A two-compartment model of pulmonary nitric oxide exchange dynamics

Feasibility of exhaled nitric oxide measurements at various flow rates in children with asthma

Measurement of bronchial and alveolar exhaled nitric oxide (NO) levels could be of clinical importance for the treatment of asthma. To discriminate between alveolar and bronchial NO, measurements need to be assessed at various flow rates. To study the feasibility, linearity, and long-term repeatability of NO measurements at four different exhalation flow rates in children with asthma. Twenty-one children with moderate persistent asthma, aged 6-12 yrs, were included in the study. NO was measured according to the ATS/ERS guidelines, using the NIOX analyzer with flow restrictors of 30, 50, 100, and 200 ml/s. Duration of the measurements ranged from 6-10 s, depending on the flow rate. The tests were repeated 3 and 6 months after the first NO measurement. Feasibility of NO measurements at these four flow rates increased from 67% to 91% and 95% at the first, second and third visit, respectively. A significant learning effect was present. Age and lung function indices did not influence success or failure of the tests. At the first measurements occasions, no problems occurred during the NO analysis at a 100 ml/s flow rate. There was a 75-90% success rate when performing the test using flow rates of 30, 50, and 200 ml/s. However, repeating the tests resulted in a 100% success rate. Measurements were not successful if: (i) children ran out of air; (ii) NO concentration exceeded 200 ppb; (iii) the measured NO flow was unstable; and (iv) the NO plateau was not formed. This study showed good feasibility and linearity of NO measurements in asthmatic children of 6 yrs and over at flow rates between 50-200 ml/s. A significant learning effect was present. The long-term reproducibility of alveolar and bronchial NO values during 6 months was moderate.

Quantifying proximal and distal sources of NO in asthma using a multicompartment model

Nitric oxide (NO) is detectable in exhaled breath and is thought to be a marker of lung inflammation. The multicompartment model of NO exchange in the lungs, which was previously introduced by our laboratory, considers parallel and serial heterogeneity in the proximal and distal regions and can simulate dynamic features of the NO exhalation profile, such as a sloping phase III region. Here, we present a detailed sensitivity analysis of the multicompartment model and then apply the model to a population of children with mild asthma. Latin hypercube sampling demonstrated that ventilation and structural parameters were not significant relative to NO production terms in determining the NO profile, thus reducing the number of free parameters from nine to five. Analysis of exhaled NO profiles at three flows (50, 100, and 200 ml/s) from 20 children (age 7-17 yr) with mild asthma representing a wide range of exhaled NO (4.9 ppb < fractional exhaled NO at 50 ml/s < 120 ppb) demonstrated that 90% of the children had a negative phase III slope. The multicompartment model could simulate the negative phase III slope by increasing the large airway NO flux and/or distal airway/alveolar concentration in the well-ventilated regions. In all subjects, the multicompartment model analysis improved the least-squares fit to the data relative to a single-path two-compartment model. We conclude that features of the NO exhalation profile that are commonly observed in mild asthma are more accurately simulated with the multicompartment model than with the two-compartment model. The negative phase III slope may be due to increased NO production in well-ventilated regions of the lungs.

The role of small airways in monitoring the response to asthma treatment: what is beyond FEV1?

The definition of asthma has evolved from that of an episodic disease characterized by reversible airways constriction to a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways, with at least partially reversible airway constriction. Increasing evidence supports the notion that small and large airways play a central role in asthma pathophysiology with regard to inflammation, remodeling and symptoms. The contribution of the distal airways to the asthma phenotype carries implications for the delivery of inhaled medications to the appropriate areas of the lung and for the monitoring of the response to asthma treatment. Asthma control is evaluated on the basis of symptoms, lung function and exacerbations. However, evidence suggests that dissociation between lung function and respiratory symptoms, quality of life and airway inflammation exists. In this study, common spirometric parameters offer limited information with regard to the peripheral airways, and it is therefore necessary to move beyond FEV(1). Several functional parameters and inflammatory markers, which are discussed in the present study, can be employed to evaluate distal lung function. In this study, extrafine formulations deliver inhaled drugs throughout the bronchial tree (both large and small airways) and are effective on parameters that directly or indirectly measure air trapping/airway closure.

Extended exhaled nitric oxide analysis in field surveys of schoolchildren: a pilot test

Extended exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) analysis can distinguish proximal and distal airway contributions to FeNO. Thus, it has the potential to detect effects of different environmental influences, allergic phenotypes, and genetic variants on proximal and distal airways. However, its feasibility in field surveys has not been demonstrated, and models for estimating compartmental NO contributions have not been standardized. In this study we verified that extended NO tests can be performed by children in schools, and assessed different analytical models to estimate bronchial flux and alveolar NO concentration. We tested students at a middle school, using EcoMedics NO analyzers with ambient NO scrubbers, at flows of 50 (conventional), 30, 100, and 300 ml/sec, with 2-3 trials at each flow. Data from 65 children were analyzed by two linear and four nonlinear published models, plus a new empirical nonlinear model. Bronchial NO flux estimates from different models differed in magnitude but were strongly correlated (r >or= 0.95), and increased in subjects with allergic asthma. Alveolar concentration estimates differed among models and did not consistently show the same effects of allergy or asthma. A novel index of nonlinear behavior of NO output versus flow was significantly related to asthma status, and not strongly correlated with bronchial flux or alveolar concentration. Field-based extended NO testing of children can yield useful information about NO in different regions of the respiratory tract that is not obtainable from conventional FeNO. Extended NO analysis holds promise for investigating environmental and genetic determinants of regional airway inflammatory states.

Airway epithelial changes in smokers but not in ex-smokers with asthma

RATIONALE

Smoking has detrimental effects on asthma outcome, such as increased cough, wheezing, sputum production, and frequency of asthma attacks. This results in accelerated lung function decline. The underlying pathological process of smoke-induced deterioration of asthma is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To compare bronchial inflammation and remodeling in never-smokers, ex-smokers, and current smokers with asthma.

METHODS

A total of 147 patients with asthma (66 never-smokers, 46 ex-smokers, and 35 current smokers) were investigated.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Lung function, exhaled nitric oxide levels, and symptom questionnaires were assessed, and induced sputum and bronchial biopsies were obtained for determination of airway inflammation and remodeling. Smokers with asthma had lower FEV(1) and alveolar and bronchial nitric oxide levels than never-smokers. Smokers also had more goblet cells and mucus-positive epithelium, increased epithelial thickness, and a higher proliferation rate of intact and basal epithelium than ex-smokers and never-smokers. Smokers had higher numbers of mast cells and lower numbers of eosinophils than never-smokers. Ex-smokers had similar goblet cell numbers and mucus-positive epithelium, epithelial thickness, epithelial proliferation rate, and mast cell numbers as never-smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

Smokers with asthma have epithelial changes that are associated with increased asthma symptoms, such as shortness of breath and phlegm production. The fact that epithelial characteristics in ex-smokers are similar to those in never-smokers suggests that the smoke-induced changes can be reversed by smoking cessation.

Exhaled nitric oxide in the diagnosis and management of asthma: clinical implications

Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) used as an aid to the diagnosis and management of lung disease is receiving attention from pulmonary researchers and clinicians alike because it offers a noninvasive means to directly monitor airway inflammation. Research evidence suggests that eNO levels significantly increase in individuals with asthma before diagnosis, decrease with inhaled corticosteroid administration, and correlate with the number of eosinophils in induced sputum. These observations have been used to support an association between eNO levels and airway inflammation. This review presents an update on current opportunities regarding use of eNO in patient care, and more specifically on its potential usage for asthma diagnosis and monitoring. The review will also discuss factors that may complicate use of eNO as a diagnostic tool, including changes in disease severity, symptom response, and technical measurement issues. Regardless of the rapid, convenient, and noninvasive nature of this test, additional well-designed, long-term longitudinal studies are necessary to fully evaluate the clinical utility of eNO in asthma management.

Role of add-on zileuton on total exhaled, large airway, and small airway/alveolar nitric oxide in moderate-severe persistent adult asthmatics on fluticasone 250 microg/Salmeterol 50 microg

BACKGROUND

Measuring non-invasive exhaled biomarkers of inflammation may be important in monitoring asthma therapy.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate exhaled nitric oxide with add-on leukotriene synthesis inhibitor in moderate-severe persistent asthmatics on combination controllers.

METHODS

In a non-randomized, non-placebo, single-blind, fixed sequence, pilot study, we evaluated 22 non-smoking, stable, moderate-severe adult asthmatics on maintenance inhaled fluticasone 250 microg/salmeterol 50 microg (F/S) via MDI bid> or =1 yr, with add-on oral zileuton 600 mg qid. Exhaled fractional nitric oxide (FENO) gas exchange, large airway NO, small airway/alveolar NO concentration (CANO), Juniper score and lung function were measured. Asthmatics were studied at baseline only on F/S bid (visit 1), on F/S bid pre and 2 h post first dose zileuton 600 mg (visit 2), and post 4 weeks (visit 3) F/S bid plus zileuton 600 mg qid. Values were compared at each visit and to healthy non-smoking age matched healthy controls with normal lung function.

RESULTS

Three asthmatics stopped zileuton prematurely (headache and/or nausea) and 19 (12F) age 55+/-17 yr (mean+/-SD) completed the 4-week study. Baseline forced expiratory lung volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) was 1.6+/-0.7L (53+/-19% pred) (mean+/-SD), FEV(1) over FVC ratio was 64+/-11% and post 180 microg albuterol FEV(1) was 1.8+/-0.7L (56+/-21% pred), and FEV(1) over FVC ratio was 67+/-12%. Baseline Juniper scores were mild (10+/-10) and similar (p=ns) at all visits. Baseline FENO@50 mL/s was 48+/-27 ppb (mean+/-SD), and FENO@100 mL/s was 29+/-16ppb, and were similar (p=ns) at all visits. Large airway NO flux was 2.0+/-1.3 nL/s (52% asthmatics abnormal) and small airway/alveolar NO was 8.0+/-4.0 ppb (79% asthmatics abnormal) and were similar (p=ns) at all visits. Compared to baseline, post 26+/-6 days Zileuton, mean FEV(1) (L)% predicted increased 3.3% predicted (p=0.03), and FEV(1) over FVC ratio increased 2.2% (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

In stable, moderate-severe persistent adult asthmatics, large airway NO flux, small airway/alveolar CANO, and Juniper airway scores, were not significantly different on F/S bid vs F/S bid plus Zileuton for 4 weeks, despite significant small increase in FEV(1) over FVC ratio and FEV(1)% predicted.

Axial distribution heterogeneity of nitric oxide airway production in healthy adults

Model simulations of nitric oxide (NO) transport considering molecular diffusion showed that the total bronchial NO production needed to reproduce a given exhaled value is deeply influenced by its axial distribution. Experimental data obtained by fibroscopy were available about proximal airway contribution (Silkoff PE, McClean PA, Caramori M, Slutsky AS. Zamel N. Respir Physiol 113: 33-38, 1998), and recent experiments using heliox instead of air gave insight on the peripheral airway production (Shin HW, Condorelli P, Rose-Gottron CM, Cooper DM, George SC. J Appl Physiol 97: 874-882, 2004; Kerckx Y, Michils A, Van Muylem A. J Appl Physiol 104: 918-924, 2008). This theoretical work aimed at obtaining a realistic distribution of NO production in healthy adults by meeting both proximal and peripheral experimental constraints. To achieve this, a model considering axial diffusion with geometrical boundaries derived from Weibel's morphometrical data was divided into serial compartments, each characterized by its axial boundaries and its part of bronchial NO production. A four-compartment model was able to meet both criteria. Two compartments were found to share all the NO production: one proximal (generations 0 and 1; 15-25% of the NO production) and one inside the acinus (proximal limit, generations 14-16; distal limit, generations 16 and 17; 75-85% of the NO production). Remarkably, this finding implies a quasi nil production in the main part of the conducting airways and in the acinar airways distal to generation 17. Given the chosen experimental outcomes and reliant on their accuracy, this very inhomogeneous distribution is likely the more realistic one that may be achieved with a "one-trumpet"-shaped model. Refinement should come from a more realistic description of the acinus structure.

A proof-of-concept study to evaluate the antiinflammatory effects of a novel soluble cyclodextrin formulation of nebulized budesonide in patients with mild to moderate asthma

BACKGROUND

A cyclodextrin solution formulation of budesonide has been developed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the anti-inflammatory effect of a novel soluble formulation of nebulized budesonide compared with the present suspension formulation based on a 1:4 nominal dose ratio.

METHODS

Seventeen mild to moderate asthmatic patients were randomized to receive 120 microg of Capsitol-Enabled Budesonide Inhalation Solution (CBIS) twice daily or 500 microg of budesonide suspension (Pulmicort Respules) twice daily via nebulizer for 2 weeks in a crossover manner. Methacholine challenge, fractionated exhaled nitric oxide (NO) measurement, spirometry, and 10-hour overnight urinary creatinine-corrected cortisol measurement were conducted at baseline and after each treatment.

RESULTS

Neither CBIS nor Pulmicort significantly improved the provocation concentration of methacholine that caused a decrease in FEV1 of 10% as change from baseline (doubling dilution changes, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.08 to 1.72; P = .08; and 0.86; 95% CI, -0.61 to 2.32; P = .41, respectively). Both CBIS and Pulmicort suppressed exhaled NO from baseline (geometric mean fold ratios: for tidal NO, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.90; P = .006; and 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.76; P < .001, respectively; for bronchial flux, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95; P = .02; and 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.74; P < .001, respectively). Alveolar NO was significantly suppressed by CBIS (geometric mean fold ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.85; P = .02) but not by Pulmicort (0.66; 95% CI, 0.25-1.76; P = .81). The mean (SEM) nebulization time for CBIS was 84 (3.0) seconds and for Pulmicort was 303 (19) seconds (P < .001). There were no differences between CBIS and Pulmicort for any other outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no significant differences between formulations for any inflammatory outcome. CBIS has a shorter nebulization time and is given at a quarter of the nominal dose of Pulmicort.

Nitric oxide gas phase release in human small airway epithelial cells

Background

Asthma is a chronic airway inflammatory disease characterized by an imbalance in both Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) is elevated in asthma, and is a potentially useful non-invasive marker of airway inflammation. However, the origin and underlying mechanisms of intersubject variability of exhaled NO are not yet fully understood. We have previously described NO gas phase release from normal human bronchial epithelial cells (NHBEs, tracheal origin). However, smaller airways are the major site of morbidity in asthma. We hypothesized that IL-13 or cytomix (IL-1β, TNF-α, and IFN-γ) stimulation of differentiated small airway epithelial cells (SAECs, generation 10–12) and A549 cells (model cell line of alveolar type II cells) in culture would enhance NO gas phase release.

Methods

Confluent monolayers of SAECs and A549 cells were cultured in Transwell plates and SAECs were allowed to differentiate into ciliated and mucus producing cells at an air-liquid interface. The cells were then stimulated with IL-13 (10 ng/mL) or cytomix (10 ng/mL for each cytokine). Gas phase NO release in the headspace air over the cells was measured for 48 hours using a chemiluminescence analyzer.

Results

In contrast to our previous result in NHBE, baseline NO release from SAECs and A549 is negligible. However, NO release is significantly increased by cytomix (0.51 ± 0.18 and 0.29 ± 0.20 pl^.s^-1.cm^-2, respectively) reaching a peak at approximately 10 hours. iNOS protein expression increases in a consistent pattern both temporally and in magnitude. In contrast, IL-13 only modestly increases NO release in SAECs reaching a peak (0.06 ± 0.03 pl^.s^-1.cm^-2) more slowly (30 to 48 hours), and does not alter NO release in A549 cells.

Conclusion

We conclude that the airway epithelium is a probable source of NO in the exhaled breath, and intersubject variability may be due, in part, to variability in the type (Th1 vs Th2) and location (large vs small airway) of inflammation.

Alveolar and bronchial nitric oxide output in healthy children

Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) concentration is a marker of pulmonary inflammation. It is usually measured at a single exhalation flow rate. However, measuring exhaled NO at multiple flow rates allows assessment of the flow-independent NO parameters: alveolar NO concentration, bronchial NO flux, bronchial wall NO concentration, and bronchial diffusing capacity of NO. Our aim was to determine the flow-independent NO parameters in healthy schoolchildren and to compare two different mathematical approaches. Exhaled NO was measured at four flow rates (10, 50, 100, and 200 ml/sec) in 253 schoolchildren (7-13 years old). Flow-independent NO parameters were calculated with linear method (flows >or=50 ml/sec) and non-linear method (all flows). Sixty-six children (32 boys and 34 girls) with normal spirometry and no history or present symptoms of asthma, allergy, atopy or other diseases were included in the analysis. Median bronchial NO flux was 0.4 nl/sec (mean +/- SD: 0.5 +/- 0.3 nl/sec) and median alveolar NO concentration was 1.9 ppb (2.0 +/- 0.8 ppb) with the linear method. Bronchial NO flux correlated positively with height (r = 0.423; P < 0.001), FEV(1) (r = 0.358; P = 0.003), and FVC (r = 0.359; P = 0.003). With the non-linear method, median bronchial wall NO concentration was 49.6 ppb (68.0 +/- 53.3 ppb) and bronchial diffusing capacity of NO was 10.0 pl/sec/ppb (11.8 +/- 7.5 pl/sec/ppb). The non-linear method gave lower alveolar NO concentration (1.4 [1.5 +/- 0.7] ppb, P < 0.001) and higher bronchial NO flux (0.5 [0.6 +/- 0.3] nl/sec, P < 0.001) than the linear method, but the results were highly correlated between the two methods (r = 0.854 and r = 0.971, P < 0.001). In conclusion, the multiple flow rate method is feasible in children but different mathematical methods give slightly different results. Reference values in healthy children are of value when applying bronchial and alveolar NO parameters in the diagnostics and follow-up of inflammatory lung diseases.

Effects of inhaled versus systemic corticosteroids on exhaled nitric oxide in severe acute asthma

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of information on the differential effects of systemic versus inhaled corticosteroids on airway inflammation in patients with acute asthma. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of stopping systemic corticosteroids while maintaining the inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on airway inflammation, lung function and asthma symptoms in patients who had been discharged from hospital after treatment for severe acute asthma.

METHODS

Twenty-four adult patients with severe exacerbations of asthma were treated with both oral and inhaled corticosteroids after discharge from hospital. Oral corticosteroids were stopped after 1 week. Spirometry, asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) score and exhaled nitric oxide (NO) were measured at discharge, 1 week, and 2 weeks after discharge.

RESULTS

Withdrawal of oral corticosteroids resulted in significant rebound in mean exhaled NO by 11.0ppb (95% CI, 4.9-17.1ppb, p<0.001) or 47.7% (95% CI, 22.4-73.1%) despite uninterrupted ICS treatment. The rebound in exhaled NO occurred despite significant improvement in the mean AQLQ score (p=0.006) and frequency of reliever use (p=0.003) and was not associated with significant change in the mean FEV(1) (p=0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients discharged from hospital after treatment for asthma exacerbations, withdrawal of oral corticosteroids resulted in increase in exhaled NO levels despite continued ICS treatment.

Effect of fluticasone 250 microg/salmeterol 50 microg and montelukast on exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

Monitoring noninvasive biomarkers of inflammation is an important adjunct in asthma therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of the present study was to identify airway and alveolar site(s) of inflammation using exhaled nitric oxide (NO) as a marker in asthmatic patients, and to evaluate the NO response to maintenance fluticasone 250 microg/salmeterol 50 microg (F/S) and add-on montelukast 10 mg (M).

METHODS

Thirty (24 women) nonsmoking, mild to moderate asthmatic patients were studied, mean age (+/- SD) 43+/-9 years, treated with F/S for more than one year. All were clinically stable for longer than eight weeks and had not taken oral corticosteroids and/or leukotriene antagonists for eight weeks before the present study. Spirometry, Juniper asthma symptom score, fractional exhaled NO (FENO) 100 mL/s, bronchial NO and alveolar NO concentration (CANO) were measured in a single-blind, nonrandomized crossover study.

PROTOCOL

Visit 1: baseline F/S; visit 2: after four weeks of F/S plus M; visit 3: after four weeks of S plus M; and visit 4: after four weeks of S only. Values in asthmatic patients were also compared with 34 nonsmoking age-matched healthy controls with normal lung function.

RESULTS

After 180 microg aerosolized metered dose inhaler albuterol, the forced expiratory volume in 1 s at baseline was 2.6+/-0.8 L (86%+/-16% of the predicted value) and the forced expiratory volume in 1 s over the forced vital capacity was 77%+/-9% (mean +/- SD), and was similar at visits 2 to 4. Juniper scores were mildly abnormal at visits 1 to 3, but significantly worse (P=0.03) at visit 4 versus visits 1 to 3. FENO values at visits 1 to 3 were similar but significantly increased (P=0.007) at visit 4. Bronchial NO was higher (P=0.03) at visit 4, versus visits 1 and 2, and was no different at visit 3. Compared with the healthy subjects, FENO and bronchial NO values were abnormal (greater than the normal mean plus 2 SD) in 33% of asthmatic patients at visits 1 to 3. CANO was similar for visits 1 to 4. CANO was abnormal (greater than the normal mean + 2 SD) in 20% of asthmatic patients.

CONCLUSION

In clinically stable asthmatic patients, despite controller treatment including moderate-dose inhaled corticosteroids and add-on M, 33% of mild to moderate asthmatic patients have ongoing nonsuppressed bronchial sites of increased NO production, compared with healthy control subjects. These controllers have no effect on CANO, which was abnormal in 20% of the asthmatic patients studied. The addition of add-on M to baseline moderate-dose inhaled corticosteroid did not further reduce total exhaled, bronchial and/or alveolar NO production.

Smokers Have Reduced Nitric Oxide Production by Conducting Airways but Normal Levels in the Alveoli

Air exhaled by cigarette smokers contains reduced amounts of nitric oxide (NO). Measurement of NO at different expiratory flow rates permits calculation of NO production by the conducting airways (Vaw(NO)) and alveolar concentration of NO (P(ALV)). An independent measurement of diffusing capacity of the alveolar compartment (D(LNO)) multiplied by P(ALV) allows calculation of NO production by the alveoli (V(LNO)). Twelve asymptomatic cigarette smokers and 22 age-matched nonsmokers had measurements of D(LNO) and expired NO at constant expiratory flow rates varying from 60 to 1500 ml/s. Vaw(NO) in smokers was only 22 +/- 11 nl/min (mean +/- standard deviation, SD) compared to 70 +/- 37 nl/min in nonsmokers (p < .0001). In contrast, V(LNO) showed no significant difference (smokers: 203 +/- 104 nl/min, nonsmokers: 209 +/- 74 nl/min, p = .86). These data show that the diminished NO expired by smokers results from diminished NO production by the tissues of the conducting airways but normal values produced by the alveoli.

The use of exhaled nitric oxide in the management of asthma

It has recently become clear that airways disease associated with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but not other patterns of inflammation, is closely associated with favourable short-and long-term responses to corticosteroid therapy, irrespective of the clinical context in which it occurs. Moreover, a raised exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) is a reasonable marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation, which has a number of advantages as a diagnostic and monitoring tool. In this review we outline essential background information on the use of FE(NO) in clinical practice and discuss some recent work evaluating the clinical value of this technique.

The effect of montelukast on exhaled nitric oxide of alveolar and bronchial origin in inhaled corticosteroid-treated asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroid therapy suppresses nitric oxide levels (NO) of airway origin but not necessarily NO of alveolar or small airway origin. Systemic therapy with an oral anti-leukotriene agent may suppress NO production in distal airways and alveoli not reached by inhaled therapy.

METHODS

Adult patients with mild asthma were treated for 3 weeks with inhaled fluticasone 250 microg twice daily then with inhaled fluticasone plus oral montelukast 10 mg daily for 3 additional weeks. We monitored exhaled NO (eNO), spirometry, lung volumes, and asthma symptoms scores at baseline and at the end of each treatment period. In a subset of patients, we continued with montelukast monotherapy and repeated these measurements.

RESULTS

In the 18 patients studied, pulmonary function parameters and asthma symptom scores were not altered significantly from baseline by any therapy. The total eNO at baseline was 55+/-35.3 ppb, dropping to 28.1+/-15.3 ppb (p=0.005) after 3 weeks of fluticasone and to 23.5+/-14 ppb (p=0.001 vs. baseline) after the addition of montelukast. The trend towards reduced total eNO with the combination therapy vs. monotherapy was not statistically significant. Alveolar eNO dropped from 4.2+/-2.4 at baseline to 3.0+/-1.5 (p=0.1) after fluticasone and then to 2.2+/-0.9 (p=0.08 vs. baseline) after fluticasone plus montelukast, increasing then to 3.8+/-1.8 after montelukast alone (p=0.6 vs. baseline).

CONCLUSIONS

Leukotriene receptor antagonists administered systemically might decrease small airway/alveolar sites of inflammation when combined to inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

Extended NO analysis in a healthy subgroup of a random sample from a Swedish population

INTRODUCTION

There is an interest in modelling exhaled nitric oxide (NO). Studies have shown that flow-independent NO parameters i.e. NO of the alveolar region (C(A)NO), airway wall (C(aw)NO), diffusing capacity (D(aw)NO) and flux (J(aw)NO), are altered in several disease states such as asthma, cystic fibrosis, alveolitis and chronic obsmuctive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, values from a healthy population are missing.

OBJECTIVES

To calculate NO parameters in a healthy population by collecting NO values at different exhalation flow rates.

METHODS

A random sample from the ECRHS II study was investigated. Among the 281 subjects that had performed a bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR)-test, FEV(1.0), IgE and NO-analyses 89 were found to be healthy.

RESULTS

There were no differences in F(E)NO(0.05) or NO parameters between men and women. There were weak correlations between height and both F(E)NO(0.05) (r = 0.23, P = 0.03) and C(aw)NO (r = 0.22, P = 0.04). There was also a correlation between age and C(A)NO (r = 0.28, P = 0.007). When controlled for gender, this correlation was more powerful in women (r = 0.51, P = 0.001) but did not remain for male subjects.

CONCLUSION

Extended NO analysis is a simple non-invasive tool that gives by far more information than F(E)NO(0.05). Based on our results, we suggest that the values for healthy subjects should be considered to fall between the following ranges: F(E)NO(0.05), 10-30 ppb; C(aw)NO, 50-250 ppb; D(aw)NO, 5-15 ml s(-1); J(aw)NO, 0.8-1.6 nl s(-1); and C(A)NO, 0-4 ppb. Values outside these intervals indicate the need for further investigation to exclude a state of disease.

History, technical and regulatory aspects of exhaled nitric oxide

The history of nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled breath as a marker of inflammation is summarized, followed by measurement aspects of exhaled NO including NO excretion models of NO in the airway, the estimation of flow-independent NO exchange parameters and issues with the standardization of these methods. Regulatory considerations in the US are also presented. A brief summary of the state of the art for clinical application of exhaled NO is also included.

Effects of aminoguanidine, an inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase, on nitric oxide production and its metabolites in healthy control subjects, healthy smokers, and COPD patients

BACKGROUND

Nitric oxide (NO) is produced by resident and inflammatory cells in the respiratory tract by the enzyme NO synthase (NOS), which exists in three isoforms: neuronal NOS (nNOS), inducible NOS (iNOS), and endothelial NOS. NO production is increased in patients with COPD, and the production of NO under oxidative stress conditions generates reactive nitrogen species that may amplify the inflammatory response in COPD.

METHODS

To examine the role of increased NO in COPD, we administered a relatively selective iNOS inhibitor, aminoguanidine, by nebulization in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in COPD patients, healthy smokers, and healthy nonsmoking subjects. We investigated whether aminoguanidine had any effect on exhaled NO produced in the central lung (flux of NO from the airways [Jno] and peripheral lungs (concentration of NO in peripheral lung [Calv], on NO metabolites (nitrite [NO(2)(-)]/nitrate [NO(3)(-)], peroxinitrite [ONOO(-)], nitrotyrosine), and on a marker of oxidative stress (8-isoprostane) in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and in sputum.

RESULTS

Aminoguanidine administration resulted in a significant reduction in Jno compared with administration of the saline solution control in healthy subjects, smokers, and COPD patients. Calv in smokers and in COPD patients was not completely inhibited 1 h after aminoguanidine inhalation, in marked contrast to previous results in asthma. Moreover, ONOO(-) and NO(2)(-)/NO(3)(-) levels were also increased in EBC and in sputum of smokers and COPD and were not completely inhibited following aminoguanidine inhalation. 8-Isoprostane levels were also increased in smokers and in COPD patients but were not reduced after aminoguanidine inhalation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the constitutive NOS isoform as well as iNOS might be involved in NO release and contribute to the high Calv and ONOO(-) production in patients with COPD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00180635.

Comparison of the anti-inflammatory effects of extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone vs fluticasone dry powder inhaler on exhaled inflammatory markers in childhood asthma

BACKGROUND

Extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone differs from other inhaled corticosteroids by its fine aerosol characteristics. Therefore, extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone may be particularly useful for treating peripheral airway inflammation in asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the anti-inflammatory effects of extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone vs fluticasone dry powder inhaler (DPI) in asthmatic children by measuring bronchial and alveolar nitric oxide (NO) and inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC).

METHODS

In a 6-month crossover study, 33 children aged 6 to 12 years with moderate persistent asthma were randomly treated with extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone (200 microg daily via an Autohaler) and fluticasone DPI (200 microg daily via a Diskus). The primary outcome variables were alveolar NO concentration and bronchial NO flux. The secondary outcome variables were levels of inflammatory markers in EBC, lung function indices, symptoms, exacerbations, and adverse effects. All the variables were recorded at baseline and after each treatment period.

RESULTS

Mean +/- SE alveolar NO concentration and bronchial NO flux were comparable after treatment with hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone vs fluticasone DPI (4.7 +/- 0.5 vs 4.3 +/- 0.5 ppb, P = .55, and 1,124.3 +/- 253.6 vs 1,029.1 +/- 195.5 pL/s, P = .70, respectively). In addition, levels of inflammatory markers in EBC, lung function indices, and symptoms did not differ between treatments. Patients used fewer beta2-agonists during the last 2 weeks of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone treatment.

CONCLUSION

The anti-inflammatory effects of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone are similar to those of fluticasone DPI in children with moderate persistent asthma.

Increased bronchial NO output in severe atopic eczema in children and adolescents

Atopic children have an increased risk for asthma, which is preceded by bronchial inflammation. Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) measured at multiple exhalation flow rates can be used to assess alveolar NO concentration and bronchial NO flux, which reflect inflammation in lung periphery and central airways, respectively. Exhaled breath condensate is another non-invasive method to measure lung inflammation. The purpose of the present study was to find out if the severity of atopic eczema is associated with lung inflammation that can be observed with these non-invasive tests. We studied 81 patients (7-22 yr old) with atopic eczema and increased wheat-specific IgE (>or=0.4 kUA/l) and no diagnosis of asthma. Exhaled NO was measured at multiple exhalation flow rates, and bronchial NO flux and alveolar NO concentration were calculated. Cysteinyl-leukotriene concentrations were measured in exhaled breath condensate. The patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of atopic eczema. Patients with severe atopic eczema had enhanced bronchial NO output as compared with patients with mild eczema (2.1 +/- 0.5 vs. 0.9 +/- 0.1, p = 0.003). No statistically significant differences in alveolar NO concentrations were found between the groups. In the whole group of patients, the bronchial NO output correlated positively with serum eosinophil protein X (r(s) = 0.450, p < 0.001), serum eosinophil cationic protein (r(s) = 0.393, p < 0.001), serum total IgE (r(s) = 0.268, p = 0.016) and with urine eosinophil protein X (r(s) = 0.279, p = 0.012), but not with lung function. Alveolar NO concentration correlated positively with serum eosinophil protein X (r(s) = 0.444, p < 0.001) and with serum eosinophil cationic protein (r(s) = 0.362, p = 0.001). Measurable cysteinyl-leukotriene concentrations in exhaled breath condensate were found only in one-third of the patients, and there were no differences between the two groups. The results show that increased bronchial NO output is associated with eosinophilic inflammation and severe atopic eczema in patients without established asthma.

Partitioned exhaled nitric oxide to non-invasively assess asthma

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the lungs, characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness. Chronic repetitive bouts of acute inflammation lead to airway wall remodeling and possibly the sequelae of fixed airflow obstruction. Nitric oxide (NO) is a reactive molecule synthesized by NO synthases (NOS). NOS are expressed by cells within the airway wall and functionally, two NOS isoforms exist: constitutive and inducible. In asthma, the inducible isoform is over expressed, leading to increased production of NO, which diffuses into the airway lumen, where it can be detected in the exhaled breath. The exhaled NO signal can be partitioned into airway and alveolar components by measuring exhaled NO at multiple flows and applying mathematical models of pulmonary NO dynamics. The airway NO flux and alveolar NO concentration can be elevated in adults and children with asthma and have been correlated with markers of airway inflammation and airflow obstruction in cross-sectional studies. Longitudinal studies which specifically address the clinical potential of partitioning exhaled NO for diagnosis, managing therapy, and predicting exacerbation are needed.

A flow- and pressure-controlled offline method of exhaled nitric oxide measurement in children

BACKGROUND

Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) is a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation. However, previous studies show that the offline value is lower than the online value.

OBJECTIVE

To compare a standard offline eNO measurement apparatus with a modified apparatus that can monitor flow volume and respiratory pressure.

METHODS

We studied 73 cooperative individuals aged 5 to 28 years (32 children: mean age, 8.3 years; 41 adults: mean age, 21.5 years). We modified the standard device by including a flow meter with a manometer and attaching a plastic tube connected to a 3-way valve to control the resistance. The online and offline (measured using the modified device and the standard device) eNO determinations were compared in a single session and were analyzed using a nitric oxide analyzer.

RESULTS

There was a good relationship between the online and modified offline eNO measurements in children. The modified offline method showed a stronger correlation with the online method (r = .97 vs. r = .92), and the modified offline eNO value was more similar to the online eNO value than to the standard offline value. The mean difference between the online and standard offline eNO values was 52%, whereas the mean difference between the online and modified offline eNO values was only 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the offline method, we can easily control the resistance and flow volume to reach the same value measured by the online method in childhood respiratory diseases.

Effect of airways constriction on exhaled nitric oxide

While airway constriction has been shown to affect exhaled nitric oxide (NO), the mechanisms and location of constricted airways most likely to affect exhaled NO remain obscure. We studied the effects of histamine-induced airway constriction and ventilation heterogeneity on exhaled NO at 50 ml/s (FeNO,50) and combined this with model simulations of FeNO,50 changes due to constriction of airways at various depths of the lung model. In 20 normal subjects, histamine induced a 26 ± 15(SD)% FeNO,50 decrease, a 9 ± 6% forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) decrease, a 19 ± 9% mean forced midexpiratory flow between 25% and 75% forced vital capacity (FEF25–75) decrease, and a 94 ± 119% increase in conductive ventilation heterogeneity. There was a significant correlation of FeNO,50 decrease with FEF25–75 decrease ( P = 0.006) but not with FEV1 decrease or with increased ventilation heterogeneity. Simulations confirmed the negligible effect of ventilation heterogeneity on FeNO,50 and showed that the histamine-induced FeNO,50 decrease was due to constriction, with associated reduction in NO flux, of airways located proximal to generation 15. The model also indicated that the most marked effect of airways constriction on FeNO,50 is situated in generations 10–15 and that airway constriction beyond generation 15 markedly increases FeNO,50 due to interference with the NO backdiffusion effect. These mechanical factors should be considered when interpreting exhaled NO in lung disease.

Effect of heterogeneous ventilation and nitric oxide production on exhaled nitric oxide profiles

Elevated exhaled nitric oxide (NO) in the breath of asthmatic subjects is thought to be a noninvasive marker of lung inflammation. Asthma is also characterized by heterogeneous bronchoconstriction and inflammation, which impact the spatial distribution of ventilation in the lungs. Since exhaled NO arises from both airway and alveolar regions, and its level in exhaled breath depends strongly on flow, spatial heterogeneity in flow patterns and NO production may significantly affect the exhaled NO signal. To investigate the effect of these factors on exhaled NO profiles, we developed a multicompartment mathematical model of NO exchange using a trumpet-shaped central airway segment that bifurcates into two similarly shaped peripheral airway segments, each of which empties into an alveolar compartment. Heterogeneity in flow alone has only a minimal impact on the exhaled NO profile. In contrast, placing 70% of the total airway NO production in the central compartment or the distal poorly ventilated compartment can significantly increase (35%) or decrease (-10%) the plateau concentration, respectively. Reduced ventilation of the peripheral and acinar regions of the lungs with concomitant elevated NO production delays the rise of NO during exhalation, resulting in a positive phase III slope and reduced plateau concentration (-11%). These features compare favorably with experimentally observed profiles in exercise-induced asthma and cannot be simulated with single-path models. We conclude that variability in ventilation and NO production in asthmatic subjects impacts the shape of the exhaled NO profile and thus impacts the physiological interpretation.

Effect of aspirin on airway inflammation and pulmonary function in patients with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Aspirin can cause bronchoconstriction in some asthmatic patients through increased production of proinflammatory mediators, particularly leukotrienes. However, recent in vivo evidence has suggested that aspirin also triggers the production of lipoxins, which act as natural antagonists of prostaglandins and leukotrienes. Aside from patients with known aspirin-sensitive asthma, physicians have avoided the use of aspirin in asthmatic patients in general because it was believed that this agent might precipitate worsening of their condition.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to establish the effect of aspirin on pulmonary inflammation and function in patients with persistent asthma.

METHODS

After withdrawal of their usual anti-inflammatory medication, patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma undertook double-blind, randomized, crossover treatment with 75 mg/d aspirin and placebo for 3 weeks each. Treatment evaluation included histamine challenge, spirometry, impulse oscillometry, total and alveolar exhaled nitric oxide measurement, and serum thromboxane B2 and 15-epilipoxin A4 levels.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients completed the trial. Compared with placebo, there were no differences in histamine PC(20) values (0.17 doubling-dilution shift; 95% CI, -0.38 to 0.73; P = 1), exhaled nitric oxide levels (0.95-fold change; 95% CI, 0.45-2.00; P = 1), or any other inflammatory, spirometric, or oscillometry measurements. Aspirin led to a significant decrease in thromboxane B2 levels (17.53-fold difference; 95% CI, 5.46-56.49; P < .001). Baseline 15-epilipoxin A4 levels were increased at 4.88 ng/mL, and there was no increase with aspirin versus placebo (0.99-fold difference; 95% CI, 0.79-1.24; P = 1).

CONCLUSION

In this preliminary study of 15 patients, low-dose aspirin did not lead to increased 15-epilipoxin A4 synthesis or alter inflammatory markers in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.

Exhaled nitric oxide

Exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a noninvasive easily measurable biomarker that is proving to be an excellent surrogate for eosinophilic inflammation in the lungs of patients who have asthma. Although large-scale normative data are still awaited, preliminary studies have shown FENO to be helpful in diagnosing and assessing severity and control for asthma. FENO levels have also proven helpful in diagnosing and managing several other inflammatory lung diseases.

Airway contribution to alveolar nitric oxide in healthy subjects and stable asthma patients

Alveolar nitric oxide (NO) concentration (Fa(NO)), increasingly considered in asthma, is currently interpreted as a reflection of NO production in the alveoli. Recent modeling studies showed that axial molecular diffusion brings NO molecules from the airways back into the alveolar compartment during exhalation (backdiffusion) and contributes to Fa(NO). Our objectives in this study were 1) to simulate the impact of backdiffusion on Fa(NO) and to estimate the alveolar concentration actually due to in situ production (Fa(NO,prod)); and 2) to determine actual alveolar production in stable asthma patients with a broad range of NO bronchial productions. A model incorporating convection and diffusion transport and NO sources was used to simulate Fa(NO) and exhaled NO concentration at 50 ml/s expired flow (Fe(NO)) for a range of alveolar and bronchial NO productions. Fa(NO) and Fe(NO) were measured in 10 healthy subjects (8 men; age 38 +/- 14 yr) and in 21 asthma patients with stable asthma [16 men; age 33 +/- 13 yr; forced expiratory volume during 1 s (FEV(1)) = 98.0 +/- 11.9%predicted]. The Asthma Control Questionnaire (Juniper EF, Buist AS, Cox FM, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Chest 115: 1265-1270, 1999) assessed asthma control. Simulations predict that, because of backdiffusion, Fa(NO) and Fe(NO) are linearly related. Experimental results confirm this relationship. Fa(NO,prod) may be derived by Fa(NO,prod) = (Fa(NO) - 0.08.Fe(NO))/0.92 (Eq. 1). Based on Eq. 1, Fa(NO,prod) is similar in asthma patients and in healthy subjects. In conclusion, the backdiffusion mechanism is an important determinant of NO alveolar concentration. In stable and unobstructed asthma patients, even with increased bronchial NO production, alveolar production is normal when appropriately corrected for backdiffusion.

Exhaled nitric oxide: a test for diagnosis and control of asthma?

The fractional concentration of nitric oxide (FE(NO)) in exhaled breath is a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation in asthma. The precise role of FE(NO) in the asthma management algorithm has not been defined. However, there are compelling data for use of FE(NO) for diagnosing asthma, assessing control and severity, titrating inhaled corticosteroids, and detecting ongoing airway inflammation. This article reviews the biology of nitric oxide in airway pathology and its role in asthma.

Alveolar, but not bronchial nitric oxide production is elevated in cystic fibrosis

Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) remains a promising non-invasive marker for measuring inflammation in lung diseases. In cystic fibrosis (CF), exhaled NO measured at a single expiratory flow has been found to be normal or low. However, this measure cannot localize the anatomical site of NO production. The aims of this study were to apply a multiple-flow NO analysis to compare alveolar NO concentration and bronchial NO flux in CF children with healthy controls. Twenty-two children with CF and 17 healthy controls had exhaled NO measured at four different expiratory flows to calculate bronchial NO flux and alveolar NO concentration. Median (range) alveolar NO concentration was 2.2 (0.6-5.6) ppb for children with CF and 1.5 (0.4-2.6) ppb for healthy controls. Median (range) bronchial NO flux was 445 (64-1,256) pL/sec for children with CF and 509 (197-1,913) pL/sec for healthy controls. Children with CF had a significantly higher alveolar NO concentration, but no significant difference in bronchial NO flux compared to healthy children. In conclusion, children with CF have increased alveolar NO production, but not bronchial NO flux compared to healthy controls. The distal airway is a major site of inflammation in CF, and measuring alveolar NO may be a marker of distal inflammation in this disease.

Extended NO analysis in asthma

The discovery of the flow dependence of exhaled NO made it possible to model NO production in the lung. The linear model provides information about the maximal flux of NO from the airways and the alveolar concentrations of NO. Nonlinear models give additional flow-independent parameters such as airway diffusing capacity and airway wall concentrations of NO. When these models are applied to patients with asthma, a clear-cut increase in NO flux is found, and this is caused by an increase in both airway diffusing capacity and airway wall concentrations of NO. There is no difference in alveolar concentrations of NO compared to healthy subjects, except in severe asthma where an increase has been found. Inhaled corticosteroids are able to reduce the airway wall concentrations but not diffusing capacity or alveolar concentrations. Oral prednisone affects the alveolar concentration, suggesting that in severe asthma there is a systemic component. Steroids distributed by any route do not affect the airway diffusing capacity. Therefore, the airway diffusing capacity should be in focus in testing new drugs or in combination treatment for asthma. Exhaled NO analysis is a promising tool in characterizing asthma in both adults and children. However, there is a strong need to agree on the models and to standardize the flow rates to be used for the modelling in order to perform a systematic and robust analysis of NO production in the lung.

Nitric oxide production in PCD: possible evidence for differential nitric oxide synthase function

Primary cilliary dyskinesia (PCD) is characterized by decreased levels of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), thought to reflect low activity of airway inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) levels. Alveolar NO (Calv) concentration and bronchial NO (JNO) flux can be calculated from FeNO measured at multiple exhalation flow rates. We hypothesised that whereas bronchial NO would be reduced in PCD due to reduced iNOS function, alveolar NO would reflect endothelial NOS (eNOS) function and be normal. We recorded the medical history; measured FeNO at multiple flow rates (50, 100, 200, 260 ml/sec); and performed spirometry in 24 children (aged 8-16 years). FeNO50 of the PCD children was significantly lower than normal mean (+/-SD) 8.1 +/- 1.3 ppb versus 12.5 +/- 1.6 ppb, P = 0.033. The mean +/- SD values of PCD (n = 24) and normal (n = 20) subjects were respectively: JNO: 383.5 +/- 307.9 versus 650.1 +/- 489 pl/s, P = 0.033, Calv: 1.60 +/- 0.78 versus 1.60 +/- 0.75 ppb, P = NS. We show that Calv is normal in PCD, demonstrating that there is no generalized disorder of NO handling in this condition. This differs from a previous report. Furthermore, we speculate that these data may provide supportive evidence that variable flow NO measurements can assess the relative activity of iNOS and eNOS.

Peripheral nitric oxide is increased in rhinitic patients with asthma compared to bronchial hyperresponsiveness

Allergic rhinitis is a predisposing factor for developing clinical asthma. Moreover, allergic rhinitis is often associated with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). We hypothesise that patients with asthma have more small airway involvement than those with allergic rhinitis and BHR alone. The aim of this study was to assess peripheral and proximal NO concentration in rhinitic subjects, and to correlate the peripheral NO concentration to the peripheral obstruction in response to methacholine. Patients with allergic rhinitis with or without BHR, or clinical asthma were investigated in and out of the allergy season. Healthy subjects served as controls. Fractional exhaled NO was performed, and peripheral NO concentration and proximal flux of NO was calculated. Methacholine test was performed including impulse oscillometry. Rhinitic patients with asthma demonstrate an increase in both proximal and peripheral NO compared to those with rhinitis alone or those with BHR. There is a trend of increased peripheral NO from patients with rhinitis only, rhinitis and BHR, to rhinitis with asthma. The increase in peripheral NO correlated with an increased peripheral obstruction in response to methacholine. Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis demonstrated a decrease in both proximal and peripheral NO in the off-season. The results support our hypothesis that rhinitic patients with asthma have more peripheral lung inflammation and small airway involvement compared to rhinitic patients with BHR alone.

Alveolar-derived exhaled nitric oxide is reduced in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is associated with cardiovascular diseases, in particular systemic arterial hypertension. We postulated that intermittent nocturnal hypoxia in OSAS may be associated to decreased fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) levels from distal airspaces.

METHODS

Multiple flow rate measurements have been used to fractionate nitric oxide (NO) from alveolar and bronchial sources in 34 patients with OSAS, in 29 healthy control subjects, and in 8 hypertensive non-OSAS patients. The effect of 2 days of treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) on FENO was examined in 18 patients with severe OSAS.

RESULTS

We found that the mean [+/- SE] concentrations of exhaled NO at a rate of 50 mL/s was 21.8 +/- 1.9 parts per billion (ppb) in patients with OSAS, 25.1 +/- 3.3 ppb in healthy control subjects, and 15.4 +/- 1.7 ppb in hypertensive control patients. The mean fractional alveolar NO concentration (CANO) in OSAS patients was significantly lower than that in control subjects (2.96 +/- 0.48 vs 5.35 +/- 0.83 ppb, respectively; p < 0.05). In addition, CANO values were significantly lower in OSAS patients with systemic hypertension compared to those in normotensive OSAS patients and hypertensive patients without OSAS. The mean values of CANO significantly improved after nCPAP therapy (2.67 +/- 0.41 to 4.69 +/- 0.74 nL/L, respectively; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that alveolar FENO, and not bronchial FENO, is impaired in patients with OSAS and that this impairment is associated with an increased risk of hypertension. NO production within the alveolar space is modified by treatment with nCPAP.

Differential flow analysis of exhaled nitric oxide in patients with asthma of differing severity

BACKGROUND

The majority of asthmatic patients achieve control of their illness; others do not. It is therefore crucial to validate/develop strategies that help the clinician monitor the disease, improving the response to treatment.

METHODS

We have quantified the inflammation in central and peripheral airways by measuring exhaled nitric oxide (NO) at multiple exhalation flows in 56 asthmatics at different levels of severity (mild, n = 10; moderate stable, n = 17; moderate during exacerbation, n = 11; severe, n = 18, 7 of whom were receiving oral corticosteroids) and 18 healthy control subjects. The reproducibility of the measurement was also assessed.

RESULTS

Bronchial NO (Jno) in patients with mild asthma (2,363 +/- 330 pL/s) [mean +/- SD] was higher than in patients with moderate stable asthma (1,300 +/- 59 pL/s, p < 0.0005), in patients with severe asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) [1,015 +/- 67 pL/s, p < 0.0005], and healthy control subjects (721 +/- 22 pL/s, p < 0.0001). There were no differences between Jno in patients with mild asthma compared to patients with severe asthma receiving ICS and oral corticosteroids (2,225 +/- 246 pL/s). Patients with exacerbations showed a higher Jno (3,475 +/- 368.9 pL/s, p < 0.05) compared to the other groups. Alveolar NO was higher in patients with severe asthma receiving oral corticosteroids (3.0 +/- 0.1 parts per billion [ppb], p < 0.0001) than in the other groups but was not significantly higher than in patients with moderate asthma during exacerbation (2.8 +/- 0.3 ppb). No differences were seen in NO diffusion levels between the different asthma groups. All the measurements were highly reproducible and free of day-to-day and diurnal variations.

CONCLUSIONS

Differential flow analysis of exhaled NO provides additional information about the site of inflammation in asthma and may be useful in assessing the response of peripheral inflammation to therapy.

Differential anti-inflammatory effects of large and small particle size inhaled corticosteroids in asthma

BACKGROUND

Extra-fine particle formulations of hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) exhibit clinical effects comparable with conventional particle formulations of chlorofluorocarbon beclometasone dipropionate (CFC-BDP) at half the dose. There is little data comparing their effects on inflammation. We have evaluated the effects of HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP on pulmonary and systemic markers of asthmatic inflammation.

METHODS

A double-blind randomized crossover trial was undertaken comparing the anti-inflammatory effects of HFA-BDP (100 and 400 microg/day) and CFC-BDP (200 and 800 microg/day). Treatment with montelukast was evaluated as add-on to the higher dose of BDP.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline after withdrawal of usual asthma therapy, 100 microg of HFA-BDP significantly attenuated serum eosinophilic cationic protein levels (0.61-fold change, 95% CI 0.49-0.77; a 39% reduction, P < 0.001), but 200 microg of CFC-BDP did not (0.87-fold change, 95% CI 0.63-1.23; P = 1). A dose of 800 microg of CFC-BDP and 400 microg of HFA-BDP led to reductions in exhaled nitric oxide (0.57-fold change, 95% CI 0.44-0.73; a 43% reduction, P < 0.001 and 0.65-fold change, 95% CI 0.47-0.91; a 35% reduction, P = 0.008, respectively); and peripheral eosinophils (-74 cells/microl, 95% CI -146 to -2; P = 0.020 and -77 cells/microl, 95% CI -140 to -14; P = 0.012, respectively). Montelukast further reduced exhaled nitric oxide (0.81-fold change, 95% CI 0.66-0.98; P = 0.028) with 400 microg HFA-BDP and eosinophils (-44 cells/microl, 95% CI -80 to -8; P = 0.012) with 800 microg CFC-BDP, but not vice versa.

CONCLUSION

Chlorofluorocarbon beclometasone dipropionate and HFA-BDP have differential effects on pulmonary and systemic inflammation, which dictate the additive effects of montelukast.

Increased alveolar nitric oxide concentration and high levels of leukotriene B(4) and 8-isoprostane in exhaled breath condensate in patients with asbestosis

BACKGROUND

Inhaled asbestos fibres can cause inflammation and fibrosis in the lungs called asbestosis. However, there are no non-invasive means to assess and follow the severity of the inflammation. Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) measured at multiple exhalation flow rates can be used to assess the alveolar NO concentration and bronchial NO flux, which reflect inflammation in the lung parenchyma and airways, respectively. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether exhaled NO or markers in exhaled breath condensate could be used to assess inflammation in asbestosis.

METHODS

Exhaled NO and inflammatory markers (leukotriene B(4) and 8-isoprostane) in exhaled breath condensate were measured in 15 non-smoking patients with asbestosis and in 15 healthy controls. Exhaled NO concentrations were measured at four constant exhalation flow rates (50, 100, 200 and 300 ml/s) and alveolar NO concentration and bronchial NO flux were calculated according to the linear model of pulmonary NO dynamics.

RESULTS

The mean (SE) alveolar NO concentration was significantly higher in patients with asbestosis than in controls (3.2 (0.4) vs 2.0 (0.2) ppb, p = 0.008). There was no difference in bronchial NO flux (0.9 (0.1) vs 0.9 (0.1) nl/s, p = 0.93) or NO concentration measured at ATS standard flow rate of 50 ml/s (20.0 (2.0) vs 19.7 (1.8) ppb, p = 0.89). Patients with asbestosis had increased levels of leukotriene B4 (39.5 (6.0) vs 15.4 (2.9) pg/ml, p = 0.002) and 8-isoprostane (33.5 (9.6) vs 11.9 (2.8) pg/ml, p = 0.048) in exhaled breath condensate and raised serum levels of C-reactive protein (2.3 (0.3) vs 1.1 (0.2) mug/ml, p = 0.003), interleukin-6 (3.5 (0.5) vs 1.7 (0.4) pg/ml, p = 0.007) and myeloperoxidase (356 (48) vs 240 (20) ng/ml, p = 0.034) compared with healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with asbestosis have an increased alveolar NO concentration and high levels of leukotriene B4 and 8-isoprostane in exhaled breath. Measurement of exhaled NO at multiple exhalation flow rates and analysis of inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate are promising non-invasive means for assessing inflammation in patients with asbestosis.

Airway nitric oxide output is reduced in bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Increased concentrations of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) have been detected in inflammatory lung diseases including asthma and have been attributed to increased expression and activity of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) within the airways. However, previous studies of exhaled NO in patients with bronchiectasis have yielded conflicting results, with reports of both increased and normal NO values. Recent evidence from animal models suggests that chronic airway infection reduces NO production within the lung, despite causing increased iNOS expression. We tested the hypothesis that, in human subjects with bronchiectasis, chronic airway infection reduces NO output from the conducting airways.

METHODS

Using a recently described two-compartment model, we measured separately the contributions of the conducting airways and the alveoli to exhaled NO in nine patients with stable bronchiectasis and eight control subjects before and after inhaled glucocorticoid therapy.

RESULTS

We found that airway NO output was significantly lower in bronchiectasis than in normal airways whereas NO output from the alveoli was similar to that of control subjects. High-dose inhaled glucocorticoid therapy did not alter airway or alveolar NO production.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that, in patients with bronchiectasis, airway NO output is reduced and that iNOS does not contribute significantly to airway NO production.