Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 Study

Cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): potential, mechanisms of resistance, and strategies for reinvigorating T cell responsiveness when resistance is acquired

Cancer is still the leading cause of death globally. The approval of the therapeutic use of monoclonal antibodies against immune checkpoint molecules, notably those that target the proteins PD-1 and PD-L1, has changed the landscape of cancer treatment. In particular, first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor drugs are increasingly common for the treatment of metastatic cancer, significantly prolonging patient survival. Despite the benefits brought by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-based therapy, the majority of patients had their diseases worsen following a promising initial response. To increase the effectiveness of ICIs and advance our understanding of the mechanisms causing cancer resistance, it is crucial to find new, effective, and tolerable combination treatments. In this article, we addressed the potential of ICIs for the treatment of solid tumors and offer some insight into the molecular pathways behind therapeutic resistance to ICIs. We also discuss cutting-edge therapeutic methods for reactivating T-cell responsiveness after resistance has been established.

Recent Advances with Precision Medicine Treatment for Breast Cancer including Triple-Negative Sub-Type

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different molecular subtypes. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of mortality in woman due to rapid metastasis and disease recurrence. Precision medicine remains an essential source to lower the off-target toxicities of chemotherapeutic agents and maximize the patient benefits. This is a crucial approach for a more effective treatment and prevention of disease. Precision-medicine methods are based on the selection of suitable biomarkers to envision the effectiveness of targeted therapy in a specific group of patients. Several druggable mutations have been identified in breast cancer patients. Current improvements in omics technologies have focused on more precise strategies for precision therapy. The development of next-generation sequencing technologies has raised hopes for precision-medicine treatment strategies in breast cancer (BC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Targeted therapies utilizing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), oncolytic viruses (OVs), glucose transporter-1 inhibitor (GLUT1i), and targeting signaling pathways are potential treatment approaches for BC and TNBC. This review emphasizes the recent progress made with the precision-medicine therapy of metastatic breast cancer and TNBC.

A phase II study of pembrolizumab plus carboplatin in BRCA-related metastatic breast cancer (PEMBRACA)

BACKGROUND

BRCA1/2-related metastatic breast cancers (mBC) are sensitive to DNA-damage agents and show high tumor-infiltrated lymphocytes. We hypothesized that the association between pembrolizumab and carboplatin could be active in BRCA-related mBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this phase II Simon's design multicenter single-arm study, BRCA1/2-related mBC patients received carboplatin at area under the curve 6 every 3 weeks for six courses associated with 200 mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary aim at first stage was overall response rate (ORR) ≥70%. Disease control rate (DCR), time to progression (TTP), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS) were the secondary aims.

RESULTS

Among 22 patients enrolled at the first stage, 5 BRCA1 and 17 BRCA2, 16 (76%) were luminal tumors and 6 (24%) triple-negative BC (TNBC). In 21 patients, ORR and DCR were 43% and 76% (47% and 87% in luminal, 33% and 50% in TNBC), respectively. TTP was 7.1 months, DOR was 6.3 months, and median OS was not reached. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs occurred in 5/22 patients (22.7%). Since the primary aim was not met, the study was terminated at the first stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the primary aim was not reached, data on efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus carboplatin in first-line visceral disease BRCA-related luminal mBC were provided and they need to be further investigated.

Status and prognostic value of immunological biomarkers of breast cancer

The immune response to cancer serves an important role in disease progression and patient prognosis. For triple-negative breast cancer showing aggressive behavior, immunotherapy has a good efficacy because of the potent immunogenicity of this type of cancer. However, the dominant subtype, luminal human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, is less immunogenic. To determine whether luminal HER2-negative cancer reacts to the anticancer immune response, the present study analyzed the status and prognostic value of the principal immunological biomarkers of breast cancer, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), CD8⁺ T lymphocytes, the major histocompatibility complex and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1). The biomarkers were compared between patients with luminal HER2-negative breast cancer and those with immunogenic subtypes including triple-negative and HER2-overexpressed breast cancer. A total of 71 patients with primary breast cancer were classified into the immunogenic non-luminal (n=23) and less immunogenic luminal HER2-negative groups (n=48) based on immunogenicity. In the luminal HER2-negative group, compared with patients with low TIL levels, those with high TIL levels were at an advanced stage of cancer (P=0.024) and showed worse relapse-free survival (P=0.057); however, the remaining biomarkers exhibited no association with cancer progression or prognosis. In the non-luminal group, patients with high TIL levels showed significantly better RFS than those with low TIL levels (P=0.014). Compared with non-luminal patients negative for PD-L1, those positive for PD-L1 exhibited better overall survival (P=0.064). Notably, TIL status was found to exhibit contrasting prognostic predictions based on immunogenicity. In conclusion, TILs are a strong candidate for prognostic prediction in breast cancer, regardless of the subtype. PD-L1 is a potential candidate for prognostic prediction in immunogenic breast cancers, but not in the luminal HER2-negative subtype.

Association Between Biomarkers and Clinical Outcomes of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: KEYNOTE-086 Exploratory Analysis

PURPOSE

In the two-cohort phase II KEYNOTE-086 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02447003), first-line and second-line or later pembrolizumab monotherapy demonstrated antitumor activity in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC; N = 254). This exploratory analysis evaluates the association between prespecified molecular biomarkers and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Cohort A enrolled patients with disease progression after one or more systemic therapies for metastatic disease irrespective of PD-L1 status; Cohort B enrolled patients with previously untreated PD-L1-positive (combined positive score [CPS] ≥ 1) metastatic disease. The association between the following biomarkers as continuous variables and clinical outcomes (objective response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]) was evaluated: PD-L1 CPS (immunohistochemistry), cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8; immunohistochemistry), stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (sTIL; hematoxylin and eosin staining), tumor mutational burden (TMB; whole-exome sequencing [WES]), homologous recombination deficiency-loss of heterozygosity, mutational signature 3 (WES), mutational signature 2 (apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like; WES), T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (Tcell_infGEP; RNA sequencing), and 10 non-Tcell_infGEP signatures (RNA sequencing); Wald test P values were calculated, and significance was prespecified at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

In the combined cohorts (A and B), PD-L1 (P = .040), CD8 (P < .001), sTILs (P = .012), TMB (P = .007), and Tcell_infGEP (P = .011) were significantly associated with ORR; CD8 (P < .001), TMB (P = .034), Signature 3 (P = .009), and Tcell_infGEP (P = .002) with PFS; and CD8 (P < .001), sTILs (P = .004), TMB (P = .025), and Tcell_infGEP (P = .001) with OS. None of the non-Tcell_infGEP signatures were associated with outcomes of pembrolizumab after adjusting for the Tcell_infGEP.

CONCLUSION

In this exploratory biomarker analysis from KEYNOTE-086, baseline tumor PD-L1, CD8, sTILs, TMB, and Tcell_infGEP were associated with improved clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab and may help identify patients with mTNBC who are most likely to respond to pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Crosstalk between triple negative breast cancer and microenvironment

Although many advances have been made in the treatment of breast cancer, for the triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) these therapies have not significantly increased overall survival. Tumor microenvironment (TME) plays an essential role to develop and control TNBC progression. Many preclinical and clinical studies are ongoing to treat patients with TNBC disease, but the effective therapies are currently not available. Here, we have reviewed recent progress in understanding of TNBC and advance in defining mechanisms of TNBC therapies and potential therapeutic strategies to overcome TNBC.

Immunotherapy for HER-2 positive breast cancer

Immunotherapy is a developing treatment for advanced breast cancer. Immunotherapy has clinical significance for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancers and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive (HER2+) breast cancers. As a proved effective passive immunotherapy, clinical application of the monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab, pertuzumab and T-DM1 (ado-trastuzumab emtansine) has significantly improved the survival of patients with HER2+ breast cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors that block programmed death receptor-1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) have also shown benefits for breast cancer in various clinical trials. Adoptive T-cell immunotherapies and tumor vaccines are emerging as novel approaches to treating breast cancer, but require further study. This article reviews recent advances in immunotherapy for HER2+ breast cancers.

Immunotherapy Targeting PD-1/PD-L1 in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

The advent of immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has revolutionized antitumor therapy. Programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are among the most promising targets for encouraging the immune system to eliminate cancer cells. PD-1/PD-L1 have made clinical remission for numerous solid tumors, including metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In recent years, integrating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors into existing treatments in early-stage TNBC has attracted wide attention. Herein, we summarize the clinical benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and targeted therapy in early-stage TNBC. Possible immunotherapy biomarkers, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and the key challenges faced in TNBC anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy are also concluded. Numerous studies on immunotherapy are ongoing, and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have demonstrated great clinical prospects in early-stage TNBC. To maximize the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, further research into the challenges which still exist is necessary.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with triple-negative breast cancer: Results from KEYNOTE-355

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer with tumor programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥10 in the global, phase 3, randomized controlled trial KEYNOTE-355. We report results for patients enrolled in Japan. Patients were randomized 2:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo Q3W for 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine-carboplatin). Primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10, PD-L1 CPS ≥1, and the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. No alpha was assigned to this exploratory analysis. Eighty-seven patients were randomized in Japan (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 61; placebo plus chemotherapy, n = 26), 66 (76%) had PD-L1 CPS ≥1, and 28 (32%) had PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Median time from randomization to data cutoff (June 15, 2021) was 44.7 (range, 37.2-52.9) months in the ITT population. Hazard ratios (HRs; 95% CI) for OS were 0.36 (0.14-0.89), 0.52 (0.30-0.91), and 0.46 (0.28-0.77) in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10, PD-L1 CPS ≥1, and ITT populations, respectively. HRs (95% CI) for PFS were 0.52 (0.20-1.34), 0.61 (0.35-1.06), and 0.64 (0.39-1.05). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 85% of patients in each group (no grade 5 events). Consistent with the global population, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy tended to show improvements in OS and PFS with manageable toxicity versus placebo plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients and supports this combination in this setting.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in patients worldwide and the main cause of cancer-related death. Though still incurable, metastatic breast cancer's prognosis has been considerably improved in the past 10 years due to the introduction of new targeted agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, these medications are associated with unique side effects known as immune-mediated adverse events (irAE). In this paper, we review the clinical evidence for the use of ICIs in breast cancer, in both the metastatic as well as neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting, followed by a review of irAE most commonly seen, and the medications used to treat them. Our opinion is that any cancer specialist treating patients with breast cancer should be aware of these side effects for early detection and management, and oncologists should be the leaders of the multidisciplinary team that will take care of them.

Novel Nanotherapeutics for Cancer Immunotherapy by PD-L1-Aptamer-Functionalized and Fexofenadine-Loaded Albumin Nanoparticles

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is an important strategy for cancer treatment and has achieved remarkable clinical results. Further enhancement of the efficacy of ICB therapy with a new technical approach is of potential medical importance. In this study, we constructed a novel nanotherapeutic agent (PDL1-NP-FEXO) for cancer immunotherapy by attaching PD-L1 aptamers to albumin nanoparticles that were loaded with H1-antihitamine fexofenadine (FEXO). FEXO has been reported to enhance the immunotherapy response by reducing the immunosuppressive M2-like macrophages in the tumor microenvironment. The albumin nanoparticle was fabricated using a self-assembly method. A dynamic light scattering (DLS) study revealed that the average size of PD-L1 aptamer-modified nanoparticle without FEXO (PDL1-NP) was 135.5 nm, while that of PDL1-NP-FEXO was 154.6 nm. Similar to free PD-L1 aptamer, PDL1-NP could also bind with PD-L1-expressing tumor cells (MDA-MB-231). Of note, compared with free PD-L1 aptamer, PDL1-NP significantly boosted tumor inhibition in CT26-bearing mice. Moreover, PDL1-NP-FEXO further enhanced the antitumor efficacy vs. PDL1-NP in an animal model, without raising systemic toxicity. These results indicate that PDL1-NP-FEXO represents a promising strategy to improve ICB efficacy and may have application potential in cancer immunotherapy.

PD-L1 expression as biomarker of efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic triple negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1) checkpoint have been approved for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in patients positive for PD-L1 expression. Negative results from the recent phase III trials (IMPassion131 and IMPassion132) have raises questions on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors and the predictive value of PD-L1 expression. Here we attempt to systematically analyze the biomarker value of PD-L1 expression for predicting the response of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in mTNBC.

Materials and methods

PubMed database was searched until Dec 2021 for studies evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors plus/minus chemotherapy in mTNBC. Outcome of interest included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4. was used for data-analysis.

Results

In total, 20 clinical trials comprising 3962 mTNBC patients (ICT: 2665 (67%); CT: 1297 (33%) were included in this study. Overall ORR was 22% (95%CI, 14-30%) and significant improvement was observed for PD-L1+ patients (ORR 1.78 [95%CI, 1.45-2.19], p<0.00001) as compared to PD-L1- cohort. Pooled outcome also indicated a significant 1-year PFS and 2-year OS advantage for patients with PD-L1 expression (1-year PFS: ORR 1.39 [95%CI, 1.04-1.85], p=0.02; I2 = 0%; 2-year OS: (ORR 2.47 [95%CI, 1.30-4.69], p=0.006; I2 = 63%). Subgroup analysis indicated that PD-L1 expression can successfully predict tumor response and 2-year OS benefit in mTNBC patients regardless of the type of investigating agent, line of treatment administration, and to some extent the type of treatment. Biomarker ability of PD-L1 expression to predict 1-year PFS was slightly better with pembrolizumab (p=0.09) than atezolizumab (p=0.18), and significantly better when treatment was administered in the first-line setting (OR 1.38 [95%CI, 1.02-1.87], p=0.04) and chemotherapy was added (OR 1.38 [95%CI, 1.02-1.86], p=0.03). Immune-related toxicity of any grade and grade≥3 was 39% (95%CI, 26%-52%) and 10% (95%CI, 8%-13%), respectively.

Conclusions

PD-L1 expression can predict objective response rate and 2-year OS in mTNBC patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. One-year PFS is also predicted in selected patients. PD-L1 expression can be a useful biomarker of efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in mTNBC.

Excellent response of refractory triple-negative breast cancer to sintilimab plus chemotherapy: a case report

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer with a high propensity for invasion and a high incidence of lymph node metastasis. Systemic chemotherapy is considered the primary treatment for patients with TNBC; however, immune checkpoint inhibitors in addition to chemotherapy have been associated with better outcomes. Sintilimab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, was developed in China. Herein, the authors report a 49-year-old woman diagnosed with TNBC with extensive lung and sternal metastases. Treatment with sintilimab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin was found highly effective after failure of first-line chemotherapy. This combinational therapy can be considered for the treatment of TNBC after necessary investigations and clinical trials.

Tissue- and liquid biopsy-based biomarkers for immunotherapy in breast cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy and now represent the mainstay of treatment for many tumor types, including triple-negative breast cancer and two agnostic registrations. However, despite impressive durable responses suggestive of an even curative potential in some cases, most patients receiving ICIs do not derive a substantial benefit, highlighting the need for more precise patient selection and stratification. The identification of predictive biomarkers of response to ICIs may play a pivotal role in optimizing the therapeutic use of such compounds. In this Review, we describe the current landscape of tissue and blood biomarkers that could serve as predictive factors for ICI treatment in breast cancer. The integration of these biomarkers in a "holistic" perspective aimed at developing comprehensive panels of multiple predictive factors will be a major step forward towards precision immune-oncology.

Targeting ATAD3A-PINK1-mitophagy axis overcomes chemoimmunotherapy resistance by redirecting PD-L1 to mitochondria

Only a small proportion of patients with triple-negative breast cancer benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 signaling in combination with chemotherapy. Here, we discovered that therapeutic response to ICI plus paclitaxel was associated with subcellular redistribution of PD-L1. In our immunotherapy cohort of ICI in combination with nab-paclitaxel, tumor samples from responders showed significant distribution of PD-L1 at mitochondria, while non-responders showed increased accumulation of PD-L1 on tumor cell membrane instead of mitochondria. Our results also revealed that the distribution pattern of PD-L1 was regulated by an ATAD3A-PINK1 axis. Mechanistically, PINK1 recruited PD-L1 to mitochondria for degradation via a mitophagy pathway. Importantly, paclitaxel increased ATAD3A expression to disrupt proteostasis of PD-L1 by restraining PINK1-dependent mitophagy. Clinically, patients with tumors exhibiting high expression of ATAD3A detected before the treatment with ICI in combination with paclitaxel had markedly shorter progression-free survival compared with those with ATAD3A-low tumors. Preclinical results further demonstrated that targeting ATAD3A reset a favorable antitumor immune microenvironment and increased the efficacy of combination therapy of ICI plus paclitaxel. In summary, our results indicate that ATAD3A serves not only as a resistant factor for the combination therapy of ICI plus paclitaxel through preventing PD-L1 mitochondrial distribution, but also as a promising target for increasing the therapeutic responses to chemoimmunotherapy.

Insight into the Crosstalk between Photodynamic Therapy and Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is the world's second most frequent malignancy and the leading cause of mortality among women. All in situ or invasive breast cancer derives from terminal tubulobular units; when the tumor is present only in the ducts or lobules in situ, it is called ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)/lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). The biggest risk factors are age, mutations in breast cancer genes 1 or 2 (BRCA1 or BRCA2), and dense breast tissue. Current treatments are associated with various side effects, recurrence, and poor quality of life. The critical role of the immune system in breast cancer progression/regression should always be considered. Several immunotherapy techniques for BC have been studied, including tumor-targeted antibodies (bispecific antibodies), adoptive T cell therapy, vaccinations, and immune checkpoint inhibition with anti-PD-1 antibodies. In the last decade, significant breakthroughs have been made in breast cancer immunotherapy. This advancement was principally prompted by cancer cells' escape of immune regulation and the tumor's subsequent resistance to traditional therapy. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has shown potential as a cancer treatment. It is less intrusive, more focused, and less damaging to normal cells and tissues. It entails the employment of a photosensitizer (PS) and a specific wavelength of light to create reactive oxygen species. Recently, an increasing number of studies have shown that PDT combined with immunotherapy improves the effect of tumor drugs and reduces tumor immune escape, improving the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Therefore, we objectively evaluate strategies for their limitations and benefits, which are critical to improving outcomes for breast cancer patients. In conclusion, we offer many avenues for further study on tailored immunotherapy, such as oxygen-enhanced PDT and nanoparticles.

Targeting pyroptosis in breast cancer: biological functions and therapeutic potentials on It

Pyroptosis is a lytic and inflammatory type of programmed cell death that is mediated by Gasdermin proteins (GSDMs). Attractively, recent evidence indicates that pyroptosis involves in the development of tumors and can serve as a new strategy for cancer treatment. Here, we present a basic knowledge of pyroptosis, and an overview of the expression patterns and roles of GSDMs in breast cancer. In addition, we further summarize the available evidence of pyroptosis in breast cancer progression and give insight into the clinical potential of applying pyroptosis in anticancer strategies for breast cancer. This review will deepen our understanding of the relationship between pyroptosis and breast cancer, and provide a novel potential therapeutic avenue for breast cancer.

A hierarchical tumor-targeting strategy for eliciting potent antitumor immunity against triple negative breast cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) as a highly aggressive and metastatic malignancy lacks targeting therapies nowadays. Moreover, although immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is known to trigger anti-tumor immune response, most TNBC falls into the immunologically "cold" category unsuitable for ICB therapy due to insufficient lymphocyte infiltration. Herein, we develop a hierarchical targeting strategy for preparing a core-shell-structural nanodrug to concurrently block the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and deliver a stimulator of interferon gene (STING) agonist into tumor-infiltrating antigen-presenting cells (APCs). The nanodrug complexed the interferon stimulatory DNA (ISD) for STING activation in its core, conjugated PD-L1 antibody (aPD-L1) on its shell through a matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) substrate peptide, and incorporated "hidden" mannose in its sublayer. Through aPD-L1-mediated active targeting of tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating APCs, the nanodrug efficiently accumulated in tumor sites. Then, the PD-L1-conjugating peptide was cleaved by tumor-enriched MMP-2, leaving aPD-L1 on target cells for ICB while exposing mannose to mediate targeted delivery of ISD into tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells (DCs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Activating the STING signaling in DCs and TAMs not only stimulated the APCs maturation to prime anti-tumor immunity but also induced their chemokine secretion to promote tumor infiltration of anti-tumor effector T cells, thus sensitizing TNBC to the ICB therapy. Consequently, a potent antitumor immunity was evoked to effectively inhibit the tumor growth and metastasis in mice bearing orthotopic 4T1 breast cancer, showing the great potential in treating immunologically "cold" tumors.

Immunotherapy in breast cancer: an overview of current strategies and perspectives

Recent progress in immunobiology has led the way to successful host immunity enhancement against breast cancer. In triple-negative breast cancer, the combination of cancer immunotherapy based on PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy was effective both in advanced and early setting phase 3 clinical trials. These encouraging results lead to the first approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer and thus offer new therapeutic possibilities in aggressive tumors and hard-to-treat populations. Furthermore, several ongoing trials are investigating combining immunotherapies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors with conventional therapies and as well as with other immunotherapeutic strategies such as cancer vaccines, CAR-T cells, bispecific antibodies, and oncolytic viruses in all breast cancer subtypes. This review provides an overview of immunotherapies currently under clinical development and updated key results from clinical trials. Finally, we discuss the challenges to the successful implementation of immune treatment in managing breast cancer and their implications for the design of future clinical trials.

Novel roles of RNA-binding proteins in drug resistance of breast cancer: from molecular biology to targeting therapeutics

Therapy resistance remains a huge challenge for current breast cancer treatments. Exploring molecular mechanisms of therapy resistance might provide therapeutic targets for patients with advanced breast cancer and improve their prognosis. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play an important role in regulating therapy resistance. Here we summarize the functions of RBPs, highlight their tremendously important roles in regulating therapy sensitivity and resistance and we also reveal current therapeutic approaches reversing abnormal functions of RBPs in breast cancer.

The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with intracranial metastatic disease

Intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) complicates the course of nearly 2-4% of patients with systemic cancer. The prevalence of IMD has been increasing over the past few decades. Historically, definitive treatment for brain metastases (BM) has been limited to radiation therapy or surgical resection. Chemotherapies have not typically proven valuable in the treatment of IMD, with the exception of highly chemotherapy-sensitive lesions. Recent data have supported a role for systemic targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of select patients with IMD. There remains, however, a clear clinical need for further investigation to delineate the role of ICIs in patients with BM. In this review, we outline and describe recent and current efforts to identify the efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with IMD.

Targeting Notch-Driven Cytokine Secretion: Novel Therapies for Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Compared with other breast cancer subtypes, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive malignancy with a high recurrence rate and reduced overall survival. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has shown modest results in this subgroup, highlighting the need for improved targeted therapeutic options. Notch is a defining feature of TNBC and drives the expression of interleukin-1 beta (IL1β) and C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2). These cytokines are involved in the recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) to the tumor, resulting in immune evasion and tumor progression. Targeting Notch, IL1β or CCL2 may reduce TAM recruitment and resistance to ICI, illuminating the potential of combination immunotherapy in TNBC.

Role of Immunotherapy in Early- and Late-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

For women with triple-negative breast cancer, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy has become a standard of care in the early-stage and first-line metastatic setting. However, many questions persist. Different chemotherapy backbones and sequencing strategies have been evaluated, but evidence supporting the superiority of one over the other is weak. Although many have been investigated, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL1) is the only approved biomarker. Since immunotherapy has been associated with potentially severe and permanent toxicities, the identification of better predictive biomarkers is essential. New strategies are needed to increase the proportion of patients who might benefit from immunotherapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Study Based on 41 Cohorts Incorporating 6558 Participants

The project was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Electronic databases were screened to identify relevant trials. The primary endpoints were prognostic parameters and adverse events (AEs) through pooled rate, odds ratio, and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI. Totally, 6558 TNBC patients from 41 cohorts were included. The pooled pathologic complete response rate (odds ratio=2.03, 95% CI: 1.35-3.06, P =0.0007) and event-free survival (HR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.96, P =0.0100) of ICIs plus chemotherapy was higher than that of chemotherapy-alone in early-stage TNBC. For metastatic TNBC, compared with chemotherapy-alone, the addition of ICIs prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.88-0.96, P <0.0001); the improvement also existed in the following 3 subgroups: programmed cell death-ligand 1 positive, race of White and Asian, and patients without previous neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy; however, the benefit of the combined regimen was not observed in overall survival (OS) (HR=0.95; 95% CI: 0.89-1.03, P =0.2127). In addition, the pooled rates of OS, PFS, and objective response rate of ICIs plus chemotherapy were better than those of ICIs plus targeted therapy or ICIs-alone. In the safety analysis, compared with chemotherapy-alone, ICIs plus chemotherapy increased immune-related AEs and several serious AE. The regimen of ICIs plus chemotherapy is promising in both early-stage and metastatic TNBC, while the increased serious AE should not be neglected. Furthermore, the pooled rates of OS, PFS, and objective response rate of ICIs plus chemotherapy were better than those of ICIs plus targeted therapy or ICIs-alone.

Expression of hormone receptors is associated with specific immunological profiles of the breast cancer microenvironment

BACKGROUND

Elucidating the unique immunoregulatory mechanisms in breast cancer microenvironment may help develop new therapeutic strategies. Some studies have suggested that hormone receptors also have immune regulatory functions, but their mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, we have comprehensively analyzed the relationship between the expressions of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PgR), and androgen receptors (AR), and the immunological profile in breast cancer.

METHODS

Using publicly available gene expression profile datasets, METABRIC and SCAN-B, the associations between the expressions of hormone receptors and the immune cell compositions in breast cancer tissue, estimated by CIBERSORTx algorithm, were analyzed. We histologically evaluated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (hTIL), PD-L1 (hPD-L1) expression, and the infiltration of 11 types of immune cells by flow cytometry (FCM) for 45 breast cancer tissue samples. The relationships between them and the expressions of ER, PgR, and AR of tumor tissues, evaluated immunohistochemically, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Expressions of ESR1, PGR, and AR were negatively correlated with overall immune composition. Expressions of ER and AR, but not that of PgR, were inversely associated with hTIL and hPD-L1 expression. FCM analysis showed that the expressions of ER and AR, but not that of PgR, were associated with decreased total leukocyte infiltration. Both CIBERSORTx and FCM analysis showed that ER expression was associated with reduced infiltration of macrophages and CD4+ T cells and that of AR with reduced macrophage infiltration.

CONCLUSION

Hormone receptor expression correlates with specific immunological profiles in the breast cancer microenvironment both at the gene and protein expression levels.

Predictive Biomarkers for Response to Immunotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Promises and Challenges

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis and a paucity of therapeutic options. In recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a new treatment option for patients with TNBC. However, this therapeutic evolution is paralleled by a growing need for biomarkers which allow for a better selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from this immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimen. These biomarkers will not only facilitate a better optimization of treatment strategies, but they will also avoid unnecessary side effects in non-responders, and limit the increasing financial toxicity linked to the use of these agents. Huge efforts have been deployed to identify predictive biomarkers for the ICI, but until now, the fruits of this labor remained largely unsatisfactory. Among clinically validated biomarkers, only programmed death-ligand 1 protein (PD-L1) expression has been prospectively assessed in TNBC trials. In addition to this, microsatellite instability and a high tumor mutational burden are approved as tumor agnostic biomarkers, but only a small percentage of TNBC fits this category. Furthermore, TNBC should no longer be approached as a single biological entity, but rather as a complex disease with different molecular, clinicopathological, and tumor microenvironment subgroups. This review provides an overview of the validated and evolving predictive biomarkers for a response to ICI in TNBC.

Evolving treatment landscape of immunotherapy in breast cancer: current issues and future perspectives

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) deeply changed the treatment landscape of breast cancer (BC). In particular, anti-programmed-death (ligand) 1 antibodies were approved for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), both in first line for metastatic disease and in neoadjuvant setting, on the basis of a demonstrated improvement of the survival outcomes. In light of these results, current clinical trials aim at improving this benefit investigating novel combinations and strategies, at exploring the role of ICIs beyond TNBC, and at better selecting the patients in order to spare non-responders from avoidable toxicities. This narrative review aims at summarizing and discussing the evolving landscape of immunotherapeutic treatments for BC, highlighting the current challenges and the future perspectives.

PDJ amplicon in triple negative breast cancer

Amplification of chromosome 9p24.1 targeting PD-L1, PD-L2, and JAK2 (PDJ amplicon) is present in subsets of triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, the prevalence of PDJ+ TNBCs varies extensively across studies applying different methods for interrogating samples of interest. To rigorously assess the prevalence of PDJ amplicons in TNBC, its prognostic value and whether it is enriched by chemotherapy, we interrogated 360 TNBC samples including 74 surgical resections from patients treated in the neoadjuvant setting, and tissue microarrays (TMAs) with 31 cases from African American women and 255 resected non-metastatic cases, with a 3 color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay targeting the 9p24.1 PDJ amplicon, 9q24.3, and 9q34.1. Samples with mean PDJ signal of > 4.5 copies, and ratios of PDJ/9q24 ≥ 2 and/or PDJ/9q34.1 ≥ 2 were called amplified (PDJ+). Correlative analyses included the association of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) with PDJ amplicons in TNBCs. In addition, we investigated intratumor copy number of PDJ amplicons in PDJ+ and PDJ- TNBCs. Matched pre- and post-neoadjuvant treatment biopsies were available from patients (n = 6) to evaluate the effects of therapy on PDJ status. Our study provides a rigorous analysis of the prevalence, distribution, and clinical correlatives of the PDJ amplicon in TNBC.

Global research trends on anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: A scientometric analysis

In recent years, anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 has been considered to be a valuable therapeutic target and prognostic indicator for triple-negative breast cancer. We analyzed all publications published in the field from their inception until the present day in order to determine the current research status and hotspots. All related publications were searched on the Web of Science. Our research used R-studio (bibliometrix package), VOSviewer, and CiteSpace to analyze and obtain annual publications and citation information, articles, highest publication countries and affiliations, influential journals and authors, keyword analysis, and keyword bursts. In total, 851 documents were retrieved including 628 articles and 223 review articles. The output of publications increased year by year from 2013 to 2021. However, the average article citation times reached the top in 2014 but generally showed a downward trend from 2014 to 2021. It was an article written by Schmid et al. in 2018 that received the most citations. With regard to publications, citations, and link strength, among the top countries was the United States. Cancers was the most published journal. Schmid and Loi ranked top in total citations and h-index. Schmid has the largest M-index and Loi has the most publication. The keywords that received the most attention were "Immunotherapy", "PD-L1", "Triple-negative breast cancer", "Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes", and "Expression". According to the report, this current research focuses on immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer and the expression of PD-L1 and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy have completed the Phase 3 clinical trial. However, the biomarkers were limited in predicting the treatment prognosis. Through the scientometric analysis, we can understand the current research status and potential research points in this filed and provide research direction for researchers.

Breast cancer tumor microenvironment affects Treg/IL-17-producing Treg/Th17 cell axis: Molecular and therapeutic perspectives

The tumor microenvironment (TME) comprises a variety of immune cells, among which T cells exert a prominent axial role in tumor development or anti-tumor responses in patients with breast cancer (BC). High or low levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as transforming growth factor β, in the absence or presence of proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), delineate the fate of T cells toward either regulatory T (Treg) or T helper 17 (Th17) cells, respectively. The transitional state of RORγt⁺Foxp3⁺ Treg (IL-17-producing Treg) resides in the middle of this reciprocal polarization, which is known as Treg/IL-17-producing Treg/Th17 cell axis. TME secretome, including microRNAs, cytokines, and extracellular vesicles, can significantly affect this axis. Furthermore, immune checkpoint inhibitors may be used to reconstruct immune cells; however, some of these novel therapies may favor tumor development. Therefore, understanding secretory and cell-associated factors involved in their differentiation or polarization and functions may be targeted for BC management. This review discusses microRNAs, cytokines, and extracellular vesicles (as secretome), as well as transcription factors and immune checkpoints (as cell-associated factors), which influence the Treg/IL-17-producing Treg/Th17 cell axis in BC. Furthermore, approved or ongoing clinical trials related to the modulation of this axis in the TME of BC are described to broaden new horizons of promising therapeutic approaches.

Breast cancer heterogeneity and its implication in personalized precision therapy

Breast cancer heterogeneity determines cancer progression, treatment effects, and prognosis. However, the precise mechanism for this heterogeneity remains unknown owing to its complexity. Here, we summarize the origins of breast cancer heterogeneity and its influence on disease progression, recurrence, and therapeutic resistance. We review the possible mechanisms of heterogeneity and the research methods used to analyze it. We also highlight the importance of cell interactions for the origins of breast cancer heterogeneity, which can be further categorized into cooperative and competitive interactions. Finally, we provide new insights into precise individual treatments based on heterogeneity.

Role of Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer

The advent of immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has revolutionized the treatment of solid tumor malignancies. In breast cancer, the most robust data to date for ICI exist for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Preclinical studies suggested increased antitumoral immune response in patients with TNBC undergoing ICI treatment. Early clinical trials investigated the use of ICI monotherapy in patients with metastatic TNBC with promising results, particularly in the first-line setting and for those patients whose tumors had high programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Subsequent trials evaluated the use of ICI in combination with conventional chemotherapy to enhance the host immune response. Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in the KEYNOTE-355 study resulted in improved progression-free survival and overall survival benefits for patients with PD-L1 combined positive score > 10 metastatic TNBC. In early-stage disease, two phase III trials demonstrated increased rates of pathologic complete response at the time of surgery with the addition of neoadjuvant ICI to standard chemotherapy. The large KEYNOTE-522 trial showed improved event-free survival with neoadjuvant and adjuvant ICI. Several biomarkers have been identified, which may be predictive of response to ICI therapy including PD-1/PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and multigene assays capturing favorable immune cell signatures. For hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor-positive breast cancer, there are ongoing studies evaluating ICI therapy in combination with chemotherapy and targeted agents. Finally, across all subtypes, several novel immunotherapeutic agents are under investigation including novel ICIs, cancer vaccines, adoptive cellular therapy, and oncolytic viruses.

Neoantigens: promising targets for cancer therapy

Recent advances in neoantigen research have accelerated the development and regulatory approval of tumor immunotherapies, including cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy and antibody-based therapies, especially for solid tumors. Neoantigens are newly formed antigens generated by tumor cells as a result of various tumor-specific alterations, such as genomic mutation, dysregulated RNA splicing, disordered post-translational modification, and integrated viral open reading frames. Neoantigens are recognized as non-self and trigger an immune response that is not subject to central and peripheral tolerance. The quick identification and prediction of tumor-specific neoantigens have been made possible by the advanced development of next-generation sequencing and bioinformatic technologies. Compared to tumor-associated antigens, the highly immunogenic and tumor-specific neoantigens provide emerging targets for personalized cancer immunotherapies, and serve as prospective predictors for tumor survival prognosis and immune checkpoint blockade responses. The development of cancer therapies will be aided by understanding the mechanism underlying neoantigen-induced anti-tumor immune response and by streamlining the process of neoantigen-based immunotherapies. This review provides an overview on the identification and characterization of neoantigens and outlines the clinical applications of prospective immunotherapeutic strategies based on neoantigens. We also explore their current status, inherent challenges, and clinical translation potential.

Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Combination Strategies to Improve Outcome

Due to the absence of hormone receptor (both estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors) along with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) amplification, the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cannot benefit from endocrine or anti-HER-2 therapy. For a long time, chemotherapy was the only systemic treatment for TNBC. Due to the lack of effective treatment options, the prognosis for TNBC is extremely poor. The successful application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) launched the era of immunotherapy in TNBC. However, the current findings show modest efficacy of programmed cell death- (ligand) 1 (PD-(L)1) inhibitors monotherapy and only a small proportion of patients can benefit from this approach. Based on the basic principles of immunotherapy and the characteristics of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in TNBC, immune combination therapy is expected to further enhance the efficacy and expand the beneficiary population of patients. Given the diversity of drugs that can be combined, it is important to select effective biomarkers to identify the target population. Moreover, the side effects associated with the combination of multiple drugs should also be considered.

Comprehensive analysis of nicotinamide metabolism-related signature for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response in breast cancer

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among women. Nicotinamide (NAM) metabolism regulates the development of multiple tumors. Herein, we sought to develop a NAM metabolism-related signature (NMRS) to make predictions of survival, tumor microenvironment (TME) and treatment efficacy in BC patients.

Methods

Transcriptional profiles and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed. NAM metabolism-related genes (NMRGs) were retrieved from the Molecular Signatures Database. Consensus clustering was performed on the NMRGs and the differentially expressed genes between different clusters were identified. Univariate Cox, Lasso, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were sequentially conducted to develop the NAM metabolism-related signature (NMRS), which was then validated in the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) database and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) single-cell RNA-seq data. Further studies, such as gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), ESTIMATE, CIBERSORT, SubMap, and Immunophenoscore (IPS) algorithm, cancer-immunity cycle (CIC), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and drug sensitivity were performed to assess the TME and treatment response.

Results

We identified a 6-gene NMRS that was significantly associated with BC prognosis as an independent indicator. We performed risk stratification according to the NMRS and the low-risk group showed preferable clinical outcomes (P < 0.001). A comprehensive nomogram was developed and showed excellent predictive value for prognosis. GSEA demonstrated that the low-risk group was predominantly enriched in immune-associated pathways, whereas the high-risk group was enriched in cancer-related pathways. The ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT algorithms revealed that the low-risk group had a higher abundance of anti-tumor immunocyte infiltration (P < 0.05). Results of Submap, IPS, CIC, TMB, and external immunotherapy cohort (iMvigor210) analyses showed that the low-risk group were indicative of better immunotherapy response (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The novel signature offers a promising way to evaluate the prognosis and treatment efficacy in BC patients, which may facilitate clinical practice and management.

The Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Modulating the Breast Cancer Microenvironment

The role of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the breast tumor microenvironment (TME) is significant and multifaceted. MSCs are recruited to breast tumor sites through molecular signals released by tumor sites. Once in the TME, MSCs undergo polarization and interact with various cell populations, including immune cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), cancer stem cells (CSCs), and breast cancer cells. In most cases, MSCs play roles in breast cancer therapeutic resistance, but there is also evidence that indicates their abilities to sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. MSCs possess inherent regenerative and homing properties, making them attractive candidates for cell-based therapies. Therefore, MSCs can be engineered to express therapeutic molecules or deliver anti-cancer agents directly to tumor sites. Unraveling the intricate relationship between MSCs and the breast TME has the potential to uncover novel therapeutic targets and advance our understanding of breast cancer biology.

NADPH Selective Depletion Nanomedicine-Mediated Radio-Immunometabolism Regulation for Strengthening Anti-PDL1 Therapy against TNBC

Anti-PD(L)1 immunotherapy recently arises as an effective treatment against triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) but is only applicable to a small portion of TNBC patients due to the low PD-L1 expression and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). To address these challenges, a multifunctional "drug-like" copolymer that possesses the auto-changeable upper critical solution temperature and the capacity of scavenging reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) inside tumor cells is synthesized and employed to develop a hypoxia-targeted and BMS202 (small molecule antagonist of PD-1/PD-L1 interactions)-loaded nanomedicine (BMS202@HZP NPs), combining the anti-PD-L1 therapy and the low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) against TNBC. In addition to the controlled release of BMS202 in the hypoxic TNBC, BMS202@HZP NPs benefit the LDRT by upregulating the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP, the primary cellular source for NADPH) of TME whereas scavenging the NADPH inside tumor cells. As a result, the BMS202@HZP NPs-mediated LDRT upregulate the PD-L1 expression of tumor to promote anti-PD-L1 therapy response while reprogramming the immunometabolism of TME to alleviate its immunosuppression. This innovative nanomedicine-mediated radio-immunometabolism regulation provides a promising strategy to reinforce the anti-PD-L1 therapy against TNBC.

Focused ultrasound-mediated small-molecule delivery to potentiate immune checkpoint blockade in solid tumors

In the last decade, immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized the standard of treatment for solid tumors. Despite success in several immunogenic tumor types evidenced by improved survival, ICB remains largely unresponsive, especially in "cold tumors" with poor lymphocyte infiltration. In addition, side effects such as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are also obstacles for the clinical translation of ICB. Recent studies have shown that focused ultrasound (FUS), a non-invasive technology proven to be effective and safe for tumor treatment in clinical settings, could boost the therapeutic effect of ICB while alleviating the potential side effects. Most importantly, the application of FUS to ultrasound-sensitive small particles, such as microbubbles (MBs) or nanoparticles (NPs), allows for precise delivery and release of genetic materials, catalysts and chemotherapeutic agents to tumor sites, thus enhancing the anti-tumor effects of ICB while minimizing toxicity. In this review, we provide an updated overview of the progress made in recent years concerning ICB therapy assisted by FUS-controlled small-molecule delivery systems. We highlight the value of different FUS-augmented small-molecules delivery systems to ICB and describe the synergetic effects and underlying mechanisms of these combination strategies. Furthermore, we discuss the limitations of the current strategies and the possible ways that FUS-mediated small-molecule delivery systems could boost novel personalized ICB treatments for solid tumors.

Immune microenvironment and clinical feature analyses based on a prognostic model in lymph node-positive breast cancer

Background

If lymph node metastasis occurs in breast cancer patients, the disease can progress rapidly. Based on the infiltrative immune cells of breast cancer patients with lymph node positivity, we constructed the LNPRS for selecting prognostic predictors.

Methods

The LNPRS was established and the predictive value of the LNPRS was verified by independent testing cohorts. A nomogram was also established to confirm the therapeutic guidance significance of the LNPRS. The correlation of the LNPRS with tumor mutation burden, immune microenvironment score, immune checkpoints, the proportion of tumor-infiltrating immune cells, and GSEA and GSVA enrichment pathways were also evaluated.

Results

In the training cohort, the overall survival of breast cancer patients who had high LNPRS was shorter than that of patients who had low LNPRS (7.98 years versus 20.42 years, P-value< 8.16E-11). The AUC values for 5-, 10-, and 15-years were 0.787, 0.739, and 0.800, respectively. The ability to predict prognosis for the LNPRS was also tested in 3 independent testing cohorts. Furthermore, the predictive value of the LNPRS for chemotherapy and immunotherapy was also proven. The GSEA and GSVA showed that the LNPRS was closely related to the activation of T and B lymphocytes and IFN-γ secretion. Moreover, breast cancer patients with low LNPRS had higher TME scores than those with high LNPRS.

Conclusion

We can conclude that the LNPRS is a robust prognostic biomarker in breast cancer patients with positive lymph nodes and may be helpful for patients to make a clinical decision.

Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors: A New Line of Attack in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Poor prognosis is a distinctive feature of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Chemotherapy has long represented the main and unique treatment for patients with TNBC. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were investigated in several clinical trials and were approved for clinical use in TNBC patients that express programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line setting. ICIs are also being investigated in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings for TNBC. This chapter aims to discuss different ICIs used to treat all TNBC stages to date.

Antitumor effect of CAR-T cells targeting transmembrane tumor necrosis factor alpha combined with PD-1 mAb on breast cancers

BACKGROUND

Our previous study showed that transmembrane tumor necrosis factor alpha (tmTNF-α) is overexpressed in primary breast cancers including triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). Chimeric antigen receptor engineered-T (CAR-T) cells have been successfully used mainly in B-cell malignancies.

METHODS

We generated CAR-T cells targeting tmTNF-α but not secreted tumor necrosis factor alpha and assessed the antitumor effect of the CAR-T cells on tmTNF-α-expressing breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

Our tmTNF-α CAR-T cells showed potent cytotoxicity against tmTNF-α-expressing breast cancer cells but not tmTNF-α-negative tumor cells with increased secretion of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukin (IL)-2 in vitro. In tmTNF-α-overexpressing TNBC-bearing mice, the tmTNF-α CAR-T therapy induced evident tumor regression, prolonged survival and increased serum concentrations of IFN-γ and IL-2. However, we found thattmTNF-α induced programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression through the p38 pathway via TNF receptor (TNFR) and through the NF-κB and AKT pathways via outside-to-inside (reverse) signaling, which might limit the efficacy of the CAR-T cell therapy. Blockage of the PD-L1/programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway by PD-1 monoclonal antibody significantly enhanced the antitumor effect of the tmTNF-α CAR-T cell therapy in vitro and in vivo, and the combination was effective for antiprimary tumors and had a tendency to increase the antimetastasis effect of the CAR-T cell therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest a potent antitumor efficacy of the tmTNF-α CAR-T cells that can be enhanced by anti-PD-L1/PD-1 because high PD-L1 expression in TNBC was induced by the tmTNF-α signaling, indicating a promising individual therapy for tmTNF-α-positive breast cancers including TNBC.

PPAR-δ as a prognostic biomarker and its association with immune infiltrates in breast cancer PPAR-δ as a prognostic biomarker and its association with immune infiltrates in breast cancer

While peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (PPAR-δ) and its associated signaling pathways have been shown to play an important regulatory role in various malignant tumors, in breast cancer, its potential influence on immune infiltration and its ability to serve as a prognostic marker remains unclear. BRCA patient samples with matched paracancerous samples were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). PPAR-δ expression, its potential effect on immune cell infiltration and its association to clinicopathological features were examined. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and Single-Sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) were utilized for functional and pathway enrichment and to quantify the extent of immune cell infiltration. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis (nomogram) were performed to assess the association between PPAR- δ and predicted survival. To confirm these findings, an allograft tumor mouse model was generated and treated with a PPAR-δ inhibitor to examine the role of PPAR-δ expression in vivo; while immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to examine PPAR-δ expression in paired BRCA patient samples in vitro. Overall, the findings presented herein suggest that PPAR-δ plays a crucial role in breast cancer progression and prognosis and may serve as a survival predictive biomarker.

Risk stratification based on DNA damage-repair-related signature reflects the microenvironmental feature, metabolic status and therapeutic response of breast cancer

DNA damage-repair machinery participates in maintaining genomic integrity and affects tumorigenesis. Molecular signatures based on DNA damage-repair-related genes (DRGs) capable of comprehensively indicating the prognosis, tumor immunometabolic profile and therapeutic responsiveness of breast cancer (BRCA) patients are still lacking. Integrating public datasets and bioinformatics algorithms, we developed a robust prognostic signature based on 27 DRGs. Multiple patient cohorts identified significant differences in various types of survival between high- and low-risk patients stratified by the signature. The signature correlated well with clinicopathological factors and could serve as an independent prognostic indicator for BRCA patients. Furthermore, low-risk tumors were characterized by more infiltrated CD8⁺ T cells, follicular helper T cells, M1 macrophages, activated NK cells and resting dendritic cells, and fewer M0 and M2 macrophages. The favorable immune infiltration patterns of low-risk tumors were also accompanied by specific metabolic profiles, decreased DNA replication, and enhanced antitumor immunity. Low-risk patients may respond better to immunotherapy, and experience improved outcomes with conventional chemotherapy or targeted medicine. Real-world immunotherapy and chemotherapy cohorts verified the predictive results. Additionally, four small molecule compounds promising to target high-risk tumors were predicted. In vitro experiments confirmed the high expression of GNPNAT1 and MORF4L2 in BRCA tissues and their association with immune cells, and the knockdown of these two DRGs suppressed the proliferation of human BRCA cells. In summary, this DNA damage-repair-related signature performed well in predicting patient prognosis, immunometabolic profiles and therapeutic sensitivity, hopefully contributing to precision medicine and new target discovery of BRCA.

Advances in the structural characterization of complexes of therapeutic antibodies with PD-1 or PD-L1

Antibody-based immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-based therapeutics have become effective clinical applications for cancers. Applications of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to de-activate the PD-1-PD-L1 pathway could effectively reverse the phenotype of depleted activated thymocytes (T cells) to recover their anti-tumoral activities. High-resolution structures of the complexes of the therapeutic monoclonal antibodies with PD-1 or PD-L1 have revealed the key inter-molecular interactions and provided valuable insights into the fundamental mechanisms by which these antibodies inhibit PD-L1-PD-1 binding. Each anti-PD-1 mAb exhibits a unique blockade mechanism, such as interference with large PD-1-PD-L1 contacting interfaces, steric hindrance by overlapping a small area of this site, or binding to an N-glycosylated site. In contrast, all therapeutic anti-PD-L1 mAbs bind to a similar area of PD-L1. Here, we summarized advances in the structural characterization of the complexes of commercial mAbs that target PD-1 or PD-L1. In particular, we focus on the unique characteristics of those mAb structures, epitopes, and blockade mechanisms. It is well known that the use of antibodies as anti-tumor drugs has increased recently and both PD-1 and PD-L1 have attracted substantial attention as target for antibodies derived from new technologies. By focusing on structural characterization, this review aims to aid the development of novel antibodies targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 in the future.

Heterologous prime-boost cellular vaccination induces potent antitumor immunity against triple negative breast cancer

Introduction

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive and hard-to-treat subtype of breast cancer, affecting 10-20% of all women diagnosed with breast cancer. Surgery, chemotherapy and hormone/Her2 targeted therapies are the cornerstones of treatment for breast cancer, but women with TNBC do not benefit from these treatments. Although the prognosis is dismal, immunotherapies hold significant promise in TNBC, even in wide spread disease because TNBC is infiltrated with more immune cells. This preclinical study is proposing to optimize an oncolytic virus-infected cell vaccine (ICV) based on a prime-boost vaccination strategy to address this unmet clinical need.

Methods

We used various classes of immunomodulators to improve the immunogenicity of whole tumor cells in the prime vaccine, followed by their infection with oncolytic Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSVd51) to deliver the boost vaccine. For in vivo studies, we compared the efficacy of a homologous prime-boost vaccination regimen to a heterologous strategy by treating 4T1 tumor bearing BALB/c mice and further by conducting re-challenge studies to evaluate immune memory responses in surviving mice. Due to the aggressive nature of 4T1 tumor spread (akin to stage IV TNBC in human patients), we also compared early surgical resection of primary tumors versus later surgical resection combined with vaccination.

Results

In vitro results demonstrated that immunogenic cell death (ICD) markers and pro-inflammatory cytokines were released at the highest levels following treatment of mouse 4T1 TNBC cells with oxaliplatin chemotherapy and influenza vaccine. These ICD inducers also contributed towards higher dendritic cell recruitment and activation. With the top ICD inducers at hand, we observed that treatment of TNBC-bearing mice with the influenza virus-modified prime vaccine followed by VSVd51 infected boost vaccine resulted in the best survival. Furthermore, higher frequencies of both effector and central memory T cells along with a complete absence of recurrent tumors were observed in re-challenged mice. Importantly, early surgical resection combined with prime-boost vaccination led to improved overall survival in mice.

Conclusion

Taken together, this novel cancer vaccination strategy following early surgical resection could be a promising therapeutic avenue for TNBC patients.

The Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy

Over the years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have become a powerful treatment strategy in the field of cancer immunotherapy. In the last decade, the number of FDA-approved CPIs has been increasing prominently, opening new horizons for the treatment of a wide range of tumor types. Pointedly, three immune checkpoint molecules have been under extensive research, which include cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand-1 (PD-L1). Despite remarkable success, not all patients respond positively to therapy, which highlights the complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and immune system. This has led to the identification of molecular biomarkers to predict response and toxicity. In addition, there has been an emerging focus on developing new delivery and targeting approaches for better drug efficacy and potency. In this review, we highlight the mechanism of action of major CPIs, their clinical impact, variation in effectiveness, response prediction, updated clinical indications, current challenges and limitations, promising novel approaches, and future directions.

Increased expression of ECT2 predicts the poor prognosis of breast cancer patients

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women. Recent studies have indicated that aberrant activation of Rho GTPases relates to the malignant properties of breast cancer cells. As the guanine nucleotide exchange factor of Rho GTPases, the role of ECT2 (epithelial cell transforming 2) in breast cancer is still unclear. Tissue microarrays and multiple public databases were utilized to investigate the relationship between ECT2 level and clinical-pathological features of breast cancer patients. Kaplan Meier-plotter online tool and tissue microarray with survival information were used to investigate the predictive value for breast cancer. Here, we found increased ECT2 level was highly associated with advanced TNM stage, poor differentiation, and loss of hormone receptors of breast cancer. Gene expression profile showed that ECT2 level was closely correlated to cell-proliferation-associated pathways. Integration analysis using public databases and tissue microarray indicated that high ECT2 was an adverse prognostic factor for breast cancer patients. We believe the ECT2 level might be a valuable complement for commercially available predictors such as the 21 genes test. Furthermore, ECT2 would be a novel target for drug development for breast cancer.

Identification of an Immune-Related Gene Signature Associated with Prognosis and Tumor Microenvironment in Esophageal Cancer

Background

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a common malignant tumor of the digestive system with high mortality and morbidity. Current evidence suggests that immune cells and molecules regulate the initiation and progression of EC. Accordingly, it is necessary to identify immune-related genes (IRGs) affecting the biological behaviors and microenvironmental characteristics of EC.

Methods

Bioinformatics methods, including differential expression analysis, Cox regression, and immune infiltration prediction, were conducted using R software to analyze the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort was used to validate the prognostic signature. Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups for further analyses, including functional enrichment, immune infiltration, checkpoint relevance, clinicopathological characteristics, and therapeutic sensitivity analyses.

Results

A prognostic signature was established based on 21 IRGs (S100A7, S100A7A, LCN1, CR2, STAT4, GAST, ANGPTL5, TRAV39, F2RL2, PGLYRP3, KLRD1, TRIM36, PDGFA, SLPI, PCSK2, APLN, TICAM1, ITPR3, MAPK9, GATA4, and PLAU). Compared with high-risk patients, better overall survival rates and clinicopathological characteristics were found in low-risk patients. The areas under the curve of the two cohorts were 0.885 and 0.718, respectively. Higher proportions of resting CD4⁺ memory T lymphocytes, M2 macrophages, and resting dendritic cells and lower proportions of follicular helper T lymphocytes, plasma cells, and neutrophils were found in the high-risk tumors. Moreover, the high-risk group showed higher expression of CD44 and TNFSF4, lower expression of PDCD1 and CD40, and higher TIDE scores, suggesting they may respond poorly to immunotherapy. High-risk patients responded better to chemotherapeutic agents such as docetaxel, doxorubicin, and gemcitabine. Furthermore, IRGs associated with tumor progression, including PDGFA, ITPR3, SLPI, TICAM1, and GATA4, were identified.

Conclusion

Our immune-related signature yielded reliable value in evaluating the prognosis, microenvironmental characteristics, and therapeutic sensitivity of EC and may help with the precise treatment of this patient population.

Identification of prognostic biomarkers among ICAMs in the breast cancer microenvironment

BACKGROUND

Intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAMs) in the tumor microenvironment are closely related to immunity and affect the prognosis of cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study is to explore the correlation between ICAM expression, mutation, methylation and immunity and their prognostic value in breast cancer (BC) is not clear.

METHODS

Online databases and tools such as UALCAN, COSMIC, cBioPortal, MethSurv, PrognoScan, Kaplan-Meier Plotter, GSCA and TIMER were utilized in this study.

RESULTS

We found that the mRNA and protein expression levels of ICAM1 were upregulated in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) compared with normal tissues, and TNBC patients with high expression of ICAM1 had better overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The main types of ICAM1 gene variants were missense mutation and amplification, and ICAM1 showed a lower level of methylation in TNBC cancer tissues than in normal tissues, which was contrary to the high expression levels of ICAM1 mRNA and protein. Next, the function of ICAM1 was mainly related to the activation of apoptosis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and inhibition of the androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor (ER) pathways. Meanwhile, functional pathway enrichment results showed that ICAM1 was also involved in the immune regulation process of BC. Furthermore, the expression of ICAM1 was positively associated with 6 types of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, B cells, neutrophils, macrophages and dendritic cells) and was also positively related to the expression of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4).

CONCLUSIONS

Our research indicated that ICAM1 was likely to be a potential therapeutic target in TNBC.