Phase III study comparing oxaliplatin plus S-1 with cisplatin plus S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced gastric cancer

WJOG10517G: a multicenter Phase II study of mFOLFOX6 in gastric cancer patients with severe peritoneal metastases

Gastric cancer patients with severe peritoneal metastases, defined as massive ascites and/or inadequate oral intake, have been excluded from clinical trials of new treatments due to poor prognosis and tumor-related complications, such as ileus. Based on the results of the JCOG1108/WJOG7312G study, their prognosis when treated with 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin or 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin plus paclitaxel remained extremely poor in this setting. Retrospective studies have shown the promising efficacy of the modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) regimen, with improved ascites and oral intake. Therefore, we planned a Phase II study of mFOLFOX6 in gastric cancer patients with severe peritoneal metastases (jRCTs041180007). The primary end point is overall survival, with an exploratory analysis comparing the findings with those of the JCOG1108/WJOG7312G study using Bayes' theorem. Trial registration Identifier: jRCTs041180007 (jRCTs: the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials).

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Combined with Systemic Chemotherapy for Patients with Extensive Liver Metastases from Gastric Cancer

Purpose

Liver metastases in patients with gastric cancer often indicate poor prognosis. Once liver metastases are extensive, it is difficult to achieve disease control by using systemic chemotherapy alone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect and safety of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) combined with systemic chemotherapy on extensive liver metastases from gastric cancer.

Patients and Methods

Between 2012 and 2019, 21 patients with extensive liver metastases from gastric cancer (LMGC) were enrolled in our study. Liver metastases were identified as unresectable and a major factor affecting prognosis mainly based on size and number of intrahepatic lesions. All patients received systemic chemotherapy with S-1 and HAI oxaliplatin plus floxuridine (FUDR).

Results

Liver metastases in 16 patients (76.2%) were evaluated as H3. The overall response rate was 76.2% (9.5% complete response). Intrahepatic and extrahepatic median progression-free survival times were 9.5 and 5.2 months, respectively. Median survival time (MST) was 12.3 months. All patients did not have the toxicity of grade 4. Grade 3 toxic effects included bone marrow suppression (14.3%) and diarrhea (9.5%). The other treatment-related toxicities were mild and reversible.

Conclusion

HAI combined with systemic chemotherapy for extensive LMGC seems to be safe and effective, which achieves a high-local response and may contribute to long survival time for patients.

Current Molecular Targeted Agents for Advanced Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of malignant tumor-related mortality worldwide. Traditional cytotoxic agents prolong the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) compared to that with best supportive care. Due to the occurrence of serious adverse drug reactions that result in discontinued treatment, the survival benefit in AGC remains unsatisfactory. Systemic chemotherapy regimens have changed greatly, especially since the introduction of trastuzumab. Nevertheless, HER2 positivity is present in only approximately 20% of tumors. Due to the genetic heterogeneity and complexity of patients, there are many studies in progress that are exploring novel targeted drugs as an alternative to chemotherapy or adjuvant treatment in early-stage, progressive, and advanced gastric cancer. On the basis of the differences in gene expression profiles among patients, searching for specific and sensitive predictive biomarkers is important for identifying patients who will benefit from a specific targeted drug. With the development of targeted therapies and available chemotherapeutic drugs, there is no doubt that, over time, more patients will achieve better survival outcomes. Recently, immune checkpoint blockade has been well developed as a promising anticancer strategy. This review outlines the currently available information on clinically tested molecular targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors for AGC to provide support for decision-making in clinical practice.

Five-year outcomes of a phase II study of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus docetaxel for stage III gastric cancer after curative D2 gastrectomy (OGSG1002)

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant S-1 monotherapy is standard of care for stage II and III gastric cancer (GC), but there is still a need to improve the efficacy of treatment for stage III disease. We conducted phase II study of eight cycles of S-1 plus docetaxel (DS) followed by S-1 monotherapy for up to 1 year after D2 gastrectomy for stage III GC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients with stage III GC were enrolled. They received oral S-1 (80 mg/m²/day) for 2 consecutive weeks and intravenous docetaxel (40 mg/m²) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks for 8 cycles, followed by S-1 until 1 year postgastrectomy. Treatment safety, tolerability, and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

The completion rate for eight cycles of DS therapy was 77.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 65.0-87.1%]. Subsequent S-1 monotherapy for 1 year was feasible in 71.0% (95% CI 58.1-81.8%) of patients. The incidence of neutropenia, leukopenia, anorexia, and fatigue of grade 3 or higher was 10% or higher. There were no treatment-related deaths. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 72.4% (95% CI 62.1-84.5%) and 60.0% (95% CI 48.8-73.9%), respectively. Subgroup analyses by disease stage showed 5-year OS and DFS rates of 74.5% (95% CI 60.7-91.5%) and 59.3% (95% CI 43.8-80.2%) for stage IIIA and 70.0% (95% CI 55.4-88.5%) and 60.0% (95% CI 44.8-80.4%) for stage IIIB, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant eight cycles of DS therapy might be safe and manageable and has promising OS and DFS for stage III GC.

The Effectiveness of Gastrectomy With Chemoradiotherapy Among Stage IV Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis

Objectives: The strategy for the treatment of stage IV gastric cancer remains controversial. The objective of this study was to assess whether tumor resection is beneficial to survival in gastric cancer patients with incurable stage IV disease. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of gastric cancer patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. Due to the baseline bias, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used in this cohort. Patients were grouped by treatment, (1) gastrectomy with chemoradiotherapy (CRT), or (2) CRT only, and a Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify predictors of survival. Overall survival was compared between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Result: After propensity score matching, 162 stage IV gastric cancer patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 were identified. Among these patients, half underwent gastrectomy with CRT, while the others received CRT only. The median overall survival rates were 22 months from the date of surgery for the gastrectomy with CRT group and 9.0 months for CRT only group. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, surgery was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) of death = 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.21-0.46, P < 0.0001]. Conclusion: In conclusion, stage IV gastric cancer is still a fatal disease. This population-based study found that compared with CRT alone, CRT with gastrectomy may be associated with a survival benefit in patients with metastatic GC. In selected patients' survival can be prolonged when the primary tumor is removed. Prospective, randomized trials are required to determine the best strategy for metastatic GC and to describe the characteristics of the selected patients.

Platinum-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: From pathogenesis to treatment

Platinum-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (PIPN) is a common side effect of platinum-based chemotherapy that may cause dose reduction and discontinuation, with oxaliplatin being more neurotoxic. PIPN includes acute neurotoxicity restricted to oxaliplatin, and chronic non-length-dependent sensory neuronopathy with positive and negative sensory symptoms and neuropathic pain in both upper and lower limbs. Chronic sensory axonal neuropathy manifesting as stocking-and-glove distribution is also frequent. Worsening of neuropathic symptoms after completing the last chemotherapy course may occur. Motor and autonomic involvement is uncommon. Ototoxicity is frequent in children and more commonly to cisplatin. Platinum-based compounds result in more prolonged neuropathic symptoms in comparison to other chemotherapy agents. Patient reported outcomes questionnaires, clinical evaluation and instrumental tools offer complementary information in PIPN. Electrodiagnostic features include diffusely reduced/abolished sensory action potentials, in keeping with a sensory neuronopathy. PIPN is dependent on cumulative dose but there is a large variability in its occurrence. The search for additional risk factors for PIPN has thus far yielded no consistent findings. There are currently no neuroprotective strategies to reduce the risk of PIPN, and symptomatic treatment is limited to duloxetine that was found effective in a single phase III intervention study. This review critically examines the pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors (both clinical and pharmacogenetic), clinical phenotype and management of PIPN.

Impact of peripheral neuropathy induced by platinum in first-line chemotherapy on second-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum, followed by paclitaxel (PTX) plus ramucirumab is a recommended treatment strategy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We investigated how peripheral neuropathy (PN), induced by platinum in first-line chemotherapy, affected the tolerability of second-line chemotherapy with PTX (2nd-PTX).

METHODS

The subjects were AGC patients who received second-line chemotherapy with PTX (2nd-PTX) after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy between March 2015 and June 2018. We retrospectively reviewed PN severity, and dose reduction and/or discontinuation due to PN during 2nd-PTX, and compared the cumulative incidence of grade 2 PN between the two groups according to first-line chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin (L-OHP) or cisplatin (CDDP).

RESULTS

The L-OHP and CDDP groups consisted of 50 patients each. PN severity before 2nd-PTX was grade 1/2 in 46/12% of patients in the L-OHP group, and 100/0% in the CDDP group. The worst grades of chemotherapy-induced PN during 2nd-PTX were grades 1/2/3 in 40/34/14% of patients in the L-OHP group, and 36/18/0% in the CDDP group. Median time to grade 2 PN after starting second-PTX was 2.5 months in the L-OHP group and 8.6 months in the CDDP group (hazard ratio 3.34, p = 0.002). The frequencies of a PN-related dose reduction and/or discontinuation of PTX were 18% in the L-OHP group and 8% in the CDDP group (p = 0.234).

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of PN and tolerability of 2nd-PTX may be affected by first-line chemotherapy with L-OHP or CDDP for AGC.

Combination Therapy With S-1, Oxaliplatin and Leucovorin in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

In this study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with S-1, oxaliplatin and leucovorin (SOL) in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten unresectable or recurrence ESCC patients, who had been previously treated with more than two regimens were included in this study. The treatment schedule comprised S-1 40-60 mg and fixed dose of leucovorin 25 mg together orally twice a day for one week, followed by one-week of rest. Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² was given as an intravenous infusion on day one, repeated every two weeks.

RESULTS

Of the eight patients with measurable lesions, two patients with partial response (25%) and two with stable disease (25%) were observed. Disease control rate was 50%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.0 and 9.3 months, respectively. The main common adverse events were malaise (60%), decreased appetite (50%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (40%).

CONCLUSION

SOL therapy showed promising antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity even for heavily pretreated ESCC.

Effect of apatinib plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection on pathologic response in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: A single-arm, open-label, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

The evidence of combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with targeted therapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer is inadequate. We conducted a single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1, oxaliplatin and apatinib (SOXA) in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients received three preoperative cycles of S-1 (80-120 mg/day on days 1-14) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m² on day 1) and two cycles of apatinib (500 mg/day for 21 days) at 3-week intervals, followed by surgery. The primary end-point was pathologic response rate (pRR). This trial is registered at ChiCTR.gov.cn: ChiCTR-OPC-16010061.

RESULTS

Of 29 patients included, median age was 60 (range, 43-73) years; 20 (69.0%) were male. The pRR was 89.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.7%-97.8%; 26 of 29 patients; P < 0.001) with 28 patients treated with surgery. All 29 patients were available for preoperative response evaluation, achieving an objective response rate of 79.3% (95% CI, 60.3%-92.0%) and a disease control rate of 96.6% (95% CI, 82.2%-99.9%). The margin-free resection rate was 96.6% (95% CI, 82.2%-99.9%). The pathologic complete response rate was 13.8% (95%CI, 1.2%-26.3%). Downstaging of overall TNM stage was observed in 16 (55.2%) patients. During neoadjuvant therapy, 10 (34.5%) patients had grade ≥III adverse events. No treatment-related death occurred. Surgery-related complications were observed in 12 of 28 (42.9%) patients.

CONCLUSION

SOXA followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma showed favourable activity and manageable safety. A randomised controlled trial in locally advanced gastric or oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04208347).

The Impact of Molecular Subtype on Efficacy of Chemotherapy and Checkpoint Inhibition in Advanced Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the association between molecular subtypes of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and the efficacy of standard chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with AGC who received systemic chemotherapy from October 2015 to July 2018 with available molecular features were analyzed. We investigated the efficacy of standard first- (fluoropyrimidine + platinum ± trastuzumab) and second-line (taxanes ± ramucirumab) chemotherapy, and subsequent anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with four molecular subtypes: MMR-D (mismatch repair deficient), EBV⁺, HER2⁺, and all negative.

RESULTS

410 patients were analyzed: MMR-D 5.9%, EBV⁺ 4.1%, HER2⁺ 13.7%, and all negative 76.3%. In 285 patients who received standard first-line chemotherapy, the median progression-free survival (PFS) times were 4.2, 6.0, 7.5, and 7.6 months and the objective response rates (ORR) were 31%, 62%, 60%, and 49% in MMR-D, EBV⁺, HER2⁺, and all-negative subtypes, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed shorter PFS in MMR-D versus all-negative patients [HR, 1.97; 95% CIs, 1.09-3.53; P = 0.022]. In second-line setting, there were no significant differences in efficacy. In 110 patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy, median PFS times were 13.0, 3.7, 1.6, and 1.9 months and the ORRs were 58%, 33%, 7%, and 13%, respectively. Twelve patients with MMR-D received subsequent anti-PD-1 therapy and showed longer PFS compared with that in 10 (83%) patients who received earlier-line chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

MMR-D might result in shorter PFS with first-line chemotherapy for AGC. Subsequent anti-PD-1 therapy achieved higher ORR and longer PFS than prior chemotherapy in most patients with MMR-D, supporting the earlier use of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab in combination with S-1 plus oxaliplatin as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: Cohort 1 data from the KEYNOTE-659 phase IIb study

AIM

The KEYNOTE-659 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment in Japanese patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. In this paper, we report results from cohort 1 (S-1 plus oxaliplatin [SOX] with pembrolizumab).

METHODS

This was a non-randomised, multicentre, open-label phase IIb study in patients with advanced programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative G/GEJ tumours. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), time to response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Exploratory analyses were performed based on the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) status.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were evaluated. The median follow-up was 10.1 months. ORR and DCR by BICR were 72.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 58.4-83.5) and 96.3% (95% CI 87.3-99.5), respectively. Median DOR, TTR, PFS and OS were as follows: not reached, 1.5 months, 9.4 months and not reached. The ORR was 73.9% in patients with CPS ≥1 to <10 and 71.0% in those with CPS ≥10. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported by 57.4% of patients. The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were decreased platelet count (14.8%), decreased neutrophil count (13.0%), colitis (5.6%) and adrenal insufficiency (5.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

SOX with pembrolizumab showed encouraging efficacy and a manageable safety profile for the first-line treatment of advanced G/GEJ cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03382600/JapicCTI-183829.

Gastric Cancer in Young Adults: A Different Clinical Entity from Carcinogenesis to Prognosis

Approximately 5.0% of gastric cancer (GC) patients are diagnosed before the age of 40 and are not candidates for screening programs in most countries and regions. The incidence of gastric cancer in young adults (GCYA) has declined over time in most countries except in the United States. Genetic alterations, environmental factors, and lifestyle may predispose some young adults to GC. According to molecular classifications, the cancer of most GCYA patients belongs to the genomically stable or microsatellite stable/epithelial-mesenchymal transition subtype, with the common genetic aberrations being mutations in CDH1. What characterizes GCYA are a higher prevalence in females, more aggressive tumor behaviors, diagnosis at advanced stages, fewer comorbidities and being better treatment candidates, and a similar or better survival outcome when compared with older patients. Considering the greater loss of life-years in younger patients, lowering the incidence of GC and diagnosing at a relatively early stage are the two most effective ways to decrease GC mortality. To achieve these goals, the low awareness of GCYA among general people, policy-makers, clinicians, and researchers should be changed.

Comparison of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as adjuvant chemotherapies for stage II and III gastric cancer after D2 resection: A single-center retrospective study

Background

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer (GC) reduces cancer recurrence and improves survival. S‐1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is well‐tolerated and effective against advanced GC, and also be used widely in adjuvant treatment. However, data comparing SOX and XELOX as adjuvant treatments are lacking.

Method

Data on treatment modalities, adverse events, recurrence and metastasis were collected from 180 patients with stage II and III GC, who received SOX or XELOX after D2 gastrectomy between January 2012 and December 2015, and analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was 3‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) rate.

Results

Median follow was 52.9 months; 3‐year DFS rate and overall survival (OS) rate were 75.2% and 67.6% (P = 0.359) and 81.2% and 83.3% (P = 0.77) in the SOX and XELOX groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in peritoneal metastasis rates in the SOX and XELOX groups (8.6% vs 15%, respectively; P = 0.232). Compound recurrent disease was associated with significantly shorter OS. Multivariate analysis identified metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) as an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.036; hazard ratio = 2.875; 95% confidence interval, 1.069–7.729); the LNR ≥17% group had inferior 3‐year OS rate to the LNR <17% group (P = 0.001). The incidence of grades 3 and 4 adverse events was similar in both groups; however, grade ≥2 hand–foot syndrome was significantly less frequent in the SOX group (P = 0.01).

Conclusion

SOX has similar survival benefits to XELOX and is well‐tolerated in Chinese patients with GC following D2 gastrectomy.

Clinical impact of renal impairment on the safety and efficacy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a single institutional study

BACKGROUNDS

S-1 plus oxaliplatin appears effective in chemo-naïve patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, comprehensive safety and efficacy data for S-1 plus oxaliplatin is limited for patients with impaired renal function.

METHODS

We retrospectively extracted data from advanced gastric cancer patients with normal renal function (normal group, CLcr ≥ 60 ml/min), who were treated with standard doses of S-1 (80 mg/m2) plus oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2), and patients with impaired renal function (impaired group, CLcr < 60 ml/min) who were treated with standard or reduced doses of S-1 (60 mg/m2 or 40 mg/m2) plus standard doses of oxaliplatin. Treatment efficacy and safety between the groups were compared.

RESULTS

Data from 100 normal patients and 42 patients with impaired renal function were extracted. Baseline characteristics differed significantly between the two groups, including age (median, 64 vs 72 years, P < 0.0001) and body surface area (median, 1.68 vs 1.51 m2, P < 0.0001). In the impaired group, 66.6% (28/42) started with a reduced dose. Within the impaired group, more patients had a reduced initial S-1 dose when CLcr <50 ml/min (77.3%). The median progression-free and overall survival between the normal and impaired groups was 6.1 vs 5.7 months (P = 0.698) and 16.1 vs 18.5 months (P = 0.638), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 plus oxaliplatin in advanced gastric cancer patients with impaired renal function appears safe and has demonstrated efficacy given appropriate dose modification.

Chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX for esophageal squamous cell cancer with synchronous rectal cancer: Four case reports and a literature review

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a valuable treatment option for localized esophageal cancer. Conventional baseline chemotherapy for this type of cancer includes cisplatin and fluorouracil. Recently, CRT with leucovorin-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) has become popular due to its convenience and lower toxicity. In Japan, the use of oxaliplatin for esophageal cancer is not yet approved, so experience with this treatment is limited to cases with colorectal cancer. As such patients are not usually included in clinical trials, little is known on the efficacy and safety of this treatment for this patient subpopulation, and treatment generalization in Japan is not allowed. We herein share our experience with CRT and FOLFOX for cases with esophageal cancer and synchronous rectal cancer at our institution. The clinical data of 4 patients who were treated for esophageal cancer with CRT/FOLFOX at our hospital between 2007 and 2016, who also had synchronous rectal cancer, were retrieved and analyzed. All the patients were male and had esophageal squamous cell cancer and synchronous rectal cancer. The median patient age was 68 years (range, 65–77 years). One patient received neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery, and the other 3 patients received definitive CRT for esophageal cancer. FOLFOX was administered biweekly during radiotherapy (41.4–60 Gy). All 4 patients completed the treatment schedule and responded to CRT. No patients experienced progression of rectal cancer during treatment. Notably, 1 patient also achieved a complete response (CR) of rectal cancer after CRT for esophageal cancer. Moreover, 2 patients without dysphagia were treated as outpatients and achieved a CR. Encephalopathy was the only reported grade 3 adverse event. Although the present study included a limited number of cases, the findings suggest that CRT with FOLFOX may be a valuable option for the treatment of patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer and synchronous rectal cancer.

Surgery Strategies for Gastric Cancer With Liver Metastasis

Gastric cancer with liver metastasis is defined as advanced gastric cancer and remains one of the deadliest diseases with poor prognosis. Approximately 4–14% of patients with gastric cancers presented with liver metastases at the initial diagnosis. Owing to its incurability, first-line treatment for gastric cancer with liver metastases is systematic chemotherapy, whereas surgery is usually performed to alleviate severe gastrointestinal symptoms. However, continuously emerging retrospective studies confirmed the role of surgery in gastric cancer with liver metastases and showed significantly improved survival rate in patients assigned to a group of surgery with or without chemotherapy. Therefore, more and more convincing data that resulted from prospective randomized clinical trials is in need to clarify the surgery strategies in patients with gastric cancer with liver metastasis.

Multicenter phase II study of trastuzumab with S-1 plus oxaliplatin for chemotherapy-naïve, HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Trastuzumab with cisplatin and fluoropyrimidines improves overall survival (OS) in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC). S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is one of the standard regimens for HER2-negative AGC in Japan. However, few studies have evaluated trastuzumab combined with SOX in patients with HER2-positive AGC.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, phase II study conducted at 10 institutions in Japan. Patients with HER2-positive AGC received S-1 twice a day on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin and trastuzumab on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the confirmed overall response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. The sample size was 75 to have 90% power with an alpha error of 0.1 (one-sided), expecting an ORR of 65% and threshold of 50%.

RESULTS

From June 2015 to January 2018, 75 patients were enrolled. The ORR was 70.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 59.0-80.6]. The median OS and PFS were estimated as 18.1 months (95% CI 15.6-26.5) and 8.8 months (95% CI 7.4-12.2), respectively. The major grade 3 or 4 adverse events were sensory neuropathy (16.0%) and neutropenia (10.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Trastuzumab with SOX had promising activity with well-tolerated toxicities for patients with HER2-positive AGC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000017602.

Refractory Chylothorax and Lymphedema Caused by Advanced Gastric Cancer

Chylothorax is the accumulation of lipid pleural effusion. Few reports have described chylothorax caused by gastric cancer. A 45-year-old woman presented with progressive lymphedema and bilateral chylothorax. Although repetitive thoracentesis was performed to relieve her dyspnea, swelling of her axillary lymph nodes became significant. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography demonstrated the accumulation of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose in these nodes, and a lymph node biopsy showed signet ring cell carcinoma. The primary site was a 0-IIc type lesion in the gastric body that was only detected by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The patient was diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer 3.5 months after presentation for chylothorax.

Correlation between immune-related adverse events and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer treated with nivolumab

Background

Recent studies have shown that immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors were associated with clinical benefit in patients with melanoma or lung cancer. In advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients, there have been few reports about the correlation between irAEs and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the correlation between irAEs and efficacy in AGC patients treated with nivolumab.

Methods

The subjects of this study were AGC patients received nivolumab monotherapy between January 2015 and August 2018. IrAEs were defined as those AEs having a potential immunological basis that required close follow-up, or immunosuppressive therapy and/or endocrine therapy. We divided the patients who received nivolumab into two groups based on occurrence of irAEs; those with irAEs (irAE group) or those without (non-irAE group). We assessed the efficacy in both groups.

Results

Of the 65 AGC patients that received nivolumab monotherapy, 14 developed irAEs. The median time to onset of irAEs was 30.5 days (range 3–407 days). Median follow-up period for survivors was 32 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 34.5). The median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 11.5) in the irAE group and 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.6) in the non-irAE group (HR = 0.11, p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 16.8 months (95% CI, 4.4 to not reached) in the irAE group and 3.2 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 4.1) in the non-irAE group (HR = 0.17, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that number of metastatic sites ≥2 (HR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.54), high ALP level (HR = 2.50; 95% CI, 1.27 to 4.54), and absence of irAEs (HR = 9.54, 95% CI, 3.34 to 27.30 for yes vs. no) were associated with a poor prognosis. The most frequent irAEs was diarrhea/colitis (n = 5). Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 6 patients; hyperglycemia (n = 2), diarrhea/colitis (n = 1), adrenal insufficiency (n = 1), aspartate aminotransferase increased (n = 1), peripheral motor neuropathy (n = 1). There were no grade 4 or 5 adverse events related to nivolumab.

Conclusions

Development of irAEs was associated with clinical benefit for AGC patients receiving nivolumab monotherapy.

A pathological complete response by chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin for a locally advanced duodenal adenocarcinoma in Lynch syndrome: a case report

BACKGROUND

Although primary duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) is a rare malignancy representing ~ 0.5% of all gastrointestinal cancers, the incidence of DA is more frequent in Lynch syndrome. Because of its rarity, treatment strategies or optimal chemotherapeutic regimens have not been clearly defined for advanced DA.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 72-year-old woman with Lynch syndrome visited our hospital with a right upper abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) showed wall thickness with enhancement in the second portion of the duodenum and adjacent abdominal wall, which suggested direct tumor invasion to the abdominal wall. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) showed a large ulcerative tumor in the second portion of the duodenum, and histological analysis revealed a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. A cT4N0M0, cStage IIB (Union for International Control Cancer TNM staging) DA was diagnosed. After three courses of chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX), follow-up CT and UGE showed shrinkage of the duodenal tumor. Therefore, the patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with lymph node dissection with curative intent. Histological examination showed a pathological complete response to SOX therapy. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 29. The patient received no adjuvant chemotherapy, and there has been no evidence of recurrence 6 months after the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

SOX therapy provided a remarkable response and can be an optimal chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced DA in Lynch syndrome.

The relationship between peripheral neuropathy and efficacy in second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer: a prospective observational multicenter study protocol (IVY)

Background

Paclitaxel is used in second-line conventional chemotherapies to manage patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer (GC). Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy is a known adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation. Additionally, oxaliplatin which causes irreversible peripheral neuropathy is now commonly used in first-line chemotherapy for advanced GC in Japan. Thus, examining the incidence of peripheral neuropathy with paclitaxel after oxaliplatin is necessary to improve the quality of life and outcomes of patients with advanced GC in the second-line treatment setting.

Methods

This prospective observational multicenter study, (which we named IVY study), will evaluate the degree of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced GC. A patient neurotoxicity questionnaire (PNQ) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) will be used to assess CIPN during the second-line treatment. The key eligibility criteria are as follows: 1) unresectable or recurrent GC histologically confirmed to be primary adenocarcinoma of the stomach, 2) age over 20 years, 3) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0–2, 4) written informed consent following full study information is provided to the patient, 5) progression or intolerance for first-line chemotherapy comprising fluorinated pyrimidine and platinum anticancer drugs (cisplatin or oxaliplatin) for advanced GC. 6) presence of evaluable lesions as confirmed using a computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. A total of 200 patients is considered to be appropriate for inclusion in this study.

Discussion

The results of this study will provide some information on CIPN with the sequential usage of oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy to paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in clinical practice.

Trial registration

This trial is registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network’s Clinical Trials Registry with the registration number UMIN000033376 (Registered 11 July 2018).

Clinical significance and prognostic role of hypoxia-induced microRNA 382 in gastric adenocarcinoma

Hypoxia and angiogenesis are critical components in the progression of solid cancer, including gastric cancers (GCs). miR-382 has been identified as a hypoxia-induced miR (hypoxamiR), but the clinical significance in GCs has not been identified yet. To explore the clinical and prognostic importance of miR-382 in GCs, the surgical specimens of 398 patients with GCs in KNU hospital in Korea, the total of 183 patients was randomly selected using simple sampling methods and big data with 446 GCs and 45 normal tissues from the data portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) were analysed. Expression of miR-382 as well as miR-210, as a positive control hypoxamiR by qRT-PCR in histologically malignant region of GCs showed significantly positive correlation (R = 0.516, p<0.001). High miR-210 and miR-382 expression was significantly correlated with unfavorable prognosis including advanced GCs (AGC), higher T category, N category, pathologic TNM stage, lymphovascular invasion, venous invasion, and perinueral invasion, respectively (all p<0.05). In univariate analysis, high miR-210 expression was significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) (p = 0.036) but not high miR-382. In paired 60 gastric normal and cancer tissues, miR-382 expression in cancer tissues was significantly higher than normal counterpart (p = 0.003), but not miR-210 expression. However, by increasing the patient number from the big data analysis, miR-210 as well as miR-382 expression in tumor tissues was significantly higher than the normal tissues. Our results suggest that miR-382, as novel hypoxamiR, can be a prognostic marker for advanced GCs and might be correlated with metastatic potential. miR-382 might play important roles in the aggressiveness, progression and prognosis of GCs. In addition, miR-382 give a predictive marker for progression of GCs compared to the normal or preneoplastic lesion.

Delivery rate of patients with advanced gastric cancer to third-line chemotherapy and those patients' characteristics: an analysis in real-world setting

Background

Nivolumab has recently become available for third-line chemotherapy of advanced gastric cancer in Japan. The drug is expected to provide long-term survival in some patients. However, not all patients receive third-line therapy. In this study, we investigated the frequency of prescribing and the predictive factors for prescribing of third-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 271 patients with unresected advanced gastric cancer who had started chemotherapy between January 2006 and June 2017 at Kurashiki Central Hospital. Patients' median age was 68 years, and 190 patients were male. We compared baseline characteristics of patients who did or did not receive third-line chemotherapy and, through multivariate logistic-regression analysis, identified potential predictive factors for receiving third-line chemotherapy.

Results

Among the 271 patients, 71 (26.2%) received third-line chemotherapy. In the univariate analysis, the rate of receiving this care was significantly related to patients' performance status, cancer histology, and several laboratory variables at baseline. Multivariate analysis revealed that performance status 0 and serum C-reactive protein levels ≤0.6 mg/dL were independent and significant predictive factors for administration of the third-line chemotherapy; adjusted odds ratios of the two factors were 4.17 (95% confidence interval, 2.13-8.15) and 2.46 (1.19-5.08), respectively.

Conclusions

In this real-world study, only 26.2% of patients received third-line chemotherapy. Poor performance status and high serum C-reactive protein value at the start of first-line chemotherapy were significantly associated with lower frequency of administration of third-line chemotherapy.

Durable Response After Combination Of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy And Anti-PD-1 Therapy In HER2-Negative Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report

Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is difficult to treat with poor prognosis. Despite various possible treatments, the median survival time of such patients remains unsatisfactory. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches or combinations need to be further explored. We herein reported a case of a 54-year-old male patient who was initially diagnosed with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer. Based on previous studies and patient's desire, we made a therapeutic plan: the combination of concurrent radiochemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy. After about 4 months of combined therapy, the patient showed satisfactory complete response to tumor lesions even metastatic lesions (CR, disappearance of all target lesions). In summary, the combination of concurrent SOX regimen chemotherapy, stomach radiotherapy and PD-1 antibody immunotherapy is effective in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Efficacy of Postoperative Chemotherapy After Resection that Leaves No Macroscopically Visible Disease of Gastric Cancer with Positive Peritoneal Lavage Cytology (CY1) or Localized Peritoneum Metastasis (P1a): A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) patients with positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY1) and/or localized peritoneum metastasis (P1a) are defined as stage IV in the 15th edition of the Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer. In Japan, the most common treatment for patients with CY1 and/or P1a is gastrectomy followed by postoperative chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Subjects in this multi-institutional retrospective study were GC patients with CY1 and/or P1a who received surgical resection that leaves no macroscopically visible disease. Patients were selected from 34 institutions in Japan between 2007 and 2012. Selection criteria included adenocarcinoma, no distant metastasis except CY1 and P1a, and no prior treatment for GC before surgery.

RESULTS

Among 824 patients registered, 506 were identified as eligible, with a background of P0CY1, P1aCY0, or P1aCY1 (72.5%, 16.0%, and 11.5% of subjects, respectively). Sixty-two patients had not received postoperative chemotherapy (no-Cx), whereas 444 patients had received postoperative chemotherapy: S-1 monotherapy (S-1; n = 267, 52.7%), cisplatin plus S-1 (CS; n = 114, 22.5%), and others (n = 63, 12.6%). Overall survival (OS) was 29.5, 24.7, 25.4 and 9.9 months in the S-1, CS, 'others', and no-Cx groups, respectively [CS vs. S-1: hazard ratio (HR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.50; p = 0.275]. In multivariate analysis, OS was similar between the S-1 and CS groups (CS vs. S-1: HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.92-1.55; p = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative chemotherapy after gastrectomy that leaves no macroscopically visible disease may have some survival benefits for GC patients with CY1 and/or P1a. In contrast, S-1 plus cisplatin seems to have no additional benefit over S-1 treatment alone.

Curative-Intent Surgery for Stage IV Advanced Gastric Cancer: Who Can Undergo Surgery and What Are the Prognostic Factors for Long-Term Survival?

BACKGROUND

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the predictive factors for performing curative-intent surgery and prognostic factors for long-term survival of patients undergoing surgery for stage IV gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2001 and 2017, 271 patients with stage IV gastric cancer with distant metastasis who underwent systemic chemotherapy were enrolled. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictive factors for curative-intent surgery. Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied for patients who were subsequently treated with curative-intent surgery to identify prognostic factors for long-term survival.

RESULTS

Curative-intent surgery was performed in 48 patients (17.7%). Median survival time was significantly longer in the surgery group than in the nonsurgery group (53 vs. 11 months, p < 0.0001). R0 resection was performed in 35 patients (72.9%). The three-year overall survival (OS) rates of the R0, R1, and R2 surgery groups were 75.4%, 33.3%, and 25.0%, respectively (p = 0.0002). Logistic regression analysis revealed that lymphogenous distant metastasis alone (odds ratio = 3.276, p = 0.004), positive lavage cytology alone (6.394, 0.014), doublet or triplet chemotherapy (4.064, 0.034), and high Glasgow prognostic score (0.276, 0.001) were independent predictive factors for performing curative-intent surgery. Among patients undergoing surgery, the Cox proportional hazards regression model for OS showed that R0 surgery was an independent prognostic factor for favorable OS (hazard ratio 0.188, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lymphogenous distant metastasis alone, P0CY1 alone, good immunonutritional status, and doublet/triplet chemotherapy are candidates for performing effective curative-intent surgery. R0 surgery is crucial for improving long-term survival after surgery.

Correlation between Skeletal Muscle Mass and Adverse Events of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery is a promising treatment strategy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Severe toxicity associated with the treatment may reduce the dose intensity of chemotherapy, resulting in the effect of chemotherapy being attenuated. Recently, skeletal muscle mass has been reported to be associated with the treatment outcomes of cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether pretreatment skeletal muscle mass is a predictor of adverse events as well as the relationship between changes in skeletal muscle mass and adverse events during NAC.

METHODS

This study included 41 advanced gastric cancer patients who were treated with NAC followed by surgery. Body composition was assessed before and after NAC. The relationship between the pre-NAC body composition and adverse events was investigated as well as the relationship between changes in body composition and adverse events.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that low pre-NAC skeletal muscle mass was the only factor significantly associated with severe diarrhea (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in body weight before and after NAC, but skeletal muscle mass was significantly reduced after NAC (-5.93 ± 7.69%, p < 0.01). Furthermore, patients who experienced severe diarrhea showed significantly greater relative skeletal muscle decrease than those who did not (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-NAC low skeletal muscle mass was a useful predictor of severe diarrhea. Prevention of severe adverse events may contribute to maintaining the skeletal muscle mass.

Conversion Surgery for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis Based on the Diagnosis of Second-Look Staging Laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

Patients with positive peritoneal cytology (CY1) or peritoneal dissemination (P1) have significantly poor prognosis. We performed pre-therapeutic staging laparoscopy (SL) to diagnose peritoneal metastasis for patients with advanced gastric cancer. When peritoneal metastasis disappears by chemotherapy for patients with CY1 or P1, we have intention to perform conversion surgery (CS). This study aims to clarify the clinical significance of CS for such patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes of 115 patients with advanced gastric cancer (large type 3, type 4, serosa-invasion) who underwent SL between 2005 and 2014. Disappearance of peritoneal metastasis was confirmed by second-look SL.

RESULTS

CY0P0, CY1P0, and P1 were found in 56, 26, and 33 patients, respectively. In patients with CY1P0, 12 patients (66.7%) underwent CS (R0) as peritoneal cytology turned negative. All cases received S-1-based regimens, with median five treatment courses. The survival of patients with CS was significantly longer than those without CS (median survival time (MST); 41 vs. 11 months, respectively, P < 0.001). We observed no difference in overall survival between patients who underwent CS and patients with CY0P0 at the first SL (P = 0.913). All patients with P1 received chemotherapy. As peritoneal metastasis of five patients (15.2%) disappeared by chemotherapy, those patients underwent the CS (R0). The survival of patients who underwent CS was significantly longer than those who did not (MST; 31 vs. 10 months, respectively, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that conversion surgery contributes to improvement in survival of patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Retrospective analysis of patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer in Colombia

Aims: To assess patient and disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and associated costs in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (A/MGC) in Colombia, in both the public and private hospitals. Materials and methods: A total of 145 patients who had received first-line chemotherapy treatment (platinum analog and/or a fluoropyrimidine) and were followed for at least 3 months after the last administration of a first-line cytotoxic agent were eligible for inclusion. Case-report forms were elaborated based on the patients' medical records from three Colombian hospitals. Estimates of treatment costs were calculated using unit costs from the participating hospitals. Results: Of the 145 patients, more than half (64.83%) were male, 79.56% were diagnosed with metastatic stage IV disease (mean age = 58.14 years). Prior to MGC diagnosis, 31.71% of the patients being operated on received a total gastrectomy; 66.9% of the patients received a doublet therapy, of which 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with cisplatin was the standard treatment (14%), followed by combination with leucovorin (12%). Only around 10% of the patients responded to first-line treatment. Out of 41.38% of the patients who received a second-line treatment, 71.67% were still administered a platinum analog and/or fluoropyrimidine. During the follow-up period, 52% of the patients progressed and 20% achieved stable disease. Best supportive care mostly consisted of outpatient visits after last line-therapy (72.41%), palliative radiotherapy (18.6%), and surgery (37.2%). Limitations and conclusions: Gastric cancer is one of the main causes of cancer-related death in Colombia, as most of the patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, when prognosis is poor. Treatment patterns are highly heterogeneous. Second-line treatments were mostly initiated with paclitaxel, capecitabine, irinotecan, or cisplatin.

Effect of First-line S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin With or Without Ramucirumab Followed by Paclitaxel Plus Ramucirumab on Advanced Gastric Cancer in East Asia: The Phase 2 RAINSTORM Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Ramucirumab, a human IgG 1 antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, has been shown to improve progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer in the second-line setting.

Objective

To compare progression-free survival for S-1 and oxaliplatin plus ramucirumab with that for S-1 and oxaliplatin plus placebo in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 2, double-blind randomized clinical trial (RAINSTORM [First-line S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin With or Without Ramucirumab Followed by Paclitaxel Plus Ramucirumab in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer]) was conducted from October 12, 2015, to April 11, 2018, at 36 sites in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Participants were chemotherapy-naive patients (n = 189) with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Analyses of the full analysis set and safety population were conducted between November 27, 2017, and June 4, 2018.

Interventions

Patients randomized to the ramucirumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm received S-1, 80 to 120 mg/d twice daily, on days 1 to 14 and oxaliplatin, 100 mg/m2, on day 1 with ramucirumab, 8 mg/kg, on days 1 and 8 in part A (21-day cycle). Patients randomized to the placebo plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm received the same S-1 and oxaliplatin dosage as well as placebo on days 1 and 8 in part A. Eligible patients received second-line paclitaxel, 80 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 and ramucirumab, 8 mg/kg, on days 1 and 15 in part B (28-day cycle).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was progression-free survival, analyzed using the stratified log-rank test; the hazard ratio (HR) was estimated using the stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model. Secondary end points included overall survival and adverse events.

Results

In total, 189 patients were randomized and received treatment: 96 to the ramucirumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm and 93 to the placebo plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm. Among the 189 patients, 121 (64.0%) were male, and the median (range) age was 62.0 (26-84) years. Median progression-free survival was not prolonged in the ramucirumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm compared with the placebo plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm (6.34 [80% CI, 5.65-6.93] vs 6.74 [80% CI, 5.75-7.13] months; HR, 1.07; 80% CI, 0.86-1.33; P = .70). Median overall survival was 14.65 (80% CI, 12.39-15.67) months in the ramucirumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm and 14.26 (80% CI, 13.83-17.31) months in the placebo plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm (HR, 1.11; 80% CI, 0.89-1.40; P = .55). The most commonly reported grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events in the ramucirumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm in part A were decreased neutrophil count (14 patients [14.6%]), hypertension (10 patients [10.4%]), and anemia (10 patients [10.4%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, the addition of ramucirumab to first-line S-1 and oxaliplatin treatment did not prolong progression-free survival or overall survival compared with S-1 and oxaliplatin alone among East Asian patients with advanced gastric cancer; no new safety signals for ramucirumab were identified.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02539225.

TOXview: a novel graphical presentation of cancer treatment toxicity profiles

Background: Toxicity profiles play a crucial role in the choice between specific palliative chemotherapy regimens. To optimize the quality of life for cancer patients, patients should be adequately informed about potential toxicities before undergoing chemotherapy. Therefore, we constructed TOXviews, a novel graphical presentation and overview of toxicity profiles to improve information provision about adverse events. As an example, we analyzed first-line chemotherapy regimens for advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEGC). Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ASCO and ESMO for prospective phase II or III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on palliative first-line systemic treatment for AEGC until February 2017. We extracted proportions of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1-2 (mild) and 3-4 (severe) adverse events from each chemotherapy arm and pooled these by using single-arm meta-analysis. Toxicity profiles per chemotherapy regimen were visualized in bidirectional bar charts with pooled proportions plus 95% confidence intervals. For comparative analysis, chemotherapy regimens were grouped in singlets, doublets and triplets. Results: We included 92 RCTs with a total of 16,963 patients. TOXviews for 3 fluoropyrimidine singlets, 5 cisplatin-containing doublets (C-doublets), 10 fluoropyrimidine non-cisplatin containing doublets (F-doublets), 4 anthracycline-containing triplets (A-triplets) and 5 taxane-containing triplets (T-triplets) were constructed. C-doublets, A-triplets and T-triplets all showed an increased incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events and clinically relevant grade 1-2 adverse events compared to F-doublets. Conclusion: TOXview provides a new graphical presentation and overview of chemotherapy toxicities. TOXviews can be used to educate physicians about the incidences of AEs of systemic therapy and improve informed decision-making.

Sex differences in the safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin and S-1 plus cisplatin for patients with metastatic gastric cancer

Previous studies have shown sex‐related differences in the incidence of adverse events following treatment with fluoropyrimidines, however the mechanism of this difference is unknown. We examined sex‐related differences in the safety of S‐1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and S‐1 plus cisplatin (CS) in 663 metastatic gastric cancer patients taking part in a phase III study. The incidences of leukopenia (odds ratio [OR] 1.9; P = .015), neutropenia (OR 2.2; P = .002), nausea (OR 2.0; P = .009), and vomiting (OR 2.8; P < .001) were increased in women versus men treated with SOX, while vomiting (OR 2.9; P < .001) and stomatitis (OR 1.8; P = .043) were increased in women versus men treated with CS. In contrast, male patients treated with CS experienced thrombocytopenia more often (OR 0.51; P = .009). The mean relative dose intensity of S‐1 in SOX was 75.4% in women and 81.4% in men (P = .032). No difference in efficacy was observed between women and men undergoing either regimen. Sex‐related differences in adverse reactions during SOX and CS treatment were confirmed in this phase III study. Further translational research studies are warranted to pursue the cause of this difference.

Recent progress of chemotherapy and biomarkers for gastroesophageal cancer

Key cytotoxic drugs of chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer include fluoropyrimidine, platinum, taxanes and irinotecan. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is one of the main treatment strategies, especially for esophageal cancer. As molecular target agents, the anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab for HER2-positive gastric cancer and the anti-angiogenesis agent ramucirumab combined with paclitaxel have been proven to improve the survival of gastric cancer patients. Recently, anti-PD-1 antibodies have become available as second- or later-line chemotherapy. Microsatellite instability is also useful as a biomarker to select patients suitable for immunotherapy. Furthermore, genome-wide analysis has improved our understanding of the biological features and molecular mechanisms of gastroesophageal cancer and will provide optimized treatment selection.

Fluoropyrimidine with or without platinum as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer and severe peritoneal metastasis: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

There is no standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer with severe peritoneal metastasis. Although fluoropyrimidine is often used, its efficacy is limited, and it remains unclear whether combination therapy with platinum improves clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved patients at six Japanese academic hospitals between 2010 and 2016. Patients with advanced gastric cancer and severe peritoneal metastasis were included if they had massive ascites and/or inadequate oral intake requiring intravenous nutritional support. We then compared the efficacy and safety of fluoropyrimidine monotherapy with those of fluoropyrimidine/platinum combination therapy.

RESULTS

Compared with the combination therapy group (n = 64), the monotherapy group (n = 65) had worse general health (more patients with elderly age, performance status > 2, and having both massive ascites and inadequate oral intake). Both overall survival (9.0 vs 5.0 months, p < 0.01) and progression-free survival (4.3 vs 2.3 months, p < 0.01) were significantly longer in the combination group, and the significance remained after adjusting for prognostic variables (hazard ratios of 0.47 and 0.41, respectively; p < 0.01). Improvements in ascites and oral intake were also greater in the combination group. Although neutropenia (grade ≥ 3) occurred more frequently with combination therapy, both treatments in this study were tolerable.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with fluoropyrimidine and platinum might be more effective than monotherapy with fluoropyrimidine and was tolerable for patients with advanced gastric cancer and severe peritoneal metastasis.

Study protocol of a randomized phase III trial of comparing preoperative chemoradiation with preoperative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: PREACT

Background

The prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma is still dismal. There are no standard treatment strategies for these patients. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is a good choice for making a high-quality decision. Generally, MDT will recommend these patients to receive preoperative chemotherapy or preoperative chemoradiation based on all kinds of treatment guidelines. However, the preferred preoperative treatment is still not established. In order to solve this problem, we carry out this randomized phase III trial of comparing preoperative chemoradiation with preoperative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Eligible patients with locally advanced gastric cancer or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma are randomized to receive preoperative chemoradiation or preoperative chemotherapy, followed by surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. In the preoperative chemoradiation arm (Pre-CRT), patients receive two cycles of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX), chemoradiation, then followed by surgery and three more cycles of SOX chemotherapy. In the preoperative chemotherapy arm (Pre-CT), patients receive three cycles of SOX, following surgery three more cycles of SOX are given. The primary endpoint of this trial is to verify that preoperative chemoradiation could significantly improve the 3-year disease free survival (DFS) of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma compared to preoperative chemotherapy.

Discussion

The results from this trial will provide important information about whether preoperative chemoradiation could improve survival compared to preoperative chemotherapy among patients with locally advanced gastric cancer or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03013010. First posted January 6, 2017.

Role of Cancer-Associated Fibroblast in Gastric Cancer Progression and Resistance to Treatments

Although the survival of gastric cancer (GC) patients has gradually improved, the outcomes of advanced GC patients remain unsatisfactory despite standard treatment with conventional chemotherapy or targeted agents. Several studies have shown that cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), a major component of tumor stroma in GC, may have significant roles in GC progression and resistance to treatments. CAFs are a major source of various secreted molecules in the tumor microenvironment, which stimulate cancer cells and other noncancerous components of GC. Surprisingly, these factors could be involved in gastric carcinogenesis. Cytokines, including interleukin-6 and interleukin-11, or growth factors, such as fibroblast growth factor produced from CAFs, can directly activate GC cells and consequently lead to the development of an aggressive phenotype. Galectin-1 or hepatocyte growth factor can be involved in CAF-derived neovascularization in GC. In addition, recent studies showed that CAFs can affect tumor immunity through M2 polarization of tumor-associated macrophages. Finally, the current study aimed to introduce several inhibitory agents and evaluate their suppressive effects on CAFs in patients with GC progression. However, further studies are required to evaluate their safety and select appropriate patients for application in clinical settings.

Placental growth factor is a predictive biomarker for ramucirumab treatment in advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Ramucirumab (RAM) has been used as the second-line standard chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) either alone or combination with paclitaxel (PTX). However, no predictive biomarkers have been identified for RAM treatment in AGC.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 26 patients who received either RAM monotherapy or RAM + PTX therapy for AGC refractory to fluoropyrimidine and platinum agents from 2015 to 2018 at Nagoya City University Hospital. First, we extracted RNA using gastric cancer (GC) tissues from two responders and two non-responders, and then analyzed 24 VEGFR-related angiogenic genes. Subsequently, we examined the relationship between the expression of each angiogenic gene and RAM clinical activity in the entire cohort. Finally, we validated using in vitro angiogenesis assays using GC cells and microvascular endothelial cells.

RESULTS

We identified five angiogenic genes with aberrant expression between RAM responders and non-responders and placental growth factor (PlGF) was the most significant gene among them. Overall survival (P = 0.046) and progression-free survival (P = 0.016) were significantly shorter in the PlGF-high group than in the PlGF-low group. Overall response rates were 50% in the PlGF-low group and 0% in the PlGF-high group. In GC cells co-cultured with endothelial cells, PlGF gene silencing from GC cells significantly reinforced the inhibitory effect of RAM in the in vitro angiogenesis assay (tube formation assay and endothelial migration) through the inactivation of ERK, in comparison to the control GC cells.

CONCLUSIONS

PlGF gene expression in gastric cancer tissues could be a predictive indicator of AGC treatment by RAM.

Systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with early recurrence after adjuvant S-1 monotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

S-1 monotherapy is one of the standard adjuvant treatments for patients with stage II and III gastric cancers. Early recurrence after S-1 adjuvant therapy has a poor prognosis. This study aimed to clarify the treatment outcomes of systemic chemotherapy and explore encouraging regimens.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective study. Among gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 monotherapy, patients who experienced a recurrence while receiving adjuvant therapy or within 6 months after completion and started systemic chemotherapy at four institutions between 2005 and 2015 were eligible.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients were included. The main treatment regimens were weekly paclitaxel (n = 38, 34%), irinotecan plus cisplatin (n = 31, 28%), capecitabine plus cisplatin (n = 7, 6%), and irinotecan monotherapy (n = 6, 5%). For all patients, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.7 and 11.4 months, respectively. Among 77 patients with measurable lesions, the overall response and disease control rates were 24.7% and 62.3%, respectively. Multivariate analyses for overall survival showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 [hazard ratio (HR) 3.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.78-7.73] and undifferentiated histological type (HR 2.04; 95% CI 1.35-3.44) were independent prognostic factors, and treatment regimens were not prognostic. Exploratory comparisons did not show statistically significant differences between treatment regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of the largest number of patients with early recurrence after S-1 adjuvant monotherapy demonstrated that the prognosis for patients treated by all regimens was similar and poor.

Docetaxel plus cisplatin and S-1 versus cisplatin and S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (JCOG1013): an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

We investigated the superiority of docetaxel plus cisplatin and S-1 compared with cisplatin and S-1 in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

In this open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial, patients were recruited from 56 hospitals in Japan. We enrolled individuals aged 20-75 years who had unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, had received no previous chemotherapy (except adjuvant chemotherapy completed 24 weeks before reccurence), radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy, could take drugs orally, and had adequate organ function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive docetaxel plus cisplatin and S-1 (docetaxel 40 mg/m² and cisplatin 60 mg/m² on day 1 intravenously, and S-1 40-60 mg twice a day orally for 2 weeks, every 4 weeks) or cisplatin and S-1 (cisplatin 60 mg/m² intravenously on day 8, and S-1 40-60 mg orally twice a day for 3 weeks, every 5 weeks). Randomisation was done centrally with the minimisation method, with a random component balancing for institution, ECOG performance status (0 vs 1), disease status at enrolment (unresectable vs recurrent), measurable lesion (yes vs no), number of metastatic sites (0-1 vs ≥2), and histological type (differentiated vs undifferentiated). Neither investigators or patients were masked to the study treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with UMIN-CTR, number UMIN000007652.

FINDINGS

Between April 3, 2012, and March 18, 2016, 741 patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel plus cisplatin and S-1 (n=370) or cisplatin and S-1 (n=371). Median overall survival was 14·2 months (95% CI 12·9-15·9) in the docetaxel plus cisplatin and S-1 group and 15·3 months (14·2-16·2) in the cisplatin and S-1 group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·99 [95% CI 0·85-1·16]; one-sided stratified log-rank p=0·47). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (209 [59%] of 357 patients in the docetaxel plus cisplatin and S-1 group vs 117 [32%] of 365 patients in the cisplatin and S-1 group), leukopenia (120 [34%] vs 60 [16%]), and anorexia (94 [26%] vs 81 [22%]). The deaths of one patient in the cisplatin and S-1 group and in three patients in the docetaxel plus cisplatin and S-1 group were deemed treatment-related.

INTERPRETATION

The addition of docetaxel to cisplatin and S-1 did not improve overall survival in chemotherapy-naive Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer. Therefore, cisplatin and S-1 remains the standard first-line chemotherapy.

FUNDING

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.

Alterations in gene expression and DNA methylation profiles in gastric cancer cells obtained from ascitic fluids collected before and after chemotherapy

Resistance to anticancer drugs is a critical issue in cancer treatment. Alterations in gene expression and DNA methylation profiles that accompany the acquisition of drug resistance are associated with resistance mechanisms. To analyze chemotherapy-associated alterations in gene expression and DNA methylation in gastric cancer cells obtained from ascites, ascitic fluids were collected from a patient with gastric cancer before chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOX), and after the disease had progressed. The fluids were cultured for 10 days, passaged into new flasks, and cultured for an additional 2 weeks. Normal cells, including white blood cells and mesothelial cells, were removed. The expression and DNA methylation profiles of 18,185 genes were analyzed using microarray, and compared between cells in ascitic fluids collected before and after the chemotherapy with CapeOX. In addition, fluorouracil- and oxaliplatin-resistant AGS cells were established and analyzed. Pathways having genes with expression profiles altered by CapeOX included those associated with 'signaling by G-protein-coupled receptor' and the 'immune system'. Genes that were commonly expressed at higher levels in CapeOX-resistant ascitic cells, fluorouracil-resistant AGS cells. and oxaliplatin-resistant AGS cells compared with those in untreated cells included telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), apolipoprotein C1 (APOC1) and serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase 1 (STYK1), whereas genes commonly expressed at lower levels in the three drug-resistant cell types compared with the untreated cells included defensin β4A (DEFB4A). A comparatively large number of genes exhibited altered methylation levels in drug-resistant AGS cells compared with the CapeOX-resistant cells. In addition, among the genes expressed at higher levels in decitabine-treated AGS cells, the majority were expressed at higher levels in fluorouracil-resistant AGS cells, and exhibited lower methylation levels. Taken together, the present study has demonstrated that comparing the expression profiles of gastric cancer cells obtained from ascitic fluids before and after chemotherapy with the expression profiles of drug-resistant cultured cells is a useful method for analyzing the molecular mechanisms underlying chemotherapy resistance.

A phase II study of biweekly oxaliplatin plus S-1 combination chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer in China

Oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) was a first-line regimen for advanced gastric cancer. The continuous administration of S-1 for 3 weeks can result in unacceptable gastrointestinal and hematological toxicities. Therefore, an alternative regimen (administration of S-1 for 1-week followed by 1-week rest) is warrant for improved tolerability and noninferiority efficacy. We conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biweekly SOX as the first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer in China.Patients with metastatic or previously untreated advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously at a dose of 85 mg/m on day 1, while S-1 was administered orally in doses of 80, 100, or 120 mg/day depending on different body surface areas of <1.25 m, 1.25-1.5 m, or >1.5 m respectively; the total dose of S-1 was administered twice daily on days 1-7 followed by a 7-day rest. This schedule was repeated every 2 weeks until disease progressed or intolerable toxicity occurred.Forty-six patients (M/F = 33/13) received biweekly oxaliplatin and S-1 as first-line chemotherapy. A total of 257 treatment cycles were administered and the median number of cycles administered was 6. Thirty-six patients (78.3%) received second-line chemotherapy. The median progression free survival and median overall survival was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.37-5.36 months) and 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.88-11.3 months), respectively. The 1-year and 2-year survival rate was 41% and 13%. The objective response rate was 30.43%, and the disease control rate was 76.08%. The observed adverse events of Grade 3/4 included were leukocytopenia (13.04%); anemia (13.04%); neutropenia (15.22%); neurological toxicity (2.17%); diarrhea (2.17%).The biweekly SOX regimen as first-line treatment was active and well tolerated in Chinese patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer.

Oxaliplatin-Based Regimen is Superior to Cisplatin-Based Regimen in Tumour Remission as First-line Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background: This study was initially designed to examine whether oxaliplatin-based regimen was superior to cisplatin-based regimen in tumour remission as first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (GC). Methods: Literature in EMBASE, PUBMED, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) was searched. Only phase II or III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness and safety between oxaliplatin-based and cisplatin-based regimens as first-line treatment for advanced GC were selected. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. The primary endpoints were complete remission rate (CRR), partial remission rate (PRR), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). The second endpoint was the toxicity response. Results: 2,140 patients from six phase II or III RCTs were included. Compared to cisplatin-based therapy, subjects who received oxaliplatin-based treatment had significantly higher PRR (OR: 1.25, 95%CI: 1.05-1.48, P=0.01, I2=0%), ORR (OR: 1.21, 95%CI: 1.02-1.44, P=0.03, I2=0%) and DCR (OR: 1.76, 95%CI: 1.31-2.38, P=0.0002, I2=25%), but not CRR (OR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.37-1.31, P=0.27, I2=0%). In addition, oxaliplatin-based therapy significantly decreased all grades of leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, nausea, stomatitis, creatinine elevation and thromboembolism, as well as grades 3-4 of leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia and febrile neutropenia than cisplatin-based regimen. However, oxaliplatin-based treatment strikingly increased the risk of thrombocytopenia, sensory neuropathy, diarrhea, fatigue and liver dysfunction. Conclusions: Oxaliplatin-based regimen is superior to cisplatin-based regimen in tumour remission as first-line chemotherapy for advanced GC, and is associated with less toxicity and better tolerability.

Pharmacokinetics of S-1 monotherapy in plasma and in tears for gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

S-1 is an oral anticancer drug composed of tegafur (FT), which is a prodrug of 5-FU, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), and potassium oxonate. Recently, some studies have been reported on watering eyes caused by S-1. However, the mechanism of watering eyes caused by S-1 is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between tears and plasma concentrations of FT, 5-FU, and CDHP, which are components and active modulator of S-1.

METHODS

We prospectively investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of FT, 5-FU, and CDHP in plasma and in tears of gastric cancer patients who were treated with S-1 monotherapy at the dose of 80 mg/m²/day. Plasma and tears from both eyes were obtained 1, 2, 4, and 8 h after S-1 administration on day 1 and 14 of the first cycle.

RESULTS

Total of eight patients were enrolled. All the FT, 5-FU and CDHP were detected both in plasma and in tears, and their PK parameters were measured. There was a positive correlation between the concentrations of FT, 5-FU and CDHP in the plasma and those in the tears on day 1 and day 14 (correlation coefficients r, right eye/left eye: r = 0.882/0.878, 0.877/0.890, and 0.885/0.878, respectively).

CONCLUSION

There was a positive correlation between the concentrations of FT, 5-FU and CDHP in the plasma and those in the tears. The result is expected to facilitate the further investigation into the causes of watering eyes and the establishment of the effective methods for the prevention and the treatment.

Oxaliplatin in perioperative chemotherapy for gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma

Platinum-based chemotherapy remains standard-of-care for gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. For locally advanced resectable disease, perioperative treatment with cisplatin-based doublet or triplet chemotherapy regimens had been the predominant approach in Europe and the US, based on pivotal phase III trials including the MAGIC study. Results from more recent landmark studies including the German FLOT4 and the Asian CLASSIC trials have, however, triggered a shift from cisplatin towards oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy protocols in the perioperative setting. Areas covered: This drug profile summarizes current state-of-the-art of perioperative and adjuvant treatment for locally advanced resectable gastric/GEJ cancers with a special focus on the increasingly predominant role of oxaliplatin over cisplatin in this setting. We review pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of oxaliplatin and oxaliplatin combination regimens. We highlight recent advances and ongoing developments in the field. Expert opinion: While the adoption of oxaliplatin-containing combination regimens for perioperative therapy of gastric/GEJ cancers represents a significant step ahead, many pivotal questions remain unanswered. At the sample time, the evolution of molecular subtyping and immunotherapy is likely to dramatically change clinical practice in the foreseeable future.

Efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimen versus cisplatin-based regimen in the treatment of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin played an important role in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). Oxaliplatin has been shown to be at least as effective as cisplatin for GC, with less toxicity and a better tolerability profile. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimen versus cisplatin-based regimen in the treatment of GC.

METHODS

Databases of CNKI, CBM, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library were searched for eligible literatures from their establishments to November 2018. Randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimen with that of cisplatin-based regimen in the treatment of GC were included. Statistical analyses were calculated using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials including 2297 patients were included. Compared with cisplatin-based regimen intervention in GC, oxaliplatin-based regimen treatment was able to significantly improve the partial response rate (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.49; p = 0.007), disease progression rate (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.25-0.66; p = 0.0002) and 1-year survival (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.00-1.56; p = 0.05). The toxicities of hematopoietic system were significantly higher in cisplatin-based regimen group (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.46-0.79; p = 0.0002), while oxaliplatin-based regimen group had higher neurosensory toxicity (OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.52-3.21; p < 0.0001), In addition, gastrointestinal toxicity was similar between the two groups (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.5-2.01; p = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with cisplatin-based regimen, oxaliplatin-based regimen treatment has an obvious advantage in patients with GC with acceptable tolerance.

Randomised phase II trial comparing four front-line doublets in Asian patients with metastatic gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Consensus has not been reached regarding the standard regimen for front-line chemotherapy of recurrent/metastatic gastric cancer. In this randomised phase II study, we compared four doublet regimens: S-1 and cisplatin (SP); oxaliplatin and 5-FU (FOLFOX); docetaxel and 5-FU (DF) and paclitaxel and 5-FU (PF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients without prior history of chemotherapy for recurrent/metastatic gastric cancer were randomised evenly to each regimen. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and safety profile.

RESULTS

A total of 179 Korean patients were enrolled from March 2010 to May 2015. The study was prematurely terminated because of slow accrual. At data cut-off, the median PFS was 8.4 months for SP, 5.8 months for FOLFOX, 5.7 months for DF and 4.2 months for PF (P = 0.023). The median OS was 14.7 months for SP, 11.3 months for FOLFOX, 11.7 months for DF and 10.8 months for PF (P = 0.143). RR was 18%, 23%, 16% and 32% for SP, FOLFOX, DF and PF, respectively. The platinum group displayed a longer PFS trend than the taxane group (7.2 versus 4.9 months, P = 0.058), but no significant difference in OS was found. Notably, 105 patients were exposed to all three drugs (platinum, taxane and fluoropyrimidine) throughout the treatment course, and OS was identical whether starting with platinum or taxane (13.3 versus 13.3 months, P = 0.997). All regimens were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

SP showed the most favourable results in PFS, whereas a significant difference in OS was not observed among the four regimens.