The fourth transmembrane segment forms the interface of the dopamine D2 receptor homodimer

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors

GnRH and its analogs are used extensively for the treatment of hormone-dependent diseases and assisted reproductive techniques. They also have potential as novel contraceptives in men and women. A thorough delineation of the molecular mechanisms involved in ligand binding, receptor activation, and intracellular signal transduction is kernel to understanding disease processes and the development of specific interventions. Twenty-three structural variants of GnRH have been identified in protochordates and vertebrates. In many vertebrates, three GnRHs and three cognate receptors have been identified with distinct distributions and functions. In man, the hypothalamic GnRH regulates gonadotropin secretion through the pituitary GnRH type I receptor via activation of G(q). In-depth studies have identified amino acid residues in both the ligand and receptor involved in binding, receptor activation, and translation into intracellular signal transduction. Although the predominant coupling of the type I GnRH receptor in the gonadotrope is through productive G(q) stimulation, signal transduction can occur via other G proteins and potentially by G protein-independent means. The eventual selection of intracellular signaling may be specifically directed by variations in ligand structure. A second form of GnRH, GnRH II, conserved in all higher vertebrates, including man, is present in extrahypothalamic brain and many reproductive tissues. Its cognate receptor has been cloned from various vertebrate species, including New and Old World primates. The human gene homolog of this receptor, however, has a frame-shift and stop codon, and it appears that GnRH II signaling occurs through the type I GnRH receptor. There has been considerable plasticity in the use of different GnRHs, receptors, and signaling pathways for diverse functions. Delineation of the structural elements in GnRH and the receptor, which facilitate differential signaling, will contribute to the development of novel interventive GnRH analogs.

Methamphetamine increases dopamine transporter higher molecular weight complex formation via a dopamine- and hyperthermia-associated mechanism

Multiple high-dose administrations of methamphetamine (METH) both rapidly (within hours) decrease plasmalemmal dopamine (DA) uptake and cause long-term deficits in DA transporter (DAT) levels and other dopaminergic parameters persisting weeks to months in rat striatum. In contrast, either a single administration of METH or multiple administrations of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) cause less of an acute reduction in DA uptake and little or no persistent dopaminergic deficits. The long-term dopaminergic deficits caused by METH have been suggested, in part, to involve the DAT. Hence, this study assessed the impact of METH and MDMA administration on the DAT protein per se. Results revealed that multiple administrations of METH promoted formation of higher molecular weight (>170 kDa) DAT-associated protein complexes 24-48 hr after treatment. This increase was attenuated by either preventing hyperthermia or pretreatment with the tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine; notably, each of these manipulations has also been demonstrated previously to prevent the persistent deficits in dopaminergic function caused by METH treatment. In contrast, either a single injection of METH or multiple injections of MDMA caused little or no formation of these DAT complexes. The addition of the reducing agent beta-mercaptoethanol to samples prepared from METH-treated rats diminished the intensity of these complexes. Taken together, these data are the first to demonstrate higher molecular weight DAT complex formation in vivo and that such formation can be altered by both pharmacological and physiological manipulations. The implications of this phenomenon with regard to the neurotoxic potential of these stimulants are discussed.

Constitutive and Agonist-dependent Self-association of the Cell Surface Human Lutropin Receptor

The human lutropin receptor (hLHR) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that plays an essential role in reproductive physiology. The present studies were undertaken to determine whether the hLHR self-associates. We show that high molecular weight complexes of the hLHR can be co-immunoprecipitated from 293 cells transfected with differentially tagged hLHRs. These complexes are detected only in extracts from cells that have been co-transfected and not in extracts combined from cells expressing only one form of tagged hLHR, confirming the in vivo self-association of the receptor. In transiently transfected cells, in which a small percentage of cells overexpress hLHR and most of the hLHR is located intracellularly in the ER, the self-associated hLHR is composed predominantly of immature hLHR. When cells were transiently co-transfected with wild-type hLHR and a misfolded mutant of the hLHR, a physical association of the ER-localized misfolded mutant with the immature hLHR was observed, resulting in a decreased cell surface expression of the wild-type receptor. In contrast, in stably transfected cells, where the majority of cells express receptor and there is much less intracellular accumulation of hLHR, the self-associated forms of the hLHR are composed predominantly of cell surface receptor. The abundance of cell surface hLHR dimers and oligomers, as detected on SDS gels, is increased further upon human choriogonadotropin treatment of the stably transfected cells. In addition to documenting the self-association of cell surface hLHR, our results underscore the importance of the cellular distribution of recombinant GPCR as it relates to the nature of the GPCR dimerization and oligomerization.

Cell surface expression of alpha1D-adrenergic receptors is controlled by heterodimerization with alpha1B-adrenergic receptors

alpha(1)-Adrenergic receptors (ARs) belong to the large Class I G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and comprise three subtypes (alpha(1A), alpha(1B), and alpha(1D)). Previous work with heterologously expressed C-terminal green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged alpha(1)-ARs showed that alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-ARs localize to the plasma membrane, whereas alpha(1D)-ARs accumulate intracellularly. We recently showed that alpha(1D)- and alpha(1B)-ARs form heterodimers, whereas alpha(1D)- and alpha(1A)-ARs do not. Here, we examined the role of heterodimerization in regulating alpha(1D)-AR localization using both confocal imaging of GFP- or CFP-tagged alpha(1)-ARs and a luminometer-based surface expression assay in HEK293 cells. Co-expression with alpha(1B)-ARs caused alpha(1D)-ARs to quantitatively translocate to the cell surface, but co-expression with alpha(1A)-ARs did not. Truncation of the alpha(1B)-AR extracellular N terminus or intracellular C terminus had no effect on surface expression of alpha(1D)-ARs, suggesting primary involvement of the hydrophobic core. Co-transfection with an uncoupled mutant alpha(1B)-AR (Delta12alpha(1B)) increased both alpha(1D)-AR surface expression and coupling to norepinephrine-stimulated Ca(2+) mobilization. Finally, GFP-tagged alpha(1D)-ARs were not detected on the cell surface when expressed in rat aortic smooth muscle cells that express no endogenous ARs, but were almost exclusively localized on the surface when expressed in DDT(1)MF-2 cells, which express endogenous alpha(1B)-ARs. These studies demonstrate that alpha(1B)/alpha(1D)-AR heterodimerization controls surface expression and functional coupling of alpha(1D)-ARs, the N- and C-terminal domains are not involved in this interaction, and that alpha(1B)-AR G protein coupling is not required. These observations may be relevant to many other Class I G protein-coupled receptors, where the functional consequences of heterodimerization are still poorly understood.

G Protein–Coupled Receptor Oligomerization

The cardiovascular system is richly endowed with G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs), members of the largest family of plasma membrane-localized receptors. During the last 10 years, it has become increasingly clear that many, if not all, GPCRs function in oligomeric complexes, as either homo- or hetero-oligomers. This review explores the mechanistic implications of GPCR dimerization and/or oligomerization on receptor activation and interactions with G proteins. The effects of GPCR oligomerization on receptor pharmacology, GPCR-mediated signaling, and potential contributions to GPCR crosstalk will be considered in the context of receptors important in the cardiovascular system. Our evolving understanding of the structural and functional consequences of GPCR oligomerization may provide novel and more selective sites for pharmacological tuning of cardiovascular function.

The second extracellular loop of the dopamine D2 receptor lines the binding-site crevice

The binding site of the dopamine D(2) receptor (D2R), like those of homologous rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that bind small molecules, is contained within a water-accessible crevice formed among its seven transmembrane segments (TMs). The high-resolution structure of bovine rhodopsin, however, revealed that the second extracellular loop (E2), which connects TM4 and TM5, folds down into the transmembrane domain and forms part of the ligand-binding surface for retinal. Whether E2 plays a related role in other rhodopsin-like GPCRs is unclear. To address this issue, we have now mutated to cysteine, one at a time, 10 consecutive residues in E2 of D2R. The reaction of five of these mutants with sulfhydryl reagents inhibited antagonist binding, and bound antagonist protected two, I184C and N186C, from reaction. The pattern of accessibility in E2 is consistent with a structure similar to that of bovine rhodopsin, in which the region C-terminal to the conserved disulfide bond is deeper in the binding-site crevice than is the N-terminal part of E2. Thus, E2 likely contributes to the binding site in the D2R and probably in other aminergic GPCRs as well. Knowledge of its detailed positioning and interactions with ligand would benefit GPCR molecular modeling and facilitate the design of novel drugs.

Homodimerization of adenosine A2A receptors: qualitative and quantitative assessment by fluorescence and bioluminescence energy transfer

The results presented in this paper show that adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) form homodimers and that homodimers but not monomers are the functional species at the cell surface. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) techniques have been used to demonstrate in transfected HEK293 cells homodimerization of A2AR, which are heptaspanning membrane receptors with enriched expression in striatum. The existence of homodimers at the cell surface was demonstrated by time-resolved FRET. Although agonist activation of the receptor leads to the formation of receptor clusters, it did not affect the degree of A2AR-A2AR dimerization. Both monomers and dimers were detected by immunoblotting in cell extracts. However, cell surface biotinylation of proteins has made evident that more than 90% of the cell surface receptor is in its dimeric form. Thus, it seems that homodimers are the functional form of the receptor present on the plasma membrane. A deletion mutant version of the A2A receptor, lacking its C-terminal domain, was also able to form both monomeric and dimeric species when cell extracts from transfected cells were analyzed by immunoblotting. This suggests that the C-terminal tail does not participate in the dimerization. This is relevant as the C-terminal tail of A2AR is involved in heteromers formed by A2AR and dopamine D2 receptors. BRET ratios corresponding to A2AR-A2AR homodimers were higher than those encountered for heterodimers formed by A2AR and dopamine D2 receptors. As A2AR and dopamine D2 receptors do indeed interact, these results indicate that A2AR homodimers are the functional species at the cell surface and that they coexist with A2AR/D2 receptor heterodimers.

Oligomerization, Biogenesis, and Signaling Is Promoted by a Glycophorin A-like Dimerization Motif in Transmembrane Domain 1 of a Yeast G Protein-coupled Receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form dimeric or oligomeric complexes in vivo. However, the functions and mechanisms of oligomerization remain poorly understood for most GPCRs, including the alpha-factor receptor (STE2 gene product) of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we provide evidence indicating that alpha-factor receptor oligomerization involves a GXXXG motif in the first transmembrane domain (TM1), similar to the transmembrane dimerization domain of glycophorin A. Results of fluorescence resonance energy transfer, fluorescence microscopy, endocytosis assays of receptor oligomerization in living cells, and agonist binding assays indicated that amino acid substitutions affecting the glycine residues of the GXXXG motif impaired alpha-factor receptor oligomerization and biogenesis in vivo but did not significantly impair agonist binding affinity. Mutant receptors exhibited signaling defects that were not due to impaired cell surface expression, indicating that oligomerization promotes alpha-factor receptor signal transduction. Structure-function studies suggested that the GXXXG motif in TM1 of the alpha-factor receptor promotes oligomerization by a mechanism similar to that used by the GXXXG dimerization motif of glycophorin A. In many mammalian GPCRs, motifs related to the GXXXG sequence are present in TM1 or other TM domains, suggesting that similar mechanisms are used by many GPCRs to form dimers or oligomeric arrays.

Homo- and hetero-oligomerization of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form homo-oligomeric and hetero-oligomeric complexes. This understanding has prompted a re-evaluation of many aspects of GPCR biology, however the concept of receptor complexes has not been fully integrated into the current thinking about GPCR structure and function. Nevertheless, receptor oligomerization is a pivotal aspect of the structure and function of GPCRs that has been shown to have implications for receptor trafficking, signaling, and pharmacology and more intricate models for understanding the physiological roles of these receptors are emerging. Here, we summarize some of the advances made in understanding the structural basis and the functional roles of homo- and hetero- oligomerization in this important group of receptors. Although this discussion focuses primarily on the dopamine receptors, particularly the D2 dopamine receptor, and the opioid and serotonin receptors, we discuss the principles governing the oligomerization of all rhodopsin-like GPCRs and potentially of the entire superfamily of these receptors.

G-protein coupled receptor oligomerization in neuroendocrine pathways

Protein-protein interactions are fundamental processes for many biological systems including those involving the superfamily of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). A growing body of biochemical and functional evidence supports the existence of GPCR-GPCR homo- and hetero-oligomers. In particular, hetero-oligomers can display pharmacological and functional properties distinct from those of the homodimer or oligomer thus adding another level of complexity to how GPCRs are activated, signal and traffick in the cell. Dimerization may also play a role in influencing the activity of agonists and antagonists. We are only beginning to unravel how and why such complexes are formed, the functional implications of which will have an enormous impact on GPCR biology. Future research that studies GPCRs as dimeric or oligomeric complexes will enhance not only our understanding of GPCRs in cellular function but will also be critical for novel drug design and improved treatment of the vast array of GPCR-related conditions.

GPCR dimerisation

The concept that GPCRs exist and potentially function as dimers and/or higher oligomers has progressed recently from hypothesis to being widely accepted. A range of techniques has contributed to this understanding, including co-immunoprecipitation and various forms of fluorescence and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. Although co-immunoprecipitation studies indicate the capacity of a wide range of GPCRs to form hetero-dimers as well as homo-dimers, this approach is not well suited to examine selectivity of interactions. Both bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) have been applied to the detection of GPCR dimerisation in intact cells and BRET and FRET have been used to attempt to quantitate the fraction of GPCRs present as dimers. Following heterologous expression, a considerable fraction of many GPCRs is not fully processed and is trafficked to the proteasome or lysosome for destruction. A distinct limitation of both BRET and conventional FRET approaches is that both the energy donor and energy acceptor tags are inside the cell. Time-resolved FRET employing N-terminally epitope-tagged GPCRs has been used to allow detection only of dimers trafficked successfully to the cell surface. Reports indicating the appearance of distinct pharmacology and function following co-expression of two GPCRs are fascinating. Much remains to be examined, however, on the specificity and mechanisms of these interactions and to develop techniques to monitor the function only of hetero-dimers when the corresponding homo-dimers must also be present.

Self-association and raft localization of functional luteinizing hormone receptors

Membrane motions of LH receptors following binding of hormone agonists are consistent with hormone-driven aggregation. It is increasingly apparent that G protein-coupled receptors, including the LH receptor, are engaged in dynamic interactions with one another and other membrane components. These interactions are governed, in part, by a number of factors including whether the receptor has bound ligand, whether the receptor is capable of transducing a hormone-mediated signal, and the nature of the membrane environment within which the receptor is found. Microscopic methods, including laser-optical techniques, are ideally suited to probe dynamic events on cell membranes and provide an opportunity to examine interactions between receptors and other membrane components on viable cells. We and others have used a variety of techniques, some of which are summarized below, to examine functional and nonfunctional LH receptors on viable cells and the membrane environment of these receptors during cell signaling events.

Potent activation of dopamine D3/D2 heterodimers by the antiparkinsonian agents, S32504, pramipexole and ropinirole

Recombinant, human dopamine D3 and D2 receptors form functional heterodimers upon co-expression in COS-7 cells. Herein, actions of the antiparkinsonian agents, S32504, ropinirole and pramipexole, at D3/D2L heterodimers were compared to their effects at the respective monomers and at split, chimeric D3trunk/D2tail and D2trunk/D3tail receptors: the trunk incorporated transmembrane domains (TDs) I-V and the tail TDs VI and VII. In binding assays with the antagonist [3H]nemonapride, all agonists were potent ligands of D3 receptors showing, respectively, 100-, 18- and 56-fold lower affinity at D2L receptors, mimicking the selective D3 receptor antagonist, S33084 (100-fold). At D3trunk/D2tail receptors, except for ropinirole, all drugs showed lower affinities than at D3 sites, whereas for D2trunk/D3tail receptors, affinities of all drugs were higher than at D2L sites. The proportion of high affinity binding sites recognized by S32504, pramipexole and ropinirole in membranes derived from cells co-expressing D3 and D2L sites was higher than in an equivalent mixture of membranes from cells expressing D3 or D2L sites, consistent with the promotion of heterodimer formation. In contrast, the percentage of high and low affinity sites (biphasic isotherms) recognized by S33084 was identical. Functional actions were determined by co-transfection of a chimeric adenylyl cyclase (AC)-V/VI insensitive to D3 receptors. Accordingly, D3 receptor-transfected cells were irresponsive whereas, in D2L receptor-transfected cells, agonists suppressed forskolin-stimulated cAMP production with modest potencies. In cells co-transfected with D3 and D2L receptors, S32504, ropinirole and pramipexole potently suppressed AC-V/VI with EC50s 33-, 19- and 11-fold lower than at D2L receptors, respectively. S32504 also suppressed AC-V/VI activity at split D3trunk/D2tail and D2trunk/D3tail chimeras transfected into COS-7 cells. In conclusion, antiparkinson agents behave as potent agonists at D3/D2'heterodimers', though any role in their actions in vivo remains to be demonstrated.

Adenosine A2A-dopamine D2 receptor-receptor heteromerization: qualitative and quantitative assessment by fluorescence and bioluminescence energy transfer

There is evidence for strong functional antagonistic interactions between adenosine A2A receptors (A2ARs) and dopamine D2 receptors (D2Rs). Although a close physical interaction between both receptors has recently been shown using co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization assays, the existence of a A2AR-D2R protein-protein interaction still had to be demonstrated in intact living cells. In the present work, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) techniques were used to confirm the occurrence of A2AR-D2R interactions in co-transfected cells. The degree of A2AR-D2R heteromerization, measured by BRET, did not vary after receptor activation with selective agonists, alone or in combination. BRET competition experiments were performed using a chimeric D2R-D1R in which helices 5 and 6, the third intracellular loop (I3), and the third extracellular loop (E3) of the D2R were replaced by those of the dopamine D1 receptor (D1R). Although the wild type D2R was able to decrease the BRET signal, the chimera failed to achieve any effect. This suggests that the helix 5-I3-helix 6-E3 portion of D2R holds the site(s) for interaction with A2AR. Modeling of A2AR and D2R using a modified rhodopsin template followed by molecular dynamics and docking simulations gave essentially two different possible modes of interaction between D2R and A2AR. In the most probable one, helix 5 and/or helix 6 and the N-terminal portion of I3 from D2R approached helix 4 and the C-terminal portion of the C-tail from the A2AR, respectively.

Dimers of class A G protein-coupled receptors function via agonist-mediated trans-activation of associated G proteins

The histamine H1 receptor and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor are G protein-coupled receptors that elevate intracellular [Ca2+] via activation of Gq/G11. Assessed by co-immunoprecipitation and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer they both exist as homo-dimers. The addition of the G protein G11alpha to the C terminus of these receptors did not prevent dimerization. Agonists produced a large stimulation of guanosine 5'-3-O-([35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding to receptor-G protein fusions containing wild type forms of both polypeptides. For both receptors this was abolished by incorporation of G208AG11alpha into the fusions. Mutation of a highly conserved leucine in intracellular loop 2 of each receptor also eliminated agonist function but not binding. Co-expression of the two non-functional but complementary fusion constructs reconstituted agonist-mediated binding of [35S]GTPgammaS in membranes of HEK293 cells and elevation of [Ca2+]i in mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking both Gq and G11. Co-expression of the histamine H1 receptor- and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor-G11alpha fusions allowed detection of functional hetero-dimeric complexes, whereas co-expression of histamine H1 receptor-G11alpha with increasing amounts of L151Dalpha1b-adrenoreceptor resulted in decreasing levels of histamine-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Co-expression of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor with a fusion protein incorporating the N-terminal domain and transmembrane helix 1 of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor and G11alpha did not result in agonist activation of the G protein but did indicate a role for transmembrane helix 1 in dimerization. These data demonstrate that dimers of these class A receptors function via trans-activation of associated G proteins.

Ligand-independent CXCR2 dimerization

Homo- and hetero-oligomerization have been reported for several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The CXCR2 is a GPCR that is activated, among the others, by the chemokines CXCL8 (interleukin-8) and CXCL2 (growth-related gene product beta) to induce cell chemotaxis. We have investigated the oligomerization of CXCR2 receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney cells and generated a series of truncated mutants to determine whether they could negatively regulate the wild-type (wt) receptor functions. CXCR2 receptor oligomerization was also studied by coimmunoprecipitation of green fluorescent protein- and V5-tagged CXCR2. Truncated CXCR2 receptors retained their ability to form oligomers only if the region between the amino acids Ala-106 and Lys-163 was present. In contrast, all of the deletion mutants analyzed were able to form heterodimers with the wt CXCR2 receptor, albeit with different efficiency, competing for wt/wt dimer formation. The truncated CXCR2 mutants were not functional and, when coexpressed with wt CXCR2, interfered with receptor functions, impairing cell signaling and chemotaxis. When CXCR2 was expressed with the AMPA-type glutamate receptor GluR1, CXCR2 dimerization was again impaired in a dose-dependent way, and receptor functions were prejudiced. In contrast, CXCR1, a chemokine receptor that shares many similarities with CXCR2, did not dimerize alone or with CXCR2 and when coexpressed with CXCR2 did not impair receptor signaling and chemotaxis. The formation of CXCR2 dimers was also confirmed in cerebellar neuron cells. Taken together, we conclude from these studies that CXCR2 functions as a dimer and that truncated receptors negatively modulate receptor activities competing for the formation of wt/wt dimers.

Oligomerization of the alpha 1a- and alpha 1b-adrenergic receptor subtypes. Potential implications in receptor internalization

We combined biophysical, biochemical, and pharmacological approaches to investigate the ability of the alpha 1a- and alpha 1b-adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes to form homo- and hetero-oligomers. Receptors tagged with different epitopes (hemagglutinin and Myc) or fluorescent proteins (cyan and green fluorescent proteins) were transiently expressed in HEK-293 cells either individually or in different combinations. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements provided evidence that both the alpha 1a- and alpha 1b-AR can form homo-oligomers with similar transfer efficiency of approximately 0.10. Hetero-oligomers could also be observed between the alpha 1b- and the alpha 1a-AR subtypes but not between the alpha 1b-AR and the beta2-AR, the NK1 tachykinin, or the CCR5 chemokine receptors. Oligomerization of the alpha 1b-AR did not require the integrity of its C-tail, of two glycophorin motifs, or of the N-linked glycosylation sites at its N terminus. In contrast, helix I and, to a lesser extent, helix VII were found to play a role in the alpha 1b-AR homo-oligomerization. Receptor oligomerization was not influenced by the agonist epinephrine or by the inverse agonist prazosin. A constitutively active (A293E) as well as a signaling-deficient (R143E) mutant displayed oligomerization features similar to those of the wild type alpha 1b-AR. Confocal imaging revealed that oligomerization of the alpha1-AR subtypes correlated with their ability to co-internalize upon exposure to the agonist. The alpha 1a-selective agonist oxymetazoline induced the co-internalization of the alpha 1a- and alpha 1b-AR, whereas the alpha 1b-AR could not co-internalize with the NK1 tachykinin or CCR5 chemokine receptors. Oligomerization might therefore represent an additional mechanism regulating the physiological responses mediated by the alpha 1a- and alpha 1b-AR subtypes.

C5a receptor oligomerization. II. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies of a human G protein-coupled receptor expressed in yeast

Recent studies demonstrate that members of the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form oligomers both in vitro and in vivo. The mechanisms by which GPCRs oligomerize and the roles of accessory proteins in this process are not well understood. We used disulfide-trapping experiments to show that C5a receptors, expressed in mammalian cells, reside in membranes as oligomers (Klco, J. M., Lassere, T. B., and Baranski, T. J. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 35345-35353). To begin to address how C5a receptors form oligomers, we now use fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments on human C5a receptors expressed in the lower eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae. C5a receptors tagged with variants of the green fluorescent protein display energy transfer in intact yeast, demonstrating that mammalian accessory proteins are not required for C5a receptor oligomerization. In both intact yeast cells and membrane preparations, agonist does not affect FRET efficiency, and little energy transfer is observed between the C5a receptor and a co-expressed yeast pheromone receptor (encoded by STE2), indicating that C5a receptor oligomerization is both receptor-specific and constitutive. FRET studies performed on fractionated membranes demonstrate similar levels of energy transfer between tagged C5a receptors in endoplasmic reticulum compared with plasma membrane, and urea washing of membranes has little effect on the extent of energy transfer. The oligomerization of C5a receptors expressed in yeast displays characteristics similar to those observed for other GPCRs studied in mammalian cells. This model system should prove useful for further studies to define mechanisms of oligomerization of mammalian GPCRs.

C5a receptor oligomerization. I. Disulfide trapping reveals oligomers and potential contact surfaces in a G protein-coupled receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), stimulated by hormones and sensory stimuli, act as molecular switches to relay activation to heterotrimeric G proteins. Recent studies suggest that GPCRs form dimeric or oligomeric structures, a phenomenon that has long been established for growth factor receptors. The elucidation of the domains of GPCRs that mediate receptor association is of critical importance for understanding the function of GPCR oligomers. Using a disulfide-trapping strategy to probe the intermolecular contact surfaces, we demonstrate cross-linking of C5a receptors in membranes prepared from both human neutrophils and stably transfected mammalian cells that is mediated by a cysteine in the second intracellular loop. To explore other surfaces that might be involved in the oligomerization of C5a receptors, we constructed receptors with individual cysteines in other intracellular regions. C5a receptors with a cysteine in the first intracellular loop or the carboxyl terminus displayed the fastest kinetics of dimer formation, whereas an intracellular loop 3 cysteine displayed minimal cross-linking. Since the rate of disulfide trapping reflects the proximity of sulfhydryl groups, assuming similar accessibility and flexibility, these results imply a symmetric dimer interface that may involve either transmembrane helices 1 and 2 or helix 4. However, neither model can account for the ability of the native cysteine in the second intracellular loop to mediate efficient crosslinking. Based on these observations, we propose that C5a receptors form higher order oligomers (i.e. tetramers) or clusters in the membrane.

Constitutive oligomerization of human D2dopamine receptors expressed inSpodoptera frugiperda9 (Sf9) and in HEK293 cells

Human D2Long (D2L) and D2Short (D2S) dopamine receptor isoforms were modified at their N-terminus by the addition of a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or a FLAG epitope tag. The receptors were then expressed in Spodoptera frugiperda 9 (Sf9) cells using the baculovirus system, and their oligomerization was investigated by means of co-immunoprecipitation and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). [3H]Spiperone labelled D2 receptors in membranes prepared from Sf9 cells expressing epitope-tagged D2L or D2S receptors, with a pKd value of approximately 10. Co-immunoprecipitation using antibodies specific for the tags showed constitutive homo-oligomerization of D2L and D2S receptors in Sf9 cells. When the FLAG-tagged D2S and HIV-tagged D2L receptors were co-expressed, co-immunoprecipitation showed that the two isoforms can also form hetero-oligomers in Sf9 cells. Time-resolved FRET with europium and XL665-labelled antibodies was applied to whole Sf9 cells and to membranes from Sf9 cells expressing epitope-tagged D2 receptors. In both cases, constitutive homo-oligomers were revealed for D2L and D2S isoforms. Time-resolved FRET also revealed constitutive homo-oligomers in HEK293 cells expressing FLAG-tagged D2S receptors. The D2 receptor ligands dopamine, R-(-)propylnorapomorphine, and raclopride did not affect oligomerization of D2L and D2S in Sf9 and HEK293 cells. Human D2 dopamine receptors can therefore form constitutive oligomers in Sf9 cells and in HEK293 cells that can be detected by different approaches, and D2 oligomerization in these cells is not regulated by ligands.

Organization of the G protein-coupled receptors rhodopsin and opsin in native membranes

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which constitute the largest and structurally best conserved family of signaling molecules, are involved in virtually all physiological processes. Crystal structures are available only for the detergent-solubilized light receptor rhodopsin. In addition, this receptor is the only GPCR for which the presumed higher order oligomeric state in native membranes has been demonstrated (Fotiadis, D., Liang, Y., Filipek, S., Saperstein, D. A., Engel, A., and Palczewski, K. (2003) Nature 421, 127-128). Here, we have determined by atomic force microscopy the organization of rhodopsin in native membranes obtained from wild-type mouse photoreceptors and opsin isolated from photoreceptors of Rpe65-/- mutant mice, which do not produce the chromophore 11-cis-retinal. The higher order organization of rhodopsin was present irrespective of the support on which the membranes were adsorbed for imaging. Rhodopsin and opsin form structural dimers that are organized in paracrystalline arrays. The intradimeric contact is likely to involve helices IV and V, whereas contacts mainly between helices I and II and the cytoplasmic loop connecting helices V and VI facilitate the formation of rhodopsin dimer rows. Contacts between rows are on the extracellular side and involve helix I. This is the first semi-empirical model of a higher order structure of a GPCR in native membranes, and it has profound implications for the understanding of how this receptor interacts with partner proteins.