Human polyoma virus-associated interstitial nephritis in the allograft kidney

Polyomavirus BK with rearranged noncoding control region emerge in vivo in renal transplant patients and increase viral replication and cytopathology

Immunosuppression is required for BK viremia and polyomavirus BK–associated nephropathy (PVAN) in kidney transplants (KTs), but the role of viral determinants is unclear. We examined BKV noncoding control regions (NCCR), which coordinate viral gene expression and replication. In 286 day–matched plasma and urine samples from 129 KT patients with BKV viremia, including 70 with PVAN, the majority of viruses contained archetypal (ww-) NCCRs. However, rearranged (rr-) NCCRs were more frequent in plasma than in urine samples (22 vs. 4%; P < 0.001), and were associated with 20-fold higher plasma BKV loads (2.0 × 10⁴/ml vs. 4.4 × 10⁵/ml; P < 0.001). Emergence of rr-NCCR in plasma correlated with duration and peak BKV load (R² = 0.64; P < 0.001). This was confirmed in a prospective cohort of 733 plasma samples from 227 patients. For 39 PVAN patients with available biopsies, rr-NCCRs were associated with more extensive viral replication and inflammation. Cloning of 10 rr-NCCRs revealed diverse duplications or deletions in different NCCR subregions, but all were sufficient to increase early gene expression, replication capacity, and cytopathology of recombinant BKV in vitro. Thus, rr-NCCR BKV emergence in plasma is linked to increased replication capacity and disease in KTs.

Clinical course of kidney transplant patients with acute rejection and BK virus replication following Campath therapy

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients with active BK virus (BKV) replication are generally treated with reduction in immunosuppression to allow a successful immune response against the virus.

METHODS

We inadvertently administered Campath to two patients with BKV viruria, and one patient with BKV nephropathy, since allograft biopsies showed severe tubulitis or intimal arteritis, and results of PCR and in situ hybridization were not available at the time of therapeutic intervention.

RESULTS

Increased viral replication was observed, but not uniformly in all cases, and follow-up biopsies showed nephropathy in one additional case. Extra-renal dissemination did not occur. With subsequent reduction of immunosuppression or antiviral therapy, it was still possible to obtain clearance of viremia in all cases. Serum creatinine fell transiently after Campath in one patient; however, at one yr post-treatment all had increased levels over baseline. One graft was lost to persistent acute rejection that led to interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy.

CONCLUSION

These cases suggest that Campath treatment does not (i) irreversibly deplete cells believed to be important in mounting an immune response against BKV, or (ii) preclude subsequent eradication of viral DNA from the blood.

Prospective monitoring of polyomavirus BK replication and impact of pre-emptive intervention in pediatric kidney recipients

Polyoma BK virus (BKV)-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is a relevant cause of poor renal allograft survival. In a prospective analysis, we monitored BKV DNA in blood and urine samples from 62 consecutive pediatric kidney recipients. In patients with BKV replication, we analyzed the impact of reduction of maintenance immunosuppression on viral load kinetics and PVAN in patients with BKV replication. BKV-specific immunity was concomitantly evaluated on blood samples of viremic patients, by measuring the frequency of BKV-specific interferon-gamma-producing and cytotoxic T cells, and BKV IgG antibody levels. At a median follow-up of 24 months, BK viruria was observed in 39 of 62 patients, while BK viremia developed in 13 patients (21%). In all viremic patients, immunosuppression reduction resulted in the clearance of viremia, and prevented development of PVAN, without increasing the rate of acute rejection or causing graft dysfunction. As a consequence of immunosuppression adjustment, an expansion of BKV-specific cellular immunity was observed that coincided with viral clearance. We conclude that treating pediatric kidney transplant patients pre-emptively with immunosuppression reduction guided by BKV DNA in blood is safe and effective to prevent onset of PVAN. BKV-specific cellular immunity may be useful to guide this intervention.

BK virus nephropathy and kidney transplantation

Nephropathy from BK virus (BKV) infection is an evolving challenge in kidney transplant recipients. It is the consequence of modern potent immunosuppression aimed at reducing acute rejection and improving allograft survival. Untreated BKV infections lead to kidney allograft dysfunction or loss. Decreased immunosuppression is the principle treatment but predisposes to acute and chronic rejection. Screening protocols for early detection and prevention of symptomatic BKV nephropathy have improved outcomes. Although no approved antiviral drug is available, leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, and intravenous Ig have been used. Retransplantation after BKV nephropathy has been successful.

Monitoring of polyomavirus BK virus viruria and viremia in renal allograft recipients by use of a quantitative real-time PCR assay: one-year prospective study

We have developed a real-time quantitative PCR (rt-QPCR) assay to detect and kinetically monitor BK virus viruria and viremia in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). A total of 607 urine and 223 plasma samples were collected from 203 individuals including those with BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) (n = 8), those undergoing routine posttransplant surveillance (SV) (n = 155), those with nontransplant chronic kidney disease (NT-CKD) (n = 20), and healthy living kidney donors (LD) (n = 20). The rt-QPCR assay was found to be highly sensitive and specific, with a wide dynamic range (2.4 to 11 log(10) copies/ml) and very good precision (coefficient of variation, approximately 5.9%). There was a significant difference in the prevalences of viruria and viremia between the BKVAN (100% and 100%) and SV (23% and 3.9%) groups (P < 0.001). No viruria or viremia was detected in LD or in NT-CKD patients. The median (range) peak levels of BK virus viruria and viremia, in log(10) copies/ml, were 10.26 (9.04 to 10.83) and 4.83 (3.65 to 5.86) for the BKVAN group versus 0 (0 to 10.83) and 0 (0 to 5.65) for the SV group, respectively (P < 0.001). When the BK virus load in the urine was <7.0 log(10) copies/ml, no BK virus viremia was detected. When the BK virus load in the urine reached 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, and > or =10.0 log(10) copies/ml, the corresponding detection of BK virus viremia increased to 20, 33, 50, and 100%, respectively. We propose monitoring of BK virus viruria in RTRs, with plasma BK virus load testing reserved for those with viruria levels of > or =7.0 log(10) copies/ml.

BK virus infection, replication, and diseases in pediatric kidney transplantation

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy is diagnosed in 2-8% of pediatric renal transplants and often precedes renal allograft dysfunction. Without intervention, however, significant graft dysfunction is observed in more than 50% of cases, although progressive early graft loss is reported in only three of 32 (9%) of cases. No specific treatment is available, but early decrease in immunosuppression is followed by declining human polyomavirus type 1 (BK virus) replication and improved outcome. The data suggest differences between pediatric and adult kidney transplantation. Possibly, pediatric patients might be able to mount a more vigorous BK virus-specific immune response than adult patients under similar modulation of immunosuppression. Also the role of cidofovir and leflunomide is still unresolved in pediatric patients. Larger prospective trials are needed to better define the impact of BK virus immunity for replication and disease as well as the role of reducing immunosuppression with or without cidofovir or leflunomide in pediatric transplant patients.

BK virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis in pediatric cancer patients receiving high-dose cyclophosphamide

Hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) is a known complication of oxazophosphorine chemotherapy. BK virus (BKV) has been commonly found to be associated with hematuria in stem cell transplant patients; however, it has rarely been reported after cyclophosphamide chemotherapy alone. The authors present 3 cases of BK viruria with HC in nontransplant pediatric oncology patients. The 3 patients with BKV had more prolonged hematuria (14 to 16 wk) compared with 1 patient with BKV-negative HC (10 wk). The HC necessitated chemotherapy delays and also prolonged supportive care. One patient was treated with intravenous cidofovir with resolution of BK viruria and hematuria. BKV may have an association with the development of HC in nonstem cell transplant patients receiving high-dose oxazophosphorine chemotherapy. HC may present early and be more prolonged in patients with BK viruria. Patients with HC after cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide with negative bacterial cultures should be studied for BKV. Cidofovir may be beneficial in certain patients with BK viruria and HC; however, definitive data will require a clinical trial.

Acute hantavirus infection or renal transplant rejection

Hantaviruses belong to the so-called emerging pathogens that are transmitted to humans by infected rodents and their excreta. In Central Europe, hantavirus infections usually occur in a mild to moderate form of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. In contrast to the mostly benign or even asymptomatic course of hantavirus infections in previously healthy individuals, the acute hantavirus infection in kidney transplant recipients represents an exceptional situation regarding diagnosis and therapy. We describe the case of a 44-year-old kidney transplant recipient with acute renal transplant failure associated with acute hantavirus infection.

BK Virus Nephropathy in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients: An Analysis of the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS) Registry

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is limited information regarding BK virus nephropathy in pediatric kidney transplantation. The objective of this study was to evaluate cases of BK virus nephropathy in the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies database.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Using a questionnaire that was sent to North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies centers, we assessed the incidence, risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes of BK virus nephropathy in pediatric renal transplant recipients who received a transplant between 2000 and 2004.

RESULTS

BK virus nephropathy was reported in 25 (4.6%) of 542 patients at a median onset of 10.1 mo after transplantation. The median age was 11 yr. All patients who were tested reported BK viruria, and 19 (91%) of 21 who had plasma tested reported BK viremia. Treatment of BK virus nephropathy included reduction of immunosuppression (84%), cidofovir (24%), leflunomide (8%), and intravenous Ig (20%). Simultaneous rejection treatment was reported in four (16%). The median creatinine was 2.0 mg/dl at a mean follow-up of 24 mo. There were six (24%) graft failures in the patients with BK virus nephropathy at a mean of 24 mo after diagnosis. Rejection occurred in eight (32%) after diagnosis. Multivariate analysis showed that use of polyclonal induction therapy and zero HLA DR mismatch were associated with the development of BK virus nephropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

This first multicenter, retrospective, cohort study of BK virus nephropathy in pediatric renal transplant recipients found a BK virus nephropathy incidence of 4.6% and identified polyclonal induction and zero HLA DR mismatch as significant risk factors for BK virus nephropathy.

Polyomavirus BK non-coding control region rearrangements in health and disease

BACKGROUND

BK virus is an increasingly recognized pathogen in transplanted patients. DNA sequencing of this virus shows considerable genomic variability.

METHODS

To understand the clinical significance of rearrangements in the non-coding control region (NCCR) of BK virus (BKV), we report a meta-analysis of 507 sequences, including 40 sequences generated in our own laboratory, for associations between rearrangements and disease, tissue tropism, geographic origin, and viral genotype.

RESULTS

NCCR rearrangements were less frequent in (a) asymptomatic BKV viruria compared to patients viral nephropathy (1.7% vs. 22.5%), and (b) viral genotype 1 compared to other genotypes (2.4% vs. 11.2%). Rearrangements were commoner in malignancy (78.6%), and Norwegians (45.7%), and less common in East Indians (0%), and Japanese (4.3%). A surprising number of rearranged sequences were reported from mononuclear cells of healthy subjects, whereas most plasma sequences were archetypal. This difference could not be related to potential recombinase activity in lymphocytes, as consensus recombination signal sequences could not be found in the NCCR region.

CONCLUSIONS

NCCR rearrangements are neither required nor a sufficient condition to produce clinical disease. BKV nephropathy and hemorrhagic cystitis are not associated with any unique NCCR configuration or nucleotide sequence.

Leflunomide treatment for polyomavirus BK-associated nephropathy after kidney transplantation

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) affects 1-10% of kidney-transplant (KT) patients, with graft failure/loss in approximately 90% of cases. Reducing immunosuppression is the key treatment option, but addition of leflunomide may improve BK Virus (BKV) clearance and graft survival. In a prospective open-labeled study, 12 KT patients with biopsy-proven PVAN were treated with reduced immunosuppression and leflunomide. BKV viremia and graft function were followed. PVAN was diagnosed at 6 months (3-192) post-transplant; median serum creatinine concentration (sCC) was 189 micromol/l (92-265). After 16 months (8-30) of follow-up, the sCC was 150 micromol/l (90-378, NS). Renal function improved in six cases (50%), remained stable in two (16.6%) and deteriorated in four (33.4%), with graft loss in two (17%). Clearance of BKV viremia was observed in five (42%) cases. Side effects included anemia in six cases leading to leflunomide withdrawal in two patients, and mild thrombocytopenia. In KT patients diagnosed with PVAN, leflunomide plus reduced immunosuppression improved graft function in 66.6%, cleared BKV viremia in 42%, and resulted in side effects in 17%. This limited efficacy contrasts with other reports and falls short of expectation. We conclude that active screening, earlier diagnosis and intervention remain the cornerstones of treatment.

End-stage renal disease due to polyomavirus in a cardiac transplant patient

BACKGROUND

A 51-year-old male orthotopic cardiac transplant recipient experienced a prolonged rejection episode immediately after transplantation. Three years and 5 months after transplantation, he presented with lower extremity swelling; at this presentation, the patient's serum creatinine level was 345 micromol/l (3.9 mg/dl), his urinalysis was trace positive for both protein and blood, the urinary sediment had no casts and his 24-hour urine collection showed 750 mg protein. The patient's renal function deteriorated over the next month, with his serum creatinine level reaching a peak of 530 micromol/l (6 mg/dl). He died 4 years and 3 months after transplantation as a result of an arrhythmia.

INVESTIGATIONS

Physical examination, urine and blood analyses, ultrasound-guided renal biopsy and autopsy.

DIAGNOSIS

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy with the development of end-stage renal disease.

MANAGEMENT

Adjustment of immunosuppressive therapy and initiation of hemodialysis.

Viral dynamics in transplant patients: implications for disease

Viral infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality in transplant patients. Quantifying viral loads is widely appreciated as a direct means to diagnose and monitor the course of viral infections. Recent studies indicate that the kinetics of viral load changes rather than single viral load measurements better correlate with organ involvement. In this Review, we will summarise the current knowledge regarding the kinetics of viruses relevant to transplantation including cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, the herpes viruses 6 and 7, hepatitis C virus, GB virus C, adenovirus, and the emerging human polyomavirus type BK. We discuss the implications of viral kinetics for organ pathology as well as for the evaluation of antiviral interventions in transplant patients.

Polyomaviruses and human diseases

Polyomaviruses are small, nonenveloped DNA viruses, which are widespread in nature. In immunocompetent hosts, the viruses remain latent after primary infection. With few exceptions, illnesses associated with these viruses occur in times of immune compromise, especially in conditions that bring about T cell deficiency. The human polyomaviruses BKV and JCV are known to cause, respectively, hemorrhagic cystitis in recipients of bone marrow transplantation and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in immunocompromised patients, for example, by HIV infection. Recently, transplant nephropathy due to BKV infection has been increasingly recognized as the cause for renal allograft failure. Quantitation of polyomavirus DNA in the blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine, identification of virus laden "decoy cells" in urine, and histopathologic demonstration of viral inclusions in the brain parenchyma and renal tubules are the applicable diagnostic methods. Genomic sequences of polyomaviruses have been reported to be associated with various neoplastic disorders and autoimmune conditions. While various antiviral agents have been tried to treat polyomavirus-related illnesses, current management aims at the modification and/or improvement in the hosts' immune status. In this chapter, we provide an overview of polyomaviruses and briefly introduce its association with human diseases, which will be covered extensively in other chapters by experts in the field.

Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Renal Transplantation

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is an emerging disease in renal transplant patients with variable prevalence of 1-10% and graft loss up to 80%. BK virus (BKV) is the primary etiologic agent, but JC virus (JCV) and possibly simian virus SV40 may account for some cases. Intense immunosuppression is viewed as the most important risk factor. However, the preferential manifestation in renal transplants as compared to other allografts or to autologous kidneys of other organ transplants suggests that organ determinants and immunologic factors synergize: Renal tubular epithelial cells and their compensatory proliferation to restore tubular integrity after immunologic, ischemic or toxic injury may provide the critical cellular milieu supporting polyomavirus replication while immune control is impaired due to maintenance immunosuppression, anti-rejection treatment and HLA-mismatches. Patient determinants (older age, male gender, seronegative recipient), and viral factors (genotype, serotype) may have a contributory role. The definitive diagnosis of PVAN requires allograft biopsy which is, however, challenged by (i) limited sensitivity due to (multi-)focal involvement (sampling errors); (ii) varying presentations with cytopathic-inflammatory and/or fibrotic/scarring patterns; (iii) coexisting acute rejection which is difficult to differentiate, but impacts on intervention strategies. Screening for polyomavirus replication in the urine and in the plasma complements allograft biopsy by high sensitivity and allows for noninvasive monitoring. Thus, we suggest a terminology similar to invasive fungal diseases where viruria ("decoy cells") defines patients at risk ("possible PVAN") who should be evaluated for plasma viral load. Increasing BK viremia (>10,000 copies/mL) or urine VP-1 mRNA (>6.5x10(5) copies/ng total RNA) load defines "presumptive PVAN" for which an intervention of reducing immunosuppression should be considered even if the diagnosis could not be confirmed by allograft biopsy ("definitive PVAN"). The response to intervention should be monitored using plasma DNA or urine mRNA load.

Latent and Productive Polyomavirus Infections of Renal Allografts

Polyomavirus allograft nephropathy, also termed BK virus nephropathy (BKN) after the main causative agent, the polyoma-BK-virus strain, is a major complication following kidney transplantation. BKN is the most common viral infection affecting the renal allograft with a reported prevalence of 1% up to 10%. It often leads to chronic allograft dysfunction and graft loss. BKN is most likely caused by the reactivation of latent BK viruses which, under sustained and intensive immunosuppression, enter a replicative/productive cycle. Viral disease, i.e., BKN, is typically limited to the kidney transplant. It is histologically defined by the presence of intranuclear viral inclusion bodies in epithelial cells and severe tubular injury. Virally induced tubular damage is the morphological correlate for allograft dysfunction. In this chapter, different variants of polyomavirus intranuclear inclusion bodies [types 1 through 4] and adjunct techniques [immunohistochemistry, in-situ hybridization, electron microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)] that are used for proper characterization of disease are described. Special emphasis is placed on the clinical and pathophysiological significance of different histological stages of BKN.

Urine cytology findings of polyomavirus infections

Polyomaviruses of the BK- and JC-strains often remain latent within the transitional cell layer of the bladder, ureters and the renal pelvis as well as in tubular epithelial cells of the kidney. Slight changes in the immune status and/or an immunocompromised condition can lead to the (re)activation of latent polyomaviruses, especially along the transitional cell layer, resulting in the shedding of viral particles and infected cells into the urine. A morphologic sign of the (re)activation of polyomaviruses is the detection of typical intranuclear viral inclusion bearing epithelial cells, so-called "decoy cells", in the urine. Decoy cells often contain polyoma-BK-viruses. The inclusion bearing cells are easily identified and quantifiable in routine Papanicolaou stained urine cytology specimens. With some experience, decoy cells can also be detected in the unstained urinary sediment by phase contrast microscopy. Different morphologic variants of decoy cells (types 1 through 4) are described and ancillary techniques (immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy (EM), and fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization (FISH)) for proper identification and characterization are discussed. Special emphasis is placed on the clinical significance of the detection of decoy cells as a parameter to assess the risk for disease, i.e., polyoma-BK-virus nephropathy (BKN) in kidney transplant recipients. The sensitivity and specificity of decoy cells for diagnosing BKN is 99% and 95%, respectively, the positive predictive value varies between 27% and more than 90%, and the negative predictive value is 99%. The detection of decoy cells is compared to other techniques applicable to assess the activation of polyomaviruses in the urine (polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and EM).

Cross-sectional study of BK virus infection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BKV reactivation is associated with impaired graft function in adult kidney transplant patients. The clinical impact of BKV infection in the pediatric transplant population has not yet been fully evaluated. The objective of our study was to determine the prevalence of BKV infection in consecutive pediatric kidney transplant recipients in our center. Forty consecutive unselected pediatric kidney transplant recipients were studied. Mean age at screening was 15.6 +/- 5.3 yr and samples were obtained a median of 60.5 months after transplantation (3-123). BKV-DNA was analyzed in urine and plasma by qualitative nested-PCR. A review of the literature was performed. Prevalence of viruria and viremia was 50% and 12.5%, respectively. Viremia was associated with the presence of hematuria (p = 0.02). The mean creatinine level in children without BKV replication was 1.6 mg/dL, BKV viruria was 0.9 mg/dL, and BKV viremia was 0.8 mg/dL. A literature review showed that viruria and viremia were found in 28.2% and 8.5% of cases, respectively; BKV nephropathy was found in 3.8% and graft loss in 11% of the patients with BKV nephropathy and in 0.4% of the children studied. Recipient serostatus was the most important risk factor. The rate of BKV replication and nephropathy among pediatric kidney recipients is similar to that of adults, but the incidence of graft loss is significantly lower.

BK virus associated renal cell carcinoma: case presentation with optimized PCR and other diagnostic tests

Polyomaviruses, including BK and JC viruses, have been associated with graft failure, but have not commonly been associated with malignancy. We present a case of renal cell carcinoma arising in an allograft kidney, in which the tumor and metastasis contain viral DNA. Tumor and biopsy specimens from this patient were examined with hematoxylin & eosin, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH). The results were confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis with BKV primers. Other viruses including herpes simplex 1-2, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and varicella zoster were not detected. The presence of BKV DNA in a renal cell carcinoma, including a metastatic focus, adds to the evidence that this virus may play a role in cancers of the kidney and urinary tract.

Polyomavirus BK-specific cellular immune response to VP1 and large T-antigen in kidney transplant recipients

Polyomavirus BK (BKV) is the primary cause of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Using ELISpot assays, we compared the frequency of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) secreting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) after stimulation with overlapping peptide pools covering BKV large T-antigen (LT) and VP1 capsid proteins (VP1). In 10 healthy donors, LT and VP1 responses were low with median 24 (range 15-95) and 25 (7-113) spot-forming units/10(6) PBMC (SFU), respectively. In 42 KT patients with current or recent plasma BKV loads, median LT and VP1 responses of 29 (0-524) and 114 (0-1432) SFU were detected, respectively. In KT patients with decreasing or past plasma BKV loads, significantly higher median BKV-specific IFN-gamma responses were detected compared to KT patients with increasing or persisting BKV loads [LT: 78 (8-524) vs. 22 (0-120) SFU, p=0.003; VP1: 285 (45-1432) vs. 53 (0-423) SFU, p=0.001, respectively]. VP1-specific IFN-gamma responses were higher and more likely to involve CD4(+) T cells, while CD8(+) T cells were more frequently directed against LT. Stimulation with JCV-specific VP1 and LT peptides indicated only low-level cross-recognition. The data suggest that control of BKV replication is correlated with differentiated expansion of BKV-specific cellular immune responses.

Prevalence and clinical course of BK virus nephropathy in pancreas after kidney transplant patients

The influence of BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) in pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation is unclear. A retrospective analysis of PAK transplants performed at our center was conducted to determine the impact of BKVN. Among 40 PAK transplants performed using sequential immunosuppression, four patients developed BKVN, as defined by a >20% rise in serum creatinine and BK viremia (BK plasma load >4 log copies/mL), at a median of 19 months following PAK. In all four patients, treatment of BKVN consisted of reduction in tacrolimus, cessation of mycophenolate mofetil, and introduction of leflunomide. With this approach, two patients experienced improvement or stabilization of renal function. The remaining two patients progressed to dialysis dependence despite treatment. Plasma BK load < or =5 log copies/mL was associated with graft preservation. Gender, age, delay between transplants, cumulative Thymoglobulin dose, and type of kidney donor were not associated with BK virus infection. Pancreas graft rejection or dysfunction was not observed with the above immunosuppression modification. Mean amylase and lipase > or =6 months following BKVN treatment remained normal. BKVN is an important cause of kidney allograft loss in PAK patients. Screening and early treatment of BKVN may enable preservation of kidney and pancreas grafts.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy risk in kidney transplants: the influence of recipient age and donor gender

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is a frequent cause of kidney transplant failure. We determined the risk factors for biopsy-proven PVAN among 1027 recent kidney transplant recipients by univariate and multivariate analyses. The rate of PVAN was determined over an univariate and multivariate analysis over an average of 30 months of follow-up of patients receiving predominantly living donor grafts with antibody induction and sequential surveillance biopsies to detect subclinical graft disease. Seventy-four transplant recipients were diagnosed with PVAN with the finding made on surveillance biopsy in 40 patients. These 40 cases did not differ from the 34 non-surveillance cases with respect to baseline clinical characteristics or initial histological features. Older recipient age and female donor gender were independent risks associated with PVAN. Factors not linked to PVAN risk included the use and type of induction agent, use of tacrolimus vs sirolimus, the number of human lympocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches, or the frequency of acute rejection. We conclude that PVAN preferentially affects older age patients and allografts from female donors but is unrelated to immunological risk, choice of immunosuppression, or rejection history.

Role of urinary cytology in detecting human polyoma bk virus in kidney transplant recipients. A preliminary report

OBJECTIVE

To report data on the evaluation of the efficacy of urine cytology in detecting BK virus (BKV).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Papanicolaou-stained cytospin preparations of randomly collected urine samples from 8 renal transplant (RTR) patients (5 males, 3 females, age: 23-63 years) who previously tested positive for BKV by PCR in urine or blood or both were studied. Urine sediment from 3 of the patients was processed for ultrastructural examination (EM). Renal biopsies before and after BKV detection were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The interval between renal transplant and urine cytology ranged between 2 and 5 years. Urine from females was difficult to assess due to vaginal contamination. In 2 of the 5 urine specimens from male recipients BKV-infected decoy cells were identified. Viral particles suggestive of BKV were identified on EM in 2 of the 3 specimens studied. Kidney biopsies showed morphologic features suggestive of BKV infection in 2 cases, 1 each detected on cytology and EM, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Screening for the presence of decoy cells in urine provides a simple sensitive means for the diagnosis of BKV nephropathy in RTR.

Impact of a polyomavirus (BKV) infection on mRNA expression in human endothelial cells

Polyomavirus BK-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is an emerging cause of early renal transplant failure. In order to learn more about the cellular response to BK virus, microarrays were used to study its effect on mRNA expression in human endothelial cells. The oligo-based, 35k arrays used cover the predicted 25,000 human protein-expressing genes, and distinguish between a number of alternatively spliced mRNAs. Four parallel experiments were performed for each of two time-points (24 and 40 h) during the first round of the 48 h viral replicative cycle. Immunoperoxidase staining demonstrated that the pulse exposure to virus caused infection in at least 75% of the cells. At 24 h, 55 genes were more than doubly up-regulated and 249 genes were similarly down-regulated; at 40 h, the numbers were 242 and 104, respectively. Gene ontology analyses suggested that immune/defence response genes were selectively down-regulated. Genes involved in cell division and DNA replication tended to be up-regulated, which may reflect an attempt on behalf of the virus to promote viral replication. Genes associated with PVAN were not induced, suggesting that these genes are not required for viral replication, but rather reflect circumstances specific for the disease. Only a few immuno-related genes were turned on, including the interferon response genes G1P2 and IFIT3. However, some of the up-regulated genes of unknown function may be involved in viral defence.

Polyomavirus nephropathy in native kidneys and renal allografts: an update on an escalating threat

Polyomavirus nephropathy, also termed BK-virus nephropathy (BKN) after the main causative agent, the polyoma-BK-virus strain, is a significant complication after kidney transplantation. BKN is the most common viral infection that affects renal allografts with a prevalence of 1-9% on average 8-13 months post surgery. It can also occur sporadically in native kidneys. Viral nephropathy is caused by the (re)activation of latent BK viruses that enter into a replicative cycle under sustained and intensive immunosuppression. Pure productive kidney infections with JC- and SV-40 polyomaviruses are exceptionally rare. BKN is morphologically defined by the presence of intranuclear viral inclusion bodies in epithelial cells and tubular injury, which is the morphological correlate for renal dysfunction. Renal disease can progress through different histologic stages (from early BKN stage A to late fibrotic stage C) that carry prognostic significance; disease stages B and C often result in chronic kidney (allograft) dysfunction and end-stage renal disease. The clinical goal is to diagnose viral nephropathy in disease stage A and to limit chronic renal injury. Strategies to recognize, classify, and manage BKN are critically discussed including ancillary techniques for risk assessment and patient monitoring: (i) urine cytology and the search for so-called 'decoy cells'; (ii) PCR analyses for viral load measurements in the plasma and urine; and (iii) negative staining urine electron microscopy to identify viral particles.

Immunoglobulin G, A, and M responses to BK virus in renal transplantation

Immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and IgM antibodies were measured in serum samples from 71 organ donors, 81 kidney transplant recipients at transplantation, and 67 patients during the posttransplant period by using a virus-like particle-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). BK virus (BKV) and JC virus DNA were detected in urine and plasma by real-time PCR. IgG antibodies to BKV were demonstrated in the majority (80.3 to 100%) of patients irrespective of clinical category, but titers were highest in patients with active viral replication. IgA antibodies were present with greater frequency (72.7 to 81.3% versus 0 to 23.6%; P < 0.001) and higher titer (mean optical density, 0.11 to 0.15 versus 0.05 to 0.08; P < 0.001) in patients who were BKV DNA positive than those who were BKV DNA negative. IgM antibodies showed a similar pattern of reactivity but lower frequency in the setting of active viral replication (9.1 to 43.7% versus 0 to 1.4%; P < 0.001). A rise in IgG level of >0.577 optical density (OD) units or a rise in IgA or IgM level of >0.041 OD units was strongly associated with active viral replication. Urine viral load showed a positive correlation with IgM titer (r = 0.22) but a negative correlation with IgG titer (r = -0.28) and IgA titer (r = -0.1). Chronic dialysis patients typically did not have serologic or virologic evidence of active BKV infection. Anti-BKV titers did not rise in patients with JC viruria. In conclusion, measurement of anti-BKV antibody titer and class response can be used to detect the onset of viral replication. ELISAs can be quite specific despite considerable sequence homology between BK virus and JC virus.

Phylogenetic analysis of polyomavirus BK sequences

Polyomavirus BK (BKV) has emerged as an important pathogen in kidney transplant patients. Existing taxonomic classifications of BKV come from conventional DNA sequence alignments based on limited data derived from the VP1 gene. We have used a phylogenetic whole-genome approach to examine the pattern of diversity and evolutionary relationships between 45 BKV strains isolated from multiple clinical settings. This analysis supports the classification of BKV into six genotypes, of which types V and VI have not been previously recognized. BKV strains hitherto classified as type I are, in fact, quite heterogeneous, and several cluster with our newly defined genotypes V and VI. The sequence information needed for assigning genotypes can be captured by VP1, VP2, VP3, or large T-gene sequencing. The most polymorphic coding region in the viral genome is VP1, but significant variation is also present in the large T-antigen gene, wherein polymorphisms are found in 11.39% of all nucleotide sites, 46.22% of which are cluster specific. Type-specific amino acid changes within the VP1 region are predicted to map to the BC and DE loops. The number of taxonomically informative amino acid changes in the large T antigen exceeds even that of the VP1 region. Viral strains isolated from healthy subjects and from patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, and vasculopathy with capillary leak syndrome formed distinct subclusters. However, within the kidney transplant population, BKV strains derived from patients with asymptomatic viruria did not show complete separation from strains associated with allograft nephropathy.

Proteomic analysis of urine in kidney transplant patients with BK virus nephropathy

The differentiation of BK virus-associated renal allograft nephropathy (BKVAN) from acute allograft rejection (AR) in renal transplant recipients is an important clinical problem because the treatment can be diametrically opposite for the two conditions. The aim of this discovery-phase biomarker development study was to examine feasibility of developing a noninvasive method to differentiate BKVAN from AR. Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis was used to compare proteomic profiles of urine samples of 21 patients with BKVAN, 28 patients with AR (Banff Ia to IIb), and 29 patients with stable graft function. SELDI analysis showed proteomic profiles that were significantly different in the BKVAN group versus the AR and stable transplant groups. Peaks that corresponded to m/z values of 5.872, 11.311, 11.929, 12.727, and 13.349 kD were significantly higher in patients with BKVAN. Bioinformatics analyses allowed distinction of profiles of patients with BKVAN from patients with AR and stable patients. SELDI profiles also showed a high degree of reproducibility. Proteomic analysis of urine may offer a noninvasive way to differentiate BKVAN from AR in clinical practice. The identification of individual proteomic peaks can improve further the clinical utility of this screening method.

Isolated heart and liver transplant recipients are at low risk for polyomavirus BKV nephropathy

BACKGROUND

BKV infection and nephropathy is a significant cause of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplantation. BKV viremia, rather than viruria, corresponds to BKV nephropathy. The prevalence of BKV viremia in non-renal solid organ transplants has not been systematically evaluated.

METHODS

We determined prevalence of BKV viremia in kidney, combined kidney-heart, kidney-liver, kidney-pancreas, kidney-heart-liver, and heart and liver transplant recipients using BKV-PCR.

RESULTS

Seven out of 173 (4%) kidney transplant recipients had BKV viremia, with BKV>2 x 10(5) copies/mL in 6/7 and 1.9 x 10(3) in the remaining one patient. BKV viremia was not found in 24 heart transplant recipients, whereas 1/37 (2.7%) liver transplants showed low copy numbers (< or =10(3)). BKV-PCR< or =10(3) copies/mL were also found in one of each combined kidney-heart and kidney-liver transplant recipients. BKV nephropathy was proven by biopsy in 4/6 patients with high BKV viral loads. All six patients showed renal dysfunction, requiring reduction in immunosuppression and antiviral therapy. All four patients with low BKV viral loads (1.9 x 10(3) or < or =10(3)) showed stable renal function after reduction of immunosuppression or no treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Higher BKV levels in plasma are associated with renal dysfunction. Kidney transplant recipients are at high risk compared with recipients of isolated heart or liver allografts, for development of BKV nephropathy.

Clinical utility of histological features of polyomavirus allograft nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine if histological features of polyomavirus allograft nephropathy (PVAN) are associated with the clinical presentation and outcomes of PVAN.

METHODS

We examined the histological features of initial and follow-up biopsies of 20 kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients with PVAN during a time prior to routine surveillance. The subjects' demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were compared based upon classification of histological features of PVAN on initial biopsy.

RESULTS

Diabetes mellitus (45%) and a history of tacrolimus-induced nephrotoxicity (35%) appeared to be prevalent in subjects with PVAN. Although histological severity of PVAN did not predict or correlate with the clinical course of PVAN, subjects with pattern C on initial PVAN biopsy presented later posttransplant, had higher serum creatinine level at presentation, and had significant allograft deterioration at follow-up than subjects with either pattern A or B on initial biopsy. Resolution of PVAN was noted in 60% of follow-up biopsies and occurred more frequently in subjects with pattern B on initial biopsy. Most subjects developed chronic allograft nephropathy after PVAN and viral clearance did not abrogate the progression to chronic allograft nephropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that histologic patterns of PVAN may have clinical correlation to disease presentation and prognosis.

Low incidence of BK virus nephropathy after simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

BK virus renal allograft nephropathy (BKVAN) in the setting of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) has been inadequately studied and reported. We analyzed our data on the incidence of BKVAN and its outcome in SKPT recipients at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) and affiliated centers and report significant differences compared to previous studies.

METHODS

This study used retrospective review and case studies.

RESULTS

A review of 243 consecutive SKPT recipients from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2004 identified seven cases (three females; ages = 23-54 yrs) of BKVAN following SKPT (incidence = 2.9%). The immunosuppressive protocols during this period were divided into: Period I (pre-August 2001) with no antibody induction and Period II (post-August 2001) with alemtuzumab or antithymocyte globulin induction with steroid avoidance. One BKVAN case was diagnosed in Period II (incidence = 1.4%). Six of seven patients were treated with intravenous cidofovir (0.20-0.50 mg/kg) every two to four weeks over one to six months. Three patients lost the renal allograft 8-22 months following diagnosis of BKVAN, whereas four patients had prolonged allograft survival. Pancreatic function was well preserved in five; one patient lost the pancreatic function due to surgical complications and one has had partial preservation.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a relatively lower incidence of BKVAN among SKPT patients at our center. Although overall graft loss rate was comparable to other series, BKVAN patients had a slightly prolonged graft life. The BKVAN incidence was further reduced in patients receiving modified immunosuppression with antibody preconditioning. The underlying reasons may include less toxic immunosuppressive protocols, earlier diagnosis and the use of antiviral therapy.

BK virus infection in transplant recipients: an overview and update

BK virus infection after kidney transplantation has been a subject of great interest in the past decade. This article traces the discovery of BK virus and the subsequent development of our knowledge about this emerging pathogen. The pathobiology of the virus is summarized with particular reference to epidemiology, interactions with host cell receptors, cell entry, cytoplasmic trafficking and targeting of the viral genome to the nucleus. This is followed by a discussion of clinical features, laboratory monitoring and therapeutic strategies. Finally, we present potential cellular mechanisms that explain the basis of virus-mediated damage to the human kidney.

Subtype I BK polyomavirus strains grow more efficiently in human renal epithelial cells than subtype IV strains

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is ubiquitous in human populations, infecting children without obvious symptoms and persisting in the kidney. BKPyV isolates have been classified into four subtypes (I-IV) using either serological or genotyping methods. In general, subtype I occurs most frequently, followed by subtype IV, with subtypes II and III rarely detected. As differences in growth capacity in human cells possibly determine the proportion of the four subtypes of BKPyV in human populations, here the growth properties of representative BKPyV strains classified as subtype I or IV in renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (HPTE cells) of human origin were analysed. HPTE cells were transfected with four and three full-length BKPyV DNAs belonging to subtypes I and IV, respectively, and cultivated in growth medium. Virus replication, detected using the haemagglutination assay, was observed in all HPTE cells transfected with subtype I BKPyV DNAs, whereas it was markedly delayed or not detected in those transfected with subtype IV BKPyV DNAs. It was confirmed that the transfected viral DNAs induced virus replication in HPTE cells. Furthermore, it was found that BKPyVs with archetypal transcriptional control regions replicated in HPTE cells, with only the occasional emergence of variants carrying rearranged transcriptional control regions. Essentially the same results as described above were obtained with renal epithelial cells derived from whole kidney. Thus, it was concluded that subtype I BKPyV replicates more efficiently than subtype IV BKPyV in human renal epithelial cells, supporting the hypothesis that growth capacity in human cells is related to the proportion of BKPyV subtypes in human populations.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy: update in diagnosis

The histological diagnosis of BK or JC polyomavirus allograft nephritis (PVAN) requires evaluation of a renal biopsy with demonstration of the polyomavirus cytopathic changes and confirmation with an ancillary technique such as immunohistochemistry. Three histological patterns of PVAN (A, B, and C) are identified in renal biopsies. Pattern A corresponds to the early disease, whereas patterns B and C identify intermediate and very advanced histological changes, respectively. The histological pattern found in the first biopsy correlates with graft outcome. Because PVAN affects the kidney in a random, multifocal manner, a negative biopsy does not rule out the disease. Patients with BK PVAN characteristically have high levels of BK viruria and viremia. Although the cutoff values of viral loads have not been fully determined, there is general agreement that BK viruria of >10(7)/mL and BK viremia of >10(4) are typical of patients with a biopsy showing BK PVAN. Prospective evaluation of viruria with urine cytology (decoy cells) and/or quantitative polymerase chain reaction can aid in the identification of patients at risk for developing PVAN. In addition to histological evaluation, viremia has emerged as the most specific test for the diagnosis of BK PVAN. JC PVAN is very infrequent in comparison with BK PVAN, but is also characterized by large viruria (>10(4)). On the other hand, JC viremia appears to be lower, in the order of 10(3)/mL. The inflammatory changes in PVAN need further characterization. Currently, there are no tools to differentiate acute cellular rejection from viral specific T-cell response.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy: update on BK virus-specific immunity

The human polyomavirus type 1, also called BK virus (BKV), causes polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) in 1-10% of renal transplant recipients, with graft loss in over 50% of cases. The risk factors for PVAN are not conclusively defined and likely involve complementing determinants of recipient, graft, and virus. A central element seems to be the failing balance between BKV replication and BKV-specific immune control, which can result from intense triple immunosuppression, HLA-mismatches, prior rejection and anti-rejection treatment, or BKV-seropositive donor/seronegative recipient pairs. Consistent with this general hypothesis, the timely reduction of immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients reduced graft loss to less than 10% of cases. However, the BKV-specific humoral and cellular immune response is not well characterized. Recent work from several groups suggest that changes in antibody titers and BKV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells may help to better define the risk and the course of PVAN in renal transplant patients.

Urinary HLA-DR and CD54 expression--indicators for inflammatory activity in decoy cell shedding patients

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus (PV) nephropathy may coexist with or follow acute renal transplant rejection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether HLA-DR and CD54 are useful cellular markers for surveillance of acute rejection in PV-infected patients.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted using 205 renal transplant patients. Urine samples were collected at a regular interval post-transplantation for routine cytology and immunocytochemistry. Urinary levels of tumour necrosis factor alpha, soluble interleukin-2 receptor and interleukin-6 were used as adjunctive markers for acute rejection.

RESULTS

Of the 699 total samples, decoy cells were identified in 100 samples of 50 patients. Patients with decoy cell-positive (DCP) samples had higher serum creatinine levels than decoy cell-negative (DCN) samples (1.55 vs 1.41 mg/dl, respectively; P = 0.006). DCP samples were also more likely to be HLA-DR positive (50.0 vs 32.4%; P = 0.029), as well as CD54 positive (17.4 vs 6.9%; P = 0.038). However, serum creatinine levels did not correlate with HLA-DR or CD54 positivity among DCP samples. Instead, CD54 positivity correlated with decoy cell grades. Immunosuppression decreased in 11 DCP patients, and HLA-DR was negatively converted in three of them. None of the patients developed acute clinical rejection. Urinary cytokine levels did not correlate with serum creatinine levels, nor did they correlate with HLA-DR or CD54 status among DCP patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary tubular HLA-DR and CD54 expression increased in decoy cell shedding patients but did not indicate a concomitant acute rejection. These markers may instead indicate renal inflammatory activity associated with viral reactivation, which has the potential to progress to PV interstitial nephritis.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the management of human polyomaviruses

Polyomaviruses [BK virus (BKV), JC virus (JCV) and simian virus 40 (SV40)] have been known to be associated with diseases in humans for over thirty years. BKV-associated nephropathy and JCV-induced progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) were for many years rare diseases occurring only in patients with underlying severe impaired immunity. Over the past decade, the use of more potent immunosuppression (IS) in transplantation, and the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) epidemic, have coincided with a significant increase in the prevalence of these viral complications. Prophylactic and therapeutic interventions for human polyomavirus diseases are limited by our current understanding of polyomaviral pathogenesis. Clinical trials are limited by small numbers of patients affected with clinically significant diseases, lack of defined risk factors and disease definitions, no proven effective treatment and the overall significant morbidity and mortality associated with these diseases. This chapter will focus on a review of the current and future research related to therapeutic targets and interventions for polyomavirus-associated diseases.

Infectious complications in renal transplant recipients

Post-kidney transplant infection is the most common life-threatening complication of long-term immunosuppressive therapy. Optimal immunosuppression, in which a balance is maintained between prevention of rejection and avoidance of infection, is the most challenging aspect of posttransplantation care. The study of infectious complications in immunologically compromised recipients is changing rapidly, particularly in the fields of prophylactic and preemptive strategies, molecular diagnostic methods, and antimicrobial agents. In addition, emerging pathogens such as BK polyomavirus and West Nile flavivirus infections and the introduction of newer immunosuppressive agents that constantly change the risk profiles for opportunistic infections has added layers of complexity to this burgeoning field. Although remarkable progress has been made in these disciplines, comprehensive understanding of the clinical manifestations of infections remains limited, and the standardization of prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment of most infections is yet inadequately defined. The long-term goal for optimal care of transplant recipients, with respect to infection, is the prevention and/or early recognition and treatment of infections while avoiding drug-related toxicities.

Antilymphoid antibody preconditioning and tacrolimus monotherapy for pediatric kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Heavy post-transplant immunosuppression may contribute to long-term immunosuppression dependence by subverting tolerogenic mechanisms; thus, we sought to determine if this undesirable consequence could be mitigated by pretransplant lymphoid depletion and minimalistic post-transplant monotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Lymphoid depletion in 17 unselected pediatric recipients of live (n = 14) or deceased donor kidneys (n = 3) was accomplished with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (n = 8) or alemtuzumab (n = 9). Tacrolimus was begun post-transplantation with subsequent lengthening of intervals between doses (spaced weaning). Maintenance immunosuppression, morbidity, graft function, and patient/graft survival were collated.

RESULTS

Steroids were added temporarily to treat rejection in two patients (both ATG subgroup) or to treat hemolytic anemia in two others. After 16 to 31 months (mean 22), patient and graft survival was 100% and 94%, respectively. The only graft loss was in a nonweaned noncompliant recipient. In the other 16, serum creatinine was 0.85 +/- 0.35 mg/dL and creatinine clearance was 90.8 +/- 22.1 mL/1.73 m2. All 16 patients are on monotherapy (15 tacrolimus, one sirolimus), and 14 receive every other day or 3 times per week doses. There were no wound or other infections. Two patients developed insulin-dependent diabetes.

CONCLUSION

The strategy of lymphoid depletion and minimum post-transplant immunosuppression appears safe and effective for pediatric kidney recipients.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy: update of clinical management in kidney transplant patients

Over the last decade, polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) has occurred with increasing frequency after renal transplantation, leading to significant renal dysfunction and graft loss. More than 95% of all cases are caused by the human polyomavirus type 1 called the BK virus. The primary treatment for PVAN is immunosuppression reduction, which must be carefully balanced against increased risks of rejection. Although no validated protocols exist, a first step commonly involves reduction of calcineurin inhibitors with antiproliferative agents by more than one-third, e.g., reaching trough levels of tacrolimus <6 ng/mL, of cyclosporine <150 ng/mL, dosing of mycophenolate mofetil to <1 g/day, and azathioprine <75 mg/day. When rejection is diagnosed together with PVAN, a transient pulse treatment is recommended before subsequent reduction in immunosuppression. No antiviral treatments for PVAN have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. The antiviral drug cidofovir has shown in vitro activity against murine polyomaviruses, and has been used in some patients in lower doses in an effort to minimize the nephrotoxic effects of cidofovir while treating PVAN. Small series of PVAN patients treated with leflunomide, intravenous immune globulin therapy, and fluoroquinolones have also been reported recently.