradiation with or without a boost for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of a randomised phase 3 trial

Expression of HGF, pMet, and pAkt is related to benefit of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a long-term follow-up of the SweBCG91-RT randomised trial

Experimental studies suggest that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and its transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor, Met, in part also relying on Akt kinase activity, mediate radioresistance. We investigated the importance of these biomarkers for the risk of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) after adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in primary breast cancer. HGF, phosphorylated Met (pMet) and phosphorylated Akt (pAkt) were evaluated immunohistochemically on tissue microarrays from 1004 patients in the SweBCG91‐RT trial, which randomly assigned patients to breast‐conserving therapy, with or without adjuvant RT. HGF was evaluated in the stroma (HGF_str); pMet in the membrane (pMet_mem); HGF, pMet and pAkt in the cytoplasm (HGF_cyt, pMet_cyt, pAkt_cyt); and pAkt in the nucleus (pAkt_nuc). The prognostic and treatment predictive effects were evaluated to primary endpoint IBTR as first event during the first 5 years. Patients with tumours expressing low levels of HGF_cyt and pMet_cyt and high levels of pAkt_nuc derived a larger benefit from RT [hazard ratio (HR): 0.11 (0.037–0.30), 0.066 (0.016–0.28) and 0.094 (0.028–0.31), respectively] compared to patients with high expression of HGF_cyt and pMet_cyt, and low pAkt_nuc [HR: 0.36 (0.19–0.67), 0.35 (0.20–0.64) and 0.47 (0.32–0.71), respectively; interaction analyses: P = 0.052, 0.035 and 0.013, respectively]. These differences remained in multivariable analysis when adjusting for patient age, tumour size, histological grade, St Gallen subtype and systemic treatment (interaction analysis, P‐values: 0.085, 0.027, and 0.023, respectively). This study suggests that patients with immunohistochemically low HGF_cyt, low pMet_cyt and high pAkt_nuc may derive an increased benefit from RT after breast‐conserving surgery concerning the risk of developing IBTR.

A Meta-Analysis of Autologous Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction and Timing of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy

BACKGROUND

 Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) decreases loco-regional recurrence and improves survival in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Autologous free flap reconstruction, while more durable in the setting of radiation than alloplastic reconstruction, is still susceptible to radiation-induced fibrosis, contracture, fat necrosis, volume loss, and distortion of breast shape. Options for reconstruction timing (immediate vs. delayed) have been discussed to mitigate these effects, but a clear optimum is not known.

METHODS

 A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using search terms "breast reconstruction AND (radiation OR irradiation OR radiotherapy)" were used. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies reporting complications for free flap breast reconstruction in the setting of PMRT. Patients who underwent PMRT were pooled into two groups: those who underwent immediate free flap reconstruction prior to PMRT and those who underwent delayed reconstruction after PMRT.

RESULTS

 Out of the 23 studies, 12 focused on immediate reconstruction, seven focused on delayed reconstruction, and four studies included both groups. Overall, 729 patients underwent immediate reconstruction, while 868 underwent delayed reconstruction. Complete and partial flap loss rates were significantly higher in patients undergoing delayed reconstruction, while infection and wound-healing complication rates were higher in those undergoing immediate reconstructions. Rates of unplanned reoperations, vascular complications, hematoma/seroma, and fat necrosis did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, rates of planned revision surgeries were higher in the delayed reconstruction group.

CONCLUSION

 Immediate free flap breast reconstruction is associated with superior flap survival compared with delayed reconstruction. Rates of complications are largely comparable, and rates of revision surgeries are equivalent. The differences in long-term aesthetic outcomes are not, however, clearly assessed by the available literature. Even in the face of PMRT, immediate free flap breast reconstruction is an effective approach.

Maintaining breast cancer care in the face of COVID-19

The battle of COVID-19 is currently at different levels of intensity in each country and even each city. The authors have prepared succinct recommendations regarding the care of patients with breast cancer, divided into phases that can easily be adapted to each units' needs and resources, and stepped up or stepped down according to escalating and de-escalating circumstances. The structure can also be transposed easily to different cancer types, enabling continued provision of best standards of care despite unprecedented stressors. Surgery must go on.

De-intensifying Radiation Therapy in HER-2 Positive Breast Cancer: To Boost or Not to Boost?

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy is fundamental in the management of breast cancer. After whole breast irradiation, an additional boost dose is often applied to the primary tumor bed. Here, we analyze the effect of radiation therapy boost on local control in patients with HER-2 positive breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We studied 1082 patients with HER-2 positive breast cancer who were originally enrolled in the Herceptin Adjuvant Trial and treated with breast-conserving surgery, radiation therapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab. The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the effect of a radiation boost on local recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated, and hazard ratios were estimated using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 441 patients (40.8%) who received radiation therapy boost and 641 patients (59.2%) who did not, after completion of whole breast radiation. Patients from both groups had similar baseline characteristics in terms of age, nodal involvement, and grade. At a median follow-up of 11 years, local control was 93% (confidence interval, 90%-95%) in the radiation boost group compared with 91% (confidence interval, 89%-93%) in the no-boost group (P = .33). When analyzing patients by age, patients <40 years of age had a higher risk for local recurrence; however, this was not significantly lowered by the addition of boost. Furthermore, no local control benefit for boost was noted in both hormone receptor (HR) subtypes (HR+: P = .11; HR-: P = .98).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HER-2 positive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery, whole breast radiation, and trastuzumab have excellent local control. Delivery of an additional radiation boost in this patient population was not shown to improve local control. Future studies are needed to identify subgroups of HER-2 positive patients who derive a clinically relevant benefit from radiation boost.

Hypofractionated Versus Conventional Fractionated Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery in the Modern Treatment Era: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial From China

PURPOSE

No randomized trials have compared hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) with conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) after breast-conserving surgery in the Asian population. This study aimed to determine whether a 3.5-week schedule of HFRT is noninferior to a standard 6-week schedule of CFRT in China.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients from 4 Chinese institutions who had undergone breast-conserving surgery and had T1-2N0-3 invasive breast cancers participated this study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated central randomization schedule, without stratification, to receive whole-breast irradiation with or without nodal irradiation, followed by tumor-bed boost, either at a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with a boost of 10 Gy in five fractions over 1 week (CFRT) or 43.5 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks with a boost of 8.7 Gy in three daily fractions (HFRT). The primary endpoint was 5-year local recurrence (LR), and a 5% margin of 5-year LR was used to establish noninferiority.

RESULTS

Between August 2010 and November 2015, 734 patients were assigned to the HFRT (n = 368) or CFRT (n = 366) group. At a median follow-up of 73.5 months (interquartile range, 60.5-91.4 months), the 5-year cumulative incidence of LR was 1.2% in the HFRT group and 2.0% in the CFRT group (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.88; P = .017 for noninferiority). There were no significant differences in acute and late toxicities, except that the HFRT group had less grade 2-3 acute skin toxicity than the CFRT group (P = .019).

CONCLUSION

CFRT and HFRT with a tumor-bed boost may have similar low LR and toxicity.

Oncological outcome, postoperative complications, and mammographic changes after intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (IOERT) as a boost in a large single-institution cohort of breast cancer patients

Advantages of using intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (IOERT) as a boosting modality in breast-conserving therapy include the direct visualization of the tumor bed, a reduced skin dose, and patient convenience. We report oncological outcome, postoperative complication rate, and mammographic changes on follow-up imaging in women treated at our institution with IOERT as a boost modality in breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. Between January 2007 and June 2018, 763 consecutive patients were enrolled. During breast-conserving surgery, an IOERT boost of 9 Gy was applied, followed by whole breast irradiation (WBI). At a median follow-up of 62.2 months (range: 0.5-135), 13 in-breast recurrences were observed, yielding a local tumor control rate of 98.4% at 5 years. In multivariable analysis, high tumor grading was predictive for local recurrence (HR = 5.6; 95%CI: 1.19-26.2). A total of 27 (3.5%) patients developed any kind of postoperative complication. None of the tumor characteristics nor any of the IOERT technical parameters were predictive for development of a postoperative complication. On follow-up imaging, 145 patients with mammographic changes BIRADS score ≥3 were found of which 50.3% required a biopsy. Only 17 patients had positive biopsies; none of the IOERT parameters were predictive for false-positive imaging. A 9 Gy IOERT boost combined with postoperative WBI provided outstanding local control rates, was well-tolerated, with limited postoperative complications. However, radiologists must be aware of a presumable higher prevalence of mammographic changes after IORT as a boost.

Rates of re-excision and conversion to mastectomy after breast-conserving surgery with or without oncoplastic surgery: a nationwide population-based study

Background

There is no consensus regarding the impact of oncoplastic surgery (OPS) on rates of re‐excision and conversion to mastectomy following breast‐conserving surgery (BCS). Here these two outcomes after BCS and OPS were compared in a nationwide population‐based setting.

Methods

In Denmark, all OPS is registered and categorized into volume displacement, volume reduction or volume replacement. Patients who underwent BCS or OPS between 2012 and 2018 were selected from the Danish Breast Cancer Group database. Multivariable analyses were performed to adjust for confounders, and propensity score matching to limit potential confounding by indication bias.

Results

A total of 13 185 patients (72·5 per cent) underwent BCS and 5003 (27·5 per cent) OPS. Volume displacement was used in 4171 patients (83·4 per cent), volume reduction in 679 (13·6 per cent) and volume replacement in 153 (3·1 per cent). Re‐excision rates were 15·6 and 14·1 per cent after BCS and OPS respectively. After adjusting for confounders, patients were less likely to have a re‐excision following OPS than BCS (odds ratio (OR) 0·80, 95 per cent c.i. 0·72 to 0·88), specifically after volume displacement and reduction. The rate of conversion to mastectomy was similar after OPS and BCS (3·2 versus 3·7 per cent; P = 0·105), but with a lower risk in adjusted analysis (OR 0·69, 0·58 to 0·84), specifically after volume displacement and reduction procedures. Findings were similar after propensity score matching.

Conclusion

A modest decrease in re‐excision rate and less frequent conversion to mastectomy were observed after OPS compared with BCS.

Severe reaction to radiotherapy provoked by hypomorphic germline mutations in ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated gene)

Background

A minority of breast cancer (BC) patients suffer from severe reaction to adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Although deficient DNA double‐strand break repair is considered the main basis for the reactions, pretreatment identification of high‐risk patients has been challenging.

Methods

To retrospectively determine the etiology of severe local reaction to RT in a 39‐year‐old woman with BC, we performed next‐generation sequencing followed by further clinical and functional studies.

Results

We found a −4 intronic variant (c.2251‐4A>G) in trans with a synonymous (c.3576G>A) variant affecting the ATM DNA‐repair gene (NG_009830.1, NM_000051.3) which is linked to autosomal recessive ataxia–telangiectasia (A–T). We verified abnormal transcripts resulting from both variants, next to a minor wild‐type transcript leading to a residual ATM kinase activity and genomic instability. Follow‐up examination of the patient revealed no classic sign of A–T but previously unnoticed head dystonia and mild dysarthria, a family history of BC and late‐onset ataxia segregating with the variants. Additionally, her serum level of alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) was elevated similar to A–T patients.

Conclusion

Considering the variable presentations of A–T and devastating impact of severe reactions to RT, we suggest a routine measurement of AFP in RT‐candidate BC patients followed by next‐generation sequencing with special attention to non‐canonical splice site and synonymous variants in ATM.

Recommendations for triage, prioritization and treatment of breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) associated disease (COVID-19) outbreak seriously challenges globally all health care systems and professionals. Expert projections estimate that despite social distancing and lockdown being practiced, we have yet to feel the full impact of COVID-19. In this manuscript we provide guidance to prepare for the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer patients and advise on how to triage, prioritize and organize diagnostic procedures, surgical, radiation and medical treatments.

Long-term patient-rated cosmetic and satisfactory outcomes of early breast cancer treated with conventional versus hypofractionated breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost technique

To compare patient-rated cosmetic and satisfactory outcomes between conventional fractionation with simultaneously integrated boost (C-SIB) vs hypofractionation with SIB (H-SIB) in early breast cancer. Patients with stage I and II breast cancer who received breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation with SIB to tumor bed and completed questionnaire were included in this study. Radiotherapy was as follows: C-SIB arm = 50 Gy and 65 Gy in 25 fractions and H-SIB arm = 43.2 Gy and 52.8 Gy in 16 fractions to the whole breast and tumor bed, respectively. Single cross-sectional assessment of the breast cosmesis was done by patients and radiation oncologist at a follow-up visit. Breast cosmetic and satisfaction scores were collected using a four-point Harvard/NSABP/RTOG cosmesis criteria scale and a four-point Likert-type scale, respectively. Of a total of 114 patients (C-SIB = 57) and (H-SIB = 57) arms, a median time from radiotherapy completion to questionnaire response was 7.2 years. Patient-rated cosmetic outcome in C-SIB vs H-SIB was "excellent" in 40.3% vs 45.6%, "good" in 33.3% vs 42.1%, "fair" in 21.1% vs 10.5%, and "poor" in 5.3% vs 1.8% (P = .288). Corresponding satisfaction was "very satisfied" in 52.6% vs 57.9%, "satisfied" in 40.4% vs 35.1%, "neutral" in 7.0% vs 5.2%, and "unsatisfied" in 0% vs 1.8% (P = .683). Stage I and older age at radiotherapy were predictors for favorable (good or excellent) cosmesis and satisfaction, respectively. In early-stage breast cancer, H-SIB provided a trend for better cosmesis than C-SIB while maintaining satisfaction. The reduction in treatment duration and cost as well as favorable cosmesis outcomes encourages the use of H-SIB.

Omitting surgery for early breast cancer showing clinical complete response to primary systemic therapy

Breast cancer is highly sensitive to systemic therapy. High probability of pathological complete response suggests a clinical question that omitting surgery is an effective alternative to surgery in breast cancer showing clinical complete response to primary systemic therapy. However, the validity of omitting surgery for early breast cancer after primary systemic therapy has not been sufficiently established; thus, even if pathological complete response is expected in patients showing clinical complete response, excision of the primary tumor site remains the standard treatment of breast cancer. Inappropriate omitting surgery increases the incidence of local recurrence, which can be the risk of a subsequent distant metastasis and reduced overall survival. To achieve acceptable local control rate, omitting surgery should be investigated in patients with early breast cancer where a high percentage of pathological complete response, a high concordance rate between clinical complete response and pathological complete response and an acceptable local control rate are expected. This review presents concept and ongoing clinical trials for omitting surgery for patients with breast cancer showing clinical complete response to primary systemic therapy.

Radiation Therapy Department Reorganization during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak: Keys to Securing Staff and Patients During the First Weeks of the Crisis and Impact on Radiation Therapy Practice from a Single Institution Experience

PURPOSE

During the first weeks of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in France, it was necessary to clearly define organizational priorities in the radiation therapy (RT) departments. In this report, we focus on the urgent measures taken to reduce risk for both our staff and patients by reducing the number of patients receiving treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed the fractionation schemes for all patients in our department, including those receiving treatment and those soon to start treatment. Our goals were to (1) decrease the number of patients coming daily to the hospital for RT, (2) adapt our human resources to continue patients' care in the department, and (3) help to cover understaffed COVID-19 sectors of the hospital.

RESULTS

We identified 50 patients who were receiving treatment (n = 6), were going to start radiation after CT scan simulation (n = 41), or for whom the CT scan was pending (n = 3). The majority were women (64%) treated for breast cancer (54%). RT was delayed for 22 (44%) patients. The majority were offered hormone therapy as "waiting therapy." Hypofractionation was considered in 21 (42%) patients mainly with breast cancer (18 of 21, 86%). The number of courses initially planned and replanned as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak during the period of March 15 to May 31, 2020, were 1383 and 683, respectively, which represented a reduction of 50% (including delayed sessions) that allowed our reorganization process.

CONCLUSIONS

To conserve resources during the pandemic, we successfully reduced the number of patients receiving treatment in a proactive fashion and adapted our organization to minimize the risk of COVID-19 contamination. Departments across the world may benefit from this same approach.

Radiation Boost After Adjuvant Whole Breast Radiotherapy: Does Evidence Support Practice for Close Margin and Altered Fractionation?

Adding a boost to whole breast radiation (WBI) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) may help improve local control, but it increases the total cost of treatment and may worsen cosmetic outcomes. Therefore, it is reserved for patients whose potential benefit outweighs the risks; however, current evidence is insufficient to support comprehensive and consistent guidance on how to identify these patients, leading to a potential for significant variations in practice. The use of a boost in the setting of close margins and hypofractionated radiotherapy represents two important areas where consensus guidelines, patterns of practice, and current evidence do not seem to converge. Close margins were previously routinely re-excised, but this is no longer felt to be necessary. Because of this recent practice change, good long-term data on the local recurrence risk of close margins with or without a boost is lacking. As for hypofractionation, although there is guidance recommending that the decision to add a boost be independent from the whole-breast fractionation schedule, it appears that patterns-of-practice data may show underutilization of a boost when hypofractionation is used. The use of a boost in these two common clinical scenarios represents important areas of future study for the optimization of adjuvant breast radiation.

[Comment] Ethical and practical considerations on cancer recommendations during COVID-19 pandemic

National and international authorities and societies have recently published important cancer treatment recommendations in order to propose extra measures that should be taken during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as prioritisation of intend-to-cure treatments and younger patients, omission of non-urgent cases, and reduction of personnel present. These measures raise important ethical considerations, since they prioritise protection of Health Systems and Professionals without seemingly taking cancer patient feelings of stress into consideration. This could lead to an erosion of the physician-patient relationship, which is considered the core element of medical ethics. Moreover, they raise practical concerns about the continuous education of Health Professionals, the status of reference centres and the evaluation of the hitherto cancer treatments.

Versatile Nanoplatforms with enhanced Photodynamic Therapy: Designs and Applications

As an emerging antitumor strategy, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has attracted intensive attention for the treatment of various malignant tumors owing to its noninvasive nature and high spatial selectivity in recent years. However, the therapeutic effect is unsatisfactory on some occasions due to the presence of some unfavorable factors including nonspecific accumulation of PS towards malignant tissues, the lack of endogenous oxygen in tumors, as well as the limited light penetration depth, further hampering practical application. To circumvent these limitations and improve real utilization efficiency, various enhanced strategies have been developed and explored during the past years. In this review, we give an overview of the state-of-the-art advances progress on versatile nanoplatforms for enhanced PDT considering the enhancement from targeting or responsive, chemical and physical effect. Specifically, these effects mainly include organelle-targeting function, tumor microenvironment responsive release photosensitizers (PS), self-sufficient O2 (affinity oxygen and generating oxygen), photocatalytic water splitting, X-rays light stimulate, surface plasmon resonance enhancement, and the improvement by resonance energy transfer. When utilizing these strategies to improve the therapeutic effect, the advantages and limitations are addressed. Finally, the challenges and prospective will be discussed and demonstrated for the future development of advanced PDT with enhanced efficacy.

Recent advances in de-intensification of radiotherapy in elderly cancer patients

Cancer in the elderly remains an evolving issue and a health challenge. Several improvements in the radiotherapy field allow the delivery of higher doses/fractions with a safe toxicity profile, permitting the reduction of radiation treatment protocols in the elderly. Regarding breast, prostate, and lung cancer, the under-representation of older patients in clinical trials limits the extension of treatment recommendations to elderly patients in routine clinical practice. Among the feasible alternatives to standard whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) in older patients are shorter courses using higher hypofractionation (HF) and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). The boost continues to be used in women at high risk of local recurrence but is less widely accepted for women at lower risk and patients over 70 years of age. Regarding prostate cancer, there are no published studies with a focus on the elderly. Current management decisions are based on life expectancy and geriatric assessment. Regimens of HF and ultra-HF protocols are feasible strategies for older patients. Several prospective non-randomized studies have documented the safe delivery of ultra-HF for patients with localized prostate cancer, and multiple phase III trials and meta-analyses have confirmed that the HF regimen should be offered with similar acute toxicity regardless of patient age and comorbidity. A recent pooled analysis from two randomized trials comparing surgery to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in older adult patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer did show comparable outcomes between surgery and SBRT. Elderly cancer patients are significantly under-represented in all clinical trials. Thus, the inclusion of older patients in clinical studies should be strongly encouraged to strengthen the evidence base for this age group. We suggest that the creation of oncogeriatric coordination units may promote individualized care protocols, avoid overtreatment with aggressive and unrecommended therapies, and support de-escalating treatment in elderly cancer patients.

Update on Partial Breast Irradiation

For early-stage breast cancer, partial breast irradiation (PBI) allows for reduction in the irradiated volume of normal tissues by confining the radiation target to the area surrounding the lumpectomy cavity after breast-conserving surgery. This approach has been supported by phase 2 data. However, widespread adoption of PBI has awaited the results of randomized controlled trials. This review discusses the results of randomized controlled trials comparing whole breast irradiation to PBI, including the recently published National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B39/Radiotherapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0413, and the Canadian RAPID trials. PBI techniques, dose/fractionation schedules, and patient selection are also reviewed.

Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after IORT treatment: evaluation of acute toxicity and cosmesis

INTRODUCTION

Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) is the current standard of treatment after breast conservative surgery (BCS). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) must be associated to WBI in patients showing high-risk factors of local recurrence in the definitive pathology report. The aim of this trial was to evaluate, for the first time, the acute toxicity and cosmesis of HWBI after photon-IORT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six luminal breast cancer patients treated by BCS and IORT(20 Gy) were included between February and December 2019, in this prospective trial, of adjuvant HWBI (40.5 Gy/2.67 Gy/15 fractions). Acute toxicity (CTCAEv5.0) and cosmesis (Harvard scale), were assessed 3 months after treatment.

RESULTS

All patients completed their treatment without interruptions. All cases were evaluable 3 months after treatment showing no toxicity ≥ G3 and excellent/good cosmesis assessment in 88% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

HWBI seems to have similar acute toxicity and cosmesis results than conventionally fractionated WBI in combination to photon-IORT after BCS.

Efficacy of radiation boost after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer with focally positive, tumor-exposed margins

Many patients with positive margins following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) undergo re-excisions that aim to remove residual disease from the breast, which brings a tremendous emotional burden in addition to financial consequences. We sought to determine whether re-excisions could be safely avoided without compromising local control and survival by using whole-breast radiation therapy (WBRT) with a tumor bed boost in patients with early-stage breast cancer with focally positive, tumor-exposed margins after BCS. All patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and/or invasive breast cancer (IBC) who had pathologically tumor-exposed margins following BCS, without re-excision and treated with WBRT with tumor bed boost between March 2005 and December 2011, were included. The radiotherapy consisted of WBRT at a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, followed by a tumor bed boost with an additional dose of 16 Gy in eight fractions. A total of 125 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria; of the 125 patients, 1 had bilateral breast cancer, resulting in 126 cases. Invasive disease was found in 102 (81%) cases and purely ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) disease in 24 (19%) cases. The 10-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) -free survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 95%, 92.5% and 96%, respectively. Patients with early-stage breast cancer who receive BCS and have focally positive, tumor-exposed margins can avoid re-excision by undergoing WBRT followed by a sufficient dose of tumor bed boost, without negatively impacting local control and survival.

Regional nodal irradiation for early breast cancer; clinical benefit according to risk stratification

Three recently published prospective trials on regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in early breast cancer showed a reduction on breast cancer mortality, any first breast recurrence and/or distant recurrence rate. The positive outcomes of the modern trials reflect the development in radiotherapy by being more precise nowadays in radiation dose delivery to the lymph nodes, while reducing the radiation dose to heart and lungs. The possibility of axillary radiotherapy (ART) to replace axillary node dissection (ALND) after positive sentinel node (SLNB) biopsy is explored in a few trials. In the AMAROS trial both ALND and ART provide excellent and comparable LRR in SN+ patients. While the lymphedema was 2 times higher after ALND compared to ART. The ACOSOG Z0011 10 years results did not show a significant difference in locoregional recurrence rate or survival. These equal results were seen despite that in 27.4% of the patients had additional positive nodes removed beyond SLN in the patients who received axillary dissection (ALND). The IBCSG 23-01 phase III trial showed that there is no need for extra treatment of the axilla after micro-metastases in SLNB, however in this trial nearly all patients received breast irradiation including part of the axilla, often combined with adjuvant therapy. The introduction of neo- adjuvant systemic treatment (NACT) may lead to less RNI in early breast cancer, especially as NACT leads to pCR in axillary lymph nodes in about one third of the patient.

Older age and comorbidity in breast cancer: is RT alone the new therapeutic frontier?

AIM

To assess the impact of age, comorbidities and endocrine therapy (ET) in older breast cancer (BC) patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (Hypo-RT).

METHODS

From June 2009 to December 2017, we enrolled in this study 735 ER-positive BC patients (stage pT1-T2, pNx-1, M0 and age ≥ 65 years) receiving hypo-RT and followed them until September 2019. Baseline comorbidities included in the hypertension-augmented Charlson Comorbidity Index were retrospectively retrieved. Logistic regression model estimated adjusted-odds ratios (ORs) of ET prescription in relation to baseline patient and tumor characteristics. Competing risk analysis estimated 5-year cumulative incidence function (CIF) of ET discontinuation due to side effects (with BC progression or death as competing events), and its effect on locoregional recurrence (LRR) and distant metastasis (DM) (with death as competing event).

RESULTS

ET has been prescribed in 89% patients. In multivariable analysis, the odds of ET prescription was significantly reduced in older patients (≥ 80 years, OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.03-0.20) and significantly increased in patients with moderate comorbidity. Patients ≥ 80 years discontinued the prescribed therapy earlier and more frequently than younger (65-69 years) patients (p = 0.060). Five-year CIF of LLR, DM and death from causes other that BC were 1.7%, 2.2% and 7.5%, respectively. Patients who discontinued ET had higher chance of LRR (p = 0.004). ET use did not impact on OS in any of the analyzed groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In older patients, ET did not show a benefit in terms of overall survival. Further studies focusing on tailored treatment approaches are warranted to offer the best care in terms of adjuvant treatment to these patients.

Accelerated partial breast irradiation with interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk early breast cancer

Patients with low-risk invasive ductal carcinoma treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were included in a multicatheter brachytherapy APBI protocol. The primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast recurrence. Between December 2008–December 2017, 186 low-risk breast cancer patients were treated with APBI using interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy and followed prospectively. At 5-years of follow-up, cumulative local recurrence (LR) and cause-specific survival was 1.1% (95% CI 0.3–1.9) and 98.3% (95% CI 97.3–99.3%) respectively. No grade 3 adverse effects were observed. Postoperative APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy after BCS in early breast cancer patients have excellent rates of local control and survival, without significant toxicity.

•

Low risk early breast cancer patients have low rate of recurrences.

•

APBI with interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy in low risk early breast cancer patients have excellent rates of local control and survival.

•

Reducing time of treatment.

•

Reducing adverse effects.

Precision Medicine and the Role of Biomarkers of Radiotherapy Response in Breast Cancer

Radiotherapy remains an important treatment modality in nearly two thirds of all cancers, including the primary curative or palliative treatment of breast cancer. Unfortunately, largely due to tumor heterogeneity, tumor radiotherapy response rates can vary significantly, even between patients diagnosed with the same tumor type. Although in recent years significant technological advances have been made in the way radiation can be precisely delivered to tumors, it is proving more difficult to personalize radiotherapy regimens based on cancer biology. Biomarkers that provide prognostic or predictive information regarding a tumor's intrinsic radiosensitivity or its response to treatment could prove valuable in helping to personalize radiation dosing, enabling clinicians to make decisions between different treatment options whilst avoiding radiation-induced toxicity in patients unlikely to gain therapeutic benefit. Studies have investigated numerous ways in which both patient and tumor radiosensitivities can be assessed. Tumor molecular profiling has been used to develop radiosensitivity gene signatures, while the assessment of specific intracellular or secreted proteins, including circulating tumor cells, exosomes and DNA, has been performed to identify prognostic or predictive biomarkers of radiation response. Finally, the investigation of biomarkers related to radiation-induced toxicity could provide another means by which radiotherapy could become personalized. In this review, we discuss studies that have used these methods to identify or develop prognostic/predictive signatures of radiosensitivity, and how such assays could be used in the future as a means of providing personalized radiotherapy.

Adjuvant breast inversely planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for early stage breast cancer : Results from a phase II trial

PURPOSE

To report early toxicity and 5‑year clinical outcomes of adjuvant breast inversely planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneously integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) after breast-conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 467 patients including 406 invasive breast cancer and 61 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were enrolled in a single institutional phase II trial. All patients underwent IMRT-SIB treatment to irradiate the whole breast and the tumor bed. Doses to whole breast and surgical bed were 45 and 60 Gy, respectively, delivered in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. The grade of maximum acute skin toxicity during treatment was recorded. Lung toxicity was noted within 6 months and patient-reported cosmetic outcomes were recorded at the 12 month follow-up after the end of radiotherapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed during follow-up.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 5.46 years. Median age was 46 years old (range 22-70 years old). No patient with DCIS had a local recurrence or distant metastasis. Among 406 patients with invasive breast cancer, the unadjusted 5‑year actuarial rate of locoregional control was 98.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.5-100), and distant metastasis-free survival 98.7% (95% CI 97.4-100), respectively. Acute skin toxicity was recorded at grade 0-1 in 76.5% of patients, and grade 2 in 23.5% of patients. None of these patients had grade 3 or more than grade 3 skin toxicity. Grade 1 pneumonitis was found in 25.3% of patients. Assessment of patient reported cosmetic outcomes at the 12 month follow-up showed good or excellent outcome in 86.5% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of inversely planned IMRT-SIB as part of breast-conserving therapy results in optimal 5‑year tumor control and minor early toxicities.

Risk communication in a patient decision aid for radiotherapy in breast cancer: How to deal with uncertainty?

Background and aim

Patient decision aids for oncological treatment options, provide information on the effect on recurrence rates and/or survival benefit, and on side-effects and/or burden of different treatment options. However, often uncertainty exists around the probability estimates for recurrence/survival and side-effects which is too relevant to be ignored. Evidence is lacking on the best way to communicate these uncertainties. The aim of this study is to develop a method to incorporate uncertainties in a patient decision aid for breast cancer patients to support their decision on radiotherapy.

Methods

Firstly, qualitative interviews were held with patients and health care professionals. Secondly, in the development phase, thinking aloud sessions were organized with four patients and 12 health care professionals, individual and group-wise.

Results

Consensus was reached on a pictograph illustrating the whole range of uncertainty for local recurrence risks, in combination with textual explanation that a more exact personalized risk would be given by their own physician. The pictograph consisted of 100 female icons in a 10 x 10 array. Icons with a stepwise gradient color indicated the uncertainty margin. The prevalence and severity of possible side-effects were explained using verbal labels.

Conclusions

We developed a novel way of visualizing uncertainties in recurrence rates in a patient decision aid. The effect of this way of communicating risk uncertainty is currently being tested in the BRASA study (NCT03375801).

•

There exists uncertainty around local recurrence risks for breast cancer patients.

•

Little is known on how to communicate uncertainty to patients.

•

Patient decision aids can help communicating risks and uncertainty.

•

We developed pictographs to communicate numerical uncertainty in recurrence risks.

•

The effect of the pictographs is currently being tested in the BRASA study.

Breast Radiation Therapy Under COVID-19 Pandemic Resource Constraints-Approaches to Defer or Shorten Treatment From a Comprehensive Cancer Center in the United States

Purpose

Breast radiation therapy accounts for a significant proportion of patient volume in contemporary radiation oncology practice. In the setting of anticipated resource constraints and widespread community infection with SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic, measures for balancing both infectious and oncologic risk among patients and providers must be carefully considered. Here, we present evidence-based guidelines for omitting or abbreviating breast cancer radiation therapy, where appropriate, in an effort to mitigate risk to patients and optimize resource utilization.

Methods and Materials

Multidisciplinary breast cancer experts at a high-volume comprehensive cancer center convened contingency planning meetings over the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic to review the relevant literature and establish recommendations for the application of hypofractionated and abbreviated breast radiation regimens.

Results

Substantial evidence exists to support omitting radiation among certain favorable risk subgroups of patients with breast cancer and for abbreviating or accelerating regimens among others. For those who require either whole-breast or postmastectomy radiation, with or without coverage of the regional lymph nodes, a growing body of literature supports various hypofractionated approaches that appear safe and effective.

Conclusions

In the setting of a public health emergency with the potential to strain critical healthcare resources and place patients at risk of infection, the parsimonious application of breast radiation therapy may alleviate a significant clinical burden without compromising long-term oncologic outcomes. The judicious and personalized use of immature study data may be warranted in the setting of a competing mortality risk from this widespread pandemic.

Recent advances in radiotherapy of breast cancer

Radiation therapy is an integral part of the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer. Regional lymph node irradiation in younger trials seems to provide superior target coverage as well as a reduction in long-term toxicity resulting in a small benefit in the overall survival rate. For partial breast irradiation there are now two large trials available which support the role of partial breast irradiation in low risk breast cancer patients. Multiple randomized trials have established that a sequentially applied dose to the tumor bed improves local control with the cost of worse cosmetic results.

COVID-19: Global radiation oncology's targeted response for pandemic preparedness

As the global COVID-19 pandemic escalates there is a need within radiation oncology to work to support our patients in the best way possible. Measures are required to reduce infection spread between patients and within the workforce. Departments need contingency planning to create capacity and continue essential treatments despite a reduced workforce. The #radonc community held an urgent online journal club on Twitter in March 2020 to discuss these issues and create some consensus on crucial next steps. There were 121 global contributors. This document summarises these discussions around themes of infection prevention, rationalisation of workload and working practice in the presence of infection.

Toxicity and cosmetic outcome after hypofractionated whole breast irradiation and boost-IOERT in early stage breast cancer (HIOB): First results of a prospective multicenter trial (NCT01343459)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To assess the role of intraoperative radiation with electrons (IOERT) as tumor bed boost followed by hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) of patients with low to intermediate risk breast cancer focusing on acute/late toxicity and cosmetic outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 2011, a prospective multicenter trial (NCT01343459) was started. Treatment consisted of BCS, IOERT (11.1 Gy) and HWBI (40.5 Gy in 15 fractions). In a single-arm design, 5-year IBR-rates are benchmarked by a sequential ratio test (SQRT) against best published evidences in 3 age groups (35-40 y, 41-50 y, >50 y). Acute/late toxicity and cosmesis were evaluated by validated scorings systems.

RESULTS

Of 627 eligible patients, 44 were excluded, leaving 583 to analyze. After a median follow-up (FUP) of 45 months (range 0-74), for acute effects CTCAE-score 0/1 was noted in 91% (end of HWBI) and 92% (4 weeks later), respectively. Late toxicity Grading 0/1 (mean values, ranges) by LENT-SOMA criteria were observed in 92.7% (89-97.3) at 4/5 months, rising to 96.5% (91-100) at 6 years post HWBI. Baseline cosmesis after wound healing prior to HWBI was scored as excellent/good in 86% of cases by subjective (patient) and in 74% by objective (doctor) assessment with no impairment thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute and late treatment tolerance of a combined Boost-IOERT/HWBI regimen is excellent in short/mid-term assessment. Postoperative cosmetic appearance is not impaired after 3 years FUP.

Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: A New Standard of Care?

Background

Breast-conserving therapy including lumpectomy and adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) has become the standard therapy for early-stage breast cancer (EBC). Without WBI, the recurrence rate is significantly increased. However, when selecting patients at a low a priori risk of local recurrence only a small breast-cancer-specific mortality benefit, but no overall survival improvement, was detected for WBI. As most recurrences occur close to the lumpectomy cavity, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) delivered exclusively to a limited volume of tissue around the initial lumpectomy site, has gained increased attention and is now discussed as an alternative to WBI for selected EBC patients.

Summary

Numerous techniques for APBI (interstitial brachytherapy, external beam-based APBI, intraoperative radiotherapy, MR-guided radiotherapy) allow treatment delivery in a shorter period of time, and radiation oncologists expect to further reduce side effects by using these new techniques, with improvements in cosmetics and quality of life. In this review, we aim to describe the existing evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of different APBI techniques used in modern radiotherapy.

Key Messages

APBI has provided outcomes similar to WBI combined with potentially reduced toxicity. While appropriate patient selection persists to be crucial for acceptable recurrence rates, the precise definition of patients suitable for APBI remains a matter of discussion. As long-term data are often still lacking, special attention should be paid to late side effects and long-term outcomes. Decision-making on appropriate treatment techniques should take into account not only local control rates, but also the impact on the patient's quality of life.

In the Era After the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 'Boost' Study, is the Additional Radiotherapy to the Breast Tumour Bed Still Beneficial for Young Women?

AIMS

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22,881-10,882 trial showed significant benefit of a radiotherapy boost (RTB) in women ≤40 years in a pre-hormone therapy (HT) era. We determined how the use of HT and RTB changed in response to clinical guidelines and whether the benefit of routine RTB was still observed in the HT era.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2004, a provincial database identified all women ≤40 years with breast cancer who met the inclusion criteria of the EORTC trial. In total, 411 patients were classified into three eras defined by the guidelines: era 1 (discretionary HT, discretionary RTB); era 2 (routine HT, discretionary RTB); era 3 (routine HT, routine RTB). HT use, RTB use and cumulative incidence of local recurrence were calculated and compared across eras.

RESULTS

HT use increased after the first policy change from 13% to 75% for oestrogen receptor-positive patients (P < 0.01). RTB use also increased from 33% to 76% following the second policy change (P < 0.01). At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 12% in era 1, 6% in era 2 and 6% in era 3 (era 2 versus era 3, P = 0.92). For patients in the routine HT era (eras 2 and 3 combined) there was no significant difference in local recurrence between RTB and 'no RTB' patients (6% versus 7%, P = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

The routine use of HT and RTB increased significantly after new practice guidelines. Introduction of the HT guideline was associated with a 6% improvement in local recurrence at 10 years. No improvement in local recurrence was associated with the introduction of the RTB guideline in the HT era. The routine use of a boost in unselected young women with negative margins should be re-evaluated in the current HT era.

Omission of postoperative radiation after breast conserving surgery: A progressive paradigm shift towards precision medicine

•

Post-operative radiotherapy is standard after breast conservation in early breast cancer.

•

To de-escalate the treatment burden, indentifying a subset at very low risk of relapse is crucial.

•

Clinical and pathological factors are important, but can be integrated with genomic signatures.

•

Ongoing trials will provide evidence on patients at low risk for radiotherapy omission.

Radiation therapy is a standard therapeutic option in the post-operative setting for early breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery, providing a substantial benefit in reducing the risk of local relapse with a consequent survival gain. Nevertheless, the reduction in the burden related to treatment is becoming crucial in modern oncology for both local and systemic therapies and investigational efforts are being put forward by radiations oncologists to identify a subset of women at very low risk to be potentially omitted from post-operative irradiation after breast conservation. Clinical factors, classical pathological parameters and new predictive scores derived from gene expression and next generation sequencing techniques are being integrated in the quest toward a reliable low-risk profile for breast cancer patients. We herein provide a comprehensive overview on the topic.

Multicentric breast cancer with heterogeneous histopathology: a multidisciplinary review

Multiple synchronous (multifocal or multicentric) ipsilateral breast cancers with heterogeneous histopathology are a rare clinical occurrence, however, their incidence is increasing due to the use of MRI for breast cancer screening and staging. Some studies have demonstrated poorer clinical outcomes for this pattern of breast cancer, but there is no evidence to guide clinical practice. In this multidisciplinary review, we reflect on pathology and molecular characteristics, imaging findings, surgical management including conservation and reconstructive options and approach to the axilla, and the role of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Multidisciplinary discussions appear decisive in planning an appropriate surgical choice and defining the correct systemic treatment tailored to each clinical condition.

Feasibility of Breast-Conservation Therapy and Hypofractionated Radiation in the Setting of Prior Breast Augmentation

PURPOSE

Cosmetic outcomes and rate of implant loss are poorly characterized among patients with breast cancer with previous breast augmentation (BA) who undergo breast-conservation therapy (BCT). Here we determine capsular contracture and implant loss frequency after BCT among patients receiving contemporary whole-breast radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with breast cancer with a history of BA presenting to our institution from January 2006 to January 2017 who elected for BCT were included. Seventy-one breast cancers in 70 patients with a history of BA electing for BCT were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathologic, treatment, and outcome variables were examined. Whole-breast RT included conventional and hypofractionated schedules with and without a boost. Rates of implant loss and cosmetic outcomes among patients who did and did not develop a new/worse contracture based on physician assessment were compared.

RESULTS

In the study, 54.9% of patients received radiation using hypofractionated whole-breast tangents; 81.7% received a boost. In addition, 18 out of 71 cases (25.4%) developed a new/worse contracture after BCT with a mean follow-up of 1.9 years. Furthermore, 9 out of 71 cases (12.7%) were referred to a plastic surgeon for revisional surgery. There were no implant-loss cases. On univariate analysis, implant location, time from implant placement to diagnosis, RT type, RT boost, body mass index, and tumor size were not associated with new/worse contracture. Of 12 patients with existing contracture, only 2 developed worsening contracture. Physician assessment of cosmetic outcome after BCT was noted to be excellent or good for 87.4% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

BCT for breast cancer patients with prior history of BA has a low risk of implant loss. Hypofractionated RT does not adversely affect implant outcomes. Patients should be counseled regarding risk for capsular contracture, but the majority have good/excellent outcome; BA does not represent a contraindication to BCT.

Adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost to tumor bed with intensity modulated radiotherapy technique in elderly breast cancer patients

Background

Adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy is the standard of care for breast cancer patients after partial mastectomy. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been reported to reduce acute toxicities compared to conventional radiotherapy. IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique can deliver higher doses to tumor bed and irradiate whole breast with a lower dose level to shorten overall treatment duration. This study presents the long-term results of adjuvant IMRT with SIB in elderly breast cancer patients who received partial mastectomy.

Methods

From January 2007 to January 2018, 93 elder breast cancer patients (≥65-year-old) who received IMRT with SIB technique after partial mastectomy were reviewed retrospectively. The axillary areas were managed with either sentinel lymph node biopsies or axillary lymph node dissection. The dose to whole breast was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions in all patients and the dose to tumor bed was 61.6 to 66.4 Gy in 28 fractions. The primary end point is locoregional control. Secondary end points include: overall survival, breast cancer-specific survival, distant-metastases-free survival, disease-free survival, and acute and chronic toxicities.

Results

The median follow-up was 56.1 months. One patient had ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, 3 patients had regional lymph node recurrence, and 9 patients had distant metastases. Death occurred in 5 patients, including 3 patients died of breast cancer progression. Five-year overall survival is 96.3% and 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival is 96.4%. The 5-year breast cancer specific survival and 5-year distant metastases-free survival is 97.5% and 87.2%, respectively. Seven patients developed second primary cancer after RT. Eighty-one point seven percent patients had acute grade 1 dermatitis while 18.3% suffered from grade 2 dermatitis. The incidence of grade 1 pneumonitis and grade 1 stomatitis was 4.3% and 8.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Adjuvant IMRT with SIB technique is a safe and effective treatment strategy for elderly breast cancer patients after partial mastectomy.

Individualised target volume selection and dose prescription after conservative surgery, mastectomy and reconstruction

Progress in radiotherapy (RT) for early breast cancer, driven by advances in radiobiology and radiation techniques is enabling individualised target volume and dose-fractionation according to recurrence risk. Conventionally fractionated WBI (CF-WBI) has been justified on the basis that it spares dose-limiting late-responding normal tissues more than breast cancer. However, randomised clinical trials (RCTs) testing hypofractionated WBI (HF-WBI) showed equivalent tumour control, improved acute toxicity and similar late toxicity between selected HF-WBI schedules and CF-WBI. RCTs showed that tumour bed boost (TBB) after WBI improved local control but increased breast fibrosis compared to no TBB. RCT comparing sequential TBB and simultaneous integrated TBB using dose intensity modulation showed similar toxicity. Partial breast irradiation (PBI) limits target volume to the tumour bed, which permits safe treatment acceleration. RCTs showed that PBI resulted in low local relapse rates but in some RCTs, higher rates of late toxicity and adverse cosmetic outcome than WBI. Given heterogeneity of PBI techniques, target volumes and dose-fractionation schedules used in RCTs, interpretation of results to distinguish whether outcome variations are caused by target volume or dose-fractionation effect is challenging. RCTs demonstrating efficacy of post-mastectomy RT (PMRT) included the chest wall and regional nodes but did not distinguish relative contributions of nodal target sub-volumes. In patients with smaller axillary tumour burden, IMC irradiation is controversial. RCTs were not powered for comparison between CF-PMRT and HF-PMRT. No increase in arm or shoulder dysfunction with HF-PMRT was observed. No RCT data exist on HF-PMRT in patients with breast reconstruction.

The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement on intraoperative radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Although radiation therapy has traditionally been delivered with external beam or brachytherapy, intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) represents an alternative that may shorten the course of therapy, reduce toxicities, and improve patient satisfaction while potentially lowering the cost of care. At this time, there are limited evidence-based guidelines to assist clinicians with patient selection for IORT. As such, the American Brachytherapy Society presents a consensus statement on the use of IORT.

METHODS

Physicians and physicists with expertise in intraoperative radiation created a site-directed guideline for appropriate patient selection and utilization of IORT.

RESULTS

Several IORT techniques exist including radionuclide-based high-dose-rate, low-dose-rate, electron, and low-energy electronic. In breast cancer, IORT as monotherapy should only be used on prospective studies. IORT can be considered in the treatment of sarcomas with close/positive margins or recurrent sarcomas. IORT can be considered in conjunction with external beam radiotherapy for retroperitoneal sarcomas. IORT can be considered for colorectal malignancies with concern for positive margins and in the setting of recurrent gynecologic cancers. For thoracic, head and neck, and central nervous system malignancies, utilization of IORT should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

CONCLUSIONS

The present guidelines provide clinicians with a summary of current data regarding IORT by treatment site and guidelines for the appropriate patient selection and safe utilization of the technique. High-dose-rate, low-dose-rate brachytherapy methods are appropriate when IORT is to be delivered as are electron and low-energy based on the clinical scenario.

Dosimetric analysis of breast cancer tumor bed boost: An interstitial brachytherapy vs. external beam radiation therapy comparison for deeply seated tumors

PURPOSE

To dosimetrically compare interstitial brachytherapy (MIBT) vs. EBRT (3DCRT and high-energy electron beams) for deep-seated tumor bed boosts (depth ≥4 cm) in early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Planning CTs of fifteen left-side breast cancer patients previously treated with MIBT boost chosen for this study. MIBT, 3DCRT (three-field technique), and enface high-energy electron (15-18 MeV) plans retrospectively generated on these images. To minimize intrapatient target contour inconsistency, due to a technical limitation for transferring identical contours from brachytherapy to EBRT planning system, spherical volumes delineated as hypothetical CTVs (CTV-H) (depth ≥4 cm with considering the geometry of the brachytherapy implant) instead of original lumpectomy cavities (which had irregular contours). In EBRT, PTV-H=CTV-H+5 mm. To account for beam penumbra, additional PTV-H to beam-edge margins added (3DCRT = 5 mm; electron = 10 mm). Included organs at risk (OARs) were ipsilateral breast, skin, ribs, lung, and heart. Prescribed dose-fractionations were 12 Gy/3fractions (MIBT) and 16 Gy/8fractions (EBRT) (BED = 24 Gy, breast cancer Alpha/Beta = 4 Gy). Biologically equivalent DVH parameters for all techniques compared.

RESULTS

Mean CTV-H depth was 6 cm. Normal breast V_25%-V_100%; skin V_10%-V_90%; rib V_25%-V_75%; lung V_5%-V_25%; heart V_10%; mean lung dose; ribs/lung D_max were lower in MIBT vs. 3CDRT. MIBT reduced breast V_25%-V_125%; skin V_25%-V_125%; rib V_25%-V_75% and V_100%; lung V_25%-V_90%; heart V_10%-V_50%; skin/ribs/lung D_max compared to electrons. In contrast, breast V_125%-V_250% and V_175%-V_250% were increased in MIBT vs. 3DCRT and electron plans, respectively. Electron plans had the minimum mean heart dose.

CONCLUSIONS

From a dosimetric point of view, in deeply-seated lumpectomy beds, MIBT boost better protects OARs from exposure to medium and high doses of radiation compared to 3DCRT and high energy electron beams (except more ipsilateral breast hot spots).