Neoral monitoring by simplified sparse sampling area under the concentration-time curve: its relationship to acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity early after kidney transplantation

Evolution of immunosuppression in liver transplantation: contribution of cyclosporine

Liver transplantation has become the standard therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease or acute liver failure, with excellent outcomes in terms of quality of life and length of survival. The use of immunosuppressive agents, without any doubt, has played a crucial role in the establishment of this technique and improved short- and long-term survival rates. Eventually, mortality from acute or chronic rejection may be entirely eliminated. Minimizing the adverse effects of immunosuppressive agents is essential to improve long-term survival and quality of life. In this chapter, we review the history of immunosuppressive agents for liver transplantation with consideration of the pre- and the postcyclosporine eras. We also review the development and contributions of cyclosporine, the excellent outcomes from C2 monitoring, comparisons between the cyclosporine microemulsion and the oil-based formula, as well as between cyclosporine microemulsion versus tacrolimus. In addition, details are provided on the newer immunosuppressive agents: mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, and the IL-2 receptor antagonists, as well as agents in development: CAMPATH 1-H, thymoglobulin, everolimus, FT720, and FK778.

Cardiac transplant experience with cyclosporine

The advent of cyclosporine 20 years ago was a major advance in the field of solid organ transplantation. Its use enabled directed immunosuppression with a consequent decrease in the incidence of graft failure, acute rejection, and systemic infection. The early oil-based preparation, however, was difficult to administer and had limited bioavailability and unpredictable pharmacokinetics. The drug also has a fairly narrow therapeutic window with major long-term side effects, which include nephrotoxicity, malignancy, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. The introduction of a microemulsion preparation (Neoral) with improved bioavailability has been associated with lower rates of rejection and comparable tolerability, therefore allowing the use of lower doses. Traditionally cyclosporine toxicity has been minimized by monitoring trough levels. Monitoring of levels 2 hours after dosing may provide a more accurate determination of cyclosporine exposure. The next phase in cardiac transplantation immunosuppression will most likely see a significantly diminished role for cyclosporine with the introduction of newer, more potent immunosuppressive agents with more favorable side-effect profiles. These agents, which include mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, and everolimus, also hold the promise of having a major impact on the development of transplant vasculopathy, which up to now has been an important determinant of limiting long-term allograft survival.

The promise of C2, simulect, and certican in heart transplantation

Immunosuppressive therapy in clinical transplantation has evolved from general nonspecific suppression of the immune system to selective blockade of intracellular immune events, maximizing graft tolerance while minimizing toxicity. Cyclosporine 2-hour postdose level monitoring has been recommended as the single most sensitive sampling point for assessment of the area under the curve, and predictor of clinical outcomes in heart transplantation. Strategies for monitoring immunosuppressive drugs to improve efficacy without increased toxicity are critical as we move into the 21st century. Everolimus, a derivative of rapamycin, is a macrocyclic immunosuppressive agent with antiproliferative activity that is efficacious in preventing graft vasculopathy. Agents that increase the armamentarium against rejection allowing individualized therapy tailored to minimize complications, and prevent graft vasculopathy will improve our flexibility and may translate into improved long-term outcomes.

Experience with conversion from sandimmun to neoral cyclosporine and the correlation of c2 levels with renal function

Pharmacologic monitoring of the cyclosporine microemulsion Neoral is an important tool to improve the efficacy and to avoid toxicity of the drug. Recent trials have shown that the absorption profiling tools represented by the area under the time-concentration curve from 0 to 4 hours postdose and concentration 2 hours postdose (C2) levels are the best predictors of acute rejection in the early posttransplant period. Since similar data regarding maintenance immunosuppression are scarce, we report our experience on Neoral C2 monitoring in renal transplant recipients during the late posttransplant period. However, available data on optimal Neoral C2 levels in the late posttransplantation period are scant and have not been correlated with well-defined endpoints such as chronic allograft nephropathy.

Optimization of cyclosporine for liver transplantation

Our understanding of cyclosporine (CsA) administration for liver transplantation has significantly improved over the past decade. Cyclosporine is a highly lipophilic molecule, and the original galenic formulation, Sandimmune, was highly dependent on bile flow and gut motility for its absorption. Sandimmune's poor absorption profile produced erratic CsA levels after liver transplantation. A new microemulsification formulation of CsA, Neoral (CsA-ME), was developed to overcome these limitations. The NOF-1 study confirmed the superiority of CsA-ME's absorption compared with Sandimmune; CsA-ME had a more consistent and reliable absorption, with lower intrapatient variability and improved dose linearity with drug exposure as measured by area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). These advantages translated into more reliable CsA predose concentrations and less toxicity. An analysis of the pharmacokinetic data showed that 2-hour postdose CsA levels (C2) provided a better measure of immune suppression than did trough levels (C0). The LIS2T study recently confirmed and extended these data by showing equivalent efficacy between CsA-ME using C2 monitoring or tacrolimus in liver transplant patients, with a similar incidence of adverse events except for a higher rate of diabetes mellitus and diarrhea with tacrolimus. These data confirmed that the improved CsA-ME formulation, when used in conjunction with optimized drug-monitoring protocols, is well tolerated after transplantation and provides low rates of graft rejection.

Optimization of the use of cyclosporine in renal transplantation

The immunological barrier remains the major obstacle to the widespread use of transplantation as a replacement therapy for terminal organ failure. Since the first successful renal transplant performed by Hume et al in 1952, there has been an elusive search for agents rendering the immune mechanism unresponsive to the specific alloantigen stimulus of the engrafted organ while sparing nonspecific host resistance. Immunosuppressive therapies in organ transplantation can be divided into the following four main classes; chemical (pharmaceutical), biological (immunological), physical (radiological), and surgical. Of these, chemical agents (drugs) have continued to play a principal role. The discovery of new immunosuppressive drugs such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclosporine (CsA), tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetils and so on made an epoch at each stage in history of clinical organ transplantation. The recent immunosuppressants were designed to focus their action selectively on T and /or B cells by inhibiting cytokine synthesis (CsA, FK506), cytokine action (Rapamycin), or cell differentiation (15-deoxyspergualin) pathways rather than to act on immune systems in a nonselective fashion. CsA has improved the success of kidney transplantation, reducing the incidence and severity of acute rejection and improving the patient and graft survival. Sandimmun Neoral offers promise due to its better bioavailability and limited dependence on bile flow for absorption. Long-term studies are under way to determine its effectiveness and safety. Therapeutic drug monitoring and combination therapy with CsA are investigated also.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine: 20 years of progress

Since its introduction 20 years ago, cyclosporine (CyA), a powerful immunosuppressant with a narrow therapeutic window, remains the cornerstone of many drug regimens in renal transplantation. However, attempts to balance its therapeutic value with its pleiotropic side effects continue to challenge clinicians. To address the wide intraindividual and interindividual differences in absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of the oil-based formulation of CyA (Sandimmune), a microemulsion (Neoral) was introduced; it displayed better absorption and lower intraindividual variability. Neoral also improves the utility of therapeutic monitoring of CyA to estimate exposure to the drug and predict patient outcomes. Drug monitoring techniques are undergoing continual refinement: today, a limited sampling strategy--C2 monitoring--shows great promise as a comparatively simple, safe, and effective method to optimize patient outcomes during both short-term and maintenance CyA therapy. However, it is not clear whether this method is useful for treatment optimization with generic formulations of CyA. Although generic substitutes meet federal bioequivalence criteria, they may not display the same pharmacokinetic properties. Further, preliminary data have shown a 10% lower 1-year graft survival rate among patients treated with generic versus Neoral CyA. Current challenges in optimizing CyA therapy include determining pretransplant patient characteristics relevant to selection of the appropriate exposure or the development of a Bayesian forecasting technique that predicts dose adjustments necessary to achieve the optimal drug regimen during the critical period immediately posttransplant.

Monitoring Cyclosporine of Pre-dose and Post-dose Samples Using Nonextraction Homogeneous Immunoassay

A nonextraction homogeneous immunoassay (CEDIA Cyclosporine Plus Assay) has been developed for the measurement of cyclosporine in predose (trough) and post-dose (C2 to C8) whole-blood samples. The method includes a low-range assay that measures cyclosporine from 25 to 450 ng/mL in pre-dose samples and a high-range assay that detects cyclosporine from 450 to 2000 ng/mL in post-dose samples. The high-range assay allows a direct measurement of post-dose samples without a dilution step. Alternatively, post-dose samples can be correctly measured by the low-range assay following a twofold dilution. Using an NCCLS precision protocol, the assay exhibited less than 10% CV or error less than the functional sensitivity. Functional sensitivity of the low-range assay was demonstrated at 20 ng/mL cyclosporine. Cross-reactivity was measured in the presence of cyclosporine and was found to be 4.4%, 19.8%, 16.4%, 0.9%, 1.0%, and 1.6% for metabolites AM1, AM9, AM4n, AM19, AM4n9, and AM1c, respectively. When 53 samples were evaluated using an HPLC method, the three most significant cross-reactive metabolites, AM1, AM4n, and AM9, exhibited an average concentration profile of 123%, 19%, and 0.06% of the parent cyclosporine, respectively. The average total contribution to cyclosporine quantification from these metabolites was estimated at 7.2% based on the percentage cross-reactivity of each metabolite in the CEDIA assay and the concentration of each metabolite as determined by HPLC. The method comparison study revealed a linear regression correlation of CEDIA = 1.095 x HPLC + 6.6, r = 0.972, for the low-range assay, and CEDIA = 1.018 x HPLC - 36.4, r = 0.968, for the high-range assay. In conclusion, the CEDIA Cyclosporine Plus Assay is a precise and accurate method for quantification of cyclosporine in pre-dose and post-dose samples.

The pharmacogenetics of immunosuppression for organ transplantation: a route to individualization of drug administration

Transplantation has transformed the treatment of patients with organ failure in a number of clinical settings, and immunosuppressive drug therapy is fundamental to its success. However, all the drugs in current use have a narrow therapeutic index. Under-dosing can lead to rejection, while over-dosing increases the risks of infection, malignant disease, and serious drug-specific adverse effects, including diabetes mellitus, nephrotoxicity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Heterogeneity in the pharmacokinetics of these drugs makes initial dose determination difficult, as there is a poor correlation between dose and blood concentration. This results in difficulties in achieving target blood concentrations early after transplantation, which are important for reducing the rate of immunological rejection. This problem is compounded by the observation that neither drug dose nor drug blood concentration accurately predict clinical efficacy or toxicity. The main determinant of heterogeneity in dose requirements is intestinal absorption of the active drug. The oxidative enzymes, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and CYP3A5, and the drug efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in enterocytes regulate this process. Most substrates for the P-gp pump are also substrates for the CYP3A enzymes. An efficient barrier to xenobiotic absorption is formed by the CYP enzymes and P-gp, and by the two systems working synergistically. Genetic polymorphisms have been reported for the genes associated with the expression of the CYP3A enzymes and P-gp. Genotyping patients for CYP3A genes has the potential to aid the establishment of optimal dosage regimens for transplant patients. Genetic polymorphism of the multiple drug resistance gene-1 (MDR1, also known as ABCB1) [3435C/T] and the CYP3A5 genes (CYP3A5*1, CYP3AP1*1) have the greatest potential to influence the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressants. Homozygosity of the T allele of the MDR1 3435C/T polymorphism has been associated with reduced enterocyte expression of P-gp resulting in increased drug absorption. The presence of the CYP3A5*1 allele is necessary for the production of a fully catalytic CYP3A5 protein, and also influences the ratio of CYP3A4 : CYP3A5 as well as the overall CYP3A catalytic activity. The CYP3A4 : CYP3A5 ratio may, in turn, influence the pattern of drug metabolites formed. Heterogeneity in the production of active and inactive metabolites has implications for both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these drugs.Gene frequencies and drug dose requirements differ between ethnic groups. Ethnic differences in dose requirements for immunosuppressants have been discussed widely. However, ethnicity is a rather crude marker for genotype. Pharmacogenetic typing offers the possibility of significant improvement in the individualization of immunosuppressive drug prescribing with reduced rates of rejection and toxicity.

The value of C2 monitoring in stable renal allograft recipients on maintenance immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporin A (CyA) is a drug with a narrow therapeutic window and highly variable pharmacokinetics. Therapeutic drug monitoring is essential and conventionally has been guided by trough levels (C0). Recent evidence indicates that a single blood concentration measurement 2 h after CyA administration (C2) is a more accurate predictor of drug exposure and clinical events than determination of C0. To date, limited prospective data are available with respect to risks and benefits of C2 monitoring in renal transplant recipients, and little experience exists with C2 monitoring in maintenance patients.

METHODS

In 127 long-term renal allograft recipients, we determined C2 levels in addition to conventional C0 and observed clinical outcome over a period of 13.6 +/- 3.1 months. To determine the precision of monitoring, we repeatedly determined C0 and C2 levels in 46 stable patients without dose change.

RESULTS

Clinical outcome was excellent (patient survival 100%, graft survival 97%), with only two borderline rejections, although C2 levels (564 +/- 186 ng/ml) were lower than recommended so far for maintenance patients. We found no significant differences in C2 levels between patients with rejection and CyA toxicity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed no prediction for risk of rejection, toxicity or infection by C2 levels. Repeated determinations of both C0 and C2 levels in 46 patients revealed a high intra-patient variability. In these patients, the coefficient of variation for C2 was only marginally better compared with C0.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that in maintenance patients, C2 concentrations between 500 and 600 ng/ml are well tolerated and provide effective and safe rejection prophylaxis. Although mean C2 levels do not seem to be helpful in identifying patients at risk for rejection, they may be useful to detect over-immunosuppression and to improve long-term allograft survival further by reducing CyA nephrotoxicity.

An economic model of 2-hour post-dose ciclosporin monitoring in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Monitoring of microemulsion ciclosporin (cyclosporine; Neoral) by 2-hour post-dose drug concentrations (C2) is an accurate measure of ciclosporin absorption efficiency and exposure, and appears superior to trough (C0) monitoring for prediction of rejection risk. A predictive decision model was used to determine if this approach also reduces total treatment costs in the first 12 months after renal transplantation.

METHODS

Parameter estimates for key clinical events were derived from the literature and from prospective pharmacokinetic studies comprising 234 adult HLA-non-identical renal graft recipients at seven Canadian centres. Patients were treated with microemulsion ciclosporin (Neoral), corticosteroids and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. Using the perspective of the Canadian healthcare provider, total treatment costs for the C2 versus the C0 strategy were modelled over 12 months, and then remodelled using conservative estimates to extend the timeframe to 5 years. Health resources were valued in 1999 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

The incidence of acute rejection was estimated to be 25% at 1 year in patients monitored by C0 and 18% in those monitored by C2. Patient survival was considered to be independent of monitoring strategy, and graft loss was predicted to be 1.4% lower in the C2 group. The studies suggested no important differences in comorbidity and the costs of C0 and C2 monitoring and ambulatory-based adverse events were held equivalent. Using these inputs, the average cost per patient for the first year post-transplant was Can dollars 46,857 for C0 monitoring and Can dollars 45,306 for C2 monitoring, rising to Can dollars 146,879 and Can dollars 142,569 after 5 years. The predicted cost for initial hospitalisation was Can dollars 11,280 for C0 and Can dollars 10,806 for C2 monitoring. The cost of maintenance immunosuppressive drug use, graft loss and dialysis was Can dollars 19,098 in the C0 group and Can dollars 18,612 in the C2 group, while acute rejection treatment costs were Can dollars 2169 and Can dollars 1577, respectively. An additional Can dollars 14,310 was consumed by other events, including repeat hospitalisation, for each group. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the most influential parameters affecting savings due to C2 monitoring were a reduction in the duration of initial and follow-up hospitalisations and reduced risks of acute rejection and subsequent graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with traditional trough concentration monitoring, ciclosporin monitoring at 2 hours post-dose produced a predicted saving of Can dollars 1551 during the first year after renal transplant. Although modelling assumptions become more restrictive over time, this projection allows a preliminary assessment of the long-term economic impact of the routine use of C2 monitoring.

Long-Term predictive value of cyclosporine microemulsion C2 level for chronic renal allograft dysfunction

This observational study was undertaken in maintenance renal transplant recipients to assess the relationship between cyclosporine C(2) and the long-term risk of chronic renal allograft dysfunction (CRAD). Pharmacokinetic profiling was undertaken twice yearly in 79 patients with stable graft function receiving cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) and steroids. Mean time since transplantation at study entry was 56 +/- 49 months posttransplant. At the end of the observational period (mean 43 +/- 14 months) 24 patients (30%) had developed CRAD, defined as proteinuria > 500 mg/24 hours associated with a rising serum creatinine and confirmed by graft biopsy. There were no significant differences at baseline between patients who did vs did not develop CRAD, except for reduced incidence of acute rejection in CRAD-free patients. The cyclosporine AUC was significantly higher among patients without CRAD (5707 ng. h/mL vs 3994 ng. h/mL, P =.0007). Mean C(2) was also significantly higher: 1001 ng/mL in the CRAD-free group versus 640 ng/mL in the CRAD group (P =.002). There was no significant difference in C(0). Regression analysis showed that the best predictors for the occurrence of CRAD were a low AUC (relative risk [RR] 1.54, P <.0001), a low C(2) (RR 1.30, P <.0001) and proteinuria (RR 4.95, P <.0001). Probability of freedom from CRAD was 90% for C(2) > 900 ng/mL. C(2) appears to be a superior strategy to C(0) monitoring of cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients with regard to the risk of CRAD. C(2) values above 900 ng/mL are appropriate to minimize the risk of CRAD among patients receiving cyclosporine microemulsion and steroids.

Tacrolimus monitoring by simplified sparse sampling under the concentration time curve

The purpose of this study was to determine which tacrolimus pharmacokinetic parameters best predicted efficacy in kidney transplantation. Blood tacrolimus levels at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours postdose were measured in 28 kidney transplants. All received tacrolimus-based triple-drug therapy with mychophenolate mofetil and prednisone. Associations between blood concentrations at each sampling time point and the area under the curve (AUC) 0-4 were measured by Pearson's correlation coefficients. Tacrolimus dosing was based on C0 not AUC. AUC and blood concentrations at each sampling time were retrospectively compared with C0 as predictor of acute rejection and nephrotoxicity. Although tacrolimus C0 correlated with AUC0-4 (r =.86), correlations were higher with C2 and C3 (r =.96 and r =.94, respectively). C0 levels were not significantly different in six patients with acute rejection and 23 patients without. There was a trend toward lower tacrolimus C3 in patients with AR than without AR (P =.06). C2 and C3 correlate better with AUC0-4 than C0. Early tacrolimus C3 levels may be a better than C0 as a predictor of efficacy.

Basiliximab widens the therapeutic window for AUC-monitored neoral therapy early after kidney transplantation

Early adequate cyclosporine exposure has been shown to predict low acute rejection. Recently basiliximab induction has been added to immunosuppressive regimens to further reduce rejection. The aim of this study was to determine the importance of achieving the early cyclosporine therapeutic threshold with basiliximab induction. A retrospective analysis of first cadaver and nonidentical living donor transplant recipients treated with or without basiliximab induction was performed. All patients (n = 170) received neoral, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. The cyclosporine absorption profile was measured on day 3. Adequate cyclosporine exposure was defined as area under the curve (AUC) 0-4: >4400 microg x h/L at day 3. The primary outcome was acute rejection (AR) within the first 6 month. In the no basiliximab (control) group, AR occurred in 22% (17/78) of recipients and was strongly associated with low cyclosporine exposure on day 3. AR occurred in 39% (9/23) with cyclosporine AUC0-4 < 4400 microg x h/L compared with 15% (8/55) with AUC0-4 > 4400 microg x h/L (P =.016). In the basiliximab group, AR occurred in only 9% (8/92) of recipients and did not correlate with cyclosporine exposure. AR occurred in 8% (2/24) with cyclosporine AUC0-4 < 4400 microg x h/L compared with 9% (6/68) with AUC0-4 > 4400 microg x h/L (P =.94). Achieving cyclosporine therapeutic targets by day 3 may not be required when anti-IL2 induction is used.

C2 monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients: is it worthwhile?

Presently, there is little knowledge regarding cyclosporine (CsA) concentration at 2 hr post-dose (C2) monitoring in maintenance patients. This study evaluates the actual C2 range in stable renal transplant recipients (who underwent transplantation >12 months ago). In addition, we investigated whether underexposure or overexposure to CsA (assessed by C2) affects graft function (as measured by serum [S]-creatinine). All renal transplant recipients in Norway receiving CsA were asked to participate; 1447 fulfilled the criteria. Valid C2 and CsA trough concentration (C0) measurements were performed in 1032 renal transplant recipients (71%) monitored by C0. Target C0 level was 75 to 125 mumol/L. CsA levels were measured using a Cloned Enzyme Donor Immunoassay method, and all analyses were performed in the same laboratory (overall mean [+/-standard deviation] CsA C0=112+/-31 mug/L, CsA C2=697+/-211 mug/L [range 81-1580 mug/L], CsA dose [mg/day]=208+/-61, CsA dose [mg/kg/day]=2.8+/-1.1, and S-creatinine=141+/-58 mumol/L). A univariate analysis of variance showed that patients with C2 levels between 700 and 800 mug/L (n=203, S-creatinine=136+/-49 mumol/L) had significantly lower S-creatinine levels compared with patients with C2 levels greater than 950 mug/L (n=94, S-creatinine=152+/-56 mumol/L) (P<0.02). The same was true for patients with C2 levels less than 450 mug/L (n=95, S-creatinine 141+/-72 mumol/L) (P<0.05) when compared with patients with C2 levels greater than 950 mug/L. There was no significant difference in S-creatinine between patients in the low and intermediate C2 group; 666 patients had C0 levels in the therapeutic range (75-125 mumol/L). A linear regression showed a significant relation between S-creatinine and C2 for these patients (P=0.03). The corresponding relation between S-creatinine and C0 was nonsignificant (P=0.3). Monitoring of C2 in maintenance patients is a valuable tool to detect overexposure to CsA. Until results from prospective studies are available, we recommend C0 in the therapeutic range and reduction in CsA in overexposed patients, aiming at a C2 value between 700 and 800 mug/L.

Clinical outcomes during the first three months posttransplant in renal allograft recipients managed by C2 monitoring of cyclosporine microemulsion

BACKGROUND

MO2ART (monitoring of 2-hr absorption in renal transplantation) is the first prospective, multicenter trial of cyclosporine (CsA) blood level 2 hr postdose (C2) monitoring in de novo kidney recipients receiving CsA microemulsion (ME) (Neoral; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland). Efficacy and safety results from the first 3 months are presented here.

METHODS

MO2ART is a 12-month, open-label, randomized study involving 296 patients. In all patients, the dose of CsA-ME was adjusted to achieve protocol-defined C2 targets of 1.6 to 2.0 microg/mL for the first month, with subsequent tapering. Randomization into two target groups occurred at 3 months. All patients received steroids and mycophenolate mofetil (89%) or azathioprine. For patients with delayed graft function, the protocol permitted reduced C2 targets and prophylactic administration of antibodies.

RESULTS

At 3 months, overall incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 11.5%. Median serum creatinine was 132 micromol/L. Patient and graft survival were 96.6% and 91.2%, respectively. C2 levels greater than 1.6 microg/mL were achieved within 5 days by 60.6% of patients with immediate graft function and 19.5% of patients with delayed graft function. Prophylactic antibodies were used in 15% of the total population. Twenty-four patients (8.1%) experienced serious adverse events with a suspected relation to CsA, and 26 patients (8.8%) discontinued the study because of adverse events (n=15) or after a switch in immunosuppression after rejection episodes (n=11).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient management by C2 monitoring resulted in a low incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection in standard risk de novo kidney recipients, 85% of whom did not receive prophylactic antibodies. CsA-ME with C2 monitoring provides excellent short-term efficacy and safety among de novo renal transplant patients.

New strategies of cyclosporine monitoring in heart transplantation: initial results

The aim of this study was to evaluate cyclosporine (CyA) absorption profiles in heart transplantation to establish the most adequate monitoring strategy and determine the optimal therapeutic range for AUC(0-4) or C2 levels. A total of 22 full pharmacokinetic studies were performed at steady-state in 22 adult heart transplant recipients (18 men, 4 women). Twelve studies were performed during the first month posttransplant (group I), and 10 studies were done after 1 month (group II). In 9 outpatients we performed an abbreviated AUC(0-4). The mean age of the patients was 49+/-15 years (range, 15-72 years), and the mean weight was 70.4+/-10.8 kg (mean, 54-98 kg). The CyA dosage had been adjusted to maintain trough levels (C0) in the putative target ranges of 200 to 400 ng/mL in group I and between 100 to 300 ng/mL in group II. Blood samples were drawn prior to and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after the morning dose. The CyA blood levels were measured by the AxSYM cyclosporine assay. The AUC was calculated by the trapezoidal rule. Multiple linear regression was done to evaluate the predictive ability of various limited sampling strategies. The C0 correlated poorly, either with the full AUC (r2=0.64) or the AUC(0-4) (r2=0.43), while C2 seemed to be the most accurate single predictor of drug exposure (r2=0.92 for AUC(0-12); r2=0.74 for AUC(0-4)). For both AUC(0-4) and AUC(0-12), all 2- or 3-point strategies had r2 values approaching that of the C2 value. In conclusion, C2 is a simple, fast, and accurate value to predict AUC(0-4) in routine clinical practice. Its implementation must focus on ensuring the commitment of all unit staff, thus ensuring that patients are sampled on time and minimizing the impact on workload.

Longitudinal evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin microemulsion (Neoral) in pediatric renal transplant recipients and assessment of C2 level as a marker for absorption

BACKGROUND

There are important differences in CsA pharmacokinetics between adult and pediatric patients, such that pharmacokinetic data can not necessarily be extrapolated from the adult to the pediatric setting. Research in adult renal transplant patients has shown that adequate cyclosporin exposure (AUC0-4) in the first week post-transplant is important for successful clinical outcome, and that cyclosporin concentration at 2 h post-dose (C2) provides the optimal single-time point marker for AUC0-4. Clinically, dose management based on C2 level results in a low incidence of acute rejection in the adult renal transplant population. The study reported here undertook pharmacokinetic profiling in de novo renal transplant patients over a period of 6 months and retrospectively assessed alternative monitoring strategies based on pharmacokinetic findings and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This open-label, observational, prospective study was carried out at four UK transplant centers over a period of 6 months in pediatric de novo renal transplant recipients receiving the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin (Neoral) according to local protocol. Twelve-hour pharmacokinetic profiles (8-16 blood samples each) were performed on days 5 and 14 and at weeks 4, 13 and 26 post-transplant.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were recruited (median age 10 yr, range 3-18 yr). At 6 months, patient survival was 100% and graft survival was 91%. The incidence of clinically determined acute rejection was 41% (13 of 32). Six patients discontinued Neoral before 6 months: three due to graft loss, one due to rejection, one due to renal toxicity and one due to hypertrichosis. At all time points studied, C2 correlated more closely with AUC0-4 and with AUC0-12 than did the pre-dose cyclosporin concentration (C0, or trough). Patients achieving C2 > 1.5 microg/mL by the fifth postoperative day experienced no acute rejection in the first 6 months, compared with a 50% rejection rate among patients with C2 < 1.5 microg/mL (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that C2 level >1.7 microg/mL was associated with approximately 90% probability of freedom from acute rejection. Analysis of renal function across patients grouped according to cyclosporine exposure (AUC0-4, C2) showed no adverse effects of higher/increased exposure on creatinine or GFR.

CONCLUSIONS

C2 level provides a more reliable marker for CsA exposure than C0 in pediatric renal transplant recipients, and is more closely predictive of acute rejection risk. A C2 target of 1.7 microg/mL appears appropriate in this population during the immediate post-transplant period in order to maximize clinical benefit.

Cyclosporin C(2) and C(0) concentration monitoring in stable, long-term heart transplant recipients receiving metabolic inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporin (CsA) dose selection is complicated by significant pharmacokinetic variability between patients. Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has proven to be a useful tool for dose individualization, the search for an effective and practical measure of clinical effect has uncovered a number of options. Monitoring the CsA concentration in a blood sample taken 2 hours after the dose (C(2)) has been utilized but has not been rigorously evaluated in all clinical situations. The aim of this study was to evaluate C(2) and trough (C(0)) CsA concentrations as surrogate markers of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in stable, long-term heart transplant recipients receiving CsA alone or with diltiazem and/or ketoconazole.

METHODS

CsA blood concentration-time data were collected at steady state for 47 stable heart transplant recipients after the morning dose of Neoral. CsA concentration in whole blood was quantitated using the EMIT immunoassay. Patients were stratified into 4 groups, depending on the long-term concomitant administration of drugs known to inhibit CsA metabolism, as part of their routine therapy: Group A (n = 11), CsA alone; Group B (n = 10), CsA with slow-release diltiazem; Group C (n = 13), CsA with ketoconazole; and Group D (n = 12), CsA with a combination of diltiazem and ketoconazole.

RESULTS

In Group A, C(2) correlated poorly with AUC(0-5) (r(2) = 0.197; p = 0.17), whereas C(0) (trough blood sample) showed a stronger correlation (r(2) = 0.710; p = 0.001). Correlations of C(0) and C(2) with AUC(0-5) were the same, but weaker in patients receiving CsA and diltiazem (r(2) = 0.650; p = 0.005); however, C(2) correlated strongly with AUC(0-5) in patients receiving ketoconazole (r(2) = 0.870; p < 0.0001) or ketoconazole with diltiazem (r(2) = 0.898; p < 0.0001). C(0) was a poor predictor of AUC(0-5) in the latter 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

C(2) showed a strong correlation with AUC(0-5) in cardiothoracic transplant recipients receiving CsA with ketoconazole, but not with CsA alone or diltiazem. TDM using C(2) as an estimate of AUC requires further evaluation before being applied in long-term, stable cardiac transplant patients, as it may lead to inappropriate dose adjustment of CsA in patients receiving concomitant metabolic inhibitors.

Clinical benefits of neoral C2 monitoring in the long-term management of renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine monitoring using the 2-hr postdose sample, C2, has been shown to have advantages in monitoring de novo renal transplant recipients. The purpose of this study was to assess cyclosporine exposure, using C2, in stable renal transplant patients previously monitored by C0 to determine the effect of dose reduction on patients with C2 more than 10% above target and the course of those with C2 at and more than 10% below target, whose dose was not modified.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-five patients, three or more months after transplantation, had C2 assessed. The relationship of C2 to C0 and of both to renal function was analyzed by linear regression. Blood pressure, serum creatinine level, and lipids were followed for a mean of 15+/-2.6 months.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients had values more than 10% above target, 42 were within 10% of target, and 48 were more than 10% below target. Cyclosporine dose was reduced in all patients above target. In this group, serum creatinine level was stable overall, but fell significantly in 46 (54%) of 85 from 153+/-55 to 132+/-49 microM. Blood pressure also fell in that group from 135/82 to 131/77. Serum creatinine level was stable in the remaining two groups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that dose reduction in many overexposed patients leads to improvements in renal function and blood pressure. Further study is required to confirm the long-term benefits of this strategy.

Comparison of cyclosporine absorption profiles over a 12-month period in stable pediatric renal transplant recipients

Evidence suggests that the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of microemulsion- cyclosporine A (m-CsA) during the 4-hour absorption phase represents an accurate tool to estimate drug exposure. In addition, several reports suggest a close correlation between selected single CsA concentrations at 1, 2, or 3 hours post-dose (C(1), C(2), and C(3)) and the abbreviated area under the curve (AUC)(0-4) among pediatric renal transplant patients. However, it is still unclear whether these PK correlations remain stable and reliable over 12 months posttransplant. In this study, we obtained 4-hour pharmacokinetic profiles (AUC(0-4)) from stable pediatric renal transplant recipients (phase 1) with repeat measurements 12 months later (phase 2). In addition, we evaluated the optimal single sampling point that correlated with the AUC(0-4) during both phases of the study. Over 1 year there was no significant change in the AUC(0-4) of m-CsA in pediatric renal transplant recipients. The mean dose-normalized AUC(0-4) values changed by less than 2.5%, namely, 557 versus 545 ng x h/mL per unit dose, respectively. The C(1) value was the sampling point that showed the best correlation with AUC(0-4); C(0) displayed the weakest correlation. No changes in cyclosporine dosing or glomerular filtration rate estimates were observed throughout the study period. This study demonstrates the stability of drug measurements during m-CsA therapy.

Pre- and postrenal transplantation pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine microemulsion

The availability of a microemulsion formulation (ME) of cyclosporin (CyA) displays improved bioavailability and reduced inter and intra-patient variability, resulting in improved long-term outcomes. Recent developments in therapeutic drug monitoring stress the need to optimize peak drug levels during the early posttransplant period to obtain long-term benefit.

METHODS

We studied early CyA-ME pharmacokinetics, comparing pre- versus immediate posttransplant values, to assess predictability of pre-transplant profiles in 22 patients including 3 diabetics. An 8 mg/kg per day amount in two divided doses was administered, for 5 days pretransplant and 10-14 days posttransplant before performing the pharmacokinetic studies. Drugs interacting with CyA metabolism/absorption were withdrawn and patients with liver disease were excluded the CyA level monitoring used a 5-point blood sampling (at 0 hours, 1 hours, 2 hours, 3 hours, and 4 hours post-dose). The study compared actual concentrations at each individual time and the limited 0-4 hour AUC.

RESULTS

The paired values at each point pre- and posttransplant were: C0 = 171 +/- 63 and 215 +/- 112, C1 = 723.86 +/- 345 and 1239.95 +/- 415, C2 = 972 +/- 185 and 1249.95 +/- 336, C3 = 822 +/- 242 and 942.7 +/- 286, and C4 = 601.54 +/- 190 and 670.5 +/- 208 ng/mL respectively. The C1 and C2 values were significantly higher posttransplant (P =.008 and 0.0045 respectively), suggesting a steeper absorption phase, a conclusion consistent with the higher 0-4 hour AUC posttransplant (P =.0089). However, linear regression analysis of pre- versus posttransplant values showed poor correlations.

CONCLUSIONS

CyA absorption is significantly lower among patients on maintenance hemodialysis and showed no predictive correlation with posttransplant levels. The possible role of uremia in retarding absorption which may have clinical significance for primary graft dysfunction, needs further evaluation.

A compartmental pharmacokinetic model of cyclosporin and its predictive performance after Bayesian estimation in kidney and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporin A (CsA) is an obvious necessity because of its unpredictable absorption and narrow therapeutic window. The use of limited sampling models (LSMs) has improved the estimation of the systemic exposure [area under curve (AUC)] compared with C(0h) monitoring, but these equations are rigid and not reliable in patients with an abnormal absorption profile. We developed and validated a limited sampling (t=0, 2 and 3 h) strategy, based on a compartmental population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for CsA after kidney transplantation alone (KTA) and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKT) recipients, a group of patients with unpredictable absorption kinetics.

METHODS

A two-compartment model with lag time and first-order absorption was calculated using a PK software package from data of 20 KTA and SPKT recipients and validated prospectively in 20 KTA and 20 SPKT recipients. Calculated population PK parameters were individualized for each of the remaining 40 patients based on their CsA dosing and on one or a combination of measured CsA blood concentrations using the Bayesian fitting method. AUCs were calculated from individualized PK parameters. AUCs were also calculated using previously published LSMs. Relationships between AUCs calculated by the models and the 'golden standard' AUC (trapezoidal rule) were investigated by Pearson correlation test.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A population two-compartment model is presented to reliably estimate the CsA AUC in KTA and SPKT recipients. The performance of the model to estimate the AUC is comparable to the performance of two published LSMs in KTA patients, but markedly better in SPKT patients. Combined with Bayesian fitting, the model is very flexible since sampling times are not rigid and can be varied as long as dosing and sampling times are recorded accurately. The model has already proven to be clinically useful and is currently used to further investigate CsA in an integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

Circadian variations in cyclosporine C2 concentrations during the first 2 weeks after liver transplantation

The strategies currently used to monitor concentrations of cyclosporine (CsA) in transplanted patients include whole blood trough (C0), total or abbreviated area under the curve (AUC) concentration and population pharmacokinetic approaches. Recently, a single blood concentration measurement at 2 hours (C2) after CsA administration has been shown to be helpful to predict clinical effects during the first weeks after transplantation of liver and kidney grafts. However, this approach has raised multiple questions about pharmacokinetic variability, analytical methods, and organizational requirements. From a pharmacokinetic point of view, the variability of CsA blood concentrations may relate to circadian variations. The present study sought to characterize the circadian variation in C0 and C2 CsA levels among 20 liver transplant recipients during the first 2 weeks posttransplant. All patients received two equal oral doses of CsA microemulsion formulation every 12 hours. Blood samples were collected before and 2 hours after CsA administration in the morning (AM) and in the evening (PM). Whole blood concentrations of CsA were assayed using the monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay system. During the first 2 weeks posttransplant, C2 AM mean levels were significantly higher than C2 PM levels (542 +/- 241 vs 383 +/- 182 ng/mL, P =.005), while the C0 AM mean level was not statistically different from the C0 PM (285 +/- 174 vs 223 +/- 124 ng/mL, P =.367). Our results suggest that morning CsA blood samples may afford a better approach to optimize the CsA dosage, especially based on C2 values.

A pharmacokinetic and clinical review of the potential clinical impact of using different formulations of cyclosporin A. Berlin, Germany, November 19, 2001

A meeting of 14 transplant and pharmacokinetic specialists from Europe and North America was convened in November 2001 to evaluate scientific and clinical data regarding the use of different formulations of cyclosporin A (CsA). The following consensus was achieved. (1) CsA is a critical-dose drug with a narrow therapeutic window. Clinical outcomes after transplantation are affected by the pharmacokinetic properties of CsA, particularly by its bioavailability, and by intrapatient variability in CsA exposure. (2) Standard bioequivalence criteria do not address differences in CsA pharmacokinetics between transplant recipients and healthy volunteers, or between subpopulations of transplant recipients. (3) In some circumstances, currently available formulations of CsA that meet standard bioequivalence criteria are likely to be nonequivalent with respect to pharmacokinetic characteristics. (4) The choice of CsA formulation can affect the short- and long-term clinical outcome. Currently, there is a lack of clinical comparisons between generic CsA formulations and the Neoral formulation (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey). Initial retrospective data from the Collaborative Transplant Study suggest that use of generic CsA formulations may result in reduced graft survival at 1 year. (5) Management of transplant recipients by monitoring Neoral concentrations 2 hours after dosing (C(2)) reduces the incidence and severity of acute rejection compared with monitoring of trough concentrations with no increase in toxicity. C(2) monitoring has been developed based on the pharmacokinetics of Neoral only and has not been evaluated or validated for generic formulations of CsA. (6) The major costs of care after transplantation relate to the management of poor clinical outcomes and toxicity. CsA formulations with different pharmacokinetic properties may be associated with varying clinical outcomes, which would be expected to affect total health care costs. (7) The transplant physician is responsible for selecting immunosuppressive agents and formulations for his or her patients. Any switch between CsA formulations in a particular patient should take place only in a controlled setting with adequate pharmacokinetic monitoring.

Effect of cyclosporin pharmacokinetics on renal allograft outcome in African-Americans

African-Americans (A-As) experience inferior outcome after transplantation compared with other ethnic groups. Bioavailability of cyclosporin (CsA) has been implicated as a possible contributing factor. This paper describes the outcome of 32 A-A recipients of de novo renal allograft who received CsA-based triple immunotherapy according to individual pharmacokinetic profiles. Patients received CsA-microemulsion q 12 h, dosed initially at 3.5 mg/kg (8 am) and 3.0 mg/kg (8 pm). The am and pm doses were independently adjusted to achieve a 12-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-12) of 6600-7200 nghr/mL and morning trough level (C0) of 250-325 ng/mL, respectively. Mean age was 43 +/- 12 yr, 37% (12) female. Mean AUC0-12 in 1 wk, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 7810 +/- 1880 nghr/mL, 9057 +/- 2097 nghr/mL, 7674 +/- 1912 nghr/mL, 7132 +/- 2040 nghr/mL, and 6503 +/- 1410 ngl/h with corresponding C0 of 301 +/- 79 ng/mL, 316 +/- 66 ng/mL, 275 +/- 59 ng/mL, 273 +/- 66 ng/mL, and 224 +/- 49 ng/mL, respectively. Acute rejection occurred in two patients (6%) 1 yr after transplantation. Prospective use of CsA pharmocokinetic profiles improves renal allograft outcome in A-As.

Comparison of peak and trough level monitoring of cyclosporine treatment using two modern cyclosporine preparations

AIMS

Determination of the peak cyclosporine blood level instead of the trough level promises to represent an improvement in cyclosporine therapy monitoring due to better correlation with the AUC. In kidney transplant recipients we investigated whether this conclusion applies also to a new dispersion formulation of cyclosporine (Cicloral).

PATIENTS

42 stable kidney transplant recipients were converted from Sandimmun Neoral (NEO) to Cicloral (CIC) in a 1:1 dose relation.

METHODS

On the last day of NEO administration and 14 days after conversion to CIC a full 12 h cyclosporine AUC was performed using blood samples obtained prior to and at serial times after dosing. The correlations between cyclosporine levels at these time points and the AUC were determined for NEO and CIC. For each measurement, a predicted AUC was calculated by regression analysis. The prediction error for each sampling time was calculated separately for NEO and CIC.

RESULTS

The cyclosporine trough levels showed the poorest correlation with AUC for both preparations (NEO: r = 0.187 vs CIC: r = 0.554). The best correlation was observed for samples obtained at three hours after intake of either CIC (r = 0.807) or NEO (r = 0.611). The number of 2 hours measurements that lead to an unacceptable estimate from the real AUC was somewhat lower for CIC (8/40 vs 11/41 with NEO).

CONCLUSIONS

Two- or three-hour cyclosporine level monitoring with the newer cyclosporine preparation Cicloral has at least the same precision as that of the original Neoral(R). In this study, the newer preparation even showed a tendency towards superior monitoring properties.

Rapamycin in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus in liver, pancreas, and kidney transplantation

A 10-year experience with the immunosuppressive drug rapamycin that begins in the laboratory then extends through multicentre trials in combination with cyclosporine in kidney transplant recipients, exploration of its use as a single agent and in combination with tacrolimus, and its potential in nonrenal organs is described. Rapamycin is a potent inhibitor of endothelial injury in rat aortic allografts. When added to full-dose cyclosporine it achieves low rejection rates, but it augments the nephrotoxicity and hyperlipidemia of cyclosporine. On the other hand, it allows discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitors in stable kidney and liver patients suffering from nephrotoxicity late posttransplant. At least in Caucasian patients, discontinuation of cyclosporine is possible as early as 3 months post-kidney transplant. In combination with low-dose tacrolimus, exceptionally low rates of rejection were seen in recipients of kidney, pancreas, and liver recipients with preservation of excellent renal function. These pilot studies have been confirmed in several single-centre and, more recently, multicentre trials in kidney and pancreas transplantation. The side-effect profile of hyperlipidemia, lymphocoeles, delayed wound healing, and possible liver effects are coming into focus, and ways of minimizing these problems being introduced. The lessons learned include the need for early adequate blood levels, the lack of correlation between dose and drug exposure, and the potency that allows marked dose reductions in calcineurin inhibitors and steroids.

Limited sampling strategies using Bayesian estimation or multilinear regression for cyclosporin AUC(0-12) monitoring in cardiac transplant recipients over the first year post-transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop routinely applicable limited sampling strategies for assessing cyclosporin (CsA) AUC(0-12 h), and possibly other exposure indices such as AUC(0-4 h) and C(max), in heart transplant patients over the first year post-transplantation.

METHODS

First, the individual pharmacokinetics (PKs) of 14 adult heart-transplant patients receiving Neoral were assessed at three post-transplantation periods, at the end of the first week (W1), the third month (M3) and the first year (Y1). To fit blood concentrations, a PK model specially developed for oral CsA was applied. Second, two statistical methods were compared for AUC(0-12 h) estimation using a limited sampling strategy (maximum of three blood samples): multiple regression analysis (MR) and Bayesian estimation (BE).

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed between the individual PK parameters at M3 and Y1, so population modelling was performed taking as a whole the concentration data collected at M3 and Y1. On the contrary, a significant difference ( P<0.05) was found for the C2/dose ratio between W1 and M3 and between W1 and Y1 (mean+/-SD =5.47+/-2.33; 7.78+/-1.05; 6.98+/-2.17 ml(-1 )for W1, M3 and Y1, respectively). Also, C(max)/dose and A were found significantly lower at W1 than at M3 ( P<0.01 and P<0.005, respectively), while lambda(1) was significantly higher at W1 than at both M3 and Y1 ( P<0.01). Using three sampling times (t0 h, t1 h and t3 h), BE allowed an accurate prediction of AUC(0-12 h) (mean bias =3.06+/-12.16%; +1.50+/-1.61%; and -0.20+/-11.42% at W1, M3 and Y1, respectively), AUC(0-4 h )and C(max). MR led to satisfactory estimation of AUC(0-12 h) using only two blood samples collected 2 h and 6 h post-dose (R=0.956-0.993; bias =-5.22 to +4.41; precision =6.38 to 9.90%), but this method is unable to estimate any other exposure index and requires strict respect of sampling times, contrary to BE.

CONCLUSION

Neoral monitoring based on full or abbreviated AUC is possible using BE or MR in heart transplant patients over the first year post-transplantation. BE provides a good description of the individual PK profiles and thus might be useful not only in case of potential discrepancies between C2 and clinical findings, but also for clinical trials aimed at finding optimum PK monitoring in heart recipients.

Predictive value of pretransplantation cyclosporine pharmacokinetic studies on initial post-transplantation dosing in pediatric kidney allograft recipients

Despite the introduction of a variety of new immunosuppressive agents, cyclosporine A (CsA) has maintained a strong position in pediatric transplantation (Tx). Post-Tx dosing with CsA is a challenging task because of the narrow therapeutic window of the drug, the great individual variability of metabolism and the lack of consensus about the optimal dosage and targeted blood concentration. Sufficient administration of CsA may be protective against acute rejections and other early complications after Tx, which is crucial for the long-term survival of the graft. Individual doses based on pre-Tx pharmacokinetic studies might be helpful in achieving optimal early concentrations of CsA. To asses the usefulness of pharmacokinetic studies, we retrospectively compared the post-Tx doses administered with the individually predicted doses between 1988 and 1998. Multiple regression of data on 65 de novo renal transplant recipients, 1.1-15.5 yr old, was used to analyze the significance of the predicted dose, trough blood concentration of CsA (B-CsA), serum creatinine and age at the time of Tx in explaining the doses used during the first three post-Tx weeks. Patients were grouped according to age (<2, 2-8 and >8 yr), according to the predicted dose (within or outside +/-25% of age-group average), and according to the oral formulation of CsA. Standard dosing scheme was simulated by using age-specific average doses in the place of the individual predicted doses. Administered doses of CsA were high [averaging 22.6 (504), 20.7 (484), and 12.4 mg/kg/d (329 mg/m2/d) for patients <2, 2-8, and >8 yr old] but the average B-CsA remained in the target range of 250-450 microg/L. The predicted dose and age were significant parameters in explaining the administered doses during the first 3 wk after Tx. B-CsA and S-creatinine were non-significant. The predicted doses were used to initiate the dosing of CsA after Tx (R2 = 0.70) and adjustments to dosing were made during the next weeks (R2 = 0.59, 0.52). Multiple regression model showed better fit for 60% of our patients, who had atypical predicted doses (R2 = 0.74, 0.60, 0.64 for first, second and third post-Tx weeks, respectively), most remarkably in patients <2 yr of age, than for the study population as a whole. A simulated standard dose was not able to explain the administered doses of CsA. In conclusion, pre-Tx pharmacokinetic studies are valuable for determining individual post-Tx starting doses, especially for those patients who need high or low doses of CsA. Individual dosing led to relatively high initial CsA doses, which could be significant for the long-term survival of the graft.

Can a pharmacokinetic approach to immunosuppression eliminate ethnic disparities in renal allograft outcome?

Although renal allograft outcome correlates more closely with area under the concentration time curve (AUC) for cyclosporin (CsA) compared with the 12-h trough level (C0), few studies have prospectively evaluated pharmacokinetic monitoring in kidney transplantation. This paper describes a study designed to evaluate the impact of a novel approach to CsA-based immunosuppression on ethnic differences in renal allograft outcome. Sixty (32 African Americans and 28 Caucasians) renal transplant recipients were treated with cyclosporin-based triple therapy. Morning and evening doses were independently adjusted to reach an AUC0-12 of 6600-7200 ng h/mL and a C0 of 250-325 ng/mL, respectively. AUCs were measured within 48 h of starting CsA, and as often as necessary to maintain target levels. Only two patients experienced significant adverse events related to immunosuppression. One (Caucasian) developed haemolytic uremic syndrome and was converted to tacrolimus, while another (African American) developed acute vascular rejection. One graft was lost (Caucasian) due to death with a functioning graft. An average of 8 AUCs (range 5-13) were measured in the first 3 months. AUCs were significantly higher in African Americans compared with Caucasians only in the first and second month. C0 values were similar in both groups throughout the study period. A pharmacokinetic approach to immunosuppression allows individualization of CsA exposure, and appears to reduce ethnic disparities in renal allograft outcome.

Bayesian forecasting of oral cyclosporin pharmacokinetics in stable lung transplant recipients with and without cystic fibrosis

The aims of the current study were (1) to study Neoral pharmacokinetics (PK) in stable lung recipients with or without cystic fibrosis (CF), (2) to compare Neoral PK between these two groups, and (3) to design Bayesian estimators for PK forecasting and dose adjustment in these patients using a limited number of blood samples. The individual PK of 19 adult lung transplant recipients, 9 subjects with CF and 10 subjects without CF, were retrospectively studied. Three profiles obtained within 5 days were available for each patient. A PK model combining a gamma distribution to describe the absorption profile and a two-compartment model were applied. Different exposure indices were estimated using nonlinear regression and Bayesian estimation. The PK model developed reliably described the individual PK of Neoral in lung transplant patients with and without CF, and the values of the first and second half-lives were different in these two populations (lambda(1) = 4.14 +/- 3.01 vs. 2.16 +/- 1.75 h(-1); P < 0.01; lambda(2) = 0.36 +/- 0.11 vs. 0.49 +/- 0.12 h(-1); P < 0.01), while the mean absorption time and standard deviation of absorption time tended to be less in patients with cystic fibrosis (P < 0.1). Also, the patients with CF required higher doses than those without CF to achieve similar drug exposure. Consequently, population modeling was performed in CF and non-CF patients separately. Bayesian estimation allowed accurate prediction of AUC(0-12), AUC(0-4), C(max), and T(max) using three blood samples collected at T0h, T1h, and T3h in both groups. This study demonstrated the applicability and good performance of the PK model previously developed for oral cyclosporin and of the MAP Bayesian estimation of cyclosporin systemic exposure in CF and non-CF patients. Moreover, it is the first to propose a monitoring tool specifically designed for cyclosporin monitoring in patients with CF.

Simultaneous and rapid analysis of cyclosporin A and creatinine in finger prick blood samples using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and its application in C2 monitoring

A simple and rapid liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the simultaneous analysis of cyclosporin A (CsA) and creatinine using capillary blood has been developed. Venous and capillary blood samples were taken predose and at C2 from 65 heart and lung transplant recipients (65 x 4 samples). For comparisons, serum creatinine and blood CsA concentrations were measured by the Jaffe and EMIT methods, respectively, using an Olympus AU600 analyzer. For the LC-MS/MS assay, samples were prepared in a 96 x 700-microL well block by adding 10 microL of blood (or serum) to 40 microL of 0.1 mol/L zinc sulphate solution containing deuterated creatinine internal standard. Proteins were precipitated by adding 100 microL acetonitrile containing ascomycin internal standard. After vigorous mixing and centrifugation, 5 microL of the supernatant was injected into the LC-MS/MS system. A Waters 2795 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system was used to elute a C18 cartridge (3 mm x 4 mm) at 0.6 mL/min with a step gradient of 50-100% methanol containing 2 mmol/L ammonium acetate and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid. The column was maintained at 55 degrees C, and the retention times were creatinine, 0.4 minutes; ascomycin, 0.98 minutes; and CsA, 1.2 minutes. Cycle time was 2.5 minutes, injection to injection. The analytes were monitored using a Quattro microtandem mass spectrometer operated in multiple reaction monitoring mode using the following transitions: creatinine, m/z 114>44; d3-creatinine (IS), m/z 117>47; ascomycin (IS), m/z 809>756; and CsA, m/z 1,220>1,203. Assay characteristics were CsA intraassay CV, 3.6-3.0% (33-1,500 microg/L); CsA interassay CV, 6.7-2.5% (10-5,000 microg/L); LC-MS/MS capillary [CsA] = 0.99 x LC-MS/MS venous [CsA] - 4.2, R = 0.98; and LC-MS/MS venous [CsA] = 0.93 x EMIT venous [CsA] + 2.9, R = 0.98. Creatinine intraassay CV, 6.6-2.5% (20-720 micromol/L); interassay CV, 5.7-3.3% (80-590 micromol/L); LC-MS/MS capillary [creatinine] = 0.99 Jaffe plasma [creatinine] -42.6, R = 0.87. Total time for the preparation and analysis of 30 samples was approximately 2 hours. This assay will provide a flexible, robust, and cost-effective solution for the monitoring of CsA and creatinine in transplant recipients with potential applications in pediatric medicine and pharmacokinetic studies, in which frequent sampling is required.

Cyclosporin monitoring in Australasia: 2002 update of consensus guidelines

Therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporin (CsA) has been established as part of the routine clinical treatment of patients following organ transplantation for more than 20 years, and based on contemporary knowledge, many consensus guidelines have been published to assist clinics and laboratories attain optimal strategies for patient care. This article addresses the newer directions in CsA monitoring, with particular reference to the Australasian situation that has evolved since the 1993 Australasian guideline. These changes have included the introduction of alternative assay methodologies, changed CsA formulation from Sandimmun to Neoral throughout Australasia, and alternatives to trough concentration (C0) monitoring, especially 2-hour concentration (C2) monitoring and associated validated dilution protocols to accurately quantitate the higher whole blood CsA concentrations. The revision was prepared following a recent survey of all Australasian CsA-monitoring laboratories where discordant practices were evident.

Spurious results in therapeutic drug monitoring research

Maximal correlation between measured blood concentration of a drug and an estimate of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is widely used as criterion for the optimal blood sampling time-point in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) research. (More generally, the correlation between an estimate of AUC and a linear combination of several concentration measurements is considered, but the principles are the same.) This particular TDM research methodology is evaluated from a theoretical statistical perspective by considering a general nonspecific study. It is shown that the TDM research methodology produces spurious results because the optimal time-point is determined by irrelevant factors. Particularly, the sampling design is an important determinant. The sampling time-points are of course the only candidates for the optimal time-point, but they may also determine which candidate is optimal. In a special case, it is mathematically proven that any time-point except the first (trough level) can be made optimal by choosing the appropriate sampling design. This is probably true in all practical situations. The theoretical optimum is defined as the optimal time-point in the ideal theoretical sampling design where concentration measurements are made continuously in time. Hence, the theoretical optimum is independent of sampling designs, and the optimal time-point of a study is an approximation to the theoretical optimum. In a homogeneous study population, it can be proven, mathematically and under realistic assumptions, that the theoretical optimum is t(max). Particularly t(max), is the individual theoretical optimum. Heterogeneity of the study population can be an important determinant of the optimal time-point. In significantly heterogeneous study populations, the optimal time-point is usually extreme compared with the distribution of the individual optimal time-points in the population.

New concepts in cyclosporine monitoring

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Inadequate cyclosporine exposure is a key risk factor for acute rejection, and may contribute to the development of chronic rejection and graft failure. Pre-dose monitoring does not accurately measure drug exposure because of extensive inter- and intra-patient variability in cyclosporine absorption and metabolism. Limited sampling, using individual timed specimens, offers a new, simple and accurate alternative for clinical monitoring of cyclosporine.

RECENT FINDINGS

The area under the first 4 h of the concentration-time curve (AUC ) and the single-point concentration at 2 h post-dose (C2) are key measures of cyclosporine exposure. De novo studies show that achieving an AUC value of more than 4400 microg.h/l or a C2 level of 1500-2000 microg/l during the first 5 days post-transplant minimizes the risk of rejection and improves graft function. Maintenance studies suggest that reducing the C2 level to approximately 800 microg/l after 3-6 months may improve the serum creatinine level, blood pressure, general well-being and reduce adverse effects.

SUMMARY

Single-point C2 monitoring can be implemented quickly and simply with appropriate site and patient training. The timing of phlebotomy is more critical, but immunoassay bias is lower with 2 h post-dose than with trough level measures. Single-point C2 monitoring may be effective in liver and heart replacement, but initial target levels for liver transplantation are lower because cyclosporine is transported directly to the liver via the portal system. C2 monitoring is now being widely adopted as an accurate and practical measure of drug exposure, and can be combined with pharmacodynamic methods to optimize immunosuppression.