Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of published randomised trials. A study of the GISCAD (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dei Carcinomi dell'Apparato Digerente)

Chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Metastatic gastric cancer remains a non-curative disease. Palliative chemotherapy has been demonstrated to prolong survival without quality of life compromise. Many single-agents and combinations have been confirmed to be active in the treatment of metastatic disease. Objective response rates ranged from 10-30% for single-agent therapy and 30-60% for polychemotherapy. Results of phase II and III studies are reviewed in this paper as well as the potential efficacy of new drugs. For patients with localized disease, the role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy is discussed. Most studies on adjuvant chemotherapy failed to demonstrate a survival advantage, and therefore, it is not considered as standard treatment in most centres. Adjuvant immunochemotherapy has been developed fundamentally in Korea and Japan. A meta-analysis of phase III trials with OK-432 suggested that immunochemotherapy may improve survival of patients with curatively resected gastric cancer. Based on the results of US Intergroup 0116 study, postoperative chemoradiation has been accepted as standard care in patients with resected gastric cancer in North America. However, the results are somewhat confounded by the fact that patients underwent less than a recommended D1 lymph node dissection and the pattern of recurrence suggested a positive effect derived from local radiotherapy without any effect on micrometastatic disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy remains experimental, but several phase II studies are showing promising results. Phase III trials are needed.

The role of chemotherapy in patients with established gastric cancer

Chemotherapy significantly improves survival in comparison to best supportive care in patients with metastasised gastric cancer. In patients for whom a three-drug-combination is considered as the treatment of choice, ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-FU as a continuous infusion) should be regarded as standard of care. However, results for ECF have been challenged by the recently presented REAL-2-trial, which demonstrated a significant survival benefit for EOX (epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabine) over ECF. Adjuvant 5-FU-based chemoradiation should be discussed in patients with inadequate lymphadenectomy, but is not internationally accepted as standard of care: whether patients with adequate lymhphadenectomy benefit from adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is currently unclear. According to the results of the UK MAGIC trial, perioperative treatment with ECF (3 cycles prior to and post surgery) results in a significantly reduced risk of death for patients with resectable gastric cancer as compared to surgery alone. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy has the ability to downsize gastric tumours and appears to improve R0-resection rates, but its potential to improve overall survival is still unclear.

Pathological features as predictors of recurrence after radical resection of gastric cancer

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the pattern and timing of recurrence and to determine associated risk factors after radical resection of gastric cancer including D2 dissection.

Methods

A total of 274 patients who had undergone radical resection of gastric cancer with nodal involvement or T3–4 tumour were randomized to receive chemotherapy or no further treatment (control group). Locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis were analysed in a competing risks framework, by estimating the crude cumulative incidence in each group. Multiple regression models were used to investigate the influence of treatment and pathological features on the risk of recurrence.

Results

Overall, the 7 year rate of locoregional relapse was 15·8 per cent and that of distant recurrence was 34·5 per cent. There was a significant association between pathological node (pN) stage and distant relapse (P < 0·001), and between pathological tumour (pT) stage and locoregional recurrence (P = 0·024). Chemotherapy had no significant effect on either locoregional or distant recurrence.

Conclusion

The rate of locoregional recurrence after radical surgery for gastric cancer was lower than that in studies based on more conservative surgery. The pT stage was related to the rate of locoregional recurrence whereas pN stage had an impact on distant recurrence.

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the management of gastric cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer remains a major challenge. After decades of investigation that have yielded little improvement in survival rates, several important studies have recently emerged that provide renewed optimism for future research endeavors. This article reviews the important advances over the past several years in the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for gastric cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

As a result of the Intergroup trial, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after operation has emerged as a new standard of care for patients who have undergone resection for carcinoma of the stomach. Strategies currently being tested to build on the Intergroup results include the use of new chemotherapy combinations with radiotherapy and the development of modern conformal techniques to deliver radiation therapy. The preliminary results of a large neoadjuvant chemotherapy study have demonstrated the efficacy of this approach with tumor downstaging and increase in the curative R0 resection rate. For patients with metastatic gastric cancer, newer generation cytotoxic agents such as oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and taxanes show promising activity. In the near future, these agents will likely be evaluated for their role as adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy.

SUMMARY

Major advances in the treatment of gastric cancer have occurred during the past several years and have improved the care of patients with this form of tumor.

Early prediction of tumor recurrence after curative resection of gastric carcinoma by measuring soluble E-cadherin

BACKGROUND

Currently, to the authors' knowledge, there is no serum marker to predict disease recurrence after patients undergo curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Previous reports have indicated that serum levels of soluble E-cadherin had prognostic value in these patients. The objective of the current study was to determine whether soluble E-cadherin levels could predict disease recurrence in patients with gastric carcinoma who underwent curative surgery.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients who underwent curative surgery for gastric carcinoma after December 1997 were followed prospectively. Venous blood samples were collected preoperatively, 1 month after surgery, and every 3 months thereafter. The blood samples were assayed for soluble E-cadherin and for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to define a cut-off level of E-cadherin for the optimal sensitivity and specificity for predicting disease recurrence.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 21 months for patients with recurrent disease (n = 17 patients) and 36 months for patients without recurrent disease (n = 52 patients; P = 0.007). The optimal cut-off level of E-cadherin was 10,000 ng/mL. The sensitivity for predicting prediction disease recurrence using this cut-off level at 3 months and at 6 months postsurgery was 47% and 59% respectively, which was significantly better compared with the sensitivity of CEA using the conventional cut-off level (6% at 3 months postsurgery and 6% at 6 months postsurgery; P = 0.004 and P < 0.0001, respectively). The median time between the elevated E-cadherin level and documented disease recurrence was 13 months (range, 3-20 months), compared with 4 months (range, 1-20 months) for CEA.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum soluble E-cadherin was a good marker for predicting disease recurrence in the first 3-6 months after surgery, with a median of 13 months before clinical recurrence. The use of this marker may allow time for vigilant surveillance and consideration of adjuvant therapy.

Gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers and one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related deaths. The incidence, diagnostic studies, and therapeutic options have undergone important changes in the last decades, but the prognosis for gastric cancer patients remains poor, especially in more advanced stages. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment of this disease, even if it is associated with a high rate of locoregional and distant recurrence. There is ongoing debate regarding the role of adjuvant treatment In advanced disease, palliation of symptoms, rather than cure, is the primary goal of patient management. Several combination therapies have been developed and have been examined in phase III trials; however, in most cases, they have failed to demonstrate a survival advantage over the reference arm. This review summarizes the most important recommendations for the management of patients with gastric cancer.

Adjuvant therapy in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer has a poor prognosis. The majority of patients will relapse after definitive surgery, and 5-year survival after surgery remains poor. The role of adjuvant therapy in gastric cancer has been controversial given the lack of significant survival benefit in many randomized studies so far. The results of a large North American study (Gastrointestinal Cancer Intergroup Trial INT 0116) reported that postoperative chemoradiotherapy conferred a survival advantage compared with surgery alone, which has led to the regimen being adopted as a new standard of care. However, controversies still remain regarding surgical technique, the place of more effective and less toxic chemotherapy regimens, and the use of more modern radiation planning techniques to improve treatment delivery and outcome in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. This article reviews the current status of the adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer including discussion on the research directions aimed at optimizing treatment efficacy. Issues such as the identification of patients who are more likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy are also addressed. Further clinical trials are needed to move towards better consensus and standardization of care.

Optimal locoregional treatment in gastric cancer

Worldwide, gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. The mainstay of curative treatment is radical surgery. But even with optimal surgical resection, the prognosis remains modest in the Western world. Numerous attempts have been undertaken to improve clinical outcome. More extensive lymph node dissection, adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy did not result in a survival benefit in randomized trials. Only postoperative chemoradiotherapy has proven to be valuable in prospective randomized trials. Questions are to be answered about optimization of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and fine tuning of the three modalities. One of the key issues that should be addressed is whether pre- or postoperative chemoradiotherapy will benefit survival or locoregional control in the case of optimal surgery with an "over-D1" lymphadenectomy and without splenectomy. In this article the most relevant literature on locoregional treatment in operable gastric cancer will be reviewed and future strategies will be discussed.

Adjuvant chemoradiation using 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid/cisplatin with or without paclitaxel and radiation in patients with completely resected high-risk gastric cancer: two cooperative phase II studies of the AIO/ARO/ACO

BACKGROUND

The current two studies evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of an adjuvant combined modality treatment strategy containing a three to four-drug chemotherapy regimen plus 5-fluorouracil (FU)-based radiochemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between December 2000 and October 2003, a total of 86 patients were included in both studies. Patients with completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma including a D1 or D2 lymph node dissection (LND) were eligible. Treatment consisted of two cycles of folinic acid 500 mg/m2, 5-FU 2000 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 24 h once weekly for 6 consecutive weeks, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in weeks 1 and 4 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 in weeks 2 and 5 (FLPP; n=41) or two cycles of the same 5-FU/folinic acid schedule but with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 only in weeks 1, 3 and 5 (FLP; n=45). Radiation with 45 Gy plus concomitantly applied 5-FU 225 mg/m2/24 h was scheduled in between the two cycles.

RESULTS

Patients characteristics were: D1/D2 LND FLP group 53%/42%; FLPP group 27%/68%; stage distribution: UICC stages III/IV(M0) FLP group 63% and FLPP group 66%. Median follow-up was 10 months (3-25) for FLP and 18 months (2-51) for FLPP patients. CTC grade 3/4 toxicities during the first cycle/chemoradiation/second cycle of FLP: granulocytopenia 3%/0/27%, anorexia 6%/10%/8%; diarrhea 8%/0/4%, nausea 3%/0/4%; FLPP: granulocytopenia 0/0/37%, anorexia 5%/11%/6%; diarrhea 5%/0/3, nausea 3%/8%/0%; early death in one patient due to Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Projected 2-year progression-free survival was 64% (95% CI 56% to 68%) for the FLP and 61% (95% CI 42% to 78%) for the FLPP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both chemoradiation regimens appear feasible with an acceptable toxicity profile indicating that cisplatin can be added to 5-FU/FA and that even a four-drug regimen can be investigated further in prospective clinical trials in completely resected gastric cancer patients. Treatment should be given in experienced centres in order to avoid unnecessary toxicity.

Perioperative adjunctive treatment in the management of operable gastric cancer

Outcome in the management of clinically resectable gastric carcinoma has been disappointing, at least in Western populations, despite increasingly radical surgery and extensive experience with adjunctive perioperative treatment with innumerable single and combined modality regimens. The United States Intergroup Study, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of adjuvant chemoradiation, demonstrated significant improvement in disease-free and overall survival. Consequently, this regimen of postoperative fluoruracil plus leucovorin and locoregional radiation has been incorporated into current clinical practice. In hopes of further improving cure rates, many other regimens are under investigation, including the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy alone, combined neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, and adjuvant therapy alone. In these clinical trials, therapeutic agents are prescribed alone or in multimodal regimens and include systemic chemotherapy, intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy with or without hyperthermia, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), and postoperative external beam irradiation. Several molecular markers have been identified, which seem to predict that a given tumor may be effective or resistant to a drug, raising the possibility of customized chemotherapy regimens. Preclinical studies suggest potential efficacy of angiogenesis inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and antisense agents.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin compared with surgery alone for gastric cancer: 7-year results of the FFCD randomized phase III trial (8801)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection for gastric cancer in a randomized controlled trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After curative resection, stage II-III-IVM0 gastric cancer patients were randomly assigned to postoperative chemotherapy or surgery alone. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m(2) daily (5-day continuous infusion) was initiated before day 14 after resection. One month later, four 5-day cycles of 5-FU (1 g/m(2) per day) plus cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) on day 2) were administered every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The study was closed prematurely after enrollment of 260 patients (79.7% N+), owing to poor accrual. At 97.8 months median follow-up, 5- and 7-year overall survival were 41.9% and 34.9% in the control group versus 46.6% and 44.6% in the chemotherapy group (P=0.22). Cox model hazard ratios were 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.02; P=0.063] for death and 0.70 (95% CI 0.51-0.97; P=0.032) for recurrence. An invaded/removed lymph nodes ratio >0.3 was the main independent poor prognostic factor identified by multivariate analysis (P=0.0001). Because of toxicity, only 48.8% of patients received more than 80% of the planned dose.

CONCLUSION

There was no statistically significant survival benefit with this toxic cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, but a risk reduction in recurrence was observed.

Prognostic Role of Thymidylate Synthase Polymorphisms in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Surgery and Adjuvant Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognostic role of thymidylate synthase (TS) polymorphisms in gastric cancer patients treated with radical surgery and fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Ninety gastric cancer cases were identified among 187 patients previously enrolled in prospective case-control studies for disease susceptibility. Patients were genotyped for a G/C nucleotide change within a triple 28 bp variable number of tandem repeat sequence in the TS 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) and a 6 bp deletion in the TS 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR). According to available functional data, patients with 5'-UTR 2R/2R, 2R/3C, 3C/3C genotypes were classified as low TS producers (5'-UTRlow) and patients with 5'-UTR 3G/3G, 3G/3C, 2R/3G genotypes as high TS producers (5'UTRhigh). Patients with 3'-UTR del6/del6 and del6/ins6 genotypes were classified as low TS producers (3'-UTRlow) and patients with 3'-UTR ins6/ins6 genotype as high TS producers (3'-UTRhigh). The prognostic analysis was based on 5'-UTR/3'-UTR combined genotypes.

RESULTS

Ten patients (11%) were 5'-UTRhigh/3'-UTRhigh, 36 patients were 5'-UTRhigh/3'-UTRlow, 19 patients were 5'-UTRlow/3'-UTRhigh, and 25 patients were 5'-UTRlow/3'-UTRlow. 5'-UTRlow/3'-UTRlow patients showed the best outcome and the threshold of statistical significance was achieved in the comparison of disease-free survival and overall survival with 5'-UTRhigh/3'-UTRlow patients and 5'-UTRhigh/3'-UTRhigh patients. The presence of at least one high TS expression genotype showed independent adverse prognostic role in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic role of TS polymorphisms in gastric cancer deserves further investigation because the adverse effect of high TS expression genotypes may be a relevant information to improve adjuvant chemotherapeutic strategies.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy after surgical resection of gastric adenocarcinoma: can LV5FU2 reduce the toxic effects of the MacDonald regimen? A report on 23 patients

AIM OF THE STUDY

A North American phase III trial has recently shown that postoperative chemoradiotherapy using the FUFOL Mayo Clinic regimen improves overall survival and relapse-free survival after surgical resection of gastric cancer. However, severe grade 3-4, hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities were frequent. The aim of this retrospective and multicentric study was to determine the tolerance of a postoperative chemoradiotherapy regimen using LV5FU2 instead of the Mayo Clinic regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with resected adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction at high risk of recurrence were treated with LV5FU2 chemotherapy and radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions and 5 weeks) delivered to the tumor bed and regional nodes. Nineteen patients were treated with two to four cycles before radiotherapy, then three cycles during radiotherapy, and finally four cycles after radiotherapy; four patients were only given three cycles during radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Of the 23 patients assigned to this protocol, 20 completed treatment (87%). There was only one interruption of treatment because of hematologic or gastrointestinal toxicity. Tolerance of LV5FU2 regimen associated with radiotherapy was excellent: one grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal toxicity (4.3%), no toxic death, and only one grade 3 neutropenia (4.3%) were reported.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy combined with LV5FU2 appears to be better tolerated than the Mayo Clinic regimen used in the North American study. These results have to be considered when elaborating future postoperative chemoradiotherapy trials for gastric cancer.

Gastrointestinal cancer: recent developments in medical oncology

BACKGROUND

Progress in the medical oncological treatment of gastrointestinal cancer has resulted from advances in tumour biology as well as randomised clinical trials. This review updates oncologists on developments in perioperative therapy for gastrointestinal tumours, optimal use of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, and novel targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).

METHODS

The recent literature, including published abstracts, was reviewed with respect to current and developing treatments for gastrointestinal cancers. Emphasis was given to randomised clinical trials published within the last 5 years.

RESULTS

Randomised evidence exists to support the use of pre-operative chemotherapy in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer and pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy for rectal cancer. There is preliminary randomised evidence to support the use of perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer has been shown to improve survival. Improved disease-free survival for colorectal cancer patients treated with either adjuvant capecitabine or oxaliplatin has been demonstrated. MAbs targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary strategies for patients with localised gastrointestinal cancers; and improved systemic therapies for patients with advanced disease are leading to superior patient outcomes. Further improvements are required, and targeted agents may contribute to future progress.

The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies

AIMS

The debate on the funding and availability of cytotoxic drugs raises questions about the contribution of curative or adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to survival in adult cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We undertook a literature search for randomised clinical trials reporting a 5-year survival benefit attributable solely to cytotoxic chemotherapy in adult malignancies. The total number of newly diagnosed cancer patients for 22 major adult malignancies was determined from cancer registry data in Australia and from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data in the USA for 1998. For each malignancy, the absolute number to benefit was the product of (a) the total number of persons with that malignancy; (b) the proportion or subgroup(s) of that malignancy showing a benefit; and (c) the percentage increase in 5-year survival due solely to cytotoxic chemotherapy. The overall contribution was the sum total of the absolute numbers showing a 5-year survival benefit expressed as a percentage of the total number for the 22 malignancies.

RESULTS

The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA.

CONCLUSION

As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival. To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required.

Gastric adenocarcinoma: review and considerations for future directions

OBJECTIVE

This update reviews the epidemiology and surgical management, and the controversies of gastric adenocarcinoma. We provide the relevance of outcome data to surgical decision-making and discuss the application of gene-expression analysis to clinical practice.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Gastric cancer mortality rates have remained relatively unchanged over the past 30 years, and gastric cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Well-conducted studies have stimulated changes to surgical decision-making and technique. Microarray studies linked to predictive outcome models are poised to advance our understanding of the biologic behavior of gastric cancer and improve surgical management and outcome.

METHODS

We performed a review of the English gastric adenocarcinoma medical literature (1980-2003). This review included epidemiology, pathology and staging, surgical management, issues and controversies in management, prognostic variables, and the application of outcome models to gastric cancer. The results of DNA microarray analysis in various cancers and its predictive abilities in gastric cancer are considered.

RESULTS

Prognostic studies have provided valuable data to better the understanding of gastric cancer. These studies have contributed to improved surgical technique, more accurate pathologic characterization, and the identification of clinically useful prognostic markers. The application of microarray analysis linked to predictive models will provide a molecular understanding of the biology driving gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Predictive models generate important information allowing a logical evolution in the surgical and pathologic understanding and therapy for gastric cancer. However, a greater understanding of the molecular changes associated with gastric cancer is needed to guide surgical and medical therapy.

Pharmacogenomics and stomach cancer

In subgroups of gastric cancer patients, chemotherapy treatments carry a high risk of toxicity without any clear evidence of antitumor activity. Individualization of therapy is required to treat each patient with the optimal drug and dose. Genetic polymorphisms are the hereditary determinants for interindividual variations of drug effect and the genetic approach represents a new tool to design a tailored therapy. This review focuses on the relevance of the host polymorphisms involved in metabolism, cellular transport and interaction with molecular targets of the drugs used in gastric cancer in conventional or innovative chemotherapy regimens. Pharmacogenetic studies based on a single gene or multi-gene approach (pharmacogenomics) are promising to identify gastric cancer patients at risk for adverse toxicity, but larger and controlled studies are needed to justify changes in the chemotherapeutic strategies.

Status of extended lymph node dissection: Locoregional control is the only way to survive gastric cancer

There are many factors that are of influence on gastric cancer treatment. The only way to survive is complete locoregional control. More extended dissections should lead to better outcome, but increased morbidity and mortality probably offset its long-term effect in survival in randomised studies. In this article the factors of influence on outcome of gastric cancer treatment such as the extent of lymph node dissection, splenectomy, pancreatectomy, age, volume and additional treatments are discussed. A literature review of these factors in relation to the latest results of the Dutch Gastric Cancer Trials are presented. If morbidity and mortality can be reduced there might be an advantage of extended lymph node dissection. Splenectomy and pancreatectomy should be performed only in case of direct in growth from the tumour into these organs. Centralisation of gastric cancer treatment should be achieved in order to improve results and to facilitate research. By refining selection criteria in the treatment of gastric cancer further improvements are to be expected.

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Group Study--FFCD 9803

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of a biweekly regimen of leucovorin (LV) plus fluorouracil (FU) alone or in combination with cisplatin or irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and to select the best arm for a phase III study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-six patients (two were ineligible) were enrolled onto the randomized multicenter phase II trial. Patients received LV 200 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) followed by FU 400 mg/m(2) (bolus) and FU 600 mg/m(2) (22-hour continuous infusion) on days 1 and 2 every 14 days (LV5FU2; arm A), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (1-hour infusion) on day 1 or 2 (arm B), or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) on day 1 (arm C).

RESULTS

The overall response rates, which were confirmed by an independent expert panel, were 13% (95% CI, 3.4% to 23.3%), 27% (95% CI, 14.1% to 40.4%), and 40% (95% CI, 25.7% to 54.3%) for arms A, B, and C, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.6 months) and 6.8 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 11.1 months) with LV5FU2, respectively; 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.3 months) and 9.5 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 12.2 months) with LV5FU2-cisplatin, respectively; and 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 8.3 months) and 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.3 to 13.3 months) with LV5FU2-irinotecan, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Of the three regimens tested, the combination of LV5FU2-irinotecan is the most promising and will be assessed in a phase III trial.

Preoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with serosa-infiltrating gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Serosa-infiltrating gastric cancer poses a high risk for peritoneal recurrence. This study examined the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy for such cancer.

METHODS

Patients with serosa-infiltrating tumors, diagnosed by conventional examinations as well as by staging laparoscopy, were enrolled in this study. Those with unresectable T4 tumors, visible peritoneal metastasis or distant organ metastasis were excluded. Twenty-five eligible patients received preoperative i.p. chemotherapy, which consisted of i.p. injection of 20 mg of mitomycin C on day 1 and 10 mg of cisplatin for 5 days, followed by surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 25 patients, 24 underwent gastrectomy with lymph node dissection and 1 underwent palliative gastrojejunostomy. The curability of the surgery was curability A in 6, B in 16, and C in 3. Preoperative T stages (T3 in 21 and T4 in 4) were downstaged postoperatively (T1 in 1, T2 in 10, T3 in 11, and T4 in 3). The 1- and 2-year overall survival was 83.3 and 51.3%, respectively. The median survival time was 24.4 months. The toxicity of the preoperative treatment was tolerable and no serious postoperative complication was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative i.p. chemotherapy seems to be a safe and effective therapy for serosa-infiltrating gastric cancer. Randomized clinical trials comparing preoperative i.p. chemotherapy followed by surgery and surgery alone are needed.

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for operable gastric cancer: long term results of the Dutch randomised FAMTX trial

AIMS

Gastric cancer in Western countries is often diagnosed in an advanced stage and prognosis is poor. We performed a randomised trial with pre-operative FAMTX vs. surgery alone in order to evaluate the effect of pre-operative chemotherapy on resectability and survival.

METHODS

Patients with proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach were randomised to receive four courses of chemotherapy using 5-Fluorouracil, doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) prior to surgery or to undergo surgery alone.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were randomised; 29 patients were allocated to the FAMTX regimen prior to surgery and 30 patients had surgery alone. Resectability rates were equal for both groups. Complete or partial response was registered in 32% of the FAMTX group. With a median follow-up of 83 months the median survival since randomisation is 18 months in the FAMTX group vs. 30 months in the surgery alone group (p=0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

This trial could not show a beneficial effect of pre-operative FAMTX. Until large randomised studies prove otherwise, adequate surgery without delay is the best treatment for operable gastric cancer.

Quality assurance of surgery in gastric and rectal cancer

Multimodality and quality controlled treatment result in improved treatment outcome in patients with solid tumours. Quality assurance focuses on identifying and reducing variations in treatment strategy. Treatment outcome is subsequently improved through the introduction of programs that reduce treatment variations to an acceptable level and implement standardised treatment. In chemotherapy and radiotherapy, such programmes have been introduced successfully. In surgery however, there has been little attention for quality assurance so far. Surgery is the mainstay in the treatment of patients with gastric and rectal cancer. In gastric cancer, the extent of surgery is continuously being debated. In Japan, extended lymph node dissection is favoured whereas in the West this type of surgery is not routinely performed with two large European trials concluding that there is no survival benefit from regional lymph node clearance. Post-operative chemoradiation is part of the standard treatment in the United States, although its role in combination with adequate surgery has not been established yet. These global differences in treatment policy clearly relate to the extent and quality of surgical treatment. As for gastric cancer, surgical treatment of rectal cancer patients determines patient's prognosis to a large extent. With the introduction of total mesorectal excision, local control and survival have improved substantially. Most rectal cancer patients receive adjuvant treatment, either pre- or post-operatively. The efficacy of many adjuvant treatment regimens has been investigated in combination with conventional suboptimal surgery. Traditional indications of adjuvant treatment might have to be re-examined, considering the substantial changes in surgical practise. Quality assurance programs enable the introduction of standardised and quality controlled surgery. Promising adjuvant regimens should be investigated in combination with optimal surgery.

Randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival after resection for gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled if they underwent resection of gastric cancer but had lymph node or serosal involvement or both. Surgical resection was either total or partial gastrectomy according to the site of the tumor, and surgeons were allowed to perform either D1 or D2 gastrectomy. The subjects were random assigned in two treatment groups as follows: surgery alone as the control group, or surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Nine cycles of 5 days protocol every 4 weeks was proposed to the patients of the chemotherapy group. The protocol included a daily administration of 200 mg/m(2) of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (375 mg/m(2) during the first session increasing 25 mg by session until reaching 500 mg/m(2)) and CDDP 15 mg/m(2). Two hundred patients were required. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared according to the log-rank and the Mantel-Haenszel methods.

RESULTS

In all, 205 patients were enrolled in the study; 104 had surgery alone and 101 had surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients' characteristics were similar except for the mean age, which was 4 years less in the control group. Because of toxicity, 54% of the patients stopped the protocol before the end of the nine courses, and 46% of the patients received the nine courses including 32% with a decreased dose and 14% with a full dose. The 5-year survival rate was 39% in the control group and 39% in the chemotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

This protocol of adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve the 5-year survival after resection for gastric cancer.

(Neo)adjuvant strategies of advanced gastric carcinoma: time for a change?

Despite surgical R0 resections, patients with gastric cancer stage UICC II-III have a high risk of recurrence and metachronic metastases. Preliminary evidence exists that adjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy protocols may improve the prognosis of these patients undergoing surgery of gastric cancer with curative intention. As for palliative regimens, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin are integral components of such (neo)adjuvant strategies. Upcoming cytostatic agents, i.e. irinotecan, docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and oral fluoropyridines are currently under investigation in new multimodality treatment regimens and may further increase R0 resection rates and may prolong disease-free and overall survival in the treatment of advanced localized gastric cancer.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer using epirubicin/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (ECF) and alternative regimens before and after chemoradiation

Chemoradiation is now used more commonly for gastric cancer following publication of the US Intergroup trial results that demonstrate an advantage to adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy. However, there remain concerns regarding the toxicity of this treatment, the optimal chemotherapy regimen and the optimal method of radiotherapy delivery. In this prospective study, we evaluated the toxicity and feasibility of an alternative chemoradiation regimen to that used in the Intergroup trial. A total of 26 patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach were treated with 3D-conformal radiation therapy to a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The majority of patients received epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-FU (ECF) as the systemic component given before and after concurrent chemoradiation. The overall rates of observed grade 3 and 4 toxicities were 38 and 15%, respectively. GIT grade 3 toxicity was observed in 19% of patients, while haematologic grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed in 23%. Our results suggest that this adjuvant regimen can be delivered safely and with acceptable toxicity. This regimen forms the basis of several new studies being developed for postoperative adjuvant therapy of gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer: epidemiology, pathology and treatment

Gastric cancer incidence and mortality has fallen dramatically over the last 50 years in many regions, but remains the second most common cancer worldwide. Despite a marked decline in fundic and distal tumors, there is a rising incidence of adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction and gastric cardia, particularly in Western nations. This may imply that there are in fact two diseases differing from each other in epidemiology, etiology, pathology and clinical expression. While surgical resection remains the cornerstone of gastric cancer treatment, the optimum extent of nodal resection remains controversial, with randomized studies failing to show that the D2 procedure improves survival when compared with D1 dissection. The high rate of recurrence and poor survival following surgery provides a rationale for the early use of adjuvant treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant radiotherapy, when used alone, do not improve survival following resection. However, the results of the recent Intergroup 0116 study are promising in showing that the combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy with radiotherapy significantly prolongs disease-free and overall survival when compared with no adjuvant treatment. In advanced gastric cancer, chemotherapy enhances quality of life and prolongs survival when compared with best supportive care. There is no agreed standard of treatment in this setting. Of the commonly used regimens, epirubicin plus cisplatin and 5-FU (ECF) probably has the strongest claim to this role. However, there is a pressing need for new agents, both cytotoxic and molecularly targeted, to be assessed in both the advanced and adjuvant settings.

Current treatments and future perspectives in colorectal and gastric cancer

Given the high rate of distant spread, effective systemic therapy is key to improving survival in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The past 40 years have seen progress. The addition of folinic acid (FA) to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), the use of infusional rather than bolus 5-FU, and the combination of new active agents such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin with 5-FU/FA have each led to an increase in activity. In trials of current combination regimens first-line, response rates (RRs) in excess of 50% and median survival durations longer than 16 months are seen. A recent controlled trial suggests that overall time to progression is maximized and toxicity minimized when an irinotecan/5-FU/FA combination is used first-line, followed by an oxaliplatin/ 5-FU/FA combination on progression. In the adjuvant setting, 5-FU/FA is the standard of care in stage III disease but of uncertain value in stage II patients. The role of new agents such as irinotecan in adjuvant regimens is being assessed. Use of highly active chemotherapy in patients with unresectable disease (particularly liver metastases) achieves responses that allow a subset of patients to proceed to potentially curative surgery. The emergence of novel agents targeted at processes such as tumor angiogenesis will complement cytotoxic chemotherapy, while improved understanding of tumor biology should enable agents to be selected according to the likely sensitivity of the disease in a particular patient. In gastric cancer also, surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment. The extent of dissection required is debated, as is the potential benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (indeed the degree of resection may interact with the effect of adjuvant treatment). In untreated metastatic gastric cancer, median survival is 3-4 months. This can be increased to around 10 months using chemotherapy. Quality of life is also enhanced. There is no clearly defined standard of care. However, some form of cisplatin/5-FU combination can serve as a reference regimen. As single agents, both irinotecan and docetaxel achieve RRs of around 20% in metastatic CRC. In combination with cisplatin and/or 5-FU a very high and promising RR is achieved. The promise of these agents in combination with 5-FU and 5-FU plus cisplatin is currently being tested in phase III trials.

Future strategies and adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer

The most recent meta-analyses of adjuvant chemotherapy in resected gastric cancer suggest that systemic treatment may achieve a small, but statistically significant and probably clinically relevant, reduction in risk of death. However, this still needs confirmation in a large, prospective, well-designed phase III study. The recent Intergroup 0116 study, conducted in USA, of combined post-operative chemoradiotherapy demonstrated significantly improved disease-free and overall 5-year survival compared with an observation-only arm. However, 54% of patients appeared to have had suboptimal surgery. The fact that adjuvant therapy reduced locoregional (and not distant) relapse suggests that its benefit may lie in compensating for inadequate dissection. Combined modality therapy was associated with moderate toxicity, but a high requirement for changes in radiation planning. Therefore, the role and feasibility of adjuvant radiotherapy needs to be confirmed in patients operated on in Western Europe. Several approaches to the development of early systemic therapy in gastric cancer are being pursued. These include the evaluation of cisplatin-based adjuvant regimens, the use of neoadjuvant treatment, the incorporation into adjuvant and neoadjuvant regimens of newer cytotoxics such as docetaxel and irinotecan, and the assessment of novel, molecularly targeted agents such as the epidermal growth factor receptor and angiogenesis inhibitors.

Gastric cancer: advances in adjuvant and adjunct therapy

Patients with gastric carcinoma remain at high risk for local and systemic relapses, even after a successful surgery (R0 resection). To reduce the rate of relapse and increase cure rates, several clinical adjuvant trials have been reported. Only a few studies have reported positive results and most have failed to demonstrate any benefit for the treated patients. The trials with positive results from chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy have not gained global acceptance. The Intergroup 0116 trial has gained acceptance in North America, but it has not been accepted globally. In North America, where gastric surgery is often less than optimal, the Intergroup 0116 trial has provided evidence of benefit in overall survival time and time-to-cancer progression for patients treated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This trial recruited 556 patients with resected gastric cancer from stage IB through IV and an R0 resection was mandatory for registration. The results of this trial have spurred many other studies and controversies. In our opinion, all of the patients in the West who have had a curatively resected node-positive gastric carcinoma (R0 resection) should be offered an option of receiving postoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Individualizing therapy in gastric cancer

Although its incidence in developed countries has declined, gastric cancer remains one of the most common human malignancies. In western countries a shift from distal to proximal tumors has been noted during the past 15 years. Today, surgery is no longer the only treatment modality of gastric cancer, with the help of modern and sophisticated staging procedures it becomes increasingly possible to individually tailor therapy. Operative morbidity and mortality has markedly decreased. The importance of surgical expertise for short- as well as long-term outcome is emphasized. The knowledge of adequate surgery together with the use of combined modalities opens the door to the amelioration of the still dismal prognosis for patients with gastric cancer. This paper reviews the modern approach to gastric cancer using an individualized treatment concept.

Chemotherapy in gastric cancer: a review and updated meta-analysis

The five years survival rate for patients with gastric cancer is 15-25%. With the aim of improving survival, chemotherapy has been used in different adjuvant settings. Similarly, but with the aim of improving quality of life and prolonging life, chemotherapy has been used extensively in metastatic disease. In this review we have included studies of systemic and intraperitoneal chemotherapy given before, during or after operation and for advanced disease. A meta-analysis has been made on the 21 randomised studies that used adjuvant systemic chemotherapy postoperatively. A significant survival benefit for the patients treated postoperatively compared with controls was identified (odds ratio (OR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 0.96). When western and Asian studies were analysed separately we found no survival benefit for the treated patients in the western groups (OR 0.96 (95 CI 0.83 to 1.12)). Flaws in the conduct of several trials made it difficult to draw firm conclusions, including the exclusion of a small but clinically meaningful survival benefit. Preoperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy has shown effects in some patients, but no significant benefit was found in the few randomised studies. The few studies that reported intraperitoneal therapy showed no detectable survival benefit either. In patients with advanced disease, four small randomised studies found significantly longer survival in the treated patients. The survival benefit is in the range of 3-9 months, and there were also improvements of the quality of life. Several drug combinations have been tested, however, with no confirmed superiority for a particular regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy cannot be recommended as a routine because of the lack of confirmed beneficial effects. Some patients with advanced disease will have a clinically important benefit from palliative chemotherapy, so this can be recommended for patients who are otherwise in good health.

Randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin, Fluorouracil, and Cytosine arabinoside followed by oral Fluorouracil in serosa-negative gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9206-1

PURPOSE

To evaluate the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection in serosa-negative gastric cancer patients (excluding patients who were T1N0), we conducted a multicenter phase III clinical trial in which 13 cancer centers in Japan participated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1993 to December 1994, 252 patients were enrolled into the study and allocated randomly to adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone. The chemotherapy comprised intravenous mitomycin 1.33 mg/m2, fluorouracil (FU) 166.7 mg/m2, and cytarabine 13.3 mg/m2 twice weekly for the first 3 weeks after surgery, and oral FU 134 mg/m2 daily for the next 18 months for a total dose of 67 g/m2. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. Overall survival and the site of recurrence were secondary end points.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight percent of patients underwent gastrectomy with D2 or greater lymph node dissection. There were no treatment-related deaths and few serious adverse events. There was no significant difference in relapse-free and overall survival between the arms (5-year relapse-free survival 88.8% chemotherapy v 83.7% surgery alone; P =.14 and 5-year survival 91.2% chemotherapy v 86.1% surgery alone; P =.13, respectively). Nine patients (7.1%) in the chemotherapy arm and 17 patients (13.8%) in the surgery-alone arm had cancer recurrence.

CONCLUSION

There was no statistically significant relapse-free or overall survival benefit with this adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with macroscopically serosa-negative gastric cancer after curative resection, and there was no statistical difference between the two arms relating to the types of cancer recurrence. We do not recommend adjuvant chemotherapy with this regimen for this population in clinical practice.

Curative treatment of gastric cancer: towards a multidisciplinary approach?

Despite marked decreases in incidence over the last century, particularly in developed countries, gastric cancer is still the second-most common tumor worldwide. Surgery remains the gold standard for the cure of locoregional disease. However, in most countries, the diagnosis is made at an advanced stage, and the 5-year survival for surgically resectable disease stays far below 50%. The efficacy of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in addition to surgery has been actively studied over the last 30 years. Unfortunately, with few exceptions, most studies of adjuvant therapy in gastric cancer have given deceiving results. The purpose of this review is to address the reasons for our failure to objectivate an improvement in the cure of gastric cancer with adjuvant treatment in most trials, and to consider potential solutions. The low efficacy of chemotherapy regimens available up to now may have hampered our progress. In addition, many previous studies suffered limitations of design or methodology (e.g. low accrual, inadequate disease stage selection, inadequate surgical treatment) that may have obscured a treatment effect. Furthermore, the reduced treatment tolerance of post-gastrectomy patients, perhaps due to their poor nutritional status, results in decreased or delayed adjuvant systemic therapy, with potential adverse consequences in its efficacy. Among potential solutions, the arrival of new drugs, taxanes and topoisomerase I inhibitors in particular, which have shown encouraging results in metastatic disease, may increase the impact of chemotherapy in a multidisciplinary treatment approach. Pre-treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy prior to surgery may also be advantageous, averting the problems associated with post-surgical treatment. Such an approach has been shown to be feasible in phase II studies, and is relatively well tolerated by patients. Several carefully designed randomized phase III trials are underway to answer this question.

Low level of p27(Kip1) protein expression in gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with disease progression and poor outcome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Low tumor expression of the p27(Kip1) protein, which is involved in cell cycle control and apoptosis, is considered a negative prognostic factor in different types of cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and pathological significance of low p27(Kip1) protein expression in patients who had undergone resection for gastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

p27(Kip1) protein was studied by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed tumor sections from 95 patients who underwent resection for gastric adenocarcinoma between 1991 and 1996. Based on the median value of protein expression, p27(Kip1) protein expression was classified as low or high.

RESULTS

Low p27(Kip1) protein expression was significantly associated with tumor de-differentiation, increased penetration through the gastric wall, lymph node metastasis, and advanced tumor stage. In the group of 84 patients who underwent curative surgery, 5-year survival was 74% in cases with high p27(Kip1) protein expression and 38% in those with low p27(Kip1) protein expression (P < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, low p27(Kip1) protein expression was an independent negative prognostic factor for survival (RR = 3.671; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In gastric adenocarcinoma, low p27(Kip1) protein expression is associated with poorly differentiated and advanced tumors and is a negative prognostic factor of potential clinical value.

[Chemoradiotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of gastric adenocarcinomas: real progress?]

Frequency of local and distant failures after gastrectomy has led to extended lymph nodes dissection to obtain a better locoregional control. However, five year survival rates were not significantly different between patients undergoing D2 and D1 lymphadenectomy, and higher morbidity and post operative deaths were reported in large randomised trials (respectively 25% vs 48% and 4 vs 13%). Additionally, several metanalysis failed to demonstrate a significant survival advantage with adjuvant chemotherapy. The results of the first trial demonstrating one advantage to adjuvant post-operative chemoradiotherapy should modify the standard care. Disease free and overall survival after surgery alone and after surgery and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were respectively 31% vs 48% and 41% vs 50%. The intergroup trial demonstrate that better local control improve survival if radiation fields include stamps, tumour bed, proximal nodal chains and nodes corresponding to D2 extended lymph nodes dissection. Treatment was feasible with few severe toxic effects (1%). Of the 281 patients, 17% stopped treatment because toxic effects. Technical modalities of radiotherapy and post-operative nutrition support, which are critical points of interest for this treatment, are also discussed.

Efficacy of adjuvant immunochemotherapy with OK-432 for patients with curatively resected gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of centrally randomized controlled clinical trials

The benefit of immunochemotherapy employing a streptococcal preparation, OK-432 (Picibanil), in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer was reassessed by meta-analysis of data from 1,522 patients enrolled in six clinical trials with central randomization. All six trials began between 1985 and 1993, and patients were followed-up for at least 3 years after surgery and enrollment of the last patient. In these trials, standard chemotherapy was compared with the same chemotherapy plus OK-432. The endpoint was overall survival and intent-to-treat analysis was done without patient exclusion. Data were analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The 3-year survival rate for all eligible patients in the six trials was 67.5% in the immunochemotherapy group versus 62.6% in the chemotherapy group. The 3-year overall survival odds ratio was 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.99). The treatment effect was shown to be statistically significant (p = 0.044). The results of this meta-analysis suggest that immunochemotherapy after surgery with OK-432 can improve the survival of patients with curatively resected gastric cancer.

Marimastat as maintenance therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised trial

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to evaluate the ability of the orally administered matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, marimastat, to prolong survival in patients with non-resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Three hundred and sixty-nine patients with histological proof of adenocarcinoma, who had received no more than a single regimen of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, were randomised to receive either marimastat (10 mg b.d.) or placebo. Patients were treated for as long as was tolerable. The primary endpoint was overall survival with secondary endpoints of time to disease progression and quality of life. At the point of protocol-defined study completion (85% mortality in the placebo arm) there was a modest difference in survival in the intention-to-treat population in favour of marimastat (P=0.07 log-rank test, hazard ratio=1.23 (95% confidence interval 0.98-1.55)). This survival benefit was maintained over a further 2 years of follow-up (P=0.024, hazard ratio=1.27 (1.03-1.57)). The median survival was 138 days for placebo and 160 days for marimastat, with 2-year survival of 3% and 9% respectively. A significant survival benefit was identified at study completion in the pre-defined sub-group of 123 patients who had received prior chemotherapy (P=0.045, hazard ratio=1.53 (1.00-2.34)). This benefit increased with 2 years additional follow-up (P=0.006, hazard ratio=1.68 (1.16-2.44)), with 2-year survival of 5% and 18% respectively. Progression-free survival was also significantly longer for patients receiving marimastat compared to placebo (P=0.009, hazard ratio=1.32 (1.07-1.63)). Marimastat treatment was associated with the development of musculoskeletal pain and inflammation. Events of anaemia, abdominal pain, jaundice and weight loss were more common in the placebo arm. This is one of the first demonstrations of a therapeutic benefit for a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor in cancer patients. The greatest benefit was observed in patients who had previously received chemotherapy. A further randomised study of marimastat in these patients is warranted.

Recent advances in the treatment of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. The prognosis of the disease is poor, with only 40% of patients eligible to undergo potentially curative surgery. Even for those patients who undergo a complete resection, the rate of recurrence is very high. Extensive studies of multidisciplinary adjuvant treatment have been conducted seeking to improve the cure rates in the past two decades. The benefit of D2 dissection is still controversial and is undergoing prospective evaluation. Preliminary results from the United States Gastrointestinal Intergroup study, a well designed trial, have shown overall survival benefit of postoperative chemoradiation therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation is under active study in order to increase the number of patients to undergo potential curative surgery. Although many chemotherapy regimens have been developed recently, only modest clinical efficacy has been demonstrated for advanced metastatic disease. So far, there is no single regimen considered to be standard.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer: 5-year results of a randomised study by the Italian Trials in Medical Oncology (ITMO) Group

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of the EAP regimen (etoposide, adriamycin and cisplatin) followed by the Machover schedule (fluorouracil and folinic acid) given as adjuvant treatment to patients with poor prognostic factors (N+ or T3/4).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Before randomisation, the subjects were stratified on the basis of node involvement (N+ or N-) and the time from surgery to randomisation (< or = 21 days or > 22 days). The surgical procedures for sub-total or total gastrectomy with D2 dissection were standardised among the participating centres.

RESULTS

Between December 1992 and December 1997, 274 patients were enrolled: 137 in the treatment arm and 137 in the control arm. The majority of the patients (90%) were N+. After a median follow up of 66 months (range 2-83), the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 52% in the treatment arm and 48% in the control arm [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.34]; the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 49% and 44%, respectively (HR: 0.83; 95% CI 0.59-1.17). Among the patients with N-/N+ (1-6), the 5-year OS was 61% in the treatment group and 60% in the control group; in those with N+ (1-6), it was 42% and 22%. The treatment was completed by 87% of patients. Drug-related grade 3/4 WHO toxicities included leukopenia (21%), nausea and vomiting (14%), mucositis (9%), neutropenia (3%) and thrombocytopenia (2%). There were two deaths due to sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our results are not statistically significant, there was a limited relative risk reduction in the patients receiving adjuvant therapy (17% in DFS and 7% in OS). The data suggest that D2 surgery may have a favourable impact on OS.