201
|
Wei Q, Jiang H, Xiao Z, Baker A, Young MR, Veenstra TD, Colburn NH. Sulfiredoxin-Peroxiredoxin IV axis promotes human lung cancer progression through modulation of specific phosphokinase signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:7004-9. [PMID: 21487000 PMCID: PMC3084097 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1013012108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Oxidative stress is known to cause tumorigenesis through induction of DNA and lipid damage. It also promotes cancer progression through a largely unknown mechanism. Sulfiredoxin (Srx) is a novel oxidative stress-induced antioxidant protein whose function in tumorigenesis and cancer progression has not been well studied. We report that Srx is highly expressed in human lung cancer. Knockdown of Srx reduces anchorage-independent colony formation, cell migration, and invasion of human lung cancer cells. Srx preferentially interacts with Peroxiredoxin (Prx) IV relative to other Prxs due to its intrinsic higher binding affinity. Knockdown of Prx IV recapitulates the phenotypic changes of depleting Srx. Disruption or enhancement of the Srx-Prx IV axis leads respectively to reduction or acceleration of tumor growth and metastasis formation in vivo. Through identification and validation of the downstream mediators we unraveled the Srx-mediated signaling network that traverses AP-1-activating and other phosphokinase signaling cascades. Our work reveals that the Srx-Prx IV axis is critical for lung cancer maintenance and metastasis, suggesting that targeting the Srx-Prx IV axis may provide unique effective strategies for cancer prevention and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiou Wei
- Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702; and
| | - Hong Jiang
- Laboratory of Molecular Cell Biology, Clinical Service Program, and
| | - Zhen Xiao
- Laboratory of Proteomics and Analytical Technologies, Advanced Technology Program, SAIC-Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702
| | - Alyson Baker
- Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702; and
| | - Matthew R. Young
- Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702; and
| | - Timothy D. Veenstra
- Laboratory of Proteomics and Analytical Technologies, Advanced Technology Program, SAIC-Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702
| | - Nancy H. Colburn
- Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702; and
| |
Collapse
|
202
|
Segev Y, Riskin-Mashiah S, Lavie O, Auslender R. Assisted reproductive technologies: medical safety issues in the older woman. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011; 20:853-61. [PMID: 21510806 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract Previous study has shown that in the United States, most maternal deaths and severe obstetric complications due to chronic disease are potentially preventable through improved medical care before conception. Many women who need assisted reproductive technology (ART) because of infertility are older than the average pregnant woman. Risks for such chronic diseases as obesity, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and malignancy greatly increase with maternal age. Chronic illness increases the risk of the in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure and is also associated with increased obstetric risk and even death. The objective of this review is to outline the potential risks for older women who undergo ART procedures and pregnancy and to characterize guidelines for evaluation before enrollment in ART programs. A PubMed search revealed that very few studies have related to pre-ART medical evaluation. Therefore, we suggest a pre-ART medical assessment, comparable to the recommendations of the American Heart Association before noncompetitive physical activity and the American Society of Anesthesiologists before elective surgery. This assessment should include a thorough medical questionnaire and medical examination. Further evaluation and treatment should follow to ensure the safety of ART procedures and of ensuing pregnancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yakir Segev
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, 7 Michal Street, Haifa, Israel .
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
203
|
Colas E, Perez C, Cabrera S, Pedrola N, Monge M, Castellvi J, Eyzaguirre F, Gregorio J, Ruiz A, Llaurado M, Rigau M, Garcia M, Ertekin T, Montes M, Lopez-Lopez R, Carreras R, Xercavins J, Ortega A, Maes T, Rosell E, Doll A, Abal M, Reventos J, Gil-Moreno A. Molecular markers of endometrial carcinoma detected in uterine aspirates. Int J Cancer 2011; 129:2435-44. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2010] [Accepted: 11/03/2010] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
204
|
Wakefield CE, Watts KJ, Meiser B, Sansom-Daly U, Barratt A, Mann GJ, Lobb EA, Gaff CL, Howard K, Patel MI. Development and pilot testing of an online screening decision aid for men with a family history of prostate cancer. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2011; 83:64-72. [PMID: 20580521 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2009] [Revised: 05/14/2010] [Accepted: 05/25/2010] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop and pilot test an online screening decision aid (DA) for men with a family history of prostate cancer. METHODS Eligible men (with no previous prostate cancer diagnosis) were recruited through relatives attending a urology outpatient clinic. Men evaluated the DA in two stages. First, they appraised a paper-based version using a questionnaire (n=22). Second, the same men were asked to reflect on an interactive web-based version via a semi-structured telephone interview (n=20). RESULTS Men evaluated both forms of the DA positively. Of the paper-based version, the majority of participants found the DA useful (91%), and that it contained enough information to make a screening decision (73%). All participants reported that the online DA was easy to use and navigate. Most participants reported that a website was their preferred mode of receiving prostate cancer screening information (70%). CONCLUSION The developed DA may represent the first online decision-making tool designed specifically for men with a family history prostate cancer that presents age and risk specific information to the user. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Comprehensive evaluations of the efficacy and impact of educational interventions such as this are crucial to improve services for individuals making informed screening decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E Wakefield
- Psychosocial Research Group, Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
205
|
Johansson M, Holmström B, Hinchliffe SR, Bergh A, Stenman UH, Hallmans G, Wiklund F, Stattin P. Combining 33 genetic variants with prostate-specific antigen for prediction of prostate cancer: longitudinal study. Int J Cancer 2011; 130:129-37. [PMID: 21328341 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2010] [Accepted: 12/30/2010] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate if a genetic risk score including 33 common genetic variants improves prediction of prostate cancer when added to measures of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). We conducted a case-control study nested within the Northern Sweden Health and Disease Cohort (NSHDC), a prospective cohort in northern Sweden. A total of 520 cases and 988 controls matched for age, and date of blood draw were identified by linkage between the regional cancer register and the NSHDC. Receiver operating characteristic curves with area under curve (AUC) estimates were used as measures of prostate cancer prediction. The AUC for the genetic risk score was 64.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 61.4-67.2], and the AUC for total PSA and the ratio of free to total PSA was 86.2% (95% CI = 84.4-88.1). A model including the genetic risk score, total PSA and the ratio of free to total PSA increased the AUC to 87.2% (95% CI = 85.4-89.0, p difference = 0.002). The addition of a genetic risk score to PSA resulted in a marginal improvement in prostate cancer prediction that would not seem useful for clinical risk assessment.
Collapse
|
206
|
Spencer KL, Olson LM, Schnetz-Boutaud N, Gallins P, Agarwal A, Iannaccone A, Kritchevsky SB, Garcia M, Nalls MA, Newman AB, Scott WK, Pericak-Vance MA, Haines JL. Using genetic variation and environmental risk factor data to identify individuals at high risk for age-related macular degeneration. PLoS One 2011; 6:e17784. [PMID: 21455292 PMCID: PMC3063776 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2010] [Accepted: 02/09/2011] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
A major goal of personalized medicine is to pre-symptomatically identify individuals at high risk for disease using knowledge of each individual's particular genetic profile and constellation of environmental risk factors. With the identification of several well-replicated risk factors for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of legal blindness in older adults, this previously unreachable goal is beginning to seem less elusive. However, recently developed algorithms have either been much less accurate than expected, given the strong effects of the identified risk factors, or have not been applied to independent datasets, leaving unknown how well they would perform in the population at large. We sought to increase accuracy by using novel modeling strategies, including multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) and grammatical evolution of neural networks (GENN), in addition to the traditional logistic regression approach. Furthermore, we rigorously designed and tested our models in three distinct datasets: a Vanderbilt-Miami (VM) clinic-based case-control dataset, a VM family dataset, and the population-based Age-related Maculopathy Ancillary (ARMA) Study cohort. Using a consensus approach to combine the results from logistic regression and GENN models, our algorithm was successful in differentiating between high- and low-risk groups (sensitivity 77.0%, specificity 74.1%). In the ARMA cohort, the positive and negative predictive values were 63.3% and 70.7%, respectively. We expect that future efforts to refine this algorithm by increasing the sample size available for model building, including novel susceptibility factors as they are discovered, and by calibrating the model for diverse populations will improve accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylee L Spencer
- Center for Human Genetics Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
207
|
Koga Y, Yasunaga M, Kajikawa M, Shimizu E, Takamatsu R, Kataoka R, Murase Y, Sasajima Y, Kasamatsu T, Kato T, Onda T, Ikeda S, Ishikawa M, Ishitani K, Ohta H, Matsumura Y. Novel virtual cytological analysis for the detection of endometrial cancer cells using autoscan fluoromicroscopy. Cancer Sci 2011; 102:1068-75. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01903.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
208
|
Zapka JM, Klabunde CN, Arora NK, Yuan G, Smith JL, Kobrin SC. Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011; 20:509-21. [PMID: 21239688 PMCID: PMC3050999 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary care physician (PCP) actions are pivotal to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening performance, and guidelines recommend discussion with patients about test options and potential benefits and harms. This article profiles patterns of discussion about and recommendations for screening and explores potential associations with multilevel factors (patient, clinician, practice, and environment). METHODS In 2009, we analyzed data from 1,266 physicians responding to the 2006-2007 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Recommendations and Practices for Breast, Cervical, Colorectal, and Lung Cancer Screening (absolute response rate=69.3%; cooperation rate=75.0%). Descriptive statistics examined physicians' reports of discussion and recommendations. Multivariate analyses assessed the associations of these practices with multilevel factors. RESULTS Although few respondents reported discussion of all options, 46% usually discuss more than one option; the vast majority of these respondents discuss fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and colonoscopy (49%) or FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy (32%). Of physicians who discuss more than one option, a majority reported usually recommending one or more test options, most commonly colonoscopy alone (43%) and FOBT and colonoscopy (43%). Several personal characteristics (specialty), perceived patient characteristics (prefer physician to decide), practice characteristics (geographic location), and community barriers (specialist availability) were independently associated with discussion and/or recommendation patterns. CONCLUSIONS PCPs do not discuss the full menu of test options, but many report selecting one or two options for discussion and recommendation. To ensure that patients' perspectives and concerns are elicited and considered, patient decision-making approaches should be considered. IMPACT Attention to informed decision making in CRC screening will be important for enhancing patient-centered quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M Zapka
- Department of Medicine, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 135 Cannon Street, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
209
|
Friedman DB, Koskan A, Rose ID. Prostate cancer guidelines on Web 2.0-based sites: the screening dilemma continues online. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2011; 26:188-93. [PMID: 21153573 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-010-0180-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Little is known about prostate cancer (PrCA) screening information on participatory, interactive, and consumer-generated websites collectively referred to as Web 2.0. A content analysis was conducted of PrCA resources on four highly trafficked Web 2.0 social bookmarking sites. A total of 127 webpages were analyzed. Most content was from news websites (48.9%) and blogs (37.8%). PrCA screening was mentioned on 95.3% of pages; only 30.7% discussed the prostate-specific antigen test. Less than half (43.8%) mentioned current screening guidelines. PrCA content is inconsistent on Web 2.0 sites. Future research should assess the readability and usability of Web 2.0 cancer resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela B Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 800 Sumter Street, Room 220B, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
210
|
Lee K, Lim HT, Hwang SS, Chae DW, Park SM. Socio-economic disparities in behavioural risk factors for cancer and use of cancer screening services in Korean adults aged 30 years and older: the Third Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005 (KNHANES III). Public Health 2011; 124:698-704. [PMID: 20888016 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2009] [Revised: 03/20/2010] [Accepted: 07/06/2010] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the current status of cancer-related health disparities in cancer risk factors and the use of cancer screening services by Korean adults. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional survey study. METHODS The disparities of behavioural cancer risk factors and use of cancer screening services according to equivalent monthly household income were evaluated, using multivariate logistic regression analysis, among 6466 subjects aged ≥30 years and who completed the health promotion knowledge, attitude and practice survey, which is part of the Third Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. RESULTS In men, smoking (P for trend = 0.05) and physical inactivity (P for trend = 0.05) were more common in the lower-income group, while high-risk drinking (P for trend <0.01) was more common in the higher-income group. In women, physical inactivity (P for trend <0.01) was more common in the lower-income group, while smoking and high-risk drinking showed no income disparities. Income disparities were also found in the degree of participation in cancer screening programmes. Men in the highest income quintile underwent more screening for both colorectal and gastric cancer than men in the lowest income quintile and men in the second to fourth income quintiles (P for trend <0.01 for both). Women in the highest income quintile underwent more screening for cervical (P for trend <0.01) and gastric (P for trend = 0.04) cancer, while income disparities were not seen for participation in colorectal or breast cancer screening. CONCLUSIONS In order to decrease behavioural risk factors and promote participation in cancer screening programmes, more targeted efforts are needed for cancer prevention among lower-income Koreans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Lee
- Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Korea
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
211
|
Hammond WP, Mohottige D, Chantala K, Hastings JF, Neighbors HW, Snowden L. Determinants of usual source of care disparities among African American and Caribbean Black men: findings from the National Survey of American Life. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2011; 22:157-75. [PMID: 21317513 PMCID: PMC3062470 DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Aday-Andersen model was used as a framework for investigating the contribution of immigration status (i.e., nativity and acculturation), socioeconomic factors, health care access, health status, and health insurance to usual source of health care (USOC) in a nationally representative sample of African American (n=551) and Caribbean Black men (n=1,217). METHODS We used the 2001-2003 National Survey of American Life, a nationally representative household survey of non-institutionalized U.S. Blacks to conduct descriptive and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Older age, more health conditions, neighborhood medical clinic access, and health insurance were associated with higher odds of reporting a USOC. Odds were lower for men with lower-middle incomes and poorer mental health status. Having health insurance was associated with higher odds of reporting a USOC for African American men but lower odds among Caribbean Black men. Odds were higher in the presence of more health conditions for African American men than for Caribbean Black men. CONCLUSIONS Health care reform policies aimed solely at increasing health insurance may not uniformly eliminate USOC disparities disfavoring U.S. and foreign-born non-Hispanic Black men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wizdom Powell Hammond
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7440, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
212
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND family history of prostate cancer is a risk factor for prostate cancer occurrence. Differently from other neoplasms no major predisposing gene has been identified. MATERIAL AND METHODS this review article presents the controversial results of studies about the prognostic and predictive role of family history in prostate cancer, reports the discovered predisposing genes, and biologic and pathologic findings. RESULTS mortality from PC remains a significant health care problem, but no trial investigated if it changed in presence of positive family history. The largest family study yet published concluded that men with family history are diagnosed and die at earlier ages than men without it. However, it failed to stress the prognostic value of family history. Genome-wide association studies of prostate cancer have identified a number of genetic variants at different loci in different populations. Prostate neoplasms of patients with positive family history exhibit a different pattern of expression of genes related with estrogen and androgen metabolism within the tumor. High-penetrance and low-penetrance genes in diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer, difficulties to define a classification and to quantify relative risks of single genes, documented gene-environment interactions are discussed. CONCLUSION family history stands for both shared genetic and environmental factors and their interaction. The availability of prostate-specific antigen test could explain partly the high familial risk, among brothers or shortly after the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Polymorphisms in genes associated with prostate cancer probably represent the most part of familial prostate cancer burden. An increasing knowledge of disregulated cellular pathways of lethal prostate cancer could define which of all genetic alterations have a role in defining new preventive and therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
|
213
|
Mitra AV, Bancroft EK, Barbachano Y, Page EC, Foster CS, Jameson C, Mitchell G, Lindeman GJ, Stapleton A, Suthers G, Evans DG, Cruger D, Blanco I, Mercer C, Kirk J, Maehle L, Hodgson S, Walker L, Izatt L, Douglas F, Tucker K, Dorkins H, Clowes V, Male A, Donaldson A, Brewer C, Doherty R, Bulman B, Osther PJ, Salinas M, Eccles D, Axcrona K, Jobson I, Newcombe B, Cybulski C, Rubinstein WS, Buys S, Townshend S, Friedman E, Domchek S, Ramon y Cajal T, Spigelman A, Teo SH, Nicolai N, Aaronson N, Ardern-Jones A, Bangma C, Dearnaley D, Eyfjord J, Falconer A, Grönberg H, Hamdy F, Johannsson O, Khoo V, Kote-Jarai Z, Lilja H, Lubinski J, Melia J, Moynihan C, Peock S, Rennert G, Schröder F, Sibley P, Suri M, Wilson P, Bignon YJ, Strom S, Tischkowitz M, Liljegren A, Ilencikova D, Abele A, Kyriacou K, van Asperen C, Kiemeney L, Easton DF, Eeles RA. Targeted prostate cancer screening in men with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 detects aggressive prostate cancer: preliminary analysis of the results of the IMPACT study. BJU Int 2011; 107:28-39. [PMID: 20840664 PMCID: PMC6057750 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09648.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of targeted prostate cancer screening in men with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, an international study, IMPACT (Identification of Men with a genetic predisposition to ProstAte Cancer: Targeted screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and controls), was established. This is the first multicentre screening study targeted at men with a known genetic predisposition to prostate cancer. A preliminary analysis of the data is reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men aged 40-69 years from families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were offered annual prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing, and those with PSA > 3 ng/mL, were offered a prostate biopsy. Controls were men age-matched (± 5 years) who were negative for the familial mutation. RESULTS In total, 300 men were recruited (205 mutation carriers; 89 BRCA1, 116 BRCA2 and 95 controls) over 33 months. At the baseline screen (year 1), 7.0% (21/300) underwent a prostate biopsy. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in ten individuals, a prevalence of 3.3%. The positive predictive value of PSA screening in this cohort was 47·6% (10/21). One prostate cancer was diagnosed at year 2. Of the 11 prostate cancers diagnosed, nine were in mutation carriers, two in controls, and eight were clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS The present study shows that the positive predictive value of PSA screening in BRCA mutation carriers is high and that screening detects clinically significant prostate cancer. These results support the rationale for continued screening in such men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth K. Bancroft
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - Yolanda Barbachano
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | | | - C. S. Foster
- Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - C. Jameson
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - G. Mitchell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Victoria, Australia
| | - G. J. Lindeman
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - A. Stapleton
- Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - G. Suthers
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - D. Cruger
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - I. Blanco
- Catalonian Institute of Oncology, L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C. Mercer
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, The Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - J. Kirk
- Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - L. Maehle
- Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - S. Hodgson
- St George’s Hospital, Tooting, London, UK
| | - L. Walker
- Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | | | - F. Douglas
- Institute of Human Genetics, Newcastle, UK
| | - K. Tucker
- Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - H. Dorkins
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
| | - V. Clowes
- Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - A. Male
- NE Thames Regional Genetics Service, Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | | | - C. Brewer
- Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - R. Doherty
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Victoria, Australia
| | - B. Bulman
- St Mary’s Hospital, CMFT, Manchester, UK
| | - P. J. Osther
- Department of Urology, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Fredericia, Denmark
| | - M. Salinas
- Catalonian Institute of Oncology, L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D. Eccles
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, The Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | | | - I. Jobson
- Institute of Human Genetics, Newcastle, UK
| | | | - C. Cybulski
- Department of Urology, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Fredericia, Denmark
| | - W. S. Rubinstein
- Center for Medical Genetics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - S. Buys
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - S. Townshend
- King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - E. Friedman
- Chaim Shema Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - S. Domchek
- Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - A. Spigelman
- Hunter Genetics, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- University of New South Wales, St Vincent’s Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - S. H. Teo
- Cancer Research Initiatives Foundation, Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
- University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - N. Nicolai
- Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - N. Aaronson
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A. Ardern-Jones
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - C. Bangma
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D. Dearnaley
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - J. Eyfjord
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - A. Falconer
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, London, UK
| | | | - F. Hamdy
- University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | | - V. Khoo
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - Z. Kote-Jarai
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - H. Lilja
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J. Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - J. Melia
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - C. Moynihan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - S. Peock
- Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratories, Cambridge, UK
| | - G. Rennert
- CHS National Cancer Control Center, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - F. Schröder
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P. Sibley
- Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Caernarfon, Gwynedd, UK
| | - M. Suri
- Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Y. J. Bignon
- Center Jean Perrin, Laboratoire D’Oncologie Moléculaire, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - S. Strom
- The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - M. Tischkowitz
- McGill Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - A. Liljegren
- Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D. Ilencikova
- National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - A. Abele
- Hereditary Cancer Institute, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - K. Kyriacou
- The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - C. van Asperen
- Leiden University Medical Center K5-R, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - L. Kiemeney
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - D. F. Easton
- Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratories, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rosalind A. Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| |
Collapse
|
214
|
Synthesis and antitumor activity of ureas containing pyrimidinyl group. Eur J Med Chem 2011; 46:429-32. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2010] [Revised: 11/15/2010] [Accepted: 11/17/2010] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
215
|
Martins E, Freitas R, Curado MP, Freitas NMA, Silva CMB, Oliveira JC. Prevalence of breast cancer in the city of Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil, between 1988 and 2002. SAO PAULO MED J 2011; 129:309-14. [PMID: 22069129 PMCID: PMC10868936 DOI: 10.1590/s1516-31802011000500005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2010] [Revised: 04/25/2011] [Accepted: 05/02/2011] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Studies have shown increased prevalence rates for breast cancer, relating to higher incidence, longer survival and breast cancer prevention programs among populations. The aim here was to analyze the annual prevalence of breast cancer in Goiânia over a 15-year period. DESIGN AND SETTING This was a cross-sectional study on women with breast cancer diagnosed in Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil, from 1988 to 2002. METHODS The breast cancer cases were identified in the database of the Population-Based Cancer Registry of Goiânia. The 15-year period was stratified into three five-year periods. The cases were followed up for five years, and the mortality database was used to exclude deaths. The population of the official census was used as the denominator for rate calculations. RESULTS The coefficient of breast cancer prevalence in Goiania was 22.87/100,000 in 1988 and 220.22/100,000 women in 2002. The analyses for periods showed that in the first period, the rate was 19.39/100,000 and that it was 44.79/100,000 in the last period. For the fifteen years analyzed, the prevalence rate for breast cancer was 127.24/100,000 women. The annual percentage change was 27.07 (P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, CI: 20.79-33.67) from 1988 to 1992 and 9.39 (P < 0.001; 95% CI: 8.52-10.25) from 1992 to 2002. CONCLUSION There was an increase in the breast cancer prevalence rate in the city of Goiânia between 1988 and 2002, possibly relating to the improvement in the screening and treatment of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edesio Martins
- MHSc. Epidemiologist, Postgraduate Program on Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) and Population-Based Cancer Registry of Goiânia, Associação de Combate ao Câncer de Goiás (ACCG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
| | - Ruffo Freitas
- MD, PhD. Gynecologist and Mastologist, Gynecology and Breast Service of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Associação de Combate ao Câncer de Goiás (ACCG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
| | - Maria Paula Curado
- MD, PhD. Senior researcher at the International Prevention Research Institute, Lyon, France, and Population-Based Cancer Registry of Goiânia, Associação de Combate ao Câncer de Goiás (ACCG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
| | - Nilceana Maya Aires Freitas
- MD, PhD. Radiotherapist, Radiotherapy Service of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Associação de Combate ao Câncer de Goiás (ACCG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
| | - Carleane Maciel Bandeira Silva
- Technician at the Population-Based Cancer Registry of Goiânia, Associação de Combate ao Câncer de Goiás (ACCG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
| | - José Carlos Oliveira
- MD, PhD. Head of Head and Neck Surgery Service of Hospital Araújo Jorge and Population-Based Cancer Registry of Goiânia, Associação de Combate ao Câncer de Goiás (ACCG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
216
|
Jacobs I, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Manchanda R, Singh N, Sharma A, Ryan A, Seif MW, Amso NN, Turner G, Brunell C, Fletcher G, Rangar R, Ford K, Godfrey K, Lopes A, Oram D, Herod J, Williamson K, Scott I, Jenkins H, Mould T, Woolas R, Murdoch J, Dobbs S, Leeson S, Cruickshank D, Skates SJ, Fallowfield L, Parmar M, Campbell S, Menon U. Sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasound screening for endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women: a case-control study within the UKCTOCS cohort. Lancet Oncol 2010; 12:38-48. [PMID: 21147030 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70268-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increase in the worldwide incidence of endometrial cancer relates to rising obesity, falling fertility, and the ageing of the population. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is a possible screening test, but there have been no large-scale studies. We report the performance of TVS screening in a large cohort. METHODS We did a nested case-control study of postmenopausal women who underwent TVS in the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) following recruitment between April 17, 2001, and Sept 29, 2005. Endometrial thickness and endometrial abnormalities were recorded, and follow-up, through national registries and a postal questionnaire, documented the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. Our primary outcome measure was endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). Performance characteristics of endometrial thickness and abnormalities for detection of endometrial cancer within 1 year of TVS were calculated. Epidemiological variables were used to develop a logistic regression model and assess a screening strategy for women at higher risk. Our study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00058032, and with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial register, number ISRCTN22488978. FINDINGS 48,230 women underwent TVS in the UKCTOCS prevalence screen. 9078 women were ineligible because they had undergone a hysterectomy and 2271 because their endometrial thickness had not been recorded; however, 157 of these women had an endometrial abnormality on TVS and were included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 5·11 years (IQR 4·05-5·95). 136 women with endometrial cancer or AEH within 1 year of TVS were included in our primary analysis. The optimum endometrial thickness cutoff for endometrial cancer or AEH was 5·15 mm, with sensitivity of 80·5% (95% CI 72·7-86·8) and specificity of 86·2% (85·8-86·6). Sensitivity and specificity at a 5 mm or greater cutoff were 80·5% (72·7-86·8) and 85·7% (85·4-86·2); for women with a 5 mm or greater cutoff plus endometrial abnormalities, the sensitivity and specificity were 85·3% (78·2-90·8) and 80·4% (80·0-80·8), respectively. For a cutoff of 10 mm or greater, sensitivity and specificity were 54·1% (45·3-62·8) and 97·2% (97·0-97·4). When our analysis was restricted to the 96 women with endometrial cancer or AEH who reported no symptoms of postmenopausal bleeding at the UKCTOCS scan before diagnosis and had an endometrial thickness measurement available, a cutoff of 5 mm achieved a sensitivity of 77·1% (67·8-84·3) and specificity of 85·8% (85·7-85·9). The logistic regression model identified 25% of the population as at high risk and 39·5% of endometrial cancer or AEH cases were identified within this high risk group. In this high-risk population, a cutoff at 6·75 mm achieved sensitivity of 84·3% (71·4-93·0) and specificity of 89·9% (89·3-90·5). INTERPRETATION Our findings show that TVS screening for endometrial cancer has good sensitivity in postmenopausal women. The burden of diagnostic procedures and false-positive results can be reduced by limiting screening to a higher-risk group. The role of population screening for endometrial cancer remains uncertain, but our findings are of immediate value in the management of increased endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic scans for reasons other than vaginal bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Jacobs
- Gynaecological Oncology, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
217
|
Villarreal-Garza C, García-Aceituno L, Villa AR, Perfecto-Arroyo M, Rojas-Flores M, León-Rodríguez E. Knowledge about cancer screening among medical students and internal medicine residents in Mexico City. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2010; 25:624-31. [PMID: 20221811 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-010-0098-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
It is extremely important that physicians are aware of cancer screening precise indications. We sought to explore its knowledge among Mexican medical students and internal medicine residents. Students and residents completed a questionnaire-based survey about breast, cervical, colon, and prostate cancer screening. Four hundred fifty-one individuals answered the survey: 64.52% students and 35.48% residents. Mean knowledge score was 63.97 ± 14.97. Residents scored higher than students (p = 0.0001). No difference in the education concerning cervical and colon cancer screening was found. Knowledge of screening guidelines is suboptimal among medical students and residents. Further efforts should be targeted to educational and training programs in this country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Seccion XVI, Delegación Tlalpan, Mexico DF C.P. 14000, Mexico.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
218
|
Zhu CB, Wang CX, Zhang X, Zhang J, Li W. Serum sHLA-G levels: A useful indicator in distinguishing colorectal cancer from benign colorectal diseases. Int J Cancer 2010; 128:617-22. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
219
|
Liu Y, Solomon M, Achilefu S. Perspectives and potential applications of nanomedicine in breast and prostate cancer. Med Res Rev 2010; 33:3-32. [PMID: 23239045 DOI: 10.1002/med.20233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Nanomedicine is a branch of nanotechnology that includes the development of nanostructures and nanoanalytical systems for various medical applications. Among these applications, utilization of nanotechnology in oncology has captivated the attention of many research endeavors in recent years. The rapid development of nano-oncology raises new possibilities in cancer diagnosis and treatment. It also holds great promise for realization of point-of-care, theranostics, and personalized medicine. In this article, we review advances in nano-oncology, with an emphasis on breast and prostate cancer because these organs are amenable to the translation of nanomedicine from small animals to humans. As new drugs are developed, the incorporation of nanotechnology approaches into medicinal research becomes critical. Diverse aspects of nano-oncology are discussed, including nanocarriers, targeting strategies, nanodevices, as well as nanomedical diagnostics, therapeutics, and safety. The review concludes by identifying some limitations and future perspectives of nano-oncology in breast and prostate cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
220
|
Zhou J, Enewold L, Peoples GE, Clifton GT, Potter JF, Stojadinovic A, Zhu K. Trends in cancer screening among Hispanic and white non-Hispanic women, 2000-2005. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010; 19:2167-74. [PMID: 21039233 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hispanics are the largest and fastest growing ethnic group in the United States. Compared with white non-Hispanic women, however, Hispanic women have significantly lower cancer screening rates. Programs designed to increase cancer screening rates, including the national Screen for Life campaign, which specifically promoted colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, regional educational/research programs, and state cancer control programs, have been launched. Screen for Life and some of these other intervention programs have targeted Hispanic populations by providing educational materials in Spanish in addition to English. METHODS The objective of this study was to compare changes in colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening rates from 2000 to 2005 among Hispanic and white non-Hispanic women, using data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The age ranges of study subjects and the definitions of cancer screening were site specific and based on the American Cancer Society (ACS) screening recommendations. RESULTS Although overall screening rates were found to be lower among Hispanic women, CRC screening increased about 1.5-fold among both Hispanic and white non-Hispanic women, mainly driven by endoscopic screening, which increased 2.1-fold and 2.9-fold, respectively, from 2000 to 2005 (p < 0.01). Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) for CRC declined among white non-Hispanic women and remained stable among Hispanic women during the same period. Mammogram and Pap smear screening tended to decline during the study period for both ethnic groups, especially white non-Hispanic women. CONCLUSION Although cancer screening rates may be affected by multiple factors, culturally sensitive and linguistically appropriate national educational programs may have contributed to the increase in endoscopic CRC screening compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Zhou
- United States Military Cancer Institute, Washington, DC 20307, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
221
|
Klabunde CN, Marcus PM, Silvestri GA, Han PKJ, Richards TB, Yuan G, Marcus SE, Vernon SW. U.S. primary care physicians' lung cancer screening beliefs and recommendations. Am J Prev Med 2010; 39:411-20. [PMID: 20965378 PMCID: PMC3133954 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2010] [Revised: 04/21/2010] [Accepted: 07/02/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No high-quality study to date has shown that screening reduces lung cancer mortality, and expert groups do not recommend screening for asymptomatic individuals. Nevertheless, lung cancer screening tests are available in the U.S., and primary care physicians (PCPs) may have a role in recommending them to patients. PURPOSE This study describes U.S. PCPs' beliefs about and recommendations for lung cancer screening and examines characteristics of PCPs who recommend screening. METHODS A nationally representative survey of practicing PCPs was conducted in 2006-2007. Mailed questionnaires were used to assess PCPs' beliefs about lung cancer screening guidelines and the effectiveness of screening tests and to determine whether PCPs would recommend screening for asymptomatic patients. Data were analyzed in 2009. RESULTS Nine hundred sixty-two PCPs completed the survey (absolute response rate=70.6%; cooperation rate=76.8%). One quarter said that major guidelines support lung cancer screening. Two thirds said that low-radiation dose spiral computed tomography (LDCT) screening is very or somewhat effective in reducing lung cancer mortality in current smokers; LDCT was perceived as more effective than chest x-ray or sputum cytology. Responding to vignettes describing asymptomatic patients of varying smoking exposure, 67% of PCPs recommended lung cancer screening for at least one of the vignettes. Most PCPs recommending screening said they would use chest x-ray; up to 26% would use LDCT. In adjusted analyses, PCPs' beliefs and practice style were strongly associated with their lung cancer screening recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Many PCPs' lung cancer screening beliefs and recommendations are inconsistent with current evidence and guidelines. Provider education regarding the evidence base and guideline content of lung cancer screening is indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie N Klabunde
- Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7344, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
222
|
Carvalhal GF, Daudi SN, Kan D, Mondo D, Roehl KA, Loeb S, Catalona WJ. Correlation between serum prostate-specific antigen and cancer volume in prostate glands of different sizes. Urology 2010; 76:1072-6. [PMID: 20846711 PMCID: PMC2975771 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2009] [Revised: 10/26/2009] [Accepted: 11/13/2009] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To further evaluate the relationship of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with prostate size and tumor volume in a contemporary surgical series. Although early studies showed a strong correlation between PSA and tumor volume, it has been suggested that PSA is no longer a valid marker for prostate cancer and only correlates with prostate size. METHODS From 2003 to 2009, 1234 men with data on prostate weight and total tumor volume underwent radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon. Prostate size was classified into tertiles: small (≤ 41.2 g), medium (41.3-54.5 g), and large (≥ 54.6 g). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the relationship of PSA with prostate size and tumor volume across different prostate sizes. RESULTS Median preoperative PSA was 4.9 ng/mL (standard deviation ± 4.6), mean prostate size was 51.7 g, and mean tumor volume was 5.6 cm(3). PSA had a significant correlation with prostate size only at a prostate weight ≥ 54.6 g (P = .02). Regardless of prostate size, PSA had a more robust significant correlation with tumor volume than with prostate size (all P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS PSA was significantly correlated with prostate size only in the largest prostate glands, but was significantly associated with tumor volume in small, medium, or large prostates. Thus, PSA continues to be a better marker for tumor volume than for prostate size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo F. Carvalhal
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Saima N. Daudi
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Donghui Kan
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Dana Mondo
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kimberly A. Roehl
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Stacy Loeb
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - William J. Catalona
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
223
|
Program for Prostate Cancer Screening Using a Mobile Unit: Results From Brazil. Urology 2010; 76:1052-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2009] [Revised: 02/15/2010] [Accepted: 02/15/2010] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
224
|
Mayrand MH, Franco EL. Integrating novel primary- and secondary-prevention strategies: the next challenge for cervical cancer control. Future Oncol 2010; 6:1725-33. [DOI: 10.2217/fon.10.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The advent of prophylactic vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, the cause of cervical cancer, and of new molecular methods to screen for this disease have become key developments in cancer control in the last 5 years. Although Pap cytology has had a significant history as a key method for cervical cancer screening, not all countries have benefited from this technology or have been able to implement the necessary public health steps to manage and treat the precancerous lesions that are detected by the Pap test. Testing of cervical exfoliated cells for DNA of oncogenic HPV types has been proven to be more accurate than Pap cytology. The latter test’s high specificity makes it an ideal technique to triage women who are found to be HPV positive via a primary screen. HPV testing followed by Pap testing only for HPV-positive women is a promising strategy for screening women in the post-vaccination era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Hélène Mayrand
- Departments of Oncology & Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Eduardo L Franco
- Departments of Obstetrics & Gynaecology & Social & Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
225
|
Koga Y, Yasunaga M, Takahashi A, Kuroda J, Moriya Y, Akasu T, Fujita S, Yamamoto S, Baba H, Matsumura Y. MicroRNA expression profiling of exfoliated colonocytes isolated from feces for colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2010; 3:1435-42. [PMID: 20959518 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-10-0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
To reduce the colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality rate, we have reported several CRC screening methods using colonocytes isolated from feces. Expression analysis of oncogenic microRNA (miRNA) in peripheral blood was recently reported for CRC detection. In the present study, we conducted miRNA expression analysis of exfoliated colonocytes isolated from feces for CRC screening. Two hundred six CRC patients and 134 healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. miRNA expression of the miR-17-92 cluster, miR-21, and miR-135 in colonocytes isolated from feces as well as frozen tissues was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. The expression of the miR-17-92 cluster, miR-21, and miR-135 was significantly higher in CRC tissues compared with normal tissues. The exfoliated colonocytes of 197 CRC patients and 119 healthy volunteers were analyzed because of the presence of sufficient miRNA concentration. miR-21 expression did not differ significantly between CRC patients and healthy volunteers (P = 0.6). The expression of miR-17-92 cluster and miR-135 was significantly higher in CRC patients than in healthy volunteers (P < 0.0001). The overall sensitivity and specificity by using miRNA expression was 74.1% (146/197; 95% confidence interval, 67.4-80.1) and 79.0% (94/119; 95% confidence interval, 70.6-85.9), respectively. Sensitivity was dependent only on tumor location (P = 0.0001). miRNA was relatively well conserved in exfoliated colonocytes from feces both of CRC patients and healthy volunteers. miRNA expression analysis of the isolated colonocytes may be a useful method for CRC screening. Furthermore, oncogenic miRNA highly expressed in CRC should be investigated for CRC screening tests in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshikatsu Koga
- Investigative Treatment Division, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
226
|
Red SN, Kassan EC, Williams RM, Penek S, Lynch J, Ahaghotu C, Taylor KL. Underuse of colorectal cancer screening among men screened for prostate cancer: a teachable moment? Cancer 2010; 116:4703-10. [PMID: 20578178 PMCID: PMC3639486 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces disease-specific mortality, whereas the utility of prostate cancer screening remains uncertain. However, adherence rates for prostate cancer screening and CRC screening are very similar, with population-based studies showing that approximately 50% of eligible US men are adherent to both tests. Among men scheduled to participate in a free prostate cancer screening program, the authors assessed the rates and correlates of CRC screening to determine the utility of this setting for addressing CRC screening nonadherence. METHODS Participants (N = 331) were 50 to 70 years old with no history of prostate cancer or CRC. Men registered for free prostate cancer screening and completed a telephone interview 1 to 2 weeks before undergoing prostate cancer screening. RESULTS One half of the participants who underwent free prostate cancer screening were eligible for but nonadherent to CRC screening. Importantly, 76% of the men who were nonadherent to CRC screening had a regular physician and/or health insurance, suggesting that CRC screening adherence was feasible in this group. Furthermore, multivariate analyses indicated that the only significant correlates of CRC screening adherence were having a regular physician, health insurance, and a history of prostate cancer screening. CONCLUSIONS Free prostate cancer screening programs may provide a teachable moment to increase CRC screening among men who may not have the usual systemic barriers to CRC screening, at a time when they may be very receptive to cancer screening messages. In the United States, a large number of men participate in annual free prostate cancer screening programs and represent an easily accessible and untapped group that can benefit from interventions to increase CRC screening rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara N. Red
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Elisabeth C. Kassan
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Randi M. Williams
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Sofiya Penek
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - John Lynch
- Department of Urology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Chiledum Ahaghotu
- Division of Urology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Kathryn L. Taylor
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
227
|
Carlson CM, Kirby KA, Casadei MA, Partin MR, Kistler CE, Walter LC. Lack of follow-up after fecal occult blood testing in older adults: inappropriate screening or failure to follow up? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 171:249-56. [PMID: 20937917 DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether lack of follow-up after screening fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) in older adults is due to screening patients whose comorbidity or preferences do not permit follow-up vs failure to complete follow-up in healthy patients. METHODS A prospective cohort study of 2410 patients 70 years or older screened with FOBT was conducted at 4 Veteran Affairs (VA) medical centers from January 1 to December 31, 2001. The main outcome measure was receipt of follow-up within 1 year of FOBT based on national VA and Medicare data. For patients with positive FOBT results, age and Charlson comorbidity scores were evaluated as potential predictors of receiving a complete colon evaluation (colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy plus barium enema), and medical records were reviewed to determine reasons for lack of follow-up. RESULTS A total of 212 patients (9%) had positive FOBT results; 42% received a complete colon evaluation within 1 year. Age and comorbidity were not associated with receipt of a complete follow-up, which was similar among patients 70 to 74 years old with a Charlson score of 0 compared with patients 80 years or older with a Charlson score of 1 or higher (48% vs 41%; P=.28). The VA site, number of positive FOBT cards, and number of VA outpatient visits were predictors. Of 122 patients who did not receive a complete follow-up within 1 year, 38% had documentation that comorbidity or preferences did not permit follow-up, and over the next 5 years 76% never received a complete follow-up. CONCLUSIONS While follow-up after positive FOBT results was low regardless of age or comorbidity, screening patients in whom complete evaluation would not be pursued substantially contributes to lack of follow-up. Efforts to improve follow-up should address the full chain of decision making, including decisions to screen and decisions to follow up.
Collapse
|
228
|
McAdam M, Sakita J, Tarivonda L, Pang J, Frazer IH. Evaluation of a cervical cancer screening program based on HPV testing and LLETZ excision in a low resource setting. PLoS One 2010; 5:e13266. [PMID: 20949059 PMCID: PMC2951361 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2010] [Accepted: 09/15/2010] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
We conducted studies in Vanuatu to evaluate potential screening and treatment strategies to assist with control of cervical cancer. In a pilot study of 496 women, visual inspection and cytology were evaluated as screening tests for detection of CIN 2 or worse (CIN2+), observed in 21 of 206 subjects biopsied on the basis of abnormal visual inspection or cytology. Sensitivity of visual inspection with Lugol's Iodine for detection of CIN2+ on biopsy was 0.63, specificity was 0.32, and the positive predictive value was 0.09. For HSIL cytology, sensitivity was 0.99, specificity was 0.77, and the positive predictive value was 0.88. HSIL cytology was significantly more sensitive and had a significantly higher PPV for CIN 2+ than visual inspection (p<0.01). In a further study of 514 women, we compared testing for HR HPV and cytology as predictors of biopsy proven CIN 2+. Sensitivity of HSIL cytology for CIN2+ as established by loop excision of the cervix was 0.81, specificity was 0.94, and positive predictive value was 0.48. Sensitivity of a positive test for HR HPV for detection of CIN2+ was non-significantly different from cytology at 0.81, specificity was 0.94, and positive predictive value was 0.42. Combining the two tests gave a significantly lower sensitivity of 0.63, a specificity of 0.98, and a positive predictive value of 0.68. For women over 30 in a low resource setting without access to cytology, a single locally conducted test for high risk HPV with effective intervention could reduce cervical cancer risk as effectively as intervention based on cytology conducted in an accredited laboratory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret McAdam
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jerol Sakita
- Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Port Vila, Efate, Vanuatu
| | - Len Tarivonda
- Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Port Vila, Efate, Vanuatu
| | - James Pang
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ian H. Frazer
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
229
|
Asgeirsson T, Zhang S, Senagore AJ. Optimal Follow-Up to Curative Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery: How and for How Long? Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2010; 19:861-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2010.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
230
|
Jones RM, Vernon SW, Woolf SH. Is discussion of colorectal cancer screening options associated with heightened patient confusion? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19:2821-5. [PMID: 20852010 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical guidelines recommend offering patients options for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but the modalities vary by frequency, accuracy, preparations, discomfort, and cost, which may cause confusion and reduce screening rates. We examined whether patients reported confusion about the options and whether confusion was associated with socio-demographic characteristics, number of options discussed, and adherence. METHODS Patients ages 50 to 75 years who had visited a clinician within 2 years were randomly selected for a cross-sectional study (n = 6,100). A questionnaire mailed in 2007 asked the following: whether a clinician had ever discussed CRC screening options; which of four recommended tests (i.e., fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and barium enema) were presented; and whether the options were confusing. Analyses were restricted to respondents who reported discussing one or more screening options (n = 1,707). Weighted frequencies were calculated and multivariate logistic regression was done. RESULTS The sample was 55.5% female, 15.6% African American, and 83.2% adherent to screening recommendations, and 56.0% had discussed two or more screening options. In adjusted analyses, nonadherent patients reported greater confusion than adherent patients (P < 0.01). Adults who discussed two or more options were 1.6 times more likely to be confused than those who discussed one option [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-2.26]. Patients who reported being confused were 1.8 times more likely to be nonadherent to screening than those who did not (95% CI, 1.14-2.75). CONCLUSIONS Our study provides the first empirical evidence linking multiple options with confusion and confusion with screening adherence. IMPACT Confusion may act as a barrier to screening and should be considered in public health messages and interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Resa M Jones
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0212, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
231
|
Forrai G, Szabó E, Ormándi K, Ambrózay E, Péntek Z, Milics M, Rajtár M, Sinkovics I. [Imaging methods in the current diagnosis of and screening for breast cancer]. Magy Onkol 2010; 54:211-216. [PMID: 20870598 DOI: 10.1556/monkol.54.2010.3.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
|
232
|
Hoffman RM, Lewis CL, Pignone MP, Couper MP, Barry MJ, Elmore JG, Levin CA, Van Hoewyk J, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making 2010; 30:53S-64S. [PMID: 20881154 PMCID: PMC3139436 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x10378701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients should understand the risks and benefits of cancer screening in order to make informed screening decisions. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the extent of informed decision making in patient-provider discussions for colorectal (CRC), breast (BrCa), and prostate (PCa) cancer screening. SETTING National sample of US adults identified by random-digit dialing. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey conducted between November 2006 and May 2007. PARTICIPANTS English-speaking US adults aged 50 y and older who had discussed cancer screening with a health care provider within the previous 2 y. MEASUREMENTS Cancer screening survey modules that asked about demographic characteristics, cancer knowledge, the importance of various sources of information, and self-reported cancer screening decision-making processes. RESULTS Overall, 1082 participants completed 1 or more of the 3 cancer modules. Although participants generally considered themselves well informed about screening tests, half or more could not correctly answer even 1 open-ended knowledge question for any given module. Participants consistently overestimated risks for being diagnosed with and dying from each cancer and overestimated the positive predictive values of prostate-specific antigen tests and mammography. Providers were the most highly rated information source, usually initiated screening discussions (64%-84%), and often recommended screening (73%-90%). However, participants reported that providers elicited their screening preferences in only 31% (CRC women) to 57% (PCa) of discussions. Although more than 90% of the discussions addressed the pros of screening, only 19% (BrCa) to 30% (PCa) addressed the cons of screening. LIMITATIONS Recall bias is possible because screening process reports were not independently validated. CONCLUSIONS Cancer screening decisions reported by patients who discussed screening with their health care providers consistently failed to meet criteria for being informed. Given the high ratings for provider information and frequent recommendations for screening, providers have important opportunities to ensure that informed decision making occurs for cancer screening decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard M Hoffman
- Medicine Service, New Mexico VA Health Care System and Department of Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
233
|
Bratt O, Garmo H, Adolfsson J, Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Lambe M, Stattin P. Effects of prostate-specific antigen testing on familial prostate cancer risk estimates. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102:1336-43. [PMID: 20724726 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family history is a strong risk factor for prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate whether increased diagnostic activity is related to the incidence of prostate cancer among brothers of men with prostate cancer. METHODS Data were from the nationwide population-based Prostate Cancer Database Sweden (PCBaSe Sweden), which includes data from the National Prostate Cancer Register, the Swedish Cancer Register, the Register of the Total Population, the Multi-Generation Register, and the Census database. We investigated the relationship of tumor characteristics, time from diagnosis of the index patient (i.e., prostate cancer patients in the National Prostate Cancer Register for whom at least one brother and their father could be identified), calendar period, geographic factors, and socioeconomic status to standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for prostate cancer among 22 511 brothers of 13 975 index patients in PCBaSe Sweden. RESULTS Brothers of index patients with prostate cancer were at increased risk for a diagnosis of prostate cancer (SIR = 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.9 to 3.3). Risk was higher for T1c tumors (SIR = 3.4, 95% CI = 3.2 to 3.8) than for metastatic tumors (SIR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.5 to 2.6), and risk of T1c tumors was especially high during the first year after the diagnosis of the index patient (SIR = 4.3, 95% CI = 3.8 to 4.9), compared with the following years (SIR range = 2.8-3.3), and for brothers of index patients who had a higher socioeconomic status (SIR = 4.2, 95% CI = 3.7 to 4.7), compared with brothers of index patients with lower socioeconomic status (SIR = 2.8, 95% CI = 2.4 to 3.2). CONCLUSIONS Increased diagnostic activity among men with a family history of prostate cancer appears to contribute to their increased risk of prostate cancer and to lead to detection bias in epidemiological and genetic studies of familial prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ola Bratt
- Department of Urology, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
234
|
Hwang SH, Oh HB, Pyo T, Lee HJ, Lee KJ. Study on Interpretation of Quantitative Results of Prostate-specific Antigen Using Information Theory. Ann Lab Med 2010; 30:357-63. [DOI: 10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.4.357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sang-Hyun Hwang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea
- Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Heung-Bum Oh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tina Pyo
- Department of Statistics, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun-Jin Lee
- Department of Statistics, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwan Jeh Lee
- Department of Statistics, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
235
|
Greif JM. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: An invited review of the benefits and costs. Breast 2010; 19:268-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2010.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
236
|
Manuti B, Rizza P, Bianco A, Nobile CGA, Pavia M. The quality of preventive health care delivered to adults: results from a cross-sectional study in Southern Italy. BMC Public Health 2010; 10:350. [PMID: 20565822 PMCID: PMC2910674 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2009] [Accepted: 06/18/2010] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is assumed that providing clinical preventive services to patients can identify or detect early important causes of adult mortality. The aim of this study was to quantify access to preventive services in Southern Italy and to assess whether and how the provision of preventive care was influenced by any specific characteristics of patients. METHODS In a cross-sectional study adults aged 18 years and over attending primary care physician (PCP) offices located in Southern Italy were interviewed from June through December 2007. Quality indicators of preventive health care developed from RAND's Quality Assessment Tools and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) were used. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify and to assess the role of patients' characteristics on delivery of clinical preventive services. RESULTS A total of 1467 subjects participated in the study. Excepting blood pressure preventive check (delivered to 64.4% of eligible subjects) and influenza vaccination (recommended to 90.2% of elderly), the rates of delivery of clinical preventive services were low across all measures, particularly for screening and counseling on health habits. Rates for providing cancer screening tests at recommended times were 21.3% for colonoscopy, 51.5% for mammography and 52.4% for Pap smear. Statistical analysis showed clear disparities in the provision of clinical preventive services associated with age, gender, education level, perceived health status, current health conditions and primary care access measures. CONCLUSIONS There is overwhelming need to develop and implement effective interventions to improve delivery of routine clinical preventive services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Manuti
- Chair of Hygiene, Medical School, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
237
|
Sun M, Wu X, Chen J, Cai J, Cao M, Ji M. Design, synthesis, and in vitro antitumor evaluation of novel diaryl ureas derivatives. Eur J Med Chem 2010; 45:2299-306. [PMID: 20181414 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2009] [Revised: 01/31/2010] [Accepted: 02/01/2010] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
238
|
Lund MJ, Butler EN, Hair BY, Ward KC, Andrews JH, Oprea-Ilies G, Bayakly AR, O'Regan RM, Vertino PM, Eley JW. Age/race differences in HER2 testing and in incidence rates for breast cancer triple subtypes: a population-based study and first report. Cancer 2010; 116:2549-59. [PMID: 20336785 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although US year 2000 guidelines recommended characterizing breast cancers by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), national cancer registries do not collect HER2, rendering a population-based understanding of HER2 and clinical "triple subtypes" (estrogen receptor [ER] / progesterone receptor [PR] / HER2) largely unknown. We document the population-based prevalence of HER2 testing / status, triple subtypes and present the first report of subtype incidence rates. METHODS Medical records were searched for HER2 on 1842 metropolitan Atlanta females diagnosed with breast cancer during 2003-2004. HER2 testing/status and triple subtypes were analyzed by age, race/ethnicity, tumor factors, socioeconomic status, and treatment. Age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated. RESULTS Over 90% of cases received HER2 testing: 12.6% were positive, 71.7% negative, and 15.7% unknown. HER2 testing compliance was significantly better for women who were younger, of Caucasian or African-American descent, or diagnosed with early stage disease. Incidence rates (per 100,000) were 21.1 for HER2+ tumors and 27.8 for triple-negative tumors, the latter differing by race (36.3 and 19.4 for black and white women, respectively). CONCLUSIONS HER2 recommendations are not uniformly adhered to. Incidence rates for breast cancer triple subtypes differ by age/race. As biologic knowledge is translated into the clinical setting eg, HER2 as a biomarker, it will be incumbent upon national cancer registries to report this information. Incidence rates cautiously extrapolate to an annual burden of 3000 and 17,000 HER2+ tumors for black and white women, respectively, and triple-negative tumors among 5000 and 16,000 respectively. Testing, rate, and burden variations warrant population-based in-depth exploration and clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Jo Lund
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
239
|
Hamashima C, Aoki D, Miyagi E, Saito E, Nakayama T, Sagawa M, Saito H, Sobue T. The Japanese Guideline for Cervical Cancer Screening. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2010; 40:485-502. [PMID: 20436034 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyq036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
|
240
|
Rozen P, Comaneshter D, Levi Z, Hazazi R, Vilkin A, Maoz E, Birkenfeld S, Niv Y. Cumulative evaluation of a quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test to determine its optimal clinical use. Cancer 2010; 116:2115-25. [PMID: 20186820 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantified, human hemoglobin (Hb)-specific, immunochemical fecal occult blood test (IFOBT) measurements are now used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The objective was to evaluate sensitivity and specificity for CRC and advanced adenomatous polyps (APs) by the fecal Hb threshold used to determine a positive test and the number of IFOBTs prepared per test, so as to determine the least number of colonoscopies required to detect a neoplasm. METHODS Cumulative data were analyzed from a prospective cross-sectional double-blind study of 1682 consecutive, ambulatory, nonbleeding colonoscopy patients who volunteered for IFOBTs, most of above average risk, from 3 ambulatory-endoscopy centers. Fecal Hb was measured in 3 samples and analyzed by an automated instrument, and the highest result >or=50 ng Hb/mL of buffer was related to findings. RESULTS Colonoscopy identified CRC in 20 patients and advanced APs in 129. Sensitivity for either was best when any of 3 tests had >or=50 ng Hb/mL of buffer; sensitivity was 61.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.2-68.9), and specificity was 87.8% (95% CI, 86.2-89.4). Positive tests identified 100% of CRCs and 55% of advanced APs every 3.1 colonoscopies. Sensitivity of a single test at the commonly used 100-ng Hb/mL threshold was lower at 31.5% (95% CI, 24.1-39.0) (P<.001), but specificity was higher at 96.4% (95% CI, 95.5-97.3) (P<.001). Positive tests identified 65% of CRCs and 26.4% of advanced APs every 2.2 colonoscopies. CONCLUSIONS The fecal Hb cutoff chosen by the screener and the number of samples collected per patient determine sensitivity and specificity for CRC/advanced AP; these factors determine the number of colonoscopies needed for positive tests and neoplasia yield. This information provides guidelines for IFOBT screening. Limitations are 1-time screening and most examinees not being at average risk for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Rozen
- Gastroenterology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
241
|
Choi KS, Jun JK, Lee HY, Hahm MI, Oh JH, Park EC. Increasing uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Korea: a population-based study. BMC Public Health 2010; 10:265. [PMID: 20492654 PMCID: PMC2887394 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2010] [Accepted: 05/21/2010] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are low in most Asian countries and remain largely unknown. This study examined trends in CRC screening rates after the introduction of the Korean National Cancer Screening Programme (NCSP) and determined the factors associated with uptake of CRC screening by test modality over time. METHODS An annual population-based survey conducted through nationally representative random sampling from 2005-2008. In total, 3,699 participants from the 2005-2008 surveys were selected as study subjects. Face-to-face interviews were performed to assess the utilization rate of CRC screening by each screening modality. RESULTS Overall, CRC screening within the recommended time interval increased significantly from 22.9% in 2005 to 36.6% in 2008 (p < 0.001). The proportion of subjects receiving a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) test within the previous year increased significantly from 7.2% in 2005 to 21.3% in 2008 (p < 0.001). Increases in FOBT testing were highest among those who had a lower income status (relative difference = 511.9%) and women (relative difference = 266.1%). Endoscopy use also increased from 18.0% in 2005 to 20.5% in 2008, albeit not significant. Overall, those who were male, non-smokers, 60-69 years old, and had a higher income status were more likely to have undergone up-to-date endoscopy and CRC screening. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed a substantial increase in up-to-date CRC screening in the general population from 2005 to 2008. However, more than half of adults in Korea are still not up-to-date with their CRC tests. It will be important to continue to investigate factors associated with up-to-date CRC screening by each modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kui Son Choi
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, 111, Jungbalsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
242
|
Fang CY, Coups EJ, Heckman CJ. Behavioral correlates of HPV vaccine acceptability in the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19:319-26. [PMID: 20142234 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-0918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of a prophylactic vaccine to prevent infection with oncogenic subtypes of human papillomavirus (HPV) is an important step in reducing cervical cancer incidence and mortality. However, national data indicate that only 37% of 13- to 17-year-old females have initiated the vaccine series. Prior studies have examined demographic, medical history, and psychosocial variables associated with parental HPV vaccine acceptability, although few have investigated the behavioral correlates of vaccine acceptability. The primary purpose of the current study is to report on national acceptability of the HPV vaccine among U.S. adults with female children in the household and to investigate the health behavior correlates of vaccine acceptability. Data were drawn from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). The study sample comprised 1,383 adults who reported having a female child under the age of 18 in their household (52% female, 59% white; mean age = 40 years). More than half (58%) reported they would have a daughter get the HPV vaccine, 25% were not sure, and 18% would not have a daughter vaccinated. Behavioral factors significantly associated with lower acceptance of the HPV vaccine included lack of physical activity in the past month (P = 0.002), past year use of complementary or alternative therapies (P = 0.021), and no history of smoking (P = 0.005). These results suggest that behavioral health factors may be associated with vaccine acceptability and further our understanding of how behavioral patterns may contribute to the uptake of new cancer prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Y Fang
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
243
|
Jones RM, Woolf SH, Cunningham TD, Johnson RE, Krist AH, Rothemich SF, Vernon SW. The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38:499-507. [PMID: 20347555 PMCID: PMC2946819 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2009] [Revised: 01/11/2010] [Accepted: 01/25/2010] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are suboptimal. The most important barriers identified by patients are poorly understood. A comprehensive assessment of barriers to all recommended modalities is needed. METHODS In 2007, a questionnaire was mailed to 6100 patients, aged 50-75 years, from 12 family medicine practices in the Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network. People aged 65-75 years and African Americans were oversampled. Patients were asked to rate 19-21 barriers to each of four recommended tests. In 2008, responses were coded on a 5-point scale; higher scores reflected stronger barrier endorsement. RESULTS The response rate was 55% (n=3357). Approximately 40% of respondents were aged >/=65 years, 30% were African-American, and 73% were adherent to screening. A clinician's failure to suggest screening and not knowing testing was necessary received the highest mean scores as barriers. Financial concerns and misconceptions were also cited. Barrier scores differed depending on whether respondents were never screened, overdue for screening, or adherent to guidelines. The top five barriers for each modality included test-specific barriers (e.g., handling stool, bowel preparation), which often outranked generic barriers to screening. Not knowing testing was necessary was a top barrier for all tests but colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS Although physician advice and awareness of the need for screening are important, barriers to screening are not homogenous across tests, and test-specific barriers warrant consideration in designing strategies to improve screening rates. Barrier scores differ by screening status, highlighting the need to address prior screening experience. Evidence that patients are more familiar with colonoscopy than with other modalities suggests an opportunity to improve screening rates by educating patients about alternative tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Resa M Jones
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0212, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
244
|
Coups EJ, Geller AC, Weinstock MA, Heckman CJ, Manne SL. Prevalence and correlates of skin cancer screening among middle-aged and older white adults in the United States. Am J Med 2010; 123:439-45. [PMID: 20399321 PMCID: PMC2858071 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2009] [Revised: 10/26/2009] [Accepted: 10/29/2009] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total skin examinations performed by a physician have the potential to identify skin cancers at an early stage, when they are most amenable to successful treatment. This study examined the prevalence rates of, and factors associated with, receipt of a total skin examination by a dermatologist or other doctor during the past year. METHODS The participants were 10,486 white men and women aged 50 years and older drawn from a random sample of 31,428 adults aged 18 years and older who took part in the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. The data were collected via in-person interviews, and participants answered questions about their receipt of total skin examinations, their demographic characteristics, health and health care access, receipt of other cancer screenings, and personal and family history of skin cancer. RESULTS Sixteen percent of men and 13% of women reported having a skin examination in the past year. The factors associated with lowest skin examination rates in multivariable analyses included younger age (50-64 years), lower education level, lack of screening for colorectal, breast (women only), and prostate cancers (men only), and lack of a personal history of skin cancer. CONCLUSIONS Rates of having a skin examination in the past year were low among men and women and among all sub-groups. Systematic efforts are needed to increase screening rates among higher risk individuals. Physicians should be particularly aware of the need to consider skin cancer screening examinations for their male, elderly patients, as well as individuals with less education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliot J Coups
- The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
245
|
Griva F, Anagnostopoulos F, Madoglou S. Mammography screening and the theory of planned behavior: suggestions toward an extended model of prediction. Women Health 2010; 49:662-81. [PMID: 20183107 DOI: 10.1080/03630240903496010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Mammography screening is probably the most effective method for the early detection of breast cancer. Existing models of health behavior, such as the theory of planned behavior, could improve their predictive validity and, therefore, their ability to promote health-related interventions by identifying additional factors associated with health decision making. This review provides an overview of research on factors related to mammography screening within the context of the theory of planned behavior and identifies the potential benefits of adding motivational factors, such as time perspective, optimism, and risk perception, in an attempt to enhance its explanatory power.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fay Griva
- Department of Psychology, Panteion University, Athens, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
246
|
Kilpeläinen TP, Auvinen A, Määttänen L, Kujala P, Ruutu M, Stenman UH, Tammela TL. Results of the three rounds of the Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial-The incidence of advanced cancer is decreased by screening. Int J Cancer 2010; 127:1699-705. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
247
|
Antiandrogen monotherapy in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer: final results from the bicalutamide Early Prostate Cancer programme at a median follow-up of 9.7 years. BJU Int 2010; 105:1074-81. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09319.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
248
|
Roland KB, Larkins TL, Benard VB, Berkowitz Z, Saraiya M. Content Analysis of Continuing Medical Education for Cervical Cancer Screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010; 19:651-7. [DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine B. Roland
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Teri L. Larkins
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Vicki B. Benard
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Zahava Berkowitz
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mona Saraiya
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
249
|
Cancer screening in Native Americans from the Northern Plains. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38:389-95. [PMID: 20307807 PMCID: PMC2851544 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2009] [Revised: 10/29/2009] [Accepted: 12/08/2009] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Native Americans from the Northern Plains have the highest age-adjusted cancer mortality compared to Native Americans from any other region in the U.S. PURPOSE This study examined the utilization and determinants of cancer screening in a large sample of Native Americans from the Northern Plains. METHODS A survey was administered orally to 975 individuals in 2004-2006 from three reservations and among the urban Native-American community in the service region of the Rapid City Regional Hospital. Data analysis was conducted in 2007-2008. RESULTS Forty-four percent of individuals reported ever receiving any cancer screening. Particularly low levels were found for breast, cervical, prostate, and colon cancer screening. In multivariate analyses, the strongest determinant of receiving cancer screening overall or cancer screening for a specific cancer site was recommendation for screening by a doctor or nurse. Other determinants associated with increased likelihood of ever having cancer screening included older age, female gender, and receiving physical exams more than once a year. Increased age was a determinant of breast cancer screening, and receiving physical exams was associated with cervical cancer screening. CONCLUSIONS Cancer screening was markedly underutilized in this sample of Native Americans from the Northern Plains. Future research should evaluate the potential for improving cancer screening.
Collapse
|
250
|
Way TD, Lee JC, Kuo DH, Fan LL, Huang CH, Lin HY, Shieh PC, Kuo PT, Liao CF, Liu H, Kao JY. Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling by Saussurea involucrata, a rare traditional Chinese medicinal herb, in human hormone-resistant prostate cancer PC-3 cells. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY 2010; 58:3356-3365. [PMID: 20166659 DOI: 10.1021/jf903793p] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Prostate carcinoma is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of death of men in the United States. To date, no effective therapeutic treatment allows abrogation of the progression of prostate cancer to more invasive forms. In this study, we identified Saussurea involucrata Kar. et Kir., a rare traditional Chinese medicinal herb, as a potential agent for androgen-independent prostate cancer patients and investigated its biological mechanism as an antineoplastic agent. S. involucrata caused a concentration- and time-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation in human hormone-resistant prostate cancer PC-3 cells. Moreover, in vitro studies in a panel of several types of human cancer cell lines revealed that S. involucrata inhibited cell proliferation with high potency. To evaluate the bioactive compounds, we successively extracted the S. involucrata with fractions of methanol (SI-1), ethyl acetate (SI-2), n-butanol (SI-3), and water (SI-4). Among these extracts, SI-2 contains the most effective bioactivity. SI-2 treatment resulted in significant time-dependent growth inhibition together with G1 phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in PC3 cells. In addition, SI-2 treatment strongly induced p21WAF1/CIP and p27KIP1 expression, independent of the p53 pathway, and downregulated expression of cyclin D1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4). SI-2 treatment increased levels of Bax, cytochrome c, activated caspase-3, and active caspase-9 and decreased Bcl-2 expression level. One of the major targets for the therapy in prostate cancer can be epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). SI-2 markedly reduced phosphorylation of EGFR and inhibited activation of AKT and STAT3. Moreover, p.o. administration of SI-2 induced a dose-dependent inhibition of PC-3 tumor growth in vivo. In summary, our study identifies S. involucrata as an effective inhibitor of EGFR signaling in human hormone-resistant prostate cancer PC-3 cells. We suggest that S. involucrata could be developed as an agent for the management of EGFR-positive human cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzong-Der Way
- Department of Biological Science and Technology, College of Life Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|